i -. New Mexico B u r e a u of Minesand Mineral Resources A Division o f New Mexico I n s t i t u t e of Mining .* - 'I..' & Technology O I L AND GAS EVALUATION OF WHITE SANDS M I S S I L E RANGE AND FORTBLISS MILITARYRESERVATION, SOUTH-CENTRAL NEW MEXICO bY . R o y W. Foster S e n i o r Petroleum G e o l o g i s t Socorro, J u l y 1 9 7 8 CONTENTS ........................ i STRATIGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Precambrian Rocks .................... 1 E l e v a t i o no fP r e c a m b r i a nS u r f a c e ...........5 B l i s s Sandstone-ElPaso Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Montoya Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -11 Devonian Rocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -12 M i s s i s s i p p i a n Rocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 3 Pennsylvanian'Rocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 4 permianRocks- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Bursum-Hueco-Abo Formations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 9 Yeso Formation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 SanAndresLimestone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Mesozoic Rocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Tertiary-Quaternary; Rocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26 FusselmanDolomite STRUCTURE ......................... -29 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -31 Geologic Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 1 T e s t Evaluation .................... -35 Lease Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -38 Evaluation of Condemned Tracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 55 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O I L AND GAS EVALUATION FIGURES Follows page ............... 2 - Elevation of Precambriansurface 3 - Isopach map and o u t c r o p area of . B l i s s - E l P a s o i n t e r v a l 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 Location map of s t u d y area and a r e a of o u t c r o p 12 .- I, - S t r a t i g r a p h i cs e c t i o n so fP e r m i a nr o c k s . 1 . i h p~ o c k e t ........ - 16 Isopach map andoutcrop Thickness .and outcrop area area of Ab0 Formation. - Location of o i l and gas I, ,I I, ... I, .24 of Q u a t e r n a r y - T e r t i a r y r o c k s . . I n p o c k e t ............. 20 - Hydrocarbon occurrences ................ 2 1 - Bid f a c t o r and .averagebidperacre,Primaryperiod .. 22 - B i d f a c t o r and a v e r a g e b i d p e r acre, Secondary period. . 19 .19 Isopach map and o u t c r o p area of Bursum-Hueco F o r m a t i o n s . i n p o c k e t 18 15 ,I I, 17 14 - .S t r a t i g r a p h i cs e c t i o n so fp r e - P e n n s y l v a n i a nr o c k s . 9 - Isopach map and o u t c r o p area of Montoya Group. - Isopach map and o u t c r o p area o f FusselmanDolomite . . . i n p o c k e t - Isopach map and o u t c r o p area o f Devonian r o c k s . . . . . . - Isopach map and o u t c r o p area o fM i s s i s s i p p i a nr o c k s . ... - S t r a t i g r a p h i cs e c t i o n so fP e n n s y l v a n i a nr o c k s . . . . . . .14 ..... Isopach map and o u t c r o p area of Yeso Formation . . . . . Isopach map and o u t c r o p area of S a n AndresFormation .. - Thicknessandoutcroparea of Mesozoic r o c k s . . . . . . - S t r a t i g r a p h i cs e c t i o n s of Mesozoicrocks . . . . . . . . 13 inpocket . .... ...... 10 - Isopach map and o u t c r o p area ofPennsylvanianrocks. 11 - - .ii tests. 1, I, ,I I, TABLES 1 - O i l andgas 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2 R e s u l t so ft e s t i n g R e s u l t s of t e s t i n g R e s u l t s of t e s t i n g R e s u l t so ft e s t i n g ........ of pre-Pennsylvanianrocks . . of Pennsylvanianrocks .... of Permian rocks . . .. . . . of Mesozoicrocks .. .... . tests ... Summary of l e a s e . d a t a : J a n u a r y Summary ofbase ... .. . . . . . .34 . . . . ..35 . . . ..37 - . . . ..37 1 9 6 9 throughFebruary - 1974 a 4 - l . . .42 . . . - .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . .43 Summary of lease d a t a : Condemned t r a c t s Follows page . 31 March 1 9 7 4 through ' Juri$ 1975. lease v a l u e s f o r p r i m a r y e v a l u a t i o n p e r i o d -44 Summary of base lease v a l u e s f o r s e c o n d a r y e v a l u a t i o n p e r i o d 4 4 Worksheets:Primary-leaseevaluationperiod Worksheets:Secondary-leaseevaluationperiod . . . . .Appendix . . . . . . .ii i i ii INTRODUCTION I n February1978 resources for certain t r a c t s of S t a t e l a n d w i t h i n WhiteSands These t r a c t s hadbeen by t h e Department ofDefense. condemned June 3 0 , 1975, The New Mexico Bureau of Minesand Mineral Resources w a s g i v e n t h e t a s k resourcesas water assist i n the e v a l u a t i o n o f m i n e r a l a n d State agencies to Missile Range. t h e S t a t e Land O f f i c e r e q u e s t e d s e v e r a l of e v a l u a t i n g t h e w e l l as m i n e r a l d e p o s i t s o t h e r t h a n oil andgas sand a n d g r a v e l . T h i s r e p o r t i s limited t o an e v a l u a t i o n of the oi1"and gas p o t e n t i a l and its v a l u e t o t h e S t a t e . The currentcondemnation ofthe s u i t involvesonly to acquire all Becauseofplans acres i n White Sands 341,388 a c r e s of S t a t e m i n e r a l r i g h t s Missile Range. 10,730.60 by t h e Departmentof Defense of t h e s e r i g h t s it was d e c i d e d t o b r o a d e n t h e scope o f t h i s r e p o r t t o include the entire military reservation i n s o u t h - c e n t r a l New Mexico. The a r e ac o n s i d e r e di n c l u d e sb o t h White Sands Missile Range and the F o r t - B l i s s M i l i t a r y R e s e r v a t i o n w i t h i n New Mexico. Because of t h e l a c k militaryreservation of o i l and g a s e x p l o r a t i o n w i t h i n t h e it w a s necessary 1) t o i n v e s t i g a t e areatoestablishthegeologic a larger framework and 2) t o e v a l u a t e S t a t e o i l a n dg a sl e a s e ss o l di nt h ev i c i n i t yo ft h er e s e r v a t i o n . a r e ao fg e o l o g i cs t u d i e s from T. 4 S . through T. a totalofabout m i l l i o na c r e s . i s shown i n f i g . 29 S . , and R. 4 W. 1. The Roughly it i n c l u d e s through R. 430 townships, 1 4 , 4 9 0 s q u a r e m i l e s , 1 4 E. -- and 9 . 9 Of this area, White Sands Missile Range c o v e r s i ii i approximately 2 . 1 m i l l i o na c r e s . The a r e ae v a l u a t e df o rS t a t e leases includesanadditionaltownship on khe west, n o r t h and e a s t sides. The g e o l o g i c e v a l u a t i o n i s based on published and unpublished reports, well r e c o r d s , g e o p h y s i c a l p e r s o n a l knowledge of t h e a r e a t h a t t h e SanAndresMountains. are i n t h e f i l e s o f t h e and g e o l o g i c a l l o g s , p l u s began i n 1954 w i t h work i n Well r e c o r d s and l o g s t h a t were examined Bureau i n Socorro and t h e Permian Assoc- i a t i o n i n Roswell.Additionallogs were obtainedfrom were obtained O i l and M i n e r a l s , a n d l o g s a n d . o t h e r i n f o r m a t i o n from Ben Donegan, ConsultingGeologist,Albuquerque. distribution of the various geologic intervals Houston The outcrop was modified from t h e Geologic Map o f New Mexico by Dane and Bachman ( 1 9 6 5 ) d a t a were compiledfrom information supplied S t a t e Land O f f i c e a n d r e p o r t s by Robert W. Piatt, Santa Values a r e b a s e d of o i l andgas . ' Lease by t h e New Mexico l e a s e sales published Fe. on l e a s e sales conductedthroughJune1975. Only those wells completed o r i n t h e process of b e i n g d r i l l e d prior to July 1, 1975~, are incl-uded i n t h e g e o l o g i c i n t e r p r e t a t i o n s presented i n t h i s r e p o r t . (I X A : FIGURE I LOCATION MAP OFSTUDY AREA AND MILITARY RESERVATION . . , I i (r 1 STRATIGRAPHY In order t o e v a l u a t e the o i l a n d g a s p o t e n t i a l o f W h i t e Sands Missile Range it is n e c e s s a r y t o e s t a b l i s h t h e s t r a t i g r a p h i c New Mexico. framework o fs o u t h - c e n t r a l B r o a d l ys p e a k i n g ,p o t e n t i a l area are restricted t o sediments source and r e s e r v o i r r o c k s i n t h i s ofPaleozoicandMesozoicage.Localandregionalstructural features can result in migration of h y d r o c a r b o n s i n t o o l d e r o r as a s u i t a b l e r e s e r v o i r youngerrocksofanytypeaslong present. However, o c c u r r e n c e so ft h i sn a t u r e . a r en o t and no c o n s i d e r a t i o n of h y d r o c a r b o n p o t e n t i a l rocks. An u n d e r s t a n d i n g rocksofthis gasevaluation of thePrecambrian common, i s made f o r t h e s e i s importantbecause age r e p r e s e n t an e x p l o r a t o r y b a s e is concerned. is as f a r as o i l and Knowledge o f t h e e l e v a t i o n o f t h i s basesurfaceaidsindeterminingthethicknessoftheoverlying sedimentarysequenceandthatpartof t h e sequenceconsideredto have some p o t e n t i a l f o r t h e a c c u m u l a t i o n o f o i l part for the andgas.In same r e a s o n s some a w a r e n e s s o f t h e t h i c k n e s s o f p o s t - Mesozoic d e p o s i t s i s important i n e v a l u a t i o n and d e t e r m i n a t i o n of drilling depths involved in adequately exploring the f a v o r a b l e p a r t of the s t r a t i g r a p h i c s e c t i o n . Precambrian Rocks The o u t c r o p d i s t r i b u t i o n o f P r e c a m b r i a n r o c k s i s shown i.n ~ i f i g . 2 . Major o u t c r o p a r e a s a r e i n t h e C a b a l l o - F r a C r i s t o b a l ranges and i n the Oscura-SanAndres-Organ chain. exposures are present in the Sacramento Mountains. Only minor (r (G r a n i t e ,g n e i s s i c thePrecambrianof In the central part 2 i n p a r t , i s thedominantrocktype S i l v e r , 1952). the CaballoMountains(Kelleyand of t h e r a n g e t h e r e in are s e v e r a l s q u a r e miles c o n s i s t i n g m o s t l y of mica s c h i s t b u t i n c l u d i n g some g r a n i t e press) gneiss, metadioriteandgreenstone.CondieandBudding(in notethepresence CaballoMountains. of a m p h i b o l i t e i n the s o u t h e r n p a r t o f t h e The Precambrian i n t h e F r a C r i s t o b a l Mountains c o n s i s t sm o s t l yo fg r a n i t i cr o c k s .S i m i l a r l yi nt h eO s c u r a , i s t h e mostcommon-rock Andres, andOrgan M o u n t a i n s ,g r a n i t e type.Kottlowski e t al. ( 1 9 5 6 ) d e s c r i b e dp i n kg r a n i t e The g r a n i t e s i n c l u d e a t the a t t h e mouth of Rhodes mouth of Ash Canyon a n d l i g h t - g r a y g r a n i t e Canyon. San masses o fg r e e n i s hb i o t i t e - h o r n - blendeschists,blackbiotite-quartz-feldsparschist,and some simple p e g m a t i t e a n d d i a b a s e d i k e s . I n t h e c e n t r a l p a r t o f t h e San AndresMountainsfromSulphnr t os o u t ho f Canyon ( T . 15 S . , Hembrillo Canyon ( T . 16 S . , R. 4 E.) R. 4 E.) there i s a t h i c k series ofmetamorphicrocks.CondieandBuddingcalculated percentagesofvariousrocktypesbased onmeasured I n order'.ofdecreasingamounts,these and p h y l l i t e , arkosite, mafic sections. are m i c a - q u a r t z s c h i s t metaigneousrocks,andquartzite. Locally i n t h e Hembrillo Canyon a r e a t h e r e i n t e r v a l t h a t unconformably overlies is a thin quartzite older Precambrian rocks and i s t r u n c a t e d by the o v e r l y i n g B l i s s Sandstone.This may be a remnant of t h e y o u n g e r s e d i m e n t a r y / v o l c a n i c s e q u e n c e p r e s e n t i n t h e Sacramento and Franklin Mountains. A t SanDiego Mountain (T. 1 9 S . , R. 1 W; 1the Precambrian c o n s i s t s of r e d c o a r s e - g r a i n e d g r a n i t e w i t h m i n o r g r a n i t e g n e i s s , s c h i s t , and pegmatite and diabase dikes (Seager .et a l . , 1971) . r _. 3 I Exposures in the Organ Mountains are granitic rocks with minor pegmatite and aplite dikes. The small exposures north and northwest ofthe Fra Outcrops found Cristobal of Mountains Precambrian insmall exposures at rocks the Alamogordo (T.19S., R.lOE.), also in consist the of granite. Sacramento base the of uplift south Mountains ar of at Pajarito Peak (T.l2S., R.l5E.), and at Bent(T.l3S., R.12E.). The exposures south of Alamogordo have been described by Pray (1961) as consisting of gray-green, in part mottled-red, shale, siltstone and quartzite- intruded 'by thin sills of diorite. The 'exposures' at Pajarito Peak consist of hornblende syenite (Kelley, 1968). and.syenite with common pegmatitic phases At Bent the exposures are light-gray quartzite that appears to be intruded by granite (Bachman, 1960). Subsurface data for Precambrian rock types is sparse. West of the Caballo Mountains the Gartland Brister well (T.l2S., R.4W.) encountered syenite (Foster and Stipp, 1961). In the Jornada del Muerto the two Sun wells (T.lOS., R.1W.) bottomed in granite beneath the Bliss Sandstone.: The only other well drilled to the Precambrian in this area was the Exxon Beard test (T.14S., Samples were not for this well. six wells have been available drilled to the Precambrian Samples were granite similar examined to for the on the several Oscura of exposures in-theOscura . anticline these wells (T.) 4S., and Mountains R.1E.I. to consist R. of the south, The Sun Bingham test (T.5S., R.5E.) encountered similar granite Well with cuttings some from of quartz-biotite-hornblende inclusions beneath Pennsylvanian of Texas Heard well (T.6S., R.9E.)on the identified as gabbro. This is not a common sediments Carrizozo rock schist. in the anticline type in the Standar were r is 4 Precambrian of New Mexico. However, east of the areaof this report gabbrowas identified in of Texas Scarp Standard the well (T.21S., R.18E.) by Flawn C19561 and in the Texam Boyle (T.9S., R.20E.) and possibly Hunt McMillan (T.26S., R.16E.) by Foster (1959). The gabbros areof particular interest because, they appear partof the tobe rhyolite Precambrian sequence anda variety of sedimentary much of the Sacramento Sedimentary rocksof Precambrian south of illamogordo Mountain were rock area age that types and en.countered in that extend similar to the includes underlie south those into Texas. exposed Stanolind Picacho ~~ (.Tt12Sq, S.18E. 1, Humble 'State N (T.l4S., , R.17E.) Southern Production Cloudcroft CT.l7S., R.l2E.)., Gulf Chaves U (T.l8S., R.16E.1, and I?agnolia Black Hills (,T.l7S., .%.20E.). In the Gulf well the sedMentqry sequence no The q9eof the doubt youngef includes s.edimentapy than the dolomite. sequence is known, not but it is 'granitic-metamorphic terrane in the western part of the area. RadjomeEric dates of granites from the Fan. Andres, Oscura, and San Di,eyo Mountains range 1.4 1.36 from to . billi.on years .(fluehlbexger, et al., 1966). Rhyolites and rqetarhyolites'.frorq wes't Texas .i.n the Carrizo Mountains and Pump al., 19621 a.ndtha.FranklinMountains Station H i . 1 1 ~ (.Nasserburg et (Muehlbeeger eii al. 1966). h.ve 'ages o f approximately 1.0 billion o f ' P'ajqrito .rocks yea:rs. The i.9neOuS 1-19 billion If the of were dated1.15 at to years, Yabbros; the s q e sequence eagtern Peak rhyolites',. ' a s the areai s underlain ,and .sedimentary by rocks othey' igneous rocks, younger and then rocks most markedly of are par the different of the western part of the area. This could ahave from those. ..s.ignificant effect on the interpretation of geophysical studies. 5 Elevation of the Precambrian Surface Well c o n t r o l i s n o t a d e q u a t e t o s a t i s f a c t o r i l y c o n t o u r was attempted only thePrecambriansurfaceandthis in the J o r n a d a d e l Muerto and south of the Sacramento Mountains. 2 was Additional elevation control for fig. that. did not reach this. interval by p r o j e c t i n g t h e d e p t h t o Precambrian by use of t h e i s o p a c h maps and s e l e c t e d f o r m a t i o n were e s t i m a t e d from t o p s .E l e v a t i o n sf o rP r e c a m b r i a no u t c r o p s topographic maps. o b t a i n e d f o r wells In.theJornadadel relief on t h e P r e c a m b r i a n s u r f a c e Muerto t h e maximum:known i s from 6 , 2 0 0 f e e t above sea l e v e l a t outcrops i n t h e SanAndres and CaballoMountains 7,075 f e e t below sea l e v e l i n t h eB e a r d . l J o r n a d a R. to well (T. 1 4 S . , ” This i s a r e l i e f of 5 9 0 f e e t p e r mile west f r o mt h e 1W.). 7 2 0 f e e t p e r mile east i n t o the Jornada SanAndresMountainsand del Muerto.from the Caballo Mountains. Estimatesbasedonsurfaceexposuresofrocksyoungerthan f o r the Precambrian. Precambrian are b i a s e d t o w a r d s h a l l o w d e p t h s I n p a r t t h i s also i s t r u e from well d a t a where tests are g e n e r a l l y d r i l l e d on s u r f a c e s t r u c t u r e s o r g e o p h y s i c a l h i g h s . Jornadadel (T. 1W.), of the C i t i e s S e r v i c e C o r r a l i t o s . t e s t (T. 2 2 S., R. 1 , 8 0 0 f e e t below sea level i n t h e S i n c l a i r R. South Muerto this i s r e f l e c t e d i n depths of s l i g h t l y below sea l e v e l i n t h e 7 . and a minus3,200 23 S., R. 2 E . ) . 2 Doiia Ana ( T . 22 S . , f e e t estimated f o r t h e C l a r y S t a t e The e l e v a t i o n of t h eP r e c a m b r i a ns u r f a c e e s t i m a t e df o rt h e Grim w e l l (T. 25 S . , below sea level. J u s t e a s t of San Augustin Pass a t e s t d r i l l e d i n t h em i l i t a r yr e s e r v a t i o n (T. 22 S., R. R. 1 E.) 5 E.) Tertiary or Quaternary basin-filling sediments i s 18,000 feet bottomed i n a t a depth of W.) , f6,005feet.Lacking i t i s assumed any d a t a t o t h e c o n t r a r y that the western part underlainby 6 of the Tularosa Basin beneath the f i l l is a completesectionofPaleozoicrocksand,at least i n the n o r t h e r n p a r t o f t h e b a s i n , s e d i m e n t s o f C r e t a c e o u s and T r i a s s i ca g e .C o n s i d e r i n go n l yP a l e o z o i cr o c k sp r e s e n ta tt h e well d r i l l e d i n T. 2 2 S . , R. 5 E . ~ ~ ~ aassuming nd locationofthe b a s i n f i l l had b e e n p e n e t r a t e d , t h e that the total thickness of depthtothePrecambriansurface the elevation about wouldbeabout 9,000 f e e t below sea level. Alamogordo three wells were In the Tularosa Basin south of d r i l l e d by Texaco ( T . 18 S . , ( T . 20 S. , R. 9 E. ) 13,000 feet and . R. 8~and 1 0 E . ) andonebyPlymouth The two Texaco wells i n R. l o c a t e d on t h e J a r i l l a b l o c k an i n t r a b a s i n u p l i f t . below sea l e v e l i n t h e s e wells. Based on i s o p a c h d a t a Mountains (T. 2 1 S . , Precambrian e l e v a t i o n i n t h i s The eleva- i s 4 , 0 7 4 f e e t and 4 , 2 1 7 f e e t t i o n on t h e P r e c a m b r i a n s u r f a c e exposures i n t h e J a r i l l a 8 E. are R. and 8 E. ) t h e area i s e s t i m a t e d t o b e 570 f e e t The Plymouth well a l s o i s t o 1,115 f e e t below s e a l e v e l . considered t o b e 3 n t h e J a r i l l a b l o c k w i t h a n ~ e l e v a t i o n of minus 3,745 feet. The Texaco well n e a r e s t t o t h e f r o n t of theSacramento Mountains h a s the d e e p e s t e s t i m a t e d P r e c a m b r i a n i n t h i s a r e a 4,858 f e e tb e l o w sea level. T h i s w e l l appears t o b e l o c a t e d i n a sub-basin t h a t flankstheSacramentoMountains. To t h e n o r t h i n the Three Rivers a r e a The Houston O i l and Minerals on t h e Precambrian s u r f a c e .T h i s 1 Lewelling 4 , 6 7 6 feet below sea l e v e l i s estimated t o h a v e a n e l e v a t i o n o f w e l l i s l o c a t e d a t t h es o u t h e r n end of the Sierra Blanca syncline but also Sacramento block.Immediately at on t h e u p l i f t e d t o t h e west o f t h i s w e l l the surface of t h e Precambrianshouldbe a t a greater depth. Mesa the Precambrian In the Sacramento Mountains and Otero i s a t o v e r 8 , 0 0 0 f e e t above sea l e v e l a t P a j a r i t o R. 15 E . ) . R. 1 2 E.) Inthe SouthernProductionCloudcroft Peak (T. 1 2 S., t e s t ( T . 1 7 S., the s u r f a c e i s a t 4 , 8 5 3 f e e t above sea l e v e l .R e l a t i v e l y shallow depths c o n t i n u e t o t h e s o u t h and e a s t r e f l e c t i n g b o t h the S a c r a m e n t o u p l i f t and t h e b u r i e d o l d e r P e d e r n a l u p l i f t . Hueco/Sacramento f r o n t i s The d e e p e s t Precambrian e a s t o f t h e estimated f o r t h e Seaboard Trigg ( T . 26 S., R. f e e t below sea level. 11 E.) a t 2,933 This t e s t i s l o c a t e d between- t h e Cornudas and Hueco Mountains. B l i s s Sandstone-ElPaso Group The B l i s s Sandstone and el^ Paso Group a r e combined on t h e isopach map ( f i g . 3 ) . fig. 4. The g e n e r a ll i t h o l o g y i s i n d i c a t e di n The Bliss c o n s i s t sm o s t l yo fq u a r t zs a n d s t o n ew i t h some f e l d s p a t h i cs a n d s t o n ei nt h el o w e rp a r t . grade upward i n t o sandydolomite The sandstones orlimestonethrough zone with the o v e r l y i n g E l Paso.carbonates.In a gradational the Caballoand San Andres Mountains sandstones i n t h e l o w e r p a r t o f t h e commonly c o n t a i n g l a u c o n i t e a n d t h i n Bliss beds o f o o l i t i c h e m a t i t e . Glauconite is p r e s e n t i n t h e B l i s s i n theSacramentoMountains, buttheoolitichematite is absent. from t h e o o l i t i c h e m a t i t e i n t e r v a l ; i s Cambrian i n age i n t h e C a b a l l o Basedon fossilcollections the l o w e r p a r t o f t h e Mountains. Bliss' S i m i l a r beds i n t h e San Andres Mountains are probably also of Cambrian age. The r e m a i n d e r o f t h e in the Sacramento B l i s s i s Ordovician,andtheentiresection Mountains i s c o n s i d e r e d t o b e O r d o v i c i a n . ". c I 8 The E l Paso Group c o n s i s t s a l m o s t e n t i r e l y o f c a r b o n a t e s . In the Caballo Mountains and s o u t h o f t h e t h e i n t e r v a l i s mostly limestone In the (T. 4 E.), chert. w i t h varyingamountsof a t l e a s t as f a r s o u t h a s S a n AndresMountains, 19 S . , R. San AndresMountains Ash Canyon the forma- and intheSacramentoMountains, t i o n i s almostentirelydolomite..In.theCaballoMountains numerous biohermal masses upper p a r t of the E l Paso contains t h a t , according t o K e l l e y a n d S i l v e r ward across t h e normalsection the "... are (1952), p i l e d up- i n some p l a c e s f o r s e v e r a l t e n s of feet." of f e e t o r o c c a s i o n a l l y f o r h u n d r e d s The E l Paso Group i s Canadian, Lower Ordovician i n age. The isopach map formsouthward of t h e B l i s s / E l Paso shows a f a i r l y u n i - t h i c k e n i n ga c r o s s of this interval pinch out in the northern part of the C r i s t o b a l and OscuraMountains. feet at the southern end t h e area.Sedimentaryrocks The sequencethickens the s o u t h e r n p a r t Bachman (1961, 1965, 1968)measuredfrom t h e northend Mountains(Kelley o € theOscuraMountains 5 t o 1 4 0 f e e t ,a n d o f the San Andres Mountains, 236 feet. t h e San Andres Mountains the sequence thickens Rhodes Canyon (T. 13' S . , Canyon (T. 16 S., (T. 1 8 S. , R. R. 4 E.), (Kottlowski e t a l . , t o 329 of the Fra Cristobal Mountains and 608 f e e t i n t h e c e n t r a l p a r t o f t h e C a b a l l o a n dS i l v e r ,1 9 5 2 ) .I n Fra R. 4 E.) 3 E.) , S o u t hi n from 352 f e e t i n t o 6 2 6 f e e t i n Hembrillo 757 f e e t i n SanAndres and 867 f e e t i n AshCanyon (T. Canyon 1 9 S., 1 9 5 6 and Bachman and Myers, 1 9 6 3 ) .I n Organ Mountains, Howe (1959)measured 1 , 8 4 0 f e e t have been reported in at 920 feet of B l i s s @ l t h e Franklin Mountains. R. 4 E.) the Paso i 9 Well c o n t r o l on t h e t h i c k n e s s o f t h e Sun tests (T. l i m i t e d .I nt h e 10 S . , Bliss-El R. Paso i s i n theJornada 1W.) d e l Muerto there are 200 t o more than 230 f e e t present. Exxon Beard l o c a t i o n (T. 1 4 S., the J o r n a d a d e l and s o u t h o f feet i nt h e 14 S. , R. to the south 10 E.) R. 2 W.)..' (T. 22 S., with 420 f e e t . In t e s t (T. 1 7 S., estimated 9 4 0 f e e t i n t h e T u r n e r E v e r e t t TurnerEvans (T. 550 f e e t i n ' t h e R. 1 2 E . ) well (T. 2 2 2 4 S., S., R. 12 E . ) . t o an R. 1 2 E.) Within themilitaryreservationtheintervalthickenssouthward the eroded edge 3724 The B l i s s - E lP a s ot h i c k e n s i n t h e SacramentoMountainsfrom feet in the an e s t i m a t e d 895 i s l i m i t e d t o the H o u s t o n S t a t e SouthernProductionCloudroft and1,035 t h e r e are 408 f e e t p r e s e n t , Muerto t h e r e a r e C i t i e s S e r v i c eC o r r a l i t o s theTularosaBasincontrol (T. R. 1 E.) A t the from i n T. 8 S . t o a maximum o f 1 , 2 0 0 f e e t and p o s s i b l y 1 , 4 0 0 f e e t a t t h e New Mexico-Texas l i n e . A s has been discussed northward thinning of the by Kelley and S i l v e r (1952) and o t h e r s , E l Paso i s t h e r e s u l t of e r o s i o n preceding deposition of the overlying Group. A t thepresentnorthern Upper Ordovician Montoya limit o f t h e E l Pasoand Bliss t h i s i s f u r t h e r c o m p l i c a t e d by t h e o v e r l a p o f P e n n s y l v a n i a n sedimentsonto the Precambrian.-Thepresent e'astern limits o f t h e B l i s s - E l Paso i n t h e map a r e a are p o o r l y known. The i n t e r v a l was removed by e r o s i o n d u r i n g and f o l l o w i n g u p l i f t o f the Pedernal block in Late Pennsylvanian-Early Permian time. I n p a r t s of the map a r e a and t o t h e e a s t P e r m i a n s e d i m e n t s overlap Pennsylvanian and o l d e r r o c k s a n d d i r e c t l y Precambrian. overlie t h e , . I 10 Montoya Group sub- The Montoya Group of Late Ordovician age has been are Cable dividedintofourformationsthat,inascendingorder, Canyon Sandstone, Upham Dolomite,and t i o n s ( f i g . 4). Aleman and C u t t e r Forma- The Cable Canyon is a l i g h t - g r a yt ow h i t e stone, locally conglomeratic and usually dolomite. sand- well cemented w i t h The o v e r l y i n gf o r m a t i o n sc o n s i s ta l m o s te n t i r e l yo f present i n t h e Aleman. dolomitewithabundantchert upward fromdarkgray C o l o rv a r i e s i n t h e Upham t o l i g h t gray i n t h e C u t t e r . The o u t c r o p d i s t r i b u t i o n i s e s s e n t i a l l y t h e same a s t h a t o f t h e B l i s s - E l Pasoexceptthatthenorthernerodededgeofthe Montoya i s a few miles f a r t h e r s o u t h ( f i g . that preceded Pennsylvanian deposition, the overlappedthe E l Pasoand 5). P r i o r t o erosion Montoya probably B l i s s and r e s t e d d i r e c t l y on t h e i s based i n p a r t on a p r o b a b l e Precambrian.Thisassumption Precambrian source area to the north for sand in the Cable The Montoya north of its present extent also Canyon. may have been removed i n p a r t by e r o s i o n a l . p e r i o d s d u r i n g S i l u r i a n a n d Devonian time. The i n t e r v a l . i s n o t p r e s e n t i n t h e Fra C r i s t o b a l Mountains, a t least where lower Paleozoic rocks are exposed, but is present to the .northwest in the foothills Mountains i n T. 8 S . , R. 4 W. .of t h e San. Mateo (KelleyandFurlow,1965). The t h i c k n e s s of t h e Montoya i s very uniform where o v e r l a i n by t h e S i l u r i a n F u s s e l m a n In this area thickness and Texas. it varies only Dolomite south of T. 1 4 S . from 355 t o 495 f e e t i n t o t a l i s 425 f e e t t h i c k i n t h e F r a n k l i n The t h i c k e s t s e c t i o n it i s Mountainsof of t h e Montoya known i n t h e map -~ f r a r e a i s i nt h eP l y m o u t h - F e d e r a l w e l l (T. 20 S . , R:'9'E.), 11 where 495 f e e t were p e n e t r a t e d . I n t h e s o u t h e a s t p a r t o f t h e of t h e Montoya on t h e west f l a n k o f t h e map the eroded edge Pedernal u p l i f t i s i n d i c a t e d . w e l l (sec. 7, t h e Montoya i s a b s e n t i n t h e CampbellLieberman T. 25 S. , R. 15 E . ) . east A s h o r td i s t a n c et ot h e The i n f l u e n c e o f t h i s u p l i f t a l s o is evident northeast of late Paleozoic Alamogordo. FusselmanDolomite The Fusselman c o n s i s t s of l i g h t - t o d a r k - g r a y d o l o m i t e l o c a l l yc o n t a i n i n ga b u n d a n tc h e r t( f i g . 4). F o s s i l s are generallypoorlypreserved,butcollectionsfromvarious a S i l u r i a na g e . l o c a l i t i e sh a v ee s t a b l i s h e d extentof intervals. The northward the Fusselman i s much less t h a n t h a t of o t h e r P a l e o z o i c p a r t of t h e a r e a a n d i n t h e S a c r a m e n t o In t h ew e s t e r n Mountains,DevonianrocksoverlaptheFusselmanabove smooth s u r f a c e of e r o s i o n . a generally To t h e e a s t t h e n o r t h e r n e x t e n t is less because of t h e i n f l u e n c e of Late Pennsylvanian-EarlyPermian erosion. Where p r e s e n t i n t h e San Andres and SacramentoMountains t h e Fusselman t h i c k e n s g r a d u a l l y t o t h e s o u t h . w i t h l o c a l v a r i a t i o n s (fig. 6 ) . I nt h ee x t r e m es o u t h w e s t e r np a r to ft h ea r e at h e intervalthickens G r i m well (T. more a b r u p t l y t o t h e 25 S . , R. Basintheintervalranges (T. 1 4 S., R. 1 0 E.) 1 E.). 655 f e e t p r e s e n t i n t h e From w e l l d a t a i n t h e T u l a r o s a f r o m zero in the Houston S t a t e 3724 t o a maximum drilledthickness i n the Texaco Federal G (sec. 33, T. 18 S., R. on p r o j e c t i o n s from wells and outcrops bordering of 1 1 0 f e e t 8 E.). Based the basin t h e f (" Fusselmanshouldthickentoas 12 much as 4 0 0 f e e t a t t h e Texas border. Devonian Rocks Rocks of Devonian age have been subdivided into f o r m a t i o n s( f i g . (from t h eb a s e I n t h e SanAndresMountains 4). numerous t h e s ea r e In up) Onate, Sly Gap, Contadero and Percha. general t h e l i t h o l o g y lesser i s oneofshaleandsiltstonewith amounts of sandstoneandlimestone. are brownish t o d a r k g r a y The s h a l e s and s i l t s t o n e s andblack,andcalcareous or dolomitic. The s e c t i o n i s similar i n t h e Sacramento.Mountains except that the ContaderoFormationapparently In southern Oteroand DoiYa Ana i s notpresent(Pray, 1961). Counties a c h e r t y limestone f a c i e s i s c a l l e dt h eC a n u t i l l oF o r m a t i o n( K o t t l o w s k i ,1 9 6 3 ) . From w e l l c o n t r o l s o u t h and s o u t h e a s t o f o u t c r o p s i n t h e Sacramento Mountains t h e t h i c k n e s s sediments of i s only 15 t o 80 f e e t , and Devonian a g e a p p e a r t o b e a b s e n t a l o n g t h e e n t i r e e a s t e r n e d g e of t h e a r e a ( f i g . 7). In part this i s due t o non- d e p o s i t i o n as well a s t o t h e e f f e c t of e r o s i o n a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h eP e d e r n a lu p l i f t . The maximum t h i c k n e s s e s f o r t h e are 2 3 4 f e e t (LeMone, 1 9 6 9 ) where it c r o p s o u t Cap a r e a ( T . 2 4 S . , (T. 25 S . , R. 1E.). R. 3 E.) Devonian i n t h eB i s h o p ' s and 2 4 5 f e e t i n t h e G r i m m well Seager (1973) r e p o r t s a t h i c k n e s s of about 1 9 0 f e e t a t Bishop's Cap, s u g g e s t i n gl o c a lv a r i a t i o n s .A l t h o u g h p r e s e n t as f a r n o r t h as Mockingbird Gap (T. 9 S . , R. 5 E . ) i n t e r v a l i s absent i n t h e F r a C r i s t o b a l a n d Mountains. most of the Caballo However, w e s t ofTruthorConsequences p r e s e n t i n t h e Mud SpringsMountains i n T. the 1 3 S., 1 0 5 f e e t are R. 4 W. i i' Wells i n the Tularosa Basin south and 13 west of Alamogordo In the p e n e t r a t e d from 45 t o 6 8 f e e t o f Devonian sediments. i n t h en o r t h e r np a r to ft h e Houston w e l l (T. 1 2 S . , R. 9 E . ) b a s i nt h ei n t e r v a l i s 116 f e e tt h i c k .T h i st h i c k n e s ss u g g e s t s t h a t t h e Devonian may e x t e n d f a r t h e r n o r t h i n t o t h e Sierra B l a n c a syncline. M i s s i s s i p p i a n Rocks a number of Mississippian s t r a t a have been subdivided into formations and mnkers ( f i g . . 4 ) . I na s c e n d i n go r d e rt h ef o r m a t i o n s .. . ~. are Caballero, Lake V a l l e y , L a s Cruces,Rancheria, i s limestone with abundant chert in The dominantrocktype members o f t h e and H e l m s . Lake ValleyFormationand in the Rancheria Formation.Shaleswithnodularlimestone C a b a l l e r o and p a r t s o f t h e some makeup most o f t h e Lake Valley. I n t h e Caballo Mountains Mississippian rocks are present o n l yi nt h es o u t h e r np a r t of t h er a n g e( f i g . 8). The t h i c k n e s s i s o n l y 40 feet and i s r e s t r i c t e d t o a remnant of the Formation.In the SanAndresMountains andRancheriaarefoundonly t h eC a b a l l e r o , Latherabruptlyto i n AshCanyon of Hembrillo (T. Almost thinning Canyon (T. 1 8 S. Canyon (T. 16 S., Canyon t h e t h i c k n e s s Else- L a k e Valley. 1 9 S . , R. 4 E . ) , 315 f e e t i n SanAndres and t o 82 f e e t i nH e m b r i l l o L a s Cruces, i nt h es o u t h e r ne x p o s u r e s . w h e r et h eM i s s i s s i p p i a ni s . r e s t r i c t e dt ot h e 450 f e e t a r ep r e s e n t Lake Valley R. 3 E.). is fairly uniform with , R. North 62 f e e t a t Rhodes Canyon ( T . 13 S . , R. 4 E . ) and 42 t o 75 f e e t i n t h en o r t h e r np a r to ft h er a n g e . The u n i t i s absent i n t h e southern part of.the Oscura Mountains where i t i s overlapped by 4 E.), c (" 14 measured by Pray P e n n s y l v a n i a ns e d i m e n t s .I ns u r f a c es e t i o n s the s e q u e n c e v a r i e s ( 1 9 6 1 ) i n t h e SacramentoMountains from 1 9 0 to 4 6 0 feet i n t h i c k n e s s .M i s s i s s i p p i a nf o r m a t i o n si d e n t i f i e d i n the area i n c l u d e t h e C a b a l l e r o , H e l m s ; .tlre'la%krtwoformations exposures.Southof Lake V a l l e y , Rancheria and are restricted t o t h e southern are p r e s e n t i n Alamogordo massivebioherms the Lake Valley Formation. S i m i l a r t o t h e Devonian, M i s s i s s i p p i a n rocks are t h i c k e r f a r t h e r t o t h e n o r t h i n the T u l a r o s a B a s i n t h a n t h e y San AndresMountains o rJ o r n a d a reservationthethicknessvaries del Muerto.Within fromzero are i n t h e the military i n the northtoabout 500 f e e t i n t h e s o u t h w e s t e r n . p a r t of t h e T u l a r o s a B a s i n . rocks o c c u r r e d p r i o r Considerable erosion of Mississippian t oP e n n s y l v a n i a nd e p o s i t i o ni n much of t h e a r e a . overlapped older Paleozoic rocks and, north of where p r e s e r v e d t o t h e the eroded edge, now rests d i r e c t l y on t h e Precambrian. Pre-Pennsylvanianerosion part of The M i s s i s s i p i a n i s less important i n t h e s o u t h e r n the area and e a s t e r n t h i n n i n g and absence of t h e i n t e r v a l i s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h the b u r i e d P e d e r n a l u p l i f t . Pennsylvanian Rocks Sediments deposited d u r i n g P e n n s y l v a n i a n t i m e c o n s i s t o f a complex sequenceoflimestone,shale,sandstone,conglomerate and minor a n h y d r i t e and d o l o m i t e( f i g . Pennsylvanian comprises rocks deposited 9). Most of t h e i n a marine environment w i t h various shelf, basin and deltaic features and changes.Biohermal rapid facies reefs a r e common i n p a r t s of t h e s e c t i o n . The Pennsylvanian sequence, along with part of t h e lower Permian, 3000' 2 500' 2000' 1500' / / / I 000' 500' I O?' ?; F I G U R E 9S T R A T I G R A P H I CS E C T I O N S O F P E N N S Y L V A N I A NR O C K S Composite sections modified from Kottlowski, et aI (1956), and Pray (1961) . . 15 sediments f o r t h e g e n e r a t i o n contains the most probable and accumulation of hydrocarbons i n t h e a r e a o f t h i s r e p o r t . Pennsylvanian sediments appear presentovertheentirearea. t o havebeenoriginally Where t h e s e d i m e n t s a r e now a b s e n t erosiontookplaceduringtheLatePennsylvanian/Early I Permian u p l i f t of t h e P e d e r n a l b l o c k o r d u r i n g t h e L a r a m i d e u p l i f t s t h a t began i n t h e Late Cretaceous andformed t h e p r e s e n t mountain ranges. Although t h e P e n n s y l v a n i a n h a s b e e n d i v i d e d l o c a l l y i n t o formations, i t i s more common now t o use series names based on b i o s t r a t i g r a p h i cz o n a t i o n .I ns o u t h - c e n t r a l New Mexico t h e s e are Morrow (Lower Pennsylvanian) , DerryandDesmoines(Middle Pennsylvanian),andMissouriandVirgil(UpperPennsylvanian). Equivalent terms u s e d i n the PermianBasin Mexico a r e Morrow, Atoka o r Bend,Strawn, of s o u t h e a s t e r n New Canyon andCisco. I n theCaballoMountainsKelleyandSilver (1952) r e f e r r e d t o Pennsylvanian s t r a t a as t h e Magdalena Group and named t h r e e formations: Red House, c o m p r i s i n gt h el o w e rt h i r d MagdalenaGroup;Nakaye, third. TheRed t h em z a d l et h i r d ;a n d House c o n s i s t sm o s t l y of the B a r B, theupper of thin-beddedlimestone a n ds h a l ec o n t a i n i n gl i m e s t o n en o d u l e s .T h e r e is a t h i n sandstone a t the b a s e and a c o n g l o m e r a t i c s a n d s t o n e n e a r t h e middle of t h e unit. The Nakaye i s madeup t h i c k t o massive b e d s o f l i m e s t o n e chert. The B a r B i s s i m i l a r t o t h e p e r c e n t a g eo fs h a l e . a l m o s te n t i r e l y of commonly containing abundant Red House but has a h i g h e r The uppermost p a r t of t h i s u n i t i n c l u d e s reddish-brown s i l t s t o n e ,l i m e s t o n ec o n g l o m e r a t e ,a n dc a l c a r e o u s sandstone i n a t r a n s i t i o n zone w i t h t h e o v e r l y i n g r e d b e d s o f 16 f Age d e t e r m i n a t i o n s were n o t made f o r t h e t h e Lower Permian. f o r m a t i o nbs ubt a s e d on Derry Hills a t t h e s o u t h e r n Mud SpringsMountains, endof theCaballoMountains,the and t h e SanAndresMountains;where f u s u l i n i ds t u d i e sh a v eb e e nc o n d u c t e d c o r r e l a t i o n sc a n Derryinterval; i n the comparisons with sections be made. Nakayewould (Thompson, 1 9 4 2 ) , t e n t a t i v e The Red House would r e p r e s e n t t h e represent the Desmoines; andBar series. E would i n c l u d e b o t h t h e M i s s o u r i a n d V i r g i l Rocks of Morrowan a g e h a v e n o t b e e n r e c o g n i z e d i n t h i s a r e a ( K o t t l o w s k i , I 1960). In the San Andres Mountains t h e D e r r y c o n s i s t s l i m e s t o n e ,s h a l e ,a n d a basalconglomerate d e r i v e d from t h eM i s s i s s i p p i a n . are mostly cherty limestone of sandstone, of c h e r t p e b b l e s Rocks a s s i g n e dt o the Desmoines and t h e M i s s o u r i i n t e r b e d d e d s t o n e and s h a l e .S e d i m e n t a r yr o c k so fV i r g i l i a na g e were named e t a l . , . 1 9 5 6 ) .T h i su n i t thePantherSeepFormation(Kottlowski c o n s i s t sm o s t l yo fs h a l e ,s a n d s t o n e ,a n dl i m e s t o n e . 'I n southern part of lime- the t h e range two beds of gypsum a r e p r e s e n t i n the upper p a r t o f t h e f o r m a t i o n . B i o h e r m a l r e e f s o c c u r i n t h e PantherSeep . i n the Hembrillo Canyon area (T. 1 6 S . , R. IntheSacramentoMountainsPray ( 1 9 6 1 ) s u b d i v i d e dt h e P e n n s y l v a n i a ni n t ot h r e ef o r m a t i o n s . are Gobbler, B e e m a n , andHolder. r a n g ei na g ef r o m From t h eb a s e two f a c i e s , o n e the other .. . up t h e s e S t r a t a a s s i g n e dt ot h eG o b b l e r Morrowan ( ? ) t om i d d l eM i s s o u r i a n . part of this interval consists of coarse quartz sandstone darklimestone 3 E.). with b l a c kc h e r tm a s s e s . The lower and The upper p a r t i n c l u d e s of l i m e s t o n e named the Bugg S c u f f l e Member and an unnamed d e t r i t a l facies of s h a l e and q u a r t z sand- stone with only minor limestone. The two facies are contemporaneous and the change from one to the other is abrupt. Pray notes that in a lateral feet of limestone changesto a section material direction. almost nearly1,000 entirely of northto northeastern change to terrigenous detritus. The clastic of 3 to 4 miles distance suggests a deltaic environmentin this The eastern component further suggests that pre-Pennsylvanian sediments were eroded farther to the south in the northern Sacramento Mountains. Kottlowski (1960) also indicates The this source Beeman direction Formation is for clastic rather sediments. uniform consisting mostly of thin-bedded limestone and calcareous shale. Sandstone beds increase in thickness and number afrom basinal facies on the west to a shelf facies in the east. Sandstones in the Beeman contain Gobbler; more this feldspar fact clasts than suggests a nearer they source do in and the underlying increasing tectonic instability. Sediments of the Holder Formation are of shallow-shelf marine origin with some nonmarine rocks in northeasternmost exposures. The interval is absent in eastern outcrop areas of erosion associated the:Pennsylvanian, with the where major it period was of removed uplift of by the Pedernal block. In additionto bedded limestone,the Holder includes deposits of red shale, nodular limestone, limestone conglomerate, chert and quartzite pebble conglomerate, sandstone, and feldspathic sandstone. Clastic material increases upward in the section. Bioherms at approximately the same latitude as in the San Andres Mountains are present in the lower part of the c 18 Holder. Gypsum beds arenot present in the outcrops of the Sacramento Mountains. However, two beds of gypsum in the upper part of the Pennsylvanian well (T.26S., were penetrated in the Seaboard Trigg R.11E.). The isopach mapof.the Pennsylvanian (fig. 10) indicates the approximate uplift eroded anda possible Numerous front, buried and edge location along for faults are probably the of the thickness the one westofflank the Pedernal of the present bordering east of the Pennsylvanian faults. Sacramento would vary much more than indicatedin.this area. The maximum outcrop thickness of Pennsylvanian Sacramento This Mountains thick strated This strata is about 3,000 feet by sequence the southern extends section Pennsylvanian basin. and the part of the across penetrated depositional in the in basin northern San Andres Tularosa the Basin Texaco has been Mountains. and called as demon- Plymouth the Orogran The Pennsylvanian section thins to the west across the Jornada del Muerto to slightly over 1,000 feet in 5 0 0 .and.~60OYfeet in the Mountains and between Corralitos well (T.22S., R.2W.). the Cities Caballo Service Slightly less than1,000 feet 7 are present in the Oscura Mountains. Over 2,500 feet measured in the foothills of the San Mateo 1960), and contouring suggests a northwestern Orogrande basin across this of Permian age (Kottlowski, continuation of area. Permian Rocks were Mountains include Rocks the Abo, Hueco, Bursum, Yeso we the 19 and San Andres Formations (fig. 11). In the northern part of the study area the Glorieta Sandstone 'and Bernal Formation are present. These are not treated separately in this report. Bursum-Hueco-Ab0 The facies lower part of the change Formatiop in Formations from the Permian mostly north is characterized a marked by continental to marine red beds limestones A b0 of of the the Hueco Formation in the south.' The red shale, siltstone, and arkosic conglomerate The and source where sandstone of the of the 'clastic erosiono f the preexisting Ab0 were mater'ial was 'uplifting Paleozoic deposited to Pedernal sediments from the by east Mountains Ordovician rivers. and was to northeast removing Pennsylvanian qge and was exposi.ng the Precambrian core. Transitional with the underlying reflect From the the changing limestone pennsylyanjan stone, with Pennsylvanian red the and conditions and dark section' gray of red amount the strata sedimentary br'ought about shale the 'of upper changes to one shale,' shale are by part this of 'of.interbedded sandstone and rocks 'and sandstone limestone .increasing that uplift. the limeconglomerate upward. This tranqitional zone 'is generally referred to as the Bursum popation in i.t the In this south-'central Laborcita Fopnation xapid.lateea1 Mexico in the 'northern toward the Pedernal uplift. In ',a distance of 1% miles the floodplain .from. environment an and changes' 9acramento to changes facies although (.1959) 'Otte named occur section area New open-marine includes the 'environment a terrestrial to fringing reefs. Mountains east Scn Andrer MIS. ..... 20 In the San Andres Mountains at Rhodes Canyon CT.13S.. R.3E.I the Bursum is overlain by thin-bedded limestone, sandstone, and shale of the Hueco Formation. In the northern part of the range this interval is not Ab0 the directly and present overlies the Bursum. The 'Hueco thickens to the south and directly overlies the Pennsylvanian at Ash Canyon (T.l8S., R.3E.). Sacramento extends Mountains the Pendejo R.11E. and .to.T.17$., north In the tongue of the Hueco separatesthe Ab0 Limestone red beds into lower and upper members. From the depositipnal limit in T.17S. th.e Pendejo and in eyentually the merges southeen Both thickenst o over with of the part thered bed and 'the 300 feet in T.l9S., R.11E. inai.n body the of Hueco Limestone area, marine facies are considered to be of Lower Penian (Wolfcampian) age based on fusulinids collected from the limestones. Upper beds of the Leonardian age Because of exploration for but the conclusive Ab0 may in part be of fossil isdata not available. 'of the .importance marine of1 and,gas,.two'isopach facies of the 'naps in Lower 12) is of the total Permian hgye beeri pcepaxed. The first (fig. ... Bursum-Huecointervalandthesedond(fig.131 facies, members thus ip including the of the.~Abo red-bed 'lower (.PQW+~OW Conglomerate) and upper the southe'rn part of the area. The marine facies of 0 0 feet the Bursum-Hueco thi'ckens southward from less 5than the Qscura Mountains to over (.T.25S, ,R.lE.) and to aver 2,500 test (.T,26S., Fi.llE.1, 3,500 feet in in feet Gin r i mthe well the Seaboard Trig9 i s absent inthe northeastern The 'interval of Alamogordo. part of the area, north.'from the 'vicinity This c 21 absence isthe result ofa combination of events involving nondeposition, facies changes, and erosion. In contrast with the marine facies the Ab0 red beds (fig. 13) thin south andare absent in much of the from extreme north southern to part of study area except in the vicinity of the Pedernal.uplift. A depositional basin over 1,500 feet of sediments receiving evident inthe northeastern part of the map. The basin are defined penetrated in the by oil tests Standard of Texaco Federal (.T.7$., R.9E.). asa source continued locally Yeso overlapped for on with Texas the limits thickest is of this sections Heard 6S., (T. R. 9E. ) and the To the east the Pedernal uplift clastic this material Aand b0 red by of the sediments Lower Permian high beds Yeso are Formation. Formation The Yeso Formation Similar tothe Abo, the is Yeso of thins to the Leonardian south from age. the 14) and is absent depositional basin in the Carrizozo area (fig. in the southwestern part of the study area. In the Carrizozo basin over4 , 0 0 0 feet o f sediments as shown bythe section Heard the on and Texaco Pedernal Precambrian The Yeso penetrated Federal uplift, accumulated in The wells. where ' it the unit during Yeso time of Texas Standard thins overlaps Ab0 the and to the rests east onto directly rocks. consists o f a complex suite of sedimentary rocks including red to orange sandstone and shale, limestone, dolomite and gypsum-anhydrite (fig. 11). In addition bedded salt is t 22 p r e s e n t i n the n o r t h e a s t b a s i n ; it w a s encountered i n t h e Standard ofTexasHeard,Texaco F e d e r a l , and HoustonJLewelling (T.l2S., R.9E.). Adequatelogs were n o t a v a i l a b l e t o d e t e r m i n e I n the Texaco well t h e thickness of s a l t i n the S t a n d a r d test. a t o t a l of 418 f e e t of s a l t was p e n e t r a t e d i n c l u d i n g two beds near t h e base of t h e Yeso t h a t are from 40 t o 5 0 f e e t t h i c k . In t h e Houston well there were 1 7 3 f e e t of s a l t w i t h t h e lowermost I bed bei.ng 1 2 6 f e e t of a l m o s t - c o n t i n u o u s s a l t . ' The p r e s e n t e x t e n t of sqlt i n the Yeso i n . t h i s area' i s n o t known. d e p o s i t e d it mqy.have been continuous the southernProduction.Clouacroft S t a n o l i n d Thorn (T,21$,, increases to the decreases, R.4E.1.. As originally a t least as f a r s o u t h a s (:T.l7S., and t h e R.1ZE.) T h e p e r c e n t of c a r b o n a t er o c k s south and t h e amount of gypsum-anhydrite Although.absent $an AndresMountains i nt h ee x p o s u r e si nt h es o u t h e r n anhydrite ' i s p r e s e n t i n the lower part of the Yeso a t l e a s t as f a r s o u t h 3 s t h e SeaboardTrigg t h e Texas l i n e i n T.26S:, w e l l near R.11E. San Andres Limestone The isopach map of the San Andres Formation (.fig. 1 5 ) includes sandstone 'intervals of i n t h e lower p a r t , andxedbedsof u p p e rp a r t . t h e G l o r i e t a and Hondo Formations the Bernal Formation in the With'the 'exception of t h e n o r t h e r n p a r t o f t h e s t u d y area th,ese beds make Up only a small p a r t of t h e t o t a l t h i c k n e s s of t h i s i n t e r v a l . T h e bdlk'of t h es e q u e n c ec o n s i s t so fd o l o m i t e and dolom$,ticlirqestone'typi.ca1 San A n d r e s c r o p s o u t e k t e n s i v e l y SacramentoMountains, of t h e $anAndres (.fig. 11). The on t h e e a s t e r n s l o p e of t h e The 3 . e p o s i t i o n a l limit i n d i c a t e d on t h e 23 map south and southwest The SanAndres' mate. the of SanAndresMountains also i.s abs'entover e a s t e r n p a r t of t h e T u l a r o s a B a s i n T h i s i s the r e s u l t Mountains. i s approxi- a largeareain the and i n t h e western Sacramento of e r o s i o n a s s o c i a t e a w i t h t h e u p l i f t o f the. SacranentoMountains..Locally be preserved i.n downfaulted blocks some San ?mares may i.n t h e eastern p a r t of t h e Tularosa Basin. Because . o f . t h e ' l a r g e ' o u t c r o p ' ares and few o i l t e s t s t h a t p e n e t r a t e .a complete 'secti,on o r t h e San A n d r e s , t h e t h i c k n e s s canonly Wells i n t h e Jornada d e l Muerto c l e a r l y be generalLzed, show t h e southward t h i n n i n g . i n t h e San AndresMountains nearthesouth T h e onlycompletesectionmeasured wa.s a t Love Ranch (.T.ZOS., end o f t h e r a n g e , ' The r e p o r t e d t h i c k n e s s a t l o c a l i t y i s 384 f e e t , a l t h o u g h s o n e o r a c t u a l l y be p a r t Qf R.4E.) this a l l of t h i s s e c t i o n may t h e Yeso Foritlation, The t h i c k e s t s e c t i o n of San Endres known i,n Levelling test th.e .study area i s 935 f e e t i n t h e Houston 1 .. CT J Z S , R. 9E. 1 Based on' l i w i t e d p a l e o n t o l u g i . c a P s t u d i e s t h e San m d r e s is considered t o b e . o f Lover' tQMLddle '(Leonardjian t o Guadalupian) Permian age, Me'sozdic Rocks No atterript has been made t o i s o p a c h t h e eroded remnants o f Mesozoic rocks,Outcrops area's are shown Cf+.g. 1.6). along y i t h thicknesses from'measured secti.ons and o i l and gas tests. mere not repioved by erosion', Trjassic sediments are p r e s e n t a c r o s s th.e n o r t h e r n p a r t of the area. T h e 'approximatesouthern 24 extent of the Triassic is indicated in fig. 16. Beyond this southern by extent the Triassic is overlapped of Upper sediments Cretaceous age. Rocks of Triassic age are generally referred to Exposures near 17). the Dockuin Group in this area (fig. Carrizozo o f the equivalents include basal Santa Rosa Sandstone and overlying Chinle Shale. The Santa Rosa consists of red sandstone with lenses of red shale and siltstone and some quartz and chert pebble conglomerate. (Smith and Budding, 1959). The Chinle is mostly red and purple mudstone and sandstone. The Dockum thins from 600 feet northof Carrizozo (T.5S., R.11E.) to 390 feet inthe Houston well (T.lZS., R.9E.). It is absent farther south in T.l5S., R.l3E., where Cretaceous rocks rest directly The onthe San outcrop the Upper and exposures.of Andres Formation distribution Cretaceous Dakota, Lower of (Pray and Cretaceous Mancos, Cretaceous and rocks Allen, 1956). rocks is Mesaverde in the limited to Formations southern part the map area. Not included is the McRae Formation exposed in the Caballo &&erto.or the Mountains Cub and Mountain the western Formation part (Bodine, Sierra Blanca area. Bothof these units may be of the Jornada 1956) in the in part of Cretaceous age. The maximum preserved thickness of Upper Cretaceous rocks is 3,145 feet at a measured sectionin the Caballo Mountains (T.14S., R.4W.). The indicated thickness of 3,588 feetin the Beard1 Jomada (T.14S., R.1W.) part of the McRae Formation. may include The southernmost exposureof Upper Cretaceous rocks is at the Love Ranch section (T.20S., of preservation R.3E.) in the San Andres Mountains. The extent del of 25 of Cretaceous rocks in the Tularosa Basin is not known. The Texaco . and Plymouth wells drilled in the eastern part of the basin south of Alamogordo began in Paleozoic sediments at the surface or beneath valley-fill deposits. To the north the Houston 1 Lewelling.(sec. 12, T.12S., R.9E.) penetrated 150 feet. Rocks of Lower Cretaceous age are exposed the East Potrillo Mountains (T.28S.. R-ZW.), at at Love Cerrode Ranch, in Cristo Rey CT.29S., R.4E.1, in the Hueco Mountains (T.26S., R.lOE.), and in the 96 feet of Cornudas black Mountains (T.26S., Rs. 13 shale and green to 1956). at Love Ranch (.Kottlowski, et al., Mountains of the Lower limestone in Cretaceous part silty to & tan 14E. ) . About sandstone are present In the East Potrillo consists sandy, of from limestone 840 and to 1,570 chert pebble conglomerate, claystone, siltstone, and sandstone (Bowers, 1960, and Hoffer, 1976). About2,100 feet are exposedat Cristo Rey. The sediments are mostly gray to black limestone and shale, but include siltstone, sandstone, and minor conglomerate (Lovejoy, 1976). About 250 feet of Lower Cretaceous shale, sandy limestone, sandstone, and minor conglomerate flank the intrusives of the Cornudas Mountains (Zapp, 1941; T i m , 1941; and Clabaugh, 1941). The only subsurface information for Lower Cretaceous strata is from the G r h well (,T.2~5S., R.lE.), where about1,300 feet were penetrated berieath Tertiary sediments. Also in this test a marine Jurassic section of 670 feet was drilled. isThis the only known Jurassic occurrence in the study the only area and feet 1500' 1000' 500' 100' io' 0' FIGURE 17 STRATIGRAPHIC S E C T I O N S OF M E S O Z O I C R O C K S Composite sections modified from Kottlowski,et (11 (19561, Smith and Budding (1959), and Eodine (1956) . c 26 marine Jurassicin New Mexico. It is doubtful that this sequence of rocks is present very far north or Tertiary/Quaternary The general outcrop rocks is shownin fig. 18. eastG r i of m well, the Pocks distribution of Tertiary/Quaternary The subdivisions have been simplified 1965) into four from the State Geologic Map (Dane and Bachman, units. These are Tertiary intrusives, Tertiary volcanics, Quaternary-Tertiary Quaternary In the volcanic end of Dosa basalt area rocks the Ana bolson deposits and Santa Fe Group, and flows. surrounding and the associated Caballo sediments Mountains, Mountains, and on military Sierra the reservation crop de west out las and Tertiary at Uvas, northern the southern Robledo sides and of the Sierra Blanca intrusive. The only outcrops of these rocks within the military cornerof the northwestern and Organ range are at Cerro and in the the Organ Colorado southern in San rocks exposed sequenceof rhyolite in tuffs overlain Mountains by andesite consist of a flows, 1935 and rhyolite ash-flow tuffs, and rhyolite flows (Dunham, Seager, 1973). The section is over4,100 feet thick.. To the (.T.26S., R.1E.) southwest the Texaco Weaver well volcanics after penetrating 4,170 feet of flows bottomed'in and tuffs of rhyolitic to andesitic composition (Kottlowski, Foster, and Wengerd, 1969). In the Grim well to the north the total the Andres Mountains. Volcanic lower reservati.on 27 thickness of volcanics is3,940 feet. In the southern part of the Robledo drilled Mountains 2,570 feet the of Sinclair rhyolite Do%a and Ana test R.1W. (T.22S., quartz-latite ) flows and tuffs in fault contact with underlying Paleozoic rocks. The large volcanic of massof the approximately Sierra 3,500 de feet las of Uvas includes a lower tuffaceous sequence mudstone, sandstone, breccia, and conglomerate of andesite-latite detritus (Clemons, 1976, 1977). This interval,. known as the Palm Park Formation, also is exposed estimated tobe The small in at the least outcrop in consists of a maximum Caballo 1,000 the Mountains feet (Kelley southern of2,100 feet where part of of the and thickness Silver, the. conglomerate San and was 1952). Andres Mounta siltstone of nonvolcanic pre-Tertiary rocks. The only with clasts made up volcanic This material interval, correlative present ais thin known with the as the Palm lens Love Park of andesite Ranch and is tuff-breccia. Formation, included may be with the Tertiar volcanic sequencefor this reason. Overlying the Palm Park Formation in the Sierra de las 2,000 feet are about Uvas of tuff, basalt, basaltic andesite, and associated sediments. To the north at Cerro Colorado (T.5S., R.2E.) the consists of latite conglomerates and volcanic sequence pyroclastics overlain by andesitic flows (Weber, 1963). No volcanic rocks have been encountered although beneath the theyare probably alluvial present fill in in the the Sornada southern part del of Muerto the basin. Volcanic rocks are widely exposed in the northeast of part the map area. These rocks consist mostly of andesitic flows, 28 tuffs, and agglomerates (Bodine, 1956; Griswold, 1959). Tertiary intrusives in the map area include a wide variety of rock types. Within the military reservation are the diorites, granodiorites, and and 1964); the Organ Craddock, monzonites of the Jarilla Mountain Mountains batholith of (Schmidt monzonite and quartz monzonite (Dunham, 1935); the rhyolite sills of Salinas Peak (Bachman and Harbour, 1970); and the syenites of the Hueco Mountains (Richardson, 1909).In the surrounding-area the Cornudas Mountains are made up of augite syenite, nepheline . syenite, and trachyte and phonolite porphyries. The intrusive rocks of the syenite, Sierra and Intrusive Blanca possibly dikes complex some and consist of monzonite, diorite, granite. sills have been encountered in numerous wells drilled for oil and gas in this area. For the most part these are fairly thin, normally less 100 thanfeet thick. The Phillips Turquoise well CT.20S., R.9E.) located north the of Jarilla before Mountains being Alluvium drilled almost abandoned in this underlying 5,300 offeet a diorite intrusive material, the Jornada del Muerto and Tularosa Basin has not been differentiated for this report. It includes Quaternary bolson deposits and the underlying Tertiary FeSanta Group. Very little 'information is available on the thickness of these sediments. A test drilled for White Sands Missile.. Range in the Tularosa Basin (T.22S., R.5E.) penetrated 6,005 feet of fill without test (.T.25S., R.7E.l fill. The drilling the 'entire section. The Ernest did drill into older rocks after 2,185 feetof Houston ..1LeWelling'(T.l2S-. iR.9E.) encountered.-215 offeet 29 alluvium above Cretaceous sediments. The €ill is generally thin in the Jornada del Muerto with 60only to 160 feet present in most wells. The Beard1 Jornada (T.14S., R.1W.I had a reported feet of sediments above the Cretaceous. However, this 2,250 may include strata Quaternary of basalt the McRae flows Formation. are of little importance in evaluating the oil and gas potential. They are normally thin and occur only in limited outcrops within the mi'litary reservation. These are the Carrizozo and Jornada flows in the northern partof the reservation.. STRUCTURE The major structural featuresof the area are shown in fig. 2. Within the military reservation these include the southern part of the Sacramento Mountains, Otero Mesa, northern Hueco Mountains, Tularosa Basin, Jarilla Mountains, Oscura, San Andres, Organ and northern Franklin Mountains, and the eastern part~ofthe Jornada del Muerto. Structure within the Tularosa Basin is poorly known. From a regional standpoint it is a large graben flanked Mountains and to on the the east west by by the east-dipping.Sacramento the west-dipping San Andres Moun- tains. The structural reliefalong.themargins of the basin can only be inferred from sparse well control. From exposed Precambrian west a few in tbe Organ Mountains to the well drilled on sideof the Tularosa Basin (T.22S., R.5E.)--a distance . of miles--there may be as asmuch 14,000 feet of structural the r 30 relief. Along the Sacramento escarpment somewhat better control is available between outcrops of Precambrian rocks (T.l9S., R.1OE.I and the Texaco Federal F (T.18S., on the frontal of 9,000 feet. fault of Here the displacement Ii.lOE.1. the Sacramento Mountains is on the order The Sqrilla block wi.thin the Tularosa Basin is of the block much more complex than indicated, The southern part appears to be much higher than the northern part based on projections from outcrops of Pqleozoic rocks. .The Texaco and Plymouth north wells but indicate is still that this probably block is structurally downclropped higher than to the the basin to the west. The Jarilla block appears to continue at least as far north as T.l5S., R.8E., where strata of the Yeso Formation are exposed. The west-bounding faultof the Sacramento uplift is continuedto.the north based on exposures in the Three Rivers area. The major structural features of the area are related to Laramide orogeny that began in .Late Cretaceous time. Displacement is still taking place as evidenced from fault scarps cutting recent fans. In the eastern Sacramento Mountains and continuing south.into Texas, the 'uplift of the Pedernal block began in Late Pennsylvanian. This structural high was later buried by sedimentation during Permian time. The block-faulting that gave trend to rise to the Pedernal that the of Central Basin uplift i s similar in Platform in age and southeastern of the area Mexico and west Texas. Thus the southeastern part as suggested graben blocks from the available to those similar that of horst and control a series is flank the western of side New the Central Basin Platform. OIL AND GAS EVALUATION gas As a result of the exploration there long have period of restrictions been no on significant oil tests and drilled within the military reservation (fig. 19 and table 1). Zf the &%?ea had been open, particularly and the embargo This during current and the conclusion and is wells.would active activity increases southwestern for explorabory in the evident began west-central following price of crude from the New been..drilled programs of the 1950's drilling that have oil and activity Mexico accumulationof hydrocarbons i s much the lower natural in where than Arab gas. parts the in oil of potential the Tularosa Basin. This conclusion alsois supported by exploration in the Jornada del Muerto where five wells were drilled between 1970 and 1975. The lackof exploration Tularosa Basin, structures along because except with of the around the difficulty alluvial cover, margins of the of makes locating an favorable evaluation of the hydrocarbon potential exceedingly difficult. The approach used is to evaluate of testing the inthe overall primarily by first area interest leasing the geologic surrounding in the the second the results reservation, and. third oil by companies area as evidenced be evaluated activities. Geologic From a geologic potential, standpoint Evaluation the area can based TABLE WELL Lanaeth 1 Federal Landreth 1 Panhandle A Imkhart 1 Federal Lockhart 2 Lockhart lkxklmrt 3 Lockhaxt N. M. .&vel. 1 Perrin S u n 1 Bingkim Standmd Texas 1 Heard Duqger 1 H e l e n Dugger 1 Gallagher mgger 1 Federal Vaughan 1 Crenshaw Sipple 1Kelt Arnold 1Apache Arnold 2 Apache Tewm 1 Federal w. Ranchers 1M a r t i n C a p o 1 spencer Cone 1 Pearson Rafferty 1 Sun 1 Victoria Sun 2 Victoria Houston 1 kwllinq Houston 1 State 2748 Gulf 1 Sierra Shell 1 Leeman Beard 3 Jornada Tularosa Basin 1 1 Mim Brmn 1 S c o t t Exxon 1 Beard Sumnit AND GAS TESTS COMPLETION LOCATION S. Gartland 1 B r i s t e r X-- O I L 554N 766W 1980N 1980E 1980N 1980W 660N 660W 2310N 330W 660s 1980E 660s 660W 1980N 1980W 330s 2310E 3305 330W 36256 505W 335N 330E 1980N 2310W 330N 330E NE 198ON 1980E 1650N 3373 330s 330E 2156s 1660W Nw? 660s 1980W 1980N 660E 660N 660W 20185 990E 1980N 660E 201051988E 1980N 660E 827s Z197W ? 1980s 66OW 1980s 660E 19805 1980E ELEV. T. R. 23-4s-6E 28-4s-6E 28-45-63 33-4s-6E 33-45-63 30-5s-lE 23-55-53 33-65-93 23-6s-1OE 26-6s-10E 30-6s-10E 21-6s-13E 29-6s-13E 13-6s-1W 13-6s-1W 29-7s-9E 19-8s-14E 36-8s-14E 12-9s-14E 9-10S-9E 25-10s-1W 27-10s-1W 12-12s-9E 25-12s-9E 35-12s-1W 8-12S-4W 17-13s-lE 22-13s-1E 34-13s-8E 2-135-4W 28-13s-4W 5-14s-lE DATE 2/1/73 8/10/73 11/18/53 12/31/54 10/10/55 3/19/28 10/17/55 4/18/51 2/29/75 .7/11/69 3/9/6 3 8/5/5 9 5/6/49 12/9/27 5/9/29 6/6/69 8/5/59 8/8/59 8/5/59 1924 1/25/52 5/5/52 8/2/76 9/1/74 8/10/70 9/20/55 3/13/65 3/15/75 4/16/26 3/1/54 9/15/47 3/4/74 ? 5,774 5 ,744 5,689 5,709 ? 5,423 5,882 5,579 ? 5,500 ? 6,550 ? 4,505 5,412DF 6,960 6 ,275 ? ? 4,809 4,786 4,706 4, 799 5 ,112 4,855 5,26lDF 4,568 ? 4,570 4,300 5 ,1 6 3 (ft) TOTAL DEPTH (ft) 3,445 3,240 2,990 3,037 2,665 3,275? 3,141 8,050 1,250 2,059 1,500 400 1,027 2,445 1,973 7,616 1,342 2,181 1,005 864 6,053 6,352 9,360 715 7,860 8,585 7,346 2,320 3,965 6 ,195 520 8,850 DBEPEST TESTED Precanbrian Precmbrian Precambrian --, Precambrian Precanbrian Valley f i l l Precambrian Erecambrian Triassic Permian? Yeso Dakota? Chinle santa Fe santa Fe Precmbrian? Yeso Precambrian Glorieta Cretaceous? Precambrian Pre&rian '7 Bliss Permian i%ntoya Precambrian Wntoya Glorieta Hueco-Ab0 Pennsylvanian Pennsylvanian Precambrian WELL COMPLETION LOCATION S. H c d p s 1 Houston Houston 1Federal Houston 1 S t a t e 3724 Beard 1 Jomada Wofford 1state m r s 1M c c d i l Smith 1 Walker Sunray 1 Federal Carr 1 Gentry kstern 2 GualTf? B r U t e n l G U X E Southern Frcd., 1 clouacrof t Temm 1 Federal E Temm 1 Federal G Texaco 1 Federal F P o r t e r 1 Rinmn Plyrmuth 1 Federal P h i l l i p s 1Turquoise Sun 1 Pearson Zapata 1 Federal Stmolind 1Thorn Parker 1 Simnsns Parker IX S h n s Otero 1 McGregor Turner 1 Everett Capbell 1 Hurley Sinclair 1 Dona Ana C i t i e s Service 1 Corralites C l a r y 1 state Parker 1 State V i k i n g 1 cox Kinney 1 S t a t e Picacho 1 Anrstrong Boles 1Federal 470N1980W 6605 660E 2198s U60W 19805 660E 990s 1650E ELEV. T. R.DEPTH 23-145-103 24-145-103 36-145-103 17-14s-1W 7-145-2W 19-14S-2W 21-15s-llE 23-15s-2W 32-15s-3W 21-16S-2E 5,017DF 5 ,312 5,053 4,792 4,700 5-17S-12E lOf18S-8E 33-18s-8E 30-18s-10E 25-18S-m 15-20s-9E 18-20s-9E 35-20s-10E 14-20s-14E 15-21s-14E 35-22s-5E 35-225-53, 5-22s-1OE SENW 660s 660E 34-225-133 6605 660W 30-225-143 660N 660W 27-225-1W 6/29/53 2/28/70 9/4/70 11/3/70 6/18/71 11/18/54 2/1/6 1 12/24/54 3/28/58 9/14/53 1939 3/44 2/22/43 8/6/38 7/4/6 0 4/7/62 9,370 3,999 4,186 4,042 1980N 1980W 6-225-2W 106N 41W 36-235-23 1980s 1980E 15-235-53 llOON 200W 26-235-53 14-235-103 sw 660N 1980E 15-23s-1W 7-245-13 660s 660E 7/25/71 11/1/49 10/44 1932? 1/26 5/15/41 4/12/63 NE 22905 660s 660N 1980s 1987s 500E 660E 1980E 1980W 660E 21-16s-2E 2310N 1980E 6605 660W 1552N 19343 1980s 1980E 3305 2310W 660N 660W 66W 66lE 800s 800E 660s 660W 1980N 660E 3305 99OE 220s llOOE TOTAL (ft) 10/16/70 7/8/72 8/5/74 4/16/73 1/7/49 1927 3/7/62 4/18/59 6/2 3/5 3 8/11/53 6/7/50 ' (ft) DATE ? ? 4,689DF ? ? ? ? 4,044 4,059DF 4,408 6,906 6,310est. ? ? 4,250 4,745 4,605 4 ,684 4,776 4,240 4,768 4 I 480 4 / 943DF 3,040 3,690 4,579 9,800 533 2,910 555 9,765 5,418 3,507 2,202 4,701 7,785 7,660 8,288 569 7,585 5,437 4,468 5,043 4,646 2,785 3,104 1,730 3,930 2,433 6,510 5,129 2,585 4,260 3,224 2,168 3,196 5,180 DEEPEST TESTED Pennsylvanian Precanbrian Pennsylvanian &saver& Permian? 7 Ab0 Bursum E l Paso Pennsylvanian? Bursm? Yeso Erecanbrian El Paso ? ? Valley fill E l Paso Tertiary Intrusive Mmtoya? Montoya Pennsylvanian Valley f i l l Valley f i l l Hueco Bliss Wntoya? Bliss-Tertiary 7 Bliss Pennsylvanian Valley f i l l ? Valley f i l l ? Mississippian? Mississippian? Valley f i l l ? , .' WELL 5. Can?&el 1 l Federal Ti.Unermans Coral 1 Spanel Grim 1Wbil E r n e s t 1Fee Bechtel 1Maris Page 1&cis Union 1 M c M i l l a n Texaco 1 Weaver Seaboard 1 Wigs Pure 1Federal .. LOCATION T. R. 18805 19993 21-245-123 22705 330W 22-245-12E 660N 660E 9-245-14E 13EN 1315W 32-255-33;. 3305 330E 20-25s-7E 19805 660W 23-255-8E 3305 2310W 23-255-8E 660N 66UN 9-255-133 6605 660W 35-265-33 1980N 1980W 18-265-113 1060N 22973 24-285-2W . ...':COMPLETION DATE ELEV. '.:I, " 1/8/59 7/20/37 4,9UDF 5,014 8/2/61 ' '. , 10/12/73 1/17/42 3,941 5/24/50 10/8/49 9/4/46 1/6/66 5/5/55 5,600 7,346 2/8/62 4,220 4,099 5 ,200 4,164 5,302 4,404 . (ft) TOTAL DEPTH (ft) . 1,855 3,763 1,873 21,759 986 731 ' 5,215 6,620 DEEPEST TESTED HUeCO? Bliss Tertiary Montoya aenitf Pennsylvanian HUeCO? V a l l e y fiL7 E l Paso? Volcanics Pennsylvanian 'Intrusive WELL . LOCATION S. canpbell.1Federal Turner/EvanS Coral 1 Spanel Grim 1 Mobil E r n e s t 1Fee Bechtel 1Maris Page 1 Maris Union 1McMillan Texaco 1Weaver Seaboard 1Trigg Fure 1 Federal 18805 19993 22705 330W 660N 660E 1 3 l 5 N 13l5W 3305 330E 1980s 660W 330s 2310W 660N 66ticJ 660s 660W 1980N 1980W 1060N 2297E T. R. . . :COMPLETION DATE ELEV. 21-245-123 '. 1/8/59 22-245-12E 7/20/37 9-24s-14E 8/2/61 32-255-13 , 10/12/73 20-25s-7E 1/17/42 23-255-83 ". 5/24/50 23-25s-8E ' : ' " 10/8/49 9-25s-13E ': 9/4/46 35-26s-LE ::: 1/6/66 18-26S-llE' . 5/5/55 24-28s-2W ' 2/8/62. 4,91lDF 5 ,014 4,220 4,099 ~ . (ft) TOTAL DEPTH (ft) 1.855 , ~. 3,763 1,873 21,759 3,941 986 731 5 ,215 6,620 5 ,600 7,346 ~~ ~ ' 5,200 4,164 5,302 4,404 . . DEEPEST TESTED HupCO? .. ~ Bliss Tertiary syenitl Montoya Pennsylvanian HUeCO? Valley f i l l -., E l Paso? Volcanics Perinsylvanian 'Intrusive 7 . . .. i on the i presence of possible source 32 rocks, the numbex and distribution of potential res'ervoir rocks, and the likelihood . of occurrence of favorable traps although.it may not be possible to identify specific traps. Possible 'source rocks for hydrocarbons include the dark-gray to black shales present in the Devonian, Mississippian, Pennsylvanian, and Cretaceous sediments and locally in parts of the Permian sequence. The bituminous content of the ofthe Yeso carbonates.of Fornation carbonateso f the- The hqs the San~pndresPormation,andpart been lower observed Paleozoic over are 'in much .of general New MeXi not considered to be important source .rocks .'for' hydrocarbons. The bedsof the El Pqso Group algal-rich The low not exclude are of Ordovician potential source them from the .possible and potentjal Silurian for exceptions. rocks containing does hydrocarbons As pointed out by where suitable reservoir-rocks are present. Jones and Smith(19651, oil on the higher part of the Central Basin Platform in the Ellenburger (El Paso equivalent) is Simpson oil (Ordovician-shale source) diluted primarily with oil from the Pennsylvanian and Wolfcampian. This commingling has resulted from the faulting of the Central Basin Platform and migration of oil into older strata. Similar conditions are Late possible Paleozoic It area in can be priorto the south-central and Laramide assumed that Laramide New Mexico where there is faulting. oil and development gas of were the present in Basin-and-Range structural province. Under the conditions that existed into Cretaceous time it I would . be 50th unique to a sequence have of source the. 33 and reservoir south-central of oil and Having increases rocks New of the Mexico thickness and not and to extent have present substantial in deposits gas. more the than one possibility or of two the exploration presence of targets greatly hydrocarbon reservoirs of commercial importance. In addition it increases the interest in an area and the value of that area from an exploration standpoint. From the isopach maps prepared for this report and the studies of outcrops presence and distribution of and numerous the literature, potential the reservoir rocks can be substantiated. These include carbonates of Ordovician, Silurian and Mississippian age; sandstones, conglomerates, and limestones of Pennsylvanian and Permian age; and sandstones of Cretaceous age. Potential pay zones in the pre-Pennsylvanian rocks are present in about two thirds of the area thinning to the north. These include the dolomites of the El Paso and Montoya Groups and Fusselman Formation, and the reefs of the Lake Valley Formation. Also present southern halfof the area are the thick in marine limestones and the carbonates of Of particular importance in the the Permian Hueco Formation. northern dolomitic the parto f the reservation limestones sandstonesof the of the Dakota are Yeso and the and porous San Mesaverde dolomites Andres and Formations; Formations; and the sandstones, conglomerates and limestones (including reefs) of the Bursum Formation. Over almost the entire area of the reservation a thick contains numerous Pennsylvanian potential sequence reservoir is rocks present including and limestones, 34 sandstones and some conglomerates. In the northeast area in particular in the there deltaic is an excellent facies in the lower potential and for middle reservoir rocks of the part Pennsylvanian. Reefs are present in the upper Virgilian sequence and are exposed in T.16S. in both the San Andres and Sacramento Mountains. It seems possible that these reefs continue arc across the approximately Tularosa following Basin, the perhaps a along northern 3000-foot contour on.the- isopach map (fig.10). Traps that are considered to be present in the study area include stratigraphic traps of depositional origin, unconformities, anticlines and fault traps. Stratigraphic traps would be developed where there are facies changes from dolomite to limestone, deltaic sandstones enclosed in shales, and reefs. Unconformity pre-Permian north traps rocks where may be present in the southeast Pennsylvanian along part strata of the the overlap eroded of edges area the and older in the Paleozoic rocks. The Presence of anticlines can be demonstrated only in the exposed fault blocks. In areas such as the Tularosa Basin identification Would require seismic exploration.. Anticlinal traps probablydo exist and are associated with the normal faulting within the basin. Faulting, particularly Laramide and later, can have both a positive and negative aspect as far as traps are concerned. Suitable traps can be formed where permeable beds are placed opposite unpermeable rocks, such as a sandstone againsta shale. Faulting could cause renewed migration of hydrocarbons from previously established traps to TABLE 2--RESULTS Well " Location Gulf 1 S i e r r a Gartland 1 Brister 35-125-1W 8-12s-4W Shell 1 Lwmn Cities Service 1 17-13s-lE Corralitos Grim 1Mobil OF TESTING OF PRE-PENNSYLVANIAN ROCKS 6-22s-2W 32-25s-lE (Western Area) Interval " 7779-7860' 8499-8527' 8518-8585' 7255-7283 3550-3680' 3680-3880' 4445-4600' ? Zone - (psi) R e c oPvreersys ' u r e Montoya FUSSelElll? SXW SO&GCM ISIP 2880 SIP 3755 Fusselrran? Montoya mesh water Fresh water 2668 FSIP Fusselmn JKM (0.8K-Cl) FSIP1267 (0.3-0.4K-Cl) F u S S e h El Paso Montoya JKM Fusselman msem DM DM FP250 Montoya Montoya XW XW (13K-W El Paso El Paso XW SIP 2750 SIP 2945 SIP 3055 SIP 1570 SG ( E a s t e r n Area) Southern Prd. 1 Cloudcrof t 5-17s-12E P l p u t h 1 Federal 15-20s-9E Sun 1 Pearson TexarO 1 Federal E 35-20s-1OE L0-18S-8E 3530-3558' 3596-3637' 6996-7045' 7202-7267' 7385-7585' 4452-4468' Devonian7033-7250' TexawlFederal F 30-18s-10E Montoya 7259-7371' 7534-7683' 7675-8000' Texaw 1 F e d e r a l G 33-185-83 7366-7410' 7055-7115' Montoya 7115-7228' 7505-7660' 30-225-143 2255 ' SINJ XW (27K-Cl) XW (35.3K-a) El Paso XW (39K-C1) FusselminMontoya Mississippian XW (25K-C1) DevonianFusselman FussehWntoya Montoya- EL Paso Fussem XW (11.5-14.51~1) XW (35K-Cl) XW (41K-C1) SSG 35 the permeability barriers formed by faulting. Faulting also can lead to flushing of hydrocarbons by meteoric waters and provide an avenue of escape for previously trapped hydrocarbons. Shale, anhydrite, andin particular salt beds can form suitable barriers against upward movement of hydrocarbons along faults. In an area such as the Tularosa trap conditions have Basin a variety probably Test Tests drilledin the distribution of characteristics flushing by been area potential meteoric favorable and introduced by unfavorable faulting. Evaluation give hydrocarbons, of of the some may Testing of pre-Pennsylvanian of the porosity-permeability reservoir waters indication rocks, have rocks taken is and areas where place. somewhat limited and in general the results are not encouraging (table 2, fig. 20). The presence additional of some hydrocarbons testingof these has intervals been would established, be warranted but only in certain areas. These rocks have probably been flushed by meteoric waters in most of the Jornada del.Muerto parts of the eastern margin the.Tularosa of Basin. In the Jornada with del chlorine Muerto content fresh has been to brackish recovered water from the and along relatively Montoya low and Fusselman intervals. The uniform lithology of these formations and the to the synclinal east and nature west of the suggests a high Jornada potential del for Muerto with flushing exposu of hydrocarbons. However, the presence of porosity and permeability indicated by the tests a is plus factor where more favorable TABLE 3"RFLiULTS OF TESTING OF PENNSYLVANIAN (Western Area) Well - Location Interval , Zone - CitiesService 1 Corralitos6-22s-2W Exxon 5-14s-1E 1 Beard 23-4s-6E Landreth 1 Federal 2975-3002' 7200-7430' 2499-2505' 2902-2918' Lower Penn. Stram Grim 1 Mobil Summit 1 Mims 32-25s-1E 2-135-4W ? 5708-5800' 5775-5800' (Eastern Hodges 1 Houston Houston 1 Federal Standard Tx 1 Heard 23-145-103 24-14S-lOE 33-6s-9E SouthernProd. 1 Cloudcroft5-17s-12E Houston 1 Lewelling 12-12s-9E TWaco 1 Federal F 30-18S-10E Texaco 1 Federal G 33-18s-8E ROCKS "Lower """- Penn. Recovery (Max) Pressure (psi) WCM 76MCFPD Gas & Cond. PSIP 962 PSIP 469 "-" "_ X W r O & G Show gas SGC water Show gas , 1 ""- Area) 2433-2444' 2465-2471' 6123-6162' 6616-6646' 7406-7463' 7745-7773' 7669-7773' 2464-2492' Canyon Ss. Upper Penn. 8000-8016' Strawn Atoka Canyon? Straivn Strawn 8572-8598' 5242-5523' 6762-6946' 5835-5854' "- 16MCFPD* Salt water(35K-C1) FSIP719 DM 0 0 & GCM 0.lMCFPD 43 SITP 1250 . . 12MCFPD Water (8.5K-Cl) Water (14.5K-Cl) . Water (21.7K-Cl). "3 TABLE 3--RESULTS TESTING OF PENNSYLVANIAN OF (Western Area) Well - Location Interval 1 Corralitos Cities Service Exxon 1 Beard Landreth 1 Federal 6-225-2W 5-14s-1E 23-4s-6E 2975-3002' Lower Penn. S tram 7200-7430' "2499-2505' 2902-2918' Lower Penn. Grimm 1 Mobil Summit 1 Mims 32-255-13 2-135-4W Hodges 1 Houston Houston 1 Federal Standard Tx 1 Heard 33-6s-9E Southern Prod.1 Cloudcroft Houston 1 Lewelling 5-17S-12E 12-12s-9E Texaco 1 Federal F 30-18s-1OE Texaco 1 Federal G 33-18S-8E 23-145-103 24-14s-10E zone - ? 5708-5800' 5775-5800' (Eastern ROCKS ""-_ "- Recovery (Max) Pressure (psi) WCM 76MCFPD Gas & Cond. PSIP 962 PSIP 469 "- ""- X W , O.& G 1 ""-_ Show gas SGC water Show gas Area) 2433-2444' Canyon Ss. 2465-2471' Upper Penn. 6123-6162' 6616-6646' 7406-7463' 7145-7773' 7669-7773' 2464-2492' 8000-8016' Strawn 8572-8598' Atoka 5242-5523' Canyon? 6762-6946' Strawn 5835-5854' Strawn 16MCFPD* Salt water DM "(35K-CX) FSIP 719 & GCM 430.lMCFPD 12MCFPD Water (8.5K-Cl) Water (14.5K-Cl) Water (21.7K-C1) ' 0 0 SITP 1250 1 c (' 36 structures might be present. In the Tularosa Basin salt water has been recovered in tests of the Mississippian, Fusselman, Montoya, and El Paso. In general the chlorine content of these waters is fairly high and is comparable to water produced with oil from these intervals in southeastern New Mexico. A rather low chlorine content was reported for water recovered from the Montoya in the Plymouth well (T.20S., R.9E.) and the Devonian and Fusselman The good in.the Texaco resultsof testing lateral and of vertical Federal G (sec. 3 3 , T.18S., Pennsylvanian R.8E.). strata distribution of hydrocarbons indicate (table 3, of the fig. 20). The only significant testin the western part area was the Exxon Beard well (T.14S., R.1E.I near the center of the Jornada del Muerto. Maximum recovery was 76 MCFPD of gas declining to 19MCFPD at~theend of the test. In the eastern part of the area several tests of Pennsylvanian strata have resulted in the recovery of natural gas. The largest volumes recovered were from the Houston1 Lewelling (sec.12, T.12S., R.9E.) on the eastern side of the Tularosa Basin. Maximum recovery was slightly over 430 MCFPD from the Strawn (Desmoinesia interval from 8,000-8,016 feet. Results of four-point tests were as follows: July 19746,July .Choke Recovery (MCFPD) 9, 1974 Recovery (MCFPD) 430.1 25/64" 138.4 304.2 20/64" 133.6 257.7 16/64" 139.7 178.6 11/64" 134.8 r The final test of this zone ata rate of 168.3 MCFPD flowed was 37 on20,July 1974, when on25/64" choke the well anda tubing An analysis ofthe gas showed82.33% pressure of 30 psi. methane, 15.88% carbon dioxiderand1.2% nitrogen. Both carbon dioxide and nitrogen were introduced into the well during treatment in completion attempts.In the same well several tests . were made 8,572-8,598 feet from in the Atoka (Derryan) interval. A final test of this zone yielded 12 MCFPD. A test of the Pennsylvanian yielded Houston well (sec.23, T.l4S., R.1OE.). at 16 MCFPD of gas( 9 8 % methane) gas in the Hodges -Recovery was estimated froma sandstone in the Canyon (Missourian). Very little analytical data was available for water recovered from Pennsylvanian rocks. In the Houston Federal well (T.14S., R.1OE.) near outcrops was 35,000 ppm. of Pennsylvanian rocks the chlorine content Chlorine content was low in tests of the Texaco Federal F (T.l8S., and Federal G (sec. 33, T.l8S., R.8E.) R.1OE.) indicating introduction of fresh water. Two of the tests reported Bug to to Scuffle the For be from the Strawn Limestone, a unit are exposedin interpreted the Sacramento be from Mountains east. the most part indications of hydrocarbons rocks are based on reported shows- (table '4, fig. 2 0 ) . limited to mud or testing logging in Permian Only hasbeen conducted on rocks of 1 this age. The most significant recovery was from the Houston Lewelling. The test wasof the Wolfcamp from 5,140-5,170 feet. Maximum recovery 1 8 MCFPD was and the final test 13 MCFPD. the TABLE 4"mSULTS OF TESTING OF PERMIAN ROCKS (Western &rea) Well - Location Interval Zone - Recovexy Beard 1 Sornada 17-14s-1W 6996-7491' 7010-7500' 1120-1125' 1823-2025' Yeso DM Lockhart 1 Federal Gulf 1 S i e r r a 28-4s-6E 35-12s-1W Pressure (psi) I Ab0 so San Andres Fresh water Yeso Hueco? San Andres? Hueco Fresh water ,-l ISIP 815 (Eastern -ea) standaxd TX 1 Heard Southern Tulqrosa Ba&n 1 Duggar 1FederqL Smi,th. 1 Walker Campbell 1 Hurley Seaboard 1 Trig9 Houston 1 Lewelling Texaco 1 Federal E Turner 1 Eyqns 33-6s-9E 34-13s-a~ 30-6s-1OE 2145s-UE 30-225--143 18-26s-llE 12-12$-93 10-18$-8E 22-245-12E 1230-1235' 1638' 476-.a191 355' 400' 2086-2104' 2410-2474' 5140-5170' 218-290' 353' 410' 1086' so so SG so nueco Hueco WOLfCamP Hueco? Yeso Yeso Hueco Fresh water Fresh water 18MCFPD Water (8K-Cl) SG t SIP 450 SIP 390 . - 7 TABLE 5--RESULTS OF TESTING OF MESOZOIC ROCKS (Western Area) W e 11 - Location Interval Zone - S h e l l 1Lee- 17-13s-1E 1270-1320' Dakota Mesaverde W f o r d 1S t a k Ek%ers 1Mccal 8-145-2W 19-14s-2w Sunray 1 Federal 23-155-2W Grim 1 Mobil 32-25s-lE 300 ' 458' 513-531' lll.5-1120 2312-2362' ? ' Recovery DM SG Mesaverde so Mesaverde Pksaverde &saver& Laer SO&G so VSGW SG Cretaceous ( E a s t e r n Area) Duggar 1 Helen 23-6s-10E 1200-1250' Duggar 1Gallagher 26-6s-1OE 1913' Pressure ( p s i ) Dakota? sso Triassic? SSO SIP 585 c i 38 or Water recovered from t h e P e r m i a n h a s b e e n r e p o r t e d a s f r e s h r e l a t i v e l y low i n c h l o r i d e s . The f r e s h w a t e r r e p o r t e d f r o m t h e Yeso i n t h e StandardofTexas Heard well (T.6S., above the s a l t s e c t i o n . The x e p o r t e df r e s h Hueco Formation i n t h e CampbellHurley theSeaboardTrigg regional dip (T.26S., R.11E.) R.9E.) i s from water from t h e w e l l (T.22S. ,' R.14E.. and ) i s expectable based on and p r o x i m i t y t o o u t c r o p s o f t h i s f o r m a t i o n . Tests ofMesozoic rocksarelimitedandoccurrencesof hydrocarbons are based on r e p o r t e d shows ( t a b l e 5, f i g . 2 0 ) . Thus €ar f a v o r a b l e results appear to b e r e s t r i c t e d MesaverdeFormation in the western part MuertoandpossiblytheDakotaSandstone t o the of t h e J o r n a d a d e l in the Sierra Blanca syncline. Lease Evaluation A s t u d y wasmade of State T r u s t Lands submitted for oil and g a s leases i n t h e area surrounding t h e m i l i t a r y r e s e r v a t i o n . The r e s u l t s of t h i s e v a l u a t i o n are summarized i n t a b l e s 6 and 7. Table 6 i n c l u d e s t h e p e r i o d 1974, and table 7 the period Duringbothperiodstheyearly y e a r s were 1 5 cents an from Sanuary 1969 through February from March 1974throughJune1975. rental f e e s f o r t h e f i r s t f i v e acre f o r leases i n Do%aAna, and Otero Counties and 1 0 c e n t s . . a n a c r e i n S i e r r a counti.es. leasebid The f i r s t y e a r ' s Lincoln, and Socorro ren'tal f e e s are included i n t h e and a f t e r f i v e y e a r s r e n t a l f e e s are doubled. Up t o March 1 9 7 4 t h e minimum a c c e p t a b l e b i d was t h e y e a r l y r e n t a l a times t h e a c r e s i n c l u d e d i n t h e lease. I n March 1 9 7 4 t h e fee c minimum lands . acceptable in this bid was 39 increased5 0to cents an acre for a11 area. understanding of lease practices ain nonproductive area An such <- as south-central New Mexico is needed in order to evaluat prices paid for - leases. ,Herewe will consider only State leases wherea minimum acceptable bid is established. State the lands are put up for leasing potential of the particular regardless of the tract oil and more often and than gas not are. sold at least for the minimum acceptable bid. Lease activities can be grouped into three broad categories: speculative, prospect, and exploratory leasing. Speculative leasing involves the purchase of leases resale of the develop the normally leases at the minimum acceptable bid and to a third party. There is no intent to property and in most acases geologic evaluation is not performed. Although the initial purchase may involve a "willing and informed" buyer the third party is most often limited to a "willing" buyer. In the second category are those involved in distribution the the to purchase and of sale leases exploration potentialof a particular through companies a of prospectus area though geologic the detailing and engineering studies. Leases are sold to a third party generally with a provision fora production override in case oil or gas is discovered. Exploratory leasing is done by companies.that include the drilling of exploratory or wildcat wells within their overall operations. Commonly on the basisof rather cursory geologic to studies conduct these additional companies will lease studies that, if large blocks favorable, in may order lead to c f" 40 the drilling of an exploratory well. Because an interest has been generated are negligible in the when area within compared exploratory effort, these established minimum acceptable to the the companies bid company overall lease costs cost of bid well above the insure that the lease will to and the is obtained. Lease plays of this nature usually result in active bidding and increased prices for adjacent tracts. This interest is sustained at least encounters a show indefinitely Although of even until a well is hydrocarbons if no numerous interest commercial studies drilled;. .If the-test have may continue production is realized. been made of the geologic, engineering, economic'and risk ftictors involved in establishing a value for areas remote from production, the fair market value is usually based on actual sales of leases. It needs to be noted not that be this limited should as For the January 697,700.66 gas acres leasing by it include is in third-party this 1969-February of State Trust the State Land report 1974 resale value and State lease sales. to period a total Lands put were up for Office in the of oil area and of this repor Of this 503,713.81 acres involving 500 tracts were sold. The remaining 193,986.85 available were acres withdrawn or for 28 percent of the lack of total lands receiving a bid or a minimum acceptable bid(MAB). The MAB for the leases sold amounted the to $68,618.31 and actual amount bid was $376,778.63 for an average of $0.75 per acre. In evaluating lease asales "bid factor" was established. This is simply the ratio of the MAB. amount bid and the With adjustmentsfor the total acreage r i at10 and 15 cents sold per acre MAB the 41 bid factor for this to the State of the leases period was 6.28. The total value sold assuming full 10-year rental payments is $1,338,289 for an average of $2.66 per acre. The averagebid.per acre and the bid factor were calculated for each township where leases were sold (fig. 21). Ona county basis (table 6) bid factors and average bid per acre were: Sierra - 15.50 and $1.55; Otero - 5.20 and $0.18; Socorro- 2.50 - and $0.25; Dona Ana - 2.27 and $0.34; and Lincoln 1.53 and $0.23. Summarizing on a township basis the tracts sold nearest to or adjacent to the military reservation the bid factor is 7.46 and the average price bid per acre $1.08. The adjacent tracts value in of Sierra $2.32 and per Socorro acre Counties based on a primary woulda 10-year have rentalfee of 10 cents per acre and an average bid92ofcents an acre. In the remaining average counties bid was where $1.13 rentals 15 arecents an acre the 10-year an value acre and the would be $3.23 per acre. Lands bordering the western part of the reservation had an average bid factor of 6.5 and an average bid per acre of 77 cents. East of the reservation the bid factor and average The bid per highest $23.44 by GulfOil acre were amount Corp. bid higher at 8.25 and $1.34. per acre during this period was for a tract located in T.12S., R.1W. del Muerto. This tract was (Sierra County) in the Jornada sold in January 1974. With rentals this tract would generate $24.84 an acre over a 10-year period and with involved an incometo the Stateof $31,795.20. 1280 acres East of the TABLE 6--SUMMARY OF LEASE DATA, JANUARY 1969 THROUGH I%BRUARY 1974 Year' 1974 , - Dona Ana otcro Sierra 1970 , , DOna Ana Lincoln Otcro Sierra Socorro B Bid/acrc E Value' 10 Year Rcntal L B i d Pcr Acro - $ $2.69 4.62 15,045 148,665 High Bid/ Acro $ 1.68 $3.72 2,021.00 194 1.25 5,213.95 24C 7,234.95 22C 1.50 - DOC 14,155.01 $ 2,123.25 $ 11,325.58 20,270.70 3,040.61 34,373.33 $1.70 11.30 1,920.00 192.00 500.00 2.6 26C 1,917.24 191.72 325.37 __ 17C 38,262.95 $ 5,547.58 $ 46,524.2s $1.22 17,545.58 17,593.76 2,040.00 37,179.34 I 2,631.84 $ 2,639.06 ' ~204.00 $ 5,474.90 $ $ 35,956.14 $ '5,393.42 61,787.41 9,268.11 27,126.70 2.93 44C 6,965.48 G96.55 104,709.03 $15,358.08. $ $ 5.33 1 . 7 $ 0.50 $ 41,051 $2.90 3.80 $ 3.33 76,938 3,188 1.66 3.75 0.31 3.010 1.57 0.18 1.20 3: 30 " " $ 42,556 40,154 $2.43 $ 2.37 $ 4.47 2.28 2.50 0.16 4.60 1.56 6,952.97 1% 63C 4,385.17 38,464.84 37C 1.29 $ 82,460 6.3 156,883 14,137 $253,480 $2.29. 2.54 2.03 2.6 $376,778.63 $189,151.74 $187,626.89 $0.75 $0.52 $1.35 ' 6.28 3.47 13.50 $2.42 2.30 3.65 2.39. . 183,007 8 955 $616,029 $1,338,289 $ 955,009 $ 383,280 6.11 1.17 $2.42 42,841 , " S 0.40 1.58 $2.55 . . .. $2.66 $2.62 $2.76 " S 2.50 8.21 2.57 " $ 1.86 1.71 7.03 3.63 0.26 $23.44 7.03 $23.44 $ 3,200.08--26% 40 " " 1.58 2.17 1.22 1.56 " " 10,1G0.62--32% 11,422.08 1.71 330 5,709.49 l8C 3,206.64 326.40 16C 9,242.53 25C 1.69 $ 5 3 lr216.46--1008 $ 5.43 5.85 " 3;183 " " " " " " $ 85,893 " " $ 2.60 $3.25 ' $68,618.31 $54,740.81 $13,877.51 $2.29 2.34 $2.33 $124,187 - Withdrawn--% 3.15 24.84 1.91 8.18 108,573.57 $16,286.04 $ 34,619.05 326 2.13' $262,834 18,632.55 2,794.88 4,618.35 2% 1.65 32,623.91 4,893.59 50,684.68 $1.55 10.36 119,192 96C 9.63 73i863.74 76,679.04 7i667.90 5,681.32 ' 568.13 1,001.7.1 .76 2 0 L 680 5.57 242,190.39 32,210.54 $164,787.03 503,713.81 364,938.71 138,775.10 $ " 24,863 ___ 50,192 $ 75,055 $ 2 1.52 23.44 0.51 High 10 Year vaiuc/acra -\ " Dona Ana otoro socorro 1971 Bid 10,791.75 $ lr610.76 $ 21,415.59 3,212.34 32,207.34 $ 4,831.10 $ Donn Ana otero Sierra Socorro 1972 - MAE 59C 3.93 5,592.74 $ 838.91 $ 3,300.00 32.21 3,217.18 103,625.00 $3.22 32,171.80 11,400.22 1,140.02 A C 3.16 3.600.00 , 49,164.76 $ 5,lgG.U$110,525.00$2.2522.48$182,845 Dona Ana Sierra Socorro Donn Ana Lincoln otcro ,1973 1969 Sold Averwe Acres COunty " 3.96 3.82 . 9.13 5.03 '1.76 $ " " ' 3,240.08-48 1,920.00--10% 7,557.65--30% " " 9,4.77.65--208 36,862.93--51% 72,51~.99--54a 1.2QO.OO--lG% 110,659.92--51% 23,508.44--18% 20,G99.14--53% 14,979.54--318 " " " " " ". 59,187.12--20% $24.84 $ 9.13 24.84 193,986.85--28% 192,706.85--35% 1,280.00"1% 7 '. .. ! ' TABLE 6--Su"ARY \ OF LEASE DATA: JANUARY 1969 THROUGH FEBRUARY1974 (continued) COUNTY DATA I Dona Ana socorro 153,691.37 117,736.32 21,038.78 Bid $61,907.09 $6,639.35 $120,605.30 $182,373.91 $5,252.98 $0.34 $0.23 $0.78 $1.55 $0.25 $171,208.74 $24,037.87 $204,186.30 $228,329.91 $13,658.98 $0.94 $0.82 $1.33 $1.94 $0.65 Hid $468,809.00 $67,704.00 $443,359.00 $348,997.00 $34,283.00 $2.58 $2.30 $2.96 $1.63 1,280.00--1a 0 10 Yr. Rental 6 10 Yr./acre Withdram--% High $7.03 . . Sierra 29,424.30 5 Yr./acre Bid . Otcro I _ 181,823.04 5 Yr. 'Rental & Bid 163 Lincoln Acres Sold, . . Average Bid/Acre 5.20 - $2.88 66,752.91--27% 20.699.14--41% 105,254.80--41$ Bid/Aere $1.71 Factor ' 1.53 Leases Sold 30 $3.33 $0.51$23.44 2.27 173 2.50 21 .. .. 15.50 113 " 0% . 42 reservation the highest per-acre bid was i n November 1 9 6 9 f o r a 734.68 acre t r a c t i n T.20S., (OteroCounty).This R.8E. value t o t r a c t was l e a s e d by Texaco f o r $7.03anacre.The t h e S t a t e over t h e 1 0 - y e a r r e n t a l p e r i o d o r $9.13 an acre. would be $6,707.63 tracts s o l dd u r i n g (The b a s i c d a t a f o r a l l are included i n t h e appendix t o t h i s r e p o r t this period as t a b l e 11). The summary of l e a s e d a t a f o r t h e p e r i o d March 1 9 7 4 throughJune1975 basic data in is given i n t a b l e 7 and f i g . 22,and the table 1 2 ( i n t h e a p p e n d i x ) . During t h i s p e r i o d a t o t a l of 1 2 6 t r a c t s i n v o l v i n g 129,480.43 acres were s o l d . to acres o r 10 p e r c e n t of t h e t o t a l s u b m i t t e d f o r 14,477.56 lease. Withdrawnlandamounted The minimum a c c e p t a b l e b i d actualbid was $64,740.22and acre of$1.45, $187,789.59 f o r a n a v e r a g e b i d p e r and a b i d factor of 2.90. State f o r The total value to the the10-yearrentalperiodamountsto the $456,847.88 f o r an average per-acre value of $3.53. Lease d i s t r i b u t i o n i s n o t as good as f o r t h e earlier period. N o t r a c t s were o f f e r e d i n Do?ia Ana 2 t r a c t si no n et o w n s h i p i n Sierra County.Both t h i s c o u n t y were w i t h i n t h e J o r n a d a d e l leased a t MAB. Northof Countyandonly $1.82 t o $4.87 were Muerto and the r e s e r v a t i o n ' i n S o c o r r o two t r a c t s s o l d a t an a v e r a g e of 7 1 c e n t s p e r the military reservation tracts i n acre. County E a s t of i n L i n c o l n County b i d s a v e r a g e d from an acre and b i d f a c t o r s from 3.64 This same b i d d i n g t r e n d c o n t i n u e s s o u t h t o 9.74. i n northern Otero . . iI TABLE 7--Su"ARY OF LEASE DATA: MARCH 1974 THROUGH JUNE 1975 Year - 1975 Acres Sold - CDunty Lincoln Otem Sierra S W a r Y 1974 Lincoln Otero socorro Totals Bid - MnB - 640.00 $ 320.00 4,970.82 2,485.41 3,290.00 1,918.40 900.00 959.20 7,529.22 3,764.61 $ Average Bid/Acre 0.50 $ Rental 1,369.60 $2.14 4.28 0.66 10 Year Value B & High Bid/ Bid Per Acre Acre 2,713.60 $4.24 $ 1.00 5,619.60 $0.75 1.49 16,069.30, $ 8,034-65 $ 43,509.99 $2.71 5.42 103,728.01 51,864.01 137,135.00 1.32 2.64 354,963.82 3.42 0.71 2,153.90 1,076.95 1,525.00 121,951.21 $60,975.61 $182,169.99 $1.49 2.99 $436,759.80 $3.58 $ $ 6.30 13.36 0.73 $ - 1.90 3,645.76 $ 20.088.08 2.14 4.75 0.50 4.75 $ 13,728.72 1.32 2.76 $2.67 $ 77,255.52 $4.81 $ ~~~ 1.42 4,540.46 2.11 High 10 Year valudacre ~ $13.36 129,480.43 $64,740.22 $187,789.59 $1.45 2.90 $456,847.88 $3.53 $13.36 Withdram--% 4.24 " " 6.85 " " 1.90 " " $6.85 " " 8.40 15.46 2.13 " " " " $15.46 14,477.56--87% 14,477.56--11% $15.46 14,477.56--10% COUNTYDATA Acres Sold . .. . ." -.- Lincoln Otero Sierra Socorro Bid - 16,709.30 $ 44,879.59 $2.69 5.37 108,698.83 140,425.00 1.29 ' 960.00 0.50 1,918.40 2,153.90 1,525.00 0.71 Average Bid/Acre 10-Year Value Bid factor Rental & 79,969.i~ 368,692.54 3.39 1.903,645.76 2.11 4,540.46 $ 2.58 1.00 1.42 0.73 Bid Per Acre Hiqh 54.79 Bid/Acre $ Leases Sold Withdrawn--% 6.30 13.36 17 " " 105 " " 0.50 2 " " 2 14,477.56--87% c' County where average bids east of the reservation range from 85 cents to$9.10 an acre and bid factors from 1.75 to 18.20. In the southeastern corner of Otero County bids were mostly at Tlracts in T.22S., R.14E. were sold at an average $2.65 of MAB. an acre. During the earlier evaluation period four tracts offered in this township were Tracts in T.26S.,R.11E. were up to February 1974 and withdrawn for MAB.of lack soldat the MAB during averaged $4.75 in the the an period later evaluation period. The average bid for all tracts east of the reservation along the the margin average The the 10-year State proceedings of are base Tularosa lease Basin value was $5.45 $3.35 per Evaluation of Condemned Tracts Trust involved given Lands in currently 'table 8 and are total proximity thickness of to the reported in shown on each occurrences pre-Tertiary of sedimentary acre and acre. condemnation of maps presented in this report. The evaluation of each includes per the tract hydrocarbons, section, type of potential reservoir rocks, local and regional geology, proximity to large Tertiary No consideration is given to the assumed that if the area were intrusive bodies, and lease sizeof the tract. It is open for leasing adjacent of Federal or fee land could be obtained. Where large blocks of State land are involved values. the the to value State would be enhanced. Each tract is rated as to whether a from geologic standpoint itis considered to be a poor, marginal, fair, or tracts C' TABLE TRACTS Location Tract NO. 202-1 202-2 8"CONDEMNED SWkNWk, Section 1 2 , T-19S, R-6E SWkNEk, NEkSWk, NWkSEk Section 5, T-'l9S, R-7E (less highway R/W) 200-3 200-4 200-5 200-6 200-7 NWkSEk Section 27, T-18S, R-4E E # S W ~Section 2 2 , T-18S, R-4E SWbSEk, Section 6, T-18S, R-5E N%SEk, Section 17, T-18s. R-4E S%SWk, Section 17, T-18S, R-4E 505-4 505-5 505-6 N%&, 607-1 All 608-10 SWkSWk, Section 23 WhNWk, NWkSWk, Section 26 E'INEb, Section 27, All i n T-6S,R-6E W%NEb, NWk, Section 16, T-6S, R-6E 402-1 402-6 R-7E 116.72 Otero DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna Sierra 160.00 200.00 Sierra 80.00 Sierra 640.00 440.00 440.00 640.00 socorro Socorro Socorro Socorro 160.00 40.00 40.00 120.00 Socorro Socorro Socorro socorro socorro socorro 80- 00 240.00 Lots 3.4, SEk, E%SWk, Section 7 S31, Section 8 A l l , Section 17 Lots 1,2,3,4, E%, E%W%, Section 18 Lots 1,2,3,4, E%, E%W%, Section 1 9 A l l , Section 20 A l l . , Section 29 A i L o t s 1,2,3,4, E%, E#w%, Section 30 ~ 1 Lots 1 1,2,3,4, E%, EW%, Section 31 A l l , Section 32 A l l above i n T-12S, R-9E Lots 1;2,3,4, s%N+z,W%SW~, section 5 LOts~1,2,3,4,5,6,7, S'INEk, SEkNWk, ESSWk, SEk, Section 6 A l l i n T-13S,R-9E SWkNEk, SEkNWb, NEbSWb NWkSEk, Section 8, T-13S, R-8E Total Otero 80.00 W%, W%SEk, SEkSEk, Section 9 E%, NEkSWk, S%SWk, Section 10 A l l Section 16, A l l i n T-7S,R-7E 31, T-6S, S E ~ S E ~Section , 22 40.00 . 80.00 Section 8 NE+, Section county 40.00 80.00 40.00 Section 1 4 , T-lOS, R-2E N%S'I, SWkSWb, Section 12, T-lOS, R-2E S%SEk, Section 6, T-lOS, R-3E 608-3 Acres 322.13 320.00 640.00 645.24 645.60 640.00 640.00 643.48 641.36 640- 00 Otero OterO otero OterO Otero otero Otero Otero Otero Otero 396.68 Otero 639.39 Otero 160.00 Otero 10,730.60 acres 44 good exploration target. The lease values (.tables 9 & 10) for the 10-year rental fair market value. period are considered not values base and Tract 202-1 (40 acres): This location is in the Tularosa Basin west of the Jarilla Block. Surface rocks consist of alluvial and eolian sediments of Quaternary age. The subsurface structure is unknown. The total Paleozoic section should be about 8,100 feet thick. If Cretaceous rocks are preserved the total sedimentary section of interest may asmuch be as 9,000 feet thick. The Paleozoic section includes strata from Ordovician to Permianin age. Potential reservoir rocks having adequate porosity and permeability are present thein Ordovician, 'probably Silurian, Mississippian, Pennsylvanian, and Permian parts of the It i s doubtfu1:that there has been flushing by section. meteoric waters in thys area. The tract is considered to be a good exploration The value primary- and target. based on the 'nearest secondary-lease tables 9 and 10. from $104.00 to The range $365.20'for leases' evaluation in the value sold periods for primary the during the are in given .40-acreis tract period and$138.80 frQm to $180.00 for the .sec'ondary period. In arrivinga fair at market the value geologic the maximum base lease value .is of because used rating. : This Tract '202-'2 (.116.'72. acres) tract is considered to have the same 'potential as 202-1. Using the same lease data the range in value for the primary is from $ 3 0 3 . 4 7 to period ! TABLE9--SUMMARYOFBASELEASE Tract Location 1-( ' "L Geologio Evaluation Location Size 202-1 T.19S., R.6E. 202-2 T.19S.. R.7E. T.l8S., R.4E. 200-3 200-4 200-5 T.lBS., R.5E. T.18S.. R.4E. 200-6 200-7 R.2E.. T.1OS.. 505-4 505-5 T.lOS., R.3E. 505-6 607-1 R.7E. T.7S.. Good 40 116.72 40 T.18-20S., Poor X 80 T.18-20s. 608-10 402-1 402-6 ._, * T.6S., R.7E. T.6S., R.6E. T.6S., R.6E. T.12-i3S., T.13S..R.8E. t %BE. Fair , 80 ' R.9E. R.l-ZE. 2,258.66 $21,094.00 X X $21,094.00 X ~~ X $3,330.00 I, Marginal 2,160 T.llS., X 6,172.16 X X X 160 200 6,172.16 X X T.SS., T.6S., 608-3 608-7 R.8E. X Fair Poor FOR P m W Y EVALUATION PERIOD Leased Tracts Evaluated Acres Sold T o t a l Bid 80 40 VZ&S R.6E. R.8E. 1,597.24 $211.57 Lease value/Acre (10 yr. Bid G Rental) Minimum Average Maximum $2.60 $2.60 $9.13 $2.25 X $9o.oo 2.25 $2.60 X $5.52 $2.60 $2.60 X X $180.00 $104.00 $18o.oo $1.59 $1.59 $1.59 $1.50 $2.87 $2.87 X $9.13 X X $5.02 $5.02 $5.02 $1.58 $1.50 $1.50 GOOd T.11-13s.. R.9E. Good Base values used i n determining f a i r inarket value are underlined. ' . . 27,494.92 $6,057.04 $104.00 $303.47 $5.52 $5.52 X $1.50 160 280 240 6,813.88 160 10-yr. Lease Value of T r a c t Minimum Averaqe Maximum $2.25 $2.25 $2.87 $1.53 $1.53 $1.53 $1.53 $2.32 $2.32 $9.13 $1.58 $1.58 $1.58 $3.19 $3.19 Slso.00 $254.40 $318.00 $127.20 $3,240.00 $220.80 $644.29 X X $220.80 X X $459.20 ~~ $574.00 $229.60 $3,304.80 $365.20 $1,065.66 X X $365.21 X~. X $803.20 $1.004.00 . . $401.60 $3,412.80 $244.80 $252.80 $428.40 $442.40 $36o.oo $379.20 $367.20 $15,331.23$15,808.20$21,736.28 $371.20 $360.00 $510.40 $24o.oo 542o.00 .. TABLE lO--S&Y Tract 202-1 202-2 200-3 200-4 200-5 200-6 T.19S..R.6E. T.19Sn, R.7E. T.18S.. R.4E. T.lBS., R.5E. T.18S.. R.4E. T.lOS., . R.2E. 505-5 505-6 607-1 608-3 608-7 T.lOS., R.3E. T.7SVr R.7E. T. 6S., R. 7E. T.6S.. R.6E. , . 608-10 402-1 T. 12-13S., 402-6 T.13S., * T.17S., GDOd Poor R. 9E. R.8E. R.9E. X X 80 200-7 505-4 40 116.72 40 40 Fair 80 80 Poor 160 200 Fair FOR SECONDARY 1,946.99 $3,700.00 x x X X T.17S..R.9E. 1,946.99 X X X X Average a l l leases $3,700.00 X X $3.47 $3.47 $2.60 $2.60 $3.47 $2-60 $2.60 X IX 80 2,160 EVALUATIONPERIOD* Lease Value/Acre Leased Tracts Evaluated (10 yr. Bid s Rental) 10-yr. Lease Value of T r a o t Location Acres Sold T o t a l B i d Minimum Average ~ a x i m u m Minimum Average M u h u m Geologic (W) Evalhation size Location OF BASE LEASEVALUES X Mazginal X 160 280 X X X 240 6,813.88 Good 160 God T.lOS., R.8E. T e l l s . , R.9%E. T.125., R.1OE. T.14S., R.9E. X X X X 8,523.39 $57,800.00 X x sL.90 $1.90 X $1.90 X $1.90 $4.25 $4.25 Base values used i n determining f a i r market value are underlined. .. $4.00 $4.00 X X $4.00 X X $3.53 $3.53 $3.53 X X X X $4.50 $4.50 X x $4.50 X X X X X $138.80 $405.02 $104.00 $2o8.00 - $138.80 $2o8.00 $ - $160.00 $466.88 X X $16o.oo X X 5$525.24 x X $180.00 X X X X $564.80 X $7o6.00 X X $282.40 X X X ~~ $8.88 $4,104.00 X X $3o4.00 X $532.00 X X X X $465.00 X X $15.46 $28,958.99 $60,507.25 $105,342.58 $8-88 $15.46 X $680.00 $1,420.80 $2,473.60 - c f and $1,065.66 for the secondary period 45 from $405.02 $525.24 to Tract 200-3 (40 adres): Surface rocks consist of Precambrian granite and alluvium overlying Precambrian. The location in is the San Andres Mountains and the potential for accumulation of hydrocarbons is considered poor. Because of the low potential only minimum lease values are given. For the 40-acre tract the primary period base and for value $90.00 is lease $104.00 for the the secondary 10-year rental period. Tract 200-5 ('40 acres): This tract is located in the Tularosa Basin about two miles east of the front of the San Andres Mountains. Surface rocks consist of Quaternary valley fill. The total thick if the or Paleozoic slightly present, total might thinner be on stratigraphic accumulation In section is estimated to be about 7,900 feet general of than the same Tract 202, Cretaceous 800 feet thick; order of section hydrocarbons the at considered could potential and thus favorable be muchasas 8,700 strata, for the feet. reservoir as,in rocksTract 202 would under1i.e the area.The proximity to the east-bounding fault ofthe San Andres Mountains reduces the exploration value of this tract. The same lease values used for Tract 202 aye applied, but basedthe ongeologic rating the average value is used in arrivinga base at fair market value. This is a range for the of from $160.00 for primary period. the secondary period $220.80 to base c Tract 200-6 46 ( 8 0 acres); Surface exposures are of Precambrian metamorphic rocks and arroyo deposits of sand and gravel along the east front of the San Andres Mountains. The tract is considered a poor exploration targetfor hydrocarbons. Values given 9 and 10 are tables in for the 10-year Tract 200-7 These minimum bid and rentals This tract is .immediately -southwest of In addition to outcrops of Precambrian rocks and sediments, sediments exposed on period. ( 8 0 acres): Tract 200-6. arroyo based and Bliss El andPaso Formations are present. . ~.. about 7 5 0 feet thick, but because they are the are are structurally unfavorable the tract a poor exploration target. Lease values are the s h e as is considered for Tract 200-6. Tract 505-4 (160 acres): Thi,s tract is located in the north- eastern partof the Jornada del Muerto. Surface exposures are of Quaternary alluvium. The pre-Pennsylvanian section is about 2 2 5 feet thick and should be limited the.Bliss, to El Paso, and Montoya intervals. The total Pennsylvanian section 3,475 feet. Cretaceous is about1,800 feet thick and the Permian and Triassic rocks may underlie the tract butbe should thin as the result of erosion. The total sedimentary section beneath the Valley Potential fill is. anticipated reservoirrocks include to 5,500about feet be dolomites in thick. El Paso the and Montoya, limestone and sandstone in the Pennsylvanian, and limestone, dolomite, and sandstone in the Bursum, Yeso and San Andres Formationsof Permian age. There may be more structural 47 area than gaqthex South complexities in this a simple d i p s l o p e However, it would..appear t o b e p r i m a r i l y t r a p s m a y occur i n t h e t ot h en o r t h w e s t .S t r a t i g r a p h f c Pennsylvanian andlower p a r t ofthe'Pefmian. The t r a c t i s a fair exploration target', considered to be The n e a r e s t l e a s i n g f o r shows a 1 0 - y e a r v a l u e ' r a n g e o f average of in the Jornada. t h e primary e v a l u a t i o n p e r i o d from'$254.40 t o $803.20and an . Be.c'ause of t h e lacK of adequate lease d a t a $459.20. d u r i n g the seconaary eyaluqti,on' period and the f a i r g e o l o g i c r a t i n g , the average 10-year b a s e v a l u e ' f o r all leases s o l d i n the study area i s used i,n qrriving a t a f a i r market value. The a v e r a g e 'is $3.'53 ' p e r acre 'and t h e b a s e v a l u e f o r the t r a c t $564.80 Tract 505-5 aye the (2'00 a c r e s ) : sme The eValuation.and lease valuesused as f o r Tract 505-4. Tract 505-'6 (80 acyes').;: EyaLuat*,Qn' b a s e 'i.s t h e 'same 'as Tract 5m-4, . ... Trac't '607-1 '(2,160 .acres) : Tki's t r a c t i,s l o c a t e d on t h e east d i p slope of t h e Qwcuya-Mountains;Surfacepocksconsistof th.ePermian Ab0 and Yeso Formations.Theunderlyi,nq FoTiqation a.nd some strata o i . Pennsylvanian age. t h e 's o u t h e e s t e f np a r t of' t h e t o w n s h i p . Bu~wq are exposed i n As much 'as 250 f e e t of t h e Bursum and 1 , 2 0 0 f e e c of P e n n s y l v a n i a n s h o u l d u n d e r l i e t h e Ab0 i n t h i s agea. FrQm' a s t r u c t u r a l s t a n d p o i n t t h e consideredfavorable,but area i s n o t some p o t e n t i a l for s t r a , t i g r a p h . i c t r a p s c cannot be r u l e d out. The o i l andgas 48 p o t e n t i a l i s considered marginal. lease p e r i o d t h e n e a r e s t t r a c t s r e c e i v e d During the primary b i d s of 10 c e n t s a n a c r e an acre. (minimum a c c e p t a b l e b i d ) The h i g h e r b i d T r a c t 607-1; favorable. the lower similar t o was for a tractgeologically w a s f o r a t r a c t g e o l o g i c a l l y more two t r a c t s were During t h es e c o n d a r yp e r i o do n l y l e a s e d ,r e c e i v i n gb i d s and 1 8 c e n t s of 6 8 and 73 c e n t sa n t h e marginal geologic rating and limited acre^. Becauseof lease d a t a o n l y a minimum a c c e p t a b l e b i d w a s used i n a r r i v i n g a t a f a i r m a r k e t value. T r a c t 608-3 i s s i m i l a rt oT r a c t ( 1 6 0 a c r e s ) :T h i s t h e same l e a s e v a l u e s 607-1 and are used. T r a c t 608-7 ( 2 8 0 'a'cr.es) : Thistract i s similar t o Tract 607-1 of Bursum Formation,and butincludesoutcrops the potential would b e lower because ,of t h i s . T r a c t 608-10 (240 acres].: Pennsylvanianbeds T h i st r a c ti n c l u d e se x p o s u r e so f as w e l l a s t h e s t i l l r a t e d as m a r g i n a l b u t w i t h Bursum Formation. It is a lower p o t e n t i a l t h a n T r a c t 607-1. T r a c t 402-1 C6,813:88' 'acres) : e a s t e r ne d g eo ft h eT u l a r o s a T h i s t r a c t . i s ..locatednearthe Basin. u n c o n s o l i d a t e db a s i n - f i l l i n gs e d i m e n t s S u r f a c e r o c k sa r e of Quaternaryage. of A s h o r t d i s t a n c e t o t h e east i n t h e Three Rivers area t h e r e are exposures of sedimentary rocks of Triassic and Cretaceous age. c (" Paleozoic rocks a possibility Potential should for as 49 about 8,300 feet thick be and much 2,000 as feet of Mesozoic pre-Pennsylvanian pay zones include there is sediments. the Bliss-El Paso, Montoya, and Mississippian intervals. The Pennsylvanian section is about2,000 feet thick and probably contains numerous reservoir rocks. Carbonate zones in the Bursum, Yeso, and San Andres These Formations three intervals Stratigraphic, Bedded represent salt fault, is formed a seal additional are and reservoirs. 4,400 feet thick in.this--area. anticlinal presumed preventing about potential present traps may in the Yeso and incursion of be present. could meteoric have waters and escape o f hydrocarbons from lower reservoir rocks. Testszdf the Bursum, Strawn, and Atoka intervals a short distance to the east recovered significant amounts of natural gas. These occurrences of the Sierra Blanca syncline. Itis are on the west flank possible that during the €ormation of this structure hydrocarbons migrated up-dip into the area of Tract 402-1. Subsequent down-faulting of the carbons beneath Based proximity on to base this the Basin section, accumulations of natural exploration value could have preserved hydro- tract. stratigraphic known considered a good The Tularosa during potential gas the for tract traps is target. the primary period. $2.25 -is to from $3.19 per acre. The 'low bid awas minimum 1 5 cents an acre and the high bid $1.09. During the secondary period bids ranged from a low of$2.15 an acre up was fora parcel in T.12$., R.1OE. $13.36 to an acre. The high bid sold in July 1974. The and for t h e t r a c t r a n g e s lo-year base value acre. Because of t h e g e o l o g i c r a t i n g t h e froq $ 2 . 9 5 t o $15.46 an .jqa,.xim.mum v a l u e i s used i n determining f a i r .ma.rket yqlue.. Tract 402-6 (160 abres): Tract 402-1 except t h a t it of n a t u r a l gas: This t r a c t ' i s edsenti,qll.y. th.e same as i . s f a r t h e r ' from the'kpown occurrence Lease values'used are t h e saqe, The a r e a i s considered a g o o d e x p l o r a t i o n t a x y e t , An a t t w p t evaluati.on wi,th is 'a made'i.n denjonstyqted value andgasleases'.Estab1i.shzn.g OX engineerin7 d@ta is oil a value'based sole:ly on geologic th.Zs area, because a be made .yith.actUal producti.on of o i l The mili,taxyreSepvati.on Higklandssection' '$corn' t h e sale. 'of State npt practi.ca1 in v a l i d comparison cannot andgas. tWs xepork t o combine 'a, geologic of;' t h e Basinand i.3 Loca,ted w i t h i n the I$exi.can Range 'Province. Th.e only es.tabliqh.ed production: of' hydrocai;bon$ ,i.n t h i s pqoysnce i s i n Nevada. The sma1.l ~ 9 U h . of t hydyoc$cbonsconynejfciallydeveloped i s the^ z e s u l t of a, combLnat5,on' of f a c t o r s i , n c h d i. n g. geology, . .. d i f f i c u l t y of s.tyuctuya1 intefpre+-ati,on$ $n t h e h o r e f a v o r a b l e b a s i n q , .lack gf adequate'expl,orati,on.,andremoten'ess pr0duci.n.g apegs l e a d i n. g. t o h i g h e r d r i l l i p. g. c o s t s , from The n a t i o n a l sqccesq r a t i . 0 f o ~ h i : g h e ~ t - r i s k 'wildcat$ . i n 1 9 7 6 of 17 percent o r 1 i n 6 VeSls d,qilled(Johnson',1977). n&ht be u s e d by p l o t - t i n 9 the number of wildcat l o c a t i o n s o n ' s t a t e t r a c t s , t h a t have < potential for success and applying 51 average reserve figures for successful wildcat wells. This method would be misleading because most of the high-risk wildcats (and almost all that are successful) are located in producing regions. With slightly more than84 wells drilled in the study area of this report the success ratio is zero. This might be modified somewhat by giving areas considerationto tests that have more that promise, have and recovered an hydrocarbons, evaluation of t6e strati- graphic section tested. Another approach would be to calculate the volume the of 'potential total a given basin and assign stratigraphic reserves for the section same within volume of rock from producing basins withZn the United States. The problem remains, however, that As pointed.out that are there there probably more 'is are no other responsible comparable factors for producing besides basin. geology of commercial the lack production of oil and gas in this area. Considering only the geologic framework the Tularosa Basin would appear ato have good potential for hydrocarbon accumulations. The structure is not as metamorphism reservoir complex of and for a variety as the parts sedimentary source of some section rocks are present; traps: and the excessive (Reiter, et al.,1975). of the Basin has there geothermal and occurred: Range potential is a possibility gradient is not The Tularosa Basinwas given 19741, the same as the a Class 2 rating (Foster and Grant, Jornada del Muerto. However, it was noted that the Tularosa Basin appeared greater to opportunity be for more complex traps. structurally, where affording c- I' In addition 52 t o the Tularosa Basin that part of the Fort B l i s s Military Reservation to the east of t h e b a s i n i s considered t o be a good e x p l o r a t i o n area, f o r . o i l andgas.Approximately t h e western t h i r d of the r e s e r v a t i o n i s i n t h e Jornada d e l Muerto o r t h e mountain r a n. g. e s t h a t b o r d e r t h e T u l a r o s a B a s i n . F a v o r a b l e reservoir rocks are .exposed i n t h e r a n g e s , are o n t h e s t r u c t u r a l l y u n f a v o r a b l e syncline. AS a n e x p l o r a t i o n andwhere buried they west-dip s l o p e of the Jornada area mostofthi'spart of t h e r e s e r v a t i o n i s consi.dered poor t om a r g i n a l .L o c a l l y more fayorable c o n d i t i o n s are p r e s e n t s u c h ~ ' a s t h e ' n o r t h w e s t e r n p a r t of t h e r e s e r v a t i o n . i n SocorroCounty. The s i g n i f i c a n c e .of t h e gas recovered .from t h e 'Houston 1 The f i n a l test y i e l d e d L e w e l l i n gt e s tc a n n o t be over-emphasized. 168.3 NCFPD anamount exceeding the d a i l y c a p a c i t y o f i n the San JuanBasin. most wells T t i . s n o t known what reserve estimates were made 'for t h e Strawn zone i n t h e .Lewelli.ng t e s t o r , i f l o c a t e d i n a producing ayea, whethey' it would have been put p r o d u c t i o n .C e r t a i n l ya d d i t i o n a l warr3nt constcuction of wells w w l d beneeded on to a pipeline.' The problems .in basing values' on leases sold have been d i s c u s s e d and 10-year base. v a l u e s . g i v e n f o r : t h e condenined tracts. Th.e Z a t t e r i s based on nearby. leases o r where t h i , s was n o t practi.ca1 on t h e ,minimum a c c e p t a b l e bid o r ' average b i d f o r t h e s t u d y ayea. Tracts h a v i n g V i r t u a l l y n o g e o l o g i c p o t e n t i a l would sti.11 h a v e t o be c o n s i d e r e d as having a minimum lease value. Thi.s is based on the . f a c t t h a t leases w i t h similar p o t e n t i a l are sold. The g e o l o g i ce v a l u a t i o nf o rt h ec o n d e m e d tracts can be r c used i n determining whet'her the 53 minimurq, a v e r a g e , o r maximum 10-year base value should be used in determining the fair market vafi3e:lfor '.aparticular‘ tkact. C o n s i d e r e dt oh a v e 'As':an example, .Tr.act 60'7-1 was a marginal potential for leases were $1.58an mum 1 0 - y e a r b a s e v a l u e s f o r n e a r b y would mean a b a s e v a l u e f o r t h e v a l u e w a s used i n a r r i v i n g a t t h e , b a s e v a l u e f o r t h e T h i s i s from$3,024.00 to have t o $4,104.00. a good g e o l o g i c p o t e n t i a l v a l u e s were used. $21,736.28under under more current Forthe This t r a c t of from$3,412.80 By a p p l y i n g a low g e o l o g i c r a t i n g . o n l y t h e Maxi- acre f o r t h e secondaryperiod. t h ep r i m a r yp e r i o da n d$ 2 . 1 3f o r $4,600.80. o i l and gas. to minimum tract. Tract 402-1 is considered and - t h e r e f o r e maximum base .entire t r a c t t h i s wouldamount t h e primary e v a l u a t i o n p e r i o d to and$105,342.58 lease 'conditions. Usi.ng minimum base v a l u e s . f o r p o o r and marginal t r a c t s , average values f o r t r a c t s c o n s i d e r e d t o h a v e '$air p o t e n t i a l , and max,imun values fox tracts w i t h good g e o l o g i c p o t e n t i a l , a lO-year b a s e v a l u e ' c a n b e a r r i v e d a t f o r t h e acreage; condemned Under the . p r i m a r y e v a l u a t i o n p e r i o d t h i s $30,051.14 and fox t h e secondary period$116,358.62. would be As. poi.pted o u t t h e s e e s t i m a t e s r e p r e s e n t a base v a h e 'for a 10-year pef$,od. a f a i r market value The 'determinationof Would seem t o require some a d d i t i o n a l i n p u t . e s t b a t e of remaining li.fe for crude Mex$co t o t h e y e a r .Based on t h e o i l production i n New 2 0 1 8 (Foster,Gutjahrand and a s s w i n g e x p l o r a t o r y i n t e r e s t ' Warner, 1 9 7 8 ) w i l l c o n t i n u e a t least t o t h a t y e a r a f a c t o r 9f 4 times' t h e 1 0 - y e a r b a s e v a l u e m i g h t b e . 54 v a l i d a s a f a i r marketvalue. T h i s wouldbe from $120,204.56 t o $465,434.48depending on t h e o r d e r of on whether the primary w a s used.Becausethesecondary o rs e c o n d a r ye v a l u a t i o np e r i o d p e r i o d more c l o s e l y r e f l e c t s c u r r e n t c o n d i t i o n s r a n g e would appear more a p p r o p r i a t e . a value in this Under t h e c u r r e n t lease arrangement of 25 c e n t s p e r a c r e p e r y e a r r e n t a l f o r a l l m i n e r a l rights the State over t h e would r e a l i z e anincomeof$107,306.00 n e x t 40 y e a r s f r o m t h e '10,730.60 a c r e s i n v o l v e d i n the current condemnation s u i t . From t h e s e c o n d a r y - l e a s e e v a l u a t i o n p e r i o d acre-year value i s 35 c e n t s f o r oil andgasleasesonly.This i s based on a l l leases s o l d i n t h e s t u d y only those tracts adjacent to the current per WhiteSands area (table 7 ) . Missile Range i n are considered Sierra, Socorro,Lincoln, and OteroCounties t h ea v e r a g ep e ra c r e - y e a r value i s 5 1 c e n t s . T h i s a t o t a l of35,009.89 value of$176,933.34. i s based on acres s o l d and a bid-plus-10-year rental Under a new r e n t a l agreement t h e S t a t e c o u l d expect a minimum offrom t h e next 40 y e a r s . I€ $150,228.00 t o $218,904.00 over c 55 References Bachman, G. 1 9 6 0 , Southwesternedge O., of L a t eP a l e o z o i c landmass i n New Mexico: U. S . Geol. Survey, P r o f . Paper, 400-B, p.239. Bachman, G. 0. , 1961, Pre-Pennsylvanian Paleozoic Gap Quadrangle, New Mexico: stratigraphy,Mockingbird U. S. Geol.Survey,Prof.Paper, 424-B, Bachman, G. 0. and Myers, D. A . , p. 119-122. 1963, Geology of t h e Bear Peak NE Quadrangle, DoXa Ana County, New Mexico: U. Geol. Survey, Map 1-374. Bachman, G. O., . . 1 9 6 5 , Geologic map o ft h eC a p i t o lP e a k Quadrangle,Socorro S. County, New Mexico: U. S. NW Geol. Survey, Map 1 - 4 4 1 . Bachman, G. O . , 1 9 6 8 , . Geology o f t h e Mockingbird Gap Quadrangle,LincolnandSocorroCounties, U. S . Geol.Survey, Prof. Paper, 594-5. Bachman, G. 0. andHarbour, thenorthern New Mexico: R. L . , 1 9 7 0 , Geologic map of part of t h e SanAndresMountains, New Mexico: U. S. Geol.Survey, central Misc. Geol. Inv., Map 1-600. Bodine, M. W . , Jr., 1956, Geology o f C a p i t a n c o a l f i e l d , LincolnCounty, New Mexico: New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources; Circ. 35. B o w e r s , W. E . , 1960, Geology of t h e E a s t P o t r i l l o Ana County, New Mexico: MS. H i l l s , DoKa t h e s i s , Univ. New Mexico. 56 Clabaugh, S . E., 1 9 4 1 , Geology of t h en o r t h w e s t e r np o r t i o n New Mexico: Univ.Texas, of t h e CornudasMountains, MA thesis. Clemons, R. E . , 1 9 7 6 , Geology o f e a s t h a l f C o r r a l i t o s Quadrangle, N e w Mexico: New MexicoBureau MineralResources,Geol. Map 36. west h a l f C o r r a l i t o s 1977, Geologyof Clemons, R. E., of Mines and Ranch Quadrangle, New Mexico: New' Mexico Bureau of Mines and MineralResources,Geol. Condie, K. C . andBudding, Map 4 4 . A . J., I n Press, Geologyand geochemistryofPrecainbrianrocks in central and south- c e n t r a l New Mexico: New MexicoBureauofMinesand MineralResources, Mem. 35. Dane, C. H. and Bachman, G . O . , Mexico: 1 9 6 5 , Geologic map of New U. S. Geol. Survey. 19'35, The geology of t h e Organ Mountains: Dunham, K. C . , New Mexico Bureau of MinesandMineralResources,Bull. Flawn, P. T., 1 9 5 6 , Basementrocksof New Mexico: Foster, R. W., Mountainsand Texas a n ds o u t h e a s t Univ. Texas, Bur. Econ. Geol., 1959,Precambrian 11. n5606. rocks of t h e Sacramento v i c i n i t y i n Guidebook of SacramentoMountains of OteroCounty, New Mexico: PermianBasinSection, Econ. P a l e o n t o l o g i s t s a n d M i n e r a l o g i s t s a n d R o s w e l l G e o l . SOC., p.137-153. SOC. c I Foster, R. W. andStipp, T. and relief map o f t h e G., 1 9 6 1 , P r e l i m i n a r yg e o l o g i c Precambrian rocks of New Mexico: New Mexico Bureauof Resources, C i r c . 57. Mines andMineral and G r a n t , P . R., Foster, R. W. 1 9 7 4 , The f u t u r e of New New Mexico Bureau of Mexico's o i l andgasresources: Mines andMineralResources,Resource F o s t e r , R. W.,Gutjahr, 57 L., A. Map 3. andWarner, G. H . , 1978, Estimates of New M e x i c o ' sf u t u r eo i lp r o d u c t i o n : Mexico Bureau of Mines andMineralResources, Griswold, G. B . , New Mexico: New Mexico Bureau of Mines andMineral 67. 1976, Geology of P o t r i l l o b a s a l t f i e l d , New Mexico Bureau of Minesand s o u t h - c e n t r a l New Mexico: MineralResources, Howe, H. J., Circ. 149. 1 9 5 9 , Montoya Group s t r a t i g r a p h y( O r d o v i c i a n ) of Trans-Pecos Texas: 2285-2332. C i r c . 166. 1959,MineraldepositsofLincolnCounty, Resources,Bull. Hoffer, 3 . M., New Am. Assoc. P e t r o l . Geol., Bull., v 4 3 , p. , Johnson, R. R., 1 9 7 7 , NorthAmerican 1 9 7 6 : Amer..Assoc.Petrol. Jones, T. S. andSmith, H . M., drilling activity in Geol., v 6 1 , n 8, p. 1121-1156. 1965,Relationshipsof composition and stratigraphy in the Permian basin of oil west Texas and N e w Mexico, i n f l u i d s i n s u b s u r f a c e e n v i r o n m e n t s : Am. ASSOC. P e t r o l .G e o l . , Kelley, V. C. and S i l v e r , C . , Mountains:Univ. N. Mex., Mem. 4 , p. 101-224. 1952,Geology Pub. G e o l . , of t h eC a b a l l o n 4. r 58 Kelley, V. C. andFurlow, J. W., wedge edges i n s o u t h - c e n t r a l Geol. SOC. A m e r . , Kelley, V. C . , 1965, Lower P a l e o z o i c New Mexico; new c o n t r o l : B u l l . , v 7 6 , p. 689-694. 1968,Geologyof t h ea l k a l i n eP r e c a m b r i a n rocks a t P a j a r i t o Mountain,OteroCounty, Geol. SOC. America,Bull., Kottlowski, F. E . , Flower, R. New Mexico: v 7 9 , p. 1565-1572. H., Thompson, M. L . , 1956, S t r a t i g r a p h i c s t u d i e s Foster, R. W., Andres M o u n t a h s . New.Mexico: of t h e San N e w Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Mem. Kottlowski, F. E . , and 1. 1 9 6 0 , Summary o fP e n n s y l v a n i a ns e c t i o n si n southwestern New Mexico a n d s o u t h e a s t e r n Arizona: New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Bull. Kottlowski,F. E., s t r a t a of 1963,PaleozoicandMesozoic southwestern and south-central New Mexico: New Mexico Bureau of Mines andMineralResources,Bull. Kottlowski,F. E., F o s t e r , R. W . , 79. and Wengerd, S. A. , i969, Key o i l t e s t s and s t r a t i g r a p h i c s e c t i o n s i n s o u t h w e s t e r n N e w Mexico, i n Guidebook oftheBorderRegion: Geol. SOC., TwentiethFieldConference,p. Le Mone, D. V., area. N. 186-196. 1 9 6 9 , Lower P a l e o z o i c r o c k s i n t h e I n Guidebookof t h eb o r d e rr e g i o n : SOC. TwentiethFieldConference,p. Lovejoy, E . M. P . , Mex. N. E l Paso Mex. Geol. 68-79. 1 9 7 6 , Geology of C e r r o d e . C r i s t 0 Rey u p l i f t , Chihuahuaand New Mexico: N e w Mexico Bureauof Mines and Mineral Resources, Men. 31. 66. c Muehlberger, W. R . , Hedge, C. E., Denison, R. E . , 59 and Marvin, R. F., 1 9 6 6 , GeochronologyoftheMidcontinent region,United States, P a r t 3 , southern area: J o u r . v 7 1 , p - 5409-5426. GeophysicalResearch, Otte, C., Pennsylvanian and EarlyPermian Jr., 1959,Late Otero stratigraphy of the northern Sacramento Mountains, County, New Mexico: New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, B u l l . 50. Pray, L. C. and Allen, J. E., strata,southeastern 1956, O u t l i e r of Dakota (?) New Mexico: Amer. Assoc. P e t r o l . Geol., Bull., v 40, p. 2735-2740. Pray, L. C . , 1 9 6 1 , Geology of t h e Sacramento Mountains Escarpment, Otero County, New Mexico: New Mexico Bureau of Mines andMineral Reiter, M., Resources, B u l l . 35. Edwards, C. L., Hartman, H. and Weidman, C . , 1975, Terrestrial h e a t f l o w a l o n g t h e New Mexico andsouthernColorado: v 86,p. rift, RioGrande Geol. SOC. A m e r . , Bull., 811-818. Richardson, G. B . , 1 9 0 9 , El Paso F o l i o : U. S. Geol. Survey, Geologic A t l a s , n 1 6 6 . Schmidt, P. G. andCraddock, C., 1 9 6 4 , The geology of J a r i l l a Mountains, Otero County, New Mexico: New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Bull. 82. Seager, W. R., Hawley, J . W., of San DiegoMountain New Mexico Bureau of and Clemons, R. E . , 1 9 7 1 , Geology a r e a Dogs Ana County, New Mexico: Mines and Mineral Resources, B u l l . 97. c Seager, W. R., 1973,Geologic 60 map a n d s e c t i o n s of Bishop Cap-Organ Mountains area, New Mexico: New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources,Geol. Smith, C . T. andBudding, A. f i f t e e n minute quadrangle, Map 29. J . , 1959, L i t t l e BlackPeak e a s t h a l f : New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources,Geol. Thompson, M. L., Map 11. 1 9 4 2 , PennsylvanianSystem i n . N e w Mexico: N e w Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, B u l l . T i m , B. C . , 17. 1 9 4 1 , The geology o € the southernCornudas Mountains, Texas and New Mexico: Univ. Texas, MA t h e s i s . Wasserburg, G. J., W e t h e r i l l , G. W., P. T . , 1 9 6 2 , A . s t u d yo ft h ea g e s S i l v e r , L. T . , OT t h e Precambrian 05 Texas: Jour.GeophysicalResearch, Weber, R. H., 1963,Cenozoic v 6 7 , p. 4 0 2 1 - 4 0 4 7 . volcanic r o c k s of Socorro County i n Guidebook of SocorroRegion: F o u r t e e n t hF i e l d and Flawn, N. Mex. Geol. SOC., Conference, p.132-143. Zapp, A. D., 1 9 4 1 , Geology of t h e n o r t h e a s t e r n Cornudas Mountains, New Mexico: Univ. Texas, MA t h e s i s . APPENDIX TABLE 11 Bid Tract 0-2 0-3 0-4 0-5 0-6 , ', 0-38 0-39 0-40 0-41 0-42 ~ ~ - Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra 0-61 0-62 Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sicrra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra 0-63 Sierra 0-43 0-44 0-45 0-46 0-47 0-48 0-49 0-50 0-51 0-52 0-53 0-54 0-55 0-56 0-57 0-58 0-59 0-60 Rentals 1,000.00 120.00 $ .78 $ $ 1.52 $ $ -31 , , $ 9 -25 $ 1,000.00 400.00 200.00 5 yr S 769.00 $ 768.00 $ 570.00 $ 769.00 $ 480.00 80.93 64.00 126.44 $ .19 $ .39 $ 9.89 $ $ $ 150.00 250.00 12,500.00 $ $ $ 324.00 256.00 2,16-12-1 809.33 640.00 1,264.38 4,18,21,27,32 12-1 1,239.96 124.00 $16.21 $ 20,100.00 3,4-12-1W 34,35,36-11-1W 1,145.65 114.57 $ .35 $ 16,32-11-4W 36-11-5W 1,2-12-1w 960.00 640.00 1,283.56 913.56 .96 .64 128.36 91.36 128.00 128.00 126.31 101.38 128bOO 128.00 128.00 128.00 102.43 128.00 104.00 64.00 126.88 $ $ .34 .43 $19.55 $ $ 80.20 $ $ $ .so 87.92 127.64 127.43 $ County LOC SE Acres Dona Ana 1.281.29 ~.~ Sierra 2.16-17-1 Dona Ana 1,280.00 32,3&17-1 950.13 DonaAna 2,6,7,16-18-1 Dona Ana 1,281,.32 1,2-18-1W Dana Ana, Ll,12-18-lW 800,OO . 32,33.36-11-1 32-11-2 . ~~ ~~~ ~ 1,280.00 20,29;30-12-1W 21,22-12-lW 23,24-12-1W 25,26-12-1W 27,28-12-1W 31,32-12-1W 33,34-12-18 2,16-12-4W 32-12-4W 2,5-13-1W 6,7-13-1W 2,10-14-2W 2,4-16-1W 1,280.00 1,263.07 1,013.75 1,280.00 1,2s0.00 1,280.00 1,280.00 1,024.34 1,280.00 1,040.00 640.00 1,268.81 801.98 879.16 1,276.37 34,36-16-1W 17,18-17-1W 1,274.28 s Min. 192.19 192.00 142.52 192.20 Page 1 - Work Sheets: Primnry LeaseEvaluationPeriod 1974 s $ Acres .55 s Total 700.00 Value 10 yr S 2.691.00 . Rental Bid . $ Per Acre 2.65 2.88 3.15 2.41 2.35 1,995.00 2,691.00 3,391.00 3,688.00 2,995.00 3,091.00 1,680.00 1,880.00 1,133,OO 896.00 1,770.00 1,283.00 1,146.00 14,270.00 $ 506.00 $ $ $ $ 496.00 $ 1,736.00 21,836.00 $ 17.61 $ 458.00 $ 1,604.00 2,004.00 $ 325.00 $ 275.00 $ $ 25,100.00 $ $ -400.00 $ 384.00 256.00 513.00 365.00 512.00 512.00 505.00 406.00 512.00 512.00 512.00 512.00 410.00 512.00 416.00 256.00 $ $ -47 1,669.00 1.171.00 26i897.00 1,679.00 31,792.00 2,892.00 2,868.00 2,419.00 2.992.00 2i792.00 23792.00 2,792.00 2i034.00 2,792.00 2,006.00 1:171.00 2;176.00 1,523.00 1,531.00 2,387.00 $ $ 1.000.00 $ $ 1;000.00'*$ $ 1,000.00 $ $ 600.00 $ $ 1,000.00: $ $ 550.00 $ ' $ 275.00 $ S 400.00 5 508.00 $ 400.00 $'321.00 $ 300.00 $ 352.00 $ 600.00 $ 511.00 1,344.00 896.00 $. 1.797.00 . $ 1,279.00 $ 1,792.00 $ 1,792.00 $ 1.768.00 $ 1;419.00 $ 1,792.00 .$ 1,792.00 $ 1,792.00 $ 1,792.00 $ 1.434.00 $ 1i792.00 $ 1,456.00 $ 896.00 $ 1,776.00 $ 1,123.00 $ 1,231.00 $ 1,787.00 .47 $. 510.00 $ .44 $23.44 .86 .87 .99 $ ..94 $ .78 $ .78 $ .78 $ .59 $ .78 $ .53 $ .43 $ .32 $ $ $ .34 400.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 1,100.00 $. 1,100.00 $ 1;OOO.OO $ $ $ $ $ 1,200.00 $ 600.00 $ $ $ $ $ 2,688.00 1,784.00 2,384.00 , $ $ $ 8 8 1.59 7 1.79 $ 11.29 1.75 1.74 1.83 $20.95 $ 1.84 $24.84 $ ' $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1 2.26 2.27 2.39 2.34 2.18 2.18 2.18 1.99 2.18 1.93 S 1.83 $ 1.71 $ 1.90 $ 1.74 $ 1.87 s 1.87 7 .. . . . Page 2 Tract 0-64 0-65 0-66 , . ' '. ' County Sierra Sierra Sierra .-LOC SE :2qi5t%%-2W 32.36-17-1W Bid Acres ~ :%:~~ 1,280.00 128.00 16-3-6 3,4-3-7 5,8,9-3-7 10,15-3-7 16,17,20-3-7 21,22-3-7 27,28-3-7 29,32-3-7 32,34-3-7 8-4-7 32-4-7 520.00 1.280.22 1,280.00 1,280.00 1,280.00 1,280.00 1,280.00 640.00 2,3,15-6-14 16,19,24-6-14 20,21,22-6-14 23,24,36-6-14 25;26-6-14 27;28,29-6-14 30,31,32,33-6-14 1,115.84 1,080.13 920.00 1,080.00 1.040.00 1;200.00 0-16 Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln 16,17,20-6-15 30-6-15 0-4 0-5 0-6 otero Otero Otero 5-12-10 9-12-10 16-12-10 0-5 0-3 0-4 0-5 0-6 0-7 Otero otero otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero 2,16-11-9 2,13-22-14 15,22-22-14 26,34-22-14 35.36-22-14 2,i6-22-15 23,24-22-15 25,31-22-15 32,36-22-15 0-67 0-68 0-69 0-70 0-71 0-72 0-73 0-74 0-75 0-76 0-77 Socorro Socorro ' : socoL.ro Socorro Socorro Socorro Socorro Socorro Saccrro Socorro Socorro Mi", l.280.00 640.00 640.00 52.00 128.02 128.00 128.00 128.00 128.00 128.00 64.00 128.00 64.00 64.00 Total Acres $ $. $ 5 $ $ $ $ $ .47 .29 . .33 .33 .39 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ .33 -51 .51 5 yr Rentals 10 vr . . 1 783 VU Value Rental Bid b 800.00 600.00 S 512.00 . $ 512.00 $ 1,792.00 2,392.00 $ 1.87 150.00 250.00 325.00 325.00 375.00 425.00 425.00 $ 208.00 512.00 512.00 512.00 512.00 512.00 512.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 878.00 2,042.00 2,117.00 2,117.00 2,167.00 2,217.00 2,217.00 1,146.00 1,792.00 1,221.00 $ 256.00 728.00 1,792.00 1,792.00 1,792.00 1,792.00 1,792.00 1L792.00 896.00 1,792.00 896.00 896.00 1.69 1.60 1.65 1.65 1.69 1.73 1.73 1.79 1.73 100.00 $ 624.00 $ 528.00 $ 381.00 $ 2,343.00 $ 2,268.00 $ 1,932.00 $ 2,268.00 $ 2,184.00 $ 2.520.00 ~ $ . 2i268.00 $ 2,184.00 $. 1.848.00 . $ 1,335.00 2,511.00 2,431.00 2,132.00 2,430.00 2,340.00 2,700.00 ~ 2,468.00 2,384.00 1,980.00 1,435.00 $ $ $ 387.00 384.00 384.00 $ $ $ 1,354.00 1,344.00 1,344.00 1,454.00 1,444.00 1,444.00 $ $ S $ $ $ >UY.UU 250.00 b 425.00 325.00 325.00 $ $ $ 512.00 256.00 256.00 168.00 $ $ $ 669.52 648.00 552.00 648.00 $' 624.00 $ 720.00 S $ S "-." 2- I. 4 9 7 . 0 0 ~~~.~ . 0.12 0-13 0-14 0-15 ' 0-8 0-9 0-10 34,354-14 . 1 5 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,221.00 1 9 7 3 0-7 0-8 0-9 0-10 0-11 Per Acre 2 ,383.UU bUO.UV . 1.91 1.91 '$ $ 880.00 635.78 167.38 162.02 138.00 162.00 156.00 180.00 162.00 156.00 132.00 95.00 644.60 640.00 640.00 97.00 96.00 96.00 $ $ $ .16 .16 .16 100.00 100.00 100.00 852.00 1,277.56 , 128.00 Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn $ 190.00 $ 192.00 $ 190.00 $ 192.00 $ .18 150.00 $ 511.00 $ 1,789.00 1,939.00 $ 2.28 $ $ $ $ .15 .15 .15 -15 190.00 192.00 190.00 192.00 $ 760.00 $ 768.00 S 761.00 $ 768.00 $ $ $ $ 2,660.00 2,688.00 2,664.00 2.688.00 2,850.00 $ $ $ $ 2.25 l1O8O.0O 1,040.00 1,280.00 1 ,280.00 1..280.00 1,266.64 1,280.00 '. 1.268.40 1.280.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ .15 .22 .15 .15 .15 .19 .19 .15 .16 . 163.00 200.00 162.00 156.00 180.00 200.00 200.00 132.00 S S 648.00 ~ . ~ 2,880.00 2,854.00 2,880.00 a $ $ $ $ $ $ $ . 2.25 2.25 2.32 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.29 2.29 2.25 $ $ $.' 2.26 2.25 2.25 2.25 I . Tract T-2 T-6 T-7 T-8 LOC SE 11,12,14-7-10 720.00 Otero Otero Otero 25,26-23-14 12,13924-14 32223-15 5-24-15 1,280.00 880.00 $ $ 1,230.62 Rejected below min. b i d 1,261.46 Withdrawn Acres AE'res $ Min. 108.00 $ .50 $ 192.00 132.00 $ $ -15 $ $ . DonaAna 7,18-26-2W T-17 Lincoln 11,12,14-7-10 T-18 T-19 T-20 Otero Otero Otero 1,280.00 1,246.12 $ 192.00 Withdrawn Otero otero Otero 1,240.67 640.00 1,286.32 640.00 $ T-21 20,29-24-15 30,31-24-15 32-24-15 5-25-15 12-25-14 7,8-25-15 16-25-15 31,32-23-14 33,34-23-14 35,36-23-14 9,11,16-24-12 7,s-24-15 16,17-24-15 18,19-24-15 1,272.32 1,193.12 1,277.16 1,280.00 1,280.68 $ $ $ $ $ T-23 Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero T-2 T-3 DonaAna Dona Ana T-4 T-5 T-6 T-7 T-8 Dona Ana DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna 2,16-25-1W 36-25-1W . 2-25-2W 2,4,5-26-1W 8,9,10,16-26-1W 32,36-26-1W 1,2-26-5 3,16-26-5 T-10 otero 18,19,30,32-26-6 1 ". ~ ' County Lincoln T-22 T-23 T-17 T-18 T-19 T-20 T-21 T-22 720.00 .21 vr 5 yr 432.00 $ 1,512.00 198.00 187.00 $ 768.00 $ 528.00 $ $ Total 1 0 360.00 $ " " $ Rental Bid 1,872.00 $ 2,688.00 1,848.00 $ $ 2,886.00 2,035.00 $ .2.25 $ 2.31 Per Acre 2.60 : Rejected(Improperapplication) .25 $ 323.33 $ 768.00 $ 2,688.00 '$ 3,011.00 S 2.35 186.00 $ 1.20 Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn $ 1,487.00 $ 744.00 $ 2,605.00 $ 4,092.00 $ 3.30 $ $ $ $ $ $: $ $ 768.00 768.00 9 $ $ 2.671.00 2;688.00 2,688.00 2,506.00 2;688.00 S $ $ $ 763.00 768.00 768.00 716.00 768.00 $ $ 261.00 261.00 261.00 238.62 241.00 301.00 241.00 $ $ $ $ .21 .20 .20 -20 .19 .24 e19 $ .$ $': 190.85 192.00 192.00 179.00 192.00 192.00 192.10 2,689.00 S $ $ 2.932.00 2i949.00 2,949.00 2.745.00 21929.00 2i989.00 2,930.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,278.24 $ 191.74 $ .4o$ 510.00 $ 767.00 $ 2,684.00 $ 3,194.00 $ 1,276.00 1,180.30 1,280.00 1,280.00 962.68 892.36 $ $ $ $ $ $ 191.40 177.05 192.00 192.00 144.40 133.85 $ 3.33 $ e96 $ .97 $ .40 $ ' -33 $ .50 $ . 4.249;09::; $ 1,133.09 $ 1.241.60: $ -510.00 $ 320.00 $ 446.57 $ 766.00 !$ 708.00 $ 768.00 $ 768.00 $ 578.00 $ 535.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,680.00 2.479.00 2,688.00 2i688.00 $ $ 1,874.00 $ $ $ 6,929.00 3,612.00 3.930.00 3i198.00 2,342.00 2,320.00 $ 5.43 $ 3.06 $ :'3.07 $ 2.50 $ 2.43 $ 2.60 862.40 $ 129.36 $ $ $ $ 1.811.00 $ 2.486.00 $ 1,280.00 1,280.00 ? $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 9 9 2;688.00 $ ' 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.29 2.34 2.29 1 9 7 2 ~~ ~~ 2.50 7 ~ ' .n 675.00 si7.00 2.022.00 $ 2.88 , Bid Tract 0-17 0-18 T-9 T-10 T- 1 T-2 T-3 ' T-4 T-13 T-14 Cauntv otero 640.00 Otero Otero 1,280.00 640.00 Otero 167.43 Dona Ana DonaAna Dona Ana DonaAna Otero Otero 487.16 LOC 26,28,33-11-9 32-11-9 15-12-9 16.32-27-3 2,i6-28-1W 32,36-28-1W' 2,16-29-1W 35-12-10 36-12-10 14-13-10 Socorro 2-5-6 0-20 Otero 13,25-24-11 29-24-12 0-23 0-24 0-25 0-26 Ocero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero 26,35-24-11 5,17-24-12 36-25-10 11,14-25-12 16-25-13 19,32-25-13 18-26-13 . T-1 T-2 Dona Ana Dona Ana 21,22,27,34-22-1W 2,16-29-2W 0-51 0-52 0-53 Sierra Sierra Siezsa 36-135-1W 36-135-2W 32-14-2 T-2 Otero T-3 T-4 Otero 23-18-13 36-24-11 32-24-12 otezo Acrea 48.12 96.00 $ 1.09 $ .55 $ $ 192.00 96.00 $ 2.10 $ 2.10 1,275.68 1,240.00 1,020.08 $ $ $ $ 25.11 191.35 186.00 153.01 $ $ $ $ .64 .57 -57 640.00 $ 96.00 $' 5 Total VI Rentals 10 yr Rental Bid Value P a r Acre 350.00 350.00 $ $ 192.00 384.00 $ $ 673.00 1.344.00 $ 1,023.00 1,694.00 $ $ $ 3.19 2.65 $ $ 2,688.88 1,344.44 $ $ 768.00 384.00 $ $ 2,688.00 1,344.00 $ $ 5,377.00 2,688.00 $ $ 4.20 4.20 .57 $ $ $ $ 107.00 727.00 707.00 581.00 $ 100.00 $ 165.00 $ 744.00 $ 612.00 $ 351.00 $ $ 2,679.00 $ $ 2,604.00 ' $ $ 2,142.00 $ 458.00 3,406.00 3,311.00 2,723.00 $ 2.74 $ 2.67 $ ''2.67 $ 2.67 $ .61 $ 390.57 $ 384.00 $ 1,344.00 $ 1,735.00 $ 2.71 :73.07 $ .61 $ 297.57 $ 292.00 $ 1,023.00 $ 1,320.00 $ 2.71 $ 63.72 $ .18 $ 111.57' $ 255.00 $ 892.00 $ 1,004.00 $ 1.58 1,040.00 $ 156.00 $ 3.75 $ 3,900.00 $ 624.00 $ 2,184.00 $ 6,084.00 $ 5.85 1,200.00 1.257.17 640.00 160.00 640.00 $ $ $ $ $ 180.00 '188.58 96.00 24.00 96.00 $ 3.25 $ .56 $ .16 $ .63 $ .63 $ $ $ $ $ 3,900.00 700.00 100.00 100.00 400.00 $ $ $ $ $ 720.00 754.00 384.00 96.00 384.00 $ $ $ $ $ 2,520.00 2,640.00 1,344.00 336.00 1,344.00 $ $ $ $ $ 6,420.00 3,340.00 1,444.00 4.36 1,744.00 $ S $ $ $ 5.35 2.66 2.26 2.73 2.73 782.74 $ 117.41 $ 3.19 $ 2.500.00 $ . 470.00 $ 1,644.00 $ 4,144.00 $ 5.29 $ $ 192.00 153.34 $ $ $ $ 261.67 531.56 $ $ 768.00 613.00 $ $ 2,688.00 2,146.00 $ $ 2,950.00 2,676.00. $ $ 2.30 -52 $ $ $ 64.00 64.00 64.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ 200.00 200.00 100.00 $ $ $ 256.00 256.00 $ .31 .16 .$ 896.00 896.00 896.00 $ $ $ 1,096.00 1,096.00 996.00 $ $ $ 1.71 1.71 1.56 $ 2.06 $ 2.06 $ $ 1,344.00 1,344.00 $ $ 2,662.00 2,662.00 $ $ 4.16 4.16 1,280.00 1,022.24 640.00 640.00 640.00 . Min. $ $ 320.77 36-25-13 15-26-13 16-26-13 637.24 T-15 0-21 0-22 Acres SE 40.00 640.00 640.00 $ $ . Withdzawn 96.00 96.00 .20 .31 I 1.318.40 1.318.40 $ $ ' 256.00 384.00 384.00 $ .$ $ , , 2.62 \ 7 Page 5 Bid Tract T-5 Covntv LOC 15.36-26-11 13;32,36-26-12 35-24-11;10,14,15 24,31-25-12 36-24-12 32-25-11 2-25-12 Oeera 17-25-12 18-25-12 36-25-12 32-25-12 1,281.56 1,278.52 640.00 T-13 0-14 0-15 0-16 Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona:Ana 2,16-27-2W 2,16-27-3W 16-27-4W 0-50 Otero 0-51 0-52 Otero Otero 36-11-9 2-12-9 16-14-11 32-14-11 T-3 Socorro 36-4-1 T-4 socorro 2-4-6 0-10 Otero 2-15-10 T- 7 T-8 T-9 T-10 Otero Otero Otero Otero 12-14-9 36-14-9 28-14-10 16-16-10 T-1 T-2 T-3 Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana 2,16-18-3W 32-18-3W 32-28-1 16-29-1 T-11 T-12 8 16-25-12 2-5-1 T-4 ' Acres ' 960.24 640.00 640.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ , 155.77 96.00 96.00 95.63 96.00 96.00 96.63 96.00 96.00 5 vr Total .. , 1,038.48 640.00 640.00 637.54 640.00 640.00 644.20 640.00 640.00 Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero T-6 T-7 T-8 T-9 T-10 Min. Acres SE $ 2.06 $ 2.06 $ 2.06 $ 2.06 $ 2.06 $ 2.06 $ 2.06 $ 2.06 $ 2.06 - -. 2,139.27 1,318.40 1,318.40 1,313.34 1,318.40 1,318.40 1,327.06 1.318:40 1.318.40 nentals Rental 10 yr Valu. Bid Per Acrs . $ 623.00 $2,181.,00 $4,320.00 . $ 384.00 $1,344.00 $2,662.00 $ 384.00 $1,344.00 $2,662.00 $ 383.00 $1,339.00 $2,653.00 $ 384.00 $1,344.00 $2,662.00. $ 384.00 $1,344.00 $ 387.00 $1,353.00 . $ 384.00 $1,344.00 $ 384.00 $1,344.00 $2,662.00 I $4.16 $4.16 $1,662.00 $2,680.00 $2,662.00 $4.16 $4.16 $4.16 $4.16 $4.16 $4.16 Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn $ .68 $ .23 $ .86 650.00 150.00 550.00 $ 576.00 $ 384.00 $ 384.00 $2,016.00 $1,344.00 $1,344.00 $2,666.00 $1,494.00 $1,894.00 $2.33 $ 128.00 Tie Bid $.17 213.80 - $ 512.00 $1,792.00 $2,006.00 $1.57 40.00 $ 6.00 $2.50- $ $ $4.60 640.00 640.00 120.00 640.00 $ $ $ 96.00 96.00 18.00 96.00 1,280.00 400.12 1,283.02 640.00 ' 640.00 381.83 .. $4.16 $ $ $ $ 144.04 96.00 96.00 $ 192.45 $ 96.00 $ 96.00 $ 57.27 1 9 7 1 $ $ -17 $ .17 $2.09 $ .1& $ .15' $ .16 $ .56 $ .29 100.00 $ 24.00 $ $ .$ $ .lio.oo 111.00 251.20 113.00 $ 384.00 $ 384.00 $ 72.00 $ 384.00 $ $ $ $ 192.45 100.00 358.40 103.00 $ $ $ $ . . 84.00 $ 1,344.00 $ 1,344.00 $ 252.00 $1,344.00 770.00 $2,695.00 384.00 $1,344.00 384.00 $1,344.00 229.00 $ 802.00 184.00 $2.78 $2.96 1 $1,454.00 $1.455.00 $ .503.00 $1,457.00 $2.27 $2.27 $4.19 $2.28 $2,887.00 $1.444.00 $1,702.00 $ 911.00 $2;25 $2.2G $2.66 $2.39 ' L OO'Z61S 00'891$ 00'889'Z$ 00'088'Z$ 52'2S 90*501$ oo's9s$ 00'891$ OO'OZ9$ 00'889'z$ 00.OLtl'lS Oo'sLs'lS 5Z'ZS 00*088'z$ SZ'ZS oo'e9LS 00'889'z$ 00'89LS 00'89LS oo'889'zS oo'L89'z$ SZ'ZS SZ'ZS ' ' 00'088'2$ 00'59Z'ES oo'szo'E$ S1' OO'Z61$ 51. $ OO'Z61$ oo'z6rS oo'lrz6 00'261$ s 21-SZ-ZE 51' $ S1' 6 00~09E$ 00'89LS 00'889'Z$ .00'099'1$ 00'8SO'ES OO''I81 6 00'09Z'tS OO'W $ 00'889'z$ oo'ss9'z$ 0O''IZ 00'00zS $ TE' $ : E€' 00'06 $ 00'261$ 00'9 OO'OZ9$ 00'009$ 00'09E$ 9S'L91$ 00'0L9S 86'061$ 86'061$ 00*89L$ 00~89LS 00'69L$ . 00'*19LS 00'99LS OO'EELS $ 00'009$ 6 00'891$ oo'ss9'zS OO'E69'Z$ 00'9L9'Z$ 00'9L9'2$ 00'99E'ZS 00'99s'z$ OO'Zl9 . OO'OLZS .. . ~ lZ-EZ-9E'SZ Sl* $ Sl. $ 91'ZtllS 00'69S$ 00'166'1$ 00'1EZ'ZS SE'ZS . 00'OSL'ZS $ ~ _ 12-0 9z-0 52-0 $Z-0 EZ-0 22-0 12-0 02-0 61-0 'm-0 11-0 91-0 Sl. $ 00'96 $ 00'9SES 00'99E'lS oo'r98'zS 19'9S 09"IS OO'SOl'ES .. . . ~ .. E9'ZS 1YZS 00'880'E$ OO'SW'ES 00'E96'Z$ 8E'Z$ oo*s98'z4 00'598'Z$ oo*Ers'z$ OO'ZL8 ME-81-9E MZ-Sl-ZE'91 'I-0 E-0 E-3 91-0 $ 1-3 L-0 9-0 5-0 00'261$ 00'261$ 8-0 OO'Z6T$ LE'ZKTi' 8-0 E-0 2-0 1-0 ZE'E81S OO'Z61$ OO'OZE . 00'5ZZ$ oo's99s OO'LEE'ZS OE'ZS , ' 9-0 5-0 8-0 OO'SZZ$ 00'98ES 00'99E'TS 58'ZS * E-0 00'099 MI-12-ZC 2-0 1-0 . .. Bid Tract County Otero 0-28 0-29 0-30 .. Otero 0-31 0-32 0-33 0-34 0-35 Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero T-2 DonaAna T-3 T-4 T-1 T-2 T-3 T-4 T-5 T-6 T-7 T-8 T-9 T-10 T-11 T-12 T-13 T-14 T-15 T-16 41 42 43 44 45 ' LOC SE 6,8-25-14 15,16-25-14 1,280.00 25,36-25-14 2.i~-26-11 1;732,36-26-11 2,3-26-15 16,32-26-15 25.36-26-15 2.16-28-1 Otero Otero 2,5-26-6 DonaAna DonaAna Dona Ana 17,18-26-2!4 16,32-26-2W 27,28,30,35,36 26-2W 3,4-26-6 DonaAna 1,2-26-3W DonaAna 12,13-26-3W DonaAna 15,16-26-26-38 Dona Ana 32,36-26-3W DanaAna 2,16-26-4W DonaAna 2,16-27-1W DonaAna 2,16-27-3W DonaAna 36-25-3 DonaAna 1,3-26-5 DonaAna 4,7-26-5 Dona Ana695.4832,36-26-5 Dona Ana 21,36-27-2 Dona Ana 2,16-29-3 16-29-4 Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Acres Rental 1,274.59 1,280.00 1:ooo.oo ~, ~ Min. ~ 1,149.85 1.280.00 816.42 918.44 . $191.19 $192.00 $192.00 $150.00 $172.4a Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Acres $ -15 $ .15 $ .15 $150.00 $ .15 $ .15 ' Total $192.00 $192.00 $192.00 $173.00 ' Rentala 5 Yr 10 V I $765.00 $2,677.00 $768.0D $2,688.00 $768.00 S2;688.00 .~ ~~-~~ $600.00 , $2,100.00 $690.00 $2,415.00 . Value Bid $2,869.00 Per Acre $2,250.00 $2.25 $2.25 .$2.25 $2.25 $2,588.00 $2.25 $2;880.00 $2;880.00 1.278.72 $191.81 1 9 7 0 $322.22 $ .25 $767.00 $2,685.00. $3,007.00 $2.35 1,310.12 1,309.84 $196.52 $196.48 $ .26 $ .26 $335.00 $335.00 $786.00 $786.00 $2,751.00 $2,751.00 $3,086.00 $3,086.00 $2.36 $2.36 1,261.46 1,280.00 $189.22 $192.00 $ -17 $ .20 $214.45 $256.00 $757.00 $768.00 $2,649.00 $2,688.00 $2,864.00 $2,944.00 $2.27 1,120.00 $168.00 $ .21 $235.20 $2,352.00 $672.00 1,147.76 1,280.00 960.00 1,280.00 1,211.36 1,275.00 1,278.52 640.00 1,295.04 816.02 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ -16 .16 .18 .18 .16 .21 ;17 .21 $182.50 $204.80 $172.80 $230.40 $193.82 $267.75 $217.35 $136.57 $689.00 $768.00 $576.00 $2,688.00 $768.00 $727.00 $2,678.00 $765.00 $767.00 $1,344.00 $384.00 $ -15 $ -17 $ .21 $125.57 $118.23 $142.80 $490.00 $417.00 $1,428.00 $408.00 $1,714.00 $1,460.00 680.00 $172.16 $192.00 $144.00 $192.00 $181.70 $191.25 $191.78 S, ~~. 96.00 Withdrawn $122.40 $104.32 $102.00 . $1,840.00 $1,578.00 $1,571.00 $2.25 $2.27 $2.31 763.92 $114.59 $ '.22 $168.06 $458.00 $1,604.00 $1,772.00 $2.32 13,23,25.28-23-12 800.00 33,36-23-12 1,295.20 1.280.60 2.16-23-13 31.32-23-13 . 1;282.81 35,36-23-13 1,120.00 Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn $2.587.00' , $2,411.00 $2,688.00 $2,016.00 $2,544.00 $2,685.00 $2,593.00 $2,893.00 $2,189.00 $2,918.00 $2,738.00 $2,945.00 $2,902.00 $k,481.00 $2.30 ' $2.31 $2.26 $2.26 $2.28 $2.28 $2.26 $2.31 1 ) Tract 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 County Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero LOG Acres SE Min. 1,278.36 1.2-23-14 314.7-23-14 11267.24 16,i1-23-14 1;280.00 12,13-23-14 1,280.00 14,15-23-14 1,280.00 Otero 16,17-23-14 1,280.00 Otero 1,259.36 18,19-23-14 Otero 20,21-23-14 1,280.00 Otiro 1,280.00 22,23-23-14 Otero 24,25-23-14 1,280.00 Otero 26,34-23-14 1,280.00 Otero 30,31-23-14 1,263.72 Otero 32,33-23-14 1,280.00 Otero 35,36-23-14 1,280.00 Otero 2,3-23-15 920.07 Otero 5,6-23-15 1.270.80 Otero 7,8,16-23-15 li155.74 Otero 32,36-23-15 1,000.00 Otero 13,26-24-11 800.00 Otero 35.36-24-11 1.280.00 Otero -' l,i,3,4-24-12 1i256.59 Otero , 5,9-24-12 1,250.29 Otero 11,12,13,15-24-121,160.00 Otero 16.17-24-12 1.120.00 Otero 20;21-24-12 1i179.48 Otero 22,25,26,29 1,040.00 24-12 Otero 32,36-24-12 1,280.00 .Otero. 2,5-24-13 13~a6.32 Otero 6,10,16-24-13 1,145.25 Otero , 14.15-24-13 1.280.00 Otero 32;35,36-24-131;040.00 Otero 25-24-13 19-24-14 1.272.24 Ocero , 1i350.96 1,2-24-14 Otero 3,4,6-24-14 926.24 Orero 8,lO-24-14 1,280.00 Otero . 11.13-24-14 1,280.00 Otero 12;16.21-24-14. 1;120.00 ~ ~~ Bid Acres 5 vr Total ' Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn .Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn WithdriaMl Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn $176.92 ,. L Rentals 10 vr . Value Rental Bid Per Acre .. . $ .30 $354.00 $708.00 $2.477.00 $2,831.00 $2.40 $ $ $ $ $ .15 $205.00 .16 $150.00 .16 .17 $205.00 $811.00 $556.00 $768.00 $768.00 $672.00 $2.837.00 .~ $1,945.00 $2,688.00 $3,042.00 $2,095.00 $2,893.00 $2,900.00 $2.522.00 $2.25 $2.26 $2.26 $2.27 $2.25 Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn $202.64 $138.94 $192.00 $192.00 $168.00 .15 $212.00 $170.00 ~ $2,688.00 $2,352.00 Page 9 Bid Tract 83 84 85 Countv Otero Otcro Otero 86 87 Otero Otero otero otero 88 89 90 91 92 93 , ' Otero . otero otero Otero :' . 105 Otero 0tero.Otero Otero Otero Otero' ' Otero Otero Otaro Otero Otero Otero 106 Otero. 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 107 Otero 108 109 110 111 112 Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero 113 Otero Acres LOC SE 1 20,30-24-14 22,23,24-24-14 28,29,33,36 24- 14 31,32-24-14 36-25-10 32-25-11 2,3-25-11 16,21-25-11 35,36-25.11 . 2,16-25-12 8.9-25-12 -10,11,14,15,24 31,32,25-12 ' 17.18-25-12 2,%-25-13 16,19-25-13 1,2-25-14 4,525-14 6,8-25'14 15,16-25-14' 25,36-25-14 2,s-26-6 3,4-26-6 3.7-26-6 '.,. Rentals Acres $ .16 $ .16 $207 .OO $207.00 $764.00 $768.00 $ ,.17 $155.00 $364.00 $205.00 $552.00 $190.90 $192.00 920.00 1,272.64 $138.00 $190.90 1.280.00 700.28 1,280.00 1,441.92 1,277.54 1.280.00 Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn 1,080.00 1.284.20 li133.93 701.88 1,279.52 1,279.84 1,274.59 1,280.00 1;280.00 1,310.12 1,309.84 947.76 Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn 1,240.00 $186.00 $ .15 $186.00 862.40 $129.36 $ .20 $172.48 . 9 .16 ... $ .17 $ .17 Rejected not min. bid $196.52 $196.48 Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdraw Withdrawn Withdraw Withdrawn . Value $2,688.00 Rental Bid $2,880.00 $2,895.00 $2,087.00 $1,932.00 $2.673.00 $2.878.00 $786.00 $2,974.00 $2,751.00 $2,751.00 $2.27 $2,974.00 $744.00 $2,790.00' $2,604.00 $517.00 $1,811.00 $1,983.00 5 yr 1,272.64 1,280.00 13,14,15,36 637.00 26-10 2,15-26-11 1,000.00 16,32,36-26-11 1,149.85 13,32.36-26-12 553.28 1,214.64 2,i5,16-26-13 16,18,32-34 26-13 1.035.19 2,7,8,16-26-14 .1.280.00 ' Min. Total 10 yr $2,673.00 Per Acre $2.26 $2.26 , $2.27 $2.26 1 , $786.00 $222.72 $222.72 . $2.27 $2.25 ' $2.30 7 Countv . . .. . . . . . I Page 10 . Value Tract 114 115 116 117 LOC Acres SE Otero 20,32,36-26-14 806.12 Otero 816.42 16,32.26-15 Otero Otero 25;36-26-15 918.44 Min Bid Total Acres 5 yr Rentals 10 yr Rental Bid Per Acre Withdrawn withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn 139 Dona Ana 2,16-28-1 1,278.72 $191.81 $ .17 $217.38 $767.00 $2,685.00 $2,902.00 $2.27 T-1 Dona Ana 2,16-21-2W 1,281.68 $192.25 $- 27 $341.57 $769.00 $2,692.00 $3,033.00 $2.37 T-7 T-8 T-9 T-10 T-11 T-12 Otero Otero Otero Otera Otero Otero 21,22-12-9 21.22-12-10 1.120.00 1,280.00 $192.00 5168.00 $156.33 $156.98 $192.00 $174.00 $ .27 5, .15 - - $768.00 $672.00 $625.00 $2.30 $768.00 $696.00 $2,688.00 $2,436.00 $3,027.00 $2,520.00 $2,400.00 $2,355.00 $2;990.00 $2,748.00 $2.37 $2.25 $ .24 $ .27 $339.33 $168.00 $212.00 $156.98 $301.57 $311.57 T-13 640.00 Sierra 36-13-213 $ 64.00 $ .20 $127.82 $256.00 $896.00 $1,024.00 $1.60 T-1 T-2 T-3 T-4 T-5 T-6 T-7 Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana 2,16-21-2W 1,281.68 12-21-2w 640.00 20.21.22-22-261. 920.00 960.00 27;34:21"2W 32,36-21-2W 1,280.00 2,16-21-3W 1,270.80 21.22,32-21-3W1,280.00 Rejected BMB $138.00 $144.00 $192.00 $190.62 $192.00 $ .16 S, .31 $ .40 $ .21 $ .31 $ .17 $105.00 $285.20 $384.00 $267.00 $397.02 $221.00 $384.00 $552.00 $576.00 $768.00 $762.00 $768.00 $1,344.00 $1;932.00 $2,016.00 $2.688.00 $2;668.00 $2,688.00 $1.449.00 $2;217.00 $2,400.00 $2,955.00 $3,065.00 $2,909.00 $2.26 $2.41 $2.50 $2.31 $2.41 $2.27 T-22 T-23 T-24 T-25 T-26 T-27 T-28 'Otero 636.88 640.00 Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero' 4-13-9 9-13-9 1,2-13-10 1,036.08 1,354-13-10 1,141.78 2,10,24,32-13-101,144.08 10,23-13-10 ,960.00 11.12-13-10 1,280.00 $ 95.53 $ 96.00 $ .33 $ .33 $210.17 $382.00 $384.00 $i,547.00 $1,555.00 $2,336.00 $2,574.00 $2,702.00 $2.43 $2.43 $2.25 0-1 0-2 0-3 0-4 Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana 19.30-21-213 23.24-21-3W 25;36-21-38 2,16-22-1W 18.19-22-1W 1,109.73 $1,422.00 $1,444.00 $2,160.00 0-5 ~ 629.40 640.00 . 960.00 1,118.40 $ 96.00 5155.41 $171.27 . ' $171.61 $144.00 $192.00 $ 94.41 $ 96.00 $144.00 Withdrawn Withdrawn . $ .20 $ .15 ~~ $628.00 . $2.688.00 ~~ ~ $2,352.00' $2,188.00 $2,198.00 $685.00 .21 $176.57 $300.00 $249.60 $267.00 $576.00 $768.00 $1,337.00 $1.344.00 $2;176.00 $2,398.00 $2,402.00 $2,016.00 $2,688.00 $ .16 $ .16 $ .15 $100.00 $100.00 $144.00 $378.00 $384.00 $576.00 $1,322.00 $1,344.00 $2.016.00 $ $ $ $. $ .15 .15 .26 .26 $211.20 $160.00 $622.00 $686.00 $2,266.00 $2,955.00 - \ $2.25 $2.25 $2.36 $2.36 $2.31 $2.26 $2.26 $2.25 "\ " - ""_." Page 11 Bid Tract 0-6 . 0-7 ' Dona Ana 1.2,12,36-26-41,149.24 $172.39 $ .17 $197.57 $690.00 $2,414.00 $2,611.00 $2.27 T-1 T-2 ' T-3 T-4 T-5 T-6 -~ T-7 , T-8 T-9 ' Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero 9.10-12-9 34,35-12-9 36-12-9 32-12-10 2,3-13-9 2,11,12-13-9 10,ll-13-9 15-13-10 15-13-10 S 96.00 $120.00 $ .16 $ .15 $ .23 $384.00 $480.00 $384.00 $384.00 $573.00 $575.00 $576.00 $192.00 $192.00 $1,344.00 $1,680.00 $1.344.00 $1:344.00 , . $2,016.00 $ -672.00 $672.00 $1,446.00', $1,802.00 Sl:493.00 $1;556.00 $2,152.00 $2,210.00 $2.162.00 $ -820.00 $ 840.00 $2.26 $2.25 $2.33 $2.43 .15 .46 .52 $102.00 $122.00 $148.57 $211.57 $146.00 $197.57 $146.00 $147.57 $167.57 13,14-13-9 16-13-9 21-13-9 23.24-13-9 g-k-10 16-13-10 $ $ $ $ ,$ .15 .21 .16 -15 .33 $ .33 $194.00 $135.60 $102.00 $194.00 $208.80 $208.80 $768.00 $384.00 $384.00 $768.00 $384.00 $384.00' $2,6a8.00 $2,882.00 T-6 Otero Otsro Otero Otero Otero Otero $1,344.00 $1,344.00 $2,688.00 $1,344.00 $1,344.00 $1,480.00 $1,446.00 $2,882.03 $1,553.00 $1,553.00 $2.25 $2.31 $2.26 52.25 $2.43 $2.&3 7 Sierra $ .59 $188.75 $128.00 $ $ $1.99 0-18 ' 0-19 T-1 T-2 T-3 T-4 T-5 ' ' Value T-1 0-17 . -. ' Rentals 10 y r 0-20 0-8 0-9 0-10 0-11 0-12 0-13 0-14. 0-15 0-16 . Mtn. Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn $192.00 Withdrawn $164.71 $168.00 Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn $144.00 $192.00 $144.00 LOC SE Acres 20.21.22-22-1131.280.00 Dona Ana Dona Ana 27;34;36-22-1W1;280.00 29,30-22-1W 1,273.18 Dona Ana 31,32-22-1W 1,273.18 Dona Ana Dona Ana 962.48 2.3-22-2w Dona Ana 16,16-22-2W 1,280.00 Dona Ana 13,24-22-2W 960.00 18,19-22-2W 1,098.66 Dona Ana 20,21-22-2w 1,120.00 Dona Ana Dona Ana 22,23-22-2W 1,280.00 Dona Ana 25,26-22-2W 1,280.00 Dona Ana 27,28-22-26 960.00 32,34-22-2W Dona Ana 960.00 Dona Ana 35.36-22-2W 1.280.00 35;36-22-3W 960.00 mna Ana 0-3 County Dona Ana 640.00 800.00 640.00 640.00 955.33 958.06 960.00 320.00 320.00 ' $ 96.00 $ 96.00 $143.30 $143.71 $144.00 $ 48.00 $ 48.00 1,280.00 $192.00 640.00 ' 640.00 1,280.00 $ 96.00 $ 96.00 640.00 $192.00 $ 96.00 $ 96.00 20-14-2W 14-15-2W 320.00 $ 32.00 19-25-2W 637.20 Withdram 1 640.00 . Acres Totel 5 VI '$ .15 $192.00 $768.00 $2,688.00 $2,880.00 $2.25 $ .15 $ .I5 $164.71 $168.00 $659.00 $672.00 $2,306.00 $2,352.00 $2,471.00 $2,520.00 $2.25 $ .15 $ .15 $ .15 $144.00 $192.00 $144.00 $576.00 $768.00 $576.00 $2,016.00 $2,688.00 $2.016.00 $2,160.00 $2,880.00 $2;160.00 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 BidRental Per Acre h $. .33 $ .15 $ $ $ $ .21 ~.. ~ $2,006.00 $2.012.00 448.00 637.00 1 $2.25 $2.25 $2.31 $2.25 $2.56 $2.62 7 . .. . .. I . . .. . . . . . . . Bid LOC SE Countv Tract Ana Dona 0-4 0-5 0-6 Ana Dona 0-7 0-8 0-9 0-10 0-11 . Dona0-12 Withdrawn 1,261.46 18-26-2W Ana Dona0-13 0-14 0-15 0-16 o-ij 0-18 0-19 0-20 0-21 0-22 6-13-9 Otero T-14 27,28-13-9 1,280.00 OteroT-15 ero T-16 T-17 T-18 T -.19 I . " " I Ana Dona AnaDona ' Acres 960.00 26,36-25-2W Withdrawn 1,119.32 29,30-25-2W Withdrawn 1,276.48 31,32-25-2W Withdrawn 1,178.30 2,5,6-25-3W 9,11,16-25-3W 1,000.00 Ana Done 23,24-25-3W Ana Dona 1,280.00 Withdrawn 25,36-25-3W Ana Dona 1,280.00 Withdrawn ' Dona Ana 30,32-25-3W Withdrawn 682.36 Ana 32,36-25-4W 1,280.00 Dona Dona . Withdrawn 16,32-26-2W 1;280.00 27,28,30,35,36 26-2W Withdrawn 1,120.00 Dona Ana 1,2-26-3W Withdrawn 1,147.76 Dona Ana . ' 12,13-26-3W 1,280.00 960.00 Dona Ana 15.16,26-26-3W Dona Ana 32;36:26-3W 1;280.00 . 1,211.36 . Dona Ana 2,16-24-4W Withdrawn Dona Ana 2,16-27-1W . 1,275.00 '1.278.52 DonaAna Withdrawn 2,16-27-3W 33.34-13-9 1,280.00 640.00 36-13-9 otero .".~ 6116.21.28 -,--,--,-- 16-10 . Value Per Acre ..., i Withdram .. . 802.17 Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn $192.00 $192.00 $192.00 $ 96.00 $ 96.00 ,. . . $120;33 Sierra 22,23-16-2W 1,240.00 $124.00 25,36-16-2W Sierra 21,22-13-10 ocero 640.00 25-13-10 Otero Otero 26,27-13-10 28-13-10 Otero 7-14-10 ' $1;450.80 .$1.17 1,240.00 $124.00 1,280.00 $192.00 $ 96.00 ' 1,080.00 $186.13 1,240.88 $ $230.40 .18 $ .17 $768.00 $217.60 $ $217.60 .17 $ .17 $111.00 $ .31 $200.00 . . $ .16 $ .16 $162.00 $768.00 $195.00 $ .15 $ .16 $165.00 $648.00 $ .15 $ .28 $768.00 $768.00 $1,455.00 $1,344.00 $384.00 $384.00 $2,688.00 $2,688.00 $2,688.00 $2,918.00 $2,906.00 $2.906.00 $2.28 $2.27 $2.27 $2.27 $1,344.00 $1;544.00 $2.41 $2,688.00 $l,8ll;oo $2,888.00 $2.26 $2.26 $2,579.00 $2.08 $2.57 $2.25 $2.26 $2.268.00 $2,883.00 $1,444.00 $2,433.00 $2,606.00 $2,956.00 $2.38 l'. I $127 .OO $200.00 $ .68 $2,330.00 $1,568.00 $448.00 $761.60 .$S43.20 $ 668 16,21-16-2W $112.00 1,120.00 SierraT-23 ' Rentals yrBidRental 10 vr Withdrawn .Withdrawn T-22$192.00 1,280.00 2,16-26-12 Otero 0-1 0-2 0-3 0-4 5 Total Acres Ana Ana 1,280.00 640.00 35-13-9 Otero Otero Min. I $1,684.00 $481.00 $768.00 $1,736.00 $496.00 $496.00 $2.08 $3,187.00 $1.736.00 $2,688.00 $100.00 $745.00 $350.00 . . .. $1,344.00 $384.00 $2.25 "7 .. . .. Page 13 x County Tract 0-5 0-6 Awes $1,392.00 520.00 640.00 LOC SE . Value Min $ 78.00 $300.00 $ 96.00 Otero Otero 32-13-10 36-13-10 T-20 T-21 T-22 T-23 T-24 T-25 Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero .. Otero 946.99 6,7,8,18-17-9 9,16.19,20-17-9 1,000.00 3O,3belj-9 800.00 2,11,14-18-9 812.12 640.00 36-18-9 36-19-8 640.00 $121.82 $ 96.00 $ 96.00 T-31 T-32 T-33 T-34 Sierra Sierra Sierra ' Sierra 32-13-2 .~ 9,17-14-2W 18,19-14-2W 32-14-2 Withdrawn $128.00 $112.55 Withdrawn '640.00 ~. . " ~ ' 1,280.00 1,125.48 640.00 $142.05 $150.00 $120.00 Bid Total Acres $ .58 $ -16 $ioo.oo Rentals 5 YK 10 yr Rental Bid $312.00 $1,092.00 $384 IO0 $1,344.00 $1,444.00 $568.00 Per Acre ' , $2.68 $2.26 $480.00 $487.00 $384.00 $384.00 $1,988.00 $2,100.00 $1,680.00 $1,705.00 $1,344.00 $1,344.00 $7,775.00 $8,210.00 $1,903.00 $2,209.00 $3,974.00 $1;664.00 $8.21 $2.38 $2.72 $6.21 $539.00 $474.00 $512.00 $450.00 $1,792.00 $1,575.00 $1.82 $2,331.00 $2,049.00 $1.82 .15 .16 .16 .16 .15 .15 .15 $150.60 $190.00 $101.00 $lOl.OO $120.00 $188.76 $160.92 $600.00 $696.00 $384.00 $384.00 $480.00 $755.00 $644.00 $2,100.00 $2,436.00 $1,345.00 $1,344.00 $1,680.00 $2,643.00 $2.253.00 $2,250.00 $2,626.00 $1,446.00 $1,445.00 $1,800.00 $2,831.00 $2,414.00 $2.25 $2.26 $2.26 $2.26 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $220.00 $240.00 $2.268.00 $2,488.00 $2,879.00 $2,047.00 $2,524.00 $2,834.00 $2,562.00 ~ . $2,923.00 $1,947.00 $2,016.00 $2.016.00 $1,551.00 $2,160.00 $2.160.00 $1;662.00 $2.29 $2.28 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $2,195.00 $2,061.00 $2,352.00 $2.251.00 $2.29 $6.11 $6.11 $ .28 ' 9 .62 $4.11 $ .50 $5,786.10 $6,110.00 $223.13 9503.51 .~ $2,630.40 $320.00 $ .42 $ .42 ~~~ $600.00 $8.21 ' - 4 $2.60 1 9 6 9 T-1 T-2 T-3 T-4 T-5 T-6 T-7 T-8 Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana T-9 T-10 T-11 T-12 T-13 T-14 T-15 T-16 T-17 T-18 T-19 ,DanaAna Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana T-20 Dona h a ~~. 27.32-23-2W 1.000.00 . 33;34,36-23-2W:.'160.00 2-23-313 640.80 36-23-3W 640.00 3,4,9,16-23-4W 800.00 6,7-23-4W 1,258.40 18.19-23-4W 1.072.82 20;21,27,28,32 23-4W 1,080.00 30,31-23-4W 1,256.96 33.34.35-23-4W 680.00 2.io"z4-1w 1.117.82 ~ ~ , - ~ -~~ 2,4,5,6-24-2W 1,241.81 13,14,16:24-2W 1,120.00 32.36-24-213 1.280.00 2,5-24-31.1 927.08 8.16-24-31.1 960.00 .. ~,~~ ' 17,20-24-3W. 960.00 25,29,30-24-3W 738.70 ' 30-24-3W 6 8 18,22-24-4W 1,045.27 981.60 3f,12-24-3W ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ $150.00 $174.00 $ 96.12 $ 96.00 $120.00 $188.76 $160.92 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $162.00 $188.54 $102.00 $167.67 $186.27. $168.00 $192.00 $139.06 $144.00 $144.00 $110.81 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ .20 .19 .91 .16 .18 .19 .18 .15 .15 $. 15 $ .15 $618.80 $176.00 $2.25 $210.00 $235.00 $139.06 $144.00 $144.00 $110.81 $648.00 $754.00 $408.00 $671.00 $745.00 $672.00 $768.00 $556.00 $576.00 $576.00 $443.00 $156.79 $147.24 $ .15 $ .19 $156.86 $190.00 $627.00 $589.00 $2;639.00 $1,428.00 $2,348.00 $2,608.00 $2.;352.00 $2.688.00 . , ~ ~ $2,086.00 $2.30 $3.01 $2.26 . . ' $2.28 , . ~ . ' - 7 $2.29 $2.25 . . . . . .. . . . . . .' .. i Page 14 Bid Tract 36-24-38 AnaDona T-21 .. , , ' ' Countv LOCAcre8 SE Min. Acres 640.00 2,3-24-4W 961;76 5,9,10-24-4W 960.24 11114-2&4W 1,280.00 16,17-24-4W 960.00 956.48 19.20-24-4W 1,160.00 23,25-24-4W 1,200.00 26,27-24-4W 1,280.00 28,29-24-4W 1,274.24 30,32-24-4W 1,280.00 35,36-24-4W 871.00 2,5-25-3W 6;9,11-25-3W 667.30 640.00 16a25-3W 1,280.00 23,24-25-3W 1,280.00 25i36-25-3W 682.36 30,32-25-3W 2,3-25-4W 1,277.12 880.00 10.15-25-413 16:21.22-25-4W 960.00 T-24 T-25 T-26 T-27 T-28 T-29 T-30 T-31 T-32 T-33 T-34 T-35 T-36 T-37 T-38 T-39 T-40 T-41 T-42 T-43 T-44 T-45 T-46 T-47 T-48 T-49 2-50 2-51 Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dora Ana Dona Ana Dana Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona An6 Dona Ana 32;36126-3W 2,i6-26-4w 1i211.36 Dona Ana Dona Ana 5,6-26-4W 7,8-26-4W Dona Ana 1,268.52 1i281.56 Dona Ana 2;16-27-2W Dona Ana 2;16-27-3W Dona Ana 1,2-27-4W 115 640.00 Sierra 32-15-2 0-55 0-56 Dona Dona 32-24-3 16,32-26-4 1-15 Otero 36-17-8 32-17-9 Ana Ana S.~96.00 - $144.26 $144.04 $192.00 $144.00 $143.47 $174.00 $180.00 $192.00 $191.14 $192.00 Withdrawn Wfthdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Wfthdrawn $191.57 $132.00 $144.00 Withdram Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Wlthdrawn Withdrawn $146.64 $190.28 $192.23 Withdrawn $107.80 . $100.00 S38L.00 S .16 $ .91 $ .91 $ .91 $ .15 $ .18 .Total Rentals -.-..5-vr 10 Value yr S1.1LL.00 .-I_, 5875.21 $873.82 $1.164.80 $ -144.00 $170.00" Rental Bid $1,444.00 $2,895.00 $2;890.00 $3,853.00 $2,160.00 $2,179.00 $2,636.00 $2,700.00 $180.00 $192.00 $191.14 $192.00' $577.00 $576.00 $768.00 $576.00 $574.00 $696.00 $720.00 $768.00 $765.00 $768.00 $ .15 $ .15 $ .15 $191.57 $132.00 $144.00 $766.00 $528.00 $576.00 $1,848.00 $2,016.00 $2,873.00 $1,980.00 $2,160.00 $ .15 $ .15 $ .15 $146.64 $190.28 $192.23 $587.00 $761.00 $769.00 $2,053.00 $2,664.00 $2,691.00 $2,200.00 $2,854.00 $2,884.00 $ .15 $107.80 $631.00 $1,509.00 $1,617.00 $ 64.00 $ .28 $179.20 $256.00 $ 896.00 $1.68 $1,075.00 560.60 1,044.56 $ 84.00 $ .80 $ .62 $450.00 $336.00 $156.68 $650.00 $627.00 $1,177.00 $2,194.00 $1.627.00 $2,844.00 1,280.00 $192.00 $5.30 $6,784.00 $768.00 $2,688.00 $7.40 $9.472.00 1.280.00 977.59 1i278.52 718.64 $ $ $ $ $' .y .15 .15 .15 -15 $200.00 $2,020.00 $2,016.00 $2.688.00 $2;016.00 $2,009.00 $1,436.00 $2,520.00 $2,688.00 $2,676.00. $2,688.00 $2,682.00 Per Acre $2.26 $3.01 ' $2.25 $2,880.00 $2.25 $2,868,00 $2,880.00 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 ' ' $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 , $2.25 $2.90 . $2.72 .. . .. . .. Pdgr 15 County Bid Tract T-16 Otero '2-17 T-18 T-19 T-20 T-21 T-22 Otero ' Otero Otsro Otero Otero Otero LOC SE 36-18-8 32-18-9 . " '. ' 0-4 0-5 g6n.no """ 1,012.24 1,280.00 734.68 1,280.00 Sierra Sierra Min. $1,543.00 $2,688.00 $5,856.00 $3,646.00 $3,669.00 93,366.00 $6,710.00 $6,855.00 $9.13 $5.36 $2,688.00 $1,220.00 $1.53 $ 92.00 $126.73 $128.00 $127.66 $ 48.00 $ .ll $ .10 $ .10 $100.00 $130.00 $130.00 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 $1,300.00 $368.00 $507.00 $512.00 $511.00 $192.00 $512.00 $511.00 $ 800.00 $288.00 $1,400.00 $1.55 $1.02 $1,000.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 $1,550.00 $1,300.00 $506.00 $464.00 $256.00 $384.00 $b18,00 $401.00 $400.00 $512.00 $1,288.00 $1,774.00 $1,792.00 $1,788.00 $' ,672.00 $1,792.00 $1,787.00 $1.008.00 $1;771.00 $1;624.00 $ 896.00 $2.016.00 $1;466.00 $1,403.00 $1.400.00 $1;792.00 $1,388.00 $1,904.00 $1.922.00 $3;188.00 $1,272.00 $3,192.00 $3,087.00 Sl;808.00 $3;171.00 $2,924.00 $1.596.00 $3;016.00 $2,566.00 $2,503.00 $2,950.00 $3,092.00' $1.51 $1.50 $1.50 $2.50 $2.65 $2.49 $2.42 $2.51 $4.41 $2.52 $2.49 $3.14 $2.45 $2.50 $2.95 $2.42 $191.40 $ .15 $191.40 $766.00 $2,680.00 $2,871.00 $2: 25 $192.31 $162.11 $ 96.00 $..16 $ .16 $. .21 $210.00 $177.00 $136.00 $769.00 $648.00 $384.00 $2,692.00 $2,269.00 $1,344.00 $2,902.00 $2,446.00 $1,480.00 $2.26 $126.77 $ $ $ $ $ $813.00 $585.00 $381.00 $535.00 $405.00 $507.00 $365.00 $353.00 $496.00 $384.00 $1,775.00 $1,277.00 $1.235.00 $1;736.00 $1,345.00 $2,588.00 $1,862.00 $1,616.00 $2.271.00 $1,750.00 Otero 1,282.08 1,2-14-9 otero 3,4-14-9 Otero 640.00 16-14-9 32 33 34 35 36 Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra 911.49 881.89 Per Acre $1,120.00 26 1.267.69 1.2-15-2W 3;5,6-15-2W 7,8.11-15-2W 12,13-15-2W 1,240.00 16,18-15-2W 961.00 $2,016.00 $2,125.00 $2,016.00 Value $320.00 27 28 1.080.72 $576.00 $607.00 $576.00 $768.00 $441.00 $768.00 Rental Bid $100.00 Dona Ana 2,16-25-213 1,276.00 Rentals 10 VI $ .13 T-1 , 5 VI $ 80.00 $127.64 $ 71.96 $126.50 $116.00 $ 64.00 $ 96.00 $104.70 $100.19 $100.00 $128.00 , Total Acres $144.00 $4.00 $3,840.00 $151.84 $1.,521.00 $1.50 $144.00 $1.72 $1,652.50 6192.00 8 $678.40 .53 $5,167.00 $7.03 $110.20 $4,167.00 $3.26 $192.00 'Withdrawn before sale 800.00 13,36-14-1 21,26-14-1W 29,32-14-1 920.00 2,16-15-1 Sierra 1,267.34 32.36-15-1 1.280.00 Sierra Sierra 1i276.56 2.k-16-1 Sierra 22,23,27,28-16-1480.00 Sierra 32,36-16-1 1.280.00 2,4-16-1W Sierra 1,276.37 3,26-16-1W 719.56 Sierra 5,6,8,9,28-16-1W1,264.96 Sierra Sierra 16,22,26-16-1W1,160.00 640.00 27-16-1W Sierra 34,36-16-lW 960.00 Sierra Sierra 1,046.95 2,3-17-1W 5,8,9-17-1W 1.001.85 Sierra Sierra 1O,i5,16-17-1w1;ooo.oo 32,36-17-1W 1,280.00 Sierra 0-6 0-7 0-8 0-9 0-10 0-11 0-12 0-13 0-14 0-15 0-16 0-17 0-18 0-19 0-20 ' " 3,lO-18-9 960.00 21.32-18-9 16,32-19-9 2-20-8 16.36-20-8 16;36-20-9 1;280.00 Acres $128.00 $ 91.15 $ 88.19 $124.00 $ 96.10 $1.10 $1.29 $1.09 $1.02 $1.11 $1.95 $1.12 $1.09 $1.04 $1.05 $l;lo .64 .64 .43 .43 .42 $ ' 600.00 $l;300.00 . ,~ $ 700.00 ~ , , $2.26 $2.31 $2.04 $2.04 $1.83 $1.83 $1.82 7 . . ... "__ -I . . . .. . . ". . . . . . Page 16 Tract , Total 5 vr 1,120.00 960.00 $112.00 $ 96.00 $ .25 $ . $422.40 $281.00 $448.00 $384.00 $1,568.00 $2,016.00 $1,849.00 $2,438.00 $1.65 $2.54 $150.00 $191.89 $192.00 $191.74 $ .38 $4.69 $ .20 $1.25 $375.00 ,~ ~. $6,000.00 $2,100.00 $2,687.00 $250.00 $1,600.00 $600.00 $768.00 $768.00 $767.00 $2.48 $6.79 $2;684.00 $2,475.00 $8,687.00 $2.938.00 $4 284.00 $193.18 Withdrawn $170.54 $192.00 $ 96.00 $ .15 $193.18 $773.00 $2,705.00 $2,898.00 $2.25 $ .20 $ .32 $1.86 $222.00. $411.40 $1,191.40 $682.00 $768.00 $384.00 $2,387.00 . $2,609.00 $1,344.00 $3,099.00 '$2.535.00 $2.30 $2.42 $3.96 640.00 $ 96.00 $ -16 $100.00 $384.00 $1,304.00 $1.444.00 $2.26 1,276.99 1,280.00 $127.70 $128.00 $1.21 $1.21 $1,545.17 $1;548.80 $511.00 $512.00 $1,788.00 $1,792.00 $3,333.00 $3,341.00 $2.61 $2.61 1,281.84 231.31 800.00 1,265.04 $192.28 $ 34.70 $120.00 $189.76 $120.00 $117.70 $140.53 $ 96.00 $192.10' $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $2,692.00 $ 486.00 $1,680.00 $2,657.00 $1,680.00 $1,648.00 $1,967.00 $1,344.00 $2,689.00 $2,884.00 $ 606.00 $1,810.00 $2,867.00 $1;800.00 $1.798.00 . $2,117.00 $1,464.00 $2,939.00 $2.25 $2.62 $2.26 $2.27 $2.25 $120.00 $250.00 $769.00 $139.00 $480.00 $759.00 $480.00 $471.00 $562.00 $384.00 $768.00 Otero Otero Otero Otero 27,36-14-10 15.16-18-9 2,16-19-8 1,000.00 1,279.24 1,280.00 1,278.24 T-5 T-6 DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna 2,16-26-5 32,36-26-5 2,6-26-2W 32,36-26-4W 32-28-3 1.287.88 695.48 1,136.95 1,280.00 640.00 42 Otero 16-15-11 44 45 Sierra Sierra 2,16-14-1' 32,36-14-1W 0-1 0- 2 0-3 0-4 0-5 0-6 0-7 0-8 0-9 DonaAna DonaAna Dona Ana DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna Dona .Aha DonaAna DanaAna 2,16-22-3W 18.19-22-3W' 21;28-22-3W 31,32-22-3W 33.34-22-3W' 4.6-23-313 7;30-23-3W 32-23-3W 2,36-23-4W "-13 T-14 Sierra Sierra 32,33,36-11-1 34,35,36-11-1W 809.33 580.54 $ 80.93 $ 58.05 $3.62 $3.63 $2.930.00 $2;108.00 $324.00 $232.00 $1,133.00 $ 813.00 T-15 T-16 Socorro Socorro 16,174-2 32-5-2 677.28 640.00 $ 67.73 $ 64.00 $ ..16 $ .16 $LlO.OO $271.00 $256.00 $ $ 0-1 0-2 0-3 0-4 0-5 0-6 DonaAna EonaAna DonaAna Dona Ana Dona Ana Dona Ana 2,15-23-1W 16-23-1W 32,36-23-1W 1.2-23-2W 11,12-23-2W 13,14,23-23-2W 887.03 640.00 1,280.00 1,278.56 800.00 960.00 $133.05 $ 96.00 $192.00 $191.78 $120.00 $144.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $133.05 $532.00 $384.00 $768.00 $767.00 $480.00 $576.00 2,16-18-8 . , 800.00 784.68 936.86 640.00 1.280.64 ' Value Acres 0-7 T-4 a Rentals 10 vr Min. Acres 24,25-15-2W 32,36-15-2W T-2 T-3 , Bid se Sierra Sierra 0-9 0-10 , LOC 37 38 0-8 ' County 4.4 .15 .52 .16 .17 .15 .19 .16 .19 .19 .15 .16 .17 .16 .18 .17 $192.28 $120.00 $130.00 $210.00 $120.00 $150.00 $150.00 $100.00 $100.00 $212.67 $207.18 $142.12 $160.00 Rental Bid $2.688.00 $2,688.00 ; ' ~~~ $4,063.00 Per Acre $2.30 $3.35 $2.29 , $2.26 $2.29 $2.29 $2,921.00 $5.02 $5.03 948.00 896.00 $1,058.00 $ 996.00 $1.56 $1.56 $1,863.00 $1.344.00 $2,688.00 $2,685.00 $1,680.00 $2,016.00 $1,996.00 $1,444.00 $2,901.00 $2,892.00 $1,822.00 $2,176.00 $2.25 $2.26 $2.27 $2.26 ' - $2.28 $2.27 7 . . . .. -. " . . .. . . .. . . . "" . . .. I Page 17 , Tract 0-724.26-23-2W Ana 0-8 0-9 0-10 0-11 ~ .' 0-12 0-13 0-14 0-15 0-16 0-17 0-18 ' 0-19 0-20 c-21 0-22 0-23 0-24 0-25 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 . 163 164 T-52 County Dona Dona Ana. DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna Dona Ana DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna Dona Ana DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna Loc SE Acres 800.03 1,000.00 1,160.00 ~~ Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra T-53 Dona Ana Dona Ana 79 Lincoln 80 Lincoln 81 Lincoln 82 Lincoln 27;32-23-2W 33.34.36-23-213 1i117.82 2,io-i4-1w 15,16-24-1W 800.00 17,18,21,,22-24-lW 878.60 32,36-24-1W 1.280.00 2.i6-25-1~ 1:278.24 1,2-27-4W 16-27-4W 2,16-27-5W 32,36-27-5W 2,16-28-3W 1i278.52 718.64 640.00 1,278.84 1,280.00 1,278.52 , 2,10-14-2W 6,7,8-14-2W 14,15,22-14-2W 28,34,35-14-2W 32-16-2W 16,32-14-3W 36-14-3W 2,18,32-15-3W 32-16-2 32-17-2 2,3,10,15,22 7-10 3,15,21,23 7-10 . ~~~ ~ 640.00 640.00 640.00 $192.00 $ 96.00 880.00 Rentals .,_.."_" Bid Min Total s120.00 . Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn $120.00 $131.79 $192.00 $191.74 $149.95 $ 96.00 $177.05 $192.00 $192.00 Withdrawn Withdrawn $ 96.00 Withdrawn $192.00 $191.78 $ 87.92 $124.05 $ 72.00 $ 80.00 $ 64.00 $ 124.00 $ 64.00 $ 88.00 $ 56.00 $ 64.00 879.16 1,240.48 720.00 800.00 640.00 1,240.00 640.00 1,280.00 16,32-20-1 36;20-1 . , Acres Total $ .16 $480.00 $480.00 $131.47 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ .16 5 yr 10 vr $1,680.00 Value Rental Bid $2.26 $2.26 $1,811.00 Per Acre .15 .16 .17 .17 .17 .17 617 .17 $131.42 $131.87 $210.00 $212.61 $165.00 $110.00 $196.60' $212.80 $215.12 $480.00 $527.00 $768.00 $767.00 $600.00 $384.00 $708.00 $768.00 $768.00 $1,680.00 $1,845.00 $2,688.00 $2,684.00 $2,100.00 $1,344.00. $2,478.00 $2,688.00 $2,688.00 $1,811.00 $1,977.00 $2,890.00 $2,897.00 $2,265.00 $1,454.00 $2,675.00 $2,901.00 $2,903.00 $2.27 $2.27 52.27 $2.27 $2.27 $2.27 $ .16 $100.'16 $384.00 $1,344.00 $1,444.00 $2.26 $ .17 $ .16 $220.00 $210,12 $768.00 $767.00 $2,688.00 $2,585.00 $2,908.00 $2.27 $2,855.00 $2.26 $ $ $ $ $ $ .44 .19 .44 .18 .38 .10 $.20 $ .I1 $ .37 $ .e37 $390.00 $240.00 $316.80 $140.00 $240.00 $124.00 $130.00 $100.00 $235.00 $235.00 $352.00 $496.00 $320.00 $256.00 $496.00 $256.00 $352.00 $384.00 $256.00 $1,231.00 $1,137.00 $1,008.00 $1,120.00 $ 896.00 $1,736.00 $ 896.00 $1,232.00 $1,344.00 $ 896.00 $1,621,00 $1.977.00 $1,325.00 $1,260.00 $1;136.00 $1;860.00 $1,026.00' $1,332.00 $1;579.00 $1,131.00 $1.84 $1.59 $1.84 $1.58 $1.78 $1.50 $1.60 $1.51 $2.47 $1.77 $ .61 $ .62 $786.40 $353.75 $768.00 $384.00 $2,688.00 $1,344.00 $3,474.00 $1.738.00 $2.71 $2.72 $288.00 $2.26 $2.25 $2.26 .: ' 1.280.05 $192.01 $ .15 $192.00 $768.00 $2,688100 $2,880.00 $2.25 786.57 $117.99 $ .15 $117.99 $472.00 $1,652.00 $1,770.00 $2.25 $150.00 $120.00 $ .15 $ .15 $150.00 $120.00 $600.00 $480.00 $2,100.00 $1.680.00 $2.250.00 $1,800.00 $2.25 $2.25 7, 7 I . . . . I . . . ., Page 18 Bid Tract 83 ' County Lincoln Lincoln 84 9ncoln 85 . 86 87 88 Lincoln ' ... 89 90 91 137 . ero 6-9 Otero 9 Otero , I . , Lincoln Lincoln 19,20,21,27, Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln . Otero Lac SE Acres 31,32,33-7-10 1,000.00 2,3-9-9 1,117.66 $131.38 875.85 13,14-9-9 1,280.00 840.00 15,16,17-9-9 28,30-9-9 23,24-9-9 25,26,33,34-9-9 960.00 35,36-9-9 2-15-9 2-15-10 16-15-10 $2.85 $108.00 32,36-15-10 . 138 139 140 Otero Otero $2,052.00 141 Otero 15,16-16-9 142 143 Sierra Sierra Sierra 2.4-15-1W 5;6-15-1W 7,8-15-1W 9,16,17-15-113 $111.94 1.119.38 18.19-15-1W 20;21-15-1W 28,29-15-1W 30J1-15-1W 32,33-15-1W 36-15-113 174 175 176 L77 178 179 180 181 182 183 Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra 186 Socorro 0-18 Otero Otero 0-19 T-1 Ana T-2 Sierra Dona Ana Dona 717.80 1,280.00 680.00 1,204.90 2,16,32-22-2 36-22-2 2,11,21-22-3 1,171.12 ' $192.00 $126.00 Total Acres $ .15 $ .15 $ .18 $ .16 $ .15 $107.67 $192.00 $102.00 $144.00 $107.67 $ .15 $ .15 $ .15 $ .15 482.00 $ 72.30 640.00 $96.00 720.00 $ 90.00 600.00 800.00 $120.00 $2.89 $142.05 946.98 $2,736.78 480.00 $2.85 $ 72.00 $2.85 $1,827.00 $2.85 920.00 , 720.00 '961.18 960.00 640.00 $ 92.00 $ 72.00 $ 96.12 $ 96.00 $ 64.00 $128.40 640.00 640.00 $ 96.00 $ 96.00 , ' ' Rentals Value 10 vr 5 yr Rental Bid $600.00 $2,100.00 $2,250.00 $2,347.00 $671.00 $2,515.00 $526.00 ' $1,840.00 $2.28 $1,990.00 $768.00 $2,895.00 $2,688.00 $1,76&.00 $2.25 $l,890.00 $504.00 $150.00 $167.65 $160,00 $207.00 $126.00 $192.00 $102.00 $2.25 $144.00 ' ' ' $1,376.00. $2.88 . .78 -. $1.13 $1.13 $1;344.00 $384.00 $739.20 $ .77 $ .77 $1;037.40 $1.13 $ .77 $ .77 $2,305.00 $1.13 $ .78 . - $693.12 , ~ ". -. s -, ~ .-w.-. ? . -n-n S?55.00 ,-.... $1,289.85 $1,448.60 $454.00 $1,590.00 $512.00 $3.241.00 $1,792.00 $861.92 $554.40 $740.11 $1,081.65 $256.00 $499.20 $1,508.00 $2,688.00, $1,428.00 $2,016.00 $289.00 $1,012.00 $384.00 $3,171.00 $1,344.00 Sk32.00 $1,512.00 $360.00 $1,260.00 $3,985.00 $1,680.00 $480.00 $568.00 $1,988.00 $288.00 $1,008.00 . . $1.368.00 s. $431.00 $768.00 $408.00 $1,530.00 $576.00 , $1,710.00 $2.85 888.01 ' $ 88.80 1,136.11 $113.61 1,280.06 $128.00 960.00 $ 96.00 1,284.04 2,16-3-3 16-15-9 36-15-9 Min. $150.00 $167.65 . ' I $~,7.00.00 . $1,344.00 $2,544.00 $1;344.00 $2,388.00 $3,564.00 $2,970.00 $ .53 $4.95 $1:95 $4.95 $4.95 $4.98 $4.99 $4.95 ' $4,725.00 $2.376.00 _)." _" $l~u?h.nn ~ $2,8s.0.00 , I $2.18 $2.53 $2.53 $2.17 $2.17 $2.53 $2.17 $2.17 $2.53 $2.18 $1.939.00 $1.51 $3,094.00 $3.98 $4.83 $180.74 $3,171.00 $2,530.00 $723.00$640.60 $ .53 $175:67 $2.63 $622.89 . . . $703.00 $2,460.00 .-,, $2.25 $2.25 -. $384.00 $384.00 $2.26 $2,160.00 $2;083.00 $418.00 S,I-.~ S K"~.." .O~ s1)11')9.m , . ...~ - ,. - - $368.00 $2,325.00 $1,288.00 $288.00 $1,008.00 $1,562.00 $384.00 $2,085.00 $1,34S100 $384.00 $1,344.00 $2,426.00 $' 896.00 $1,395.00 $ .I1 $1,798.00 '$514.00 $141.21 $1.88 $1,750.00 $2.73 $1,615.00 $2,880.00 P e r Acre $2.25 $2.25 $3,083.00 $2.63 7 ~ - .".. __ . . .. . -. " " .. .. . ., Page 19 Countv LOC SE T-3 DonaAna T-4 "-5 T-6 -~ T-7 T-8 DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna T-9 T-10 . T-11 T-14 T-15 DonaAna Dona'Ana Dona.Ana DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna DonaAna T-16 T-17 T-18 T-19 T-20 T-21 T-22 DonaAna Dona Ana DonaAna DonaAna Dona Ana DonaAna DonaAna T-23 .Dona Ana 14.23-22-3 20:22-4 2,36-23-2 1.092.50 2.16-23-3 25,32-23-3 1;240.00 16,32-24-1 36-24-1 2.32-24-2 2,ll-24-3 12,14,34-24-3 360.00 16,36-24-3 2,16-25-1(3fj25 2,X-25-2 32.36-25-2 ' l.i.11.12.16. 3i-i5-5 2,36-26-1 2,16-26-2 32.36-26-2 1,276.82 ~,i6,36-26-3 2,10,14,15-27-1 16,32-27-1 1,280.00 36127-1 ~~. 32-27-2 2,16-27-2 Tract 920.00 , I~ ~ . ' 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 .. Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Acres 1,280.38 1.280.00 . 1.120.84 800.32 ~ 1,280.00 1,279.29 1,247.16 1,120.00 . . 1,218.47 1,238.14 1,161.42 1;140.87 1,278.88 Acres Bid Total 5 yt Rentals 10 vr Value Per Acre Rental Bid $ .53 $ .53 $ .54 $ .53 $490.00 $682.75 $585.49 $660.66 $552.00 $768.00 $656.00 $744.00 $1,932.00 $2,689.00 $2;295.00 $2,604.00 $2,422.00 $3,371.00 $2,880.00 $3,265.00 $2.63 $2.63 Withdrawn $120.05 $ 54.00 $192.00 $191.89 $187.07 $168.00 $ .53 $ .54 $ .53 $ .15 $ .53 $ .54 $427.40 $192.62 . $681.39 $195.00 $480.00 $216.00 $768.00 $768.00 $748.00 $672.00 $1,681.00 $756.00 $2,688.00 $2,687.00 $2,619.00 $2.352.00 $2,108.00 S949.00 . ..... $3,369.y0 $3.285.00 $2;952.00 $2.63 $2.64 $2.63 $2.25 $2.63 $2.64 $182.77 $185.72 $174.21 $191.52 $171.13 $191.83 $192.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $651.82 $662.62 $620.21 $2.63 $2.64 $2.63 $2.63 $2.64 $2.63 $2.63 $192.00 $191.46 $ .53 $ .54 $128.36 $1.57 $1.58 $1.58 $1.57 $1.56 $1.56 $1.58 $1.59 $1.58 $1.57 .$138.00 $192.06 $163.88 $186.00 Withdrawn -53 .54 .53 .53 .54 .53 .53 $666.66 $600.30 $680.88 $610.90 $681.77 $683.45 . $2,882.00 $731.00 $743.00 $697.00 $766.00 $685.00 '$767.00 $768.00 $2,439.00 $2;681.00 $2;396.00 $2,685.00 $2,688.00 $3.211.00 $3,263.00 $3,059.00 $3,362.00 $3,007.00 $3,367.00 $3,371.00 $768.00 $766.00 $2,688.00 $2,681.00 $3,373.00 $3,363.00 $2.63 $2.64 $513.00 $335.00 $512.00 $512.00 $512.00 $382.00 $512.00 $512.00 $512.00 $512.00 $426.00 $512.00 $512.00 $1,797.00 $1,174.00 $1,792.00 $1,792.00. $1.792.00 $3;813.00 $1:338.00 , $2;830.00 $1,792.00 $1,792.00 $1,792.00 $1,792.00 $1,491.00 $1,792.00 $1,792.00 $3,816.00 $3,828.00 $3.816.00 $3;803.00 $3,154.00 $3,790.00 $3,803.00 $2.97 $2.98 $2.98 $2.97 $2.96 $2.96 $2.98 $2.99 $2.98 $2.97 $2.96 $2.96 $2.97 $2,559.00 $2,600.00 ~ 1,280.00 1,276.38 1,283.56 1,2-12-1w 3,4,9-12-1W 838.67 1.280.00 10,ll-lZ-lW 1,280.00 12,13-12-1W 1,280.00 14.15-12-113 ' 16:17.20-12-1W -955.91 21;22-12-1w ' 1,280.00 1,280.00 23,24-12-1W 25.26-12-113 1.280.00 27;28-12-1w 1;280.00 29.30.31-12-1W . 1.065.25 . 32;33112-1W 1,280.00 ' 1,280.00 34,35-12-1W ' ~ ' ~~ Min. $ 83.87 slzs.00 $128.00 $128.00 . $95.59 $128.00 $128.00 $128.00 $lZ8.00 $106.53 $128.00 $1.28 $1.56 $1.56 $1.57 $684.50 $682.82 $2,016.39 $1,326.30 $2,023.60 $2,010.80 $1,998.00 Sli492.42 $2;023.60 $2,036.40 $2,023.60 $2,010.80 $1.662.99 $1;998.00 $Z,Ol0.80 $2,500.00 $3,816.00 $3,803.00 $3:790.00 ' 7 .. . Page 20 County Tract 88 Sierra 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra Sierra T-54 T-55 Lincoln Lincoln T-56 T-57 Lincoln Lincoln 0-41 0-42 Otero 960.24 Oterb 0-43 Otero 0-44 Otero 0-45 0-46 0-47 0-48 0-49 0-50 0-51 0-52 0-53 Otero Otero Otero 0-54 0-55 Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero LOC SE 36-12-1W 36-13-1W 2,5-13-1W 6.7-13-1W 16,32-13-1W 32,36-14-5W 2,16-15-5W 2,4,18-12-1 16,21,27-12-1 32,36-12-1 2,lO-13-1 9.16-13-1 32.36-13-1 32,364-9 36-6-10 16-7-10 8,274-11 32,35,36-6-11 Value Min. Acres Bid Rentals 10 yr Per Acre Rental Bid Acres Total 5 yr $1.56 $1.56 $1.56 $512.00 $508.00 $321.00 $512.00 $512.00 $518.00 $362.00 $384.00 $504.00 $383.00 $384.00 $512.00 $1,792.00 $1,777.00 S1:123.00 $1,792.00 $1,792.00 $1,814.00 $1,266.00 $1,344.00. $1,763.00 $1;341.00 $1;344.00 $1,792.00 $3,790.00 $3.757.00 $2;375.00 $1,923.00 $1,920.00 S1:940.00 , . . ~ $2,696.00 $2,872.00 $3,741.00 $1;516.00 $1;474;00 $1,922.00 960.00 1,280.00 $128.00 $126.88 $ 80.20 $128.00 $128.00 $129.62 $ 90.43 $ 96.00 $125.90 $ 95.84 $ 96.00 $128.00 $1.58 $1.59 $1.57 $ .18 $ .14 $ .10 $1,998.00 $1,980.55 $1,252.29 $131.00 $128.00 $129.62 $1,430.06 $1,527.60 $1,977.80 $: 175.00 $ 130.00 $. .I30.00 1.280.00 $128.00 $ .26 $335.00 $512.00 $1,792.00 $2,127.00 $1.66 1.134.08 800.00 879.14 $i70.11 $120.00 $131.87 $ -23 $ .23 $ .23 $260.84 $184.00 $202.20 $680.00 $480.00 $527.00 $2,381.00 $1,680.00 $1,846.00 $2,642.00 $1,864.00 $2,048.00 $2.33 $2.33 $2.33 $157.80 $144.04 $ .20 $ .15 $210.00 $145.00 $631.00 $576.00 $2,209.00 $2,016.00 $2,419.00 $2,161.00 $2.30 $2.25 $191.11 $ .15 $195.00 $764.00 $2,675.00 $2,870.00 $2.25 $174.30 $191.91 Withdrawn $192.00 . $192.00 $ 72.00 $ 96.00 $192.00 Withdrawn $ .15 $ a15 $175.00 $195.00 $697.00 $768.00 $2,440.00 $2,687.00 $2,615.00 $2,882.00 $2.25 $2.25 $ $ $ $ $' $195.00 $195.00 $100.00 $100.00 $192.00 $768.00 $768.00 $288.00 $384.00 $768.00 $2,688.00 $2,688.00 $2,883.00 $2,883.00 $1.108.00 $1;444.00 $2,880.00 1,280.00 1,268.81 801.98 1,280.00 1,280.00 1,296.24 904.34 960.00 1,258.98 ' 958.40 2,16,28,33-11-91,052.00 36-11-9 2-12-9 1,2,24,25-11-9 6,17,18,19,20-11-101,274.06 11,12,16,22,27,32 11-9; 8-12-10 1,162.03 4,9,16-12-9 1,279.40 9.10.15-12-9 1.280.00 zi,zi-12-9 1;280.00 1,280.00 23,26-12-9 25,35-12-9 480.00 27-12-9 640.00 28.33-12-9 1.280.00 . 34;35-12-9 800.00 36-12-9 32-12-10 1,280.00 1.11,12-12-10 931.54 1,227.48 3,4-12-10 $ .10 $ .10 $ .10 ' Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn .15 -15 .21 .16 .15 . . ~ $1,008.00 $1;344.00 $2,688.00 ~~ $2.96 $2.96 . $2.96 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $2.98 $2.99 $2.97 $1.58 $1.54 $1.50 ~~ ~ - ' $2.25 $2.25 $2.31 $2.26 $2.25 .? 7 Page 21 Bid County Tract , . 0-56 0-57 0-58 0-59 0-60 0-61 0-62 0-63 0-64 Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero T-1 T-2 Dona Ana 1.278.72 2,16-28-1 Dona Ana 32-28-1 1,021.83 16-29-1 2J6-28-2 Dona Ana 7,32-28-2 Dona Ana 16-29-2 36-28-2 . Dona Ana 2-29-2 T-3 T-4 T-5 ' LOC SE 34 35 36 37 Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln 38 Lincoln 39' Lincoln 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 . 47 48 49 Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln 1.284.60 5.9-12-10 16,15-12-10 13,24,25-12-10 14.23-12-10 36-12-10 Acres ~ 1,160.00 1,208.76 1.280.00 407.16 Min. Acres Total ' 5 vr Rentals 10 yr Per Acre Withdrawn Withdrawn . Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn $191.81 $ .15 $191.'81 $767.00 $153.27 $191.87 $ .20 $ .64 $204.37 ' $819.62 $767.00 $613.00 $2,146.00 1;279.10 1.102.57 $165.39 $ .68 $750.74 1.280.00 $192.00 $ .64 $820.20 2,164-9 1,382.12 3,4.5-6-11 1.160.00 1;120.00 9;16-6-11 2,3,10,15,22 7-10 1,280.05 15,20,21,22,23,24 7-10 1,258.34 28,30,31,32.33 7-10 1,138.59 L,3,4-7-11 1.221.73 2,3,16,20-7-111,240.55 5,6-7-11 1,243.25 7,8-7-11 1,281.55 18,19-7-11 1,079.19 760.00 21.22-7-11 26-7-11 320.00 2,36-8-8 1,278.40 2.13-8-9 1.280.00 . 1i254.73 16;31-8-9 Value Rental Bid Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn , , $2,685.06 $2,877.00 $2.25 $2,686.00 $2,350.00 $3,505.00 $2.30 $2.74 $662.00 $2,316.00 $3,067.00 $2.78 $768.00 $2.688.00 $3.508.00 ' $2.74 Page 22 51 County Lac SE 32,364-9 Lincoln 1,120.64 7,8-8-10 Lincoln 78 socorro Tract 50 0-1 : ' DonaAna Bid Acre8 Total ' 5 vr Rentals . 10 yr ' Rental Bid Value Per Acre Withdrawn Withdrawn 22,23,26,27,36, 6-8 . . Min. Acres 1,280.00 $ 96.00 960.00 36-28-1 2-29-1 $192.00 1,280.00 1.280.00 641.40 0-45 0-46 Lincoln Lincoln 2,16-7-9 32-7-9 T-19 T-20 Dona Ana DonaAna 2,16128-31.1Withdrawn 1,278.52 32,36-28-3W $192.00 1,280.00 0-4 DonaAna 16-28blW 10 Socorro 11 Socorro 32,36-3-6 24,32,36-4-6 $ .10 I $ .86 $192.00 $1,100.00 $1.71 $ 96.21 640.00 $100.00 $384.00 $1,344.00 $1,100.00 $768.00 $2,688.00 $3,788.00 $ .47 $600.00 $768.00 $385.00 $2,688.00 $1,347.00 $3,288.00 $2,447.00 $ -15 $195.00 $768.00 $2,688.00 $2.25 $2,883.00 $250.00 $300.00 $512.00 $336.00 $1,792.00 $1,176.00 $2,042.00 $1,476.00 $2.96 ' '' $2.57 $3.82 Withdram before s a l e 1,280.00 840.00 $128.00 $ 64.00 .. . . $ .20 $ -26 , $1.60 $1.76 . . . .. . TABLE 12 . . County Otero Otero 0-3 sierra 0-4 0-9 0-10 0.11 0-12 0-13 0-13 Sierra Otero Otero Otaro Otero Otero Lincoln 0-2 Lincoln 0-23 Otero 0-24 Otero 0-25 Otero 0-26 0-27 0-28 0-29 0-30 0-31 0-32 0-33 0-34 0-35 0-36 Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero 0-37 Otero 0-38 0-39 0-40 0-41 Otero Otero Otero Otero . Bid Acres Total $ -50 $ 400.00 $4.75 $ ,,. 950.00 $ 3 0 $ 480.00 $ -50 $ 480.00 $ .50 , $ 100.00 6 a50 $ 100.00 $ .50 $ 560.00 $ .50 $ 640.00 $ .50 $ 640.00 $2.14 $ 1,369.60 Period Rentals 5 vr: 1 0 yr $ 480.00 $ 1.680.00 $..G120.00 $ -420.00 $ 383.00 $ 1,342.00 $ 384.00 S 1.364.00 s 87.00 ~ . . ~$ . 306.00 $ 96.00 $ 336.00 $ 672.00 $ 2,352.00 $ 764.00 $ 2i673.00 S 764.00 $ 2,673.00 $ 384.00 $ 1,344.00 $ 3i313.00 $ 3,313.00 $ 2,714.00 6.85 1.90 1.90 2.79 2.73 2.60 2.60 2.60 4.24 Value Per Acre 3-24-14 12,16,21-24-14 20,30-24-14 31,32-24-14 13-7-10 Acres 799.95 200.00 958.40 960.00 145.59 160.00 1.120.00 ~~, 1,272.64 1,272.64 640.00 16,20,25,26,27, 33,34,36-9-9 1,240.00 620.00 $4.00 $ 4,959.99 $ 744.00 $ 2,604.00 $ 7,564.00 6.10 1,280.00 1,426.08 640.00 713.04 $ -50 $ .50 $ $ 640.00 715.00 $ $ 768.00 856.00 $ $ 2,688.00 2,995.00 $ 3,328.00 $ 3,710.00 2.60 2.60 1,280.00 1,429.94 1.200.00 1;280.28 1,120.00 1,119.05 1.249.52 1;280.00 720.00 706.00 628.36 1,280.00 640.00 714.97 600.00 640.14 560.00 559.53 624.76 640.00 360.00 353.00 314 18 640.00 $2.73 $ .50 $6.25 $ .50 $ .SO $4.29 ' $2.32 $5.47 $4.44 $3.54 $ S $ $ $ $ $ 768.00 2.688.00 $ 6.188.00 $ 3,718.00 S $ 2.350.00 $ $ $ $ $ 720.00 768.00 672.00 671.00 750.00 768.00 432.00 424.00 377.00 768.00 S $ $ $ $ $3.82 $3.28 $ 3,500.00 $ 715.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 645.00 $ 560.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 2.900.00 $ 7;OOO.OO $ 3,200.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 4,200.00 $ $ $ $ $ 2,688.00 1,512.00 1,483.00 1,320.00 2,688.00 $ 4.83 2.60 8.35 2.60 2.60 6.39 4.42 7.57 6.54 5.64 5.92 5.38 840.00 420.00 $.50 $ 420.00 $ 504.00 $ 1,764.00 $ 2,184.00 2.60 976.32 1,295.20 1,280.60 1,280.00 488.16 647.60 640.30 640.00 $.SO s $.50 586.00 777.00 768.00 768.00 S $ $ $ $ $ 2,050.00 2,720.00 2,689.00 $.50 490.00 650.00 645.00 640.00 $ $ $.SO $ $ $ 2;688.00 $ $ $ $ 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 LOC SE 2.36-19-15 2-26-11 2;9-13-1 10.16-13-1 3-24-14 36-21-13 32-21-14 2,16-21-14 36-21-14 32-21-15 2,9-21-15 16;36-21-15 1,2-22-13 32,36-22-13 4,a-22-14 6,7-22-14 9,16-22-14 17,29-27-14 18,30-22-14 31-22-14 32,33-22-14 13,14,23.24,25 23-12 28.32-23-12 33;36-23-12 2,16-23-13 32,35-23-13 ~~ ~ s Min. 399.98 ~ ..". 100.00 479.20 480.00 100.00 100.00 560.00 . PAge 1 - Work Sheets:SecondaryLeaseEvaluation ! Tract 0-19 0-20 . 636.32 636.32 320330 . I s $ $ $ $ Rental, Bid 2.080.00 1;370.00 1.822.00 1;824.00 406.00 k36.00 $ 1.912.00 2.60 1974 858.00 . ~~~~ 3,003.00 2,520.00 2,689.00 2,352.00 2;624.00 $lo,ozo.oo $ $ S $ $ $ S, $ 3,334.00 2;912.00 7.150.00 ,~~ . 5,524.00 9,688.00 4,712.00 31983.00 .,..~.~~ 3,720.00 . 6,888.00 , ~ 2,540.00 3,370.00 3.334.00 3.328.00 ~~ ~ ~ ! - \ . . ... .. ,, .r .. I ..: . . , Page 1 1 Bid Tract 0-42 0-43 0-44 0-45 0-46 0-47 0-48 0-49 0-50 0-51 0-52 0-53 0-54 0-55 0-56 0-57 Countv Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero . Otero : 0-59 0-60 0-61 Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero 0-62 Otero . ' 0-58 0-63 Otero 0-64 Otero 0-65 Otero Per Acr. 1,280.00 720.00 1,280.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ so 36-24-11 32-24-12 1,280.00 640.00 $ .50 640.00 $ 768.00 $ 2,688.00 $ 3,328.00 1,2,3,12,13 24-12 4-15-24-12 1,277.67 1,299.42 638.84 649.71 $ .50 $ .50 640.00 650.00 $ $ 767.00 780.00 $ 2,683.00 $ 2.729.00 $ 3,323.00 $ 3,379.00 $ 2,520.00 $ 3,120.00 2.60 I , Value Total 645.00 640.00 635.00 640.00 640.00 640.00 640.00 630.00 640.00 640.00, 640.00 640.00 640.00 645.00 640.00 640.00 400.00 640.00 360.00 640.00 I i Rentals 5 vr 10 v r 770.00 $ 2,694.00 767.00 $ 2.685.00 760.00 S 2:661.00 768.00 $ 2i688.00 768.00 $ 2,688.00 768.00 $ 2,688.00 768.00 $ 2;688.00 756.00 $ 2,645.00 768.00 $ 2,688.00 768.00 $ 2,688.00 768.00 $ 2,688.00 768.00 $ 2.688.00 763.00 5 2:670.00 768.00 $ 2;689;00 762.00 $ 2,669.00 763.00 $ 2,670.00 ,480.00 $ 1,680.00 768.00 $ 2;688.00 432.00 $ 1,512.00 768.00 $ 2,688.00 Min. 641.41 639.18 633.62 640.00 640.00 640.00 640.00 629.68 640.00 640.00 640.00 640.00 635.70 640.24 635.40 635.80 400.00 640.00 360.00 640.00 Loc SE 31,36-23-13 1,2-23-14 3.4,7-23-14 10,ll-23-14 12113-23-14 14;15-23-14 16,17-23-14 18119-23-14 20,21-23-14 22,23-23-14 24126.36-23-14 27,28-23-14 29,30-23-14 2,3-23-15 5.6-23-15 718-23-15 ,~ ~. -~ 16,23-23-15 32,36-23-15 13,25-24-11 26;35-24-11 ~ ~~~ I~~ Acres . 1,282.81 1,278.36 1,267.24 1.280.00 1;280.00 1,280.00 1,280.00 1,259.36 1,280.00 1,280.00 1,280.00 1,280.00 1,271.40 1,280.48 1,270.80 1,271.60 800.00 Acres $ .50 $ .50 $ .so S .50 $ ..50 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 9 40 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 S O .50 .50 .50 S $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Rental Bid S $ $ $ $ ."~. 3,325.00 3.339.00 . ~ 7.60 _." ~ 3,296.00 3,328.00 3,328.00 S 3i328.00 $ 3;328.00 $ 3,275.00 $ 3,328.00 $ 3,328.00 $ 3,328.00 S. 31328.00 ~,~~ $ 3,310.00 $ 3,334.00 $ 3,309.00 $ 3;310.00 3.310.00 $. 2:080.00 $ 3,328.00 $ 1,872.00 $ 3,328.00 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 . 2.60 2.60 ~ .~~ ', 2.60 ~. 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 ,. 2.60 2.60 .- . 16,22,24,25,26 24-12 1,200.00 600.00 $ .50 600.00 $ 720.00 $ .50 480.00 ~.~ 635.00 575.00 640.00 S 576.00 . .~.~ $ .2,016.00 $ $ $ 760.00 687.00 768.00 $ 2,659.00 $ 2,405.00 $ 2i688.00 $ 2,496.00 $ 3,294.00 $ 2.980.00 $ 3i328.00 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 560.00 300.00 $ $ 672.00 355.00 $ 2,352.00 $ 1.244.00 $ 2,912.00 $ 1,544.00 2.60 2.60 0-66 0-67 0-68 0-69 Otero Otero Otero Otero 29,36-24-12 2,5-24-13 6,10,16-24-13 25,32-24-13 960.00 1,266.32 1,145.25 1,280.00 480.00 633.16 572.63 640.00 0-70 Otero 0-71 Otero 35,36-24-13 16,21-24-14 4-24-14 1.120.00 592.16 560.00 296.08 $. -50 $ .50 $ so $ .50 $ -50 .-? ,- . . . .. . . . . .. . . county 0-72 0-73 0-74 Otero 0-75 Otero Otero otero Min. LOC SE 6-24-14 6-24-14 6-24-14 145.77 83.86 118.03 $ $ $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 5 .50 19,22,35,36 24-14 1,152.24 $ 576.12 1,122.52 1,276.46 1,243.60 640.00 $ $ $ $ Acres $ $ 100.00 100.00 $ $ .50 561.26 638.23 621.80 320.00 $ $ $ $ $ .50 $ .50 5 vr Total Acres 100.00 87.00 50.00 71.00 $ 580.00 $ 691.00 $ $ $ $ 565.00 640.00 625.00 320.00 S $ $ $ 674.00 766.00 746.00 . Otero Otero Otero Otero 8,17-24-15 2,5-24-15 31,32-24-15 36-24-15 ' 0-80 Otero 36-25-10 21-25-11 960.00 $ 480.00 $ .50 $ 480.00 640.00 $ 320.00 $ .50 $ 1,117.54 $ 558.77 $ .50 $ 1,280.00 764.20 1,280.00 667.72 1,119.52 880.00 600.67 1,245.13 1,286.32 1,280.00 1,245.83 1,280.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 640.00 382.10 640.00 333.86 559.76 440.00 300.34 622.57 643.16 640.00 622.92 640.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 13,14,15,16.32 36-26-10 984.56 $ 494.78 $ :SO $ 500.00 $ 15,36-26-11 32,36-26-12 598.48 $ 299.24 $ .50 $ 300.00 $ 604.49 $ .50 $ 605.00 . , 0-81 Otero 32-25-11 0-82 Otero 2,9,10,11,14,15 25-12 0-83 0-84 Otero 0-85 Otero Otero Otero' Otero Otero Otero. Otero Otero Otero 0-86 0-87 0-88 0-89 0-90 0-91 0-92 0-93 0-94 0-95 0-96 0-97 16,17-25-12 18,24,31-25-12 32,36-25-12 Otero 0tero 0t e r o otero Otero 2-25-13 - ~. . . I. b.'. ~ ''I 2,12,15-25-14 24,32,33-25-14 5-25-15 6,28-25-15 7.8-25-15 1i.17-25-15 18,20-25-15 21,32-25-15 2,32,34,36 26-13 1.208.97 -50 .50 S O -50 Rentals $ $ $ 0-76 0-77 0-78 0-79 ' . . . Bid Tract . I $ $ $ Rental Bid Value Per Acre 306.00 176.00 248.00 $ $ $ 406.00 276.00 348.00 $ $ $ 2.60 2.60 $2,420.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 2.60 $ $ $ $ $ $ 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 . 52.357.00 --- 2.60 8 384.00 $2,681.00 $2,612.00 $1,344.00 $ 2,922.00 3,321.00 3,237.00 1,664.00 $ 576.00 $2,016.00 $ 2,496.00 $ 2.60 320.00 $ 384.00 $1,344.00 $ 1,664.00 $ 2.60 560.00 $ 671.00 $2,347.00 $ 2,907.00 $ 2.60 768.00 459.00 768.00 401.00 672.00 528.00 360.00 747.00 772.00 768.00 748.00 768.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,328.00 1,990.00 3,328.00 1.737.00 2,911.00 2.60 2.60 2.60 1,566.00 3,240.00 $ 3,346.00 $ 3,328.00 $ 3,241.00 $ 3,328.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,578.00 $ 2.60 $ 359.00 $1.257.00 $ 1,557.00 $ 2.60 $ $ 3,144.00 $ 2.60 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 640.00 385.00 640 .OO 335.00 .50 440.00 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 303.00 625.00 560.00 645.00 640.00 625.00 640.00 .M 10 vr 2,688.00 1,605.00 $2,688.00 $1,402.00 $2,351.00 $1,848.00 $1,261.00 $2,615.00 $2,701.00 $2,688.00 $2,616.00 $2,688.00 594.00 $2,078.00 725.00 $2,539.00 2,288.00 $ $ .T 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 . -. . . .., . . -. _" 8 4 . . .. . . . Page 5 Bid Tract 0-28 1.280.00 " Gountv Lincoln Loc SE 26,27,33,34,35 10-9 Acres 0-29 Lincoln 36-10-9 0-30 Otero 1,2,12,24,25,36 11-9 0-31 827.61 Otero. 0-32 0-33 0-34 0-35 0tero ' 0-36 0-37 0-38 0-39 0-40 0-41 0-42 0-43 0-44 0-45 Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero Otero 0-5 Otero Otero Otero Otero 0-7 0-8 640.00 640.00 $ 1,086.48 SQcOrro 4,5-4-7 $1,280.00 13.15-22-14 $1,280.00 22,26-22-14 34,35-22-14 36-22-14 Total Acres . 5 vr Rentals 10 vr Value Rental Bid Per Acre $1.80 2,300.00 $768.00 $2,688.00 $4,988.00 $3.90 320.00 $2.34 1,500.00 $384.00 $1,344.00 $2,844.00 $4.44 $ 543.24 $3.04 3,300.00 $652.00 $2,282.00 $5,582.00 $ 413.81 $ .85 700.00 $49,7.00 $1,739.00 $2,438.00 $2.95 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 613.74 465.77 580.00 520.00 395.22 628.44 480.00 320.00 320.00 320.00 100.00 520.00 473.50 $11.08 $13.36 $ 9.81 $ .51 $ . .56 $1.56 $ 2.34 $: 2.03 $ 2.97 $ 7.34 $ 2.21 $ 1.37 13,600.00 2,000.00 15,500.00 10,200.00 400.00 700.00 1,500.00 1.500.00 1,300.00 1;900.00 300.00 . 2,300.00 1,300.00 $736.00 $559.00 $696.00 $624.00 $474.00 $754.00 $576.00 $384.00 $384.00 $384.00 $ 25.00 $62&.00 $568.00 $2,578.00 $1,956.00 $2,436.00 $2,184.00 $1,660.00 52.639.00 $2;016.00 $1,344.00 $1,344.00 $1;344.00 $ 86.00 $2,184.00 $1,987.00 $16,178.00 $3,956.00 $17,936.00 $12,384.Q0 $ 2.060.00 $ 3i244.00 $ 386.00 $ 4,484.00 $ 3,287.00 $13.18 $4.25 515.46 $11.91 $ 2.61 $ 2.66 $ 3.66 $ 4.44 $ 4.13 $ 5.07 $ 9.44 $ 4.31 $ 3.47 $1,000.00 $ 500.00 $ 2.40 2,400.00 $600.00 $2,100.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 4.50 $ 921.90 $ $ 616.00 460.95 $ $ .73 .68 900.00 625.00 $493.00 $369.00 $1,725.00 $1,291.00 $ 2,629.00 $ 1,916.00 $ 2.13 $ 2.08 640.00 640.00 640.00 320.00 S $1,280.00 $ 640.00 $ $ $ $ .50 .50 .50 .50 640.00 6h0.00 640.00 320.00 $768.00 $768.00 $768.00 $384.00 $2,688.00 $2,688.00 $2,680.00 $1,344.00 $ 3.328.00 $ 3;328.00 $ 3,328.00 $ 1,664.00 3,4-12-10 1,227.48 1,11,12-12-10 931.54 10,15-12-10 1,160.00 1,040.00 13,14-12-10 1,3,10,36-13-11 790.43 4,5,6,7-13-11 1,256.88 8,9,16,32-13-11 960.00 36-14-9 640.00 640.00 16-15-9 36-15-9 640.00 2-15-10 40.88 32.36-16-19(9.16-17-9) $1,040.00 $ 946.99 Socorm $1,232.002,3-4-7 0-6 $ 6,17,18,20 11-10 0-8 0-9 Mln. b $2.15 $ .$ $ $ ' 2.60 $ 2.60 $ 2.60 $ 2.60 - " " " " M i l i t a r y reservation (402-6) Tractnumber r l H : .I 5 0 IO r n c IO F I G U R E 2 E L E V A T I O N OF P R E C A M B R I A N S U R F A C E A N D A R E A O F A - 4 8 7 6 ' Well c o n t r o l p o i n t a n d e l e v a t i o n x S u r f a c e p r o ~ e c t ~ o na sn d t o p o g r a p h y - 1000 f e e t CI on nt et or vuar l OUTCROP # Fault, showlng downthrown x Estlrnated side 106' 107O reservation Military " " " (402-6) Tract number I 1 0 7 O. M E X -1 C - IO 5 0 IO ml FIGURE 3 I S O P A C HM A P A N D OUTCROPAREA O F BLISS-ELPAS0INTERVAL C o n t o u r I n t e r v a l 100 feet x Estlrnated e3 W e l l c o n t r o l (9S k r r f c l c ( ~cullirul 0 c _" . - " 107" 7 14 5 " (402-6) "I I p-" L -L I I R.1 E. -@a E X I C O T E X A .$I 166' Military reservation (402-6) Tractnumber " " " 425' F I G U R E 5 ISOPACH M A P C o n t o u r I n t e r v a l 5cA0 oW nf tereloItl A N D O U T C R O P A R E A OF M O N T O Y G AROUP A S cuor fnat cr oe l L I -33O 0 " " " Militory reservation IO (402-6) Tract number 5 0 F I G U R E 6 I S O P A C H M A P A N D O U T C R O P A R E A OF F U S S E L M E N D O L O M I T E 50 feef CIonnt e t or u va rl " " " . " __ Q W e l l control - D Surface control 4O I 0 zo tI 3 2 R. I W. W.1 E. 24 5 Military reservation (402-6) Tract n u m b e r " " " '1 - 10 5 0 10 rnl 175' F I G U R E 7 I S O P A CMHA P A NODU T C R O P A R EOAF D E V O N I A N ROCKS C o Innt toeur rv a l 5 0AcfW oe ne tI rl o l D S ucr of anct reo l B4po 106" 107' 3 4 O R O t" 0' D ZIT P E R R A I I C I I I06O 107O " " " 2789 Militaryreservation (402-6) Tractnumber P'T:"I IO 5 0 1 IO m i F I G U R E IO I S O P A C H M A P A N D O U T C R O P A R E A O F P E N N S Y L V A N I A N R O C K S C oi nntteoruvra l 500 feet Ac oW n ter lol l D Surface control 34' _j D O N A 32% " " " 4I + - M i l r t a r yr e s e r v a t l o n (402-6) Tract n u m b e r F I G U R E 12 I S O P A C HM A PA N DO U T C R O P _ I _ E X 1 6 8 C ol nn tt os ur vr a l 500 feet A R E AO F BURSUM-HUECO FORMATIONS h Well control D Surface control 107" 34O 106' 1 D cfi d G R.4W. 2 3 R.1 W. - R.1 E. 2 4 3 5 630; I U-J \ ( I I-N I 32 " " " Militaryreservation (402-6) Tract number a B B P " I H - I IO 5 FIGURE I3 ISOPACH MAPAND OUTCROPAREA C o n t lonut re r v a I 2 5 0 feet & Well control 0 4 IO ml OF A B 0 F O R M A T I O N D S u r f ac oc en t r o l 4' 106" k R.4W. \ I I - ~ I - I 33' I .32" Military r e s e r v a t i o n (402-6) Tract number P - 7 " " " IO 5 0 I IO mi F I G U R E 15 I S O P A C H M A P A N D O U T C R O P A R E A O F S A N A N D R E S F O R M A T I O N C o n t o u r Interval 2 0 0 f e e t 107" A Well control 0 Surface control \ I I -t 0 330i2 Ir "i --/ " J LI I I- I- I-\. i r' D O N A I I * R.14E. K 250' 32 .: I Military reservation (402-6) Tractnumber " " " I L .' P"'l IO 5 0 1 IO rnl FIGURE 16 T H I C K N E S S A N D O U T C R O P A R E A OF M E S O Z O I C R O C K S d W e l l control D S u r f a c e control 1 107" 106" 4 O -33 I 6-(u I .32" 107" 106" Shell 330ig I r- Jordo I - ! e Zapata c.l ' un arson I-N D . O N A I Ir I -Ana 1 cho rc) strong N Bales I >Fed I I I .+ 3echlel I I 5 'i' 107' M 6 I " " " hlJrls "" E 3 " L " " k"4 I I I dcbl I 32 II I I Foge 8 8 9 Or" " -J i ' J J -9u >( IO A S 106. MiIItary reservation IO (402-6) Tract number 5 0 -kkY .A " F I G U R E 19 L O C A T I O N OF O I L A N D G A S TESTS IO ml W N t: 107" 106" 32 .32" " " " M iI i t a r yr e s e r v a t i o n (402-6) Tractnumber r IO - 5 7 ~ 0 ~ :1 IO r n l FIGURE 2 0 HYDROCARBON O C C U R R E N C E S .- 107" _ I M E x - " " " " " " . " 1- c 0 0 1 , @Gas 0 0 1 1& G a s K m v - M e s a v e r d e Fm. Cretaceous r(-Trlassic P s a - S o nA n d r e Fs mP y - Y e s o Frn Pwc- Wolfcamp I P - P e n n s y l v a n lP o nc - C a n y P o ns - S t r a w P na - A t o k a 0 "S f - F u s s e l m a n -" Dol O m - M o n t o y a Gp. Kd-Dakota Ss LK-Lower P a - A b o S s P h - H u e c o Ls 32 X " " " A S 106" M i l i t a r y reservation - IO (402-6) Tractnumber F I G U R E 21 BIr 5 0 IO rnl FACTOR A N D A V E R A G E B I D PER A C R E PrlrnJry Perlad JL!r 1'339 t h r i ) u q h 0 ;'e)) B I J F u c t o r W - 5 L e a s e s W ~ t h d r u w n PJ E?] l h d Fdctor FPII I 9 7 3 b3aA'dPrUQe pq BId/Acre m nces R - IE. 2 32" " " " r-qt" Military reservation (402-6) Tract n u m b e r IO F I G U R E 2 2 BID FACTOR 5 1 0 IO r n t A N D A V E R A G E BID PER A C R E S e c u i i d a r y P e r r o d M a r 1974 t h r o u g h J u n e 1975 ( 3 2 3 )6 1 d Factor W - 5 L e a s e s W l t h d r a w r l a 8 a A v ~ r u q c - J6 1 d / A c r e 107" E X -I C 0 j?-3/ Bld Fnctor Li m