Hindawi Publishing Corporation Abstract and Applied Analysis Volume 2013, Article ID 420514, 6 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/420514 Research Article Existence and Exact Asymptotic Behavior of Positive Solutions for a Fractional Boundary Value Problem Habib Mâagli, Noureddine Mhadhebi, and Noureddine Zeddini King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh Campus, College of Sciences and Arts, Department of Mathematics, P.O. Box 344, Rabigh 21911, Saudi Arabia Correspondence should be addressed to Noureddine Zeddini; noureddine.zeddini@ipein.rnu.tn Received 4 November 2012; Accepted 25 December 2012 Academic Editor: Chuanzhi Bai Copyright © 2013 Habib MaΜagli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. We establish the existence and uniqueness of a positive solution π’ for the fractional boundary value problem π·πΌ π’(π₯) = −π(π₯)π’π (π₯), π₯ ∈ (0, 1) with the condition limπ₯ → 0 π·πΌ−1 π’(π₯) = 0, π’(1) = 0, where 1 < πΌ ≤ 2, π ∈ (−1, 1), and π is a nonnegative continuous function on (0, 1) that may be singular at π₯ = 0 or π₯ = 1. 1. Introduction Fractional differential equations arise in various fields of science and engineering such as control, porous media, electrochemistry, viscoelasticity, and electromagnetism. They also serve as an excellent tool for the description of hereditary properties of various materials and processes (see[1–3]). In consequence, the subject of fractional differential equations is gaining much importance and attention. Motivated by the surge in the development of this subject, we consider the following problem: π·πΌ π’ (π₯) = −π (π₯) π’π (π₯) , lim+ π·πΌ−1 π’ (π₯) = 0, π₯→0 π₯ ∈ (0, 1) , π’ (1) = 0, (1) where 1 < πΌ ≤ 2, −1 < π < 1, π is a nonnegative continuous function on (0, 1) that may be singular at π₯ = 0 or π₯ = 1 and π·πΌ is the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative. Then we study the existence and exact asymptotic behavior of positive solutions for this problem. We recall that for a measurable function V, the RiemannLiouville fractional integral πΌπ½ V and the Riemann-Liouville derivative π·π½ V of order π½ > 0 are, respectively, defined by πΌπ½ V (π₯) = π·π½ V (π₯) = π₯ 1 ∫ (π₯ − π‘)π½−1 V (π‘) ππ‘, Γ (π½) 0 1 π π π₯ ( ) ∫ (π₯ − π‘)π−π½−1 V (π‘) ππ‘ Γ (π − π½) ππ₯ 0 =( (2) π π ) πΌπ−π½ V (π₯) , ππ₯ provided that the right-hand sides are pointwise defined on (0, 1]. Here π = [π½] + 1 and [π½] means the integral part of the number π½ and Γ is the Euler Gamma function. Moreover, we have the following well-known properties (see [2, 4]): (i) πΌπ½ πΌπΎ V(π₯) = πΌπ½+πΎ V(π₯) for π₯ ∈ [0, 1], V ∈ πΏ1 ((0, 1]), π½ + πΎ ≥ 1, (ii) π·π½ πΌπ½ V(π₯) = V(π₯) for a.e. π₯ ∈ [0, 1], where V ∈ πΏ1 ((0, 1]), π½ > 0, (iii) π·π½ V(π₯) = 0 if and only if V(π₯) = ∑ππ=1 ππ π‘π½−π , where π = [π½] + 1 and (π1 , π2 , . . . , ππ ) ∈ Rπ . Several results are obtained for fractional differential equation with different boundary conditions (see [5–15] and the 2 Abstract and Applied Analysis references therein), but none of them deals with the existence of a positive solution for problem (1). Our aim in this paper is to establish the existence and uniqueness of a positive solution π’ ∈ πΆ2−πΌ ([0, 1]) for problem (1) with a precise asymptotic behavior, where πΆ2−πΌ ([0, 1]) is the set of all functions π such that π‘ → π‘2−πΌ π(π‘) is continuous on [0, 1]. Note that for 0 < πΌ < 2, the solution π’ for problem (1) blows up at π₯ = 0. To state our result, we need some notations. We will use K to denote the set of Karamata functions πΏ defined on (0, π] by 2. Technical Lemmas To keep the paper self-contained, we begin this section by recapitulating some properties of Karamata regular variation theory. The following is due to [16, 17]. Lemma 2. The following hold. (i) Let πΏ ∈ K and π > 0, then one has lim π‘π πΏ (π‘) = 0. (9) π‘ → 0+ (3) (ii) Let πΏ 1 , πΏ 2 ∈ K and π ∈ R. Then one has πΏ 1 +πΏ 2 ∈ K, π πΏ 1 πΏ 2 ∈ K, and πΏ 1 ∈ K. for some π > 1, where π > 0 and π§ ∈ πΆ([0, π]) such that π§(0) = 0. It is clear that a function πΏ is in K if and only if πΏ is a positive function in πΆ1 ((0, π]) such that Example 3. Let π ∈ N∗ . Let π > 0, (π1 , π2 , . . . , ππ ) ∈ Rπ and let π be a sufficiently large positive real number such that the function πΏ (π‘) := π exp (∫ π π‘ lim+ π‘→0 π§ (π ) ππ ) , π π‘πΏσΈ (π‘) = 0. πΏ (π‘) For two nonnegative functions π and π defined on a set π, the notation π(π₯) ≈ π(π₯), π₯ ∈ π, means that there exists π > 0 such that (1/π)π(π₯) ≤ π(π₯) ≤ ππ(π₯), for all π₯ ∈ π. We denote also π₯+ = max(π₯, 0) for π₯ ∈ R. Throughout this paper we assume that π is nonnegative on (0, 1) and satisfies the following condition. (π»0 ) π ∈ πΆ((0, 1)) such that −π −π π (π‘) ≈ π‘ πΏ 1 (π‘) (1 − π‘) πΏ 2 (1 − π‘) , π‘ ∈ (0, 1) , (5) ∫ 0 πΏ 1 (π‘) ππ‘ < ∞, π‘π+(2−πΌ)π ∫ π 0 πΏ 2 (π‘) ππ‘ < ∞. π‘π−πΌ+1 (6) π (π₯) . < π −1, then ∫0 π π πΏ(π )ππ diverges and π > −1, then ∫0 π π πΏ(π )ππ π‘ π ∫0 π πΏ(π )ππ ∼π‘ → 0+ (π‘1+π πΏ(π‘)/(π + 1)). (ii) If π converges and Lemma 5. Let πΏ ∈ K be defined on (0, π]. Then one has lim π π‘ → 0+ ∫ π‘ (7) πΏ (π‘) (πΏ (π ) /π ) ππ (11) π πΏ (π‘) (πΏ (π ) /π ) ππ = 0. (12) Proof. We distinguish two cases. π Case 1. We suppose that ∫0 (πΏ(π )/π )ππ converges. Since the function π‘ → πΏ(π‘)/π‘ is nonincreasing in (0, π], for some π < π, it follows that, for each π‘ ≤ π, we have πΏ (π‘) ≤ ∫ π‘ 0 (8) This paper is organized as follows. Some preliminary lemmas are stated and proved in the next section, involving some already known results on Karamata functions. In Section 3, we give the proof of Theorem 1. = 0. If further ∫0 (πΏ(π )/π )ππ converges, then one has lim π‘ π‘ → 0+ ∫ 0 Theorem 1. Let π ∈ (−1, 1) and assume that π satisfies (H0 ). Then problem (1) has a unique positive solution π’ ∈ πΆ2−πΌ ([0, 1]) satisfying for π₯ ∈ (0, 1) π’ (π₯) ≈ π₯ Lemma 4. Let π ∈ R and let πΏ be a function in K defined on (0, π]. One has the following. π Our main result is the following. πΌ−2 Applying Karamata’s theorem (see [16, 17]), we get the following. ∫π‘ π π πΏ(π )ππ ∼π‘ → 0+ − (π‘1+π πΏ(π‘)/(π + 1)). In the sequel, we introduce the function π defined on (0, 1) by 1 − π₯ if π < π + πΌ − 1, { { { 1/(1−π) π { { {(1 − π₯) (∫ πΏ 2 (π ) ππ ) { { { π { 1−π₯ { { { if π = π + πΌ − 1, { { { 1/(1−π) π (π₯) = {(1 − π₯)(πΌ−π)/(1−π) (πΏ 2 (1 − π₯)) { { { if π + πΌ − 1 < π < πΌ, { { { 1/(1−π) { 1−π₯ { πΏ 2 (π ) { { if π = πΌ. ππ ) {(∫ { { π { { 0 { (10) is defined and positive on (0, π], for some π > 1, where logπ π₯ = log β log β ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ β log π₯ (π times). Then πΏ ∈ K. (i) If π where π + (2 − πΌ)π ≤ 1, π ≤ πΌ, πΏ 1 , πΏ 2 ∈ K satisfying π π π −ππ πΏ (π‘) = π∏(logπ ( )) π‘ π=1 (4) πΏ (π ) ππ . π (13) It follows that limπ‘ → 0+ πΏ(π‘) = 0. So we deduce (11). Now put π (π‘) = πΏ (π‘) , π‘ for π‘ ∈ (0, π) . (14) Abstract and Applied Analysis 3 Using that limπ‘ → 0+ (π‘πσΈ (π‘)/π(π‘)) = −1, we obtain π‘ π‘ π‘ 0 0 0 Using the fact that limπ₯ → 0 π·πΌ−1 π’(π₯) = 0 and π’(1) = 0, we obtain π1 = 0 and π2 = πΌπΌ π(1). So ∫ π (π ) ππ ∼π‘ → 0+ − ∫ π πσΈ (π ) ππ = −π‘π (π‘) + ∫ π (π ) ππ . π’ (π₯) = (15) π‘ 0 π‘ πΏ (π ) πΏ (π ) ππ ∼π‘ → 0+ − πΏ (π‘) + ∫ ππ . π π 0 π π π‘ π‘ (17) This implies that π‘ π πΏ (π ) πΏ (π ) ππ ∼π‘ → 0+ πΏ (π‘) − ππ (π) + ∫ ππ . π π π‘ (18) This proves (11) and completes the proof. π‘ σ³¨→ ∫ π‘ πΏ (π ) ππ ∈ K. π (19) π If further ∫0 (πΏ(π )/π )ππ converges, we have by (11) that π‘ σ³¨→ ∫ π‘ 0 πΏ (π ) ππ ∈ K. π π π min (1, ) (1 − ππ‘π ) ≤ 1 − ππ‘π ≤ max (1, ) (1 − ππ‘π ) . π π (25) Proposition 9. On (0, 1) × (0, 1), one has πΊπΌ (π₯, π‘) ≈ π₯πΌ−2 (1 − π‘)πΌ−2 (1 − max (π₯, π‘)) . lim π·πΌ−1 π’ (π₯) = 0, (21) 0 ]. (27) Since (π₯ − π‘)+ /π₯(1 − π‘) ∈ (0, 1) for π‘ ∈ (0, 1), then, by applying Lemma 8 with π = πΌ − 1 and π = 1, we obtain =π₯ has a unique solution given by π’ (π₯) = πΊπΌ π (π₯) := ∫ πΊπΌ (π₯, π‘) π (π‘) ππ‘, (π₯ − π‘)+ (1 − π‘)πΌ−1 π₯πΌ−2 [1 − π₯( ) Γ (πΌ) π₯ (1 − π‘) (20) π’ (1) = 0, 1 (26) πΌ−1 πΊπΌ (π₯, π‘) = πΌ−2 (1 − π‘) πΌ−2 (π₯ − π‘)+ ) 1−π‘ (28) (1 − max (π₯, π‘)) , which completes the proof. In the sequel we put π‘ ∈ (0, 1) , π₯→0 π (π‘) = π‘−π½ πΏ 3 (π‘) (1 − π‘)−πΎ πΏ 4 (1 − π‘) , (29) where πΏ 3 , πΏ 4 ∈ K and we aim to give some estimates on π₯2−πΌ πΊπΌ π(π₯). Proposition 10. Assume that πΏ 3 , πΏ 4 ∈ K, π½ ≤ 1, πΎ ≤ πΌ with (22) π ∫ π‘−π½ πΏ 3 (π‘) ππ‘ < ∞, 0 where πΊπΌ (π₯, π‘) = Lemma 8. For π, π ∈ (0, ∞), and π, π‘ ∈ [0, 1], one has πΊπΌ (π₯, π‘) ≈ π₯πΌ−2 (1 − π‘)πΌ−1 (1 − Lemma 7. Given 1 < πΌ ≤ 2 and π is such that the function π‘ → (1 − π‘)πΌ−1 π(π‘) is continuous and integrable on (0, 1), then the boundary value problem π·πΌ π’ (π‘) = −π (π‘) , In the following, we give some estimates on the function πΊπΌ . So, we need the following lemma. Proof. For π₯, π‘ ∈ (0, 1) × (0, 1), we have Remark 6. Let πΏ ∈ K defined on (0, π]; then, using (4) and (11), we deduce that π = ∫ πΊπΌ (π₯, π‘) π (π‘) ππ‘. 0 ∫ π (π ) ππ ∼π‘ → 0+ π‘π (π‘) − ππ (π) + ∫ π (π ) ππ . π (24) 1 (16) So (12) holds. π Case 2. We suppose that ∫0 (πΏ(π )/π )ππ diverges. We have, for some π < π, ∫ π₯ 1 ∫ (π₯ − π‘)πΌ−1 π (π‘) ππ‘ Γ (πΌ) 0 − This implies that ∫ 1 πΌ−2 1 π₯ ∫ (1 − π‘)πΌ−1 π (π‘) ππ‘ Γ (πΌ) 0 π ∫ π‘πΌ−1−πΎ πΏ 4 (π‘) ππ‘ < ∞. 0 (30) Then for π₯ ∈ (0, 1), 1 πΌ−1 [π₯πΌ−2 (1 − π‘)πΌ−1 − ((π₯ − π‘)+ ) ] , Γ (πΌ) (23) is the Green function for the boundary value problem (21). Proof. Since π’0 = −πΌπΌ π is a solution of the equation π·πΌ π’ = −π, then π·πΌ (π’ + πΌπΌ π) = 0. Consequently there exist two constants π1 , π2 ∈ R such that π’(π₯) + πΌπΌ π(π₯) = π1 π₯πΌ−1 + π2 π₯πΌ−2 . 1−π₯ { { π { πΏ 4 (π‘) { { ππ‘ (1 − π₯) ∫ { { 2−πΌ π‘ 1−π₯ π₯ πΊπΌ π (π₯) ≈ { {(1 − π₯)πΌ−πΎ πΏ 4 (1 − π₯) { { { { 1−π₯ πΏ 4 (π‘) { ππ‘ ∫ { 0 π‘ if πΎ < πΌ − 1, if πΎ = πΌ − 1, if πΌ − 1 < πΎ < πΌ, if πΎ = πΌ. (31) 4 Abstract and Applied Analysis This together with (34) implies that (36) holds on (0, 1). Proof. Using Proposition 9, we have π₯ π₯2−πΌ πΊπΌ π (π₯) ≈ (1 − π₯) ∫ (1 − π‘)πΌ−2−πΎ π‘−π½ πΏ 3 (π‘) πΏ 4 (1 − π‘) ππ‘ 0 1 3. Proof of Theorem 1 + ∫ (1 − π‘) πΌ−1−πΎ −π½ π‘ πΏ 3 (π‘) πΏ 4 (1 − π‘) ππ‘ π₯ We begin this section by giving a preliminary result that will play a crucial role in the proof of Theorem 1. = (1 − π₯) πΌ (π₯) + π½ (π₯) . (32) For 0 < π₯ ≤ 1/2, we use Lemma 4 and hypotheses (30) to deduce that 1−π½ {π₯ π₯ πΏ 3 (π₯) πΌ (π₯) ≈ { πΏ 3 (π‘) ππ‘ ∫ π‘ { 0 π½ (π₯) ≈ ∫ 1 1/2 (1 − π‘) ≈1+∫ 1/2 π₯ πΌ−1−πΎ π₯2−πΌ πΊπΌ π (π₯) ≈ π (π₯) . if π½ < 1, πΏ 4 (1 − π‘) ππ‘ + ∫ 1/2 π₯ −π½ π‘ πΏ 3 (π‘) ππ‘ π‘−π½ πΏ 3 (π‘) ππ‘ (33) Hence, it follows from Lemma 2 and hypothesis (30) that, for 0 < π₯ ≤ 1/2, we have π₯2−πΌ πΊπΌ π (π₯) ≈ 1. (34) Now, for 1/2 ≤ π₯ < 1, we use again Lemma 4 and hypothesis (30) to deduce that 1/2 0 π₯ π‘−π½ πΏ 3 (π‘) ππ‘ + ∫ 1/2 ≈1+∫ 1/2 1−π₯ 1−π₯ 0 π‘−π−(2−πΌ)π (1 − π‘)−π+π πΏ 1 (π‘) πΏ 2 (1 − π‘) { { { { if π < π + πΌ − 1, { { { −π+π { −π−(2−πΌ)π { πΏ 1 (π‘) πΏ 2 (1 − π‘) (1 − π‘) { {π‘ { π/(1−π) π { { πΏ (π ) { 2 { if π = π + πΌ − 1, { { ×(∫1−π‘ π ππ ) = { −π−(2−πΌ)π −(π−ππΌ)/(1−π) πΏ 1 (π‘) π‘ (1 − π‘) { { { { π/(1−π) { if π + πΌ − 1 < π < πΌ, { { ×(πΏ 2 (1 − π‘)) { { −π −π−(2−πΌ)π { π‘ πΏ − π‘) πΏ 2 (1 − π‘) (1 (π‘) { 1 { { π/(1−π) { 1−π‘ { { { ×(∫ πΏ 2 (π ) ππ ) if π = πΌ. π { 0 Μ 2 (1 − π‘) , Μ 1 (π‘) πΏ π (π‘) = π‘−π½ (1 − π‘)−πΎ πΏ π‘πΌ−2−πΎ πΏ 4 (π‘) ππ‘ (35) π‘πΌ−1−πΎ πΏ 4 (π‘) ππ‘ (38) (39) where π½ ≤ 1, πΎ ≤ πΌ and, according to Lemma 2, the functions Μ 1 (π‘) and π‘ → πΏ Μ 2 (π‘) are in K. Moreover, using π‘ → πΏ π −π½ π Μ Μ 2 (π‘)ππ‘ < Lemma 4, we have ∫0 π‘ πΏ1 (π‘)ππ‘ < ∞ and ∫0 π‘−πΎ πΏ ∞. So the result follows from Proposition 10. Proof of Theorem 1. From Proposition 11, there exists π > 1 such that for each π₯ ∈ (0, 1) 1 π (π₯) ≤ π₯2−πΌ πΊπΌ π (π₯) ≤ ππ (π₯) , π πΌ−πΎ {(1 − π₯) πΏ 4 (1 − π₯) if πΎ < πΌ, 1−π₯ ≈{ πΏ 4 (π‘) ππ‘ if πΎ = πΌ. ∫ { 0 π‘ (40) where π(π‘) = π(π‘)π‘(πΌ−2)π ππ (π‘). Put π0 = π1/(1−|π|) and let Hence, it follows from Lemmas 2 and 5 that, for π₯ ∈ [1/2, 1), we have 1−π₯ { { π { πΏ 4 (π‘) { { ππ‘ (1 − π₯) ∫ { { 2−πΌ π‘ 1−π₯ π₯ πΊπΌ π (π₯) ≈ { {(1 − π₯)πΌ−πΎ πΏ 4 (1 − π₯) { { { { 1−π₯ πΏ 4 (π‘) { ππ‘ ∫ { 0 π‘ π (π‘) = π (π‘) π‘(πΌ−2)π ππ (π‘) So, we can see that (1 − π‘)πΌ−2−πΎ πΏ 4 (1 − π‘) ππ‘ 1 if πΎ < πΌ − 1, { { { π πΏ 4 (π‘) ≈ {∫ ππ‘ if πΎ = πΌ − 1, { π‘ { 1−π₯ πΌ−1−πΎ πΏ 4 (1 − π₯) if πΎ > πΌ − 1, {(1 − π₯) π½ (π₯) ≈ ∫ (37) Proof. For π‘ ∈ (0, 1), we have if π½ = 1, ≈ 1. πΌ (π₯) ≈ ∫ Proposition 11. Assume that the function π satisfies (π»0 ) and put π(π‘) = π(π‘)π‘(πΌ−2)π ππ (π‘) for π‘ ∈ (0, 1). Then one has, for π₯ ∈ (0, 1), if πΎ < πΌ − 1, Λ = {V ∈ πΆ ([0, 1]) : 1 π ≤ V ≤ π0 π} . π0 (41) In order to use a fixed point theorem, we denote πΜ(π‘) = π(π‘)π‘(πΌ−2)π and we define the operator π on Λ by if πΎ = πΌ − 1, if πΌ − 1 < πΎ < πΌ, if πΎ = πΌ. (36) πV (π₯) = π₯2−πΌ πΊπΌ (ΜπVπ ) (π₯) . (42) For this choice of π0 , we can easily prove that for V ∈ Λ, we have πV ≤ π0 π and πV ≥ (1/π0 )π. Abstract and Applied Analysis 5 (iii) If π = π + πΌ − 1 and π½ < 1, then for π₯ ∈ (0, 1), Now, we have πV (π₯) = = π₯2−πΌ 1 ∫ πΊ (π₯, π‘) πΜ (π‘) Vπ (π‘) ππ‘ Γ (πΌ) 0 πΌ 1 1 πΌ−1 ∫ [(1 − π‘)πΌ−1 − π₯2−πΌ ((π₯ − π‘)+ ) ] Γ (πΌ) 0 π’ (π₯) ≈ π₯πΌ−2 (1 − π₯) [log ( (43) Since the function (π₯, π‘) → (1 − π‘)πΌ−1 − π₯2−πΌ ((π₯ − π‘)+ )πΌ−1 is continuous on [0, 1] × [0, 1] and the function π‘ → (1 − π‘)πΌ−1 πΜ(π‘)ππ (π‘) is integrable on (0, 1), we deduce that the operator π is compact from Λ to itself. It follows by the Schauder fixed point theorem that there exists V ∈ Λ such that πV = V. Put π’(π₯) = π₯πΌ−2 V(π₯). Then π’ ∈ πΆ2−πΌ ([0, 1]) and π’ satisfies the equation (44) Since the function π‘ → (1 − π‘)πΌ−1 π(π‘)π’π (π‘) is continuous and integrable on (0, 1), then by Lemma 7 the function π’ is a positive continuous solution of problem (1). Finally, let us prove that π’ is the unique positive continuous solution satisfying (8). To this aim, we assume that (1) has two positive solutions π’, V ∈ πΆ2−πΌ ([0, 1]) satisfying (8) and consider the nonempty set π½ = {π ≥ 1 : 1/π ≤ π’/V ≤ π} and put π = inf π½. Then π ≥ 1 and we have (1/π)V ≤ π’ ≤ πV. It follows that π’π ≤ π|π| Vπ and consequently −π·πΌ (π|π| V − π’) = π (π|π| Vπ − π’π ) ≥ 0, lim+ π·πΌ−1 (π|π| V − π’) (π‘) = 0, π‘→0 (π|π| V − π’) (1) = 0. (45) Which implies by Lemma 7 that π|π| V − π’ = πΊπΌ (π(π|π| Vπ − π’π )) ≥ 0. By symmetry, we obtain also that V ≤ π|π| π’. Hence π|π| ∈ π½ and π ≤ π|π| . Since |π| < 1, then π = 1 and consequently π’ = V. Example 12. Let π ∈ (−1, 1) and π be a positive continuous function on (0, 1) such that π (π‘) ≈ (1 − π‘)−π log ( 3 −π½ ) , 1−π‘ (46) where π < πΌ and π½ ∈ R or π = πΌ and π½ > 1. Then, using Theorem 1, problem (1) has a unique positive continuous solution π’ satisfying the following estimates. (i) If π < π + πΌ − 1 or π = π + πΌ − 1 and π½ > 1, then for π₯ ∈ (0, 1), π’ (π₯) ≈ π₯πΌ−2 (1 − π₯) . (47) (ii) If π = π + πΌ − 1 and π½ = 1, then for π₯ ∈ (0, 1), π’ (π₯) ≈ π₯πΌ−2 (1 − π₯) [log (log ( 1/(1−π) 3 . ))] 1−π₯ (48) (49) (iv) If π + πΌ − 1 < π < πΌ, then for π₯ ∈ (0, 1), π’ (π₯) ≈ π₯πΌ−2 (1 − π₯)(πΌ−π)/(1−π) [log ( × πΜ (π‘) Vπ (π‘) ππ‘. π’ (π₯) = πΊπΌ (ππ’π ) (π₯) . (1−π½)/(1−π) 3 . )] 1−π₯ −π½/(1−π) 3 . (50) )] 1−π₯ (v) If π = πΌ and π½ > 1, then for π₯ ∈ (0, 1), π’ (π₯) ≈ π₯πΌ−2 [log ( (1−π½)/(1−π) 3 )] . 1−π₯ (51) Acknowledgment The authors thank the anonymous referees for a careful reading of the paper and for their helpful suggestions. References [1] K. Diethelm and A. D. Freed, “On the solution of nonlinear fractional order differential equations used in the modelling of viscoplasticity,” in Scientific Computing in Chemical Engineering II-Computational Fluid Dynamics, Reaction Engineering and Molecular Properties, F. Keil, W. Mackens, and H. Voss, Eds., pp. 217–224, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 1999. [2] A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, and J. J. Trujillo, Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. [3] W. Lin, “Global existence theory and chaos control of fractional differential equations,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 332, no. 1, pp. 709–726, 2007. [4] I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, vol. 198 of Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1999. [5] R. P. Agarwal, D. O’Regan, and S. StaneΜk, “Positive solutions for Dirichlet problems of singular nonlinear fractional differential equations,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 371, no. 1, pp. 57–68, 2010. [6] R. P. Agarwal, M. Benchohra, S. Hamani, and S. Pinelas, “Boundary value problems for differential equations involving Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative on the half-line,” Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete & Impulsive Systems A, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 235–244, 2011. [7] Z. Bai and H. LuΜ, “Positive solutions for boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional differential equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 311, no. 2, pp. 495–505, 2005. [8] B. Ahmad, “Existence of solutions for irregular boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 390–394, 2010. [9] B. Ahmad and J. J. Nieto, “Riemann-Liouville fractional integrodifferential equations with fractional nonlocal integral boundary conditions,” Boundary Value Problems, vol. 2011, article 36, 2011. [10] J. Caballero, J. Harjani, and K. Sadarangani, “Positive solutions for a class of singular fractional boundary value problems,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 1325–1332, 2011. 6 [11] J. Deng and L. Ma, “Existence and uniqueness of solutions of initial value problems for nonlinear fractional differential equations,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 676– 680, 2010. [12] N. Kosmatov, “A singular boundary value problem for nonlinear differential equations of fractional order,” Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, vol. 29, no. 1-2, pp. 125–135, 2009. [13] Y. Liu, W. Zhang, and X. Liu, “A sufficient condition for the existence of a positive solution for a nonlinear fractional differential equation with the Riemann-Liouville derivative,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1986–1992, 2012. [14] T. Qiu and Z. Bai, “Existence of positive solutions for singular fractional differential equations,” Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 149, 19 pages, 2008. [15] Y. Zhao, S. Sun, Z. Han, and Q. Li, “Positive solutions to boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2011, Article ID 390543, 16 pages, 2011. [16] V. MaricΜ, Regular Variation and Differential Equations, vol. 1726 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2000. [17] E. Seneta, Regularly Varying Functions, vol. 508 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1976. Abstract and Applied Analysis Advances in Operations Research Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Advances in Decision Sciences Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Mathematical Problems in Engineering Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Journal of Algebra Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Probability and Statistics Volume 2014 The Scientific World Journal Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 International Journal of Differential Equations Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Volume 2014 Submit your manuscripts at http://www.hindawi.com International Journal of Advances in Combinatorics Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Mathematical Physics Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Journal of Complex Analysis Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences Journal of Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Stochastic Analysis Abstract and Applied Analysis Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com International Journal of Mathematics Volume 2014 Volume 2014 Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Volume 2014 Volume 2014 Journal of Journal of Discrete Mathematics Journal of Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Applied Mathematics Journal of Function Spaces Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Optimization Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014