Hindawi Publishing Corporation Abstract and Applied Analysis Volume 2013, Article ID 534083, 5 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/534083 Research Article An Opial-Type Inequality on Time Scales Qiao-Luan Li1 and Wing-Sum Cheung2 1 2 College of Mathematics and Information Science, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China Department of Mathematics, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Correspondence should be addressed to Qiao-Luan Li; qll71125@163.com Received 4 January 2013; Accepted 16 January 2013 Academic Editor: Allan Peterson Copyright © 2013 Q.-L. Li and W.-S. Cheung. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. We establish some new Opial-type inequalities involving higher order delta derivatives on time scales. These extend some known results in the continuous case in the literature and provide new estimates in the setting of time scales. 1. Introduction Opial’s inequality appeared for the first time in 1960 in [1] and has been receiving continual attention throughout the years (cf., e.g., [2–7]). The inequality together with its numerous generalizations, extensions, and discretizations has been playing a fundamental role in the study of the existence and uniqueness properties of solutions of initial and boundary value problems for differential equations as well as difference equations [8, 9]. Two excellent surveys on these inequalities can be found in [10, 11]. In 1960, Opial established the following integral inequality. Theorem A (see [1]). If π ∈ πΆ1 [0, β] satisfies π(0) = π(β) = 0 and π(π₯) > 0 for all π₯ ∈ (0, β), then β β β σ΅¨σ΅¨ σΈ σ΅¨σ΅¨2 σ΅¨ σ΅¨ ∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨π (π₯)πσΈ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ ≤ ∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨π (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯. 4 0 σ΅¨ 0 (1) Shortly after the publication of Opial’s paper, Olech provided a modified version of Theorem A. His result is stated in the following. Theorem B (see [12]). If π is absolutely continuous on [0, β] with π(0) = 0, then β β β σΈ 2 σ΅¨ σ΅¨ ∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨π (π₯)πσΈ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ₯ ≤ ∫ π (π₯) ππ₯. 2 0 0 (2) The equality in (2) holds if and only if π(π₯) = ππ₯, where π is a constant. The first natural extension of Opial’s inequality (1) involving higher order derivatives π₯(π) (π ) (π ≥ 1) is embodied in the following. Theorem C (see [10]). Let π₯(π‘) ∈ πΆ(π) [0, π] be such that π₯(π) (0) = 0, 0 ≤ π ≤ π − 1 (π ≥ 1). Then the following inequality holds: π π 1 σ΅¨ σ΅¨2 σ΅¨ σ΅¨ ∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨π₯ (π‘) π₯(π) (π‘)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ‘ ≤ ππ ∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨π₯(π) (π‘)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ππ‘. 2 0 0 (3) In 1997, Alzer [13] considered Opial-type inequalities which involve higher-order derivatives of two functions. These generalize earlier results of Agarwal and Pang [14]. In this paper, we consider the Opial-type inequality which involves higher-order delta derivatives of two functions on time scales. Our results in special cases yield some of the recent results on Opial’s inequality and provide some new estimates on such types of inequalities in this general setting. 2. Main Results Let T be a time scale; that is, T is an arbitrary nonempty closed subset of real numbers. Let π, π ∈ T. We suppose that the reader is familiar with the basic features of calculus on time scales for dynamic equations. Otherwise one can consult 2 Abstract and Applied Analysis Bohner and Peterson’s book [15] for most of the materials needed. We first quote the following elementary lemma and the delta time scales Taylor formula. and hence π − 1 1/π 1 (1−π)/π π+ π π π π (4) π₯ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ σ΅¨σ΅¨π (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ≤ ∫ βπ−π−1 (π₯, π (π)) σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ π π₯ σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨ = ∫ βπ−π−1 (π₯, π (π)) π(π)−1/π‘ π(π)1/π‘ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π π (T) = the set of functions Lemma 2 (see [17]). Let π ∈ πΆππ that are π times differentiable with rd-continuous derivatives on T, π ∈ N. Then for any π, π ∈ T and π‘ ∈ [π, π] ∩ T, π 1/π‘ π₯ σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π‘ ⋅ (∫ π (π) σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ) σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π π(π‘) = ∑ βπ (π‘, π) πΔ (π) (5) π‘ 1−1/π‘ π₯ π‘/(π‘−1) ≤ [∫ βπ−π−1 (π₯, π (π)) π(π)1/(1−π‘) Δπ] π π=0 = π(π₯)1−1/π‘ πΉ(π₯)1/π‘ , π + ∫ βπ−1 (π‘, π (π)) πΔ (π) Δπ, π (10) π‘ where β0 (π‘, π ) := 1, βπ+1 (π‘, π ) := ∫π βπ (π, π )Δπ, π ∈ N. π₯ π‘/(π‘−1) where π(π₯) := ∫π βπ−π−1 (π₯, π(π))π(π)1/(1−π‘) Δπ, πΉ(π₯) := π₯ Our main results are given in the following theorems. Theorem 3. Let 0 ≤ π ≤ π < π‘, π > 0, π‘ > 1 be real numbers, and let π, π be integers with 0 ≤ π ≤ π−1. Let π > 0 and π ≥ 0 be measurable functions on Υ := [π, π] ∩ T. Further, let π, π ∈ π π π−1 (Υ) with πΔ (π) = πΔ (π) = 0, π = 0, 1, . . . , π − 1, πΆππ π−1 π−1 and letπΔ , πΔ be absolutely continuous on Υ such that the π π π π integrals ∫π π(π₯)|πΔ (π₯)|π‘ Δπ₯ and ∫π π(π₯)|πΔ (π₯)|π‘ Δπ₯ exist. Then one has π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π ∫ π (π₯) [σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π +σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ] Δπ₯ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ (6) 1−πΌ π ≤ 21−πΌ (∫ β(π₯)π‘/(π‘−π ) Δπ₯) π ⋅ [π½π π½−1 π ∫π π(π)|πΔ (π)|π‘ Δπ. Let π₯ σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π‘ πΊ (π₯) := ∫ π (π) σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ. σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π πΉ (π) πΊ (π) + (1 − π½) π (πΉ (π) + πΊ (π))] , where πΌ := π /π‘, π½ := π/π , Then we have σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ σ΅¨σ΅¨π (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ = πΊΔ (π₯)π /π‘ π(π₯)−π /π‘ . σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ So (10) together with (12) implies σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π π (π₯) σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ≤ β (π₯) πΉ(π₯)π/π‘ πΊΔ (π₯)π /π‘ , σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨ (13) where β(π₯) := π(π₯)π(π₯)−π /π‘ π(π₯)π(π‘−1)/π‘ . Integrating both sides of (13) over Υ and making use of HoΜlder’s inequality, we obtain π π 1/(1−π‘) Δπ, π (π₯) := ∫ βπ‘/(π‘−1) π−π−1 (π₯, π (π)) π(π) π −πΌ π(π‘−1)/π‘ β (π₯) := π (π₯) π(π₯) π(π₯) π ≤ (∫ β(π₯) , σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π‘ πΉ (π₯) := ∫ π (π) σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ, σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π π₯ (7) π Proof. Since πΔ (π) = 0, π = 0, 1, . . . , π − 1, we obtain from Taylor’s theorem that for all π₯ ∈ Υ, π π(π₯) = ∫ βπ−1 (π₯, π (π)) πΔ (π) Δπ, π‘/(π‘−π ) π 1−π /π‘ Δπ₯) π π /π‘ π/π Δ (∫ πΉ(π₯) πΊ (π₯) Δπ₯) . π (14) Similarly, we get σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π‘ πΊ (π₯) := ∫ π (π) σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ. σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π π₯ π (12) ≤ ∫ β (π₯) πΉ(π₯)π/π‘ πΊΔ (π₯)π /π‘ Δπ₯ π₯ π₯ (11) π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π ∫ π (π₯) σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ₯ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π πΌ π½ (9) From (9) and HoΜlder’s inequality we get for any π > 0. π−1 π π Lemma 1 (see [16]). Let π ≥ 0, π ≥ 1 be real constants. Then π1/π ≤ π₯ π πΔ (π₯) = ∫ βπ−π−1 (π₯, π (π)) πΔ (π) Δπ. (8) π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π ∫ π (π₯) σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ₯ σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π π 1−π /π‘ ≤ (∫ β(π₯)π‘/(π‘−π ) Δπ₯) π π π /π‘ ⋅ (∫ πΊ(π₯)π/π πΉΔ (π₯) Δπ₯) . π (15) Abstract and Applied Analysis 3 Recall the elementary inequalities From (18) and (19), we conclude ππΌ (π΄ + π΅)πΌ ≤ π΄πΌ + π΅πΌ ≤ ππΌ (π΄ + π΅)πΌ , (π΄, π΅ ≥ 0) , (16) where π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π ∫ π (π₯) [σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ + σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ] Δπ₯ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π 1−πΌ π ππΌ := { ππΌ := { 1, 21−πΌ , ≤ 21−πΌ (∫ β(π₯)π‘/(π‘−π ) Δπ₯) 0 ≤ πΌ ≤ 1, πΌ ≥ 1, 1−πΌ 2 , 1, π (17) 0 ≤ πΌ ≤ 1, πΌ ≥ 1. Let π½ = π/π . Since πΌ = π /π‘ ∈ (0, 1) and πΉ is nondecreasing, from (14)–(16), we have π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π ∫ π (π₯) [σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ + σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ] Δπ₯ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π 1−πΌ π ≤ (∫ β(π₯)π‘/(π‘−π ) Δπ₯) Δ πΌ π½ The proof is complete. Theorem 4. Let π ≥ 0, π > 0, π < π‘, π‘ > 1 be real numbers, and let π, π be integers with 0 ≤ π ≤ π − 1. Let π > 0, and π ≥ 0 be measurable functions on Υ := [π, π] ∩ T. Further, let π, π ∈ π π π−1 (Υ) with let πΔ (π) = πΔ (π) = 0, π = 0, 1, . . . , π − 1, πΆππ π−1 π−1 and πΔ , πΔ be absolutely continuous on Υ such that the π π π πΌ ⋅ [π½ππ½−1 πΉ (π) πΊ (π) + (1 − π½) ππ½ (πΉ (π) + πΊ (π))] . (20) π Δ πΌ π½ π π π integrals ∫π π(π₯)|πΔ (π₯)|π‘ Δπ₯ and ∫π π(π₯)|πΔ (π₯)|π‘ Δπ₯ exist. Then one has ⋅ [(∫ πΉ (π₯) πΊ (π₯) Δπ₯) + (∫ πΊ (π₯) πΉ (π₯) Δπ₯) ] π π π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π ∫ π (π₯) [σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ + σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ] Δπ₯ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π 1−πΌ π ≤ (∫ β(π₯)π‘/(π‘−π ) Δπ₯) π 1−πΌ π ≤ 21−πΌ (∫ β(π₯)π‘/(π‘−π ) Δπ₯) πΌ π ⋅21−πΌ (∫ [πΉΔ (π₯) πΊπ½ (π₯) + πΊΔ (π₯) πΉπ½ (π₯)] Δπ₯) π π πΌ ⋅ [ππ½ Γ (πΊ + πΉ) − Γ (πΊ) − Γ (πΉ)] , 1−πΌ π ≤ (∫ β(π₯)π‘/(π‘−π ) Δπ₯) (21) π πΌ π ⋅ 21−πΌ (∫ [πΉΔ (π₯) πΊπ½ (π₯) + πΊΔ (π₯) πΉπ½ (π (π₯))] Δπ₯) . π (18) π where Γ(π») := ∫π π»π½ Δπ», π½ := π/π , πΌ := π /π‘, β(π₯) := π(π₯)π(π₯)−πΌ π₯ π‘/(π‘−1) π(π₯)π(π‘−1)/π‘ , π(π₯) := ∫π βπ−π−1 (π₯, π(π))π(π)1/(1−π‘) Δπ, and By Lemma 1, we get 21−π½ , ππ½ := { 1, π ∫ [πΉΔ (π₯) πΊπ½ (π₯) + πΊΔ (π₯) πΉπ½ (π (π₯))] Δπ₯ 0 ≤ π½ ≤ 1, π½ ≥ 1. (22) π π ≤ ∫ [π½ππ½−1 πΊ (π₯) πΉΔ (π₯) + (1 − π½) ππ½ πΉΔ (π₯) Proof. Following the proof of Theorem 3, we obtain π + π½ππ½−1 πΉ (π (π₯)) πΊΔ (π₯) + (1 − π½) ππ½ πΊΔ (π₯)] Δπ₯ π = π½ππ½−1 ∫ [πΊ (π₯) πΉΔ (π₯) + πΉ (π (π₯)) πΊΔ (π₯)] Δπ₯ π π π π π = π½π 1−πΌ π ≤ (∫ β(π₯)π‘/(π‘−π ) Δπ₯) π + (1 − π½) ππ½ [∫ πΉΔ (π₯) Δπ₯ + ∫ πΊΔ (π₯) Δπ₯] π½−1 π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π ∫ π (π₯) [σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ + σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ] Δπ₯ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π π πΌ ⋅ 21−πΌ (∫ [πΉΔ (π₯) πΊπ½ π₯ + πΊΔ (π₯) πΉπ½ (π₯)] Δπ₯) . π½ πΉ (π) πΊ (π) + (1 − π½) π [πΉ (π) + πΊ (π)] . π (19) (23) 4 Abstract and Applied Analysis Integrating both sides over π₯ from π to π and using Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we observe Using (16), π πσ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π ∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯) πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ₯ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π ∫ [πΉΔ (π₯) πΊπ½ (π₯) + πΊΔ (π₯) πΉπ½ (π₯)] Δπ₯ π π = ∫ (πΊπ½ (π₯) + πΉπ½ (π₯)) (πΊΔ (π₯) + πΉΔ (π₯)) Δπ₯ π π π½ Δ π½ Δ − ∫ (πΊ (π₯) πΊ (π₯) + πΉ (π₯) πΉ (π₯)) Δπ₯ π ≤ ππ½ ∫ (πΊ (π₯) + πΉ (π₯))π½ Δ (πΊ (π₯) + πΉ (π₯)) π π π π π π π π₯ 1/2 1/2 πσ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨2 π₯ σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨2 σ΅¨ π ⋅ [∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ΔπΔπ₯] σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ (24) π π π 2 ≤ [∫ ∫ βπ−π−1 (π₯, π (π)) ΔπΔπ₯] (28) 1/2 π₯ 2 = [∫ ∫ βπ−π−1 (π₯, π (π)) ΔπΔπ₯] π π − ∫ πΊπ½ (π₯) ΔπΊ (π₯) − ∫ πΉπ½ (π₯) ΔπΉ (π₯) 1/2 πσ΅¨ σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨2 ⋅ [∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ] . σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ = ππ½ Γ (πΊ + πΉ) − Γ (πΊ) − Γ (πΉ) . The proof is complete. The proof is complete. Remark 5. In the special case where T = R, Theorem 4 reduces to Theorem 1 of [13]. π−1 (Υ), Υ := [π, π] ∩ T be such that Theorem 6. Let π ∈ πΆππ π−1 Δπ π (π) = 0, 0 ≤ π ≤ π−1, let πΔ (π₯) be absolutely continuous π Theorem 7. Let π(π₯) > 0, π(π₯) be nonnegative and measurπ−1 able on Υ = [π, π] ∩ T, and let π ∈ πΆππ (Υ) be such that π π−1 πΔ (π) = 0, 0 ≤ π ≤ π − 1. If πΔ (π₯) is absolutely continuous on Υ, then for π > 1, ππ > 0, and any 0 ≤ ππ < π, π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨ππ σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨ππ ∫ π (π₯) σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ₯ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π π on Υ, and let ∫π |πΔ (π₯)|2 Δπ₯ < ∞. Then π ≤ [∫ π(π₯)π/(π−ππ ) π(π₯)−ππ /(π−ππ ) π σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ π ∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯) πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ₯ σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ π π ≤ (∫ ∫ π₯ π π 2 βπ−π−1 (π−ππ )/π × π(π₯)(π−1)ππ /(π−ππ ) Δπ₯] 1/2 (π₯, π (π)) ΔπΔπ₯) π /π Φ(π¦) π , (25) π₯ π/π−1 where π(π₯) := ∫π βπ−π−1 (π₯, π(π))π(π)−(π/π−1) Δπ, Φ(π¦) := 1/2 πσ΅¨ σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨2 ⋅ (∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ) σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ π π₯ σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨π (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ≤ ∫ βπ−π−1 (π₯, π (π)) σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ. σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ π (26) π Multiplying (26) by |πΔ (π₯)| and using Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we obtain π Proof. Following the hypotheses, it is easy to see that (26) holds. By using HoΜlder’s inequality with indices π and π/(π−1), we obtain σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ σ΅¨σ΅¨π (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ π₯ σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨ ≤ ∫ βπ−π−1 (π₯, π (π)) π(π)−1/π π(π)1/π σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π (π−1)/π π₯ π/(π−1) ≤ [∫ βπ−π−1 (π₯, π (π)) π(π)−π/(π−1) Δπ] (30) π π σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ σ΅¨σ΅¨π (π₯) πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ π₯ σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ π ≤ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ ∫ βπ−π−1 (π₯, π (π)) σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ σ΅¨ 1/2 σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨ π₯ ≤ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ (∫ β2π−π−1 (π₯, π (π)) Δπ) σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π π₯ ∫π π¦ππ /ππ Δπ¦(π₯), π¦(π₯) := ∫π π(π)|πΔ (π)|π Δπ. . Proof. From the hypotheses, we have 1/2 π₯σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨2 ⋅ (∫ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ) . σ΅¨ π σ΅¨ (29) π 1/π π₯ σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π ⋅ [∫ π (π) σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ] σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π (27) = π(π₯)(π−1)/π π¦(π₯)1/π , π₯ π/(π−1) where π(π₯) := ∫π βπ−π−1 (π₯, π(π))π(π)−π/(π−1) Δπ, π¦(π₯) := π₯ π ∫π π(π)|πΔ (π)|π Δπ. So we get σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨π π¦Δ (π₯) = π (π₯) σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ , σ΅¨ σ΅¨ (31) Abstract and Applied Analysis 5 and hence for any ππ , σ΅¨π σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ σ΅¨σ΅¨π (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ π = (π (π₯))−ππ /π (π¦Δ (π₯))ππ /π . σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨ (32) Thus for ππ > 0, σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨ππ σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨ππ π (π₯) σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ ≤ π (π₯) (π (π₯)) −ππ /π ππ /π (π¦Δ (π₯)) (33) × π(π₯)(π−1)ππ /π π¦(π₯)ππ /π . Integrating both sides of (33) from π to π and applying HoΜlder’s inequality with indices π/ππ and π/(π−ππ ), we obtain π σ΅¨σ΅¨ππ σ΅¨σ΅¨ π σ΅¨σ΅¨ππ σ΅¨σ΅¨ π ∫ π (π₯) σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨πΔ (π₯)σ΅¨σ΅¨σ΅¨ Δπ₯ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ σ΅¨ π π ππ /π ≤ ∫ π (π₯) π(π₯)−ππ /π (π¦Δ (π₯)) π(π₯)(π−1)ππ /ππ¦(π₯)ππ /π Δπ₯ π π ≤ [∫ π(π₯) π/(π−ππ ) −ππ /(π−ππ ) π(π₯) π (π−1)ππ /(π−ππ ) π(π₯) (π−ππ )/π Δπ₯] ππ /π π ⋅ [∫ π¦Δ (π₯) π¦(π₯)ππ /ππ Δπ₯] π π = [∫ π(π₯)π/(π−ππ ) π(π₯)−ππ /(π−ππ ) π (π−1)ππ /(π−ππ ) ×π(π₯) (π−ππ )/π Δπ₯] π /π Φ(π¦) π , (34) π where Φ(π¦) := ∫π π¦(π₯)ππ /ππ Δπ¦(π₯). The proof is complete. Remark 8. In the special case where T = R, Theorems 6 and 7 reduce to Theorems 1 and 2 of [18]. Acknowledgments The first author’s research was supported by NSF of China (11071054), Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (A2011205012). The second author’s research was partially supported by an HKU URG grant. References [1] Z. Opial, “Sur une ineΜgaliteΜ,” Annales Polonici Mathematici, vol. 8, pp. 29–32, 1960. [2] G. A. Anastassiou, “Opial type inequalities involving RiemannLiouville fractional derivatives of two functions with applications,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 48, no. 3-4, pp. 344–374, 2008. [3] W.-S. Cheung, Z. Dandan, and J. PecΜaricΜ, “Opial-type inequalities for differential operators,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 2028–2039, 2007. [4] W. S. Cheung, “Some generalized opial-type inequalities,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 317–321, 1991. [5] W. S. Cheung, “Opial-type inequalities with π functions in π variables,” Mathematika, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 319–326, 1992. [6] C.-J. Zhao and W.-S. Cheung, “On some opial-type inequalities,” Journal of Inequalities and Applications, vol. 2011, article 7, 2011. [7] C. J. Zhao and W. S. Cheung, “On opial’s type inequalities for an integral operator with homogeneous kernel,” Journal of Inequalities and Applications, vol. 2012, article 123, 2012. [8] R. P. Agarwal and V. Lakshmikantham, Uniqueness and Nonuniqueness Criteria for Ordinary Differential Equations, vol. 6 of Series in Real Analysis, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 1993. [9] J. D. Li, “Opial-type integral inequalities involving several higher order derivatives,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 167, no. 1, pp. 98–110, 1992. [10] R. P. Agarwal and P. Y. H. Pang, Opial Inequalities with Applications in Differential and Difference Equations, vol. 320 of Mathematics and Its Applications, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995. [11] D. S. MitrinovicΜ, J. E. PecΜaricΜ, and A. M. Fink, Inequalities Involving Functions and Their Integrals and Derivatives, vol. 53 of Mathematics and Its Applications (East European Series), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1991. [12] Z. Olech, “A simple proof of a certain result of Z. Opial,” Annales Polonici Mathematici, vol. 8, pp. 61–63, 1960. [13] H. Alzer, “An Opial-type inequality involving higher-order derivatives of two functions,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 123–128, 1997. [14] R. P. Agarwal and P. Y. H. Pang, “Sharp Opial-type inequalities involving higher order derivatives of two functions,” Mathematische Nachrichten, vol. 174, pp. 5–20, 1995. [15] M. Bohner and A. Peterson, Dynamic Equations on Time scales: An Introduction with Applications, BirkhaΜuser, Boston, Mass, USA, 2001. [16] W. N. Li, “Some new dynamic inequalities on time scales,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 319, no. 2, pp. 802–814, 2006. [17] M. Bohner and G. Sh. Guseinov, “The convolution on time scales,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, Article ID 58373, 24 pages, 2007. [18] C. J. Zhao and W. S. Cheung, “On opial-type inequalities with higher order partial derivatives,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 25, pp. 2156–2161, 2012. Advances in Operations Research Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Advances in Decision Sciences Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Mathematical Problems in Engineering Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Journal of Algebra Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Probability and Statistics Volume 2014 The Scientific World Journal Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 International Journal of Differential Equations Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Volume 2014 Submit your manuscripts at http://www.hindawi.com International Journal of Advances in Combinatorics Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Mathematical Physics Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Journal of Complex Analysis Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences Journal of Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Stochastic Analysis Abstract and Applied Analysis Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com International Journal of Mathematics Volume 2014 Volume 2014 Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Volume 2014 Volume 2014 Journal of Journal of Discrete Mathematics Journal of Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Applied Mathematics Journal of Function Spaces Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Optimization Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014