Women in U.S. Academic Medicine:
Statistics and Benchmarking Report
2009-2010
Learn
Serve
Lead
Association of
American Medical Colleges
Women in U.S. Academic Medicine
and Science:
Statistics and Benchmarking Report
2009–2010
March 2011
Women in U.S. Academic Medicine and Science:
Statistics and Benchmarking Report
2009–2010
Jennifer Leadley
Senior Professional Development Specialist
Rae Anne Sloane
Faculty Database Specialist
The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of AAMC staff members:
Hershel Alexander, Ph.D.
Director, Medical School and Faculty Studies
Jarod Field
Lead Associate Specialist
Tai Pham
Faculty Database Specialist
Stephanie Wragg, Ph.D.
Director, Women in Medicine and Science
A special thanks to Laurie Hergert, Technical Manager, and Tom Hudson, Business Relationship
Manager, who contributed to the technical design and development of the survey.
© 2011 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
2
Table of Contents
BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................ 4
THE 2009–2010 REPORT ............................................................................................................................ 5
MEDICAL SCHOOL APPLICANTS, STUDENTS, AND RESIDENTS ........................................................ 6
MEDICAL SCHOOL FACULTY.................................................................................................................... 6
FACULTY RANK BY GENDER, DEPARTMENT, DEGREE, AND ETHNICITY............................................................ 7
PROMOTION AND TENURE ....................................................................................................................... 9
NEW HIRES AND DEPARTURES ............................................................................................................... 9
LEADERSHIP POSITIONS .......................................................................................................................... 9
DIVISION/SECTION CHIEFS ......................................................................................................................... 10
ASSOCIATE CHAIRS AND VICE CHAIRS ........................................................................................................ 10
DEPARTMENT CHAIRS ................................................................................................................................ 10
DECANAL POSITIONS ................................................................................................................................. 10
RESOURCES TO SUPPORT WOMEN FACULTY .................................................................................... 11
CONCLUDING COMMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 12
Figures
Figure 1: Snapshot, A Ten Year Comparison of Women Representation in U.S. Medical Schools 6
Figure 2: U.S. Medical School Faculty Distribution by Rank and Gender, 2010
7
Figure 3A: Distribution of Women Faculty by Rank, 2010
7
Figure 3B: Distribution of Men Faculty by Rank, 2010
7
Figure 4: U.S. Medical School Faculty Distribution by Race/Hispanic Origin
8
Figure 5: Distribution of Women in Permanent, Interim, and Acting Leadership Positions, 2009 10
Figure 6: Percentage of U.S. Medical Schools Providing Resources for the Professional
Development of Women
11
Tables
Table 1: Medical Students, Selected Years, 1965–2010
Table 2: Distribution of Residents by Specialty, 1999 compared to 2009
Table 3: Distribution of Full-Time Faculty by Department, Rank, and Gender, 2010
Table 4A: Distribution of Women M.D. Faculty by Department and Rank, 2010
Table 4B: Distribution of Women Ph.D. Faculty by Department and Rank, 2010
Table 5: Distribution of Faculty by Race/Hispanic Origin, Gender, and Rank, 2010
Table 6A: 2009 Benchmarking—Women New Hires and Departures
Table 6B: 2009 Benchmarking—Men New Hires and Departures
Table 7: 2009 Benchmarking—Full-Time Faculty by Gender, Rank, and Tenure
Table 8: 2009 Benchmarking—New Tenure and Promotions for Full-Time Faculty
Table 9A: 2009 Benchmarking—Permanent Division/Section Chiefs and Department Chairs
Table 9B: 2009 Benchmarking—Acting Division/Section Chiefs and Department Chairs
Table 9C: 2009 Benchmarking—Interim Division/Section Chiefs and Department Chairs
Table 10A: 2009 Benchmarking—Permanent Decanal Positions
Table 10B: 2009 Benchmarking—Acting Decanal Positions
Table 10C: 2009 Benchmarking—Interim Decanal Positions
Table 11: Distribution of Chairs by Department, Gender, and Race/Hispanic Origins, 2010
Table 12: 2009 Benchmarking—Resources to Support Women Faculty
© 2011 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
22
25
28
31
35
39
43
46
49
52
54
3
Women in Academic Medicine and Science Statistics and
Benchmarking Survey, 2009–2010
Background
Since 1983, the survey has captured a national snapshot of women students, residents, faculty, and administrative
leaders in academic medicine. The data have served as a reliable resource to support gender equity studies and to
understand the progress of women’s representation in a variety of medical school positions.
In 1998, the AAMC Increasing Women’s Leadership Committee outlined an ambitious five-year plan to formalize
the data collection process and benchmark the extent of women’s representation in academic medicine. For the
first time, Faculty Roster Representatives (FRRs) and Women Liaison Officers (WLOs) were asked to provide
information on faculty departures and new hires, the number of women administrators, women’s representation
on committees, and funding for women faculty activities and programs. The inclusion of benchmarking tables in
the 1998 report enabled medical schools to examine historical trends in data and to compare local outcomes with
national averages.
A survey conducted by the Increasing Women’s Leadership Committee confirmed committee observations about
the paucity of women in leadership positions at many medical schools. These results stimulated discussions of
new strategies for recruiting, preparing, and advancing women leaders. Following these discussions, medical
schools have been surveyed periodically on ways to improve the environment for women in medicine and science.
For this year’s survey, 112 medical schools reported providing resources to support the professional development
of women.
In 2003, the Women in Medicine Coordinating Committee was established to develop new strategies for
advancing women and to educate others on women’s representation in academic medicine. Six years later, the
AAMC Board of Directors approved the creation of the Group on Women in Medicine and Science (GWIMS). This
action recognized the longstanding Women in Medicine Committee as a formal AAMC professional development
group.
GWIMS is committed to advancing the full and successful participation of women in all roles within academic
medicine. GWIMS-designated representatives are appointed by medical school deans and teaching hospital CEOs
to address gender disparities around the recruitment, retention, and advancement of women. Currently, there are
131 designated medical school representatives and eight teaching hospital representatives. The group
membership is inclusive of all member organizations (i.e., medical schools and teaching hospitals).
© 2011 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
4
The 2009–2010 Report
The GWIMS-designated representative was the primary recipient of the survey and was encouraged to partner
with his or her institution’s Faculty Roster Representative for data collection and completion of the survey. For
this year’s survey, 39 percent of the primary respondents listed themselves as the GWIMS-designated
representative, 44 percent listed themselves as the Faculty Roster Representative, and 20 percent listed
themselves as “other.” The total percentage exceeds 100 percent because a representative can fill more than one
role.
This year’s survey added several new elements to the data collection. Additional data were collected on:
1)
2)
3)
4)
Part-time faculty appointments,
Instructor appointments,
Volunteer faculty appointments, and
Temporary leadership appointments (e.g., interim and acting appointments).
The employment status in the organization is particularly relevant to understanding the role of women faculty.
Recognizing that each organization has specific definitions for employment status, the following criteria were
provided only as guidance:
•
•
•
Full-time: remunerated work and greater than 0.75 FTE (12-month contract)
Part-time: remunerated work but less than 0.75 FTE (12-month contract)
Volunteer: no remuneration, no defined FTE
The following definitions were provided for guidance in reporting the appointment status of leaders:
•
•
Interim: a temporary appointment while recruitment is underway (e.g., a chair steps down and is replaced
by an interim while a new search takes place for a permanent appointee).
Acting: an appointment made with a definite endpoint (e.g., a substitute while the permanent holder is
on sabbatical leave).
Also new this year, Canadian medical schools were asked to participate in order to shed light on female
representation in the faculty of the 17 affiliate medical school members.
Given the importance of Canadian faculty, part-time faculty, and volunteer faculty to understanding the role of
women in medicine and science, the survey will continue to collect this information in the future. But due to
potential limitations in the data submitted in this initial collection, these data points are not presented in this
report. For example, only three Canadian medical schools participated in the survey, and only 45 percent of the
responding U.S. medical schools provided information to all part-time sections of the survey.
The AAMC is pleased to announce that 117 of the 131 accredited U.S. medical schools completed the faculty,
administrative, and leadership portions of the survey this year, resulting in an 89 percent response rate. Thank you
to each of the schools that completed the survey. Your participation makes it possible to provide a historical
record of trends related to staffing patterns and resources in support of women in medicine and science.
© 2011 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
5
Medical School Applicants, Students, and Residents
In 2008 and
2009, women
represented 48
percent of the
total applicants,
matriculants,
and enrollments
to medical
schools.
The early 1970s was marked by a period of rapid growth of the number of women
applicants. At the same time, capacity for new medical students and demand for
new faculty was increasing with the opening of 27 new two-year and four-year
medical schools between 1965 and 1974.
Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, a steady increase in the number of men and
women applicants was documented. In 2003, the number of women applicants
exceeded that of men applicants for the first time. However, the proportion of
women applicants has been decreasing since 2005. In 2009, women represented 48
percent of the total applicants, matriculants, and enrollments to medical schools.
Over the years, the distribution of women residents among the various specialties
has fluctuated little even as the proportion of women in each of these specialties
continues to increase. For example, in 1999, the specialties with the highest
proportion of women were obstetrics and gynecology (67 percent), pediatrics (62
percent), medical genetics (51 percent), and dermatology (54 percent). Ten years
later—in 2009—the specialties with the highest proportion of women remained the
same: obstetrics and gynecology (80 percent), pediatrics (70 percent), medical genetics (68 percent), and
dermatology (62 percent).
Data sources: Table1, Table2
AAMC Data Warehouse, AAMC GME Track. See table legends for additional sources.
Medical School Faculty
Among medical school faculty, women continue to be underrepresented at the rank of full professor and in
leadership positions, compared to men. Figure 1 compares the representation of women in medical schools in
1999 and 2009. Over the last 10 years, division/section chief, department chair, and dean appointments have had
the largest increases in the proportion of women.
Figure 1: Snapshot, A Ten-Year Comparison of Women
Representation in U.S. Medical Schools, 1999 vs. 2009
Applicants
Accepted Applicants
Residents
Instructors/Other Ranks
Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
Division/Section Chiefs
Department Chairs
Deans
© 2011 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
1999
2009
45%
46%
36%
46%
35%
23%
12%
12%
8%
6%
48%
48%
46%
52%
42%
31%
19%
21%
13%
13%
% Change
7%
4%
28%
13%
20%
35%
58%
75%
63%
117%
6
Faculty Rank by Gender, Department, Degree, and Ethnicity
Figure 2 displays the distribution of medical school faculty by rank and gender. In 2010, 35 percent of medical
school faculty are women, up from 28 percent in 2000 and 32 percent in 2005. Due to rounding, the percentages
in Figure 2 do not sum to 100 percent.
Figure 2: U.S. Medical School Faculty
Distribution by Rank and Gender, 2010 Men Other Ranks 1%
Women Instructors 6%
Women Other Ranks 1%
Men Instructors 5%
Men Full Professors 19%
Women Full Professors 4%
Women Assistant Professors 17%
Men Associate Professors 15%
Men Assistant Professors 24%
Women Associate Professors 6%
Of the 129,929 medical school faculty, 35% are women and 65% are men.
Figures 3A and 3B compare the distribution of faculty by rank within the separate populations of men and women
faculty. In 2010, the majority of women faculty (69 percent) are instructors, assistant professors, or other ranks.
Only 13 percent of women faculty are full professors, compared to 30 percent of men faculty who are full
professors.
Of all women
faculty, 19 percent
are instructors or
other ranks and 50
percent are assistant
professors.
Figure 3A: Distribution of Women
Faculty by Rank, 2010
Full Professor 13%
Associate Professor 18%
Other 3%
Instructor 16%
Assistant Professor 50%
45,722 Women
Of all men faculty,
10 percent are
instructors or other
ranks and 38 percent
are assistant
professors.
Figure 3B: Distribution of Men
Faculty by Rank, 2010
Other 2%
Instructor 8%
Full Professor 30%
Associate Professor 22%
Assistant
Professor 38%
84,207 Men
© 2011 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
7
Nineteen percent of all full professors are women, up from 11 percent in 1999 and 16 percent in 2004. Despite the
steady growth of the number of women in ranks of associate professor and full professor, the proportion of
women in these ranks is changing at a rather slow rate. The annual increase in the proportion of associate
professors and full professors who are women from 2007 to the present is less than one percentage point per
year.
The majority (92 percent) of the total 45,722 women faculty have an M.D. degree or a Ph.D. or other health
doctorate degree (66 percent hold an M.D. or equivalent degree and 26 percent hold a Ph.D. or equivalent
degree). The majority of both men faculty (85 percent) and women faculty (87 percent) hold appointments in
clinical departments. Within clinical departments, the departments that have the largest proportion of faculty
who are women are obstetrics and gynecology (52 percent), public health and preventative medicine (50 percent),
and pediatrics (49 percent). The departments with the lowest proportion of women faculty are orthopedic surgery
(15 percent) and dentistry (18 percent).
Data sources: Table 3, Table 4a, Table 4b
AAMC Faculty Roster
Figure 4 shows the ethnic breakdown of medical school faculty. Compared to last year, the 2010 data show a
slight decrease in the number of faculty who are reported as white, but a slight increase in the number of faculty
who are reported as other, unknown, or multiple race. The majority of both men and women faculty identify
themselves as White (67 percent of men and 59 percent of women). The majority of the remaining faculty identify
themselves as either unknown (16 percent of women and 11 percent of men) or Asian (13 percent of women and
13 percent of men). The ethnicities with the highest proportion of women faculty are black or African American
(51 percent), unknown (44 percent), and Puerto Rican (44 percent).
While 85 percent of department chairs are white, only 65 percent of the 129,929 medical school faculty are white.
There are no department chairs of American Indian/Alaska native or native Hawaiian/other Pacific island descent.
In addition, although 6 percent (N=19) of women department chairs are of Hispanic origin, there are no women
chairs of Mexican American or Cuban descent.
American Indian
& Pacific
Islander, 0.3%
Figure 4: Medical School Faculty Distribution by
Rank and Gender, 2010
Black or African
American, 3.0%
Asian, 12.8%
White
Other, Unknown, Multiple Race
Hispanic, 4.1%
Hispanic
Other,
Unknown,
Multiple Race,
15.4%
White,
64.5%
Asian
American Indian & Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Data sources: Table 5, Table 11
AAMC Faculty Roster
© 2011 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
8
Promotion and Tenure
In 2009, 30 percent of all new tenures were women. At the time of the survey, six medical schools did not offer
tenure to any of their faculty (Boston University School of Medicine, Mayo Medical School, Morehouse School of
Medicine, Ponce School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad
Central del Caribe School of Medicine, and Wright State University Boonshoft
School of Medicine) while five medical schools offered tenure to only basic
In 2009, women
science faculty (Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Northeastern
represented only 28
Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine,
percent of the
University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, and the Warren Alpert
Medical School of Brown University.)
promotions to full
professor.
The expansion of medical schools and growth of faculty size over the past
several decades have been accompanied by a decreased proportion of
clinical M.D. faculty appointed to tenure-eligible tracks. Since 1984, the
percentage of tenured or tenure-eligible clinical M.D. faculty has dropped 27
percent. One trend that has remained fairly consistent over time is that men are more likely to hold tenure
1
positions than are women. In 2009, 23 percent of men and 10 percent of women were tenured.
Women represented 36 percent of the promotions to associate professor and 28 percent of the promotions to full
professor in 2009. Of all faculty who were promoted to full professor in 2009, 1,075 were men while only 419
were women. The number of women promoted to full professor exceeded the number of men promoted to full
professor at only six medical schools.
Data sources: Table 7, Table 8
AAMC Faculty Roster
2010 Annual Women in Medicine and Science Statistics and Benchmarking Survey
New Hires and Departures
In 2009, women represented 41 percent of the 11,528 new hires and 37 percent
of the 7,538 departures. The average number of newly hired women was 38 per
medical school, compared to 54 newly hired men per medical school. Since 1999,
the average percentage of women new hires has increased by 11 percent while
the average percentage of women departures has increased by 24 percent.
Data sources: Table 6a, Table 6b
2010 Annual Women in Medicine and Science Statistics and Benchmarking Survey
Leadership Positions
This year was the first time that the Women in Medicine survey collected data on
interim and acting leadership appointments. The time frame of the interim or
acting appointment can serve as a stepping stone to a permanent role. As such,
interim and acting leadership positions are helpful in providing access to
2
leadership to women and underrepresented persons.
Faculty Departures,
Men and Women
2009 vs. 2004
2009:
7,538 total departures
Range: 0–423
Median: 47
2004:
6,808 total departures
Range: 1–284
Median: 42
1
Bunton, S. and Corrice, A. (2010). Trends in tenure for clinical M.D. faculty in U.S. medical schools: A 25-year review. AAMC Analysis in Brief,
9(9).
2
Grigsby, R.K., Aber, R., and Quillen, D. A. (2009). Commentary: Interim leadership of academic departments at U.S. medical schools. Academic
Medicine, 84, 1328-1329.
© 2011 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
9
Figure 5 provides the counts and percentages of women leaders with permanent, interim, or acting appointments.
Figure 5: Distribution of Women in
Permanent, Interim, and Acting Leadership Positions, 2009
Permanent
Division/Section Chief
Interim
Acting
1,027
(21%)
32
(37%)
8
(28%)
Associate Chair/Vice Chair
311
(21%)
1
(50%)
7
(39%)
Department Chair
372
(13%)
46
(21%)
9
(15%)
Assistant Dean
285
(47%)
1
(50%)
8
(47%)
Associate Dean
365
(36%)
4
(33%)
9
(47%)
Sr. Associate Dean/Vice Dean
113
(28%)
2
(29%)
2
(18%)
13
(11%)
4
(29%)
0
(0%)
Dean
Division/Section Chiefs
In 2009, the number of women division/section chiefs exceeded that of men at only two medical schools—
Morehouse School of Medicine and Baylor College of Medicine.
Associate Chairs and Vice Chairs
The average number of permanent associate
chairs and vice chairs who were women was
three per medical school, up from two per
medical school in 1999 and 2004.
Department Chairs
The same number of women with
permanent department chair appointments
(N=372) were reported as were reported in
2008. Of all permanent department chairs,
women represented 17 percent of chairs in
basic science departments, 11 percent of
chairs in clinical departments, and 31
3
percent of chairs in other departments.
In 2009, there were 2,417
men department chairs and
372 women department
chairs.
There was no change in the proportion of women with
permanent division/section chief, associate chair/vice
chair, department chair, and assistant dean
appointments from 2008 to 2009.
--------------------------The proportion of women deans has steadily grown
from 5 percent in 1999 to 10 percent in 2004 to 13
percent in 2009.
Among interim chairs, women represented 50 percent of the interim
chairs of other departments, followed by 24 percent of basic science
interim chairs and 19 percent of clinical interim chairs.
Decanal Positions
Although there were three fewer women with permanent senior
associate dean/vice dean appointments in 2009 than were reported in
2008, the proportion of permanent senior associate deans/vice deans
who were women increased from 26 percent to 28 percent. The increase
was caused by the rather significant drop in the number of men with
permanent senior associate dean/vice dean appointments from 326 in 2008 to 289 in 2009.
3
Other departments encompass all medical school departments that are neither clinical nor basic science departments, such as dentistry, other
health professions, veterinary sciences, and social sciences.
© 2011 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
10
Of the 131 medical schools with full or preliminary accreditation, 117 currently have permanent deans. Thirteen
(11 percent) of these 117 permanent deans are women. No acting deans were reported at any medical school. Of
the 131 permanent and interim deans, 13 percent are women.
Data sources: Table 9a, Table 9b, Table 9c, Table 10a, Table 10b, Table 10c
2010 Annual Women in Medicine and Science Statistics and Benchmarking Survey
Resources to Support Women Faculty
The Women in Medicine survey has queried medical schools periodically for nearly two decades about institutional
support for women. For this year’s survey, when asked if their medical school provides resources to promote the
professional development of women in medicine and science, 112 respondents answered yes, four respondents
answered no, and two respondents indicated that they did not know. Thirteen medical schools did not participate
in this portion of the survey. Figure 6 shows a breakdown of the types of resources provided by medical schools to
promote the professional development of women.
Figure 6: Percentage of U.S. Medical Schools Providing Resources for the
4
Professional Development of Women
Salary Support for GWIMS Representative
35%
Financial Support for Programs
76%
Dedicated Office Space
25%
In-House Coaching/Mentoring
66%
Executive Coaching/Mentoring by External Consultants
27%
Other (e.g., meetings, awards, seminars, etc.)
31%
Of the 118 medical schools that responded to this portion of the survey, 35 percent (N=41) reported that they
provide salary support for a GWIMS representative. Among the 16 medical schools that were able to calculate
staff support, 0.9 was the average full time equivalent (FTE). In 2004, the proportion of medical schools providing
staff support was noticeably higher, with 59 percent (N=64) of respondents reporting that their medical school
provided staff support. The average amount of support reported by these medical schools was 0.8 FTE.
In 2009, 76 percent (N=90) of the 118 responding medical schools indicated that they provide financial support for
the professional development of women. Of these, 38 medical schools reported the total amount of funding
allocated to support programs. The average financial support was $53,638 per medical school with a median of
$25,000 and a range of $500–$325,000. The proportion of medical schools providing financial support has not
changed much in the last five years. In 2004, 81 percent (N=88) of responding medical schools reported providing
financial support for the professional development of women. However, there has been significant growth in the
amount of funding allocated to support these programs. The average amount of financial support was $27,107 per
medical school in 2004, with a median of $11,500 and a range of $200–$250,000.
Taken together, the data indicate that more schools are making additional resources and tools available to support
women faculty through a variety of approaches. It is not clear from these data which types of support are having
the most impact on the medical school gender profile among faculty and leadership positions. Further analysis of
the impact of the types of support in the context of a faculty satisfaction survey and/or institutional climate survey
may prove informative.
Data sources: Table 12
2010 Annual Women in Medicine and Science Statistics and Benchmarking Survey
4
The percentages in this table are based on the 118 medical schools that responded to this portion of the survey.
© 2011 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
11
Concluding Comments
The 2009–2010 report highlights the slight, yet gradual, increase in women representation in U.S. Academic
Medicine. Despite the increase, the report also documents the continued underrepresentation of women in
leadership positions. The reasons underpinning the choice by women for leadership in academic medicine
continue to be explored. Faculty attrition rates affect underrepresentation of women faculty in general. Previous
AAMC studies on faculty retention have shown that when faculty are tracked for 10 years, attrition rates are higher
5
for women than for men. Women report lower agreement with statements about perceptions of promotion
6
opportunities for women and equitable treatment of women and faculty of color. These previous findings, as well
as this report, support the consideration of organizational culture as an important indicator of how women
navigate their careers.
Initiatives to assess organizational culture have helped institutions conduct self-studies. The AAMC Faculty
7
Forward is a recent initiative offering the added benefit of national benchmarking data on faculty satisfaction at
U.S. medical schools. In combination with data from this and other AAMC reports, institutions will have the tools
to continue supporting and developing innovative approaches to support women faculty in their leadership
journey.
5
6
7
Alexander, H. and Lang, J. (2008). The long-term retention and attrition of U.S. medical school faculty. AAMC Analysis in Brief. 8(4).
Bunton, S. (2008). Differences in U.S. medical school faculty job satisfaction by gender. AAMC Analysis in Brief. 8(7).
https://www.aamc.org/services/facultyforward/
© 2011 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
12
TABLE 1: MEDICAL STUDENTS, SELECTED YEARS, 1965–2010
APPLICANTS
Academic
Year
1965–66
1970–71
1975–76†
1980–81
1985–86
1990–91
1991–92
1992–93
1993–94
1994–95
1995–96
1996–97
1997–98
1998–99
1999–00
2000–01
2001–02
2002–03
2003–04
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
2007–08
2008–09
2009-10
Total
18,703
24,987
42,282
36,083
32,885
29,241
33,297
37,402
42,806
45,360
46,586
46,965
43,016
40,996
38,443
37,088
34,860
33,624
34,791
35,735
37,372
39,108
42,315
42,231
42,269
Women
1,676
2,734
9,590
10,657
11,558
11,785
13,699
15,618
17,957
18,967
19,776
20,028
18,271
17,785
17,395
17,273
16,718
16,556
17,672
18,018
18,625
19,293
20,735
20,360
20,252
ACCEPTED APPLICANTS
Women as
% of Total
9.0%
10.9%
22.7%
29.5%
35.1%
40.3%
41.1%
41.8%
41.9%
41.8%
42.5%
42.6%
42.5%
43.4%
45.2%
46.6%
48.0%
49.2%
50.8%
50.4%
49.8%
49.3%
49.0%
48.2%
47.9%
Total
9,012
11,500
15,360
17,141
17,225
17,206
17,435
17,465
17,361
17,318
17,356
17,385
17,312
17,373
17,421
17,535
17,454
17,592
17,542
17,662
17,986
18,418
18,858
19,135
19,332
Women
799
1,297
3,642
4,948
5,857
6,656
6,943
7,257
7,288
7,255
7,437
7,439
7,484
7,685
7,966
8,027
8,294
8,631
8,732
8,768
8,765
8,943
9,107
9,181
9,264
Women as
% of Total
8.9%
11.3%
23.7%
28.9%
34.0%
38.7%
39.8%
41.6%
42.0%
41.9%
42.8%
42.8%
43.2%
44.2%
45.7%
45.8%
47.5%
49.1%
49.8%
49.6%
48.7%
48.6%
48.3%
48.0%
47.9%
MATRICULANTS
Total
8,554
11,169
14,897
16,587
16,268
15,998
16,211
16,289
16,307
16,287
16,252
16,201
16,164
16,170
16,221
16,301
16,365
16,488
16,541
16,648
17,003
17,361
17,759
18,036
18,390
Women
799
1,228
3,511
4,757
5,520
6,153
6,433
6,772
6,851
6,819
6,941
6,918
6,994
7,162
7,412
7,472
7,784
8,113
8,212
8,235
8,239
8,438
8,582
8,614
8,817
FIRST-YEAR ENROLLMENT*
Women as
% of Total
9.3%
11.0%
23.6%
28.7%
33.9%
38.5%
39.7%
41.6%
42.0%
41.9%
42.7%
42.7%
43.3%
44.3%
45.7%
45.8%
47.6%
49.2%
49.6%
49.5%
48.5%
48.6%
48.3%
47.8%
47.9%
Total
8,759
11,348
15,295
17,186
16,963
16,876
17,071
17,097
17,121
17,085
17,058
16,935
16,867
16,790**
16,856^
16,699
16,875
16,953
17,035
17,059
17,376
17,826
18,287
18,370
18,853
Women
731@
1,256
3,647
4,966
5,800
6,550
6,804
7,158
7,230
7,212
7,363
7,271
7,333
7,450**
---^
7,659
8,039
8,311
8,470
8,433
8,416
8,678
8,863
8,798
9,109
Women as
% of Total
8.3%
11.1%
23.8%
28.9%
34.2%
38.8%
39.9%
41.9%
42.2%
42.2%
43.2%
42.9%
43.5%
44.4%
---^
45.9%
47.6%
49.0%
49.7%
49.4%
48.4%
48.7%
48.5%
47.9%
48.3%
TOTAL ENROLLMENT
Total
32,835
40,487
55,818
65,189‡
66,585
65,163
65,602
65,606
66,202
66,815
66,947
66,913
69,089
69,297
69,303
69,413
69,518
69,930
70,313
71,028
72,000
73,111
74,525
76,202
77,722
Women
2,589
3,894
11,417
17,248
21,650
24,286
24,962
25,754
26,589
27,364
27,925
28,157
29,205
29,680
30,179
30,739
31,492
32,452
33,331
34,261
34,929
35,470
36,005
36,533
37,129
Notes
For 1995–96 to present, the applicant and matriculant data are derived from AAMC Data Warehouse (DW): Applicant Matriculant File, updated as of 1/4/2010.
Starting with 2000–01, the First-Year Enrollment data are from the Student Records System (SRS).
Starting with 1992–93, the Total Enrollment and Graduates data are from the DW: Student section and SRS; Total Enrollment is reported as of October 31 of the academic year.
Total active enrollments for 1998-99 forward are derived from DW: Student section on 10/19/2009. Graduates for 1995-1996 forward are derived from DW Student section on 7/8/2010.
Differences in Total Enrollment between years may not be statistically significant. Data starting in 1992–93 are biased slightly toward undercounting, as some cases (less than 1%)
were necessarily excluded due to insufficient enrollment status information.
@ 1965–66 First-Year Enrollment count of women is taken from the Journal of Medical Education, February 1973, p.188.
† 1975–76 Totals include less than one percent for whom gender information was not available.
‡ 1980–81 Total Enrollment count includes 55 students for whom gender information was not available.
* First-Year Enrollment figures include new entrants and those repeating the initial year.
** 1998–99 First-Year Enrollment counts are taken from the Journal of Medical Education, September 1999, p.891.
^ 1999–00 First-Year Enrollment Total is derived from LCME Part II, 1997–98, 1998–99, and 1999–00. Gender information is not available.
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
Women as
% of Total
7.9%
9.6%
20.5%
26.5%
32.5%
37.3%
38.1%
39.3%
40.2%
41.0%
41.7%
42.1%
42.3%
42.8%
43.5%
44.3%
45.3%
46.4%
47.4%
48.2%
48.5%
48.5%
48.3%
47.9%
47.8%
GRADUATES
Total
7,574
8,974
13,634
15,632
16,117
15,427
15,356
15,474
15,504
15,883
15,895
15,894
15,972
16,006
15,716
15,794
15,676
15,532
15,829
15,760
15,927
16,140
16,169
16,467
16,818
Women
524
827
2,212
3,898
4,957
5,553
5,543
5,890
5,895
6,228
6,501
6,595
6,656
6,792
6,675
6,824
6,923
7,029
7,261
7,412
7,748
7,925
7,969
8,036
8,127
Women as
% of Total
6.9%
9.2%
16.2%
24.9%
30.8%
36.0%
36.1%
38.1%
38.0%
39.2%
40.9%
41.5%
41.7%
42.4%
42.5%
43.2%
44.2%
45.3%
45.9%
47.0%
48.6%
49.1%
49.3%
48.8%
48.3%
TABLE 2: DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDENTS BY SPECIALTY, 1999 COMPARED TO 2009
Specialty
Allergy and Immunology
Anesthesiology
Colon and Rectal Surgery
Dermatology
Emergency Medicine
Family Medicine
Internal Medicine
Internal Medicine Subspecialties
Medical Genetics
Neurological Surgery
Neurology
Nuclear Medicine
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ophthalmology
Orthopaedic Surgery
Otolaryngology
Pathology
Pediatrics
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Plastic Surgery
Preventive Medicine
Psychiatry
Radiation Oncology
Radiology-Diagnostic
Surgery
Surgery Subspecialties
Thoracic Surgery
Urology
Transitional Year
TOTAL
Total Number of
Women and Men
Residents in Specialty
2009
294
5,675
78
1,183
4,900
9,412
21,724
10,006
84
1,062
2,278
146
4,764
1,271
3,650
1,390
2,820
11,219
1,235
365
274
5,668
587
5,022
7,385
459
223
1,048
1,112
Total Number of
Women Residents
in Specialty
2009
177
2,102
26
730
1,990
5,206
9,747
3,664
57
143
1,095
57
3,800
537
488
428
1,501
7,793
513
83
134
3,140
201
1,379
2,596
124
33
250
396
105,334
48,390
Women Residents as % of
Total Women and Men
Residents in Specialty
1999
2009
44.6%
60.2%
28.2%
37.0%
29.3%
33.3%
53.2%
61.7%
27.0%
40.6%
46.8%
55.3%
39.6%
44.9%
25.4%
36.6%
50.8%
67.9%
9.6%
13.5%
37.2%
48.1%
24.6%
39.0%
67.3%
79.8%
29.3%
42.3%
7.9%
13.4%
17.7%
30.8%
46.4%
53.2%
61.6%
69.5%
37.5%
41.5%
20.6%
22.7%
40.4%
48.9%
49.1%
55.4%
28.3%
34.2%
24.2%
27.5%
21.2%
35.2%
16.8%
27.0%
6.9%
14.8%
11.8%
23.9%
30.2%
35.6%
36.4%
45.9%
Percent of Women
Residents in Specialty
Percent of Men
Residents in Specialty
1999
0.3%
3.2%
*
1.3%
2.6%
13.7%
23.1%
5.4%
0.1%
0.2%
1.7%
0.1%
8.7%
1.1%
0.6%
0.5%
3.3%
16.0%
1.1%
0.3%
0.5%
7.2%
0.3%
2.7%
4.5%
0.1%
0.1%
0.3%
1.0%
2009
0.4%
4.3%
0.1%
1.5%
4.1%
10.8%
20.1%
7.6%
0.1%
0.3%
2.3%
0.1%
7.9%
1.1%
1.0%
0.9%
3.1%
16.1%
1.1%
0.2%
0.3%
6.5%
0.4%
2.9%
5.4%
0.3%
0.1%
0.5%
0.8%
1999
0.2%
5.1%
0.1%
0.7%
4.3%
9.5%
21.6%
9.7%
0.1%
1.2%
1.7%
0.2%
2.6%
1.6%
4.6%
1.6%
2.4%
6.1%
1.2%
0.7%
0.4%
4.6%
0.5%
5.2%
10.3%
0.4%
0.5%
1.6%
1.4%
2009
0.2%
6.3%
0.1%
0.8%
5.1%
7.4%
21.0%
11.1%
*
1.6%
2.1%
0.2%
1.7%
1.3%
5.6%
1.7%
2.3%
6.0%
1.3%
0.5%
0.2%
4.4%
0.7%
6.4%
8.4%
0.6%
0.3%
1.4%
1.3%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Notes
This table does not include residents in combined specialty programs (1999: n = 2,165; 2009: n = 1,878 ) or those with unreported gender (1999: n = 0; 2009: n = 62).
* Less than 0.1%
As an example of how to interpret this table, the 0.4% figure for Allergy and Immunology under Percent of Women Residents in Specialty in 2009 indicates that of all women residents
in the 2009–10 academic year, 0.4% were in an Allergy and Immunology residency program. In addition, the 60.2% figure for Allergy and Immunology under Women Residents as a
Percent of Total Women and Men Residents in Specialty in 2009 indicates that of all women and men residents in an Allergy and Immunology program in the 2009–10 academic
year, 60.2% were women.
Source: AAMC GME Track (2009 data); AMA (1999 data)
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 3: DISTRIBUTION OF FULL-TIME FACULTY BY DEPARTMENT, RANK, AND GENDER, 2010
Men
N
BASIC SCIENCES
Anatomy
Biochemistry
Microbiology
Pathology (Basic Science)
Pharmacology
Physiology
Other Basic Sciences
SUBTOTAL
CLINICAL SCIENCES
Anesthesiology
Dermatology
Emergency Medicine
Family Practice
Internal Medicine
Neurology
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Ophthalmology
Orthopedic Surgery
Otolaryngology
Pathology (Clinical)
Pediatrics
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Psychiatry
Public Health & Preventive Medicine
Radiology
Surgery
Other Clinical Sciences
SUBTOTAL
OTHER DEPARTMENTS
Dentistry
Other Health Professions
Social Sciences
Veterinary Sciences
All Others
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
Instructor
Women
N
%
Men
N
Assistant Professor
Women
N
%
Associate Professor
Men
Women
N
N
%
Men
N
Full Professor
Women
N
%
Men
N
Total (All Ranks) *
Women
N
%
42
70
41
69
60
65
124
471
45
55
35
85
39
39
148
446
52%
44%
46%
55%
39%
38%
54%
49%
323
545
364
482
356
301
868
3,239
190
264
219
470
207
160
597
2,107
37%
33%
38%
49%
37%
35%
41%
39%
310
415
351
379
316
311
624
2,706
104
164
153
217
124
106
328
1,196
25%
28%
30%
36%
28%
25%
34%
31%
531
914
665
647
665
691
1,104
5,217
151
214
185
204
140
141
330
1,365
22%
19%
22%
24%
17%
17%
23%
21%
1,242
2,016
1,460
1,609
1,437
1,400
2,867
12,031
519
723
633
1,002
544
484
1,493
5,398
29%
26%
30%
38%
27%
26%
34%
31%
511
55
207
168
2,067
234
140
141
185
63
98
548
83
484
33
538
508
19
6,082
399
64
129
268
2,035
247
460
118
60
102
73
1,286
100
756
59
281
360
37
6,834
44%
54%
38%
61%
50%
51%
77%
46%
24%
62%
43%
70%
55%
61%
64%
34%
41%
66%
53%
2,032
158
1,073
1,229
7,901
1,004
799
515
899
412
584
3,151
318
2,119
195
2,278
3,466
206
28,339
1,102
232
486
1,099
5,388
665
1,209
352
191
155
489
4,011
319
2,062
277
1,035
1,062
151
20,285
35%
59%
31%
47%
41%
40%
60%
41%
18%
27%
46%
56%
50%
49%
59%
31%
23%
42%
42%
898
120
354
580
4,523
618
585
358
522
304
487
1,831
156
1,088
136
1,245
2,121
126
16,052
318
86
108
321
1,827
266
394
137
81
77
278
1,401
97
642
115
364
411
49
6,972
26%
42%
23%
36%
29%
30%
40%
28%
13%
20%
36%
43%
38%
37%
46%
23%
16%
28%
30%
765
181
239
459
5,840
944
707
534
574
338
841
2,355
111
1,443
200
1,447
2,775
165
19,918
166
56
36
157
1,116
161
201
93
29
43
215
895
43
434
93
282
240
58
4,318
18%
24%
13%
25%
16%
15%
22%
15%
5%
11%
20%
28%
28%
23%
32%
16%
8%
26%
18%
4,290
524
1,901
2,471
20,666
2,853
2,257
1,607
2,212
1,135
2,052
7,985
679
5,206
606
5,653
9,014
519
71,630
2,056
444
781
1,902
10,677
1,380
2,420
743
387
412
1,091
7,716
576
3,988
596
2,040
2,156
296
39,661
32%
46%
29%
43%
34%
33%
52%
32%
15%
27%
35%
49%
46%
43%
50%
27%
19%
36%
36%
0
32
0
4
23
59
0
88
0
0
54
142
0%
73%
0%
0%
70%
71%
19
65
2
5
104
195
7
134
6
6
117
270
27%
67%
75%
55%
53%
58%
11
42
2
5
71
131
1
50
2
6
69
128
8%
54%
50%
55%
49%
49%
6
26
7
4
90
133
0
15
6
1
48
70
0%
37%
46%
20%
35%
34%
36
165
11
18
316
546
8
288
15
13
339
663
18%
64%
58%
42%
52%
55%
6,612
7,422
53%
31,773
22,662
42%
18,889
8,296
31%
25,268
5,753
19%
84,207
45,722
35%
Notes
* The Total columns include faculty with unspecified Other ranks.
The table does not include faculty with unreported gender (n = 317).
As an example of how to interpret this table, the 52% figure for Anatomy under Instructor indicates that of all women and men Instructors in Anatomy departments as of May 2010, 52% were women.
Source: AAMC Faculty Roster, May 2010
Staff Contact: Tai Pham, tpham@aamc.org
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 4A: DISTRIBUTION OF WOMEN M.D. FACULTY BY DEPARTMENT AND RANK, 2010
Women as a
Women as a
Women as a
Women as a
Women as a
Count or Percent of
Count or Percent of
Count or Percent of
Count or Percent of
Count or Percent of All
Women and Men M.D. Women and Men M.D. Women and Men M.D. Women and Men M.D. Women and Men M.D.
Instructors
Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
Faculty (All Ranks)*
N
BASIC SCIENCES
Anatomy
Biochemistry
Microbiology
Pathology (Basic Science)
Pharmacology
Physiology
Other Basic Sciences
SUBTOTAL
CLINICAL SCIENCES
Anesthesiology
Dermatology
Emergency Medicine
Family Practice
Internal Medicine
Neurology
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Ophthalmology
Orthopedic Surgery
Otolaryngology
Pathology (Clinical)
Pediatrics
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Psychiatry
Public Health & Preventive Medicine
Radiology
Surgery
Other Clinical Sciences
SUBTOTAL
OTHER DEPARTMENTS
Dentistry
Other Health Professions
Social Sciences
Veterinary Sciences
All Others
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
7
2
3
40
7
3
8
70
47%
33%
27%
52%
50%
21%
26%
42%
25
15
20
307
26
19
78
490
32%
23%
37%
50%
39%
38%
35%
43%
6
7
9
158
7
12
46
245
13%
17%
19%
41%
18%
24%
32%
33%
9
8
15
123
13
10
33
211
13%
9%
14%
23%
13%
8%
13%
16%
53
34
53
636
57
50
172
1,055
24%
16%
23%
39%
25%
21%
25%
31%
241
43
104
150
1,482
118
309
72
21
17
32
823
54
328
13
189
144
9
4,149
37%
59%
35%
54%
47%
43%
72%
40%
14%
27%
40%
66%
50%
52%
54%
34%
29%
53%
48%
1,034
197
467
920
4,534
494
1,058
264
134
98
341
3,409
193
1,056
82
874
790
56
16,001
35%
61%
31%
45%
40%
38%
59%
41%
15%
22%
45%
56%
43%
42%
47%
34%
20%
32%
40%
288
74
101
231
1,520
198
341
93
55
45
202
1,183
53
318
25
285
310
20
5,342
26%
43%
23%
31%
28%
27%
40%
26%
11%
16%
37%
42%
32%
30%
39%
25%
14%
21%
28%
149
47
35
101
882
118
157
46
20
20
140
751
26
201
19
245
176
22
3,155
18%
23%
13%
21%
14%
12%
21%
10%
4%
7%
18%
26%
25%
17%
19%
18%
7%
18%
16%
1,735
362
710
1,421
8,513
942
1,887
500
235
181
729
6,213
331
1,917
143
1,628
1,437
108
28,992
31%
46%
28%
40%
32%
29%
49%
29%
11%
17%
33%
47%
40%
35%
38%
28%
15%
26%
33%
0
2
0
0
3
5
0%
67%
0%
0%
38%
45%
0
4
1
0
18
23
0%
50%
100%
0%
42%
41%
0
3
1
0
14
18
0%
43%
100%
0%
38%
38%
0
0
0
0
8
8
0%
0%
0%
0%
19%
16%
0
9
2
0
44
55
0%
38%
67%
0%
32%
32%
4,224
47%
16,514
40%
5,605
29%
3,374
16%
30,102
33%
Notes
* The Women as a Count or Percent of All Women and Men M.D. Faculty columns include faculty at unspecified Other ranks.
This table includes all faculty who have an M.D. or equivalent degree, regardless of other doctoral degrees held (including M.D./Ph.D. or D.O.).
As an example of how to interpret this table, the 47% figure for Anatomy under Women as a Percent of Women and Men M.D. Instructors indicates that of all
women and men Instructors in Anatomy departments with an M.D. or equivalent degree as of May 2010, 47% were women.
Source: AAMC Faculty Roster, May 2010
Staff Contact: Tai Pham, tpham@aamc.org
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 4B: DISTRIBUTION OF WOMEN PH.D. FACULTY BY DEPARTMENT AND RANK, 2010
Women as a
Women as a
Women as a
Women as a
Women as a
Count or Percent of
Count or Percent of
Count or Percent of
Count or Percent of
Count or Percent of All
Women and Men Ph.D. Women and Men Ph.D. Women and Men Ph.D. Women and Men Ph.D. Women and Men Ph.D.
Instructors
Assistant Professors
Associate Professors
Full Professors
Faculty (All Ranks)*
BASIC SCIENCES
Anatomy
Biochemistry
Microbiology
Pathology (Basic Science)
Pharmacology
Physiology
Other Basic Sciences
SUBTOTAL
CLINICAL SCIENCES
Anesthesiology
Dermatology
Emergency Medicine
Family Practice
Internal Medicine
Neurology
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Ophthalmology
Orthopedic Surgery
Otolaryngology
Pathology (Clinical)
Pediatrics
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Psychiatry
Public Health & Preventive Medicine
Radiology
Surgery
Other Clinical Sciences
SUBTOTAL
OTHER DEPARTMENTS
Dentistry
Other Health Professions
Social Sciences
Veterinary Sciences
All Others
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
29
43
24
27
26
26
78
253
48%
43%
44%
52%
35%
36%
52%
45%
158
235
189
142
170
133
471
1,498
38%
33%
38%
47%
36%
34%
41%
38%
97
155
138
57
114
91
264
916
26%
30%
31%
28%
29%
25%
34%
30%
140
203
169
77
127
131
293
1,140
23%
20%
23%
26%
18%
18%
25%
22%
442
654
546
315
459
408
1,152
3,976
30%
27%
30%
36%
27%
26%
34%
30%
7
15
0
13
255
85
17
33
6
16
25
92
9
296
7
53
73
7
1,009
23%
39%
0%
68%
48%
57%
52%
61%
19%
70%
44%
51%
64%
69%
41%
31%
46%
44%
52%
55
27
12
128
754
150
90
73
40
41
133
482
107
900
170
130
222
70
3,584
44%
51%
46%
62%
46%
44%
61%
37%
31%
46%
48%
56%
66%
61%
65%
20%
42%
47%
49%
28
12
6
75
289
66
40
40
23
30
72
196
34
312
82
69
97
25
1,496
33%
38%
40%
52%
37%
43%
35%
32%
31%
31%
35%
49%
44%
48%
48%
16%
36%
34%
38%
17
9
1
49
230
40
42
47
9
22
74
137
17
229
72
35
60
36
1,126
20%
31%
10%
40%
32%
26%
30%
31%
11%
23%
27%
35%
33%
34%
38%
9%
20%
36%
28%
115
66
21
269
1,634
350
199
208
80
122
313
932
170
1,771
351
298
460
138
7,497
34%
41%
36%
54%
42%
43%
44%
38%
25%
38%
37%
50%
55%
53%
52%
18%
36%
41%
42%
0
7
0
0
3
10
0%
70%
0%
0%
100%
59%
7
81
5
6
56
155
33%
70%
83%
60%
49%
58%
1
38
1
6
30
76
11%
56%
33%
55%
44%
48%
0
15
6
1
32
54
0%
44%
55%
20%
39%
39%
8
142
12
13
126
301
22%
62%
60%
43%
45%
51%
1,272
50%
5,237
45%
2,488
35%
2,320
25%
11,774
37%
Notes
* The Women as a Count or Percent of All Women and Men Ph.D. Faculty columns include faculty at unspecified Other ranks.
This table includes all faculty who have a Ph.D. or other health doctorate (OHD) degree (e.g., Pharm.D.), except for those faculty who also have an M.D. or
equivalent degree (e.g., M.D./Ph.D.). M.D./Ph.D. faculty are included in Table 4A: Distribution of Women M.D. Faculty by Department and Rank, 2010.
As an example of how to interpret this table, the 48% figure for Anatomy under Women as a Percent of Women and Men Ph.D. Instructors indicates that of all
women and men Instructors in Anatomy departments with a Ph.D. or OHD degree as of May 2010, 48% were women.
Source: AAMC Faculty Roster, May 2010
Staff Contact: Tai Pham, tpham@aamc.org
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 5: DISTRIBUTION OF FACULTY BY RACE/HISPANIC ORIGIN, GENDER, AND RANK, 2010
Race/Hispanic Origin
Instructor
Assistant
Professor
Women
Associate
Professor
Total
Full Professor (All Ranks) *
Instructor
Assistant
Professor
Men
Associate
Professor
Total
Full Professor (All Ranks) *
Asian
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
White
Other
Unknown
Multiple Race
Cuban
Mexican American
Puerto Rican
Other Hispanic
Multiple Hispanic
883
325
14
6
3,668
31
2,133
105
1
40
40
163
13
3,524
1,191
38
42
12,272
113
3,760
609
12
144
207
705
45
946
295
7
2
5,908
18
599
162
6
48
73
215
17
501
105
3
2
4,583
4
274
66
2
11
69
125
8
6,028
1,948
64
52
27,091
170
7,406
965
24
258
403
1,230
83
1,024
172
20
14
3,332
17
1,645
124
3
46
37
163
15
5,073
958
57
99
18,049
159
4,904
905
21
199
233
1,061
55
2,275
418
13
13
13,740
52
1,253
409
9
91
120
466
30
1,941
314
13
8
20,805
31
1,095
302
9
74
125
540
11
10,550
1,893
105
137
56,659
268
9,466
1,770
43
421
523
2,261
111
TOTAL
7,422
22,662
8,296
5,753
45,722
6,612
31,773
18,889
25,268
84,207
Notes
* The Total columns include faculty at unspecified Other ranks.
To allow an unduplicated faculty count, a faculty member's Hispanic origin classifications take priority over a faculty member's race classifications.
This table does not include faculty with unreported gender (n = 317).
Source: AAMC Faculty Roster, May 2010
Staff Contact: Tai Pham, tpham@aamc.org
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 6A: 2009 BENCHMARKING—WOMEN NEW HIRES AND DEPARTURES
Women as a Count or
Percent of Total Women
and Men New Hires
Medical School
ALABAMA
Alabama
South Alabama
ARIZONA
Arizona
ARKANSAS
Arkansas
CALIFORNIA
Loma Linda
Southern Cal-Keck *
Stanford
UC Davis
UC Irvine
UC San Diego
UC San Francisco
UCLA-Geffen
COLORADO
Colorado
CONNECTICUT
Connecticut
Yale
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
George Washington
Georgetown
Howard
FLORIDA
Central Florida *
FIU-Wertheim
Florida
Florida State *
Miami-Miller
South Florida
GEORGIA
Emory
MC Georgia
Mercer
Morehouse *
HAWAII
Hawaii-Burns
ILLINOIS
Chicago Med-Franklin
Chicago-Pritzker
Illinois
Loyola-Stritch
Northwestern-Feinberg
Rush
Southern Illinois
INDIANA
Indiana
IOWA
Iowa-Carver
KANSAS
Kansas
KENTUCKY
Kentucky
Louisville
LOUISIANA
LSU New Orleans
LSU Shreveport
Tulane
MARYLAND
Johns Hopkins
Maryland
Uniformed Services-Hebert
Women as a Count or
Percent of Total Women
and Men Departures
Women as a
Percent of
Total Women
Departures
%
Women and Men
Departures as a
Count or Percent of
Total Faculty
N
%
N
%
N
%
27
10
33%
59%
19
7
28%
29%
5%
11%
69
24
6%
10%
51
33%
18
33%
6%
55
6%
54
41%
9
16%
3%
55
6%
48
80
13
14
34
109
98
85
38%
47%
35%
40%
47%
48%
49%
39%
16
36
8
7
21
10
57
40
38%
35%
25%
21%
30%
29%
41%
35%
6%
8%
4%
3%
12%
4%
8%
5%
42
102
32
34
70
34
139
114
5%
8%
4%
5%
13%
4%
8%
5%
118
61%
54
64%
5%
85
4%
22
44
43%
42%
13
20
30%
36%
5%
5%
43
55
5%
5%
53
50
7
57%
43%
41%
17
25
7
55%
36%
35%
5%
4%
7%
31
70
20
4%
4%
7%
2
NA
41
3
39
21
67%
NA
31%
38%
35%
34%
0
NA
28
1
46
40
NA
NA
32%
17%
36%
37%
0%
NA
8%
4%
9%
11%
0
NA
88
6
127
107
0%
NA
7%
8%
9%
10%
113
22
6
5
41%
42%
50%
38%
54
24
8
1
37%
53%
35%
50%
8%
18%
12%
1%
145
45
23
2
8%
11%
11%
1%
10
33%
14
45%
13%
31
13%
0
23
24
24
103
36
10
0%
40%
42%
39%
52%
44%
36%
0
18
27
16
124
41
9
NA
26%
36%
42%
29%
49%
33%
0%
6%
9%
7%
17%
14%
7%
0
68
74
38
423
84
27
0%
8%
9%
6%
22%
10%
8%
62
42%
26
37%
6%
70
5%
39
37%
15
28%
7%
53
7%
31
43%
15
34%
7%
44
7%
33
34
35%
39%
20
26
40%
35%
8%
12%
50
75
6%
11%
14
16
21
30%
29%
38%
16
16
11
40%
36%
61%
8%
12%
7%
40
45
18
7%
11%
4%
126
56
5
38%
42%
33%
77
35
2
37%
36%
20%
9%
8%
2%
208
97
10
9%
8%
2%
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 6A: 2009 BENCHMARKING—WOMEN NEW HIRES AND DEPARTURES
Women as a Count or
Percent of Total Women
and Men New Hires
Medical School
MASSACHUSETTS
Boston
Harvard *
Massachusetts *
Tufts
MICHIGAN
Michigan
Michigan State
Wayne State
MINNESOTA
Mayo
Minnesota
MISSISSIPPI
Mississippi
MISSOURI
Missouri Columbia
Missouri Kansas City
St Louis
Washington U St Louis
NEBRASKA
Creighton
Nebraska
NEVADA
Nevada
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Dartmouth
NEW JERSEY
UMDNJ New Jersey
UMDNJ-RW Johnson
NEW MEXICO
New Mexico
NEW YORK
Albany
Buffalo
Columbia
Cornell-Weill
Einstein
Mount Sinai
New York Medical
New York University
Rochester
SUNY Downstate
SUNY Upstate
Stony Brook
NORTH CAROLINA
Duke
East Carolina-Brody
North Carolina
Wake Forest
NORTH DAKOTA
North Dakota
OHIO
Case Western
Cincinnati
Northeastern Ohio
Ohio State
Toledo
Wright State-Boonshoft
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma
OREGON
Oregon
PENNSYLVANIA
Commonwealth
Drexel
Women as a Count or
Percent of Total Women
and Men Departures
Women as a
Percent of
Total Women
Departures
%
Women and Men
Departures as a
Count or Percent of
Total Faculty
N
%
N
%
N
%
24
42
16
98
59%
40%
36%
38%
9
30
12
27
21%
37%
41%
44%
2%
1%
4%
5%
42
82
29
61
4%
1%
3%
4%
55
3
27
40%
18%
41%
40
3
18
30%
27%
38%
5%
2%
6%
135
11
48
6%
2%
5%
32
28
38%
34%
22
43
28%
30%
4%
9%
80
142
3%
9%
41
37%
29
43%
15%
67
12%
23
39
22
61
37%
42%
33%
41%
8
13
18
26
17%
32%
38%
27%
5%
5%
10%
5%
47
41
47
96
9%
6%
9%
6%
6
29
27%
33%
3
8
21%
32%
4%
5%
14
25
5%
4%
6
38%
7
28%
10%
25
13%
62
45%
0
NA
0%
0
0%
15
34
52%
42%
9
19
25%
42%
4%
6%
36
45
5%
5%
35
43%
32
48%
9%
67
9%
24
17
51
55
106
78
51
67
45
33
16
32
45%
45%
52%
42%
48%
44%
55%
51%
39%
53%
31%
46%
9
3
34
34
68
44
8
39
28
29
7
11
60%
14%
49%
52%
53%
43%
33%
42%
41%
48%
27%
35%
5%
1%
4%
8%
6%
6%
2%
9%
6%
9%
6%
6%
15
21
69
65
128
103
24
93
69
60
26
31
3%
3%
4%
6%
5%
6%
2%
8%
5%
7%
6%
5%
68
NA
39
43
48%
NA
38%
33%
38
NA
25
29
47%
NA
40%
44%
6%
NA
5%
11%
81
NA
63
66
4%
NA
5%
7%
3
33%
2
25%
3%
8
6%
71
63
19
51
8
11
37%
43%
50%
36%
36%
32%
16
25
2
27
4
4
36%
30%
25%
32%
25%
15%
2%
5%
2%
5%
4%
4%
44
82
8
85
16
26
2%
6%
3%
5%
5%
8%
41
43%
22
42%
9%
53
7%
78
49%
53
53%
7%
100
6%
NA
25
NA
45%
NA
9
NA
45%
NA
4%
NA
20
NA
4%
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 6A: 2009 BENCHMARKING—WOMEN NEW HIRES AND DEPARTURES
Women as a Count or
Percent of Total Women
and Men New Hires
Medical School
Jefferson
Penn State
Pennsylvania
Pittsburgh
Temple
PUERTO RICO
Caribe *
Ponce
Puerto Rico
San Juan Bautista *
RHODE ISLAND
Brown-Alpert
SOUTH CAROLINA
MU South Carolina
South Carolina
SOUTH DAKOTA
South Dakota-Sanford
TENNESSEE
East Tennessee-Quillen
Meharry
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
TEXAS
Baylor
Texas A & M
Texas Tech
Texas Tech-Foster
UT Galveston
UT HSC San Antonio
UT Houston
UT Southwestern
UTAH
Utah
VERMONT
Vermont
VIRGINIA
Eastern Virginia
Virginia
Virginia Commonwealth
Virginia Tech Carilion
WASHINGTON
U Washington
WEST VIRGINIA
Marshall-Edwards
West Virginia
WISCONSIN
MC Wisconsin
Wisconsin
2009 Total
2009 AVERAGE #
2004 AVERAGE
Women as a Count or
Percent of Total Women
and Men Departures
Women as a
Percent of
Total Women
Departures
%
8%
4%
NA
9%
10%
Women and Men
Departures as a
Count or Percent of
Total Faculty
N
%
68
8%
35
4%
NA
NA
163
8%
42
10%
N
33
32
NA
64
24
%
38%
29%
NA
37%
38%
N
21
12
NA
63
12
%
31%
34%
NA
39%
29%
0
2
7
1
0%
67%
88%
33%
13
1
3
0
68%
50%
43%
NA
27%
2%
2%
0%
19
2
7
0
17%
1%
2%
0%
38
49%
9
30%
3%
30
4%
48
10
50%
37%
28
6
40%
33%
7%
9%
70
18
7%
8%
12
31%
8
33%
9%
24
8%
4
8
16
115
25%
42%
25%
41%
2
12
16
49
33%
75%
31%
35%
3%
16%
8%
8%
6
16
51
141
3%
9%
7%
8%
NA
45
26
19
22
41
68
137
NA
37%
45%
37%
41%
45%
39%
39%
NA
12
11
5
146
28
21
51
NA
21%
26%
38%
39%
43%
33%
37%
NA
5%
9%
8%
43%
9%
7%
9%
NA
58
42
13
373
65
63
138
NA
8%
11%
7%
40%
8%
8%
8%
44
42%
13
33%
4%
39
3%
16
44%
6
32%
4%
19
4%
14
23
45
NA
56%
29%
35%
NA
12
35
20
NA
63%
38%
29%
NA
7%
10%
5%
NA
19
92
68
NA
5%
9%
6%
NA
94
48%
34
50%
4%
68
3%
15
21
52%
29%
6
18
38%
32%
8%
10%
16
56
7%
9%
47
29
37%
33%
37
8
35%
19%
9%
3%
107
42
9%
4%
4,749
38
34
41%
41%
37%
2,758
22
20
37%
36%
34%
6%
7%
7%
7,538
60
55
6%
7%
7%
Notes
# The 2009 average percents are calculated from the percents of all schools and are not adjusted for the number of faculty per school.
* The data for these schools are based on the figures reported to the AAMC Faculty Roster as of December 31, 2009.
NA indicates that the information was not available or that the percentage could not be calculated due to a zero in the denominator.
Some percents in this table are less than 0.5% and therefore display as 0% when rounded. In these cases, the actual percents were used in
calculating the 2009 Average.
As an example of how to interpret this table, the 33% figure for Alabama under Women as a Percent of Total Women and Men New Hires
indicates that of all the individuals who were hired as full-time faculty or moved to full-time status at the University of Alabama School of Medicine
in calendar year 2009, 33% were women. In addition, the 5% figure for Alabama under Women as a Percent of Total Women Departures
indicates that of all the full-time women faculty at the University of Alabama School of Medicine, 5% left in calendar year 2009. The 6% figure for
Alabama under Women and Men Departures as a Percent of Total Faculty indicates that of all full-time women and men faculty at the
University of Alabama School of Medicine, 6% left in calendar year 2009.
Source: 2010 Annual Women in Academic Medicine and Science Statistics and Benchmarking Survey
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 6B: 2009 BENCHMARKING—MEN NEW HIRES AND DEPARTURES
Men as a Count or
Percent of Total Women
and Men New Hires
Medical School
ALABAMA
Alabama
South Alabama
ARIZONA
Arizona
ARKANSAS
Arkansas
CALIFORNIA
Loma Linda
Southern Cal-Keck *
Stanford
UC Davis
UC Irvine
UC San Diego
UC San Francisco
UCLA-Geffen
COLORADO
Colorado
CONNECTICUT
Connecticut
Yale
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
George Washington
Georgetown
Howard
FLORIDA
Central Florida *
FIU-Wertheim
Florida
Florida State *
Miami-Miller
South Florida
GEORGIA
Emory
MC Georgia
Mercer
Morehouse *
HAWAII
Hawaii-Burns
ILLINOIS
Chicago Med-Franklin
Chicago-Pritzker
Illinois
Loyola-Stritch
Northwestern-Feinberg
Rush
Southern Illinois
INDIANA
Indiana
IOWA
Iowa-Carver
KANSAS
Kansas
KENTUCKY
Kentucky
Louisville
LOUISIANA
LSU New Orleans
LSU Shreveport
Tulane
MARYLAND
Johns Hopkins
Maryland
Uniformed Services-Hebert
Men as a Count or
Percent of Total Women
and Men Departures
Men as a
Percent of
Total Men
Departures
Women and Men
Departures as a
Count or Percent of
Total Faculty
N
%
N
%
%
N
%
55
7
67%
41%
50
17
72%
71%
6%
10%
69
24
6%
10%
102
67%
37
67%
6%
55
6%
77
59%
46
84%
8%
55
6%
77
89
24
21
39
117
101
132
62%
53%
65%
60%
53%
52%
51%
61%
26
66
24
27
49
24
82
74
62%
65%
75%
79%
70%
71%
59%
65%
4%
8%
4%
6%
13%
4%
8%
5%
42
102
32
34
70
34
139
114
5%
8%
4%
5%
13%
4%
8%
5%
77
39%
31
36%
3%
85
4%
29
61
57%
58%
30
35
70%
64%
5%
5%
43
55
5%
5%
40
65
10
43%
57%
59%
14
45
13
45%
64%
65%
3%
4%
8%
31
70
20
4%
4%
7%
1
NA
90
5
72
41
33%
NA
69%
63%
65%
66%
0
NA
60
5
81
67
NA
NA
68%
83%
64%
63%
0%
NA
7%
9%
9%
10%
0
NA
88
6
127
107
0%
NA
7%
8%
9%
10%
161
31
6
8
59%
58%
50%
62%
91
21
15
1
63%
47%
65%
50%
7%
7%
10%
1%
145
45
23
2
8%
11%
11%
1%
20
67%
17
55%
13%
31
13%
7
35
33
37
95
45
18
100%
60%
58%
61%
48%
56%
64%
0
50
47
22
299
43
18
NA
74%
64%
58%
71%
51%
67%
0%
8%
9%
5%
25%
8%
8%
0
68
74
38
423
84
27
0%
8%
9%
6%
22%
10%
8%
86
58%
44
63%
4%
70
5%
67
63%
38
72%
6%
53
7%
41
57%
29
66%
7%
44
7%
62
54
65%
61%
30
49
60%
65%
6%
10%
50
75
6%
11%
33
39
35
70%
71%
63%
24
29
7
60%
64%
39%
6%
10%
3%
40
45
18
7%
11%
4%
207
77
10
62%
58%
67%
131
62
8
63%
64%
80%
9%
8%
2%
208
97
10
9%
8%
2%
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 6B: 2009 BENCHMARKING—MEN NEW HIRES AND DEPARTURES
Men as a Count or
Percent of Total Women
and Men New Hires
Medical School
MASSACHUSETTS
Boston
Harvard *
Massachusetts *
Tufts
MICHIGAN
Michigan
Michigan State
Wayne State
MINNESOTA
Mayo
Minnesota
MISSISSIPPI
Mississippi
MISSOURI
Missouri Columbia
Missouri Kansas City
St Louis
Washington U St Louis
NEBRASKA
Creighton
Nebraska
NEVADA
Nevada
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Dartmouth
NEW JERSEY
UMDNJ New Jersey
UMDNJ-RW Johnson
NEW MEXICO
New Mexico
NEW YORK
Albany
Buffalo
Columbia
Cornell-Weill
Einstein
Mount Sinai
New York Medical
New York University
Rochester
SUNY Downstate
SUNY Upstate
Stony Brook
NORTH CAROLINA
Duke
East Carolina-Brody
North Carolina
Wake Forest
NORTH DAKOTA
North Dakota
OHIO
Case Western
Cincinnati
Northeastern Ohio
Ohio State
Toledo
Wright State-Boonshoft
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma
OREGON
Oregon
PENNSYLVANIA
Commonwealth
Drexel
Men as a Count or
Percent of Total Women
and Men Departures
Men as a
Percent of
Total Men
Departures
Women and Men
Departures as a
Count or Percent of
Total Faculty
N
%
N
%
%
N
%
17
63
28
160
41%
60%
64%
62%
33
52
17
34
79%
63%
59%
56%
5%
1%
2%
3%
42
82
29
61
4%
1%
3%
4%
81
14
39
60%
82%
59%
95
8
30
70%
73%
63%
7%
2%
4%
135
11
48
6%
2%
5%
52
54
62%
66%
58
99
73%
70%
3%
9%
80
142
3%
9%
70
63%
38
57%
11%
67
12%
40
54
45
88
63%
58%
67%
59%
39
28
29
70
83%
68%
62%
73%
10%
6%
8%
6%
47
41
47
96
9%
6%
9%
6%
16
58
73%
67%
11
17
79%
68%
6%
4%
14
25
5%
4%
10
63%
18
72%
14%
25
13%
76
55%
0
NA
0%
0
0%
14
47
48%
58%
27
26
75%
58%
6%
5%
36
45
5%
5%
47
57%
35
52%
8%
67
9%
29
21
48
77
113
101
42
65
70
29
36
37
55%
55%
48%
58%
52%
56%
45%
49%
61%
47%
69%
54%
6
18
35
31
60
59
16
54
41
31
19
20
40%
86%
51%
48%
47%
57%
67%
58%
59%
52%
73%
65%
2%
4%
3%
5%
4%
5%
2%
8%
4%
5%
6%
5%
15
21
69
65
128
103
24
93
69
60
26
31
3%
3%
4%
6%
5%
6%
2%
8%
5%
7%
6%
5%
74
NA
65
89
52%
NA
63%
67%
43
NA
38
37
53%
NA
60%
56%
4%
NA
5%
6%
81
NA
63
66
4%
NA
5%
7%
6
67%
6
75%
8%
8
6%
123
85
19
92
14
23
63%
57%
50%
64%
64%
68%
28
57
6
58
12
22
64%
70%
75%
68%
75%
85%
2%
6%
3%
6%
6%
9%
44
82
8
85
16
26
2%
6%
3%
5%
5%
8%
54
57%
31
58%
6%
53
7%
80
51%
47
47%
5%
100
6%
NA
31
NA
55%
NA
11
NA
55%
NA
3%
NA
20
NA
4%
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 6B: 2009 BENCHMARKING—MEN NEW HIRES AND DEPARTURES
Men as a Count or
Percent of Total Women
and Men New Hires
Medical School
Jefferson
Penn State
Pennsylvania
Pittsburgh
Temple
PUERTO RICO
Caribe *
Ponce
Puerto Rico
San Juan Bautista *
RHODE ISLAND
Brown-Alpert
SOUTH CAROLINA
MU South Carolina
South Carolina
SOUTH DAKOTA
South Dakota-Sanford
TENNESSEE
East Tennessee-Quillen
Meharry
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
TEXAS
Baylor
Texas A & M
Texas Tech
Texas Tech-Foster
UT Galveston
UT HSC San Antonio
UT Houston
UT Southwestern
UTAH
Utah
VERMONT
Vermont
VIRGINIA
Eastern Virginia
Virginia
Virginia Commonwealth
Virginia Tech Carilion
WASHINGTON
U Washington
WEST VIRGINIA
Marshall-Edwards
West Virginia
WISCONSIN
MC Wisconsin
Wisconsin
2009 Total
2009 AVERAGE #
Men as a Count or
Percent of Total Women
and Men Departures
Men as a
Percent of
Total Men
Departures
Women and Men
Departures as a
Count or Percent of
Total Faculty
N
55
80
NA
107
40
%
63%
71%
NA
63%
63%
N
47
23
NA
100
30
%
69%
66%
NA
61%
71%
%
7%
4%
NA
7%
9%
N
68
35
NA
163
42
%
8%
4%
NA
8%
10%
6
1
1
2
100%
33%
13%
67%
6
1
4
0
32%
50%
57%
NA
9%
1%
2%
0%
19
2
7
0
17%
1%
2%
0%
39
51%
21
70%
4%
30
4%
48
17
50%
63%
42
12
60%
67%
6%
8%
70
18
7%
8%
27
69%
16
67%
7%
24
8%
12
11
47
168
75%
58%
75%
59%
4
4
35
92
67%
25%
69%
65%
3%
4%
7%
8%
6
16
51
141
3%
9%
7%
8%
NA
77
32
33
32
51
107
211
NA
63%
55%
63%
59%
55%
61%
61%
NA
46
31
8
227
37
42
87
NA
79%
74%
62%
61%
57%
67%
63%
NA
9%
12%
7%
37%
7%
9%
8%
NA
58
42
13
373
65
63
138
NA
8%
11%
7%
40%
8%
8%
8%
61
58%
26
67%
3%
39
3%
20
56%
13
68%
4%
19
4%
11
55
85
NA
44%
71%
65%
NA
7
57
48
NA
37%
62%
71%
NA
3%
8%
6%
NA
19
92
68
NA
5%
9%
6%
NA
103
52%
34
50%
3%
68
3%
14
51
48%
71%
10
38
63%
68%
6%
9%
16
56
7%
9%
80
60
63%
67%
70
34
65%
81%
8%
5%
107
42
9%
4%
6,779
54
59%
59%
4,780
38
63%
64%
6%
6%
7,538
60
6%
7%
Notes
# The 2009 average percents are calculated from the percents of all schools and are not adjusted for the number of faculty per school.
* The data for these schools are based on the figures reported to the AAMC Faculty Roster as of December 31, 2009.
NA indicates that the information was not available or that the percentage could not be calculated due to a zero in the denominator.
Some percents in this table are less than 0.5% and therefore display as 0% when rounded. In these cases, the actual percents were used in
calculating the 2009 Average.
As an example of how to interpret this table, the 67% figure for Alabama under Men as a Percent of Total Women and Men New Hires indicates
that of all the individuals who were hired as full-time faculty or moved to full-time status at the University of Alabama School of Medicine in
calendar year 2009, 67% were men. In addition, the 6% figure for Alabama under Men as a Percent of Total Men Departures indicates that
of all the full-time men faculty at the University of Alabama School of Medicine, 6% left in calendar year 2009. The 6% figure for Alabama under
Women and Men Departures as a Percent of Total Faculty indicates that of all full-time women and men faculty at the University of Alabama
School of Medicine, 6% left in calendar year 2009.
Source: 2010 Annual Women in Academic Medicine and Science Statistics and Benchmarking Survey
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 7: 2009 BENCHMARKING—FULL-TIME FACULTY BY GENDER, RANK, AND TENURE
Medical School
ALABAMA
Alabama
South Alabama
ARIZONA
Arizona
ARKANSAS
Arkansas
CALIFORNIA
++
Loma Linda
Southern Cal-Keck *
Stanford
UC Davis
UC Irvine
UC San Diego
UC San Francisco
UCLA-Geffen
COLORADO
Colorado
CONNECTICUT
Connecticut
Yale
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
George Washington
Georgetown
Howard
FLORIDA
Central Florida *
FIU-Wertheim
Florida
Florida State *
Miami-Miller
South Florida
GEORGIA
Emory
MC Georgia
Mercer
Morehouse * +
HAWAII
Hawaii-Burns
ILLINOIS
Chicago Med-Franklin
Chicago-Pritzker
Illinois
Loyola-Stritch
Northwestern-Feinberg
Rush
Southern Illinois
INDIANA
Indiana
IOWA
Iowa-Carver
KANSAS
Kansas
KENTUCKY
Kentucky
Louisville
LOUISIANA
LSU New Orleans
LSU Shreveport
Tulane
MARYLAND
Johns Hopkins
Maryland
Uniformed Services-Hebert
MASSACHUSETTS
Boston +
Harvard *
Massachusetts *
Tufts ++
MICHIGAN
Michigan
Michigan State
Wayne State
MINNESOTA
Mayo +
Minnesota
MISSISSIPPI
Mississippi
MISSOURI
Missouri Columbia
Missouri Kansas City ++
St Louis
Washington U St Louis
Women as a Count or
Percent of Total Women
and Men Faculty
N
%
Women as a Count or
Percent of Women and
Men Full Professors
N
%
% of Women
who are Full
Professors
%
% of Men
who are Full
Professors
%
Women as a Count or
Percent of Women and
Men Tenured Faculty
N
%
% of Women
who are
Tenured
%
% of Men
who are
Tenured
%
377
66
32%
28%
72
10
19%
13%
19%
15%
39%
42%
84
7
20%
11%
22%
11%
41%
34%
346
33%
34
12%
10%
35%
36
19%
10%
22%
335
35%
56
21%
17%
33%
86
22%
26%
48%
284
494
219
210
188
381
739
809
31%
38%
27%
32%
35%
34%
41%
33%
14
54
76
67
55
115
196
205
11%
17%
20%
23%
23%
23%
28%
21%
5%
11%
35%
32%
29%
30%
27%
25%
18%
32%
49%
52%
52%
53%
47%
45%
2
43
49
44
33
32
53
67
12%
17%
18%
25%
22%
16%
23%
20%
1%
9%
22%
21%
18%
8%
7%
8%
2%
26%
36%
30%
32%
23%
17%
16%
1,137
48%
88
20%
8%
29%
46
18%
4%
16%
285
398
32%
34%
31
71
15%
19%
11%
18%
28%
40%
26
46
21%
20%
9%
12%
16%
24%
379
591
102
46%
32%
38%
54
63
8
23%
17%
14%
14%
11%
8%
41%
24%
30%
44
29
22
24%
28%
23%
12%
5%
22%
32%
6%
45%
18
NA
370
25
488
332
33%
NA
30%
31%
34%
34%
7
NA
38
9
76
39
35%
NA
13%
26%
19%
18%
39%
NA
10%
36%
16%
12%
36%
NA
28%
45%
34%
28%
5
NA
53
3
66
26
50%
NA
15%
20%
19%
22%
28%
NA
14%
12%
14%
8%
14%
NA
33%
21%
31%
14%
706
133
67
110
35%
31%
32%
49%
49
15
4
11
14%
16%
7%
28%
7%
11%
6%
10%
22%
27%
38%
25%
52
13
4
0
16%
18%
15%
NA
7%
10%
6%
0%
21%
20%
16%
0%
103
44%
19
35%
18%
28%
17
35%
17%
25%
77
293
292
249
728
289
124
32%
34%
36%
36%
43%
36%
36%
11
52
45
41
77
33
14
16%
19%
21%
22%
22%
19%
19%
14%
18%
15%
16%
11%
11%
11%
34%
39%
32%
33%
28%
26%
28%
8
56
76
25
46
70
18
19%
25%
27%
22%
20%
24%
22%
10%
19%
26%
10%
6%
24%
15%
20%
29%
38%
20%
18%
43%
30%
504
32%
63
17%
13%
29%
87
20%
17%
33%
236
28%
49
16%
21%
40%
54
16%
23%
46%
218
33%
26
18%
12%
27%
38
19%
17%
37%
259
227
31%
31%
46
30
19%
13%
18%
13%
34%
39%
76
37
23%
14%
29%
16%
45%
44%
189
136
168
33%
31%
36%
24
18
23
17%
17%
19%
13%
13%
14%
30%
30%
33%
27
31
10
20%
21%
12%
14%
23%
6%
28%
39%
24%
901
436
135
37%
36%
27%
103
43
22
20%
17%
23%
11%
10%
16%
27%
26%
21%
104
39
29
20%
17%
31%
12%
9%
21%
28%
24%
18%
496
3,097
331
650
42%
40%
31%
35%
51
115
43
36
22%
14%
19%
13%
10%
4%
13%
6%
26%
15%
25%
21%
0
52
21
17
NA
13%
16%
27%
0%
2%
6%
3%
0%
8%
14%
4%
779
196
330
37%
34%
31%
94
40
60
19%
29%
19%
12%
20%
18%
29%
25%
36%
117
36
36
20%
37%
18%
15%
18%
11%
35%
16%
23%
536
467
22%
31%
64
69
11%
18%
12%
15%
28%
29%
0
94
NA
24%
0%
20%
0%
28%
203
35%
26
15%
13%
38%
61
27%
30%
42%
170
314
185
535
31%
40%
33%
31%
21
25
33
66
16%
21%
17%
15%
12%
8%
18%
12%
29%
20%
42%
32%
26
4
28
62
18%
40%
18%
14%
15%
1%
15%
12%
32%
1%
32%
33%
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 7: 2009 BENCHMARKING—FULL-TIME FACULTY BY GENDER, RANK, AND TENURE
Medical School
NEBRASKA
Creighton
Nebraska
NEVADA
Nevada
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Dartmouth
NEW JERSEY
UMDNJ New Jersey
UMDNJ-RW Johnson
NEW MEXICO
New Mexico
NEW YORK
Albany
Buffalo
Columbia
Cornell-Weill
Einstein
Mount Sinai
New York Medical
New York University
Rochester
SUNY Downstate
SUNY Upstate
Stony Brook
NORTH CAROLINA
Duke
East Carolina-Brody
North Carolina
Wake Forest
NORTH DAKOTA
North Dakota
OHIO
Case Western
Cincinnati
++
Northeastern Ohio
Ohio State
Toledo
Wright State-Boonshoft +
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma
OREGON
Oregon
PENNSYLVANIA
Commonwealth
Drexel
Jefferson
Penn State
Pennsylvania
Pittsburgh
Temple
PUERTO RICO
Caribe * +
Ponce +
Puerto Rico
San Juan Bautista *
RHODE ISLAND
Brown-Alpert ++
SOUTH CAROLINA
MU South Carolina
South Carolina
SOUTH DAKOTA
South Dakota-Sanford
TENNESSEE
East Tennessee-Quillen *
Meharry
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
TEXAS
Baylor
Texas A & M
Texas Tech
Texas Tech-Foster
UT Galveston
UT HSC San Antonio
UT Houston
UT Southwestern
UTAH
Utah
VERMONT
Vermont
VIRGINIA
Eastern Virginia
Women as a Count or
Percent of Total Women
and Men Faculty
N
%
Women as a Count or
Percent of Women and
Men Full Professors
N
%
% of Women
who are Full
Professors
%
% of Men
who are Full
Professors
%
Women as a Count or
Percent of Women and
Men Tenured Faculty
N
%
% of Women
who are
Tenured
%
% of Men
who are
Tenured
%
75
190
29%
30%
10
25
13%
15%
13%
13%
37%
33%
29
24
20%
16%
39%
13%
61%
29%
72
38%
15
26%
21%
37%
15
28%
21%
32%
509
40%
28
14%
6%
22%
13
16%
3%
9%
247
349
37%
38%
33
48
19%
24%
13%
14%
34%
27%
38
31
27%
23%
15%
9%
24%
19%
344
44%
79
34%
23%
35%
69
36%
20%
28%
202
235
774
466
1,167
743
464
454
466
310
132
219
33%
34%
40%
40%
42%
40%
35%
39%
33%
35%
28%
36%
15
17
103
60
102
62
36
52
52
28
27
37
13%
11%
23%
23%
21%
22%
17%
19%
17%
21%
19%
23%
7%
7%
13%
13%
9%
8%
8%
11%
11%
9%
20%
17%
24%
30%
31%
29%
24%
20%
20%
32%
26%
18%
33%
32%
7
30
36
26
19
52
10
61
47
35
31
40
14%
15%
18%
20%
15%
21%
13%
20%
23%
28%
17%
25%
3%
13%
5%
6%
2%
7%
2%
13%
10%
11%
23%
18%
11%
38%
15%
15%
6%
18%
8%
36%
17%
16%
43%
31%
680
NA
569
272
36%
NA
41%
28%
70
NA
89
43
16%
NA
23%
16%
10%
NA
16%
16%
30%
NA
37%
31%
92
NA
115
35
17%
NA
25%
19%
14%
NA
20%
13%
37%
NA
42%
21%
61
44%
6
23%
10%
26%
11
28%
18%
37%
699
511
102
583
94
110
33%
34%
31%
36%
32%
32%
84
78
10
55
19
13
16%
19%
13%
18%
21%
17%
12%
15%
10%
9%
20%
12%
31%
33%
29%
24%
35%
26%
47
66
3
85
18
0
18%
19%
12%
21%
20%
NA
7%
13%
3%
15%
19%
0%
15%
28%
10%
31%
36%
0%
274
34%
37
16%
14%
35%
50
19%
18%
40%
780
44%
65
18%
8%
29%
26
18%
3%
12%
NA
247
262
298
NA
687
129
NA
41%
29%
32%
NA
33%
28%
NA
30
28
48
NA
80
19
NA
23%
11%
19%
NA
18%
13%
NA
12%
11%
16%
NA
12%
15%
NA
29%
34%
33%
NA
26%
39%
9
15
42
NA
80
17
NA
17%
15%
18%
NA
16%
15%
NA
4%
6%
14%
NA
12%
13%
NA
12%
13%
30%
NA
30%
30%
35
48
189
19
35%
36%
48%
58%
4
5
63
3
27%
28%
42%
50%
11%
10%
33%
16%
17%
15%
43%
21%
0
0
80
5
NA
NA
45%
56%
0%
0%
42%
26%
0%
0%
49%
29%
310
38%
62
23%
20%
41%
57
31%
18%
25%
399
73
37%
33%
47
8
17%
17%
12%
11%
34%
26%
34
11
16%
28%
9%
15%
27%
20%
94
29%
10
17%
11%
21%
7
18%
7%
14%
62
71
196
705
28%
38%
26%
35%
12
21
43
53
13%
36%
19%
14%
19%
30%
22%
8%
53%
32%
34%
24%
9
20
70
56
13%
36%
24%
16%
15%
28%
36%
8%
39%
31%
41%
23%
NA
265
135
78
212
317
357
681
NA
32%
34%
36%
34%
38%
39%
36%
NA
10
15
4
41
37
47
75
NA
21%
14%
9%
20%
21%
23%
18%
NA
4%
11%
5%
19%
12%
13%
11%
NA
7%
34%
29%
40%
28%
29%
27%
8
11
2
38
33
38
54
NA
13%
12%
7%
21%
19%
21%
18%
NA
3%
8%
3%
18%
10%
11%
8%
NA
10%
31%
19%
35%
27%
26%
20%
365
30%
74
19%
20%
38%
61
18%
17%
34%
158
32%
31
20%
20%
38%
32
21%
20%
36%
167
44%
15
19%
9%
30%
3
17%
2%
7%
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
NA
NA
TABLE 7: 2009 BENCHMARKING—FULL-TIME FACULTY BY GENDER, RANK, AND TENURE
Medical School
Virginia
Virginia Commonwealth
Virginia Tech Carilion
WASHINGTON
U Washington
WEST VIRGINIA
Marshall-Edwards
West Virginia
WISCONSIN
MC Wisconsin
Wisconsin
2009 TOTAL
#
2009 AVERAGE
2004 AVERAGE
Women as a Count or
Percent of Total Women
and Men Faculty
N
%
338
33%
405
34%
NA
NA
Women as a Count or
Percent of Women and
Men Full Professors
N
%
43
15%
63
21%
NA
NA
% of Women
who are Full
Professors
%
13%
16%
NA
% of Men
who are Full
Professors
%
34%
30%
NA
Women as a Count or
Percent of Women and
Men Tenured Faculty
N
%
58
17%
58
23%
NA
NA
% of Women
who are
Tenured
%
17%
14%
NA
% of Men
who are
Tenured
%
41%
25%
NA
825
37%
148
22%
18%
38%
41
19%
5%
13%
80
191
33%
30%
16
31
22%
18%
20%
16%
35%
31%
22
23
23%
18%
28%
12%
46%
24%
412
306
33%
29%
63
53
19%
17%
15%
17%
32%
34%
26
65
16%
22%
6%
21%
16%
31%
44,711
358
304
35%
35%
32%
5,699
46
35
19%
19%
16%
13%
14%
14%
30%
31%
32%
4,619
37
32
20%
21%
18%
10%
13%
13%
23%
25%
27%
Notes
# The 2009 average percents are calculated from the percents of all schools and are not adjusted for the number of faculty per school.
* The data for these schools are based on information reported to the AAMC Faculty Roster as of December 31, 2009.
+
These institutions do not offer tenure.
++
Tenure is only available to Basic Science faculty at these institutions.
NA indicates that the information was not available or that the percentage could not be calculated due to a zero in the denominator.
As an example of how to interpret this table, the 19% figure for Alabama under Women as a Percent of Women and Men Full Professors indicates that of all full professors with
a full-time faculty appointment at the University of Alabama School of Medicine as of December 31, 2009, 19% were women. In addition, the 19% figure for Alabama under
Percentage of Women who are Full Professors indicates that of all women with a full-time faculty appointment at the University of Alabama School of Medicine as of December 31,
2009, 19% held the rank of full professor. The 22% figure for Alabama under Percentage of Women who are Tenured indicates that of all women with a full-time faculty appointment
at the University of Alabama School of Medicine as of December 31, 2009, 22% were tenured.
Source: 2010 Annual Women in Academic Medicine and Science Statistics and Benchmarking Survey
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 8: 2009 BENCHMARKING—NEW TENURES AND PROMOTIONS FOR FULL-TIME FACULTY
New Tenures
Medical School
ALABAMA
Alabama
South Alabama
ARIZONA
Arizona
ARKANSAS
Arkansas
CALIFORNIA
++
Loma Linda
Southern Cal-Keck *
Stanford
UC Davis
UC Irvine
UC San Diego
UC San Francisco
UCLA-Geffen
COLORADO
Colorado
CONNECTICUT
Connecticut
Yale
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
George Washington
Georgetown
Howard
FLORIDA
Central Florida *
FIU-Wertheim
Florida
Florida State *
Miami-Miller
South Florida
GEORGIA
Emory
MC Georgia
Mercer
Morehouse * +
HAWAII
Hawaii-Burns
ILLINOIS
Chicago Med-Franklin
Chicago-Pritzker
Illinois
Loyola-Stritch
Northwestern-Feinberg
Rush
Southern Illinois
INDIANA
Indiana
IOWA
Iowa-Carver
KANSAS
Kansas
KENTUCKY
Kentucky
Louisville
LOUISIANA
LSU New Orleans
LSU Shreveport
Tulane
MARYLAND
Johns Hopkins
Maryland
Uniformed Services-Hebert
MASSACHUSETTS
Boston +
Harvard *
Massachusetts *
Tufts ++
MICHIGAN
Michigan
Michigan State
Wayne State
N
17
4
1
0
6%
0%
47
4
15
2
32%
50%
22
1
2
0
9%
0%
7
4
57%
18
8
44%
13
5
38%
15
2
13%
18
6
33%
13
4
31%
0
NA
12
5
4
7
8
10
0
NA
4
5
1
2
2
2
NA
NA
33%
100%
25%
29%
25%
20%
9
11
19
20
20
33
61
67
1
3
5
8
8
13
23
24
11%
27%
26%
40%
40%
39%
38%
36%
0
1
21
24
14
33
42
42
0
0
6
8
5
13
17
11
NA
NA
29%
33%
36%
39%
40%
26%
14
4
29%
66
23
35%
35
12
34%
1
10
0
7
0%
70%
14
35
2
8
14%
23%
6
15
2
5
33%
33%
4
4
1
1
0
0
25%
0%
0%
13
2
1
9
0
0
69%
0%
0%
7
2
1
2
0
0
29%
0%
0%
NA
NA
14
NA
9
2
NA
NA
3
NA
2
0
NA
NA
21%
NA
22%
0%
0
NA
23
0
28
20
0
NA
4
0
6
13
NA
NA
17%
NA
21%
65%
0
NA
11
0
20
11
0
NA
3
0
4
4
NA
NA
27%
NA
20%
36%
20
3
0
0
7
3
0
0
35%
100%
NA
NA
26
19
2
7
9
7
1
3
35%
37%
50%
43%
15
10
2
3
7
2
0
0
47%
20%
0%
0%
0
0
NA
2
2
100%
1
0
0%
0
14
18
1
5
18
6
0
5
12
1
2
9
2
NA
36%
67%
100%
40%
50%
33%
1
23
24
15
45
11
7
0
6
13
5
15
7
2
0%
26%
54%
33%
33%
64%
29%
0
20
7
15
15
7
4
0
5
3
4
4
2
2
NA
25%
43%
27%
27%
29%
50%
28
9
32%
41
16
39%
14
3
21%
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
3
30%
8
4
50%
6
1
17%
26
9
9
3
35%
33%
25
15
9
7
36%
47%
11
17
4
3
36%
18%
12
7
3
2
3
0
17%
43%
0%
10
10
1
2
4
0
20%
40%
0%
6
5
8
1
0
2
17%
0%
25%
29
10
4
6
0
1
21%
0%
25%
53
23
3
19
8
1
36%
35%
33%
28
13
1
6
1
0
21%
8%
0%
0
NA
NA
1
NA
NA
NA
33%
17
14
14
22
8
4
4
8
47%
29%
29%
36%
10
10
3
8
5
1
1
2
50%
10%
33%
25%
39%
NA
0%
51
2
18
21
1
6
41%
50%
33%
40
2
10
15
0
6
38%
0%
60%
28
0
4
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
11
0
0
%
NA
NA
Total
N
Promotions to
Full Professor
Women
N
Total
N
0
NA
NA
3
Women
Promotions to
Associate Professor
Total
Women
N
N
%
%
NA
TABLE 8: 2009 BENCHMARKING—NEW TENURES AND PROMOTIONS FOR FULL-TIME FACULTY
New Tenures
Medical School
MINNESOTA
Mayo +
Minnesota
MISSISSIPPI
Mississippi
MISSOURI
Missouri Columbia
++
Missouri Kansas City
St Louis
Washington U St Louis
NEBRASKA
Creighton
Nebraska
NEVADA
Nevada
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Dartmouth
NEW JERSEY
UMDNJ New Jersey
UMDNJ-RW Johnson
NEW MEXICO
New Mexico
NEW YORK
Albany
Buffalo
Columbia
Cornell-Weill
Einstein
Mount Sinai
New York Medical
New York University
Rochester
SUNY Downstate
SUNY Upstate
Stony Brook
NORTH CAROLINA
Duke
East Carolina-Brody
North Carolina
Wake Forest
NORTH DAKOTA
North Dakota
OHIO
Case Western
Cincinnati
Northeastern Ohio ++
Ohio State
Toledo
Wright State-Boonshoft +
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma
OREGON
Oregon
PENNSYLVANIA
Commonwealth
Drexel
Jefferson
Penn State
Pennsylvania
Pittsburgh
Temple
PUERTO RICO
Caribe * +
Ponce +
Puerto Rico
San Juan Bautista *
RHODE ISLAND
Brown-Alpert ++
SOUTH CAROLINA
MU South Carolina
South Carolina
SOUTH DAKOTA
South Dakota-Sanford
N
0
16
0
6
NA
38%
56
32
16
7
29%
22%
52
9
9
3
17%
33%
23
6
26%
19
4
21%
7
2
29%
4
1
7
19
1
1
2
6
25%
100%
29%
32%
8
15
12
40
4
6
8
15
50%
40%
67%
38%
6
10
10
34
1
3
3
7
17%
30%
30%
21%
12
5
5
2
42%
40%
13
10
5
1
38%
10%
9
6
2
0
22%
0%
2
0
0%
4
0
0%
3
1
33%
5
0
0%
16
7
44%
8
3
38%
6
0
3
0
50%
NA
15
9
6
2
40%
22%
6
4
2
3
33%
75%
16
9
56%
23
12
52%
25
12
48%
1
14
19
7
6
5
0
5
23
7
5
4
0
4
3
0
2
4
0
3
4
1
2
2
0%
29%
16%
0%
33%
80%
NA
60%
17%
14%
40%
50%
12
8
35
30
30
34
14
16
38
15
5
11
5
1
15
11
11
14
3
9
14
2
2
2
42%
13%
43%
37%
37%
41%
21%
56%
37%
13%
40%
18%
6
4
49
11
26
18
12
8
14
18
3
8
0
2
17
1
6
9
4
3
3
5
1
4
0%
50%
35%
9%
23%
50%
33%
38%
21%
28%
33%
50%
25
NA
15
10
7
NA
6
4
28%
NA
40%
40%
47
NA
13
34
18
NA
6
17
38%
NA
46%
50%
17
NA
12
21
6
NA
2
6
35%
NA
17%
29%
2
0
0%
4
1
25%
0
0
20
6
1
45
6
0
5
0
0
15
4
0
25%
0%
0%
33%
67%
NA
37
43
5
33
1
7
12
15
2
11
1
2
32%
35%
40%
33%
100%
29%
23
21
11
30
1
3
6
5
1
9
1
0
26%
24%
9%
30%
100%
0%
3
0
0%
18
4
22%
12
3
25%
10
2
20%
49
21
43%
26
5
19%
NA
2
0
6
NA
29
5
NA
0
0
3
NA
9
0
NA
0%
NA
50%
NA
31%
0%
NA
16
14
19
NA
14
17
NA
4
4
6
NA
7
6
NA
25%
29%
32%
NA
50%
35%
NA
4
8
15
NA
9
7
NA
0
3
1
NA
2
3
NA
0%
38%
7%
NA
22%
43%
0
0
7
NA
0
0
4
NA
NA
NA
57%
NA
3
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
33%
100%
NA
NA
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
100%
100%
NA
NA
1
0
0%
13
6
46%
16
5
31%
12
1
3
0
25%
0%
14
5
7
1
50%
20%
14
0
3
0
21%
NA
0
0
1
0
0%
0
0
NA
%
NA
Total
N
Promotions to
Full Professor
Women
N
Total
N
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
Women
Promotions to
Associate Professor
Total
Women
N
N
%
%
NA
TABLE 8: 2009 BENCHMARKING—NEW TENURES AND PROMOTIONS FOR FULL-TIME FACULTY
New Tenures
Medical School
TENNESSEE
East Tennessee-Quillen
Meharry
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
TEXAS
Baylor
Texas A & M
Texas Tech
Texas Tech-Foster
UT Galveston
UT HSC San Antonio
UT Houston
UT Southwestern
UTAH
Utah
VERMONT
Vermont
VIRGINIA
Eastern Virginia
Virginia
Virginia Commonwealth
Virginia Tech Carilion
WASHINGTON
U Washington
WEST VIRGINIA
Marshall-Edwards
West Virginia
WISCONSIN
MC Wisconsin
Wisconsin
2009 TOTAL
2009 AVERAGE #
2004 AVERAGE
Women
Promotions to
Associate Professor
Total
Women
N
N
%
Total
N
N
5
8
15
23
2
2
1
3
40%
25%
7%
13%
6
3
16
31
NA
0
1
1
5
16
8
16
NA
0
0
0
1
7
1
6
NA
NA
0%
0%
20%
44%
13%
38%
NA
7
6
3
22
22
12
10
16
3
19%
5
0
0%
0
10
8
NA
0
3
2
NA
18
%
2
2
1
11
Total
N
Promotions to
Full Professor
Women
N
%
33%
67%
6%
35%
4
4
12
11
NA
2
1
1
NA
50%
8%
9%
NA
3
1
1
7
8
2
8
NA
43%
17%
33%
32%
36%
17%
80%
NA
10
1
0
17
13
12
34
NA
1
0
0
2
5
5
19
NA
10%
0%
NA
12%
38%
42%
56%
11
0
0%
10
0
0%
11
4
36%
9
3
33%
NA
30%
25%
NA
3
22
12
NA
3
7
4
NA
100%
32%
33%
NA
0
9
15
NA
0
0
5
NA
NA
0%
33%
NA
3
17%
42
19
45%
40
14
35%
4
3
3
0
75%
0%
4
14
1
7
25%
50%
5
3
1
0
20%
0%
9
16
0
5
0%
31%
36
35
11
11
31%
31%
15
27
2
6
13%
22%
1,011
8
8
299
3
2
30%
28%
26%
2,294
18
17
821
7
6
36%
36%
36%
1,494
12
11
419
3
3
28%
27%
25%
Notes
# The 2009 average percents are calculated from the percents of all schools and are not adjusted for the number of faculty per school.
* The data for these schools are based on information reported to the AAMC Faculty Roster as of December 31, 2009.
+
These institutions do not offer tenure.
++
Tenure is only available to Basic Science faculty at these institutions.
NA indicates that the information was not available or that the percentage could not be calculated due to a zero in the denominator.
As an example of how to interpret this table, the 6% figure for Alabama under New Tenures indicates that of all the full-time faculty at the University of
Alabama School of Medicine who received tenure in calendar year 2009, 6% were women.
Source: 2010 Annual Women in Academic Medicine and Science Statistics and Benchmarking Survey
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 9A: 2009 BENCHMARKING—PERMANENT DIVISION/SECTION CHIEFS AND DEPARTMENT CHAIRS
Medical School
ALABAMA
Alabama
South Alabama
ARIZONA
Arizona
ARKANSAS
Arkansas
CALIFORNIA
Loma Linda
Southern Cal-Keck * +
Stanford
UC Davis
UC Irvine
UC San Diego
UC San Francisco
UCLA-Geffen
COLORADO
Colorado
CONNECTICUT
Connecticut
Yale
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
George Washington
Georgetown
Howard
FLORIDA
Central Florida ++
FIU-Wertheim @ +
Florida
Florida State * +
Miami-Miller
South Florida
GEORGIA
Emory
MC Georgia
Mercer
Morehouse * +
HAWAII
Hawaii-Burns
ILLINOIS
Chicago Med-Franklin
Chicago-Pritzker
Illinois
Loyola-Stritch
Northwestern-Feinberg
Rush
Southern Illinois
INDIANA
Indiana
Division/Section
Chiefs
Men
Women
Associate Chairs & Vice
Chairs
Men
Women
Basic Science
Men
Women
Department Chairs
Clinical Science
Other
Men
Women
Men
Women
Total
Men
Women
63
10
10
8
27
0
8
0
7
6
2
0
11
11
2
0
0
0
0
0
18
17
4
0
42
14
0
0
4
2
8
2
0
0
12
4
55
23
16
8
3
2
16
5
0
0
19
7
25
19
18
21
40
20
105
51
7
2
2
2
7
5
22
12
10
NA
16
31
0
26
82
81
2
3
5
0
2
32
23
2
3
9
2
4
1
6
5
0
0
1
1
2
1
1
1
20
13
15
14
17
11
15
14
1
3
3
2
2
0
3
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
22
17
24
16
23
12
21
19
1
3
4
3
5
1
4
2
43
11
38
10
4
2
14
2
0
0
18
4
48
59
8
14
10
0
2
0
3
6
1
0
8
12
2
3
0
1
0
1
11
19
3
4
12
23
16
1
15
9
1
7
6
1
2
4
4
7
4
0
1
1
14
17
10
0
1
2
1
2
0
2
0
0
19
26
14
2
2
3
0
0
70
0
97
44
0
0
15
0
16
19
NA
NA
15
NA
9
0
NA
NA
2
0
0
0
4
0
3
3
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
25
2
19
13
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
13
29
2
22
16
0
0
4
1
3
0
100
22
0
6
28
3
0
11
42
8
0
NA
14
0
0
NA
7
3
3
3
0
1
0
1
14
15
10
3
4
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
21
18
13
6
4
2
0
4
0
0
0
0
4
1
4
3
0
0
8
4
0
35
0
28
27
96
30
0
2
0
11
4
24
6
15
0
0
10
0
12
0
6
0
0
3
0
2
0
5
7
12
2
4
5
6
1
2
0
1
0
1
0
4
10
32
14
21
19
7
1
0
4
2
3
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
9
17
45
16
25
24
13
2
2
4
3
3
2
2
79
16
28
6
6
0
16
2
0
3
22
5
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
NA
7
NA
TABLE 9A: 2009 BENCHMARKING—PERMANENT DIVISION/SECTION CHIEFS AND DEPARTMENT CHAIRS
Medical School
Division/Section
Chiefs
Men
Women
Associate Chairs & Vice
Chairs
Men
Women
Basic Science
Men
Women
Department Chairs
Clinical Science
Other
Men
Women
Men
Women
Total
Men
Women
IOWA
Iowa-Carver
KANSAS
Kansas
KENTUCKY
Kentucky
Louisville
LOUISIANA
LSU New Orleans
LSU Shreveport
Tulane
MARYLAND
Johns Hopkins
Maryland
Uniformed Services-Hebert
MASSACHUSETTS
Boston
Harvard * +
Massachusetts * +
Tufts
MICHIGAN
Michigan
Michigan State
Wayne State
MINNESOTA
Mayo
Minnesota
MISSISSIPPI
Mississippi
MISSOURI
Missouri Columbia
Missouri Kansas City
St Louis
Washington U St Louis
NEBRASKA
Creighton
Nebraska
NEVADA
Nevada
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Dartmouth
NEW JERSEY
UMDNJ New Jersey
UMDNJ-RW Johnson
NEW MEXICO
New Mexico
NEW YORK
Albany
Buffalo
0
0
0
0
4
0
16
3
0
0
20
3
0
0
1
0
9
0
24
0
0
0
33
0
0
44
0
13
0
0
0
0
6
5
2
0
15
14
1
1
0
3
0
0
21
22
3
1
38
41
0
7
14
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
4
4
4
1
0
0
16
16
14
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
22
20
18
1
0
3
115
43
0
23
11
0
30
19
0
8
7
0
9
5
2
2
1
2
17
16
11
1
0
2
1
0
2
1
1
1
27
21
15
4
2
5
0
41
28
0
0
3
15
0
0
0
2
0
0
13
37
12
13
2
4
2
3
7
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
25
44
18
19
4
6
2
3
36
0
0
0
0
5
7
6
6
7
0
0
25
7
12
8
0
3
5
5
2
1
0
2
16
8
15
3
1
3
3
0
1
0
0
1
24
13
18
4
1
6
141
42
18
5
99
0
16
0
6
10
2
0
56
16
6
3
0
0
0
0
62
26
8
3
32
12
0
0
6
0
10
1
0
0
16
1
35
52
45
50
8
10
11
4
16
0
4
13
3
0
2
2
3
1
5
5
0
1
0
1
13
9
13
16
1
1
1
0
2
1
0
2
0
0
0
2
18
11
18
23
1
2
1
3
13
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
4
3
0
1
7
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
17
0
1
0
0
2
0
3
0
7
2
1
0
11
2
0
0
10
6
4
1
11
0
0
0
15
1
46
62
19
16
10
0
11
0
3
2
1
0
11
11
1
1
0
0
0
0
14
13
2
1
40
19
1
2
4
0
12
2
0
1
16
3
18
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
1
1
11
13
2
1
1
0
2
0
16
17
5
2
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
TABLE 9A: 2009 BENCHMARKING—PERMANENT DIVISION/SECTION CHIEFS AND DEPARTMENT CHAIRS
Medical School
Columbia
Cornell-Weill
Einstein
Mount Sinai
New York Medical
New York University
Rochester
SUNY Downstate
SUNY Upstate
Stony Brook
NORTH CAROLINA
Duke
East Carolina-Brody @ +
North Carolina
Wake Forest
NORTH DAKOTA
North Dakota
OHIO
Case Western
Cincinnati
Northeastern Ohio
Ohio State
Toledo
Wright State-Boonshoft
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma
OREGON
Oregon
PENNSYLVANIA
Commonwealth @ +
Drexel
Jefferson
Penn State
Pennsylvania @ +
Pittsburgh
Temple
PUERTO RICO
Caribe * +
Ponce
Puerto Rico
San Juan Bautista * +
RHODE ISLAND
Brown-Alpert
SOUTH CAROLINA
MU South Carolina
South Carolina
SOUTH DAKOTA
South Dakota-Sanford
Division/Section
Chiefs
Men
Women
0
0
42
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
64
13
88
25
68
16
46
27
Associate Chairs & Vice
Chairs
Men
Women
0
0
27
13
0
0
0
0
12
2
20
5
10
1
0
1
11
4
16
4
Basic Science
Men
Women
8
0
5
2
12
1
9
0
6
0
7
2
16
3
2
0
2
2
6
1
Department Chairs
Clinical Science
Other
Men
Women
Men
Women
14
2
0
0
15
0
0
1
18
0
0
0
23
0
0
0
17
2
0
0
15
2
0
0
16
4
0
0
15
2
2
0
14
4
0
0
13
2
0
0
Total
Men
22
20
30
32
23
22
32
19
16
19
Women
2
3
1
0
2
4
7
2
6
3
74
64
35
25
19
17
9
5
33
NA
0
0
12
NA
0
0
3
4
5
8
2
2
2
1
10
11
16
21
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
13
15
21
29
2
2
4
2
3
3
3
0
3
1
7
0
1
1
11
2
0
0
21
0
20
47
0
0
3
0
3
15
0
0
0
11
4
6
0
0
0
0
0
1
11
6
2
6
4
2
2
3
1
0
0
1
30
17
11
13
10
9
2
1
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
41
23
13
19
14
11
4
4
1
1
4
1
60
14
0
0
5
0
21
4
0
0
26
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
10
98
42
9
0
14
0
7
28
10
3
0
2
NA
1
3
7
7
6
4
5
0
1
1
1
0
5
1
0
14
17
12
13
16
18
2
3
2
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
17
24
23
19
20
23
2
4
3
3
3
6
1
6
0
13
0
3
0
9
0
NA
0
0
3
4
4
1
2
1
1
4
7
4
8
2
3
2
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
8
12
3
5
3
6
6
65
23
13
2
3
1
9
2
0
0
12
3
28
18
4
10
0
2
0
6
6
1
0
2
14
8
1
2
0
0
0
0
20
9
1
4
29
8
7
2
0
0
6
1
0
0
6
1
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
NA
4
37
26
NA
0
0
3
5
3
NA
0
0
NA
0
0
NA
NA
TABLE 9A: 2009 BENCHMARKING—PERMANENT DIVISION/SECTION CHIEFS AND DEPARTMENT CHAIRS
Medical School
TENNESSEE
East Tennessee-Quillen
Meharry
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
TEXAS
Baylor @ +
Texas A & M
Texas Tech
Texas Tech-Foster
UT Galveston
UT HSC San Antonio
UT Houston
UT Southwestern
UTAH
Utah
VERMONT
Vermont
VIRGINIA
Eastern Virginia
Virginia
Virginia Commonwealth
Virginia Tech Carilion @ +
WASHINGTON
U Washington
WEST VIRGINIA
Marshall-Edwards
West Virginia
WISCONSIN
MC Wisconsin
Wisconsin
2009 TOTAL
2009 AVERAGE #
Division/Section
Chiefs
Men
Women
Associate Chairs & Vice
Chairs
Men
Women
Basic Science
Men
Women
Department Chairs
Clinical Science
Other
Men
Women
Men
Women
0
1
0
3
5
4
6
1
0
0
3
5
4
29
21
1
2
1
1
0
3
7
0
14
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
6
3
4
3
3
0
5
10
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
10
21
8
10
6
16
16
4
0
0
5
3
30
2
6
0
3
2
72
45
0
0
18
12
0
6
26
18
NA
3
8
4
57
17
13
24
29
9
9
18
53
3,911
30
Women
1
1
0
0
0
0
8
10
34
27
2
2
1
4
2
0
3
0
3
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
17
13
25
11
13
9
21
29
4
0
3
0
3
1
3
4
15
0
0
0
20
3
1
9
1
0
0
12
2
2
7
4
0
1
1
5
0
13
19
16
0
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
1
1
15
26
20
9
4
2
7
1
2
11
1
15
1
0
0
26
2
1
14
1
4
3
4
0
0
10
21
0
3
0
0
0
0
13
25
0
3
4
10
4
49
0
9
3
1
1
8
18
3
2
13
0
0
0
0
21
4
3
21
1,027
8
1,161
10
311
3
594
5
124
1
1,752
13
216
2
71
1
32
0
2,417
18
372
3
20
9
35
114
7
2
6
45
0
0
0
23
0
56
23
0
2
0
0
9
0
14
8
0
45
3
8
8
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
Notes
# The 2009 average percents are calculated from the percents of all schools and are not adjusted for the number of faculty per school.
+
The division/section chief counts for these schools are based on information from the AAMC's 2009–2010 Directory of American Medical Education .
@
The department chair counts for these schools are based on information from the AAMC's 2009–2010 Directory of American Medical Education .
* The department chair counts for these schools are based on information reported to the AAMC Faculty Roster as of December 31, 2009.
++
As of December 31, 2009, Central Florida had not appointed any department chairs or division/section chiefs.
NA indicates that no information was available.
Source: 2010 Annual Women in Academic Medicine and Science Statistics and Benchmarking Survey
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
Total
Men
NA
NA
TABLE 9B: 2009 BENCHMARKING—ACTING DIVISION/SECTION CHIEFS AND DEPARTMENT CHAIRS
Medical School
ALABAMA
Alabama
South Alabama
ARIZONA
Arizona
ARKANSAS
Arkansas
CALIFORNIA
Loma Linda
Southern Cal-Keck * +
Stanford
UC Davis
UC Irvine
UC San Diego
UC San Francisco
UCLA-Geffen
COLORADO
Colorado
CONNECTICUT
Connecticut
Yale
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
George Washington
Georgetown
Howard
FLORIDA
Central Florida ++
FIU-Wertheim @ +
Florida
Florida State * +
Miami-Miller
South Florida
GEORGIA
Emory
MC Georgia
Mercer
Morehouse * +
HAWAII
Hawaii-Burns
ILLINOIS
Chicago Med-Franklin
Chicago-Pritzker
Illinois
Loyola-Stritch
Northwestern-Feinberg
Rush
Southern Illinois
INDIANA
Indiana
Acting Division/Section
Chiefs
Men
Women
Acting Associate
Chairs & Vice Chairs
Men
Women
Basic Science
Men
Women
Acting Department Chairs
Clinical Science
Other
Men
Women
Men
Women
Total
Men
Women
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
0
NA
NA
0
NA
NA
0
NA
0
NA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NA
NA
TABLE 9B: 2009 BENCHMARKING—ACTING DIVISION/SECTION CHIEFS AND DEPARTMENT CHAIRS
Medical School
Acting Division/Section
Chiefs
Men
Women
Acting Associate
Chairs & Vice Chairs
Men
Women
Basic Science
Men
Women
Acting Department Chairs
Clinical Science
Other
Men
Women
Men
Women
Total
Men
Women
IOWA
Iowa-Carver
KANSAS
Kansas
KENTUCKY
Kentucky
Louisville
LOUISIANA
LSU New Orleans
LSU Shreveport
Tulane
MARYLAND
Johns Hopkins
Maryland
Uniformed Services-Hebert
MASSACHUSETTS
Boston
Harvard * +
Massachusetts * +
Tufts
MICHIGAN
Michigan
Michigan State
Wayne State
MINNESOTA
Mayo
Minnesota
MISSISSIPPI
Mississippi
MISSOURI
Missouri Columbia
Missouri Kansas City
St Louis
Washington U St Louis
NEBRASKA
Creighton
Nebraska
NEVADA
Nevada
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Dartmouth
NEW JERSEY
UMDNJ New Jersey
UMDNJ-RW Johnson
NEW MEXICO
New Mexico
NEW YORK
Albany
Buffalo
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
TABLE 9B: 2009 BENCHMARKING—ACTING DIVISION/SECTION CHIEFS AND DEPARTMENT CHAIRS
Medical School
Columbia
Cornell-Weill
Einstein
Mount Sinai
New York Medical
New York University
Rochester
SUNY Downstate
SUNY Upstate
Stony Brook
NORTH CAROLINA
Duke
East Carolina-Brody @ +
North Carolina
Wake Forest
NORTH DAKOTA
North Dakota
OHIO
Case Western
Cincinnati
Northeastern Ohio
Ohio State
Toledo
Wright State-Boonshoft
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma
OREGON
Oregon
PENNSYLVANIA
Commonwealth @ +
Drexel
Jefferson
Penn State
Pennsylvania @ +
Pittsburgh
Temple
PUERTO RICO
Caribe * +
Ponce
Puerto Rico
San Juan Bautista * +
RHODE ISLAND
Brown-Alpert
SOUTH CAROLINA
MU South Carolina
South Carolina
SOUTH DAKOTA
South Dakota-Sanford
Acting Division/Section
Chiefs
Men
Women
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Acting Associate
Chairs & Vice Chairs
Men
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Men
0
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
NA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NA
0
Acting Department Chairs
Clinical Science
Other
Men
Women
Men
Women
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
0
Basic Science
Men
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NA
NA
0
0
0
NA
0
0
0
NA
0
0
0
0
NA
0
0
NA
NA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TABLE 9B: 2009 BENCHMARKING—ACTING DIVISION/SECTION CHIEFS AND DEPARTMENT CHAIRS
Medical School
TENNESSEE
East Tennessee-Quillen * +
Meharry
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
TEXAS
Baylor @ +
Texas A & M
Texas Tech
Texas Tech-Foster
UT Galveston
UT HSC San Antonio
UT Houston
UT Southwestern
UTAH
Utah
VERMONT
Vermont
VIRGINIA
Eastern Virginia
Virginia
Virginia Commonwealth
Virginia Tech Carilion @ +
WASHINGTON
U Washington
WEST VIRGINIA
Marshall-Edwards
West Virginia
WISCONSIN
MC Wisconsin
Wisconsin
2009 TOTAL
2009 AVERAGE #
Acting Division/Section
Chiefs
Men
Women
Acting Associate
Chairs & Vice Chairs
Men
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NA
0
NA
Basic Science
Men
Women
Acting Department Chairs
Clinical Science
Other
Men
Women
Men
Women
Total
Men
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
0
8
0
11
0
7
0
9
0
3
0
40
0
5
0
2
0
1
0
51
0
9
0
0
0
0
NA
NA
NA
Notes
# The 2009 average percents are calculated from the percents of all schools and are not adjusted for the number of faculty per school.
+
The division/section chief counts for these schools are based on information from the AAMC's 2009–2010 Directory of American Medical Education .
@
The department chair counts for these schools are based on information from the AAMC's 2009–2010 Directory of American Medical Education .
* The department chair counts for these schools are based on information reported to the AAMC Faculty Roster as of December 31, 2009.
++
As of December 31, 2009, Central Florida had not appointed any department chairs or division/section chiefs.
NA indicates that no information was available.
The 2010 Women in Academic Medicine survey provided the following guidance for defining persons appointed in an acting capacity: an appointment
made with a definite end point (for example, a substitute while the permanent holder is on sabbatical leave).
Source: 2010 Annual Women in Academic Medicine and Science Statistics and Benchmarking Survey
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 9C: 2009 BENCHMARKING—INTERIM DIVISION/SECTION CHIEFS AND DEPARTMENT CHAIRS
Medical School
ALABAMA
Alabama
South Alabama
ARIZONA
Arizona
ARKANSAS
Arkansas
CALIFORNIA
Loma Linda
Southern Cal-Keck * +
Stanford
UC Davis
UC Irvine
UC San Diego
UC San Francisco
UCLA-Geffen
COLORADO
Colorado
CONNECTICUT
Connecticut
Yale
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
George Washington
Georgetown
Howard
FLORIDA
Central Florida ++
FIU-Wertheim @ +
Florida
Florida State * +
Miami-Miller
South Florida
GEORGIA
Emory
MC Georgia
Mercer
Morehouse * +
HAWAII
Hawaii-Burns
ILLINOIS
Chicago Med-Franklin
Chicago-Pritzker
Illinois
Loyola-Stritch
Northwestern-Feinberg
Rush
Southern Illinois
INDIANA
Indiana
Interim Division/Section
Chiefs
Men
Women
Interim Associate
Chairs & Vice Chairs
Men
Women
Basic Science
Men
Women
Interim Department Chairs
Clinical Science
Other
Men
Women
Men
Women
Total
Men
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
9
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
5
10
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
0
NA
NA
0
NA
NA
0
NA
0
NA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
2
1
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
1
7
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
8
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
NA
NA
TABLE 9C: 2009 BENCHMARKING—INTERIM DIVISION/SECTION CHIEFS AND DEPARTMENT CHAIRS
Medical School
Interim Division/Section
Chiefs
Men
Women
Interim Associate
Chairs & Vice Chairs
Men
Women
Basic Science
Men
Women
Interim Department Chairs
Clinical Science
Other
Men
Women
Men
Women
Total
Men
Women
IOWA
Iowa-Carver
KANSAS
Kansas
KENTUCKY
Kentucky
Louisville
LOUISIANA
LSU New Orleans
LSU Shreveport
Tulane
MARYLAND
Johns Hopkins
Maryland
Uniformed Services-Hebert
MASSACHUSETTS
Boston
Harvard * +
Massachusetts * +
Tufts
MICHIGAN
Michigan
Michigan State
Wayne State
MINNESOTA
Mayo
Minnesota
MISSISSIPPI
Mississippi
MISSOURI
Missouri Columbia
Missouri Kansas City
St Louis
Washington U St Louis
NEBRASKA
Creighton
Nebraska
NEVADA
Nevada
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Dartmouth
NEW JERSEY
UMDNJ New Jersey
UMDNJ-RW Johnson
NEW MEXICO
New Mexico
NEW YORK
Albany
Buffalo
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
3
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
1
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
TABLE 9C: 2009 BENCHMARKING—INTERIM DIVISION/SECTION CHIEFS AND DEPARTMENT CHAIRS
Medical School
Columbia
Cornell-Weill
Einstein
Mount Sinai
New York Medical
New York University
Rochester
SUNY Downstate
SUNY Upstate
Stony Brook
NORTH CAROLINA
Duke
East Carolina-Brody @ +
North Carolina
Wake Forest
NORTH DAKOTA
North Dakota
OHIO
Case Western
Cincinnati
Northeastern Ohio
Ohio State
Toledo
Wright State-Boonshoft
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma
OREGON
Oregon
PENNSYLVANIA
Commonwealth @ +
Drexel
Jefferson
Penn State
Pennsylvania @ +
Pittsburgh
Temple
PUERTO RICO
Caribe * +
Ponce
Puerto Rico
San Juan Bautista * +
RHODE ISLAND
Brown-Alpert
SOUTH CAROLINA
MU South Carolina
South Carolina
SOUTH DAKOTA
South Dakota-Sanford
Interim Division/Section
Chiefs
Men
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
1
0
3
0
0
0
1
Interim Associate
Chairs & Vice Chairs
Men
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Men
0
0
1
0
0
2
1
0
3
0
Women
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
1
1
4
0
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
8
2
1
4
0
1
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
NA
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
2
0
0
1
0
4
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
NA
0
Interim Department Chairs
Clinical Science
Other
Men
Women
Men
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
1
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
0
Basic Science
Men
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
NA
NA
0
0
0
NA
0
0
0
NA
0
0
0
0
NA
0
0
NA
NA
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
TABLE 9C: 2009 BENCHMARKING—INTERIM DIVISION/SECTION CHIEFS AND DEPARTMENT CHAIRS
Medical School
TENNESSEE
East Tennessee-Quillen
Meharry
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
TEXAS
Baylor @ +
Texas A & M
Texas Tech
Texas Tech-Foster
UT Galveston
UT HSC San Antonio
UT Houston
UT Southwestern
UTAH
Utah
VERMONT
Vermont
VIRGINIA
Eastern Virginia
Virginia
Virginia Commonwealth
Virginia Tech Carilion @ +
WASHINGTON
U Washington
WEST VIRGINIA
Marshall-Edwards
West Virginia
WISCONSIN
MC Wisconsin
Wisconsin
2009 TOTAL
2009 AVERAGE #
Interim Division/Section
Chiefs
Men
Women
NA
0
0
0
NA
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
Interim Associate
Chairs & Vice Chairs
Men
Women
NA
0
0
0
NA
NA
0
0
0
NA
Basic Science
Men
Women
Interim Department Chairs
Clinical Science
Other
Men
Women
Men
Women
Total
Men
Women
1
0
0
0
NA
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
NA
1
0
0
NA
0
0
0
NA
0
0
0
2
1
1
1
NA
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
2
4
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
1
2
4
0
1
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
55
0
32
0
1
0
1
0
44
0
14
0
124
1
29
0
3
0
3
0
171
1
46
0
NA
NA
Notes
# The 2009 average percents are calculated from the percents of all schools and are not adjusted for the number of faculty per school.
+
The division/section chief counts for these schools are based on information from the AAMC's 2009–2010 Directory of American Medical Education .
@
The department chair counts for these schools are based on information from the AAMC's 2009–2010 Directory of American Medical Education .
* The department chair counts for these schools are based on information reported to the AAMC Faculty Roster as of December 31, 2009.
++
As of December 31, 2009, Central Florida had not appointed any department chairs or division/section chiefs.
NA indicates that no information was available.
The 2010 Women in Academic Medicine survey provided the following guidance for defining persons appointed in an interim capacity: a temporary
appointment while recruitment is underway (for example, a chair steps down and is replaced by an interim while a new search takes place for a
permanent appointee).
Source: 2010 Annual Women in Academic Medicine and Science Statistics and Benchmarking Survey
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 10A: 2009 BENCHMARKING—PERMANENT DECANAL POSITIONS
Permanent Dean**
Medical School
ALABAMA
Alabama
South Alabama
ARIZONA
Arizona
ARKANSAS
Arkansas
CALIFORNIA
Loma Linda
Southern Cal-Keck *
Stanford
UC Davis
UC Irvine
UC San Diego
UC San Francisco
UCLA-Geffen
COLORADO
Colorado
CONNECTICUT
Connecticut
Yale
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
George Washington
Georgetown
Howard
FLORIDA
Central Florida *
FIU-Wertheim *
Florida
Florida State *
Miami-Miller
South Florida
GEORGIA
Emory
MC Georgia
Mercer
Morehouse *
HAWAII
Hawaii-Burns
ILLINOIS
Chicago Med-Franklin
Chicago-Pritzker
Illinois
Loyola-Stritch
Northwestern-Feinberg
Rush
Southern Illinois
INDIANA
Indiana
IOWA
Iowa-Carver
KANSAS
Kansas
KENTUCKY
Kentucky
Louisville
LOUISIANA
LSU New Orleans
LSU Shreveport
Tulane
MARYLAND
Johns Hopkins
Maryland
Uniformed Services-Hebert
MASSACHUSETTS
Boston
Harvard *
Massachusetts *
Tufts
MICHIGAN
Michigan
Michigan State
Wayne State
MINNESOTA
Mayo
Minnesota
Senior
Associate Dean/
Vice Dean
Associate Dean
Assistant Dean
Men
Women
Men
Women
Men
Women
Men
Women
1
1
0
0
3
0
2
0
4
0
1
1
3
1
3
3
1
0
1
2
4
6
2
3
0
1
0
0
4
3
0
4
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
7
2
6
3
5
4
0
1
2
0
1
1
2
2
9
4
7
6
4
3
5
9
2
4
3
1
2
2
7
1
2
4
0
0
3
0
1
5
6
2
0
0
0
3
0
6
1
0
4
1
8
7
2
2
1
1
0
0
1
2
1
2
7
3
2
6
2
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
4
3
3
4
0
0
6
0
2
4
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
1
11
4
0
0
1
2
1
2
3
5
8
2
12
10
3
0
3
4
3
4
0
3
10
7
3
0
3
0
6
1
7
3
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
2
2
0
1
1
0
1
12
4
4
3
3
4
2
2
3
3
1
0
2
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
5
1
3
0
0
1
2
3
0
2
0
0
4
3
14
3
6
5
1
1
3
6
2
4
6
4
3
0
3
3
2
1
0
1
0
3
1
2
2
0
1
0
3
0
12
3
10
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
9
3
1
0
1
1
0
0
3
0
1
1
2
5
1
3
3
1
3
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
4
3
0
0
2
8
16
2
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
5
3
1
1
0
0
9
8
5
4
3
3
4
5
2
6
9
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
4
4
4
4
0
3
4
2
0
11
1
2
0
4
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
3
2
2
0
1
0
5
2
3
3
5
0
7
3
6
3
5
2
1
1
0
0
4
2
2
3
18
2
5
4
0
0
0
0
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 10A: 2009 BENCHMARKING—PERMANENT DECANAL POSITIONS
Permanent Dean**
Medical School
MISSISSIPPI
Mississippi
MISSOURI
Missouri Columbia
Missouri Kansas City
St Louis
Washington U St Louis
NEBRASKA
Creighton
Nebraska
NEVADA
Nevada
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Dartmouth
NEW JERSEY
UMDNJ New Jersey
UMDNJ-RW Johnson
NEW MEXICO
New Mexico
NEW YORK
Albany
Buffalo
Columbia
Cornell-Weill
Einstein
Mount Sinai
New York Medical
New York University
Rochester
SUNY Downstate
SUNY Upstate
Stony Brook
NORTH CAROLINA
Duke
East Carolina-Brody *
North Carolina
Wake Forest
NORTH DAKOTA
North Dakota
OHIO
Case Western
Cincinnati
Northeastern Ohio
Ohio State
Toledo
Wright State-Boonshoft
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma
OREGON
Oregon
PENNSYLVANIA
Commonwealth *
Drexel
Jefferson
Penn State
Pennsylvania *
Pittsburgh
Temple
PUERTO RICO
Caribe *
Ponce
Puerto Rico
San Juan Bautista *
RHODE ISLAND
Brown-Alpert
SOUTH CAROLINA
MU South Carolina
South Carolina
SOUTH DAKOTA
South Dakota-Sanford
TENNESSEE
East Tennessee-Quillen
Meharry
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
TEXAS
Baylor *
Senior
Associate Dean/
Vice Dean
Associate Dean
Assistant Dean
Men
Women
Men
Women
Men
Women
Men
Women
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
4
2
1
4
1
0
0
1
6
3
4
6
2
5
0
4
0
2
4
3
0
3
0
2
1
1
0
0
1
5
0
0
5
6
2
1
2
7
3
0
1
0
1
0
0
3
1
1
1
0
2
1
0
5
3
4
0
1
0
0
3
2
1
1
4
6
1
5
4
1
3
4
1
0
2
1
3
4
5
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
9
0
6
1
2
5
3
0
4
0
5
1
1
0
1
2
0
2
2
3
1
3
2
4
6
3
10
2
7
3
3
4
6
3
0
2
3
0
14
2
3
3
3
3
3
0
3
2
2
6
1
0
3
0
2
0
4
1
2
2
1
10
1
0
1
2
0
1
3
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
3
0
5
1
2
0
1
1
5
4
8
3
4
1
3
3
1
0
3
2
1
0
7
6
0
0
0
0
3
3
3
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
6
2
1
0
0
0
3
2
0
0
0
1
8
1
3
0
5
5
4
2
0
1
5
2
1
6
0
0
2
3
3
6
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
6
2
1
2
1
0
2
1
2
5
2
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
5
3
0
2
3
0
1
3
0
0
0
1
7
6
4
9
7
4
4
2
2
1
5
6
6
6
0
0
4
1
2
7
2
0
1
3
0
1
5
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
2
1
1
1
2
1
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
4
6
1
1
1
1
0
0
3
0
1
0
16
4
5
0
1
2
1
3
1
0
5
1
2
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
5
NA
1
0
2
3
2
8
9
1
4
2
1
3
1
8
2
4
2
5
1
0
0
4
2
3
2
1
2
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 10A: 2009 BENCHMARKING—PERMANENT DECANAL POSITIONS
Permanent Dean**
Medical School
Texas A & M
Texas Tech
Texas Tech-Foster
UT Galveston
UT HSC San Antonio
UT Houston
UT Southwestern
Senior
Associate Dean/
Vice Dean
Associate Dean
Assistant Dean
Men
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Men
4
0
1
1
1
1
1
Women
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
Men
7
6
6
3
2
5
12
Women
3
2
1
1
3
4
4
Men
5
4
0
4
3
7
4
Women
1
5
0
3
3
4
1
1
0
1
0
4
1
6
0
1
0
4
0
5
3
1
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
3
1
0
3
1
0
4
7
7
2
1
4
3
0
0
9
2
1
1
7
4
1
1
0
3
2
7
3
10
4
1
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
1
4
4
5
3
5
4
2
1
1
0
0
5
4
3
0
14
9
1
3
2
4
1
11
104
1
13
0
289
2
113
1
659
5
365
3
318
2
285
2
UTAH
Utah
VERMONT
Vermont
VIRGINIA
Eastern Virginia
Virginia
Virginia Commonwealth
Virginia Tech Carilion *
WASHINGTON
U Washington
WEST VIRGINIA
Marshall-Edwards
West Virginia
WISCONSIN
MC Wisconsin
Wisconsin
2009 TOTAL
2009 AVERAGE #
Notes
# The 2009 average percents are calculated from the percents of all schools and are not adjusted for the number of faculty per school.
* The counts of Senior Associate Deans/Vice Deans, Associate Deans, and Assistant Deans for these schools are based on the AAMC's 2009–2010 Directory
of American Medical Education.
** The counts of permanent deans are based on the AAMC Council of Deans records.
NA indicates that no information was available.
Source: 2010 Annual Women in Academic Medicine and Science Statistics and Benchmarking Survey
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 10B: 2009 BENCHMARKING—ACTING DECANAL POSITIONS
Acting Dean**
Medical School
ALABAMA
Alabama
South Alabama
ARIZONA
Arizona
ARKANSAS
Arkansas
CALIFORNIA
Loma Linda
Southern Cal-Keck *
Stanford
UC Davis
UC Irvine
UC San Diego
UC San Francisco
UCLA-Geffen
COLORADO
Colorado
CONNECTICUT
Connecticut
Yale
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
George Washington
Georgetown
Howard
FLORIDA
Central Florida *
FIU-Wertheim *
Florida
Florida State *
Miami-Miller
South Florida
GEORGIA
Emory
MC Georgia
Mercer
Morehouse *
HAWAII
Hawaii-Burns
ILLINOIS
Chicago Med-Franklin
Chicago-Pritzker
Illinois
Loyola-Stritch
Northwestern-Feinberg
Rush
Southern Illinois
INDIANA
Indiana
IOWA
Iowa-Carver
KANSAS
Kansas
KENTUCKY
Kentucky
Louisville
LOUISIANA
LSU New Orleans
LSU Shreveport
Tulane
MARYLAND
Johns Hopkins
Maryland
Uniformed Services-Hebert
MASSACHUSETTS
Boston
Harvard *
Massachusetts *
Tufts
MICHIGAN
Michigan
Michigan State
Wayne State
MINNESOTA
Mayo
Minnesota
Acting Senior
Associate Dean/
Vice Dean
Men
Women
Men
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acting Associate Dean
Acting Assistant Dean
Men
Women
Men
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 10B: 2009 BENCHMARKING—ACTING DECANAL POSITIONS
Acting Dean**
Medical School
MISSISSIPPI
Mississippi
MISSOURI
Missouri Columbia
Missouri Kansas City
St Louis
Washington U St Louis
NEBRASKA
Creighton
Nebraska
NEVADA
Nevada
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Dartmouth
NEW JERSEY
UMDNJ New Jersey
UMDNJ-RW Johnson
NEW MEXICO
New Mexico
NEW YORK
Albany
Buffalo
Columbia
Cornell-Weill
Einstein
Mount Sinai
New York Medical
New York University
Rochester
SUNY Downstate
SUNY Upstate
Stony Brook
NORTH CAROLINA
Duke
East Carolina-Brody *
North Carolina
Wake Forest
NORTH DAKOTA
North Dakota
OHIO
Case Western
Cincinnati
Northeastern Ohio
Ohio State
Toledo
Wright State-Boonshoft
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma
OREGON
Oregon
PENNSYLVANIA
Commonwealth *
Drexel
Jefferson
Penn State
Pennsylvania *
Pittsburgh
Temple
PUERTO RICO
Caribe *
Ponce
Puerto Rico
San Juan Bautista *
RHODE ISLAND
Brown-Alpert
SOUTH CAROLINA
MU South Carolina
South Carolina
SOUTH DAKOTA
South Dakota-Sanford
TENNESSEE
East Tennessee-Quillen
Meharry
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
TEXAS
Baylor *
Acting Senior
Associate Dean/
Vice Dean
Men
Women
Men
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acting Associate Dean
Acting Assistant Dean
Men
Women
Men
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NA
0
0
0
NA
1
0
0
NA
2
0
0
NA
4
0
0
NA
1
0
0
NA
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 10B: 2009 BENCHMARKING—ACTING DECANAL POSITIONS
Acting Dean**
Medical School
Texas A & M
Texas Tech
Texas Tech-Foster
UT Galveston
UT HSC San Antonio
UT Houston
UT Southwestern
Acting Senior
Associate Dean/
Vice Dean
Men
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
Men
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acting Associate Dean
Acting Assistant Dean
Men
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
Women
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
Men
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
Women
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
2
0
10
0
9
0
9
0
8
0
UTAH
Utah
VERMONT
Vermont
VIRGINIA
Eastern Virginia
Virginia
Virginia Commonwealth
Virginia Tech Carilion *
WASHINGTON
U Washington
WEST VIRGINIA
Marshall-Edwards
West Virginia
WISCONSIN
MC Wisconsin
Wisconsin
2009 TOTAL
2009 AVERAGE #
Notes
# The 2009 average percents are calculated from the percents of all schools and are not adjusted for the number of faculty per school.
* The counts of Acting Senior Associate Deans/Vice Deans, Acting Associate Deans, and Acting Assistant Deans for these schools are based on the AAMC's
2009–2010 Directory of American Medical Education.
** This information comes from the AAMC Council of Deans records. At present, the AAMC codes individuals as permanent dean or interim dean. The AAMC
does not use the code of acting dean.
NA indicates that no information was available.
The 2010 Women in Academic Medicine survey provided the following guidance for defining persons appointed in an acting capacity: an appointment
made with a definite end point (for example, a substitute while the permanent holder is on sabbatical leave).
Source: 2010 Annual Women in Academic Medicine and Science Statistics and Benchmarking Survey
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 10C: 2009 BENCHMARKING—INTERIM DECANAL POSITIONS
Interim Senior
Associate Dean/
Vice Dean
Interim Dean**
Medical School
ALABAMA
Alabama
South Alabama
ARIZONA
Arizona
ARKANSAS
Arkansas
CALIFORNIA
Loma Linda
Southern Cal-Keck *
Stanford
UC Davis
UC Irvine
UC San Diego
UC San Francisco
UCLA-Geffen
COLORADO
Colorado
CONNECTICUT
Connecticut
Yale
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
George Washington
Georgetown
Howard
FLORIDA
Central Florida *
FIU-Wertheim *
Florida
Florida State *
Miami-Miller
South Florida
GEORGIA
Emory
MC Georgia
Mercer
Morehouse *
HAWAII
Hawaii-Burns
ILLINOIS
Chicago Med-Franklin
Chicago-Pritzker
Illinois
Loyola-Stritch
Northwestern-Feinberg
Rush
Southern Illinois
INDIANA
Indiana
IOWA
Iowa-Carver
KANSAS
Kansas
KENTUCKY
Kentucky
Louisville
LOUISIANA
LSU New Orleans
LSU Shreveport
Tulane
MARYLAND
Johns Hopkins
Maryland
Uniformed Services-Hebert
MASSACHUSETTS
Boston
Harvard *
Massachusetts *
Tufts
MICHIGAN
Michigan
Michigan State
Wayne State
MINNESOTA
Mayo
Minnesota
Interim Associate Dean
Interim Assistant Dean
Men
Women
Men
Women
Men
Women
Men
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 10C: 2009 BENCHMARKING—INTERIM DECANAL POSITIONS
Interim Senior
Associate Dean/
Vice Dean
Interim Dean**
Medical School
MISSISSIPPI
Mississippi
MISSOURI
Missouri Columbia
Missouri Kansas City
St Louis
Washington U St Louis
NEBRASKA
Creighton
Nebraska
NEVADA
Nevada
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Dartmouth
NEW JERSEY
UMDNJ New Jersey
UMDNJ-RW Johnson
NEW MEXICO
New Mexico
NEW YORK
Albany
Buffalo
Columbia
Cornell-Weill
Einstein
Mount Sinai
New York Medical
New York University
Rochester
SUNY Downstate
SUNY Upstate
Stony Brook
NORTH CAROLINA
Duke
East Carolina-Brody *
North Carolina
Wake Forest
NORTH DAKOTA
North Dakota
OHIO
Case Western
Cincinnati
Northeastern Ohio
Ohio State
Toledo
Wright State-Boonshoft
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma
OREGON
Oregon
PENNSYLVANIA
Commonwealth *
Drexel
Jefferson
Penn State
Pennsylvania *
Pittsburgh
Temple
PUERTO RICO
Caribe *
Ponce
Puerto Rico
San Juan Bautista *
RHODE ISLAND
Brown-Alpert
SOUTH CAROLINA
MU South Carolina
South Carolina
SOUTH DAKOTA
South Dakota-Sanford
TENNESSEE
East Tennessee-Quillen
Meharry
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
TEXAS
Baylor *
Interim Associate Dean
Interim Assistant Dean
Men
Women
Men
Women
Men
Women
Men
Women
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
NA
0
0
0
NA
0
0
0
NA
0
0
0
NA
0
0
0
NA
0
0
0
NA
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 10C: 2009 BENCHMARKING—INTERIM DECANAL POSITIONS
Interim Senior
Associate Dean/
Vice Dean
Interim Dean**
Medical School
Texas A & M
Texas Tech
Texas Tech-Foster
UT Galveston
UT Houston
UT San Antonio
UT Southwestern
Interim Associate Dean
Interim Assistant Dean
Men
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Men
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Women
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Men
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Women
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Men
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Women
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
4
0
5
0
2
0
8
0
4
0
1
0
1
0
UTAH
Utah
VERMONT
Vermont
VIRGINIA
Eastern Virginia
Virginia
Virginia Commonwealth
Virginia Tech Carilion *
WASHINGTON
U Washington
WEST VIRGINIA
Marshall-Edwards
West Virginia
WISCONSIN
MC Wisconsin
Wisconsin
2009 TOTAL
2009 AVERAGE #
Notes
# The 2009 average percents are calculated from the percents of all schools and are not adjusted for the number of faculty per school.
* The counts of Interim Senior Associate Deans/Vice Deans, Interim Associate Deans, and Interim Assistant Deans for these schools are based on the AAMC's
2009–2010 Directory of American Medical Education.
** The counts of interim deans are based on the AAMC Council of Deans records.
NA indicates that no information was available.
The 2010 Women in Academic Medicine survey provided the following guidance for defining persons appointed in an interim capacity: a temporary
appointment while recruitment is underway (for example, a chair steps down an is replaced by an interim while a new search takes place for a
permanent appointee).
Source: 2010 Annual Women in Academic Medicine and Science Statistics and Benchmarking Survey
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 11: DISTRIBUTION OF CHAIRS BY DEPARTMENT, GENDER, AND RACE/HISPANIC ORIGIN, 2010
Asian
Women
BASIC SCIENCES
Anatomy
Biochemistry
Microbiology
Pathology (Basic Science)
Pharmacology
Physiology
Other Basic Sciences
SUBTOTAL
CLINICAL SCIENCES
Anesthesiology
Dermatology
Emergency Medicine
Family Practice
Internal Medicine
Neurology
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Ophthalmology
Orthopedic Surgery
Otolaryngology
Pathology (Clinical)
Pediatrics
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Psychiatry
Public Health & Preventive Medicine
Radiology
Surgery
Other Clinical Sciences
SUBTOTAL
OTHER DEPARTMENTS
Dentistry
Other Health Professions
Social Sciences
Veterinary Sciences
All Others
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
Men
Black or African
American
Women
Men
American Indian or
Alaska Native
Women
Men
Native Hawaiian or
Other Pacific
Women
Men
White
Women
Other
Men
Women
Unknown
Men
Women
Multiple Race
Men
Women
Men
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
3
1
6
3
0
4
3
4
21
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
2
2
3
1
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
9
15
5
10
4
30
84
60
70
63
37
60
61
127
478
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
2
1
2
0
0
0
2
7
0
1
2
1
5
1
8
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
5
8
1
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
4
1
1
14
0
3
1
3
3
4
5
7
2
3
2
2
3
5
0
6
14
0
63
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
7
3
2
3
5
5
0
6
3
4
1
1
2
1
2
1
5
12
1
57
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
9
7
18
6
3
20
2
0
1
8
14
6
12
5
15
4
5
146
78
42
54
68
105
74
74
68
82
61
50
83
29
83
21
123
231
17
1,343
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
1
2
6
0
0
0
2
1
3
4
2
2
0
0
5
0
0
2
3
4
0
28
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
1
2
1
2
0
2
1
0
0
3
0
2
0
3
5
0
23
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
2
1
11
20
3
6
2
5
13
29
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
85
8
69
0
0
0
0
250
1,850
0
2
14
49
3
31
Notes
Source: AAMC Faculty Roster, May 2010
Staff Contact: Tai Pham, tpham@aamc.org
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 11: DISTRIBUTION OF CHAIRS BY DEPARTMENT, GENDER, AND RACE/HISPANIC ORIGIN, 2010, CONTINUED
Cuban
Women
Mexican American
Men
Women
Puerto Rican
Women
Men
Other Hispanic
Men
Women
Multiple Hispanic
Men
Women
Total
Men
Women
Men
BASIC SCIENCES
Anatomy
Biochemistry
Microbiology
Pathology (Basic Science)
Pharmacology
Physiology
Other Basic Sciences
SUBTOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
0
9
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
1
1
4
0
2
3
5
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
10
19
7
10
6
34
99
64
83
73
43
77
73
150
563
CLINICAL SCIENCES
Anesthesiology
Dermatology
Emergency Medicine
Family Practice
Internal Medicine
Neurology
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Ophthalmology
Orthopedic Surgery
Otolaryngology
Pathology (Clinical)
Pediatrics
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Psychiatry
Public Health & Preventive Medicine
Radiology
Surgery
Other Clinical Sciences
SUBTOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
1
3
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
9
0
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
0
1
0
2
2
2
0
0
4
0
23
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
6
1
4
0
1
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
1
0
3
5
1
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
13
10
7
20
11
5
23
2
1
10
23
9
16
5
22
6
8
191
83
53
60
85
119
87
93
87
95
68
55
100
36
97
24
143
275
19
1,579
OTHER DEPARTMENTS
Dentistry
Other Health Professions
Social Sciences
Veterinary Sciences
All Others
SUBTOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
2
1
11
21
5
8
2
5
16
36
TOTAL
0
2
0
6
11
33
8
50
0
1
311
2,178
Notes
Source: AAMC Faculty Roster, May 2010
Staff Contact: Tai Pham, tpham@aamc.org
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 12: 2009 BENCHMARKING—RESOURCES TO SUPPORT WOMEN FACULTY
Type of Resource
Medical School
ALABAMA
Alabama
South Alabama
ARIZONA
Arizona
ARKANSAS
Arkansas
CALIFORNIA
Loma Linda
Southern Cal-Keck
Stanford
UC Davis
UC Irvine
UC San Diego
UC San Francisco
UCLA-Geffen
COLORADO
Colorado
CONNECTICUT
Connecticut
Yale
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
George Washington
Georgetown
Howard
FLORIDA
Central Florida
FIU-Wertheim
Florida
Florida State
Miami-Miller
South Florida
GEORGIA
Emory
MC Georgia
Mercer
Morehouse
HAWAII
Hawaii-Burns
ILLINOIS
Chicago Med-Franklin
Chicago-Pritzker
Illinois
Loyola-Stritch
Northwestern-Feinberg
Rush
Southern Illinois
INDIANA
Indiana
IOWA
Iowa-Carver
KANSAS
Kansas
Resources
Provided
Salary Support for
GWIMS
Representative
Financial Support for
Programs
Dedicated Office
Space
In-house
Coaching/Mentoring
Executive
Coaching/Mentoring
Provided by External
Consultants
Other
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
NR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
NR
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
NR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
FTE Support
Financial
Support Amount
N
N
1.8
NA
Unknown
NA
N
N
Unknown
$2,000
N
N
N
NA
Unknown
N
NR
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
NR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
NR
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
NR
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
NA
NR
2.5
NA
1.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
$204,350
$10,000
Unknown
Unknown
$15,000
Unknown
N
N
N
N
Y
Unknown
NA
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
NA
Unknown
$20,000
NA
Y
Y
N
N
N
NA
Y
Y
NA
N
N
NA
N
Y
NA
N
Y
NA
N
N
NA
NA
NA
NA
Unknown
Unknown
NA
NR
NR
Y
NR
Y
Y
NR
NR
N
NR
Y
N
NR
NR
Y
NR
Y
Y
NR
NR
N
NR
N
N
NR
NR
Y
NR
Y
Y
NR
NR
N
NR
N
Y
NR
NR
Y
NR
Y
N
NR
NR
NA
NR
Unknown
NA
NR
NR
$15,000
NR
Unknown
$25,000
Y
Y
Y
NR
Y
N
N
NR
Y
Y
N
NR
Y
N
N
NR
Y
Y
N
NR
Y
N
N
NR
Y
N
Y
NR
Unknown
NA
NA
NR
Unknown
$8,000
NA
NR
Unknown
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NA
NA
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
$500
$25,000
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
$4,768
Unknown
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
1.2
$84,400
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
NA
Unknown
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
NA
$16,000
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 12: 2009 BENCHMARKING—RESOURCES TO SUPPORT WOMEN FACULTY
Type of Resource
Medical School
KENTUCKY
Kentucky
Louisville
LOUISIANA
LSU New Orleans
LSU Shreveport
Tulane
MARYLAND
Johns Hopkins
Maryland
Uniformed Services-Hebert
MASSACHUSETTS
Boston
Harvard
Massachusetts
Tufts
MICHIGAN
Michigan
Michigan State
Wayne State
MINNESOTA
Mayo
Minnesota
MISSISSIPPI
Mississippi
MISSOURI
Missouri Columbia
Missouri Kansas City
St Louis
Washington U St Louis
NEBRASKA
Creighton
Nebraska
NEVADA
Nevada
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Dartmouth
NEW JERSEY
UMDNJ New Jersey
UMDNJ-RW Johnson
NEW MEXICO
New Mexico
NEW YORK
Albany
Buffalo
Columbia
Cornell-Weill
Einstein
Mount Sinai
New York Medical
New York University
Rochester
Resources
Provided
Salary Support for
GWIMS
Representative
Financial Support for
Programs
Dedicated Office
Space
In-house
Coaching/Mentoring
Executive
Coaching/Mentoring
Provided by External
Consultants
Other
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Unknown
Y
NA
NR
Y
NA
NR
N
NA
NR
Y
NA
NR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
NR
NR
Y
Y
NR
NR
N
Y
NR
NR
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
FTE Support
Financial
Support Amount
Y
N
NA
NA
NA
Unknown
N
NA
NR
N
N
NR
Unknown
NA
NR
$45,000
NA
NR
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Unknown
Unknown
NA
$325,000
$7,500
Unknown
Y
NR
NR
N
Y
NR
NR
Y
N
NR
NR
Y
N
NR
NR
Y
Unknown
NR
NR
NA
Unknown
NR
NR
Unknown
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
NA
1.0
NA
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Unknown
NA
Unknown
Unknown
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
NA
NA
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
NA
NA
NA
Unknown
$1,333
NA
Unknown
$40,000
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
NA
Unknown
$35,000
$85,000
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
NA
$20,419
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
0.2
$60,000
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
NA
0.2
Unknown
$30,000
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
NA
NA
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
NA
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
NA
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
NA
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
NA
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NA
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
NA
N
N
Unknown
NA
Unknown
Unknown
NA
Unknown
NA
Unknown
Unknown
$10,000
Unknown
$40,000
$120,000
NA
Unknown
NA
NA
Unknown
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 12: 2009 BENCHMARKING—RESOURCES TO SUPPORT WOMEN FACULTY
Type of Resource
Medical School
SUNY Downstate
SUNY Upstate
Stony Brook
NORTH CAROLINA
Duke
East Carolina-Brody
North Carolina
Wake Forest
NORTH DAKOTA
North Dakota
OHIO
Case Western
Cincinnati
Northeastern Ohio
Ohio State
Toledo
Wright State-Boonshoft
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma
OREGON
Oregon
PENNSYLVANIA
Commonwealth
Drexel
Jefferson
Penn State
Pennsylvania
Pittsburgh
Temple
PUERTO RICO
Caribe
Ponce
Puerto Rico
San Juan Bautista
RHODE ISLAND
Brown-Alpert
SOUTH CAROLINA
MU South Carolina
South Carolina
SOUTH DAKOTA
South Dakota-Sanford
TENNESSEE
East Tennessee-Quillen
Meharry
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
TEXAS
Baylor
Texas A & M
Texas Tech
Texas Tech-Foster
UT Galveston
Resources
Provided
Salary Support for
GWIMS
Representative
Financial Support for
Programs
Dedicated Office
Space
In-house
Coaching/Mentoring
Executive
Coaching/Mentoring
Provided by External
Consultants
Other
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
NR
Y
Y
N
NR
N
Y
Y
NR
Y
Y
N
NR
N
Y
N
NR
Y
Y
N
NA
NA
NA
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
FTE Support
Financial
Support Amount
N
Y
N
NA
NA
NA
Unknown
NA
Unknown
N
NR
N
N
Y
NR
N
N
NA
NR
NA
Unknown
Unknown
NR
Unknown
Unknown
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.1
NA
$53,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
Unknown
Y
N
Y
N
Y
NA
Unknown
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Unknown
Unknown
NR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
NR
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
NR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
NR
N
N
N
Y
N
N
NR
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
NR
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
NR
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
NR
Unknown
NA
NA
2.0
NA
Unknown
NR
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
$258,327
Unknown
Unknown
NR
Y
Y
NR
NR
N
N
NR
NR
N
Y
NR
NR
N
Y
NR
NR
Y
Y
NR
NR
N
N
NR
NR
N
N
NR
NR
NA
NA
NR
NR
NA
Unknown
NR
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
1.5
$42,651
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
1.0
NA
NA
NA
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
NA
Unknown
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
NA
NA
NA
NA
$97,000
NA
NA
Unknown
NR
Y
Y
Y
Y
NR
N
N
N
Y
NR
Y
Y
Y
Y
NR
N
N
N
N
NR
N
Y
Y
N
NR
N
N
N
N
NR
N
Y
N
Y
NR
NA
NA
NA
0.1
NR
Unknown
$24,000
Unknown
$53,000
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
TABLE 12: 2009 BENCHMARKING—RESOURCES TO SUPPORT WOMEN FACULTY
Type of Resource
Medical School
UT HSC San Antonio
UT Houston
UT Southwestern
Resources
Provided
Salary Support for
GWIMS
Representative
Financial Support for
Programs
Dedicated Office
Space
In-house
Coaching/Mentoring
Executive
Coaching/Mentoring
Provided by External
Consultants
Other
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
NR
N
Y
Y
NR
Y
Y
Y
NR
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
FTE Support
Financial
Support Amount
Y
N
N
NA
0.3
Unknown
$5,000
NA
Unknown
N
N
Unknown
$99,000
Y
N
N
0.5
$110,000
N
N
N
NR
Y
Y
Y
NR
N
N
Y
NR
N
N
N
NR
NA
0.3
Unknown
NR
Unknown
$25,000
$12,000
NR
Y
N
Y
N
Y
NA
Unknown
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
1.0
NA
Unknown
Unknown
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
NA
Unknown
$10,000
Unknown
0.9
1.0
$53,638
$25,000
UTAH
Utah
VERMONT
Vermont
VIRGINIA
Eastern Virginia
Virginia
Virginia Commonwealth
Virginia Tech Carilion
WASHINGTON
U Washington
WEST VIRGINIA
Marshall-Edwards
West Virginia
WISCONSIN
MC Wisconsin
Wisconsin
AVERAGE
MEDIAN
Notes
NR indicates that the information was not reported.
NA indicates that the information was not applicable because the medical school responded "No" to one or more of the following survey questions:
1) Does your institution provide resources to promote the professional development of women in medicine?
2) Does your institution provide salary support for GWIMS representatives and staff?
3) Does your institution provide financial support for programs?
Source: 2010 Annual Women in Academic Medicine and Science Statistics and Benchmarking Survey
© 2010 AAMC. May not be reproduced without permission.
Association of
American Medical Colleges
2450 N Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037-1127
T 202 828 0400 F 202 828 1125
www.aamc.org