European Commission DG Justice, Freedom and Security
Framework Contract Quality Assurance –JLS-B3-2007-05
Service Order: so 30- Entry-Exit Costing Study
Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems
(CB-E-SO30-REP-003)
Abstract
This document is the Final Report of the cost analysis of the Entry-Exit
and Registered Traveller Systems
Document information
AUTHOR
OWNER
ISSUE DATE
VERSION
APPROVAL STATUS
Unisys
European Commission DG JLS
19-04-2010
1.30
Submitted
Document History
VER
DATE
AUTHOR
DESCRIPTION
ACTION*
PG
0.01
25/01/10
Huijgens
Initial draft
0.02
11/02/10
Huijgens
Tavano
Updated based
on feedback
from COM.
Identified
scenarios and
described the
methodology
I U
All
0.03
16/02/10
Tavano
Revised text,
tables, pictures
IR
All
0.04
26/02/10
Tavano
Updated based
on feedback
from COM.
IR
All
0.05
04/03/10
Huijgens
Tavano
Revised text,
tables, pictures.
Updated based
on feedback
from COM.
IR
All
0.06
23/03/10
Huijgens
Revised text,
tables, pictures
IR
All
0.07
24/03/10
Huijgens
Revised text,
tables, pictures
IR
All
1.00
24/03/10
Huijgens,
Dalamanga,
Wiersma
Final version
IR
All
1.10
29/03/10
Huijgens,
Dalamanga,
Wiersma
Final version
addressing COM
comments
IR
All
L I M I T E D D I S T R I B U T I O N , Printed 4/25/2012, p. 1/137
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
VER
DATE
AUTHOR
DESCRIPTION
ACTION*
PG
1.20
31/03/10
Huijgens,
Dalamanga,
Wiersma
Final version
IR
All
1.30
19/04/10
Huijgens
Final version,
removed
disclaimer
Changed ‘SemiAutomated’ to
‘Semi-Manual’
R
3
Action: I = Insert, R = Replace
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 2/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
Contents
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
7
2
INTRODUCTION
10
3
METHODOLOGY AND COST ANALYSIS STRUCTURE
11
3.1
IDENTIFYING THE COST ELEMENTS
11
3.2
TOOLS
12
3.2.1
The Cost Model
12
3.2.2
Function Point Analysis
13
3.2.3
CostXpert
14
3.2.4
Infrastructure Design and Sizing
14
3.2.5
Accuracy
14
4
USE CASES
15
4.1
THIRD COUNTRY NATIONAL BORDER CROSSING – ENTRY
15
4.2
THIRD COUNTRY NATIONAL BORDER CROSSING – EXIT
20
4.3
REGISTERED TRAVELLER BORDER CROSSING – ENTRY
23
4.4
REGISTERED TRAVELLER BORDER CROSSING – EXIT
27
4.5
REGISTERED TRAVELLER ENROLMENT
30
4.6
DATA DICTIONARY
33
4.7
TABLE OF INTERFACES
35
5
ASSUMPTIONS FOR SYSTEM AND COST MODELS
36
5.1
GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS
36
5.2
ANTICIPATED SYSTEM LOAD
37
5.3
SYSTEM MODEL PARAMETERS AND ASSUMPTIONS
38
6
SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE
42
6.1
CENTRALISED SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE
42
6.1.1
Member State Technical Infrastructure
43
6.1.2
Central Technical Infrastructure
46
6.2
DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE
49
6.2.1
Member State Distributed Technical Architecture
53
7
COST ANALYSIS
57
7.1
HOW TO USE THE EXCEL COST MODEL
57
7.1.1
Input
57
7.1.2
Presentation
57
7.1.3
Sizing
59
7.1.4
Estimating costs using the Model
59
7.2
COST ANALYSIS PRESENTATION
60
7.2.1
Cost elements
60
7.2.2
Costs
62
7.2.3
General Remarks
63
7.3
CENTRALISED SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE
64
7.4
A1C – CENTRALISED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM, NO BIOMETRICS
64
7.4.1
Scenario Parameters
64
7.4.2
Cost Summary Tables
66
7.5
A1D – DISTRIBUTED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM, NO BIOMETRICS
68
7.5.1
Scenario Parameters
68
7.5.2
Cost Summary Tables
69
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 3/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
7.6
A2C – CENTRALISED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM, WITH BIOMETRICS
71
7.6.1
Scenario Parameters
71
7.6.2
Cost Summary Tables
72
7.7
A2D – DISTRIBUTED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM, WITH BIOMETRICS
74
7.7.1
Scenario Parameters
74
7.7.2
Cost Summary Tables
75
7.8
A3C – CENTRALISED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM, BIOMETRICS ADDED LATER
77
7.8.1
Scenario Parameters
77
7.8.2
Cost Summary Tables
78
7.9
A3D – DISTRIBUTED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM, BIOMETRICS ADDED LATER
80
7.9.1
Scenario Parameters
80
7.9.2
Cost Summary Tables
81
7.10
B0 – TOKEN-BASED RTS ONLY
83
7.10.1
Scenario Parameters
83
7.10.2
Cost Summary Tables
84
7.11
B1C – TOKEN-BASED RTS AND CENTRALISED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM WITHOUT BIOMETRICS
86
7.11.1
Scenario Parameters
86
7.11.2
Cost Summary Tables
87
7.12
B1D – TOKEN-BASED RTS AND DISTRIBUTED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM WITHOUT BIOMETRICS
89
7.12.1
Scenario Parameters
89
7.12.2
Cost Summary Tables
90
7.13
B2C – TOKEN-BASED RTS AND CENTRALISED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM WITH BIOMETRICS 92
7.13.1
Scenario Parameters
92
7.13.2
Cost Summary Tables
93
7.14
B2D – TOKEN-BASED RTS AND DISTRIBUTED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM WITH BIOMETRICS 95
7.14.1
Scenario Parameters
95
7.14.2
Cost Summary Tables
96
7.15
B3C – TOKEN-BASED RTS AND CENTRALISED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM WITH BIOMETRICS
ADDED LATER
98
7.15.1
Scenario Parameters
98
7.15.2
Cost Summary Tables
99
7.16
B3D – TOKEN-BASED RTS AND DISTRIBUTED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM WITH BIOMETRICS
ADDED LATER
101
7.16.1
Scenario Parameters
101
7.16.2
Cost Summary Tables
102
7.17
C0 – TOKEN-LESS RTS ONLY
104
7.17.1
Scenario Parameters
104
7.17.2
Cost Summary Tables
105
7.18
C1C – TOKEN-LESS RTS AND CENTRALISED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM WITHOUT BIOMETRICS
107
7.18.1
Scenario Parameters
107
7.18.2
Cost Summary Tables
108
7.19
C1D – TOKEN-LESS RTS AND DISTRIBUTED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM WITHOUT BIOMETRICS
110
7.19.1
Scenario Parameters
110
7.19.2
Cost Summary Tables
111
7.20
C2C – TOKEN-LESS RTS AND CENTRALISED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM WITH BIOMETRICS 113
7.20.1
Scenario Parameters
113
7.20.2
Cost Summary Tables
114
7.21
C2D – TOKEN-LESS RTS AND DISTRIBUTED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM WITH BIOMETRICS 116
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 4/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
7.21.1
Scenario Parameters
116
7.21.2
Cost Summary Tables
117
7.22
C3C – TOKEN-LESS RTS AND CENTRALISED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM WITH BIOMETRICS
ADDED LATER
119
7.22.1
Scenario Parameters
119
7.22.2
Cost Summary Tables
120
7.23
C3D – TOKEN-LESS RTS AND DISTRIBUTED ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM WITH BIOMETRICS
ADDED LATER
122
7.23.1
Scenario Parameters
122
7.23.2
Cost Summary Tables
123
8
SUMMARY TABLE
125
8.1
COMPARISON OF THE COSTS FOR VIS CO-LOCATION (NO VIS CONNECTION)
126
8.2
COMPARISON OF THE COSTS FOR VIS CONNECTION
127
9
REFERENCE AND APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
128
9.1
APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
128
9.2
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
128
10
TERMINOLOGY AND ANNEXES
130
10.1
ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS
130
11
ANNEX 1 – COST MODEL BUILDING BLOCKS
132
12
ANNEX 2 – COST XPERT INPUT REPORTS
137
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 5/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
Tables
Table 1: Comparison of the costs - VIS co-location (no VIS connection) ............................................... 8
Table 2: Comparison of costs - VIS co-location................................................................................. 9
Table 3: Costing Scenarios ..........................................................................................................10
Table 4: Cost Items vs. Solution Scenarios .....................................................................................11
Table 5: EES Anticipated System load............................................................................................37
Table 6: RTS Anticipated System load............................................................................................38
Table 7: Business parameters ......................................................................................................38
Table 8: Cost Parameters ............................................................................................................39
Table 9: Member State Technical Architecture Building Blocks ...........................................................44
Table 10: Central Infrastructure Building Blocks ..............................................................................47
Table 11: Central System Building Blocks .......................................................................................51
Table 12: Distributed architecture building blocks ............................................................................54
Table 13: Cost elements..............................................................................................................61
Table 14: Cost parameters ..........................................................................................................61
Table 15: Example of MS Administrative Costs ................................................................................64
Table 15: Comparison of the costs - VIS co-location (no VIS connection)........................................... 126
Table 16: Comparison of costs – VIS connection............................................................................ 127
Table 17: Applicable Documents ................................................................................................ 128
Table 18: Reference Documents ................................................................................................. 129
Table 19: Acronyms & Abbreviations ........................................................................................... 131
Figures
Figure 1: Spreadsheet Costing Workbook Structure .........................................................................13
Figure 2: TCN Border Crossing Systems Map – Entry .......................................................................16
Figure 3: TCN Border Crossing Systems Map – Exit ..........................................................................20
Figure 4: RT Border Crossing Systems Map – Entry..........................................................................23
Figure 5: RT Border Crossing Systems Map – Exit ............................................................................27
Figure 6: RT Enrolment ...............................................................................................................30
Figure 7: Centralised System Architecture ......................................................................................42
Figure 8: Member State Technical Architecture................................................................................44
Figure 9: Central Technical Architecture .........................................................................................47
Figure 10: Collaboration architecture .............................................................................................50
Figure 11: Base distributed system architecture ..............................................................................50
Figure 12: Central RTS system in distributed architecture .................................................................51
Figure 13: Member State distributed architecture ............................................................................54
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 6/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1
The objective of this study was to carry out a thorough assessment of the costs connected to
establishing an Entry/Exit System and a Registered Traveller System taking into account the
various options and sub-options identified during the preparation of the legal proposals of the two
systems. The study complements the Impact Assessments accompanying those proposals. The
study was carried out based on the details in this document and, to a limited extent, on the EntryExit Feasibility Study Final report1.
All cost estimates have been based on the documentary material provided by COM and the
“SPECIFICATIONS FOR A COST ANALYSIS STUDY” as reported in the document
“20091110_EES_RT_IA_Cost_ToR_lang”.
To correctly estimate the costs, various techniques were used:
-
-
-
Sizing
o
Hardware sizing based on simplified process models from the Feasibility Study and
forecasted numbers of Entries/Exits and RT travel events.
o
Software development sizing based on information in the Feasibility Study and
completed with Function Point Analysis when necessary.
o
Network sizing based on predictions of the eventual expected system load
Costing
o
Parametric cost analysis techniques were used to estimate development efforts and
maintenance costs to support the introduction of a new software product.
o
Parametric cost estimation is based on the functional size of the solution, the level of
re-usability of existing products and the proportion of COTS products that are used.
Obvious parameters are the hourly rates and skill levels of the development team at
specified reference rates. Less obvious parameters are associated with the
development environment and project governance. The parameters that we propose to
use for the estimations have been discussed and agreed with the COM.
o
Estimates of the costs of third party hardware, software and network products were
based on list prices of popular and appropriate COTS products.
o
For estimating operational costs, we assumed a harmonised model, in which we
adopted the rates given in the specifications as average rates to be used across
Member States. We also assumed the same business hours throughout the Union, as
well as the same number of holidays.
Planning
o
The initial planning was produced by the parametric costing tool (CostXpert). This
includes specification, design, realisation, testing and implementation and the first
phase of deployment, where any defects have been detected.
o
The manual intervention and adjustments of the schedule is necessary, as CostXpert
assumes unlimited resources to be available, which means that the planning needs to
be adjusted to make it fit the actual situation.
Two basic architectures have been considered:
•
Central architecture
•
Distributed (full-meshed) architecture.
In addition to the above considerations, other features considered were the existence or not of a
Registered Traveller System.
Based on the analysis presented in the current study, the following tables present a summary of
the costs for the different scenarios and for the two variables considered (co-location with VIS,
VIS connection):
1
CA-B38-FR-004, 7.2.2008
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 7/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
Table 1: Comparison of the costs - VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
€
21,028,017
€
EU Total Yearly MS Total Yearly EU Total Yearly MS Total Yearly
Incurring costs
Incurring costs Incurring costs
Incurring costs
in 2014
in 2014
in 2020
in 2020
178,216,654 €
6,202,947 €
129,063,562 €
6,467,072 €
171,626,820
€
27,543,949
€
175,948,404
€
(3,335,536) €
125,568,865
€
7,652,216
€
168,457,900
€
27,790,819
€
175,491,869
€
(3,304,561) €
125,516,924
€
7,683,190
€
168,405,959
€
21,028,017
€
178,216,654
€
6,202,947
€
129,063,562
€
6,467,072
€
171,626,820
€
25,042,223
€
180,809,796
€
6,633,247
€
129,293,997
€
6,897,371
€
171,857,255
€
34,686,831
€
181,186,811
€
(1,555,916) €
129,580,236
€
8,260,409
€
173,773,514
€
34,940,784
€
180,763,172
€
(1,530,520) €
129,537,872
€
8,285,804
€
173,731,150
€
30,255,713
€
178,713,446
€
(149,470) €
129,367,775
€
11,006,450
€
172,787,550
€
34,454,544
€
181,635,674
€
(1,577,548) €
129,625,122
€
8,175,616
€
173,018,098
€
34,454,544
€
181,641,325
€
(1,577,548) €
129,865,124
€
7,790,432
€
173,377,884
€
34,719,998
€
181,198,498
€
(1,551,003) €
129,820,841
€
7,816,977
€
173,333,601
€
13,320,261
€
204,488,995
€
4,755,301
€
125,907,808
€
4,979,870
€
151,338,725
€
17,315,218
€
238,570,976
€
5,276,562
€
130,376,886
€
5,457,774
€
159,171,805
€
17,884,224
€
237,425,584
€
5,333,462
€
130,262,347
€
5,457,774
€
159,171,805
EU one-time
costs
Scenario, no VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A1C - Central EES no biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS,
co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A2C - Central EES with biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS,
co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A3C - Central EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B0 - Token-Based RTS, No EES, not connected to VIS, co-located
with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B1C - Token-Based RTS, EES no biometrics, not connected to
VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B2C - Token-Based RTS, EES with biometrics, not connected to
VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B3C - Token-Based RTS, EES with biometrics added later, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C0 - Token-Less RTS, No EES, not connected to VIS, co-located
with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C1C - Token-Less RTS, EES no biometrics, not connected to VIS,
co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C2C - Token-Less RTS, EES with biometrics, not connected to
VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C3C - Token-Less RTS, EES with biometrics added later, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A1D - Distributed EES no biometrics, no RTS, not connected to
VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A2D - Distributed EES with biometrics, no RTS, not connected to
VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A3D - Distributed EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
MS one-time
Costs
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 8/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
Table 2: Comparison of costs - VIS co-location
€
15,708,069
€
EU Total Yearly MS Total Yearly EU Total Yearly MS Total Yearly
Incurring costs
Incurring costs Incurring costs
Incurring costs
in 2014
in 2014
in 2020
in 2020
179,508,919 €
4,548,235 €
125,969,552 €
6,549,689 €
168,841,787
€
27,477,147
€
175,948,404
€
(3,391,917) €
125,568,865
€
7,538,791
€
168,457,900
€
27,724,017
€
175,491,869
€
(3,360,942) €
125,516,924
€
7,569,765
€
168,405,959
€
20,984,516
€
178,216,654
€
6,148,533
€
129,063,562
€
6,420,185
€
171,626,820
€
24,998,722
€
180,809,796
€
6,578,833
€
129,293,997
€
6,850,485
€
171,857,255
€
34,627,999
€
181,186,811
€
(1,613,234) €
129,580,236
€
8,146,984
€
173,773,514
€
34,881,951
€
180,763,172
€
(1,587,839) €
129,537,872
€
8,172,379
€
173,731,150
€
30,207,578
€
178,713,446
€
(232,510) €
129,367,775
€
10,651,523
€
172,787,550
€
34,395,196
€
181,635,674
€
(1,635,336) €
129,625,122
€
8,062,191
€
173,018,098
€
34,395,196
€
181,641,325
€
(1,635,336) €
129,865,124
€
7,677,007
€
173,377,884
€
34,660,651
€
181,198,498
€
(1,608,790) €
129,820,841
€
7,703,552
€
173,333,601
€
13,276,053
€
204,488,995
€
4,724,002
€
125,907,808
€
4,932,984
€
151,338,725
€
17,271,010
€
238,570,976
€
5,245,263
€
130,376,886
€
5,410,888
€
159,171,805
€
17,840,016
€
237,425,584
€
5,302,163
€
130,262,347
€
5,410,888
€
159,171,805
EU one-time
costs
Scenario, with VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A1C - Central EES no biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A2C - Central EES with biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A3C - Central EES with biometrics added later, no RTS,
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B0 - Token-Based RTS, No EES, connected to VIS, co-located
with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B1C - Token-Based RTS, EES no biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B2C - Token-Based RTS, EES with biometrics, connected to VIS,
co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B3C - Token-Based RTS, EES with biometrics added later,
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C0 - Token-Less RTS, No EES, connected to VIS, co-located with
VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C1C - Token-Less RTS, EES no biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C2C - Token-Less RTS, EES with biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C3C - Token-Less RTS, EES with biometrics added later,
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A1D - Distributed EES no biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS,
co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A2D - Distributed EES with biometrics, no RTS, connected to
VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A3D - Distributed EES with biometrics added later, no RTS,
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
MS one-time
Costs
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 9/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
INTRODUCTION
2
Table 3 contains the identifications of all costing scenarios that are described in this document.
For easy navigation, the references to the scenarios contain hyper links to the relevant sections.
Table 3: Costing Scenarios
No E-E
E-E
E-E
E-E
No/Biometrics
w/Biometrics
Later/Biometrics
Central
Distributed
Central
Distributed
Central
Distributed
N/A
A1C
A1D
A2C
A2D
A3C
A3D
RTS | Token
Based
B0
B1C
B1D
B2C
B2D
B3C
B3D
RTS | Tokenless2
C0
C1C
C1D
C2C
C2D
C3C
C3D
No RTS
As described in the Terms of Reference [R1] document, the costs for the Entry-Exit System (EES)
are estimated in two forms; as a centralised system with national interfaces and as a distributed
system with a consultation mechanism active between Member States. These scenarios end up
being remarkably different from a technical stand-point, making it appropriate to identify them as
two separate alternatives, whereby 20 alternative scenarios are defined and analysed in total.
2
The token-less and token-based Registered Traveller systems refer to centralised
systems that serve all the Member States. Only the EES can be either centralised or
distributed architecture.
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 10/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
3
METHODOLOGY AND COST ANALYSIS STRUCTURE
3.1
Identifying the Cost Elements
For each applicable scenario, cost elements as mentioned in the Terms of Reference [R1] are
calculated, based on the expected yearly volumes of third-country national (TCN) travellers.
As several commonalities can be found among the various cost scenarios, it is therefore
appropriate to introduce well-identified “cost building blocks” to be re-used in order to rationalise
the cost model and reduce inherent complexity.
Cost items pertain to the so called Central System (CS) scenario – which is to be run by under
responsibility of the Management Authority – and to Member States’ distributed systems.
For tangible cost elements – such as hardware, networking, software and facilities – costs have
been estimated using a bottom-up approach, detailing the actual a Bill-of-Materials (BOM) of each
individual system component.
Furthermore, cost values are projected over time up to 2020, so that estimates for 2013, 2015
and 2020 can be extracted as requested by ToR [R1].
Table 2 below provides a complete overview of all cost categories and applicable options.
Table 4: Cost Items vs. Solution Scenarios
Cost
Category
Hardware
Software
Other Capital
Expenditure
Project
Management
Central System
Distributed System
Development
Operations
Development
Operations
1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
9 9 9 9
Purchase
Deploy
Purchase
Develop
Deploy
Purchase
Deploy
Provide
Maintain
Grow
Maintain
Grow
• Maintain
• Grow
Purchase
Deploy
Purchase
Develop
Deploy
Purchase
Deploy
Provide
Maintain
Grow
Maintain
Grow
• Maintain
• Grow
Quality
Assurance
Administration
Training
Options
•
•
•
•
•
Procure
Contract
Control
Plan
Deliver
Operating
•
•
•
•
•
•
Control
Procure
Contract
Plan
Deliver
Manage
•
•
•
•
•
Procure
Contract
Control
Plan
Deliver
•
•
•
•
•
•
Control
Procure
Contract
Plan
Deliver
Manage
2
3
4
5
9 9 9 9
9
9 9 9
9
9 9 9
9
9 9 9
9
9 9
9 9 9 9 9
Applicable options are:
1. Architecture
a.
E-E is a self-contained system, thoroughly independent from SIS/VIS
b.
E-E is interfaced with VIS, leverages BMS features, including database and
biometric matcher
2. Retention Time
a.
1 year
b.
5 years
c.
1 year for E-E details, 5 years for traveller details
3. RTS Enrolment site
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 11/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
a.
Consular post
b.
At Schengen border control points (BCP)
c.
Both a) and b) above
4. Border Control mode for RTS users
a.
Fully-automated
b.
Semi-manual
5. Housing of EES / RTS
3.2
a.
Co-location with SIS / VIS
b.
Location independent from SIS / VIS
Tools
Actual costs are calculated by identifying the elementary ‘cost units’ that are specific or typical of
each cost category, such as:
•
Development / Management / Administration
o
•
•
•
3.2.1
Labour
Facilities
o
Required space
o
Power
o
Bandwidth
Operations
o
HW Maintenance
o
SW Maintenance / Licensing
o
Labour
...
The Cost Model
Microsoft Excel is the tool of choice for elaborating the cost structure that eventually allows
calculating solutions cost for the various scenarios. This structure is designed top-down, starting
from the ToR [R1] and the supporting documentation.
Starting from the business requirements, that quantify system functionality and behaviour, the
most-likely solution architectures have been determined – inclusive of technical and software
elements – based on the findings of [R6] and also taking into account further developments since
the publication of that report.
The sizing of the system infrastructure is calculated from the expected system load. Sizing in this
context comes down to actually determine which of building blocks are required for which
scenarios, thus calculating the actual “horsepower” needed to meet the required performance.
Business requirements per se are necessary but not sufficient in order to be able to properly size
the solution. In fact, detailed technical assumptions are made to achieve this goal.
The starting point is that most costs were as far as possible estimated irrelevant of any particular
commercial product. However, infrastructure cost estimates were based on average ‘list prices’ for
popular products, such that cost values are as realistic as possible and drawn from public sources.
All relevant assumptions are duly documented in this report, the technical assumptions required
for system sizing being implemented as variable parameters in the Excel structure so that they
can be changed if and when necessary.
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 12/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
Actual costs are calculated bottom-up, aggregating all costs that are captured for each building
block. Aggregation to conform to scenarios is then done via the option-based scenario
specifications.
Figure 1 shows the spreadsheet workbook structure.
(ToR)
Feasibility Study
Legal Draft
etc
General
parameters
EES-RTS Sizing
Building Block
g
icin
Pr tails
de
Pric
det ing
ails
EES-RTS Parameters
Bu
Bu
ild
S
ildin Sc
ingPa cen
ena
gP
rio
r
inf Brl am ario in Balo
fo acm
o oc et
k ete
k er
rs
s
Building Block
Pr
de icin
ta g
ils
io
ar rs
en ete
Sc am
r
Pa
k
loc
gB
ildin fo
Bu
in
Building Block
Te
c
De hnic
sig al P
n a ar
ss am
um et
pti ers
on
s
sizing
Scenario
parameters
EES-RTS Scenario
XnC/D
Scenario
Parameters
Building Block
info
Scenario Costs
BOM
Specification
Costs
Unisys Team
s
ter
me
ra s
Pa tion
p
ral
ne sum
Ge As
Costing info
Final Report
Business
Requirements
Business requirements
EES/RTS Costing
Study
Building Block
ing
Pric ils
deta
Public Domain
Figure 1: Spreadsheet Costing Workbook Structure
3.2.2
Function Point Analysis
Function-Point Analysis (FPA) was used to estimate the effort required to develop the custommade software components.
FPA is a well-known and accepted technique that allows estimating the functional size of the
system, describing it as a number of “Function Points”. In summary, the technique is based on
analysing the data that is stored and managed by the system, its interactions with the users and
other systems that store external data. The level of complexity of the data to be handled and the
required operations on the data represent a reliable measure of the functional size of the system.
As system sizing is fully based on system functionality as perceived from the user’s perspective,
this technique is well suited for this cost analysis as only the functional behaviour of the EES and
RTS systems are known at this time.
The results from FPA do not represent cost, or project schedule. They are treated as input data
into the CostXpert cost analysis tool (see below).
For each required scenario, an FPA estimation was performed, which led to a single spreadsheet
containing the results and documenting all parameters.
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 13/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
3.2.3
CostXpert3
CostXpert is a parametric tool capable of estimating development costs and planning of a software
development project. The tool relies on industry best practice data that are gathered by
researchers in this area.
“The Cost Xpert Tool Suite represents the latest standard of the Integrated Methodology driven
Estimation (IME) and is an intuitive operated standard tool for the realistic estimation of effort,
time, resources and cost to complete a project, as well as an estimate of potential risk, defects,
and documentation page count for the entire IT application life cycle. Our solution is based on
scientifically published methods and models, industry standards and best practice approaches. It
is the most comprehensive approach, covering any project situation no matter if it is feasibility
phase, development or maintenance.
The intelligent consideration of all relevant elements including project types, process models, hard
facts, soft facts, quality and risk factors and constraints ensures the accurate estimation. The
intuitive workflow and precalibrations of our expert system, as well as a wizard guided
assessment enables the effective use of methods even without the necessarily need to become a
methodology expert first.”4
CostXpert supports a wide variety of estimation algorithms and methods. One all important input
parameter is the actual size of the solution, but the tool also caters for such characteristic
elements as the development environment, development methodology and maturity and quality of
the development organisation.
CostXpert also provides a high-level project plan, inclusive of a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS),
estimating the project’s efficiency and throughput time. Based on proper hourly rates, it can thus
provide a reliable estimate of development costs.
Lastly, it is worth observing that the calculated values include costs associated with the early
phase immediately following the system’s deployment, as the model also allows estimates of the
number and nature of system infancy defects and incidents that need resolution.
3.2.4
Infrastructure Design and Sizing
Designing the system infrastructure is mandatory, as it is needed to estimate infrastructure costs
and also to understand the impact in terms of required storage space, network capacity and
power.
This design was done assuming an Enterprise Data Centre Architecture (EDCA) model, while using
‘Queuing Theory’ to estimate the ‘physical size’ of the infrastructure in combination with the
expected system loads.
Again, a spreadsheet was used to capture all this information.
3.2.5
Accuracy
Given the many assumptions made – given the level of uncertainty on the final solution, and the
many options proposed – the described approach led to estimates that we consider realistic, if not
“real”, as we consider overall accuracy to fall in the surroundings of 20% to 30%.
This is well in line with industry’s best practices and historical data. In fact, the relevant amount
of options, alternative scenarios and undefined constraints make it impossible to provide
estimates much closer to the final figures.
Therefore, all cost values in the following of this report should be considered a median value,
considering circa 25% as confidence range, plus or minus.
3 The Estimation Company.
4 http://www.costxpert.eu/en/expertise_product/cost_xpert_tool_suite
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 14/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
USE CASES
4
The Use Cases that are described in this section represent the basis for estimating the functional
requirements of the solution system(s). These requirements serve then as an input to the FPA
phase.
These Use Cases are examples of the information that is presented in the Technical Feasibility
Study [R6] and in the proposal for the foreseen implementation [R5], though the information from
these sources is used to perform the analysis. The described processes are without prejudice to
the final technical implementation at central or national level.
4.1
Third Country National Border Crossing – Entry5
CONTEXT
BRIEF
DESCRIPTION
ACTORS
STAKEHOLDERS
& INTEREST
PRECONDITIONS
•
TCN travellers crossing external EU borders to enter the
Schengen area
•
This process is triggered when a TCN Traveller wishes to
cross the border to enter the EU Schengen area
•
He/she must undergo a border check procedure.
•
Border Officer
•
National Border Check System (NBCS)
•
TCN Traveller
•
The stakeholders are the EES, VIS, SIS, other national
systems/databases
•
The interest of these stakeholders is to support the
border check procedure and, for EES, to record the entry
record of TCN travellers
•
BCP is open and accepting travellers
•
Border Officer is available
•
TCN Traveller presents herself at a border check-booth
5
Note that this use case does not take into account RTS, which is described in section
4.3.
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 15/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
Figure 2: TCN Border Crossing Systems Map – Entry
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 16/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
A
ƒ Border Officer gathers information from the TCN’s travel document and inserts it in the NBCS
Source
• Travel
Credential
Interface
Input Data
Process
Output Data
Interface
Storage
Hyperlinks
• MRZ
• Scan
• MRZ_Validity_Status_OK
•
•
•
•
• Travel
Credential
Reader
•
• MRZ
• Read
•
•
•
•
•
• Pax_Details
• Travel_Credential_Details
• Write
• Pax_Details
• Travel_Credential_Details
• Entry_Data_Record
• I-NBCS
• NBCS
•
B
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
•
•
•
•
•
SIS
EES
Other Syt’s
Other Syt’s
NBCS
•
•
•
•
•
C
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
•
• Traveller
• NBCS
• NBCS
• Border
Officer
NBCS interrogates various databases (EES, SIS and national databases, possibly in parallel) to
confirm document validity
validate the travellers’ identity
help assess her entry eligibility
Specifically, EES confirms that TCN Traveller has not previously overstayed, returns the allowed number
and sends the result to the NBCS
NBCS returns any relevant information found
I-SIS
• Entry_Data_Record
• Check Blacklist
• SIS_Entry_Status
• I-NBCS
•
I-EES
• Entry_Data_Record
• Check EE History
• EE_Entry_Status
• I-NBCS
•
I-Others
• Entry_Data_Record
• Check Blacklist
• Other_Sys_Entry_Status
• I-NBCS
•
I-Others
• Entry_Data_Record
• Check
• Other_Sys_Entry_Status
• I-NBCS
•
• *_Entry_Status
• Assessment & Clearance • Entry_Status_OK
• Display
•
Border Officer helps and supervises the traveller while capturing her fingerprints
NBCS verifies the quality of the fingerprints and stores them temporarily for later processing
Border Officer allows the TCN to enter the Schengen area and inserts his decision in the NBCS
Fingerprint
• Fingerprints
• Scan
• Fingerprint_Image
• I-NBCS
scanner
• Fingerprint_Template
•
• Fingerprint_Image
• Check Quality Level
• Fingerprint_Quality_Status •
• Fingerprint_Template
• I-NBCS
• Fingerprint_Quality_Status
• Decision on Entry
• Decision_on_Entry_OK
•
• *_Entry_Status
• Interactive
• Procedural_Q&A
• Decision on Entry
• Decision_on_Entry_OK
• I-NBCS
Dialogue
of days for the present stay
NBCS
NBCS
NBCS
NBCS
NBCS
•
•
•
•
•
• NBCS
•
• NBCS
•
•
•
• NBCS
•
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 17/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
D
ƒ NBCS creates an EES record, inclusive of biographic and biometric data gathered earlier in the process
ƒ NBCS purges any temporary data stored
Source
Interface
• NBCS
•
• NBCS
•
Input Data
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Process
Pax_Details
Fingerprint_Image
Fingerprint_Template
Decision_on_Entry_OK
Date&Time_Stamp
BCP
*_Temporary_Data
Output Data
Interface
Storage
Hyperlinks
• Write
• EE_Data_Record
• I-EES
• EES
•
• Delete
•
•
•
•
If TCN holds a valid entry visa, the following event applies.
E
Source
• TCN Visa
• VIS
ƒ Border Officer additionally gathers information from the visa sticker and inserts it in the NBCS
ƒ NBCS additionally interrogates VIS to validate the traveller’s identity and visa to help assess eligibility to entry
Interface
• Visa Reader
• I-VIS
Input Data
Process
• Visa_Data
• Visa_Data
• Scan
• Check Visa Validity
Output Data
• Visa_Data
• Visa_Validity_OK
Interface
• I-NBCS
• I-NBCS
Storage
• NBCS
• NBCS
Hyperlinks
•
•
In case TCN needs to be re-directed to second-line checks, the following event applies.
F
Source
• NBCS
ƒ Border Officer cancels the procedure
ƒ NBCS purges any unneeded information
ƒ TCN is directed to second-line checks
Interface
Input Data
• Interactive
• *_Temporary_Data
Process
• Delete
Output Data
•
Interface
•
Storage
•
Hyperlinks
•
In the case the TCN is not granted entry to the Schengen zone, the following event applies.
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 18/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
G
ƒ Border Officer enters recording of refusal of entry in the national system (This point is referred here for completeness, but is out of
scope for the current cost study).
Source
•
Interface
•
Input Data
• Refuse_Entry
Process
• Write
Output Data
•
Interface
• Interactive
Storage
• NBCS
Hyperlinks
•
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 19/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
4.2
Third Country National Border Crossing – Exit
CONTEXT
BRIEF
DESCRIPTION
ACTORS
STAKEHOLDERS
& INTEREST
•
TCN travellers crossing external EU borders to exit the
Schengen area
•
This process is triggered when a TCN Traveller wishes to
cross the border to exit the EU Schengen area
•
He/she must undergo a border check procedure.
•
Border Officer
•
National Border Check System (NBCS)
•
Automated Exit Gate (e-Gate)
•
TCN Traveller
•
The stakeholders are the EES, VIS, SIS, other national
systems/databases
•
The interest of these stakeholders is to support the border
exit procedure and, for EES, to record the exit record of TCN
travellers
•
BCP is open and accepting travellers
•
Border Officer is available, or
PRECONDITIONS •
•
Automated Gate (e-Gate) is available under Border Officer
supervision
TCN Traveller presents herself at a border check-booth
Figure 3: TCN Border Crossing Systems Map – Exit
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 20/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
A
ƒ Automated Gate (e-Gate) or Border Officer provides instructions to the TCN Traveller to help her scan her travel document and to
capture her fingerprints.
ƒ E-Gate (Border Officer) processes and dispatches all data to NBCS
Interface
Input Data
• E-Gate
Source
• Video screen
• Display
•
•
•
•
• Travel
Credential
• Scan
• MRZ_Validity_Status_OK
•
•
•
•
• Travel
Credential
Reader
•
• E_Gate_Instructions_to_Tra
veller
• MRZ
• MRZ
• Read
•
•
•
•
•
• Write
• I-NBCS
• NBCS
•
• Traveller
• NBCS
•
• Check Quality Level
•
• NBCS
•
• NBCS
• I-NBCS
• Decision on Exit
• Decision_on_Exit_OK
•
•
•
• Border
Officer
• Interactive
Dialogue
•
•
•
•
•
• Fingerprint_Image
• Fingerprint_Template
• Fingerprint_Quality_Status
• I-NBCS
• NBCS
• Fingerprint
scanner
•
• Pax_Details
• Travel_Credential_Details
• Fingerprints
• Pax_Details
• Travel_Credential_Details
• Exit_Data_Record
• Decision on Exit
• Decision_on_Exit_OK
• I-NBCS
• NBCS
•
B
•
•
•
•
•
SIS
EES
Other Syt’s
Other Syt’s
NBCS
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
•
ƒ
•
•
•
Process
Fingerprint_Image
Fingerprint_Template
Fingerprint_Quality_Status
*_Exit_Status
Procedural_Q&A
• Scan
Output Data
Interface
NBCS interrogates various databases (EES, SIS and national databases, possibly in parallel) to
confirm document validity
validate the travellers’ identity
help assess her entry eligibility
Specifically, EES confirms that TCN Traveller has not previously overstayed, returns the allowed number
sends the result to the NBCS
NBCS returns any relevant information found
I-SIS
• Exit_Data_Record
• Check Blacklist
• SIS_Exit_Status
• I-NBCS
I-EES
ƒ Exit_Data_Record
ƒ Check EE History
ƒ EE_Exit_Status
ƒ I-NBCS
I-Others
• Exit_Data_Record
• Check Blacklist
• Other_Sys_Exit_Status
• I-NBCS
I-Others
• Exit_Data_Record
• Check
• Other_Sys_Exit_Status
• I-NBCS
• *_Exit_Status
• Assessment & Clearance • Exit_Status_OK
• Display
Storage
Hyperlinks
of days for the present stay and
•
ƒ
•
•
•
NBCS
NBCS
NBCS
NBCS
NBCS
•
ƒ
•
•
•
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 21/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
C
ƒ EES confirms that TCN is exiting within the allowed number of days (no overstaying) and sends the result back to NBCS
ƒ NBCS creates an EES record, inclusive of biographic and biometric data gathered earlier in the process
ƒ NBCS purges any temporary data stored
Source
Interface
• NBCS
•
• NBCS
•
Input Data
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Pax_Details
Fingerprint_Image
Fingerprint_Template
Decision_on_Exit_OK
Date&Time_Stamp
BCP
*_Temporary_Data
Process
Output Data
Interface
Storage
Hyperlinks
• Write
• EE_Data_Record
• I-EES
• EES
•
• Delete
•
•
•
•
When Exception handlings are required, such as:
•
Travel document cannot be read/scanned at e-Gate
•
Fingerprints do not meet required quality levels
•
EES or other critical system is unavailable
•
TCN Traveller is recognised as a threat to security and/or public health
•
TCN Traveller is flagged by EES as having overstayed her permit/visa
TCN is to be re-directed to second-line checks, whereby the following event applies.
D
Source
ƒ NBCS
ƒ Border Officer takes control of the procedure
ƒ NBCS purges any unneeded information
Interface
ƒ Interactive
Input Data
ƒ *_Temporary_Data
Process
ƒ Manual handling
Output Data
ƒ
Interface
ƒ
Storage
ƒ
Hyperlinks
ƒ
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 22/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
4.3
Registered Traveller Border Crossing – Entry
CONTEXT
BRIEF
DESCRIPTION
ACTORS
STAKEHOLDERS
& INTEREST
PRECONDITIONS
•
Registered travellers crossing external EU borders to enter the
Schengen area
•
This process is triggered when a Registered Traveller (RT)
wishes to cross the border to enter the EU Schengen area
•
He/she must undergo a border check procedure.
•
Border Officer
•
National Border Check System (NBCS), Registered Traveller
System (RTS)
•
Automated Gate (e-Gate)
•
Registered Traveller (RT)
•
The stakeholders are the EES, RTS, VIS, SIS, other national
databases
•
The role of the RT system is to make sure verification occurs
that the traveller was previously enrolled and therefore
entitled to use the automated border crossing facility
•
The role of all systems is to support the border check
procedure and, for EES, to record the entry record of
Registered Travellers
•
BCP is open and accepting travellers
•
E-Gate is available6
•
Border Officer is available for supervision and back-up
•
RT presents herself at a BCP e-Gate
Figure 4: RT Border Crossing Systems Map – Entry
6 E-gate might not be available at all BCPs but in this case the RT holder could still benefit from a facilitated
check. The same processes would take place, but without the e-gate.
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 23/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
A
ƒ e-Gate (Border Officer) provides instructions to the Traveller to help her scan her travel document and to capture her fingerprints
ƒ E-Gate processes and dispatches all data to NBCS
ƒ RTS final validation is required only after NBCS has verified effective rights of entry, also replacing mandatory Q&A interaction with
the Border Officer
Interface
Input Data
• E-Gate
Source
• Video screen
• Display
•
•
•
•
• Travel
Credential
• Scan
• MRZ_Validity_Status_OK
•
•
•
•
• Travel
Credential
Reader
•
• EGate_Instructions_to_Trav
eller
• MRZ
• MRZ
• Read
•
•
•
•
•
• Write
• I-NBCS
• NBCS
•
• Traveller
• NBCS
•
• Check Quality Level
•
• NBCS
•
• NBCS
• I-NBCS
•
•
•
•
• Fingerprint_Image
• Fingerprint_Template
• Fingerprint_Quality_Status
• I-NBCS
• NBCS
• Fingerprint
scanner
•
• Pax_Details
• Travel_Credential_Details
• Fingerprints
• Pax_Details
• Travel_Credential_Details
• Entry_Data_Record
• I-RTS
• RTS
•
• RTS
•
•
•
•
•
• I-NBCS
• NBCS
•
B
•
•
•
•
•
SIS
EES
Other Syt’s
Other Syt’s
NBCS
Process
Fingerprint_Image
Fingerprint_Template
Fingerprint_Quality_Status
*_Entry_Status
• Travel_Credential_Details
• Fingerprint_Image
• Fingerprint_Template
• Scan
• Decision on Entry
• Check RTS
Output Data
Decision_on_Entry_OK
Fingerprint_Quality_Status
*_Entry_Status
Decision_on_Entry_OK
Interface
ƒ NBCS interrogates various databases (EES, SIS and national databases in parallel) to:
o confirm document validity
o validate the travellers’ identity
o help assess her entry eligibility
ƒ Specifically, EES confirms that RT has not previously overstayed, returns the allowed number
the result to the NBCS
ƒ NBCS returns any relevant information found
• I-SIS
• Entry_Data_Record
• Check Blacklist
• SIS_Entry_Status
•
• I-EES
• Entry_Data_Record
• Check EE History
• EE_Entry_Status
•
• I-Others
• Entry_Data_Record
• Check Blacklist
• Other_Sys_Entry_Status
•
• I-Others
• Entry_Data_Record
• Check
• Other_Sys_Entry_Status
•
•
• *_Entry_Status
• Assessment & Clearance • Entry_Status_OK
•
Storage
Hyperlinks
of days for the present stay and sends
I-NBCS
I-NBCS
I-NBCS
I-NBCS
Display
•
•
•
•
•
NBCS
NBCS
NBCS
NBCS
NBCS
•
•
•
•
•
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 24/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
C
ƒ NBCS creates an EES record, inclusive of biographic and biometric data gathered earlier in the process
ƒ NBCS purges any temporary data stored
Source
Interface
• NBCS
•
• NBCS
•
Input Data
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Process
Pax_Details
Fingerprint_Image
Fingerprint_Template
Decision_on_Entry_OK
Date&Time_Stamp
BCP
*_Temporary_Data
Output Data
Interface
Storage
Hyperlinks
• Write
• EE_Data_Record
• I-EES
• I-RTS
• EES
• RTS
•
• Delete
•
•
•
•
If RT holds a valid entry visa, the following event applies.
D
ƒ NBCS additionally interrogates VIS to validate the traveller’s identity and visa to help assess eligibility to entry
Source
Interface
• TCN Visa
• Travel
Credential
Reader
• I-VIS
• VIS
Input Data
Process
Output Data
Interface
Storage
Hyperlinks
• Visa_Data
• Scan
• Visa_Data
• I-NBCS
• NBCS
•
• Visa_Data
• Check Visa Validity
• Visa_Validity_OK
• I-NBCS
• NBCS
•
In case RT needs to be re-directed to second-line checks, the following event holds.
E
Source
• NBCS
ƒ Border Officer cancels the procedure
ƒ NBCS purges all information no more needed
ƒ RT is directed to second-line checks
Interface
Input Data
• Interactive
• *_Temporary_Data
Process
• Delete
Output Data
•
Interface
•
Storage
•
Hyperlinks
•
In the case RT is not granted entry to the Schengen zone, the following event applies.
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 25/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
F
ƒ Border Officer enters recording of refusal of entry in the national system (This point is referred here for completeness, but is out of
scope for the current cost study).).
ƒ
Source
•
• NBCS
Interface
•
•
Input Data
• Refuse_Entry
•
Process
• Write
• Write
Output Data
•
• Refuse_Entry
Interface
• Interactive
• I-RTS
Storage
• NBCS
• RTS
Hyperlinks
•
•
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 26/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
4.4
Registered Traveller Border Crossing – Exit
CONTEXT
BRIEF
DESCRIPTION
ACTORS
•
Registered travellers crossing external EU borders to enter
the Schengen area
•
This process is triggered when a Registered Traveller (RT)
wishes to cross the border to exit the EU Schengen area
•
He/she must undergo a border check procedure.
•
Border Officer
•
National Border Check System (NBCS)
•
Registered Traveller System (RTS)
•
Automated Gate (e-Gate)
•
Registered Traveller (RT)
•
The stakeholders are the EES, RTS, VIS, SIS, other national
databases
•
The role of the RT system is to make sure verification
occurs that the traveller was previously enrolled and
therefore entitled to use the automated border crossing
facility, if available. A facilitated check could be carried out
manually in case an automated border crossing system is
not available.
•
The role of all systems is to support the border check
procedure and, for EES, to record the exit record of
Registered Travellers
•
BCP is open and accepting travellers
•
E-Gate is available
•
Border Officer is available for supervision and back-up
•
RT presents herself at a BCP e-Gate
STAKEHOLDERS
& INTEREST
PRECONDITIONS
Figure 5: RT Border Crossing Systems Map – Exit
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 27/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
A
ƒ e-Gate (Border Officer) provides instructions to the Traveller to help her scan her travel document and to capture her fingerprints
ƒ E-Gate processes and dispatches all data to NBCS
ƒ RTS final validation is required only after NBCS has verified effective rights of exit, and replaces the mandatory Q&A interaction with
the Border Officer
Interface
Input Data
• E-Gate
Source
• Video screen
• Display
•
•
•
•
• Travel
Credential
• Scan
• MRZ_Validity_Status_OK
•
•
•
•
• Travel
Credential
Reader
•
• EGate_Instructions_to_Trav
eller
• MRZ
• MRZ
• Read
•
•
•
•
•
• Write
• I-NBCS
• NBCS
•
• Traveller
• NBCS
•
• Check Quality Level
•
• NBCS
•
• NBCS
• I-NBCS
•
•
•
•
• Fingerprint_Image
• Fingerprint_Template
• Fingerprint_Quality_Status
• I-NBCS
• NBCS
• Fingerprint
scanner
•
• Pax_Details
• Travel_Credential_Details
• Fingerprints
• Pax_Details
• Travel_Credential_Details
• Exit_Data_Record
• I-RTS
• RTS
•
• RTS
•
•
•
•
•
• I-NBCS
• NBCS
•
B
•
•
•
•
•
SIS
EES
Other Syt’s
Other Syt’s
NBCS
Process
Fingerprint_Image
Fingerprint_Template
Fingerprint_Quality_Status
*_Exit_Status
• Travel_Credential_Details
• Fingerprint_Image
• Fingerprint_Template
• Scan
• Decision on Exit
• Check RTS
Output Data
Decision_on_Exit_OK
Fingerprint_Quality_Status
*_Exit_Status
Decision_on_Exit_OK
Interface
Storage
Hyperlinks
ƒ NBCS interrogates various databases (EES, SIS and national databases, possibly in parallel) to
o confirm document validity
o validate the travellers’ identity
o help assess her exit eligibility
ƒ Specifically, EES confirms that RT has not previously overstayed, returns the allowed number of days for the present stay and sends
the result to NBCS
ƒ NBCS returns any relevant information found
• I-SIS
• Exit_Data_Record
• Check Blacklist
• SIS_Exit_Status
• I-NBCS
• NBCS
•
• I-EES
• Exit_Data_Record
• Check EE History
• EE_Exit_Status
• I-NBCS
• NBCS
•
• I-Others
• Exit_Data_Record
• Check Blacklist
• Other_Sys_Exit_Status
• I-NBCS
• NBCS
•
• I-Others
• Exit_Data_Record
• Check
• Other_Sys_Exit_Status
• I-NBCS
• NBCS
•
•
• *_Exit_Status
• Assessment & Clearance • Exit_Status_OK
• Display
• NBCS
•
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 28/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
C
ƒ NBCS creates an EES record, inclusive of biographic and biometric data gathered earlier in the process
ƒ NBCS purges any temporary data stored
Source
Interface
• NBCS
•
• NBCS
•
Input Data
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Process
Pax_Details
Fingerprint_Image
Fingerprint_Template
Decision_on_Exit_OK
Date&Time_Stamp
BCP
*_Temporary_Data
Output Data
Interface
Storage
Hyperlinks
• Write
• EE_Data_Record
• I-EES
• I-RTS
• EES
• RTS
•
• Delete
•
•
•
•
When Exception handlings are required, such as:
•
Travel document cannot be read/scanned at e-Gate
•
Fingerprints do not meet required quality levels
•
EES or other critical system is unavailable
•
RT Traveller is recognised as a threat to security and/or public health
•
RT Traveller is flagged by EES as having overstayed her permit/visa
RT is to be re-directed to second-line checks, whereby the following event applies.
D
Source
• NBCS
ƒ Border Officer takes control of the procedure
ƒ NBCS purges all information no more needed
Interface
Input Data
• Interactive
• *_Temporary_Data
Process
• Manual handling
Output Data
•
Interface
•
Storage
•
Hyperlinks
•
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 29/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
4.5
Registered Traveller Enrolment
•
(TCN) Travellers seeking cleared status of Registered
Traveller in order to benefit from fast processing at semi/automated facilities when crossing external EU borders
upon entry to or exit from the Schengen area
•
This process is triggered when a traveller wishes to enrol as
a Registered Traveller and gain Registered Traveller status
•
He/she must undergo a preliminary background check
procedure and willingly provide her biometric details.
•
Border/Enrolment Officer
•
Registered Traveller System (RTS)
•
Traveller applying for RT status
•
The stakeholders are the EES, VIS, SIS, other national
databases
•
The role of the RTS is to make sure verification occurs that
the traveller is suitable for enrolment and therefore can be
entitled to use semi-/automated border crossing facilities
•
The role of all systems is to support the enrolment
procedure and, for EES, to return previous border crossing
records, including a qualitative assessment of the traveller’s
overstay history, if applicable
•
RTS is operational
•
Border/Enrolment Officer is available
•
Traveller presents herself at a Registered Traveller System
Enrolment Facility (RTS-EF)
CONTEXT
BRIEF
DESCRIPTION
ACTORS
STAKEHOLDERS
& INTEREST
PRECONDITIONS
Figure 6: RT Enrolment
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 30/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
A
ƒ Border/Enrolment Officer drives the process, providing instructions to the Traveller, helping her while scanning travel document and
capturing fingerprints
ƒ RTS processes and dispatches all data to NBCS7
ƒ NBCS polls all relevant back-office systems to carry out background checks and vet traveller’s application
ƒ RTS final validation is required only after NBCS has verified effective rights of entry, and replaces the mandatory Q&A interaction with
the Border Officer8 on arrival at BCP
Source
• Travel
Credential
Interface
Input Data
Process
Output Data
Interface
Storage
Hyperlinks
• MRZ
• Scan
• MRZ_Validity_Status_OK
•
•
•
•
• Travel
Credential
Reader
•
• MRZ
• Read
•
•
•
•
•
• Write
• I-RTS
• RTS
•
• Traveller
• RTS
•
• Scan
• I-RTS
• RTS
•
• RTS
•
• Check Quality Level
• Fingerprint_Quality_Status
•
• RTS
•
• RTS
• I-RTS
• Decision on Application
• RT_Status_OK
•
•
•
• RTS
• I-RTS
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• Fingerprint_Image
• Fingerprint_Template
• Face_Image
• I-RTS
• Traveller
• Fingerprint
scanner
• Camera
• Pax_Details
• Travel_Credential_Details
• Fingerprints
• Pax_Details
• Travel_Credential_Details
• Entry_Data_Record
• Check NBCS
• RT_Data_Record
• I-NBCS
• NBCS
•
B
Face9
Fingerprint_Image
Fingerprint_Template
Fingerprint_Quality_Status
*_RT_Status
Travel_Credential_Details
Fingerprint_Image
Fingerprint_Template
• Scan
ƒ NBCS interrogates various databases (EES, SIS and national databases, possibly in parallel) to
o confirm document validity
o validate the travellers’ identity
o help assess her entry eligibility
ƒ Specifically, EES returns Traveller’s history of previous stays and dispatches the result to the NBCS
ƒ NBCS returns any relevant information found to RTS
7 Please note that the enrolment would most likely take place using a direct interface to the RTS, though also this structure could/would be used in
some MS depending on the national implementation.
8 The application processing procedure is described in the Draft proposal.
9 Optional feature
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 31/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
•
•
•
•
•
•
SIS
EES
Other Syt’s
Other Syt’s
NBCS
NBCS
C
•
•
•
•
•
•
I-SIS
I-EES
I-Others
I-Others
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
RT_Data_Record
RT_Data_Record
RT_Data_Record
RT_Data_Record
*_Entry_Status
RT_Data_Record
*_RT_Status
RT-Status_OK
Check Blacklist
Check EE History
Check Blacklist
Check
Assessment & Clearance
Write
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
SIS_RT_Status
RT_Entry_Status
RT_Entry_Status
RT_Entry_Status
RT_Status_OK
NBCS_Assessment_Data
*_RT_Status
•
•
•
•
•
•
I-NBCS
I-NBCS
I-NBCS
I-NBCS
Display
I-RTS
•
•
•
•
•
•
NBCS
NBCS
NBCS
NBCS
NBCS
RTS
•
•
•
•
•
•
ƒ RTS creates a RT record, inclusive of biographic and biometric data gathered earlier in the process
Source
Interface
• RTS
•
• NBCS
•
Input Data
•
•
•
•
Process
RT_Data_Record
NBCS_Assessment_Data
*_RT_Status
*_Temporary_Data
Output Data
Interface
Storage
Hyperlinks
• Write
• RT_Data_Record
•
• RTS
•
• Delete
•
•
•
•
If RT holds a valid entry visa, the following event applies.
D
ƒ Border/Enrolment Officer additionally gathers information from the visa sticker and inserts it in the RTS
ƒ Border/Enrolment Officer additionally interrogates VIS to validate the traveller’s identity and visa to help assess eligibility to entry
Source
• TCN Visa
• VIS
Interface
• Visa Reader
• I-VIS
Input Data
• Visa_Data
• Visa_Data
Process
• Scan
• Check Visa Validity
Output Data
• Visa_Data
• Visa_Validity_OK
Interface
• I-NBCS
• I-NBCS
Storage
• NBCS
• NBCS
Hyperlinks
•
•
In the case RT is not granted RT status, the following event applies.
E
ƒ Border/Enrolment Officer enters refusal of RT status in the RTS
Source
•
Interface
•
Input Data
• Refuse_Enrolment
Process
• Write
Output Data
•
Interface
• Interactive
Storage
• RTS
Hyperlinks
•
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 32/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
4.6
Data Dictionary
Data Item
Description
Format
*_Entry_Status
All flags associated to an Entry
event
Array
*_Exit_Status
All flags associated to an Exit
event
Array
*_RT_Status
All flags associated to an RT
event
Array
*_Temporary_Data
All temporary data used by
systems
Data set
BCP
Border Crossing (Control) Point
data record
Data field
Date&Time_Stamp
Date and Time of event
Date_Time field
Decision_on_Entry_OK
Flag
Digit
Decision_on_Exit_OK
Flag
Digit
EE_Data_Record
Data associated to EE event
Data set
EE_Entry_Status
Flag
Digit
EE_Exit_Status
Flag
Digit
EGate_Instructions_to_Traveller
Operating instructions for
traveller
Multi-media content
Entry_Data_Record
Data associated to Entry event
Data set
Entry_Status_OK
Flag
Digit
Exit_Data_Record
Data associated to Exit event
Data set
Exit_Status_OK
Flag
Digit
Face
Data associated to biometric
capture event
Data set
Face_Image
Result of face capture
JPEG
Fingerprint_Image
Result of fingerprint capture
WSQ
Fingerprint_Quality_Status
Flag
Digit
Fingerprint_Template
Result from fingerprint capture,
elaborated
Proprietary file
Fingerprints
Data associated to biometric
capture event
Data set
MRZ
Machine-readable zone of
passport or ID
Data set
MRZ_Validity_Status_OK
Flag
Digit
NBCS_Assessment_Data
Flag
Digit
NBCS_Entry_Status
Flag
Digit
NBCS_Exit_Status
Flag
Digit
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 33/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
Data Item
Description
Format
Other_Sys_Entry_Status
Flag
Digit
Other_Sys_Exit_Status
Flag
Digit
Pax_Details
All biographical data describing
traveller
Data set
Procedural_Q&A
Questions to traveller, Answers
given by traveller
Data set
Refuse_Enrolment
Flag
Data set
Refuse_Entry
Flag
Data set
RT_Data_Record
Data associated the traveller
when registered
Data set
RT_Entry_Status
Flag
Digit
RT_Status_OK
Flag
Digit
RT_Sys_Entry_Status
Flag
Digit
RTS_Instructions_to_Traveller
Operating instructions for
traveller
Multi-media content
SIS_Entry_Status
Flag
Digit
SIS_Exit_Status
Flag
Digit
SIS_RT_Status
Flag
Digit
Travel_Credential_Details
Data associated to traveller’s
credentials
Data set
Visa_Data
Data associated to traveller’s
visa
Data set
Visa_Validity_OK
Flag
Digit
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 34/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
4.7
Table of Interfaces
Interface
Connects ...
With
Camera
Traveller
ƒ RTS
Fingerprint Scanner
Traveller
I-EES
EES
ƒ NBCS
ƒ RTS
ƒ NBCS
I-NBCS
NBCS
I-NPS
NPS
I-RTS
RTS
I-SIS
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
NBCS
RTS
SIS
EES
NPS
VIS
Other Systems
Border Officer
NBCS
SIS II
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Traveller
Border/Enrolment Officer
NBCS
NBCS
I-VIS
VIS
ƒ NBCS
Travel Credential
Reader
Travel Credential
ƒ NBCS
I-Others
Other Systems
ƒ NBCS
Video Screen
Traveller
ƒ NBCS
ƒ RTS
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 35/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
5
ASSUMPTIONS FOR SYSTEM AND COST MODELS
5.1
General Assumptions
In order to be able to properly size the infrastructure components and to be able to estimate their
cost, the following assumptions hold.
ID
Assumption
Remark
1
ƒ Every border crossing is assumed to
pertain to a new traveller, so that a
complete EES record is captured and
stored. This allows for scaling in the
future.
2
ƒ To estimate the network and system
load, we assume that there are 20
business hours per day, 365 days per
year. This caters for extra capacity at
peak time and for system maintenance.
3
ƒ The amount of data handled by the EES
is calculated based on the draft legal
proposal (art. 11, 12, 13 and 14)
ƒ Based on [R14], which specifies
the record contents.
4
ƒ The number of fingerprint searches
(identification mode) on all biometric
data requires definition.
ƒ This parameter has a huge
impact on the size of the AFIS
and therefore on its costs,
which are exponentially
dependent on both the number
of travellers and the data
retention time.
ƒ We have assumed this parameter to be
500.000 searches in year 1 up to
2.000.000 searches at the end of the
period of time considered.
ƒ This is a sensitive parameter in
the cost estimation model.
5
ƒ The number of facial searches
(identification mode) on all biometric
data requires definition.
ƒ We have assumed this parameter to be
500.000 searches in year 1 up to
2.000.000 searches at the end of the
period of time considered.
6
ƒ This parameter has a huge
impact on the size on the Facial
Matching Engine (FME) and
therefore on its costs, which are
exponentially dependent on
both the number of travellers
and the data retention time.
ƒ This is an optional system feature.
ƒ This is a sensitive parameter in
the cost estimation model.
ƒ The response time for biometric
(fingerprint and/or face) verification shall
be less than 3 seconds (similar to VIS)
ƒ This parameter is used to
calculate the number of
verification-matching CPUs as
per Queuing Theory.
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 36/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
7
ƒ The response time for fingerprint
searches (identification mode) shall be
less than 15 minutes
ƒ This parameter is used to
calculate the number of
identification-matching CPUs as
per Queuing Theory.
8
ƒ The response time for facial searches
(identification mode) shall be less than
15 minutes.
ƒ This parameter is used to
calculate the number of
identification-matching CPUs as
per Queuing Theory.
ƒ This is an optional system feature.
5.2
Anticipated System Load
Table 5 specifies the parameters for the system load and the data which is captured during the
process.
The anticipated Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) is 10%. Actually, figures from the
Commission highlight a value around 7%. In this case, we take a safe margin in assessing
systems capacity and size.
Table 5: EES Anticipated System load
EES Parameter
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Border Crossings
TCNVH Crossings
IN
TCVNE Crossings
IN
Total Crossings IN
(million)
67
74
81
89
98
108
119
131
(million)
100
110
121
133
146
161
177
195
(million)
167
184
202
222
245
269
296
325
TCVNH Crossings
OUT
TCVNE Crossings
OUT
Total Crossings
OUT
Total Crossings
(million)
67
74
81
89
98
108
119
131
(million)
100
110
121
133
146
161
177
195
(million)
167
184
202
222
245
269
Percentage of
Photos captured at
BCP
Percentage of new
travellers
325
(million)
334
367
404
445
489
538
296
592
(%)
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
(%)
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
651
Table 6 shows the parameters that drive the costs for the RTS, when applicable.
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 37/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
Table 6: RTS Anticipated System load
RTS Parameter
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Yearly Registrations
(million)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
RT IN
(million)
30
60
90
120
150
150
150
150
RT OUT
(million)
30
60
90
120
150
150
150
150
Applications Consular
Posts
Applications at
external BCP
BCP Enrolments
(million)
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
(%)
2.3
45%
2.3
45%
2.3
45%
2.3
45%
2.3
45%
2.3
45%
2.3
45%
2.3
45%
(%)
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
(n)
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Percentage of
revocations/extensions
Average number or RT
travels per yr
(million)
The actual distribution of RTS enrolments over the Border Control Points (BCP) and Consular Posts
of the Member States is an option in the applicable scenarios.
5.3
System Model Parameters and Assumptions
Table 7: Business parameters
Business Parameter
First year
Value
Unit
Description
2013
EES Initial TCNVH IN
67
million
The first year in the analysis. By changing this, the project
can be moved in time by full years
The number of TCNVH travellers as specified by COM
EES Initial TCNVH OUT
67
million
The number of TCNVH travellers as specified by COM
EES Initial TCNVE IN
100
million
The number of TCNVE travellers as specified by COM
EES Initial TCNVE OUT
100
million
The number of TCNVE travellers as specified by COM
5
million
The initial number of RTS members in the first year as
specified by COM
The rate at which the number of enrolees of RTS grows
CAGR
Initial nr of RT registrations
RT enrolment growth rate
Yearly growth rate EES
Passengers
Percentage FP Searches
0%
Initial annual FP Searches
0,50
million
Initial annual Facial Searches
0,50
million
Annual growth Fingerprint
searches
10%
Annual growth Facial
searches
Verification response time
10%
1,00
seconds
The growth of the number of travellers that are handled
by the EES per year
The number of TCN per million travellers that are
biometrically (fingerprint) searched against the database
The number of TCN per million travellers that are
biometrically (face) searched against the database
The fixed number of TCN that are biometrically
(fingerprint) searched against the database in the first
year
The fixed number of TCN that are biometrically (face)
searched against the database in the first year
The annual growth of the fixed number of fingerprint
searches (only applicable in case of fixed number based
calculation)
The annual growth of the fixed number of facial searches
(only applicable in case of fixed number based calculation)
Biometric verification response time, specified by COM
Biometric search response
time
Exact text search response
time
2,00
hours
Biometric search response time, specified by COM
3,00
seconds
Exact text search response time, specified by COM
Percentage Facial Searches
10%
0
1/million
0
1/million
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 38/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
Business Parameter
Value
Number of overstayers
3,5
Overstayers annual growth
5%
Investigated overstayers
Business days per year
Unit
Description
million
Expected number of overstayers that may need
investigations by means of biometric searches. Provided
by COM
Expected annual growth of the expected number of
overstayers. Provided by COM
Percentage of overstayers that are actually biometrically
searched in the database
100%
365
days
Business hours per day
20
hours
Facial Matching
Yes
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections
preferred
TESTA 1 Gbps connections
preferred
Yes
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps
Interconnect
Yes
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
No
4
Logical, when Yes, facial matching capabilities are
included
Logical, when Yes, fingerprint matching capabilities are
included
When Yes, 100Mbps TESTA connections are preferred way
to interface with TESTA
When Yes, 1Gbps TESTA connections are preferred way to
interface with TESTA, depends on the availability of 1Gbps
lines
When Yes, 100Mbps VIS/BMS connections are preferred
way to interface with VIS/BMS. Only applicable in case of
independent housing
When Yes, 1Gbps VIS/BMS connections are preferred way
to interface with VIS/BMS. Only applicable in case of
independent housing
The rate at which RTS members whose membership has
expired, will re-enrol after the expiry date (not
implemented yet)
The lifetime of the RT membership, after which the
membership data is removed (not implemented yet)
The number of fingerprint images captured for EES. These
are flat prints.
The number of fingerprint images captured for RTS. These
are flat prints.
The average size of fingerprint images compressed using
WSQ with a ratio of 1:15. Actual size varies (12-20k)
The size of a fingerprint template. This may differ from
vendor to vendor, this size is sufficient for the major
algorithms
The average size of fingerprint images compressed using
JPEG or JPEG-2000
The peak factor to determine the peak load
300
The number of incidents per month that require helpdesk
50%
min
The speed at which the number of incidents decreases per
month
The time required for the helpdesk to find a work-around
for the incident
per year
Unit
Description
year
Is included in the calculation of the costs associated to
hardware
Intended to automatically calculate hardware
replacements. This is not used yet
To calculate energy costs
No
RT Renewal rate
50%
RT Validity time
5
Number of Fingerprints for
EES
Number of Fingerprints for
RTS
Average Fingerprint image
size (WSQ)
Average Fingerprint template
size
4
Average photo image size
Peak Load factor
Initial number of incidents
per month
Incident decrease
percentage per year
Average helpdesk repair
time
Project Meeting Frequency
years
10
15.360
bytes
2.048
bytes
15.360
bytes
60
4
Table 8: Cost Parameters
Cost Parameter Name
Average installation cost rate
Technical Lifecycle
Power costs per kwh
Net-Gross HW space factor
Office space per workstation
Value
10%
10
€ 0,06
6
10
m2
To calculate the required datacentre floor space based on
calculated equipment space
to calculate the required amount of office space for staff
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 39/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
Cost Parameter Name
Value
Number of servers per FTE
100
Max. nr of technical support
staff
Number of databases per
DBA
Cost per year per m2
(datacentre), co-located
Cost per year per m2
(datacentre), independently
located
One-of costs per m2 for colocation
25
3
€ 500
€ 600
€ 300
Unit
Description
The span of control for system engineers
The span of control for DBA's
Estimation of the cost per sqr metre for datacentre space,
when co-located with VIS
Estimation of the cost per sqr metre for datacentre space,
when located independently from VIS
€ 74
Estimation of costs required to acquire the required
datacentre space when co-located with VIS (establishing
the room, airco, power, network etc)
Estimation of costs required to acquire the required
datacentre space when independently located from VIS
(establishing the room, airco, power, network etc)
Estimation of the cost per sqr metre for office space at the
Management Authority
Estimation of the one-off cost per sqr metre to setup the
office space at the Management Authority
The industry average standard for Hardware maintenance
fees (replacement, repair)
The industry average standard for Software maintenance
fees (replacement, repair)
Provided by COM
€ 26
Provided by COM
7,5
Provided by COM
20
Provided by COM
Working days per year
220
Provided by COM
Working hours per year
1650
One-of costs per m2 for
independent-location
€ 700
Cost per year per m2
(office), MA
One-off cost per year per m2
(office), MA
Hardware Yearly
maintenance costs
Software Yearly Maintenance
costs
Hourly rate for Management
Authority staff
Average hourly rate for EU27 and Schengen associated
country staff
Working hours per day
€ 500
Working days per month
Span of control Team/leader
€ 900
8%
20%
5
Admin support
20%
Contractor Average rate
€ 85
Yearly development effort
10%
Training percentage
10%
Price per Gbyte TESTA
Communication costs per
month
MS average technical space
costs
MS average one-off space
costs
Average costs per Monthly
progress meeting
Average costs per Quarterly
meeting
€€ 2.100
€ 350
€ 500
Calculated from the above
Determines the number of team Leaders
The percentage of admin support FTE related to the
operational staff
The industry average standard for developer fees
(average hourly rate)
Effort to continue developments on the custom software
(pro-active maintenance, new/changing functionality, etc)
The amount of training effort to be invested, related to
the maintenance
Estimate of the data transmission costs over TESTA. To be
provided by COM
As per quote Orange via COM
The average price per square meter per year in the
Member States for technical space to accommodate data
centres, border control gates and enrolment systems
Estimation of costs required to acquire the required space
for the Member States (establishing the room, airco,
power, network etc). This includes space for data centres,
border control gates and enrolment systems
€ 30.000
€ 50.000
Operational Cost
parameters
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 40/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
Cost Parameter Name
Value
24*7 Helpdesk support
factor
4
MA Development effort
11%
MS Development effort
12%
Automated Border Control
officers per gate
Semi Automated BC officers
2,73
Manual BC officers per
million travellers per gate
BC Officer control automated
BC Officer control - semiautomated
BC Officer control - Manual
7,68
5
10
Unit
Description
The factor used to calculate the required FTE for the
helpdesk relative to the size of the helpdesk FTEs for
office hours
The percentage f the time spent by the MA, relative to the
contractor effort
The percentage f the time spent by the MA, relative to the
contractor effort
officers per million travellers per year records (from
feasibility study)
Between manual and automated
from feasibility study, pg 208
BC Officer span of control for automated gates
3
BC Officer span of control for semi-automated gates
1
BC Officer span of control for manual gates
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 41/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE
6
Two main architectural alternatives are considered in the following – namely, a centralised
systems design where all peripheral connections rely on a common hub and a de-centralised
system where a network of national sub-systems is built to co-operate in a peer-to-peer, manyto-many mode.
Each solution may present advantages and shortcomings, depending upon the technical, cost and
political (e.g., ownership) choices. In this chapter we present these alternatives from a technical
viewpoint only, while the following chapter will provide insight on the various cost scenarios
associated to these architectures.
6.1
Centralised System Architecture
The high-level system architecture for the Centralised solution is presented in Figure 7. This
shows all components of the solution, regardless of the various scenarios.
The goal of the picture is to define and identify all sub-systems that take part in the solution. This
picture is fully based on [R6] (CA-B38-FR-004) and [R1]
(20091110_EES_RT_IA_Cost_ToR_lang.doc).
Figure 7: Centralised System Architecture
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 42/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
Only the parts marked in red on the figure below fall within the scope of this cost analysis;
namely:
•
Entry-Exit System Central Unit (EES-CU)
•
Registered Traveller System Central Unit (RTS-CU)
•
BMS Central Unit Expansion
•
Entry-Exit System Backup Central Unit (EES-BCU)
•
Registered Traveller System Backup Central Unit (RTS-BCU)
•
BMS Backup Central Unit Expansion
•
RTS Enrolment System @ Consular Post
•
RTS Enrolment System @ Border Control Point (BCP)
•
Manual/Assisted Border Control System
•
(semi-)Automated Border Control System
The blue parts highlight relevant existing central systems that need to be integrated with the EES
and RTS, depending on the option. These are:
•
Visa Information System Central Unit (VIS-CU)
•
Biometric Matching System Central Unit (BMS-CU)
•
Visa Information System Backup Central Unit (VIS-BCU)
•
Biometric Matching System Backup Central Unit (BMS-BCU)
The grey components represent national (Member State) components that must be integrated
with the EES and RTS in order to deploy the functionality. For most Member States, these are:
•
National Border Control System (NBCS)
•
National Information Systems (NIS)
•
National Visa Information System (N-VIS)
Albeit complete, this view is not sufficient to provide an estimate of infrastructure costs. For this
reason a high-level technical design was developed, enabling the identification of all required
infrastructure components and their sizing, thus allowing an estimate of the associated costs.
The technical architecture of the Centralised system covers also national components that are to
be implemented in the Member States, besides the strictly central system. These are described in
sections 6.1.1 and 6.1.2 respectively.
6.1.1
Member State Technical Infrastructure
Figure 8 shows the Member State technical architecture for the Centralised solution, identifying by
means of circular marks N1 the elements whose costs need being estimated.
The national technical architecture will need to be implemented in all Member States, the major
differences among Member States – from the perspective of this study – being represented by
•
the size of the country as relates to number of end users and connections required
•
the number of border crossing points
•
The number of travellers.
Infrastructure costs per Member State are assumed to be proportional to the actual number of
Border Crossing Points (BCP) and Consular Posts (CP).
For labour-related cost estimates, average hourly rates were used, as provided by COM.
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 43/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
Systems that fall within the scope of this study show a tag associated with them, while their base
colour is red (or dark grey when printed in black/white).
The tagged systems represent the building blocks used to estimate system costs, and are briefly
described in Table 9 below.
Figure 8: Member State Technical Architecture
Table 9: Member State Technical Architecture Building Blocks10
ID
Building Block name
Description
Remarks
N1
National RTS
ƒ The local system for
managing the RTS
applications and tokens at
national level.
ƒ Basically contains a copy
of the lists of existing
enrolees to avoid
duplicate tokens being
issued
N2
National EES
ƒ The local system that
manages entry/exit
records for the Member
State.
N3
Consular Post RTS
Enrolment System
ƒ The enrolment system to
capture RT applicant
details at one Member
State’s consular posts
N4
NI.RTS
ƒ The National Interface to
ƒ It should be possible to
re-use enrolment
equipment already in use
for Visa and e-Passports
10 All possible elements are included in the picture, irrelevant of applicable options. An actual implementation
scenario might not include some components, e.g., printers for token production.
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 44/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
the Central RTS.
N5
NI.EES
ƒ The National Interface to
the Central EES.
N6
BCP RTS Enrolment
system
ƒ The enrolment system for
registration of RTS
member at the Border
Control Points
N7
Automated Border
Control System
ƒ Automated Border Control
system that supports RTS
tokens and e-Passports.
The process is automated
and assumes supervision
of the Border Control
Authorities, who can
intervene when deemed
necessary.
It should be possible to reuse enrolment equipment
already in use for Visa and
the same enrolment system
as in N3.
ƒ EES records are
automatically generated.
N8
Semi-manual Border
Control System
ƒ Semi-manual Border
Control system that
supports RTS tokens and
e-Passports, where the ID
verification based on RTS
tokens and e-Passports is
automated and the Border
Control Authority
manually controls the
process.
ƒ EES records are
automatically generated.
N9
Manual/Assisted
ƒ Manual Border Control
system that supports RTS
tokens and e-Passports,
where the ID verification
based on RTS tokens and
e-Passports is performed
manually and the Border
Control Authority
manually controls the
process.
-
ƒ EES records are manually
entered into the system
N10
National EES-RTS
Database Server
ƒ National Database Server
that manages a copy of
the relevant data of the
central EES and RTS
systems
-
N11
National Storage
ƒ The actual storage device
that physically stores the
data.
-
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 45/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
6.1.2
Central Technical Infrastructure
Figure 9 depicts the technical architecture for the Central Unit (CU) of the EES and RTS systems
for the Centralised solution, identifying by means of circular designators C1 the elements for which
costs need to be estimated.
The architecture assumes the existence of a Central National Interface (CNI) and a Central
System (CS). A layered network architecture is considered in order to provide the required levels
of security, commanding the deployment of firewalls.
The CU has a backup facility (Backup Central Unit, BCU) that makes the overall system redundant
for disaster recovery purposes. This BCU is essentially a copy of the CU, and it is therefore not
explicitly shown.
Note that CU-BCU interconnect is necessary to allow for data replication between the CU and BCU
and to enable the switch-over from CU to BCU and switch-back from BCU to CU when needed.
The systems that are in the scope of this study have a tag associated with them. They are
grouped together in architectural entities indicated by the yellow boxes:
•
Central National Interface (CNI)
•
Central System (CS)
•
Biometric Matcher
•
RTS Token Management System.
When possible, components are put together to form a composite building block featuring more
than one function. These composite building blocks are marked by means of a grey rectangle.
Systems thus tagged constitute the building blocks used for cost estimate purposes and briefly
described in Table 4 below.
Please note that not all elements are necessarily applied, as their use depends on the choices
made at configuration level. They are reported here for the sake of completeness.
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 46/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
Figure 9: Central Technical Architecture
Table 10: Central Infrastructure Building Blocks
ID
Building Block
Description
C1
TESTA Interface
ƒ This is the physical interface
to the TESTA network,
consisting of firewall and WAN
access routers.
C2
Web Server
ƒ These web servers convey EES
and RTS services to the
Member States.
C3
RTS Token
Directory
ƒ This is the server that
provides token revocation lists
to Member States.
ƒ The RTS Token Directory is
provisioned by the RTS Token
Management System.
C4
CU/BCU Cluster
ƒ The high-speed connection
Remarks
ƒ It is assumed that this
directory is copied daily
by Member States so
that they can perform
revocation checks
independently from the
Central RTS system.
ƒ Fail-over and fail-back
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 47/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
Interconnect
C5
Supporting
Servers
between the CU and BCU that
is sized to support replication
of the EES and RTS databases
and provides the cluster
interconnect.
must be fast.
ƒ These are the supporting
servers required to run the
CU/BCU and being able to
maintain them.
ƒ They consist of Message-,
DNS-, DHCP-, Management-,
Backup-, and directory
servers.
C6
Database Server
ƒ This database server will run
the RDBMS that will support
the databases for the EES,
RTS and biometric systems, if
applicable.
ƒ Sizing depends on data
size and retention time
ƒ Data is physically stored in the
appropriate SAN components.
C7
Logging Server
ƒ The logging server takes care
of logging all transactions for
system auditing.
C8
RTS Application
Server
ƒ This is the server that runs
the RTS Central Application.
C9
EES Application
Server
ƒ This is the server that runs
the EES Central Application.
C10
Biometric
Storage
ƒ This is the SAN server that
stores all biometric data for
EES and RTS if applicable.
ƒ This storage is kept separate
from the other data to
optimise protection of
personal data.
C11
RTS Storage
ƒ This is the SAN server that
physically stores the RTS
database.
C12
EES Storage
ƒ This is the SAN server that
physically stores the EES
database.
C13
Backup &
Archive
ƒ This Backup & Archive is the
facility that takes care of
backing up and archiving the
EES and RTS data according to
the policies.
ƒ Independent from the
Database Server to limit
the impact on the EES
and RTS performance.
ƒ Options:
-
EES only
-
EES / RTS
-
EES only, TCNVH in
VIS
-
EES / RTS, TCNVH
in VIS
-
Retention time (1
yr, 5 yr, variable)
ƒ ‘Member’ information
ƒ Options:
-
Token-based
-
Token-less
-
Retention time (1
yr, 5 yr, variable)
ƒ Backup facility
ƒ Variants:
-
EES only
-
EES/RTS, with
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 48/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
biometrics
C14
FP Matcher
ƒ The fingerprint matcher facility
that can do 1:n fingerprint
identifications searches and
1:1 verification comparisons
to support EES and RTS
functionality.
ƒ This building block can be
regarded as either a standalone system, or as an
expansion of the BMS.
C15
Facial Matcher
ƒ The facial matcher facility that
can do facial 1:n identification
searches and 1:1 verification
comparisons to support EES
and RTS functionality.
EES/RTS, no
biometrics
ƒ Includes 1:1 and 1:n
matching.
ƒ Options:
-
EES FP Matcher
-
BMS FP Matcher
Expansion
-
RTS FP Matcher
-
Based on
templates only
-
Based on images
(optional)
ƒ Optional, includes both
-
1:1 matching
-
1:n matching
ƒ This building block can be
regarded as either a standalone system, or as an
expansion to the BMS.
C16
C17
6.2
RTS Token
Management
System
ƒ The RTS token management
system manages the lifecycle
of RTS tokens or virtual
tokens.
VIS/BMS
Interconnect
ƒ The VIS/BMS interconnect
provides the network
connection over the internal
LAN to the VIS and BMS
systems.
ƒ Variants:
-
Token based
-
Token-less
Distributed System Architecture
Essentially the distributed architecture means that when a Member State looks for information,
they would have to send a request to all other Member States. Consequently, Member States also
receive requests every time a MS searches information on a TCN crossing external borders. This is
why it can also be referred to as collaboration architecture, represented graphically Figure 10
below.
For the Data Storage, it is assumed that no tape backup devices will be used, but instead modern
archiving technology. The latter is based on high available disk arrays, where data will be archived
to cheaper, lower speed disks, and it then becomes near-line storage. The advantage is that the
data will be always on-line, no hassle with tapes. The storage systems will need to be configured
properly to assure that the data is secure.
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 49/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
Figure 10: Collaboration architecture
The high-level system architecture for the Centralised solution is presented in Figure 11.
Internal LAN
Internal LAN
This shows all components of the solution, regardless of the various scenarios.
Figure 11: Base distributed system architecture
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 50/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
Figure 12: Central RTS system in distributed architecture
presents the central part in the EES-RTS distributed architecture:
Figure 12: Central RTS system in distributed architecture
The architecture for the central system in the distributed architecture is basically the same as for
the central architecture, the difference is that is does not provide EES systems and storage. This
means that the size is smaller and the costs will be lower.
Table 11: Central System Building Blocks
ID
Building Block
Description
C1
TESTA Interface
ƒ This is the physical interface
to the TESTA network,
consisting of firewall and WAN
access routers.
C2
Web Server
ƒ These web servers convey RTS
services to the Member
States.
Remarks
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 51/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
C3
RTS Token
Directory
ƒ This is the server that
provides token revocation lists
to Member States.
ƒ The RTS Token Directory is
provisioned by the RTS Token
Management System.
C4
CU/BCU Cluster
Interconnect
ƒ The high-speed connection
between the CU and BCU that
is sized to support replication
of the RTS databases and
provides the cluster
interconnect.
C5
Supporting
Servers
ƒ These are the supporting
servers required to run the
CU/BCU and being able to
maintain them.
ƒ It is assumed that this
directory is copied daily
by Member States so
that they can perform
revocation checks
independently from the
Central RTS system.
ƒ Fail-over and fail-back
must be fast.
ƒ They consist of Message-,
DNS-, DHCP-, Management-,
Backup-, and directory
servers.
C6
Database Server
ƒ This database server will run
the RDBMS that will support
the databases for the RTS and
biometric systems, if
applicable.
ƒ Sizing depends on data
size and retention time
ƒ Data is physically stored in the
appropriate SAN components.
C7
Logging Server
ƒ The logging server takes care
of logging all transactions for
system auditing.
C8
RTS Application
Server
ƒ This is the server that runs
the RTS Central Application.
C10
Biometric
Storage
ƒ This is the SAN server that
stores all biometric data for
RTS if applicable.
ƒ This storage is kept separate
from the other data to
optimise protection of
personal data.
C11
C13
RTS Storage
Backup &
Archive
ƒ This is the SAN server that
physically stores the RTS
database.
ƒ This Backup & Archive is the
facility that takes care of
backing up and archiving the
RTS data according to the
policies.
ƒ Independent from the
Database Server to limit
the impact on the RTS
performance.
ƒ Options:
-
RTS
-
Retention time (1
yr, 5 yr, variable)
ƒ ‘Member’ information
ƒ Options:
-
Token-based
-
Token-less
-
Retention time (1
yr, 5 yr, variable)
ƒ Backup facility
ƒ Variants:
-
Token-less RTS
-
Token-based RTS
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 52/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
C14
FP Matcher
ƒ The fingerprint matcher facility
that can do 1:n fingerprint
identifications searches and
1:1 verification comparisons
to support RTS functionality.
ƒ This building block can be
regarded as either a standalone system, or as an
expansion of the BMS.
C15
Facial Matcher
ƒ The facial matcher facility that
can do facial 1:n identification
searches and 1:1 verification
comparisons to support RTS
functionality.
ƒ Includes 1:1 and 1:n
matching.
ƒ Options:
-
BMS FP Matcher
Expansion
-
RTS FP Matcher
-
Based on
templates only
ƒ Optional, includes both
-
1:1 matching
-
1:n matching
ƒ This building block can be
regarded as either a standalone system, or as an
expansion to the BMS.
C16
C17
6.2.1
RTS Token
Management
System
ƒ The RTS token management
system manages the lifecycle
of RTS tokens or virtual
tokens.
VIS/BMS
Interconnect
ƒ The VIS/BMS interconnect
provides the network
connection over the internal
LAN to the VIS and BMS
systems.
ƒ Variants:
-
Token based
-
Token-less
Member State Distributed Technical Architecture
The figure below presents the Member State distributed architecture for the distributed
architecture solution.
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 53/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
Figure 13: Member State distributed architecture
Distributed architecture building blocks are listed in the table below:
Table 12: Distributed architecture building blocks
ID
Building Block
Description
Remarks
N1
National RTS
ƒ The local system for managing
the RTS applications and
tokens at national level
Basically contains a copy
of the lists of existing
enrolees to avoid duplicate
tokens being issued
N2
National EES
ƒ The local system that
manages entry/exit records
for the Member State.
It provides the same
functionality as the Central
EES, but is smaller in size,
while it is more complex
on the other side, as it
interfaces with all other
MS’ National EESs
N3
Consular post
RTS – Enrolment
system
ƒ The enrolment system to
capture RT applicant details at
one Member State’s consular
posts
ƒ It should be possible to
re-use enrolment
equipment already in use
for Visa and e-Passports
N4
NI.RTS
ƒ The National Interface to the
Central RTS.
N5
NI.EES
ƒ The National Interface to the
EES systems of other Member
States, This forms the secure
collaboration and
communication infrastructure.
N6
BCP RTS
Enrolment
system
ƒ The enrolment system for
registration of RTS member at
the Border Control Points
This interface relies on the
capacity and security of
the (TESTA) network.
It should be possible to
re-use enrolment
equipment already in use
for Visa
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 54/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
N7
Automated
Border Control
system
ƒ Automated Border Control
system that supports RTS
tokens and e-Passports. The
process is automated and
assumes supervision of the
Border Control Authorities,
who can intervene when
deemed necessary.
ƒ EES records are automatically
generated.
N8
Semi-manual
Border Control
system
ƒ Semi-manual Border Control
system that supports RTS
tokens and e-Passports, where
the ID verification based on
RTS tokens and e-Passports is
automated and the Border
Control Authority manually
controls the process.
ƒ EES records are automatically
generated.
N9
Manual/ Assisted
Border control
system
ƒ Manual Border Control system
that supports RTS tokens and
e-Passports, where the ID
verification based on RTS
tokens and e-Passports is
performed manually and the
Border Control Authority
manually controls the process.
ƒ EES records are manually
entered into the system
N10
Database server
ƒ This database server will run
the RDBMS that will support
the databases for the EES,
RTS and biometric systems, if
applicable.
-
Sizing depends on
the number of TCN
travellers that
travel via a specific
country, the data
size and the
retention time
-
This storage
includes Backup
and Archiving
functionality.
ƒ Data is physically stored in the
appropriate SAN components.
N11
EES/RTS
Storage
ƒ The physical data storage,
which holds all data.
N12
Testa interface
ƒ This is the physical interface
to the TESTA network,
consisting of firewall and WAN
access routers.
N13
National
EES/RTS (Face
matcher)
ƒ The facial matcher facility that
can do facial 1:n identification
searches and 1:1 verification
comparisons to support EES
and RTS functionality.
ƒ Optional, includes both
-
1:1 matching
-
1:n matching
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 55/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
N14
National
EES/RTS AFIS
ƒ The fingerprint matcher facility
that can do 1:n fingerprint
identifications searches and
1:1 verification comparisons
to support EES and RTS
functionality.
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 56/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
COST ANALYSIS
7
This section provides the cost estimates for the different options that are looked at in the current
study (Table 3).
Due to the fact that the variables for each scenario are numerous (retention time, use of
biometrics, architecture, etc), after agreement with the Commission, this section only presents
the cost estimates for the following possible options:
o
Separate architecture co-located with VIS, but not connected to VIS
o
Architecture connected to VIS.
Note that the above cost estimations are presented for the option of 5 year retention time.
Using the model that has been developed in the framework of the current study it is possible to
estimate the costs of the scenarios for all other different parameters that are possible.
The following sections therefore include the 21 different costing scenarios (see Table 3). Each
section is structured in the same way in order to enable easier comparison between the costs of
the different scenarios and parameters. The structure used is the following:
•
Listing of scenario parameters
•
Cost estimates for:
7.1
o
Independent from VIS
o
With connection to VIS
How to use the Excel cost model
The tables in the report are generated using a cost calculation model based on Excel (2003).
7.1.1
Input
The model takes the input parameters from the file ‘Parameters.xls’ and configures the Building
Blocks that are required to implement the required functionality. This configuration is done in two
different Excel workbooks: ‘Scenario - EES Distributed Architecure.xls’ for the solution based on
the distributed architecture and ‘Scenario - EES Central Architecure.xls’. These workbooks create
the actual Bill Of Material (BOM) for the scenario in the sheets ‘BOM 1yr’, BOM 5yr’ and ‘BOM var’,
which are specific for the different retention times. In these sheets, the costs are assigned three
attributes: Phase, Cost Category and Allocation. The values of these attributes are described in
section 7.1.
7.1.2
Presentation
These attributes are used to present the costs in the ‘EU Cost model’, which was specified by
COM. If required, the detailed cost items in the BOM sheets are accessible and can be studied in
detail, the BOM provides the lowest level of cost items calculated by the cost model. It is possible
to create pivot tables using this information to create the required view. As the model calculates
the costs per calendar year, it is possible to retrieve information which is not shown on the ‘EU
Cost Model’. The exhaustive list of the building blocks / cost line items used in the BOM is
provided in Annex I – Cost Model Building Blocks.
In those cases that the BOM does not provide sufficient information, this can be found in the
underlying worksheets. Costs associated with hardware, software and infrastructure can be found
in:
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 57/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
•
Hardware Costs 1yr11 – specifies the hardware and network components
•
Hardware Costs 5yr12
•
Hardware Costs var13
•
Servers 1yr11 – specifies the number of servers, used to calculate license, such as OS,
DB, AFIS etc
•
Servers 5yr12
•
Servers var13
•
Power 1yr11 – specifies the power consumption per year
•
Power 5yr12
•
Power 5yr13
•
Space 1yr11 – specifies the net space required in the data centre
•
Space 5yr12
•
Space var13
•
Software Costs 1yr11 – specifies the software costs (COTS) per year
•
Software Costs 5yr12
•
Software Costs variable13
These sheets contain the detailed information per building block and also aggregations for the
Management Authority and the Member States.
Details about development costs and associated man-time can be found in the sheet:
•
Development Costs – specifies the development effort for realising the solution;
ƒ
Contractor development for MA,
ƒ
Management Authority development,
ƒ
Contractor development, for MS
ƒ
Member State development,
This includes training, testing and project management.
In the Development Cost sheet all estimated administrative efforts are specified per year and it
will show the amount of time and the associated costs. These costs of these detailed line items
are visible in the BOM. The man-time input is provided by CostXpert.
In these estimates, project management meetings for the development of the solution are
included. However, the quarterly meetings and monthly meetings with the Member States and the
Management Authority are added separately under the Administrative costs
The costs of all development costs items are visible in the BOM.
Details about the Administrative Costs are to be found in the sheet:
o
Admin Costs – specifies the admin man-time effort, required office space (m2), meetings,
infra costs, power, COTS HW/SW maintenance, Border Control Staffing, communication
costs
In this sheet all estimated administrative efforts are specified per year and it will show the
amount of time and the associated costs. These costs of these detailed line items are visible in the
BOM.
11 Denotes 1 year data retention time
12 Denotes 5 year data retention time
13 Denotes variable data retention time (5 year for personal data, 1 year for entry-exit data)
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 58/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
7.1.3
Sizing
The actual required sizing of the solution is calculated by the sizing workbooks ‘Scenario –
Distributed Sizing.xlsm’ and ‘Scenario – Sizing.xlsm’ for the Distributed and Centralised
architecture respectively.
These files take as input the configuration specific data provided by the Scenario worksheets, and
calculate the required capacity of the various building blocks. This is based on the Queuing
Theory, which allows us to estimate the number of servers and CPUs. Next to that the
specification of the data and the system load is used, not only for the CPU sizing, but also for the
network bandwidth.
7.1.4
Estimating costs using the Model
The Building Block files that specify the functionality, capacity, costs, power consumption,
necessary space and man-power are common for both the Distributed and Central architectures
and are located in a subdirectory of the Central Architecture. The calculation of manpower effort is
kept with the scenario worksheets, as explained above, since it contains the result of a calculation
done using CostXpert. The output is a file with the name ‘CX Labor xxx.xls’, where xxx denotes
the scenario name. This sheet provides both the required development effort for the scenario and
the estimated project schedule in months. The CostXpert input file contains all the parameters
used to create the project estimation, and it also contains the project schedule and the estimated
effort, specified per project role. The costs in CostXpert are based on US$, and that can not be
changed, the tool only supports US$. However, the pricing information is not used in the Cost
Model, only the man-time – effort is used and the rates as provided by COM are applied. The
labour Costs in CostXpert are irrelevant.
The Cost model implements an estimation of the number of incidents after delivery of the
solution, similar to CostXpert. Based on this input, it is possible to estimate the 1st and 2nd line
support.
The directory also contains a file provided by COM, which specifies the number of entries and exits
of travellers for the various countries in the EU. This information is used to calculate the
participation of the individual Member States, and is important for the sizing of the national
systems in both the Centralised and Distributed architectures.
To estimate the costs for a certain scenario, it is required to create a subdirectory within the
structure and to copy the above-mentioned files to a subdirectory within the structure (or use an
existing one) to open all the files simultaneously. The following actions should then be performed:
1)
The proper parameters should be entered in the ‘Parameters.xls’ workbook, including the
name of the scenario (sheets ‘Business Parameters’ and ‘Cost Parameters’);
2)
The worksheet ‘Scenario – (Distributed) Sizing.xls’ should be used to calculate the biometric
sizing by clicking the ‘Calculate!’ button at the top of the sheet ‘EES AFIS Sizing’ or ‘EES
Face Match Sizing’;
3)
Then, the configurator file ‘Scenario - EES Distributed/Central Architecure.xls’ should be
used in order to check that the output in the EU Cost Model represents the input. Especially
the title should be the same as the title in the Paramaters.xls file. Open this file and
calculate the contents of the ‘EU Cost Model’ by clicking the ‘Calculate’ button at the top of
the sheet ‘EU Cost Model’;
4)
Finally, the output generator sheet, called ‘XXX Document Output.xls’ needs to be updated.
These files are actually used to provide the information that is used in this document.
5)
It is recommended simultaneously to open the following files for each scenario
(subdirectory), make the changes as described above and save and close all files when
done; ‘Parameters.xls’, ‘Scenario – (Distributed) Sizing.xls’, ‘Scenario - EES
Distributed/Central Architecure.xls’ and ‘XXX Document Output.xls’. The other available files
(‘CX Labor.xls’ and ‘sammanstallning lander 091008.xls’) can also be opened, but these
typically do not change and thus this will have no effect.
Note that it is not possible to open files from different directories, as this will create incorrect links
between the various workbooks and the result will not be correct.
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 59/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
7.2
Cost analysis presentation
It is important at this point to briefly describe the way the cost estimates are presented in the
following sections. The costs are displayed in the form of tables displayed as shown in the table
below:
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
Scenario Code
VIS co-location / connection
5 year retention
Tariff
Time
Price
Price
Freq
(€ per hour)
(hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Nbr of
Entities
Total Yearly
Total Yearly Incurring
Total Number
Incurring costs
costs in 2020
of actions
in 2014
Type of Description
Obligatio of required Target Groups
action
n
No
7.2.1
Total one time costs
EU
MS
Cost elements
The cost elements estimated and displayed on the cost tables are listed below:
•
The number (No) is a unique identifier for the element / required action whose cost is being
estimated. This is the same across all scenarios.
•
Description of the Type of Obligation and its cost impact. More specifically, this describes what
obligations are mentioned in a legal proposal and their costs, such as administration costs and
operating the system, as well as monitoring.
•
The description of the required action includes the list of elements for which costs are being
estimated in the tables. It concerns costs for the Management Authority, costs for the Member
States and costs for the Border Check Points, as shown the table below.
•
Finally, target groups are other stakeholders for which the costs and required actions are
relevant, such as for example banks. However, other target groups are not involved at this stage
of the costing exercise.
Border Control Costs
In addition, to the above, the Cost table contains the costs for the various border check point
(BCP) systems; automated, semi-manual and manual.
Only that cost of the variant that is actually selected is shown. These costs contain the
hardware/software required to implement physical BCP systems in all Member States. The
quantity is based on the number of passengers and the number of BCP in the various countries.
The number is calculated based on Queuing Theory.
The costs for the Border Control Staff is also estimated, based on the number of passengers
crossing the border, applying the parameters provided by COM.
In the background, the costs for all types of BCP systems and associated staff is calculated based
on the same information and parameters,, in order to assess the impact of implementing one or
the other, comparing it with manual BCP systems. These costs are not shown, as they are no part
of the estimate. However, the details can be found in the underlying sheets.
The above listed cost elements are shown in detail in the table below:
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 60/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
Table 13: Cost elements
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Type of
Description of required action
Target Groups
Obligation
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
21
22
23
23
24
22
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Automated Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
The cost elements listed in the above table are calculated in an Excel sheet. The following attributes
have been used in order to group the cost elements and present the data consistently:
•
Project phase to which the cost parameters are relevant (e.g. DEV, OPE etc)
•
Operational phase identifier (e.g. hardware, software etc)
•
Allocation for Management Authority or Member States.
Table 14: Cost parameters
Cost Parameter Name
Value
Unit
Description
Development Cost Identifier
DEV
Operation Cost Identifier
OPE
Admin Cost Identifier
ADM
Value used to identify costs during development
phase
Value used to identify Operational costs during
operational phase
Value used to identify Administrative costs
Hardware Cost
HW
Value used to identify Hardware costs
Software Cost
SW
Value used to identify Software costs
Infra Cost Identifier
INF
Value used to identify Infrastructure costs
Contractor Cost Identifier
CONTR
Office Cost Identifier
OFFICE
Value used to identify Contractor costs (if
applicable)
Value used to reserved to identify Office Space
costs
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 61/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
Cost Parameter Name
Value
Border Check Systems
identifier
Border Check Systems
identifier
Border Check Systems
identifier
Border Check Systems
identifier
Border Officers Identifier
A-BORDER
B-OFFICER-A
Border Officers Identifier
B-OFFICER-S
Value used to identify Semi - Manual Border
Control costs (if applicable)
Border Officers Identifier
OTH
Border Officers Identifier
B-OFFICERM
Value used to identify Semi - Manual Border
Control costs (if applicable)
Value used to identify Semi - Manual Border
Control costs (if applicable)
Management Authority
MA
Value used to identify the Management Authority
Member States
MS
Value used to identify Member States
7.2.2
Unit
S-BORDER
M-BORDER
ENROL
Description
Value used to reserved to identify Automated
Border Control costs
Value used to identify Semi - Automated Border
Control costs (if applicable)
Value used to identify Semi - Manual Border
Control costs (if applicable)
Value used to identify Semi - Manual Border
Control costs (if applicable)
Value used to identify Semi - Manual Border
Control costs (if applicable)
Costs
The following figure presents the different costs / other values that are being estimated for each
of the elements described above.
Tariff
Time
(€ per hour) (hour)
Price
Price
Freq
(per action or
equip)
in 2014
(per action or
equip)
in 2020
Nbr of
Entities
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
Total one time costs
•
Tariff (€ per hour) and time per hour are used in order to calculate manpower costs.
For example, the costs of trainings and meetings in Member States and Management
Authority, tariff (€ per hour) and time per hour are calculated.
•
Price per action or equipment in 2014 estimates the annual cost of all cost
elements in 2014.
•
Similarly, the price per action or equipment in 2020 provides the estimated annual
cost for 2020. The cost estimates for the two years enables the reader to understand
how the cost develops within the period between 2014 and 2020.
•
The following 3 values are multipliers taken into account for the estimation of the total
incurring costs.
o
Frequency per year presents the value of how the costs develop.
o
Number of entities is relevant for infrastructure, hardware and software
costs. For example, the number of entities for the development costs is 2 due
to the fact that there is a development for CU and BCU.
Note that Member States are considered as a whole. This is why the number of
entities is 1 and not 27.
o
•
Total number of actions is always 1 as the Cost Model assumes that the
costs instance occur only once during the project.
Total incurring costs in 2014 presents the calculated price based on:
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 62/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
o
•
ƒ
the number of entities,
ƒ
the total number of actions and
ƒ
The frequency per year.
Total incurring costs in 2020 presents the calculated price based on
o
•
the price per action or equipment by 2014 multiplied by:
the price per action or equipment by 2020 multiplied by:
ƒ
the number of entities,
ƒ
the total number of actions and
ƒ
The frequency per year.
Total one time costs presents the costs for the Management Structure, one time
costs for hardware and other costs.
In addition to the costs presented above, the tables also include some additional information
specific to the scenario, the cost of which is displayed. More specifically, the business parameters
that define the scenario are presented, i.e.:
Scenario
•
RTS
•
EES
•
EES/RTS built together
Scenario options
•
Architecture vs. VIS
•
RTS Enrolment
•
RTS Border Check Mode
•
Housing
•
Bio-searches based on
Finally, a number of assumptions that are relevant for the specific scenario investigated are also
displayed in the costs tables, such as the impact of deploying (semi-)automated border check
systems.
7.2.3
General Remarks
In the various cost sheets, the following should be noted:
1. Meeting Costs:
As part of the Management Authority Admin costs, it is assumed that there are monthly
progress meetings, to update everybody involved. The costs for these meetings are
assumed to be €30,000. These meetings occur 10 times per annum (not during holiday
and Christmas season).
The costs for the Quarterly Meetings with the Member States are assumed to be € 50,000.
These Quarterly meetings occur 4 times per annum.
These costs include rental of space and travel for the Management Authority, it is assumed
that the Member State Delegates cover their own costs.
2. In most scenarios, there is quite a large sum for Administrative Costs for the Member
States. These costs are high, as they are the sum of the Admin Costs for all Member
States. The admin costs comprise the following items, as presented in the following
example:
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 63/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
Table 15: Example of MS Administrative Costs
Description
MS Power Costs per year
MS Technical system managers
MS DBA
MS Admin support
MS Team leader/planner
MS helpdesk & Incident Management
MS Helpdesk
MS Technical support
MS Hardware Maintenance, 1yr retention
MS COTS Software Maintenance, 1yr retention
MS EES Development
MS EES Development
MS RTS Development
MS RTS Development
MS EES/RTS Development
MS EES/RTS Development
MS Testing
MS Testing
Phase
OPE
OPE
OPE
OPE
OPE
OPE
OPE
OPE
OPE
OPE
DEV
OPE
DEV
OPE
DEV
OPE
DEV
OPE
Category
ADM
ADM
ADM
ADM
ADM
ADM
ADM
ADM
ADM
ADM
ADM
ADM
ADM
ADM
ADM
ADM
ADM
ADM
Allocated
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
2013
1,632,138
20,571,408
3,174,600
4,749,690
5,699,140
6,349,200
260,000
33,606,720
3,432,363
7,694,661
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
2014
1,787,193
20,571,408
3,174,600
4,749,690
5,699,140
3,174,600
130,000
14,002,800
61,977,936
8,750,460
343,236
769,466
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
2015
1,969,282
20,571,408
3,174,600
4,749,690
5,699,140
1,587,300
65,000
14,002,800
68,080,592
9,033,700
343,236
769,466
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
2016
2,145,452
20,571,408
3,174,600
4,749,690
5,699,140
793,650
35,000
14,002,800
73,963,584
9,288,900
343,236
769,466
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
2017
2,145,452
20,888,868
3,174,600
4,810,740
5,774,842
396,825
20,000
14,188,800
81,954,240
9,393,380
343,236
769,466
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
2018
2,612,664
20,888,868
3,174,600
4,810,740
5,774,842
198,413
10,000
14,188,800
89,711,328
9,593,580
343,236
769,466
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
2019
2,851,993
20,888,868
3,174,600
4,810,740
5,774,842
99,206
5,000
14,188,800
97,519,024
9,672,180
343,236
769,466
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
2020
3,155,732
20,888,868
3,174,600
4,810,740
5,774,842
99,206
5,000
14,188,800
97,519,024
9,672,180
This example is extracted from the worksheet ‘BOM 1yr’ in the workbook ‘Scenario - EES
Central Architecture.xls’, where only the Administrative costs for the Member States are
selected. As shown, many cost types are included, and these costs are calculated per
calendar year. In this way, it is possible to view the details associated for each cost type.
The large number of Member States causes these costs to be so high. It must be noted
though, that the Member State costs are calculated for the individual Member States when
possible based on the relative portion of passengers being managed by those states. After
that, the costs are aggregated. However, this mechanism does not allow to accurately
assign the costs per individual Member State. This mechanism only makes sure that the
figures are realistic for the total number of travellers.
7.3
Centralised System Architecture
7.4
A1C – Centralised Entry-Exit System, no biometrics
7.4.1
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario A1C
RTS
No
EES
Yes
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
No
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
No
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
No
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
No
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
Biometric Data specification
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 64/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
No
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
Yes
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 65/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.4.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.4.2.1
VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A1C - Central EES no biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Tariff
Time
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
13,954
€
74
14,146
€
85
27,852
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
501,628
1,335,600
825,000
632,746
9,000
236,744
3,540,719
24,000
173,948
1,878,200
112,469,134
14,002,800
515,479
129,063,562
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
501,628
1,335,600
935,000
657,871
236,744
3,680,843
36,000
173,948
705,900
156,006,693
14,188,800
515,479
171,626,820
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
1,003,256
2,671,200
1,650,000
632,746
9,000
236,744
6,202,947
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,003,256
2,671,200
1,870,000
657,871
236,744
6,467,072
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
173,948
1,878,200
112,469,134
14,002,800
515,479
129,063,562
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
36,000
173,948
705,900
156,006,693
14,188,800
515,479
171,626,820
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
Token- EES
Based
RTS Enrolment
Self
Contained
None
EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,322,000
1,032,565
2,773,200
10,450,000
1,046,811
36,000
2,367,441
21,028,017
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,094,000
1,739,483
41,874,100
72,279,559
34,074,720
5,154,792
178,216,654
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
315,800,226
21,028,017
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 66/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.4.2.2
VIS connection
Tariff
Time
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A1C - Central EES no biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, co-located
with VIS, 5 year retention
(€ per hour) (hour)
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total Yearly
Total
Number of Incurring costs
in 2014
actions
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
14,115
€
74
36,414
€
85
38,079
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
502,226
1,335,600
557,914
(9,000)
323,669
2,710,409
24,000
157,075
715,000
110,289,916
14,002,800
780,762
125,969,552
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
502,226
1,360,800
935,000
601,968
323,669
3,737,663
12,000
157,075
836,000
152,867,150
14,188,800
780,762
168,841,787
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
1,004,452
2,671,200
557,914
(9,000)
323,669
4,548,235
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,004,452
2,721,600
1,870,000
601,968
323,669
6,549,689
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
157,075
715,000
110,289,916
14,002,800
780,762
125,969,552
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
12,000
157,075
836,000
152,867,150
14,188,800
780,762
168,841,787
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
None
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
EES
RTS Enrolment
No Biometrics
at both
EES/RTS built together
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
Yes
Yes
Manual Housing
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
Co-located with
VIS
2,764,000
1,044,522
2,773,200
3,168,000
2,694,657
27,000
3,236,690
15,708,069
€
€
€
MS
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,070,000
1,570,747
41,159,100
71,826,738
34,074,720
7,807,615
179,508,919
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
317,092,492
15,708,069
Bio-searches
based on
€
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 67/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
7.5
A1D – Distributed Entry-Exit System, no biometrics
7.5.1
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario A1D
RTS
No
EES
Yes (no biometrics)
Biometric Data specification
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
No
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
No
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
No
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
Yes
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
No
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 68/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.5.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.5.2.1
VIS-co-location (no VIS connection)
Tariff
Time
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A1D - Distributed EES no biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
(€ per hour) (hour)
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
EU
€
74
€
74
€
85
€
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
14,700 €
€
€
16,475 €
€
75,118 €
€
€
€
€
595,590 €
€
€
2,741,111 €
€
163,118 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
23,800
504,391
1,310,400
439,612
638,506
2,916,709
1,548,535
108,969,969
14,002,800
1,386,504
125,907,808
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
42,400
500,000
1,310,400
440,000
394,270
2,687,070
81,000
137,254,925
14,002,800
151,338,725
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
47,600
1,008,783
2,620,800
439,612
638,506
4,755,301
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
84,800
1,000,000
2,620,800
880,000
394,270
4,979,870
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
1,548,535
108,969,969
14,002,800
1,386,504
125,907,808
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
81,000
137,254,925
14,002,800
151,338,725
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Total one time costs
None
EES
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
No Biometrics
at both
EES/RTS built together
RTS Border Check mode
Yes
Yes
Manual Housing
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
Co-located with
VIS
816,400
1,087,828
2,620,800
1,164,000
1,219,174
27,000
6,385,058
13,320,261
€
€
€
MS
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
30,213,000
15,485,352
1,782,000
37,800,000
71,268,887
34,074,720
13,865,036
204,488,995
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
356,237,068
13,320,261
Bio-searches
based on
€
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 69/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.5.2.2
VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A1D - Distributed EES no biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Tariff
Price
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
€
74
€
85
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
14,700 €
€
€
15,878 €
€
75,118 €
€
€
€
€
595,590 €
€
€
2,741,111 €
€
163,118 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
23,800
504,391
1,310,400
399,313
9,000
638,506
2,885,410
1,548,535
108,969,969
14,002,800
1,386,504
125,907,808
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
42,400
500,000
1,310,400
440,000
347,384
2,640,184
81,000
137,254,925
14,002,800
151,338,725
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
47,600
1,008,783
2,620,800
399,313
9,000
638,506
4,724,002
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
84,800
1,000,000
2,620,800
880,000
347,384
4,932,984
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
1,548,535
108,969,969
14,002,800
1,386,504
125,907,808
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
81,000
137,254,925
14,002,800
151,338,725
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
None
Total one time costs
EU
€
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Time
EES
RTS Enrolment
No Biometrics
at both
EES/RTS built together
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
Yes
Yes
Manual Housing
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
Co-located with
VIS
816,400
1,087,828
2,620,800
1,164,000
1,174,966
27,000
6,385,058
13,276,053
€
€
€
MS
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
30,213,000
15,485,352
1,782,000
37,800,000
71,268,887
34,074,720
13,865,036
204,488,995
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
356,237,068
13,276,053
Bio-searches
based on
€
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 70/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
A2C – Centralised Entry-Exit System, with
biometrics
7.6
This section includes the cost estimations for the option whereby there is a centralised Entry-Exit
system and database with biometrics for verification of TCN crossing the EU borders. In this
scenario, the Registered Traveller System is not taken into account.
7.6.1
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario A2C
RTS
No
EES
With biometrics
Biometric Data specification
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
Yes
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
No
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
Yes
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
No
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 71/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.6.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.6.2.1
VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A2C - Central EES with biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Tariff
Time
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
14,510
€
74
34,632
€
85
63,062
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
215,000
503,687
1,335,600
(4,400,000)
810,864
9,000
536,027
(989,822)
24,000
115,852
715,000
110,135,354
14,002,800
575,859
125,568,865
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
503,687
1,360,800
935,000
1,489,215
536,027
4,838,729
12,000
115,852
836,000
152,729,389
14,188,800
575,859
168,457,900
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
430,000
1,007,373
2,671,200
(8,800,000)
810,864
9,000
536,027
(3,335,536)
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,007,373
2,721,600
1,870,000
1,489,215
536,027
7,652,216
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
115,852
715,000
110,135,354
14,002,800
575,859
125,568,865
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
12,000
115,852
836,000
152,729,389
14,188,800
575,859
168,457,900
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
None
EES
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
With Biometrics EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
No
No
Manual Housing
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
Co-located with
VIS
3,748,000
1,073,732
2,773,200
11,990,000
2,562,743
36,000
5,360,274
27,543,949
€
€
€
MS
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,070,000
1,158,521
41,159,100
70,727,471
34,074,720
5,758,592
175,948,404
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
313,531,977
27,543,949
Bio-searches
based on
€
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 72/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.6.2.2
VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A2C - Central EES with biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Tariff
Time
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
14,510
€
74
33,851
€
85
63,062
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
215,000
503,687
1,335,600
(4,400,000)
754,483
9,000
536,027
(1,046,203)
24,000
115,852
715,000
110,135,354
14,002,800
575,859
125,568,865
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
503,687
1,360,800
935,000
1,375,790
536,027
4,725,304
12,000
115,852
836,000
152,729,389
14,188,800
575,859
168,457,900
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
430,000
1,007,373
2,671,200
(8,800,000)
754,483
9,000
536,027
(3,391,917)
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,007,373
2,721,600
1,870,000
1,375,790
536,027
7,538,791
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
115,852
715,000
110,135,354
14,002,800
575,859
125,568,865
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
12,000
115,852
836,000
152,729,389
14,188,800
575,859
168,457,900
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
None
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
EES
RTS Enrolment
With Biometrics EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
No
No
Manual Housing
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
Co-located with
VIS
3,748,000
1,073,732
2,773,200
11,990,000
2,504,941
27,000
5,360,274
27,477,147
€
€
€
MS
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,070,000
1,158,521
41,159,100
70,727,471
34,074,720
5,758,592
175,948,404
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
313,531,977
27,477,147
Bio-searches
based on
€
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 73/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
7.7
A2D – Distributed Entry-Exit System, with
biometrics
7.7.1
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario A2D
RTS
No
EES
Yes, with biometrics
Biometric Data specification
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
Yes
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
No
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
Yes
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
No
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 74/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.7.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.7.2.1
VIS co-location (no connection to VIS)
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A2D - Distributed EES with biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS,
co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Tariff
Time
Price
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
EU
€
74
€
74
€
85
€
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
15,344 €
€
€
22,268 €
€
115,846 €
€
€
€
€
452,658 €
€
€
2,872,827 €
€
124,455 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
80,600
506,772
1,310,400
496,322
984,695
3,378,789
54,000
1,176,912
880,000
113,205,308
14,002,800
1,057,867
130,376,886
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
250,000
500,000
1,310,400
440,000
456,974
2,957,374
54,000
145,115,005
14,002,800
159,171,805
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
161,200
1,013,545
2,620,800
496,322
984,695
5,276,562
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
500,000
1,000,000
2,620,800
880,000
456,974
5,457,774
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
54,000
1,176,912
880,000
113,205,308
14,002,800
1,057,867
130,376,886
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
54,000
145,115,005
14,002,800
159,171,805
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Total one time costs
None
EES
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
With Biometrics EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Yes
Yes
Manual Housing
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
Co-located with
VIS
873,200
1,135,448
2,620,800
1,164,000
1,647,822
27,000
9,846,948
17,315,218
€
€
€
MS
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
35,748,000
11,769,115
1,782,000
67,500,000
74,693,512
36,499,680
10,578,668
238,570,976
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
390,319,049
17,315,218
Bio-searches
based on
€
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 75/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.7.2.2
VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A2D - Distributed EES with biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Tariff
Price
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
€
74
€
85
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
15,344 €
€
€
21,670 €
€
115,846 €
€
€
€
€
452,658 €
€
€
2,872,827 €
€
124,455 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
80,600
506,772
1,310,400
456,023
9,000
984,695
3,347,490
54,000
1,176,912
880,000
113,205,308
14,002,800
1,057,867
130,376,886
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
250,000
500,000
1,310,400
440,000
410,088
2,910,488
54,000
145,115,005
14,002,800
159,171,805
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
161,200
1,013,545
2,620,800
456,023
9,000
984,695
5,245,263
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
500,000
1,000,000
2,620,800
880,000
410,088
5,410,888
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
54,000
1,176,912
880,000
113,205,308
14,002,800
1,057,867
130,376,886
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
54,000
145,115,005
14,002,800
159,171,805
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
None
Total one time costs
EU
€
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Time
EES
RTS Enrolment
With Biometrics EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
Yes
Yes
Manual Housing
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
Co-located with
VIS
873,200
1,135,448
2,620,800
1,164,000
1,603,614
27,000
9,846,948
17,271,010
€
€
€
MS
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
35,748,000
11,769,115
1,782,000
67,500,000
74,693,512
36,499,680
10,578,668
238,570,976
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
390,319,049
17,271,010
Bio-searches
based on
€
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 76/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
7.8
A3C – Centralised Entry-Exit System, biometrics
added later
7.8.1
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario A3C
RTS
No
EES
Biometrics added later
Biometric Data specification
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
Yes
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
No
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
Yes
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
No
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 77/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.8.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.8.2.1
VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A3C - Central EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, not connected
to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Tariff
Time
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total Yearly
Total
Number of Incurring costs
in 2014
actions
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
14,561
€
74
34,238
€
85
66,265
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
215,000
503,874
1,335,600
(4,400,000)
814,234
9,000
563,256
(959,035)
24,000
110,567
715,000
110,114,971
14,002,800
549,586
125,516,924
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
503,874
1,360,800
935,000
1,492,586
563,256
4,869,516
12,000
110,567
836,000
152,709,006
14,188,800
549,586
168,405,959
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
430,000
1,007,748
2,671,200
(8,800,000)
814,234
9,000
563,256
(3,304,561)
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,007,748
2,721,600
1,870,000
1,492,586
563,256
7,683,190
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
110,567
715,000
110,114,971
14,002,800
549,586
125,516,924
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
12,000
110,567
836,000
152,709,006
14,188,800
549,586
168,405,959
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
None
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
EES
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
Biometrics added EES/RTS built together
later
at both
RTS Border Check mode
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,748,000
1,077,478
2,773,200
11,990,000
2,533,578
36,000
5,632,564
27,790,819
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,070,000
1,105,665
41,159,100
70,586,521
34,074,720
5,495,863
175,491,869
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
313,075,442
27,790,819
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 78/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.8.2.2
VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A3C - Central EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, connected to
VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Tariff
Time
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total Yearly
Total
Number of Incurring costs
in 2014
actions
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
14,561
€
74
33,456
€
85
66,265
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
215,000
503,874
1,335,600
(4,400,000)
757,854
9,000
563,256
(1,015,416)
24,000
110,567
715,000
110,114,971
14,002,800
549,586
125,516,924
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
503,874
1,360,800
935,000
1,379,161
563,256
4,756,092
12,000
110,567
836,000
152,709,006
14,188,800
549,586
168,405,959
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
430,000
1,007,748
2,671,200
(8,800,000)
757,854
9,000
563,256
(3,360,942)
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,007,748
2,721,600
1,870,000
1,379,161
563,256
7,569,765
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
110,567
715,000
110,114,971
14,002,800
549,586
125,516,924
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
12,000
110,567
836,000
152,709,006
14,188,800
549,586
168,405,959
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
None
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
EES
RTS Enrolment
Biometrics added EES/RTS built together
later
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,748,000
1,077,478
2,773,200
11,990,000
2,475,776
27,000
5,632,564
27,724,017
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,070,000
1,105,665
41,159,100
70,586,521
34,074,720
5,495,863
175,491,869
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
313,075,442
27,724,017
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 79/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
7.9
A3D – Distributed Entry-Exit System, biometrics
added later
7.9.1
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario A3D
RTS
No
EES
Biometrics added later
Biometric Data specification
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
Yes
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
No
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
Yes
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
No
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 80/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.9.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.9.2.1
VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
Tariff
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A3D - Distributed EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Time
Price
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
in 2020
(per year)
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
€
74
€
85
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
15,437 €
€
€
23,105 €
€
121,731 €
€
€
€
€
432,006 €
€
€
2,867,989 €
€
118,777 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
80,600
507,116
1,310,400
502,514
1,034,715
3,435,346
54,000
1,123,216
880,000
113,192,728
14,002,800
1,009,603
130,262,347
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
250,000
500,000
1,310,400
440,000
456,974
2,957,374
54,000
145,115,005
14,002,800
159,171,805
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
161,200
1,014,233
2,620,800
502,514
1,034,715
5,333,462
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
500,000
1,000,000
2,620,800
880,000
456,974
5,457,774
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
54,000
1,123,216
880,000
113,192,728
14,002,800
1,009,603
130,262,347
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
54,000
145,115,005
14,002,800
159,171,805
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
None
Total one time costs
EU
€
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
in 2014
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
EES
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
Biometrics added EES/RTS built together
later
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Yes
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
873,200
1,142,328
2,620,800
1,164,000
1,709,746
27,000
10,347,150
17,884,224
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
35,748,000
11,232,163
1,782,000
67,500,000
74,567,712
36,499,680
10,096,028
237,425,584
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
389,173,657
17,884,224
Yes
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 81/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.9.2.2
VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A3D - Distributed EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, connected
to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Tariff
Price
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
€
74
€
85
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
15,437 €
€
€
22,507 €
€
121,731 €
€
€
€
€
432,006 €
€
€
2,867,989 €
€
118,777 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
80,600
507,116
1,310,400
462,216
9,000
1,034,715
3,404,047
54,000
1,123,216
880,000
113,192,728
14,002,800
1,009,603
130,262,347
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
250,000
500,000
1,310,400
440,000
410,088
2,910,488
54,000
145,115,005
14,002,800
159,171,805
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
161,200
1,014,233
2,620,800
462,216
9,000
1,034,715
5,302,163
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
500,000
1,000,000
2,620,800
880,000
410,088
5,410,888
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
54,000
1,123,216
880,000
113,192,728
14,002,800
1,009,603
130,262,347
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
54,000
145,115,005
14,002,800
159,171,805
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
None
Total one time costs
EU
€
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Time
EES
RTS Enrolment
Biometrics added EES/RTS built together
later
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
Yes
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
873,200
1,142,328
2,620,800
1,164,000
1,665,538
27,000
10,347,150
17,840,016
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
35,748,000
11,232,163
1,782,000
67,500,000
74,567,712
36,499,680
10,096,028
237,425,584
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
389,173,657
17,840,016
Yes
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 82/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
7.10
B0 – Token-Based RTS only
7.10.1 Scenario
Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario B0
RTS
Yes token-based
EES
No
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
No
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
Yes
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
No
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
No
Biometric Data specification
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 83/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.10.2 Cost
Summary Tables
7.10.2.1 VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
Tariff
Time
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B0 - Token-Based RTS, No EES, not connected to VIS, co-located with
VIS, 5 year retention
(€ per hour) (hour)
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
13,954
€
74
14,146
€
85
27,852
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
501,628
1,335,600
825,000
632,746
9,000
236,744
3,540,719
24,000
173,948
1,878,200
112,469,134
14,002,800
515,479
129,063,562
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
501,628
1,335,600
935,000
657,871
236,744
3,680,843
36,000
173,948
705,900
156,006,693
14,188,800
515,479
171,626,820
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
1,003,256
2,671,200
1,650,000
632,746
9,000
236,744
6,202,947
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,003,256
2,671,200
1,870,000
657,871
236,744
6,467,072
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
173,948
1,878,200
112,469,134
14,002,800
515,479
129,063,562
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
36,000
173,948
705,900
156,006,693
14,188,800
515,479
171,626,820
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
Token- EES
Based
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
None
EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,322,000
1,032,565
2,773,200
10,450,000
1,046,811
36,000
2,367,441
21,028,017
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,094,000
1,739,483
41,874,100
72,279,559
34,074,720
5,154,792
178,216,654
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
315,800,226
21,028,017
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 84/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.10.2.2 VIS connection
Tariff
Time
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B0 - Token-Based RTS, No EES, connected to VIS, co-located with VIS,
5 year retention
(€ per hour) (hour)
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total Yearly
Total
Number of Incurring costs
in 2014
actions
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
13,954
€
74
13,680
€
85
27,852
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
501,628
1,335,600
825,000
596,332
(9,000)
236,744
3,486,305
24,000
173,948
1,878,200
112,469,134
14,002,800
515,479
129,063,562
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
501,628
1,335,600
935,000
610,985
236,744
3,633,957
36,000
173,948
705,900
156,006,693
14,188,800
515,479
171,626,820
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
1,003,256
2,671,200
1,650,000
596,332
(9,000)
236,744
6,148,533
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,003,256
2,671,200
1,870,000
610,985
236,744
6,420,185
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
173,948
1,878,200
112,469,134
14,002,800
515,479
129,063,562
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
36,000
173,948
705,900
156,006,693
14,188,800
515,479
171,626,820
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
TokenBased
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
EES
RTS Enrolment
None
EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,322,000
1,032,565
2,773,200
10,450,000
1,012,310
27,000
2,367,441
20,984,516
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,094,000
1,739,483
41,874,100
72,279,559
34,074,720
5,154,792
178,216,654
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
315,800,226
20,984,516
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 85/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
7.11
7.11.1
B1C – Token-Based RTS and Centralised Entry-Exit
System without biometrics
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario B1C
RTS
Yes token-based
EES
Yes (no biometrics)
Biometric Data specification
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
No
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
Yes
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
No
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
Yes
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 86/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.11.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.11.2.1 VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
Tariff
Time
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B1C - Token-Based RTS, EES no biometrics, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
(€ per hour) (hour)
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
14,657
€
74
16,572
€
85
72,354
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
504,230
1,335,600
825,000
679,575
9,000
615,012
3,968,417
24,000
144,501
1,878,200
112,500,098
14,002,800
744,398
129,293,997
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
504,230
1,335,600
935,000
704,700
615,012
4,108,542
36,000
144,501
705,900
156,037,657
14,188,800
744,398
171,857,255
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
1,008,460
2,671,200
1,650,000
679,575
9,000
615,012
6,633,247
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,008,460
2,671,200
1,870,000
704,700
615,012
6,897,371
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
144,501
1,878,200
112,500,098
14,002,800
744,398
129,293,997
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
36,000
144,501
705,900
156,037,657
14,188,800
744,398
171,857,255
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
Token- EES
Based
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
With Biometrics EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,322,000
1,084,597
2,773,200
10,450,000
1,226,305
36,000
6,150,121
25,042,223
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,094,000
1,445,007
41,874,100
72,877,994
34,074,720
7,443,976
180,809,796
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
318,393,369
25,042,223
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 87/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.11.2.2 VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B1C - Token-Based RTS, EES no biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Tariff
Time
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
14,657
€
74
16,105
€
85
72,354
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
504,230
1,335,600
825,000
643,161
(9,000)
615,012
3,914,003
24,000
144,501
1,878,200
112,500,098
14,002,800
744,398
129,293,997
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
504,230
1,335,600
935,000
657,813
615,012
4,061,655
36,000
144,501
705,900
156,037,657
14,188,800
744,398
171,857,255
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
1,008,460
2,671,200
1,650,000
643,161
(9,000)
615,012
6,578,833
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,008,460
2,671,200
1,870,000
657,813
615,012
6,850,485
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
144,501
1,878,200
112,500,098
14,002,800
744,398
129,293,997
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
36,000
144,501
705,900
156,037,657
14,188,800
744,398
171,857,255
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
TokenBased
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
EES
RTS Enrolment
With Biometrics EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,322,000
1,084,597
2,773,200
10,450,000
1,191,804
27,000
6,150,121
24,998,722
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,094,000
1,445,007
41,874,100
72,877,994
34,074,720
7,443,976
180,809,796
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
318,393,369
24,998,722
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 88/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
7.12
7.12.1
B1D – Token-Based RTS and Distributed Entry-Exit
System without biometrics
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario B1D
RTS
Yes token-based
EES
Yes (no biometrics)
Biometric Data specification
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
No
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
Yes
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
Yes
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
No
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 89/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.12.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.12.2.1 VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
Tariff
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B1D - Distributed EES no biometrics, Token-Based RTS, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Time
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
EU
€
74
€
74
€
85
€
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
15,327 €
€
€
22,517 €
€
114,806 €
€
€
€
€
456,308 €
€
€
2,914,601 €
€
130,024 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
23,800
506,712
1,335,600
1,210,000
612,673
975,855
4,664,640
3,645,000
1,186,401
54,660,400
260,611,790
19,767,600
1,105,201
340,976,391
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
70,800
500,000
1,335,600
440,000
617,124
2,963,524
54,000
176,363,477
20,926,800
197,344,277
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
47,600
1,013,423
2,671,200
2,420,000
612,673
975,855
7,740,751
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
141,600
1,000,000
2,671,200
880,000
617,124
5,309,924
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,645,000
1,186,401
54,660,400
260,611,790
19,767,600
1,105,201
340,976,391
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
54,000
176,363,477
20,926,800
197,344,277
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Total one time costs
Token- EES
Based
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
Biometrics added EES/RTS built together
later
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Yes
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
2,017,000
1,134,232
2,773,200
12,772,000
1,666,268
27,000
9,758,552
30,148,252
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
30,213,000
11,864,006
1,782,000
37,800,000
75,779,629
34,074,720
11,052,008
202,565,363
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
354,313,436
30,148,252
Yes
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 90/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.12.2.2 VIS connection
Tariff
Time
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B1D - Distributed EES no biometrics, Token-Based RTS, connected to
VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
(€ per hour) (hour)
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
€
74
€
85
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
15,327 €
€
€
22,066 €
€
114,806 €
€
€
€
€
456,308 €
€
€
2,914,601 €
€
130,024 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
23,800
506,712
1,335,600
1,210,000
582,197
975,855
4,634,163
3,645,000
1,186,401
54,660,400
260,611,790
19,767,600
1,105,201
340,976,391
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
70,800
500,000
1,335,600
440,000
570,238
2,916,638
54,000
176,363,477
20,926,800
197,344,277
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
47,600
1,013,423
2,671,200
2,420,000
582,197
975,855
7,710,275
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
141,600
1,000,000
2,671,200
880,000
570,238
5,263,038
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,645,000
1,186,401
54,660,400
260,611,790
19,767,600
1,105,201
340,976,391
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
54,000
176,363,477
20,926,800
197,344,277
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
TokenBased
Total one time costs
EU
€
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
EES
RTS Enrolment
Biometrics added EES/RTS built together
later
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
Yes
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
2,017,000
1,134,232
2,773,200
12,772,000
1,632,848
27,000
9,758,552
30,114,832
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
30,213,000
11,864,006
1,782,000
37,800,000
75,779,629
34,074,720
11,052,008
202,565,363
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
354,313,436
30,114,832
Yes
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 91/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
7.13
7.13.1
B2C – Token-Based RTS and Centralised Entry-Exit
System with biometrics
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario B2C
RTS
Yes token-based
EES
With biometrics
Biometric Data specification
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
Yes
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
Yes
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
Yes
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
No
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 92/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.13.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.13.2.1 VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B2C - Token-Based RTS, EES with biometrics, not connected to VIS,
co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Tariff
Time
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
14,620
€
74
17,082
€
85
70,043
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
215,000
504,095
1,335,600
(3,569,000)
868,327
9,000
595,368
(41,610)
24,000
148,314
1,878,200
112,762,880
14,002,800
764,042
129,580,236
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
237,000
504,095
1,360,800
935,000
1,591,251
595,368
5,223,514
36,000
148,314
705,900
157,930,458
14,188,800
764,042
173,773,514
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
430,000
1,008,189
2,671,200
(7,138,000)
868,327
9,000
595,368
(1,555,916)
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
474,000
1,008,189
2,721,600
1,870,000
1,591,251
595,368
8,260,409
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
148,314
1,878,200
112,762,880
14,002,800
764,042
129,580,236
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
36,000
148,314
705,900
157,930,458
14,188,800
764,042
173,773,514
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
Token- EES
Based
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
With Biometrics EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
4,306,000
1,081,895
2,773,200
19,272,000
1,264,057
36,000
5,953,680
34,686,831
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,094,000
1,483,140
41,874,100
73,020,434
34,074,720
7,640,417
181,186,811
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
318,770,383
34,686,831
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 93/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.13.2.2 VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B2C - Token-Based RTS, EES with biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Tariff
Time
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total Yearly
Total
Number of Incurring costs
in 2014
actions
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
14,620
€
74
16,287
€
85
70,043
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
215,000
504,095
1,335,600
(3,569,000)
811,008
9,000
595,368
(98,929)
24,000
148,314
1,878,200
112,762,880
14,002,800
764,042
129,580,236
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
237,000
504,095
1,360,800
935,000
1,477,826
595,368
5,110,089
36,000
148,314
705,900
157,930,458
14,188,800
764,042
173,773,514
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
430,000
1,008,189
2,671,200
(7,138,000)
811,008
9,000
595,368
(1,613,234)
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
474,000
1,008,189
2,721,600
1,870,000
1,477,826
595,368
8,146,984
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
148,314
1,878,200
112,762,880
14,002,800
764,042
129,580,236
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
36,000
148,314
705,900
157,930,458
14,188,800
764,042
173,773,514
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
TokenBased
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
EES
RTS Enrolment
With Biometrics EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
4,306,000
1,081,895
2,773,200
19,272,000
1,205,224
36,000
5,953,680
34,627,999
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,094,000
1,483,140
41,874,100
73,020,434
34,074,720
7,640,417
181,186,811
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
318,770,383
34,627,999
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 94/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
7.14
7.14.1
B2D – Token-Based RTS and Distributed Entry-Exit
System with biometrics
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario B2D
RTS
Yes token-based
EES
Yes with biometrics
Biometric Data specification
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
Yes
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
Yes
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
Yes
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
No
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 95/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.14.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.14.2.1 VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
Tariff
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B2D - Distributed EES with biometrics, Token-Based RTS, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Time
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
EU
€
74
€
74
€
85
€
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
15,271 €
€
€
22,349 €
€
111,247 €
€
€
€
€
468,801 €
€
€
3,088,375 €
€
133,584 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
100,600
506,503
1,335,600
1,210,000
754,154
9,000
945,596
4,861,453
3,753,000
1,218,883
55,540,400
272,002,550
19,767,600
1,135,460
353,417,893
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
500,000
1,335,600
440,000
965,980
3,255,580
54,000
191,015,221
20,926,800
211,996,021
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
201,200
1,013,007
2,671,200
2,420,000
754,154
9,000
945,596
8,014,157
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,000,000
2,671,200
880,000
965,980
5,545,180
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,753,000
1,218,883
55,540,400
272,002,550
19,767,600
1,135,460
353,417,893
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
54,000
191,015,221
20,926,800
211,996,021
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Total one time costs
Token- EES
Based
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
Biometrics added EES/RTS built together
later
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Yes
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,295,800
1,130,070
2,773,200
28,612,000
1,653,815
36,000
9,455,961
46,956,846
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
35,748,000
12,188,828
1,782,000
67,500,000
80,297,743
36,499,680
11,354,599
245,370,851
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
397,118,924
46,956,846
Yes
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 96/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.14.2.2 VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B2D - Distributed EES with biometrics, Token-Based RTS, connected
to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Tariff
Price
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
€
74
€
85
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
15,271 €
€
€
21,835 €
€
111,247 €
€
€
€
€
468,801 €
€
€
3,088,375 €
€
133,584 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
100,600
506,503
1,335,600
1,210,000
713,989
945,596
4,812,289
3,753,000
1,218,883
55,540,400
272,002,550
19,767,600
1,135,460
353,417,893
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
500,000
1,335,600
440,000
880,999
3,170,599
54,000
191,015,221
20,926,800
211,996,021
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
201,200
1,013,007
2,671,200
2,420,000
713,989
945,596
7,964,992
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,000,000
2,671,200
880,000
880,999
5,460,199
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,753,000
1,218,883
55,540,400
272,002,550
19,767,600
1,135,460
353,417,893
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
54,000
191,015,221
20,926,800
211,996,021
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
TokenBased
Total one time costs
EU
€
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Time
EES
RTS Enrolment
Biometrics added EES/RTS built together
later
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
Yes
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,295,800
1,130,070
2,773,200
28,612,000
1,615,760
27,000
9,455,961
46,909,791
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
35,748,000
12,188,828
1,782,000
67,500,000
80,297,743
36,499,680
11,354,599
245,370,851
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
397,118,924
46,909,791
Yes
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 97/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
7.15
7.15.1
B3C – Token-Based RTS and Centralised Entry-Exit
System with biometrics added later
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario B3C
RTS
Yes token-based
EES
With biometrics added later
Biometric Data specification
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
Yes
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
Yes
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
Yes
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
No
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 98/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.15.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.15.2.1 VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B3C - Token-Based RTS, EES with biometrics added later, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Tariff
Time
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
14,662
€
74
17,455
€
85
72,670
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
215,000
504,248
1,335,600
(3,569,000)
871,091
9,000
617,692
(16,369)
24,000
143,980
1,878,200
112,747,175
14,002,800
741,717
129,537,872
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
237,000
504,248
1,360,800
935,000
1,594,015
617,692
5,248,756
36,000
143,980
705,900
157,914,753
14,188,800
741,717
173,731,150
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
430,000
1,008,497
2,671,200
(7,138,000)
871,091
9,000
617,692
(1,530,520)
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
474,000
1,008,497
2,721,600
1,870,000
1,594,015
617,692
8,285,804
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
143,980
1,878,200
112,747,175
14,002,800
741,717
129,537,872
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
36,000
143,980
705,900
157,914,753
14,188,800
741,717
173,731,150
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
Token- EES
Based
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
Biometrics added EES/RTS built together
later
at both
RTS Border Check mode
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
4,306,000
1,084,965
2,773,200
19,272,000
1,291,694
36,000
6,176,924
34,940,784
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,094,000
1,439,804
41,874,100
72,863,375
34,074,720
7,417,173
180,763,172
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
318,346,745
34,940,784
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 99/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.15.2.2 VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B3C - Token-Based RTS, EES with biometrics added later, connected
to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Tariff
Time
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
14,662
€
74
16,660
€
85
72,670
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
215,000
504,248
1,335,600
(3,569,000)
813,772
9,000
617,692
(73,687)
24,000
143,980
1,878,200
112,747,175
14,002,800
741,717
129,537,872
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
237,000
504,248
1,360,800
935,000
1,480,590
617,692
5,135,331
36,000
143,980
705,900
157,914,753
14,188,800
741,717
173,731,150
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
430,000
1,008,497
2,671,200
(7,138,000)
813,772
9,000
617,692
(1,587,839)
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
474,000
1,008,497
2,721,600
1,870,000
1,480,590
617,692
8,172,379
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
143,980
1,878,200
112,747,175
14,002,800
741,717
129,537,872
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
36,000
143,980
705,900
157,914,753
14,188,800
741,717
173,731,150
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
TokenBased
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
EES
RTS Enrolment
Biometrics added EES/RTS built together
later
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
4,306,000
1,084,965
2,773,200
19,272,000
1,232,861
36,000
6,176,924
34,881,951
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,094,000
1,439,804
41,874,100
72,863,375
34,074,720
7,417,173
180,763,172
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
318,346,745
34,881,951
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 100/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
7.16
7.16.1
B3D – Token-Based RTS and Distributed Entry-Exit
System with biometrics added later
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario B3D
RTS
Yes token-based
EES
With biometrics added later
Biometric Data specification
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
Yes
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
Yes
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
Yes
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
No
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 101/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.16.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.16.2.1 VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B3D - Distributed EES with biometrics added later, Token-Based RTS,
not connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Tariff
Time
Price
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
EU
€
74
€
74
€
85
€
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
15,271 €
€
€
22,349 €
€
111,247 €
€
€
€
€
468,801 €
€
€
3,088,375 €
€
133,584 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
100,600
506,503
1,335,600
1,210,000
754,154
9,000
945,596
4,861,453
3,753,000
1,218,883
55,540,400
272,002,550
19,767,600
1,135,460
353,417,893
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
500,000
1,335,600
440,000
965,980
3,255,580
54,000
191,015,221
20,926,800
211,996,021
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
201,200
1,013,007
2,671,200
2,420,000
754,154
9,000
945,596
8,014,157
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,000,000
2,671,200
880,000
965,980
5,545,180
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,753,000
1,218,883
55,540,400
272,002,550
19,767,600
1,135,460
353,417,893
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
54,000
191,015,221
20,926,800
211,996,021
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Total one time costs
Token- EES
Based
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
Biometrics added EES/RTS built together
later
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Yes
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,295,800
1,130,070
2,773,200
28,612,000
1,653,815
36,000
9,455,961
46,956,846
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
35,748,000
12,188,828
1,782,000
67,500,000
80,297,743
36,499,680
11,354,599
245,370,851
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
397,118,924
46,956,846
Yes
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 102/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.16.2.2 VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B3D - Distributed EES with biometrics added later, Token-Based RTS,
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Tariff
Price
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
€
74
€
85
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
15,271 €
€
€
21,835 €
€
111,247 €
€
€
€
€
468,801 €
€
€
3,088,375 €
€
133,584 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
100,600
506,503
1,335,600
1,210,000
713,989
945,596
4,812,289
3,753,000
1,218,883
55,540,400
272,002,550
19,767,600
1,135,460
353,417,893
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
500,000
1,335,600
440,000
880,999
3,170,599
54,000
191,015,221
20,926,800
211,996,021
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
201,200
1,013,007
2,671,200
2,420,000
713,989
945,596
7,964,992
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,000,000
2,671,200
880,000
880,999
5,460,199
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,753,000
1,218,883
55,540,400
272,002,550
19,767,600
1,135,460
353,417,893
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
54,000
191,015,221
20,926,800
211,996,021
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
TokenBased
Total one time costs
EU
€
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Time
EES
RTS Enrolment
Biometrics added EES/RTS built together
later
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
Yes
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,295,800
1,130,070
2,773,200
28,612,000
1,615,760
27,000
9,455,961
46,909,791
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
35,748,000
12,188,828
1,782,000
67,500,000
80,297,743
36,499,680
11,354,599
245,370,851
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
397,118,924
46,909,791
Yes
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 103/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
7.17
7.17.1
C0 – Token-less RTS only
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario C0
RTS
Yes token-less
EES
No
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
No
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
Yes
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
No
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
No
Biometric Data specification
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 104/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.17.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.17.2.1 VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C0 - Token-Less RTS, No EES, not connected to VIS, co-located with
VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Tariff
Time
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
13,882
€
74
14,016
€
85
23,296
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
1,016,000
501,362
1,335,600
(3,546,000)
1,020,594
18,000
198,013
543,568
24,000
181,467
1,878,200
112,744,141
14,002,800
537,167
129,367,775
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
250,000
501,362
1,335,600
935,000
4,764,513
198,013
7,984,488
36,000
181,467
705,900
157,138,217
14,188,800
537,167
172,787,550
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
2,032,000
1,002,724
2,671,200
(7,092,000)
1,020,594
18,000
198,013
(149,470)
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
500,000
1,002,724
2,671,200
1,870,000
4,764,513
198,013
11,006,450
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
181,467
1,878,200
112,744,141
14,002,800
537,167
129,367,775
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
36,000
181,467
705,900
157,138,217
14,188,800
537,167
172,787,550
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
Token- EES
Less
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
None
EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
4,152,000
1,027,237
2,773,200
19,250,000
1,037,148
36,000
1,980,128
30,255,713
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,094,000
1,814,667
41,874,100
72,484,289
34,074,720
5,371,669
178,713,446
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
316,297,018
30,255,713
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 105/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.17.2.2 VIS connection
Tariff
Time
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C0 - Token-Less RTS, No EES, connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5
year retention
(€ per hour) (hour)
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
13,882
€
74
13,487
€
85
23,296
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
1,016,000
501,362
1,335,600
(3,546,000)
946,553
9,000
198,013
460,528
24,000
181,467
1,878,200
112,744,141
14,002,800
537,167
129,367,775
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
250,000
501,362
1,335,600
935,000
4,409,587
198,013
7,629,562
36,000
181,467
705,900
157,138,217
14,188,800
537,167
172,787,550
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
2,032,000
1,002,724
2,671,200
(7,092,000)
946,553
9,000
198,013
(232,510)
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
500,000
1,002,724
2,671,200
1,870,000
4,409,587
198,013
10,651,523
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
181,467
1,878,200
112,744,141
14,002,800
537,167
129,367,775
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
36,000
181,467
705,900
157,138,217
14,188,800
537,167
172,787,550
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
TokenLess
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
EES
RTS Enrolment
None
EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
4,152,000
1,027,237
2,773,200
19,250,000
998,013
27,000
1,980,128
30,207,578
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,094,000
1,814,667
41,874,100
72,484,289
34,074,720
5,371,669
178,713,446
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
316,297,018
30,207,578
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 106/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
7.18
7.18.1
C1C – Token-less RTS and Centralised Entry-Exit
System without biometrics
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario C1C
RTS
Yes token-less
EES
No biometrics
Biometric Data specification
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
No
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
Yes
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
No
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
Yes
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 107/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.18.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.18.2.1 VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C1C - Token-Less RTS, EES no biometrics, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Tariff
Time
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
14,576
€
74
16,724
€
85
67,261
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
215,000
503,932
1,335,600
(3,569,000)
870,673
9,000
571,714
(63,080)
24,000
152,906
1,878,200
112,779,521
14,002,800
787,695
129,625,122
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
250,000
503,932
1,335,600
935,000
1,554,837
571,714
5,151,084
36,000
152,906
705,900
157,146,797
14,188,800
787,695
173,018,098
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
430,000
1,007,864
2,671,200
(7,138,000)
870,673
9,000
571,714
(1,577,548)
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
500,000
1,007,864
2,671,200
1,870,000
1,554,837
571,714
8,175,616
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
152,906
1,878,200
112,779,521
14,002,800
787,695
129,625,122
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
36,000
152,906
705,900
157,146,797
14,188,800
787,695
173,018,098
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
Token- EES
Less
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
With Biometrics EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
4,340,000
1,078,641
2,773,200
19,272,000
1,237,559
36,000
5,717,144
34,454,544
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,094,000
1,529,056
41,874,100
73,186,844
34,074,720
7,876,954
181,635,674
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
319,219,246
34,454,544
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 108/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.18.2.2 VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C1C - Token-Less RTS, EES no biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Tariff
Time
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
14,576
€
74
15,922
€
85
67,261
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
215,000
503,932
1,335,600
(3,569,000)
812,886
9,000
571,714
(120,868)
24,000
152,906
1,878,200
112,779,521
14,002,800
787,695
129,625,122
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
250,000
503,932
1,335,600
935,000
1,441,413
571,714
5,037,659
36,000
152,906
705,900
157,146,797
14,188,800
787,695
173,018,098
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
430,000
1,007,864
2,671,200
(7,138,000)
812,886
9,000
571,714
(1,635,336)
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
500,000
1,007,864
2,671,200
1,870,000
1,441,413
571,714
8,062,191
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
152,906
1,878,200
112,779,521
14,002,800
787,695
129,625,122
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
36,000
152,906
705,900
157,146,797
14,188,800
787,695
173,018,098
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
TokenLess
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
EES
RTS Enrolment
With Biometrics EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
4,340,000
1,078,641
2,773,200
19,272,000
1,178,212
36,000
5,717,144
34,395,196
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,094,000
1,529,056
41,874,100
73,186,844
34,074,720
7,876,954
181,635,674
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
319,219,246
34,395,196
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 109/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
7.19
7.19.1
C1D – Token-less RTS and Distributed Entry-Exit
System without biometrics
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario C1D
RTS
Yes token-less
EES
Yes, no biometrics
Biometric Data specification
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
No
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
Yes
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
No
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
Yes
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 110/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.19.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.19.2.1 VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C1D - Distributed EES no biometrics, Token-Less RTS, not connected
to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Tariff
Time
Price
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
EU
€
74
€
74
€
85
€
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
14,689 €
€
€
25,638 €
€
74,402 €
€
€
€
€
598,104 €
€
€
3,177,077 €
€
170,428 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
6,238,600
504,350
1,335,600
1,237,000
3,835,766
45,000
632,417
13,828,732
3,699,000
1,555,072
55,540,400
304,211,477
19,767,600
1,448,639
386,222,188
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
500,000
1,335,600
440,000
8,849,002
11,138,602
189,418,949
20,926,800
210,345,749
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
12,477,200
1,008,699
2,671,200
2,474,000
3,835,766
45,000
632,417
23,144,282
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,000,000
2,671,200
880,000
8,849,002
13,428,202
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,699,000
1,555,072
55,540,400
304,211,477
19,767,600
1,448,639
386,222,188
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
189,418,949
20,926,800
210,345,749
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Total one time costs
Token- EES
Less
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
No Biometrics
EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Yes
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,809,800
1,086,991
2,773,200
29,086,000
1,897,244
72,000
6,324,167
56,049,402
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
35,748,000
15,550,717
1,782,000
67,500,000
82,603,999
36,499,680
14,486,393
254,170,789
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
405,918,862
56,049,402
Yes
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 111/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.19.2.2 VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C1D - Distributed EES no biometrics, Token-Less RTS, connected to
VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Tariff
Price
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
€
74
€
85
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
14,689 €
€
€
23,619 €
€
74,402 €
€
€
€
€
598,104 €
€
€
3,177,077 €
€
170,428 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
6,238,600
504,350
1,335,600
1,237,000
3,584,535
36,000
632,417
13,568,502
3,699,000
1,555,072
55,540,400
304,211,477
19,767,600
1,448,639
386,222,188
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
500,000
1,335,600
440,000
8,205,688
10,495,288
189,418,949
20,926,800
210,345,749
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
12,477,200
1,008,699
2,671,200
2,474,000
3,584,535
36,000
632,417
22,884,051
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,000,000
2,671,200
880,000
8,205,688
12,784,888
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,699,000
1,555,072
55,540,400
304,211,477
19,767,600
1,448,639
386,222,188
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
189,418,949
20,926,800
210,345,749
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
TokenLess
Total one time costs
EU
€
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Time
EES
RTS Enrolment
No Biometrics
EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
Yes
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,809,800
1,086,991
2,773,200
29,086,000
1,747,833
63,000
6,324,167
55,890,991
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
35,748,000
15,550,717
1,782,000
67,500,000
82,603,999
36,499,680
14,486,393
254,170,789
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
405,918,862
55,890,991
Yes
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 112/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
7.20
7.20.1
C2C – Token-less RTS and Centralised Entry-Exit
System with biometrics
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario C2C
RTS
Yes token-less
EES
With biometrics
Biometric Data specification
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
Yes
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
Yes
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
Yes
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
No
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 113/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.20.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.20.2.1 VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
Tariff
Time
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C2C - Token-Less RTS, EES with biometrics, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
(€ per hour) (hour)
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
14,576
€
74
16,724
€
85
67,261
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
215,000
503,932
1,335,600
(3,569,000)
870,673
9,000
571,714
(63,080)
24,000
152,906
1,878,200
113,019,523
14,002,800
787,695
129,865,124
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
503,932
1,360,800
935,000
1,591,253
571,714
4,976,700
36,000
152,906
705,900
157,506,583
14,188,800
787,695
173,377,884
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
430,000
1,007,864
2,671,200
(7,138,000)
870,673
9,000
571,714
(1,577,548)
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,007,864
2,721,600
1,870,000
1,591,253
571,714
7,790,432
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
152,906
1,878,200
113,019,523
14,002,800
787,695
129,865,124
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
36,000
152,906
705,900
157,506,583
14,188,800
787,695
173,377,884
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
Token- EES
Less
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
With Biometrics EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
4,340,000
1,078,641
2,773,200
19,272,000
1,237,559
36,000
5,717,144
34,454,544
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,094,000
1,529,056
41,874,100
73,192,496
34,074,720
7,876,954
181,641,325
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
319,224,897
34,454,544
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 114/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.20.2.2 VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C2C - Token-Less RTS, EES with biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Tariff
Time
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
14,576
€
74
15,922
€
85
67,261
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
215,000
503,932
1,335,600
(3,569,000)
812,886
9,000
571,714
(120,868)
24,000
152,906
1,878,200
113,019,523
14,002,800
787,695
129,865,124
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
503,932
1,360,800
935,000
1,477,828
571,714
4,863,275
36,000
152,906
705,900
157,506,583
14,188,800
787,695
173,377,884
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
430,000
1,007,864
2,671,200
(7,138,000)
812,886
9,000
571,714
(1,635,336)
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,007,864
2,721,600
1,870,000
1,477,828
571,714
7,677,007
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
152,906
1,878,200
113,019,523
14,002,800
787,695
129,865,124
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
36,000
152,906
705,900
157,506,583
14,188,800
787,695
173,377,884
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
TokenLess
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
EES
RTS Enrolment
With Biometrics EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
4,340,000
1,078,641
2,773,200
19,272,000
1,178,212
36,000
5,717,144
34,395,196
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,094,000
1,529,056
41,874,100
73,192,496
34,074,720
7,876,954
181,641,325
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
319,224,897
34,395,196
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 115/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
7.21
7.21.1
C2D – Token-less RTS and Distributed Entry-Exit
System with biometrics
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario C2D
RTS
Yes token-less
EES
Yes, with biometrics
Biometric Data specification
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
Yes
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
Yes
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
Yes
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
No
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 116/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.21.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.21.2.1 VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
Tariff
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C2D - Distributed EES with biometrics, Token-Less RTS, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Time
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
EU
€
74
€
74
€
85
€
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
15,140 €
€
€
34,093 €
€
102,966 €
€
€
€
€
497,861 €
€
€
3,108,310 €
€
141,864 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
6,238,600
506,019
1,335,600
1,210,000
4,685,170
45,000
875,210
14,895,600
3,699,000
1,294,440
55,540,400
279,319,878
19,767,600
1,205,846
360,827,163
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
500,000
1,335,600
440,000
10,335,278
12,624,878
189,418,949
20,926,800
210,345,749
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
12,477,200
1,012,039
2,671,200
2,420,000
4,685,170
45,000
875,210
24,185,819
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,000,000
2,671,200
880,000
10,335,278
14,914,478
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,699,000
1,294,440
55,540,400
279,319,878
19,767,600
1,205,846
360,827,163
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
189,418,949
20,926,800
210,345,749
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Total one time costs
Token- EES
Less
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
With Biometrics EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Yes
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
20,947,800
1,120,388
2,773,200
29,140,000
2,522,910
90,000
8,752,105
65,346,403
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
35,748,000
12,944,397
1,782,000
67,500,000
80,816,064
36,499,680
12,058,456
247,348,597
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
399,096,670
65,346,403
Yes
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 117/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.21.2.2 VIS connection
Tariff
Time
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C2D - Distributed EES with biometrics, Token-Less RTS, connected to
VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
(€ per hour) (hour)
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
€
74
€
85
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
15,140 €
€
€
34,093 €
€
102,966 €
€
€
€
€
497,861 €
€
€
3,108,310 €
€
141,864 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
6,238,600
506,019
1,335,600
1,210,000
4,685,170
45,000
875,210
14,895,600
3,699,000
1,294,440
55,540,400
279,319,878
19,767,600
1,205,846
360,827,163
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
500,000
1,335,600
440,000
10,335,278
12,624,878
189,418,949
20,926,800
210,345,749
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
12,477,200
1,012,039
2,671,200
2,420,000
4,685,170
45,000
875,210
24,185,819
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,000,000
2,671,200
880,000
10,335,278
14,914,478
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,699,000
1,294,440
55,540,400
279,319,878
19,767,600
1,205,846
360,827,163
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
189,418,949
20,926,800
210,345,749
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
TokenLess
Total one time costs
EU
€
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
EES
RTS Enrolment
With Biometrics EES/RTS built together
at both
RTS Border Check mode
Interfaced
with VIS
Yes
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
20,947,800
1,120,388
2,773,200
29,140,000
2,522,910
90,000
8,752,105
65,346,403
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
35,748,000
12,944,397
1,782,000
67,500,000
80,816,064
36,499,680
12,058,456
247,348,597
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
399,096,670
65,346,403
Yes
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 118/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.22
7.22.1
C3C – Token-less RTS and Centralised Entry-Exit
System with biometrics added later
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario C3C
RTS
Yes token-less
EES
With biometrics added later
Biometric Data specification
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
Yes
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
Yes
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
Yes
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
No
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 119/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.22.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.22.2.1 VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
Tariff
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C3C - Token-Less RTS, EES with biometrics added later, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Time
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
Type of
Target
Description of required action
Obligation
Groups
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
14,620
€
74
17,114
€
85
70,006
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
215,000
504,093
1,335,600
(3,569,000)
873,562
9,000
595,050
(36,695)
24,000
148,376
1,878,200
113,003,106
14,002,800
764,360
129,820,841
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
504,093
1,360,800
935,000
1,594,142
595,050
5,003,085
36,000
148,376
705,900
157,490,166
14,188,800
764,360
173,333,601
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
430,000
1,008,185
2,671,200
(7,138,000)
873,562
9,000
595,050
(1,551,003)
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,008,185
2,721,600
1,870,000
1,594,142
595,050
7,816,977
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
148,376
1,878,200
113,003,106
14,002,800
764,360
129,820,841
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
36,000
148,376
705,900
157,490,166
14,188,800
764,360
173,333,601
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
RTS
Scenario
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
Token- EES
Less
Self
RTS Enrolment
Contained
Biometrics added EES/RTS built together
later
at both
RTS Border Check mode
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
4,340,000
1,081,851
2,773,200
19,272,000
1,266,448
36,000
5,950,500
34,719,998
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,094,000
1,483,757
41,874,100
73,028,323
34,074,720
7,643,598
181,198,498
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
318,782,070
34,719,998
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 120/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.22.2.2 VIS connection
Tariff
Time
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C3C - Token-Less RTS, EES with biometrics added later, connected to
VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
(€ per hour) (hour)
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Target
Type of
Description of required action
Groups
Obligation
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
€
74
14,620
€
74
16,312
€
85
70,006
€
26
10,260
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
215,000
504,093
1,335,600
(3,569,000)
815,775
9,000
595,050
(94,483)
24,000
148,376
1,878,200
113,003,106
14,002,800
764,360
129,820,841
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
504,093
1,360,800
935,000
1,480,717
595,050
4,889,660
36,000
148,376
705,900
157,490,166
14,188,800
764,360
173,333,601
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
430,000
1,008,185
2,671,200
(7,138,000)
815,775
9,000
595,050
(1,608,790)
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,008,185
2,721,600
1,870,000
1,480,717
595,050
7,703,552
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,000
148,376
1,878,200
113,003,106
14,002,800
764,360
129,820,841
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
36,000
148,376
705,900
157,490,166
14,188,800
764,360
173,333,601
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
293,450
11,967,050
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
519,864
24,984,264
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
TokenLess
Total one time costs
EU
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Price
EES
RTS Enrolment
Biometrics added EES/RTS built together
later
RTS Border Check mode
at both
Interfaced
with VIS
No
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
4,340,000
1,081,851
2,773,200
19,272,000
1,207,101
36,000
5,950,500
34,660,651
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
23,094,000
1,483,757
41,874,100
73,028,323
34,074,720
7,643,598
181,198,498
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
266,772
137,583,572
€
318,782,070
34,660,651
No
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Semi-Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 25.9 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 121/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller
Systems
7.23
7.23.1
C3D – Token-less RTS and Distributed Entry-Exit
System with biometrics added later
Scenario Parameters
The following parameters and values apply.
Scenario C3D
RTS
Yes token-less
EES
Yes, with biometrics added later
Biometric Data specification
Fingerprint images in EES
No
Fingerprint templates in EES
Yes
Fingerprint images in RTS
No
Fingerprint templates in RTS
Yes
Facial Matching
No
Fingerprint matching
Yes
TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred
Yes
TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred
No
VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect
Yes
VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect
No
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 122/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.23.2
Cost Summary Tables
7.23.2.1 VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C3D - Distributed EES with biometrics added later, Token-Less RTS,
not connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Target
Type of
Description of required action
Groups
Obligation
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Tariff
Time
Price
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
Total one time costs
EU
€
74
€
74
€
85
€
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
15,207 €
€
€
34,691 €
€
107,169 €
€
€
€
€
483,112 €
€
€
3,098,192 €
€
137,661 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
6,238,600
506,265
1,335,600
1,210,000
4,689,592
45,000
910,934
14,935,991
3,699,000
1,256,092
55,540,400
275,657,463
19,767,600
1,170,122
357,090,677
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
500,000
1,335,600
440,000
10,335,278
12,624,878
189,418,949
20,926,800
210,345,749
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
12,477,200
1,012,530
2,671,200
2,420,000
4,689,592
45,000
910,934
24,226,456
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,000,000
2,671,200
880,000
10,335,278
14,914,478
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,699,000
1,256,092
55,540,400
275,657,463
19,767,600
1,170,122
357,090,677
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
189,418,949
20,926,800
210,345,749
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Token- EES
Less
RTS Enrolment
Self
Contained
Biometrics added EES/RTS built together
later
RTS Border Check mode
at both
Yes
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
20,947,800
1,125,302
2,773,200
29,140,000
2,567,135
90,000
9,109,338
65,752,775
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
35,748,000
12,560,918
1,782,000
67,500,000
80,552,997
36,499,680
11,701,222
246,344,816
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
398,092,889
65,752,775
Yes
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 123/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered Traveller Systems
7.23.2.2 VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C3D - Distributed EES with biometrics added later, Token-Less RTS,
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
37
Target
Type of
Description of required action
Groups
Obligation
Management Authority
Management Authority Hardware
Management Authority Other (training, meetings)
Management Authority Infrastructure
Management Authority software
Management Authority Admin
Management Authority Office Space
Management Authority Contractor Development
Subtotal MA
Member States
Member States Hardware
Member States Other (training, meetings)
Member States Infrastructure
Member States software
Member States Admin
Member States Office Space
Member States Contractor Development
Subtotal MS
Tariff
Price
Price
Freq
Nbr of
Entities
(€ per hour) (hour)
in 2014
in 2020
(per year)
Total
Total Yearly
Number of Incurring costs
actions
in 2014
Total Yearly
Incurring costs
in 2020
Total one time costs
EU
€
74
€
74
€
85
€
Member States Border Check Points
Automated Border Check Points
Semi-Manual Border Check Points
Manual Border Check Points
Border Control Staff - Automated Check Points
Border Control Staff - Semi-Manual Check Points
Border Control Staff - Manual Check Points
Subtotal Border Check Points
Time
26
€
26
€
85
26
€
26
€
€
15,207 €
€
€
34,691 €
€
107,169 €
€
€
€
€
483,112 €
€
€
3,098,192 €
€
137,661 €
€
€
€
€
€
5281415.385 €
€
€
555,049 €
€
6,238,600
506,265
1,335,600
1,210,000
4,689,592
45,000
910,934
14,935,991
3,699,000
1,256,092
55,540,400
275,657,463
19,767,600
1,170,122
357,090,677
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
14,000
500,000
1,335,600
440,000
10,335,278
12,624,878
189,418,949
20,926,800
210,345,749
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
12,477,200
1,012,530
2,671,200
2,420,000
4,689,592
45,000
910,934
24,226,456
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
28,000
1,000,000
2,671,200
880,000
10,335,278
14,914,478
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
3,699,000
1,256,092
55,540,400
275,657,463
19,767,600
1,170,122
357,090,677
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
189,418,949
20,926,800
210,345,749
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
11,673,600
15,658,107
27,331,707
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
24,464,400
24,764,314
49,228,714
Total of
administrati
ve costs
Scenario
RTS
Specification
Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS
Token- EES
Less
RTS Enrolment
Self
Contained
Biometrics added EES/RTS built together
later
RTS Border Check mode
at both
Yes
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
20,947,800
1,125,302
2,773,200
29,140,000
2,567,135
90,000
9,109,338
65,752,775
€
€
€
MS
€
-
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
35,748,000
12,560,918
1,782,000
67,500,000
80,552,997
36,499,680
11,701,222
246,344,816
-
€
€
€
€
€
€
€
137,316,800
14,431,273
151,748,073
€
398,092,889
65,752,775
Yes
Manual Housing
Co-located with
VIS
Bio-searches
based on
Co-located with
VIS
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Deploying semi-manual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems
Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings
Project Schedule is 29.8 months
Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 124/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
8
SUMMARY TABLE
The tables below summarises the cost estimates for all the different scenarios that were presented
in section 7 of this report. For the easier comparison, there are three tables in this section:
1. Comparison of the costs for VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
2. Comparison of the costs for VIS connection.
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 125/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
8.1
Comparison of the costs for VIS co-location (no VIS
connection)
Table 16: Comparison of the costs - VIS co-location (no VIS connection)
€
22,741,703
€
EU Total Yearly MS Total Yearly EU Total Yearly MS Total Yearly
Incurring costs
Incurring costs Incurring costs
Incurring costs
in 2020
in 2020
in 2014
in 2014
184,844,599 €
6,220,758 €
128,532,953 €
6,035,990 €
158,939,594
€
31,840,217
€
181,699,133
€
(3,156,308) €
125,904,137
€
6,644,764
€
157,052,092
€
32,228,963
€
180,980,228
€
(3,107,532) €
125,822,345
€
6,644,764
€
157,052,092
€
22,741,703
€
184,844,599
€
6,220,758
€
128,532,953
€
6,035,990
€
158,939,594
€
29,062,869
€
188,928,019
€
6,898,351
€
128,895,819
€
6,035,990
€
158,939,594
€
38,579,054
€
189,519,267
€
(1,360,213) €
129,200,082
€
7,121,294
€
160,605,800
€
38,978,952
€
188,852,164
€
(1,320,224) €
129,133,371
€
7,121,294
€
160,605,800
€
31,723,065
€
185,624,462
€
(271,459) €
128,860,361
€
9,370,708
€
159,625,889
€
38,192,130
€
190,226,091
€
(1,398,670) €
129,270,764
€
7,078,848
€
159,610,089
€
38,192,130
€
190,231,742
€
(1,398,670) €
129,510,766
€
6,694,704
€
161,228,147
€
38,610,142
€
189,534,423
€
(1,356,869) €
129,441,034
€
6,694,704
€
161,228,147
€
13,703,708
€
204,105,549
€
4,759,085
€
125,753,063
€
4,932,782
€
151,145,325
€
17,606,643
€
238,279,550
€
5,264,328
€
130,231,344
€
5,380,254
€
158,978,405
€
18,162,354
€
237,147,454
€
5,319,899
€
130,118,134
€
5,380,254
€
158,978,405
€
30,148,252
€
202,565,363
€
7,654,087
€
339,457,191
€
5,156,828
€
195,722,677
€
46,139,013
€
245,370,851
€
7,818,367
€
350,314,693
€
5,110,721
€
208,785,621
€
46,139,013
€
245,370,851
€
7,818,367
€
350,314,693
€
5,110,721
€
208,785,621
EU Cost Model:
€
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C1D - Distributed EES no biometrics, Token-Less RTS, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
€
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C2D - Distributed EES with biometrics, Token-Less RTS, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
€
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C3D - Distributed EES with biometrics added later, Token-Less
RTS, not connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
42,877,216
€
212,306,433
€
7,466,024
€
377,861,788
€
5,092,676
€
199,235,749
45,639,124
€
247,348,597
€
7,742,214
€
357,644,763
€
5,092,676
€
207,067,749
46,045,496
€
246,344,816
€
7,782,851
€
353,908,277
€
5,092,676
€
207,067,749
EU one-time
costs
Scenario, no VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A1C - Central EES no biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS,
co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A2C - Central EES with biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS,
co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A3C - Central EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B0 - Token-Based RTS, No EES, not connected to VIS, co-located
with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B1C - Token-Based RTS, EES no biometrics, not connected to
VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B2C - Token-Based RTS, EES with biometrics, not connected to
VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B3C - Token-Based RTS, EES with biometrics added later, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C0 - Token-Less RTS, No EES, not connected to VIS, co-located
with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C1C - Token-Less RTS, EES no biometrics, not connected to VIS,
co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C2C - Token-Less RTS, EES with biometrics, not connected to
VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C3C - Token-Less RTS, EES with biometrics added later, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A1D - Distributed EES no biometrics, no RTS, not connected to
VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A2D - Distributed EES with biometrics, no RTS, not connected to
VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A3D - Distributed EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B1D - Distributed EES no biometrics, Token-Based RTS, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B2D - Distributed EES with biometrics, Token-Based RTS, not
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B3D - Distributed EES with biometrics added later, Token-Based
RTS, not connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
MS one-time
Costs
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 126/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
8.2
Comparison of the costs for VIS connection
Table 17: Comparison of costs – VIS connection
€
18,897,846
€
EU Total Yearly MS Total Yearly EU Total Yearly MS Total Yearly
Incurring costs
Incurring costs Incurring costs
Incurring costs
in 2014
in 2014
in 2020
in 2020
187,305,874 €
4,645,194 €
126,539,826 €
6,029,326 €
157,041,492
€
31,773,415
€
181,699,133
€
(3,212,688) €
125,904,137
€
6,531,339
€
157,052,092
€
32,162,161
€
180,980,228
€
(3,163,913) €
125,822,345
€
6,531,339
€
157,052,092
€
22,698,202
€
184,844,599
€
6,166,345
€
128,532,953
€
5,989,104
€
158,939,594
€
29,019,368
€
188,928,019
€
6,843,937
€
128,895,819
€
5,989,104
€
158,939,594
€
38,520,222
€
189,519,267
€
(1,417,532) €
129,200,082
€
7,007,869
€
160,605,800
€
38,920,120
€
188,852,164
€
(1,377,542) €
129,133,371
€
7,007,869
€
160,605,800
€
31,674,930
€
185,624,462
€
(354,499) €
128,860,361
€
9,015,781
€
159,625,889
€
38,132,783
€
190,226,091
€
(1,456,457) €
129,270,764
€
6,965,424
€
159,610,089
€
38,132,783
€
190,231,742
€
(1,456,457) €
129,510,766
€
6,581,279
€
161,228,147
€
38,550,794
€
189,534,423
€
(1,414,656) €
129,441,034
€
6,581,279
€
161,228,147
€
13,659,500
€
204,105,549
€
4,727,786
€
125,753,063
€
4,885,896
€
151,145,325
€
17,562,435
€
238,279,550
€
5,233,029
€
130,231,344
€
5,333,368
€
158,978,405
€
18,118,146
€
237,147,454
€
5,288,600
€
130,118,134
€
5,333,368
€
158,978,405
€
30,114,832
€
202,565,363
€
7,623,611
€
339,457,191
€
5,109,942
€
195,722,677
€
46,096,078
€
245,370,851
€
7,772,953
€
350,314,693
€
5,063,835
€
208,785,621
€
46,096,078
€
245,370,851
€
7,772,953
€
350,314,693
€
5,063,835
€
208,785,621
EU Cost Model:
€
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C1D - Distributed EES no biometrics, Token-Less RTS, connected
to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
€
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C2D - Distributed EES with biometrics, Token-Less RTS,
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
€
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C3D - Distributed EES with biometrics added later, Token-Less
RTS, connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
42,833,766
€
212,306,433
€
7,420,141
€
377,861,788
€
5,045,789
€
199,235,749
45,595,674
€
247,348,597
€
7,696,332
€
357,644,763
€
5,045,789
€
207,067,749
46,045,496
€
246,344,816
€
7,782,851
€
353,908,277
€
5,092,676
€
207,067,749
EU one-time
costs
Scenario, with VIS connection
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A1C - Central EES no biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A2C - Central EES with biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A3C - Central EES with biometrics added later, no RTS,
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B0 - Token-Based RTS, No EES, connected to VIS, co-located
with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B1C - Token-Based RTS, EES no biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B2C - Token-Based RTS, EES with biometrics, connected to VIS,
co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B3C - Token-Based RTS, EES with biometrics added later,
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C0 - Token-Less RTS, No EES, connected to VIS, co-located with
VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C1C - Token-Less RTS, EES no biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C2C - Token-Less RTS, EES with biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
C3C - Token-Less RTS, EES with biometrics added later,
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A1D - Distributed EES no biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS,
co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A2D - Distributed EES with biometrics, no RTS, connected to
VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
A3D - Distributed EES with biometrics added later, no RTS,
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B1D - Distributed EES no biometrics, Token-Based RTS,
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B2D - Distributed EES with biometrics, Token-Based RTS,
connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
EU Cost Model:
Proposal for the EES/RTS
B3D - Distributed EES with biometrics added later, Token-Based
RTS, connected to VIS, co-located with VIS, 5 year retention
MS one-time
Costs
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 127/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
9
REFERENCE AND APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
9.1
Applicable documents
ID
Reference
Title
Version
A1
CB-C-PQP-001
Project Quality Plan
1.10
A2
Call for Tender JLS-B3-2007-05
N/A
A3
Framework Contract JLS-B3-2007-05
N/A
Table 18: Applicable Documents
9.2
Reference documents
ID
Reference
Title
R1
20091110_EES
_RT_IA_Cost_T
oR_lang.doc
Specifications For A Cost Analysis
Study, EU Commission, 10
November 2009
R2
20091110_EES
_RT_IA_Cost_R
oadmap.doc
Cost Analysis Study/Roadmap
10.11.2009, P. Nokelainen et all,
10 November 2009
R3
Impact Assessment Guidelines SEC
(2009) 92
R4
Draft proposal for a Regulation
establishing a Registered Traveller
Programme
R5
Draft proposal for a Regulation
establishing the Entry/Exit System
(EES) to register entry and exit
data of third country nationals
crossing the external borders of
the Member States of the
European Union
R6
CA-B38-FR-004
Entry-Exit Feasibility Study, Final
report CA-B38-FR-004, 7.2.2008,
in particular Chapters 7 and 8 as
well as the data tables
R7
Migrapol 222, 14.10.2008;
R8
Migrapol 234, 2.3.2009
R9
SEC(2009) 837
Version
Commission staff working
document accompanying the
Proposal for a Regulation of the EP
and the Council establishing an
Agency for the operational
management of large-scale IT
systems in the area of freedom,
security and justice and the
Proposal for a Council decision
conferring upon the Agency
established by Regulation XX tasks
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 128/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
ID
Reference
Title
Version
regarding the operational
management of SIS II and VIS in
application of Title VI of the EU
Treaty,
R10
COM(2009) 292
final
Communication from the
Commission on a legislative
package establishing an Agency
for the operational management of
large-scale IT systems in the area
of freedom, security and justice
N/A
R11
COM(2009) 293
final
Proposal for a Regulation of the EP
and the Council establishing an
Agency for the operational
management of large-scale IT
systems in the area of freedom,
security and justice
N/A
Proposal for a Council decision
conferring upon the Agency
established by Regulation XX tasks
regarding the operational
management of SIS II and VIS in
application of Title VI of the EU
Treaty
N/A
Inception Report on Cost Study on
Entry-Exit System and Registered
Traveller System
1.00
Proposal for a “REGULATION OF
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND
OF THE COUNCIL”
As provided
by COM
R12
R13
R14
CB-E-SO30REP-003
Table 19: Reference Documents
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 129/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
10
TERMINOLOGY AND ANNEXES
10.1
Acronyms & Abbreviations
Acronym or
Abbreviation
Meaning
AFIS
Automated Fingerprint Information System
BMS
Biometric Matching System
BCP
Border Control Point
BCU
Backup Central Unit
BOM
Bill-of-Materials
CAGR
Compound Annual Growth Rate
CMS
Card Management System
CNI
Central National Interface
COM
The European Commission (DG JLS)
COTS
Custom Of The Shelf
CP
Consular Post
CPUs
Central Processing Unit
CS
Central System
CU
Central Unit
DHCP
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
DNS
Domain Name Service
EDCA
Enterprise Data Centre Architecture
E-E
Entry-Exit
EES
Entry-Exit System
e-Gate
Automated Gate
FPA
Function-Point Analysis
FP-Matcher
Fingerprints matcher
HW
Hardware
KMS
Key Management System
LAN
Local Area Network
MS
Member State(s)
MRZ
Machine Readable Zone
NBCS
National Border Control System
NI.RTS
National Interface to the Central RTS.
NI.EES
National Interface to the Central EES
NIS
National Information Systems
NPS
National Police System
N-VIS
National Visa Information System
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 130/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
Q&A
Questions and Answers
RDBMS
Relational database Management System
RT
Registered Traveller
RTS
Registered Traveller System
SAN
Storage Area Network
SIS
Schengen Information System
SW
Software
TCN
Third-Country National
TCVNE
Third-Country National Visa Exempt
TCVNH
Third Country National Visa Holder
Testa
Trans European Services for Telematics between Administrations
ToR
Terms of Reference
UIS
Unisys
VIS
Visa Information System
WAN
Wide Area Network
WBS
Work Break Down Structure
Table 20: Acronyms & Abbreviations
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 131/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
11
ANNEX 1 – COST MODEL BUILDING BLOCKS
ID
Building Block Description
Phase
Category
Allocated
C1
TESTA interface (100 Mbps links), yearly investments
DEV
INF
MA
C1
TESTA interface (100 Mbps links), yearly investments
OPE
INF
MA
C1
TESTA interface (1 Gbps links), yearly investments
DEV
INF
MA
C1
TESTA interface (1 Gbps links), yearly investments
OPE
INF
MA
C2
WEBSERVER, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MA
C2
WEBSERVER, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MA
C3
RTS Directory Server, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MA
C3
RTS Directory Server, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MA
C4
CU-BCU Interconnect, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MA
C4
CU-BCU Interconnect, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MA
C5
Supporting Servers, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MA
C5
Supporting Servers, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MA
C6
Database Server, 1 yr retention, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MA
C6
Database Server, 1 yr retention, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MA
C7
Logging Server, 1 yr retention, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MA
C7
Logging Server, 1 yr retention, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MA
C8
EES Application Server, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MA
C8
EES Application Server, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MA
C9
RTS Application Server, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MA
C9
RTS Application Server, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MA
C10-13
EES RTS Data Storage, 1 yr retention, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MA
C10-13
EES RTS Data Storage, 1 yr retention, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MA
C14
HARDWARE for Facial Matching 1 year retention of
biometric data, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MA
C14
HARDWARE for Facial Matching 1 year retention of
biometric data, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MA
C15
HARDWARE for Fingerprint matching 1 year retention of
biometric data, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MA
C15
HARDWARE for Fingerprint matching 1 year retention of
biometric data, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MA
C16
CMS & KMS HARDWARE , yearly investments
DEV
HW
MA
C16
CMS & KMS HARDWARE , yearly investments
OPE
HW
MA
C17
VIS/BMS Interconnect, co-located, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MA
C17
VIS/BMS Interconnect, co-located, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MA
C17
VIS/BMS Interconnect, independently located, STM-1,
yearly investments
DEV
HW
MA
C17
VIS/BMS Interconnect, independently located, STM-1,
yearly investments
OPE
HW
MA
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 132/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
ID
Building Block Description
Phase
Category
Allocated
C17
VIS/BMS Interconnect, independently located, STM-4,
yearly investments
DEV
HW
MA
C17
VIS/BMS Interconnect, independently located, STM-4,
yearly investments
OPE
HW
MA
N1
MS RTS Application Server, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MS
N1
MS RTS Application Server, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MS
N2
MS EES Application Server, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MS
N2
MS EES Application Server, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MS
N3
Consular Post RTS enrolment, yearly investments
DEV
ENROL
MS
N3
Consular Post RTS enrolment, yearly investments
OPE
ENROL
MS
N4
NI.RTS Server, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MS
N4
NI.RTS Server, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MS
N5
NI.EES Server, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MS
N5
NI.EES Server, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MS
N6
Border Control Point RTS enrolment, yearly investments
DEV
ENROL
MS
N6
Border Control Point RTS enrolment, yearly investments
OPE
ENROL
MS
N7
Automated RTS Border Control Point, yearly
investments
DEV
A-BORDER
MS
N7
Automated RTS Border Control Point, yearly
investments
OPE
A-BORDER
MS
N8
Semi-manual RTS Border Control Point, yearly
investments
DEV
S-BORDER
MS
N8
Semi-manual RTS Border Control Point, yearly
investments
OPE
S-BORDER
MS
N9
Manual Border Control Point, yearly investments
DEV
M-BORDER
MS
N9
Manual Border Control Point, yearly investments
OPE
M-BORDER
MS
N10
MS EES -RTS Database Server, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MS
N10
MS EES -RTS Database Server, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MS
N11
MS National Storage, 1 yr retention, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MS
N11
MS National Storage, 1 yr retention, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MS
N12
MS TESTA Interface, yearly investments
DEV
INF
MS
N12
MS TESTA Interface, yearly investments
OPE
INF
MS
N13
MS HARDWARE for Facial Matching 1 year retention of
biometric data, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MS
N13
MS HARDWARE for Facial Matching 1 year retention of
biometric data, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MS
N14
MS HARDWARE for Fingerprint matching 1 year
retention of biometric data, yearly investments
DEV
HW
MS
N14
MS HARDWARE for Fingerprint matching 1 year
retention of biometric data, yearly investments
OPE
HW
MS
OS
Operating System licenses, yearly investments
DEV
SW
MA
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 133/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
ID
Building Block Description
Phase
Category
Allocated
OS
Operating System licenses, yearly investments
OPE
SW
MA
MSG
Messaging Software licensing, yearly investments
DEV
SW
MA
MSG
Messaging Software licensing, yearly investments
OPE
SW
MA
DB
Database Software licenses, yearly investments
DEV
SW
MA
DB
Database Software licenses, yearly investments
OPE
SW
MA
DIRECTORY
Directory Server software licenses, yearly investments
DEV
SW
MA
DIRECTORY
Directory Server software licenses, yearly investments
OPE
SW
MA
CMS &
KMS
Token Management and Key Management Software,
yearly investments
DEV
SW
MA
CMS &
KMS
Token Management and Key Management Software,
yearly investments
OPE
SW
MA
OTHER
SOFTWAR
E
Supporting Server Software, yearly investments
DEV
SW
MA
OTHER
SOFTWAR
E
Supporting Server Software, yearly investments
OPE
SW
MA
AFIS
AFIS SOFTWARE, yearly investments
DEV
SW
MA
AFIS
AFIS SOFTWARE, yearly investments
OPE
SW
MA
FACE
MATCH
Face Matching Software, yearly investments
DEV
SW
MA
FACE
MATCH
Face Matching Software, yearly investments
OPE
SW
MA
MS-OS
MS Operating System licenses, yearly investments
DEV
SW
MS
MS-OS
MS Operating System licenses, yearly investments
OPE
SW
MS
MS-MSG
MS Messaging Software (application servers), yearly
investments
DEV
SW
MS
MS-MSG
MS Messaging Software (application servers), yearly
investments
OPE
SW
MS
MS-DB
MS Database Software, yearly investments
DEV
SW
MS
MS-DB
MS Database Software, yearly investments
OPE
SW
MS
AFIS
MS AFIS Software 1yr, yearly investments
DEV
SW
MS
AFIS
MS AFIS Software 1yr, yearly investments
OPE
SW
MS
FACE
MATCH
MS Face Match Software 1yr, yearly investments
DEV
SW
MS
FACE
MATCH
MS Face Match Software 1yr, yearly investments
OPE
SW
MS
Management Authority Power costs per year
OPE
ADM
MA
MS Power Costs per year
OPE
ADM
MS
MA Technical system managers
OPE
ADM
MA
MA DBA
OPE
ADM
MA
MA Admin support
OPE
ADM
MA
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 134/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
ID
Building Block Description
Phase
Category
Allocated
MA Team leader/planner
OPE
ADM
MA
MA Central site helpdesk & Incident Management
OPE
ADM
MA
MA Helpdesk
OPE
ADM
MA
MA Technical support
OPE
ADM
MA
MA Helpdesk one-off Office Space
OPE
OFFICE
MA
MA Technical office space
OPE
OFFICE
MA
MA EES Communication Costs
OPE
INF
MA
MA RTS Communication Costs
OPE
INF
MA
MS Technical system managers
OPE
ADM
MS
MS DBA
OPE
ADM
MS
MS Admin support
OPE
ADM
MS
MS Team leader/planner
OPE
ADM
MS
MS helpdesk & Incident Management
OPE
ADM
MS
MS Helpdesk
OPE
ADM
MS
MS Technical support
OPE
ADM
MS
MS Helpdesk one-off Office Space
OPE
OFFICE
MS
MS Technical office space
OPE
OFFICE
MS
MA Hardware Maintenance, 1yr retention
OPE
ADM
MA
MA COTS Software Maintenance, 1yr retention
OPE
ADM
MA
MS Hardware Maintenance, 1yr retention
OPE
ADM
MS
MS COTS Software Maintenance, 1yr retention
OPE
ADM
MS
Automated Border Control Staff
OPE
B-OFFICER-A
MS
Semi-manual Border Control Staff
OPE
B-OFFICER-S
MS
Manual Border Control Staff
OPE
B-OFFICER-M
MS
TESTA 600Mbps monthly costs (MA) (1yr)
OPE
INF
MA
TESTA 600Mbps monthly costs (MS)(1yr)
OPE
INF
MA
Contractor EES Development
DEV
CONTR
MA
Contractor EES Development
OPE
CONTR
MA
Contractor RTS Development
DEV
CONTR
MA
Contractor RTS Development
OPE
CONTR
MA
Contractor EES/RTS Development
DEV
CONTR
MA
Contractor EES/RTS Development
OPE
CONTR
MA
Contractor Testing
DEV
CONTR
MA
Contractor Testing
OPE
CONTR
MA
Contractor Training development
DEV
CONTR
MA
Contractor Training development
OPE
CONTR
MA
Contractor EES Development
DEV
CONTR
MS
Contractor EES Development
OPE
CONTR
MS
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 135/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
ID
Building Block Description
Phase
Category
Allocated
Contractor RTS Development
DEV
CONTR
MS
Contractor RTS Development
OPE
CONTR
MS
Contractor EES/RTS Development
DEV
CONTR
MS
Contractor EES/RTS Development
OPE
CONTR
MS
Contractor Testing
DEV
CONTR
MS
Contractor Testing
OPE
CONTR
MS
Contractor Training development
DEV
CONTR
MS
Contractor Training development
OPE
CONTR
MS
MA EES Project Management & QA
DEV
ADM
MA
MA EES Project Management & QA
OPE
ADM
MA
MA RTS Project Management & QA
DEV
ADM
MA
MA RTS Project Management & QA
OPE
ADM
MA
MA EES/RTS Project management & QA
DEV
ADM
MA
MA EES/RTS Project management & QA
OPE
ADM
MA
MA Testing
DEV
ADM
MA
MA Testing
OPE
ADM
MA
MA Training
DEV
OTH
MA
MA Training
OPE
OTH
MA
MS EES Project Management
DEV
ADM
MA
MS EES Project Management
OPE
ADM
MA
MS RTS Project Management
DEV
ADM
MA
MS RTS Project Management
OPE
ADM
MA
MS EES/RTS Project Management
DEV
ADM
MS
MS EES/RTS Project Management
OPE
ADM
MS
MS Testing
DEV
ADM
MS
MS Testing
OPE
ADM
MS
MS Training
DEV
OTH
MS
MS Training
OPE
OTH
MS
MA Monthly Progress meetings
OPE
OTH
MA
MA Quarterly Meetings
OPE
OTH
MA
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 136/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry-Exit & Registered
Traveller Systems
12
ANNEX 2 – COST XPERT INPUT REPORTS
For the Annexes see separate zip file delivered with the report (Entry-Exit&Registered-TravellerAnnex-2.v.1.10).
*** End of CB-E-30-REP-003 ***
Quality Assurance, JLS-B3-2007-05, CB-E-so30-REP-003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 137/137
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION