Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Applied Mathematics Volume 2013, Article ID 914210, 8 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/914210 Research Article Existence Results for a π(π₯)-Kirchhoff-Type Equation without Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz Condition Libo Wang1,2 and Minghe Pei2 1 2 Institute of Mathematics, Jilin University, Chang’chun 130012, China Department of Mathematics, Beihua University, Ji’lin 132013, China Correspondence should be addressed to Libo Wang; wlb math@163.com Received 25 November 2012; Accepted 28 April 2013 Academic Editor: Jaime Munoz Rivera Copyright © 2013 L. Wang and M. Pei. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. We consider the existence and multiplicity of solutions for the π(π₯)-Kirchhoff-type equations without Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition. Using the Mountain Pass Lemma, the Fountain Theorem, and its dual, the existence of solutions and infinitely many solutions were obtained, respectively. 1. Introduction Autuori et al. [30, 31] have dealt with the nonstationary Kirchhoff-type equation involving the π(π₯)-Laplacian of the form The Kirchhoff equation π π0 π2 π’ π2 π’ πΈ πΏ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ’ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯) − ( =0 + ∫ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ ππ‘2 β 2πΏ 0 σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯2 (1) Ω was introduced by Kirchhoff [1] in the study of oscillations of stretched strings and plates, where π, π0 , β, πΈ, and πΏ are constants. The stationary analogue of the Kirchhoff equation, that is, (1), is as follows: − (π + π ∫ |∇π’|2 ππ₯) Δπ’ = π (π₯, π’) . Ω π’π‘π‘ − π (∫ (2) After the excellent work of Lions [2], problem (2) has received more attention; see [3–10] and references therein. The π(π₯)-Laplace operator arises from various phenomena, for instance, the image restoration [11], the electro-rheological fluids [12], and the thermoconvective flows of nonNewtonian fluids [13, 14]. The study of the π(π₯)-Laplace operator is based on the theory of the generalized Lebesgue space πΏπ(π₯) (Ω) and the Sobolev space ππ,π(π₯) (Ω), which we called variable exponent Lebesgue and Sobolev space. We refer the reader to [15–19] for an overview on the variable exponent Sobo-lev space, and to [20–29] for the study of the π(π₯)Laplacian-type equations. Recently, there has been an increasing interest in studying the Kirchhoff equation involving the π(π₯)-Laplace operator. 1 |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯) Δ π(π₯) π’ π (π₯) + π (π‘, π₯, π’, π’π‘ ) + π (π₯, π’) = 0, (3) 1 π’π‘π‘ − π (∫ |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯) Δ π(π₯) π’ π (π₯) Ω + π|∇π’|π(π₯)−2 π’ + π (π‘, π₯, π’, π’π‘ ) = π (π‘, π₯, π’) . In [32–35], applying variational method and AmbrosettiRabinowitz (AR) condition, Guowei Dai has studied the existence and multiplicity of solutions for the π(π₯)-Kirchhofftype equations with Dirichlet or Neumann boundary condition. In [36], by using (π+ ) mapping theory and the Mountain Pass Lemma, Fan has discussed the nonlocal π(π₯)-Laplacian Dirichlet problem with the nonvariational form −π΄ (π’) Δ π(π₯) π’ = π΅ (π’) π (π₯, π’) , π’ = 0, on πΩ, in Ω, (4) 2 Journal of Applied Mathematics and the π(π₯)-Kirchhoff-type equation with the variational form − π (∫ Ω 1,π(π₯) use the notation βπ’β = |∇π’|π(π₯) for π’ ∈ π0 1 |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯) Δ π(π₯) π’ π (π₯) = π (∫ πΉ (π₯, π’) ππ₯) π (π₯, π’) , Ω π’ = 0, in Ω, (5) on πΩ, under (AR) condition, where π΄, π΅ are two functionals defined π‘ 1,π(π₯) on π0 (Ω), and πΉ(π₯, π‘) = ∫0 π(π₯, π )ππ . Motivated by the above works, the purpose of this paper is to study the π(π₯)-Kirchhoff-type equation − (π + π ∫ Ω 1 |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯) Δ π(π₯) π’ = π (π₯, π’) , π (π₯) π’ = 0, in Ω, on πΩ, (6) without (AR) condition, where Ω is a smooth bounded domain in Rπ, π, π are two positive constants, Δ π(π₯) π’ = div(|∇π’(π₯)|π(π₯)−2 ∇π’(π₯)), π ∈ πΆ0,π½ (Ω) for some π½ ∈ (0, 1), and 1 < π− := inf π (π₯) ≤ π+ := supπ (π₯) < +∞. Ω 1,π(π₯) (Ω) the closure of πΆ0∞ (Ω) in π1,π(π₯) (Ω). Denote by π0 1,π(π₯) |∇π’|π(π₯) is an equivalent norm on π0 (Ω). In this paper we Ω (7) By taking the famous Mountain Pass Lemma, the Fountain Theorem, and its dual, we obtain the existence of solutions and infinitely many solutions for the π(π₯)-Kirchhoff-type equation (6) under no (AR) condition. ππ (π₯) { { π π (π₯) = { − π (π₯) { {+∞ (Ω). Define if π (π₯) < π, ∗ We refer the reader to [36–38] for the elementary properties of the space π1,π(π₯) (Ω). Proposition 1 (see [38]). Set π(π’) = ∫Ω |π’(π₯)|π(π₯) ππ₯. For any π’ ∈ πΏπ(π₯) (Ω), then the following are given: (1) |π’|π(π₯) = π ⇔ π(π’/π) = 1 if π’ =ΜΈ 0; (2) |π’|π(π₯) < 1(= 1; > 1) ⇔ π(π’) < 1(= 1; > 1); π− π+ π+ π− (3) |π’|π(π₯) ≤ π(π’) ≤ |π’|π(π₯) if |π’|π(π₯) > 1; (4) |π’|π(π₯) ≤ π(π’) ≤ |π’|π(π₯) if |π’|π(π₯) < 1; (5) limπ → +∞ |π’π |π(π₯) = 0 ⇔ limπ → +∞ π(π’π ) = 0; (6) limπ → +∞ |π’π |π(π₯) = +∞ ⇔ limπ → +∞ π(π’π ) = +∞. 3. Positive Energy Solution In this section we discuss the existence of weak solutions of 1,π(π₯) (Ω). (6). For simplicity we write π = π0 First, we state the assumptions on π as follows. (π0 ) Let π : Ω × R → R be a continuous function, and there exist positive constants π1 , π2 such that σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ πΌ(π₯)−1 , σ΅¨σ΅¨π (π₯, π‘)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ≤ π1 + π2 |π‘| 2. Preliminary We recall in this section some definitions and properties of variable exponent Lebesgue-Sobolev space. The variable exponent Lebesgue space πΏπ(π₯) (Ω) is defined by πΏπ(π₯) (Ω) π(π₯) = {π’ : π’ : Ω → R is measurable, ∫ |π’| Ω (8) (13) where πΌ ∈ πΆ(Ω) and 1 < πΌ(π₯) < π∗ (π₯) for all π₯ ∈ Ω. (π0σΈ ) Let π : Ω × R → R be a continuous function, and there exist positive constants π1 , π2 such that σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ πΌ(π₯)−1 , σ΅¨σ΅¨π (π₯, π‘)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ≤ π1 + π2 |π‘| ππ₯ < ∞} (12) if π (π₯) ≥ π. (14) where πΌ ∈ πΆ(Ω) and π+ < πΌ(π₯) < π∗ (π₯) for all π₯ ∈ Ω; π‘π(π₯, π‘) ≥ 0 for all π‘ > 0. + (π1 ) Let limπ‘ → +∞ (πΉ(π₯, π‘)/|π‘|2π ) = +∞, uniformly π‘ for π₯ ∈ Ω, where πΉ(π₯, π‘) = ∫0 π(π₯, π )ππ . with the norm σ΅¨σ΅¨ π’ σ΅¨σ΅¨π(π₯) |π’|πΏπ(π₯) = |π’|π(π₯) = inf {π > 0 : ∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ ≤ 1} . Ω σ΅¨πσ΅¨ (9) The variable exponent Sobolev space π1,π(π₯) (Ω) is defined by π1,π(π₯) (Ω) = {π’ ∈ πΏπ(π₯) (Ω) : |∇π’| ∈ πΏπ(π₯) (Ω)} (10) with the norm βπ’βπ1,π(π₯) = βπ’β1,π(π₯) = |π’|π(π₯) + |∇π’|π(π₯) . (11) (π2 ) There exists π ≥ 1 such that ππΊ(π₯, π‘) ≥ πΊ(π₯, π π‘) for (π₯, π‘) ∈ Ω × R and π ∈ [0, 1], where πΊ (π₯, π‘) = π‘π (π₯, π‘) − 2π+ πΉ (π₯, π‘) . (15) + (π3 ) Let limπ‘ → 0 (πΉ(π₯, π‘)/|π‘|π ) = 0, uniformly on π₯ ∈ Ω. (π3σΈ ) There exists πΏ > 0, such that πΉ(π₯, π‘) ≤ 0 for π₯ ∈ Ω, |π‘| < πΏ. Journal of Applied Mathematics 3 (π4 ) Let π(π₯, π‘) = −π(π₯, −π‘) for π₯ ∈ Ω and π‘ ∈ R. π+ (π5 ) Let limπ‘ → 0 (πΉ(π₯, π‘)/|π‘| ) = 0, uniformly on π₯ ∈ Ω, where π ∈ πΆ(Ω) satisfies 1 < π(π₯) < π(π₯) for π₯ ∈ Ω. Remark 2. Condition (π2 ) was first introduced by Jeanjean + [39] for the case π(π₯) = 2. Let π(π₯, π‘) = 2π+ |π‘|2π −2 π‘ ln |π‘|, then + πΉ (π₯, π‘) = |π‘|2π ln |π‘| − + 1 |π‘|2π , + 2π + πΊ (π₯, π‘) = |π‘|2π . (16) It is easy to see that the function π does not satisfy (AR) condition, but it satisfies (π1 )–(π5 ) and (π3σΈ ). Define πΌ(π’) = π½(π’) − Φ(π’), where π½ (π’) = (π + 1 1 π ∫ |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯) ∫ |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯, 2 Ω π (π₯) Ω π (π₯) (17) Then πΌ ∈ πΆ1 (π, R). Proposition 3 (see [38]). Assume that (π0 ) hold, then the functional π½ : π → R is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous, Φ : π → R is sequentially weakly continuous, and πΌ is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous. Proposition 4 (see [37]). Assume that (π0 ) hold, and let π’0 ∈ 1,π(π₯) (Ω) be a local minimizer (resp., a strictly local miniπ0 mizer) of πΌ in the πΆ1 (Ω) topology. Then π’0 is a local minimizer 1,π(π₯) (resp., a strictly local minimizer) of πΌ in the π0 (Ω) topology. Definition 5. We say that π’ ∈ π is a weak solution of (6), if 1 |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯) ∫ |∇π’|π(π₯)−2 ∇π’∇V ππ₯ π (π₯) Ω (18) Then we have Ω + 1 1 − + ) |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯ π (π₯) 2π 1 π ∫ |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯ 2 Ω π (π₯) ×∫ ( Ω + 1 1 − + ) |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯ π (π₯) π (21) 1 ∫ πΊ (π₯, π’) ππ₯} 2π+ Ω = lim {πΌ (π’π ) − π→∞ 1 β¨πΌσΈ (π’π ) , π’π β©} = π. 2π+ Let Vπ = π’π /βπ’π β, then up to a subsequence we may assume that Vπ σ³¨→ V in π, in πΏπΌ(π₯) (Ω) , Vπ (π₯) σ³¨→ V (π₯) Ω σ΅© σ΅©σ΅© σ΅©σ΅© σ΅©σ΅©σ΅© σΈ σ΅©σ΅©π’π σ΅©σ΅© σ΅©σ΅©πΌ (π’π )σ΅©σ΅©σ΅©σ΅© σ³¨→ 0. (20) σ΅©σ΅© σ΅©σ΅© σ΅©σ΅©π’π σ΅©σ΅© σ³¨→ ∞, πΌ (π’π ) σ³¨→ π, Vπ β V = ∫ π (π₯, π’) V ππ₯ (22) a.e. π₯ ∈ Ω. If V = 0, inspired by [13, 14], then we define for any V ∈ π. Definition 6. Let π be a Banach space and πΌ ∈ πΆ1 (π, R). Given π ∈ R. we say that πΌ satisfies the Cerami π condition (we denote by (πΆ)π the condition), if (i) any bounded sequence {π’π } ⊂ π such that πΌ(π’π ) → π and πΌσΈ (π’π ) → 0 has a convergent subsequence; (ii) there exist constants πΏ, π , π½ > 0 such that σ΅© σ΅© βπ’β σ΅©σ΅©σ΅©σ΅©πΌσΈ (π’)σ΅©σ΅©σ΅©σ΅© ≥ π½, Proof. From [36, Proposition 3.1], πΌ satisfies (i) of (πΆ) condition. Now we check that πΌ satisfies (ii) of (πΆ) condition. Arguing by contradiction, we may assume that, for some π ∈ R, π→∞ Ω Ω Lemma 8. Assume that conditions (π0 )–(π2 ) hold. Then πΌ satisfies (πΆ) condition. lim {π ∫ ( Φ (π’) = ∫ πΉ (π₯, π’) ππ’. (π + π ∫ Remark 7. Although (PS) condition is stronger than (πΆ) condition, the Deformation Theorem is still valid under (πΆ) condition; we see that the Mountain Pass Lemma, the Fountain Theorem, and its dual are true under (πΆ) condition. −1 ∀π’ ∈ πΌ [π − πΏ, π + πΏ] , πΌ (π‘π π’π ) = max πΌ (π‘π’π ) . π‘∈[0,1] − For any π > 1/2π+ , let π€π = (2ππ+ )1/π Vπ . Since π€π → 0 in πΏπΌ(π₯) (Ω) and |πΉ (π₯, π‘)| ≤ π5 + π6 |π‘|πΌ(π₯) , βπ’β ≥ π . (19) If πΌ ∈ πΆ1 (π, R) satisfies (πΆ)π condition for every π ∈ R, then we say that πΌ satisfies (πΆ) condition. (23) (24) by the continuity of πΉ(π₯, ⋅), πΉ(⋅, π€π ) → 0 in πΏ1 (Ω), thus, lim ∫ πΉ (⋅, π€π ) ππ₯ = 0. π→0 Ω (25) 4 Journal of Applied Mathematics 1/π− Then for π large enough, (2ππ+ ) /βπ’π β ∈ (0, 1) and ≥ π∫ ( Ω πΌ (π‘π π’π ) ≥ πΌ (π€π ) = π∫ Ω + 1 σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨π(π₯) σ΅¨∇π€ σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ π (π₯) σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ Ω π(π₯) 1 1/π− σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨∇Vπ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨) ππ₯ ((2ππ+ ) σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π (π₯) Ω + 2 + − ∫ πΉ (π₯, π€π ) ππ₯ ≥ 2π2 π 2 (π+ ) + 2 σ΅¨ σ΅¨π(π₯) (∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨∇Vπ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯) − ∫ πΉ (π₯, π€π ) ππ₯ Ω Ω 2ππ 2π2 π + − ∫ πΉ (π₯, π€π ) ππ₯. 2 π+ Ω (π+ ) That is, πΌ(π‘π π’π ) → ∞. From πΌ(0) = 0 and πΌ(π’π ) → π, we know that π‘π ∈ (0, 1) and 1 σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨π(π₯) σ΅¨ σ΅¨π(π₯) σ΅¨∇π‘ π’ σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯) ∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨∇π‘π π’π σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ π (π₯) σ΅¨ π π σ΅¨ Ω 1 1 (πΌ (π‘π π’π ) − + β¨πΌσΈ (π‘π π’π ) , π‘π π’π β©) π 2π = 1 πΌ (π‘ π’ ) → ∞. π π π π∫ ( Ω 1 1 σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨π(π₯) ) σ΅¨∇π’ σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ − π (π₯) 2π+ σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ + 1 σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨π(π₯) ∫ σ΅¨∇π’ σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ 2 Ω π (π₯) σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ 1 σ΅¨ 1 σ΅¨π(π₯) − + ) σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨∇π’π σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ ×∫ ( π Ω π (π₯) 1 + + ∫ πΊ (π₯, π’π ) ππ₯ 2π Ω This contradicts (21). If V =ΜΈ 0, from (20), when βπ’π β ≥ 1, π 1 π π + π (1) − σ΅© σ΅©2π+ + + 2 − π− σ΅©σ΅©σ΅©π’ σ΅©σ΅©σ΅©π σ΅©σ΅©π’π σ΅©σ΅© 2(π ) σ΅© πσ΅© σ΅© σ΅© Ω Therefore, from (π2 ), we have (28) Then from (π1 ) we have − ∫ π (π₯, π‘π π’π ) π’π ππ₯ π σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ = β¨πΌσΈ (π‘π π’π ) , π‘π π’π β© = π‘π σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ πΌ (π‘π’π ) = 0. ππ‘ σ΅¨σ΅¨π‘=π‘π πΊ (π₯, π‘π π’π ) 1 ππ₯ ∫ + 2π Ω π π σ΅©σ΅© σ΅©σ΅©π+ π σ΅©σ΅© σ΅©σ΅©2π+ σ΅©σ΅©π’π σ΅©σ΅© + σ΅©π’π σ΅©σ΅© − (π + π (1)) ≥ ∫Ω πΉ (π₯, π’π ) ππ₯. 2σ΅© − π 2(π− ) (29) σ΅¨ σ΅¨π(π₯) π ∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨∇π‘π π’π σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ Ω Ω 1 1 σ΅¨ σ΅¨π(π₯) − ) π‘π(π₯) σ΅¨σ΅¨∇π’ σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ π (π₯) π+ π σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ = (26) + π (∫ 1 π(π₯) σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨π(π₯) π‘ σ΅¨∇π’ σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ ∫ 2π Ω π (π₯) π σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ Ω 2ππ σ΅¨ σ΅¨π(π₯) ∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨∇V σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ π+ Ω σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ + πΊ (π₯, π‘π π’π ) 1 ππ₯ ∫ 2π+ Ω π ×∫ ( Ω 1 σ΅¨ 1 σ΅¨π(π₯) − + ) σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨∇π’π σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ π (π₯) π 1 1 π σ΅¨ σ΅¨π(π₯) − ) π‘π(π₯) σ΅¨σ΅¨∇π’ σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ ∫ ( π Ω π (π₯) 2π+ π σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ ≥ π(π₯) 1 π 1/π− σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨∇Vπ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨) ππ₯) ((2ππ+ ) + (∫ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ 2 Ω π (π₯) ≥ 1 σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨π(π₯) ∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨∇π’π σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ 2 Ω π (π₯) ×∫ ( 2 1 σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨π(π₯) + (∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨∇π€π σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯) − ∫ πΉ (π₯, π€π ) ππ₯ 2 Ω π (π₯) Ω = π∫ 1 σ΅¨σ΅¨ 1 σ΅¨π(π₯) − ) σ΅¨∇π’ σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ π (π₯) 2π+ σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ (27) πΉ (π₯, π’ ) ≥ ∫ σ΅© σ΅©2ππ+ ππ₯ Ω σ΅© σ΅©σ΅©π’π σ΅©σ΅©σ΅© πΉ (π₯, π’ ) σ΅¨ σ΅¨2π+ + ∫ ) σ΅¨ σ΅¨2π+π σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨Vπ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ = (∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨π’π σ΅¨σ΅¨ Vπ =ΜΈ 0 Vπ =0 σ΅¨ σ΅¨ =∫ Vπ =ΜΈ 0 (30) πΉ (π₯, π’π ) σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨2π+ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨2π+ σ΅¨σ΅¨Vπ σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯. σ΅¨σ΅¨π’π σ΅¨σ΅¨ For π₯ ∈ Θ := {π₯ ∈ Ω : V(π₯) =ΜΈ 0}, |π’π (π₯)| → +∞. By (π1 ) we have πΉ (π₯, π’π ) σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨π+ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨π+ σ΅¨σ΅¨Vπ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ³¨→ +∞. σ΅¨σ΅¨π’π σ΅¨σ΅¨ (31) Journal of Applied Mathematics 5 Note that the Lebesgue measure of Θ is positive; using the Fatou Lemma, we have πΉ (π₯, π’π ) σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨2π+ σ΅¨V σ΅¨ ππ₯ σ³¨→ +∞. (32) 2π+ σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ Vπ =ΜΈ 0 σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨π’ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ σ΅¨ This contradicts (30). The technique used in this lemma was first introduced by [39, 40]. ∫ Theorem 9. Assume that conditions (π0 )–(π2 ) and (π3 ) (or (π3σΈ )) hold. Then (6) has a nontrivial solution with positive energy. Proof. From Lemma 8, πΌ satisfies (πΆ) condition. Let us show that the functional πΌ has a Mountain-Pass-type geometry. Note that πΌ(0) = 0. By (π3 ), there exists πΏ > 0, and for any π’ ∈ π with |π’|πΏ∞ (Ω) < πΏ, 1 πΌ (π’) = π ∫ |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯ Ω π (π₯) + π π 2π+ − ∫ πΉ (π₯, π’) ππ₯ > 0. βπ’βπ + 2 βπ’β + π+ Ω (π ) This shows that 0 is a strictly local minimizer of πΌ in the πΆ(Ω) topology, and hence 0 is a strictly local minimizer of πΌ in the πΆ1 (Ω) topology. By [37, Theorem 1.1], 0 is a strictly local 1,π(π₯) minimizer of πΌ in the π0 (Ω) topology. Thus there exists π > 0 such that πΌ(π’) > 0 for every π’ ∈ π \ {0} with βπ’β ≤ π. We claim that inf βπ’β=π πΌ(π’) > 0. To prove this claim, arguing by contradiction, assume that there exists a sequence {π’π } ⊂ π with βπ’π β = π such that πΌ(π’π ) → 0 as π → ∞. We may assume that π’π β π’0 in π. Since πΌ is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous, we have that πΌ(π’0 ) = 0, and hence π’0 = 0. Since Φ is sequentially weakly continuous, then we have that Φ(π’π ) → Φ(0) = 0, and hence π½(π’π ) = πΌ(π’π ) + Φ(π’π ) → 0. It follows from this that π’π → 0 in π which contradicts with βπ’π β = π. Let π¦ ∈ π with π¦ > 0 in Ω and βπ¦β = 1. By (π0 ) and (π1 ), for π ≥ 1 we have 1 σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨π(π₯) πΌ (π π¦) = π ∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨∇π π¦σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ Ω π (π₯) π 2π+ π π+ π + π 2 π− (π− ) + σ΅¨ σ΅¨2π+ − π1 π 2π ∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨π¦σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ + π2 σ³¨→ −∞ as π σ³¨→ +∞. Ω (34) We set π = π π¦. Then for π large, we obtain πΌ (π) < 0. π = span {ππ : π = 1, 2, . . .}, π∗ = span {ππ∗ : π = 1, 2, . . .}, 1, β¨ππ , ππ∗ , β© = { 0, (36) π = π, π =ΜΈ π. For convenience, we write ππ = span{ππ }, ππ = ⊕ππ=1 ππ , ππ = ⊕∞ π=π ππ . (37) Then limπ → +∞ π½π = 0. Proposition 11 (Fountain Theorem). Assume that πΌ ∈ πΆ1 (π, R) is an even functional. If, for any π ∈ N, there exists ππ > ππ > 0 such that (π΄ 1 ) ππ = maxπ’∈ππ ,βπ’β=ππ πΌ(π’) ≤ 0, (π΄ 2 ) ππ = inf π’∈ππ ,βπ’β=ππ πΌ(π’) → +∞ as π → ∞, (π΄ 3 ) πΌ satisfies (πΆ)π condition for every π > 0, then πΌ has an unbounded sequence of critical values. Proposition 12 (Dual Fountain Theorem). Assume that πΌ ∈ πΆ1 (π, R) is an even functional. If, for any π ≥ π0 , there exists ππ > ππ > 0 such that (π΅1 ) ππ = inf π’∈ππ ,βπ’β=ππ πΌ(π’) ≥ 0, (π΅2 ) ππ = maxπ’∈ππ ,βπ’β=ππ πΌ(π’) < 0, (π΅3 ) ππ = inf π’∈ππ ,βπ’β≤ππ πΌ(π’) → 0 as π → ∞, (π΅4 ) πΌ satisfies (π)∗π condition for every π ∈ [ππ0 ,0 ], then πΌ has a sequence of negative critical values converging to 0. 2 1 σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨π(π₯) + π(∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨∇π π¦σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯) − ∫ πΉ (π₯, π π¦) ππ₯ Ω π (π₯) Ω βπβ > π, Since π is a reflexive and separable Banach space, then there exists {ππ } ⊂ π and {ππ∗ } ⊂ π∗ such that π½π = sup {|π’|πΌ(π₯) : βπ’β = 1, π’ ∈ ππ } . (33) ≤ 4. Infinitely Many Solutions Lemma 10 (see [21]). If πΌ ∈ πΆ(Ω), 1 < πΌ(π₯) < π∗ for any π₯ ∈ Ω, denote 2 1 π + (∫ |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯) − ∫ πΉ (π₯, π’) ππ₯ 2 Ω π (π₯) Ω ≥ Hence by the famous Mountain Pass Lemma, problem (6) has a nontrivial weak solution with positive energy. (35) Theorem 13. Assume that the conditions (π0σΈ ), (π1 )–(π4 ) hold. Then (6) has infinitely many solutions {π’π } such that πΌ(π’π ) → ∞ as π → ∞. Proof. By conditions (π0σΈ ), (π1 ), and (π3 ), for any π > 0, there exists πΆπ such that + + πΉ (π₯, π’) ≥ πΆπ |π’|2π − π|π’|π , ∀ (π₯, π’) ∈ Ω × R. (38) 6 Journal of Applied Mathematics Proof . By conditions (π0σΈ ), (π1 ), and (π5 ), for any π > 0, there exists πΆπ such that For π’ ∈ ππ , when βπ’β > 1, πΌ (π’) = π ∫ Ω 1 |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯ π (π₯) + πΌ (π’) = π ∫ Ω + + π π βπ’βπ + βπ’β2π 2 − π 2(π− ) 2π+ π+ − πΆπ |π’|2π+ + π|π’|π+ σ³¨→ −∞ as βπ’β σ³¨→ +∞. (39) On the other hand, by that ≤ and (π3 ), there exists πΆπ > 0 such ∀ (π₯, π’) ∈ Ω × R. (41) 1 |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯ π (π₯) ππ := − |πΉ (π₯, π’)| ≤ π|π’|π + πΆπ |π’|πΌ(π₯) , Ω (42) − − π βπ’βπ − ππ½π βπ’βπΌ . + 2π − − 1/(πΌ −π ) If we choose ππ := (π/4ππ+ π½ππΌ ) then, for π’ ∈ ππ with βπ’β = ππ , → ∞ as π → ∞, ≥ + − π π+ βπ’βπ − ππΆπ |π’|πΌπΌ− − ππ|π’|π+ + π ≥ + π π+ βπ’βπ − π|π’|π+ + 2π ≥ + + π π+ βπ’βπ − ππ½π βπ’βπ . 2π+ If we choose ππ := (4ππ+ π½π /π) for π’ ∈ ππ with βπ’β = ππ , πΌ (π’) ≥ := ππ , (47) 1 |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯ π (π₯) π+ π− /(πΌ− −π− ) π π πΌ (π’) ≥ + ( − ) 4π 4ππ+ π½ππΌ ∀ (π₯, π’) ∈ Ω × R. 2 1 π + (∫ |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯) − ∫ πΉ (π₯, π’) ππ₯ 2 Ω π (π₯) Ω − − π ≥ + βπ’βπ − π|π’|πΌπΌ− 2π − (46) Let π½π := supπ’∈ππ ,βπ’β=ππ |π’|π− , then π½π → 0 as π → ∞. For π’ ∈ ππ , when βπ’β and π small enough, πΌ (π’) = π ∫ − − π π π+ 2π− − πΆπ |π’|πΌπΌ− − π|π’|π+ βπ’βπ + 2 βπ’β + π+ 2(π ) max πΌ (π’) < 0. π’∈ππ ,βπ’β=ππ On the other hand, by (π5 ), there exists πΆπ > 0 such that 2 1 π + (∫ |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯) − ∫ πΉ (π₯, π’) ππ₯ 2 Ω π (π₯) Ω ≥ π− as βπ’β σ³¨→ +∞. (40) Let π½π := supπ’∈ππ ,βπ’β=ππ |π’|πΌ− . From Lemma 10, π½π → 0 as π → ∞. For π’ ∈ ππ , when βπ’β ≤ 1 and π small enough, ≥ (45) Then for some ππ > 0 large enough, + Ω + + π π βπ’βπ + βπ’β2π 2 − π (π− ) 2π+ max πΌ (π’) ≤ 0. |πΉ (π₯, π’)| ≤ π|π’|π + πΆπ |π’|πΌ(π₯) , πΌ (π’) = π ∫ 1 |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯ π (π₯) − πΆπ |π’|2π+ + π|π’|π− σ³¨→ −∞ π’∈ππ ,βπ’β=ππ (π0σΈ ) (44) 2 1 π + (∫ |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯) − ∫ πΉ (π₯, π’) ππ₯ 2 Ω π (π₯) Ω Then for some ππ > 0 large enough, ππ := ∀ (π₯, π’) ∈ Ω × R. For π’ ∈ ππ , when βπ’β is large enough, 2 1 π + (∫ |∇π’|π(π₯) ππ₯) − ∫ πΉ (π₯, π’) ππ₯ 2 Ω π (π₯) Ω ≤ + πΉ (π₯, π’) ≥ πΆπ |π’|2π − π|π’|π , (43) which implies that ππ := inf π’∈ππ ,βπ’β=ππ πΌ(π’) ≥ ππ → +∞ as π → +∞. Assume that conditions (π0σΈ ), (π1 ), (π2 ), (π4 ), and Theorem 14. (π5 ) hold. Then (6) has infinitely many solutions {π’π } such that πΌ(π’π ) → 0 as π → ∞. 1/(π+ −π+ ) + + π π+ 4ππ π½π ππ½π ( π (48) → 0 as π → ∞, then, π+ /(π+ −π+ ) ) := ππ , (49) which implies that ππ := inf π’∈ππ ,βπ’β=ππ πΌ(π’) ≥ ππ → 0 as π → +∞. Furthermore, if π’ ∈ ππ with βπ’β ≤ ππ , then π− π− πΌ (π’) ≥ −ππ½π ππ σ³¨→ 0 as π σ³¨→ ∞, (50) which implies that ππ = inf π’∈ππ ,βπ’β≤ππ πΌ(π’) → 0 as π → ∞. Journal of Applied Mathematics Acknowledgment This paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foun dation of China (11126339, 11201008). References [1] G. Kirchhoff, Mechanik, Teubner, Leipzig, Germany, 1883. [2] J. L. Lions, “On some equations in boundary value problems of mathematical physics,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Contemporary Developments in Continuum Mechanics and Partial Differential Equations, vol. 30 of North-Holland Mathematics Studies, pp. 284–346, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, North-Holland, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 19771978. [3] C. O. Alves, F. J. S. A. CorreΜa, and T. F. Ma, “Positive solutions for a quasilinear elliptic equation of Kirchhoff type,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 85–93, 2005. [4] B. Cheng, X. Wu, and J. Liu, “Multiplicity of nontrivial solutions for Kirchhoff type problems,” Boundary Value Problems, vol. 2010, Article ID 268946, 13 pages, 2010. [5] X. He and W. Zou, “Infinitely many positive solutions for Kirchhoff-type problems,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A: Theory and Methods, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1407– 1414, 2009. [6] S. B. Liu and S. J. Li, “Infinitely many solutions for a superlinear elliptic equation,” Acta Mathematica Sinica, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 625–630, 2003. [7] T. F. Ma and J. E. MunΜoz Rivera, “Positive solutions for a nonlinear nonlocal elliptic transmission problem,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 243–248, 2003. [8] A. Mao and Z. Zhang, “Sign-changing and multiple solutions of Kirchhoff type problems without the P.S. condition,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A: Theory and Methods, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1275–1287, 2009. [9] K. Perera and Z. Zhang, “Nontrivial solutions of Kirchhoff-type problems via the Yang index,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 221, no. 1, pp. 246–255, 2006. [10] Z. Zhang and K. Perera, “Sign changing solutions of Kirchhoff type problems via invariant sets of descent flow,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 317, no. 2, pp. 456– 463, 2006. [11] Y. Chen, S. Levine, and R. Rao, “Functionals with π(π₯)growth in image processing,” Technical Report 2004-01, Duquesne University, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, http://www.mathcs.duq .edu/sel/CLR05SIAPfinal.pdf. [12] M. RuzΜicΜka, Electrorheological Fluids: Modeling and Mathematical Theory, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2000. [13] S. N. Antontsev and S. I. Shmarev, “A model porous medium equation with variable exponent of nonlinearity: existence, uniqueness and localization properties of solutions,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A: Theory and Methods, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 515–545, 2005. [14] S. N. Antontsev and J. F. Rodrigues, “On stationary thermorheological viscous flows,” Annali dell’UniversitaΜ di Ferrara, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 19–36, 2006. [15] L. Diening, P. Harjulehto, P. HaΜstoΜ, and M. RuzΜicΜka, Lebesgue and Sobolev Spaces with Variable Exponents, vol. 2017 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2011. 7 [16] X. Fan, J. Shen, and D. Zhao, “Sobolev embedding theorems for spaces ππ,π(π₯) (Ω),” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 262, no. 2, pp. 749–760, 2001. [17] P. Harjulehto and P. HaΜstoΜ, “An overview of variable exponent Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces,” in Proceedings of the RNC Workshop on Future Trends in Geometric Function Theory, D. Herron, Ed., pp. 85–93, JyvaΜskylaΜ, Finland, 2003. [18] S. Samko, “On a progress in the theory of Lebesgue spaces with variable exponent: maximal and singular operators,” Integral Transforms and Special Functions, vol. 16, no. 5-6, pp. 461–482, 2005. [19] V. V. Jikov, S. M. Kozlov, and O. A. Oleinik, Homogenization of Differential Operators and Integral Functionals, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1994. [20] J. Chabrowski and Y. Fu, “Existence of solutions for π(π₯)Laplacian problems on a bounded domain,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 306, no. 2, pp. 604–618, 2005. [21] X.-L. Fan and Q.-H. Zhang, “Existence of solutions for π(π₯)Laplacian Dirichlet problem,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A: Theory and Methods, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 1843–1852, 2003. [22] X. Fan, Q. Zhang, and D. Zhao, “Eigenvalues of π(π₯)-Laplacian Dirichlet problem,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 302, no. 2, pp. 306–317, 2005. [23] X. Fan and X. Han, “Existence and multiplicity of solutions for π(π₯)-Laplacian equations in Rπ ,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A: Theory and Methods, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 173–188, 2004. [24] X. Fan, “Solutions for π(π₯)-Laplacian Dirichlet problems with singular coefficients,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 312, no. 2, pp. 464–477, 2005. [25] X. Fan, “Remarks on eigenvalue problems involving the π(π₯)Laplacian,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 352, no. 1, pp. 85–98, 2009. [26] D. Stancu-Dumitru, “Multiplicity of solutions for anisotropic quasilinear elliptic equations with variable exponents,” Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 875–889, 2010. [27] D. Stancu-Dumitru, “Two nontrivial solutions for a class of anisotropic variable exponent problems,” Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1205–1219, 2012. [28] D. Stancu-Dumitru, “Multiplicity of solutions for a nonlinear degenerate problem in anisotropic variable exponent spaces,” Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Sciences Society, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 117–130, 2013. [29] Z. Tan and F. Fang, “On superlinear π(π₯)-Laplacian problems without Ambrosetti and Rabinowitz condition,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A: Theory and Methods, vol. 75, no. 9, pp. 3902–3915, 2012. [30] G. Autuori, P. Pucci, and M. C. Salvatori, “Asymptotic stability for anisotropic Kirchhoff systems,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 352, no. 1, pp. 149–165, 2009. [31] G. Autuori, P. Pucci, and M. C. Salvatori, “Global nonexistence for nonlinear Kirchhoff systems,” Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, vol. 196, no. 2, pp. 489–516, 2010. [32] G. Dai and D. Liu, “Infinitely many positive solutions for a π(π₯)Kirchhoff-type equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 359, no. 2, pp. 704–710, 2009. 8 [33] G. Dai and J. Wei, “Infinitely many non-negative solutions for a π(π₯)-Kirchhoff-type problem with Dirichlet boundary condition,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A: Theory and Methods, vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 3420–3430, 2010. [34] G. Dai and R. Hao, “Existence of solutions for a π(π₯)-Kirchhofftype equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 359, no. 1, pp. 275–284, 2009. [35] G. Dai and R. Ma, “Solutions for a π(π₯)-Kirchhoff type equation with Neumann boundary data,” Nonlinear Analysis. Real World Applications. An International Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 2666–2680, 2011. [36] X. Fan, “On nonlocal π(π₯)-LaplacianDirichlet problems,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A: Theory and Methods, vol. 72, no. 7-8, pp. 3314–3323, 2010. [37] X. Fan, “A Brezis-Nirenberg type theorem on local minimizers for π(π₯)-Kirchhoff Dirichlet problems and applications,” Differential Equations & Applications, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 537–551, 2010. [38] X. Fan and D. Zhao, “On the spaces πΏπ(π₯) and ππ,π(π₯) ,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 263, no. 2, pp. 424– 446, 2001. [39] L. Jeanjean, “On the existence of bounded Palais-Smale sequences and application to a Landesman-Lazer-type problem set on Rπ ,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh A, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 787–809, 1999. [40] W. Zou, “Variant fountain theorems and their applications,” Manuscripta Mathematica, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 343–358, 2001. Journal of Applied Mathematics Advances in Operations Research Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Advances in Decision Sciences Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Mathematical Problems in Engineering Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Journal of Algebra Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Probability and Statistics Volume 2014 The Scientific World Journal Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 International Journal of Differential Equations Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Volume 2014 Submit your manuscripts at http://www.hindawi.com International Journal of Advances in Combinatorics Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Mathematical Physics Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Journal of Complex Analysis Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences Journal of Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Stochastic Analysis Abstract and Applied Analysis Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com International Journal of Mathematics Volume 2014 Volume 2014 Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Volume 2014 Volume 2014 Journal of Journal of Discrete Mathematics Journal of Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Applied Mathematics Journal of Function Spaces Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Optimization Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014