Research Article A Uniqueness Theorem for Bessel Operator from Interior Spectral Data

advertisement
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2013, Article ID 713654, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/713654
Research Article
A Uniqueness Theorem for Bessel Operator from
Interior Spectral Data
Murat Sat1 and Etibar S. Panakhov2
1
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Art, Erzincan University, 24100 Erzincan, Turkey
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Firat University, 23119 Elazig, Turkey
Correspondence should be addressed to Murat Sat; msat@erzincan.edu.tr
Received 24 February 2013; Accepted 12 April 2013
Academic Editor: Rodrigo Lopez Pouso
Copyright © 2013 M. Sat and E. S. Panakhov. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly
cited.
Inverse problem for the Bessel operator is studied. A set of values of eigenfunctions at some internal point and parts of two spectra
are taken as data. Uniqueness theorems are obtained. The approach that was used in investigation of problems with partially known
potential is employed.
1. Introduction
Inverse spectral analysis involves the problem of restoring a
linear operator from some of its spectral parameters. Currently, inverse problems are being studied for certain special
classes of ordinary differential operators. The simplest of
these is the Sturm-Liouville operator 𝐿𝑦 = −𝑦󸀠󸀠 + π‘ž(π‘₯)𝑦. For
the case where it is considered on the whole line or half line,
the Sturm-Liouville operator together with the function π‘ž(π‘₯)
has been called a potential. In this direction, Borg [1] gave
important results. He showed that, in general, one spectrum
does not determine a Sturm-Liouville operator, so the result
of Ambarzumyan [2] is an exception to the general rule. In
the same paper, Borg showed that two spectra of a SturmLiouville operator determine it uniquely. Later, Levinson
[3], Levitan [4], and Hochstadt [5] showed that when the
boundary condition and one possible reduced spectrum
are given, then the potential is uniquely determined. Using
spectral data, that is, the spectral function, spectrum, and
norming constant, different methods have been proposed
for obtaining the potential function in a Sturm-Liouville
problem. Such problems were subsequently investigated by
other authors [4–6]. On the other hand, inverse problems
for regular and singular Sturm-Liouville operators have been
extensively studied by [7–15].
The inverse problem for interior spectral data of the
differential operator consists in reconstruction of this operator from the known eigenvalues and some information
on eigenfunctions at some internal point. Similar problems
for the Sturm-Liouville operator and discontinuous SturmLiouville problem were formulated and studied in [16, 17].
The main goal of the present work is to study the inverse
problem of reconstructing the singular Sturm-Liouville operator on the basis of spectral data of a kind: one spectrum and
some information on eigenfunctions at the internal point.
Consider the following singular Sturm-Liouville operator
𝐿 satisfying (1)–(3):
𝐿𝑦 = −𝑦󸀠󸀠 + [
β„“ (β„“ + 1)
+ π‘ž (π‘₯)] 𝑦 = πœ†π‘¦,
π‘₯2
0<π‘₯<1
(1)
with boundary conditions,
𝑦 (0) = 0,
(2)
𝑦󸀠 (1, πœ†) + 𝐻𝑦 (1, πœ†) = 0,
(3)
where π‘ž(π‘₯) is a real-valued function and π‘ž ∈ 𝐿 2 (0, 1), πœ†
spectral parameter, β„“ ∈ N0 , 𝐻 ∈ R. The operator 𝐿 is self
adjoint on the 𝐿 2 (0, 1) and has a discrete spectrum {πœ† 𝑛 }.
2
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Let us introduce the second singular Sturm-Liouville op̃ satisfying
erator 𝐿
Μƒ = −𝑦󸀠󸀠 + [ β„“ (β„“ + 1) + π‘žΜƒ (π‘₯)] 𝑦 = πœ†π‘¦,
𝐿𝑦
π‘₯2
0 < π‘₯ < 1, (4)
subject to the same boundary conditions (2), (3), where π‘žΜƒ(π‘₯)
Μƒ is
is a real-valued function and π‘žΜƒ ∈ 𝐿 2 (0, 1). The operator 𝐿
Μƒ
self adjoint on the 𝐿 2 (0, 1) and has a discrete spectrum {πœ† 𝑛 }.
2. Main Results
Before giving some results concerning the Bessel equation,
we should give its physical properties. The total energy of the
particle is given by 𝐸 = 𝑝2 /2𝑀 = β„Ž2 π‘˜2 /2𝑀 = π‘˜2 , where 𝑝 is
its initial or final momentum, and π‘˜ the corresponding wave
number, β„Ž planck constant, 𝑀 particle’s mass, and 𝐸 energy.
The reduced radial Schrödinger equation for the partial wave
of angular momentum β„“ then reads [18]
β„“ (β„“ + 1)
𝑑2
Ψ (π‘˜, π‘Ÿ) + (π‘˜2 −
) Ψ1 (π‘˜, π‘Ÿ) = 𝑉 (π‘Ÿ) Ψ1 (π‘˜, π‘Ÿ) .
π‘‘π‘Ÿ2 1
π‘Ÿ2
(5)
When 𝑉 = 0, the above equation reduces to the classical
Bessel equation in the form
𝑑2
β„“ (β„“ + 1)
Ψ (π‘˜, π‘Ÿ) + (π‘˜2 −
) Ψ1 (π‘˜, π‘Ÿ) = 0.
π‘‘π‘Ÿ2 1
π‘Ÿ2
(6)
This equation has the solution 𝐽ℓ (π‘Ÿ), called the Bessel function.
Eigenvalues of the problem (1)–(3) are the roots of (3).
This spectral characteristic satisfies the following asymptotic
expression [19, 20]:
1
β„“ 2
πœ† 𝑛 = (𝑛 + ) πœ‹2 + ∫ π‘ž (π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯ − 𝑙 (𝑙 + 1) + π‘Žπ‘› ,
2
0
(7)
2
where the series ∑∞
𝑛=1 π‘Žπ‘› < ∞. Next, we present the main
results in this paper. When 𝑏 = 1/2, we get the following
uniqueness Theorem 1.
Theorem 1. If for every 𝑛 ∈ N one has
Μƒ ,
πœ†π‘› = πœ†
𝑛
Lemma 2. Let {π‘š(𝑛)}𝑛∈N be a sequence of natural numbers
satisfying (10) and 𝑏 ∈ (0, 1/2) are so chosen that 𝜎 > 2𝑏. If for
any 𝑛 ∈ N
𝑦𝑛󸀠 (1/2) 𝑦̃𝑛󸀠 (1/2)
=
𝑦𝑛 (1/2) 𝑦̃𝑛 (1/2)
(8)
πœ† π‘š(𝑛)
π‘Ž.𝑒 π‘œπ‘› π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘–π‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘ŸVπ‘Žπ‘™ (0, 1) .
0 < 𝜎 ≤ 1, πœ€π‘› 󳨀→ 0.
=
π‘¦Μƒπ‘š(𝑛) (𝑏)
π‘ž (π‘₯) = π‘žΜƒ (π‘₯)
π‘Ž.𝑒 π‘œπ‘› (0, 𝑏] .
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
Let {𝑙(𝑛)}𝑛∈N and {π‘Ÿ(𝑛)}𝑛∈N be a sequence of natural
numbers such that
𝑛
(1 + πœ€1,𝑛 ) , 0 < 𝜎1 ≤ 1, πœ€1,𝑛 󳨀→ 0,
𝑙 (𝑛) =
(13)
𝜎1
π‘Ÿ (𝑛) =
𝑛
(1 + πœ€2,𝑛 ) ,
𝜎2
0 < 𝜎2 ≤ 1, πœ€2,𝑛 󳨀→ 0
(14)
and let πœ‡π‘› be the eigenvalues of (1), (2), and (15) and πœ‡Μƒπ‘› be the
eigenvalues of (4), (2), and (15)
𝑦󸀠 (1, πœ†) + 𝐻1 𝑦 (1, πœ†) = 0,
𝐻 ≠ 𝐻1 .
(15)
Using Mochizuki and Trooshin’s method from Lemma 2 and
Theorem 1, we will prove that the following Theorem 3 holds.
Theorem 3. Let {𝑙(𝑛)}𝑛∈N and {π‘Ÿ(𝑛)}𝑛∈N be a sequence of
natural numbers satisfying (13) and (14), and 1/2 < 𝑏 < 1
are so chosen that 𝜎1 > 2𝑏 − 1, 𝜎2 > 2 − 2𝑏. If for any 𝑛 ∈ N
one has
Μƒ ,
πœ†π‘› = πœ†
𝑛
πœ‡π‘™(𝑛) = πœ‡Μƒπ‘™(𝑛) ,
σΈ€ 
π‘¦π‘Ÿ(𝑛)
(𝑏)
π‘¦π‘Ÿ(𝑛) (𝑏)
=
σΈ€ 
π‘¦Μƒπ‘Ÿ(𝑛)
(𝑏)
π‘¦Μƒπ‘Ÿ(𝑛) (𝑏)
(16)
then
π‘ž (π‘₯) = π‘žΜƒ (π‘₯)
π‘Ž.𝑒 π‘œπ‘› (0, 1) .
(17)
3. Proof of the Main Results
In this section, we present the proofs of main results in this
paper.
Proof of Theorem 1. Before proving Theorem 1, we will mention some results, which will be needed later. We get the initial
value problems
−𝑦󸀠󸀠 + [
β„“ (β„“ + 1)
+ π‘ž (π‘₯)] 𝑦 = πœ†π‘¦,
π‘₯2
0 < π‘₯ < 1,
𝑦 (0) = 0,
In the case 𝑏 =ΜΈ 1/2, the uniqueness of π‘ž(π‘₯) can be proved
if we require the knowledge of a part of the second spectrum.
Let {π‘š(𝑛)}𝑛∈N be a sequence of natural numbers with a
property
𝑛
π‘š (𝑛) = (1 + πœ€π‘› ) ,
𝜎
π‘¦π‘š(𝑛) (𝑏)
σΈ€ 
π‘¦Μƒπ‘š(𝑛)
(𝑏)
then
then
π‘ž (π‘₯) = π‘žΜƒ (π‘₯)
σΈ€ 
π‘¦π‘š(𝑛)
(𝑏)
Μƒ
=πœ†
π‘š(𝑛) ,
−𝑦̃󸀠󸀠 + [
β„“ (β„“ + 1)
Μƒ
+ π‘žΜƒ (π‘₯)] 𝑦̃ = πœ†π‘¦,
π‘₯2
(18)
(19)
0 < π‘₯ < 1,
𝑦̃ (0) = 0.
(20)
(21)
As known from [18], Bessel’s functions of the first kind of
order V = β„“ − 1/2 are
∞
(−1)π‘˜ π‘₯V+2π‘˜
V+2π‘˜ π‘˜!Γ (V + π‘˜ + 1)
π‘˜=0 2
𝐽V (π‘₯) = ∑
(22)
Abstract and Applied Analysis
3
Μƒ πœ†) and (20) by 𝑦(π‘₯, πœ†), subtractMultiplying (18) by 𝑦(π‘₯,
ing and integrating from 0 to 1/2, we obtain
and asymptotic formulas for large argument
𝐽V (π‘₯) = √
2
Vπœ‹ πœ‹
1
{cos [π‘₯ −
− ] + 𝑂 ( )} ,
πœ‹π‘₯
2
4
π‘₯
𝐽VσΈ€  (π‘₯) = −√
2
Vπœ‹ πœ‹
1
{sin [π‘₯ −
− ] + 𝑂 ( )} .
πœ‹π‘₯
2
4
π‘₯
1/2
(23)
π‘₯
√𝑑
√π‘₯
√
√
V 𝐽V ( πœ†π‘₯) + ∫ 𝐻 (π‘₯, 𝑑)
V 𝐽V ( πœ†π‘‘) 𝑑𝑑,
0
(√πœ†)
(√πœ†)
(24)
π‘₯
√𝑑
√π‘₯
Μƒ
√
√
𝑦̃ (π‘₯, πœ†) =
V 𝐽V ( πœ†π‘₯) + ∫ 𝐻 (π‘₯, 𝑑)
V 𝐽V ( πœ†π‘‘) 𝑑𝑑,
0
(√πœ†)
(√πœ†)
(25)
Μƒ 𝑑)) is the solution
respectively, where the kernel 𝐻(π‘₯, 𝑑) (𝐻(π‘₯,
of the equation
πœ•2 𝐻 (π‘₯, 𝑑) β„“ (β„“ + 1)
+
𝐻 (π‘₯, 𝑑)
πœ•π‘₯2
π‘₯2
(26)
[𝐽VσΈ€  (𝑑, πœ†) = 𝑂 (𝑑V−1/2 )] .
(27)
1
πœ‚ = (π‘₯ − 𝑑)2 ,
4
−V+1/2
𝐻 (π‘₯, 𝑑) = (πœ‰ − πœ‚)
(28)
π‘ˆ (πœ‰, πœ‚) ,
(32)
𝐾 (πœ†) = ∫
1/2
0
𝑄 (π‘₯) 𝑦 (π‘₯, πœ†) 𝑦̃ (π‘₯, πœ†) 𝑑π‘₯.
(33)
Μƒ πœ†) are considered, the
If the properties of 𝑦(π‘₯, πœ†) and 𝑦(π‘₯,
function 𝐾(πœ†) is an entire function.
Therefore the condition of Theorem 1 implies
1
1
1
1
𝑦̃ ( , πœ† 𝑛 ) 𝑦󸀠 ( , πœ† 𝑛 ) − 𝑦 ( , πœ† 𝑛 ) 𝑦̃󸀠 ( , πœ† 𝑛 ) = 0
2
2
2
2
(34)
𝐾 (πœ† 𝑛 ) = 0,
𝑛 ∈ N.
(35)
1
,
πœ†V
(36)
where 𝑀 is constant.
Introduce the function
(37)
πœ•2 π‘ˆ
πœ•π‘ˆ
πœ•π‘ˆ
1
1
−
+
πœ•πœ‰πœ•πœ‚ 4 (πœ‰ − πœ‚) πœ•πœ‰ 4 (πœ‰ − πœ‚) πœ•πœ‚
Ψ (πœ†) =
π‘ž (√πœ‰ + √πœ‚) π‘ˆ,
(29)
π‘ˆ (πœ‰, πœ‰) = 0,
πœ•π‘ˆ 𝛼
1
+ π‘ˆ = π‘ž (√πœ‰) πœ‰V−1 ,
πœ•πœ‰ πœ‰
4
π‘Š (πœ†) = √πœ† sin (√πœ† −
Vπœ‹ πœ‹
− ) + 𝑂 (1) .
2
4
(38)
The zeros of π‘Š(πœ†) are the eigenvalues of 𝐿 and hence it
has only simple zeros πœ† 𝑛 because of the seperated boundary
conditions. From (38), π‘Š(πœ†) is an entire function of order
1/2 of πœ†. Since the set of zeros of the entire function π‘Š(πœ†) is
contained in the set of zeros of 𝐾(πœ†), we see that the function
we obtain the following problem:
4√πœ‰πœ‚
𝑄 (π‘₯) = π‘ž (π‘₯) − π‘žΜƒ (π‘₯) ,
Let
By using the asymptotic forms of 𝑦 and 𝑦󸀠 , we obtain
1
πœ‰ = (π‘₯ + 𝑑)2 ,
4
=
(31)
π‘Š (πœ†) = 𝑦󸀠 (1, πœ†) + 𝐻𝑦 (1, πœ†) .
After the transformations
1
𝑦̃ (0, πœ†) 𝑦󸀠 (0, πœ†) − 𝑦 (0, πœ†) 𝑦̃󸀠 (0, πœ†) = 0.
|𝐾 (πœ†)| ≤ 𝑀
𝑑𝐻 (π‘₯, π‘₯)
= π‘ž (π‘₯) ,
𝑑π‘₯
lim 𝐻 (π‘₯, 𝑑) 𝑑V−1/2 = 0,
Μƒ πœ†) satisfy the same initial
The functions 𝑦(π‘₯, πœ†) and 𝑦(π‘₯,
conditions (19) and (21), that is,
In addition, using (24) and (33) for 0 < π‘₯ < 1,
subject to the boundary conditions
𝑑→0
(30)
and hence
πœ•2 𝐻 (π‘₯, 𝑑)
β„“ (β„“ + 1)
=
+(
+ π‘ž (𝑑)) 𝐻 (π‘₯, 𝑑)
2
πœ•π‘‘
𝑑2
2
0
󡄨1/2
Μƒ πœ†)𝑦󸀠 (π‘₯, πœ†) − 𝑦(π‘₯, πœ†)𝑦̃󸀠 (π‘₯, πœ†)]󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨0 .
= [𝑦(π‘₯,
It can be shown [19] that there exists a kernel
Μƒ 𝑑)) continuous in the triangle 0 ≤ 𝑑 ≤ π‘₯ ≤ 1
𝐻(π‘₯, 𝑑)(𝐻(π‘₯,
such that by using the transformation operator every solution
of (18), (19) and (20), (21) can be expressed in the form [8, 21],
𝑦 (π‘₯, πœ†) =
(π‘ž (π‘₯) − π‘žΜƒ (π‘₯)) 𝑦 (π‘₯, πœ†) 𝑦̃ (π‘₯, πœ†) 𝑑π‘₯
∫
1
𝛼 = −V + .
2
This problem can be solved by using the Riemann method
[21].
𝐾 (πœ†)
π‘Š (πœ†)
(39)
is an entire function on the parameter πœ†. From (36), (38), and
(39), we get
|Ψ (πœ†)| = 𝑂 (
1
).
πœ†V+1/2
(40)
So, for all πœ†, from the Liouville theorem,
Ψ (πœ†) = 0,
(41)
4
Abstract and Applied Analysis
or
𝐾 (πœ†) = 0.
(42)
It was proved in [19] that there exists absolutely continũ
Μƒ 𝜏) such that we have
ous function 𝐻(π‘₯,
1
Vπœ‹ πœ‹
𝑦 (π‘₯, πœ†) 𝑦̃ (π‘₯, πœ†) = {1 + cos 2 [√πœ†π‘₯ −
− ]
2
2
4
Thus from the completeness of the functions cos, it follows
that
1/2
Q (𝜏) + ∫
𝜏
× cos 2 [√πœ†πœ −
Vπœ‹ πœ‹
− ] π‘‘πœ} ,
2
4
(43)
where
−π‘₯+2𝜏
+∫
Μƒ (π‘₯, 𝑠 − 2𝜏) 𝑑𝑠
𝐻 (π‘₯, 𝑠) 𝐻
π‘₯−2𝜏
−π‘₯
(49)
π‘žΜƒ (π‘₯) = π‘ž (π‘₯)
(50)
almost everywhere on (0, 1/2]. Therefore Theorem 1 is
proved.
Theorem 4. To prove that π‘ž(π‘₯) = 0 on [1/2, 1) almost everywhere, we should repeat the above arguments for the supplementary problem
Μƒ
Μƒ (π‘₯, 𝑑) = 2 [𝐻 (π‘₯, π‘₯ − 2𝜏) + 𝐻
Μƒ (π‘₯, π‘₯ − 2𝜏)]
𝐻
π‘₯
𝑄 (π‘₯) = π‘ž (π‘₯) − π‘žΜƒ (π‘₯) = 0,
or
0
+ 2 [∫
(44)
Μƒ (π‘₯, 𝑠 + 2𝜏) 𝑑𝑠] .
𝐻 (π‘₯, 𝑠) 𝐻
𝐿𝑦 = −𝑦󸀠󸀠 + [
β„“ (β„“ + 1)
+ π‘ž (1 − π‘₯)] 𝑦,
(1 − π‘₯)2
1
∫
2 0
𝑄 (π‘₯) {1 + cos 2 [√πœ†π‘₯ −
Μƒ (π‘₯, 𝜏)
Μƒ
+∫ 𝐻
π‘ž (π‘₯) = π‘žΜƒ (π‘₯)
0
Vπœ‹ πœ‹
− ] π‘‘πœ} 𝑑π‘₯ = 0.
2
4
(45)
This can be written as
1/2
0
𝑄 (π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯ + ∫
1/2
0
0
󡄨
= [𝑦̃ (π‘₯, πœ†) 𝑦 (π‘₯, πœ†) − 𝑦 (π‘₯, πœ†) 𝑦̃ (π‘₯, πœ†)]󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨π‘₯=𝑏 ,
σΈ€ 
𝑄 (π‘₯)
Let πœ† → ∞ along the real axis, by the Riemann-Lebesgue
lemma, one should have
1/2
0
× [𝑄 (𝜏) + ∫
𝑄 (π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯ = 0,
Vπœ‹ πœ‹
− ]
2
4
cos 2 [√πœ†πœ −
1/2
𝜏
Μƒ
Μƒ (π‘₯, 𝜏) 𝑑π‘₯] π‘‘πœ = 0.
𝑄 (π‘₯) 𝐻
(54)
σΈ€ 
where 𝜌 = √πœ† = π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘–πœƒ and 𝑄(π‘₯) = π‘ž(π‘₯) − π‘žΜƒ(π‘₯). From the
assumption
(46)
0
Proof of Lemma 2. As in the proof of Theorem 1 we can show
that
0
Μƒ
Μƒ (π‘₯, 𝜏) 𝑑π‘₯] π‘‘πœ = 0.
×𝐻
1/2
(53)
Next, we show that Lemma 2 holds.
𝐺 (𝜌) = ∫ 𝑄 (π‘₯) 𝑦 (π‘₯, πœ†) 𝑦̃ (π‘₯, πœ†) 𝑑π‘₯
Vπœ‹ πœ‹
− ]
2
4
cos 2 [√πœ†πœ −
1/2
∫
a.e on the interval (0, 1) .
𝑏
× [𝑄 (𝜏) + ∫
∫
(52)
Consequently
π‘₯
∫
(51)
𝑦 (1) = 0,
𝑦󸀠 (0, πœ†) + 𝐻𝑦 (0, πœ†) = 0.
Vπœ‹ πœ‹
− ]
2
4
× cos 2 [√πœ†πœ −
0<π‘₯<1
subject to the boundary conditions
We are now going to show that 𝑄(π‘₯) = 0 a.e. on (0, 1/2]. From
(33), (43) we have
1/2
(48)
But this equation is a homogeneous Volterra integral equation and has only the zero solution. Thus we have obtained
π‘₯
Μƒ
Μƒ (π‘₯, 𝜏)
+∫ 𝐻
1
0<π‘₯< .
2
Μƒ
Μƒ (π‘₯, 𝜏) 𝑑π‘₯ = 0,
𝑄 (π‘₯) 𝐻
(47)
σΈ€ 
π‘¦π‘š(𝑛)
(𝑏)
π‘¦π‘š(𝑛) (𝑏)
=
σΈ€ 
π‘¦Μƒπ‘š(𝑛)
(𝑏)
(55)
π‘¦Μƒπ‘š(𝑛) (𝑏)
together with the initial condition at 0 it follows that,
𝐺 (πœŒπ‘š(𝑛) ) = 0,
𝑛 ∈ N.
(56)
Next, we will show that 𝐺(𝜌) = 0 on the whole 𝜌 plane.
The asymptotics (23) imply that the entire function 𝐺(𝜌) is
a function of exponential type ≤ 2𝑏.
Define the indicator of function 𝐺(𝜌) by
β„Ž (πœƒ) = lim sup
π‘Ÿ→∞
󡄨
󡄨
ln 󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨𝐺 (π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘–πœƒ )󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨
π‘Ÿ
.
(57)
Abstract and Applied Analysis
5
Since | Im √πœ†| = π‘Ÿ| sin πœƒ|, πœƒ = arg √πœ† from (23) it follows that
β„Ž (πœƒ) ≤ 2𝑏 |sin πœƒ| .
(58)
Let us denote by 𝑛(π‘Ÿ) the number of zeros of 𝐺(𝜌) in the
disk {|𝜌| ≤ π‘Ÿ}. According to [22] set of zeros of every entire
function of the exponential type, not identically zero, satisfies
the inequality
lim inf
π‘Ÿ→∞
𝑛 (π‘Ÿ)
1 2πœ‹
≤
∫ β„Ž (πœƒ) π‘‘πœƒ,
π‘Ÿ
2πœ‹ 0
(59)
We are going to show that inequality (59) fails and consequently, the entire function of exponential type 𝐺(𝜌)
vanishes on the whole 𝜌-plane. The πœŒπ‘› and 𝑠𝑛 have the same
asymptotics (7). Counting the number of πœŒπ‘› and 𝑠𝑛 located
inside the disc of radius π‘Ÿ, we have
(60)
From the assumption and the known asymptotic expression
(7) of the eigenvalues √πœ† 𝑛 we obtain
𝑛 (π‘Ÿ) ≥ 2
1=
∑
(πœ‹π‘›/𝜎)[1+𝑂(1/𝑛)]<π‘Ÿ
2
πœŽπ‘Ÿ (1 + π‘œ (1)) ,
πœ‹
1+
For the case 𝜎 > 2𝑏,
2πœ‹
1 2πœ‹
𝑛 (π‘Ÿ) 2
4𝑏
≥ 𝜎>
= 2𝑏 ∫ |sin πœƒ| π‘‘πœƒ ≥
∫ β„Ž (πœƒ) π‘‘πœƒ.
π‘Ÿ→∞ π‘Ÿ
πœ‹
πœ‹
2πœ‹ 0
0
(62)
π‘ž (π‘₯) = π‘žΜƒ (π‘₯)
a.e on the interval (0, 𝑏] .
(63)
This completes the proof of Lemma 2.
Proof of Theorem 3. From
𝑛 (π‘Ÿ) 2
lim
= (𝜎1 + 1) .
π‘Ÿ→∞ π‘Ÿ
πœ‹
(70)
Repeating the last part of the proof of Lemma 2, and
considering the condition 𝜎1 > 2𝑏 − 1, we can show that
𝐺(𝜌) = 0 identically on the whole 𝜌-plane which implies that
π‘ž (π‘₯) = π‘žΜƒ (π‘₯)
a.e on (0, 𝑏]
(71)
a.e on (0, 1) .
(72)
and consequently
π‘ž (π‘₯) = π‘žΜƒ (π‘₯)
Hence the proof of Theorem 3 is completed.
Acknowledgment
References
σΈ€ 
π‘¦π‘Ÿ(𝑛)
(𝑏)
π‘¦π‘Ÿ(𝑛) (𝑏)
=
σΈ€ 
π‘¦Μƒπ‘Ÿ(𝑛)
(𝑏)
π‘¦Μƒπ‘Ÿ(𝑛) (𝑏)
,
(64)
where {π‘Ÿ(𝑛)}𝑛∈N satisfies (14) and 𝜎2 > 2 − 2𝑏. Similar to the
proof of Lemma 2, we get
π‘ž (π‘₯) = π‘žΜƒ (π‘₯)
1
2
[π‘Ÿ (𝜎1 + 1) + 𝑂 ( )] ,
πœ‹
𝑛
The authors would like to thank the referees for valuable comments in improving the original paper.
Now we prove that Theorem 3 is valid.
Μƒ ,
πœ† π‘Ÿ(𝑛) = πœ†
π‘Ÿ(𝑛)
(69)
𝑛 (π‘Ÿ) = 2 +
lim
The inequalities (59) and (62) imply that 𝐺(𝜌) = 0 on the
whole 𝜌 plane.
Similar to the proof of Theorem 1, we have
2
1
π‘ŸπœŽ [1 + 𝑂 ( )] .
πœ‹ 1
𝑛
of 𝑠𝑛 ’s.
This means that
π‘Ÿ 󳨀→ ∞.
(61)
(68)
of πœŒπ‘› ’s and
where 𝑛(π‘Ÿ) is the number of zeros of 𝐺(𝜌) in the disk |𝜌| ≤ π‘Ÿ.
By (58),
1 2πœ‹
4𝑏
𝑏 2πœ‹
∫ β„Ž (πœƒ) π‘‘πœƒ ≤ ∫ |sin πœƒ| π‘‘πœƒ = .
2πœ‹ 0
πœ‹ 0
πœ‹
1
2
π‘Ÿ [1 + 𝑂 ( )]
πœ‹
𝑛
1+
a.e on [𝑏, 1) .
(65)
Thus, it needs to be proved that π‘ž(π‘₯) = π‘žΜƒ(π‘₯) a.e on (0, 𝑏].
The eigenfunctions 𝑦𝑛 (π‘₯, πœ† 𝑛 ) and 𝑦̃𝑛 (π‘₯, πœ† 𝑛 ) satisfy the same
boundary condition at 1. It means that
𝑦𝑛 (π‘₯, πœ† 𝑛 ) = πœ‰π‘› 𝑦̃𝑛 (π‘₯, πœ† 𝑛 )
(66)
on [𝑏, 1] for any 𝑛 ∈ N where πœ‰π‘› are constants.
Let πœŒπ‘› = √πœ† 𝑛 , 𝑠𝑛 = √πœ‡π‘› . From (54) and (66) we obtain
𝐺 (πœŒπ‘› ) = 0,
𝑛 ∈ N,
𝐺 (𝑠𝑙𝑛 ) = 0,
𝑛 ∈ N.
(67)
[1] G. Borg, “Eine Umkehrung der Sturm-Liouvilleschen Eigenwertaufgabe. Bestimmung der Differentialgleichung durch die
Eigenwerte,” Acta Mathematica, vol. 78, pp. 1–96, 1946.
[2] V. A. Ambarzumyan, “Über eine frage der eigenwerttheorie,”
Zeitschrift Für Physik, vol. 53, pp. 690–695, 1929.
[3] N. Levinson, “The inverse Sturm-Liouville problem,” Mathematica Tidsskrift B, vol. 1949, pp. 25–30, 1949.
[4] B. M. Levitan, “On the determination of the Sturm-Liouville
operator from one and two spectra,” Mathematics of the USSRIzvestiya, vol. 12, pp. 179–193, 1978.
[5] H. Hochstadt, “The inverse Sturm-Liouville problem,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 26, pp. 715–729,
1973.
[6] V. A. Marchenko, “Certain problems of the theory of one dimensional linear di¤erential operators of the second order,”
Trudy Moskovskogo Matematicheskogo Obshchestva, vol. 1, pp.
327–340, 1952.
[7] R. Carlson, “A Borg-Levinson theorem for Bessel operators,”
Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 1997.
6
[8] V. V. Stashevskaya, “On inverse problems of spectral analysis
for a certain class of differential equations,” Doklady Akademii
Nauk SSSR, vol. 93, pp. 409–412, 1953.
[9] S. Albeverio, R. Hryniv, and Ya. Mykytyuk, “Inverse spectral
problems for coupled oscillating systems: reconstruction from
three spectra,” Methods of Functional Analysis and Topology, vol.
13, no. 2, pp. 110–123, 2007.
[10] G. Freiling and V. Yurko, “Inverse problems for differential
operators with singular boundary conditions,” Mathematische
Nachrichten, vol. 278, no. 12-13, pp. 1561–1578, 2005.
[11] V. A. Yurko, “On the reconstruction of Sturm-Liouville differential operators with singularities inside the interval,” Matematicheskie Zametki, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 143–156, 1998, English
translation in Mathematical Notes, vol. 64, no.1, pp. 121–132,
1998.
[12] V. A. Yurko, “An inverse problem for differential equations with
a singularity,” Differentsial’nye Uravneniya, vol. 28, no. 8, pp.
1355–1362, 1992 (Russian), English translation in Differential
Equations, vol. 28, pp. 1100–1107, 1992.
[13] V. A. Yurko, “On higher-order differential operators with a
singular point,” Inverse Problems, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 495–502, 1993.
[14] F. Gesztesy and B. Simon, “Inverse spectral analysis with partial
information on the potential. II. The case of discrete spectrum,”
Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 352, no.
6, pp. 2765–2787, 2000.
[15] E. S. Panakhov and M. Sat, “On the determination of the
singular Sturm-Liouville operator from two spectra,” CMES.
Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 84, no. 1, pp.
1–11, 2012.
[16] K. Mochizuki and I. Trooshin, “Inverse problem for interior
spectral data of the Sturm-Liouville operator,” Journal of Inverse
and Ill-Posed Problems, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 425–433, 2001.
[17] C.-F. Yang and X.-P. Yang, “An interior inverse problem for
the Sturm-Liouville operator with discontinuous conditions,”
Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1315–1319, 2009.
[18] G. A. Watson, Treatise on the Theory of the Bessel Functions,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1962.
[19] H. Koyunbakan, “Inverse spectral problem for some singular
differential operators,” Tamsui Oxford Journal of Mathematical
Sciences, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 277–283, 2009.
[20] W. Rundell and P. E. Sacks, “Reconstruction of a radially
symmetric potential from two spectral sequences,” Journal of
Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 264, no. 2, pp. 354–
381, 2001.
[21] V. Ya. Volk, “On inversion formulas for a differential equation
with a singularity at π‘₯ = 0,” Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk,
vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 141–151, 1953.
[22] B. Ja. Levin, Distribution of Zeros of Entire Functions, vol. 5,
American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA, 1964.
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Advances in
Operations Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Advances in
Decision Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems
in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Journal of
Algebra
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Probability and Statistics
Volume 2014
The Scientific
World Journal
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
International Journal of
Differential Equations
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Submit your manuscripts at
http://www.hindawi.com
International Journal of
Advances in
Combinatorics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Mathematical Physics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Journal of
Complex Analysis
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
International
Journal of
Mathematics and
Mathematical
Sciences
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Stochastic Analysis
Abstract and
Applied Analysis
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
International Journal of
Mathematics
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Discrete Dynamics in
Nature and Society
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Journal of
Journal of
Discrete Mathematics
Journal of
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Applied Mathematics
Journal of
Function Spaces
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Optimization
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Download