Research Article Existence Results for a Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz Condition -Kirchhoff-Type Equation without

advertisement
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2013, Article ID 914210, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/914210
Research Article
Existence Results for a 𝑝(π‘₯)-Kirchhoff-Type Equation without
Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz Condition
Libo Wang1,2 and Minghe Pei2
1
2
Institute of Mathematics, Jilin University, Chang’chun 130012, China
Department of Mathematics, Beihua University, Ji’lin 132013, China
Correspondence should be addressed to Libo Wang; wlb math@163.com
Received 25 November 2012; Accepted 28 April 2013
Academic Editor: Jaime Munoz Rivera
Copyright © 2013 L. Wang and M. Pei. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
We consider the existence and multiplicity of solutions for the 𝑝(π‘₯)-Kirchhoff-type equations without Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz
condition. Using the Mountain Pass Lemma, the Fountain Theorem, and its dual, the existence of solutions and infinitely many
solutions were obtained, respectively.
1. Introduction
Autuori et al. [30, 31] have dealt with the nonstationary Kirchhoff-type equation involving the 𝑝(π‘₯)-Laplacian of the form
The Kirchhoff equation
𝜌
𝜌0
πœ•2 𝑒
πœ•2 𝑒
𝐸 𝐿 󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨 πœ•π‘’ 󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨
𝑑π‘₯)
−
(
=0
+
∫
󡄨
󡄨
πœ•π‘‘2
β„Ž 2𝐿 0 󡄨󡄨󡄨 πœ•π‘₯ 󡄨󡄨󡄨
πœ•π‘₯2
(1)
Ω
was introduced by Kirchhoff [1] in the study of oscillations
of stretched strings and plates, where 𝜌, 𝜌0 , β„Ž, 𝐸, and 𝐿 are
constants. The stationary analogue of the Kirchhoff equation,
that is, (1), is as follows:
− (π‘Ž + 𝑏 ∫ |∇𝑒|2 𝑑π‘₯) Δ𝑒 = 𝑓 (π‘₯, 𝑒) .
Ω
𝑒𝑑𝑑 − 𝑀 (∫
(2)
After the excellent work of Lions [2], problem (2) has received
more attention; see [3–10] and references therein.
The 𝑝(π‘₯)-Laplace operator arises from various phenomena, for instance, the image restoration [11], the electro-rheological fluids [12], and the thermoconvective flows of nonNewtonian fluids [13, 14]. The study of the 𝑝(π‘₯)-Laplace operator is based on the theory of the generalized Lebesgue space
𝐿𝑝(π‘₯) (Ω) and the Sobolev space π‘Šπ‘š,𝑝(π‘₯) (Ω), which we called
variable exponent Lebesgue and Sobolev space. We refer the
reader to [15–19] for an overview on the variable exponent
Sobo-lev space, and to [20–29] for the study of the 𝑝(π‘₯)Laplacian-type equations.
Recently, there has been an increasing interest in studying
the Kirchhoff equation involving the 𝑝(π‘₯)-Laplace operator.
1
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯) Δ π‘(π‘₯) 𝑒
𝑝 (π‘₯)
+ 𝑄 (𝑑, π‘₯, 𝑒, 𝑒𝑑 ) + 𝑓 (π‘₯, 𝑒) = 0,
(3)
1
𝑒𝑑𝑑 − 𝑀 (∫
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯) Δ π‘(π‘₯) 𝑒
𝑝
(π‘₯)
Ω
+ πœ‡|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯)−2 𝑒 + 𝑄 (𝑑, π‘₯, 𝑒, 𝑒𝑑 ) = 𝑓 (𝑑, π‘₯, 𝑒) .
In [32–35], applying variational method and AmbrosettiRabinowitz (AR) condition, Guowei Dai has studied the
existence and multiplicity of solutions for the 𝑝(π‘₯)-Kirchhofftype equations with Dirichlet or Neumann boundary condition. In [36], by using (𝑆+ ) mapping theory and the Mountain
Pass Lemma, Fan has discussed the nonlocal 𝑝(π‘₯)-Laplacian
Dirichlet problem with the nonvariational form
−𝐴 (𝑒) Δ π‘(π‘₯) 𝑒 = 𝐡 (𝑒) 𝑓 (π‘₯, 𝑒) ,
𝑒 = 0,
on πœ•Ω,
in Ω,
(4)
2
Journal of Applied Mathematics
and the 𝑝(π‘₯)-Kirchhoff-type equation with the variational
form
− π‘Ž (∫
Ω
1,𝑝(π‘₯)
use the notation ‖𝑒‖ = |∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) for 𝑒 ∈ π‘Š0
1
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯) Δ π‘(π‘₯) 𝑒
𝑝 (π‘₯)
= 𝑏 (∫ 𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒) 𝑑π‘₯) 𝑓 (π‘₯, 𝑒) ,
Ω
𝑒 = 0,
in Ω,
(5)
on πœ•Ω,
under (AR) condition, where 𝐴, 𝐡 are two functionals defined
𝑑
1,𝑝(π‘₯)
on π‘Š0
(Ω), and 𝐹(π‘₯, 𝑑) = ∫0 𝑓(π‘₯, 𝑠)𝑑𝑠.
Motivated by the above works, the purpose of this paper
is to study the 𝑝(π‘₯)-Kirchhoff-type equation
− (π‘Ž + 𝑏 ∫
Ω
1
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯) Δ π‘(π‘₯) 𝑒 = 𝑓 (π‘₯, 𝑒) ,
𝑝 (π‘₯)
𝑒 = 0,
in Ω,
on πœ•Ω,
(6)
without (AR) condition, where Ω is a smooth bounded
domain in R𝑁, π‘Ž, 𝑏 are two positive constants, Δ π‘(π‘₯) 𝑒 =
div(|∇𝑒(π‘₯)|𝑝(π‘₯)−2 ∇𝑒(π‘₯)), 𝑝 ∈ 𝐢0,𝛽 (Ω) for some 𝛽 ∈ (0, 1), and
1 < 𝑝− := inf 𝑝 (π‘₯) ≤ 𝑝+ := sup𝑝 (π‘₯) < +∞.
Ω
1,𝑝(π‘₯)
(Ω) the closure of 𝐢0∞ (Ω) in π‘Š1,𝑝(π‘₯) (Ω).
Denote by π‘Š0
1,𝑝(π‘₯)
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) is an equivalent norm on π‘Š0
(Ω). In this paper we
Ω
(7)
By taking the famous Mountain Pass Lemma, the Fountain
Theorem, and its dual, we obtain the existence of solutions
and infinitely many solutions for the 𝑝(π‘₯)-Kirchhoff-type
equation (6) under no (AR) condition.
𝑁𝑝 (π‘₯)
{
{
𝑁
𝑝 (π‘₯) = { − 𝑝 (π‘₯)
{
{+∞
(Ω). Define
if 𝑝 (π‘₯) < 𝑁,
∗
We refer the reader to [36–38] for the elementary properties
of the space π‘Š1,𝑝(π‘₯) (Ω).
Proposition 1 (see [38]). Set 𝜌(𝑒) = ∫Ω |𝑒(π‘₯)|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯. For any
𝑒 ∈ 𝐿𝑝(π‘₯) (Ω), then the following are given:
(1) |𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) = πœ† ⇔ 𝜌(𝑒/πœ†) = 1 if 𝑒 =ΜΈ 0;
(2) |𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) < 1(= 1; > 1) ⇔ 𝜌(𝑒) < 1(= 1; > 1);
𝑝−
𝑝+
𝑝+
𝑝−
(3) |𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) ≤ 𝜌(𝑒) ≤ |𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) if |𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) > 1;
(4) |𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) ≤ 𝜌(𝑒) ≤ |𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) if |𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) < 1;
(5) limπ‘˜ → +∞ |π‘’π‘˜ |𝑝(π‘₯) = 0 ⇔ limπ‘˜ → +∞ 𝜌(π‘’π‘˜ ) = 0;
(6) limπ‘˜ → +∞ |π‘’π‘˜ |𝑝(π‘₯) = +∞ ⇔ limπ‘˜ → +∞ 𝜌(π‘’π‘˜ ) = +∞.
3. Positive Energy Solution
In this section we discuss the existence of weak solutions of
1,𝑝(π‘₯)
(Ω).
(6). For simplicity we write 𝑋 = π‘Š0
First, we state the assumptions on 𝑓 as follows.
(𝑓0 ) Let 𝑓 : Ω × R → R be a continuous function,
and there exist positive constants 𝑐1 , 𝑐2 such that
󡄨
󡄨󡄨
𝛼(π‘₯)−1
,
󡄨󡄨𝑓 (π‘₯, 𝑑)󡄨󡄨󡄨 ≤ 𝑐1 + 𝑐2 |𝑑|
2. Preliminary
We recall in this section some definitions and properties of
variable exponent Lebesgue-Sobolev space. The variable
exponent Lebesgue space 𝐿𝑝(π‘₯) (Ω) is defined by
𝐿𝑝(π‘₯) (Ω)
𝑝(π‘₯)
= {𝑒 : 𝑒 : Ω → R is measurable, ∫ |𝑒|
Ω
(8)
(13)
where 𝛼 ∈ 𝐢(Ω) and 1 < 𝛼(π‘₯) < 𝑝∗ (π‘₯) for all π‘₯ ∈ Ω.
(𝑓0σΈ€  ) Let 𝑓 : Ω × R → R be a continuous function,
and there exist positive constants 𝑐1 , 𝑐2 such that
󡄨
󡄨󡄨
𝛼(π‘₯)−1
,
󡄨󡄨𝑓 (π‘₯, 𝑑)󡄨󡄨󡄨 ≤ 𝑐1 + 𝑐2 |𝑑|
𝑑π‘₯ < ∞}
(12)
if 𝑝 (π‘₯) ≥ 𝑁.
(14)
where 𝛼 ∈ 𝐢(Ω) and 𝑝+ < 𝛼(π‘₯) < 𝑝∗ (π‘₯) for all π‘₯ ∈ Ω;
𝑑𝑓(π‘₯, 𝑑) ≥ 0 for all 𝑑 > 0.
+
(𝑓1 ) Let lim𝑑 → +∞ (𝐹(π‘₯, 𝑑)/|𝑑|2𝑝 ) = +∞, uniformly
𝑑
for π‘₯ ∈ Ω, where 𝐹(π‘₯, 𝑑) = ∫0 𝑓(π‘₯, 𝑠)𝑑𝑠.
with the norm
󡄨󡄨 𝑒 󡄨󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
|𝑒|𝐿𝑝(π‘₯) = |𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) = inf {𝜎 > 0 : ∫ 󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨 󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯ ≤ 1} .
Ω σ΅„¨πœŽσ΅„¨
(9)
The variable exponent Sobolev space π‘Š1,𝑝(π‘₯) (Ω) is defined by
π‘Š1,𝑝(π‘₯) (Ω) = {𝑒 ∈ 𝐿𝑝(π‘₯) (Ω) : |∇𝑒| ∈ 𝐿𝑝(π‘₯) (Ω)}
(10)
with the norm
β€–π‘’β€–π‘Š1,𝑝(π‘₯) = ‖𝑒‖1,𝑝(π‘₯) = |𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) + |∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) .
(11)
(𝑓2 ) There exists πœƒ ≥ 1 such that πœƒπΊ(π‘₯, 𝑑) ≥ 𝐺(π‘₯, 𝑠𝑑)
for (π‘₯, 𝑑) ∈ Ω × R and 𝑠 ∈ [0, 1], where
𝐺 (π‘₯, 𝑑) = 𝑑𝑓 (π‘₯, 𝑑) − 2𝑝+ 𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑑) .
(15)
+
(𝑓3 ) Let lim𝑑 → 0 (𝐹(π‘₯, 𝑑)/|𝑑|𝑝 ) = 0, uniformly on π‘₯ ∈
Ω.
(𝑓3σΈ€  ) There exists 𝛿 > 0, such that 𝐹(π‘₯, 𝑑) ≤ 0 for π‘₯ ∈
Ω, |𝑑| < 𝛿.
Journal of Applied Mathematics
3
(𝑓4 ) Let 𝑓(π‘₯, 𝑑) = −𝑓(π‘₯, −𝑑) for π‘₯ ∈ Ω and 𝑑 ∈ R.
π‘ž+
(𝑓5 ) Let lim𝑑 → 0 (𝐹(π‘₯, 𝑑)/|𝑑| ) = 0, uniformly on π‘₯ ∈
Ω, where π‘ž ∈ 𝐢(Ω) satisfies 1 < π‘ž(π‘₯) < 𝑝(π‘₯) for π‘₯ ∈
Ω.
Remark 2. Condition (𝑓2 ) was first introduced by Jeanjean
+
[39] for the case 𝑝(π‘₯) = 2. Let 𝑓(π‘₯, 𝑑) = 2𝑝+ |𝑑|2𝑝 −2 𝑑 ln |𝑑|,
then
+
𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑑) = |𝑑|2𝑝 ln |𝑑| −
+
1
|𝑑|2𝑝 ,
+
2𝑝
+
𝐺 (π‘₯, 𝑑) = |𝑑|2𝑝 .
(16)
It is easy to see that the function 𝑓 does not satisfy (AR) condition, but it satisfies (𝑓1 )–(𝑓5 ) and (𝑓3σΈ€  ).
Define 𝐼(𝑒) = 𝐽(𝑒) − Φ(𝑒), where
𝐽 (𝑒) = (π‘Ž +
1
1
𝑏
∫
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯) ∫
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯,
2 ٠𝑝 (π‘₯)
٠𝑝 (π‘₯)
(17)
Then 𝐼 ∈ 𝐢1 (𝑋, R).
Proposition 3 (see [38]). Assume that (𝑓0 ) hold, then the
functional 𝐽 : 𝑋 → R is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous, Φ : 𝑋 → R is sequentially weakly continuous, and 𝐼
is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous.
Proposition 4 (see [37]). Assume that (𝑓0 ) hold, and let 𝑒0 ∈
1,𝑝(π‘₯)
(Ω) be a local minimizer (resp., a strictly local miniπ‘Š0
mizer) of 𝐼 in the 𝐢1 (Ω) topology. Then 𝑒0 is a local minimizer
1,𝑝(π‘₯)
(resp., a strictly local minimizer) of 𝐼 in the π‘Š0
(Ω) topology.
Definition 5. We say that 𝑒 ∈ 𝑋 is a weak solution of (6), if
1
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯) ∫ |∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯)−2 ∇𝑒∇V 𝑑π‘₯
𝑝 (π‘₯)
Ω
(18)
Then we have
Ω
+
1
1
− + ) |∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯
𝑝 (π‘₯) 2𝑝
1
𝑏
∫
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯
2 ٠𝑝 (π‘₯)
×∫ (
Ω
+
1
1
− + ) |∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯
𝑝 (π‘₯) 𝑝
(21)
1
∫ 𝐺 (π‘₯, 𝑒) 𝑑π‘₯}
2𝑝+ Ω
= lim {𝐼 (𝑒𝑛 ) −
𝑛→∞
1
βŸ¨πΌσΈ€  (𝑒𝑛 ) , 𝑒𝑛 ⟩} = 𝑐.
2𝑝+
Let V𝑛 = 𝑒𝑛 /‖𝑒𝑛 β€–, then up to a subsequence we may assume
that
V𝑛 󳨀→ V
in 𝑋,
in 𝐿𝛼(π‘₯) (Ω) ,
V𝑛 (π‘₯) 󳨀→ V (π‘₯)
Ω
σ΅„©
σ΅„©σ΅„© σ΅„©σ΅„© σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© σΈ€ 
󡄩󡄩𝑒𝑛 σ΅„©σ΅„© 󡄩󡄩𝐼 (𝑒𝑛 )σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© 󳨀→ 0.
(20)
σ΅„©σ΅„© σ΅„©σ΅„©
󡄩󡄩𝑒𝑛 σ΅„©σ΅„© 󳨀→ ∞,
𝐼 (𝑒𝑛 ) 󳨀→ 𝑐,
V𝑛 ⇀ V
= ∫ 𝑓 (π‘₯, 𝑒) V 𝑑π‘₯
(22)
a.e. π‘₯ ∈ Ω.
If V = 0, inspired by [13, 14], then we define
for any V ∈ 𝑋.
Definition 6. Let 𝑋 be a Banach space and 𝐼 ∈ 𝐢1 (𝑋, R).
Given 𝑐 ∈ R. we say that 𝐼 satisfies the Cerami 𝑐 condition
(we denote by (𝐢)𝑐 the condition), if
(i) any bounded sequence {𝑒𝑛 } ⊂ 𝑋 such that 𝐼(𝑒𝑛 ) → 𝑐
and 𝐼󸀠 (𝑒𝑛 ) → 0 has a convergent subsequence;
(ii) there exist constants 𝛿, 𝑅, 𝛽 > 0 such that
σ΅„©
σ΅„©
‖𝑒‖ 󡄩󡄩󡄩󡄩𝐼󸀠 (𝑒)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© ≥ 𝛽,
Proof. From [36, Proposition 3.1], 𝐼 satisfies (i) of (𝐢) condition.
Now we check that 𝐼 satisfies (ii) of (𝐢) condition.
Arguing by contradiction, we may assume that, for some 𝑐 ∈
R,
𝑛→∞
Ω
Ω
Lemma 8. Assume that conditions (𝑓0 )–(𝑓2 ) hold. Then 𝐼
satisfies (𝐢) condition.
lim {π‘Ž ∫ (
Φ (𝑒) = ∫ 𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒) 𝑑𝑒.
(π‘Ž + 𝑏 ∫
Remark 7. Although (PS) condition is stronger than (𝐢)
condition, the Deformation Theorem is still valid under (𝐢)
condition; we see that the Mountain Pass Lemma, the Fountain Theorem, and its dual are true under (𝐢) condition.
−1
∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐼 [𝑐 − 𝛿, 𝑐 + 𝛿] ,
𝐼 (𝑑𝑛 𝑒𝑛 ) = max 𝐼 (𝑑𝑒𝑛 ) .
𝑑∈[0,1]
−
For any π‘š > 1/2𝑝+ , let 𝑀𝑛 = (2π‘šπ‘+ )1/𝑝 V𝑛 . Since 𝑀𝑛 → 0
in 𝐿𝛼(π‘₯) (Ω) and
|𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑑)| ≤ 𝑐5 + 𝑐6 |𝑑|𝛼(π‘₯) ,
‖𝑒‖ ≥ 𝑅.
(19)
If 𝐼 ∈ 𝐢1 (𝑋, R) satisfies (𝐢)𝑐 condition for every 𝑐 ∈ R, then
we say that 𝐼 satisfies (𝐢) condition.
(23)
(24)
by the continuity of 𝐹(π‘₯, ⋅), 𝐹(⋅, 𝑀𝑛 ) → 0 in 𝐿1 (Ω), thus,
lim ∫ 𝐹 (⋅, 𝑀𝑛 ) 𝑑π‘₯ = 0.
𝑛→0 Ω
(25)
4
Journal of Applied Mathematics
1/𝑝−
Then for 𝑛 large enough, (2π‘šπ‘+ )
/‖𝑒𝑛 β€– ∈ (0, 1) and
≥ π‘Ž∫ (
Ω
𝐼 (𝑑𝑛 𝑒𝑛 ) ≥ 𝐼 (𝑀𝑛 )
= π‘Ž∫
Ω
+
1 󡄨󡄨
󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
󡄨∇𝑀 󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯
𝑝 (π‘₯) 󡄨 𝑛 󡄨
Ω
𝑝(π‘₯)
1
1/𝑝− 󡄨
󡄨󡄨∇V𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨) 𝑑π‘₯
((2π‘šπ‘+ )
󡄨
󡄨
𝑝 (π‘₯)
Ω
+
2
+
− ∫ 𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑀𝑛 ) 𝑑π‘₯
≥
2π‘š2 𝑏
2
(𝑝+ )
+
2
󡄨 󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
(∫ 󡄨󡄨󡄨∇V𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯) − ∫ 𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑀𝑛 ) 𝑑π‘₯
Ω
Ω
2π‘šπ‘Ž 2π‘š2 𝑏
+
− ∫ 𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑀𝑛 ) 𝑑π‘₯.
2
𝑝+
Ω
(𝑝+ )
That is, 𝐼(𝑑𝑛 𝑒𝑛 ) → ∞. From 𝐼(0) = 0 and 𝐼(𝑒𝑛 ) → 𝑐, we
know that 𝑑𝑛 ∈ (0, 1) and
1 󡄨󡄨
󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
󡄨
󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
󡄨∇𝑑 𝑒 󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯) ∫ 󡄨󡄨󡄨∇𝑑𝑛 𝑒𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯
𝑝 (π‘₯) 󡄨 𝑛 𝑛 󡄨
Ω
1
1
(𝐼 (𝑑𝑛 𝑒𝑛 ) − + βŸ¨πΌσΈ€  (𝑑𝑛 𝑒𝑛 ) , 𝑑𝑛 𝑒𝑛 ⟩)
πœƒ
2𝑝
=
1
𝐼 (𝑑 𝑒 ) → ∞.
πœƒ 𝑛 𝑛
π‘Ž∫ (
Ω
1
1 󡄨󡄨
󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
) 󡄨∇𝑒 󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯
−
𝑝 (π‘₯) 2𝑝+ 󡄨 𝑛 󡄨
+
1 󡄨󡄨
𝑏
󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
∫
󡄨∇𝑒 󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯
2 ٠𝑝 (π‘₯) 󡄨 𝑛 󡄨
1 󡄨
1
󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
− + ) 󡄨󡄨󡄨∇𝑒𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯
×∫ (
𝑝
٠𝑝 (π‘₯)
1
+ + ∫ 𝐺 (π‘₯, 𝑒𝑛 ) 𝑑π‘₯
2𝑝 Ω
This contradicts (21).
If V =ΜΈ 0, from (20), when ‖𝑒𝑛 β€– ≥ 1,
π‘Ž
1
𝑏
𝑐 + π‘œ (1)
− σ΅„© σ΅„©2𝑝+
+ +
2
−
𝑝− 󡄩󡄩󡄩𝑒 󡄩󡄩󡄩𝑝
󡄩󡄩𝑒𝑛 σ΅„©σ΅„©
2(𝑝 )
σ΅„© 𝑛󡄩
σ΅„© σ΅„©
Ω
Therefore, from (𝑓2 ), we have
(28)
Then from (𝑓1 ) we have
− ∫ 𝑓 (π‘₯, 𝑑𝑛 𝑒𝑛 ) 𝑒𝑛 𝑑π‘₯
𝑑 󡄨󡄨󡄨
= βŸ¨πΌσΈ€  (𝑑𝑛 𝑒𝑛 ) , 𝑑𝑛 𝑒𝑛 ⟩ = 𝑑𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝐼 (𝑑𝑒𝑛 ) = 0.
𝑑𝑑 󡄨󡄨𝑑=𝑑𝑛
𝐺 (π‘₯, 𝑑𝑛 𝑒𝑛 )
1
𝑑π‘₯
∫
+
2𝑝 Ω
πœƒ
π‘Ž σ΅„©σ΅„© 󡄩󡄩𝑝+
𝑏 σ΅„©σ΅„© σ΅„©σ΅„©2𝑝+
󡄩󡄩𝑒𝑛 σ΅„©σ΅„© +
󡄩𝑒𝑛 σ΅„©σ΅„© − (𝑐 + π‘œ (1)) ≥ ∫٠𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒𝑛 ) 𝑑π‘₯.
2σ΅„©
−
𝑝
2(𝑝− )
(29)
󡄨
󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
π‘Ž ∫ 󡄨󡄨󡄨∇𝑑𝑛 𝑒𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯
Ω
Ω
1
1
󡄨
󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
−
) 𝑑𝑝(π‘₯) 󡄨󡄨∇𝑒 󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯
𝑝 (π‘₯) 𝑝+ 𝑛 󡄨 𝑛 󡄨
=
(26)
+ 𝑏 (∫
1 𝑝(π‘₯) 󡄨󡄨
𝑏
󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
𝑑 󡄨∇𝑒 󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯
∫
2πœƒ ٠𝑝 (π‘₯) 𝑛 󡄨 𝑛 󡄨
Ω
2π‘šπ‘Ž
󡄨 󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
∫ 󡄨󡄨∇V 󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯
𝑝+ ٠󡄨 𝑛 󡄨
+
𝐺 (π‘₯, 𝑑𝑛 𝑒𝑛 )
1
𝑑π‘₯
∫
2𝑝+ Ω
πœƒ
×∫ (
Ω
1 󡄨
1
󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
− + ) 󡄨󡄨󡄨∇𝑒𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯
𝑝 (π‘₯) 𝑝
1
1
π‘Ž
󡄨
󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
−
) 𝑑𝑝(π‘₯) 󡄨󡄨∇𝑒 󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯
∫ (
πœƒ ٠𝑝 (π‘₯) 2𝑝+ 𝑛 󡄨 𝑛 󡄨
≥
𝑝(π‘₯)
1
𝑏
1/𝑝− 󡄨
󡄨󡄨∇V𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨) 𝑑π‘₯)
((2π‘šπ‘+ )
+ (∫
󡄨
󡄨
2 ٠𝑝 (π‘₯)
≥
1 󡄨󡄨
𝑏
󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
∫
󡄨󡄨∇𝑒𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯
2 ٠𝑝 (π‘₯)
×∫ (
2
1 󡄨󡄨
𝑏
󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
+ (∫
󡄨󡄨∇𝑀𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯) − ∫ 𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑀𝑛 ) 𝑑π‘₯
2 ٠𝑝 (π‘₯)
Ω
= π‘Ž∫
1 󡄨󡄨
1
󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
−
) 󡄨∇𝑒 󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯
𝑝 (π‘₯) 2𝑝+ 󡄨 𝑛 󡄨
(27)
𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒 )
≥ ∫ σ΅„© σ΅„©2𝑝𝑛+ 𝑑π‘₯
Ω σ΅„©
󡄩󡄩𝑒𝑛 σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©
𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒 ) 󡄨 󡄨2𝑝+
+ ∫ ) 󡄨 󡄨2𝑝+𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨V𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯
= (∫
󡄨󡄨𝑒𝑛 󡄨󡄨
V𝑛 =ΜΈ 0
V𝑛 =0
󡄨 󡄨
=∫
V𝑛 =ΜΈ 0
(30)
𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒𝑛 ) 󡄨󡄨 󡄨󡄨2𝑝+
󡄨󡄨 󡄨󡄨2𝑝+ 󡄨󡄨V𝑛 󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯.
󡄨󡄨𝑒𝑛 󡄨󡄨
For π‘₯ ∈ Θ := {π‘₯ ∈ Ω : V(π‘₯) =ΜΈ 0}, |𝑒𝑛 (π‘₯)| → +∞. By (𝑓1 ) we
have
𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒𝑛 ) 󡄨󡄨 󡄨󡄨𝑝+
󡄨󡄨 󡄨󡄨𝑝+ 󡄨󡄨V𝑛 󡄨󡄨 󳨀→ +∞.
󡄨󡄨𝑒𝑛 󡄨󡄨
(31)
Journal of Applied Mathematics
5
Note that the Lebesgue measure of Θ is positive; using the
Fatou Lemma, we have
𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒𝑛 ) 󡄨󡄨 󡄨󡄨2𝑝+
󡄨V 󡄨 𝑑π‘₯ 󳨀→ +∞.
(32)
2𝑝+ 󡄨 𝑛 󡄨
V𝑛 =ΜΈ 0 󡄨󡄨󡄨𝑒 󡄨󡄨󡄨
𝑛
󡄨 󡄨
This contradicts (30).
The technique used in this lemma was first introduced by
[39, 40].
∫
Theorem 9. Assume that conditions (𝑓0 )–(𝑓2 ) and (𝑓3 ) (or
(𝑓3σΈ€  )) hold. Then (6) has a nontrivial solution with positive
energy.
Proof. From Lemma 8, 𝐼 satisfies (𝐢) condition. Let us show
that the functional 𝐼 has a Mountain-Pass-type geometry.
Note that 𝐼(0) = 0. By (𝑓3 ), there exists 𝛿 > 0, and for any
𝑒 ∈ 𝑋 with |𝑒|𝐿∞ (Ω) < 𝛿,
1
𝐼 (𝑒) = π‘Ž ∫
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯
٠𝑝 (π‘₯)
+
𝑏
π‘Ž
2𝑝+
− ∫ 𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒) 𝑑π‘₯ > 0.
‖𝑒‖𝑝 +
2 ‖𝑒‖
+
𝑝+
Ω
(𝑝 )
This shows that 0 is a strictly local minimizer of 𝐼 in the 𝐢(Ω)
topology, and hence 0 is a strictly local minimizer of 𝐼 in
the 𝐢1 (Ω) topology. By [37, Theorem 1.1], 0 is a strictly local
1,𝑝(π‘₯)
minimizer of 𝐼 in the π‘Š0
(Ω) topology. Thus there exists
π‘Ÿ > 0 such that 𝐼(𝑒) > 0 for every 𝑒 ∈ 𝑋 \ {0} with ‖𝑒‖ ≤ π‘Ÿ.
We claim that inf ‖𝑒‖=π‘Ÿ 𝐼(𝑒) > 0. To prove this claim,
arguing by contradiction, assume that there exists a sequence
{𝑒𝑛 } ⊂ 𝑋 with ‖𝑒𝑛 β€– = π‘Ÿ such that 𝐼(𝑒𝑛 ) → 0 as 𝑛 → ∞. We
may assume that 𝑒𝑛 ⇀ 𝑒0 in 𝑋. Since 𝐼 is sequentially weakly
lower semicontinuous, we have that 𝐼(𝑒0 ) = 0, and hence
𝑒0 = 0. Since Φ is sequentially weakly continuous, then we
have that Φ(𝑒𝑛 ) → Φ(0) = 0, and hence 𝐽(𝑒𝑛 ) = 𝐼(𝑒𝑛 ) +
Φ(𝑒𝑛 ) → 0. It follows from this that 𝑒𝑛 → 0 in 𝑋 which contradicts with ‖𝑒𝑛 β€– = π‘Ÿ.
Let 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 with 𝑦 > 0 in Ω and ‖𝑦‖ = 1. By (𝑓0 ) and (𝑓1 ),
for 𝑠 ≥ 1 we have
1 󡄨󡄨
󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
𝐼 (𝑠𝑦) = π‘Ž ∫
󡄨󡄨∇𝑠𝑦󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯
٠𝑝 (π‘₯)
𝑏 2𝑝+
π‘Ž 𝑝+
𝑠 +
𝑠
2
𝑝−
(𝑝− )
+
󡄨 󡄨2𝑝+
− 𝑐1 𝑠2𝑝 ∫ 󡄨󡄨󡄨𝑦󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯ + 𝑐2 󳨀→ −∞ as 𝑠 󳨀→ +∞.
Ω
(34)
We set 𝑒 = 𝑠𝑦. Then for 𝑠 large, we obtain
𝐼 (𝑒) < 0.
𝑋 = span {𝑒𝑗 : 𝑗 = 1, 2, . . .},
𝑋∗ = span {𝑒𝑗∗ : 𝑗 = 1, 2, . . .},
1,
βŸ¨π‘’π‘– , 𝑒𝑗∗ , ⟩ = {
0,
(36)
𝑖 = 𝑗,
𝑖 =ΜΈ 𝑗.
For convenience, we write 𝑋𝑗 = span{𝑒𝑗 }, π‘Œπ‘˜ = ⊕π‘˜π‘—=1 𝑋𝑗 , π‘π‘˜ =
⊕∞
𝑗=π‘˜ 𝑋𝑗 .
(37)
Then limπ‘˜ → +∞ π›½π‘˜ = 0.
Proposition 11 (Fountain Theorem). Assume that 𝐼 ∈
𝐢1 (𝑋, R) is an even functional. If, for any π‘˜ ∈ N, there exists
πœŒπ‘˜ > π‘Ÿπ‘˜ > 0 such that
(𝐴 1 ) π‘Žπ‘˜ = max𝑒∈π‘Œπ‘˜ ,‖𝑒‖=πœŒπ‘˜ 𝐼(𝑒) ≤ 0,
(𝐴 2 ) π‘π‘˜ = inf 𝑒∈π‘π‘˜ ,‖𝑒‖=π‘Ÿπ‘˜ 𝐼(𝑒) → +∞ as π‘˜ → ∞,
(𝐴 3 ) 𝐼 satisfies (𝐢)𝑐 condition for every 𝑐 > 0,
then 𝐼 has an unbounded sequence of critical values.
Proposition 12 (Dual Fountain Theorem). Assume that 𝐼 ∈
𝐢1 (𝑋, R) is an even functional. If, for any π‘˜ ≥ π‘˜0 , there exists
πœŒπ‘˜ > π‘Ÿπ‘˜ > 0 such that
(𝐡1 ) π‘Žπ‘˜ = inf 𝑒∈π‘π‘˜ ,‖𝑒‖=πœŒπ‘˜ 𝐼(𝑒) ≥ 0,
(𝐡2 ) π‘π‘˜ = max𝑒∈π‘Œπ‘˜ ,‖𝑒‖=π‘Ÿπ‘˜ 𝐼(𝑒) < 0,
(𝐡3 ) π‘‘π‘˜ = inf 𝑒∈π‘π‘˜ ,‖𝑒‖≤πœŒπ‘˜ 𝐼(𝑒) → 0 as π‘˜ → ∞,
(𝐡4 ) 𝐼 satisfies (𝑐)∗𝑐 condition for every 𝑐 ∈ [π‘‘π‘˜0 ,0 ],
then 𝐼 has a sequence of negative critical values converging to 0.
2
1 󡄨󡄨
󡄨𝑝(π‘₯)
+ 𝑏(∫
󡄨󡄨∇𝑠𝑦󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯) − ∫ 𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑠𝑦) 𝑑π‘₯
٠𝑝 (π‘₯)
Ω
‖𝑒‖ > π‘Ÿ,
Since 𝑋 is a reflexive and separable Banach space, then there
exists {𝑒𝑗 } ⊂ 𝑋 and {𝑒𝑗∗ } ⊂ 𝑋∗ such that
π›½π‘˜ = sup {|𝑒|𝛼(π‘₯) : ‖𝑒‖ = 1, 𝑒 ∈ π‘π‘˜ } .
(33)
≤
4. Infinitely Many Solutions
Lemma 10 (see [21]). If 𝛼 ∈ 𝐢(Ω), 1 < 𝛼(π‘₯) < 𝑝∗ for any π‘₯ ∈
Ω, denote
2
1
𝑏
+ (∫
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯) − ∫ 𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒) 𝑑π‘₯
2 ٠𝑝 (π‘₯)
Ω
≥
Hence by the famous Mountain Pass Lemma, problem (6) has
a nontrivial weak solution with positive energy.
(35)
Theorem 13. Assume that the conditions (𝑓0σΈ€  ), (𝑓1 )–(𝑓4 ) hold.
Then (6) has infinitely many solutions {π‘’π‘˜ } such that 𝐼(π‘’π‘˜ ) →
∞ as π‘˜ → ∞.
Proof. By conditions (𝑓0σΈ€  ), (𝑓1 ), and (𝑓3 ), for any πœ€ > 0, there
exists πΆπœ€ such that
+
+
𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒) ≥ πΆπœ€ |𝑒|2𝑝 − πœ€|𝑒|𝑝 ,
∀ (π‘₯, 𝑒) ∈ Ω × R.
(38)
6
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Proof . By conditions (𝑓0σΈ€  ), (𝑓1 ), and (𝑓5 ), for any πœ€ > 0, there
exists πΆπœ€ such that
For 𝑒 ∈ π‘Œπ‘˜ , when ‖𝑒‖ > 1,
𝐼 (𝑒) = π‘Ž ∫
Ω
1
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯
𝑝 (π‘₯)
+
𝐼 (𝑒) = π‘Ž ∫
Ω
+
+
𝑏
π‘Ž
‖𝑒‖𝑝 +
‖𝑒‖2𝑝
2
−
𝑝
2(𝑝− )
2𝑝+
𝑝+
− πΆπœ€ |𝑒|2𝑝+ + πœ€|𝑒|𝑝+ 󳨀→ −∞
as ‖𝑒‖ 󳨀→ +∞.
(39)
On the other hand, by
that
≤
and (𝑓3 ), there exists πΆπœ€ > 0 such
∀ (π‘₯, 𝑒) ∈ Ω × R.
(41)
1
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯
𝑝 (π‘₯)
π‘π‘˜ :=
−
|𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒)| ≤ πœ€|𝑒|π‘ž + πΆπœ€ |𝑒|𝛼(π‘₯) ,
Ω
(42)
−
−
π‘Ž
‖𝑒‖𝑝 − π‘π›½π‘˜ ‖𝑒‖𝛼 .
+
2𝑝
−
− 1/(𝛼 −𝑝 )
If we choose π‘Ÿπ‘˜ := (π‘Ž/4𝑐𝑝+ π›½π‘˜π›Ό )
then, for 𝑒 ∈ π‘π‘˜ with ‖𝑒‖ = π‘Ÿπ‘˜ ,
→ ∞ as π‘˜ → ∞,
≥
+
−
π‘Ž
π‘ž+
‖𝑒‖𝑝 − π‘πΆπœ€ |𝑒|𝛼𝛼− − π‘πœ€|𝑒|π‘ž+
+
𝑝
≥
+
π‘Ž
π‘ž+
‖𝑒‖𝑝 − 𝑐|𝑒|π‘ž+
+
2𝑝
≥
+
+
π‘Ž
π‘ž+
‖𝑒‖𝑝 − π‘π›½π‘˜ β€–π‘’β€–π‘ž .
2𝑝+
If we choose πœŒπ‘˜ := (4𝑐𝑝+ π›½π‘˜ /π‘Ž)
for 𝑒 ∈ π‘π‘˜ with ‖𝑒‖ = πœŒπ‘˜ ,
𝐼 (𝑒) ≥
:= π‘π‘˜ ,
(47)
1
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯
𝑝 (π‘₯)
π‘ž+
𝑝− /(𝛼− −𝑝− )
π‘Ž
π‘Ž
𝐼 (𝑒) ≥ + (
− )
4𝑝 4𝑐𝑝+ π›½π‘˜π›Ό
∀ (π‘₯, 𝑒) ∈ Ω × R.
2
1
𝑏
+ (∫
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯) − ∫ 𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒) 𝑑π‘₯
2 ٠𝑝 (π‘₯)
Ω
−
−
π‘Ž
≥ + ‖𝑒‖𝑝 − 𝑐|𝑒|𝛼𝛼−
2𝑝
−
(46)
Let π›½π‘˜ := sup𝑒∈π‘π‘˜ ,‖𝑒‖=π‘Ÿπ‘˜ |𝑒|π‘ž− , then π›½π‘˜ → 0 as π‘˜ → ∞. For
𝑒 ∈ π‘π‘˜ , when ‖𝑒‖ and πœ€ small enough,
𝐼 (𝑒) = π‘Ž ∫
−
−
𝑏
π‘Ž
𝑝+
2𝑝−
− πΆπœ€ |𝑒|𝛼𝛼− − πœ€|𝑒|𝑝+
‖𝑒‖𝑝 +
2 ‖𝑒‖
+
𝑝+
2(𝑝 )
max 𝐼 (𝑒) < 0.
𝑒∈π‘Œπ‘˜ ,‖𝑒‖=π‘Ÿπ‘˜
On the other hand, by (𝑓5 ), there exists πΆπœ€ > 0 such that
2
1
𝑏
+ (∫
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯) − ∫ 𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒) 𝑑π‘₯
2 ٠𝑝 (π‘₯)
Ω
≥
π‘ž−
as ‖𝑒‖ 󳨀→ +∞.
(40)
Let π›½π‘˜ := sup𝑒∈π‘π‘˜ ,‖𝑒‖=πœŒπ‘˜ |𝑒|𝛼− . From Lemma 10, π›½π‘˜ → 0 as
π‘˜ → ∞. For 𝑒 ∈ π‘π‘˜ , when ‖𝑒‖ ≤ 1 and πœ€ small enough,
≥
(45)
Then for some π‘Ÿπ‘˜ > 0 large enough,
+
Ω
+
+
π‘Ž
𝑏
‖𝑒‖𝑝 +
‖𝑒‖2𝑝
2
−
𝑝
(𝑝− )
2𝑝+
max 𝐼 (𝑒) ≤ 0.
|𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒)| ≤ πœ€|𝑒|𝑝 + πΆπœ€ |𝑒|𝛼(π‘₯) ,
𝐼 (𝑒) = π‘Ž ∫
1
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯
𝑝 (π‘₯)
− πΆπœ€ |𝑒|2𝑝+ + πœ€|𝑒|π‘ž− 󳨀→ −∞
𝑒∈π‘Œπ‘˜ ,‖𝑒‖=πœŒπ‘˜
(𝑓0σΈ€  )
(44)
2
1
𝑏
+ (∫
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯) − ∫ 𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒) 𝑑π‘₯
2 ٠𝑝 (π‘₯)
Ω
Then for some πœŒπ‘˜ > 0 large enough,
π‘Žπ‘˜ :=
∀ (π‘₯, 𝑒) ∈ Ω × R.
For 𝑒 ∈ π‘Œπ‘˜ , when ‖𝑒‖ is large enough,
2
1
𝑏
+ (∫
|∇𝑒|𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯) − ∫ 𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒) 𝑑π‘₯
2 ٠𝑝 (π‘₯)
Ω
≤
+
𝐹 (π‘₯, 𝑒) ≥ πΆπœ€ |𝑒|2𝑝 − πœ€|𝑒|π‘ž ,
(43)
which implies that π‘π‘˜ := inf 𝑒∈π‘π‘˜ ,‖𝑒‖=π‘Ÿπ‘˜ 𝐼(𝑒) ≥ π‘π‘˜ → +∞ as
π‘˜ → +∞.
Assume that conditions (𝑓0σΈ€  ), (𝑓1 ), (𝑓2 ), (𝑓4 ), and
Theorem 14.
(𝑓5 ) hold. Then (6) has infinitely many solutions {π‘’π‘˜ } such that
𝐼(π‘’π‘˜ ) → 0 as π‘˜ → ∞.
1/(𝑝+ −π‘ž+ )
+
+ π‘ž
π‘ž+ 4𝑐𝑝 π›½π‘˜
π‘π›½π‘˜ (
π‘Ž
(48)
→ 0 as π‘˜ → ∞, then,
π‘ž+ /(𝑝+ −π‘ž+ )
)
:= π‘Žπ‘˜ ,
(49)
which implies that π‘Žπ‘˜ := inf 𝑒∈π‘π‘˜ ,‖𝑒‖=πœŒπ‘˜ 𝐼(𝑒) ≥ π‘Žπ‘˜ → 0 as π‘˜ →
+∞.
Furthermore, if 𝑒 ∈ π‘π‘˜ with ‖𝑒‖ ≤ πœŒπ‘˜ , then
π‘ž− π‘ž−
𝐼 (𝑒) ≥ −π‘π›½π‘˜ πœŒπ‘˜ 󳨀→ 0
as π‘˜ 󳨀→ ∞,
(50)
which implies that π‘‘π‘˜ = inf 𝑒∈π‘π‘˜ ,‖𝑒‖≤πœŒπ‘˜ 𝐼(𝑒) → 0 as π‘˜ → ∞.
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Acknowledgment
This paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foun
dation of China (11126339, 11201008).
References
[1] G. Kirchhoff, Mechanik, Teubner, Leipzig, Germany, 1883.
[2] J. L. Lions, “On some equations in boundary value problems of
mathematical physics,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Contemporary Developments in Continuum Mechanics and Partial Differential Equations, vol. 30 of North-Holland
Mathematics Studies, pp. 284–346, Universidade Federal Rural
do Rio de Janeiro, North-Holland, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 19771978.
[3] C. O. Alves, F. J. S. A. CorreΜ‚a, and T. F. Ma, “Positive solutions
for a quasilinear elliptic equation of Kirchhoff type,” Computers
& Mathematics with Applications, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 85–93, 2005.
[4] B. Cheng, X. Wu, and J. Liu, “Multiplicity of nontrivial solutions
for Kirchhoff type problems,” Boundary Value Problems, vol.
2010, Article ID 268946, 13 pages, 2010.
[5] X. He and W. Zou, “Infinitely many positive solutions for
Kirchhoff-type problems,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods
& Applications A: Theory and Methods, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1407–
1414, 2009.
[6] S. B. Liu and S. J. Li, “Infinitely many solutions for a superlinear
elliptic equation,” Acta Mathematica Sinica, vol. 46, no. 4, pp.
625–630, 2003.
[7] T. F. Ma and J. E. MunΜƒoz Rivera, “Positive solutions for a nonlinear nonlocal elliptic transmission problem,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 243–248, 2003.
[8] A. Mao and Z. Zhang, “Sign-changing and multiple solutions of
Kirchhoff type problems without the P.S. condition,” Nonlinear
Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A: Theory and Methods, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1275–1287, 2009.
[9] K. Perera and Z. Zhang, “Nontrivial solutions of Kirchhoff-type
problems via the Yang index,” Journal of Differential Equations,
vol. 221, no. 1, pp. 246–255, 2006.
[10] Z. Zhang and K. Perera, “Sign changing solutions of Kirchhoff
type problems via invariant sets of descent flow,” Journal of
Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 317, no. 2, pp. 456–
463, 2006.
[11] Y. Chen, S. Levine, and R. Rao, “Functionals with 𝑝(π‘₯)growth in image processing,” Technical Report 2004-01,
Duquesne University, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, http://www.mathcs.duq
.edu/sel/CLR05SIAPfinal.pdf.
[12] M. Ružička, Electrorheological Fluids: Modeling and Mathematical Theory, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2000.
[13] S. N. Antontsev and S. I. Shmarev, “A model porous medium
equation with variable exponent of nonlinearity: existence, uniqueness and localization properties of solutions,” Nonlinear
Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A: Theory and Methods, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 515–545, 2005.
[14] S. N. Antontsev and J. F. Rodrigues, “On stationary thermorheological viscous flows,” Annali dell’Universitá di Ferrara, vol.
52, no. 1, pp. 19–36, 2006.
[15] L. Diening, P. Harjulehto, P. Hästö, and M. Ružička, Lebesgue
and Sobolev Spaces with Variable Exponents, vol. 2017 of Lecture
Notes in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2011.
7
[16] X. Fan, J. Shen, and D. Zhao, “Sobolev embedding theorems for
spaces π‘Šπ‘˜,𝑝(π‘₯) (Ω),” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 262, no. 2, pp. 749–760, 2001.
[17] P. Harjulehto and P. Hästö, “An overview of variable exponent
Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces,” in Proceedings of the RNC Workshop on Future Trends in Geometric Function Theory, D. Herron,
Ed., pp. 85–93, Jyväskylä, Finland, 2003.
[18] S. Samko, “On a progress in the theory of Lebesgue spaces with
variable exponent: maximal and singular operators,” Integral
Transforms and Special Functions, vol. 16, no. 5-6, pp. 461–482,
2005.
[19] V. V. Jikov, S. M. Kozlov, and O. A. Oleinik, Homogenization of
Differential Operators and Integral Functionals, Springer, Berlin,
Germany, 1994.
[20] J. Chabrowski and Y. Fu, “Existence of solutions for 𝑝(π‘₯)Laplacian problems on a bounded domain,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 306, no. 2, pp. 604–618,
2005.
[21] X.-L. Fan and Q.-H. Zhang, “Existence of solutions for 𝑝(π‘₯)Laplacian Dirichlet problem,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A: Theory and Methods, vol. 52, no. 8, pp.
1843–1852, 2003.
[22] X. Fan, Q. Zhang, and D. Zhao, “Eigenvalues of 𝑝(π‘₯)-Laplacian
Dirichlet problem,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 302, no. 2, pp. 306–317, 2005.
[23] X. Fan and X. Han, “Existence and multiplicity of solutions for
𝑝(π‘₯)-Laplacian equations in R𝑁 ,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory,
Methods & Applications A: Theory and Methods, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 173–188, 2004.
[24] X. Fan, “Solutions for 𝑝(π‘₯)-Laplacian Dirichlet problems with
singular coefficients,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and
Applications, vol. 312, no. 2, pp. 464–477, 2005.
[25] X. Fan, “Remarks on eigenvalue problems involving the 𝑝(π‘₯)Laplacian,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications,
vol. 352, no. 1, pp. 85–98, 2009.
[26] D. Stancu-Dumitru, “Multiplicity of solutions for anisotropic
quasilinear elliptic equations with variable exponents,” Bulletin
of the Belgian Mathematical Society, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 875–889,
2010.
[27] D. Stancu-Dumitru, “Two nontrivial solutions for a class of
anisotropic variable exponent problems,” Taiwanese Journal of
Mathematics, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1205–1219, 2012.
[28] D. Stancu-Dumitru, “Multiplicity of solutions for a nonlinear
degenerate problem in anisotropic variable exponent spaces,”
Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Sciences Society, vol. 36,
no. 1, pp. 117–130, 2013.
[29] Z. Tan and F. Fang, “On superlinear 𝑝(π‘₯)-Laplacian problems
without Ambrosetti and Rabinowitz condition,” Nonlinear
Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A: Theory and Methods, vol. 75, no. 9, pp. 3902–3915, 2012.
[30] G. Autuori, P. Pucci, and M. C. Salvatori, “Asymptotic stability
for anisotropic Kirchhoff systems,” Journal of Mathematical
Analysis and Applications, vol. 352, no. 1, pp. 149–165, 2009.
[31] G. Autuori, P. Pucci, and M. C. Salvatori, “Global nonexistence
for nonlinear Kirchhoff systems,” Archive for Rational Mechanics
and Analysis, vol. 196, no. 2, pp. 489–516, 2010.
[32] G. Dai and D. Liu, “Infinitely many positive solutions for a 𝑝(π‘₯)Kirchhoff-type equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and
Applications, vol. 359, no. 2, pp. 704–710, 2009.
8
[33] G. Dai and J. Wei, “Infinitely many non-negative solutions for
a 𝑝(π‘₯)-Kirchhoff-type problem with Dirichlet boundary condition,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A:
Theory and Methods, vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 3420–3430, 2010.
[34] G. Dai and R. Hao, “Existence of solutions for a 𝑝(π‘₯)-Kirchhofftype equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 359, no. 1, pp. 275–284, 2009.
[35] G. Dai and R. Ma, “Solutions for a 𝑝(π‘₯)-Kirchhoff type equation
with Neumann boundary data,” Nonlinear Analysis. Real World
Applications. An International Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 12,
no. 5, pp. 2666–2680, 2011.
[36] X. Fan, “On nonlocal 𝑝(π‘₯)-LaplacianDirichlet problems,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A: Theory and
Methods, vol. 72, no. 7-8, pp. 3314–3323, 2010.
[37] X. Fan, “A Brezis-Nirenberg type theorem on local minimizers
for 𝑝(π‘₯)-Kirchhoff Dirichlet problems and applications,” Differential Equations & Applications, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 537–551, 2010.
[38] X. Fan and D. Zhao, “On the spaces 𝐿𝑝(π‘₯) and π‘Šπ‘š,𝑝(π‘₯) ,” Journal of
Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 263, no. 2, pp. 424–
446, 2001.
[39] L. Jeanjean, “On the existence of bounded Palais-Smale
sequences and application to a Landesman-Lazer-type problem
set on R𝑁 ,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh A, vol.
129, no. 4, pp. 787–809, 1999.
[40] W. Zou, “Variant fountain theorems and their applications,”
Manuscripta Mathematica, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 343–358, 2001.
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Advances in
Operations Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Advances in
Decision Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems
in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Journal of
Algebra
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Probability and Statistics
Volume 2014
The Scientific
World Journal
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
International Journal of
Differential Equations
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Submit your manuscripts at
http://www.hindawi.com
International Journal of
Advances in
Combinatorics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Mathematical Physics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Journal of
Complex Analysis
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
International
Journal of
Mathematics and
Mathematical
Sciences
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Stochastic Analysis
Abstract and
Applied Analysis
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
International Journal of
Mathematics
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Discrete Dynamics in
Nature and Society
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Journal of
Journal of
Discrete Mathematics
Journal of
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Applied Mathematics
Journal of
Function Spaces
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Optimization
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Download