Discussion Interest Rate Swaps and Corporate Default by Jermann and Yue Xiaoji Lin

advertisement

Discussion

Interest Rate Swaps and Corporate Default by Jermann and Yue

Xiaoji Lin

Ohio State University

Minnesota Macro Asset Pricing Conference

May 10, 2013

Summary of the Paper

Interest rate swaps in a general equilibrium model

Countercyclical idiosyncratic volatility and in‡ation risk important for:

1 …rms being …xed-rate payers

2 the negative relation between swap positions and the term spread

Summary of the Paper

Interest rate swaps in a general equilibrium model

Countercyclical idiosyncratic volatility and in‡ation risk important for:

1 …rms being …xed-rate payers

2 the negative relation between swap positions and the term spread

Summary of the Paper

Interest rate swaps in a general equilibrium model

Countercyclical idiosyncratic volatility and in‡ation risk important for:

1 …rms being …xed-rate payers

2 the negative relation between swap positions and the term spread

Summary of the Paper

Interest rate swaps in a general equilibrium model

Countercyclical idiosyncratic volatility and in‡ation risk important for:

1 …rms being …xed-rate payers

2 the negative relation between swap positions and the term spread

Outline

1

Model

2

Mechanism

3

Comments

The Model

Timeline of the model w/t swaps

The Model

Timeline of the model w/t swaps

Tension between long term projects and short term debt

The Model

Timeline of the model with swaps

The Model

Timeline of the model with swaps

Interest rate swaps are used to reduce default risk

The Model

Firms’optimization problem max

B;s

P V ( output )( B ) debt ( B ) P V ( default cost )( B; s )

Firms optimally choose swaps to reduce default costs

Mechanism

Optimal swap position is determined by

1

2

Interest rate exposure

Productivity risk exposure

Aggregate productivity shocks

Countercyclical idiosyncratic volatility shocks

3

In‡ation risk exposure

(inf,prod)

1. Countercyclical idio vol is crucial for …rms being …xed-rate payers

E(swap)

Prod Inf+Prod Inf+Prod+ (inf,prod) All+CounterIdioVol

5.98

Corr(swap,TS) 0.24

-1.96

-1.37

0.33

Mechanism

Optimal swap position is determined by

1

2

Interest rate exposure

Productivity risk exposure

Aggregate productivity shocks

Countercyclical idiosyncratic volatility shocks

3

In‡ation risk exposure

(inf,prod)

1. Countercyclical idio vol is crucial for …rms being …xed-rate payers

E(swap)

Prod Inf+Prod Inf+Prod+ (inf,prod) All+CounterIdioVol

5.98

Corr(swap,TS) 0.24

-1.96

-1.37

0.33

Mechanism

Optimal swap position is determined by

1

2

Interest rate exposure

Productivity risk exposure

Aggregate productivity shocks

Countercyclical idiosyncratic volatility shocks

3

In‡ation risk exposure

(inf,prod) < 0

2. Negative (inf,prod) is crucial for corr(swap,TS) < 0

E(swap)

Prod Inf+Prod Inf+Prod+ (inf,prod) All+CounterIdioVol

5.98

-1.96

-1.37

0.33

Corr(swap,TS) 0.24

0.95

-0.92

-0.75

Swap Positions and Countercyclical Idiosyncratic Volatility

Bloom at al 2012 construct 21 measures of idiosyncratic time-varying uncertainty. 16 of them have positive correlations with swap positions.

15

Swap position

XS TFP volatility

0.6

10 0.55

5

0

0.5

0.45

-5

1993

0.4

2003 corr(% Swapped into …xed, XS TFP VOL) = 0.59 with p-value = 0.06

Swap Positions and Countercyclical Idiosyncratic Volatility

Bloom at al 2012 construct 21 measures of idiosyncratic time-varying uncertainty. 16 of them have positive correlations with swap positions.

15

Swap position

XS TFP volatility

0.6

10 0.55

5

0

0.5

0.45

-5

1993

0.4

2003 corr(% Swapped into …xed, XS TFP VOL) = 0.59 with p-value = 0.06

Swap Positions and Countercyclical Idiosyncratic Volatility

20

Swap pos ition

IQR W IT HIN FIRM T FP

0.35

10 0.3

0 0.25

- 10 0.2

corr(% Swapped into …xed, IQR within …rm TFP) = 0.63 with p-value =

0.04

Swap Positions and Countercyclical Idiosyncratic Volatility

20

Swap pos ition

Labor Prod Volatility

0.7

10 0.6

0 0.5

- 10 0.4

corr(% Swapped into …xed, Labor productivity shocks) = 0.58 with p-value

= 0.05

Swaps and Default

Interest rate swaps are used to reduce default risk

20

%Swapped into fix ed

BAA-AAA

7to10 y ear c orp y ld-10 y ear tr y ld

10

5

0

-5

1997 1998 1999 2000

Year

2001 2002 2003 2004 corr(Swap, 10-15 year corp yld- 10 year tr yld) = -0.28, p-value = 0.02

corr(Swap, 7-10 year corp yld- 10 year tr yld) = -0.18, p-value = 0.12

Swaps and Default

Interest rate swaps are used to reduce default risk

20

%Swapped into fix ed

BAA-AAA

7to10 y ear c orp y ld-10 y ear tr y ld

10

5

0

-5

1997 1998 1999 2000

Year

2001 2002 2003 2004 corr(Swap, 10-15 year corp yld- 10 year tr yld) = -0.28, p-value = 0.02

corr(Swap, 7-10 year corp yld- 10 year tr yld) = -0.18, p-value = 0.12

Swaps and Default

20

10

0

-10

1997

% swapped into fixed

7to10 year yld-10 year tr yld

3

2

1

0

2004

Swaps and Welfare

In the model: Value of swap usage is small.

Resource constraint:

Y = C + I

Default cost is wasted.

Welfare bene…t of interest swaps may be nontrivial. Swaps may have a wealth e¤ect for households?

Conclusion

Very nice and very interesting paper!

Model predictions consistent with the data

Would be nice to see additional tests of model mechanism.

Download