ACOMPILATION
OF TRACEMETALVALUES
IN
WATERAND
SEDIMENTSCOLLECTED ALONG THE
R I O GRANDE AND ITS T R I B U T A R I E S I N NEW MEXICO.
DATA FROM SELECTEDPUBLISHED AND UNPUBLISHED
SOURCES
Lynn A. Brandvold
New Mexico B u r e a u of Mines and Mineral R e s o u r c e s
and
Donald K. B r a n d v o l d
N e w Mexico I n s t i t u t e of Mining and Technology
Socorro, New Mexico
A p r i l 1990
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST
OF TABLES................................................ii
LIST OF FIGURES
...............................................
INTRODUCTION...................................................l
ELEMENT BY ELEMENT COMMENTS...................................gl
GENERAL COMMENTS..............................................96
BIBLIOGRAPHY..................................................gI
i
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Table
1
Identification
of
Sources,
Sites,
Sample Handling, Sampling Dates,
Frequency, and Metals Determined
2
SitevsAverageSedimentConcentration
11
3
KeytoMasterSampleSites
14
4
Dissolved
Element
Data
A. Arsenic
B. Barium
C. Berylium
D. Boron
E. Cadmium
F. Chromium
G. Cobalt
H. Copper
I. Iron
J. Lead
K. Manganese
L. Mercury
M. Molybdenum
N. Nickel
0. Selenium
P. Uranium
Q. Vanadium
R. Zinc
5
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Total Element Data
A. Arsenic
B. Barium
C. Berylium
D. Boron
E. Cadmium
F. chromium
'G. Cobalt
H. Copper
I. Iron
' J.
Lead
K. Manganese
L. Mercury
M. Molybdenum
N. Nickel
0. Selenium
P. Uranium
Q. Vanadium
R. Zinc
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
4a
49
50
ii
6
Sediment
Data
A . Arsenic
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
B. Barium
ium
C. Beryl
D. Boron
E. Cadmium
F. Chromium
G. Cobalt
H. Copper
I. Iron
J. Lead
K. Manganese
L. Mercury
M. Molybdenum
N. Nickel
0. Selenium
P. Uranium
Q. Vanadium
R. Zinc
7
Bar
Graph
Site
Identification
8
Elemental Values Displayed
as Bar
at Selected Sites
9
Comparison of Rio Grande Trace Metals'to
Colorado River Trace Metals. Values in
ppb as Dissolved Species
iii
69
Graphs
70
92
LIST OF FIGURES
Fisures
Paqe
1
L o c a t i o n of S i t e s along
Rio
Grande
2
Locationof
Rio Puerco
3
12
S i t e s along Rio San Jose
Bar G r a p h s f o r R i o
13
Grande
A . Cadmium
B. Chromium
C. C o b a l t
D. Copper
E. Lead
F.Mercury
G . Molybdenum
H. Selenium
I. Uranium
J. Zinc
4
.. ..
-
Bar G r a p hfsoR
r iS
o a Jno s e
Cadmium
B. Chromium
C. C o b a l t
D. Copper
E . Lead
F. Mercury
G. Molybdenum
H. Selenium
I . Uranium
J . Zinc
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
Rio
Puerco
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
A.
iv
INTRODUCTION
The
Rio
km2 is New
Grande
Mexico's
watershed
most
comprising
significant
an
source
area
of
128,150
of
about
surface
an3
sub-
surface water. Flow is derived primarily from snowmelt in the
mountains of northern New Mexico and southern Colorado an3 from
intermittent but locally heavy thunderstorms during July and
August. Storage and flood control reservoirs utilized for irrigation and recreation are located along the Rio Grande and are
potential
sediment
and
pollutant
traps.
Prior to1975, heavy metal concentrations in the Rio Grande
had been determined by
the U.S. Geological Survey on filtered
samples at only a few sites. Since that time, studies have been
done
on
many
sites
not
only
for
dissolved
metals
but
for
metals
in suspended, bottom, and bank sediment. This report ais
compilation of data from all the studies available through
1986, with
the exception of the USGS Water Resources Data, which is readily
available but contains very little trace metal data. Four of the
studies from which data are included here are M.S. theses available
only
from
the
library
at New Mexico Institute of Mining and
Technology. Another study is a report to the Interstate Stream
Commission, anotheris a study done for EPA, and still another is
a report for the Office of Surface Mining. The data from these
studies
are
difficult
to
obtain
and
then
difficult
to use kecause
the values are not reported in the same form. This report Fathers
the data together in the
readily
useable
and
same form in order t o make it more
available.
1
Data are included here from
the following studies: Faith
(1974), Dauchy (1976), Popp et al. (1979), Laquer (1981), Brand-
vold et al. (1980), Brandvold et al. (1981), Novo-Gradec (1983),
Popp, Hawley, and Love (1983), and Popp, et al. (1983).
Not all
the metals listed in this compilation were determined
ir each
study and not all the same sampling sites were utilized. Values
for sample sites located close together were combined for the
tables and bar graphs. For instance, data from sample sites at
San Acacia, Escondida, and Socorro were combined. A l l samples
were handled by the researchers in a similar manner. Similar
methods of analysis were used in all cases with the exception
of
In the Dauchy study, colorimet-
those for arsenic and selenium.
(1979) and
ric methods were used for these elements. In the Popp
Laquer (1981) studies, electrothermal atomic absorption was used.
In the Brandvold, et al. (1981) and Popp, et al. (1983) (Rio
Grande)
studies, arsenic and selenium were done by hydride
generation atomic absorption. The electrothermal atomic absorption values wereso much higher than the other values they are
thought
to
be
in
error
and
are
not
included
here.
Values in the tables represent simple averages of data from
individual reports. If several sampling trips were reported for
each source, all values were averaged. If values were reported
as "less than" a certain value, then a number of half the Itless
than" value was used for averaging., A listed average one half
the detection limit indicates values were given in the source(s)
2
as tlless than" the
detection limit. A mean of 0 indicater that
samples
we,re
not
analyzed
for
this
element.
Trace metal data is listed in different forms: "dissclved"
(analyses were done on water samples filtered through
0.45 pm paper), lttotaltl
(analyses
were done on unfiltered samples
mixed before an aliquot was taken) and ltsedimenttt (analyse? were
either on suspended sediment, bottom sediment, or sediment. from
the stream bed).
Samples were treated slightly different.ly in
the different studies (See Table 1).
In some cases, susrended
sediment was analyzed separately. In others, the sediment was
analyzed together with the water as
tltotallt
a
analysis. This was
particularly true where there was little suspended sediment.. In
reports
where
sediment
was
analyzed
separately
and
secliment
the
concentration was given, it was possible to calculate a ltt.otallt
value for the tables.
In reports where a l1totalSt valu?.
was
determined and sediment was not analyzed, it was possibleto
calculate a sediment value if the sediment concentration was
given.
In this context, sediment concentration is the same as
USGS usage and is given in g/l.
Sediment load, on the other
hand, is in
tons/day.
The sources, sites, sampling dates, sampling frequency,
metals determined, and an assigned atcolorcodell are given in
Table 1.
A color
code was assigned each source because several
sources numbered their sites identically. Master sample sites
are identified in Table
3.
The location of these sites along the
3
-
Rio Grande, Red River, and Rio San Juan
Rio Puerco systems is'
shown in Figures1 and 2.
Sample sites beginat the Colorado
border
Grande
and
follow
the
Rio
to
the
Texas
border.
Sediment concentrations when given in the source were aver2. Average concentrations of metals
aged and are iisted in Table
in filtered water samples (dissolved metals) are listed
alphabetically by element in Tables 4A
- 4P.
Average concentra-
tions of metals in whole water (total metals) are listed alphabetically by elementin Tables 5A
-
5P. The sediment data are
-
6A
6P.
given alphabetically by element in Tables
The
selected
elements
listed
in
Table
7 are
displayed
in
bar
graphs in Figure3A to 3J, and 4A to 4J. Bar graph site identification is given in Table
8.
4
TABLE 1
IDENTIFICATION OF SOURCES, SITES, SAMPLE HANDLING,
SAMPLES DATES, FREQUENCY,
AND METALS DETERMINED
SOURCE: "A Selected Trace Metal Profile of the Rio Grande in
New Mexico"J. Dauchey, Thesis (1976).
C O M R CODE:
Brown
SITES:
1. Cerro
2. Arroyo Hondo
3 . Espanola
4. Bernalillo
5. Isleta
6. Bernard0
7. Escondida
8 . San Antonio
9. San Marcia1
10. Caballo
11. Radium Springs
12. Anthony
FREQUENCY: Samples taken three times over one-year period in
5/75, 7/75, 1/76.
SAMPLE HANDLING: Samples were filtered through
0.45~paper,
then acidified in the field. Filtered sample
and sediment were analyzed for metals.
METALS ANALYZED: As, Ba,
B, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Mn, Hg, Mo, Se,
and Zn.
SOURCE: "An Equilibium Distribution of Trace Elements in a
Natural Stream Environmenttt
S. Faith, Thesis (1974).
COLOR
CODE:
Purple
SITES:
Site A--Red River--1/2 mile upstream from molybdenum
mine and mill
Site €%--Red River--1/2 mile downstream from
molybdenum mine and mill
FREQUENCY: Samples were taken oncein 6/74.
SAMPLE HANDLING: Samples were filtered through 0.45~paper and
acidified in the field. Filtered samples
were analyzed €or metals.
5
METALS ANALYZED :
SOURCE:
Na, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, All Cu, Nil Sn, and
Mo
.
'@Heavy Metals and Pesticides in Water, Sediments, and
Selected Tissue Samples
of Aquatic Life in the Middle
Rio Grande Valley in New Mexico"
C. Popp, D. Brand
vold, J. Brierley, N. Scott, and S. Gloss, EPA Report
(1979)
COLOR
CODE:
Green
-
SITES: 1. Corrales (Bridge) 4 Km upstream from Oxbow
6 Km upstream from 1-40 bridge
2. Albuquerque Oxbow
3. Isleta
16 Km below Albuquerque sewage treatment
plant
US-60 bridge
4 . Bernard0
Bureau of Reclamation Channel
5. Socorro
6. Bosque - 20 Km downstream from Socorro
7. San Marcia1 railroad bridge 4 Km east of San Marcia1
8. Monticello Point headwaters of Elephant Butte Lake
9. La Joya Game Refuge24 Km north of Socorro
10. Elephant Butte Marsh 10 Km upstream from Reservoir
headwaters
11. Elephant Butte Dam
12. Rio Salado at 1-25 bridge
13. Rio Puerco at 1-25 bridge
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1/77 and 8/78.
FREQUENCY: Six sampling trips were taken between
SAMPLE HANDLING:
Samples for dissolved
tered and/or centrifuged
as possible. Whole water
with suspended sediment
was also analyzed.
metal analysis were filas soon
and acidified
samples were digested
and suspended sediment
METALS ANALYZED: AS, B, Be,Ba, Cd, CO, Cr,
CU, Pb, Mn,Hg, MO,
Ni, Se, U, V, and Zn.
SOURCE:
"A Survey of Trace Metal Distribution in Water and
in the Rio Grande, Rio
Suspended Sediment in the
Puerco, and Rio Salado in Central New Mexico"
F.
Laquer, Thesis (1981).
COLOR CODE: Blue
6
SITES: 1. Alameda Bridge
-- below N"44 at Corrales
2. Isleta below N"147
3. US-60 bridge at Bernard0
4. Rio Puerco at 1-25 bridge
5.' Rio Saladoat 1-25 bridge
6. San Acacia above dam
7. Socorro
8. Ottowi - N"4
9 . Cochiti Dam
10. Cochiti Spillway-- 160 Km below dam
11. Bernalillo
12. San Lorenzo Arroyo 20 Km north of Socorro
13. Arroyo 6 Km north of Socorro
14. San Marcia1
-
-
FREQUENCY:
Samples were
(1978-1979).
taken
11 times
over
a
one-year
period
SAMPLE HANDLING: Samples for dissolved metal analysis were
filtered through0.45~paper and acidifiedin
the field. Samples for total metal analysis
were not filtered or acidified.
METAL
.ANALYZED:
As, Ba, Be, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn,
Hg, Mo,
Ni, Pb, Se,V, and Zn. (As and Se values
-- not usedir this
believed to be incorrect
report)
.
SOURCE: "Heavy
Metal and Nutrient Load
of Rio San Jose-Rio Puerco
SystemrrD. Brandvold, and L. Brandvold, Interctate
System Commission Report (1980).
COLOR
CODE:
Pink
SITES: 1A.
1B.
1c.
1D.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Bluewater Lake
San MateoCreek
Upstream San Mateo Creek
Arroyo del Puerto
Rio Jose at Milan
Rest Stop on 1-40 Lava
at Beds
Rio San Jose after confluence with Rio Paguate
Rio San Jose before confluence with Rio Puerco
Rio Puerco at 1-40
Km downstream from confluence wit.h Rio
Rio Puerco 16
San Jose
FREQUENCY: Six
sampling
trips
were
7
taken
between
3/786/79.
and
SAMPLE
HANDLING: Samples for dissolved metal analysis were fil
tered through0 . 4 5 ~paper and acidified
as soon
as possible. Whole water samples were mixed and
analyzed for total metals.
METALS ANALYZED: Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg,
Mol Sr, Se, U,V, and Zn.
SOURCE:
"Transport Mechanism in Sediment Rich Streams--Heavy
Metal and Nutrient Load of the Rio San Jose-Rio Pu?-rco
Systems" D. Brandvold, C. Popp, and L. Brandvold, WRRI
Report (1981)
.
C O M R CODE: Red
SITES: 1. San Mateo Creek
2. Lava Beds Rest Stop 1-40
on
3. Rio San Jose after confluence with Rio Paguate
4. Rio San Jose just before confluence with Rio Puerco
5. Rio Puerco just before confluence with Rio San JoTe
6. Rio Puerco just after confluence with Rio San Jose
7. Rio Puerco just before confluence with Rio Grande
8. Rio San Jose at Milan
9. Upstream on San Mateo Creek
10. Arroyo del Puerto
1/79 and 9/80.
FREQUENCY: Nine sampling trips were taken between
SAMPLE HANDLING: Samples for dissolved metal analyses were
filtered through0 . 4 5 ~paper and acidified
as
soon as possible. Suspended sediment and bed
sediment were also analyzed for total m?tals.
METALS ANALYZED:
SOURCE:
As, Ba , Cd, Cs, Cr, Cu, Pb, Mn, Hg,
Mo, Nil
Se, U, V, and Zn.
"An Evolution of Sediments in Middle Rio Grande, Elephant Butte Reservoir and Caballo Reservoir
as Potential Sources for Toxic Materials" C. Popp, D. Bravdvold, T. Lynch, and L. Brandvold, WRRI Report (1933).
COLOR CODE: Yellow
SITES: 1. Rio Grandeat Socorro
2. Rio Grandeat San Marcia1
A. Elephant Butte north end of reservoir
B. Elephant Butte upper middle
C. Elephant Butte lower middle
D. Elephant Butte south end of reservoir
3. Caballo
-
8
FREQUENCY: Four sampling trips were taken between
10/81 and 5/82.
SAMPLE HANDLING: Samples for dissolved meals analysis were filtered and acidified.Whole water samples and bed
sediments were also collected.
METALS ANALYZED: As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb,
Hg, Mo, Se,
U, and V.
SOURCE: "Radionuclide and Heavy Metal Distribution in Recent
Sediments of Major Streams in Grants Mineral NM"
Belt.,
C. Popp, J. Hawley, and D. Love
(1983).
COLOR CODE: orange
SITES: 2. Rio Puerco near Popalitito Windmill
3 . Rio Puerco below confluence
of Rio San Jose and
Puerco
SJ-1. San Jose before confluence with Rio Puerco
7. Rio Puerco upstream from Rio San Jose
Pag-1. Paguate Reservoir
9. Chico Arroyo
hio
FREQUENCY: Samples were taken once at each site 1982.
during
SAMPLE HANDLING: No water samples were collected. Sediment
samples are from cores taken along stream bed.
Metal analysis was done only<63onmicror
fraction. Values are listed in tables in parentheses.
METALS ANALYZED: As, Cd, Cr,
CU, Hg, Mol Ni, Se,U, and V.
SOURCE:
"Trace Metal and Radionuclide Distributions in Recent
Sediments of the Rio Puerco, Rio San Jose, and Peguate
K. Novo-Gredec,
Reservoir in the Grants Mineral Belt"
Thesis (1983).
COLOR CODE: Black
-
SITES:
1,2.
3/43.
6,7.
8,9.
10,ll.
Pag
SJ-1.
Pag-1.
.
Rio Puerco west of Belen
Rio Puerco below confluence with Rio San Jose
Rio Puerco above confluence with Rio San Jose
Rio Puerco above Chico Arroyo
Chico Arroyo
Paguate Reservoir
Rio San Jose before confluence with Rio Puercc
Rio San Jose after confluence with Rio Paguate
9
FREQUENCY: Each site sampled once during
1981-1983.
SAMPLE HANDLING: Cored sediment cas collected. Metal analysis
was done only on
<63 micron and clay fraction.
Values reported here are for surface sediment
in parentheses because they repreonly and are
sent onlya fraction of sediment.
Cu, Hg, Mo, Pb, Se,V, and
METALS ANALY2E.D: As, Ba, Cd, Cr, Co,
U.
10
TABLE 2
SITE vs AVERAGE
SEDIMENT
CONCENTRATION
sedimentation
concentrations
(g/1)
Site
Cerro
Arroyo Hondo
Espanola, Ottowi
Bernalillo, Corrales
Isleta
Bernard0
Puerco
Salado
San Acacia, Escondida,and Socorro
San Antonio, San Marcia1
narrows to dam
Elephant Butte
Caballo
Radium Springs, Anthony
--
11
1.1
0.43
0.74
1.07
0.64
0.96
320.0
26.0
2.13
1.12
0.96
0.31
0.9
(22) San Antonio
:aballo Reservoir
t
Anthony
Figure 1. Location of sites along Rio Grande
12
Figure 2. Location of sites along Rio San Jose-Rio Puerco.
13
Table 3
KEY
TO
Rio
Master
Site
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
MASTER
Grande
SAMPLE
SITES
Sites
Descrbtion
Brown-1 (Cerro)
Brown-2 (Arroyo Hondo)
Purple-A (Red River)
Purple-B (Red River)
Brown-3 (Espanola)
Blue-8 (Ottowi)
Blue-9 (Cochiti Dam)
Blue-10 (CochitiS p y )
Blue-11, Brown-4 (Bernalillo)
Blue-1, Green-1 (Corrales)
Green-2 (Oxbow)
Blue-2, Green-3, Brown-5 (Isleta)
Blue-3, Green-4, Brown-6 (Bernardo)
Green-9, (La Joya)
Blue-4, Green-13, Red-7, (Puerco)
Blue-5, Green-12 (Salado)
Blue-6 (San Acacia)
Blue-12 (San Lorenzo)
Blue-13 (arroyo, Socorro)
Brown-7 (Escondida)
Blue-7, Green-5, Yellow-1 (Socorro)
Brown-8, Green-6 (San Antonio)
Green-7, Yellow-2, Brown-9, Blue-14 (San Marcial)
Green-8, Yellow-A (Monticello Point)
Green-10, Yellow-B (Elephant Butte Marsh)
Yellow-C (Mid-Elephant Butte)
Yellow-Dl Green-11 (Dam)
Brown-10, Yellow-3 (Caballo)
Brown-11 (Radium Springs)
Brown-12 (Anthony)
- Puerco Sites
Rio San Jose
Orange-2, Black-l,Z (Puerco near Popalitito Windmill)
Red-6, Orange-3, Black-3,4,5, Pink-6 (Puerc? below
San Jose)
Red-4, Orange-SJ-1, Black-SJ-1, Pink-4 (San Jose)
Red-3, Pink-3, Black-PAG-1 (San Jose-Paguate)
Orange-PAG-1, Black-PAG (Paguate Resevoir)
Red-2, Pink-2 (San Jose-lava beds)
Red-8, Pink-1 (San Jose-Milan)
Pink-lA, Red-BW (Bluewater)
Red-1, Pink-1B (San Mateo Creek)
Red-9, Pink-1C (upstream-San Mateo Creek)
Red-10, Pink-1D (Arroyo del Puerto)
Black-8,9 (above Chico Arroyo on Puerco)
Orange-9, Black-l0,ll (Chico Arroyo)
Orange-7, Black-6,7, Red-5, -Pink-5 (Puerco above
1-40)
14
Table 4-A
ARSENIC
Sample type: dissolved
values in ppb
No.
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
20
74
48
12
3
3
0
0
3
3
0
0
4
1
1
5
4
0
3
2
1
0
0
3
1
4
6
2
2
1
2
4
3
4
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
S.D.Max.
Mean
’
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
0
13
10
18
18
45
0
111
346 190
102
0
0
8
80
16
36
14
33
9
18
9
8
7
0
5
4
5
0
7
2
0
3
39
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9.7
0
0
0
86.5
221
0
0
0
2.9
0
16
3.5
34
0
3
3
3
0
0
30
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Min.
.5
5
0
0
5
0
0
0
5
10
18
5
5
0
21
102
0
0
5
80
5
5
11
8
9
9
5
5
5
0
5
4
5
0
7
2
0
3
39
30
0
0
3
Sea Water = 3 ppb
NMEID Drinking water Standard= 50 ppb
15
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
0
27
10
18
55
156
0
193
503
102
0
0
10
80
13 1
131
16
57
9
26
12
10
10
0
5
4
5
0
7
2
0
3
39
0
0
3
Table 4-B
BARIUM
Sample type: dissolved
values in ppb
Site
47 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
No.
3
3
42
0
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
63
91
0
0
60
170
130
77
73
0
100
200
37
1
1
5
5
0
3
2
1
0
0
3
1
4
1
1
0
1
A
B
C
D
E
F
3
4
0
1
1
1
0
1
G
1
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
S.D.
Mean
75
39
90
101
200
100
0
100
84
75
93
0
82
80
65
0
64
69
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
117
91
160
0
0
59
67 19
2
30
40
0
0
0
42
16
0
0
17
0
0
16049
27
0
30
78
0
0
71
126
0
0
0
23
0
42
18045
200 0
0
0
0
0
Min
0
4
88
1.5
12522
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
65
64
69
91
0
0
0
0
.
44
0
0
110
109
0
0
0
35
170
13 0
40
50
0
44
111
37
0
0
50
39
60
65
200
100
70
17 0
130
120
0
180
290
37
0
0
95
39
150
100
0
0
100
80
74
75
0
82
82
65
0
64
69
0
117
91
160
0
0
59
100
Sea Water = 30 ppb
NMEID Drinking Water Standard = 1000
16
Max.
77
0
82
82
0
0
117
160
0
0
59
ppb
.2
Table 4-C
BERYLIUM
Sample type: dissolved
values in ppb
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
Mean
S.D.
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
1
a
9
10
11
12
NO.
0.005
1
1
4
1
4
7
0
3.8 6
6
5
0
0
0
6
1
2
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.05
0.03 0.015 0.016
0.015
0
0.015
0 0.015
0.03
0
0.07
0.08
0.51
0
0.13
0. oa0.05
0.05
0.3
0.63
0
0
- 01.1
5
2.4
2.7
11.0
.9
0.1
0.05
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .01. 0 0 5
0.1
1.7
1.7 0
2 . 7 1.5
1.6
0
1.9
0.98
9
0
0
0.4
0.4 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Min.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sea
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Water = 0 . 0 0 0 6 ppb
17
Max.
0
0
0
0
0
0.015
0.015
0.03
0.015
0.51
0
0.51
0.28
1.0
0
0.005
4.9
0.13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.005
0.03
1.7
.5
1.9
0.98
1.9
0.98
0
0
0.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T a b l e 4-D
BORON
Sample type: d i s s o l v e d
values i n ppm
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Mean
S.D.
3
3
0
0
4.3
2.2
0
6.9
3.3
3
0
0
0
3
4.6
0
0
0
1.9
0.5
0.3
1.4
2.2
0
0
0
0
No.
3
2
6
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
5
6
3
3
0
0
3
3
3
A
B
0
0
C
0
0
D
E
2.1
0.1
1.4
3.3
0
0.41
0
0
0.17
1.2
2.3
0
0
0
0
L
0
0
0
M
0
0
N
0
0
F
G
H
I
J
K
7.5
0
0
0
2.7
0.2
0.2
4.5
6.9
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.3
0.0
1.6
8.3
0
0.3
0
0
0.10
1.8
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
Min.
0.05
0.05
0
0
0.05
0
0
0
0.05
0.1
0.26
0.05
0.05
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0
0.1
0
0
0.05
0.05
0.05
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Max.
12.2
6
0
0
13.2
0
0
0
5
0.F
0.:
1.:
12.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
6.5
0.2
3.1
15.8
0
0.6
0
0
0.25
3.3
6.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Table 4-E
CADMIUM
Sample type: dissolved
values in ppm
No,
Site
*
I
2
3
0.3
-
1
12.5
3
0
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3
3
1
1
4
4
1
5
10
0
8
6
.6
0
0
3
7
4
6
2
2
1
2
4
3
4
A
B
0
3
C
D
2
2
0
3
1
0
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
1
1
1
0
0
2
S.D.
Mean
8.7
8.7
0
0
9.3
0.47
0.41
0.52
5.8
5.3
0.3
3.9
3.3
0
3.2
3.5
1.8
0
0
2.2
3.0
1.9
2.8
0.74
1.25
1.1
0.27
4.5
8.1
14
0
14
6.3
5.6
0
2.3
0.36
0
1.6
1.4
3.8
10.9
0
0
15.3
0.2
0
0
10.1
8.6
0
7.3
5.5
0
3.1
4.8
3.5
0
0
1.7
4.5
1.27
4.2
0.50
1.48
0
0.10
7.1
8.9
15.3
0
22
0.42
3.7
0
2.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.5
0
0
8.9
19
Min.
0.2
0
0
0.3
0.4
0.41
0.52
0.3
0.34
0.3
0.2
0.24
0
0.24
0.06
0.16
0
0
0.07
0.2
0.7
0.05
0.39
0.2
1.1
0.65
0.05
0.8
0.3
0
15
6
3
0
0.5
0.36
0
1.6
1.4
3.8
0
0
7.8
Max.
23
0.21
0
0
27
0.76
0.41
0.52
21
18.2
0.3
17
10
0
8
11.9
9.0
0
0
10.0
03.2
3
11
1.1
2.3
1.1
0.8
15
18
33
0
39
6.6
8.2
0
5.6
0.36
0
1.6
1.4
3.8
0
0
10
Table 4-F
CHROMIUM
Stample type: dissolved
values in ppb
Site
No.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
3
0
0
3
4
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
1
1
4
5
1
5
12
0
8
7
6
0
0
3
7
4
6
2
2
1
2
4
3
4
0
5
3
3
0
5
1
0
2
2
2
0
0
3
Mean
S.D.
1.2
1.2
6
0
0
2.1
0.55
0
0
0.55
2.2
0
0.87
4.9
0
0
1.9
0.7
0.3
0.2
0.98
2.3
2.3
1.2
1.7
0
2.8
5.3
0.6
0
0
4
71
2.8
2.5
4.3
2.3
0.95
4.0
2.1
2.4
2.0
0
0.62
4.8
1.5
0
0.68
0.9
0
6.5
1.1
2
0
0
1.37
1
0
3.8
4.5
0.75
0
0
4.6
99
2.3
2.2
5.8
0.21
0
4.0
3.3
2.9
3.2
0
0.86
7.9
2.3
0
0.99
0
0
9.2
0.85
2.1
0
0
1.5
Min.
1.3
0
0
'
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.5
0.3
2.3
0.2
0.2
0
0.3
0.3
0.1
0
0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.2
2.1
0.95
1.2
0.2
0.5
0.1
0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0
0.1
0.9
0
1
0.5
0.5
0
0
0.5
NMEID Drinking Water Standards= 5 0 ppb
20
Max.
12
0
0
4.3
1.18
0.3
0.2
1.5
5.4
2.3
2.5
3.2
0
7.7
12
2.1
0
0
9.1
141
5
5.9
8.4
2.4
0.95
6.9
7.1
5.8
6.8
0
2.1
14
4.15'
0
2.4
0.9
0
14
1.7
3.5
0
0
3.1
Table 4-G
COBALT
Sample type: dissolved
values in ppb
No.
Site
1
2
3
0
4
5
6
0
0
0
0.743
0
7
14
13
15
0
0
1
1
8
1
9
10
. 1
11
1
41 6
12
28
9
13
0
14
0
1 .52 5
8 28
10 .62 5
8 07
17
.
5
0
18
19
0
20
0
0.25 2 1
2.6 6
22
i
23
14
2
1
24
1
25
26
0
27
1
28
0
29
0
30
0
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
1
1
1
0
2
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
S.D. Max.
Mean
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.3
3.2
2.7
5.5
3.6
3.4
0 . 215
1
0.25 7
0
34
33
5.11
0
0
0
3.6 0
0
35
20
0
2.7
0
0
0
0
0
0
5.5
0
24
30
21
0
7.9
0
0
0
24
0
220
19
30
0
8
0
0
19
35
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.7
3.2
2.7
5.5
3.6
3.4
0
0.25
0
0
0
4.2
3.2
2.7
5.5
3.4
0
0
0
6.8
0
0
0
24
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30
21
0
7.9
0
0
30
21
0
7.9
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26
0
Water= 0 . 1 ppb
21
0
0
0
0
Sea
Min.
0
200
19
30
0
1
0
220
19
30
0
16
0
0
0
19
35
10
0
19
35
10
0
0
0
26
0
26
Table 4-H
COPPER
Sample type: dissolved
values in ppb
Site
1
3703
8 . 73
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
4 .18 2
13
14
4 .15
4
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
5 . 4 23
24
1 2 25
26
7.9 27
28
29
30
A
B
13 C
D
E
F
1 1 . 84
4
1
118
.8
222
10
4
2
8.7
5.0
1.8
2.3
12
7.8
11
12
11
7.5
1
3
5
1.8
4
1
1
0
1 88
7
6
0
0
3
6
4
19 6
9.2 2
2 . 82
1
8 . 62
4
7 .30
4
0
13 3
1 0 42
89 2
0
33. 6
G
1
H
I
0
J
K
1
1
1
L
0
M
N
0
2
S.D.
Mean
NO.
3.7
Min.
Max.
1
4
0
0
6.0
3.5
1 .08
0
13.5 4.3
0
25 8
0
0
16
15
17
6.9 1.7
5.3
0
0
0
0
13
7
1.07
5 . 44 . 4
20
11
21
42
14
18
0
14
11
4.1
8.3
55
75
0
0
12
86
77
0
0
5.8
25
25
0
0
0
11
0
7.6
0
0
5.2
0
0
0
0
38
31
Sea Water = 3 ppb
NMEID Drinking Water Standards
22
670
20
4
2
15
8.5
4
2
3
1.8
2.3
5
4.2
11
2.3
30
11
2.2
0
0
39
2.1
0
0
6
8
0
0
20
7.3
30
6
55
49
18
18
6
1
5
0
2
16
15
166
0
27
14
0
140
0
9.3
2
25
0
11
7.6
5.2
0
11
7.6
5.2
0
0
0
16
= 1000
0
60
ppb
Table 4-1
IRON
Sample type: dissolved
values in ppb
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
NO.
0
0
'
1
1
0
2
1
1
1
4
0
4
7
0
6
6
5
0
0
0
6
0
1
.
Mean
0
0
450
270
0
91
114
80
563
272
0
0
355
109
0
270
1228
88
0
0
0
96
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NMEID
S.D.
Min.
0
0
0
0
0
450
270
0
50
114
80
563
28
0
34
30
0
40
15
22
0
0
0
8
0
450
270
0
131
114
80
563
585
0
0
0
57
0
0
0
275
0
558
97
0
3 19
2828
84
0
0
0
71
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sea Water= 10 ppb
= 300
Drinking Water Standards
23
0
190
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1190
270
0
900
7000
230
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Max.
ppb
Table 4-3
LEAD
Sample type: dissolved
values in ppb
No.
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
13.6
3
3
0
0
3
4
1
1
4
4
1
8
0
7
6
5
0
0
3
7
4
6
2
2
1
2
4
3
4
A
0
B
4
2
2
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
0
4
1
0
1
2
2
M
0
0
N
3
Mean
S.D. Max.
17
16
0
14
0
0
10.8
1.0
0.05
0.28
4.85
3.4
6.9
4.2
4.2
0
4.5
11
0.33
0
0
10.7
2.4
0.15
7.2
3.7
11
4.7
5.7
6.6
5.8
21
0
15
5.1
5.4
0
11.5
2.8
0
5.3
23
25
0
0
8.6
0
10
0.75
0
0
4.5
3.5
0
7.2
7.2
0
19
12
0.22
0
0
12
4.2
0.2
3.3
3.1
10
0
'
0.21
5.5
7.2
30
0
11
0.14
0.56
0
7.50
0
0
0
4.2
7.1
0
0
2.4
Min.
1
1
0
0
0.5
0.5
0.05
0.28
0.44
0.21
6.9
0.21
0.21
0
0.03
0.32
0.025
0
0
3
0.4
0.03
4
1.5
3.9
4.7
5.5
2
0.5
0.5
0
5
5.0
5.0
0
5
2.8
0
5.3
20
20
0
0
5.9
Sea Water = .03 ppb
NMEID Drinking Water Standards = 5 0 ppb
24
25
29
0
0
21
1.8
0.C5
0.28
11
8.1
6.9
17
17
0
26
28
0.62
0
0
25
11.1
0.45
12
5.9
18
4.7
5.e
5.E
14
66
0
30
5.2
5.e
0
18
2.e
0
5.3
26
30
0
0
10
Table 4-K
MANGANESE
Sample type: dissolved
values in ppb
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
No.
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
4
5
1
5
8
0
8
3 88'
53
5
0
0
3
6
3
5
1
1
0
1
3
2 . 93
42
4
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
S . D . Max.
Mean
12
13
90
83
48
2 430
31
24
20.6
70
280
81
123
0
3 3 01115
0
2775
12.8
0
0
15
4.5
202
134
610
430
7.5
11
0
83
0
48
25
0
0
14
118
280
0
113
250
0
1892
7
0
0
7
1.3
378
266
0
0
0
0
14
8
6.7
36
0
90
2.3
107
0
58
0
0
15
25
230
0
0
63
0
3
0
0
2.3 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
63
0
Min.
5
5
90
83
10
31
24
5
2.5
280
16
5
0
6.8
51
3.8
0
0
8
2.7
5
5
610
430
0
14
5
5
6
0
90
2.3
107
0
58
0
0
15
25
230
0
0
63
Sea Water = 2 ppb
NMEID Drinking Water Standards = 5 0 ppb
25
20
25
90
94
50
31
24
38
280
280
570
0
5500
22.6
0
0
22
6.1
710
610
610
430
0
14
11
10
96
0
90
107
0
58
0
0
15
25
230
0
0
Table 4-L
MERCURY
Sample type: dissolved
values in ppb
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.05
9
10
11
12 0.05
0.05
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 0.05
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
No.
Mean
S.D. Max.
3
3
0
0
3
0
0.05
0.05
0
0
0.05
0
0
0.05
0.05
0
0
0
0
0.05
0.05
0.05
0
0
0.05
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0
1.2
0
0
0
3
0
1
40.6
0.7
4
0
2
2.3
1
0
0
0
3
1.1
0
1.2
0.5
0.4
0
2.3
0
0
0
2.6 1.3
0
1.2 0
0
3.3
0
0
0
0.05
0
0
0.68
3.3
1.4
0.05
0
3.9
3.3
0
0
0
0
0.05
0
0
0.05
0.51
0.42
0.44
0.44
0.45
1.8
1.7
1.2
0.44
1.4
0.61
0
0
4
5
2
0.2
0.89
1
1
1
0
0.15
0.05
1.02
1.1
0.81
0.44
0.92
0.19
0.05
0.05
0
0.71
0.18
0.49
0
0.69
0.1
0.1
0.17
0.17
0.3
0
0
0
1
0.48
1
1
0
0
0
00.05
0
2 0.5
1
2
4
0.05
0.29
3
40.04
0
1
1
1
0
0.38 2 0.44
.
Min.
0.8
0
0.68
0.05
0
0
0
0
0.05
0
00.71
0
0
0.71
0.18
0.49
0
0
0
0.1
0.1
0.17
0.17
0.3
0.1
0
0
0
0
0
0.48
0
0
0
0
0.18
0.49
0
1
0.10
0
0
0
0.3
0.17
0.17
0.48
Detection limit is0.1 ppb; Sea Water= 0.03 ppb
NMEID Drinking Water Standards= 2 ppb
26
Table 4-M
MOLYBDENUM
Sample type: dissolved
values in ppb
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
No.
25 3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
4
2
1
5
7
0
6
6
6
0
0
3
6
4
6
2
2
1
2
4
3
4
0
7
5
4
0
8
1
1
2
2
2
0
0
4
Mean
20
42
7
124
37
5.5
6.2
5.2
29
6.9
9.3
29
17.8
0
36
14
8
0
0
37
6.7
32
25
9.3
9
4.6
7.8
28
37
36
0
56
19
26
0
19
61
10
525
525
425
0
0
31
Sea
S.D. Max.
Min.
10
14
0
0
23
0.6
0
0
24
0.65
0
19
29
0
128
16
2.7
0
0
23
3.3
21
20
3.7
5.7
0
2.8
25
23
16
0
87
8.9
8.5
0
16
0
0
163
488
148
0
0
33
Water = 10 ppb
27
26
7
124
10
5
6.2
5.2
50
6.2
9.3
4
9.2
0
4.6
8.2
4.8
0
0
10
3.2
10
5
6.7
5
4.6
5.8
3.7
10
20
0
10
10
13
0
10
61
10
4 10
180
320
0
0
10
50
50
7
124
50
6.2
6.2
5.2
6.2
7.5
9.3
50
50
0
18 0
31
12.6
0
0
50
12.1
50
50
12
13
4.6
9.8
50
50
50
"
0
250
250
30
0
57
61
10
640
870
530
'0
0
79
Table 4-N
NICKEL
Sample type: dissolved
values in ppb
Site
1
2
3
12
1.4
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
0.25
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
No.
0
0
1
1
0
52. 9
1
1
1
4
1
6
40
8
0
628
56
7
5
0
0
0
6
1
2 '
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
S.D.
Mean
0
0
9
24
24
0
7.2
0.6
0.25
3.7
7.6
8.2
28
24
0.25
14
0
22
37
2.3
0
0
0
6.4
49 49
51
74
74
36
36
0
26
26
0
0
0
0
58
24.5
0 62
0
45
41
0
44
44
47 47
29 29
0
0
56
56
Sea
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .02 5
0
1.0
0
48
25
0
0
9
24
0
3
0.6
0.25
0.25
28
1.4
.
Max.
0
0
9
0
11.3
0.6
0.2:
18.9
28
80
0
0
0
0
2.1
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
6.1
0
1.0
49
74
74
36
0
26
0
0
0
12.3
0
4.5
0
31.7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
58
49
0
0
0
58
0
62
0
45
41
0
44
47
29
0
0
0
0
56
0
0
34.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
Water = 2 ppb
28
Min
0 '
45
41
0
Table 4-0
SELENIUM
Sample type: dissolved
values in ppb
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
No.
7
3
3
0
0
3
3
0
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
4
1
1
5
5
0
3
2
1
0
0
3
2
4
6
2
2
1
2
4
3
4
A
0
B
7
5
4
C
D
E
F
G.
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
0
8
1
2
2
2
2
0
0
4
Mean
6
6
0
0
6
3
0
0
4.9
5.3
18
8.7
10
0
85
12 0
1.2
0
0
6
3.8
12
22.6
8.7
30
0.4
4.6
8.9
6.2
5.6
0
3.1
2.2
2.6
0
4.1
4
5.8
61
84
40
0
0
2.9
S.D.
3
3
0
0
3
3.4
0
0
3.7
-0
0
4.5
9.7
Min
2.5
2.5
0
0
2.5
1.2
0
0
0.9
5.3
18
2.5
2.5
0
0
134
99
0
0
0
3
5.3
13
16
10
41
0
3.4
9.8
3.2
2.8
0
4.3
1.6
2.2
8
49.6
1.2
0
0
5.1
1.5
4
2.5
8
0
4.6
74
107
7.1
0
0
2.8
.
0
0
2.5
0.05
2.5
1
1.3
0.9
0.4
2.2
2.1
2.5
2.5
0
1.5
1.5
1.5
8
35
0
0
1.5
Sea Water = 0.4 ppb
NMEID Drinking Water Standards = 10 ppb
29
Max.
8
8
0
0
8
7.1
0
0
8
5.?
18
15
27
0
240
190
1 2.
0
.
0
8
7.5
31
46
16
59
0 4.
7
23
8
8
0
13
5
6
.
0
16
4
9
113
160
45
0
0
7
Table 4-P
URANIUM
Sample type: dissolved
values in ppb
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
NO.
Mean
S.D.Mar.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
22
15
33
0
48
22
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
7
5
4
0
8
1
2
2
1
2
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
19
19
0
0
37
0
0
0
0
26
20
32
0
32
68
35
669
1400
885
0
0
21
Sea
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
22
26
0
29
0
35
280
0
445
0
0
23
Water= 3
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Min.
0
0
22
15
33
22
15
33
0
0
47
22
0
49
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
19
19
0
37
0
0
0
0
10
10
10
0
10
68
10
470
1400
570
0
ppb
0
0
0
0
0
19
19
19
0
37
0
0
0
0
80
59
60
0
80
68
60
867
1400
1200
0
0
0
10
55
Table 4-4
VANADIUM
Sample type: d i s s o l v e d
v a l u e s i n ppb
Site
No.
Mean
S.D.
Min.
Max.
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0
11
1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
4
7
0
6
6
5
0 '
0
0
0
0
3.8
0
0
0
4.3
0
70
166
0
146
103
6.6
0
0
0
8 4.
8 4.
4
0
0
4.6
8.4
1.3
1.8
7.3
18
41.5
15
0
28
55
10.5
0
0
0
0
16.7
150
52
51
26
12
19
14
0
0
0
100
56
105
0
24
150
25
86
63
48
0
0
124
6.4
0
40
66
22
0
9.9
0
0
0
0
72
33
41
0
12
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
3
1
1
1
1
3
2
2
1
2
1
0
0
0
7
5
4
0
8
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
20
53
32
0
0
101
Sea Water = 2 ppb
31
0
0
1.3
8.4
1.3
1.8
..
l.?
1.E
1.3
18
1.3
15
0
7
8
4.6
0
10.:
18
147
256
0
320
200
20.€
0
0
0
0
24.6
150
98
98
42
12
26
14
0
0
0
240
100
160
0
43
150
25
100
100
71
0
0
230
7.0
150
27
4
11
12
12
14
0
0
0
25
25
60
0
0
150
25
71
25
25
0
0
25
0
'
Table 4-R
ZINC
Sample type: dissolved
values in ppb
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
No.
3
0
0
3
4
5
4
5
8
0
6
0
0
1
4
5
1
1
0
1
3
4
0
4
3
3
0
4
1
H
I
J
K
L
1
M
0
N
3
2
2
2
0
Mean
31
17
0
0
23
28
10
60
18
286
325
33
30
0
28
10
99
0
0
17
12
38
25
42
48
0
25
21
16
47
0
88
65
45
0
32
80
90
46
60
56
0
0
61
S.D. Max.
24
7
0
0
4.3
28
0
0
9.2
567
138
28
32
0
17
20
0
0
0
7.5
0
14
10
0
0
0
0
6.4
7.8
41
0
33
49
14
0
17
0
0
4.9
42
34
0
0
26
Min.
11
12
0
0
18
10
10
60
9
286.2
200
3
5
0
10
5
99
0
0
10
12
10
15
42
48
0
25
14
10
14
0
57
10
30
0
10
80
90
43
30
32
0
0
40
Sea Water = 10 ppb
NMEID Drinking Water Standard= 5 ppm
58
25
0
0
26
60
10
60
26
286.2
500
73
87
0
79
50
99
0
0
25
12
43
42
42
48
0
25
25
25
106
0
130
105
58
0
47
80
90
50
90
80
0
0
90
Table 5-A
ARSENIC
Sample type: t o t a l
values i n ppb
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
No.
Mean
S.D.
3
3
0
0
3
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Min.
5
5
5
5
0
0
5
15
9
7
5
0
0
0
0
5
15
9
7
18
125
53
55
77
760
1955
6284
623
0
0
4
3
119
1 71
227
171
3
5
200
1 75
559
0
6
2
2
1
110
2
4
3
61
6
5
30
A
2
5
0
0
0
B
C
1
335
2
28
D
63
0
G
1
0
1
0
H
0
0
I
J
X
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L
M
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
N
0
0
1457
9
10
11
12
13
1
1
1
4
3
1
5
5
14
1
15
16
17
18
3
2
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
E
F
1
0
25
0
0
69
100
0
1 1 46
6624
0
0
0
301
233
765
0
83
3
0
0
19
0
33
Max.
5
15
9
7
56
15
180
53
5
5
760
1050
1600
623
0
0
5
11
5
5
10
18
110
3
53
140
210
760
3245
5
5
10968
623
0
0
460
351
5
64 0
340
1100
110
120
12
5
5
0
335
0
335
28
28
63
0
63
0
19
0
19
0
0
0
0
1457
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
1457
Table 5-B
BARIUM
Sample Type: total
values in ppb
Site
61 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
NO.
65
3
0
0
1
8
1
5
14
0
0
4
9
3
6
1
0
1
3
3
2
0
1
1
1
0
1
S.D.
Mean
137
86
0
0
155
21
23
19
101
173
860
174
851
1700
6380
6980
1927
0
0
2455
1550
154
244
1300
12 0
0
430
193
260
197
0
10112
243
81
0
82
38
0
0
71
4.7
0
0
83
106
0
193
1367
0
9028
7064
2199
0
50
125
0
0
0
86
18
23
19
28
38
860
14
42
1700
145
600
63
0
0
228
25
23
19
220
320
860
463
4280
1700
26000
20700
5300
0
0
0
0
143
87
77
36
1300
120
0
430
114
13 1
114
8700
5500
208
487
1300
12 0
0
430
328
493
280
0
0
0
0
117
202
117
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10112
243
81
0
82
0
10112
243
81
0
0
0
0
0
500
500
0
0
0
0
0
6828
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
6828
0
0
1
Max.
4166
2120
69
318
0
0
500
0
0
0
Min.
34
0
82
0
6828
Table 5-C
BERY LIUM
Sample t y p e :t o t a l
v a l u e s i n ppb
S.D.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
Min.
Mean
Site
0
0
0
2
1
1
1
6
1
6
11
1
9
8
6
0
0
1
8
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.9
0.6
0.13
0.77
1.55
1.55
102
106
23
0
0
1
23
0
1
1.2
1.2
0
0.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.08
0
0
0
0.71
0
1.1
1.3
0
76
83
27
0
0
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.9
0.06
0.13
0.12
0.11
1.4
14
6.7
1.8
0
0
Max.
0
0
0.39
0.2
0.3
0.9
1.6
0.13
2.9
1.8
1.4
190
230
65
0
0
1
0.5
1
70
0
1
1.2
1.2
0
1
0.37
1.2
1.2
0
0.37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
35
0
Table 5-D
BORON
Sample type: total
values in ppm
.
Site
No.
Mean
S.D.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
3
3
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
0
0
3
3
0
0
6
2
0
0
5
0
0
0
1.8
4.5
4.2
0
0
0.05
0
0
0
0.05
0
0
0.05
0.05
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
8.916.3
3.4
0
0
7.5
0
0
0
2.8
0
0
7.5
6.9
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
3
3
0
2.1
0
1.9
6.4
0
3.3
0
1.6
8.3
0
0.05
0
0.05
0.05
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
3
0
0
0
0
0.17
1.2
2.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.10
1.8
3.5
0
0
0
0.05
0.05
0.05
0
0
0
0.25
3.3
6.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
36
Min
0.05
0.05
0
0
Max.
6
0
0
13.2
0
0
0
5
0
0
13.2
12.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
1.3
15.8
Table 5-E
CADMIUM
Sample type: total
values in ppb
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
No.
3
3
0
0
3
1
1
1
4
7
1
10
14
1
10
8
6
0
0
4
10
3
7
2
2
1
2
4
3
2
0
2
2
2
0
2
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
2
Mean
15
17
0
0
23
2.8
3.4
2
27
2.5
8
22
8.8
15
45
69
12
0
0
60
10.6
23
17.2
6.4
9.4
0.71
4.2
13
20
20
0
131
39
48
12
9.9
27
0
112
30
45
0
0
29
0.36
0
2
1.4
3.8
0
0
77
Min.
S.D.
11
14
0
0
21
0
0
0
24
3.4
0
42
25
0
55
47
15
0
0
90
16
11
26
4.2
5.1
0
4.5
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a9
37
2.3
1.2
0
0
2.3
2.8
3.4
2
0.9
0.47
8
0.2
1.2
15
2.0
8
0.8
0
0
8.2
1.0
10.7
1
3.4
5.8
0.71
1.1
1.5
8.8
0.3
0
52
la
16
0
7.6
0.36
0
2
1.4
3.8
0
0
14
Max.
23
31
0
0
45
2.8
3.4
2
49
7.1
8
74
39
15
160
136
33
0
0
194
41
31
65
9.4
13
0.71
7.4
7.5
26
39
0
210
60
80
0
50
0.36
0
2
1.4
3.8
0
0
1 40
T a b l e 5-F
CHROMIUM
Sample t y p e : t o t a l
v a l u e s i n ppb
Mean
Site
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
3
3
7.1
9.3
0
0
0
0
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
' G
H
I
J
2
1
1
4
8
1
10
14
1
10
8
6
0
0
3
6
2
1
2
4
3
2
0
5
4
4
0
5
0
0
149
280
45
38
80
51
9
58
47
28
31
0
710
210
137
0
73
0
9.9
0
0
16
89
0
0
26
48
0
51
28
0
370
1164
264
0
0
206
351
72
30
99
36
0
21
83
45
40
0
765
316
181
0
91
0
Min.
0.1
0
0
0.1
4.7
2.9
0.6
5.1
6.8
93
3
4..2
102
117
125
20
0
0
14
10
0.2
0.5
10
26
9
44
0.1
0.5
3.1
0
4
6
6
0
6
0
Max.
18.5
24
0
0
32
131
2.9
0.6
61
100
93
130
79
102
1950
3621
685
0
0
451
885
129
70
150
77
9
73
17
79
59
0
1600
680
400
0
200
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
51
10
63
0
0
0
7
10
10
0
0
710
96
10
10
0
0
1737
L
M
1
1
0
0
N
4
K
17
68
2.9
0.6
23
48
93
45
36
102
960
1668
221
0
S.D.
10
0
0
1130
0
455
38
1
Table 5-G
COBALT
Sample type: t o t a l
v a l u e s in ppb
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
29 1 5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J3 5
K
L
NO.
Mean
S.D.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
1
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
11
1
1 7 01 0
8
2006
0
0
1
9
0
2 20
1
1
0
1
0
0
7
1.2
0.7
3.9
3 . 0 11
2.8
11.7 6.6
1.2 0
0
0
12
0
6.3
8.9
0
6
2.0
16
47
1050
1151
145
0
0
23
17.5
0
1 612.6
27
31
0
14
837
0
0
0
2 5 6 599
0
5.2
27
0
31 0
0
0
Min.
0
2.3
1.2
0.7
3.9
2.8
1.5
47
15.
4.4
0
0
23
4.9
0
27
31
0
14
Max.
0
0
0
0
0
0.7
3.9
28
2.8
17.9
31
47
2370
493
0
0
23
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9 8 20
89
0
0
0
0
982
89
80
0
0
2
0
0
1
1
1
8
M
0
0
N
1
0
0
19
35
10
0
19
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
669
0
6 6 90
39
982
89
80
0
1
0
0
0
80
0
16
0
0
19
10
0
0
669
10
0
0
Table 5-H
COPPER
Sample t y p e : t o t a l
values in ppb
No.
Site
185
1
2
3
4
5136
6
7
8
9 164
10
11
12
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
89
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
18
A
B
C
D 222
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
3030
M
N2852
3
3
0
0
3
1
1
4
20 6
1
6
127
10
1
8
7
6
0
0
4
8
3 154
6
2
12
1
2
4
3
2
0
2
2
2
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
Mean
321
86
0
0
10.5
5.8
4.3
523
926
12 1
0
0
11
0.7
0
0
291
62
25
45
0
45
51
12 0
62
84
0
1912 182
2160
1497
1193
229
3 12
0
0
0
0
157
208
247
347
13 4
840
141
376
90
15084
42
12 0
12
26
5.7
38
41
77
98
202.8
0
0
3293 910
3371
293
349
194360
0
0
41
2.1
25
0
0
0
54
0
7.6
0
5.2
0
0
0
0
0
4995
.
40
Max.
Min.
S.D.
12
11
0
0
27
10
5.8
4.3
4.8
5
45
10
84
90
16
0
0
29
14
41
19
31
33
12
22
9
17
16
0
46
85
0
40
25
0
54
7.6
5.2
0
0
710
226
0
0
349
5.8
4.3
600
291
3
17
84
5093
3408
831
0
.
o
466
840
51
30
100
191
0
5677
540
0
43
25
0
54
7.6
5.2
0
0
Table 5-1
IRON
Sample type: total
values in ppb
No.
Mean
S.D. Max.
1
0
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
1
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1
0
0
0
2000
550
350
6250
6900
0
7480
21400
0
1276000
1741000
243000
0
0
0
274000
0
0
0
0
495
0
Site
A
B
1
0
10
0
8
7
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
F
G
0
0
0
0
0
0
H
0
C
D
E
0
0
4276
0
8270
14770
0
92910
115100
28720
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
J
K
L
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
41
Min.
0
0
0
0
0
1650
550
350
6250
2400
0
500
7750
0
12500
8400
16500
0
0
0
274
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2350
550
350
6250
12700
0
23000
60000
0
2400000
5250000
7600000
0
0
0
37100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Table 5-J
LEAD
Sample type: total
values in ppb
Site
73 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
No.
0
0
3
2
1
1
8
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1
10
14
1
10
8
6
0
0
0
4
10
3
6
2
0
90
230
70
87
24
18
30
31
32
78
22
0
1187
320
242
0
13
0
0
59
30
20
0
1
2
G
3
2
0
3
2
2
0
3
0
H
0
I
J
K
1
C
D
E
F
L
M
N
150
0
0
47
10
2.2
0.8
44
7.8
27
36
17
.33
874
1228
150
1
1
0
0
0
3
1158
Min.
S.D.
3
10
A
B
Mean
197
0
0
18
12
0
0
41
9
0
52
70
0
1888
947
280
0
0
64
3 60
41
106
18
20
0
16
37
96
4.2
0
1006
395
181
0
19
0
0
0
19
7
0
0
32
1.8
2.2
0.8
1.9
0.005
27
5
2.1
33
20
30.4
7
0
0
25
2.5
23
15
11
4.1
30
20
2
21
19
0
40
41
114
0
12.5
0
0
59
0
30
0
0
20
0
0
1263
30
42
0
Max.
117
375
0
0
67
18.1
2.2
0.8
98
23
27
138
13 8
33
4016
2500
720
0
, o
156
860
100
295
37
32
30
42
86
189
19
0
1920
600
370
0
50
0
0
59
30
20
0
0
2523
T a b l e 5-K
MANGANESE
Sample type: t o t a l
values i n ppb
No.
Site
41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
29
3
3
0
0
3
2
1
1
4
6
1
6
9
1
8
7
1
0
0
4
a
3
5
1
1
0
1
0
3
2
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
Mean
71
48
0
0
166
123
40
50
102
265
140
252
414
910
18450
65366
3710
0
0
180
3336
238
300
590
400
0
7.5
0
273
183
0
859.6
485
374
0
101
0
0
1196
0
0
0
0
8062
S.D.
2a
0
0
158
74
0
0
41
144
0
186
480
0
14710
90204
0
0
0
1 23
4158
210
140
0
0
30
0
0
58
70
40
50
66
160
1 40
55
53
910
1600
1230
3710
0
0
98
100
58
58
590
400
0
0
0
7.5
0
0
21 4
75
0
0
0
26
130
0
8596
485
374
0
101
0
0
1196
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
43
Max.
Min.
81
0
0
347
175
40
50
160
430
1 40
580
1500
910
40800
261000
3710
0
0
360
10700
470
500
590
400
0
7.5
0
409
236
0
8596
485
374
0
101
0
0
1196
'
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8062
8062
Table 5-L
MERCURY
Sample t y p e : t o t a l
Valuesinppb
No.
Mean
S.D.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
3
0
0
3
0
0.05
0
0.05
0
0
0
a
0
3
2
1
4
4
Site
0.42
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
200.05
21
22
23
24
25 0.11
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
0
1
0.85
2
1
0
0
0
6.4
4
1
3
5
2
20.22
1
2
4 0.58
3
2
0
6
0.7
5
1.9
4
0
5
0
1
2
1
1
M
0
0
N
4
0
0
4.6
0
0
0
4.4
0
0
7
0.78
0
2.7
0
0
0
3.8
1. a
1.2
4
0.44
0.05
2.5
4.5
3.2
0
0
0
3.4
4.9
4
3.5
1
0.27
0.3
0.27
0.34
0.05
0.05
0
2.9
1.3
1.1 0.5
0
1.1
0
0.5
6.3
3
3
0
0.05
0.05
0
0
0.05
0
0
0.05
0.05
0
0
8
0
0
0
8.6
1.8
0
0.05
1.0
1.2
0.05
1.2
14.6
1.6
0
2.5
3.9
3.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6.9
6.4
0.99
4.9
0.05
0.05
0.3
0
13
4.9
12
14.8
0
0.19
0.3
0.13
0.05
0.05
0.05
0
2
0
0 0.05
0
1.02
0.5
0.58
0
2.9 1
0
0.5
0
8.1
0
0
0
2.5
5.1
3.2
1.7
0.3
0.44
1.2
0.05
0
4
2.09
0
0.5
0
0
0
0.5
0.5
3
3
0
0
0
0
2.2
0.45
2
44
Max.
Min.
12
3
3
0
0
2.9
Table 5-M
MOLYBDENUM
Sample type: total
values in ppb
Site
No.
149
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
3
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
0
2
1
1
4
6
10
1
3
8
6
0
0
3
6
2
2
3
2
0
6
5
4
0
5
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
4
S.D.
Mean
25
100
0
0
129
153
6.3
7.2
16
26
25
15
75
280
325
223
15
0
0
27
7.4
20
19
24
100
7
23
4
20
18
0
77
155
170
0
29
61
10
550
370
820
0
0
67
215
128
0
0
193
2
08
0
0
10
17
0
9.4
125
0
173
400
21
0
0
15
1.8
8.7
18
26
86
0
11
18
8.7
11
Min
"
0
0
10
6
6.3
7.2
4.3
2
25
1.9
1
280
191
1.4
2.1
0
0
10
4.5
10
4.19
5.6
39
7
15
8.7
10
10
0
0
10
10
10
0
10
61
10
440
370
820
0
0
0
0
55
10
45
Ma,-.
398
107
281
274
0
31
0
156
0
0
0
.
~
248
0
0
352
300
6.:
7.2
25
85
25
25
400
280
520
1180
56
0
0
46
9
25
50
42
160
7
31
25
25
25
0
284
657
579
0
60
61
10
660
370
820
0
0
117
Table 5-N
NICKEL
Sample type: total
values in ppb
No.
Site
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
1
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
26
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1
6
1
7
11
1
5.1
8.4
26
18
37
57
1
1
0
0
1
8
239 6
0
0
1
272
0
0
0
0
0
11
1.7
260
2091
3555
256
0
0
80
305
0
57
120
54
35
12
07
7
0
2
F
1
48
0
0
0
0
4629
120
67
0
91
G
0
0
H
I
0
1
J
K
L
M
0
0
126
0
0
0
0
4196
A
0
0
0
0
B
C
D
E
1
1
1
N
0
0
0
0
1
S.D.Max.
Mean
0
0
0
0
0
2.9
0
0
8.4 0
22
0
9.2
160 4 1
0
2566
0
0
0
0
9 655
0
0
0
0
0
0
120
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
126 0
0
0
0
0
49160
46
Min.
0
0
0
0
0
8.9
1.78
5.1
8.4
9
18
20
22
260
120
135
0
0
80
5
0
18.5
12
120
54
0
48
0
0
0
0
4629
120
67
0
91
0
0
126
0
0
0
0
4916
0
0
0
0
0
13.0
1.7
5.1
59
18
66
260
7734
7140
0
0
80
680
0
0
54
0
48
0
0
0
0
4629
67
0
91
0
0
0
0
0
0
.
Table 5-0
SELENIUM
Sample type: total
values in ppb
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
NO.
0
0
1
1
3
1
5
1
2
1
0
0
2
3
5
1
2
4
3
2
0
5
5
3
0
4
G
0
H
I
J
K
L
1
2
1
1
0
M
0
N
4
S . D . Max.
Mean
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
0
7.9
39
56
45
65
225
5512
5190
500
0
0
38
107
5
72
96
119
0.45
24
8.9
10
9.6
0
5.5
3.4
3.6
0
5.1
0
17
64
1
47
0
0
5.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
23
0
56
84
0
1006
297
0
0
0
67
13
0
51
136
168
0
33
10
0
0
0
3.1
3.1
0
0
0
0
0
69
0
0
0
0
4
47
Min.
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
0
0.95
12
56
4
4
225
4800
4980
500
0
0
4
98
4
25
0.05
0.6
0.45
0.05
0.05
10
9.4
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
17
15
1
47
0
0
1
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
0
12
52
56
106
163
225
6223
5400
500
0
0
13 8
117
4
127
19 3
238
0.45
47
23
10.4
9.8
0
8
8
1
0
1
0
17
113
1
47
0
0
9.2
T a b l e 5-P
URANIUM
Sampletype:
total
v a l u e s i n ppb
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
3
K
L
No.
Mean
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
3210
S.D.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14 0
0
0
0
0
3210
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
5
4
0
5
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
1409
87
102
0
65
0
10
907
1810
1615
0
M
0
0
N
5
1263
0
0
0
0
0
0
2039
118
93
0
61
0
0
547
0
0
0
0
1368
48
Min.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
3210
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
10
10
0
10
0
10
520
1810
1615
0
0
10
Max.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0'
0
0
0
0
0
0
4675
286
229
0
170
0
10
1293
1810
1615
0
0
2550
Table 5-Q
VANADIUM
Sampletype:
total
v a l u e s i n ppb
site
6.2
23
Mean
S.D.
1
2
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
6
0.35
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0.64
2
1
1
1
6
1
2.1
6
28 1 0
1
2 5 18
9
8
4 3 36
0
0
1
58
596 8
0
10
38
210
0
A
B
25
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
190 N
3
2
2
1
2
1
0
65
58
0
6
5
4
0
60
5
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
488 4
0
0
0
0.8
1.3
1.3
4.1
17
35
19
34
4 10
2376
3290
367
0
0
58
448
1.3 0
0
0
41
0
0
2754
0
0
0
0
1
92
35 .
43
410
104
65
185
0
410
7738
7938
1040
0
0
0
58
0
11
15
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 045307
0
25
0
0
220
100
0
0
25
25
1.3
4.1
13
12
27
0
140
0
0
0
25
1 5140 0
25
25
0
0
838
0
1.25
0
30
53
49
12
0
0
0
Max.
0
1.3
1.3
4.1
3.2
35
7
23
27
30
12
1 2111
15
0
532
126
145
0
52
Min
.
No.
0
0
76
0
0
0
0
49
0
25
25
25
0
0
0
159
0
25
207
25
0
0
3
Table 5-R
ZINC
Sample type: total
values in ppb
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
No.
3
0
0
3
2
1
1
4
8
1
10
14
1
10
7
128
0
1
0
195
48
10
5
230
68
80
133
143
100
4143
3572
620
0
0
4 15
765
303
124
35
93
0
0
A
B
C
D
E
F
1
3
3
2
0
4
3
3
0
4
G
0
H
I
J
0
2
1
1
0
0
3
57
107
119
147
0
3729
386
227
0
224
0
0
72
100
100
K
L
M
N
0
0
4
3
5
S . D . Mar.
Mean
0
0
3334
247
108
0
0
96
11
0
0
232
99
0
281
144
0
10740
2277
845
0
0
313
1027
76
82
0
0
0
0
68
42
259
0
3406
245
177
0
182
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
990
50
Min.
101
40
0
0
120
40
10
5
10
10
8
20
40
100
500
270
50
0
0
30
70
216
23
35
93
0
57
55
72
234
0
180
130
120
0
70
0
0
64
100
100
0
0
2190
548
248
0
0
304
55
10
5
498
230
80
720
397
100
22142
6959
2170
0
0
775
2440
354
234
35
93
0
57
184
154
600
0
6786
568
432
0
487
0
0
80
100
100
0
0
3912
Table 6-A
ARSENIC
Sediment type: suspended
values in ppm
.
Site
No.
Mean
S.D.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3
5
0
0
5
5
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
5
157
111
5
5
0
22
48
0
0
5
189
111
79
96
0
63
119
0
0
0
0
0
0
46
0
107
126
0
38
100
111
238
256
0
98
190
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
81
5
11
28
265
4
3
6
0
0
0
33
78
0
13
27
367
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
6
5
5
9
5
4
3
5
5
5
0
5
19
71
0
33
0
0
5
139
5
35
47
524
4
3
8
5
5
0
5
19
71
0
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
0
0
3
2
1
5
5
0
3
2
0
0
0
3
3
3
5
2
2
1
1
3
3
3
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Values
5
5
0
5'
19
71
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26
Min
0
0
0
26
Crustal Abundance = 1.8 ppm
in parenthesis are f o r bottom
51
Max.
5
0
0
0
5
222
0
0
0
0
26
sediment
Table 6-B
BARIUM
Sediment type: suspended
values in ppm
187
Site
No.
1 256
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3
3
0
Mean
0
0
0
0
2
1
'
12
0
9
7
5
0
0
3
6
3
4
1
1
0
0
363
0
0
212
0
0
0
127
348
2400
190
223
0
13 0
123
124
116
0
0
289
0
0
0
17
200
94
698
13
411
S.D.
8
0
0
132
9.9
0
288
159
0
lis
83
48
0
0
44
115
62
908
0
0
Min.
5017
230
0
0
28
0
0
0
30
341
2400
52
35
0
25
15
78
0
0
136
68
25
79
13
411
0
0
97
63
42
3
3
0
528
252
208
0
0
610
244
240
A
0
0
0
0
B
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
130
19
0
49
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
130
19
0
49
0
0
0
0
0
121
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
0
0
107
0
0
0
0
121
Crustal
0
0
107
0
0
Abundance= 425 ppm
52
Ma).
4
444
0
0
545
0
0
0
278
355
2400
774
540
0
266
222
192
0
. o
224
378
143
2048
13
411
0
0
960
528
484
0
0
130
19
0
49
0
0
107
0
0
0
0
121
.
Table 6-C
BERYLIUM
Sediment type: suspended
values in ppm
2.5
3.5
Site
No.
Mean
S.D.Max.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
100.32
11
12
0.4
13
14
15 0.83
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.1
1.6
1.8
2.0
0
2.1
2.1
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.6
1.6
6.1
0
0.2
0
0
1.3
3
1
4
1.5
2.2 8
0
70.9
6
5
0
0
0
50.8
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
B
0
C
0
0
D
E
F
G
H
I
3
K.
L
M
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.7
0
1.12
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.2
1.1
1.04
0
0
0
Crustal
0
0
0
0
Min.
0
0
0.09
1.3
0
0
0
1.96
0
1.12
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.2
0
0
0
4.13
0
1.12
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Abundance = 2.8 ppm
53
0
3.0
Table 6-D
BORON
Sedimenttype:suspended
v a l u e s i n ppm
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
No.
Mean
S.D.
3
3
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
3.3
0.25
0
0
0.25
0
0
0
0.25
0
4.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Min.
0.25
0.25
0
0
0.25
0
Max.
8.3
0.25
0
0
0.25
0.25
0
0
0
0.25
0
0
0
0.25
0
0
3.8
0.25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.25
0
0.25
0.25
0
0
0
5.7
0
0.25
4.8
0
0
0
0
0
1.1
0.25
0.25
0
0
0
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.25
0.25
0.25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.25
0.25
0.25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
3
0
3
0
0
2.4
2.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.1
0
0.25
1.7
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.0
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.1
0
0
2.6
0
0
0
0.25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Crustal Abundance = 10 ppm
54
0
Table 6-E
CADMIUM
Sediment type: suspended
values in ppm
Site
Max.
Min.NO. S.D.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
16
14
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
4
1
8
12
0
9
6
5
0
0
3
7
3
5
2
2
1
1
3
3
3
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
Mean
18
24
0
0
16
0
0
0
51
2.5
0.83
23
19
0
0.69
1.7
1.4
0
0
13
4.9 (2.3)
12
14 .66)
1.6 (2.5)
2.1
2.5 (4.0)
2.7 (2.7)
2 ( 1
19 3.6)
15
12
0 (.49)
0.2 (.25)
9
10
0 (.39)
5
0
0
0.1(.07)
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0 (-4)
0 (-3)
0.12 (.06)
Values
0.5
9.3
0
0
17
0
0
0
32
2.8
0
30
19
0
0.48
1.2
0.8
0
0
3.8
4.9
3.2
9.0
1.3
0
0
3
0
0
0
20
0.51
0.83
0.5
1.25
0
0.16
0.06
0.5
0
0
10
0.44
10
0.66
0.61
1
0
0
14
8.1
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.7
2
3.6
9
0.5
0
0.2
9
10
0
5
0
0
0.1
0
0
0
0
0.12
Crustal Abundance= 0.2 ppm
in parenthesis are
f o r bottom
55
33
38
0
0
35
0
0
0
83
4.5
0.83
65
85
0
1.11
3.3
2.6
0
0
17
10.5
16
25
2.5
4
2.7
2
32
24
27
0
0.2
9
10
0
5
0
0
0.1
0
0
0
0
0.12
sediment
Table 6-F
CHROMIUM
Sediment type: suspended
values in ppm
Site
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
12
0
9
7
0
0
3
7
3
5
2
1
A
1
3
3
3
0
B
1
C
D
E
F
1
0
1
G
0
H
I
J
K
L
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
M
N
Values
S.D. Max.
Mean
33
49
33
56
0
0
0
43
0
0
0
43
0.6
0
12
91
0
25
16
6.0
0
0
14
203
64
13
21
20
0
0
28
0
37
0
0
0
59
38
0
14
54
0
30
31
24
0
0
8
80 (44)
41
14 (28)
26 (40)
14 (28)
53 (53)
42 (42)
31 (42)
0.73
20
Min.
0.1
0.1
0
0
0.1
0
0
0
28
47.1
0
0.1
0.1
0
15
9.5
17.9
0
0
0
21
0.1
0.1
11
0
66
110
0
0
85
0
0
0
108
48.2
0
38
2 15
0
62
41
33.9
0
0
24
391
115
28
40
28
53
42
52
2
33
0
0
23
31
33
0
22
0
0
21
0
0
0
0
31
0
0
0
0
0
53
42
0.1
0.1
0.1
0
23
31
33
0
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
0
0
0
0
31
0
21
0
0
0
0
31
1.1
18
0
0
0
0
0
Crustal Abundance = 100 ppm
in parenthesis are for bottom
56
0
23
31
33
0
22
sediment
Table 6-G
COBALT
Sediment type: suspended
values in ppm
Site
No.
Mean
S.D.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Min.
Max.
~
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
0
0
38 2
1
12
11 7
0
9
0
0
0
6
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
37
21
16
21
0
14
15
13
0
0
0
14
0
23
12
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.9
7.8
8.5
0
0
0
41
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
56
61
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
21
5
7.3
0
4.8
5
5.3
0
0
0
7
0
23
12
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
56
61
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
Crustal
0
0
0
0
0
Abundance = 25 ppm
57
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
57
21
29.5
37.8
0
21
26
24.6
0
0
0
71
0
23
12
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
56
61
0
0
'0
0
0
0
'0
0
0
11
Table 6-H
COPPER
Sediment type: suspended
values in ppm
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
No.
3
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
3
1
5
8
0
3
6
5
0
0
3
5
3
5
2
1
1
3
3
0
F
1
1
1
0
1
G
0
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
1
C
D
E
0
0
0
0
1
Values
S.D.
Mean
197
0
0
128
0
0
0
30
30
35
190
175
0
42
25
23
0
0
97
36
73
84
19
43
19
20
110
88
98
0
89
87
87
0
93
0
342
9
0
0
78
0
0
0
7.8
7.8
0
288
315
740
0
24
5
30
30
5
0
'0
93
(19)65 25
50
(20)
68
(23)
5.7
11
(35)
0
(19)
0
(20)
(37)
85
220
115
89
0
(31)
0
(39)
0
(19)
0
0
93
0
Min
91
191
0
0
38
0
0
0
23
23
35
32
16
0
26
.18
18
0
0
29
16
16
16
15
35
19
20
12
17
5
0
89
87
87
0
93
0
0
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
0 (20)
89 (23)
0
0
0
a9
crustal Abundance = 55 ppm
in parenthesis aref o r bottom
58
.
Max.
724
207
0
0
179
0
0
0
35
35
35
702
0
71
0
0
203
128
175
23
50
19
20
167
183
0
89
87
a7
0
0
0.
12
0
0
0
0
89
sediment
Table 6-1
IRON
Sediment type: suspended
values in percent
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
2.04
15
0.28
16
17
18
19
NO.
Mean
S . D . Max.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.80
0
2.80
3.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.90
20
0
3
0
4
8
0
7
6
5
0
2.95
2.55
0
0
0
0
0
2.14
(2.37)0.63
21 2.95
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
A
0
B
C
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
F
G
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.30
0
0
0
0.39
0
0.69
0.58
4.20
0
0.85
Min.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.00
0
3.40
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.30
0
0.23
0
2.83
3.40
0.54
0
0
0
2.06
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.39
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.81
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(1.96)
(2.67)
(2.96)
(3.84)
(3.16)
(3.18)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
H
I
J
0
0
0
0
K
0
L
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Crystal Abundance= 5.6 x lo4 ppm
Values in parenthesis are
for bottom sediment
59
00
Table 6-J
LEAD
Sediment type: suspended
values in ppm
Site
301
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
.N
No.
156
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
1
8
12
0
9
5
0
0
7
3
5
2
1
1
3
3
3
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
Values
Mean
120
250
0
0
46
0
0
S.D. Ma>-. Min.
73
0
0
17
0
0
19 0
0
0
5
0
88
25.5
114
12 3
54
0
18
17.4
12.9
0
0
59
31 (49)
44
527 (33)
30 (48)
26 (41)
55 (55)
57 (57)
32 (55)
88
122
0 (22)
25 (13)
29 (10)
132
0 (21)
27
0
0
15
0
0
0 (27)
0 (42)
46 (16)
0
331
0
0
28
0
0
61
0
0
78
2.1
0
332
260
0
24
8.1
8.8
0
0
29
46
21
978.8
26
22
0
0
20
113
160
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
114
3.8
6.8
0
3.4
6
3.6
0
0
35
5
32
33
11
10
55
57
20
23
18
0
25
29
132
0
27
0
0
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 '
0
45
0
0
161
27
114
684
434
0
56
26
26
0
0
91
109
69
'2275
48
41
55
57
55
218
306
0
25
29
132
0
27
0
0
15
0
0
0
0
45
Crustal Abundance= 12.5 ppm
in parenthesis are
for bottom sediments
60'
Table 6-X
MANGANESE
Sediment type: suspended
values in ppm
site
No.
.
212
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
195
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
3
1
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
21
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
.
8
0
7
158
61026
5
0
0
3
5
3
5
2
2
1
1
3
3
3
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
Mean
262
231
0
0
217
0
0
0
S.D. Max.
0
0
195
0
0
0
103
250
0
475
523
0
138
785
113
438
550
0
268
1039
133
476
0
0
0
0
85
78
467(400)
266
192
231
889 (230) 1495
359 280) 112
4130 300) 5416
0
410 410)
0
450 450)
400 1070) 583
393
424
280
230
0
0
134
0
0
386
0
326
0
0
0
119
0
0
0
0
330
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
143
0
0
0
0
0
Min.
20
20
0
0
9
0
0
0
20
636
113
29
75
0
107
235
338
0
0
39
2 67
22
20
280
300
410
450
10
20
22
0
134
386
326
0
119
0
0
395
0
0
0
206
1035
713
1096
1438
0
385
5386
656
0
0
176
913
400
3550
438
7960
4 10
450
1070
8 04
548
0
134
386
326
0
119
0
0
0
330
0
0
0
0
143
0
330
0
Crustal Abundance= 950 ppm
Values in parentheses arefor bottom
61
4 17
0
0
0
143
sediment
T a b l e 6-L
MERCURY
Sediment type: suspended
v a l u e s i n ppm
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
0 . 0152
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
0
2 2. 0 5
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
No.
3
3
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
0
0
5 . 73
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
1
43
.6
4
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
A
0
B
C
D
E
1
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
Max.
Mean
S.D.
Min.
0.05
0.05
0
0
1.4
0
0
0
2
00. 0 5
0
2.3
0
0
0.05
0.05
0
0
0.05
0
0
'
0
0
0
0
0
3.4
0
0
0.05
0
0
5.5'
0
0
0.05
0
0.06
0.05
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.4
0.05
0
0
0
0.06
00. 0 6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3.4
(68)
0.68
08. 6 8
2.7
1.5 (98)
2.3
3(.33. 3 )
0
8
.
1
0
8 . 1 (8.1)
0
3 (3)
(2.9)
2.9
9
1.4
(2.5) 0.87
0.05
0 . 005
0.03
00..0053
0 (.42)
0
(.67)
0.04
0 0.04
1.5 (.93)
0
( . 9 8 )1 . 7
0
0 (.12)
0
7.1
0
0
0
0
0
3.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.04
0 . 004
0
0
0.05
0.68
0.05
. o
0
4
5.5
0.05
3.3
8.1
4.F
3.2
8.1
3
3
2.9
0.05
0.05
0.01
0
0.04
1.5
1.7
0
7.1
0
0
3.4
0
0
0
0
0.04
2.5
2.5
0
1.5
1.7
0
7.1
0
0
3.4
0
0
0
0
C r u s t a l Abundance = 0 . 0 8 ppm; D e t e c t i o n limit = . 0 1 pFm
Values i n P a r e n t h e s i s are f o r bottom sediment
'62
Table 6-M
MOLYBDENUM
Sediment type: suspended
values in ppm
Site
No.
186
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
3
3
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
3
0
4
8
0
7
6
5
0
0
3
5
3
5
2
2
1
1
3
3
3
0
F
1
1
1
0
1
G
0
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
Mean
S.D.
416
208
83
127
0
0
0
0
65
96
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
14
7.5
0
0
10.6
5.8
28
57
0
0
1.7
3.5
2.0
1.7
1.6
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
10
3.7 2.7) 4.3
0
10
6.8 1.4) 4.4
2.5
2.5 0.8)
1.9 1.0) 1.4
1.5 1.5) 0
1.5 1.5) 0
4.8
7.2 1.7)
35
30
64
47
0 (2.6)
0
0.54 (1.0) 0
0
500 (5.8)
0
690 (2.3)
0
0
74
0
0
0
0
0
0
8.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 (1.8)
0
0.68 (1.5) 0
Min.
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
0
10
9
0
6
0.2
0
0.16
0.01
0.4
0
0
10
0.2
10
1.4
0.76
0.98
1.5
1.5
1.7
10
10
0
0.54
500
690
0
74
0
0
8.4
0
0
0
0
0.68
May.
230
0
0
176
0
0
0
10
22
0
18
167
0
9.6
5
5
0
0
10
10
10
10
4.3
2.9
1.5
1.5
10
10
120
0
0.54
500
690
0
74
0
0
8.4
0
0
0
0
0.68
Crustal Abundance = 1.5 ppm
Values in parenthesis are for bottom sediment
63
Table 6-N
NICKEL
Sediment type: suspended
values in ppm
Site
No *
Mean
S.D.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
29
30
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16.4
43
17
26
0
19
24
23
0
B
C
D
1
5
9
0
9
7
5
0
0
0
5
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
E
F
0
G
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
51
43
69
96
0
34
50
29
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
25
25
51
0
0
0
0
0
0
72
63
63
6.2
0
129
0
0
23
0
0
0
0
6 380. 8
0
45
61
0
47
32
3.9
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6.2 0
0
0
0
0
23
0
0
0
0
0
0
74
Crustal
Min.
0
0
0
0
43
126
164
0
107
109
33
0
0
0
0
15
0
53
0
'
0
0
25
25
51
0
0
0
25 .
25
51
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
72
63
6.2
0
129
0
0
23
0
0
0
0
74
Abundance = 7 5 ppm
64
Max.
0
0
72
0
129
0
0
'
'
0
0
0
0
74
Table 6-0
SELENIUM
Sediment type: suspended
values in ppm
Site
1
2
3
4
4 5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2 0.
21
4 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
4
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
3
K
L
M
0.04
N
No.
Mean
3
3
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
2
1
5
5
0
2
4
2
0
0
0
4
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
0
18
19
0
39
0.7
0
0
0
0
3
4
0
3
121 (.04) 209
3
0
5
34 (1.8)
47
2
47
34 (.9)
2
47
34 (.12)
0
1
(.34)
0.34
1
0.16 (.16) 0
3 3.9(.16) 4
8 0.16
30 3
21
4
4
0
2
0
0 (.3)
0
0
0
0 (.2)
0.12
0
1
0
0 (.15)
0
0
0 (2.0)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.9
1.90
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 (-2)
0
0
0 (.14)
0
1
0.C4
0
Values
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
19
103
11
12
0
4472
77
S.D. Max.
Min.
4
4
0
0
4
0
0
0
4
9
103
0
0
0
76
0
0
0
4
0
4
0.18
0.09
0.12
0.34
0.16
4
4
0
0
0.12
0
0
0
0
0
1.9
0
0
0
0
0.04
Crustal Abundance= 0.05 ppm
in parenthesis are for bottom
4
0
0
0
0
0
4
38
103
43
46
0
99
77
0
0
0
4
362
4
110
67
67
0.34
0.16
4
0
0
0.12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
sediment
Table 6-P
URANIUM
sediment type: suspended
values in ppm
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
No.
Mean
S . D . Max.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
(12 0 0 )
0
(1
180)
(1
180)
(1
200)
(1
230)
(1
250)
(1
280)
0
0
0
1
1
(340)
(1
400)
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
( 51
50)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
44
0
0
0
0
0
200
0
180
180
200
230
250
280
0
0
0
51
181
213
0
262
0
0
115
0
0
0
0
39
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
200 0
0
1
08 0
1
08 0
200 0
230
0
250
0
280
0
0
0
(390)
0
0
0181
201 3
(459)
0
262 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
390
Min.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
44
0
0
0
0
0
200
0
:'o
0
0
,,
0
0
0
,' ..
0
44
'
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
180
180
200
230
250
280
0
0
0
51
181
213
0
262
0
0
115
0
0
0
0
39
0
0
0
51
0
0
0
115
0
Crustal Abundance = 2 . 7 ppm
Values in parenthesis arefor bottom sediment
66
0
0
0
Table 6-Q
VANADIUM
Sediment type: suspended
values i n ppm
Site
No.
Mean
S.D. Max.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
8
0
7
6
0
0
0
5
0
2
2
0
39
166
40
42
0
31
46
32
0
0
0
(87)
45
0
D
E
F
1
0
1
G
0
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
1
0
95
(83)
50 (80)
207
(40)
236
110 (110)
67 (67)
(83)
83
0
0
0 (91)
11
(94)
90
195 (110)
0 (110)
323
0
0
38
0
0
0
0
0 (140)
A
B
1
1
0
0
0
1
C
0
1
Values
Min.
0
0
0
10.6
3.5
0
39
24
21
0
23
166
29
23
0
18
21
15.4
0
0
0
0
8.4
0
17
17
0
0
0
0
32
0
83
19
40
110
67
83
0
0
0
11
90
195
0
323
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
38
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 (70)
14
0
0
0
'
0
0
0
14
Crustal Abundance = 135 ppm
in parenthesis are for bottom
67
51
166
47
80
0
106
a2
66
0
0
0
87
0
107
80
374
110
67
83
0
0
0
11
90
195
0
323
0
0
38
0
0
0
0
14
sediment
Table 6-R
ZINC
Sedimenttype:suspended
v a l u e s in ppm
Site
1500
1
161
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
No.
698
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
1
8
0
9
Mean
716
548
0
0
217
0
0
3
3
4
1
0
0
2
3
3
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
463
0
0
75
0
0
0
0
561
139
0
115
318
0
630
31
100
70
0
0
S.D.
12
0
0
383
484
253
340
49
183
0
0
153
225
225
0
63
390
456
0
1230
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
69
Min.
2 17
0
0
139
0
0
0
14
76
0
0
42
3 68
0
629
21
12
0
0
280
560
80
220
64
53
0
100
34
63
0
0
210
88
161
79
49
183
0
0
0
0
47
179
179
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
120
52
52
0
63
390
456
0
1230
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
69
Crustal Abundance = 70 ppm
68
Max.
1077
0
0
288
0
0
0
1273
160
0
166
950
0
1390
90
90
0
0
706
880
301
600
49
18 3
0
0
187
3667
3667
0
63
390
456
0
1230
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
69
on
umber
Table 7
BAR
GRAPH SITE IDENTIFICATION
Rio Grande Sites
Site
Colorado border (Cerro)
Bernalillo
Bernard0
Confluence of Fuerco
Confluence of Salado
socorro
San Marcia1
Monticello Point
Mid-Elephant Butte
Caballo
Texas-New Mexico border
1
9
13
15
16
21
23
24
26
28
30
Rio
H
X
J
I
G
F
D
C
N
B
15
San
Jose-Puerco
(Anthony)
Sites
Bluewater
Arroyo de Puerco
upstream San Mateo Creek
San Mateo Creek
San Jose at Milan (dry most of the time)
San Jose at lava beds
San Jose at Paguate
San Jose
Puerco above 1-40
Puerco below confluence with San Jose
Puerco at confluence of Rio Grande
69
Table 8
~
ELEMENTAL
~~~
VALUES DISPLAYED
AS E A R GRAPHS
AT SELECTED SITES
Cadmium
chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Molybdenum
Selenium
Uranium
Zinc
I
70
71
Chromium Along the Rio Grande
D18solved
izzzzzm
Total
Sedlment
-dl
2000
1500
1500
1000
1000
500
500
0
D
0
0
s
13
0
0
In
D
0
0
m
b
N
(0
N
8
m
N
T;i
$
m
c
0)
c
0
zi
a
0
0
74
I
I
0
m
Q)
hl
t
0
0
0
0
u)
0
76
(3
.cu
Molybdenum Along t h e Rio Grande
Dlssolved
k?2zzzm
Total
Sediment
d
4
4
16
1
15
9
13
.2l
23
24
26
Values in ppb except sediment in ppm
28
30
Selenium Along the Rio Grande
Dissolved
Fzzzzm
Total
Sediment
E
6000
4000
4000
2000
2000
Q
0
116
915
13
21
23
.-..24
28
26
. . .
Yaiues in ppb except sediment in ppm
30
Uranium Along the Rio Grande
Dissolved
Sedlment
fz2zzzB
3oc
Total
:oncentration
20a
ioc
12
13
27
W'39S
15
24 16
23
in ??5 9397f ss4i!?.lsnfin ??!?I
Total at site 15 is 3210 ppb
.-0
U
Q)
c
.c.,
0
C
-0
a
0
C
i;;i
I
0
I
0
0
I
0
e4
0
m
0
0
3
80
I
0
0
s
1
0
Cadmium Along the San Jose-Puerco
Dissolved
150
Sediment
Total
l?zzzza
B
Concentration
150
100
50
.
50
o
0
H
K
J
I
V44X35
G
F
!!I ppb 2Y,s3$
D
33'%333f
C
N
k l ??2l
B
15
Chromium Along the San Jose-Puerco'
Total
Dissolved
FGzzzzl
1500
Sediment
I
Concentration
1500
1000
O
I0
0
500
500
0
0
H
K
J
I
F
C
N
Values in ppb except sediment In ppm
B
15
u)
I
a,
0
3
t:
a
v,
a,
.cI
-t:
0
C
0
0
a
a
0
C
Q
.-cC
C
L
+
a
c
C
6
83
d
4
E
n
P
C
u
Copper Along t h e San Jose-Puerco
L22zzzm
4000
Sediment
Total
Dissolved
m
Concentration
unm
3000t-
3000
2000
zoo0
1000
io00
3
H
K
J
I
G
F
D
C
N
‘:aloes in ppb except sediment in ppm
B
15
Lead Along the San Jose-Puerco
Dissolved
Fz2Bzzl
Total
Sediment
I
Concentration
1500
1000
500
3
Values in DDb exceot sediment in
D
D
~
Mercury Along the San.Jose-Puerco
Dissolved
Total
bzzzzm
Sediment
0
Concentration
-8
-6
m
m
- 4
- 2
-0
H
K
J
I
F
D
C
N
':slues in ppb except sediment in ppm
B
15
Molybdenum Along the San Jose-Puerco
Sediment
Total
Dissolved
1000
1000
800
800
600
600
400
400
200
200
0
0
H
K
J
I
G
F
D
C
N
Values In Dab except sediment in nnm
'
B
15
Selenium Along the San Jose-Puerco
Dlssolved
i?2zzza
100
SedIment
Total
I
Concentration
80
80
m
m
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
0
H
K
J
I
F
D
C
N
Yalues In ppb except sediment in ppm
Total at site 15 Is 5512 ppb
B
15
-
Uranium Along the San Jose-Puerco
Dissolved
rzzzzza
..
.
Q)
W
.
4000
Concentration
Total
Sediment
4000
Zinc Along the San Jose-Puerco
10
0
H
K
J
I
F
D
C
N
‘;aloes in ppb except sediment in ppin
15
ELEMENT
BY
ELEMENT
COMMENTS
Mean values for dissolved heavymetals at Isleta from 3
sources and meanvalues for dissolvedheavy metalsfor all sites
on Rio Grande, except at sites where Rio Puerco and Rio Salado
enter system, are compared to those tabulated by Kopp and Kroner
9). Isleta (downstream from
for the Colorado River Basin (Table
Albuquerque) was chosen as a representative site because it was
upstream from the influence of the Rio Puerco and Rio Salado and
the site was common to three studies. Water from the Colorado
in overall water chemistry to
River drainage is probably closer
the Rio Grandethan other majorU . S . river systems due to the
high dissolvedsolids content andsediment load.
ARSENIC
The arsenic data from Laquerls report were high, probably
because of interferences in the electro-thermal atomic abscrption
method. Sulfate is a known interferent in this method and New
Mexico's waters are often high in sulfate. Arsenic data from
Popp, et al. (1979), obtained by the same method, were also high
but were included in the tables in this report inadvertently.
This has the effect of producing a high
biasmean at. sites
on the
11, 12, 13, 14,
containing arsenic values from this report (Sites
15, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 27). Rio Puerco and Rio Salado
show high arsenic in unfiltered samples because
of their high
sediment concentrations.
BARIUM
Dissolved barium concentrations are greater than that in
seawater, but about the same as in the Colorado River. Barium in
sediments averages less than crustal abundance. Barium minerals
are rather insoluble and thus barium is found associated with the
sediments.
BERYLIUM
Berylium was only determined on samples from the middle Rio
(1979). It is higher in the dissolved
Grande reported in Laquer,
form than that in seawater by a factor of a thousand, but still
very low, less than 2 ppb. The berylium in sediment av,=rages
less than crustal abundance.
91
Table 9
COMPARISON OF RIO GRANDE TRACE METALS TO
METALS. VALUES IN PPB AS DISSOLVED SPECIES.
22
As
B
Ba
Be
53
179
60
Cd
2
11
16
10
co
Cr
cu
Fe
Hg
Mn
32
12
MO
13 0
Ni
Se
U
V
12
30
105
2l-l
51
Pb
331
90
10
130
160
0.5
3.2
.39
7.4
<10
2500
50
6
41
2.1
13
2.5
18
209
0.6
6.4
1.4
61
19
21
8.5
23
26
36
COLORADO
RIVER
TRPCIE
55
73
.08
-1.4
F
0.6
17
7
355
13
400
19
80
15
11
25
4.2
81
20
16
<a
150
28
13
4
41
21
33
(1) Kopp, J. F. and Kroner, R. D.,1969, Trace Metalsin Waters
of the U.S., Div. of PollutionSurveillance, F.W.P.C.P.
Cincinnati.
Values are averaqes for all sites
on Rio Grande from Colorado to Texas except at Rio Puerco and Rio Salado confluences.
(1976) are not included.
Boron values from Dauchy
( 4 ) (5) Averages at Isleta site.
92
BORON
Boron was determined only Dauchy
by
(1976) and Popp, et al.
In the Popp etal. (1979) study, it wasonly determined
on the filtered water samples. Dauchyls values were much higher
than those from Popp's study. Dauchy used the curcumin color
method while Popp used the carmine color method. Comparing the
values from these two studies with boron from the Colorado River
system indicate that Dauchy's are probably in error 9).
(Table
.
(1979)
CADMIUM
The amount of dissolved cadmium at several sites exceeds
NMEID drinking water standards, but the average value is comparable with the Colorado River (Table
9).
Cadmium in the sediments
an order
of magnitude.
is higher than crustal abundance
by
CHROMIUM
Dissolved chromium is higher than that in seawater, in fact,
one site, #21 (Socorro), is higher than the NMEID drinking water
standard of 50 ppb. However, the high average is due to one
sample from the Popp et al.
(1983) data which was a single value
of 141 ppb chromium. The rest of the data for that site average
about 1 ppb, which is similar to the other sites. The amovnt in
sediments is lower than crustal abundance. Chromium appesrsto
be associated with the sediments.
COBALT
Amount of dissolved cobalt is much higher than that in
seawater but similar to that
in the Colorado River (Table
9).
The amount in sediments is about the same as crustal abundance.
COPPER
Amount of dissolved copper is about an order
of magnitude
greater than that
in seawater but similar to that in the Colorado
River (Table 9). The amount in sedimentsis about the ssme as
crustal abundance.
IRON
Dissolved iron is about 10-fold greater than that in seawater. The amount in sediments is slightly less that in crustal
abundance. Iron is associated with the sediments.
93
LEAD
of magnitude higher in dissolvad
form
Lead is several orders
than that in seawater but lower than that in the Colorado
(Table 9 ) . Lead is also higher in sediments than crustal
abundance.
River
MANGANESE
Manganese is several orders
of magnitude
that in seawater.
higher
in
dissolved
form than
MERCURY
Mercury in dissolvedform is higher than that in sealater.
Mercury is an order of magnitude higher in sediments than crustal
abundance.
It is present mostly in dissolved
form.
MOLYBDENUM
Dissolved molybdenum is higher than that in seawater but
lower than that in the Colorado River (Table 9 ) . Dissolved
molybdenum is high in stretches
of Red River and San Mateo Creek,
both most likely related to mining activities. Sediment contains
higher molybdenum than crustal abundance. Element appears to
travel in dissolvedform.
NICKEL
Dissolved nickel is higher than in
that
seawater but similar
that that in the Colorado River (Table 9 ) . Sediments csmtain
about the same amount as crustal abundance.
SELENIUM
Selenium in dissolvedform is higher than amount in seawater
and is also higherat many sites than drinking water standards
but average value is lower than that in the Colorado River (Table
9).
Selenium is also much higher in sediments than crustal
abundance. Selenium travels in dissolvedform but also increases
with increases in sediment load.
94
URANIUM
Dissolved uranium is higherthan that in seawater. Uranium
is much higher
in sediments that
crustal abundance. There is not
much data on upper Rio Grande on which to base
the following
statement but uranium appears
to be coming into the system from
Rio San Jose & Rio Puerco. Uranium appears to travel with the
sediments
VANADIUM
is higher than thatin seawater
Vanadium in dissolved form
the Colorado River (Table
average value is lower than inthat
9).
Amount of vanadium in sediments
is about the same as crustal
abundance.
but
ZINC
form than that in seawater but
Zinc is higher in dissolved
9).
It is higher in
lower than that in the Colorado River (Table
sediments than that in crustal abundance. Zinc travels with
sediment. In Laquer's (1981) work, total values are sonetimes
reported as less than dissolved.A l s o , his values are lower than
other reported values.
95
GENERAL
COMMENTS
Only two elements, mercury and selenium, exceeded the
NMEID's Criteria for Public Drinking Water. Concentrations of
both elements increased at Corrales and were further increased .by
flow from the Rio Puerco and Rio Salado.
The increase ir these
by that in whole water
elements in filtered water is mirrored
samples to an even greater degree. Increases inthe sediment
concentration (Table2 ) in the Rio Puerco and Rio Salado are felt
to be responsible for these increases. Concentrations cf most
elements increase when flow from the Rio Puerco is reached except
and molybdenum. These elements travel to a
for boron, mercury,
dissolved state.
large extent in the
The following elements were present in sediments in amounts
greater than crustal abundance: Pb (3x), Hg
(loox), Mo (:x), Se
(lox), U (lOOx), and Zn (3x)
.
96
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Brandvold, D . K . , and Brandvold, L.A., 1980, Heavy Metal and
Rio Puerco System,
Nutrient Load of the Rio San Jose
Interstate Stream Commission Report, State Engineer Office,
Santa Fe,N.M.
-
Brandvold, D.K., Popp, C.J., and Brandvold, L.A., 1981, TranSD0t-t
Mechanisms in Sediment Rich Streams
Heavy Metal an$
Nutrient Load of the Rio San Jose
Rio Puerco Systems,
Technical Completion Report #132, New Mexico Water Resources
Research Institute, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces,
N.M.
- --
Dauchy, J.W., 1976, A Selected Trace Metal Profile the
of Rio
Grande in New Mexico,
M.S. Thesis, New Mexico1nstit.Jt.e of
Mining and Technology, Socorro,
N.M.
Faith, S.E., 1974, An Equilibrium Distributionof Trace Elements
in a Natural Stream Environment,
M.S. Thesis, New Mexico
Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro,
N.M.
Kopp, J.F., ana Droner,R.D., 1969, Trace Metals in Waters of the
U.S., Div. of Pollution Surveillance, F.W.P.C.A. Cincinnati.
Laquer, F.C., 1981, A survey of Trace Metal Distribution in Water
and
and Suseended Sediment in the Rio Grande. Rio Puerco.
Rio Salado in Central New Mexico,
M.S. Thesis, New Mexico
Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro,
N.M.
Novo-Gradec, K.J., 1983, Trace Metal and Radionuclide Distributions in Recent Sedimentsof the Rio Puerco. Rio San Jose,
and Paquate Reservoir in the Grants Mineral Belt, M.S .
Thesis, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology,
Socorro, N.M.
Brierley, J.A., Scott, N., and
Popp, C.J., Brandvold, D . K . ,
Gloss, S., 1979, peavv Metals and Pesticides in Vater.
Sediments and Selected Tissue Samples of Aquatic Life in the
Middle Rio Grande Valley in New Mexico, Technical Completion
Report, Project #EPA-E4W7-06-072, Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, D.C.
97
Popp, C.J., Hawley, J.W., and Love, D.W., 1983, Radionuclide and
Trace Metals in Recent sediments
of Major Streams in the
Grants Mineral Belt, N.M., Technical Completion Report
Office of Surface Mining, Departmentof the Interior, Washington, D.C.
Popp, C.J., Brandvold, D.K., Lynch, T.R., and Brandvold, L.A.,
1983, An Evaluation of Sediments inthe Middle Rio C-rande,
FleDhant Butte Reservoir and Caballo Reservoir as Potential
Sources for Toxic Materials, Technical Completion Report No.
161, New Mexico Water Resources Research Institute, New
Mexico State University, LaS Cruces, N.M.
98