Hindawi Publishing Corporation Abstract and Applied Analysis Volume 2013, Article ID 713654, 6 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/713654 Research Article A Uniqueness Theorem for Bessel Operator from Interior Spectral Data Murat Sat1 and Etibar S. Panakhov2 1 2 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Art, Erzincan University, 24100 Erzincan, Turkey Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Firat University, 23119 Elazig, Turkey Correspondence should be addressed to Murat Sat; msat@erzincan.edu.tr Received 24 February 2013; Accepted 12 April 2013 Academic Editor: Rodrigo Lopez Pouso Copyright © 2013 M. Sat and E. S. Panakhov. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Inverse problem for the Bessel operator is studied. A set of values of eigenfunctions at some internal point and parts of two spectra are taken as data. Uniqueness theorems are obtained. The approach that was used in investigation of problems with partially known potential is employed. 1. Introduction Inverse spectral analysis involves the problem of restoring a linear operator from some of its spectral parameters. Currently, inverse problems are being studied for certain special classes of ordinary differential operators. The simplest of these is the Sturm-Liouville operator πΏπ¦ = −π¦σΈ σΈ + π(π₯)π¦. For the case where it is considered on the whole line or half line, the Sturm-Liouville operator together with the function π(π₯) has been called a potential. In this direction, Borg [1] gave important results. He showed that, in general, one spectrum does not determine a Sturm-Liouville operator, so the result of Ambarzumyan [2] is an exception to the general rule. In the same paper, Borg showed that two spectra of a SturmLiouville operator determine it uniquely. Later, Levinson [3], Levitan [4], and Hochstadt [5] showed that when the boundary condition and one possible reduced spectrum are given, then the potential is uniquely determined. Using spectral data, that is, the spectral function, spectrum, and norming constant, different methods have been proposed for obtaining the potential function in a Sturm-Liouville problem. Such problems were subsequently investigated by other authors [4–6]. On the other hand, inverse problems for regular and singular Sturm-Liouville operators have been extensively studied by [7–15]. The inverse problem for interior spectral data of the differential operator consists in reconstruction of this operator from the known eigenvalues and some information on eigenfunctions at some internal point. Similar problems for the Sturm-Liouville operator and discontinuous SturmLiouville problem were formulated and studied in [16, 17]. The main goal of the present work is to study the inverse problem of reconstructing the singular Sturm-Liouville operator on the basis of spectral data of a kind: one spectrum and some information on eigenfunctions at the internal point. Consider the following singular Sturm-Liouville operator πΏ satisfying (1)–(3): πΏπ¦ = −π¦σΈ σΈ + [ β (β + 1) + π (π₯)] π¦ = ππ¦, π₯2 0<π₯<1 (1) with boundary conditions, π¦ (0) = 0, (2) π¦σΈ (1, π) + π»π¦ (1, π) = 0, (3) where π(π₯) is a real-valued function and π ∈ πΏ 2 (0, 1), π spectral parameter, β ∈ N0 , π» ∈ R. The operator πΏ is self adjoint on the πΏ 2 (0, 1) and has a discrete spectrum {π π }. 2 Abstract and Applied Analysis Let us introduce the second singular Sturm-Liouville opΜ satisfying erator πΏ Μ = −π¦σΈ σΈ + [ β (β + 1) + πΜ (π₯)] π¦ = ππ¦, πΏπ¦ π₯2 0 < π₯ < 1, (4) subject to the same boundary conditions (2), (3), where πΜ(π₯) Μ is is a real-valued function and πΜ ∈ πΏ 2 (0, 1). The operator πΏ Μ self adjoint on the πΏ 2 (0, 1) and has a discrete spectrum {π π }. 2. Main Results Before giving some results concerning the Bessel equation, we should give its physical properties. The total energy of the particle is given by πΈ = π2 /2π = β2 π2 /2π = π2 , where π is its initial or final momentum, and π the corresponding wave number, β planck constant, π particle’s mass, and πΈ energy. The reduced radial SchroΜdinger equation for the partial wave of angular momentum β then reads [18] β (β + 1) π2 Ψ (π, π) + (π2 − ) Ψ1 (π, π) = π (π) Ψ1 (π, π) . ππ2 1 π2 (5) When π = 0, the above equation reduces to the classical Bessel equation in the form π2 β (β + 1) Ψ (π, π) + (π2 − ) Ψ1 (π, π) = 0. ππ2 1 π2 (6) This equation has the solution π½β (π), called the Bessel function. Eigenvalues of the problem (1)–(3) are the roots of (3). This spectral characteristic satisfies the following asymptotic expression [19, 20]: 1 β 2 π π = (π + ) π2 + ∫ π (π₯) ππ₯ − π (π + 1) + ππ , 2 0 (7) 2 where the series ∑∞ π=1 ππ < ∞. Next, we present the main results in this paper. When π = 1/2, we get the following uniqueness Theorem 1. Theorem 1. If for every π ∈ N one has Μ , ππ = π π Lemma 2. Let {π(π)}π∈N be a sequence of natural numbers satisfying (10) and π ∈ (0, 1/2) are so chosen that π > 2π. If for any π ∈ N π¦πσΈ (1/2) π¦ΜπσΈ (1/2) = π¦π (1/2) π¦Μπ (1/2) (8) π π(π) π.π ππ π‘βπ πππ‘ππVππ (0, 1) . 0 < π ≤ 1, ππ σ³¨→ 0. = π¦Μπ(π) (π) π (π₯) = πΜ (π₯) π.π ππ (0, π] . (9) (10) (11) (12) Let {π(π)}π∈N and {π(π)}π∈N be a sequence of natural numbers such that π (1 + π1,π ) , 0 < π1 ≤ 1, π1,π σ³¨→ 0, π (π) = (13) π1 π (π) = π (1 + π2,π ) , π2 0 < π2 ≤ 1, π2,π σ³¨→ 0 (14) and let ππ be the eigenvalues of (1), (2), and (15) and πΜπ be the eigenvalues of (4), (2), and (15) π¦σΈ (1, π) + π»1 π¦ (1, π) = 0, π» =ΜΈ π»1 . (15) Using Mochizuki and Trooshin’s method from Lemma 2 and Theorem 1, we will prove that the following Theorem 3 holds. Theorem 3. Let {π(π)}π∈N and {π(π)}π∈N be a sequence of natural numbers satisfying (13) and (14), and 1/2 < π < 1 are so chosen that π1 > 2π − 1, π2 > 2 − 2π. If for any π ∈ N one has Μ , ππ = π π ππ(π) = πΜπ(π) , σΈ π¦π(π) (π) π¦π(π) (π) = σΈ π¦Μπ(π) (π) π¦Μπ(π) (π) (16) then π (π₯) = πΜ (π₯) π.π ππ (0, 1) . (17) 3. Proof of the Main Results In this section, we present the proofs of main results in this paper. Proof of Theorem 1. Before proving Theorem 1, we will mention some results, which will be needed later. We get the initial value problems −π¦σΈ σΈ + [ β (β + 1) + π (π₯)] π¦ = ππ¦, π₯2 0 < π₯ < 1, π¦ (0) = 0, In the case π =ΜΈ 1/2, the uniqueness of π(π₯) can be proved if we require the knowledge of a part of the second spectrum. Let {π(π)}π∈N be a sequence of natural numbers with a property π π (π) = (1 + ππ ) , π π¦π(π) (π) σΈ π¦Μπ(π) (π) then then π (π₯) = πΜ (π₯) σΈ π¦π(π) (π) Μ =π π(π) , −π¦ΜσΈ σΈ + [ β (β + 1) Μ + πΜ (π₯)] π¦Μ = ππ¦, π₯2 (18) (19) 0 < π₯ < 1, π¦Μ (0) = 0. (20) (21) As known from [18], Bessel’s functions of the first kind of order V = β − 1/2 are ∞ (−1)π π₯V+2π V+2π π!Γ (V + π + 1) π=0 2 π½V (π₯) = ∑ (22) Abstract and Applied Analysis 3 Μ π) and (20) by π¦(π₯, π), subtractMultiplying (18) by π¦(π₯, ing and integrating from 0 to 1/2, we obtain and asymptotic formulas for large argument π½V (π₯) = √ 2 Vπ π 1 {cos [π₯ − − ] + π ( )} , ππ₯ 2 4 π₯ π½VσΈ (π₯) = −√ 2 Vπ π 1 {sin [π₯ − − ] + π ( )} . ππ₯ 2 4 π₯ 1/2 (23) π₯ √π‘ √π₯ √ √ V π½V ( ππ₯) + ∫ π» (π₯, π‘) V π½V ( ππ‘) ππ‘, 0 (√π) (√π) (24) π₯ √π‘ √π₯ Μ √ √ π¦Μ (π₯, π) = V π½V ( ππ₯) + ∫ π» (π₯, π‘) V π½V ( ππ‘) ππ‘, 0 (√π) (√π) (25) Μ π‘)) is the solution respectively, where the kernel π»(π₯, π‘) (π»(π₯, of the equation π2 π» (π₯, π‘) β (β + 1) + π» (π₯, π‘) ππ₯2 π₯2 (26) [π½VσΈ (π‘, π) = π (π‘V−1/2 )] . (27) 1 π = (π₯ − π‘)2 , 4 −V+1/2 π» (π₯, π‘) = (π − π) (28) π (π, π) , (32) πΎ (π) = ∫ 1/2 0 π (π₯) π¦ (π₯, π) π¦Μ (π₯, π) ππ₯. (33) Μ π) are considered, the If the properties of π¦(π₯, π) and π¦(π₯, function πΎ(π) is an entire function. Therefore the condition of Theorem 1 implies 1 1 1 1 π¦Μ ( , π π ) π¦σΈ ( , π π ) − π¦ ( , π π ) π¦ΜσΈ ( , π π ) = 0 2 2 2 2 (34) πΎ (π π ) = 0, π ∈ N. (35) 1 , πV (36) where π is constant. Introduce the function (37) π2 π ππ ππ 1 1 − + ππππ 4 (π − π) ππ 4 (π − π) ππ Ψ (π) = π (√π + √π) π, (29) π (π, π) = 0, ππ πΌ 1 + π = π (√π) πV−1 , ππ π 4 π (π) = √π sin (√π − Vπ π − ) + π (1) . 2 4 (38) The zeros of π(π) are the eigenvalues of πΏ and hence it has only simple zeros π π because of the seperated boundary conditions. From (38), π(π) is an entire function of order 1/2 of π. Since the set of zeros of the entire function π(π) is contained in the set of zeros of πΎ(π), we see that the function we obtain the following problem: 4√ππ π (π₯) = π (π₯) − πΜ (π₯) , Let By using the asymptotic forms of π¦ and π¦σΈ , we obtain 1 π = (π₯ + π‘)2 , 4 = (31) π (π) = π¦σΈ (1, π) + π»π¦ (1, π) . After the transformations 1 π¦Μ (0, π) π¦σΈ (0, π) − π¦ (0, π) π¦ΜσΈ (0, π) = 0. |πΎ (π)| ≤ π ππ» (π₯, π₯) = π (π₯) , ππ₯ lim π» (π₯, π‘) π‘V−1/2 = 0, Μ π) satisfy the same initial The functions π¦(π₯, π) and π¦(π₯, conditions (19) and (21), that is, In addition, using (24) and (33) for 0 < π₯ < 1, subject to the boundary conditions π‘→0 (30) and hence π2 π» (π₯, π‘) β (β + 1) = +( + π (π‘)) π» (π₯, π‘) 2 ππ‘ π‘2 2 0 σ΅¨1/2 Μ π)π¦σΈ (π₯, π) − π¦(π₯, π)π¦ΜσΈ (π₯, π)]σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨0 . = [π¦(π₯, It can be shown [19] that there exists a kernel Μ π‘)) continuous in the triangle 0 ≤ π‘ ≤ π₯ ≤ 1 π»(π₯, π‘)(π»(π₯, such that by using the transformation operator every solution of (18), (19) and (20), (21) can be expressed in the form [8, 21], π¦ (π₯, π) = (π (π₯) − πΜ (π₯)) π¦ (π₯, π) π¦Μ (π₯, π) ππ₯ ∫ 1 πΌ = −V + . 2 This problem can be solved by using the Riemann method [21]. πΎ (π) π (π) (39) is an entire function on the parameter π. From (36), (38), and (39), we get |Ψ (π)| = π ( 1 ). πV+1/2 (40) So, for all π, from the Liouville theorem, Ψ (π) = 0, (41) 4 Abstract and Applied Analysis or πΎ (π) = 0. (42) It was proved in [19] that there exists absolutely continuΜ Μ π) such that we have ous function π»(π₯, 1 Vπ π π¦ (π₯, π) π¦Μ (π₯, π) = {1 + cos 2 [√ππ₯ − − ] 2 2 4 Thus from the completeness of the functions cos, it follows that 1/2 Q (π) + ∫ π × cos 2 [√ππ − Vπ π − ] ππ} , 2 4 (43) where −π₯+2π +∫ Μ (π₯, π − 2π) ππ π» (π₯, π ) π» π₯−2π −π₯ (49) πΜ (π₯) = π (π₯) (50) almost everywhere on (0, 1/2]. Therefore Theorem 1 is proved. Theorem 4. To prove that π(π₯) = 0 on [1/2, 1) almost everywhere, we should repeat the above arguments for the supplementary problem Μ Μ (π₯, π‘) = 2 [π» (π₯, π₯ − 2π) + π» Μ (π₯, π₯ − 2π)] π» π₯ π (π₯) = π (π₯) − πΜ (π₯) = 0, or 0 + 2 [∫ (44) Μ (π₯, π + 2π) ππ ] . π» (π₯, π ) π» πΏπ¦ = −π¦σΈ σΈ + [ β (β + 1) + π (1 − π₯)] π¦, (1 − π₯)2 1 ∫ 2 0 π (π₯) {1 + cos 2 [√ππ₯ − Μ (π₯, π) Μ +∫ π» π (π₯) = πΜ (π₯) 0 Vπ π − ] ππ} ππ₯ = 0. 2 4 (45) This can be written as 1/2 0 π (π₯) ππ₯ + ∫ 1/2 0 0 σ΅¨ = [π¦Μ (π₯, π) π¦ (π₯, π) − π¦ (π₯, π) π¦Μ (π₯, π)]σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨π₯=π , σΈ π (π₯) Let π → ∞ along the real axis, by the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma, one should have 1/2 0 × [π (π) + ∫ π (π₯) ππ₯ = 0, Vπ π − ] 2 4 cos 2 [√ππ − 1/2 π Μ Μ (π₯, π) ππ₯] ππ = 0. π (π₯) π» (54) σΈ where π = √π = ππππ and π(π₯) = π(π₯) − πΜ(π₯). From the assumption (46) 0 Proof of Lemma 2. As in the proof of Theorem 1 we can show that 0 Μ Μ (π₯, π) ππ₯] ππ = 0. ×π» 1/2 (53) Next, we show that Lemma 2 holds. πΊ (π) = ∫ π (π₯) π¦ (π₯, π) π¦Μ (π₯, π) ππ₯ Vπ π − ] 2 4 cos 2 [√ππ − 1/2 ∫ a.e on the interval (0, 1) . π × [π (π) + ∫ ∫ (52) Consequently π₯ ∫ (51) π¦ (1) = 0, π¦σΈ (0, π) + π»π¦ (0, π) = 0. Vπ π − ] 2 4 × cos 2 [√ππ − 0<π₯<1 subject to the boundary conditions We are now going to show that π(π₯) = 0 a.e. on (0, 1/2]. From (33), (43) we have 1/2 (48) But this equation is a homogeneous Volterra integral equation and has only the zero solution. Thus we have obtained π₯ Μ Μ (π₯, π) +∫ π» 1 0<π₯< . 2 Μ Μ (π₯, π) ππ₯ = 0, π (π₯) π» (47) σΈ π¦π(π) (π) π¦π(π) (π) = σΈ π¦Μπ(π) (π) (55) π¦Μπ(π) (π) together with the initial condition at 0 it follows that, πΊ (ππ(π) ) = 0, π ∈ N. (56) Next, we will show that πΊ(π) = 0 on the whole π plane. The asymptotics (23) imply that the entire function πΊ(π) is a function of exponential type ≤ 2π. Define the indicator of function πΊ(π) by β (π) = lim sup π→∞ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ ln σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΊ (ππππ )σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ π . (57) Abstract and Applied Analysis 5 Since | Im √π| = π| sin π|, π = arg √π from (23) it follows that β (π) ≤ 2π |sin π| . (58) Let us denote by π(π) the number of zeros of πΊ(π) in the disk {|π| ≤ π}. According to [22] set of zeros of every entire function of the exponential type, not identically zero, satisfies the inequality lim inf π→∞ π (π) 1 2π ≤ ∫ β (π) ππ, π 2π 0 (59) We are going to show that inequality (59) fails and consequently, the entire function of exponential type πΊ(π) vanishes on the whole π-plane. The ππ and π π have the same asymptotics (7). Counting the number of ππ and π π located inside the disc of radius π, we have (60) From the assumption and the known asymptotic expression (7) of the eigenvalues √π π we obtain π (π) ≥ 2 1= ∑ (ππ/π)[1+π(1/π)]<π 2 ππ (1 + π (1)) , π 1+ For the case π > 2π, 2π 1 2π π (π) 2 4π ≥ π> = 2π ∫ |sin π| ππ ≥ ∫ β (π) ππ. π→∞ π π π 2π 0 0 (62) π (π₯) = πΜ (π₯) a.e on the interval (0, π] . (63) This completes the proof of Lemma 2. Proof of Theorem 3. From π (π) 2 lim = (π1 + 1) . π→∞ π π (70) Repeating the last part of the proof of Lemma 2, and considering the condition π1 > 2π − 1, we can show that πΊ(π) = 0 identically on the whole π-plane which implies that π (π₯) = πΜ (π₯) a.e on (0, π] (71) a.e on (0, 1) . (72) and consequently π (π₯) = πΜ (π₯) Hence the proof of Theorem 3 is completed. Acknowledgment References σΈ π¦π(π) (π) π¦π(π) (π) = σΈ π¦Μπ(π) (π) π¦Μπ(π) (π) , (64) where {π(π)}π∈N satisfies (14) and π2 > 2 − 2π. Similar to the proof of Lemma 2, we get π (π₯) = πΜ (π₯) 1 2 [π (π1 + 1) + π ( )] , π π The authors would like to thank the referees for valuable comments in improving the original paper. Now we prove that Theorem 3 is valid. Μ , π π(π) = π π(π) (69) π (π) = 2 + lim The inequalities (59) and (62) imply that πΊ(π) = 0 on the whole π plane. Similar to the proof of Theorem 1, we have 2 1 ππ [1 + π ( )] . π 1 π of π π ’s. This means that π σ³¨→ ∞. (61) (68) of ππ ’s and where π(π) is the number of zeros of πΊ(π) in the disk |π| ≤ π. By (58), 1 2π 4π π 2π ∫ β (π) ππ ≤ ∫ |sin π| ππ = . 2π 0 π 0 π 1 2 π [1 + π ( )] π π 1+ a.e on [π, 1) . (65) Thus, it needs to be proved that π(π₯) = πΜ(π₯) a.e on (0, π]. The eigenfunctions π¦π (π₯, π π ) and π¦Μπ (π₯, π π ) satisfy the same boundary condition at 1. It means that π¦π (π₯, π π ) = ππ π¦Μπ (π₯, π π ) (66) on [π, 1] for any π ∈ N where ππ are constants. Let ππ = √π π , π π = √ππ . From (54) and (66) we obtain πΊ (ππ ) = 0, π ∈ N, πΊ (π ππ ) = 0, π ∈ N. (67) [1] G. Borg, “Eine Umkehrung der Sturm-Liouvilleschen Eigenwertaufgabe. Bestimmung der Differentialgleichung durch die Eigenwerte,” Acta Mathematica, vol. 78, pp. 1–96, 1946. [2] V. A. Ambarzumyan, “UΜber eine frage der eigenwerttheorie,” Zeitschrift FuΜr Physik, vol. 53, pp. 690–695, 1929. [3] N. Levinson, “The inverse Sturm-Liouville problem,” Mathematica Tidsskrift B, vol. 1949, pp. 25–30, 1949. [4] B. M. Levitan, “On the determination of the Sturm-Liouville operator from one and two spectra,” Mathematics of the USSRIzvestiya, vol. 12, pp. 179–193, 1978. [5] H. Hochstadt, “The inverse Sturm-Liouville problem,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 26, pp. 715–729, 1973. [6] V. A. Marchenko, “Certain problems of the theory of one dimensional linear di¤erential operators of the second order,” Trudy Moskovskogo Matematicheskogo Obshchestva, vol. 1, pp. 327–340, 1952. [7] R. Carlson, “A Borg-Levinson theorem for Bessel operators,” Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 1997. 6 [8] V. V. Stashevskaya, “On inverse problems of spectral analysis for a certain class of differential equations,” Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, vol. 93, pp. 409–412, 1953. [9] S. Albeverio, R. Hryniv, and Ya. Mykytyuk, “Inverse spectral problems for coupled oscillating systems: reconstruction from three spectra,” Methods of Functional Analysis and Topology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 110–123, 2007. [10] G. Freiling and V. Yurko, “Inverse problems for differential operators with singular boundary conditions,” Mathematische Nachrichten, vol. 278, no. 12-13, pp. 1561–1578, 2005. [11] V. A. Yurko, “On the reconstruction of Sturm-Liouville differential operators with singularities inside the interval,” Matematicheskie Zametki, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 143–156, 1998, English translation in Mathematical Notes, vol. 64, no.1, pp. 121–132, 1998. [12] V. A. Yurko, “An inverse problem for differential equations with a singularity,” Differentsial’nye Uravneniya, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1355–1362, 1992 (Russian), English translation in Differential Equations, vol. 28, pp. 1100–1107, 1992. [13] V. A. Yurko, “On higher-order differential operators with a singular point,” Inverse Problems, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 495–502, 1993. [14] F. Gesztesy and B. Simon, “Inverse spectral analysis with partial information on the potential. II. The case of discrete spectrum,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 352, no. 6, pp. 2765–2787, 2000. [15] E. S. Panakhov and M. Sat, “On the determination of the singular Sturm-Liouville operator from two spectra,” CMES. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2012. [16] K. Mochizuki and I. Trooshin, “Inverse problem for interior spectral data of the Sturm-Liouville operator,” Journal of Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 425–433, 2001. [17] C.-F. Yang and X.-P. Yang, “An interior inverse problem for the Sturm-Liouville operator with discontinuous conditions,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1315–1319, 2009. [18] G. A. Watson, Treatise on the Theory of the Bessel Functions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1962. [19] H. Koyunbakan, “Inverse spectral problem for some singular differential operators,” Tamsui Oxford Journal of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 277–283, 2009. [20] W. Rundell and P. E. Sacks, “Reconstruction of a radially symmetric potential from two spectral sequences,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 264, no. 2, pp. 354– 381, 2001. [21] V. Ya. Volk, “On inversion formulas for a differential equation with a singularity at π₯ = 0,” Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 141–151, 1953. [22] B. Ja. Levin, Distribution of Zeros of Entire Functions, vol. 5, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA, 1964. Abstract and Applied Analysis Advances in Operations Research Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Advances in Decision Sciences Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Mathematical Problems in Engineering Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Journal of Algebra Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Probability and Statistics Volume 2014 The Scientific World Journal Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 International Journal of Differential Equations Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Volume 2014 Submit your manuscripts at http://www.hindawi.com International Journal of Advances in Combinatorics Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Mathematical Physics Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Journal of Complex Analysis Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences Journal of Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Stochastic Analysis Abstract and Applied Analysis Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com International Journal of Mathematics Volume 2014 Volume 2014 Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Volume 2014 Volume 2014 Journal of Journal of Discrete Mathematics Journal of Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Applied Mathematics Journal of Function Spaces Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Optimization Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014