Selected Acquisition Report (SAR)
RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-560
JPATS
As of December 31, 2011
Defense Acquisition Management
Information Retrieval
(DAMIR)
UNCLASSIFIED
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Table of Contents
Program Information
Responsible Office
References
Mission and Description
Executive Summary
Threshold Breaches
Schedule
Performance
Track To Budget
Cost and Funding
Low Rate Initial Production
Nuclear Cost
Foreign Military Sales
Unit Cost
Cost Variance
Contracts
Deliveries and Expenditures
Operating and Support Cost
3
3
3
4
5
7
8
9
11
13
28
29
29
30
33
36
40
41
UNCLASSIFIED
2
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Program Information
Designation And Nomenclature (Popular Name)
Joint Primary Aircraft Training System (JPATS)
DoD Component
Air Force
Joint Participants
United States Air Force; United States Navy
Responsible Office
Responsible Office
Mr. Stephen G. Henrich
Building 11A Room 204.10
1970 Monahan Way
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433-7211
stephen.henrich@wpafb.af.mil
Phone
Fax
DSN Phone
DSN Fax
Date Assigned
937-255-0817
937-656-7201
785-0817
-February 15, 2011
References
SAR Baseline (Production Estimate)
Air Force Acquisition Executive (AFAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated February 28, 2002
Approved APB
Air Force Acquisition Executive (AFAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated September 26, 2007
UNCLASSIFIED
3
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Mission and Description
The Joint Primary Aircraft Training System (JPATS) is a United States Air Force (USAF)/United States Navy (USN)
program to replace USAF's T-37B aircraft, USN's T-34C aircraft, and the associated Ground Based Training
Systems (GBTS). The aircraft and GBTS are being used to train entry-level students in the fundamentals of flying so
they can transition into advanced training tracks leading to rated qualification.
The program represents a systems approach to aviator training requiring the purchase of air vehicles (750
production units), aircrew training devices (126), associated ground based training devices, an integrated training
management system (TIMS), instructional courseware, as well as the entire logistics and sustainment of the training
system which includes contractor logistics support (CLS).
The USAF will train at six bases and the USN at three bases. Each operational training location will be equipped
with a full complement of operational flight trainers, instrument flight trainers, unit training devices and egress training
devices. Courseware has been developed for the T-6A and converted from existing courseware for other platforms
where appropriate. The TIMS will provide a training and scheduling management capability which will tie the efforts
and activities of all Air Education and Training Command (AETC) and Chief of Naval Air Training operating locations
together.
The USAF will have CLS for most of the off-aircraft equipment maintenance. The on-aircraft equipment maintenance
will be performed by third party contractor or organically supported. The USN will employ total CLS for the entire
aircraft. The GBTS will be a total CLS effort for both services.
UNCLASSIFIED
4
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Executive Summary
JPATS is meeting requirements in the field. As of December 31, 2011, the contractor was 13 aircraft ahead of
schedule and Aircrew Training Devices (ATD) are meeting the delivery schedule.
Significant events in 2011 include realization of the FY 2011 Navy procurement funding mark, continuing business
without rate agreements at Hawker Beechcraft, and addressing technical issues with the ejection seat, an in-flight
control stick fracture, the engine and nose wheel shimmy. Also, the Hawker Beechcraft government business unit
formally changed their name to Hawker Beechcraft Defense Company (HBDC).
Production line efforts for Lot 17 (FY 2010 funding) began, without a contract award, in March 2010 at HBDC risk
(planned award March 2010, delivery beginning January 2012). HBDC decided to proceed at risk in order to avoid
a production line shutdown and supplier interruption. In September 2010, a Congressional mark on Lot 18 FY 2011
funding (due to contracting delays) removed the ability for Lot 18 to be funded on schedule (planned award March
2011). Again, HBDC decided to proceed at risk and also extended their pricing through the end of 2011 to facilitate
the use of FY 2012 funding for Lot 18. Due to Continuing Resolution Authority (CRA) and the budget distribution
process, HBDC further extended their price validity to February 29, 2012 and award was completed January 19,
2012. The overall result is that the time between lot funding and aircraft delivery has been reduced from 22 to 12
months. However, HBDC long lead time remains the same, placing them at 10-12 months of financial risk for each
remaining production year (2012 through 2014). The 2013 Presidents Budget included funding to buy back Lot 18
aircraft, replacing them over two years, FY 2013 and FY 2014. In FY 2011 the Navy realized a Congressional mark
due to contracting delays, eliminating funding for 38 Navy T-6B's, with $22.6M remaining in Navy Procurement
funds. The Navy included funding in the FY 2013 President's Budget to buy-back the 38 aircraft in FY 2013 and FY
2014. HBDC proceeded at risk to maintain the production schedule and FY 2012 funding was awarded to procure
36 aircraft in January 2012.
In 2010, HBDC removed Lots 19-20 from negotiations due to a corporate cost savings initiative that undermined
their original cost proposal. The updated proposal for Lots 19-20 is due in March 2012 and will be funded with FY
2013 and FY 2014 appropriations.
Since mid 2010, changes at HBDC due to cost savings initiatives, as well as changing potential for Foreign Military
Sales, complicated their ability to produce an adequate pricing rate proposal. HBDC pulled out of their last Forward
Pricing Rate Agreement (FPRA) in December 2010 and have not yet come to an agreement with Defense Contract
Management Agency (DCMA). The latest proposal was submitted to DCMA on January 24, 2012 and is in review.
This impacts and delays several contracting efforts, adding time and work to the overall process as well as adding
risk to the program funding and schedule.
In November 2010, HBDC informed the JPATS office that the latest lot of ejection seat propellant cartridges did not
pass acceptance testing, failing the low temperature test. Throughout 2011, the program office took interim steps to
mitigate this issue including using higher temperature cartridges under a deviation and utilizing sustainment
cartridges until a new design is complete. The new design was scheduled to be delivered in December 2011 but
technical issues will delay deliveries until May 2012.
On September 13, 2011, a Sheppard AFB aircraft experienced an in-flight emergency caused by the fracture of the
aft stick control assembly housing, resulting in loss of aileron control in the front cockpit and loss of pitch control in the
aft cockpit; ultimately the crew was able to land safely. Post flight analysis revealed that the front cockpit stick had a
crack, as well as one other aircraft that was spot inspected. Based on the findings, all Navy/Air Force aircraft were
grounded until they successfully passed inspection on the control sticks. A second set of inspections is now
underway and the root cause determination is in work with HBDC, the program office, and the Air Force Research
Lab.
High Pressure Fuel Pump (HPFP) failure investigations were resolved with part changes, new periodic inspections,
and changes to the engine overhaul manual.
UNCLASSIFIED
5
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
The Propeller Sleeve Touchdown (PSTD) Phase 0 engine upgrades concluded in December 2011, finally removing
the susceptible parts from service. Overall, 449 engines were upgraded to the Phase1/Phase 2 configuration and
none of the new configuration have experienced a PSTD event.
HBDC received Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) certification in September 2011 for the nose wheel shimmy
friction collar and the acquisition process is underway to procure parts and begin retrofits.
There are no significant software-related issues with this program at this time.
UNCLASSIFIED
6
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Threshold Breaches
APB Breaches
Schedule
Performance
Cost
RDT&E
Procurement
MILCON
Acq O&M
Unit Cost
PAUC
APUC
Nunn-McCurdy Breaches
Current UCR Baseline
PAUC
None
APUC
None
Original UCR Baseline
PAUC
None
APUC
None
UNCLASSIFIED
7
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Schedule
Milestones
Milestone 0/I
Milestone II
Aircraft Critical Design Review (CDR)
Start MOT&E
Milestone III
AF Req'd Asset Availability
Navy Req'd Asset Availability
SAR Baseline
Prod Est
JAN 1993
AUG 1995
JUN 1996
APR 2000
NOV 2001
JUN 2002
AUG 2003
Current APB
Production
Objective/Threshold
JAN 1993 JUL 1993
AUG 1995 AUG 1995
JUN 1996 DEC 1996
APR 2000 OCT 2000
NOV 2001 MAY 2002
JUN 2002 DEC 2002
AUG 2003 FEB 2004
Current
Estimate
JAN 1993
AUG 1995
NOV 1996
JUN 2000
DEC 2001
JUN 2002
AUG 2003
Acronyms And Abbreviations
AF - Air Force
MOT&E - Multi-Service Operational Test and Evaluation
Req'd - Required
Change Explanations
None
UNCLASSIFIED
8
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Performance
Characteristics
Syllabus Maneuvers
Mission Profiles
(Contact,
Familiarization,
Precision Aerobatics,
Instrument, and
Navigation -High and
Low)
Sustained Speed at
1000 ft MSL, hot day
(KTAS)
Operational G Envelope
(Gs)
Accomplish
all five
mission
profiles
Current APB
Production
Objective/Threshold
Accomplish Accomplish
all five
all five
mission
mission
profiles
profiles
270
270
250 (270
Dash)
250 (270
Dash)
250 (270
Dash)
+7 to -3
symmetric
+7 to -3
symmetric
Pressurization (PSI
Differential)
Bird Strike Capability (4
lb bird, no catastropic
damage) (KTAS)
Ejection Seat with
Survival Kit
(Altitude/Airspeed in
Knots)
Able To Perform an
Engine Out Landing
Anthropometric
Accommodation
(Sitting Height in
inches)
Cockpit Configuration
5.0
5.0
+6 to -3
symmetric;
+4 to 0
asymmetric
3.5
+7 to -3.5
symmetric
+4.0 to 0
asymmetric
3.5
+7 to -3.5
symmetric
+4.0 to 0
asymmetric
3.5
Max Low
Level
Airspeed
0/0
Max Low
Level
Airspeed
0/0
270
270
270
0/60
0/0
0/0
Unprepared
surface
31.0 to 40.0
Unprepared Runway
surface
31.0 to 40.0 32.8 to 40.0
Runway
Runway
31.0 to 40.0
31.0 to 40.0
Interchangeable
Instructor/
Student
0 Degree
Over-theNose
Visibility
from the
Rear
Cockpit at
Design Eye
Height
FAR Part
36, Most
Interchangeable
Instructor/
Student
0 Degree
Over-theNose
Visibility
from the
Rear
Cockpit at
Design Eye
Height
FAR Part
36, Most
Stepped
Tandem
Interchangeable
Instructor/Studen
Stepped
Tandem
Interchangeable
Instructor/Student
Stepped
Tandem
FAR Part
36, Most
FAR Part
36, Most
FAR Part
36, Most
Cockpit Seating
Configuration
Exterior Noise
SAR Baseline
Prod Est
Yes
UNCLASSIFIED
Demonstrated
Performance
Current
Estimate
Demonstrated all
five mission
profiles
Demonstrated all five
mission
profiles
9
JPATS
Takeoffs/Touch &
Go/Land (Wx, Weight,
Configuration) at Main
Operating Bases
(Runway Length - FT)
IFR Certified
Instrumentation
Visual System For
IFT/OFT
December 31, 2011 SAR
Restrictive
Applicable
Standard
4000
Restrictive
Applicable
Standard
4000
Restrictive
Applicable
Standard
5000
Restrictive
Applicable
Standard
4000
Restrictive
Applicable
Standard
4000
All Digital
except
Backups
Yes
All Digital
except
Backups
Yes
IFR Certified
(Selectable
EADI/EHSI)
Provide a
visual field of
view
commensurate with
the JPPT
syllabus
training
requirements
IFR Certified
(Select-able
EADI/EHSI)
Provide a
visual field of
view
commensurate with
the JPPT
syllabus
training
requirements
IFR Certified
(Select-able
EADI/EHSI)
Provide a
visual field of
view
commensurate with
the JPPT
syllabus
training
requirements
Requirements Source: Operational Requirements Document (ORD), ORD III 005-88-III, dated April 1, 2000.
Acronyms And Abbreviations
EADI - Electronic Attitude/Directional Indicator
EHSI - Electronic Horizontal Situation Indicator
FAR - Federal Aviation Regulation
FT - Feet
G - Gravitational Acceleration
IFR - Instrument Flight Rules
IFT - Instrument Flight Trainer
JPPT - Joint Primary Pilot Training
KTAS - Knots True Airspeed
lb - Pound
MSL - Mean Sea Level
OFT - Operational Flight Trainer
PSI - Pounds Per Square Inch
Wx - Weather
Change Explanations
None
Memo
Demonstrated performance for JPATS meets all Key Performance Parameters.
UNCLASSIFIED
10
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Track To Budget
RDT&E
APPN 1319
BA 05
PE 0603208N
(Navy)
Training System Aircraft
APPN 3600
(Sunk)
BA 05
PE 0604233F
(Air Force)
Project 4102
Specialized Undergraduate Pilot (Shared)
Training
BA 03
PE 0804745N
ICN 033900
Undergraduate Pilot Training
BA 05
PE 0804745N
ICN 057100
Undergraduate Pilot Training
BA 06
PE 0804745N
(Navy)
ICN 060500
Undergraduate Pilot Training
(Shared)
BA 06
PE 0804740F
(Air Force)
ICN 000999
T-6
(Shared)
BA 05
PE 0804740F
(Air Force)
ICN JPAT00
AETC Aircraft Systems
Modification
(Shared)
BA 03
PE 0804740F
(Air Force)
ICN JPATS0
New AETC Aircraft Systems
Procurement
APPN 1506
APPN 1506
APPN 1506
APPN 3010
APPN 3010
APPN 3010
(Navy)
(Navy)
(Sunk)
MILCON
APPN 1205
PE 0212176N
(Navy)
Project N1000203 Operational Facilities for T-6
(Sunk)
UNCLASSIFIED
11
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Project N1000205 T-6 Outlying Landing Field
(Sunk)
APPN 1205
PE 0805796N
(Navy)
Base Operations, Training
(Sunk)
APPN 3300
PE 0804741F
(Air Force)
Undergraduate Pilot Training
(Sunk)
Project 05000212 Columbus T-6 Parts Warehouse
(Sunk)
Project 06VNVP01 T-6 Combs Warehouse
(Sunk)
UNCLASSIFIED
12
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Cost and Funding
Cost Summary
Total Acquisition Cost and Quantity
BY2002
$M
BY2002 $M
Appropriation
SAR
Baseline
Prod Est
RDT&E
Procurement
Flyaway
Recurring
Non Recurring
Support
Other Support
Initial Spares
MILCON
Acq O&M
Total
Quantity
RDT&E
Procurement
Total
TY $M
Current APB
Current
Production
Estimate
Objective/Threshold
289.2
4177.1
3277.3
3250.4
26.9
899.8
776.6
123.2
62.7
0.0
4529.0
302.4
4512.4
------103.8
0.0
4918.6
332.6
4963.6
------114.2
-N/A
SAR Baseline
Prod Est
SAR
Baseline
Prod Est
308.4
4362.3
3499.6
3447.7
51.9
862.7
625.2
237.5
96.2
0.0
4766.9
275.5
4699.2
3700.1
3666.2
33.9
999.1
860.7
138.4
66.4
0.0
5041.1
Current APB
Production
1
782
783
UNCLASSIFIED
1
767
768
Current
APB
Current
Production Estimate
Objective
293.3
300.8
5139.0 4924.6
-- 3961.3
-- 3896.3
-65.0
-963.3
-701.3
-262.0
120.5
110.5
0.0
0.0
5552.8 5335.9
Current Estimate
1
749
750
13
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Cost and Funding
Funding Summary
Appropriation and Quantity Summary
FY2013 President's Budget / December 2011 SAR (TY$ M)
Appropriation
Prior
RDT&E
Procurement
MILCON
Acq O&M
PB 2013 Total
PB 2012 Total
Delta
286.8
3976.0
110.5
0.0
4373.3
4647.3
-274.0
Quantity
Development
Production
PB 2013 Total
PB 2012 Total
Delta
To
Complete
0.0
0.0
2.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.7
0.0
FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017
4.7
281.7
0.0
0.0
286.4
297.4
-11.0
2.3
303.3
0.0
0.0
305.6
258.2
47.4
2.3
314.5
0.0
0.0
316.8
30.8
286.0
2.3
30.9
0.0
0.0
33.2
17.6
15.6
2.4
15.5
0.0
0.0
17.9
17.9
0.0
Total
300.8
4924.6
110.5
0.0
5335.9
5269.2
66.7
To
Total
Complete
0
0
1
0
0 749
0
0 750
0
0 748
0
0
2
Undistributed Prior FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017
1
0
1
1
0
0
649
649
687
-38
0
36
36
36
0
0
33
33
24
9
0
31
31
0
31
UNCLASSIFIED
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Cost and Funding
Annual Funding By Appropriation
Annual Funding TY$
1319 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Total
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway Support Program
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
1994
------3.6
1995
------3.7
1996
------1.1
1997
------1.7
1998
------0.3
1999
------0.6
2000
------0.3
Subtotal
------11.3
UNCLASSIFIED
15
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Annual Funding BY$
1319 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Total
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway
Support
Program
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
BY 2002 $M BY 2002 $M BY 2002 $M
BY 2002 $M
BY 2002 $M
BY 2002 $M
1994
------4.0
1995
------4.0
1996
------1.2
1997
------1.8
1998
------0.3
1999
------0.6
2000
------0.3
Subtotal
------12.2
UNCLASSIFIED
16
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Annual Funding TY$
3600 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Total
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway Support Program
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
1992
------0.9
1993
------1.9
1994
------2.6
1995
------35.4
1996
------27.1
1997
------40.9
1998
------49.4
1999
------38.3
2000
------36.4
2001
------23.8
2002
------1.8
2003
------1.8
2004
------1.8
2005
------1.6
2006
------1.6
2007
------2.5
2008
------2.0
2009
------2.2
2010
------1.4
2011
------2.1
2012
------4.7
2013
------2.3
2014
------2.3
2015
------2.3
2016
------2.4
Subtotal
1
-----289.5
UNCLASSIFIED
17
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Annual Funding BY$
3600 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Total
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway
Support
Program
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
BY 2002 $M BY 2002 $M BY 2002 $M
BY 2002 $M
BY 2002 $M
BY 2002 $M
1992
------1.0
1993
------2.1
1994
------2.9
1995
------38.4
1996
------28.8
1997
------43.0
1998
------51.6
1999
------39.6
2000
------37.0
2001
------23.9
2002
------1.8
2003
------1.8
2004
------1.7
2005
------1.5
2006
------1.4
2007
------2.2
2008
------1.7
2009
------1.9
2010
------1.2
2011
------1.7
2012
------3.8
2013
------1.8
2014
------1.8
2015
------1.8
2016
------1.8
Subtotal
1
-----296.2
UNCLASSIFIED
18
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Annual Funding TY$
3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Total
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway Support Program
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
1995
9
59.9
--59.9
20.6
80.5
1996
4
13.7
--13.7
1.2
14.9
1997
11
37.7
--37.7
22.7
60.4
1998
22
65.2
--65.2
6.7
71.9
1999
22
76.7
--76.7
31.1
107.8
2000
29
71.7
--71.7
35.7
107.4
2001
34
101.7
--101.7
37.8
139.5
2002
40
178.2
--178.2
40.8
219.0
2003
35
171.0
--171.0
64.1
235.1
2004
52
220.5
--220.5
61.7
282.2
2005
53
270.1
--270.1
40.8
310.9
2006
54
290.6
--290.6
43.5
334.1
2007
48
238.5
--238.5
90.9
329.4
2008
39
208.4
--208.4
31.7
240.1
2009
-7.5
--7.5
34.2
41.7
2010
-17.4
1.3
-18.7
17.2
35.9
2011
-30.9
3.1
-34.0
0.5
34.5
2012
-12.0
3.1
-15.1
1.9
17.0
2013
-13.2
2.2
-15.4
-15.4
2014
-7.8
2.3
-10.1
0.8
10.9
2015
-10.2
2.3
-12.5
0.8
13.3
2016
-9.4
3.4
-12.8
0.9
13.7
2017
-0.9
--0.9
-0.9
Subtotal
452
2113.2
17.7
-2130.9
585.6
2716.5
UNCLASSIFIED
19
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Annual Funding BY$
3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Total
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway
Support
Program
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
BY 2002 $M BY 2002 $M BY 2002 $M
BY 2002 $M
BY 2002 $M
BY 2002 $M
1995
9
63.5
--63.5
21.8
85.3
1996
4
14.3
--14.3
1.3
15.6
1997
11
39.1
--39.1
23.5
62.6
1998
22
67.1
--67.1
6.9
74.0
1999
22
78.1
--78.1
31.7
109.8
2000
29
71.9
--71.9
35.8
107.7
2001
34
101.0
--101.0
37.5
138.5
2002
40
174.8
--174.8
40.0
214.8
2003
35
165.0
--165.0
61.9
226.9
2004
52
207.3
--207.3
58.0
265.3
2005
53
246.8
--246.8
37.2
284.0
2006
54
258.6
--258.6
38.7
297.3
2007
48
206.7
--206.7
78.8
285.5
2008
39
177.8
--177.8
27.0
204.8
2009
-6.3
--6.3
28.7
35.0
2010
-14.3
1.1
-15.4
14.1
29.5
2011
-25.0
2.5
-27.5
0.4
27.9
2012
-9.5
2.5
-12.0
1.5
13.5
2013
-10.3
1.7
-12.0
-12.0
2014
-6.0
1.8
-7.8
0.6
8.4
2015
-7.7
1.7
-9.4
0.6
10.0
2016
-7.0
2.4
-9.4
0.7
10.1
2017
-0.7
--0.7
-0.7
Subtotal
452
1958.8
13.7
-1972.5
546.7
2519.2
UNCLASSIFIED
20
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Cost Quantity Information
3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
Fiscal
(Aligned
Quantity
Year
with
Quantity)
BY 2002
$M
1995
9
65.8
1996
4
15.3
1997
11
41.9
1998
22
72.6
1999
22
83.5
2000
29
78.9
2001
34
109.2
2002
40
184.3
2003
35
173.2
2004
52
219.1
2005
53
257.2
2006
54
265.2
2007
48
211.8
2008
39
180.8
2009
--2010
--2011
--2012
--2013
--2014
--2015
--2016
--2017
--Subtotal
452
1958.8
UNCLASSIFIED
21
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Annual Funding TY$
1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Total
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway Support Program
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
TY $M
2000
12
44.1
--44.1
14.5
58.6
2001
24
77.0
--77.0
3.6
80.6
2002
7
34.6
-0.1
34.7
4.1
38.8
2003
4
18.8
-0.1
18.9
10.6
29.5
2004
2
8.5
-0.2
8.7
14.3
23.0
2005
3
13.2
-0.2
13.4
4.7
18.1
2006
2
11.8
-5.5
17.3
4.8
22.1
2007
20
118.7
-3.8
122.5
30.2
152.7
2008
44
262.1
-0.1
262.2
43.6
305.8
2009
43
254.0
-2.4
256.4
47.6
304.0
2010
36
218.2
-4.6
222.8
46.8
269.6
2011
-1.8
-2.4
4.2
23.7
27.9
2012
36
225.0
-5.9
230.9
33.8
264.7
2013
33
241.7
-12.2
253.9
34.0
287.9
2014
31
230.7
-11.5
242.2
61.4
303.6
2015
-1.6
-16.0
17.6
-17.6
2016
-1.8
--1.8
-1.8
2017
-1.8
--1.8
-1.8
Subtotal
297
1765.4
-65.0
1830.4
377.7
2208.1
UNCLASSIFIED
22
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Annual Funding BY$
1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy
Non End
End Item
Non
Item
Total
Total
Total
Fiscal
Recurring
Recurring
Quantity
Recurring
Flyaway
Support
Program
Year
Flyaway
Flyaway
Flyaway
BY 2002 $M BY 2002 $M BY 2002 $M
BY 2002 $M
BY 2002 $M
BY 2002 $M
2000
12
44.3
--44.3
14.6
58.9
2001
24
76.4
--76.4
3.6
80.0
2002
7
33.9
-0.1
34.0
4.0
38.0
2003
4
18.1
-0.1
18.2
10.1
28.3
2004
2
8.0
-0.2
8.2
13.3
21.5
2005
3
12.0
-0.2
12.2
4.3
16.5
2006
2
10.5
-4.9
15.4
4.2
19.6
2007
20
102.8
-3.3
106.1
26.1
132.2
2008
44
223.5
-0.1
223.6
37.2
260.8
2009
43
213.6
-2.0
215.6
40.1
255.7
2010
36
180.2
-3.8
184.0
38.6
222.6
2011
-1.5
-1.9
3.4
19.2
22.6
2012
36
179.4
-4.7
184.1
26.9
211.0
2013
33
189.5
-9.6
199.1
26.6
225.7
2014
31
177.7
-8.9
186.6
47.2
233.8
2015
-1.2
-12.1
13.3
-13.3
2016
-1.3
--1.3
-1.3
2017
-1.3
--1.3
-1.3
Subtotal
297
1475.2
-51.9
1527.1
316.0
1843.1
The right-shift of lot funding will continue for all subsequent lots until production is complete, effectively requiring 12
months of long-lead risk for Hawker Beechcraft Defence Corporation (HBDC) in order to maintain the production
schedule and avoid a break.
UNCLASSIFIED
23
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Cost Quantity Information
1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
Fiscal
(Aligned
Quantity
Year
with
Quantity)
BY 2002
$M
2000
12
44.5
2001
24
76.9
2002
7
34.0
2003
4
18.2
2004
2
8.0
2005
3
12.1
2006
2
10.5
2007
20
103.1
2008
44
224.3
2009
43
214.4
2010
36
180.7
2011
--2012
36
179.6
2013
33
190.1
2014
31
178.8
2015
--2016
--2017
--Subtotal
297
1475.2
UNCLASSIFIED
24
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Annual Funding TY$
3300 | MILCON | Military Construction, Air
Force
Total
Fiscal
Program
Year
TY $M
1998
2.5
1999
3.3
2000
3.2
2001
-2002
-2003
6.0
2004
2.2
2005
-2006
3.0
Subtotal
20.2
UNCLASSIFIED
25
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Annual Funding BY$
3300 | MILCON | Military Construction, Air
Force
Total
Fiscal
Program
Year
BY 2002 $M
1998
2.6
1999
3.4
2000
3.2
2001
-2002
-2003
5.7
2004
2.0
2005
-2006
2.6
Subtotal
19.5
UNCLASSIFIED
26
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Annual Funding TY$
1205 | MILCON | Military Construction,
Navy and Marine Corps
Total
Fiscal
Program
Year
TY $M
1998
1.4
1999
1.4
2000
5.2
2001
5.4
2002
-2003
-2004
-2005
-2006
-2007
-2008
23.9
2009
-2010
23.9
2011
29.1
Subtotal
90.3
UNCLASSIFIED
27
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Annual Funding BY$
1205 | MILCON | Military Construction,
Navy and Marine Corps
Total
Fiscal
Program
Year
BY 2002 $M
1998
1.4
1999
1.4
2000
5.2
2001
5.4
2002
-2003
-2004
-2005
-2006
-2007
-2008
20.3
2009
-2010
19.6
2011
23.4
Subtotal
76.7
Low Rate Initial Production
Approval Date
Approved Quantity
Reference
Start Year
End Year
Initial LRIP Decision
8/9/1995
108
ADM
1996
2000
Current Total LRIP
2/21/2001
170
ADM
1996
2004
Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) is greater than 10% of the total procurement buy. LRIP for 108 aircraft was
included in Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM) dated August 9, 1995. LRIP quantity increased to 170
aircraft in ADM dated February 21, 2001 to ensure maintenance of efficient manufacturing capability.
UNCLASSIFIED
28
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Foreign Military Sales
Country
Iraq
Iraq
Israel
Morocco
Date of
Total
Quantity
Memo
Sale
Cost $M
6/23/2009
7
100.0 The Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA) signed
June 23, 2009 is Foreign Military Sales (FMS)
Case # (E4-D-SBU) using Iraq Special Forces
Fund FY 2009 appropriated funds for seven T-6A
aircraft. All aircraft have been delivered.
5/20/2009
8
110.0 The LOA signed May 20, 2009 for eight T-6A
aircraft is FMS Case # (IQ-D-SAD) using Iraqi
country funds. All aircraft have been delivered.
9/11/2008
20
153.6 The LOA signed September 11, 2008 is FMS
Case # (IS-D-SAB), all aircraft have been
delivered. Letter of Request (LOR) received
December 20, 2010 requesting the procurement
of one additional aircraft.
6/18/2008
24
205.9 The LOA signed June 18, 2008 is FMS Case #
(MO-D-SAB) for 24 T-6C aircraft. To date, 24
aircraft have been delivered.
The Iraq LOA was split in two to accommodate reduced Iraq funds availability.
Nuclear Cost
None
UNCLASSIFIED
29
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Unit Cost
Unit Cost Report
BY2002 $M
Current UCR
Baseline
(SEP 2007 APB)
Unit Cost
Program Acquisition Unit Cost (PAUC)
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Average Procurement Unit Cost (APUC)
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Program Acquisition Unit Cost (PAUC)
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Average Procurement Unit Cost (APUC)
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Current Estimate
(DEC 2011 SAR)
BY
% Change
4918.6
768
6.404
4766.9
750
6.356
-0.75
4512.4
767
5.883
4362.3
749
5.824
-1.00
BY2002 $M
Revised
Original UCR
Baseline
(SEP 2007 APB)
Unit Cost
BY2002 $M
BY2002 $M
Current Estimate
(DEC 2011 SAR)
BY
% Change
4918.6
768
6.404
4766.9
750
6.356
-0.75
4512.4
767
5.883
4362.3
749
5.824
-1.00
UNCLASSIFIED
30
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Unit Cost History
Original APB
APB as of January 2006
Revised Original APB
Prior APB
Current APB
Prior Annual SAR
Current Estimate
Date
AUG 1995
FEB 2002
SEP 2007
FEB 2002
SEP 2007
DEC 2010
DEC 2011
BY2002 $M
PAUC
APUC
4.439
3.861
5.784
5.342
6.404
5.883
5.784
5.342
6.404
5.883
6.341
5.806
6.356
5.824
TY $M
PAUC
5.689
6.438
7.230
6.438
7.230
7.044
7.115
APUC
5.068
6.009
6.700
6.009
6.700
6.503
6.575
SAR Unit Cost History
Initial SAR Baseline to Current SAR Baseline (TY $M)
Initial PAUC
Dev Est
5.689
Econ
-0.750
Qty
-0.035
Sch
-0.155
Changes
Eng
Est
0.000
1.550
Oth
0.000
Spt
0.139
Total
0.749
PAUC
Prod Est
6.438
Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)
PAUC
Prod Est
Econ
6.438 0.013
Qty
0.067
Sch
0.093
Changes
Eng
Est
0.568 -0.048
Oth
0.068
UNCLASSIFIED
Spt
Total
-0.085 0.677
PAUC
Current Est
7.115
31
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Initial SAR Baseline to Current SAR Baseline (TY $M)
Initial APUC
Dev Est
5.068
Econ
-0.753
Qty
0.021
Sch
-0.151
Changes
Eng
Est
0.000 1.680
Oth
0.000
APUC
Prod Est
6.009
Spt
Total
0.144 0.941
Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)
APUC
Prod Est
Econ
6.009 0.012
Qty
0.048
Sch
0.094
Changes
Eng
Est
0.555 -0.058
Oth
0.000
Spt
Total
-0.085 0.566
APUC
Current Est
6.575
SAR Baseline History
Item/Event
Milestone I
Milestone II
Milestone III
IOC
Total Cost (TY $M)
Total Quantity
Prog. Acq. Unit Cost (PAUC)
SAR
Planning
Estimate (PE)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
SAR
Development
Estimate (DE)
JAN 1993
AUG 1995
SEP 1999
JUN 2002
4050.6
712
5.689
SAR
Production
Estimate (PdE)
JAN 1993
AUG 1995
NOV 2001
N/A
5041.1
783
6.438
Current
Estimate
JAN 1993
AUG 1995
DEC 2001
JUN 2002
5335.9
750
7.115
Initial Operational Capability (IOC) is equal to Air Force Required Assets Available (RAA) and occurred June
2002.
IOC is equal to United States Navy RAA and occurred August 2003.
UNCLASSIFIED
32
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Cost Variance
Cost Variance Summary
SAR Baseline (Prod Est)
Previous Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Current Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Total Changes
CE - Cost Variance
CE - Cost & Funding
Summary Then Year $M
RDT&E
Proc
275.5
4699.2
MILCON
Total
66.4
5041.1
+1.4
--+10.3
+13.7
--+25.4
-9.0
-172.3
+59.5
+413.9
-63.6
--69.9
+158.6
-2.0
----4.9
+51.0
-+44.1
-9.6
-172.3
+59.5
+424.2
-54.8
+51.0
-69.9
+228.1
+0.2
----0.3
---0.1
+25.3
300.8
300.8
+17.9
+10.0
+10.6
+1.8
+20.4
-+6.1
+66.8
+225.4
4924.6
4924.6
+1.0
----1.0
---+44.1
110.5
110.5
+19.1
+10.0
+10.6
+1.8
+19.1
-+6.1
+66.7
+294.8
5335.9
5335.9
UNCLASSIFIED
33
JPATS
SAR Baseline (Prod Est)
Previous Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Current Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Total Changes
CE - Cost Variance
CE - Cost & Funding
December 31, 2011 SAR
Summary Base Year 2002 $M
RDT&E
Proc
289.2
4177.1
MILCON
Total
62.7
4529.0
---+8.9
+10.7
--+19.6
--135.0
+8.5
+322.2
+4.0
--39.5
+160.2
-----6.8
+41.1
-+34.3
--135.0
+8.5
+331.1
+7.9
+41.1
-39.5
+214.1
-----0.4
---0.4
+19.2
308.4
308.4
-+7.7
+0.2
+1.4
+13.3
-+2.4
+25.0
+185.2
4362.3
4362.3
-----0.8
---0.8
+33.5
96.2
96.2
-+7.7
+0.2
+1.4
+12.1
-+2.4
+23.8
+237.9
4766.9
4766.9
Previous Estimate: December 2010
UNCLASSIFIED
34
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
RDT&E
Current Change Explanations
Revised escalation indices. (Economic)
Decrease due to higher Air Force priorities. (Air Force) (Estimating)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating)
RDT&E Subtotal
Procurement
$M
Base
Then
Year
Year
N/A
+0.2
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
-0.1
-0.4
-0.1
$M
Current Change Explanations
Revised escalation indices. (Economic)
Total Quantity variance resulting from an increase of 2 T-6Bs from 295 to 297 (Navy).
(Subtotal)
Quantity variance resulting from an increase of 2 T-6Bs from 295 to 297 (Navy).
(Quantity)
Allocation to Schedule resulting from Quantity change. (Schedule) (QR)
Allocation to Engineering resulting from Quantity change. (Engineering) (QR)
Allocation to Estimating resulting from Quantity change. (Estimating) (QR)
Stretch-out of procurement buy profile from FY 2013 to FY 2014 (Navy). (Schedule)
Decrease due to higher Air Force priorities. (Air Force) (Estimating)
Increase due to Congressional rescissions in FY 2011 and FY 2012. (Navy)
(Estimating)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating)
Change in estimating assumptions resulting from inflationary guidance related to nonpay/non-fuel. (Air Force) (Estimating)
Change in estimating assumptions resulting from inflationary guidance related to nonpay/non-fuel. (Navy) (Estimating)
Increase to program for FY 2017 for corrections of deficiencies included in APB. (Air
Force) (Estimating)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Support)
Decrease in Other Support due to higher Air Force priorities (Air Force). (Support)
Decrease in Initial Spares due to higher Air Force priorities (Air Force). (Support)
Increase in Other Support for prior years correction (Navy). (Support)
Increase in Initial Spares (Navy). (Support)
Procurement Subtotal
Base
Year
N/A
Then
Year
+17.9
+9.1
+11.8
(+7.7)
(+10.0)
(+0.2)
(+1.4)
(-0.2)
0.0
-13.3
(+0.3)
(+1.8)
(-0.3)
+10.3
-16.5
+40.8
+55.0
-8.8
-11.3
-0.5
-0.7
-5.4
-6.7
+0.7
+0.9
-2.1
-0.5
-1.0
+5.7
+0.3
+25.0
-2.2
-0.4
-1.1
+8.6
+1.2
+66.8
(QR) Quantity Related
MILCON
$M
Current Change Explanations
Revised escalation indices. (Economic)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating)
MILCON Subtotal
UNCLASSIFIED
Base
Year
N/A
-0.8
-0.8
Then
Year
+1.0
-1.0
0.0
35
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Contracts
Appropriation: RDT&E
Contract Name
Contractor
Contractor Location
Contract Number, Type
Award Date
Definitization Date
Initial Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
438.9
N/A
83
JPATS Follow-on Production Contract Lot 15
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation
Wichita, KS 67201
FA8617-07-D-6151/15, FFP
October 04, 2007
March 28, 2008
Current Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
492.6
N/A
83
Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date
Previous Cumulative Variances
Net Change
Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Contractor
Program Manager
492.6
492.6
Cost Variance
Schedule Variance
0.0
-+0.0
0.0
-+0.0
Cost And Schedule Variance Explanations
None
Contract Comments
The difference between the initial contract price target and the current contract price target is due to engineering and
contract change proposal activities.
This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract.
UNCLASSIFIED
36
JPATS
Appropriation: RDT&E
Contract Name
Contractor
Contractor Location
Contract Number, Type
Award Date
Definitization Date
Initial Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
263.9
N/A
43
December 31, 2011 SAR
JPATS Follow-on Production Contract Lot 16
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation
Wichita, KS 67201
FA8617-07-D-6151/16, FFP
February 24, 2009
February 24, 2009
Current Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
293.6
N/A
43
Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date
Previous Cumulative Variances
Net Change
Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Contractor
Program Manager
293.6
293.6
Cost Variance
Schedule Variance
0.0
-+0.0
0.0
-+0.0
Cost And Schedule Variance Explanations
None
Contract Comments
The difference between the initial contract price target and the current contract price target is due to
Current target price increase is due to engineering and contract change proposal activities.
This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract.
UNCLASSIFIED
37
JPATS
Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name
Contractor
Contractor Location
Contract Number, Type
Award Date
Definitization Date
Initial Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
255.9
N/A
36
December 31, 2011 SAR
JPATS Follow-on Production Contract Lot 17
Hawker Beechcraft Defense Corporation
Wichita, KS 67201
FA8617-07-D-6151/17, FFP
February 18, 2011
March 31, 2011
Current Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
255.9
N/A
36
Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Contractor
Program Manager
255.9
255.9
Cost And Schedule Variance Explanations
Cost and Schedule variance reporting is not required on this FFP contract.
Contract Comments
This contract includes both Aircrew Training Devices and Aircraft for Lot 17.
UNCLASSIFIED
38
JPATS
Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name
Contractor
Contractor Location
Contract Number, Type
Award Date
Definitization Date
Initial Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
195.3
N/A
36
December 31, 2011 SAR
JPATS Follow-on Production Contract Lot 18
Hawker Beechcraft Defense Corporation
Wichita, KS 67201
FA8617-07-D-6151/18, FFP
January 19, 2012
January 19, 2012
Current Contract Price ($M)
Target
Ceiling
Qty
195.3
N/A
36
Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Contractor
Program Manager
195.3
195.3
Cost And Schedule Variance Explanations
Cost and Schedule variance reporting is not required on this FFP contract.
Contract Comments
This is the first time this contract is being reported. Contract awarded on January 19, 2012.
UNCLASSIFIED
39
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Deliveries and Expenditures
Deliveries To Date
Plan To Date
Development
Production
Total Program Quantities Delivered
Total Acquisition Cost
Expenditures To Date
Percent Expended
Total Funding Years
Actual To Date
1
603
604
Total Quantity
1
617
618
Expenditures and Appropriations (TY $M)
5335.9
Years Appropriated
3991.6
Percent Years Appropriated
74.81%
Appropriated to Date
26
Percent Appropriated
1
749
750
Percent
Delivered
100.00%
82.38%
82.40%
21
80.77%
4659.7
87.33%
Aircraft deliveries and expenditures as of January 30, 2012.
UNCLASSIFIED
40
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Operating and Support Cost
Assumptions And Ground Rules
The operating and support (O&S) costs are based on the purchase of 749 operational aircraft, 126 Aircrew Training
Devices (ATDs), Training Integration Management System (TIMS), development and conversion courseware, and
Contractor Logistic Support (CLS) which will be provided by Hawker Beechcraft Defense Corporation, LLC.
This section consists of seven elements. Unit-Level Manpower includes the cost of military and civilian systemrelated personnel involved in the operation of this system. Unit Operations include the cost of fuel resources and unit
level consumables.
The JPATS logistics support concept assumes that organizational, intermediate and depot support are CLS;
therefore, there is no additional cost for intermediate or depot level maintenance. Maintenance costs for CLS
include contract labor, materials, and overhead incurred in providing the logistics support required by an aircraft
system, subsystem or associated support equipment. Ground Based Training System (GBTS) CLS support is
provided separately.
Sustaining Support includes the costs of replacement support equipment, modification kits, sustaining engineering,
software maintenance, and simulator operations for the aircraft system. Indirect Support includes the costs of
personnel support for specialty training, permanent changes of station, and medical care.
The antecedent system is the T-37 for the Air Force and T-34 for the Navy. At the JPATS Milestone I decision, the
requirement for a Cost/Operational Effectiveness Analysis (COEA) was waived due to the streamlining initiatives for
pilot programs. Thus, the direct comparison to the antecedent systems was not prepared. Program Authorized
Aircraft of 346 was used to determine the antecedent steady state year cost per aircraft.
O&S cost elements are combined Air Force and Navy requirements for the Air Vehicle and GBTS for a typical
steady state operating year (post Full Operational Capability) in Base Year 2002 dollars. Source for all costs is the
JPATS Program Office Estimate (POE) dated January 2012.
The $449.4M reflects the 2012 JPATS POE annual steady state cost for both the Air Force and Navy during the FY
2016-2024 timeframe when all 749 production aircraft are in operation. Due to the varying timelines for major time
change and inspection items, this value is the average during the full operations timeframe and not the specific value
in each year. The $11,673.8M reflects the costs of operating both fleets during their useful life as reflected in the
projected buy/delivery profiles at the time of the estimate. Total O&S costs do not include the cost of disposal or
demilitarization. Useful life for the Air Force is FY 2000-2035 (36 years), and FY 2003-2039 for the Navy (37 years.)
JPATS per unit aircraft cost of $0.6M is for a steady state period of 8 years, while total O&S costs are for the
program duration of 36 years. Total O&S costs also include ramp up and ramp down costs that would not be in the
steady state per unit cost. Therefore, the product of per unit aircraft cost, number of aircraft, and steady state period
will not equal the total O&S costs.
Continued budgetary constraints will negatively impact the ability to meet the requirements of JPATS O&S.
UNCLASSIFIED
41
JPATS
December 31, 2011 SAR
Cost Element
Costs BY2002 $M
JPATS
per steady state year (per
aircraft)
Unit-Level Manpower
Unit Operations
Maintenance
Sustaining Support
Continuing System Improvements
Indirect Support
Other
Total Unitized Cost (Base Year 2002 $)
Total O&S Costs $M
Base Year
Then Year
0.26
0.07
0.13
0.09
-0.04
0.01
0.60
JPATS
Antecedent: T-37 Only
11697.8
19448.8
UNCLASSIFIED
Antecedent: T-37 Only
per steady state year (AF only per aircraft)
0.26
0.31
0.02
0.11
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.90
---
42