Assignment: Landmark Cases Name: Directions: For these Landmarks Cases, fill in the charts on the following pages to explain each of the cases and the Constitutional and landmark issues that were appealed in the Supreme Court. Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) Munn v. Illinois (1877) Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) Schenck v. United States (1919) Brown v. Board of Education (1954) Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Roe v. Wade (1972) United States v. Nixon (1974) Texas v. Johnson (1989) Final Question: When you have completed the charts, review the cases and answer the following question: In your opinion, which of the landmark cases you studied in this class, including Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v. Maryland and Gideon v. Wainright, is the most important to you specifically? While these are all important, you must decide on the single case that you think most directly has an impact on you. Be sure to explain why and give supporting details. Case name, year Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) Munn v. Illinois (1877) Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) What was the context of the case? (Why did it appear before the Supreme Court?) What was/were the question(s) before the Court to decide? What was the Court’s ruling? What was/are the implications of the case (i.e., what does it mean for the law)? What Amendments, Constitutional clauses and/or landmark issues were involved? Case name, year Schenck v. United States (1919) Brown v. Board of Education (1954) Miranda v. Arizona (1966) What was the context of the case? (Why did it appear before the Supreme Court?) What was/were the question(s) before the Court to decide? What was the Court’s ruling? What was/are the implications of the case (i.e., what does it mean for the law)? What Amendments, Constitutional clauses and/or landmark issues were involved? Case name, year Roe v. Wade (1972) United States v. Nixon (1974) Texas v. Johnson (1989) What was the context of the case? (Why did it appear before the Supreme Court?) What was/were the question(s) before the Court to decide? What was the Court’s ruling? What was/are the implications of the case (i.e., what does it mean for the law)? What Amendments, Constitutional clauses and/or landmark issues were involved?