Research Article Existence and Exact Asymptotic Behavior of Positive Solutions

advertisement
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2013, Article ID 420514, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/420514
Research Article
Existence and Exact Asymptotic Behavior of Positive Solutions
for a Fractional Boundary Value Problem
Habib Mâagli, Noureddine Mhadhebi, and Noureddine Zeddini
King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh Campus, College of Sciences and Arts, Department of Mathematics, P.O. Box 344,
Rabigh 21911, Saudi Arabia
Correspondence should be addressed to Noureddine Zeddini; noureddine.zeddini@ipein.rnu.tn
Received 4 November 2012; Accepted 25 December 2012
Academic Editor: Chuanzhi Bai
Copyright © 2013 Habib MaΜ‚agli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
We establish the existence and uniqueness of a positive solution 𝑒 for the fractional boundary value problem 𝐷𝛼 𝑒(π‘₯) = −π‘Ž(π‘₯)π‘’πœŽ (π‘₯),
π‘₯ ∈ (0, 1) with the condition limπ‘₯ → 0 𝐷𝛼−1 𝑒(π‘₯) = 0, 𝑒(1) = 0, where 1 < 𝛼 ≤ 2, 𝜎 ∈ (−1, 1), and π‘Ž is a nonnegative continuous
function on (0, 1) that may be singular at π‘₯ = 0 or π‘₯ = 1.
1. Introduction
Fractional differential equations arise in various fields of
science and engineering such as control, porous media,
electrochemistry, viscoelasticity, and electromagnetism. They
also serve as an excellent tool for the description of hereditary
properties of various materials and processes (see[1–3]). In
consequence, the subject of fractional differential equations
is gaining much importance and attention. Motivated by the
surge in the development of this subject, we consider the
following problem:
𝐷𝛼 𝑒 (π‘₯) = −π‘Ž (π‘₯) π‘’πœŽ (π‘₯) ,
lim+ 𝐷𝛼−1 𝑒 (π‘₯) = 0,
π‘₯→0
π‘₯ ∈ (0, 1) ,
𝑒 (1) = 0,
(1)
where 1 < 𝛼 ≤ 2, −1 < 𝜎 < 1, π‘Ž is a nonnegative continuous
function on (0, 1) that may be singular at π‘₯ = 0 or π‘₯ = 1 and
𝐷𝛼 is the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative. Then we
study the existence and exact asymptotic behavior of positive
solutions for this problem.
We recall that for a measurable function V, the RiemannLiouville fractional integral 𝐼𝛽 V and the Riemann-Liouville
derivative 𝐷𝛽 V of order 𝛽 > 0 are, respectively, defined
by
𝐼𝛽 V (π‘₯) =
𝐷𝛽 V (π‘₯) =
π‘₯
1
∫ (π‘₯ − 𝑑)𝛽−1 V (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑,
Γ (𝛽) 0
1
𝑑 𝑛 π‘₯
( ) ∫ (π‘₯ − 𝑑)𝑛−𝛽−1 V (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑
Γ (𝑛 − 𝛽) 𝑑π‘₯
0
=(
(2)
𝑑 𝑛
) 𝐼𝑛−𝛽 V (π‘₯) ,
𝑑π‘₯
provided that the right-hand sides are pointwise defined on
(0, 1]. Here 𝑛 = [𝛽] + 1 and [𝛽] means the integral part of the
number 𝛽 and Γ is the Euler Gamma function.
Moreover, we have the following well-known properties
(see [2, 4]):
(i) 𝐼𝛽 𝐼𝛾 V(π‘₯) = 𝐼𝛽+𝛾 V(π‘₯) for π‘₯ ∈ [0, 1], V ∈ 𝐿1 ((0, 1]), 𝛽 +
𝛾 ≥ 1,
(ii) 𝐷𝛽 𝐼𝛽 V(π‘₯) = V(π‘₯) for a.e. π‘₯ ∈ [0, 1], where V ∈
𝐿1 ((0, 1]), 𝛽 > 0,
(iii) 𝐷𝛽 V(π‘₯) = 0 if and only if V(π‘₯) = ∑𝑛𝑗=1 𝑐𝑗 𝑑𝛽−𝑗 , where
𝑛 = [𝛽] + 1 and (𝑐1 , 𝑐2 , . . . , 𝑐𝑛 ) ∈ R𝑛 .
Several results are obtained for fractional differential equation with different boundary conditions (see [5–15] and the
2
Abstract and Applied Analysis
references therein), but none of them deals with the existence
of a positive solution for problem (1).
Our aim in this paper is to establish the existence and
uniqueness of a positive solution 𝑒 ∈ 𝐢2−𝛼 ([0, 1]) for problem
(1) with a precise asymptotic behavior, where 𝐢2−𝛼 ([0, 1]) is
the set of all functions 𝑓 such that 𝑑 → 𝑑2−𝛼 𝑓(𝑑) is continuous
on [0, 1]. Note that for 0 < 𝛼 < 2, the solution 𝑒 for problem
(1) blows up at π‘₯ = 0.
To state our result, we need some notations. We will use
K to denote the set of Karamata functions 𝐿 defined on (0, πœ‚]
by
2. Technical Lemmas
To keep the paper self-contained, we begin this section by
recapitulating some properties of Karamata regular variation
theory. The following is due to [16, 17].
Lemma 2. The following hold.
(i) Let 𝐿 ∈ K and πœ€ > 0, then one has
lim π‘‘πœ€ 𝐿 (𝑑) = 0.
(9)
𝑑 → 0+
(3)
(ii) Let 𝐿 1 , 𝐿 2 ∈ K and 𝑝 ∈ R. Then one has 𝐿 1 +𝐿 2 ∈ K,
𝑝
𝐿 1 𝐿 2 ∈ K, and 𝐿 1 ∈ K.
for some πœ‚ > 1, where 𝑐 > 0 and 𝑧 ∈ 𝐢([0, πœ‚]) such that
𝑧(0) = 0. It is clear that a function 𝐿 is in K if and only if 𝐿 is
a positive function in 𝐢1 ((0, πœ‚]) such that
Example 3. Let π‘š ∈ N∗ . Let 𝑐 > 0, (πœ‡1 , πœ‡2 , . . . , πœ‡π‘š ) ∈ Rπ‘š and
let 𝑑 be a sufficiently large positive real number such that the
function
𝐿 (𝑑) := 𝑐 exp (∫
πœ‚
𝑑
lim+
𝑑→0
𝑧 (𝑠)
𝑑𝑠) ,
𝑠
𝑑𝐿󸀠 (𝑑)
= 0.
𝐿 (𝑑)
For two nonnegative functions 𝑓 and 𝑔 defined on a set 𝑆, the
notation 𝑓(π‘₯) ≈ 𝑔(π‘₯), π‘₯ ∈ 𝑆, means that there exists 𝑐 > 0
such that (1/𝑐)𝑓(π‘₯) ≤ 𝑔(π‘₯) ≤ 𝑐𝑓(π‘₯), for all π‘₯ ∈ 𝑆. We denote
also π‘₯+ = max(π‘₯, 0) for π‘₯ ∈ R.
Throughout this paper we assume that π‘Ž is nonnegative
on (0, 1) and satisfies the following condition.
(𝐻0 ) π‘Ž ∈ 𝐢((0, 1)) such that
−πœ†
−πœ‡
π‘Ž (𝑑) ≈ 𝑑 𝐿 1 (𝑑) (1 − 𝑑) 𝐿 2 (1 − 𝑑) ,
𝑑 ∈ (0, 1) ,
(5)
∫
0
𝐿 1 (𝑑)
𝑑𝑑 < ∞,
π‘‘πœ†+(2−𝛼)𝜎
∫
πœ‚
0
𝐿 2 (𝑑)
𝑑𝑑 < ∞.
π‘‘πœ‡−𝛼+1
(6)
πœƒ (π‘₯) .
<
πœ‚
−1, then ∫0 π‘ πœ‡ 𝐿(𝑠)𝑑𝑠 diverges and
πœ‚
> −1, then ∫0 π‘ πœ‡ 𝐿(𝑠)𝑑𝑠
𝑑 πœ‡
∫0 𝑠 𝐿(𝑠)𝑑𝑠∼𝑑 → 0+ (𝑑1+πœ‡ 𝐿(𝑑)/(πœ‡ + 1)).
(ii) If πœ‡
converges and
Lemma 5. Let 𝐿 ∈ K be defined on (0, πœ‚]. Then one has
lim πœ‚
𝑑 → 0+ ∫
𝑑
(7)
𝐿 (𝑑)
(𝐿 (𝑠) /𝑠) 𝑑𝑠
(11)
πœ‚
𝐿 (𝑑)
(𝐿 (𝑠) /𝑠) 𝑑𝑠
= 0.
(12)
Proof. We distinguish two cases.
πœ‚
Case 1. We suppose that ∫0 (𝐿(𝑠)/𝑠)𝑑𝑠 converges. Since the
function 𝑑 → 𝐿(𝑑)/𝑑 is nonincreasing in (0, πœ”], for some πœ” <
πœ‚, it follows that, for each 𝑑 ≤ πœ”, we have
𝐿 (𝑑) ≤ ∫
𝑑
0
(8)
This paper is organized as follows. Some preliminary lemmas
are stated and proved in the next section, involving some
already known results on Karamata functions. In Section 3,
we give the proof of Theorem 1.
= 0.
If further ∫0 (𝐿(𝑠)/𝑠)𝑑𝑠 converges, then one has
lim 𝑑
𝑑 → 0+ ∫
0
Theorem 1. Let 𝜎 ∈ (−1, 1) and assume that π‘Ž satisfies
(H0 ). Then problem (1) has a unique positive solution 𝑒 ∈
𝐢2−𝛼 ([0, 1]) satisfying for π‘₯ ∈ (0, 1)
𝑒 (π‘₯) ≈ π‘₯
Lemma 4. Let πœ‡ ∈ R and let 𝐿 be a function in K defined on
(0, πœ‚]. One has the following.
πœ‚
Our main result is the following.
𝛼−2
Applying Karamata’s theorem (see [16, 17]), we get the
following.
∫𝑑 π‘ πœ‡ 𝐿(𝑠)𝑑𝑠∼𝑑 → 0+ − (𝑑1+πœ‡ 𝐿(𝑑)/(πœ‡ + 1)).
In the sequel, we introduce the function πœƒ defined on (0, 1) by
1 − π‘₯ if πœ‡ < 𝜎 + 𝛼 − 1,
{
{
{
1/(1−𝜎)
πœ‚
{
{
{(1 − π‘₯) (∫ 𝐿 2 (𝑠) 𝑑𝑠)
{
{
{
𝑠
{
1−π‘₯
{
{
{
if πœ‡ = 𝜎 + 𝛼 − 1,
{
{
{
1/(1−𝜎)
πœƒ (π‘₯) = {(1 − π‘₯)(𝛼−πœ‡)/(1−𝜎) (𝐿 2 (1 − π‘₯))
{
{
{
if 𝜎 + 𝛼 − 1 < πœ‡ < 𝛼,
{
{
{
1/(1−𝜎)
{
1−π‘₯
{
𝐿 2 (𝑠)
{
{
if πœ‡ = 𝛼.
𝑑𝑠)
{(∫
{
{
𝑠
{
{ 0
{
(10)
is defined and positive on (0, πœ‚], for some πœ‚ > 1, where
logπ‘˜ π‘₯ = log ∘ log ∘ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ∘ log π‘₯ (π‘˜ times). Then 𝐿 ∈ K.
(i) If πœ‡
where πœ† + (2 − 𝛼)𝜎 ≤ 1, πœ‡ ≤ 𝛼, 𝐿 1 , 𝐿 2 ∈ K satisfying
πœ‚
π‘š
𝑑 −πœ‡π‘˜
𝐿 (𝑑) = 𝑐∏(logπ‘˜ ( ))
𝑑
π‘˜=1
(4)
𝐿 (𝑠)
𝑑𝑠.
𝑠
(13)
It follows that lim𝑑 → 0+ 𝐿(𝑑) = 0. So we deduce (11).
Now put
πœ‘ (𝑑) =
𝐿 (𝑑)
,
𝑑
for 𝑑 ∈ (0, πœ‚) .
(14)
Abstract and Applied Analysis
3
Using that lim𝑑 → 0+ (π‘‘πœ‘σΈ€  (𝑑)/πœ‘(𝑑)) = −1, we obtain
𝑑
𝑑
𝑑
0
0
0
Using the fact that limπ‘₯ → 0 𝐷𝛼−1 𝑒(π‘₯) = 0 and 𝑒(1) = 0, we
obtain 𝑐1 = 0 and 𝑐2 = 𝐼𝛼 𝑓(1). So
∫ πœ‘ (𝑠) 𝑑𝑠∼𝑑 → 0+ − ∫ π‘ πœ‘σΈ€  (𝑠) 𝑑𝑠 = −π‘‘πœ‘ (𝑑) + ∫ πœ‘ (𝑠) 𝑑𝑠.
𝑒 (π‘₯) =
(15)
𝑑
0
𝑑
𝐿 (𝑠)
𝐿 (𝑠)
𝑑𝑠∼𝑑 → 0+ − 𝐿 (𝑑) + ∫
𝑑𝑠.
𝑠
𝑠
0
πœ”
πœ”
𝑑
𝑑
(17)
This implies that
𝑑
πœ”
𝐿 (𝑠)
𝐿 (𝑠)
𝑑𝑠∼𝑑 → 0+ 𝐿 (𝑑) − πœ”πœ‘ (πœ”) + ∫
𝑑𝑠.
𝑠
𝑠
𝑑
(18)
This proves (11) and completes the proof.
𝑑 󳨀→ ∫
𝑑
𝐿 (𝑠)
𝑑𝑠 ∈ K.
𝑠
(19)
πœ‚
If further ∫0 (𝐿(𝑠)/𝑠)𝑑𝑠 converges, we have by (11) that
𝑑 󳨀→ ∫
𝑑
0
𝐿 (𝑠)
𝑑𝑠 ∈ K.
𝑠
πœ‡
πœ‡
min (1, ) (1 − π‘Žπ‘‘πœ† ) ≤ 1 − π‘Žπ‘‘πœ‡ ≤ max (1, ) (1 − π‘Žπ‘‘πœ† ) .
πœ†
πœ†
(25)
Proposition 9. On (0, 1) × (0, 1), one has
𝐺𝛼 (π‘₯, 𝑑) ≈ π‘₯𝛼−2 (1 − 𝑑)𝛼−2 (1 − max (π‘₯, 𝑑)) .
lim 𝐷𝛼−1 𝑒 (π‘₯) = 0,
(21)
0
].
(27)
Since (π‘₯ − 𝑑)+ /π‘₯(1 − 𝑑) ∈ (0, 1) for 𝑑 ∈ (0, 1), then, by applying
Lemma 8 with πœ‡ = 𝛼 − 1 and πœ† = 1, we obtain
=π‘₯
has a unique solution given by
𝑒 (π‘₯) = 𝐺𝛼 𝑓 (π‘₯) := ∫ 𝐺𝛼 (π‘₯, 𝑑) 𝑓 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑,
(π‘₯ − 𝑑)+
(1 − 𝑑)𝛼−1 π‘₯𝛼−2
[1 − π‘₯(
)
Γ (𝛼)
π‘₯ (1 − 𝑑)
(20)
𝑒 (1) = 0,
1
(26)
𝛼−1
𝐺𝛼 (π‘₯, 𝑑) =
𝛼−2
(1 − 𝑑)
𝛼−2
(π‘₯ − 𝑑)+
)
1−𝑑
(28)
(1 − max (π‘₯, 𝑑)) ,
which completes the proof.
In the sequel we put
𝑑 ∈ (0, 1) ,
π‘₯→0
𝑏 (𝑑) = 𝑑−𝛽 𝐿 3 (𝑑) (1 − 𝑑)−𝛾 𝐿 4 (1 − 𝑑) ,
(29)
where 𝐿 3 , 𝐿 4 ∈ K and we aim to give some estimates on
π‘₯2−𝛼 𝐺𝛼 𝑏(π‘₯).
Proposition 10. Assume that 𝐿 3 , 𝐿 4 ∈ K, 𝛽 ≤ 1, 𝛾 ≤ 𝛼 with
(22)
πœ‚
∫ 𝑑−𝛽 𝐿 3 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑 < ∞,
0
where
𝐺𝛼 (π‘₯, 𝑑) =
Lemma 8. For πœ†, πœ‡ ∈ (0, ∞), and π‘Ž, 𝑑 ∈ [0, 1], one has
𝐺𝛼 (π‘₯, 𝑑) ≈ π‘₯𝛼−2 (1 − 𝑑)𝛼−1 (1 −
Lemma 7. Given 1 < 𝛼 ≤ 2 and 𝑓 is such that the function
𝑑 → (1 − 𝑑)𝛼−1 𝑓(𝑑) is continuous and integrable on (0, 1), then
the boundary value problem
𝐷𝛼 𝑒 (𝑑) = −𝑓 (𝑑) ,
In the following, we give some estimates on the function 𝐺𝛼 .
So, we need the following lemma.
Proof. For π‘₯, 𝑑 ∈ (0, 1) × (0, 1), we have
Remark 6. Let 𝐿 ∈ K defined on (0, πœ‚]; then, using (4) and
(11), we deduce that
πœ‚
= ∫ 𝐺𝛼 (π‘₯, 𝑑) 𝑓 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑.
0
∫ πœ‘ (𝑠) 𝑑𝑠∼𝑑 → 0+ π‘‘πœ‘ (𝑑) − πœ”πœ‘ (πœ”) + ∫ πœ‘ (𝑠) 𝑑𝑠.
πœ”
(24)
1
(16)
So (12) holds.
πœ‚
Case 2. We suppose that ∫0 (𝐿(𝑠)/𝑠)𝑑𝑠 diverges. We have,
for some πœ” < πœ‚,
∫
π‘₯
1
∫ (π‘₯ − 𝑑)𝛼−1 𝑓 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑
Γ (𝛼) 0
−
This implies that
∫
1 𝛼−2 1
π‘₯ ∫ (1 − 𝑑)𝛼−1 𝑓 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑
Γ (𝛼)
0
πœ‚
∫ 𝑑𝛼−1−𝛾 𝐿 4 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑 < ∞.
0
(30)
Then for π‘₯ ∈ (0, 1),
1
𝛼−1
[π‘₯𝛼−2 (1 − 𝑑)𝛼−1 − ((π‘₯ − 𝑑)+ ) ] ,
Γ (𝛼)
(23)
is the Green function for the boundary value problem (21).
Proof. Since 𝑒0 = −𝐼𝛼 𝑓 is a solution of the equation 𝐷𝛼 𝑒 =
−𝑓, then 𝐷𝛼 (𝑒 + 𝐼𝛼 𝑓) = 0. Consequently there exist two
constants 𝑐1 , 𝑐2 ∈ R such that 𝑒(π‘₯) + 𝐼𝛼 𝑓(π‘₯) = 𝑐1 π‘₯𝛼−1 + 𝑐2 π‘₯𝛼−2 .
1−π‘₯
{
{
πœ‚
{
𝐿 4 (𝑑)
{
{
𝑑𝑑
(1 − π‘₯) ∫
{
{
2−𝛼
𝑑
1−π‘₯
π‘₯ 𝐺𝛼 𝑏 (π‘₯) ≈ {
{(1 − π‘₯)𝛼−𝛾 𝐿 4 (1 − π‘₯)
{
{
{
{ 1−π‘₯ 𝐿 4 (𝑑)
{
𝑑𝑑
∫
{ 0
𝑑
if 𝛾 < 𝛼 − 1,
if 𝛾 = 𝛼 − 1,
if 𝛼 − 1 < 𝛾 < 𝛼,
if 𝛾 = 𝛼.
(31)
4
Abstract and Applied Analysis
This together with (34) implies that (36) holds on (0, 1).
Proof. Using Proposition 9, we have
π‘₯
π‘₯2−𝛼 𝐺𝛼 𝑏 (π‘₯) ≈ (1 − π‘₯) ∫ (1 − 𝑑)𝛼−2−𝛾 𝑑−𝛽 𝐿 3 (𝑑) 𝐿 4 (1 − 𝑑) 𝑑𝑑
0
1
3. Proof of Theorem 1
+ ∫ (1 − 𝑑)
𝛼−1−𝛾 −𝛽
𝑑 𝐿 3 (𝑑) 𝐿 4 (1 − 𝑑) 𝑑𝑑
π‘₯
We begin this section by giving a preliminary result that will
play a crucial role in the proof of Theorem 1.
= (1 − π‘₯) 𝐼 (π‘₯) + 𝐽 (π‘₯) .
(32)
For 0 < π‘₯ ≤ 1/2, we use Lemma 4 and hypotheses (30) to
deduce that
1−𝛽
{π‘₯ π‘₯ 𝐿 3 (π‘₯)
𝐼 (π‘₯) ≈ { 𝐿 3 (𝑑)
𝑑𝑑
∫
𝑑
{ 0
𝐽 (π‘₯) ≈ ∫
1
1/2
(1 − 𝑑)
≈1+∫
1/2
π‘₯
𝛼−1−𝛾
π‘₯2−𝛼 𝐺𝛼 πœ” (π‘₯) ≈ πœƒ (π‘₯) .
if 𝛽 < 1,
𝐿 4 (1 − 𝑑) 𝑑𝑑 + ∫
1/2
π‘₯
−𝛽
𝑑 𝐿 3 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑
𝑑−𝛽 𝐿 3 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑
(33)
Hence, it follows from Lemma 2 and hypothesis (30) that, for
0 < π‘₯ ≤ 1/2, we have
π‘₯2−𝛼 𝐺𝛼 𝑏 (π‘₯) ≈ 1.
(34)
Now, for 1/2 ≤ π‘₯ < 1, we use again Lemma 4 and hypothesis
(30) to deduce that
1/2
0
π‘₯
𝑑−𝛽 𝐿 3 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑 + ∫
1/2
≈1+∫
1/2
1−π‘₯
1−π‘₯
0
𝑑−πœ†−(2−𝛼)𝜎 (1 − 𝑑)−πœ‡+𝜎 𝐿 1 (𝑑) 𝐿 2 (1 − 𝑑)
{
{
{
{
if πœ‡ < 𝜎 + 𝛼 − 1,
{
{
{
−πœ‡+𝜎
{
−πœ†−(2−𝛼)𝜎
{
𝐿 1 (𝑑) 𝐿 2 (1 − 𝑑)
(1 − 𝑑)
{
{𝑑
{
𝜎/(1−𝜎)
πœ‚
{
{
𝐿
(𝑠)
{
2
{
if πœ‡ = 𝜎 + 𝛼 − 1,
{
{ ×(∫1−𝑑 𝑠 𝑑𝑠)
= { −πœ†−(2−𝛼)𝜎
−(πœ‡−πœŽπ›Ό)/(1−𝜎)
𝐿 1 (𝑑)
𝑑
(1 − 𝑑)
{
{
{
{
𝜎/(1−𝜎)
{
if 𝜎 + 𝛼 − 1 < πœ‡ < 𝛼,
{
{ ×(𝐿 2 (1 − 𝑑))
{
{
−πœ‡
−πœ†−(2−𝛼)𝜎
{
𝑑
𝐿
−
𝑑)
𝐿 2 (1 − 𝑑)
(1
(𝑑)
{
1
{
{
𝜎/(1−𝜎)
{
1−𝑑
{
{
{ ×(∫ 𝐿 2 (𝑠) 𝑑𝑠)
if πœ‡ = 𝛼.
𝑠
{
0
Μƒ 2 (1 − 𝑑) ,
Μƒ 1 (𝑑) 𝐿
πœ” (𝑑) = 𝑑−𝛽 (1 − 𝑑)−𝛾 𝐿
𝑑𝛼−2−𝛾 𝐿 4 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑
(35)
𝑑𝛼−1−𝛾 𝐿 4 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑
(38)
(39)
where 𝛽 ≤ 1, 𝛾 ≤ 𝛼 and, according to Lemma 2, the functions
Μƒ 1 (𝑑) and 𝑑 → 𝐿
Μƒ 2 (𝑑) are in K. Moreover, using
𝑑 → 𝐿
πœ‚ −𝛽
πœ‚
Μƒ
Μƒ 2 (𝑑)𝑑𝑑 <
Lemma 4, we have ∫0 𝑑 𝐿1 (𝑑)𝑑𝑑 < ∞ and ∫0 𝑑−𝛾 𝐿
∞. So the result follows from Proposition 10.
Proof of Theorem 1. From Proposition 11, there exists 𝑀 > 1
such that for each π‘₯ ∈ (0, 1)
1
πœƒ (π‘₯) ≤ π‘₯2−𝛼 𝐺𝛼 πœ” (π‘₯) ≤ π‘€πœƒ (π‘₯) ,
𝑀
𝛼−𝛾
{(1 − π‘₯) 𝐿 4 (1 − π‘₯) if 𝛾 < 𝛼,
1−π‘₯
≈{
𝐿 4 (𝑑)
𝑑𝑑
if 𝛾 = 𝛼.
∫
{ 0
𝑑
(40)
where πœ”(𝑑) = π‘Ž(𝑑)𝑑(𝛼−2)𝜎 πœƒπœŽ (𝑑).
Put 𝑐0 = 𝑀1/(1−|𝜎|) and let
Hence, it follows from Lemmas 2 and 5 that, for π‘₯ ∈ [1/2, 1),
we have
1−π‘₯
{
{
πœ‚
{
𝐿 4 (𝑑)
{
{
𝑑𝑑
(1 − π‘₯) ∫
{
{
2−𝛼
𝑑
1−π‘₯
π‘₯ 𝐺𝛼 𝑏 (π‘₯) ≈ {
{(1 − π‘₯)𝛼−𝛾 𝐿 4 (1 − π‘₯)
{
{
{
{ 1−π‘₯ 𝐿 4 (𝑑)
{
𝑑𝑑
∫
{ 0
𝑑
πœ” (𝑑) = π‘Ž (𝑑) 𝑑(𝛼−2)𝜎 πœƒπœŽ (𝑑)
So, we can see that
(1 − 𝑑)𝛼−2−𝛾 𝐿 4 (1 − 𝑑) 𝑑𝑑
1
if 𝛾 < 𝛼 − 1,
{
{
{ πœ‚ 𝐿 4 (𝑑)
≈ {∫
𝑑𝑑
if 𝛾 = 𝛼 − 1,
{
𝑑
{ 1−π‘₯ 𝛼−1−𝛾
𝐿 4 (1 − π‘₯) if 𝛾 > 𝛼 − 1,
{(1 − π‘₯)
𝐽 (π‘₯) ≈ ∫
(37)
Proof. For 𝑑 ∈ (0, 1), we have
if 𝛽 = 1,
≈ 1.
𝐼 (π‘₯) ≈ ∫
Proposition 11. Assume that the function π‘Ž satisfies (𝐻0 ) and
put πœ”(𝑑) = π‘Ž(𝑑)𝑑(𝛼−2)𝜎 πœƒπœŽ (𝑑) for 𝑑 ∈ (0, 1). Then one has, for
π‘₯ ∈ (0, 1),
if 𝛾 < 𝛼 − 1,
Λ = {V ∈ 𝐢 ([0, 1]) :
1
πœƒ ≤ V ≤ 𝑐0 πœƒ} .
𝑐0
(41)
In order to use a fixed point theorem, we denote π‘ŽΜƒ(𝑑) =
π‘Ž(𝑑)𝑑(𝛼−2)𝜎 and we define the operator 𝑇 on Λ by
if 𝛾 = 𝛼 − 1,
if 𝛼 − 1 < 𝛾 < 𝛼,
if 𝛾 = 𝛼.
(36)
𝑇V (π‘₯) = π‘₯2−𝛼 𝐺𝛼 (Μƒπ‘ŽV𝜎 ) (π‘₯) .
(42)
For this choice of 𝑐0 , we can easily prove that for V ∈ Λ, we
have 𝑇V ≤ 𝑐0 πœƒ and 𝑇V ≥ (1/𝑐0 )πœƒ.
Abstract and Applied Analysis
5
(iii) If πœ‡ = 𝜎 + 𝛼 − 1 and 𝛽 < 1, then for π‘₯ ∈ (0, 1),
Now, we have
𝑇V (π‘₯) =
=
π‘₯2−𝛼 1
∫ 𝐺 (π‘₯, 𝑑) π‘ŽΜƒ (𝑑) V𝜎 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑
Γ (𝛼) 0 𝛼
1
1
𝛼−1
∫ [(1 − 𝑑)𝛼−1 − π‘₯2−𝛼 ((π‘₯ − 𝑑)+ ) ]
Γ (𝛼) 0
𝑒 (π‘₯) ≈ π‘₯𝛼−2 (1 − π‘₯) [log (
(43)
Since the function (π‘₯, 𝑑) → (1 − 𝑑)𝛼−1 − π‘₯2−𝛼 ((π‘₯ − 𝑑)+ )𝛼−1
is continuous on [0, 1] × [0, 1] and the function 𝑑 → (1 −
𝑑)𝛼−1 π‘ŽΜƒ(𝑑)πœƒπœŽ (𝑑) is integrable on (0, 1), we deduce that the
operator 𝑇 is compact from Λ to itself. It follows by the
Schauder fixed point theorem that there exists V ∈ Λ such
that 𝑇V = V. Put 𝑒(π‘₯) = π‘₯𝛼−2 V(π‘₯). Then 𝑒 ∈ 𝐢2−𝛼 ([0, 1]) and
𝑒 satisfies the equation
(44)
Since the function 𝑑 → (1 − 𝑑)𝛼−1 π‘Ž(𝑑)π‘’πœŽ (𝑑) is continuous
and integrable on (0, 1), then by Lemma 7 the function 𝑒 is
a positive continuous solution of problem (1).
Finally, let us prove that 𝑒 is the unique positive continuous solution satisfying (8). To this aim, we assume that (1)
has two positive solutions 𝑒, V ∈ 𝐢2−𝛼 ([0, 1]) satisfying (8)
and consider the nonempty set 𝐽 = {π‘š ≥ 1 : 1/π‘š ≤ 𝑒/V ≤ π‘š}
and put 𝑐 = inf 𝐽. Then 𝑐 ≥ 1 and we have (1/𝑐)V ≤ 𝑒 ≤ 𝑐V. It
follows that π‘’πœŽ ≤ 𝑐|𝜎| V𝜎 and consequently
−𝐷𝛼 (𝑐|𝜎| V − 𝑒) = π‘Ž (𝑐|𝜎| V𝜎 − π‘’πœŽ ) ≥ 0,
lim+ 𝐷𝛼−1 (𝑐|𝜎| V − 𝑒) (𝑑) = 0,
𝑑→0
(𝑐|𝜎| V − 𝑒) (1) = 0.
(45)
Which implies by Lemma 7 that 𝑐|𝜎| V − 𝑒 = 𝐺𝛼 (π‘Ž(𝑐|𝜎| V𝜎 −
π‘’πœŽ )) ≥ 0. By symmetry, we obtain also that V ≤ 𝑐|𝜎| 𝑒. Hence
𝑐|𝜎| ∈ 𝐽 and 𝑐 ≤ 𝑐|𝜎| . Since |𝜎| < 1, then 𝑐 = 1 and
consequently 𝑒 = V.
Example 12. Let 𝜎 ∈ (−1, 1) and π‘Ž be a positive continuous
function on (0, 1) such that
π‘Ž (𝑑) ≈ (1 − 𝑑)−πœ‡ log (
3 −𝛽
) ,
1−𝑑
(46)
where πœ‡ < 𝛼 and 𝛽 ∈ R or πœ‡ = 𝛼 and 𝛽 > 1. Then, using
Theorem 1, problem (1) has a unique positive continuous
solution 𝑒 satisfying the following estimates.
(i) If πœ‡ < 𝜎 + 𝛼 − 1 or πœ‡ = 𝜎 + 𝛼 − 1 and 𝛽 > 1, then for
π‘₯ ∈ (0, 1),
𝑒 (π‘₯) ≈ π‘₯𝛼−2 (1 − π‘₯) .
(47)
(ii) If πœ‡ = 𝜎 + 𝛼 − 1 and 𝛽 = 1, then for π‘₯ ∈ (0, 1),
𝑒 (π‘₯) ≈ π‘₯𝛼−2 (1 − π‘₯) [log (log (
1/(1−𝜎)
3
.
))]
1−π‘₯
(48)
(49)
(iv) If 𝜎 + 𝛼 − 1 < πœ‡ < 𝛼, then for π‘₯ ∈ (0, 1),
𝑒 (π‘₯) ≈ π‘₯𝛼−2 (1 − π‘₯)(𝛼−πœ‡)/(1−𝜎) [log (
× π‘ŽΜƒ (𝑑) V𝜎 (𝑑) 𝑑𝑑.
𝑒 (π‘₯) = 𝐺𝛼 (π‘Žπ‘’πœŽ ) (π‘₯) .
(1−𝛽)/(1−𝜎)
3
.
)]
1−π‘₯
−𝛽/(1−𝜎)
3
. (50)
)]
1−π‘₯
(v) If πœ‡ = 𝛼 and 𝛽 > 1, then for π‘₯ ∈ (0, 1),
𝑒 (π‘₯) ≈ π‘₯𝛼−2 [log (
(1−𝛽)/(1−𝜎)
3
)]
.
1−π‘₯
(51)
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the anonymous referees for a careful
reading of the paper and for their helpful suggestions.
References
[1] K. Diethelm and A. D. Freed, “On the solution of nonlinear
fractional order differential equations used in the modelling of
viscoplasticity,” in Scientific Computing in Chemical Engineering
II-Computational Fluid Dynamics, Reaction Engineering and
Molecular Properties, F. Keil, W. Mackens, and H. Voss, Eds., pp.
217–224, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 1999.
[2] A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, and J. J. Trujillo, Theory
and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, Elsevier,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006.
[3] W. Lin, “Global existence theory and chaos control of fractional
differential equations,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and
Applications, vol. 332, no. 1, pp. 709–726, 2007.
[4] I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, vol. 198 of Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Academic Press, San Diego,
Calif, USA, 1999.
[5] R. P. Agarwal, D. O’Regan, and S. Staněk, “Positive solutions for
Dirichlet problems of singular nonlinear fractional differential
equations,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications,
vol. 371, no. 1, pp. 57–68, 2010.
[6] R. P. Agarwal, M. Benchohra, S. Hamani, and S. Pinelas,
“Boundary value problems for differential equations involving Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative on the half-line,”
Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete & Impulsive Systems A, vol.
18, no. 2, pp. 235–244, 2011.
[7] Z. Bai and H. Lü, “Positive solutions for boundary value
problem of nonlinear fractional differential equation,” Journal
of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 311, no. 2, pp.
495–505, 2005.
[8] B. Ahmad, “Existence of solutions for irregular boundary value
problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations,” Applied
Mathematics Letters, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 390–394, 2010.
[9] B. Ahmad and J. J. Nieto, “Riemann-Liouville fractional integrodifferential equations with fractional nonlocal integral boundary conditions,” Boundary Value Problems, vol. 2011, article 36,
2011.
[10] J. Caballero, J. Harjani, and K. Sadarangani, “Positive solutions
for a class of singular fractional boundary value problems,”
Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 62, no. 3, pp.
1325–1332, 2011.
6
[11] J. Deng and L. Ma, “Existence and uniqueness of solutions
of initial value problems for nonlinear fractional differential
equations,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 676–
680, 2010.
[12] N. Kosmatov, “A singular boundary value problem for nonlinear
differential equations of fractional order,” Journal of Applied
Mathematics and Computing, vol. 29, no. 1-2, pp. 125–135, 2009.
[13] Y. Liu, W. Zhang, and X. Liu, “A sufficient condition for
the existence of a positive solution for a nonlinear fractional
differential equation with the Riemann-Liouville derivative,”
Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1986–1992, 2012.
[14] T. Qiu and Z. Bai, “Existence of positive solutions for singular
fractional differential equations,” Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 149, 19 pages, 2008.
[15] Y. Zhao, S. Sun, Z. Han, and Q. Li, “Positive solutions to
boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential
equations,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2011, Article ID
390543, 16 pages, 2011.
[16] V. Marić, Regular Variation and Differential Equations, vol. 1726
of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Germany,
2000.
[17] E. Seneta, Regularly Varying Functions, vol. 508 of Lecture Notes
in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1976.
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Advances in
Operations Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Advances in
Decision Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems
in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Journal of
Algebra
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Probability and Statistics
Volume 2014
The Scientific
World Journal
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
International Journal of
Differential Equations
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Submit your manuscripts at
http://www.hindawi.com
International Journal of
Advances in
Combinatorics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Mathematical Physics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Journal of
Complex Analysis
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
International
Journal of
Mathematics and
Mathematical
Sciences
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Stochastic Analysis
Abstract and
Applied Analysis
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
International Journal of
Mathematics
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Discrete Dynamics in
Nature and Society
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Journal of
Journal of
Discrete Mathematics
Journal of
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Applied Mathematics
Journal of
Function Spaces
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Optimization
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Download