Symmetry Breaking by Parallel Flow Shear: Intrinsic Axial Flow and Intrinsic Rotation

advertisement
DPP15-2015-000573
SymmetryBreakingbyParallelFlowShear:
DynamicsofIntrinsicAxialFlow inaLinearDevice,
and
ItsImplicationforIntrinsicRotation inTokamaks
J.Li,P.H.Diamond,UCSD
X.Q.Xu,LLNL
Y.Kosuga,KyushuUniversity,Japan
O.D.Gurcan,Ecole Polytechnique,France
Ackn:R.Hong,A.Ashourvan,S.C.Thakur,L.Cui,G.R.Tynan,P.Vaezi,UCSD
ThismaterialisbaseduponworksupportedbytheU.S.DepartmentofEnergy,Officeof
Science,OfficeofFusionEnergySciences, underAwardNumber DE-FG02-04ER54738
Outline
• Motivation
• LinearDeviceConfiguration andResults:CSDX&PANTA
• Problem: Originofaxialflow?
• DynamicalSymmetryBreakingMechanism
•
•
•
•
Introduction toresidualstress,problem withapplicabilityofconventional wisdom
Dynamicalsymmetrybreaking
Residualstress
Comparetostandardmechanism(negativeviscosityvsintrinsictorque)
• NegativeViscosityPhenomena
• Modulational instabilityforatestflowshear<->๐œ’" vs|๐œ’ $%& |
• Whatstops ๐‘ฃ( ) growth? – ParallelShearFlowInstability(PSFI)
• Flowstructure
• Turbulent pipeflowmodel: Δ๐‘ƒ( ,neutralboundary layer
• Flowprofile: Including PSFIeffectà ๐‘ฃ( ) structure
• Significancefortokamaks
• Conclusion
2
Summary
• Existenceofintrinsicflowsuggestedbyexperiments
• Dynamicalsymmetrybreaking: Atestflowshearseeds
symmetrybreakingà ๐›ฟ ๐‘ฃ( ) feedsbackonitself
•
๐›ฟΠ $%& ∼ ๐œ’ $%& ๐›ฟ⟨๐‘ฃ( ⟩′ inducesanegativeviscosityincrement
๐œ’ $%& ,totalviscosity ๐œ’ tot = ๐œ’ − |๐œ’ $%& |
"
"
• ๐‘ฃ( ) staysunderParallel ShearFlowInstabilitythreshold,
totalviscositystayspositive
• Asynergyofstandardresidualstressdrivenby๐›ป๐‘‡, ๐›ปP, etc.
and๐›ฟΠ $%& inducednegativeviscosityincrementisimpliedfor
tokamaks.
3
Experiments:configuration
Gasinput
• PANTA[2]
• CSDX[1]
• Gasinputfromthesourceend
• Gasinputfromside
àAxialmomentuminput
àNoaxialmomentuminput
Parameters
CSDXTypical Values
PANTA TypicalValues
Source
<5kW
3kW
Pressure
0.1~1.3Pa
0.1Pa,0.4Pa
B field
Upto2400G
900G
๐‘‡%
3~6eV
3eV
๐‘›%
0.5~2x1019m3
1x1019m3
๐‘‡E
0.3~0.8eV
---
*[1]S.Thakuretal,PlasmaSourcesSci.Technol.23(2014)044006;
[2]T.Kobayashi (2014,Jun).Parallelflowstructureformationbyturbulentmomentumtransportinlinearmagnetized
plasma. AsiaPacificTransportWorking Group,Kyushu University, Japan.
4
ProfileofAxialFlow
Endplate
cs ~ 3 km/s
• CSDX[1]
• Noaxialmomentuminput
• FlowprofilesteepensasBincreases
Source
• PANTA[2]
• Flowreversal
• Inputflow:insufficientmomentuminput
Intrinsicaxialflow!
Origin,physics?
*[1]L.Cui (2015,Nov). SpontaneousProfileSelf-OrganizationinaSimpleRealizationofDrift-WaveTurbulence.Invitedtalk,
Session BI3,57th APS-DPPmeeting,Savannah,Georgia.
[2]T.Kobayashi (2014,Jun).Parallelflowstructureformationbyturbulentmomentumtransportinlinearmagnetized
5
plasma. AsiaPacificTransportWorking Group,Kyushu University, Japan.
EvidenceofIntrinsicFlow
Device
CauseofDrivenFlow
CSDX
Neutralgas
EvidenceofIntrinsicFlow
Flow profile,densityprofilesteepenasB
increases:
à Ionized&heatedduringhelicon
discharge
๐›ป๐‘ ↑ à DriftWave (DW)turbulence ↑
à Ionpressuregradientinaxial
direction Δ๐‘ƒ(
à Drivenflow
PANTA
à Turbulenttransportofaxialmomentum↑
à Intrinsicflowinteractswithdrivenflow
à Totalflowstructurechanges
Gasthruput intothesourceend
Flowreversal
à Externalmomentumsource
à Intrinsicflowinteractswithdrivenflow
à Drivesflow fromsourceto
endplate
à Globalnetflowdirection:
Sourceà Endplate
6
Problem
• Axialflows
• CSDX,PANTAbothsuggesttheexistenceofintrinsicaxialflows
• Questions:
• (1)Whatgeneratestheintrinsicflow?
• (2)Howdoesintrinsicflowinteractwithdrivenflow?
• Approach:
$%&
• IntrinsicflowacceleratedbyΠHโˆฅ
à Needssymmetrybreaking
• Standardapproach
$%&
à Intrinsictorque,−๐œ•H ΠHโˆฅ
acceleratesflow
à DoesnotapplytostraightB fields
• Here:DynamicalSymmetryBreaking
7
à Negativeviscosityincrement
StandardApproach
• Intrinsicflowisacceleratedbytheresidualpieceofthe
momentumflux:
๐‘ฃKH ๐‘ฃKโˆฅ =
L Mโˆฅ
−๐œ’" LH
$%&
+ ๐‘‰P ๐‘ฃโˆฅ + ΠHโˆฅ
• Ignoremomentumpinch๐‘‰P
• CorrelatedbyB fieldstructure,๐‘˜โˆฅ =
shearlength
•
$%&
ΠHโˆฅ
∼ ๐‘˜R ๐‘˜โˆฅ = ∑Y ๐‘˜R ๐‘˜โˆฅ|๐œ™Y
|Z
• ๐‘ฅ:distancefromrationalsurface
=
S
๐‘˜R T ,๐ฟ&
U
= magnetic
Z S
๐‘˜R
TU
• Needssymmetrybreaking!
8
SymmetryBreaking
• Summaryofconventionalsymmetrybreakingmechanisms*:
Conventional mechanisms
Keyphysics
Electricfield shear๐ธH)
Centroidshiftà parallelacousticwave
asymmetryà mean⟨๐‘˜โˆฅ ⟩
Intensity gradient๐ผ )
Spectraldispersionfromintensitygradient
Stress frompolarization
acceleration⟨๐ธ^โˆฅ ๐›ป_Z ๐œ™^⟩
Guidingcenterstressfromaccelerationdue
topolarizationcharge
Stressfrom๐œ•H ๐‘ฃKH ๐‘ฃK_ àBR ⟨๐ฝH ⟩
๐‘ฑ×๐‘ฉ torque frompolarizationflux
• DonotapplytoCSDXorPANTAß StraightBfields
• à Dynamicalsymmetrybreaking
• Driftwaveturbulenceinpresenceofaxialflowshear
• ๐›ฟ ๐‘ฃ( ) seedssymmetrybreaking
*P.H.Diamond etal,Nucl.Fusion 53(2013)104019;
P.H.Diamond etal,Nucl.Fusion 49(2009) 045002.
9
ModelEquations
• Hasegawa-Wakatani +Axialflow:
Acousticcoupling
• Acousticcoupling
• CoupleaxialflowfluctuationtoDW
• Familiar:Convertparallelcompressionintozonalflow*
• ๐‘–๐›ฟ:nonadiabatic electronresponseà Driftwaveinstability
• Dispersionrelation:
Driftwave
*Wangetal,PlasmaPhys.Control.Fusion 54(2012)095015
Symmetry
breaking
Ionacousticwave
10
DynamicalSymmetryBreaking
• Spectralimbalance:
• Growthrate~frequencyshift:
Infinitesimaltestaxialflow
shear,e.g.๐›ฟ ๐‘ฃ( ) > 0
• Frequency:
• Frequencyshift~Flowshear:
kR
๐œ™Y
Modeswith๐‘˜R ๐‘˜( > 0 grow
fasterthanothermodes,
๐›พY |Ym Yn op > ๐›พY |YmYn qp
Z
Spectral
imbalance
0
: {๐‘˜+}
Spectralimbalance(Fig.1)
k(
:{๐‘˜−}
{๐‘˜±}:Domainswheremodes growfaster/slower
Fig.1:Spectralimbalance.
0
k(
๐‘˜R ๐‘˜( ≠ 0
11
Quasilinear ReynoldsStress
• Reynoldsstress=diffusiveflux+residualstress
• Turbulentdiffusivity:
• Residualstress:
• Sumover2domains,accountingforthespectralimbalance
Spectralimbalance∼ ๐›ฟ ๐‘ฃ(
)
12
Contrastthe2Stories
StandardSymmetry Breaking
Dynamical SymmetryBreaking
Freeenergy source ๐›ป๐‘‡E,๐›ปn,…depending onturbulence type Onlydriftwaveturbulence sofar,๐›ปn
Symmetrybreaker
Radial electricfieldshear, ๐ธH) ;
Intensitygradient,๐ผ ๐‘ฅ ),etc.
All tiedtomagneticfieldconfiguration.
Testaxial flowshear, ๐›ฟ ๐‘ฃ( );
No requirement forshearof๐‘ฉ
structure.
Effect ontheflow
$%&
Intrinsictorque, −๐œ•H ΠHโˆฅ
Negativeviscosity,
$%&
๐›ฟΠH(
= |๐œ’ $%& |๐›ฟ ๐‘ฃ(
Flowprofile
๐‘ฃโˆฅ
Feedbackloop
)
$%&
ΠHโˆฅ
=
๐œ’"
๐›ป๐‘‡E +geometry
(magneticshear)
Heatflux
Openloop
๐‘ฃโˆฅ
)
$%&
ΠHโˆฅ
)
$%&
Flowdrive(Π
,Δ๐‘ƒ( )
H(
๐‘ฃ( ) =
๐œ’" − |๐œ’ $%& |
Testflow
shear๐›ฟ ๐‘ฃ(
)
Intrinsic
flow,
feedbackon
๐›ฟ ๐‘ฃ( )
Closed
loop
Breaks the
symmetry,
spectral
imbalance
Residualstress
$%&
ΠH(
13
NegativeViscosityIncrement
$%& ∼ ๐œ’ $%& ๐›ฟ ๐‘ฃ ),back-of-envelopestyle
• Calculatenegativediffusion๐›ฟΠH(
(
• Quasilinear residualstress:
• ๐‘Y ∼ |๐œ™Y |Z/๐œ”Y waveactiondensitygovernedbywavekineticequation:
Convectionby
wavepacket
Refraction
Lineargrowth
Self-interaction
• Recall:
14
NegativeViscosityIncrement:cont’d
• Dynamicsofatestflowshear
(From formalcalculation)
• Negativeviscosityincrement:
• Growthrateofflowshearmodulation
15
Limitson ๐‘ฃ(
•
tot = ๐œ’ − |๐œ’ $%& | < 0 à ๐›ฟ ๐‘ฃ
๐œ’"
"
(
)
)
grows,profilesteepens,until…
• ๐‘ฃ( ) hitsParallelShearFlowInstability(PSFI)threshold
• PSFI:recalldispersionrelationofthemodelwithadiabaticelectrons:
• Unstable↔ discriminant
à PSFI
• à
• PSFIturbulenceà ๐œ’"PSFI addsontotheambient๐œ’"tot
à ๐œ’"tot = ๐œ’"DW + ๐œ’"PSFI Θ
•
๐‘ฃ( ) − ๐‘ฃ(
)
ƒHE„
− |๐œ’ $%& |
๐œ’"PSFI switchedon,๐œ’"PSFI > |๐œ’ $%& | à ๐œ’"tot > 0
• ๐‘ฃ( ) staysbelowPSFIthreshold;totalviscositystayspositive.
• Similartononlineardampingofzonalflow
16
FlowStructureinLinearDevice
PressuredropΔ๐‘ƒ(
Plasma
source,
heating
Neutrallayer
Pipe flow Plasma flow
Drive
Plasmaflow
Momentum outflux∼ ๐œŒp ⟨๐‘ฃH ๐‘ฃ( ⟩
Pressure
drop Δ๐‘ƒ(
Ion pressure
dropΔ๐‘ƒ(
Boundary Noslip
condition
Setby
neutrallayer
Viscosity
๐œ’" − |๐œ’ $%& |
๐œˆ
• IdeaofModel:Turbulentpipeflow,Prandtl +residualstress
• Prandtl (momentumbalance):
• Reynoldsstress:
• à Flowprofile:
17
FlowStructure:cont’d
• PSFIà Enhanceturbulentdiffusion,
eff = ๐œ’ DW + ๐œ’ PSFI Θ ๐‘ฃ ) − ๐‘ฃ
๐œ’"
(
(
"
"
)
ƒHE„
• IncludingPSFIeffect:
•
PSFI
๐œ’"
nonlinearin⟨๐‘ฃ( ⟩′ à ๐œ’"eff > |๐œ’ $%&| à Profilerelaxes
• ๐‘ฃ( ) staysbelowPSFIthreshold
18
ImplicationforTokamaks
• SynergyofΠ $%& ๐›ป๐‘‡, ๐›ป๐‘ƒ, ๐›ป๐‘ and๐›ฟΠ $%& = ๐œ’$%& ๐›ฟ⟨๐‘ฃ( ⟩′
• DWturbulence,๐‘ฉ shear
• Symmetrybreaker
(๐ธH) ,๐ผ ๐‘ฅ ),…)
$%&
• à residualstressΠHโˆฅ
• DWturbulence
• Testflowshear
• à negativeviscosity|๐œ’ $%& |
• Flowprofilesetbymomentumfluxbalance:
• Enhancedflowprofile
Applicableto
electronDW’s
à CTEM
à Mechanismto
enhanceintrinsic
rotationpredictions
19
Conclusion
• ResultsfromCSDX,PANTAsuggestintrinsicaxialflow;
• Intrinsicmechanismtogenerateaxialflowsandtobuildupa
meanflowprofileisintroduced:
• Testflowshear๐›ฟ ๐‘ฃ( )seedssymmetrybreakingandfeedsbackon
itself;
• Differentfromstandardsymmetrybreakingmechanism:
• Intrinsictorque−๐œ•H Π$%& drivenby๐›ป๐‘‡, ๐›ปP, … v.s.Negativeviscosity
increment ๐œ’ $%& inducedby๐›ฟΠ$%& ;
• Flowstructureinalineardevice:
• Implicationfortokamaks:
• SynergyofΠ $%& ๐›ป๐‘‡, ๐›ปP, … and๐›ฟΠ$%& = ๐œ’ $%& ๐›ฟ ๐‘ฃ( );
• Enhancedintrinsicrotationprofile:
20
Download