Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis and Applications ISSN: 1821-1291, URL: http://www.bmathaa.org Volume 2 Issue 4(2010), Pages 137-139. ON SOME ACCURATE ESTIMATES OF π (DEDICATED IN OCCASION OF THE 70-YEARS OF PROFESSOR HARI M. SRIVASTAVA) CRISTINEL MORTICI Abstract. The aim of this paper is to establish some inequalities related to an accurate approximation formula of π. Being practically diο¬cult, the computations arising in this problem were made using computer softwares such as Maple. 1. Introduction Maybe the best known example of inο¬nite product for estimating the constant π is the Wallis product [4] ∞ ∏ 4π2 2 2 4 4 6 6 π = ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅⋅⋅ = , 2 1 3 3 5 5 7 4π2 − 1 π=1 (1.1) which is related to Euler’s gamma function Γ, since π ∏ 4 4π 2 16π (Γ (π + 1)) = 2. 4π 2 − 1 (2π + 1) (Γ (2π + 1)) π=1 (1.2) Although it has a nice form, (1.1) is very slow, so it is not suitable for approximating the constant π. A possible starting point for accelerating (1.1) is the work of Fields [1] who shown that Γ (π§ + π) Γ (π§ + π) 2π π −1 ∑ −2π (2π) π΅2π (π) (π − π)2π (π§ + π − π) (2π)! π=0 ( ) π−π −2π , + (π§ + π − π) π (π§ + π − π) π−π ∼ (π§ + π − π) 1 + π − π, = (2π) where the symbols π΅2π β£arg (π§ + π)β£ ≤ π − π, (1.3) π > 0. stand for the generalized Bernoulli polynomials [2, 5]. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classiο¬cation. 33B15, 26D15. Key words and phrases. Wallis formula inequalities; asymptotic series; approximations. c β2010 Universiteti i PrishtineΜs, PrishtineΜ, KosoveΜ. Submitted October 21, 2010. Published November 22, 2010. 137 138 C. MORTICI With π§ = π, π = −π₯, π = 1, and π = −π₯/2 in (1.3), we get ( ) ∞ (2π) π −(π₯+1) ∑ π΅2π (π) (π₯ + 1)2π (−1) (π − π₯/2) π₯ π₯ ∼ , π=− , 2π π Γ (−π₯) 2 π=0 (2π)! (π − π₯/2) [ ( ) π −(π₯+1) (π₯)3 (π₯)5 (5π₯ − 2) (−1) (π − π₯/2) π₯ ∼ 1+ + (1.4) 2 4 π Γ (−π₯) 24 (π − π₯/2) 5760 (π − π₯/2) ] ( ) (π₯)7 35π₯2 − 42π₯ + 16 + ⋅⋅⋅ . + 6 2903040 (π − π₯/2) See also [3, p. 142], where the following identity is stated ( ) π (−1) Γ (π − π₯) π₯ = . π Γ (−π₯) Γ (π + 1) Further, with π₯ = −1/2 in (1.4), we obtain the following formula [ 4 1 21 4 (Γ (π + 1)) 16π π = 2 1− 2 + 4 (4π + 1) (Γ (2π + 1)) 4 (4π + 1) 32 (4π + 1) 671 180323 20898423 − 6 + 8 − 10 128 (4π + 1) 2048 (4π + 1) 8192 (4π + 1) ( )]2 1874409465055 1 7426362705 + . 12 − 14 + π π16 65536 (4π + 1) 262144 (4π + 1) (1.5) The idea of expressing π using the asymptotic expansion of the ratio Γ(π+1/2) Γ(π+1) was introduced by Tricomi and ErdeΜlyi in [3, p. 142, Rel. 23]. Here we make use of the asymptotic expansion for Γ(π+1/2) Γ(π+1) given in [1] to improve the results of Tricomi and ErdeΜlyi [3]. 2. The results By truncation of series (1.5), increasingly accurate approximations for π can be derived. As example, if π = 10, use of the ο¬rst ο¬ve terms in (1.5) gives π with an error of 1.1639 × 10−12 , while use of the ο¬rst six terms in (1.5) gives π with an error of 3.0431 × 10−14 . We prove the following Theorem 2.1. For every integer π ≥ 1, we have 4 4 4 (Γ (π + 1)) 16π (4π + 1) (Γ (2π + 1)) 2 π (π) < π < 4 (Γ (π + 1)) 16π (4π + 1) (Γ (2π + 1)) 2 π (π) , where ( π (π) = 1− 1 4 (4π + 1) 2 + 21 32 (4π + 1) 4 − 671 128 (4π + 1) 6 + )2 180323 2048 (4π + 1) 8 and ( π (π) = 1− 1 4 (4π + 1) 2 + 21 32 (4π + 1) 4 − 671 128 (4π + 1) 6 + 180323 2048 (4π + 1) 8 − )2 20898423 8192 (4π + 1) 10 . ON SOME ACCURATE ESTIMATES OF π 139 Proof. The sequences 4 π₯π = 4 (Γ (π + 1)) 16π 4 π¦π = 4 (Γ (π + 1)) 16π 2 π (π) (4π + 1) (Γ (2π + 1)) (4π + 1) (Γ (2π + 1)) converge to π and it suο¬ces to show that π₯π is strictly increasing and π¦π is strictly decreasing. In this sense, we have π₯π+1 −1 π₯π 2 π (π) , 2 = 4 (4π + 1) (π + 1) π (π + 1) −1 2 π (π) (4π + 5) (2π + 1) = − π (π) (4π + 5) 17 2 (2π + 1) (134217728π8 + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ + 172467) 2, where the polynomial π (π) = 60235603222675842001797120π24 + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ + 22691018044772336786409 has all coeο¬cients positive. In consequence, π₯π is strictly increasing, convergent to π, so π₯π < π. Then 2 4 (4π + 1) (π + 1) π (π + 1) π¦π+1 −1 −1 = 2 π¦π π (π) (4π + 5) (2π + 1) = π (π) 2 (2π + 1) (4π + 5) where the polynomial π (π + 1) = 12 (8589934592π10 + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ − 20208555) 2, 210420037966350927549442377646080π30 + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ + 1909672653415578833630022434217112437351 has all coeο¬cients positive. In consequence, π¦π is strictly decreasing, convergent to π, so π¦π > π. β‘ Remark. The computations in this paper were made using Maple software. Acknowledgments. The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee for his/her comments that helped us improve this article. References [1] J. L. Fields, A note on the asymptotic expansion of a ratio of gamma functions, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 15 2 (1966) 43-45. [2] N.E. Nørlund, Vorksungen uΜber Diο¬erenzenrechnung, Springer (Berlin), 1924. [3] F. G. Tricomi, A. ErdeΜlyi, The asymptotic expansion of a ratio of gamma functions, Paciο¬c J. Math., 1 1 (1951) 133-142. [4] J. Wallis, Computation of π by successive interpolations, (1655) in: A Source Book in Mathematics, 1200-1800 (D. J. Struik, Ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, (1969), 244-253. [5] N.M. Temme, Special Functions, Wiley (NewYork), 1996. Cristinel Mortici, Valahia University of TaΜrgovisΜ§te, Department of Mathematics, Bd. Unirii 18, 130082 TaΜrgovisΜ§te, Romania E-mail address: cmortici@valahia.ro; cristinelmortici@yahoo.com URL: http://www.cristinelmortici.ro