QUEENSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Program Review Data
Packet
Computer Engineering Technology (CT-A.A.S.)
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
10/18/2012
Printout of PDF created on 10/18/2012
CT2 Program Review Data Packet
Computer Engineering Technology (CT‐A.A.S.)
Table of Contents
A. Enrollment and Student Profile
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Student Profile & Headcount
Headcount by Part‐time/Full‐time Status and FTE
Gender and Age
Ethnicity Imputed (IPEDS count)
Language Spoken at Home
Student Admit Type (e.g. first‐time freshmen, advanced transfer)
Freshmen and Sophomore: Percent of Total Enrollment
College Discovery
B. Institutional Effectiveness
8
9
10
11
12
Graduation and Retention Rates
One‐Year Retention Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Three‐Year Retention & Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Six‐Year Retention & Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Degrees Awarded
Transfer Rates and College Destinations
Page 1 of 16
CT2 Program Review Data Packet
Computer Engineering Technology (CT‐A.A.S.)
A. Enrollment and Student Profile
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Student Profile & Headcount
Headcount by Part‐time/Full‐time Status and FTE
Gender and Age
Ethnicity Imputed (IPEDS count)
Language Spoken at Home
Student Admit Type (e.g. first‐time freshmen, advanced transfer)
Freshmen and Sophomore: Percent of Total Enrollment
College Discovery
Page 2 of 16
CT2 Program Review Data Packet
Computer Engineering Technology (CT‐A.A.S.)
A.1. Headcount by Part‐time/Full‐time Status and FTE
Headcount by Part‐time/Full‐time Status
Fall 2006
F‐TIME
P‐TIME
Total
125
64
189
Spring 2007
66.1% 98
33.9% 82
100% 180
Fall 2007
54.4% 133
45.6% 64
100% 197
Spring 2008
67.5% 110
32.5% 74
100% 184
Fall 2008
59.8% 142
40.2% 58
100% 200
Spring 2009
71.0% 129
29.0% 75
100% 204
Fall 2009
63.2% 198
36.8% 82
100% 280
Spring 2010
70.7% 177
29.3% 79
100% 256
Fall 2010
69.1% 190
30.9% 86
100% 276
Spring 2011
68.8% 155
31.2% 89
100% 244
Fall 2011
63.5% 192
36.5% 115
100% 307
Spring 2012
62.5% 166
37.5% 100
100% 266
Fall 2012
62.4% 208
37.6% 85
100% 293
Spring 2013
71.0% 207
29.0% 81
100% 288
Fall 2013
71.9% 277
28.1% 96
100% 373
Part‐time and Full‐time
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
33.9%
45.6%
32.5%
40.2%
29.0%
36.8%
29.3%
30.9%
31.2%
36.5%
37.5%
37.6%
29.0%
28.1%
25.7%
PART‐TIME
66.1%
Fall 06
54.4%
Sp 07
67.5%
Fall 07
59.8%
Sp 08
71.0%
Fall 08
63.2%
Sp 09
70.7%
69.1%
68.8%
63.5%
62.5%
62.4%
Fall 09
Sp 10
Fall 10
Sp 11
Fall 11
Sp 12
Page 3 of 16
71.0%
71.9%
74.3%
Fall 12
Sp 13
Fall 13
FULL‐TIME
74.3%
25.7%
100%
CT2 Program Review Data Packet
Computer Engineering Technology (CT‐A.A.S.)
A.1. Headcount by Part‐time/Full‐time Status and FTE (Cont'd)
FTE* Count (Full‐time equivalency)
FTE
Fall 06
Sp 07
Fall 07
Sp 08
Fall 08
Sp 09
Fall 09
Sp 10
Fall 10
Sp 11
Fall 11
Sp 12
Fall 12
Sp 13
Fall 13
134
118
143
125
149
142
211
195
204
186
225
194
230
226
291
CT2: Full‐time Equivalency (FTE*) Student Count
350
300
291
250
200
211
150
100
134
118
143
125
149
142
Fall 08
Sp 09
195
204
Sp 10
Fall 10
225
230
226
Fall 12
Sp 13
194
186
50
0
Fall 06
Sp 07
Fall 07
Sp 08
Fall 09
Sp 11
Fall 11
Sp 12
Fall 13
*Full‐time Equivalent
Full‐time equivalent (FTE) is a standardized measure of enrollment equal to a full‐time load of credits. It is calculated by summing the total credits and equated credits associated with course enrollment and dividing by 15.
Page 4 of 16
CT2 Program Review Data Packet
Computer Engineering Technology (CT‐A.A.S.)
A.2. Student Gender
Gender
Fall 2006
Women
Men
Total
17
172
189
Spring 2007
9.0% 19
91.0% 161
100% 180
Fall 2007
10.6% 24
89.4% 173
100% 197
Spring 2008
12.2% 110
87.8% 74
100% 184
Fall 2008
59.8% 15
40.2% 185
100% 200
Spring 2009
7.5% 17
92.5% 187
100% 204
Fall 2009
8.3% 20
91.7% 260
100% 280
Spring 2010
7.1% 13
92.9% 243
100% 256
Fall 2010
5.1% 18
94.9% 258
100% 276
Spring 2011
6.5% 14
93.5% 230
100% 244
Fall 2011
5.7% 15
94.3% 292
100% 307
Spring 2012
4.9% 13
95.1% 253
100% 266
Fall 2012
4.9% 16
95.1% 277
100% 293
Spring 2013
5.5% 18
94.5% 270
100% 288
Fall 2013
6.3% 22
93.8% 351
100% 373
5.9%
94.1%
100%
Gender by Full‐time/Part‐time Status
Fall 2006
Spring 2007
Fall 2007
Spring 2008
Fall 2008
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
Spring 2013
Fall 2013
Full‐Time Women
Men
Full‐Time 9
116
125
7.2% 9
92.8% 89
100% 98
9.2% 17
90.8% 116
100% 133
12.8% 13
87.2% 97
100% 110
11.8% 10
88.2% 132
100% 142
7.0% 7
93.0% 122
100% 129
5.4% 13
94.6% 185
100% 198
6.6% 10
93.4% 167
100% 177
5.6% 14
94.4% 176
100% 190
7.4% 11
92.6% 144
100% 155
7.1% 11
92.9% 144
100% 155
7.1% 10
92.9% 156
100% 166
6.0% 10
94.0% 198
100% 208
4.8% 15
95.2% 192
100% 207
7.2% 14
92.8% 263
100% 277
5.1%
94.9%
100%
Part‐Time
Women
Men
Part‐Time
8
56
64
12.5% 10
87.5% 72
100% 82
12.2% 7
87.8% 57
100% 64
10.9% 9
89.1% 65
100% 74
12.2% 5
87.8% 53
100% 58
8.6% 10
91.4% 65
100% 75
13.3% 7
86.7% 75
100% 82
8.5% 3
91.5% 76
100% 79
3.8% 4
96.2% 82
100% 86
4.7% 3
95.3% 86
100% 89
3.4% 3
96.6% 112
100% 115
2.6% 3
97.4% 97
100% 100
3.0% 6
97.0% 79
100% 85
7.1% 3
92.9% 78
100% 81
3.7% 8
96.3% 88
100% 96
8.3%
91.7%
100%
Age
Fall 2006
UNDER 19
19
20 ‐ 22
23 ‐ 24
25 ‐ 29
30 ‐ 44
45 & OVER
Total
34
33
62
21
27
12
189
18.0%
17.5%
32.8%
11.1%
14.3%
6.3%
Spring 2007
24
29
66
23
23
14
1
100% 180
13.3%
16.1%
36.7%
12.8%
12.8%
7.8%
0.6%
100%
Fall 2007
51
34
63
22
11
11
5
197
25.9%
17.3%
32.0%
11.2%
5.6%
5.6%
2.5%
100%
Spring 2008
35
31
63
24
14
12
5
184
19.0%
16.8%
34.2%
13.0%
7.6%
6.5%
2.7%
100%
Fall 2008
54
30
72
15
18
8
3
200
27.0%
15.0%
36.0%
7.5%
9.0%
4.0%
1.5%
100%
Spring 2009
41
39
74
13
18
15
4
204
20.1%
19.1%
36.3%
6.4%
8.8%
7.4%
2.0%
100%
Fall 2009
84
54
81
26
22
12
1
280
30.0%
19.3%
28.9%
9.3%
7.9%
4.3%
0.4%
100%
Spring 2010
49
66
89
21
17
12
2
256
19.1%
25.8%
34.8%
8.2%
6.6%
4.7%
0.8%
100%
Page 5 of 16
Fall 2010
52
62
104
30
16
11
1
276
18.8%
22.5%
37.7%
10.9%
5.8%
4.0%
0.4%
100%
Spring 2011
39
42
104
26
20
12
1
244
16.0%
17.2%
42.6%
10.7%
8.2%
4.9%
0.4%
100%
Fall 2011
77
41
119
29
24
16
1
307
25.1%
13.4%
38.8%
9.4%
7.8%
5.2%
0.3%
100%
Spring 2012
50
43
109
23
25
16
266
18.8%
16.2%
41.0%
8.6%
9.4%
6.0%
0.0%
100%
Fall 2012
73
58
94
26
23
17
2
293
24.9%
19.8%
32.1%
8.9%
7.8%
5.8%
0.7%
100%
Spring 2013
55
63
104
31
20
14
1
288
19.1%
21.9%
36.1%
10.8%
6.9%
4.9%
0.3%
100%
Fall 2013
87
83
114
31
38
19
1
373
23.3%
22.3%
30.6%
8.3%
10.2%
5.1%
0.3%
100%
CT2 Program Review Data Packet
Computer Engineering Technology (CT‐A.A.S.)
A.3. Ethnicity Imputed (IPEDS count)
Black, Non‐
Nonresident Alien
Hispanic
Fall 06 26
13.8%
52
27.5%
Spring 07 31
17.2%
53
29.4%
Fall 07 31
15.7%
44
22.3%
Spring 08 23
12.5%
41
22.3%
Fall 08 31
15.5%
51
25.5%
Spring 09 30
14.7%
53
26.0%
Fall 09 33
11.8%
73
26.1%
Spring 10 41
16.0%
64
25.0%
Fall 10 38
13.8%
61
22.1%
Spring 11 32
13.1%
64
26.2%
Fall 11 37
12.1%
75
24.4%
Spring 12 23
8.6%
87
32.7%
Fall 12 30
10.2%
80
27.3%
Spring 13 27
9.4%
80
27.8%
Fall 13 31
8.3%
104
27.9%
American Indian or Asian or Pacific Native Alaskan
Islander
3
1.6%
24
12.7%
0.0%
24
13.3%
1
0.5%
33
16.8%
2
1.1%
29
15.8%
2
1.0%
33
16.5%
3
1.5%
44
21.6%
5
1.8%
64
22.9%
3
1.2%
61
23.8%
4
1.4%
65
23.6%
1
0.4%
53
21.7%
2
0.7%
67
21.8%
1
0.4%
59
22.2%
2
0.7%
80
27.3%
1
0.3%
76
26.4%
4
1.1%
88
23.6%
Hispanic
30.2%
28.9%
31.5%
35.9%
27.0%
24.5%
26.4%
23.0%
25.7%
22.1%
24.1%
22.9%
21.2%
23.3%
25.7%
57
52
62
66
54
50
74
59
71
54
74
61
62
67
96
27
20
26
23
29
24
31
28
37
40
52
35
39
37
50
White, Non‐
Hispanic
14.3%
11.1%
13.2%
12.5%
14.5%
11.8%
11.1%
10.9%
13.4%
16.4%
16.9%
13.2%
13.3%
12.8%
13.4%
Total
189
180
197
184
200
204
280
256
276
244
307
266
293
288
373
CT2: Ethnicity
100.0%
90.0%
14.3%
80.0%
70.0%
30.2%
11.1%
28.9%
11.8%
11.1%
10.9%
24.5%
26.4%
23.0%
16.5%
21.6%
22.9%
25.5%
26.0%
26.1%
13.2%
12.5%
14.5%
31.5%
35.9%
27.0%
13.2%
13.3%
12.8%
13.4%
22.9%
21.2%
23.3%
25.7%
22.2%
27.3%
26.4%
23.6%
24.4%
32.7%
27.3%
27.8%
27.9%
13.4%
16.4%
16.9%
25.7%
22.1%
24.1%
23.6%
21.7%
21.8%
22.1%
26.2%
60.0%
50.0%
12.7%
13.3%
16.8%
40.0%
30.0%
27.5%
29.4%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
15.8%
22.3%
22.3%
23.8%
25.0%
13.8%
17.2%
15.7%
12.5%
15.5%
14.7%
11.8%
16.0%
13.8%
13.1%
12.1%
8.6%
10.2%
9.4%
8.3%
Fall 06
Sp 07
Fall 07
Sp 08
Fall 08
Sp 09
Fall 09
Sp 10
Fall 10
Sp 11
Fall 11
Sp 12
Fall 12
Sp 13
Fall 13
Nonresident Alien
Black, Non‐Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
* American Indian or Native Alaskan less than 2% ‐ not shown in chart
Page 6 of 16
Hispanic
White, Non‐Hispanic
CT2 Program Review Data Packet
Computer Engineering Technology (CT‐A.A.S.)
A.4. Language Spoken at Home
Fall 2006
Spring 2007
Fall 2007
Spring 2008
Fall 2008
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
Spring 2013
Fall 2013
LANG. OTHER THAN ENGLISH
104
55.0% 99
55.0% 113
57.4% 111
60.3% 99
49.5% 92
45.1% 129
46.1% 124
48.4% 126
45.7% 96
39.3% 119
38.8% 101
38.0% 132
45.1% 131
45.5% 160
42.9%
ENGLISH ONLY
53
28.0% 52
28.9% 54
27.4% 46
25.0% 61
30.5% 70
34.3% 84
30.0% 77
30.1% 80
29.0% 60
24.6% 83
27.0% 81
30.5% 81
27.6% 77
26.7% 91
24.4%
UNKNOWN
32
16.9% 29
16.1% 30
15.2% 27
14.7% 40
20.0% 42
20.6% 67
23.9% 55
21.5% 70
25.4% 88
36.1% 105
34.2% 84
31.6% 80
27.3% 80
27.8% 122
32.7%
CT2 Total
189
100% 180
100% 197
100% 184
100% 200
100% 204
100% 280
100% 256
100% 276
100% 244
100% 307
100% 266
100% 293
100% 288
100% 373
100%
45.1%
45.5%
Fall 12
Sp 13
CT2: Percent of Students Who Speak a Language Other Than English at Home
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
55.0%
55.0%
57.4%
60.3%
49.5%
50.0%
45.1%
46.1%
48.4%
45.7%
39.3%
38.8%
38.0%
Sp 11
Fall 11
Sp 12
40.0%
42.9%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Fall 06
Sp 07
Fall 07
Sp 08
Fall 08
Sp 09
Fall 09
Sp 10
Page 7 of 16
Fall 10
Fall 13
CT2 Program Review Data Packet
Computer Engineering Technology (CT‐A.A.S.)
A.5. Admit Type
Fall 2006
First Time Freshmen
Advanced Transfer
Spring 2007
Fall 2007
Spring 2008
Fall 2008
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
Spring 2013
Fall 2013
61
32.3%
19
10.6%
73
37.1%
19
10.3%
68
34.0%
32
15.7%
114
40.7%
42
16.4% 74
26.8%
24
9.8%
107
34.9% 27
10.2% 103
35.2% 50
17.4% 124
33.2%
8
4.2%
10
5.6%
13
6.6%
12
6.5%
11
5.5%
12
5.9%
18
6.4%
7
2.7%
11
4.0%
5
2.0%
22
7.2%
6
2.3%
17
5.8%
12
4.2%
24
6.4%
Internal Transfer 1
0.5%
1
0.6%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
2
1.0%
0
0.0%
1
0.4%
0
0.0%
2
0.7%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
Degree Readmit 11
Continuing Degree
108
Total
189
5.8%
11
6.1%
8
4.1%
18
9.8%
15
7.5%
21
10.3%
14
5.0%
18
7.0%
14
5.1%
25
26
8.5%
17
6.4%
13
4.4%
19
25
6.7%
57.1%
100%
139
180
77.2%
100%
103
197
52.3%
100%
135
184
73.4%
100%
104
200
52.0%
100%
139
204
68.1%
100%
133
280
47.5%
100%
189
256
73.8% 175
100% 276
63.4%
100%
190
244
152
307
49.5% 216
100% 266
77.9%
90%
81.2% 160
100% 293
54.6% 207
100% 288
71.9% 200
93%
373
CT2: New to Continuing Student Ratio (Fall)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
32.3%
4.2%
37.1%
34.0%
26.8%
40.7%
34.9%
35.2%
33.2%
7.2%
5.8%
6.4%
4.0%
6.6%
5.5%
6.4%
First Time Freshmen
50%
Advanced Transfer
40%
30%
63.5%
56.3%
60.5%
Fall 07
Fall 08
69.2%
52.9%
58.0%
59.0%
60.4%
Fall 11
Fall 12
Fall 13
20%
10%
0%
Fall 06
Fall 09
Fall 10
Page 8 of 16
Other
53.6%
100%
CT2 Program Review Data Packet
Computer Engineering Technology (CT‐A.A.S.)
A.6. Freshmen and Sophomore Class Level: Percent of Total Enrollment
Fall 2006
Fall 2007
Spring 2008
Fall 2008
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
Spring 2013
Fall 2013
72.5% 122
67.8% 152
77.2% 128
69.6% 154
77.0% 150
73.5% 223
79.6% 186
72.7% 205
74.3% 175
71.7% 233
75.9% 190
71.4% 231
78.8% 221
76.7% 290
77.7%
SOPHOMORE 52
27.5% 58
32.2% 45
22.8% 56
30.4% 46
23.0% 54
26.5% 57
20.4% 70
27.3% 71
25.7% 69
28.3% 74
24.1% 76
28.6% 62
21.2% 67
23.3% 83
22.3%
Total
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
FRESHMEN
137
Spring 2007
189
180
197
184
200
204
280
256
276
244
307
266
293
288
373
CT2: Freshmen and Sophomore Class Level: Percent of Total Enrollment
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
27.5%
32.2%
22.8%
30.4%
23.0%
26.5%
20.4%
27.3%
25.7%
28.3%
24.1%
28.6%
21.2%
23.3%
22.3%
70.0%
60.0%
SOPHOMORE
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
72.5%
67.8%
Fall 06
Sp 07
77.2%
69.6%
77.0%
73.5%
Fall 08
Sp 09
79.6%
72.7%
74.3%
71.7%
75.9%
71.4%
Sp 10
Fall 10
Sp 11
Fall 11
Sp 12
78.8%
76.7%
77.7%
Fall 12
Sp 13
Fall 13
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Fall 07
Sp 08
Fall 09
Page 9 of 16
FRESHMEN
CT2 Program Review Data Packet
Computer Engineering Technology (CT‐A.A.S.)
A.7. College Discovery Students
Fall '06
Regular
CD
Total
184
5
189
Sp '07
175
5
180
Fall '07
190
7
197
Sp '08
179
5
184
Fall '08
Sp '09
Fall '09
Sp '10
Fall '10
Sp '11
Fall '11
Sp '12
Fall '12
Sp '13
Fall '13
190
10
200
199
5
204
269
11
280
251
5
256
272
4
276
238
6
244
302
5
307
263
3
266
292
1
293
286
2
288
367
6
373
Page 10 of 16
CT2 Program Review Data Packet
Computer Engineering Technology (CT‐A.A.S.)
B. Institutional Effectiveness
8
9
10
11
12
Graduation and Retention Rates
One‐Year Retention Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Three‐Year Retention & Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Six‐Year Retention & Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Degrees Awarded
Transfer Rates and College Destinations
Page 11 of 16
CT2 Program Review Data Packet
Computer Engineering Technology (CT‐A.A.S.)
B.8. One‐Year Retention Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Freshmen Cohort)
CT2
Total
Fall Cohort
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
N
52
62
63
98
63
88
28
32
44
70
36
55
QCC‐Wide
Still Enrolled for Degree Pursued at QCC
Still Enrolled for Degree Pursued at QCC
N
%
53.8%
51.6%
69.8%
71.4%
57.1%
62.5%
%
65.8%
69.5%
70.7%
71.5%
72.1%
69.2%
CT2 : One Year Retention Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Freshmen Cohort)
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
70.7%
69.5%
65.8%
53.8%
69.8%
71.5%
71.4%
72.1%
69.2%
57.1%
51.6%
62.5%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Fall 06
Fall 07
Fall 08
Fall 09
QCC‐wide
CT2
Page 12 of 16
Fall 10
Fall 11
CT2 Program Review Data Packet
Computer Engineering Technology (CT‐A.A.S.)
B.9. Three‐Year Retention and Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Freshmen Cohort)
CT2
Total
Fall Cohort
N
2001
85
2002
81
2003
58
2004
46
2005
40
2006
52
2007
62
2008
63
2009
98
QCC‐wide
Still Enrolled for Earned Degree Degree Pursued Still Enrolled for Degree Pursued Pursued at QCC
at QCC
Earned Degree Pursued at QCC
at QCC
N
%
N
%
%
%
7
8.2%
20
23.5%
13.8%
20.6%
8
9.9%
15
18.5%
14.4%
20.0%
8
13.8%
14
24.1%
15.0%
20.7%
3
6.5%
12
26.1%
12.8%
21.3%
3
7.5%
11
27.5%
13.0%
22.6%
3
5.8%
9
17.3%
15.8%
21.4%
7
11.3%
12
19.4%
12.8%
21.3%
14
22.2%
20
31.7%
13.8%
23.2%
9
9.2%
21
21.4%
16.2%
21.5%
CT2: Three‐Year Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Freshmen Cohort)
30.0%
25.0%
22.2%
20.0%
15.0%
15.0%
14.4%
13.8%
13.8%
9.9%
10.0%
15.8%
13.0%
12.8%
13.8%
11.3%
12.8%
7.5%
8.2%
16.2%
9.2%
6.5%
5.8%
5.0%
0.0%
Fall 2001
Fall 2002
Fall 2003
Fall 2004
Fall 2005
QCC‐Wide Earned Degree
Page 13 of 16
Fall 2006
CT2
Fall 2007
Fall 2008
Fall 2009
CT2 Program Review Data Packet
Computer Engineering Technology (CT‐A.A.S.)
B.10. Six‐Year Retention & Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Freshmen Cohort)
CT2
Fall Cohort
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Still Enrolled for Degree Pursued at QCC
Total Earned Degree Pursued at QCC
N
N
%
N
%
85
19
22.4%
1
1.2%
81
17
21.0%
1
1.2%
58
13
22.4%
2
3.4%
46
11
23.9%
2
4.3%
40
11
27.5%
1
2.5%
52
10
19.2%
1
1.9%
QCC‐wide
Earned Degree Pursued at QCC
%
24.3%
26.2%
25.1%
24.0%
25.2%
25.3%
CT2: Six‐Year Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Freshmen)
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
26.2%
24.3%
22.4%
21.0%
27.5%
24.0%
25.1%
23.9%
22.4%
25.2%
25.3%
19.2%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Fall 2001
Fall 2002
Fall 2003
QCC‐Wide Earned Degree
Fall 2004
CT2 Earned Degree
Page 14 of 16
Fall 2005
Fall 2006
CT2 Program Review Data Packet
Computer Engineering Technology (CT‐A.A.S.)
B.11. Degrees Awarded
Graduation Year¹ Degree
CT2
A.A.S.
2005‐2006 2006‐2007 2007‐2008 2008‐2009 2009‐2010 2010‐2011 2011‐2012 2012‐2013
17
19
17
18
20
26
33
21
¹ Graduation year include summer, fall, and spring graduations. (E.g. 05/06 includes summer 2005, fall 2005, and spring 2006 graduations).
Degrees Awarded Trend Analysis
Degree
CT2
A.A.S.
05/06
12/13
Growth %
11/12
12/13
Growth %
17
21
23.5%
33
21
‐36.4%
Page 15 of 16
CT2 Program Review Data Packet
Computer Engineering Technology (CT‐A.A.S.)
B.12. Transfer Rates¹ and College Destinations
CT2 Graduates
2005‐2006
2006‐2007
2007‐2008
2008‐2009
2009‐2010
2010‐2011
2011‐2012
Total Graduates
17
19
17
18
20
26
33
% CUNY Transfer
17.6%
31.6%
23.5%
16.7%
40.0%
42.3%
45.5%
CT2: Total Transfer Rates by Graduation Year
Total
% Non‐CUNY Transfer
Rate
Transfers
35.3%
52.9%
26.3%
57.9%
5.9%
29.4%
11.1%
27.8%
15.0%
55.0%
34.6%
76.9%
15.2%
60.6%
90.0%
76.9%
80.0%
70.0%
57.9%
50.0%
40.0%
29.4%
27.8%
2007‐2008
2008‐2009
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
2006‐2007
2012‐2013 CUNY College Destinations of 2011‐2012 CT2 Graduates¹
Number of CUNY Colleges
Graduates
City
Baruch
Hunter
Lehman
Brooklyn
Queens
4
Staten Island
NYC Tech
11
York
John Jay
60.6%
55.0%
60.0%
2009‐2010
2010‐2011
2011‐2012
Non‐CUNY College Destinations of CT2 Graduates¹ (overall)
HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY
NEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY‐ OLD WESTBURY
SUNY EMPIRE STATE COLLEGE
SUNY FARMINGDALE
SUNY NEW PALTZ
SUNY STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY
VAUGHN COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS AND TECHNOLOGY
¹ Graduates were counted as transferred if they were registered in any of the CUNY senior colleges (including the Graduate Center, the Law School, the School of Professional Studies, and the School of Journalism) in any or all semesters of the academic year following the graduation year.
Page 16 of 16