Research Article Saddle-Node Heteroclinic Orbit and Exact Nontraveling Da-Quan Xian

advertisement
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2013, Article ID 696074, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/696074
Research Article
Saddle-Node Heteroclinic Orbit and Exact Nontraveling
Wave Solutions for (2+1)D KdV-Burgers Equation
Da-Quan Xian
School of Sciences, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
Correspondence should be addressed to Da-Quan Xian; daquanxian@163.com
Received 21 September 2012; Accepted 8 December 2012
Academic Editor: de Dai
Copyright © 2013 Da-Quan Xian. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
We have undertaken the fact that the periodic solution of (2+1)D KdV-Burgers equation does not exist. The Saddle-node heteroclinic
orbit has been obtained. Using the Lie group method, we get two-(1+1)-dimensional PDE, through symmetric reduction; and by the
direct integral method, spread F-expansion method, and (𝐺󸀠 /𝐺)-expansion method, we obtain exact nontraveling wave solutions,
for the (2+1)D KdV Burgers equation, and find out some new strange phenomenons of sympathetic vibration to evolution of
nontraveling wave.
1. Introduction
We consider the (2+1)-dimensional Korteweg-de Vries Burgers ((2+1)D KdV Burgers) equation
(𝑒𝑑 + 𝑒𝑒π‘₯ − 𝛽𝑒π‘₯π‘₯ + 𝛼𝑒π‘₯π‘₯π‘₯ )π‘₯ + 𝛾𝑒𝑦𝑦 = 0,
(1)
where 𝑒 : 𝑅π‘₯ × π‘…π‘¦ × π‘…π‘‘+ → 𝑅, 𝛼, 𝛽, and 𝛾 are real parameters.
Equation (1) is model equation for wide class of nonlinear
wave models in an elastic tube, liquid with small bubbles,
and turbulence [1–3]. Much attention has been put on the
study of their exact solutions by some methods [4], such
as, a complex line soliton by extended tanh method with
symbolic computation [5], exact traveling wave solutions
including solitary wave solutions, periodic wave and shock
wave solutions by extended mapping method, and homotopy
perturbation method [6, 7].
It is well known that the investigation of exact solutions
of nonlinear evolution equations plays an important role in
the study of nonlinear physical phenomena. Many effective
methods have been presented [7–22], such as functional
variable separation method [8, 9], homotopy perturbation
method [12], F-expansion method [7, 13], Lie group method
[14, 15], variational iteration method [16], homoclinic test
method [17–19], Exp-function method [20, 21], and homogeneous balance method [22]. Practically, there is no unified
method that can be used to handle all types of nonlinearity.
In this paper, we will discuss the existence of periodic
traveling wave solution and seek the Saddle-Node heteroclinic orbit, and further use the Lie group method with the
aid of the symbolic computation system Maple to construct
the non-traveling wave solutions for (1).
2. Existence of Periodic Traveling
Wave Solution of (1)
Introducing traveling wave transformation in this form
𝑒 (π‘₯, 𝑦, 𝑑) = 𝑒 (πœ‰) , πœ‰ = 𝑝π‘₯ + π‘žπ‘¦ − 𝑐𝑑
(2)
permits us to convert (1) into an ODE for 𝑒 = 𝑒(πœ‰)
𝑝(π‘π‘’π‘’πœ‰ − 𝛽𝑝2 π‘’πœ‰πœ‰ + 𝛼𝑝3 π‘’πœ‰πœ‰πœ‰ )πœ‰ − π‘Ÿπ‘’πœ‰πœ‰ = 0,
(3)
where π‘Ÿ = 𝑝𝑐−π‘ž2 𝛾, Integrating (3) with respect to πœ‰ twice and
taking integration constant to 𝐴 yields
2𝛼𝑝4 π‘’πœ‰πœ‰ − 2𝛽𝑝3 π‘’πœ‰ + 𝑝2 𝑒2 − 2π‘Ÿπ‘’ = 𝐴.
(4)
Letting π‘’πœ‰ = 𝑣, thus nonlinear ordinary differential equation
(4) is equivalent to the autonomous dynamic system as follows:
𝑑𝑒
= 𝑣,
(5)
π‘‘πœ‰
𝑑𝑣
1
(2𝛽𝑝3 𝑣 − 𝑝2 𝑒2 + 2π‘Ÿπ‘’ + 𝐴) .
=
(6)
π‘‘πœ‰ 2𝛼𝑝4
2
Abstract and Applied Analysis
The dynamic system (5) has two balance points:
𝑃1 (𝑒1 , 𝑣1 ) = (
π‘Ÿ + √π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴
𝑝2
Consequently, the system expressed in (12) is not a conservative one, then periodic traveling wave solution of (1) does not
exist.
We conclude the above analysis in the following theorem.
, 0) ,
(7)
𝑃2 (𝑒2 , 𝑣2 ) = (
π‘Ÿ−
√π‘Ÿ2
+
𝑝2 𝐴
𝑝2
, 0) .
The Jacobi matrixes at the balance points for the right-hand
side of (5) are obtained as follows, respectively:
0
1
),
𝐽1 = ( √π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴
𝛽
−
𝑝4 𝛼
𝑝𝛼
0
𝑝4 𝛼
𝛽
𝑝𝛼
3. Saddle-Node Heteroclinic Orbits of
KdV-Burgers Equation
First, we assume the solutions of (4) in the form
(8)
1
𝐽2 = ( √π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴
Theorem 1. Under the traveling wave transformation, the
periodic solution of (2+1)-dimensional KdV-Burgers equation
does not exist.
But, saddle-node heteroclinic orbits and nontraveling periodic solution do exist, which will be discussed later in this paper.
).
𝑒 (πœ‰) =
π‘Ÿ + √π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴
𝑝2
+
𝑏
2
(1 + π‘’π‘Žπœ‰ )
.
(14)
Substituting (14) into (4) yields
2 (4𝛼𝑝4 π‘Ž2 + √π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴 + 2𝛽𝑝3 π‘Ž) 𝑒2π‘Žπœ‰
Their latent equations are expressed, respectively, as,
𝑝3 πœ† (π‘π›Όπœ† − 𝛽) + √π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴 = 0,
− 4 (𝛼𝑝4 π‘Ž2 − √π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴 − 𝛽𝑝3 π‘Ž) π‘’π‘Žπœ‰
(9)
𝑝3 πœ† (π‘π›Όπœ† − 𝛽) − √π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴 = 0.
(15)
+ 2√π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴 + 𝑝2 𝑏 = 0.
Relevant latent roots are as follows respectively:
Then we get
πœ†1 =
πœ†2 =
𝑝𝛽 ±
√ 𝑝2 𝛽2
−
4𝛼√π‘Ÿ2
+
𝑝2 𝐴
2𝑝2 𝛼
4𝛼𝑝4 π‘Ž2 + √π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴 + 2𝛽𝑝3 π‘Ž = 0,
,
(10)
𝑝𝛽 ± √ 𝑝2 𝛽2 + 4𝛼√π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴
2𝑝2 𝛼
.
𝑝2 𝛽2 < 4𝛼√π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴, then πœ† 1 are conjugate complex roots
and real part is positive, so 𝑃1 is a nonsteady focus point. And
πœ† 2 is a positive and minus real root, thus 𝑃2 is a saddle point.
From (5), we know the phase trajectory on the phase plane
satisfies
Solving the system (16) gets
π‘Ž=−
𝛽
,
5𝛼𝑝
12𝛽2
,
25𝛼
√π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴 =
6𝑝2 𝛽2
.
25𝛼
(17)
Substituting (17) into (14) obtains
(11)
𝑒 (πœ‰) =
π‘Ÿ + √π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴
Integrating (11), we can obtain
1
𝐻 (𝑒, 𝑣) = 𝐴𝑒 + π‘Ÿπ‘’2 − 𝑝2 𝑒3 + 2𝛽𝑝3 𝑒𝑣 − 𝛼𝑝4 𝑣2 ,
3
(12)
where 𝐻(𝑒, 𝑣) is a total energy or Hamiliton function of system (4). Apparently
πœ•π»
,
πœ•π‘£
𝑏=−
2 2
𝑑𝑣 2𝛽𝑝 𝑣 − 𝑝 𝑒 + 2π‘Ÿπ‘’ + 𝐴
=
.
𝑑𝑒
2𝛼𝑝4 𝑣
π‘’πœ‰ =ΜΈ −
(16)
2√π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴 + 𝑝2 𝑏 = 0.
Obviously, if 𝑝2 𝛽2 > 4𝛼√π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴, then πœ† 1 are two positive
real roots, therefore 𝑃1 is a nonsteady node point. If 0 <
3
𝛼𝑝4 π‘Ž2 − √π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴 − 𝛽𝑝3 π‘Ž = 0,
π‘£πœ‰ =ΜΈ
πœ•π»
.
πœ•π‘’
(13)
= 𝑒1 −
𝑝2
2
−
12𝛽2
1
25𝛼 (1 + 𝑒−(𝛽/5𝛼𝑝)πœ‰ )2
(18)
2
3𝛽
𝛽
(1 + tanh
πœ‰) .
25𝛼
20𝛼
Evidently, πœ‰ → −∞ ⇒ 𝑒(πœ‰) → 𝑒1 , πœ‰ → +∞ ⇒ 𝑒(πœ‰) →
𝑒1 − (6𝛽2 /25𝛼) = 𝑒2 . Thus (18) is a saddle-node heteroclinic
orbit through nonsteady node point 𝑃1 and saddle point 𝑃2
[23].
Abstract and Applied Analysis
3
Ecumenic, taking the Hamiliton function 𝐻(𝑒, 𝑣) = 𝐡, we
obtain
𝑑𝑒
=𝑣
π‘‘πœ‰
=
3𝑝𝛽𝑒 ± √3𝑒 [3𝐴𝛼 + 3 (𝑝2 𝛽2 + π‘Ÿπ›Ό) 𝑒 − 𝑝2 𝛼𝑒2 ] − 9𝐡𝛼
3𝛼𝑝2
,
(19)
−300
−200
−100
u
0
100
200
300
where 𝐡 is an arbitrary constant. Integrating (19) with respect
to πœ‰ we have
∫
2
𝑒(πœ‰)
3𝛼𝑝
3𝑝𝛽𝑠 ± √3𝑠 [3𝐴𝛼 +
3 (𝑝2 𝛽2
+ π‘Ÿπ›Ό) 𝑠 −
𝑝2 𝛼𝑠2 ]
− 9𝐡𝛼
−10
y
𝑑𝑠
= πœ‰ + πœ‰0 ,
(20)
where πœ‰0 is an arbitrary constant. We can see that (4) has
the general solution (20) and all partial cases as include
above result can be found from the general solution of (20).
Example, take 𝛼√π‘Ÿ2 + 𝑝2 𝐴 − 𝑝2 𝛽2 = 0, 3𝐡𝛼 + 𝐴𝛽2 = 0,
π‘Ÿπ›Ό + 𝑝2 𝛽2 = 0 in (20), we find a solution of (4) as follows:
2
3𝛽2
𝛽
[1 + tanh (
𝑒 (πœ‰) = −
πœ‰ + πœ‰0 )] .
4𝛼
4𝑝𝛼
−20
𝜎 = 𝜎 (π‘₯, 𝑦, 𝑑, 𝑒, 𝑒𝑑 , 𝑒π‘₯ , 𝑒𝑦 , . . .) .
(22)
be the Li symmetry of (1). From Lie group theory, 𝜎 satisfies
the following equation
6
8
t
10
12
14
Based on the integrability of reduced equation of symmetry
(26), we are to consider the following three cases.
Case 1. Taking π‘˜2 (𝑑) = 0 and 𝑐 = 0 in (26) yields
𝜎 = π‘˜1 (𝑑) 𝑒π‘₯ − π‘˜1σΈ€  (𝑑) .
π‘˜1σΈ€  (𝑑)
π‘₯ + 𝐹 (𝑦, 𝑑) ,
π‘˜1 (𝑑)
(27)
(23)
We take the function 𝜎 in the form
𝜎 = π‘Ž1 𝑒π‘₯ + π‘Ž2 𝑒𝑦 + π‘Ž3 𝑒𝑑 + π‘Ž4 𝑒 + π‘Ž5 ,
(24)
where π‘Žπ‘– = π‘Žπ‘– (π‘₯, 𝑦, 𝑑) : 𝑅π‘₯ × π‘…π‘¦ × π‘…π‘‘+ → 𝑅 (𝑖 = 1, . . . , 5)
are functions to be determined later. Substituting (3) into (2)
yields
1 σΈ€ 
π‘˜ (𝑑) 𝑦 + π‘˜1 (𝑑) ,
2𝛾 2
π‘Ž5 =
π‘Ž2 = π‘˜2 (𝑑) ,
1 σΈ€ σΈ€ 
π‘˜ (𝑑) 𝑦 − π‘˜1σΈ€  (𝑑) ,
2𝛾 2
(25)
where π‘˜π‘— (𝑑) (𝑗 = 1, 2) are arbitrary functions of 𝑑, 𝑐 is an
arbitrary constant. Substituting (25) into (24), we obtain the
Li symmetries of (1) as follows:
1 σΈ€ 
π‘˜ (𝑑) 𝑦 + π‘˜1 (𝑑)] 𝑒π‘₯ + π‘˜2 (𝑑) 𝑒𝑦
2𝛾 2
1
+ 𝑐𝑒𝑑 + π‘˜2σΈ€ σΈ€  (𝑑) 𝑦 − π‘˜1σΈ€  (𝑑) .
2𝛾
(26)
𝐹 (𝑦, 𝑑) : 𝑅𝑦 × π‘…π‘‘+ → 𝑅.
(28)
Substituting (28) into (1) yields the function 𝐹(𝑦, 𝑑) which
satisfies the following linear PDE:
π‘˜1σΈ€ σΈ€ 
πœ•2 𝐹
+ 𝛾 2 = 0.
π‘˜1
πœ•π‘¦
𝜎π‘₯𝑑 + 2𝑒π‘₯ 𝜎π‘₯ + π‘’πœŽπ‘₯π‘₯ + πœŽπ‘’π‘₯π‘₯ − π›½πœŽπ‘₯3 + π›ΌπœŽπ‘₯4 + π›ΎπœŽπ‘¦π‘¦ = 0.
𝜎 = [−
4
5. Symmetry Reduction and Solutions of (1)
𝑒=
This section devotes to Li symmetry of (1) [14, 15]. Let
π‘Ž4 = 0,
20 0
2
The solution of the differential equation 𝜎 = 0 is
4. Li Symmetry of (1)
π‘Ž3 = 𝑐,
10
Figure 1: The strange phenomenon which is a sympathetic vibration
of periodicity on the 𝑑-axis and paraboloid on 𝑦-axis for 𝑒1 (π‘₯, 𝑦, 𝑑)
as π‘₯ = 1.
(21)
It is a heteroclinic orbit too.
π‘Ž1 = −
0
(29)
By integrating both sides, we find out the following result:
𝐹 (𝑦, 𝑑) = −
π‘˜1σΈ€ σΈ€  2
𝑦 + π‘˜3 (𝑑) 𝑦 + π‘˜4 (𝑑) ,
2π›Ύπ‘˜1
(30)
where π‘˜3 (𝑑), π‘˜4 (𝑑) are new arbitrary functions of 𝑑. Substituting (30) into (28), we can get the solutions of (1) as follows:
𝑒1 (π‘₯, 𝑦, 𝑑) =
π‘˜1σΈ€  (𝑑)
π‘˜σΈ€ σΈ€ 
π‘₯ − 1 𝑦2 + π‘˜3 (𝑑) 𝑦 + π‘˜4 (𝑑) .
π‘˜1 (𝑑)
2π›Ύπ‘˜1
(31)
(1) Given π‘˜π‘– (𝑑) = cn(𝑑, 0.95) (𝑖 = 1, 3, 4), π‘₯ = 1, 𝛾 = 0.6 in
(31), the local structure of 𝑒1 is obtained (Figure 1). Where
cn(𝑑, 0.95) is an Jacobian elliptic cosine function.
(2) Given π‘˜1 (𝑑) = sech(𝑑), π‘˜3 (𝑑) = sin(𝑑), π‘˜4 (𝑑) = cn(𝑑,
0.1), 𝑦 = 1, 𝛾 = 0.6 in (31), the local structure of 𝑒1 is obtained
(Figure 2).
Case 2. Take π‘˜1 (𝑑) = 𝑑, π‘˜2 (𝑑) = 1 and 𝑐 = 0 in (26), then
𝜎 = 𝑑𝑒π‘₯ + 𝑒𝑦 − 1.
(32)
4
Abstract and Applied Analysis
−8
Solving the system of function equations with the aid of
Maple, we obtain
−6
−4
π‘Ž0 =
u −2
0
3𝛽2 − 25𝛼
,
25𝛼
π‘Ž1 =
6𝛽2 π‘ž
,
25𝑠𝛼
π‘Ž2 =
3𝛽2 π‘ž
.
25𝛼𝑝
(40)
2
−5
4
x 0
5
14
12
10
8
6
4
when π‘˜ = 𝛽/10𝑠𝛼, π‘π‘ž < 0, 𝐴 = (625𝛼2 − 36𝛽4 )/625𝛼2 , where
𝑠 = √−π‘π‘ž.
It is known that solutions of (38) are as follows [24]:
2
t
Figure 2: The periodic solution which is a periodic nontraveling
wave traveling on the 𝑑-axis for 𝑒1 (π‘₯, 𝑦, 𝑑) as 𝑦 = 1.
πœ‰ = π‘₯ − 𝑑𝑦.
(33)
Substituting (33) into (1) and integrating once with respect to
πœ‰ yield
𝐹𝑑 + πΉπΉπœ‰ + 𝛾𝑑2 πΉπœ‰ − π›½πΉπœ‰πœ‰ + π›ΌπΉπœ‰πœ‰πœ‰ = 0.
=
1
{3𝛽2 − 25𝛼 − 3π‘žπ›½2
25𝛼
(34)
× [ tanh (
(35)
(36)
2
𝑀 = 𝑝 + π‘žπ‘€ .
𝑒3 (π‘₯, 𝑦, 𝑑)
=
1
{3𝛽2 − 25𝛼 − 3π‘žπ›½2
25𝛼
× [coth (
𝛽
𝛾
(π‘₯ − 𝑑𝑦 + 𝑑 − 𝑑3 ))
10𝑠𝛼
3
(37)
where π‘Žπ‘– (𝑖 = 0, 1, 2) are constants to be determined later,
𝑀(πœƒ) satisfies the following auxiliary equation
σΈ€ 
𝛽
𝛾
(π‘₯ − 𝑑𝑦 + 𝑑 − 𝑑3 ))]}
10𝑠𝛼
3
+ 𝑦,
where 𝐴 is an integration constant, 𝐹󸀠 = 𝑑𝐹(πœƒ)/π‘‘πœƒ. We
assume that the solution of (36) can be expressed in the form
𝐹 (πœƒ) = π‘Ž0 + π‘Ž1 𝑀 (πœƒ) + π‘Ž2 𝑀(πœƒ)2 ,
𝛽
𝛾
(π‘₯ − 𝑑𝑦 + 𝑑 − 𝑑3 ))
10𝑠𝛼
3
− 2π‘π‘žtanh2 (
Substituting (35) into (34) and integrating once with respect
to πœƒ yield
2π‘˜2 𝛼𝐹󸀠󸀠 − 2π‘˜π›½πΉσΈ€  + 𝐹2 + 2𝐹 + 𝐴 = 0,
(41)
𝑒2 (π‘₯, 𝑦, 𝑑)
Again, further using the transformation of dependent variable to (34),
1
𝐹 (𝑑, πœ‰) = 𝐹 (πœƒ) , πœƒ = π‘˜ (𝑑 − 𝛾𝑑3 + πœ‰) .
3
𝑀 (πœƒ) = −𝑠 coth (π‘ πœƒ) .
Substituting (41), (40), (37), and (35) into (33), we obtain solutions of (1) as follows:
Solving the differential equation 𝜎 = 0, we can get
𝑒 = 𝑦 + 𝐹 (𝑑, πœ‰) ,
𝑀 (πœƒ) = −𝑠 tanh (π‘ πœƒ) ,
− 2π‘π‘ž coth2 (
𝛽
𝛾
(π‘₯ − 𝑑𝑦 + 𝑑 − 𝑑3 ))]}
10𝑠𝛼
3
+ 𝑦.
(42)
(38)
Substituting (37) and (38) into (36) and equating the coefficients of all powers of 𝑀 to zero yield a set of algebra equations
for π‘Ž0 , π‘Ž1 , π‘Ž2 , and 𝐴 as follows.
(see Figures 3 and 4).
2 2
Remark 2. If we direct assume that the solution of (34) can
be expressed in the form
𝑀3 : − 4π›½π‘˜π‘Ž2 π‘ž + 2π‘Ž1 π‘Ž2 + 4π›Όπ‘˜2 π‘Ž1 π‘ž2 = 0,
𝐹 (𝑑, πœ‰) = π‘Ž0 (𝑑) + π‘Ž1 (𝑑) 𝑀 (πœƒ) + π‘Ž2 (𝑑) 𝑀(πœƒ)2 ,
4
𝑀 : π‘Ž2 (π‘Ž2 + 12π›Όπ‘˜ π‘ž ) = 0,
𝑀2 : π‘Ž12 + 16π›Όπ‘˜2 π‘Ž2 π‘žπ‘ − 2π›½π‘˜π‘Ž1 π‘ž + 2π‘Ž2 + 2π‘Ž2 π‘Ž0 = 0,
𝑀1 : 2π‘Ž1 π‘Ž0 − 4π›½π‘˜π‘Ž2 𝑝 + 2π‘Ž1 + 4π›Όπ‘˜2 π‘Ž1 π‘žπ‘ = 0,
𝑀0 : 2π‘Ž0 + 𝐴 + 4π›Όπ‘˜2 π‘Ž2 𝑝2 + π‘Ž02 − 2π›½π‘˜π‘Ž1 𝑝 = 0.
(39)
(43)
where πœƒ = 𝑓(𝑑)πœ‰ + 𝑔(𝑑), 𝑓(𝑑), and 𝑔(𝑑) are continuous functions of 𝑑 to be determined later. 𝑀(πœƒ) satisfies the auxiliary
equation (38). Substituting (43) and (38) into (34), equating
the coefficients of all powers of 𝑀 to zero yields a set of
Abstract and Applied Analysis
5
Solving the system of function equations, we obtain
π‘Ž0 (𝑑) =
−20
u
π‘Ž2 (𝑑) =
0
3𝛽2 π‘ž
,
25𝛼𝑝
3𝛽2
,
25𝛼
𝑓 (𝑑) = ±
π‘Ž1 (𝑑) = ±
6𝛽2 π‘ž
,
25𝑠𝛼
𝛽
,
10𝑠𝛼
𝑔 (𝑑) = βˆ“
20
−2
−1
t
0
1
2
6
4
2
−2
0
y
−4
−6
𝛽𝛾 3
𝑑.
30𝑠𝛼
(45)
This result indicate the idea is equivalent to idea of Case 2
above.
Case 3. Take π‘˜2 (𝑑) = 0 and 𝑐 = 1 in (26), then
𝜎 = π‘˜1 (𝑑) 𝑒π‘₯ + 𝑒𝑑 − π‘˜1 (𝑑) .
Figure 3: Local structure of 𝑒2 (π‘₯, 𝑦, 𝑑) is shown as π‘₯ = 1, 𝛼 = 1, 𝛽 =
10, 𝑝 = −1, π‘ž = 1, and 𝛾 = 6.
(46)
Solving the differential equation 𝜎 = 0, we obtain
𝑒 = π‘˜1 (𝑑) + 𝐹 (πœ‰, 𝑦) , πœ‰ = π‘₯ − ∫ π‘˜1 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑.
(47)
Substituting (47) into (1) yield
π›ΌπΉπœ‰πœ‰πœ‰πœ‰ − π›½πΉπœ‰πœ‰πœ‰ + πΉπΉπœ‰πœ‰ + πΉπœ‰2 + 𝛾𝐹𝑦𝑦 = 0.
−20
u
(48)
Using the transformation 𝐹(πœ‰, 𝑦) = 𝐹(πœ‚), πœ‚ = π‘˜πœ‰ − 𝑐𝑦 and
integrating the resulting equation with respect to πœ‚ we have
0
20
π‘˜2 𝐹2 + 2𝛾𝑐2 𝐹 + 2π‘˜4 𝛼𝐹󸀠󸀠 − 2π‘˜3 𝛽𝐹󸀠 + 𝐴 = 0,
−2
−1
t
0
1
2
6
4
2
0
−2
−4
−6
y
(49)
σΈ€ 
where 𝐴 is an arbitrary constant, 𝐹 = 𝑑𝐹/π‘‘πœ‚. Suppose that
the solution of ODE (49) can be expressed by a polynomial in
(𝐺󸀠 /𝐺) as follows:
𝑛
Figure 4: Local structure of 𝑒3 (π‘₯, 𝑦, 𝑑) is shown as π‘₯ = 1, 𝛼 = 1, 𝛽 =
10, 𝑝 = −1, π‘ž = 1, 𝛾 = 6.
function equations for π‘Ž0 (𝑑), π‘Ž1 (𝑑), π‘Ž2 (𝑑), 𝑓(𝑑), and 𝑔(𝑑) as
follows:
𝐹 (πœ‚) = 𝑏𝑛 (
𝐺󸀠
) + ⋅⋅⋅,
𝐺
(50)
where 𝐺 = 𝐺(πœ‚) satisfies the second-order LODE in the form
[25]
𝐺󸀠󸀠 + πœ†πΊσΈ€  + πœ‡πΊ = 0.
(51)
Balancing 𝐹󸀠󸀠 with 𝐹2 in (49) gives 𝑛 = 2. So that
2
𝐹 (πœ‚) = 𝑏2 (
𝑀5 : 2π‘“π‘Ž2 π‘ž (12𝑓2 π‘ž2 𝛼 + π‘Ž2 ) = 0,
𝐺󸀠
𝐺󸀠
) + 𝑏1 ( ) + 𝑏0 ,
𝐺
𝐺
𝑏2 =ΜΈ 0,
(52)
where 𝑏𝑖 (𝑖 = 0, 1, 2) and πœ‡ are constants to be determined
later. Substituting (52) and (51) into (49). Setting these coefficients of the 𝐺󸀠 /𝐺 to zero, yields a set of algebraic equations
as follows:
𝑀4 : − 3π‘“π‘ž (−2π‘Ž1 π‘ž2 𝑓2 𝛼 + 2π‘žπ‘“π‘Ž2 𝛽 − π‘Ž1 π‘Ž2 ) = 0,
𝑀3 : − 2π›½π‘Ž1 𝑓2 π‘ž2 + 2π‘Ž22 𝑓𝑝 + 40π›Όπ‘Ž2 𝑓3 π‘ž2 𝑝 + 2π‘Ž2 𝑔󸀠 π‘ž
π‘˜2 𝑏2 (12π›Όπ‘˜2 + 𝑏2 ) = 0,
+ 2π‘Ž0 π‘Ž2 π‘“π‘ž + π‘Ž12 π‘“π‘ž + 2π‘Ž2 𝑓󸀠 πœ‰π‘ž + 2𝛾𝑑2 π‘Ž2 π‘“π‘ž = 0,
2π‘˜2 (10π›Όπ‘˜2 𝑏2 πœ† + 𝑏1 𝑏2 + 2π›Όπ‘˜2 𝑏1 + 2π›½π‘˜π‘2 ) = 0,
𝑀2 : − 8π›½π‘Ž2 𝑓2 π‘π‘ž + π‘Ž1 𝑔󸀠 π‘ž + π‘Ž2σΈ€  + π‘Ž0 π‘Ž1 π‘“π‘ž + 𝛾𝑑2 π‘Ž1 π‘“π‘ž
+ 8π›Όπ‘Ž1 𝑓3 π‘π‘ž2 + π‘Ž1 𝑓󸀠 πœ‰π‘ž + 3π‘Ž1 π‘Ž2 π‘“π‘ž = 0,
8π›Όπ‘˜4 𝑏2 πœ†2 + 2π›½π‘˜3 𝑏1 + π‘˜2 𝑏12 + 16π›Όπ‘˜4 𝑏2 πœ‡ + 2π‘˜2 𝑏2 𝑏0
𝑀1 : π‘Ž12 𝑓𝑝 + 16π›Όπ‘Ž2 𝑓3 𝑝2 π‘ž + π‘Ž1σΈ€  + 2𝛾𝑑2 π‘Ž2 𝑓𝑝 + 2π‘Ž0 π‘Ž2 𝑓𝑝
+ 6π›Όπ‘˜4 𝑏1 πœ† + 4π›½π‘˜3 𝑏2 πœ† + 2𝛾𝑐2 𝑏2 = 0,
+ 2π‘Ž2 𝑔󸀠 𝑝 + 2π‘Ž2 𝑓󸀠 πœ‰π‘ − 2π›½π‘Ž1 𝑓2 π‘π‘ž = 0,
2π‘˜2 𝑏1 𝑏0 + 4π›½π‘˜3 𝑏2 πœ‡ + 4π›Όπ‘˜4 𝑏1 πœ‡ + 2𝛾𝑐2 𝑏1 + 2π›Όπ‘˜4 𝑏1 πœ†2
𝑀0 : π‘Ž1 𝑔󸀠 𝑝 + π‘Ž1 𝑓󸀠 πœ‰π‘ + π‘Ž0 π‘Ž1 𝑓𝑝 − 2π›½π‘Ž2 𝑓2 𝑝2 + π‘Ž0σΈ€ 
+ 2π›½π‘˜3 𝑏1 πœ† + 12π›Όπ‘˜4 𝑏2 πœ†πœ‡ = 0,
+ 2π›Όπ‘Ž1 𝑓3 𝑝2 π‘ž + 𝛾𝑑2 π‘Ž1 𝑓𝑝 = 0.
(44)
2𝛾𝑐2 𝑏0 + 2π›Όπ‘˜4 𝑏1 πœ†πœ‡ + 𝐴 + 2π›½π‘˜3 𝑏1 πœ‡ + 4π›Όπ‘˜4 𝑏2 πœ‡2 + π‘˜2 𝑏02 = 0.
(53)
6
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Solving the algebraic equations above yields
𝑏0 =
3
2 2
2
15π‘˜ πœ†π›Ό (5π‘˜πœ†π›Ό + 2𝛽) − 3π‘˜ 𝛽 + 25𝑐 𝛼𝛾
,
25π‘˜2 𝛼
12π‘˜ (5π‘˜π›Όπœ† + 𝛽)
𝑏1 = −
,
5
(54)
2
𝑏2 = −12π‘˜ 𝛼.
when 25π‘˜2 𝛼2 (4πœ‡ − πœ†2 ) + 𝛽2 = 0 and 625𝛼2 (π΄π‘˜2 − 𝑐2 𝛾2 ) +
36π‘˜4 𝛽4 = 0. Consequently, we obtain the following solution
of (1) for πœ†2 − 4πœ‡ > 0:
𝑒4 (π‘₯, 𝑦, 𝑑) = −12π‘˜2 π›Όπœ2
× [(𝐢1 sinh 𝜏 (π‘˜ (π‘₯ − ∫ π‘˜1 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑) − 𝑐𝑦)
+ 𝐢2 cosh 𝜏 (π‘˜ (π‘₯ − ∫ π‘˜1 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑) − 𝑐𝑦))
× (𝐢1 cosh 𝜏 (π‘˜ (π‘₯ − ∫ π‘˜1 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑) − 𝑐𝑦)
+ 𝐢2 sinh 𝜏
−1 2
× (π‘˜ (π‘₯ − ∫ π‘˜1 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑) − 𝑐𝑦)) ]
+ (12π‘˜2 πœ†π›Όπœ −
12π‘˜ (5π‘˜π›Όπœ† + 𝛽)
)
5
× [(𝐢1 sinh 𝜏 (π‘˜ (π‘₯ − ∫ π‘˜1 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑) − 𝑐𝑦)
+ 𝐢2 cosh 𝜏 (π‘˜ (π‘₯ − ∫ π‘˜1 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑) − 𝑐𝑦))
× (𝐢1 cosh 𝜏 (π‘˜ (π‘₯ − ∫ π‘˜1 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑) − 𝑐𝑦)
+ 𝐢2 sinh 𝜏
−1 2
× (π‘˜ (π‘₯ − ∫ π‘˜1 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑) − 𝑐𝑦)) ]
+
15π‘˜3 πœ†π›Ό (5π‘˜πœ†π›Ό + 2𝛽) − 3π‘˜2 𝛽2 + 25𝑐2 𝛼𝛾
25π‘˜2 𝛼
+
πœ†2
,
4
(55)
where 𝜏 = (1/2)√πœ†2 − 4πœ‡.
6. Conclusions
Based on the fact that the periodic solution of (2+1)D KdVBurgers equation does not exist, we have obtained Saddlenode Heteroclinic Orbits. By applying the Lie group method,
we reduce the (2+1)D KdV Burgers equation to (1+1)-dimensional equations including the (1+1)-dimensional linear partial differential equation with constants coefficients (29), (48)
and (1+1)-dimensional nonlinear partial differential equation
with variable coefficients (34). By solving the equations (29),
(34), and (48), we obtain some new exact solutions and
discover the strange phenomenon of sympathetic vibration
to evolution of nontraveling wave soliton for the (2+1)D KdV
Burgers equation. Our results show that the unite of Lie group
method with others is effective to search simultaneously exact
solutions for nonlinear evolution equations. Other structures
of solutions with symmetry (26) are to be further studied.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank professor S. Y. Lou for the
helpful discussions. This work was supported by key research
projects of Sichuan Provincial Educational Administration
no. 10ZA021 and Chinese Natural Science Foundation Grant
no. 10971169.
References
[1] R. S. Johnson, “A non-linear equation incorporating damping
and dispersion,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 42, pp. 49–60,
1970.
[2] L. van Wijngaarden, “One-dimensional flow of liquids containing small gas bubbles,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol.
4, pp. 369–396, 1972.
[3] G. Gao, “A theory of interaction between dissipation and
dispersion of turbulence,” Scientia Sinica A, vol. 28, no. 6, pp.
616–627, 1985.
[4] W. X. Ma, “An exact solution to two-dimensional Korteweg-de
Vries-Burgers equation,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 26, no. 1, pp.
L17–L20, 1993.
[5] Z. B. Li and M. L. Wang, “Travelling wave solutions to the twodimensional KdV-Burgers equation,” Journal of Physics A, vol.
26, no. 21, pp. 6027–6031, 1993.
[6] J. Zhang, “Soliton-like solutions for the (2 + 1)-dimensional
nonlinear evolution equation,” Communications in Theoretical
Physics, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 315–318, 1999.
[7] E. G. Fan and H. Q. Zhang, “A note on the homogeneous balance
method,” Physics Letters A, vol. 246, pp. 403–406, 1998.
[8] S. Y. Lou and G. J. Ni, “The relations among a special type of
solutions in some (𝐷 + 1)-dimensional nonlinear equations,”
Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1614–1620,
1989.
[9] X.-Y. Tang and S.-Y. Lou, “Folded solitary waves and foldons in
(2 + 1) dimensions,” Communications in Theoretical Physics, vol.
40, no. 1, pp. 62–66, 2003.
[10] E. J. Parkes and B. R. Duffy, “Travelling solitary wave solutions
to a compound KdV-Burgers equation,” Physics Letters A, vol.
229, no. 4, pp. 217–220, 1997.
[11] A. Elgarayhi and A. Elhanbaly, “New exact traveling wave solutions for the two-dimensional KdV-Burgers and Boussinesq
equations,” Physics Letters A, vol. 343, no. 1–3, pp. 85–89, 2005.
[12] A. Molabahrami, F. Khani, and S. Hamedi-Nezhad, “Soliton
solutions of the two-dimensional KdV-Burgers equation by
homotopy perturbation method,” Physics Letters A, vol. 370, no.
5-6, pp. 433–436, 2007.
[13] H. L. Chen and D. Q. Xian, “Periodic wave solutions for
the Klein-Gordon-Zakharov equations,” Acta Mathematicae
Applicatae Sinica. Yingyong Shuxue Xuebao, vol. 29, no. 6, pp.
1139–1144, 2006.
Abstract and Applied Analysis
[14] D. Q. Xian, “New exact solutions to a class of nonlinear wave
equations,” Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 977–980, 2006.
[15] D.-Q. Xian and H.-L. Chen, “Symmetry reduced and new
exact non-traveling wave solutions of potential KadomtsevPetviashvili equation with p-power,” Applied Mathematics and
Computation, vol. 217, no. 4, pp. 1340–1349, 2010.
[16] J.-H. He, “Periodic solutions and bifurcations of delay-differential equations,” Physics Letters A, vol. 347, no. 4–6, pp. 228–230,
2005.
[17] Z. Dai and D. Xian, “Homoclinic breather-wave solutions for
Sine-Gordon equation,” Communications in Nonlinear Science
and Numerical Simulation, vol. 14, pp. 3292–3295, 2009.
[18] Z. Dai, D. Xian, and D. Li, “Homoclinic breather-wave with
convective effect for the (1 + 1)- dimensional boussinesq
equation,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 26, no. 4, Article ID
040203, 2009.
[19] Z. Dai, Z. Li, Z. Liu, and D. Li, “Exact homoclinic wave and
soliton solutions for the 2D Ginzburg-Landau equation,” Physics
Letters A, vol. 372, no. 17, pp. 3010–3014, 2008.
[20] D. Xian and Z. Dai, “Application of exp-function method to
potential kadomtsev-petviashvili equation,” Chaos, Solitons and
Fractals, vol. 42, pp. 2653–2659, 2009.
[21] G.-C. Xiao, D.-Q. Xian, and X.-Q. Liu, “Application of expfunction method to Dullin-Gottwald-Holm equation,” Applied
Mathematics and Computation, vol. 210, no. 2, pp. 536–541,
2009.
[22] X.-Q. Liu and S. Jiang, “The secπ‘ž -tanhπ‘ž -method and its applications,” Physics Letters A, vol. 298, no. 4, pp. 253–258, 2002.
[23] S. K. Liu and S. D. Liu, Solitary wave and turbulence, Shanghai
Scientifc and Technological Education, Shanghai, China, 1994.
[24] S. K. Liu and S. D. Liu, Nonliner Equations in Physics, Peking
University, Beijing, China, 2000.
[25] M. Wang, X. Li, and J. Zhang, “The (𝐺󸀠 /𝐺)-expansion method
and travelling wave solutions of nonlinear evolution equations
in mathematical physics,” Physics Letters A, vol. 372, no. 4, pp.
417–423, 2008.
7
Advances in
Operations Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Advances in
Decision Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems
in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Journal of
Algebra
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Probability and Statistics
Volume 2014
The Scientific
World Journal
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
International Journal of
Differential Equations
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Submit your manuscripts at
http://www.hindawi.com
International Journal of
Advances in
Combinatorics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Mathematical Physics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Journal of
Complex Analysis
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
International
Journal of
Mathematics and
Mathematical
Sciences
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Stochastic Analysis
Abstract and
Applied Analysis
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
International Journal of
Mathematics
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Discrete Dynamics in
Nature and Society
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Journal of
Journal of
Discrete Mathematics
Journal of
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Applied Mathematics
Journal of
Function Spaces
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Optimization
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Download