Hindawi Publishing Corporation Abstract and Applied Analysis Volume 2013, Article ID 128458, 6 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/128458 Research Article On an Extension of Kummer’s Second Theorem Medhat A. Rakha,1,2 Mohamed M. Awad,2 and Arjun K. Rathie3 1 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 36 (123), Alkhoud, Muscat, Oman Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41511, Egypt 3 Department of Mathematics, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Central University of Kerala, Riverside Transit Campus, Padennakkad P.O. Nileshwar, Kasaragod, Kerala 671 328, India 2 Correspondence should be addressed to Medhat A. Rakha; medhat@squ.edu.om Received 4 December 2012; Accepted 26 February 2013 Academic Editor: Adem Kilic抬man Copyright © 2013 Medhat A. Rakha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The aim of this paper is to establish an extension of Kummer’s second theorem in the form 饾憭−饾懃/2 2 饾惞2 [ 0 饾惞1 [ −; 饾憥+3/2; 饾懃2 /16 ] + ((饾憥/饾憫 − 1/2)/(饾憥 + 1))饾懃 0 饾惞1 [ −; 饾憥+3/2; 饾懃2 /16 ] 2 + (饾憪饾懃 /2(2饾憥 + 3)) 0 饾惞1 [ −; 饾憥+5/2; 饾懃2 /16 ], 饾憥, 2+饾憫; 2饾憥+2, 饾憫; 饾懃] = where 饾憪 = (1/(饾憥 + 1))(1/2 − 饾憥/饾憫)+ 饾憥/饾憫(饾憫 + 1), 饾憫 =谈 0, −1, −2, . . .. For 饾憫 = 2饾憥, we recover Kummer’s second theorem. The result is derived with the help of Kummer’s second theorem and its contiguous results available in the literature. As an application, we obtain two general results for the terminating 3 饾惞2 (2) series. The results derived in this paper are simple, interesting, and easily established and may be useful in physics, engineering, and applied mathematics. 1. Introduction The generalized hypergeometric function 饾憹 饾惞饾憺 with 饾憹 numerator and 饾憺 denominator parameters is defined by [1] 饾憥1 , . . . , 饾憥饾憹 ; [ 饾懅 ] = 饾憹 饾惞饾憺 [饾憥1 , . . . , 饾憥饾憹 ; 饾憦1 , . . . , 饾憦饾憺 ; 饾懅] 饾惞 饾憹 饾憺 饾憦 , . . . , 饾憦 ; 饾憺 [ 1 ] ∞ =∑ 饾憶=0 (饾憥1 )饾憶 ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ (饾憥饾憹 )饾憶 饾懅饾憶 (饾憦1 )饾憶 ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ (饾憦饾憺 )饾憶 饾憶! (1) , where (饾憥)饾憶 denotes Pochhammer’s symbol (or the shifted or raised factorial, since (1)饾憶 = 饾憶!) defined by 饾憥 (饾憥 + 1) ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ (饾憥 + 饾憶 − 1) , (饾憥)饾憶 = { 1, 饾憶 ∈ N, 饾憶 = 0. (2) Using the fundamental properties of Gamma function Γ(饾憥 + 1) = 饾憥Γ(饾憥), (饾憥)饾憶 can be written in the form Γ (饾憥 + 饾憶) , (饾憥)饾憶 = Γ (饾憥) where Γ is the familiar Gamma function. (3) It is not out of place to mention here that whenever a generalized hypergeometric or hypergeometric function 2 饾惞1 reduces to Gamma function, the results are very important from the applicative point of view. Thus, the classical summation theorem for the series 2 饾惞1 such as those of Gauss, Gauss second, Kummer, and Bailey plays an important role in the theory of hypergeometric series. For generalization and extensions of these classical summation theorems, we refer to [2, 3]. By employing the above mentioned classical summation theorems, Bailey [4] had obtained a large number of very interesting results (including results due to Ramanujan, Gauss, Kummer, and Whipple) involving products of generalized hypergeometric series. On the other hand, from the theory of differential equations, Kummer [5] established the following very interesting and useful result known in the literature as Kummer’s second theorem: −; [ 饾懃2 ] [ ] −饾懃/2 [ ] 饾懃 = 0 饾惞1 [ . 饾憭 1 饾惞1 16 ] [ ] 1 2饾憥; [ ] 饾憥+ ; [ ] 2 饾憥; (4) 2 Abstract and Applied Analysis Bailey [4] established the result (4) by employing the Gauss second summation theorem, and Choi and Rathie [6] established the result (4) (of course, by changing 饾懃 to 2饾懃) by employing the classical Gauss summation theorem. From (4), Rainville [7] deduced the following two useful and classical results: −2饾憶, 饾憥; [ 2 饾惞1 [ 2饾憥; 2 饾惞1 [ (1/2)饾憶 2]= , (饾憥 + 1/2)饾憶 ] −2饾憶 − 1, 饾憥; [ 2饾憥; (饾憶 ∈ N0 := N ∪ {0}) , We, however, would like to mention one of their results which we will require in our present investigation: 饾憥; 饾懃] 饾憭−饾懃/2 1 饾惞1 [ [ 2饾憥 + 2; ] [ [ = 0 饾惞1 [ [ [ (5) 2 ] = 0, ] (饾憶 ∈ N0 ) . −; 3 饾憥+ ; 2 饾懃2 16 [ ] 饾懃 [ ] 饾惞 [ ]− ] 2 (饾憥 + 1) 0 1 [ [ ] [ 饾懃 [ 饾惞 + [ 1 4 (饾憥 + 1) (2饾憥 + 3) 0 [ (6) [ Using (5) and (6), it is not difficult to establish the following transformation due to Kummer: [ (1 − 饾懃) 2 饾惞1 [ 饾憻, 饾憵; −饾憻 − [ 2饾憵; 2饾懃 ] ] 1−饾懃 ] [ [ = 0 饾惞1 [ [ [ −; 1 饾憥+ ; 2 [ 饾懃 [ − 0 饾惞1 [ [ 2 (2饾憥 + 1) [ −; 3 饾憥+ ; 2 饾懃2 16 ] ] ]. ] ] (8) (9) for 饾憲 = 0, ±1, . . . , ±5 by employing the generalized Gauss second summation theorem obtained earlier by Lavoie et al. [9]. ] ] ]. ] ] (10) ] ] ] ] (11) ] [ In 2010, Kim et al. [1] have generalized the Kummer’s second theorem and obtained explicit expressions of 饾憥; 饾懃 ], 饾憭−饾懃/2 1 饾惞1 [ 2饾憥 + 饾憲; [ ] 饾懃2 16 [ 饾懃 (1 − 2饾憥/饾憫) [ 饾惞 − [ 2 (2饾憥 + 1) 0 1 [ −; [ 饾懃2 ] ] 饾懃 ] = 0 饾惞1 [ 饾憭−饾懃/2 1 饾惞1 [ [ 16 ] [ ] 1 [ 2饾憥 + 1; ] 饾憥+ ; [ ] 2 ] 饾憥, 1 + 饾憫; 饾懃] 饾憭−饾懃/2 2 饾惞2 [ 2饾憥 + 1, 饾憫; [ ] In 1995, Rathie and Nagar [8] obtained two results closely related to Kummer’s second theorem (4); one of those results is given below: 饾憥; 5 饾憥+ ; 2 饾懃2 16 3 饾憥+ ; 2 ] ] ] ] 饾懃2 16 In 2008, Rathie and Poga虁ny [10] established a new summation formula for 3 饾惞2 (1/2) and, as an application, obtained the following result which is known as an extension of Kummer’s second Theorem (4): (7) 1 1 1 饾憻+ ; [ 2 饾憻, ] 2 2 [ ] = 2 饾惞1 [ 饾懃2 ] . [ ] 1 饾憵+ ; [ ] 2 −; 2 −; −; 3 饾憥+ ; 2 饾懃2 16 ] ] ], ] ] for 饾憫 =谈 0, −1, −2, . . .. It is noted that if in (11) we set 饾憫 = 2饾浖, we immediately recover Kummer’s second Theorem (4). Very recently Rakha [11] rederived the result (11) in its equivalent form by employing the classical Gauss summation theorem, and Kim et al. [12] derived (11) in a very elementary way and, as an application, obtained the following two elegant results: 3 饾惞2 [ −2饾憶, 饾憥, 1 + 饾憫; [ 2饾憥 + 1, 饾憫; (1/2)饾憶 2]= , (饾憥 + 1/2)饾憶 ] (饾憶 ∈ N0 ) , (12) −2饾憶 − 1, 饾憥, 1 + 饾憫; (1 − 2饾憥/饾憫) (3/2)饾憶 [ 2]= 饾惞 , 3 2 (2饾憥 + 1) (饾憥 + 3/2)饾憶 2饾憥 + 1, 饾憫; [ ] (饾憶 ∈ N0 ) . (13) It is interesting to mention here that the right-hand side of (12) is independent of 饾憫, where 饾憫 =谈 0, −1, −2, . . .. Abstract and Applied Analysis 3 Remark 1. (a) In (12) and (13), if we set 饾憫 = 2饾憥, we recover (5) and (6), respectively. (b) Using (12) and (13), Kim et al. [12] have obtained the following extension of transformation (7) due to Kummer: [ (1 − 饾懃)−饾憻 3 饾惞2 [ 饾憻, 饾憵, 饾憫 + 1; − [ 2饾憵 + 1, 饾憫; 2饾懃 ] ] 1−饾懃 ] 2.1. Derivation. In order to derive (15), we proceed as follows. Denoting the left-hand side of (15) by 饾憜 and expressing 2 饾惞2 as a series with the help of (1), we have ∞ (饾憥)饾憶 饾懃饾憶 (2 + 饾憫)饾憶 }. { (饾憫)饾憶 饾憶=0 (2饾憥 + 2)饾憶 饾憶! 饾憜 = 饾憭−饾懃/2 ∑ Now, it is not difficult to see that (2 + 饾憫)饾憶 2 饾憶 (饾憶 − 1) ; =1+ 饾憶+ 饾憫 饾憫 (饾憫 + 1) (饾憫)饾憶 1 1 1 饾憻+ ; [ 2 饾憻, ] 2 2 [ ] = 2 饾惞1 [ 饾懃2 ] [ ] 1 饾憵+ ; [ ] 2 (14) ∞ (饾憥)饾憶 饾懃饾憶 2 饾憶 (饾憶 − 1) }. {1 + 饾憶 + 饾憶! 饾憫 饾憫 + 2) (饾憫 + 1) (2饾憥 饾憶 饾憶=0 饾憜 = 饾憭−饾懃/2 ∑ (18) Separating (18) into three terms, we have ∞ (饾憥)饾憶 饾懃饾憶 2 ∞ (饾憥)饾憶 饾懃饾憶 + ∑ 饾憫 饾憶=1 (2饾憥 + 2)饾憶 (饾憶 − 1)! 饾憶=0 (2饾憥 + 2)饾憶 饾憶! 饾憜 = 饾憭−饾懃/2 [ ∑ ∞ (饾憥)饾憶 饾懃饾憶 1 + ]. ∑ 饾憫 (饾憫 + 1) 饾憶=2 (2饾憥 + 2)饾憶 (饾憶 − 2)! for 饾憫 =谈 0, −1, −2, . . .. The aim of this paper is to establish another extension of Kummer’s second Theorem (4) by employing the known results (4), (8), and (10). As an application, we mention two interesting results for the terminating 3 饾惞2 (2) series. The results established in this paper are simple, interesting, and easily established and may be useful in physics, engineering, and applied mathematics. (19) For the second and third terms on the right-hand side of (19), changing 饾憶 to 饾憶+1 and 饾憶 to 饾憶+2, respectively, and making use of the following results: (饾憥)饾憶+1 = 饾憥(饾憥 + 1)饾憶 , (2饾憥 + 2)饾憶+1 = (2饾憥 + 2) (2饾憥 + 3)饾憶 , (饾憥)饾憶+2 = 饾憥 (饾憥 + 1) (饾憥 + 2)饾憶 , 2. Main Result (20) (2饾憥 + 2)饾憶+2 = (2饾憥 + 2) (2饾憥 + 3) (2饾憥 + 4)饾憶 , we have, after some simplification, The result to be established in this paper is as follows: 饾憥, ∞ 2 + 饾憫; 饾憭−饾懃/2 2 饾惞2 [ [ 2饾憥 + 2, 饾憫; [ [ = 0 饾惞1 [ [ −; 3 饾憥+ ; [ 2 + (17) we have 1 1 1 饾憻 + , 饾憻 + 1; [ ] 2 2 2 饾懃饾憻 (1 − 2饾憵/饾憫) [ 2 ] 饾惞 + 饾懃 [ ], ] (2饾憵 + 1) 2 1 [ 3 饾憵+ ; [ ] 2 + (16) 饾懃2 16 ∞ (饾憥)饾憶 饾懃饾憶 (饾憥 + 1)饾憶 饾懃饾憶 饾憥饾懃 + ∑ 饾憫 (饾憥 + 1) 饾憶=0 (2饾憥 + 3)饾憶 饾憶! 饾憶=0 (2饾憥 + 2)饾憶 饾憶! 饾憜 = 饾憭−饾懃/2 [ ∑ 饾懃] ] ∞ (饾憥 + 2)饾憶 饾懃饾憶 饾憥饾懃2 + ]. ∑ 2饾憫 (饾憫 + 1) (2饾憥 + 3) 饾憶=0 (2饾憥 + 4)饾憶 饾憶! ] ] ] ] Now, summing up the series with the help of (1), we have ] [ (饾憥/饾憫 − 1/2) [ 饾懃 0 饾惞1 [ [ (饾憥 + 1) (15) −; 2 3 饾憥+ ; [ 2 [ 饾憪饾懃2 [ 0 饾惞1 [ [ 2 (2饾憥 + 3) (21) −; 5 饾憥+ ; [ 2 饾懃2 16 饾懃 16 ] ] ] ] 饾憥; 饾懃] 饾憜 = 饾憭−饾懃/2 1 饾惞1 [ 2饾憥 + 2; [ ] + 饾憥 + 1; 饾憥饾懃 饾懃] 饾憭−饾懃/2 1 饾惞1 [ 饾憫 (饾憥 + 1) [ 2饾憥 + 3; ] + 饾憥 + 2; 饾憥饾懃2 饾懃 ]. 饾憭−饾懃/2 1 饾惞1 [ 2饾憫 (饾憫 + 1) (2饾憥 + 3) [ 2饾憥 + 4; ] ] ] ] ], ] ] where 饾憫 =谈 0, −1, −2, . . . and 饾憪 is given by 饾憪 = (1/(饾憥 + 1))(1/2 − 饾憥/饾憫) + 饾憥/饾憫(饾憫 + 1). (22) Finally, observing the right-hand side of (22), we see that the first, second, and third expressions can now be evaluated with the help of the results (10), (8), and (4), respectively, and, after some simplification, we arrive at the desired result (15). This completes the proof of (15). 4 Abstract and Applied Analysis 3. New Results for Terminating 3 饾惞2 (2) In this section, from our newly obtained result (15), we will establish two new results for the terminating 3 饾惞2 series. These are 3 饾惞2 [ −2饾憶, 饾憥, 2 + 饾憫; [ 2饾憥 + 2, 饾憫; 3 饾惞2 [ [ 2饾憥 + 2, 饾憫; (1/4饾憪 + 1)饾憶 (1/2)饾憶 2]= , (1/4饾憪)饾憶 (饾憥 + 3/2)饾憶 ] we finally have 3.1. Derivations. In order to derive the results (23), we proceed as follows. Denoting the left-hand side of (15) by 饾憜1 , then expressing both of the functions involved in the series, we have ∞ (−1)饾憶 饾懃饾憶 ∞ (饾憥)饾憵 (2 + 饾憫)饾憵 饾懃饾憵 ∑ 饾憶 饾憶! 2 饾憵! + 2) (2饾憥 (饾憫) 饾憵 饾憵 饾憶=0 饾憵=0 饾憜1 = ∑ ∞ ∞ (−1)饾憶 (饾憥)饾憵 (2 + 饾憫)饾憵 饾憶+饾憵 =∑∑ 饾憶 饾懃 . 饾憶=0 饾憵=0 2 (2饾憥 + 2)饾憵 (饾憫)饾憵 饾憵!饾憶! (24) ∞ ∞ ∞ 饾憶=0 饾憳=0 饾憶=0 饾憳=0 饾憶 ∑ ∑ 饾惔 (饾憳, 饾憶) = ∑ ∑ 饾惔 (饾憳, 饾憶 − 饾憳) , (25) we have 饾憶 (−1)饾憶−饾憵 (饾憥)饾憵 (2 + 饾憫)饾憵 饾懃饾憶 . 饾憶−饾憵 (2饾憥 + 2) (饾憫) 饾憵! (饾憶 − 饾憵)! 2 饾憵 饾憵 饾憶=0 饾憵=0 饾憜1 = ∑ ∑ (26) Using the identity (饾憶 − 饾憵)! = 饾憵 (−1) 饾憶! , (−饾憶)饾憵 (27) we have, after some simplification, 饾憶 (−饾憶)饾憵 (饾憥)饾憵 (2 + 饾憫)饾憵 饾憵 (−1) 饾懃 饾憶 饾懃 ∑ 2 . 饾憶 饾憶=0 2 饾憶! 饾憵=0 (2饾憥 + 2)饾憵 (饾憫)饾憵 饾憵! 饾憜1 = ∑ (28) Expressing the inner series in the last result, we get −饾憶, 饾憥, 2 + 饾憫; (−1)饾憶 饾懃饾憶 饾憶 [ 2 ]. 饾惞 饾懃 3 2 饾憶 饾憶! 2 饾憶=0 [ 2饾憥 + 2, 饾憫; ] ∞ 饾憜1 = ∑ 饾憜1 = ∑ −2饾憶 − 1, 饾憥, 2 + 饾憫; 饾懃2饾憶+1 [ 2 ]. 饾惞 2 3 4饾憶+1 饾憶!(3/2) 饾憶 饾憶=0 2 2饾憥 + 2, 饾憫; [ ] (31) ∞ −∑ Also, it is not difficult to see that 1 [ 4饾憪 + 1; ] [ 2 ] [ ] 饾懃 ] 1 饾惞2 [ [ 16 ] [ 1 ] 3 , 饾憥+ ; 2 [ 4饾憪 ] [ [ = 0 饾惞1 [ [ [ Replacing 饾憶 by 饾憶 − 饾憵 in (24) and using the known result [7, page 56, Lemma 10]: 饾憶 饾憶 −2饾憶, 饾憥, 2 + 饾憫; 饾懃2饾憶 [ 2] 饾惞 2 3 4饾憶 饾憶=0 2 饾憶!(1/2)饾憶 [ 2饾憥 + 2, 饾憫; ] ∞ (饾憫 − 2饾憥) (3/2)饾憶 2]= , 饾憫 (饾憥 + 1) (饾憥 + 3/2)饾憶 ] where 饾憪 = (1/(饾憥 + 1))(1/2 − 饾憥/饾憫) + 饾憥/饾憫(饾憫 + 1), and 饾憫 =谈 0, −1, −2, , . . .. ∞ (30) 3 (2饾憶 + 1)! = 2 饾憶!( ) , 2 饾憶 (饾憶 ∈ N0 ) , (23) ∞ 1 (2饾憶)! = 22饾憶 饾憶!( ) , 2 饾憶 2饾憶 (饾憶 ∈ N0 ) , −2饾憶 − 1, 饾憥, 2 + 饾憫; Now, separating the 3 饾惞2 into even and odd powers of 饾懃 and making use of the results: (29) −; 3 饾憥+ ; 2 饾懃2 16 [ ] 饾憪饾懃2 [ ] 饾惞1 [ ]+ 0 [ ] 2 (2饾憥 + 3) [ ] −; 5 饾憥+ ; 2 饾懃2 16 ] ] ]. ] ] (32) Now, if we denote the right-hand side of (15) by 饾憜2 , then with the help of (32), it can be expressed as 1 [ 4饾憪 + 1; ] [ 2 ] [ ] 饾懃 饾憜2 = 1 饾惞2 [ ] [ ] 16 [ 1 ] 3 , 饾憥+ ; 2 [ 4饾憪 ] [ (饾憥/饾憫 − 1/2) [ 饾懃 0 饾惞1 [ + [ (饾憥 + 1) [ −; 3 饾憥+ ; 2 (33) 饾懃2 16 ] ] ]. ] ] Thus, from (31) and (33), if we equate the coefficients of 饾懃2饾憶 and 饾懃2饾憶+1 on both sides, we at once arrive at the results (23). This completes the proof. Remark 2. (a) Setting 饾憫 = 2饾憥 in (15), we immediately recover Kummer’s second Theorem (4). Thus, (15) can be regarded as the extension of (4). (b) Also, if we take 饾憫 = 2饾憥 in (12) and (13), we again at once get the result (5) and (6), respectively. Thus, our results (12) and (13) can be regarded as extensions of (5) and (6). Abstract and Applied Analysis 5 4. Extension of a Transformation due to Kummer Using (饾憶 − 饾憳)! = In this section, we will establish a natural extension of Kummer’s transformation: [ (1 − 饾懃) 3 饾惞2 [ 饾憻, 饾憵, 饾憫 + 2; −饾憻 [ 2饾憵 + 2, 饾憫; ∞ 饾憶=0 饾憳=0 饾憵, 饾憫 + 2; −饾憻 − [ 2饾憵 + 2, 饾憫; −饾憶, 饾憵, 饾憫 + 2; (饾憻)饾憶 饾憶 2 ], 饾懃 3 饾惞2 [ 饾憶=0 饾憶! [ 2饾憵 + 2, 饾憫; ] (35) (44) −2饾憶, 饾憵, 饾憫 + 2; (饾憻)2饾憶 2饾憶 2] 饾懃 3 饾惞2 [ 饾憶=0 (2饾憶)! [ 2饾憵 + 2, 饾憫; ] ∞ 饾憜3 = ∑ 2饾懃 ] ] ; (36) 1−饾懃 ] (饾憻) (饾憵)饾憳 (饾憫 + 2)饾憳 (−1)饾憳 2饾憳 饾懃饾憳 饾憜3 = ∑ 饾憳 (1 − 饾懃)−(饾憻+饾憳) . + 2) 饾憳! (2饾憵 (饾憫) 饾憳 饾憳 饾憳=0 −2饾憶 − 1, 饾憵, 饾憫 + 2; (饾憻)2饾憶+1 2饾憶+1 [ 2 ]. 饾惞 饾懃 2 3 饾憶=0 (2饾憶 + 1)! [ 2饾憵 + 2, 饾憫; ] (45) ∞ +∑ Using the the following identities: 1 1 1 (饾憻)2饾憶 = 22饾憶 ( 饾憻) ( 饾憻 + ) , 2 饾憶 2 2 饾憶 (37) 1 1 1 (饾憻)2饾憶+1 = 饾憻22饾憶 ( 饾憻 + ) ( 饾憻 + 1) , 2 2 饾憶 2 饾憶 Applying the generalized Binomial theorem (|饾懅| < 1) , 1 (2饾憶)! = 22饾憶 ( ) 饾憶!, 2 饾憶 (38) ∞ ∞ (饾憻)饾憳 (饾憵)饾憳 (饾憫 + 2)饾憳 (−2)饾憳 (饾憻 + 饾憳)饾憶 饾懃饾憳+饾憶 . + 2) 饾憳!饾憶! (2饾憵 (饾憫) 饾憳 饾憳 饾憳=0 饾憶=0 饾憜3 = ∑ ∑ (39) Using (饾憻)饾憳 (饾憻 + 饾憳)饾憶 = (饾憻)饾憳+饾憶 , we have (饾憵)饾憳 (饾憫 + 2)饾憳 (−2)饾憳 (饾憻)饾憳+饾憶 饾憳+饾憶 饾憜3 = ∑ ∑ 饾懃 ; (2饾憵 + 2)饾憳 (饾憫)饾憳 饾憳!饾憶! 饾憳=0 饾憶=0 together with the 3 饾惞2 (2) result, we have ∞ ((1/2) 饾憻)饾憶 ((1/2) 饾憻 + 1/2)饾憶 2饾憶 (1/4饾憪 + 1)饾憶 饾懃 饾憶! (1/4饾憪) 饾憶 (饾憵 + 3/2)饾憶 饾憶=0 饾憜3 = ∑ ∞ ∞ (40) ∞ 饾憻((1/2) 饾憻 + 1/2)饾憶 ((1/2) 饾憻 + 1) 2饾憶+1 饾懃 饾憶! 饾憶=0 + 饾懃∑ changing 饾憶 to 饾憶 − 饾憳 and using (25), we have 饾憶 (饾憵)饾憳 (饾憫 + 2)饾憳 (−2)饾憳 (饾憻)饾憶 饾憶 饾懃 . 饾憶=0 饾憳=0 (2饾憵 + 2)饾憳 (饾憫)饾憳 饾憳! (饾憶 − 饾憳)! (46) 3 (2饾憶 + 1)! = 22饾憶 ( ) 饾憶! 2 饾憶 we have ∞ (43) ∞ 饾憜3 = ∑ ∞ 饾憜3 = ∑ ∑ (2饾憵 + 2)饾憳 (饾憫)饾憳 饾憳!(−1) 饾憶! 饾懃饾憶 Expressing the inner series, as 3 饾惞2 , we find expressing 3 饾惞2 as a series, we have (−饾憥)饾憶 饾憶 饾懅 (1 − 饾懅) = ∑ 饾憶=0 饾憶! 饾憳 饾憶 (饾憻) (−饾憶)饾憳 (饾憵)饾憳 (饾憫 + 2)饾憳 饾憳 = ∑ 饾憶 饾懃饾憶 ∑ 2 . (2饾憵 + 2)饾憳 (饾憫)饾憳 饾憳! 饾憶=0 饾憶! 饾憳=0 (34) 4.1. Derivation. In order to establish the result (34), we proceed as follows. Denote the left-hand side of (34) by 饾憜3 ; we have ∞ (饾憵)饾憳 (饾憫 + 2)饾憳 (−2)饾憳 (饾憻)饾憶 (−饾憶)饾憳 from which, we have 1 饾憵 饾憵 1 ( − )+ . 饾憪= 饾憵+1 2 饾憫 饾憫 (饾憫 + 1) 饾憥 (42) ∞ for 饾憫 =谈 0, −1, −2, . . . and 饾憪 is given by 饾憻, 饾憶 饾憜3 = ∑ ∑ 1 1 1 饾憻 + , 饾憻 + 1; [ ] 2 2 饾懃饾憻 (饾憫 − 2饾憵) [ 2 2 ] 饾惞 + 饾懃 [ ], ] 饾憫 (饾憵 + 1) 2 1 [ 3 饾憵+ ; [ ] 2 [ 饾憜3 = (1 − 饾懃) 3 饾惞2 [ (0 ≤ 饾憳 ≤ 饾憶) , we have 2饾懃 ] − ] 1−饾懃 ] 1 1 1 1 饾憻+ , + 1; [ 2 饾憻, ] 2 2 4饾憪 [ ] = 3 饾惞2 [ 饾懃2 ] [ ] 3 1 饾憵+ , ; [ ] 2 4饾憪 (−1)饾憳 饾憶! (−饾憶)饾憳 (41) × (饾憫 − 2饾憵) 饾憫 (饾憵 + 1) (饾憵 + 3/2)饾憶 6 Abstract and Applied Analysis 1 1 1 1 [ 2 饾憻, 2 饾憻 + 2 , 4饾憪 + 1; ] [ ] = 3 饾惞2 [ 饾懃2 ] [ 1 ] 3 , 饾憵+ ; [ 4饾憪 ] 2 1 1 1 饾憻 + , 饾憻 + 1; [ ] 2 2 饾懃 (饾憫 − 2饾憵) 饾憻 [ 2 ] + 饾懃2 ] , 2 饾惞1 [ [ ] 饾憫 (饾憵 + 1) 3 饾憵+ ; [ ] 2 (47) with 饾憪= 1 饾憵 饾憵 1 ( − )+ , 饾憵+1 2 饾憫 饾憫 (饾憫 + 1) 饾憫 =谈 0, −1, −2, . . . . (48) This completes the proof of (34). Remark 3. In (34), if we take 饾憫 = 2饾憵, we get (7). Thus, (34) may be regarded as an extension of (7). Authors’ Contribution All authors contributed equally to this paper. They read and approved the final paper. Acknowledgments The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the referees for their valuable comments and suggestions. They are so much appreciated to the College of Science, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman, for supporting the publication charge of this paper. References [1] Y. S. Kim, M. A. Rakha, and A. K. Rathie, “Generalizations of Kummer’s second theorem with application,” Journal of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 387–402, 2010. [2] Y. S. Kim, M. A. Rakha, and A. K. Rathie, “Extensions of certain classical summation theorems for the series 2 饾惞1 , 3 饾惞2 , and 4 饾惞3 with applications in Ramanujan’s summations,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 2010, Article ID 309503, 26 pages, 2010. [3] M. A. Rakha and A. K. Rathie, “Generalizations of classical summation theorems for the series 2 饾惞1 and 3 饾惞2 with applications,” Integral Transforms and Special Functions, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 823–840, 2011. [4] W. N. Bailey, “Products of generalized hypergeometric series,” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 242–250, 1928. [5] E. E. Kummer, “U虉ber die hypergeometridche Reihe,” Journal fu虉r Die Reine Und Angewandte Mathematik, vol. 15, pp. 39–83, 1836. [6] J. Choi and A. K. Rathie, “Another proof of Kummer’s second theorem,” Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 933–936, 1998. [7] E. D. Rainville, Special Functions, The Macmillan Company, New York, NY, USA, 1960. [8] A. K. Rathie and V. Nagar, “On Kummer’s second theorem involving product of generalized hypergeometric series,” Le Matematiche, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 35–38, 1995. [9] J.-L. Lavoie, F. Grondin, and A. K. Rathie, “Generalizations of Watson’s theorem on the sum of a 3 饾惞2 ,” Indian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 1992. [10] A. K. Rathie and T. K. Poga虂ny, “New summation formula for 3 饾惞2 (1/2) and a Kummer-type II transformation of 2 饾惞2 (饾懃),” Mathematical Communications, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 63–66, 2008. [11] M. A. Rakha, “A note on Kummer-type II transformation for the generalized hypergeometric function 2 饾惞2 ,” Mathematical Notes, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 154–156, 2012. [12] Y. S. Kim, J. Choi, and A. K. Rathie, “Two results for the terminating 3 饾惞2 (2) with applications,” Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 621–633, 2012. Advances in Operations Research Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Advances in Decision Sciences Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Mathematical Problems in Engineering Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Journal of Algebra Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Probability and Statistics Volume 2014 The Scientific World Journal Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 International Journal of Differential Equations Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Volume 2014 Submit your manuscripts at http://www.hindawi.com International Journal of Advances in Combinatorics Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Mathematical Physics Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Journal of Complex Analysis Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences Journal of Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Stochastic Analysis Abstract and Applied Analysis Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com International Journal of Mathematics Volume 2014 Volume 2014 Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Volume 2014 Volume 2014 Journal of Journal of Discrete Mathematics Journal of Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Applied Mathematics Journal of Function Spaces Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Optimization Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014