81
Technical Report Series
Number 77-
32
,
r
...J
....
.
32
'\
}
I
.
~
GEORGIA'S COASTAL ZONEAN INVENTORY OF PHOTOGRAPHIC
AND SATELLITE COVERAGE 1945-1977
J
by
Ronald Keeler
and
Robert J. Reimold
31
31
Georgia Marine Science Center
University System of Georgia
Skidaway Island, Georgia
81
GEORGIA'S COASTAL ZONE - AN INVENTORY OF
PHOTOGRAPHIC AND SATELLITE COVERAGE
194 5 - 1977
by
Ronald Keeler
Coastal Area Planning and
Development Commission
P . 0. Box 1316
Brunswick, Georgia 31520
and
Robert J. Reimold
The University of Georgia
Marine Extension Service
P. 0. Box 517
Brunswick, Georgia 31520
The Technical Report Series of the Georgia Marine Sci ence Center
i s issued by the Georgia Sea Grant Program and the Marine Extension
Serv i ce of the University of Georgia on Skidaway Island (P. 0. Box 13687,
Savannah, Georgia 31406). It was established to provide di ssemination
of technical information and progress reports resulting from marine
studies and inves tigatio ns mainly by staff and faculty of the University
System of Georgia. In addition, it is intended for the presentation of
techniques and methods , reduced data and general informati on of interest
to industry, local, regional, and state governments and the public.
Information co ntained in these reports is in the public domain. If this
prepublication copy is cited, it should be cited as an unpublished manuscript.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
o
o
1
o
TIME and COVERAGE
2
FILM TYPE
3
SCALE and FOCAL LENGTH
5
o
............
SOURCES
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
9
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY COVERAGE
Bryan County
Camden County
Chatham County .
. . .
Glynn Coun t y
Liberty County . . • .
Mcintosh County . . . . .
0
o
10
13
17
23
. . .
28
. . . . 32
•
0
o
o
•
o
•
•
o
•
•
•
o
0
•
o
o
•
•
•
o
•
•
•
o
o
o
•
•
o
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
o
o
. .
.
. 36
LANDSAT IMAGERY
LANDSAT COVERAGE • •
6
.......
•
•
0
•
39
Introduction
Dur ing the past 10 to 15 years, remote sensing from
aircraft and spacecraft has become an efficient, economic and
effective means of collecting data related to our coastal
frontiers.
Evaluation of aerial photography over a period of
years appears to be a very practical method for the collection
and synthesis of data related to numerous environmental and
socio logical problems of our coast. Numerous features, such
as delineation of topography, wildlife habitat, public utilities,
open planting zones, transportation corridors, soil characteristics, vegetation, and population distribution, can be identified from aerial photography. Although the field surveys of
ground truth can not be entirely eliminated with aerial photography, the implementation of aerial photography provides a
relatively inexpensive tool that can greatly reduce the time
and cost for comprehensive data acquisition and assessment.
In the early days of aerial photography, exposures were
made at an oblique angle with the ground.
These oblique photographs provide wide angle perspectives of the terrain, but the
usefulne ss was impaired due to unevenness of scale across the
photography.
A vertical photograph taken with the aerial camera
pointed straight towards the earth's surface provides uniform
scale throughout the photograph. With adequate end overlap or
consecutive exposures, the resultant overlapping pairs permit
three dimensional (stereoscopic) viewing for additional interpretation.
Imagery from spacecraft is a relatively new source of
remotely sensed data providing an inexpensive means of collecting
data over a very large area.
Satellite imagery is availab le for
practically every land mass in the world and on a continuous
basis.
Landsat imagery in particular has become a very popular
resource tool in several professions.
Because of limitation s of
sca le, the imagery is generally used for statewide or regional
investigations where the broad overview is necessary.
Unlike
conventional aerial photography, satellite data is available
for both photo interpretation and automated digital interpretation.
Both photography and satellite imagery data are important
to resource management.
Whether you are involved in land use
planning, wildlife management, energy research, economic
deve lopment, or government decision making, remote sensing
could be valuable.
The purpose of this publication is to summarize the
numerous aerial surveys and Landsat images that are available
for the six coastal .counties of Georgia.
The first part lists
aerial photographic surveys that have been completed since
1945, while the second part deals with Landsat coverage of
the region.
1
The surveys are categorized by county and subclassified
by date.
Each of the entries identifies:
1) the date, 2)
percentage of coverage of the county, 3) type of film, 4) scale,
5) agency that conducted the survey, 6) project identification
number, and 7) map indicating the location of the flight.
Entire surveys are enumerated; individual photographs are not
listed . Addresses for each of the source agencies foll ow the
surveys, as well as addresses of several agencies that can
provide the user with continuous, up-to-date data on most aerial
surveys for any location in the United States. When ordering
photographs, it is essential to indicate the date, scale, type
o f film, and project identification number. This will prevent
confus i on and ensure receipt of the correct photos.
0~
percent of
coverage
date
March 1949
~larc-h
1951
100%
5%
area covered
by survey
'
. .... . .
(
' ·.
~'
if ~ '" !!>".:.'~
<i'
qf
~
,~'
<J
o'
01
<J
eo '
..._,'1>'
,~
scale
X
1:20,000
X
1:28,400
focal length
8. 25"
6"
source
pro,ect 10
number
ASCS
rxN
USGS
1-N
\
Time and Coverage
Since the season of the year is an important factor in photo
interpreta tion, each entry indicates the month and year for a
particular survey . Although most surveys are conducted from
October to April, the months of least vegetation cover and most
favorable weather, several flights are taken in mid-summer .
These photos could be valuable in cropland and marsh identifi cation.
The historic availability of the photography (1945 to
present) also permits many comparative studies of coastal
features.
By including an estimate of the coverage and a map delineating the area, we hope to simplify the search for the best
photography for a particula r use and a specific area. ~ost of
the photographic missions in this region of Georgia deal with
the coastline:
research involving shoreline mechanics, ecology,
hydrology or related subjects. Therefore, most flights are
conducted without regard to political boundaries, and very few
of the surveys cover 100% of a county.
It is easy to see why
well over half of the surveys cover only the eastern portion of
most counties.
Regardl ess, all counties have at least one survey
with complete coverage.
2
Film Type
Once the time
identif ied, one can
Major films used in
white Panchromat i c,
and color infrared .
of ye a r a nd the a r e a of coverage have been
revi ew th e ty p e of film used in the survey.
aer i al pho t ography include: b l a ck and
bla c k and white infr ared, natural c o lor ,
The mainstay of mos t ae rial surve ys is black and white
Pan c hr oma t i c film.
This fi lm i s sen s i t ive to vis i ble light
in the range of 500 to 600 n an ome ter s . The emulsion records
about 200 different shad e s of gr a y . The r e are no special
characteristics associated wi t h pa nc h roma t ic film.
Its
characteristics fall somewhere be t we e n n atural color and black
and white infrared f ilms. The s u nspot prob l em is intermediate,
while its water penetration ability approaches that of natural
color film.
It is the mos t inexpensive fil m to use, and thus
is utilized for most low altitude photo graphy.
Because of this
cost factor, severa l Federal age ncies, like t h e Soil Conservation Service and Agr icultural Stabilization a nd Co n servation
Service, use panc h romatic films exclusively. However, many
more agencies and c ompanies are using other typ es of film for
specific purposes.
Pa nchromatic films have app roximately the
same range of light se n s itivity as the human e y e . These films
have been regarded for many years as standar d film for aerial
mapping, charti n g, and general aerial photograp hy .
The most
common panchroma t ic film is Kodak Double - X ae r o graphic film
2405 .
This film was designed to provide a wide e xposure latitude , medium r eso l ut ion, moderate course granu l arity , and good
tonal contrast .
I t does have a slightly higher th a n normal
sensitivity in the red portion of the spectrum and th i s permit s
relative ly fas t s hu t ter speeds, especially with t h e use of haze
cutting f ilters.
Black and white infrared film is s e nsitiv e to longer ene rgy
wavelengths, betwee n 7 4 0 and 920 nanometers.
The additional exposure into the n ear-infrared adds a new dime nsion i nto this type
of remote sensing.
Black and white infrared f i lm is often used to
determine the boundary between land and water. Water absorbs
infrared radi at ion and reflects the shorter wave l e n g ths, thereby
making wa t er a ppea r blac~. Vegetation reflects infr a re d radiation also and c r eates a whitish color on the exposure. This
characteristi c i s use ful for the identification of species and
plant vigor.
Other advantages of black and white i n f rared includes
i ncre a sed atmosph eric haze penetration and a r e duc ed r eflectio n
of the sun fro m water surfaces (sunspots).
Since pa~chromatic film is n o t very sensitive i n the green
portion of the spectrum, healthy vegetation appea rs in gray tones
on the pri n t.
Whe r e c oniferous trees are present , p anchromatic
film may be used for forest vegetation classifica tion.
If deciduous veg e tatio n i s intermixed with the coniferou s vegetation , the
uti l izat i on o f Kod d k infrared aerographic film 24 2 4 provides a
better s ep ar a t i o n of the types.
This infrared film has a high
contras t and i s s ensitive to the infrared radiation, as well as
3
the blue, green and red portions of the visible spectrum.
Sometimes this film is exposed through red or dark red filters thereby only recording the red infrared wavelengths reflected from
the subject.
Silt laden bodies of water absorb infrared reflection to a high degree; consequently, they register light on film
as opposed to clear water which registers dark on film.
This
has been useful for identification of water masses along the
coastal zone.
The development of natural color aerial films was a great
improvement for the photo interpretation of man-made and natural
features.
Natural color film can record 20,000 separate colors a vast difference from panchromatic emulsions. This film has
several advantages. Unlike black and white films, it presents
the photo interpreter with a record of objects as they actually
appear in nature.
The human experience is to see things in color,
and this film permits easy identification.
In addition, there
is greater penetration into shadows produced by elevated objects.
Natural color has the deepest water penetration, reaching nearly
75 feet into clear water.
However, it may decrease to 5-10 feet
in turbid waters.
Natural color film records approximately the
same range of visible light as black and white Panchromatic,
420 to 680 nanometers.
Because of this, it reflects nearly all
visible light from water surfaces yielding a larger sunspot
problem. Additionally, it is not as good a haze penetrator as
infrared emulsions.
Natural color film is valuable for interpretation of healthy
and diseased vegetation. The most commonly utilized film is
Kodak Ektachrome MS aerographic film 2448.
This film when processed produces a color positive transparency.
The color photograph is superior to the black and white photos for natural vegetation studies because the human eye can detect more color
variation on a color photograph than shades of gray on a black
and white photograph.
It has also been utilized for identifying
soil types, crops, and other features.
This natural color film
penetrates water and is therefore useful in subsurface exploration and delineation of numerous shoreline features.
It does
have a drawback in that correct exposure with proper bright
sunlight conditions is a necessity.
Another natural color system designed to utilize the aerial
photography produces a va r iety of products from a single negative.
Kodak aerocolor negative film 2445 produces a singular
negative from which black and white or color prints, as well as
black and white or color transparencies, or black and white or
color diaposit ives can be produced.
This system provide s a
wide variety of products which can be made from the exposure of
one singular aerial negative. This is especially popular with
plant ecologists, foresters, geographers, and land planner s who
desire a variety of products from one negative.
Finally, there is c olor i nfra r ed ae r ial film.
4
This ernul-
sion was developed by the military in the 1940's to differentiate between camou flage and natural foliage.
Today, it is
widely used in remote sensing as probably the best choice of
all the emulsions.
The term "false-color" is used because the
exposure produces an arbitrary color shift. I4ost color infrared film is sensitive to radiation between 520 and 865 nanometers,
more into the infrared part of the spectrum that natu ral color
film.
Near infrared radiation produces a red image; visible
red radiation yields a green image, and visible green light
produces a blue image on the developed film.
Short wavelength,
blue light is not recorded.
The false rendering of familiar colors may take some amount
of familiarity , but the advantages of this type of film outweigh
this handicap. There are several advantages to color infrared
film over the previous types of film.
One of the most prominent
is its sensitivity to vegetat ion. Vegetation emits longer wavelength radia tion than the human eye can process, resulti ng in a
better vegetation response than non-infrared films.
However, it
is the add ition of color that makes this film more attractive
than black and white infrared.
Healthy vegetation yield s a
bright red tone on the film, but there can also be several tones
between r ed and blue, depending on the species. This film is
also valuable in detection of diseased foliage.
Another advantage of this film is the high degree of atmospheric haz e penetration.
In fact, color infrared provides nearly all the benefits
of o ther emulsions, with the exception of water penetration , which
is limited to abo ut 25 feet in clear water.
For these reasons,
color infrared photography i s becoming very popular in remote
sens ing.
Kodak aerochrome infrared film 2443 has been designed as
a false color film with emulsion sensitive to the infra red, red,
and green portions of the spectrum rather than the usua l blue,
green and red wavelengths. This film when processed re sults
in a co lor transparency displaying false colors for most natural
features.
This film has become especially valuable f o r natural
resourc es surveys as well as disease detection in stands of
timber.
Dead foliage generally registers as bright gre en
contras ted with the healthy magenta or red vegetati on on the
re sultant positive trans parency.
Scale and Focal length
Various scales are exhibited in the following listing,
ranging f rom 1:5,000 to 1:130,000. Large scale photograp hy
(1:5, 000) shows a small area, but yields a great amount of detail.
Whereas, small scale photography (1:130,000) covers a much larger
area and show little detail.
However, it takes fewer pho tos to
cover a county than large scale pho tography.
5
In addition to the scale, we have included the focal length
o f the camera. In order to compute the flight altitude, simply
divide the focal length by the photo scale.
flight altitude~ f~c~l length (ft.)
p o o scale
(ft.)
Sources
Abbreviations under the sources column reflect the agency
that should be contacted in o rder to purchase the photography.
Generally, Federal agencies maintain their own photo labs and
photos can be purchased directly from them.
Local or state
governments and private companies , however, either do not have
large photo labs or must contract out their surveys to commercial aerial survey companies .
In order to obtain photographs,
written permission must be first acquired from the state or
local government or company prior to contacting the aerial
survey company. Addresses for the aerial companies are listed
after the sources.
Aerial photographs from the Georgia Department of Transportation are not available for general public sale. However, the
Ga. DOT has guidelines which enable them to work cooperatively
with State, Federal, and other governmental agencies on a cost
reimbursement basis . All requests and additional information
pe.rtaining to Ga. DOT photography should be submitted by letter.
Although the Army Corps of Engineers does not sell any
aerials, they have many photographs "on-file" for review.
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Savannah District
Post Office Box 899
Savannah, Georgia 31401
(912) 233-8822
6
Abbreviations
ASCS
Name and Address of Source
Other Instructions
Agricultural Stabilization and
Conservation Service
Aerial Photography Field Office
Users Services Section
2505 Parley's Way
Salt Lake City, Utah 85109
(801) 524-5856
Bwk. Pulp Land
Brunswick Pulp Land Co.
Woods Division
P.O. Box 860
Brunswick, Georgia 31520
written permission
Camden Co.
Camden County Tax Assessor
Count¥ Courthouse
Woodb1ne, Georgia 31569
written permission;
available from:
Park Aerial Survey
Standiford Field
P.O. Box 21379
Louisville, KY 40221
(502) 366-4571
Chatham Co.
Chatham Co . - Savannah Metro
Planning Commission
P.O . Box 1027
Savannah, Georgia . 31402
written permission;
available from:
Abrams Aerial Survey
124 N. Larch St.
P.O. Box 508
Lansing, MI 48902
(517) 372-8100
Ga. DOT
State Highway Location Eng.
Georgia Dept. of Transportation
No. 2 Capitol Square, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30334
written permission
ATTN:
Raymond Blue
Inter'l Paper
International Paper Co.
P.O. Box 355
Richmond Hill, Georgia 31324
written permission;
available from:
Kucera and Assoc.
7000 Reynolds Road
Mentor, Ohio 44060
(216) 946-5665
ITT Rayonier
ITT Rayonier
SE Timber Division
P.O. Box 728
Fernandina Beach, Fla.
written permission;
available from:
Abrams Aerial Survey
124 N. Larch St.
P.O . Box 508
Lansing, MI 48902
(517) 372-8100
Mc intosh Co.
32034
Mcintosh County Tax Assessor
P.O. Box 801
Darien, Georgia 31305
7
written permission;
available from:
Abrams Aerial Survey
124 N. Larch St.
P.O. Box 508
Lansing, MI 48902
(517) 372-8100
Abbreviations
NASA
Name and Address of Source
EROS Data Center
User Servi ces Unit
Sioux Falls, S. Dakota
NOS
Park Aerial
scs
Other Instructions
(605) 594-6511
Ext. 151
57198
Nationa l Ocean Survey
Coastal Mapp ing Division
c 3415
Rockville, Maryland 20 852
(301) 443-8601
Park Aerial Surveys
Standiford Field
P.O. Box 21379
Louisville, Kentucky
(502) 366-4571
40221
Soil Cons ervation Service , USDA
Cartographic Division
Federa l Building
Hyattsville, Maryland 20782
(301) 436-8187
Schmidt Photo
Southeastern Photogramanetrics
(formerl y Schmidt Photo)
P.O. Box 82464
Hapeville, Georgia 30354
(401) 761-0855
Thomas Lowe &
Assoc.
Thomas Lowe & Assoc.
1920 Monro e Drive NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30334
(404) 875-0136
Union Camp
Union Camp Corporation
Woods Division
P.O. Box 570
Savannah, Georgia 31402
written permission;
avai lable from:
Abrams Aerial Survey
124 N. Larch St.
P.O. Box 508
Lansing, MI 48902
(517) 372-8100
Univ. of Ga.
University of Georgia
Mar ine Extension Service
P.O. Box 517
Brunswick, Georgia 31520
written permission;
available f rom:
Airborne Data Inc.
P.O. Box 6094
Daytona Beach, Fla.
32015
(904) 255-8952
U. S. Geolo gical Survey
National Cartographic
Information Center
507 National Center
Reston, Virginia 22092
(703) 860-604 5
I
USGS
8
Additional Information
Several Federal agencies have Map and Aerial Information
Systems.
Some systems detail information for only one agency;
o ther s ystems maintain a record of all aerial surveys.
The National Cartographic Information Center maintains
detailed information about all Federal, and some state, photography throughout the U. S. through the Aerial Photography
Summary Record System.
This system does not include information on satellite imagery or space photography.
Information
can be obtained both in paper catalogs or microfiche.
National Cartographic Information Center
U. S. Geological Survey
507 National Center
Reston, Virginia 22092
(703) 860-6045
The U. S. Geologica l Survey also maintains an informational
library at the EROS Data Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota which
details all Landsat imagery, space photography, NASA aircraft
and USGS Aerial Mapping photography.
The NASA Ames Research Center maintains details on all NASA
high altitude projects through the Airborne Instrumentation Research Project. For information contact:
NASA Ames Research Center
AIRP Data Facility
Mail Stop 211-8
Moffet Field, California 94035
(415) 965-6252
9
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
~..'v
0~
date
March 1949
percent of
coverage
100%
area covered
by survey
~~
~~
rz,O
!1>- ,,~
~d·
:...
llJIJ
~
0
'
......
0u
/
,C'·
-~'lj
/
~
4'"
X
April 1951
...... ''
5%
5%
BRYAN COUNTY -]
(j
<¢
/
c:-u /
/
source
project I D
number
scale
focal length
1:20,000
8.25"
ASCS
rx;y
-~
March 1951
[
~"'
Q,flj
l
X
1:28,400
6"
USGS
NV
..... ' .
.'
X
1:24,000
6"
NOS
51-0
~
-~~
X
1:10,000
8.25"
ASCS
rx;y
. I
.'-<1
.
(
_'- ~
Feb. 1954
100%
0
M
,.
Jan . 1956
SO%
Jan. 1958
100%
(
......
'
'
l/lf4~
~~~
X
1:60,000
6"
X
1:20,000
8.25"
X
1:24,000
6"
X
1:36,000
6"
NOS
62-W
X
1:20,000
8.25"
ASCS
rx;y
USGS
55-AM-20
ASCS
r:x:;y
.Y/1
Feb. 1961
20%
":
....
Oct. 1962
10%
-
~
'
·~
'
..
' ..
Ga.
oor
Ga. Coastal Mosai c
~
-'-,.....
'.
~
' - ' r~.tlk" ·,
\ !
--~
Nov. 1963
20%
1f{f!Tf!lh<
' ..... ' .
\-
\
'
.' \
:
·'•
[
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
I
date
~ la rch
1965
percent of
coverage
I
W,
0
0
BRYAN COUNTY]
0,-\
Q)
r~>'-'v~
,t'f}0~d-o'~
,'l>'0 '~'tf
"v~
area covered
by survey
5%
Q'tf
'"
'
,0
"'b
1>-
~o!..
vo
'"
00
~''l>'
'"
scale
focal length
source
prOJeCt I D
number
X
1: 20,000
6"
NOS
:\
1:20,000
6"
USGS
X
1:20,000
8. 2 S"
ASCS
DGY
X
1:50,000
6"
scs
DGY
65-1.
-~
~iarch
1966
Jan. 1970
90%
20%
rt4Jfl.~~
'-llh-
N/41¢~
~illf/!1/!tt,,
iff!.;
.....
'
-'
\
April 1970
Nov . 1971
100%
'
AF66-75
:
~tt4n; ' ,,\
MI!~/Ju~l
r-1
rl
5%
1:30,000
6"
NOS
71-E(c)
1: 20,000
6"
NOS
71- F.
X
1:60, 000
3. 25"
NOS
71-M
X
1 : 24,000
6"
USGS
VOlA
1 : 24 , 000
6"
X
.,11/.
Nov. 1971
10 %
X
~~
Nov . 1971
20%
Dec. 1971
10 %
......
- ~
, ... .. ~/1
. . rfl/1! ...
.
, .
..
\
Dec .
1972
Sept. 1973
20%
5%
X
'
~
X
I 1:60,000
3. 46"
llniv. of Ga.
NOS
UGMI -G
73-C(c)
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
[
;__,c..
f..q,o
a> • "'?>' •
0(.
date
percent of
coverage
Sept. 1973
20%
Oct. 1973
100%
Feb. 1974
20%
April 1974
100%
area covered
by survey
~
(.j
<f<::'
~
/
~o
/
~o'
_Q
c..u·
X
X
X
X
b
f..flj
,...~
-~"
'b
/ -,~·
BRYAN COUNTY
q,,'-\
/
/
scale
focal length
source
project I D
number
1:130,000
6"
NASA
73-158
1:130,000
6"
NASA
73-180
1:21,000
3.46"
USGS
SWIJ
1:130,000
6"
NASA
74-065B
N
r-1
April 1974
20%
April 1974
100%
Jan . 1975
1:76,000
6"
USGS
VDLR
X
1:40,000
6"
Park Aerial
BBR
IP land
only
X
1:15,840
6"
Inter'l Paper
Harch 1975
5%
X
1:15,840
6"
Union Camp
UCC-SAP
Oct. 1975
5%
X
X
1:65,000
12"
NA..SA
75-179
April 1976
5%
X
1:24,000
6"
Ga. DOT
X
g
12595
Ga. Shoreline
J
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
date
I
April 1951
percent of
coverage
I
100%
0
[ CAMDEN
n<.."\
,..,_v
~~YJ
lb,,u~.._'l}e;~(Yo'~,'b,e '~'b"J
,~
~
,~
l)
~
... ~.~
~
()'
area covered
by survey
SO %
t-1ay 1951
0
(lc::'
~.J'
~'b
~0~
u0
'7>'
\.'
,~
scale
foca I length
source
p ro,ect 10
number
X
1:24,000
6"
~OS
51 - 0
•
X
1: 32,800
o"
USGS
NU
X
1:15,840
6"
.:'"......'- j.,
X
1:30,000
6"
'
Feb. 1952
I BPP land
only
Oct. 1952
I
10%
v;'$~4
{1·:..·~~~/
,
I
100%
Nov. 1953
I
5%
I
.: ,
I
20%
March 1957
I
70 %
NOS
52-0
"~ ...
·~
C"")
r-i
X
1:20,000
6"
scs
DSH
X
1:10,000
6"
NOS
53-J
·~?.~1
X
1:60,000
6"
USGS
':.if!.';f
X
1:24,000
6"
USGS
X
1: 15 '840
6"
·~~-~
,.;'"'- 1
. . ........
(
. - ....... J
"
.Jan. 1956
ASC
- 'J
~
'
Jan . 1953
Bwk . Pulp Land
.~ '
,-'h
55-AM-20
VPt--1
-"" ...... _
March 1959
IBPP land
onl y
II(~~~
~
""''fllf)
.
· -~
8\.,rk. Pulp La nd
G;\
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
[ CAMDEN COUN;v]
,p
date
percent of
coverage
Feb . 1961
70 ~.
:-.Jov. 1962
20 ~
Nov . 1962
10 ~
0'
<:'
a rea cove, ed
by SUI ve y
~
~~
' -t
0
0
0
~
~
/
~
.<..
"''-
.,.<::·
,v'
~
00
o'
~
<r
q,'-
,,
,<:'
1-.
0::-._0
"''
ruo
-~'l>O)
,
'l>'
foca I Ieng t h
X
1:24,000
6"
\
1:20,000
6"
NOS
62- \\'
1:10,000
6''
NOS
62-l\'(c)
X
1:36,000
6"
NOS
63-W
X
1:10,000
6"
NOS
64-W
X
1:19,200
6"
X
1:21,000
3.46"
USGS
SWDG
1:20,000
6"
NOS
71-E
1:30,000
6"
NOS
71- E(c)
"'l>
v
'"
X
J(
0
source
t;a . Coastal
Ga. OOT
•
.....
;
proJect I 0
numbe r
seale
'· j
i
l::
, ,v
aJ
f:'~
ru('\
"
Feb. 1963
5%
'1
1.,1
I
·-
~
.
•
t •• ftl•
....
'
• ..
"
Sept . 1964
10%
; . ~ ·····
..
'\.-
.
.. J
~ ·
April 1965
100%
~
-~~
Schimdt Photo
0
AW
"
10%
~'·.:::. 7;
Nov. 1971
30%
_,'- t
Nov. 1971
5%
Jan. 1970
,f'~ J~
0
'·
I ..::.:
,. '
'
0
' f
.
~
.
•
X
'
I •" " I •
'
, I
X
.Al
I
~lc
c
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
date
percent of
coverage
1971
30%
Dec. 1972
SO%
March 1973
20%
Oct. 1973
20%
~ov.
I
w:
~,,v~''?>,ro~ lP'
v~
area covered
by survey
-
..~­
~
?'_
;ci_
zF'
Q
,,~
~'-"
~
:'\
:
X
'flj
~
!-..
2P
(j
\
~~~
· :~
~~-7
.
,~
~
[
CA~DEN c0u~Tv]
ro'-\
Q)
.._'?> ~ ,~'1)
ro
scale
foca I Ie ng t h
1:611, ()(](]
3.2S"
l: 24, (1()(1
11"
l:-6,00()
6"
source
\!OS
llniv. of Ga .
proJeCt 10
number
71 · M
UGMT-G
USGS
VDFQ
NOS
73 -(
· - --~
cr,'-....-j.
;
......
..}
X
·~
1:60,000
:s. 4o"
•.
Oct. 1973
100%
11)
~~
~4f'Ai
M
X
1:1~0.0()0
6"
NASA
7'!--180
.: ~ ·
Feb . 1974
70%
April 1974
70%
',lf~
' ~
- -~
·~
1:21 '000
3. 4 6"
llSGS
sw I.J
X
1:76,000
6"
USGS
VOLR
X
1:60,0()()
3 . 46"
~OS
74-C
X
1: no, ooo
X
"
April 1974
20%
April 1974
100%
: ·:~
.J
~~
-
6"
:.lAS/\
74-0658
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
. 0~
date
Dec. 1974
Feb . 197 5
percent of
coverage
area covered
by survey
. /JL}""'
fTI land
only
20 %
0
c.,
. · IUJ.)i.
c.,~
<:<7>"
a>~-- .
~
, fb'Qi
:;:..v /
0
~o'
0v
X
®.:.)
X
. . .jj,
'l>'Qi
[ CAMDEN COUNTY
e}~
J
'~'l>C$
/
/
,<.'
/
foca I !eng t h
sour ce
1:15,840
6"
JTI Rayonier
1:15,000
6"
1:15,840
6"
1:65,000
12"
scale
llSGS
project I D
numbe r
RAY
VDFR-1
'
r.larch 1975
CX:t.
1975
BPP land
only
t~
. . . l(
20%
fii.:~~,
X
Bwk. Pulp Land
ERT
..
... ](
X
X
NASA
75-179
\D
,·' ·. ..
April 1976
~
: ."··:·...
(
20 %
r-1
·C
..... .J
Jan. 19 77
100%
,~
Feb. 19 77
100 %
ftt
~ -
X
1:24,000
6"
Ga. OOT
X
1:20,000
6"
Camden Co .
X
1:48 , 000
6''
scs
Ga. Shoreline
BLB
13039
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
[CHATHAM COUNTY
(,
:--.."
0~
percent of
coverage
da te
area covered
by su rvey
~
(,
<t"
0
,e;
a> •. ,'lJ
~
c;-v
'
0
,e
~
~0
-0
'b
, ,,
,c:-
,z,"--\
,..e;s
0
,c:-
-~v
'
0
'
\"-'b
pro Ject ID
number
scale
foca I length
X
1:20,000
3.46"
NOS
45-C
X
1:28,400
6"
USGS
NV
X
1:24,000
6"
NOS
51-0
X
1:20,000
6"
scs
rxx;
X
1:10,000
6"
NOS
53-J
1:15 ,000
6"
NOS
55-L
X
1:60,000
6"
USGS
55-AM-20
X
1:30,000
6"
NOS
X
1:24,000
6"
c,'-'
J
source
...
·I.
Feh. 1945
.....;~
5%
' ..'·~=-t#
.
,.,
\ .
~!arch
1951
-~
80%
.
April 1951
10%
'
~'~
·...
',.(..
. "''\ _,
( ,·
Jan. 1952
Nov. 1953
•
100%
10%
//'
,
<. .....~~
"'
rl
- .;r..-
( ..:
' ' 11
Nov. 1955
, r.
( ",.. 7;' '-~
5%
I I
\,
X
X
. - v"\r-'
~
Jan. 1956
40%
Nov. 1956
10%
l
/1}
&55-0
(/
.
"'"' '- ~
-~
~4~~
'. ·.3-
56-W
• ..;)r• '
(/
·:r
,'~ .
Feb. 1961
80 %
.
Ga . DOT
Ga. Coastal Mosa ic
[CHATHAM COUNTY]
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
:---.'(_
~'e;0
'C
0~
percent of
cove ra ge
date
1962
April
60%
area cover eu
by survey
<'~
:-<''
,v
~'
~
<0
'(
'
0
,ro
~0'
~'
\'u
0
,z.' -\
'<>OJ
-~
/
VV
/
,,,
/
sour·ce
pro Jec t ID
nu mber
scale
focal length
X
1:40,000
6"
NOS
62-S
X
1:36,000
6"
NOS
62-W
X
1:20,000
6"
NOS
62-\\1
X
1:70,000
3. 25"
:-.lOS
64-M
I. /
Oct.
1962
<4~
'I;IJ! ·.t
50 %
~, ~ -
11
Nov. 1962
net.
1964
Nov. 1964
10%
10%
30 ~
1. ·
.
( ......?'~
'
~
-~-
<:.. ~
·.}.
-tr_.
- <· .,~~
00
.-1
X
1:30,000
6"
NOS
64-S
X
1:40,000
1:20,000
6"
NOS
65-L
X
1:19,200
6"
Schimdt Photo .
AX
X
1:20,000
6"
USGS
AF 66-75
X
1:30,000
6"
NOS
(,
/.
March
1965
Nov. 1965
March
1966
20%
100%
20%
(
~
'· .·:·,
\!\.'~
'~
~~.....""""'ftt
~
·.l
;t.()•'
March
1967
20%
,-~~~
·,1.
.
-...).c ~'
( -~
67-S
[CHATHAM COUNTY ]
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
date
I
percent of
coverage
I
area cove r ed
by survey
April 1970
100%
June 1970
100%
'~
Nov. 1970
60%
/:.~~
·-
JJ/1/!.,
Vl~.liJi.
-
~
\.
-,
..
I:>
~
0
71,ro ,~71~J
71. . .,_v~,r$~;y.o'~,
s ' ~ 1.- '" 71'cz,0
('G'
~..::>
~0
\.'
<:?
"71
00
,0
scale
~
foe a I leng t h
source
scs
pro 1ect I D
number
ax;
X
1:50.000
6"
X
1: 24, 000
6"
X
1:40,000
6"
NOS
70 - L(c J
X
1:20,000
6"
NOS
70-L(c)
/1
I,
I:>
cz,'---\
Chatham Co.
CXJ
,
('
Nov . 1970
/ ...\
\__~ :.~
10%
._tY
m
.-1
" \..~
Mar ch 1971
1%
<~··-~
··
-i J
(
5~
"
Nov. 1971
80 %
l'bv. 1971
20%
Nov. 1971
10%
.
X
..\.
'· -,~~)
~
<~
X
~/ ~
\~~
~~~~
'.
•.. 4 •
. .. '-"l:t; ~o
(
\ '
'
1:20,000
6"
NOS
71-E(c)
1:30,000
6"
NOS
71-E
1:60,000
3.25"
N0S
71-M
1:30,000
n"
NOS
71-E(c)
1:30,000
6"
NOS
71-S
~-
( ... .
' ~ ...:.
/
March 1971
X
~..,
X
X
[CHATHAM COUNTY]
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
date
I
percent of
coverage
t\ov . 1971
20%
Dec·. 1971
90%
I
0
5%
~
"(;~
area covered
by survey
Q'l>
,_..J("
"'l>
\ · ·~~
~
~0
vo
'
<:-.''l>
,<::-
source
pro1ect ID
number
scale
foc a I length
1:20,000
6"
NOS
71-E
1:24,000
6"
USGS
VCJA
X
l: 130,000
6"
NASA
72-116
X
1:130,000
6"
NASA
72-144
X
•
q,'-"\
i;·-' ~<..'l>..,i~>&o"~~.,'l>'<o
,~'l>CfJ
,<::~
,<::l>
~~
\
\:. . -~ .
/
July 1972
0
\·····~
· •• .,~'>
( -Aug. 1972
.•
5%
/
-~
.......
)
-\,_;
·-~-
'\
(,
0
N
// ~
Sept. 1972
10%
<~_ ....... ~
1:130,000
6"
X
1:24,000
6"
X
1:130,000
6"
NASA
X
1:40,000
6"
NOS
73-E
1:60,000
3. 46"
NC\.<;
73-C
X
· - -~~?:
NASA
72-167
~ -.
Dec. 1972
SO%
Sept. 1973
30%
"\
<'/ ...,...
'·
.
': ~~
Univ. of Ga.
UGH-G
73-158
'"\ .·
( .
.
\ >~,
/
Oct. 1973
10 %
/
.
·~··-
.
...~- ~
~
'.""'..,. -.
~
Oct . 1973
20%
:.1:,. ,
-·
-~
. '
~
X
[ CHATHAM
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
'-'0
a>
(:''
,o
date
Oct. 1973
percent of
coverage
100 ~
Feb . 1974
8 O"o
Apr il 1974
80 %
:-<:"
"0
i'lrea CO\ er eel
by survey
•.-t
-·<)
•
q~
-i-
/
<0
0
0°
o'
~
.<..
,,-
,:::--
0~
: -._
,'b
'-0
"'b
~
~0
cP
'b,e;
e.'-\
,<S:''[)O)
'
,,
'"
-CouNTY]
00
'b'
"'
'"
seale
focal length
1:130,000
6"
1:21 ,000
3.46"
X
1:76,000
X
1:60,000
X
\
source
prOJeCt ID
number
7~-180
t-\ASA
USGS
SWIJ
6"
USGS
VDLR
3.46"
NOS
74-C
,. .,.
April 1974
30%
.
April 1974
100%
Nov. 1974
10%
.
...-t
'
N
~
1:130,000
6"
NASA
X
1:30,000
6"
NOS
X
1 :24,000
6"
1:20,000
6"
X
74-065B
1'
_,,p,;~
'
'
......
I
.
Jan. 1975
100%
•
~
' '
74-S
\ •
~' .
~
~
Chatham
Co.
ER'3
,·
CX:t.
1975
10%
<.~.:~
X
. ,. ...
,:)..
~
~
I
NOS
75 -B(c )
[CHATHAM
AER IAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
da te
per-cent of
coverage
area co ve1ed
by SlliV ey
30 ~
5~
0
~
~0
/
~
..:>'
'
0~
~o'
"''
(,~
o'
(J
v
0 -~--y
~, ~
'
0'~
.§>)
'0
'0
~'
source
foca I Ieng t h
\
1:2-l,OOO
6"
G:1. I'OT
r.a . Shoreline
\
l: 12 ,000
6"
G:1. roT
Ga. Shoreline
1 :24 ,000
6"
'
-
'I
. .. ·-·- ~
. ,:). .
·-
Feb . 1977
100 %
piOJeCt 10
number
scale
"...
l
.
.\p r i l 1976
q'U'
,
'
.\pl ·i l 1976
0
,v~
, ,C·
'
!:'"'
couNTY]
4.,
~
-
\
01atham Co.
FKS
.
I
N
N
[ GLYNN COUNTY -]
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
~.?
~()
. _o
date
percent of
co verage
Feb. 1945
1 n··
Feb. 1945
5''·'
area covered
by sur vey
.. · · -~
.
' -t /
...
90 Q
,
'
0u /
0
o'
~
,e;
'l:i
/
vu / ,<.." /
proJe c t I D
number
focal length
X
1: 20,000
3.46"
NOS
4 5-C
X
1 : 5,000
1 :10,000
3. 46"
NOS
45-C
X
1 :24 , 000
6"
NOS
51 -0
X
1: 32 ,800
6"
USGS
NU
-- - ~
'
source
scale
.I
.,..
-~
e}--\
,.,Q)
'~v
:, ~
'
Apr i l 1951
·-~
~ ~
u <Q/~
QzF'
\"-~
,0
rl>
<..
"~
May 1951
Feb. 1952
Feb. 1952
100°o
BPP land
only
10%
1
,
•
it~.
wm
.Y:-.i..
M
N
ASC
X
l : 15 ' 840
6"
X
l: 24' 000
6"
NOS
52-0
X
1:30,000
6"
NOS
52-0
X
1:20,000
6"
scs
DSF
X
1:10,000
()"
NOS
53-.J
Bwk. Pulp Land
J.- •
- --- ~
'
;., ... ~-
.
I
Oct. 1952
5%
,:
__
J.-' -- :-.
Jan. 1953
100 %
:-Jov. 195 3
10 %
.
-' ..
·-~
' ---$.
?'
I
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
[ GLYNN COUNTY]
~-.'0
~.0
~0
percent of
cove rage
date
area cove red
by surve y
i5'
<:?\:'
:.X.
<(/
\'-~
ro0
~
o
o'
11' 0
~
/
,<:-
cf.v /
ro'-\
~11(;$
..
,<:-
/
source
pro jec t ID
numbe r
sca le
foca l length
X
1: 60, 000
6"
USGS
55-AM-20
·'· -·~
X
1: 24 , 000
6"
USGS
VPM
lkfP
"h
X
1:15, 840
6"
(~
X
1 : 24,000
6"
0u
/
-
J an. 1956
--~·r;
20%
~~-
I
~Ta rch
1957
March 1959
Feb. 1961
10%
BPP l and
only
70%
~ ,~
, v,../~ >'
~,
-_ ,
Bwk. Pul p Land
Ga .
~
Ga. OOT
Ga . Coastal Mosai c
~
N
April 1962
100%
•,
,
Schimdt Photo .
AL
1 :20 ,00 0
6"
1 :10, 000
6"
NOS
62-W(c)
X
1:20 , 000
6"
NOS
62-W
X
1:36,000
6"
NOS
63-W
X
1:10,000
6"
NOS
64-W
X
I
Nov. 1962
10%
,.....
X
'·I
-'
Nov. 1962
20%
(~_,
I
Feb . 1963
20 %
_,.. ..
!..
.
~- --
.
I
Sept. 1964
10%
/. :~Jf
;;;..-
I
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
v
:--.."
0~
date
percent of
coverage
area covered
by surve y
v~
4>~
[lJ
<o
0
'q;
/
• ,1)
~u
y'
~
q}~
0
~o'
c,~
~0!..
v0
!>..($
'flj
1>
:'<.'
,~
\.'-1>(
,~
J
[ GLYNN COUNTY
eo
'~v
'
scale
foca I length
source
prOJeCt 10
number
I
~
Sept. 1964
5%
1
{,·· ..
- :...
r··-,
I
March 1965
20%
X
1:5,000
6"
NOS
04 - \1/(c)
1 : 20,000
1:40,000
6"
l\lQS
65-L
1:30,000
6"
NOS
67-S(c)
1: 3(),000
6"
NOS
71-E
'
X
' ·-
'
Oct. 1967
5!\
/ _-_-~
:..."
X
/... ,
I
April 1971
10%
/_-~
/.,
~-.. .....
Nov . 1971
30 %
X
~
X
1: 20,000
6"
NOS
71-E
1:30,000
6"
NOS
71-E(c)
.NOS
71-M
1.. , __ .
/- · 1
t=f
I
Nov. 1971
20%
X
1.. , __
I
Nov. 1971
40%
X
1:60,000
3. 25"
1:24,000
6"
Univ. of Ga .
1:24,0()0
6"
Schimdt Photo.
I
Dec. 1972
30 %
/
r~
.....
X
UCMI -G
1.. , _
Feb. 1973
1009,;
~
~
Lf)
N
X
BZ
[ GLYNN COUNTY . ]
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
date
percent of
cove rage
a>~--"
i>
!-.
o'
~
. _o~~ ,c:-\.'v ~ v~
~ ~
,'l>
<.,
c:-"
/
~"'
~0
<:? ~
c:-'l>
v0
area cov ere d
by survey
,ro0
'l>
,c:-"''
0
e.'"
,_Q)
'~v
o'
'
\.'-'l>
,c:-
seale
focal length
source
pro1ect I D
number
...b;
~1arch
1973
20~
-~
};;;.;;;,; ~
.
.i
-
X
1: 76 ,000
6"
UGSG
VDFQ
X
1:60,000
3.4fl"
NOS
7:)-C
X
1:130,000
6"
NASA
1:21,000
3.46"
USGS
I
~ · -- -~-
,· ·1
I
0ct. 197 3
20 ~,
-
Oct. 1973
100 %
Feb. 1974
80 %
-~
"~
.,
73- 180
I
April 1974
100%
X
SWTJ
\0
N
~-
X
1:130,000
6"
NASA
74-065B
X
1:76,000
6"
USGS
VDLR
X
1:60 , 000
3. 4fl"
NOS
74-C
1 : 30,000
6"
NOS
74-S
1:15,000
6"
USGS
I
April 1974
80 %
I
Apr il 1974
20 %
~ '· --
~
Nov . 1974
20%
;:=r
Feb. 1975
20 %
.J:;..r~
I
~ - ·-~
.%
' ·'.J
'
-- - ~
I
X
X
VDFR-1
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
date
March 1975
Oct. 1975
I
percent of
coverage
I BPP land
only
40 ~.
I
[ GLYNN cOUNTY ]
area covered
by survey
~
c:?~
Q'?:f
0
~
2p'~,~,ro ,~'?:f
i;-' ~,7.>,ro~
,~
~
,~
00
~~)
~..-;.~J
'
0
0
e,d
,0'
~~
X
~0!..
c,O
~,~'
,~
scale
focal length
source
I: 15,840
6"
X
1:65,000
12"
NASA
X
1:24,000
6"
Ga. OOT
1:48,000
6' '
scs
# ·'\..,·
Bwk. Pulp Land
pro 1ect I D
number
ERT
' - - ~~
,:r
X
75-179
I
April 1976
Feb. 1977
30%
100%
;·.:r
•
X
Ga. Shore1 ine
13127
I'
N
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
r.
~,v
~-,< "'
,o
date
percent of
coverage
·.
Feb. 1945
...
1%
1951
April 1951
~0 %
\
,e.
~v
/
0v
/
,,,
"'Qi
-~~-
'b
/
/
scale
foca I Ieng t h
sou rce
\
-~~~/ZI~
- \.-' '
1:20,000
3. 46"
:-:os
45 -C
X
1 : 32,800
6"
USGS
NU
X
1:24,000
6"
NOS
51 - 0
X
1:15 , 840
6"
I
30 %
<~
I....
BPP land
only
.
'. ;:/ 1
......
'\
~b-" .
~
. ' \-
-<,
,, ...
1o n~.
'
'·~
·~
--··~.
'~'>VI)
,....
.
Jan. 1956
90%
co
N
X
1:30 , 000
6"
NOS
52 - 0
X
1:20,000
6"
scs
DSD
X
1:60,000
6"
USGS
55 -AM-20
March 1959
BPP land
onl y
X
1:15,840
6"
Bwk. Pulp Land
~. .
r
Feb. 1961
3 (l ~
X
1 : 24 , 000
6"
Ga. OOT
.
'
'%!~
<
ASC
\
.'
10%
Bwk. Pu1 p Land
' ........... \ _ -:..
Jan. 1953
prOJeCt 10
number
X
,.)
\
'
".... ' \ -'
Oct . 1952
-0
.
'
Feb. 1952
<o
'
- -~
\- .
... .
~
Q7J0
~
~0
'l>
[LIBERTY coUNTY]
e.'~
..
-·.,
'
~lay
()'
area covered
by survey
.._e;0
0
_.,
.,... '
\.
\
' , 'i~~-\ ~
\-.
-. .....
GA
•
II
' //$~
i
Ga. Coastal Mosaic
[LI BERTY cOuNTY]
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
date
percent of
I cover age
Nov. 1962
10%
I
~
00
0
0
q,<.oo\
""
i;-' ~,'7J
~c://j,'?Jro
,(:''l>'-'J
,0
~
,c::IZJo
"\'
area cov er·ed
by stu vey
"'"'
q'tl
.._'l>
. . _v
c::-'tl
~
~o
c,O
'
\'-'l>
,c::-
scal e
focal length
source
prOJeCt I D
num be r
\ -'
\....
·~
',." "
X
1:20 , 000
6"
NOS
62-W
X
1:20,000
8.2 5"
ASCS
DSD
1:40,000
6"
NOS
1:10,000
6"
NOS
~-''·- --v
!\lar ch 1963
30 ~
Oct. 1963
20%
·~~
'( ....~.: ·'~
',
X
',
63-h'(c)
''? ,
,..
-
Sept . 1964
5%
'
' ( . ..~.:·\~
''
.......
") \ _
X
64 -W
.
0'1
N
·"'
March 1965
20%
>.~.:·\·
',
.......
X
1:40,000
6"
NOS
65-L
X
1:20,000
6"
NOS
65-L
X
1: 20,0 00
6"
USGS
X
1 : 60, 000
3. 25"
NOS
1:30, 000
6"
...,. \ -
.,.... '
March 1965
~larch
1966
20%
70 %
-<( ..•~~-, '~
,
' '
''? ,
-
'~ ~
'"',
~lov .
1971
20 %
AF 66-7 5
' ' - -~
': ...~.~\4t
,
'•,
71-M
':',
",
:--.Jov . 1971
20 %
·~ ',...~.: '~
,
' ·-: \
X
NOS
71- E(c)
[ Ll BERTY
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
,o
date
percent of
coverage
a1 ea covered
by surv ey
Q~"
G'
~
«:)
0°
,,
~,0
~c
\.,:.:,
,0
'
,..J
0'I>
o
o'
'0
~
e,~
-i>i..
~0
c;0
,.Q)
_(:'"
.
,,,0
00
'~>'
"'
'
scale
,0
focal length
source
-.
~ov.
1971
.....
10";
.
1972
3f' o
Jan. 1973
70 %
Dec .
Oct . 1973
Oct. 1973
0
10*
100*
''
30 %
prOJeCt ID
number
71-E
J : 20,00 0
6"
1:24,000
6"
Univ. of Ga.
uan -G
1:20 , 000
6"
Park Aerial
AVO
1:60,000
3.46"
~OS
-~
-'
--'
\
>~
-~~
~.....
' ·. _.,
I
'
X
X
·:·=~·-·~
\.
NOS
73-C
0
M
~
-~~
"...
Feb. 1974
X
"\
COUNT~]
0'-\
73-180
1:130,000
6"
NASA
1:21,000
3 . 46"
USGS
SWIJ
X
1 : 76,000
6"
USGS
VDLR
X
1:60 , 000
3. 46"
NOS
74-C
X
1:130 , 000
6"
X
__.,
~<~
X
"'- ' _.,
\.
Apr i l 1974
Apri l 1974
April 1974
30%
10%
100 %
.'>~~
"' ' ; \--,'
' . n ••·
\
·.
\
'~'-· - l
t~~
I
j\;ASA
74-065B
[ LIBERTY
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
percent of
cove ra ge
date
~'" \<' .<.f0°
~0
area covered
by s ur vey
"' -I ' '- \
,o
'"
~ ~
qf
<o
I"
('" / uv
'
0
o'
<.([;
~
'b
,,
fOd
,Q)
'~v
/
so urce
sc ale
focal length
X
1:15,840
6"
X
1:48,000
3.46"
1:15,840
6"
Bwk. Pulp Land
1:15,840
6"
Union Camp
'
c<>LNTYl
prOJeCt ID
num ber
~
Dec. 1974
Jan. 1975
ITT land
only
100%
',,"4#~ ' ''\
''I , _-~
t~
~ ~
.
March 1975
BPP land
only
ITT Ra yonie r
scs
RAY
DSD
'
'"' I'- .....
\
'\
X
'·,~
FRT
-·" '
~larch
1975
SO%
'~~·~
X
UCC-SAP
r-1
('f)
. '
Oct. 1975
20%
" I '- \
·--= 1
'
X
X
1:65,000
12"
NASA
X
1:24,000
6"
Ga . DOT
-..,
~
April 1976
10 %
' -I '
\
......
,
•,
75-179
-
··.: -..,_·~
Ga. Shoreline
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
date
I
percent of
coverage
I
~
-·· . -!~)
April 1951
100%
~
May 1951
1()0 %
Oct. 1952
5%
Jan. 1953
Nov. 1953
100%
5%
X'
area co vered
by surve y
·-~
~
•
~'-~:}
~
~: ~.'.~ -;,}
(C-(;
4>
0
0
:--.'
5%
Feb. 1945
a
.
~
(;
[MciNTOSH
,ro
,'b
'
o'
(;2}
,§~ (yo
01>'
,ro
~
1-.
. .~
e,"--\
9>
0 '~'tf
(lj
scale
focal length
X
1:20,000
3.46"
X
1:24 , 000
X
X
(j
COUNT~
source
prOJeCt I D
number
N()S
4 5-C
6"
~OS
51-0
1:32,800
6"
USGS
NU
1:30,000
6"
NOS
52-0
N
("")
X
1:20,000
6"
scs
DSE
X
1:10,000
6"
NOS
53- J
X
1:60,000
6"
USGS
Ga . OOT
-·~~~
-~
Jan . 1956
SO%
Feb . 1961
70 %
~ :'~~
X
1:24,000
6"
:-.iov . 196 2
20%
::· -~
X
1:20,000
6"
~
·-~~
NOS
55-AM-20
Ga . Coasta l !"v1osaic
62-W
[MciNTOSH COUNTY)
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
~,0
0~
date
percent of
coverage
Oct . 1963
30%
Sept. 1964
5%
area covered
by su rvey
..
-.,
,!l.Jo
. •1>
~0
100
,
• ,?}
~
9Jq,d
'~'b
/
(j
4>\:'
..
..
<Q
~v
c.;'-' /
,,,
scale
focal length
source
prOJect I D
number
1:40,000
6"
NOS
63-IV(c)
X
1:10,000
6"
NOS
64-1\1
X
1:20,000
6"
NOS
65- L
X
1:40,000
6"
NOS
65-L
X
1:28,800
6"
X
1:20,000
6"
NOS
71-S
1:30, 000
6"
NOS
71-E(c)
1:2o,noo
6"
N0S
71-E
NOS
71-H
X
~_
~ -··-, .~~
~
--....
March 1965
20%
March 1965
20%
~ ~:.:.-· ~
.,
~
•.., . .
r'l
M
·~
Jan. 1967
100%
Nov. 1971
10 %
Nov . 1971
40%
j~-r
.
.........
Thomas Lowe
Assoc.
171
'
:,·:·.,
X
-. .
Nov. 1971
10%
_,:·:f
_,_,
X
· ·~
Nov . 1971
60%
X
1:60,000
:1. 25"
[ MciNTOSH COUNTY)
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
0~
da te
Dec.
1972
1'-!arch 1973
percent of
coverage
area covered
by su rvey
l>
o'
'b' '
_(:}
c::-v /
0u
'?}
/
0~
4>"
<Q
/
'bO)
~
/
,1..'
/
scale
foca I length
source
protect 10
number
-~
··~
70%
30%
ro0
,,0
'b~
ro'--\
d'.- -~)
~
~/
:;.,... .
X
1:24,000
6"
1:76,000
6"
X
1:60,000
3.46"
X
1:130,000
X
Univ. of Ga.
UGMI -G
USGS
VDFQ
NOS
73-C
.,~_
CX:t. 1973
20%
.....
'I
:~...0,_-
...
-
CX:t. 1973
100 %
Feb.
1974
70 %
Feb.
1974
30%
April 1974
100%
April 1974
70 %
41
:'f
/~
J_·~ -~)
~
'/
~ ~~ ·
ff..~h
-/I
~
_,I
1_
April 1974
20%
··-
6"
NASA
73-180
'<:!'
(I")
X
1:21,000
3.46''
USGS
SWIJ
VDFR -l
X
1 :15,000
6"
USGS
X
1 :130,000
6"
NASA
74-0658
X
1 : 76 ,000
6"
USGS
VDLR
X
1:60,000
3.46"
NOS
74-C
.. .._
[ MciNTOsH-CouNT~
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
COVERAGE
v
0~
date
Dec. 1974
percent of
coverage
--
~- :)/
·-~~
~
,_:1/i'i
'\-
Jan. 1975
Feb . 1975
IP land
only
30%
0
!.
_o~0
(l,d
. .10
'~v
/
(j
qf'
<()
/
(:-Cl /
vu I' ,<'- I'
scale
foca I length
source
prOjeCt 10
number
X
1:15 ,840
6"
ITT Rayonier
X
1:15,840
6"
Inter' 1 Paper
1:15,000
6"
USGS
VDFR-I
1:15,840
6"
Union Camp
UCC-SAP
RAY
.... . . .
~-<.,
,.t.ef.,i.-·
~
,ro
'b
~
area covered
by survey
~
ITT land
only
0
~"'
"q;
~ . . ,'b •
X
')
12595
~-
April 1975
90%
~-
~
~
Oct. 1975
60 %
~:-)
Jan. 1976
10%
~ - .7
30%
X
X
X
.,
~-
1:65,000
12"
NA.SA
75-179
1:15,000
6"
USGS
VDFR-I
1:24,000
6"
1:24,000
6"
.... _.,. . . 4
~ ::....~
X
Ga.
ror
Ga. Shoreline
-"
March 1977
100%
~
~
Lf)
(V)
/'--;)
%
~
Apri l 1976
X
X
r-lcintosh Co.
FKG
Landsat Imagery
Imagery is a relatively new type of graphic medium available to scientists, planners and resource managers in compari Space imagery began in the early
s on to aerial photography.
1960's with weather satellites scanning the earth to provide
r emotely sensed data.for better weather forecasting.
The
success of these projec ts opened the way in the early 1970's
for the Earth Resources Technology Satellite Program.
Today the
Landsat satellite provides earth resource data for a wide
variety of investigations in man y different disciplines around
t he world.
Imagery has proved to be a valuabl e tool in many areas of
study.
In agriculture, satel lite imagery can be used to make
soil surveys, assess crop management practices and range conditions, and predict yields.
Foreste rs can monitor reclamation or
assess fire and insec t damage.
Geologists use imagery in mineral
and petroleum exploration, volcano and earthquake prediction .
Landsat data can also be used in snow surveys, drainage and
flooding patterns, and water pollution studies.
Imagery has
uses in a variety of geographic studies from transportation and
urban land use to topography and population de nsity.
Imagery
can prove data for better seafood production, regulation of air
pollution or monitor i cebe rg movements.
The first Earth Resource Technology Satellite, ERTS-1
(now renamed Landsat-!), was launched on July 23, 1972 . A
second Landsat-2 satellite was launched Janu ar y 22, 1975.
Together they prov ide nearly continuous coverage of the earth's
surface.
Landsat passes over any point on the earth every 9
days at a flight altitude of 570 miles.
The sunsynchronous
polar orbit was selected to reduce the sun angle.
On each north
to south pass, Land sat crosses the equator at about 9:30 a.m.
(10:00 to 10:30 a.m. on the Georgia coast).
Each Landsat satellite presently carries t hree data acquisition systems:
(1) a multispectral scanner (MSS) with four
spectral bands, (2) a return beam vidicon (RBV) and (3) a data
collection system that relays data to ground-based stations.
The multispectral scanner is the primary sensor which supplies
images for dissemin ation.
The images are 115 miles (185 km)
per s ide in four spectral bands in the visible and near-infrar ed
portions of the spe ctrum.
These four bands are :
Band 4,
the green band, 500 to 600 nanometers, emphasizes
movement o f sediment-laden water and delinea tes
areas of shal low water, such as shoals, reefs , etc.
Band 5,
the r ed band, 600 to 700 nanometers, emphasizes
cultural features.
Band 6,
the near-infrared band, 700 to 800 nanometers emphasizes vegetation, the boundary between land and water,
and la ndfo rms.
36
Band 7,
the second near-infrared band, 800 to 1100 nanometers
provides the best haze penetration and emphasizes
vegetation, the boundary between land and water,
and landforms.
An analysis of the four individual black and white images
or the false-color infrared composite images often enables
inventory and identification of different earth resource s,
and the repet itive (9 or 18 days) and seasonal coverage provided
by Landsat is an important tool for the interpretati on of
dynamic systems . A set of black and white images for all four
bands reveals the same area in green, red and near-infr ared
wavelen gths.
The sensors onboard the spacecraft transmit t he images
to the ground receiving stations at Goddard Space Flight
Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. The data is then converted from
electronic signals to photographic images and computer compatible tapes. Master reproducible copies are sent to the EROS
Data Center in Sioux Falls, S. Dakota, where the data is available to the public.
The following listing identifies all of the Landsat images
for Georgia's coast that are of good quality for interpreta tion.
Images were judged as good if (l) there was 10% or less cloud
cover over the entire scene and (2) there was an overall quality
rating of 8 or higher, on a scale of 1 to 10. Coverage includes
those areas in orbiting Paths 17 and 18 and Rows 37,3 8, and 39
that cove rs the coastal area. Each entry identifies :
DATE OF IMAGE - month/day/year
SCENE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER - 81DDDHHMMS50000
8: Landsat image
1 and 5: Landsat-1 or 2: Landsat-2
DDD: days since launch
HHMM: hours/minutes since launch
S: tens of seconds since launch
5: multispectral scanner (MSS)
0000: unused
PERCENT OF CLOUD COVER - 10% or 0% of cloud coverage
over the entire scene
QUALITY OF MSS IMAGE BAND - rating for each of the
MSS bands (4,5,6,7) on a scale of
1 to 10 (10 is the best)
37
All Landsat imagery whether computer compatible tape
o r photographic images are available from:
EROS Data Center
User Services
Sioux Fa lls, S. Dakota 57198
( 60 5) 594 - 6511 ext. 151
@00@~00 !;:@00~
LANDSAT STANDARD PRODUas
Return
completed
form to
tho facility
nearest you.
U.S. DEPARTMENT Of THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
OAI£
...
HAM[
•ccou~r
!f illS I I
iti!II W. I
. ~h
HO
!11 111101111111
NCIC HEADQUARTERS
COMPANY
PHON[ (8U\ I
U.S. Gtologlct l Surwv
507 Net lo nel Center
Retton , VA 22092
!lf i iJS IIilf SS.t.SS«Il iiO•
.
AOOR£SS
PHON( (Home)
CllY
SIU [
FTS : i28-8045
COMM : 703-8e0-8045
liP _ _ _ You• Ret No
•' 0
CiOWI "(C I OI OI>If l o
Pt£ASf IY Pl OR PRINI PLAINlY
SC ENE IDENTIFICATION NO.
PRODUCT f..-.!W!D TOTAL
CODE 1415 ' 6 7 BANOS QTY .
UNIT
PRIC E
TOTAL
PRICE
EROS APP LIC ATION S
FACILI T Y
NSTL
u.s. G.at~ letl
Surwv
Bey St. Louil , MS 39!i20
FTS : 494 · 3~ 1
COMM · 688 -34 72
NCIC M ID-CONTI NENT
U.S. G.ologlcal Surwv
1400
lnd~nekonc:.
Rd .
Roll e, MO 66401
FTS · 276-910 7
COMM 3 14-3&0-3680
EROS D A T A CENTER
U.S. G.aloglctl Survey
TOTAL ABOVE
STANDARD PRODUCTS
• \.& ( ol .o. H(I""M" t
I liA C I(.
...... ...
t ol l
' ..
K4 1. 1
l fU
~,..,._
·~
'
Jl k,..
......
O tU
,,I .. ,
.......,...
1J "-"'
......
,,, ... ,
ol ) ..
·-
f et
IU
'"'tn
...,_
'"'"'
ti9J ... .
COI..Of'l
•M -
,>;) _ . . ,
t ..
. .....-·. .
"' CI I ' '
.... ,.
c,
...
"
.
. .,..... ..
• OI>f•of
· · ~· ·
....
. ,.
Siou lt Fell s, SO 57 198
FT S · 784·115 1
COMM · 805-69-0-851 1
TOT AL FROM
•
~=~·~.:..:'c".:.:"':.:o~·•:.:o_
•oo..:.•:..:·•::;."~~PREVIOUS SHEETSI-:---t--1
~·~p;:;~~·~.~:.:~.:..::::..:..~·::..:~·.:..:~:..:'+-~~:~~~TOTALCOST
...,. ..
I•
c
NCIC ROC KY MOU NT ... I N
U.S. Geologic.! Suf"t'tV
o-~
PAYMENT MADE BY :
:..!' :..:•":--1:'..:."::.'=-:..:L:..:''.:..:".:..:'....L....:":.._j
....
CHECK, MONEY ORDER
PU RCHASE ORDER
C Ofol~l ll Cl!,UU. J ~
GOVT . ACCOUNT
I ·r: 1.. "'"'I::·::;:· 1-::=J
0
0
0
pnce list for rosl delermmatton
FTS 234 -2326
COMM · 303-2 34 ·2326
NCIC WESTE RN
G -a l og i e-~ 1 Surwv
346 Middlefi eld Ad ,
~n lo P~r k . CA SM025
FTS : 4117-2.27
COMM : 415-323 ·242 7
u.s.
COMMENTS: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -FOAM g 1938
' """ 1911 )
38
Stop 510, Bo• 25046
Den..,., Fl'de.,. l Ctt.
Oenw r, CO 80225
LANDSAT COVERAGE
date
scene identification
num ber
percent of
cloud cover
quality of MSS
image band
8/19/72
4/10/73
6/3/73
8/14/73
11/12/73
81027152655NOOO
81261152805NOOO
81315152745NOOO
81387152645NOOO
81477152505NOOO
10%
0%
0%
10%
0%
8
8
8
2
8
11/30/73
2/10/74
3/18/74
4/18/75
9/27/75
814951524SSNOOO
81567152305NOOO
81603152225NOOO
81999150825NOOO
851611459050000
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
1/22/76
1/31/76
2/9/76
4/3/76
7/11/76
823651513150000
852871451150000
823831513050000
824371511250000
854491439550000
8/16/76
11/23/76
12/29/76
2/21/77
854851436550000
826711504250000
827071502550000
827611500550000
Landsat Worldwide
Reference System:
Path 17,
39
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
2
8
8
2
2
8
5
5
8
8
8
8
5
8
8
8
8
5
8
8
2
8
8
0%
10%
10%
0%
10%
5
5
5
5
5
8
8
8
5
8
5
5
8
5
8
5
8
8
8
8
10%
10%
10%
10%
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
5
8
8
8
5
2
2
2
LANDSAT COVERAGE
date
scene identif1cat1on
number
percent of
cloud cover
quality of MSS
image band
4/10/73
6/3/73
9/19/73
5/11/74
1/31/76
81261152835NOOO
81315152805NOOO
81423152635NOOO
81657152135NOOO
852871451350000
0%
10 %
10%
10%
10%
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
2
8
8
5
8
8
8
8
8
4/12/76
7/11/76
8/16/76
12/29/76
2/21/77
853591446550000
854491440250000
85485143 7250000
827071503150000
827611 501150000
10%
10%
10%
10%
0%
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
5
8
8
8
Landsat Worldwide
Reference System:
Path 17,
40
8
8
8
LANDSAT COVERAGE
date
scene identtftcatton
number
percent of
cloud cover
9/7/72
11/18/72
1/11/73
7/10/73
10/26/73
81046153225NOOO
81118153305NOOO
81172153245NOOO
81352153235NOOO
81460153025NOOO
10%
10%
10%
10%
0%
8
8
8
8
2
8
8
8
8
8
2
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
12/1/73
3/19/74
10/21/74
11/26/74
1/30/75
81496153015NOOO
81604152745NOOO
81820152125NOOO
81856151955NOOO
82008152102NOOO
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
8
2
8
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
2
2
8
8
5
8
2
8
8
5/25/75
6/3/75
1/23/76
2/10/76
2/19/76
85036151145NOOO
8 213215210 5NOOO
823661518350000
823841518150000
853061455250000
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
5
5
8
8
8
5
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
5
8
8
8
8
5/19/76
9/22/76
11/6/76
·n/24/76
1/17/77
853961449150000
855221439150000
826541510250000
826721509450000
827261507250000
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
2/10/77
2/22/77
856631426550000
827621506050000
0%
0%
8
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
Landsat Worldwide
Reference System: Path 18,
41
quality of MSS
image band
LANDSAT COVERAGE
date
scene ident ification
number
percent of
cloud cover
quality of MSS
image band
10/31/72
2/16/73
3/24/73
4/11/73
5/17/73
81100153315NOOO
81208153335NOOO
81244153355NOOO
81262153355NOOO
81298153335NOOO
10%
0%
10%
0%
0%
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
2
8
8
8
8
10/26/73
11/13/73
12/1/73
2/11/74
3/19/74
8146015305SNOOO
81478153045NOOO
81496153045NOOO
81568152845NOOO
81604152815NOOO
0%
10%
0%
0%
10%
2
8
8
2
2
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
2
8
2
8
2
8
8
2
4/24/74
6/1 7/74
10/3/74
10/21/74
11/26/74
81640152725NOOO
81694152545NOOO
81802152155NOOO
81820152145NOOO
81856152025NOOO
0%
10 %
10%
10%
0%
2
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
2
8
8
5
8
2
8
8
8
8
4/28/75
5/25/7 5
:1.2/18/75
1/23/76
2/10/76
82096152135NOOO
85036151215NOOO
823301519250000
823661519050000
823841518450000
10%
10%
10%
0%
0%
5
5
5
8
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
2/28/76
3/17/76
4/4/76
4/13/76
5/19/76
824021518150000
824201517350000
824381517050000
853601452050000
853961449350000
0%
0%
10%
10%
0%
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
0
u
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Continued fol lowing page
42
LANDSAT COVERAGE
date
scene identification
number
percent of
cloud cover
quality of MSS
image band
6/6/76
7/12/76
7/21/76
9/22/76
10/1/76
854141448250000
854501445350000
825461514150000
855221439450000
826181512050000
10%
0%
10%
10%
10%
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
5
8
8
8
11/6/76
12/30/76
2/10/77
2/22/77
826541510450000
827081508350000
856631427150000
827621506350000
10%
10%
0%
0%
8
8
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Landsat Worldwide
Reference System:
Path 18,
43
LANDSAT COVERAGE
date
scene identification
number
percent of
cloud cover
qua lity of MSS
image band
10/13/72
10/31/72
12/24/72
2/16/7 3
4/11/73
8108 21 53325NOOO
81100153345NOOO
811541 53355NOOO
81208153405NOOO
81262153415NOOO
10%
10%
10%
0%
0%
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
2
8
8
8
8
8
8
4/29/73
5/17/73
10/26/73
11/13/73
12/1/73
81 280153415NOOO
81298153405NOOO
81460153115NOOO
814 78153105NOOO
81496153105NOOO
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
2
8
2
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
2
8
8
2
2
8
8
8
8
2/11/74
3/1/74
4/ 24/74
10/21/74
11/26/74
81568152905NOOO
81586152855NOOO
81640152745NOOO
81820152215NOOO
81856152045NOOO
0%
0%
0%
10%
10%
8
8
2
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
2
8
5
8
8
2
8
8
12/14/74
. 1/1/75
12/18/75
3/17/75
4/4/76
81874152005NOOO
81892151925NOOO
823301519450000
824201518050000
8243815172 50000
10%
0%
10%
0%
10%
8
8
5
8
8
8
8
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
5
8
8
7/21/76
9/22/76
10/1/76
2/ 22/77
825461514350000
855221440050000
826181512350000
827621506550000
10%
10%
10 %
0%
8
8
0
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Landsat Worldwide
Reference System:
Path 18,
44
ADDENDUM:
1.
GEORGIA'S COASTAL ZONE PHOTOGRAPHIC INVENTORY
ASCS Photos:
Address-
November 1978
Agricultu_ral Stabilization & Conservation Service
Aerial Photography Field Office
Users Services Section
P. 0. Box 30010
Salt Lake City, Utah 84125
(801) 524-5856/Linda Rhees
They handle (rather than S.C.S. in Hyattsville, Md.) both the
Jan . 1952, 1:20,000, B/W, DQG and the April 1970, 1:50,000,
B/W, DQG photographs .
9 11 x 9 11 paper prints = $2.00 each
Offer alternate coverage and st ereo coverage .
2X enlarg. on 17" x 17" at $6.00
3X enlarg. on 24" x 24" at $7.00
4X enlarg. on 38" x 38" at $15.00
No prepayment necessary - offer billing s~rvices
2.
Univ. of GA Photos:
Order direct from
Airborne Data Inc.
P.O. Box 6013
Daytona Beach FLA. 32022
(904) 677-2610/Gary Grabe
Film Diapositives
Paper Prints
9"x9"= $18 for 1st
9"x9"= $18 for 1st
$10 each thereafter
$5 for each thereafter
for orders from Zl to 50 frames
for orders from 26 to 50 frames
No prepayment necessary
3.
NOS Photos:
4.
USGS Photos: Do Not Send to Map Distribution Section, USGS
Address -- NCIC Headquarters
U.S. Geological Survey
507 National Center
Reston VA 22092
(703) 860-6045/Gary Krohn
Address
Same as stated in book
(301) 443-8601/Mr. Cator
9"x9" Paper Print or film transparency = $9 each
2X enlarg. - paper = $20
3X enlarg.
paper = $25
4X enlarg. - paper = $40
No prepayment necessary
9"x9" paper prints= $7.00 each
9"x9" film positive transparencies = $15.00 each
2X enlarg. on 18"
$25
3X enlarg. on 27"
$30
4X enlarg. on 36"
$50
Must Send Payment with Order
5.
NASA Photos:
Address -- Same as ·stated in book
(605) 594-6511 ext. 151/Becky Rollinger
9"x9" paper print= $7.00 each
9"x9" film transparency = $15.00 each
2X, 3X, & 4X enlargement (paper) same prices as USGS Photos
Must Send Payment with Order
To Order When Index Is Not Available:
1 . Telephone first and try to get frame numbers necessary
to particular work area.
2. Send xerox copy of a suitable base map with work area
accurately outlined. Give co-ordinates of the approximate anter of
work area or of the 4 corners, etc. Give approximate
dimensions of work area. Locate by State, County, City,
Town .
3. If ordering photos from a source not requ1r1ng pre-payment
then step 2, above, is all that is necessary . If source
requires payment accompanying order then send xerox base
map and request frame Nb.s and/or Index (Indexes are around
$5.00 each).