Research Article -Exponential Stability of Nonlinear Impulsive Dynamic Equations on Time Scales

advertisement
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2013, Article ID 103894, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/103894
Research Article
πœ“-Exponential Stability of Nonlinear Impulsive
Dynamic Equations on Time Scales
Veysel Fuat HatipoLlu,1 Deniz Uçar,2 and Zeynep Fidan Koçak1
1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, MugΜ†la University, Kötekli Campus,
48000 Muğla, Turkey
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences and Arts, Usak University, 1 Eylul Campus,
64200 Usak, Turkey
Correspondence should be addressed to Veysel Fuat Hatipoğlu; veyselfuat.hatipoglu@mu.edu.tr
Received 26 November 2012; Accepted 15 March 2013
Academic Editor: Stefan Siegmund
Copyright © 2013 Veysel Fuat HatipogΜ†lu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly
cited.
The purpose of this paper is to present the sufficient πœ“-exponential, uniform exponential, and global exponential stability conditions
for nonlinear impulsive dynamic systems on time scales.
1. Introduction
In recent years, a significant progress has been made in the
stability theory of impulsive systems [1, 2], and in [3] authors
studied the πœ“-exponential stability for nonlinear impulsive
differential equations. There are various types of stability of
dynamic systems on time scales such as asymptotic stability
[4, 5], exponential and uniform exponential stability [6–8],
and β„Ž-stability [9]. In the past decade, many authors studied
impulsive dynamic systems on time scales [10–14]. There
are some papers on the theory of the stability of impulsive
dynamic systems on time scales. In [15], stability criteria for
impulsive systems are given and in [16], authors studied πœ“uniform stability of linear impulsive dynamic systems.
In this paper, we consider the πœ“-exponential stability
of the zero solution of the first-order nonlinear impulsive
dynamic system
Δ
π‘₯ (𝑑) = 𝑓 (𝑑, π‘₯ (𝑑)) ,
π‘₯ (π‘‘π‘˜+ ) − π‘₯ (π‘‘π‘˜− ) = πΌπ‘˜ (π‘₯ (π‘‘π‘˜− )) ,
𝑑∈
T𝑑+0 ,
𝑑 =ΜΈ π‘‘π‘˜ ,
𝑑 = π‘‘π‘˜ , π‘˜ = 1, 2, . . . , 𝑛, (1)
π‘₯ (𝑑0+ ) = π‘₯0 ,
where T is a time scale which has at least finitely many rightdense points of impulsive π‘‘π‘˜ , 𝑓 : [0, ∞) × R𝑛 → R𝑛 is
a nonlinear function and rd continuous in (π‘‘π‘˜−1 , π‘‘π‘˜ ] × R𝑛 ,
πΌπ‘˜ ∈ 𝐢rd [R𝑛 , R𝑛 ], and 0 ≤ 𝑑0 < 𝑑1 < 𝑑2 < ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ < 𝑑𝑛 < 𝑑 are
fixed moments of impulsive effect. Let πœ“π‘– : T → (0, ∞),
𝑖 = 1, 2, . . . , 𝑛, be rd continuous functions and let πœ“ =
diag[πœ“1 , πœ“2 , . . . , πœ“π‘› ]. Throughout the paper, we assume that
𝑓(𝑑, 0) = 0, for all 𝑑 in the time scale interval [0, ∞), and call
the zero function the trivial solution of (1) and we consider
T𝑑+0 = {𝑑 ∈ T : 𝑑 ≥ 𝑑0 }. Existence and uniqueness of solutions
of (1) have been studied in [10].
In the following part we present some basic concepts
about time scale calculus and we refer the reader to resource
[17] for more detailed information on dynamic equations on
time scales.
2. Preliminaries
A time scale T is an arbitrary nonempty closed subset of
the real numbers R. For 𝑑 ∈ T we define the forward jump
operator 𝜎 : T → T by
𝜎 (𝑑) := inf {𝑠 ∈ T : 𝑠 > 𝑑}
(2)
while the backward jump operator 𝜌 : T → T is defined by
𝜌 (𝑑) := sup {𝑠 ∈ T : 𝑠 < 𝑑} .
(3)
2
Abstract and Applied Analysis
If 𝜎(𝑑) > 𝑑, we say that 𝑑 is right scattered, while if 𝜌(𝑑) < 𝑑,
we say that 𝑑 is left scattered. Also, if 𝜎(𝑑) = 𝑑, then 𝑑 is called
right dense, and if 𝜌(𝑑) = 𝑑, then 𝑑 is called left dense. The
graininess function πœ‡ : T → [0, ∞) is defined by
πœ‡ (𝑑) := 𝜎 (𝑑) − 𝑑.
(4)
πœ…
We introduce the set T which is derived from the time
scale T as follows. If T has a left-scattered maximum π‘š, then
T πœ… = T − {π‘š}; otherwise T πœ… = T.
A function 𝑓 on T is said to be delta differentiable at some
point 𝑑 ∈ T if there is a number π‘“Δ (𝑑) such that for every πœ€ > 0
there is a neighborhood π‘ˆ ⊂ T of 𝑑 such that
󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨𝑓 (𝜎 (𝑑)) − 𝑓 (𝑠) − π‘“Δ (𝑑) (𝜎 (𝑑) − 𝑠)󡄨󡄨󡄨 ≤ πœ€ |𝜎 (𝑑) − 𝑠| ,
󡄨
󡄨
(5)
𝑠 ∈ π‘ˆ.
The function 𝑝 : T → R is said to be regressive provided
1 + πœ‡(𝑑)𝑝(𝑑) =ΜΈ 0 for all 𝑑 ∈ T πœ… . The set of all regressive rdcontinuous functions 𝑓 : T → R is denoted by R.
Let 𝑝 ∈ R and πœ‡(𝑑) =ΜΈ 0 for all 𝑑 ∈ T. The exponential
function on T, defined by
𝑒𝑝 (𝑑, 𝑠) = exp (∫
𝑑
𝑠
1
log (1 + πœ‡ (𝑧) 𝑝 (𝑧)) Δ𝑧) ,
πœ‡ (𝑧)
(6)
is the solution to the initial value problem π‘¦Δ = 𝑝(𝑑)𝑦,
𝑦(𝑠) = 1. Properties of the exponential function on T are
given in [6].
In [6] authors defined the Lyapunov function on time
scales, type I Lyapunov function 𝑉 as,
where 𝑑 is a positive constant and 𝐢(β„Ž, 𝑑) ∈ R+ × T𝑑+0 → R+
is a nonnegative increasing function, 𝑀 > 0. If the function
𝐢 is independent of 𝑑0 , then the trivial solution to system (1)
is said to be πœ“ uniformly exponentially stable on [0, ∞).
Definition 2. The trivial solution to (1) is πœ“ globally exponentially stable on [0, ∞) if there exist some constants 𝛿 > 0
and 𝑀 ≥ 1 such that any solution π‘₯(𝑑, 𝑑0 , π‘₯0 ) of (1), for all
𝑑 ∈ [π‘‘π‘˜−1 , π‘‘π‘˜ ), π‘˜ = 1, 2, . . . , 𝑛, we have
σ΅„©
σ΅„©σ΅„©
σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑) π‘₯ (𝑑, 𝑑0 , π‘₯0 )σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© ≤ π‘€π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 𝑑0 ) .
(10)
Now, we shall present sufficient conditions for the πœ“exponential stability, πœ“ uniformly exponential stability, and
πœ“ globally exponentially stability of(1).
Theorem 3. Assume that 𝐷 ⊂ R𝑛 contains the origin and there
exists a type I Lyapunov function 𝑉 : T𝑑+0 × π· → [0, ∞) such
that, for all (𝑑, π‘₯) ∈ T𝑑+0 × π· and 𝑑 ∈ [π‘‘π‘˜−1 , π‘‘π‘˜ ), π‘˜ = 1, 2, . . . , 𝑛,
󡄩𝑝
σ΅„©π‘ž
σ΅„©
σ΅„©
πœ† 1 (𝑑) σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑) π‘₯ (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© ≤ 𝑉 (𝑑, π‘₯) ≤ πœ† 2 (𝑑) σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑) π‘₯ (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© ,
π‘‰Δ (𝑑, π‘₯) ≤
(11)
σ΅„©π‘Ÿ
σ΅„©
−πœ† 3 (𝑑) σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑) π‘₯ (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© − 𝐿 (𝑀 βŠ– 𝛿) π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 𝑑0 )
,
1 + π‘€πœ‡ (𝑑)
(12)
𝑉 (𝑑, π‘₯) − π‘‰π‘ŸβŸ‹π‘ž (𝑑, π‘₯) ≤ π›Ύπ‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 𝑑0 ) ,
(13)
𝑛
𝑉 (π‘₯) = ∑𝑉𝑖 (π‘₯𝑖 ) = 𝑉1 (π‘₯1 ) + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ + 𝑉𝑛 (π‘₯𝑛 ) ,
(7)
𝑖=1
and Δ derivative of type I Lyapunov function as follows:
[𝑉 (π‘₯ (𝑑))]Δ
𝑛
[𝑉𝑖 (π‘₯𝑖 + πœ‡ (𝑑) 𝑓𝑖 (𝑑, π‘₯)) − 𝑉𝑖 (π‘₯𝑖 )]
{
{
{∑
πœ‡ (𝑑)
= {𝑖=1
{
{
{∇𝑉 (π‘₯) ⋅ 𝑓 (𝑑, π‘₯)
for πœ‡ (𝑑) =ΜΈ 0,
for πœ‡ (𝑑) = 0.
(8)
We start introducing notations that will be used
in the following sections. In the Euclidean 𝑛-space,
norm of a vector π‘₯ = {π‘₯1 , π‘₯2 , . . . , π‘₯𝑛 }𝑇 is given by β€–π‘₯β€– =
max{|π‘₯1 |, |π‘₯2 |, . . . , |π‘₯𝑛 |}. The induced norm of an 𝑛 × π‘› matrix
𝐴 is defined to be ‖𝐴‖ = supβ€–π‘₯β€–≤1 ‖𝐴π‘₯β€–.
Now, we give definition of πœ“-exponential, πœ“-uniform
exponential, πœ“-global exponential stability, and stability conditions for the solution of nonlinear impulsive dynamic
system (1).
3. πœ“-Exponential Stability
Definition 1. The trivial solution to (1) is πœ“ exponentially
stable on [0, ∞) if any solution π‘₯(𝑑, 𝑑0 , π‘₯0 ) of the system (1)
satisfies for all 𝑑 ∈ [π‘‘π‘˜−1 , π‘‘π‘˜ ), π‘˜ = 1, 2, . . . , 𝑛,
𝑑
σ΅„© σ΅„©
σ΅„©
σ΅„©σ΅„©
(9)
σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑) π‘₯ (𝑑, 𝑑0 , π‘₯0 )σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© ≤ 𝐢 (σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©π‘₯0 σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© , 𝑑0 ) (π‘’βŠ–π‘€ (𝑑, 𝑑0 )) ,
where πœ† 1 (𝑑), πœ† 2 (𝑑), and πœ† 3 (𝑑) are positive functions, where πœ† 1 (𝑑)
is nondecreasing; 𝑝, π‘ž, π‘Ÿ, and 𝛾 are positive constants; 𝐿 is a
nonnegative constant, and 𝛿 > 𝑀 := inf 𝑑≥0 πœ† 3 (𝑑)βŸ‹[πœ† 2 (𝑑)]π‘ŸβŸ‹π‘ž >
0. Then the trivial solution to (1) is πœ“ exponentially stable on
[0, ∞).
Proof. Let π‘₯ be a solution to (1) that stays in 𝐷 for all 𝑑 ≥ 𝑑0 .
As 𝑀 := inf 𝑑≥0 πœ† 3 (𝑑)βŸ‹[πœ† 2 (𝑑)]π‘ŸβŸ‹π‘ž > 0, 𝑒𝑀(𝑑, 𝑑0 ) is well defined
and positive. Thus πœ† 3 (𝑑)βŸ‹[πœ† 2 (𝑑)]π‘ŸβŸ‹π‘ž ≥ 𝑀. Consider
Δ
[𝑉 (𝑑, π‘₯ (𝑑)) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑, 𝑑0 )]
𝜎
Δ
= π‘‰Δ (𝑑, π‘₯ (𝑑)) 𝑒𝑀
(𝑑, 𝑑0 ) + 𝑉 (𝑑, π‘₯ (𝑑)) 𝑒𝑀
(𝑑, 𝑑0 ) ,
σ΅„©π‘Ÿ
σ΅„©
≤ (−πœ† 3 (𝑑) σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑) π‘₯ (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© − 𝐿 (𝑀 βŠ– 𝛿) π‘’βŠπ›Ώ (𝑑, 𝑑0 )) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑, 𝑑0 )
+ 𝑀𝑉 (𝑑, π‘₯ (𝑑)) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑, 𝑑0 )
σ΅„©π‘Ÿ
σ΅„©
= (−πœ† 3 (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑)π‘₯ (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© +𝑀𝑉(𝑑, π‘₯ (𝑑))−𝐿(𝑀 βŠ– 𝛿) π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 𝑑0))
× π‘’π‘€ (𝑑, 𝑑0 )
≤(
−πœ† 3 (𝑑)
π‘ŸβŸ‹π‘ž 𝑉
[πœ† 2 (𝑑)]
π‘ŸβŸ‹π‘ž
(𝑑, π‘₯ (𝑑)) + 𝑀𝑉 (𝑑, π‘₯ (𝑑))
−𝐿 (𝑀 βŠ– 𝛿) π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 𝑑0 ) ) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑, 𝑑0 )
Abstract and Applied Analysis
3
≤ (𝑀 (𝑉 (𝑑, π‘₯ (𝑑)) − π‘‰π‘ŸβŸ‹π‘ž (𝑑, π‘₯ (𝑑)))−𝐿 (𝑀 βŠ– 𝛿) π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 𝑑0 ))
× π‘’π‘€ (𝑑, 𝑑0 )
≤ (𝑀𝛾 − 𝐿 (𝑀 βŠ– 𝛿)) π‘’π‘€βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 𝑑0 ) .
(14)
Proof. The proof is similar to proof of Theorem 3 by taking
𝛿 > πœ† 3 βŸ‹[πœ† 2 ]π‘ŸβŸ‹π‘ž and 𝑀 = πœ† 3 βŸ‹[πœ† 2 ]π‘ŸβŸ‹π‘ž , hence omitted.
Theorem 5. Assume that 𝐷 ⊂ R𝑛 contains the origin and there
exists a type I Lyapunov function 𝑉 : T𝑑+0 × π· → [0, ∞) such
that, for all (𝑑, π‘₯) ∈ T𝑑+0 × π· and 𝑑 ∈ [π‘‘π‘˜−1 , π‘‘π‘˜ ), π‘˜ = 1, 2, . . . , 𝑛,
Integrating both sides of above inequality from 𝑑0 to 𝑑 with
π‘₯0 = π‘₯(𝑑0 ), we obtain, for 𝑑 ∈ [π‘‘π‘˜−1 , π‘‘π‘˜ ),
π‘‰Δ (𝑑, π‘₯) ≤
𝑉 (𝑑, π‘₯) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑, 𝑑0 ) ≤ 𝑉 (𝑑0 , π‘₯0 )
𝑑
+ ∫ (𝑀𝛾 − 𝐿 (𝑀 βŠ– 𝛿)) π‘’π‘€βŠ–π›Ώ (𝜏, 𝑑0 ) Δ𝜏
𝑑0
= 𝑉 (𝑑0 , π‘₯0 ) + (
+
𝑀𝛾
− 𝐿) π‘’π‘€βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 𝑑0 )
π‘€βŠ–π›Ώ
𝑀𝛾
+𝐿
π›ΏβŠ–π‘€
≤ 𝑉 (𝑑0 , π‘₯0 ) +
𝑀𝛾
+ 𝐿.
π›ΏβŠ–π‘€
󡄩𝑝
σ΅„©
πœ† 1 σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“π‘₯ (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© ≤ 𝑉 (π‘₯) ,
(22)
−πœ† 2 𝑉 (π‘₯) − 𝐿 (𝑀 βŠ– 𝛿) π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0)
,
1 + π‘€πœ‡ (𝑑)
(23)
where πœ“ is a constant function independent of 𝑑. πœ† 1 , πœ† 2 , 𝑝, 𝛿 >
0, 𝐿 ≥ 0 are constants and 0 < 𝑀 < min{πœ† 2 , 𝛿}. Then the
trivial solution to (1) is πœ“ uniformly exponentially stable on
[0, ∞).
Proof. Let π‘₯ be a solution to (1) that stays in 𝐷 for all 𝑑 ≥
𝑑0 . Since 𝑀 ∈ R+ , 𝑒𝑀(𝑑, 0) is well defined and positive. Now
consider
(15)
[𝑉 (π‘₯ (𝑑)) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑, 0)]
Δ
𝜎
= π‘‰Δ (𝑑, π‘₯ (𝑑)) 𝑒𝑀
(𝑑, 0) + 𝑀𝑉 (π‘₯ (𝑑)) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑, 0) ,
From condition 𝑉(𝑑0 , π‘₯0 ) ≤ πœ† 2 (𝑑0 )β€–πœ“(𝑑0 )π‘₯0 β€–π‘ž
𝑀𝛾
σ΅„©
σ΅„©π‘ž
𝑉 (𝑑, π‘₯) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑, 𝑑0 ) ≤ πœ† 2 (𝑑0 ) σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑0 ) π‘₯0 σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© +
+ 𝐿. (16)
π›ΏβŠ–π‘€
Letting
≤ (−πœ† 2 𝑉 (π‘₯ (𝑑)) − 𝐿 (𝑀 βŠ– 𝛿) π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0)) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑, 0)
+ 𝑀𝑉 (π‘₯ (𝑑)) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑, 0)
= (−πœ† 2 𝑉 (π‘₯ (𝑑))+𝑀𝑉(π‘₯ (𝑑))−𝐿 (𝑀 βŠ– 𝛿) π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0)) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑, 0)
𝑀𝛾
σ΅„©π‘ž
σ΅„©
σ΅„© σ΅„©
πœ† 2 (𝑑0 ) σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑0 ) π‘₯0 σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© +
+ 𝐿 = 𝐢 (σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©π‘₯0 σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© , 𝑑0 ) > 0
π›ΏβŠ–π‘€
(17)
≤ −𝐿 (𝑀 βŠ– 𝛿) π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑, 0)
we get,
σ΅„© σ΅„©
𝑉 (𝑑, π‘₯) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑, 𝑑0 ) ≤ 𝐢 (σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©π‘₯0 σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© , 𝑑0 ) .
(18)
By condition (11), we have
−1βŸ‹π‘
σ΅„©
σ΅„©σ΅„©
(𝑑) (𝑉 (𝑑, π‘₯))1βŸ‹π‘
σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑) π‘₯ (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© ≤ πœ† 1
(19)
= −𝐿 (𝑀 βŠ– 𝛿) π‘’π‘€βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0) .
(24)
Integrating both sides of the above inequality from 𝑑0 to 𝑑, we
obtain, for 𝑑 ∈ [π‘‘π‘˜−1 , π‘‘π‘˜ ),
𝑉 (π‘₯ (𝑑)) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑, 0) ≤ 𝑉 (π‘₯0 ) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑0 , 0) − πΏπ‘’π‘€βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0)
And by the fact that πœ† 1 (𝑑) ≥ πœ† 1 (𝑑0 ), we obtain
−1βŸ‹π‘
σ΅„©
σ΅„©σ΅„©
(𝑑0 ) (𝑉 (𝑑, π‘₯))1βŸ‹π‘ .
σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑) π‘₯ (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© ≤ πœ† 1
≤ ((𝑀 − πœ† 2 ) 𝑉 (π‘₯ (𝑑)) − 𝐿 (𝑀 βŠ– 𝛿) π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0)) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑, 0)
+ πΏπ‘’π‘€βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑0 , 0)
(20)
≤ 𝑉 (π‘₯0 ) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑0 , 0) + πΏπ‘’π‘€βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑0 , 0)
From (18) and (20) we obtain the result for all, 𝑑 ∈ [π‘‘π‘˜−1 , π‘‘π‘˜ ),
π‘˜ = 1, 2, . . . , 𝑛,
1βŸ‹π‘
1βŸ‹π‘
−1βŸ‹π‘
σ΅„©
σ΅„© σ΅„©
σ΅„©σ΅„©
(𝑑0 ) (𝐢 (σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©π‘₯0 σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© , 𝑑0 )) π‘’βŠ–π‘€(𝑑, 𝑑0 ) .
σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑) π‘₯ (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© ≤ πœ† 1
(21)
By Definition 1 system (1) is πœ“ exponentially stable.
If we consider πœ“ as scaler function independent of 𝑑, then
we get a sufficient condition for πœ“ uniformly exponential
stability as stated below.
Theorem 4. In Theorem 3 if πœ“ is a constant function independent of 𝑑 and πœ† 𝑖 (𝑑) = πœ† 𝑖 , 𝑖 = 1, 2, 3, are positive constants, then
the trivial solution to system (1) is πœ“ uniformly exponentially
stable on [0, ∞).
(25)
≤ (𝑉 (π‘₯0 ) + 𝐿) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑0 , 0) .
This implies that
𝑉 (π‘₯ (𝑑)) ≤ ((𝑉 (π‘₯0 ) + 𝐿) 𝑒𝑀 (𝑑0 , 0)) π‘’βŠ–π‘€ (𝑑, 0)
= (𝑉 (π‘₯0 ) + 𝐿) π‘’βŠ–π‘€ (𝑑, 𝑑0 ) .
(26)
From (26) and by invoking condition (22) we obtain, for all
𝑑 ∈ [π‘‘π‘˜−1 , π‘‘π‘˜ ), π‘˜ = 1, 2, . . . , 𝑛,
1βŸ‹π‘
−1βŸ‹π‘
σ΅„©
σ΅„©σ΅„©
σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“π‘₯ (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© ≤ πœ† 1 ((𝑉 (π‘₯0 ) + 𝐿) π‘’βŠ–π‘€ (𝑑, 𝑑0 )) .
(27)
By Definition 1 system (1) is πœ“ uniformly exponentially stable.
4
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Theorem 6. Assume that 𝐷 ⊂ R𝑛 contains the origin and there
exists a type I Lyapunov function 𝑉 : T𝑑+0 × π· → [0, ∞) such
that, for all (𝑑, π‘₯) ∈ T𝑑+0 × π· and 𝑑 ∈ [π‘‘π‘˜−1 , π‘‘π‘˜ ), π‘˜ = 1, 2, . . . , 𝑛,
󡄩𝑝
󡄩𝑝
σ΅„©
σ΅„©
πœ† 1 σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑) π‘₯ (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© ≤ 𝑉 (π‘₯) ≤ πœ† 2 σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑) π‘₯ (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© ,
󡄩𝑝
σ΅„©
−πœ† 3 σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑) π‘₯ (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© − 𝐿 (𝐾 βŠ– 𝛿) π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0)
,
π‘‰Δ (𝑑, π‘₯) ≤
1 + πΎπœ‡ (𝑑)
(28)
(29)
where πœ† 1 , πœ† 2 , πœ† 3 , and 𝑝 are positive constants, 𝐾 = πœ† 3 /πœ† 2 , 𝐿 ≥
πœ† 1 is a nonnegative constant, and 𝛿 > πœ† 3 /πœ† 2 . Then the trivial
solution to (1) is πœ“ globally exponentially stable on [0, ∞).
Proof. Let π‘₯ be a solution to (1) that stays in 𝐷 for all 𝑑 ≥ 𝑑0 .
Since 𝐾 = πœ† 3 /πœ† 2 , 𝑒𝐾 (𝑑, 0) is well defined and positive. For all
𝑑 ∈ [π‘‘π‘˜−1 , π‘‘π‘˜ ), π‘˜ = 1, 2, . . . , 𝑛, consider
[𝑉 (π‘₯ (𝑑)) 𝑒𝐾 (𝑑, 0)]
Δ
If we set 𝑀 := ((𝑉(π‘₯0 ) + 𝐿)/πœ† 1 )1βŸ‹π‘ , then (33) can be written
as
1βŸ‹π‘
σ΅„©
σ΅„©σ΅„©
σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑) π‘₯ (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© ≤ 𝑀(π‘’βŠ–πΎ (𝑑, 𝑑0 )) .
(34)
Since 𝑀 ≥ 1, by Definition 2 system (1) is πœ“ globally
exponentially stable.
4. Examples
Example 7. We consider Example (35) in [7] and extend the
example by using impulse condition,
1
π‘₯Δ = −π‘₯ + π‘₯1/3 π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0) ,
5
1
π‘₯ (π‘‘π‘˜+ ) = − ,
3
𝑑 =ΜΈ π‘‘π‘˜ , 𝑑 ∈ T,
𝑑 = π‘˜, π‘˜ = 1, 2, . . . , 𝑛,
(35)
(36)
where 𝛿 > 0 is a constant π‘₯0 ∈ R. If there is a constant 0 <
𝑀 < 𝛿 such that
𝜎
Δ
= π‘‰Δ (𝑑, π‘₯ (𝑑)) 𝑒𝐾
(𝑑, 0) + 𝑉 (π‘₯ (𝑑)) 𝑒𝐾
(𝑑, 0) ,
(πœ‡ (𝑑) − 1) (1 + π‘€πœ‡ (𝑑)) ≤ −𝑀,
󡄩𝑝
σ΅„©
≤ (−πœ† 3 σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑) π‘₯ (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© − 𝐿 (𝐾 βŠ– 𝛿) π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0)) 𝑒𝐾 (𝑑, 0)
(37)
3/2
󡄨󡄨󡄨(2/5) − (2/5) πœ‡ (𝑑)󡄨󡄨󡄨3
2 1
󡄨 ) (1 + π‘€πœ‡ (𝑑))
( ( πœ‡ (𝑑)) + 󡄨
3 25
3
+ 𝐾𝑉 (π‘₯ (𝑑)) 𝑒𝐾 (𝑑, 0)
󡄩𝑝
σ΅„©
= (−πœ† 3 σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑) π‘₯ (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© + 𝐾𝑉 (π‘₯ (𝑑)) − 𝐿 (𝐾 βŠ– 𝛿) π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0))
≤ −𝐿 (𝑀 βŠ– 𝛿) (𝑑) ,
(38)
× π‘’πΎ (𝑑, 0)
−πœ†
≤ ( 3 𝑉 (π‘₯ (𝑑)) + 𝐾𝑉 (π‘₯ (𝑑)) − 𝐿 (𝐾 βŠ– 𝛿) π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0)) 𝑒𝐾 (𝑑, 0)
πœ†2
= (−𝐿 (𝐾 βŠ– 𝛿) π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0)) 𝑒𝐾 (𝑑, 0)
= −𝐿 (𝐾 βŠ– 𝛿) π‘’πΎβŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0) .
(30)
Integrating both sides of the above inequality from 𝑑0 to
𝑑, 𝑑 =ΜΈ π‘‘π‘˜ , with π‘₯0 = π‘₯(𝑑0 ), we obtain,
𝑉 (π‘₯ (𝑑)) 𝑒𝐾 (𝑑, 0) ≤ 𝑉 (π‘₯0 ) 𝑒𝐾 (𝑑0 , 0)
for some constant 𝐿 ≥ 0 and all 𝑑 =ΜΈ π‘˜, (35) is πœ“ uniformly
exponentially stable.
Under above assumptions, we will show that the conditions of Theorem 4 are satisfied. Let πœ“(𝑑) = 1/2, choose 𝐷 = R
and 𝑉(π‘₯) = π‘₯2 , 𝑑 =ΜΈ π‘˜, then (11) holds with 𝑝 = π‘ž = 2, πœ† 1 =
πœ† 2 = 4. If we calculate π‘‰Δ , for all 𝑑 =ΜΈ π‘˜,
1
π‘‰Δ = 2π‘₯ (−π‘₯ + π‘₯1/3 π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0))
5
2
1
+ πœ‡ (𝑑) (−π‘₯ + π‘₯1/3 π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0)) ,
5
(39)
we have the following comparison:
+ 𝐿 (π‘’πΎβŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑0 , 0) − π‘’πΎβŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0))
≤ 𝑉 (π‘₯0 ) 𝑒𝐾 (𝑑0 , 0) + πΏπ‘’πΎβŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑0 , 0)
(31)
1
π‘‰Δ = 2π‘₯ (−π‘₯ + π‘₯1/3 π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0))
5
2
1
+ πœ‡ (𝑑) (−π‘₯ + π‘₯1/3 π‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 0))
5
≤ (𝑉 (π‘₯0 ) + 𝐿) 𝑒𝐾 (𝑑0 , 0) .
This implies that
≤ (πœ‡ (𝑑) − 1) π‘₯2
𝑉 (π‘₯ (𝑑)) ≤ ((𝑉 (π‘₯0 ) + 𝐿) 𝑒𝐾 (𝑑0 , 0)) π‘’βŠ–πΎ (𝑑, 0)
= (𝑉 (π‘₯0 ) + 𝐿) π‘’βŠ–πΎ (𝑑, 𝑑0 ) .
(32)
From (32), and by invoking condition (28), we obtain, for all
𝑑 ∈ [π‘‘π‘˜−1 , π‘‘π‘˜ ), π‘˜ = 1, 2, . . . , 𝑛,
1βŸ‹π‘
−1βŸ‹π‘
σ΅„©
σ΅„©σ΅„©
σ΅„©σ΅„©πœ“ (𝑑) π‘₯ (𝑑)σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„© ≤ πœ† 1 ((𝑉 (π‘₯0 ) + 𝐿) π‘’βŠ–πΎ (𝑑, 𝑑0 ))
−1βŸ‹π‘
≤ πœ†1
1βŸ‹π‘
((𝑉 (π‘₯0 ) + 𝐿) π‘’βŠ–πΎ (𝑑, 𝑑0 ))
.
(33)
3/2
󡄨󡄨󡄨(2/5) − (2/5) πœ‡ (𝑑)󡄨󡄨󡄨3
2 1
󡄨 ] 𝑒 (𝑑, 0) .
+ [ ( πœ‡ (𝑑)) + 󡄨
βŠ–π›Ώ
3 25
3
(40)
Dividing and multiplying the right-hand side by (1 + π‘€πœ‡(𝑑)),
we see that (12) holds under the above assumptions with π‘Ÿ = 2
and πœ† 3 = 4𝑀. Also, since 𝑝 = π‘ž = 2, we have
2/2
𝑉 (π‘₯) − π‘‰π‘ŸβŸ‹π‘ž (π‘₯) = π‘₯2 − (π‘₯2 )
= 0 ≤ π›Ύπ‘’βŠ–π›Ώ (𝑑, 𝑑0 ) ,
(41)
Abstract and Applied Analysis
5
for all 𝑑 =ΜΈ π‘˜. Therefore (13) is satisfied. Hence, all hypotheses
of Theorem 4 are satisfied and we conclude that the trivial
solution to (35) is πœ“ uniformly exponentially stable. We
consider following two special cases of (35).
Case 1. If T = R, then πœ‡(𝑑) = 0. It is easy to see that (37) holds
for 𝑀 = 1. Also for 𝐿 = 8/[375(𝛿 − 𝑀)], condition (38) is
satisfied. Hence, we conclude that if 𝛿 > 1, then the trivial
solution to (35) is πœ“ uniformly exponentially stable.
Case 2. If T = (1/2)Z, then πœ‡(𝑑) = 1/2. In this case rewriting
(37) we have
𝑀
1
(− ) (1 + ) ≤ −𝑀,
2
2
(42)
then (37) holds for 2/3 > 𝑀 > 0. Also for 𝐿 = ((6 + √2)/
2250(𝛿−𝑀))(1−(𝑀/2))(1−(𝛿/2)), condition (38) is satisfied.
Therefore for 𝛿 > 2/3, then the trivial solution to (35) is πœ“
uniformly exponentially stable.
References
[1] V. Lakshmikantham, D. D. BaΔ±Μ†nov, and P. S. Simeonov, Theory
of Impulsive Differential Equations, vol. 6 of Series in Modern
Applied Mathematics, World Scientific Publishing, Teaneck, NJ,
USA, 1989.
[2] D. D. BaΔ±Μ†nov and P. S. Simeonov, Systems with Impulse Effect:
Stability, Theory and Applications, Ellis Horwood Series: Mathematics and its Applications, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK,
1989.
[3] B. Gupta and S. K. Srivastava, “πœ“-exponential stability for nonlinear impulsive differential equations,” International Journal of
Computational and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 329–
333, 2010.
[4] J. Hoffacker and C. C. Tisdell, “Stability and instability for
dynamic equations on time scales,” Computers & Mathematics
with Applications, vol. 49, no. 9-10, pp. 1327–1334, 2005.
[5] J. J. DaCunha, “Stability for time varying linear dynamic
systems on time scales,” Journal of Computational and Applied
Mathematics, vol. 176, no. 2, pp. 381–410, 2005.
[6] A. C. Peterson and C. C. Tisdell, “Boundedness and uniqueness
of solutions to dynamic equations on time scales,” Journal of
Difference Equations and Applications, vol. 10, no. 13–15, pp.
1295–1306, 2004.
[7] A. C. Peterson and Y. N. Raffoul, “Exponential stability of
dynamic equations on time scales,” Advances in Difference
Equations, vol. 2005, Article ID 858671, 2005.
[8] A.-L. Liu, “Boundedness and exponential stability of solutions
to dynamic equations on time scales,” Electronic Journal of
Differential Equations, vol. 2007, article 12, 14 pages, 2007.
[9] S. K. Choi, N. J. Koo, and D. M. Im, “β„Ž-stability for linear
dynamic equations on time scales,” Journal of Mathematical
Analysis and Applications, vol. 324, no. 1, pp. 707–720, 2006.
[10] M. Benchohra, J. Henderson, and S. Ntouyas, Impulsive Differential Equations and Inclusions, vol. 2 of Contemporary Mathematics and Its Applications, Hindawi Publishing Corporation,
New York, NY, USA, 1st edition, 2006.
[11] M. Benchohra, J. Henderson, S. K. Ntouyas, and A. Ouahab,
“On first order impulsive dynamic equations on time scales,”
Journal of Difference Equations and Applications, vol. 10, no. 6,
pp. 541–548, 2004.
[12] V. Lakshmikantham and A. S. Vatsala, “Hybrid systems on time
scales,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol.
141, no. 1-2, pp. 227–235, 2002.
[13] V. Lupulescu and A. Zada, “Linear impulsive dynamic systems
on time scales,” Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of
Differential Equations, no. 11, pp. 1–30, 2010.
[14] E. R. Kaufmann, N. Kosmatov, and Y. N. Raffoul, “Impulsive
dynamic equations on a time scale,” Electronic Journal of
Differential Equations, vol. 2008, article 67, 9 pages, 2008.
[15] Y. Ma and J. Sun, “Stability criteria for impulsive systems on time
scales,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol.
213, no. 2, pp. 400–407, 2008.
[16] IΜ‡. B. YasΜ§ar and A. Tuna, “πœ“-uniformly stability for time varying
linear dynamic systems on time scales,” International Mathematical Forum, vol. 2, no. 17–20, pp. 963–972, 2007.
[17] M. Bohner and A. Peterson, Dynamic Equations on Time Scales,
An Introduction with Applications, Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass,
USA, 2001.
Advances in
Operations Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Advances in
Decision Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems
in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Journal of
Algebra
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Probability and Statistics
Volume 2014
The Scientific
World Journal
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
International Journal of
Differential Equations
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Submit your manuscripts at
http://www.hindawi.com
International Journal of
Advances in
Combinatorics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Mathematical Physics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Journal of
Complex Analysis
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
International
Journal of
Mathematics and
Mathematical
Sciences
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Stochastic Analysis
Abstract and
Applied Analysis
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
International Journal of
Mathematics
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Discrete Dynamics in
Nature and Society
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Journal of
Journal of
Discrete Mathematics
Journal of
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Applied Mathematics
Journal of
Function Spaces
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Optimization
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Download