Research Article An Opial-Type Inequality on Time Scales Qiao-Luan Li and Wing-Sum Cheung

advertisement
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2013, Article ID 534083, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/534083
Research Article
An Opial-Type Inequality on Time Scales
Qiao-Luan Li1 and Wing-Sum Cheung2
1
2
College of Mathematics and Information Science, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
Department of Mathematics, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Correspondence should be addressed to Qiao-Luan Li; qll71125@163.com
Received 4 January 2013; Accepted 16 January 2013
Academic Editor: Allan Peterson
Copyright © 2013 Q.-L. Li and W.-S. Cheung. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly
cited.
We establish some new Opial-type inequalities involving higher order delta derivatives on time scales. These extend some known
results in the continuous case in the literature and provide new estimates in the setting of time scales.
1. Introduction
Opial’s inequality appeared for the first time in 1960 in
[1] and has been receiving continual attention throughout
the years (cf., e.g., [2–7]). The inequality together with its
numerous generalizations, extensions, and discretizations
has been playing a fundamental role in the study of the
existence and uniqueness properties of solutions of initial and
boundary value problems for differential equations as well as
difference equations [8, 9]. Two excellent surveys on these
inequalities can be found in [10, 11].
In 1960, Opial established the following integral inequality.
Theorem A (see [1]). If 𝑓 ∈ 𝐢1 [0, β„Ž] satisfies 𝑓(0) = 𝑓(β„Ž) = 0
and 𝑓(π‘₯) > 0 for all π‘₯ ∈ (0, β„Ž), then
β„Ž
β„Ž β„Ž 󡄨󡄨 σΈ€  󡄨󡄨2
󡄨
󡄨
∫ 󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨𝑓 (π‘₯)𝑓󸀠 (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯ ≤
∫ 󡄨󡄨𝑓 (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯.
4 0 󡄨
0
(1)
Shortly after the publication of Opial’s paper, Olech
provided a modified version of Theorem A. His result is stated
in the following.
Theorem B (see [12]). If 𝑓 is absolutely continuous on [0, β„Ž]
with 𝑓(0) = 0, then
β„Ž
β„Ž β„Ž σΈ€  2
󡄨
󡄨
∫ 󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨𝑓 (π‘₯)𝑓󸀠 (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑑π‘₯ ≤
∫ 𝑓 (π‘₯) 𝑑π‘₯.
2 0
0
(2)
The equality in (2) holds if and only if 𝑓(π‘₯) = 𝑐π‘₯, where 𝑐
is a constant.
The first natural extension of Opial’s inequality (1) involving higher order derivatives π‘₯(𝑛) (𝑠) (𝑛 ≥ 1) is embodied in
the following.
Theorem C (see [10]). Let π‘₯(𝑑) ∈ 𝐢(𝑛) [0, π‘Ž] be such that
π‘₯(𝑖) (0) = 0, 0 ≤ 𝑖 ≤ 𝑛 − 1 (𝑛 ≥ 1). Then the following
inequality holds:
π‘Ž
π‘Ž
1
󡄨
󡄨2
󡄨
󡄨
∫ 󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨π‘₯ (𝑑) π‘₯(𝑛) (𝑑)󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑑𝑑 ≤ π‘Žπ‘› ∫ 󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨π‘₯(𝑛) (𝑑)󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑑𝑑.
2
0
0
(3)
In 1997, Alzer [13] considered Opial-type inequalities
which involve higher-order derivatives of two functions.
These generalize earlier results of Agarwal and Pang [14].
In this paper, we consider the Opial-type inequality which
involves higher-order delta derivatives of two functions on
time scales. Our results in special cases yield some of the
recent results on Opial’s inequality and provide some new
estimates on such types of inequalities in this general setting.
2. Main Results
Let T be a time scale; that is, T is an arbitrary nonempty
closed subset of real numbers. Let π‘Ž, 𝑏 ∈ T. We suppose that
the reader is familiar with the basic features of calculus on
time scales for dynamic equations. Otherwise one can consult
2
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Bohner and Peterson’s book [15] for most of the materials
needed.
We first quote the following elementary lemma and the
delta time scales Taylor formula.
and hence
𝑝 − 1 1/𝑝
1 (1−𝑝)/𝑝
π‘Ž+
π‘˜
π‘˜
𝑝
𝑝
(4)
π‘₯
󡄨
󡄨 π‘š 󡄨
󡄨󡄨 Δπ‘˜
󡄨󡄨𝑓 (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 ≤ ∫ β„Žπ‘š−π‘˜−1 (π‘₯, 𝜎 (𝜏)) σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (𝜏)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δ𝜏
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
π‘Ž
π‘₯
󡄨󡄨 π‘š 󡄨󡄨
= ∫ β„Žπ‘š−π‘˜−1 (π‘₯, 𝜎 (𝜏)) 𝑝(𝜏)−1/𝑑 𝑝(𝜏)1/𝑑 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (𝜏)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δ𝜏
󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž
π‘š
(T) = the set of functions
Lemma 2 (see [17]). Let 𝑓 ∈ πΆπ‘Ÿπ‘‘
that are π‘š times differentiable with rd-continuous derivatives
on T, π‘š ∈ N. Then for any π‘Ž, 𝑏 ∈ T and 𝑑 ∈ [π‘Ž, 𝑏] ∩ T,
π‘Ž
1/𝑑
π‘₯
󡄨󡄨 π‘š 󡄨󡄨𝑑
⋅ (∫ 𝑝 (𝜏) σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (𝜏)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δ𝜏)
󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž
𝑓(𝑑) = ∑ β„Žπ‘˜ (𝑑, π‘Ž) π‘“Δ (π‘Ž)
(5)
𝑑
1−1/𝑑
π‘₯
𝑑/(𝑑−1)
≤ [∫ β„Žπ‘š−π‘˜−1
(π‘₯, 𝜎 (𝜏)) 𝑝(𝜏)1/(1−𝑑) Δ𝜏]
π‘˜
π‘˜=0
= 𝑃(π‘₯)1−1/𝑑 𝐹(π‘₯)1/𝑑 ,
π‘š
+ ∫ β„Žπ‘š−1 (𝑑, 𝜎 (𝜏)) π‘“Δ (𝜏) Δ𝜏,
π‘Ž
(10)
𝑑
where β„Ž0 (𝑑, 𝑠) := 1, β„Žπ‘›+1 (𝑑, 𝑠) := ∫𝑠 β„Žπ‘› (𝜏, 𝑠)Δ𝜏, 𝑛 ∈ N.
π‘₯
𝑑/(𝑑−1)
where 𝑃(π‘₯) := ∫π‘Ž β„Žπ‘š−π‘˜−1
(π‘₯, 𝜎(𝜏))𝑝(𝜏)1/(1−𝑑) Δ𝜏, 𝐹(π‘₯) :=
π‘₯
Our main results are given in the following theorems.
Theorem 3. Let 0 ≤ π‘Ÿ ≤ 𝑠 < 𝑑, 𝑠 > 0, 𝑑 > 1 be real numbers,
and let π‘š, π‘˜ be integers with 0 ≤ π‘˜ ≤ π‘š−1. Let 𝑝 > 0 and π‘ž ≥ 0
be measurable functions on Υ := [π‘Ž, 𝑏] ∩ T. Further, let 𝑓, 𝑔 ∈
𝑖
𝑖
π‘š−1
(Υ) with π‘“Δ (π‘Ž) = π‘”Δ (π‘Ž) = 0, 𝑖 = 0, 1, . . . , π‘š − 1,
πΆπ‘Ÿπ‘‘
π‘š−1
π‘š−1
and letπ‘“Δ , π‘”Δ be absolutely continuous on Υ such that the
𝑏
𝑏
π‘š
π‘š
integrals ∫π‘Ž 𝑝(π‘₯)|π‘“Δ (π‘₯)|𝑑 Δπ‘₯ and ∫π‘Ž 𝑝(π‘₯)|π‘”Δ (π‘₯)|𝑑 Δπ‘₯ exist.
Then one has
𝑏
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿ 󡄨󡄨 π‘š
󡄨󡄨𝑠
󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
∫ π‘ž (π‘₯) [σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘”Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿ 󡄨󡄨 π‘š
󡄨󡄨𝑠
󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
+σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘”Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 ] Δπ‘₯
󡄨󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
(6)
1−𝛼
𝑏
≤ 21−𝛼 (∫ β„Ž(π‘₯)𝑑/(𝑑−𝑠) Δπ‘₯)
π‘Ž
⋅ [π›½π‘˜
𝛽−1
π‘š
∫π‘Ž 𝑝(𝜏)|π‘“Δ (𝜏)|𝑑 Δ𝜏.
Let
π‘₯
󡄨󡄨 π‘š 󡄨󡄨𝑑
𝐺 (π‘₯) := ∫ 𝑝 (𝜏) σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘”Δ (𝜏)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δ𝜏.
󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž
𝐹 (𝑏) 𝐺 (𝑏) + (1 − 𝛽) π‘˜ (𝐹 (𝑏) + 𝐺 (𝑏))] ,
where 𝛼 := 𝑠/𝑑, 𝛽 := π‘Ÿ/𝑠,
Then we have
󡄨𝑠
󡄨󡄨 Δπ‘š
󡄨󡄨𝑔 (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 = πΊΔ (π‘₯)𝑠/𝑑 𝑝(π‘₯)−𝑠/𝑑 .
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
So (10) together with (12) implies
󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
󡄨󡄨𝑠
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿ 󡄨󡄨 π‘š
π‘ž (π‘₯) σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘”Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 ≤ β„Ž (π‘₯) 𝐹(π‘₯)π‘Ÿ/𝑑 πΊΔ (π‘₯)𝑠/𝑑 ,
󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨
(13)
where β„Ž(π‘₯) := π‘ž(π‘₯)𝑝(π‘₯)−𝑠/𝑑 𝑃(π‘₯)π‘Ÿ(𝑑−1)/𝑑 . Integrating both sides
of (13) over Υ and making use of Hölder’s inequality, we
obtain
𝑏
π‘Ž
1/(1−𝑑)
Δ𝜏,
𝑃 (π‘₯) := ∫ β„Žπ‘‘/(𝑑−1)
π‘š−π‘˜−1 (π‘₯, 𝜎 (𝜏)) 𝑝(𝜏)
π‘Ž
−𝛼
π‘Ÿ(𝑑−1)/𝑑
β„Ž (π‘₯) := π‘ž (π‘₯) 𝑝(π‘₯) 𝑃(π‘₯)
𝑏
≤ (∫ β„Ž(π‘₯)
,
󡄨󡄨 π‘š 󡄨󡄨𝑑
𝐹 (π‘₯) := ∫ 𝑝 (𝜏) σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (𝜏)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δ𝜏,
󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž
π‘₯
(7)
𝑖
Proof. Since π‘“Δ (π‘Ž) = 0, 𝑖 = 0, 1, . . . , π‘š − 1, we obtain from
Taylor’s theorem that for all π‘₯ ∈ Υ,
π‘š
𝑓(π‘₯) = ∫ β„Žπ‘š−1 (π‘₯, 𝜎 (𝜏)) π‘“Δ (𝜏) Δ𝜏,
𝑑/(𝑑−𝑠)
π‘Ž
1−𝑠/𝑑
Δπ‘₯)
𝑏
𝑠/𝑑
π‘Ÿ/𝑠
Δ
(∫ 𝐹(π‘₯) 𝐺 (π‘₯) Δπ‘₯) .
π‘Ž
(14)
Similarly, we get
󡄨󡄨 π‘š 󡄨󡄨𝑑
𝐺 (π‘₯) := ∫ 𝑝 (𝜏) σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘”Δ (𝜏)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δ𝜏.
󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž
π‘₯
π‘Ž
(12)
≤ ∫ β„Ž (π‘₯) 𝐹(π‘₯)π‘Ÿ/𝑑 πΊΔ (π‘₯)𝑠/𝑑 Δπ‘₯
π‘₯
π‘₯
(11)
𝑏
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿ 󡄨󡄨 π‘š
󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
󡄨󡄨𝑠
∫ π‘ž (π‘₯) σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘”Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δπ‘₯
󡄨󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž
𝛼
𝛽
(9)
From (9) and Hölder’s inequality we get
for any π‘˜ > 0.
π‘š−1
π‘š
π‘Ž
Lemma 1 (see [16]). Let π‘Ž ≥ 0, 𝑝 ≥ 1 be real constants. Then
π‘Ž1/𝑝 ≤
π‘₯
π‘˜
π‘“Δ (π‘₯) = ∫ β„Žπ‘š−π‘˜−1 (π‘₯, 𝜎 (𝜏)) π‘“Δ (𝜏) Δ𝜏.
(8)
𝑏
󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿ 󡄨󡄨 π‘š
󡄨󡄨𝑠
∫ π‘ž (π‘₯) σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘”Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δπ‘₯
󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž
𝑏
1−𝑠/𝑑
≤ (∫ β„Ž(π‘₯)𝑑/(𝑑−𝑠) Δπ‘₯)
π‘Ž
𝑏
𝑠/𝑑
⋅ (∫ 𝐺(π‘₯)π‘Ÿ/𝑠 πΉΔ (π‘₯) Δπ‘₯) .
π‘Ž
(15)
Abstract and Applied Analysis
3
Recall the elementary inequalities
From (18) and (19), we conclude
𝑐𝛼 (𝐴 + 𝐡)𝛼 ≤ 𝐴𝛼 + 𝐡𝛼 ≤ 𝑑𝛼 (𝐴 + 𝐡)𝛼 ,
(𝐴, 𝐡 ≥ 0) ,
(16)
where
𝑏
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿ 󡄨󡄨 π‘š
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿ 󡄨󡄨 π‘š
󡄨󡄨𝑠
󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
󡄨󡄨𝑠 󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
∫ π‘ž (π‘₯) [σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘”Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 + σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘”Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 ] Δπ‘₯
󡄨󡄨
󡄨 󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž
1−𝛼
𝑏
𝑐𝛼 := {
𝑑𝛼 := {
1,
21−𝛼 ,
≤ 21−𝛼 (∫ β„Ž(π‘₯)𝑑/(𝑑−𝑠) Δπ‘₯)
0 ≤ 𝛼 ≤ 1,
𝛼 ≥ 1,
1−𝛼
2 ,
1,
π‘Ž
(17)
0 ≤ 𝛼 ≤ 1,
𝛼 ≥ 1.
Let 𝛽 = π‘Ÿ/𝑠. Since 𝛼 = 𝑠/𝑑 ∈ (0, 1) and 𝐹 is nondecreasing,
from (14)–(16), we have
𝑏
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿ 󡄨󡄨 π‘š
󡄨󡄨𝑠 󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿ 󡄨󡄨 π‘š
󡄨󡄨𝑠
󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
∫ π‘ž (π‘₯) [σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘”Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 + σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘”Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 ] Δπ‘₯
󡄨󡄨
󡄨 󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž
1−𝛼
𝑏
≤ (∫ β„Ž(π‘₯)𝑑/(𝑑−𝑠) Δπ‘₯)
Δ
𝛼
𝛽
The proof is complete.
Theorem 4. Let π‘Ÿ ≥ 0, 𝑠 > 0, 𝑠 < 𝑑, 𝑑 > 1 be real numbers, and
let π‘š, π‘˜ be integers with 0 ≤ π‘˜ ≤ π‘š − 1. Let 𝑝 > 0, and π‘ž ≥ 0
be measurable functions on Υ := [π‘Ž, 𝑏] ∩ T. Further, let 𝑓, 𝑔 ∈
𝑖
𝑖
π‘š−1
(Υ) with let π‘“Δ (π‘Ž) = π‘”Δ (π‘Ž) = 0, 𝑖 = 0, 1, . . . , π‘š − 1,
πΆπ‘Ÿπ‘‘
π‘š−1
π‘š−1
and π‘“Δ , π‘”Δ be absolutely continuous on Υ such that the
𝑏
π‘Ž
𝑏
𝛼
⋅ [π›½π‘˜π›½−1 𝐹 (𝑏) 𝐺 (𝑏) + (1 − 𝛽) π‘˜π›½ (𝐹 (𝑏) + 𝐺 (𝑏))] .
(20)
𝑏
Δ
𝛼
𝛽
𝑏
π‘š
π‘š
integrals ∫π‘Ž 𝑝(π‘₯)|π‘“Δ (π‘₯)|𝑑 Δπ‘₯ and ∫π‘Ž 𝑝(π‘₯)|π‘”Δ (π‘₯)|𝑑 Δπ‘₯ exist.
Then one has
⋅ [(∫ 𝐹 (π‘₯) 𝐺 (π‘₯) Δπ‘₯) + (∫ 𝐺 (π‘₯) 𝐹 (π‘₯) Δπ‘₯) ]
π‘Ž
π‘Ž
𝑏
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿ 󡄨󡄨 π‘š
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿ 󡄨󡄨 π‘š
󡄨󡄨𝑠
󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
󡄨󡄨𝑠 󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
∫ π‘ž (π‘₯) [σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘”Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 + σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘”Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 ] Δπ‘₯
󡄨󡄨
󡄨 󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž
1−𝛼
𝑏
≤ (∫ β„Ž(π‘₯)𝑑/(𝑑−𝑠) Δπ‘₯)
π‘Ž
1−𝛼
𝑏
≤ 21−𝛼 (∫ β„Ž(π‘₯)𝑑/(𝑑−𝑠) Δπ‘₯)
𝛼
𝑏
⋅21−𝛼 (∫ [πΉΔ (π‘₯) 𝐺𝛽 (π‘₯) + πΊΔ (π‘₯) 𝐹𝛽 (π‘₯)] Δπ‘₯)
π‘Ž
π‘Ž
𝛼
⋅ [𝑑𝛽 Γ (𝐺 + 𝐹) − Γ (𝐺) − Γ (𝐹)] ,
1−𝛼
𝑏
≤ (∫ β„Ž(π‘₯)𝑑/(𝑑−𝑠) Δπ‘₯)
(21)
π‘Ž
𝛼
𝑏
⋅ 21−𝛼 (∫ [πΉΔ (π‘₯) 𝐺𝛽 (π‘₯) + πΊΔ (π‘₯) 𝐹𝛽 (𝜎 (π‘₯))] Δπ‘₯) .
π‘Ž
(18)
𝑏
where Γ(𝐻) := ∫π‘Ž 𝐻𝛽 Δ𝐻, 𝛽 := π‘Ÿ/𝑠, 𝛼 := 𝑠/𝑑, β„Ž(π‘₯) := π‘ž(π‘₯)𝑝(π‘₯)−𝛼
π‘₯
𝑑/(𝑑−1)
𝑃(π‘₯)π‘Ÿ(𝑑−1)/𝑑 , 𝑃(π‘₯) := ∫π‘Ž β„Žπ‘š−π‘˜−1
(π‘₯, 𝜎(𝜏))𝑝(𝜏)1/(1−𝑑) Δ𝜏, and
By Lemma 1, we get
21−𝛽 ,
𝑑𝛽 := {
1,
𝑏
∫ [πΉΔ (π‘₯) 𝐺𝛽 (π‘₯) + πΊΔ (π‘₯) 𝐹𝛽 (𝜎 (π‘₯))] Δπ‘₯
0 ≤ 𝛽 ≤ 1,
𝛽 ≥ 1.
(22)
π‘Ž
𝑏
≤ ∫ [π›½π‘˜π›½−1 𝐺 (π‘₯) πΉΔ (π‘₯) + (1 − 𝛽) π‘˜π›½ πΉΔ (π‘₯)
Proof. Following the proof of Theorem 3, we obtain
π‘Ž
+ π›½π‘˜π›½−1 𝐹 (𝜎 (π‘₯)) πΊΔ (π‘₯) + (1 − 𝛽) π‘˜π›½ πΊΔ (π‘₯)] Δπ‘₯
𝑏
= π›½π‘˜π›½−1 ∫ [𝐺 (π‘₯) πΉΔ (π‘₯) + 𝐹 (𝜎 (π‘₯)) πΊΔ (π‘₯)] Δπ‘₯
π‘Ž
𝑏
𝑏
π‘Ž
π‘Ž
= π›½π‘˜
1−𝛼
𝑏
≤ (∫ β„Ž(π‘₯)𝑑/(𝑑−𝑠) Δπ‘₯)
π‘Ž
+ (1 − 𝛽) π‘˜π›½ [∫ πΉΔ (π‘₯) Δπ‘₯ + ∫ πΊΔ (π‘₯) Δπ‘₯]
𝛽−1
𝑏
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿ 󡄨󡄨 π‘š
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿ 󡄨󡄨 π‘š
󡄨󡄨𝑠
󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
󡄨󡄨𝑠 󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
∫ π‘ž (π‘₯) [σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘”Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 + σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘”Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 ] Δπ‘₯
󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž
𝑏
𝛼
⋅ 21−𝛼 (∫ [πΉΔ (π‘₯) 𝐺𝛽 π‘₯ + πΊΔ (π‘₯) 𝐹𝛽 (π‘₯)] Δπ‘₯) .
𝛽
𝐹 (𝑏) 𝐺 (𝑏) + (1 − 𝛽) π‘˜ [𝐹 (𝑏) + 𝐺 (𝑏)] .
π‘Ž
(19)
(23)
4
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Integrating both sides over π‘₯ from π‘Ž to 𝑏 and using
Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we observe
Using (16),
𝑏
𝑏󡄨
π‘š
󡄨󡄨
󡄨 π‘˜
∫ σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯) π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δπ‘₯
󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž
∫ [πΉΔ (π‘₯) 𝐺𝛽 (π‘₯) + πΊΔ (π‘₯) 𝐹𝛽 (π‘₯)] Δπ‘₯
π‘Ž
𝑏
= ∫ (𝐺𝛽 (π‘₯) + 𝐹𝛽 (π‘₯)) (πΊΔ (π‘₯) + πΉΔ (π‘₯)) Δπ‘₯
π‘Ž
𝑏
𝛽
Δ
𝛽
Δ
− ∫ (𝐺 (π‘₯) 𝐺 (π‘₯) + 𝐹 (π‘₯) 𝐹 (π‘₯)) Δπ‘₯
π‘Ž
≤ 𝑑𝛽 ∫ (𝐺 (π‘₯) + 𝐹 (π‘₯))𝛽 Δ (𝐺 (π‘₯) + 𝐹 (π‘₯))
π‘Ž
π‘Ž
π‘Ž
π‘Ž
𝑏
π‘Ž
𝑏
π‘₯
1/2
1/2
𝑏󡄨
󡄨󡄨2 π‘₯ 󡄨󡄨 π‘š 󡄨󡄨2
󡄨 π‘š
⋅ [∫ σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 ∫ σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (𝜏)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δ𝜏Δπ‘₯]
󡄨 π‘Ž 󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž 󡄨
(24)
𝑏
𝑏
𝑏
2
≤ [∫ ∫ β„Žπ‘š−π‘˜−1
(π‘₯, 𝜎 (𝜏)) Δ𝜏Δπ‘₯]
(28)
1/2
π‘₯
2
= [∫ ∫ β„Žπ‘š−π‘˜−1
(π‘₯, 𝜎 (𝜏)) Δ𝜏Δπ‘₯]
π‘Ž π‘Ž
− ∫ 𝐺𝛽 (π‘₯) Δ𝐺 (π‘₯) − ∫ 𝐹𝛽 (π‘₯) Δ𝐹 (π‘₯)
1/2
𝑏󡄨
󡄨 π‘š 󡄨󡄨2
⋅ [∫ σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (𝜏)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δ𝜏] .
󡄨
π‘Ž 󡄨
= 𝑑𝛽 Γ (𝐺 + 𝐹) − Γ (𝐺) − Γ (𝐹) .
The proof is complete.
The proof is complete.
Remark 5. In the special case where T = R, Theorem 4
reduces to Theorem 1 of [13].
π‘š−1
(Υ), Υ := [π‘Ž, 𝑏] ∩ T be such that
Theorem 6. Let 𝑓 ∈ πΆπ‘Ÿπ‘‘
π‘š−1
Δ𝑖
𝑓 (π‘Ž) = 0, 0 ≤ π‘˜ ≤ π‘š−1, let π‘“Δ (π‘₯) be absolutely continuous
𝑏
Theorem 7. Let 𝑝(π‘₯) > 0, π‘ž(π‘₯) be nonnegative and measurπ‘š−1
able on Υ = [π‘Ž, 𝑏] ∩ T, and let 𝑓 ∈ πΆπ‘Ÿπ‘‘
(Υ) be such that
π‘˜
π‘š−1
π‘“Δ (π‘Ž) = 0, 0 ≤ π‘˜ ≤ π‘š − 1. If π‘“Δ (π‘₯) is absolutely continuous
on Υ, then for π‘Ÿ > 1, π‘Ÿπ‘˜ > 0, and any 0 ≤ π‘Ÿπ‘š < π‘Ÿ,
𝑏
󡄨󡄨 π‘š
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿπ‘š 󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿπ‘˜
∫ π‘ž (π‘₯) σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δπ‘₯
󡄨
󡄨 󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž
π‘š
on Υ, and let ∫π‘Ž |π‘“Δ (π‘₯)|2 Δπ‘₯ < ∞. Then
𝑏
≤ [∫ π‘ž(π‘₯)π‘Ÿ/(π‘Ÿ−π‘Ÿπ‘š ) 𝑝(π‘₯)−π‘Ÿπ‘š /(π‘Ÿ−π‘Ÿπ‘š )
π‘š
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
∫ σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯) π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δπ‘₯
󡄨
π‘Ž 󡄨
𝑏
𝑏
≤ (∫ ∫
π‘₯
π‘Ž π‘Ž
2
β„Žπ‘š−π‘˜−1
(π‘Ÿ−π‘Ÿπ‘š )/π‘Ÿ
× π‘„(π‘₯)(π‘Ÿ−1)π‘Ÿπ‘š /(π‘Ÿ−π‘Ÿπ‘š ) Δπ‘₯]
1/2
(π‘₯, 𝜎 (𝜏)) Δ𝜏Δπ‘₯)
π‘Ÿ /π‘Ÿ
Φ(𝑦) π‘š ,
(25)
π‘₯
π‘Ÿ/π‘Ÿ−1
where 𝑄(π‘₯) := ∫π‘Ž β„Žπ‘š−π‘˜−1
(π‘₯, 𝜎(𝜏))𝑝(𝜏)−(π‘Ÿ/π‘Ÿ−1) Δ𝜏, Φ(𝑦) :=
1/2
𝑏󡄨
󡄨 π‘š 󡄨󡄨2
⋅ (∫ σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (𝜏)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δ𝜏)
󡄨
π‘Ž 󡄨
𝑏
π‘₯
󡄨󡄨 Δπ‘˜
󡄨
󡄨 π‘š 󡄨
󡄨󡄨𝑓 (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 ≤ ∫ β„Žπ‘š−π‘˜−1 (π‘₯, 𝜎 (𝜏)) σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (𝜏)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δ𝜏.
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
π‘Ž
(26)
π‘š
Multiplying (26) by |π‘“Δ (π‘₯)| and using Cauchy-Schwarz
inequality, we obtain
π‘š
Proof. Following the hypotheses, it is easy to see that (26)
holds. By using Hölder’s inequality with indices π‘Ÿ and π‘Ÿ/(π‘Ÿ−1),
we obtain
󡄨
󡄨󡄨 Δπ‘˜
󡄨󡄨𝑓 (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
π‘₯
󡄨󡄨 π‘š 󡄨󡄨
≤ ∫ β„Žπ‘š−π‘˜−1 (π‘₯, 𝜎 (𝜏)) 𝑝(𝜏)−1/π‘Ÿ 𝑝(𝜏)1/π‘Ÿ σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (𝜏)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δ𝜏
󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž
(π‘Ÿ−1)/π‘Ÿ
π‘₯
π‘Ÿ/(π‘Ÿ−1)
≤ [∫ β„Žπ‘š−π‘˜−1
(π‘₯, 𝜎 (𝜏)) 𝑝(𝜏)−π‘Ÿ/(π‘Ÿ−1) Δ𝜏]
(30)
π‘Ž
π‘š
󡄨
󡄨󡄨 Δπ‘˜
󡄨󡄨𝑓 (π‘₯) π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 π‘₯
󡄨󡄨 π‘š 󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 π‘š
≤ σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 ∫ β„Žπ‘š−π‘˜−1 (π‘₯, 𝜎 (𝜏)) σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (𝜏)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δ𝜏
󡄨
󡄨 π‘Ž
󡄨
󡄨
1/2
󡄨󡄨 π‘š
󡄨󡄨 π‘₯
≤ σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 (∫ β„Ž2π‘š−π‘˜−1 (π‘₯, 𝜎 (𝜏)) Δ𝜏)
󡄨
󡄨 π‘Ž
π‘₯
∫π‘Ž π‘¦π‘Ÿπ‘˜ /π‘Ÿπ‘š Δ𝑦(π‘₯), 𝑦(π‘₯) := ∫π‘Ž 𝑝(𝜏)|π‘“Δ (𝜏)|π‘Ÿ Δ𝜏.
.
Proof. From the hypotheses, we have
1/2
π‘₯󡄨
󡄨 π‘š 󡄨󡄨2
⋅ (∫ σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (𝜏)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δ𝜏) .
󡄨
π‘Ž 󡄨
(29)
π‘Ž
1/π‘Ÿ
π‘₯
󡄨󡄨 π‘š σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿ
⋅ [∫ 𝑝 (𝜏) σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (𝜏)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δ𝜏]
󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž
(27)
= 𝑄(π‘₯)(π‘Ÿ−1)/π‘Ÿ 𝑦(π‘₯)1/π‘Ÿ ,
π‘₯
π‘Ÿ/(π‘Ÿ−1)
where 𝑄(π‘₯) := ∫π‘Ž β„Žπ‘š−π‘˜−1
(π‘₯, 𝜎(𝜏))𝑝(𝜏)−π‘Ÿ/(π‘Ÿ−1) Δ𝜏, 𝑦(π‘₯) :=
π‘₯
π‘š
∫π‘Ž 𝑝(𝜏)|π‘“Δ (𝜏)|π‘Ÿ Δ𝜏. So we get
󡄨󡄨 π‘š
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿ
π‘¦Δ (π‘₯) = 𝑝 (π‘₯) σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 ,
󡄨
󡄨
(31)
Abstract and Applied Analysis
5
and hence for any π‘Ÿπ‘š ,
σ΅„¨π‘Ÿ
󡄨󡄨 Δπ‘š
󡄨󡄨𝑓 (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 π‘š = (𝑝 (π‘₯))−π‘Ÿπ‘š /π‘Ÿ (π‘¦Δ (π‘₯))π‘Ÿπ‘š /π‘Ÿ .
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
(32)
Thus for π‘Ÿπ‘˜ > 0,
󡄨󡄨 π‘š
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿπ‘š 󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿπ‘˜
π‘ž (π‘₯) σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨
󡄨 󡄨
󡄨
≤ π‘ž (π‘₯) (𝑝 (π‘₯))
−π‘Ÿπ‘š /π‘Ÿ
π‘Ÿπ‘š /π‘Ÿ
(π‘¦Δ (π‘₯))
(33)
× π‘„(π‘₯)(π‘Ÿ−1)π‘Ÿπ‘˜ /π‘Ÿ 𝑦(π‘₯)π‘Ÿπ‘˜ /π‘Ÿ .
Integrating both sides of (33) from π‘Ž to 𝑏 and applying
Hölder’s inequality with indices π‘Ÿ/π‘Ÿπ‘š and π‘Ÿ/(π‘Ÿ−π‘Ÿπ‘š ), we obtain
𝑏
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿπ‘š 󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿπ‘˜
󡄨󡄨 π‘š
∫ π‘ž (π‘₯) σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘“Δ (π‘₯)󡄨󡄨󡄨 Δπ‘₯
󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
π‘Ž
𝑏
π‘Ÿπ‘š /π‘Ÿ
≤ ∫ π‘ž (π‘₯) 𝑝(π‘₯)−π‘Ÿπ‘š /π‘Ÿ (π‘¦Δ (π‘₯))
𝑄(π‘₯)(π‘Ÿ−1)π‘Ÿπ‘˜ /π‘Ÿπ‘¦(π‘₯)π‘Ÿπ‘˜ /π‘Ÿ Δπ‘₯
π‘Ž
𝑏
≤ [∫ π‘ž(π‘₯)
π‘Ÿ/(π‘Ÿ−π‘Ÿπ‘š )
−π‘Ÿπ‘š /(π‘Ÿ−π‘Ÿπ‘š )
𝑝(π‘₯)
π‘Ž
(π‘Ÿ−1)π‘Ÿπ‘˜ /(π‘Ÿ−π‘Ÿπ‘š )
𝑄(π‘₯)
(π‘Ÿ−π‘Ÿπ‘š )/π‘Ÿ
Δπ‘₯]
π‘Ÿπ‘š /π‘Ÿ
𝑏
⋅ [∫ π‘¦Δ (π‘₯) 𝑦(π‘₯)π‘Ÿπ‘˜ /π‘Ÿπ‘š Δπ‘₯]
π‘Ž
𝑏
= [∫ π‘ž(π‘₯)π‘Ÿ/(π‘Ÿ−π‘Ÿπ‘š ) 𝑝(π‘₯)−π‘Ÿπ‘š /(π‘Ÿ−π‘Ÿπ‘š )
π‘Ž
(π‘Ÿ−1)π‘Ÿπ‘˜ /(π‘Ÿ−π‘Ÿπ‘š )
×𝑄(π‘₯)
(π‘Ÿ−π‘Ÿπ‘š )/π‘Ÿ
Δπ‘₯]
π‘Ÿ /π‘Ÿ
Φ(𝑦) π‘š ,
(34)
𝑏
where Φ(𝑦) := ∫π‘Ž 𝑦(π‘₯)π‘Ÿπ‘˜ /π‘Ÿπ‘š Δ𝑦(π‘₯). The proof is complete.
Remark 8. In the special case where T = R, Theorems 6 and
7 reduce to Theorems 1 and 2 of [18].
Acknowledgments
The first author’s research was supported by NSF of China
(11071054), Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province
(A2011205012). The second author’s research was partially
supported by an HKU URG grant.
References
[1] Z. Opial, “Sur une inégalité,” Annales Polonici Mathematici, vol.
8, pp. 29–32, 1960.
[2] G. A. Anastassiou, “Opial type inequalities involving RiemannLiouville fractional derivatives of two functions with applications,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 48, no. 3-4,
pp. 344–374, 2008.
[3] W.-S. Cheung, Z. Dandan, and J. Pečarić, “Opial-type inequalities for differential operators,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory,
Methods & Applications, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 2028–2039, 2007.
[4] W. S. Cheung, “Some generalized opial-type inequalities,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 162, no. 2,
pp. 317–321, 1991.
[5] W. S. Cheung, “Opial-type inequalities with π‘š functions in 𝑛
variables,” Mathematika, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 319–326, 1992.
[6] C.-J. Zhao and W.-S. Cheung, “On some opial-type inequalities,” Journal of Inequalities and Applications, vol. 2011, article 7,
2011.
[7] C. J. Zhao and W. S. Cheung, “On opial’s type inequalities
for an integral operator with homogeneous kernel,” Journal of
Inequalities and Applications, vol. 2012, article 123, 2012.
[8] R. P. Agarwal and V. Lakshmikantham, Uniqueness and
Nonuniqueness Criteria for Ordinary Differential Equations,
vol. 6 of Series in Real Analysis, World Scientific Publishing,
Singapore, 1993.
[9] J. D. Li, “Opial-type integral inequalities involving several
higher order derivatives,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and
Applications, vol. 167, no. 1, pp. 98–110, 1992.
[10] R. P. Agarwal and P. Y. H. Pang, Opial Inequalities with
Applications in Differential and Difference Equations, vol. 320 of
Mathematics and Its Applications, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht,
The Netherlands, 1995.
[11] D. S. Mitrinović, J. E. Pečarić, and A. M. Fink, Inequalities
Involving Functions and Their Integrals and Derivatives, vol. 53 of
Mathematics and Its Applications (East European Series), Kluwer
Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1991.
[12] Z. Olech, “A simple proof of a certain result of Z. Opial,” Annales
Polonici Mathematici, vol. 8, pp. 61–63, 1960.
[13] H. Alzer, “An Opial-type inequality involving higher-order
derivatives of two functions,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol.
10, no. 4, pp. 123–128, 1997.
[14] R. P. Agarwal and P. Y. H. Pang, “Sharp Opial-type inequalities
involving higher order derivatives of two functions,” Mathematische Nachrichten, vol. 174, pp. 5–20, 1995.
[15] M. Bohner and A. Peterson, Dynamic Equations on Time scales:
An Introduction with Applications, Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass,
USA, 2001.
[16] W. N. Li, “Some new dynamic inequalities on time scales,”
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 319, no.
2, pp. 802–814, 2006.
[17] M. Bohner and G. Sh. Guseinov, “The convolution on time
scales,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, Article ID 58373, 24
pages, 2007.
[18] C. J. Zhao and W. S. Cheung, “On opial-type inequalities with
higher order partial derivatives,” Applied Mathematics Letters,
vol. 25, pp. 2156–2161, 2012.
Advances in
Operations Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Advances in
Decision Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems
in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Journal of
Algebra
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Probability and Statistics
Volume 2014
The Scientific
World Journal
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
International Journal of
Differential Equations
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Submit your manuscripts at
http://www.hindawi.com
International Journal of
Advances in
Combinatorics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Mathematical Physics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Journal of
Complex Analysis
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
International
Journal of
Mathematics and
Mathematical
Sciences
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Stochastic Analysis
Abstract and
Applied Analysis
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
International Journal of
Mathematics
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Discrete Dynamics in
Nature and Society
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Journal of
Journal of
Discrete Mathematics
Journal of
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Applied Mathematics
Journal of
Function Spaces
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Optimization
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Download