Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis and Applications ISSN: 1821-1291, URL:

advertisement
Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis and Applications
ISSN: 1821-1291, URL: http://www.bmathaa.org
Volume 2 Issue 4(2010), Pages 137-139.
ON SOME ACCURATE ESTIMATES OF πœ‹
(DEDICATED IN OCCASION OF THE 70-YEARS OF
PROFESSOR HARI M. SRIVASTAVA)
CRISTINEL MORTICI
Abstract. The aim of this paper is to establish some inequalities related
to an accurate approximation formula of πœ‹. Being practically difficult, the
computations arising in this problem were made using computer softwares
such as Maple.
1. Introduction
Maybe the best known example of infinite product for estimating the constant
πœ‹ is the Wallis product [4]
∞
∏
4𝑛2
2 2 4 4 6 6
πœ‹
= ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅⋅⋅ =
,
2
1 3 3 5 5 7
4𝑛2 − 1
𝑛=1
(1.1)
which is related to Euler’s gamma function Γ, since
𝑛
∏
4
4π‘˜ 2
16𝑛 (Γ (𝑛 + 1))
=
2.
4π‘˜ 2 − 1
(2𝑛 + 1) (Γ (2𝑛 + 1))
π‘˜=1
(1.2)
Although it has a nice form, (1.1) is very slow, so it is not suitable for approximating
the constant πœ‹.
A possible starting point for accelerating (1.1) is the work of Fields [1] who shown
that
Γ (𝑧 + π‘Ž)
Γ (𝑧 + 𝑏)
2𝜌
𝑁
−1
∑
−2π‘˜
(2𝜌)
𝐡2π‘˜ (𝜌) (𝑏 − π‘Ž)2π‘˜ (𝑧 + π‘Ž − 𝜌)
(2π‘˜)!
π‘˜=0
(
)
π‘Ž−𝑏
−2𝑁
,
+ (𝑧 + π‘Ž − 𝜌)
𝑂 (𝑧 + π‘Ž − 𝜌)
π‘Ž−𝑏
∼ (𝑧 + π‘Ž − 𝜌)
1 + π‘Ž − 𝑏,
=
(2𝜌)
where the symbols 𝐡2π‘˜
∣arg (𝑧 + π‘Ž)∣ ≤ πœ‹ − πœ€,
(1.3)
πœ€ > 0.
stand for the generalized Bernoulli polynomials [2, 5].
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 33B15, 26D15.
Key words and phrases. Wallis formula inequalities; asymptotic series; approximations.
c
⃝2010
Universiteti i Prishtinës, Prishtinë, Kosovë.
Submitted October 21, 2010. Published November 22, 2010.
137
138
C. MORTICI
With 𝑧 = 𝑛, π‘Ž = −π‘₯, 𝑏 = 1, and 𝜌 = −π‘₯/2 in (1.3), we get
(
)
∞
(2𝜌)
𝑛
−(π‘₯+1) ∑
𝐡2π‘˜ (𝜌) (π‘₯ + 1)2π‘˜
(−1) (𝑛 − π‘₯/2)
π‘₯
π‘₯
∼
, 𝜌=− ,
2π‘˜
𝑛
Γ (−π‘₯)
2
π‘˜=0 (2π‘˜)! (𝑛 − π‘₯/2)
[
(
)
𝑛
−(π‘₯+1)
(π‘₯)3
(π‘₯)5 (5π‘₯ − 2)
(−1) (𝑛 − π‘₯/2)
π‘₯
∼
1+
+
(1.4)
2
4
𝑛
Γ (−π‘₯)
24 (𝑛 − π‘₯/2)
5760 (𝑛 − π‘₯/2)
]
(
)
(π‘₯)7 35π‘₯2 − 42π‘₯ + 16
+ ⋅⋅⋅ .
+
6
2903040 (𝑛 − π‘₯/2)
See also [3, p. 142], where the following identity is stated
(
)
𝑛
(−1) Γ (𝑛 − π‘₯)
π‘₯
=
.
𝑛
Γ (−π‘₯) Γ (𝑛 + 1)
Further, with π‘₯ = −1/2 in (1.4), we obtain the following formula
[
4
1
21
4 (Γ (𝑛 + 1)) 16𝑛
πœ‹ =
2 1−
2 +
4
(4𝑛 + 1) (Γ (2𝑛 + 1))
4 (4𝑛 + 1)
32 (4𝑛 + 1)
671
180323
20898423
−
6 +
8 −
10
128 (4𝑛 + 1)
2048 (4𝑛 + 1)
8192 (4𝑛 + 1)
(
)]2
1874409465055
1
7426362705
+
.
12 −
14 + 𝑂
𝑛16
65536 (4𝑛 + 1)
262144 (4𝑛 + 1)
(1.5)
The idea of expressing πœ‹ using the asymptotic expansion of the ratio Γ(𝑛+1/2)
Γ(𝑛+1) was
introduced by Tricomi and Erdélyi in [3, p. 142, Rel. 23]. Here we make use of
the asymptotic expansion for Γ(𝑛+1/2)
Γ(𝑛+1) given in [1] to improve the results of Tricomi
and Erdélyi [3].
2. The results
By truncation of series (1.5), increasingly accurate approximations for πœ‹ can be
derived. As example, if 𝑛 = 10, use of the first five terms in (1.5) gives πœ‹ with an
error of 1.1639 × 10−12 , while use of the first six terms in (1.5) gives πœ‹ with an error
of 3.0431 × 10−14 .
We prove the following
Theorem 2.1. For every integer 𝑛 ≥ 1, we have
4
4
4 (Γ (𝑛 + 1)) 16𝑛
(4𝑛 + 1) (Γ (2𝑛 + 1))
2 π‘Ž (𝑛) < πœ‹ <
4 (Γ (𝑛 + 1)) 16𝑛
(4𝑛 + 1) (Γ (2𝑛 + 1))
2 𝑏 (𝑛) ,
where
(
π‘Ž (𝑛) =
1−
1
4 (4𝑛 + 1)
2
+
21
32 (4𝑛 + 1)
4
−
671
128 (4𝑛 + 1)
6
+
)2
180323
2048 (4𝑛 + 1)
8
and
(
𝑏 (𝑛) =
1−
1
4 (4𝑛 + 1)
2
+
21
32 (4𝑛 + 1)
4
−
671
128 (4𝑛 + 1)
6
+
180323
2048 (4𝑛 + 1)
8
−
)2
20898423
8192 (4𝑛 + 1)
10
.
ON SOME ACCURATE ESTIMATES OF πœ‹
139
Proof. The sequences
4
π‘₯𝑛 =
4 (Γ (𝑛 + 1)) 16𝑛
4
𝑦𝑛 =
4 (Γ (𝑛 + 1)) 16𝑛
2 𝑏 (𝑛)
(4𝑛 + 1) (Γ (2𝑛 + 1))
(4𝑛 + 1) (Γ (2𝑛 + 1))
converge to πœ‹ and it suffices to show that π‘₯𝑛 is strictly increasing and 𝑦𝑛 is strictly
decreasing. In this sense, we have
π‘₯𝑛+1
−1
π‘₯𝑛
2 π‘Ž (𝑛) ,
2
=
4 (4𝑛 + 1) (𝑛 + 1) π‘Ž (𝑛 + 1)
−1
2
π‘Ž (𝑛)
(4𝑛 + 5) (2𝑛 + 1)
= −
𝑃 (𝑛)
(4𝑛 + 5)
17
2
(2𝑛 + 1) (134217728𝑛8 + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ + 172467)
2,
where the polynomial
𝑃 (𝑛) = 60235603222675842001797120𝑛24 + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ + 22691018044772336786409
has all coefficients positive. In consequence, π‘₯𝑛 is strictly increasing, convergent to
πœ‹, so π‘₯𝑛 < πœ‹.
Then
2
4 (4𝑛 + 1) (𝑛 + 1) 𝑏 (𝑛 + 1)
𝑦𝑛+1
−1
−1 =
2
𝑦𝑛
𝑏 (𝑛)
(4𝑛 + 5) (2𝑛 + 1)
=
𝑄 (𝑛)
2
(2𝑛 + 1) (4𝑛 + 5)
where the polynomial
𝑄 (𝑛 + 1)
=
12
(8589934592𝑛10 + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ − 20208555)
2,
210420037966350927549442377646080𝑛30
+ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ + 1909672653415578833630022434217112437351
has all coefficients positive. In consequence, 𝑦𝑛 is strictly decreasing, convergent to
πœ‹, so 𝑦𝑛 > πœ‹.
β–‘
Remark. The computations in this paper were made using Maple software.
Acknowledgments. The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee for
his/her comments that helped us improve this article.
References
[1] J. L. Fields, A note on the asymptotic expansion of a ratio of gamma functions, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 15 2 (1966) 43-45.
[2] N.E. Nørlund, Vorksungen über Differenzenrechnung, Springer (Berlin), 1924.
[3] F. G. Tricomi, A. Erdélyi, The asymptotic expansion of a ratio of gamma functions, Pacific
J. Math., 1 1 (1951) 133-142.
[4] J. Wallis, Computation of πœ‹ by successive interpolations, (1655) in: A Source Book in Mathematics, 1200-1800 (D. J. Struik, Ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, (1969),
244-253.
[5] N.M. Temme, Special Functions, Wiley (NewYork), 1996.
Cristinel Mortici, Valahia University of Târgovişte, Department of Mathematics,
Bd. Unirii 18, 130082 Târgovişte, Romania
E-mail address: cmortici@valahia.ro; cristinelmortici@yahoo.com
URL: http://www.cristinelmortici.ro
Download