Quality Account Circle Reading 2013 - 2014 -1- Patient Comment…… ‘Service and food first class. The nursing staff were excellent. Helpful and cheerful reception. Bedrooms expertly cleaned. Accommodation first class'. -2- Contents Chapter One Statement of Quality from the Leadership Team Chapter Two The Circle Ethos Circle Reading Chapter Three Reviewing our Quality improvement Objectives from 2013 To develop patient and visitor information relating to our facilities further. To develop a suite of Theatre Audits to reduce the potential for harm in the peri-operative environment. To re-energise the safety initiative ‘Stop the Line’. Chapter Four Setting out new Quality Improvement Objectives for 2014 / 2015 Chapter Five Fully embed the Circle Operating System into the culture of Circle Reading to improve patient experience, efficiencies and overall service. Re-construct the Hospital Quality Audit, to more closely mirror a CQC inspection, with the aim of creating innovative monitoring solutions for patient safety and care. Monitor re-admissions and variances in patient care to review and improve Clinical Effectiveness. Further enhance Patient Experience. Review of Quality Performance in 2013 National Audits Internal Audits Clinical Outcomes Patient Safety Infection Prevention and Control CQUIN Pharmacy Services Patient Experience Staff Engagement Care Quality Commission Data Quality Information Governance Involvement in Local Networks New Initiatives -3- About the Quality Account What are the required elements of the Quality Account? The Health Act 2009 required all healthcare providers to produce a Quality Account and the National Health Service (Quality Accounts) Regulations 2010 specified the requirements for the reports produced. We have used the requirements as a template around which our account has been written. What are the key requirements? 1. A statement by the Leadership Team 2. Priorities for Improvement – these are commitments that Circle Reading makes to improve the level of quality within the hospital 3. Review of quality improvement – this demonstrates how the hospital has performed so far. How did we produce our Quality Account? We have used the Department of Health’s Quality Accounts Toolkit as a guide for our Quality Account. To supplement all the mandatory elements of the account, we have also worked closely with our patients, consultants and other partners to ensure this account truly reflects the quality measures in place and provides readers with an accurate and comprehensive insight into the organisation. -4- Patient Comment…… ‘From start to finish, I received 5 star treatment from my Consultant, Anaesthetist and all the nurses who have cared and looked after me. I really cannot thank you enough.' -5- Statement on Quality from the Leadership Team It is with great pleasure that we welcome you to the 2013/2014 Quality Account produced by Circle Reading which has been written in accordance with the Department of Health’s policy document ‘High Quality Care for All’. It is hence a statutory requirement; however we are pleased to report on the quality of our services, patient experience and assurance procedures in place. We hope you find our plans for the coming year of interest. During 2013 Circle Reading has taken every step to ensure the quality of the patient experience is at its very best. This encompasses the medical treatment received, the quality of accommodation and facilities, food and hospitality, which are all centred around the individuals’ personal needs. We therefore pay meticulous attention to the whole patient pathway, from making an enquiry, booking an appointment, the treatment, and after care. We have developed a number of methods of measuring and benchmarking the quality of our services with the primary aim of continuous improvement for our patients. Many such measures are made available to our partners (staff and consultants), as well as patients, through our ethos of transparency. We have presented some of these measures in this report. Circle Reading is committed to providing the very highest quality services for patients and working environment for our clinicians and partners. We strive to provide choice, innovation, safe and personalised care for our patients, whom we fully welcome feedback from. As all our staff are partners in Circle Reading, everyone has a voice on how to ensure and improve the quality of our services and we promote a culture that advocates ‘we are the agents of our patients’ in line with our credo. We are proud of all our achievements to date. Consequently, the purpose of this report is to present our successes and outline quality related improvements which may still be required. Furthermore, we aim to explain our main priorities over the next year, including a delineation of those to be involved; how we aim to measure their effectiveness and the inclusion of reflective learning from previous initiatives. Information provided in the Quality Account is trustworthy and reflects a true picture, which aims to be meaningful and relevant. Comparisons can be made with other organisations and within Circle Reading over time. Access to the report will be enhanced through its publication on the Circle website and internally to patients and partners. The Registered Manager and Clinical Chairman have reviewed the content of this Quality Account and confirm that we are accountable for the report’s content. We are confident that it provides a balanced view and that to the best of our knowledge the information contained within this document is accurate. Adrian Peake Registered Manager Tony Andrade Clinical Chairman -6- The Circle Ethos Our Principles We are above all the agent of our patients. We aim to exceed our patients' expectations every time, so that we earn their trust and loyalty. We strive to continuously improve the quality and value of the care we give our patients. We empower our people to do their best. Our people are our greatest asset. We should select them attentively and invest in them passionately. Because everyone matters, everyone who contributes should be a partner in everything we do. In return we expect partners to give patients all they can. We are unrelenting in the pursuit of excellence. We embrace innovation and learn from our mistakes. We measure everything we do and share the data for all to judge. Pursuing our ambition to be the best healthcare provider is a never-ending process. Good enough never is. Our Values Caring – The natural ability to empathise with others, to understand how they’re feeling, and to be able to act accordingly. Putting the patient at the centre of everything we do. Inclusive – The natural inclination to work collaboratively in teams and involve others when appropriate. The intuitive sense that most times two heads are better than one. Uncompromising – The desire to strive for excellence – always. The ability to convert ideas and plans into real actions and progress. Entrepreneurial – The ability to spot opportunities for improvement and the drive to get on and realise them. Not being frightened to take appropriate risks. Delivery focussed – The ability to convert ideas and plans into real action and progress. Take ownership and make things happen. Innovation and Learning – A natural desire to learn and improve. Curiosity is good. -7- CircleReading Circle was founded on the belief that hospitals should be dedicated to patients. CircleReading has been designed to offer 21st century medical technology with an unequivocal focus on quality of care and customer service. Each of our hospitals is co-formed, co-owned and co-run by clinicians. We are the largest partnership of healthcare professionals in Europe. CircleReading is wholly committed to delivering clinical excellence and the highest level of customer service, every step of the way. We embrace innovation and look for ways to improve what we do every single day. We believe that makes us different to other hospitals. Our Facilities Circle Hospital Reading facilities are state-of-the-art and include: Five operating theatres One endoscopy and audiology suite 20 day case beds 30 in-patient beds 15 consultation rooms and treatment rooms Physiotherapytherapy suite Full diagnostic service including MRI, Digital Mammography Screening, X-ray, ultrasound and pathology testing Aims and Objectives The hospital operates 7 days a week on a 24 hour basis. We aim to deliver a patient experience characterised by comfort and respect for the patient’s individual needs and views. We aim to provide speedy access to out-patient, in-patient and day case surgery treatments in a first-class facility. We aim to deliver high quality evidence based clinical care that provides patients with the best outcomes. Based on: 1. Operational Efficiency 2. Clinical Excellence 3. Collaborative Approach Principles We will therefore exclusively focus our efforts on services where we: Can be the best provider for our patients in their community; Have a passion for service delivery; and Realise a sustainable economic driver that allows our services to persist. -8- Patient Comment…… ‘Probably my best experience of inpatient hospital treatment covering 60yrs and some 15 plus inpatient visits'. -9- Reviewing Quality Improvement Objectives from our last Quality Account: Our priorities for improvement in 2013 were based on the value equation: Best Clinical Outcomes Most Engaged Staff Best Patient Experience Best Value Our priorities for last year were: To develop patient and visitor information in relation to our facilities further. To develop a suite of Theatre Audits to reduce the potential for harm in the perioperative environment. Re-energise the safety initiative ‘Stop the Line’. The details of progress made on our key priorities from last year are outlined within this Quality Account. The outcomes of further planned initiatives will be reviewed and analysed over the coming year. Our successes will be clearly demonstrable and areas for improvement identified. - 10 - Review of Last Years' Objectives 1. To develop patient and visitor information in relation to our facilities further At CircleReading our aim is to provide clinical excellence and a highly positive patient experience within a calming and relaxing environment. In addition to a wonderful building, fantastic service and beautiful art and sculpture work we have a deli bar serving our patients and visitors with a wide variety of beverages and freshly prepared food. Patient feedback has recognised that these services are beneficial to their experience and we have adopted and are continuing to enhance the following principles: We have further engaged and expanded our patient forum in relation to feedback. We have increased our facilities to our patients and visitors. We have reviewed the level of information provided in relation to our facilities to our patients and visitors and have further developed how this information is presented. We have reviewed and development our inpatient, daycase and discharge information guides which we provide to our patients pre and post operatively. We have reviewed our opening hours to now include weekends for some of our outpatient clinics. Patient feedback, both verbal and written, provides enormous guidance on matters relating to patient experience and accordingly we shall monitor this closely. Suggestions and comments arising specifically around these services will continue to be discussed within the departmental teams and proposals will continue to be put forward to the patient forum for their consideration. - 11 - 2. To develop a suite of Theatre Audits to reduce the potential for harm in the peri-operative environment The following audits were undertaken in 2012 / 2013 by our theatre and recovery partners, assessing all patients on one day per week. The cumulative analysed results from December 2013 to date are detailed below: 85% of clinically appropriate surgical patients receive on time appropriate antibiotics within 60 mins of surgical incision. 99% of all surgical patients maintain normal range temperature during surgery and in the immediate post-operative phase. 100% of all known diabetic patients maintain a serum glucose level within the normal range on the day of surgery. 99% of all elective surgical inpatients that require hair removal for their surgery will have it performed using the recommended method. 100% compliance with the WHO surgical checklist with evidence of changes made to the team brief. Compliance figures will continue to be monitored and action plans highlighting improvements required in relation to such are and will continue to be discussed further at the bi-weekly Quality Improvement meetings which are attended by the Lead Nurse and departmental clinical and non-clinical leads. - 12 - 3. Re-energise the safety initiative ‘Stop the Line’. Staff who encounter a situation that may harm a patient can make an immediate call to "stop the line" (cease any activity that could cause further harm). This empowers staff to "stop the line" when potential sources of mistakes are discovered, without fear of blame. This also incorporates our pro-active incident reporting structure and supports any educational learning. We have created and embedded a safety culture which allows our staff: • To process manage serious incidents. • To learn lessons from serious incidents by the implementation of action plans, STL improvement groups and embedding improvements. • To further create a culture where safety is paramount and each voice is heard which under-pins the stop the line process. We are continuing to create a culture of openness, learning and continuous improvement with: • Hospital staff that pledge to stop and act. • Leadership that will support staff who raise a concern (even if they are wrong). • Teams that will act immediately to rectify problems and prevent harm. Our staff, should they see a problem are empowered to: - Stop The Line - SWARM as a team to find a solution (the team needs to consist of those relevant to the issue and complete an incident form). Within 1 hour » Notify Clinical Nurse Lead » Notify Operations Lead » Interim action decided CLINICAL NON-CLINICAL Within 24 hours » SWARM as a team – including the Lead Nurse, Governance and Assurance Lead, containing members of involved parties » Review interim actions » Notify General Manager or HLT on call » Complete incident form Within 48 hours » Clinical Unit Lead Report produced and sent to identified staff » STL Team will review report and actions taken » Recommendations may be made for implementation within 25 days » Final report produced by unit lead with clear Root Cause Analysis » Lessons learnt shared with relevant staff » Permanent change to practice fully implemented Within 30 days » Audit of practice to ensure implementation - 13 - New Objectives for 2014 Our priorities for improvement in 2014/2015 are as follows: 1. Continue to embed the Circle Operating System at Circle Reading to improve patient experience, efficiencies and overall service. There is a growing body of evidence that leaders who engage staff and patients deliver better results in a range of measures (1). Circle values and anticipated this need and therefore prioritised the engagement of its patients and staff to enhance the quality of care and patient experience. The Circle Operating System (COS) has been designed to constructively create and promote a continuous improvement environment at Circle. COS uses a few, simple, proven quality improvement tools, which underpin Circle’s organisational values and mission statement. How COS improved quality 1. Develop staff with the problem solving skills to constructively deliver satisfying, continuous and sustainable improvement and encourage original thinking. 2. Respond to patients’ needs by viewing the service from a patient’s perspective, and regular reflection of clinical and non-clinical aspects of patient care and decision making processes aided this process. 3. Establish a culture of distributed leadership, teamwork and collaboration, where ideas were listened to and valued. 4. Articulate a shared vision of performance based upon a combination of parameters: patient experience, clinical outcomes, staff engagement and organisational value. 5. Promote trust, fairness, respect and celebrated success. COS plan 1. Each clinical unit will be coached in the application of COS. Although COS incorporates generic improvement tools, the approach for each unit was tailored to their qualities and challenges. Project Lead: Antti Kivimaki The board sponsor: Adrian Peake - 14 - 2. Re-construct the Hospital Quality Audit, to more closely mirror a CQC inspection, with the aim of creating innovative monitoring solutions for patient safety and care. The Nurse Lead and Governance and Assurance Lead introduced a new Quality Audit in Quarter 1 of 2013, which has evolved from an earlier version of a Quality Walk-Around. We reconstructed the initial audit to closely mirror a CQC inspection. The Plan: Each quarter four CQC outcomes will be fully investigated throughout all departments of the hospital. They have been grouped according to theme, as far as possible. Following the audits on a pre-designed template (utilising the CQC guidance), an action plan of any areas for improvement will be distributed to all department leads. Departmental Leads will work to resolve the issues and report their actions to the Lead Nurse and the Governance and Assurance Lead. The audit also provides an opportunity to observe departments implementing best practice or innovative ways of working, which can then be shared. Quarter 1: Outcome 7 – Safeguarding of people who use services from abuse Outcome 8 – Cleanliness and infection control Outcome 9 – Management of medicines Outcome 11 – Safety, availability and sustainability of equipment Quarter 2: Outcome 1 – Respecting and involving people who use services Outcome 2 – Consent to care and treatment Outcome 4 – Care and welfare of people who use services Outcome 6 – Cooperating with other providers Quarter 3: Outcome 10 – Safety and suitability of premises Outcome 12 – Requirements relating to workers Outcome 13 – Staffing Outcome 14 –Supporting workers Quarter 4: Outcome 5 – Meeting nutritional needs Outcome 16 – Assessing and monitoring the quality of service provision Outcome 17 – Complaints Outcome 21 – Records Project Lead: Antti Kivimaki The board sponsor: Adrian Peake - 15 - 3. Monitor patient re-admissions and transfers to review and improve Clinical Effectiveness At the beginning of 2012, we undertook a thorough review of the data collected with regards to patient re-admissions within 30 days of their operative procedure and the flow of emergency transfers. Following this review, we aimed to increase the robustness of our data collection processes and analysis. Overall, new forms were produced to ease data capture and communication channels through which this data is disseminated were also made more effective. An additional aim was to ensure all data relating to re-admissions and transfers is delivered to the Executive Board at the earliest possible point, so that actions, which may be required, are swift as well as consultant and nurse led. Patient Re-admissions Process: All patient re-admissions within 30 days of procedure are documented by the inpatient staff. The patient details, operation type and date, consultant and patient status i.e. private patient, self-pay patient or NHS patient and reason for re-admission are collected and the Lead Nurse is informed immediately. All the data is reviewed by the Lead Nurse and Governance and Assurance Lead to allow trend analysis and an immediate intervention should it be necessary. Data is then reported to the Executive Board via the ‘Live’ Quality Quartet on a monthly basis by the Lead Nurse and the Governance and Assurance Lead. Patient Transfer Process: All patient transfers are documented by the inpatient, recovery or day surgery staff. The patient details, operation type and date, consultant and patient status i.e. private patient, self-pay patient or NHS patient and reason for transfer are collected and the Lead Nurse is informed as soon as possible. An investigative report or root cause analysis (where applicable) is undertaken, by reviewing the patient notes to determine the reason for the transfer. This will then be discussed with the RMO, Consultant, Anaesthetist and nursing staff involved where relevant to establish that this was the correct line of treatment for the patient or whether the patient could have received the relevant treatment safely at Circle Reading. All transfer data is discussed at the Executive Board meeting via the Assurance Dashboard on a monthly basis, with an annual report submitted each year. If it is decided that the patient could have remained at Circle Reading and safely received the treatment required, the Lead Nurse will establish why the patient was transferred, to ensure that the issues are addressed to prevent a reoccurrence. Staff training, skill mix, patient / nurse ratio and senior nurse input are considered to have a very important part to play in these decisions. These factors are reviewed on a daily basis by the Lead Nurse or a Deputy Lead nurse in their absence. A senior nurse is on call out of hours and contact details are held by all relevant areas within the hospital. In quarter four of 2014, The Lead Nurse will re-examine the processes outlined above, to determine their effectiveness and impact on service quality for our patients. The findings will be reported in the Quality Account for 2014/2015. Project Lead: Antti Kivimaki The board sponsor: Adrian Peake - 16 - 4. Further enhance Patient Experience We have a simple, yet effective system which captures patient feedback. Patients are asked to complete our 3 question feedback card, which is illustrated in subsequent chapters of this Quality Account. The data collected is collated into a spreadsheet on a weekly basis and analysed by our Governance and Assurance Lead. This raw feedback is then published on our website. Comments for improvement are actioned by all departmental leads; to ensure any issues which may have arisen, do not re-occur. However, our credo strongly advocates that we are the agents of our patients, hence we wish to develop new and consolidate current mechanisms of feedback capture, to inform us of changes which may be needed. This will ensure that we are providing the highest quality service for our patients, based on needs they have expressed themselves. Aim of the project: Identify common areas of concern for patients Identify what we do well and maintain consistency Allocate areas of concern to all departmental leads for further investigation Provide the correct solution in a timely manner The Plan: Action points to be allocated weekly to all departmental leads Action Log created to keep abreast of all ‘open’ and ‘closed’ actions Departmental leads to add updates in ‘real’ time Involve our Patient Forum on a more regular basis with set agenda project plans Regular monthly departmental meetings to be maintained and developed Publish actions taken next to patient concerns so patients can see real change How will this improve patient experience: Areas of concern will be addressed swiftly and consistently We will actively listen to our patients an improve their experience, aiming to do so immediately if possible This enhanced approach will allow us to adapt to our patients’ needs and provide frontline staff to take ownership and empower them to create effective change. Project Lead: Antti Kivimaki The board sponsor: Adrian Peake - 17 - Patient Comment…… ‘All of the partners are friendly and professional. You are treated like a person not a number'. - 18 - Review of Services During 2012/13 Circle Reading provided Choose and Book and transferred activity of NHS Services. Circle Reading has reviewed all the data available to them on the quality of care in 100% of these NHS Services. The income generated by the NHS services reviewed in 2013 represents 100% of the total income generated from the provision of NHS services by Circle Reading for 2013. - 19 - Quality Indicators Clinical Audits National Audits: CircleReading participates in 100 % of national clinical audits and 100 % of national confidential enquires for the national clinical audits and national confidential enquires which it was eligible to participate in. Blood Audits: Our Blood Lead, Antti Kivimaki, is responsible for all blood products within the hospital, in conjunction with a team of blood transfusion link workers. The team have established rigorous audit procedures, in conjunction with those conducted by external bodies. The Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust (RBH) supply CircleReading Hospital with all blood and blood components in compliance with the Blood Safety and Quality Regulations (BSQR) 2005 No.50 (SI 2005/50). All blood components supplied to CircleReading are accompanied by the appropriate documentation. The RBH supply two units of O Negative blood which after fourteen days if not used is returned to the RBH and new O Negative blood supplied. Patient specific blood and blood components are supplied on request. Circle Reading is subject to all comparative traceability audits which are conducted on a quarterly basis by the RBH. Since opening in August 2012, Circle Reading has achieved an excellent level of compliance for every unit. Results for 2013 are shown below: Units transfused: % traceability: 38 100 % Jan 2013 - Dec 2013 Internally a number of audits are completed to ensure the highest quality of blood management practice is adhered to. Blood fridge temperatures are monitored daily manually, with blood disc cards being changed weekly. Quarterly audits of the blood register are also undertaken. Patient notes are also audited on a quarterly basis (those having had a blood transfusion); to check all the necessary paperwork was completed correctly and within relevant time scales. Further details are seen below: - 20 - The following Blood Safety Audits are undertaken at Circle Reading Hospital: 1. Monthly blood register audit – to ensure the register is always completed correctly, all daily checks are carried out and the blood fridge disc has been changed every week. Currently there is 100% compliance with this audit. 2. 10% of all (transfused) patients’ notes will be audited every three months – to ensure they have had a blood transfusion, to check all paperwork was completed correctly and within relevant time scales. Currently there is 100 % compliance with this audit. Our last report (January 2013 - December 2013) data: Total number of blood units issued - 211* Number of units transfused – 38 Number of blood units wasted - 0 *all unused units were returned to The Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust (RBH) and used elsewhere. Training: All trained staff involved in the blood transfusion process have their blood competencies assessed every three years. Scenario training exercises are also completed within the Theatre department, ensuring ODPs understand the most up to date blood procedures. Comprehensive staff training matrix records the date of training and competency completion. Currently 100 % of staff have completed 'face-to-face' training successfully and deemed competent. Transfusion Objectives for 2013 1. The transfusion team will meet three times in 2013. 2. Continue with regular monthly and three monthly audits. 3. Run emergency desk top scenarios as planned. - 21 - Internal Audits: Audit planning is carried out within the Governance and Assurance Team and is split into three categories: 1. Centralised audits – internally collected by designated staff over the course of a year. All data is inputted into a central audit tool, in line with all other Circle Sites. The data is then collated centrally and reviewed by the Corporate Integrated Governance Committee, to which all sites provide a representative. 2. External Audits – within the central audit tool, a number of audits are designated to be completed by external advisors (corporate employees, with no affiliations to a specific Circle Hospital). 3. Internal Audit Programme – A further series of audits are completed internally in Circle Reading, to enhance clinical safety, patient care and quality of services specifically for our Hospital. - 22 - Audit Calendar 2014 KEY: Coloured Box means audit due J a n MONTHLY AUDITS Hand Hygiene Who has to complete this audit? Outpatients, Inpatients, Endoscopy, Radiology, Theatre, Recovery, Daycase, Physiotherapy, Hospitality Health and Safety Environmental Hygiene / Cleaning ALL DEPARTMENTS Outpatients, Inpatients, Endoscopy, Radiology, Theatre, Recovery, Daycase, Physiotherapy Fire Warden Clinical Records ALL DEPARTMENTS Physiotherapy, Daycase, Outpatients, Inpatients, Theatre (separate tab for each department) Controlled Drugs Inpatients, Recovery, Endoscopy, Theatre Medical Gas Theatres (Porters) Pre-Assessment Care Medical Notes and Tracker System Pre-Assessment Dept QUARTERLY AUDITS Who has to complete this audit? Endoscopy, Radiology, Physiotherapy, Outpatients, Recovery, Theatre, Daycase, Inpatients Sharps Laundry M ar ch A p ri l M a y J u n e J u ly A u g S e p t O c t N o v D e c Medical Records Team Waste (departmental) Stores (Porters) Endoscopy, Radiology, Physiotherapy, PreAssessment, Outpatients, Recovery, Theatre, Daycase, Inpatients Endoscopy, Radiology, Physiotherapy, PreAssessment, Outpatients, Recovery, Theatre, Daycase, Inpatients Information Security ALL DEPARTMENTS BI - ANNUAL AUDITS Security Card Machine Who has to complete this audit? Visitors Log Book Reception spare swipe cards audit Reception ANNUAL AUDITS Waste Management (in depth) Medical Gas (more detailed Audit) Who has to complete this audit? Housekeeping Lead and Facilities Management Lead (with support from other departments) Privacy and Dignity F e b Reception Reception Theatre Lead and Facilities Management Lead Governance Audits will also take place throughout the year - please see below for a selection. - 23 - Confidential Waste Audit Site Wide Privacy and Dignity Site Wide Fire Assessments Site Wide Health and Safety Audit Site Wide Infection Control Audit Business Impact Assessment Business Continuity Plan review Site Wide Security and Information Security Audit Governance & Assurance Lead Annual Governance & Assurance Lead and Nurse Lead Annual Fire Officer Annual Corporate H&S Lead Annual Corporate IPC Lead Governance & Assurance Lead and All Departments Governance & Assurance Lead, SMT, Facilities Management Lead Annual Governance and Corporate IG Officer Annual Radiology Lead Annual Facilities Management Lead Annual Evening Information Security Audit Governance & Assurance Lead Twice a year Variance Form Audit Governance & Assurance Lead Twice a year HR Lead Every two months HR Lead Every two months HR Lead Every two months HR audits Governance & Assurance Lead Every two months Resus trolley Audit Lead Nurse Monthly Resus Scenarios Penny Rutter & Sarah Blake Governance & Assurance Lead, Nurse Lead, Theatre Lead Governance & Assurance Lead, Nurse Lead, Theatre Lead Monthly Governance & Assurance Lead and Nurse Lead Recovery, DSU, Theatre, Governance & Assurance Lead, Nurse Lead Governance & Assurance Lead & Unit Lead (separate outcome allocated to each unit lead) Monthly Laser Audit Medical Gas Annual Audit CALMS registration compliance reporting CALMS IG training compliance report Practicing Privileges audit Cancellations Returns to theatre Emergency transfers WHO Compliance CQC Outcome Quality Audit Annual Annual Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly - 24 - Clinical Research The number of patients receiving NHS services provided or sub contracted by CircleReading in 2013 that were recruited during that period to participate in research approved by a research ethics committee was 0. - 25 - Patient Comment…… ‘I always feel that the hospital treats the person as a whole and not just the condition. Always informative and procedures explained. Staff are always very pleasant.' - 26 - Clinical Outcomes Steering Committee The vision: The clinical outcomes steering group aims to collect and report robust clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction that will raise the benchmark of excellence in clinical care delivery in the independent healthcare sector aims to be: • • • • • Best at collecting clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction Best achievement in clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction Open and consistent publication of unfiltered patient feedback Best at translating what we learn to create positive impact on patient care A centre of excellence and a beacon for other organisations for clinical outcomes CircleReading still collects PROMS for all NHS patients (four key procedures) as well as in-house PROMS for most of our private patients’ procedures. Quarterly reports are generated and distributed to the General Managers and Clinical Chairs of each Circle site for review and action. With regards to NHS patients there have been some changes since August 2013. We are now able to access and download our patients’ level data from the NHS Information Centre. As more patients are added to the system each month we will be able to monitor and trend our performance. Since we opened in August 2012, we have been collecting all relevant PROMS and going forwards we will be in a position to be able to report on all of our health gains from July 2013. This will include comparisons in relation to the UK Average and the Best UK Performer. - 27 - PROMs Summary Knee Replacement Primary - Average Health Gain per Patient (Private) Selection: Circle Reading Hospital(s) Reporting Period: January - 2014 (rolling data) - Comparisons/Rank Based On: Oxford Knee Score Site Comparisons - 28 - PROMs Summary Knee Replacement Primary - Average Health Gain per Patient (Private) Selection: Circle Reading Hospital(s) Reporting Period: January - 2014 (rolling data) - Comparisons/Rank Based On: Oxford Knee Score Trends For: Circle Site(s) - 29 - PROMs Summary Knee Replacement Primary - Average Health Gain per Patient (Private) Selection: Circle Reading Hospital(s) Reporting Period: January - 2014 (rolling data) - Comparisons/Rank Based On: Oxford Knee Score - 30 - PROMs Summary Knee Replacement Primary - Average Health Gain per Patient (Private) Selection: Circle Reading Hospital(s) Reporting Period: January - 2014 (rolling data) - Comparisons/Rank Based On: Oxford Knee Score - 31 - PROMs Summary Hip Replacement Primary - Average Health Gain per Patient (Private) Selection: Circle Reading Hospital(s) Reporting Period: January - 2014 (rolling data) - Comparisons/Rank Based On: Oxford Hip Score Site Comparisons - 32 - PROMs Summary Hip Replacement Primary - Average Health Gain per Patient (Private) Selection: Circle Reading Hospital(s) Reporting Period: January - 2014 (rolling data) - Comparisons/Rank Based On: Oxford Hip Score Trends For: Circle Site(s) - 33 - PROMs Summary Hip Replacement Primary - Average Health Gain per Patient (Private) Selection: Circle Reading Hospital(s) Reporting Period: January - 2014 (rolling data) - Comparisons/Rank Based On: Oxford Hip Score - 34 - PROMs Summary Hip Replacement Primary - Average Health Gain per Patient (Private) Selection: Circle Reading Hospital(s) Reporting Period: January - 2014 (rolling data) - Comparisons/Rank Based On: Oxford Hip Score - 35 - Patient Comment…… ‘A really pleasant experience. So happy I have come to Circle. Thank you so much. Spotlessly clean. All staff very welcoming. Very relaxed atmosphere.' - 36 - Patient Safety Device Alerts A plethora of safety measures are in place at Circle Reading, to ensure the highest standards are adhered to. The follow medical safety checks are made: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. MHRA Medical Device alerts MHRA Field Safety alerts NICE guidance CAS Alert system MHRA Drug Alerts Company field safety alerts (received directly from source) A database of all alerts and their outcome is kept centrally by our Governance & Assurance Lead and reported on a monthly basis to the Clinical Governance and Risk Management Committee. Information is also reported to the Medicines Management Committee and the Executive Board through monthly reports. MHRA Alerts: The hospital is registered for electronic alerts which are reviewed and distributed to the relevant and responsible member of staff. 69 MHRA Medical Device Alerts were received, of which 2 was relevant to hospital equipment. Appropriate action and communication with the company involved and relevant departments took place to resolve any issues. NICE Guidance: All NICE guidance is reviewed on a monthly basis. Those which are relevant to the hospital are distributed to our Lead Nurse and Governance & Assurance Lead. Action plans are drawn up and added to our NICE Library which is available to all staff. Drug Alerts Alerts are received electronically and audited on a monthly basis by our Pharmacy Lead at Circle Reading. 36 drug related alerts were received, of which 3 were relevant to the hospital. Actions were taken by the Pharmacy Lead to remove affected stock and communicate related information to our clinical staff. Equipment All equipment is thoroughly checked and maintained either by our facilities team or our visiting site EBME engineer. - 37 - Incident Reporting Incidents are reported electronically using the DATIX system. Extensive training has been provided for staff. Full details of the incidents are recorded with unit leads assigned the role of ‘investigator’. All details of the review are then recorded on the electronic record, with clear lessons learnt and actions taken logged. The Governance & Assurance Lead, Inpatients Lead, the Lead Nurse are able to review all records, as can the Corporate Head of Risk & Assurance and the General Manager. Additional resources or procedures stated in the action plans can also be loaded into the electronic record as evidence. On a monthly basis a full audit is undertaken using the incident reports and actions plans to ensure that all incidents, near misses and accidents have been captured and acted upon. The incident records and any actions logged as a result of an actual incident, near miss or accident are presented to the Clinical Governance and Risk Management Committee and the Integrated Governance Committee corporately. Accidents are reported to RIDDOR when appropriate. An incident form is also logged for each accident. There were no RIDDOR reportable incidents in 2013. INCIDENT AND NEAR MISS REPORTING – 2013 January 2013 No. of Incidents Reported Investigated Open / Closed Clinical 21 Yes Closed Administrative 5 Yes Closed Facilities Management 3 Yes Closed February 2013 No. of Incidents Reported Investigated Open / Closed Clinical 28 Yes Closed Administrative 4 Yes Closed Facilities Management 2 Yes Closed March 2013 No. of Incidents Reported Investigated Open / Closed Clinical 38 Yes Closed Administrative 5 Yes Closed Facilities Management 0 N/A N/A - 38 - April 2013 No. of Incidents Reported Investigated Open / Closed Clinical 37 Yes Closed Administrative 2 Yes Closed Facilities Management 0 N/A N/A May 2013 No. of Incidents Reported Investigated Open / Closed Clinical 41 Yes Closed Administrative 3 Yes Closed Facilities Management 0 N/A N/A June 2013 No. of Incidents Reported Investigated Open / Closed Clinical 49 Yes Closed Administrative 1 Yes Closed Facilities Management 0 N/A N/A July 2013 No. of Incidents Reported Investigated Open / Closed Clinical 37 Yes Closed Administrative 4 Yes Closed Facilities Management 1 Yes Closed August 2013 No. of Incidents Reported Investigated Open / Closed Clinical 50 Yes Closed Administrative 4 Yes Closed Facilities Management 2 Yes Closed - 39 - September 2013 No. of Incidents Reported Investigated Open / Closed Clinical 43 Yes Closed Administrative 3 Yes Closed Facilities Management 3 Yes Closed October 2013 No. of Incidents Reported Investigated Open / Closed Clinical 33 Yes Closed Administrative 2 Yes Closed Facilities Management 0 N/A N/A November 2013 No. of Incidents Reported Investigated Open / Closed Clinical 26 Yes Closed Administrative 5 Yes Closed Facilities Management 0 N/A N/A December 2013 No. of Incidents Reported Investigated Open / Closed Clinical 38 Yes Closed Administrative 4 Yes Closed Facilities Management 3 Yes Closed Examples of actions taken following incidents reported: A number of in depth clinical risk assessments were developed to prevent incidents and near misses. a. b. c. d. Nutrition Falls Bed Rails VTE - 40 - Patient Falls All patient falls are logged through our incident management system and reported to the Clinical Governance and Risk Management Committee. Date of Incident / Departmental Area Incident Description Immediate Action Taken Incident Investigation / Action Plan Implemented 04/07/2013 Inpatients Patient was assessed as competent and capable of having a shower. The patient was informed and understood that he should not bend down to put his shorts on. The nurse was informed that the patient was in the shower. The nurse went in to assess the patient and heard him fall to the floor. The patient was attended by the nurse and assessed. No obvious injuries were noted. All nurses are to ensure that patients are fully aware and understand the information in relation to showering unaided. As I entered room 304 to take the patient's observations, the patient asked if she could use the toilet. I assisted her in walking to the toilet and helped to position her correctly in front of the toilet. I asked if she would like me to stay but she refused and said that she would not need assistance in sitting down. I reassured her that I would be just outside the toilet door if she need me. I then heard her lose her footing as she was sitting down but when I ran into the toilet she was already on the floor.. The patient attempted to stand but I asked her to stay where she was The patient returned to theatre for a knee wound washout and re suturing. The nurse immediately pulled the emergency bell. Two nurses on shift came in immediately and took over. One applied pressure to the patient's bleeding knee. A new falls risk assessment was completed following the fall. 13/08/2013 Inpatients The importance of the above has been reiterated to all nurses in relation to patient care. The Lead Nurse commenced a Root Cause The RMO also attended and Analysis (RCA) in relation changed the dressing to the to the incident and operation site. recommendations and lessons learnt have been The consultant was shared with all respective informed of the incident nursing teams. immediately. - 41 - Date of Incident / Departmental Area Incident Description Immediate Action Taken Incident Investigation / Action Plan Implemented 05/09/2013 Inpatients Patient was walking out to the bathroom using a zimmer frame and was assisted by a nurse. The patient was standing against the toilet and went to sit down. The patient was given coaching on how to sit down but the patient did not follow the instructions and missed the toilet and fell backwards towards the wall of the toilet with her shoulder and slipped to the floor. Patient was assisted back to the bed and reviewed by the RMO. The patient was reassessed by the Physiotherapist. 25/09/2013 Day Surgery The patient sustained no visible injuries and confirmed that she did not hurt herself. The physiotherapist was contacted and a raised toilet with handles was put in place and a full Falls Risk Assessment was completed and documented. Patient attempted to stand Patient sustained to mobilise to toilet when his numbness as a result of the leg buckled. block used in surgery. The feeling had not returned The nurse gently assisted adequately prior to the and guided him to sit on the nurse mobilising the floor. patient. The Nurse involved contacted the physiotherapist in relation to the patient's care and the patient was mobilised safely. The nurse provided a reflective account of the incident. Shared learning undertaken by all staff regarding decreased sensation postoperatively. Falls prevention in place in all clinical areas. Incidents of this nature to be continually monitored. Reassurance given to the patient regarding the block and the loss of sensation at the time. - 42 - Date of Incident / Departmental Area Incident Description Immediate Action Taken Incident Investigation / Action Plan Implemented 27/09/2013 Outpatients Whilst walking past the Radiology reception desk towards the atrium, a Nurse and a Consultant noticed a patient in the atrium. The patient was assessed by the attending nurse and consultant present at the time. All nursing staff and patients reminded of the hazard associated with not having seat belts fastened whilst using wheelchairs. She was in a wheelchair and had leant so far forward that she tipped the wheelchair forward. No obvious injuries were noted. Before we could get to her, she had slid from the wheelchair to the floor. Patient declined on accepting a seat belt fastened prior to using the wheelchair. 03/10/2013 Inpatients Found patient lying on the floor after few minutes of leaving her. Nurse providing care of patient fully reviewed the patient. Patient said she wanted to pick up something she had dropped on the floor and ended up on the floor herself. No signs of injury noted. The patient was stable and not distressed. Both bed rails noted to be up at the time. 25/01/2014 Inpatients Patient was with the physiotherapist for mobility assessment. The patient was mobilising well with a walking stick and stand-by support. Falls Risk Assessment undertaken. Patient assisted back to bed and again given the call bell in ease of reach. Patient advised to use call bell as provided. Physiotherapist was in front of the patient. Patient missed the edge of the bed and slipped onto the floor and was slowly put into a seated position by staff. Falls Risk Assessment undertaken. - 43 - Date of Incident / Departmental Area Incident Description Immediate Action Taken Incident Investigation / Action Plan Implemented 27/01/2014 Inpatients Physiotherapist was assisting in the mobilising of patient up the stairs on ward 2. Nursing were staff present. Patient began to feel faint. Patient advised to walk back downstairs. Patient when at the bottom of the stairs began to feel better. Patient suddenly dropped towards floor and hit both knees on the bottom step on the way down. Patient eased to the floor by physiotherapist assistant. Falls Risk Assessment undertaken. 06/02/2014 Inpatients Patient was assisted with bed pan and given call bell. Health Care Assistant reported finding the patient on the floor. Patient states she lost balance, her legs gave way and she sat on the floor but did not harm herself. Patient assessed by nursing staff. No obvious injuries noted. Falls Risk Assessment undertaken. 14/02/2014 Inpatients Patient informed nurse that he had got out of bed unsupervised and had fallen over into the armchair. The fall was not witnessed. Patient assessed by nursing staff and informed to press the call bell if assistance required. Falls Risk Assessment undertaken. Patient assessed by nursing staff and physiotherapist. When the nurse arrived into the room, the patient was back in his bed, with both bed rails up and the call bell was in ease of reach. - 44 - Date of Incident / Departmental Area Incident Description Immediate Action Taken Incident Investigation / Action Plan Implemented 03/04/2014 Inpatients Patient rang call bell and stated that she had fainted in the bathroom and woke up on the floor. Patient managed to return to bed unaided and hit her head and bruised her lip with her teeth. Patient only contacted the nursing staff after the incident. Patient assessed by nursing staff and RMO and informed to press the call bell if assistance required. Falls Risk Assessment undertaken. 17/04/2014 Inpatients Whilst nursing staff were assisting a patient to mobilise from the toilet to the bed, the patient's left leg gave way and she fell. Emergency call bell activated and assistance arrived. Patient hoisted back to bed and full examination carried out. Noted bruising to bottom with no other injuries sustained. Full physiotherapy input. Full assistance to mobilise. Call bell placed in ease of reach. Patient lowered to the floor by nursing staff. Pressure relieving mattress ordered to reduce risk of skin break-down from the bruising. Physiotherapy sessions and exercise increased in order to improve patient's mobility and strength. Consultant and RMO informed. Patient's length of stay increased. Patient referred for community physiotherapy upon discharge. - 45 - Actions taken: All patient falls are reviewed on a monthly basis at the Clinical Governance and Risk Management Committee, under a separate agenda item. Patient fall data capture is added to the monthly Governance & Assurance Monthly Reports. Patient falls are reviewed at the Health and Safety Committee Meeting with specific lessons learnt for Health & Safety Link Workers, who cascade knowledge to their departments. A Falls Prevention Committee has been established and meetings are held on a monthly basis. Patient falls are also addressed during the Pre-Assessment and Admission processes in place using the Falls Risk Assessment Tool with 100% of NHS patients having been risk assessed on admission. Recommendations: Ensure all new staff provided with mandatory training dates on induction. Health and Safety Link Workers to provide an induction. Review at Health and Safety Committee to continue. Ensure all new staff are given the Health and Safety Induction Leaflet. Further develop the use of the Health and Safety Notice Board outside the staff restaurant. Further training opportunities for the Health and Safety Link Workers to be investigated. Patient Comment…… ‘Very warm and efficient welcome. Great time keeping. Helpful and friendly staff. Lovely clean and relaxing surroundings and facilities. All in all, a very pleasant experience'. - 47 - Infection Prevention and Control Since opening in August 2012, Circle Reading has taken Infection Prevention and Control extremely seriously and we pride ourselves on our excellent level of cleanliness. Hand Hygiene All staff attend mandatory Infection Prevention and Control training. This is completed on an annual basis. Each department is also assigned an Infection Prevention and Control Link Worker who champions good practice, provides information to staff and is a point of reference if colleagues have queries. Regular Infection Prevention and Control Committee Meetings are also held, which all Link Workers attend. Each Linker Worker completes more in-depth Infection Prevention and Control training and has the opportunity to undertake on-line e-Learning NVQ studies. Monthly hand hygiene audits are completed by each Link Worker and are performed on a crossdepartmental triangulation basis to provide assurances in relation to compliances achieved. The monthly audits are reported to the Corporate Team and the Clinical Governance and Risk Management Committee. The average score for Hand Hygiene during 2013 was: 96.70%. The average score for Hand Hygiene for 2014 to date is: 99.00% Departments also use the light box to improve Hand Hygiene awareness within their teams. This is carried out on a rolling monthly schedule and results and audits from such are discussed in detail. Alert Organisms The company has had no alert organism infections (MRSA Bacteraemia or Cdiff) to report to the Health Protection Agency. We continue to have zero cases of bloodstream alert organisms to report. - 48 - Pressure Ulcers During 2013 we have had 1 reported incident of hospital acquired pressure ulcers during our care. VTE Risk Assessments A VTE Risk Assessment is undertaken for all patients whilst in our care at Circle Reading. This is audited on a monthly basis; which involves reviewing 10% of patient notes for that month. Any issues raised during the audits are acted upon swiftly by the Lead Nurse. Safety Thermometer Circle Reading began participating in the safety thermometer scheme in October 2012. Every month data is formally submitted. To date no harms have been recorded. CQUIN A maximum of 1% of actual annual NHS contract value is available through the achievement of quality improvement and innovation goals through the Commissioning for Quality and Innovation. - 49 - Patient Comment…… ‘Made me feel very comfortable and went through everything I needed to know prior to the operation'. - 50 - Virtual Pharmacy PHARMACY PROVISION: The pharmacy service at the hospital is currently provided by Pharmaxo under a Contract. The Pharmacy provision includes: The management of electronic dispensing cabinets Stock control and supply for medicines and medical gases Pharmacy review of all prescriptions Pharmacy advice 24 hours Formulary control Alert review and communication Audit and Training Prescriptions are recorded on a paper record medication chart which is scanned directly to Pharmaxo through a secure line; prescriptions are reviewed by a pharmacist and labelled drugs released through the electronic drug cabinet. In order for the nurse to access drugs in the electronic cabinet they are required to use finger print recognition and a password, they then need to enter the drug and dose as written on the prescription chart to confirm the drugs being removed. The cabinet does not replace the normal pre-administration checks which are undertaken at the patient’s bedside and administration is recorded on the prescription chart. The cabinet, drug fridge and fluids are remotely monitored by Pharmaxo, including constant temperature monitoring. STAFF TRAINING: All staff receive training on the cabinets and the medicines management policy by Pharmaxo prior to the granting of a password allowing access to the cabinet. Relevant staff also receive an annual update on medicines management and a competency assessment. Additional workstreams are currently creating a new Medicines Training Framework which will be implemented in 2014. CONTROLLED DRUGS: The Authorised Officer for controlled drugs is the Registered Manager. The hospital sits on the Local Intelligence Network (LIN) Committees, submitting quarterly reports on Controlled Drugs Incidents and receiving drug alerts through LIN. Controlled drugs are stored both in the electronic cabinets and in controlled drugs cabinets. Dual finger prints are required for the removal of controlled drugs from the electronic cabinet. All controlled drug stock and use is recorded in traditional controlled drug registers which are audited on a monthly basis. - 51 - AUDIT: The electronic cabinets enable regular audit of stock use and dispensing by Pharmaxo who also audit prescription chart completion and compliance, the findings of audits and spot checks are discussed through the weekly medicines management meeting and an overall report is submitted to the Clinical Governance and Risk Management Committee. An annual Controlled Drugs Audit is also undertaken for submission to external organisations. Further audits are conducted by unit leads on a monthly basis, and an in-depth audit carried out by the Lead Nurse on a Quarterly basis, the results of which are submitted to the General Manager (also the Accountable Officer). An additional medicines workstream is currently carrying out a full suite of audits to improve the service further. MEDICINES MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE MEETINGS: A Medicines Management Committee has been established, which examines higher level pharmacy processes and guides changes to ensure the highest quality pharmacy services are delivered. The Lead Nurse, Departmental Leads, Anaesthetists, Clinicians and a Consultant Clinical Microbiologist (Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust) are invited to attend these meetings to discuss concerns, incidents and stock issues. Action points from these meetings are shared with the Clinical Governance and Risk Management Committee. FUTURE PLANS AND CHANGES TO THE PHARMACY SERVICE IN 2014: Our contract with Pharmaxo, our external pharmacy supplier, will come to an end in July 2014 and as of Monday the 21st July of 2014 there will be an on-site Circle Pharmacy which will provide all clinical and supply services throughout the entire hospital. The on-site pharmacy opening hours will be from 8.00am– 4.45pm (Monday to Friday). Prescriptions may be left for processing outside of these times with the Pharmacy Technician. For Out-of-Hours take home medications, there will be a small supply of pre-labelled items in the designated areas. Our nurses will no longer need to dispense prescriptions as this will all be done via the pharmacy during opening hours which will directly free up valuable nursing time for all of our patients. We have a brand new Circle Private Prescription Pad. This will give our patients the freedom to have their outpatient medication dispensed either at CircleReading or at a chemist of their choice, which is also ideal for use out of hours. NHS patients attending evening clinics, who are normally entitled to free medication, may wish to leave their prescription at CircleReading for collection the next day. Alternatively they can see their GP to obtain an NHS FP10 prescription. We are currently in the process of providing information on the New Pharmacy Service available at CircleReading to all of our patients. - 52 - Patient Comment…… 'Everything was perfect. Staff were very attentive, friendly and happy. A very enjoyable experience. The food was excellent, especially the warm baked biscuits and the lovely pleasant man who delivered the food'. - 53 - Patient Experience At CircleReading patient feedback is key and our ability to respond to patients’ views and make the care and experience for our patients better, this is something that sits as a priority in all of our minds. We encourage feedback from our patients at all stages of their journey through Circle Reading starting with our meet and greet team and ending with our patient feedback card and encouragement to email the Registered Manager with feedback. All feedback is shared with our team on a weekly basis and in the "Patient Hour" which take place within each of our departments. Patient feedback is reviewed and actions decided to make the required changes highlighted by our patients, learning and growing every step of the way. Our recently formed Patient Focus Group has become embedded within our organisation and enables us to ensure patients continue to be at the heart of every key decision we make. The first year has proved a great year for CircleReading and the feedback received both through our formal mechanisms and also through the many letters and cards received, has enabled us to share pride in what we do well and to act on the areas we have needed to improve upon. Patients can express their views and provide feedback in the following ways: Patient Feedback Cards / iPad Tablets / CircleReading Website / Facebook / NHS Choices Letters of Compliment or Concern / Telephone / In Person All patient feedback is logged anonymously Weekly report produced Distributed to: Executive Board Members Senior Management Team Consultants Departmental Leads Published on the CircleReading website in its raw format on a monthly basis Compliment letters logged and distributed to all staff involved with treating the patient Thank you cards collated and presented within the Ward Areas Concern letters logged & investigated Actioned accordingly Reported to Clinical Governance & Risk Management Committee and Executive Board - 54 - In order to embed the collection process for patient feedback the Lead Nurse, Departmental Leads and the Governance & Assurance Lead work closely together and disseminate this information throughout all departmental teams. These members of staff are responsible for ensuring the feedback process is streamlined. They are also empowered to make changes and recommendations highlighted by patients, to ensure swift action is taken. Patient Feedback Cards During 2013, Circle Reading had 4757 patient feedback cards completed and returned: Overall, 99.7% of patients would recommend us to friends or family. - 55 - Overall breakdown of completed Patient Feedback Cards by Departmental Area: 3 Question Patient Feedback Cards Over the course of 2013, patients were asked to complete a short three question patient feedback card following every visit to the hospital. In total, 4757 cards were returned. The breakdown of returned cards is shown in the table below: Departmental Area Inpatients Outpatients Pre-Assessment Daycase Radiology Physiotherapy Total Total No. of Completed Feedback Cards (2013) 683 1597 555 1487 282 153 4757 Inpatients Of the 683 responses from Inpatients: 99.4% would recommend us to family or friends 0.6 % would not recommend us to family or friends which is equivalent to 4 feedback cards Outpatients Of the 1597 responses from Outpatients: 99.6% would recommend us to family or friends 0.4 % would not recommend us to family or friends which is equivalent to 7 feedback cards Pre-Assessment Of the 555 responses from Pre-Assessment: 100% would recommend us to family or friends Daycase Of the 1487 responses from Daycase: 99.9% would recommend us to family or friends 0.1 % would not recommend us to family or friends which is equivalent to 1 feedback card - 56 - Radiology Of the 282 responses from Radiology: 99.6% would recommend us to family or friends which is equivalent to 2 feedback cards Physiotherapy Of the 153 responses from Physiotherapy: 100% would recommend us to family or friends The following positive comments are direct quotes from the feedback cards received in 2013 and 2014 to date: Pre-Assessment thorough. Consultant and operation excellent. Nursing care good, especially as the continuity of the nurse was maintained. Excellent experience overall. Thank you. From my operation to my final physiotherapy appointment today, the care, the treatment, the accommodation and the food were first class. Thank you. Everyone was extremely friendly. Everything was explained in full detail and options were given. Feels more like a hotel. All staff extremely welcoming. The radiographer was excellent at explaining everything to a nervous fourteen year old having an MRI. Very attentive and professional. Any questions asked were answered immediately. The night and day staff were lovely. The doctors were patient and kind. Thanks to all. Care and treatment throughout. Lots of check-ups to make sure everything was OK. Great food. Positive experience. I like the diverse culture of the staff you employ at the hospital. Polite. Respectful. Everything was good. Lovely greeting and settings in the lobby area. Very prompt service. Lovely consultant. Complimentary coffee was a nice thought. The food was fantastic. Both the sole and the duck dishes were beautifully cooked and presented. No one likes coming into hospital but it was a real pleasure to be here. Only my second time in hospital in some 65 years but my assessment is that there is little you could have done better. Thank you. - 57 - You looked after me during a difficult time with care and compassion. My pain was well managed and everyone was extremely nice. Quick service. Good explanation. Hardworking people to help patients to meet their needs. Brilliant. The whole journey from start to finish was ten out of ten. You are all a credit to your profession. Thanks. Positive feedback within the Pre-Assessment and Outpatients Area was focussed on the general welcome received and the staff within the area, in conjunction with the atmosphere and efficient Reception. Positive feedback within the Inpatient and Day Surgery Areas was heavily focused on staff. Patients remarked on the friendly and welcoming approach of both clinical and hospitality staff. Patients felt that staff kept them well informed and calm before their procedure. A large proportion of patients also commented on how good the food was. Positive feedback in connection with the Radiology and Physiotherapy Departments focussed heavily on the practical advice given by the knowledgeable staff in conjunction with their caring and professional manner. Areas for improvement The feedback card requested patients to highlight areas that they thought could be improved. The hospital welcomes this valuable feedback so that action plans can be implemented to address areas requiring improvement. This is completed on a weekly basis and all comments and suggestions are discussed within weekly departmental team updates. The tables below illustrate the principal comments and suggestions for improvements and the actions implemented. Patient Suggestions / Comments Would be good to see the same nurse Try to reduce length of stay times Patient Suggestions / Comments Actions Implemented Nurses allocated to patients where possible to provide continuity Now encouraging early dressing and mobilisation for major joint surgery patients which has resulted in a positive approach to early discharge Actions Implemented Lack of communication in relation to delays Teams encouraged to frequently feedback to patients if there are any delays Inconsistency in nursing experience Increase flexible use of permanent staff, reduce use of bank staff and zero use of agency staff - 58 - More detailed pre-admission information about the room facilities Inpatient and Day Surgery Patient Information Guides have been implemented and are sent to our patients prior to admission Admission needs to be closer to the estimated operating time We are currently investigating staggered admissions in conjunction with our Consultant Partners Inside door handles within the Ladies Toilet (reception area) difficult to use We have fitted new door handles within the ladies toilet in order to make the opening of the doors easier Less paperwork and duplication of information requested We have introduced a new Care Plan Pathway Booklet which has minimised the duplication of information The T.V. System not working properly We are trialling a new remote control that should remove the problems that our patients are experiencing Richness of food and lighter menu choices Our Hospitality Team discuss menus in greater detail with our patients and highlight the option of ordering 'off the menu options' for more simpler and lighter dishes. Our Head Chef actively visits patients to further discuss menu options, particularly in relation to long stay patients and children Continuity of ward rounds Roll-out of nurse quality ward rounds and ‘time to care’ initiative Communication flow between nursing teams and other departments Weekly Team Meetings have been implemented across all departments within the hospital. This provides the opportunity for all team members to share information and to be updated on any new developments within the hospital Further patient feedback We were very pleased to receive a wealth of thank you cards, flowers and chocolates from patients who have wanted to show their appreciation for the care they have received whilst at CircleReading. These are displayed within the departments received, to ensure that all staff feel appreciated and valued. When compliment letters are received, copies are distributed to all those involved with the patient’s care and any patient identifiable information is removed. - 59 - Patient Focus Group Aim: Circle is an organisation dedicated to its patients and we continuously strive to improve the quality and value of care that we give. For this reason we initiated the Patient Focus Group to capture patients’ experiences and ideas so that we can address issues and ideas not only from our perspective but also from that of the patients. Who: The members of the Focus Group are past and present inpatients and outpatients of Circle Reading and include both NHS and private patients. We currently have 8 members. They were personally approached and invited to be members. It was emphasised that they were not committed in any way. The variety of patients reflects a cross section of personal experiences within the hospital. How: The first meeting was held on the 10th of May 2013. The agenda included a welcome tour of the hospital and then a lunch with the Lead Nurse, Hospital Hotel Manager, Governance & Assurance Lead and other members of staff from a cross section of all departments within the hospital. The meetings are held every quarter. Evolving: From the conception of the Patient Focus Group, we have implemented a structured approach to the meetings. We have agendas, issues, changes and progress which we discuss. An invitation is sent out to the members with the agenda and they in turn confirm their attendance. We arrange a meeting followed by lunch. Minutes are taken and circulated to the members for their information and review. The future: We aim to continue with the current forum as its members represent a real variety in both personal experiences of Circle but also thoughts regarding the varied topics we discuss. Key issues discussed in 2013 and 2014 (to date) include: Patient Feedback, Net Promoter Scores for NHS Inpatients, Patient Suggestion Boxes, Automating the Friends & Family Test, Circle Reading 'Facebook', 'Staying in Touch' Post-Operatively (Newsletters / Promotional Offers), Gift Shop Product Updates, 'Grab & Go' Menu, Post-Operative Home Service (Patient Nutrition Plan) and Hand Hygiene Alcohol Gel Stands. Key actions implemented in 2013: As a result of the above discussions, Patient Suggestion Boxes have been placed in all departmental areas of the hospital for use by our patients. iPad Tablets which electronically collect patient feedback are now situated in Outpatients, Inpatients and the Daycase areas within the hospital. Our 'new look' website has been launched which incorporates the suggestions made by our patient forum members. - 60 - Providing Feedback to Consultants & GP’s Patient feedback is shared with Consultants in several formats. The monthly analysis of feedback is distributed to all staff via email prior to publishing on our website. In addition the Quality Quartet is discussed at the monthly Executive Board meetings and feature the top 3 improvements suggested by patients and the % of recommendations. Also discussed at this time are any formal complaints that are in progress. Consultants engage very positively in this process and are actively involved in of the resulting actions. GP surgeries are informed about Patient Feedback in a variety of ways with the main being a hard copy delivered during a visit to the Surgery by one of the two GP Partnership team. The feedback is taken from the website and is therefore unaltered or edited and includes negative as well as positive comments. A GP Newsletter is produced every two months and this includes the patient feedback from the website, the % of patients that have recommended Circle Reading to their friends and family in the previous two months and is usually accompanied by a selection of patient comments. On the Circle Partnership website there is an area dedicated to GPs and staff at GP practices and we ensure that the patient feedback is accessible from this area. - 61 - Complaints and Concerns: In total during 2013 we received: 37 formal complaints. 19 concerns. Formal Complaints 100% of formal complaints were acknowledged within 3 working days. 100% of formal investigations and subsequent responses were sent within 20 working days. 95% of formal complaints were upheld. Complaints Received during 2013 Month No. of Formal Complaints Received January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 1 0 8 2 0 2 2 4 4 2 7 5 Actions Resulting from Formal Complaints Received in 2013 All complaints, associated investigations and respective responses are shared with not only the staff members involved and the departmental team members from the respective area(s), but are also shared on a broader scale. Action plans are implemented in order that there is education, training and feedback in relation to sharing lessons learnt. This information is shared in a multi-disciplinary approach. Complaint Overview Action Implemented Issues with Pre-Assessment summarised as a general apparent lack of organisation and poor communication. All Pre-Assessment staff instructed to re educate themselves in relation to screening policies. Further development and training implemented in relation to some specific areas of our operation. New process initiated incorporating detailed 1/2 hourly and 2 hourly checks (as a minimum) of patients to ensure that all relevant information requirements and clinical needs are being met. Greater feedback in relation to theatre delays and post-operative care nursing. - 62 - Patient Comment…… 'The overall care was excellent. The Consultant and the staff made me feel special. Thank you'. - 63 - Staff Engagement Staff Survey: Circle Reading undertake an annual staff survey, as part of the performance management process. We ask our staff to score the following statements (1= strongly disagree: 5 = strongly agree): At work I have clear, well understood objectives. During the last week, I have received praise for my work. I am consistently free to make ethical decisions. I feel that my opinions at work are valued. I have adequate materials and equipment to do my work well. I have the opportunity at work to do what I do best every day. My immediate manager is supportive of me. Average Scores: In 2013, staff partners (95%) said they would recommend working at Circle to other potential candidates. Average Score for the last half of 2012 = 4.2 Average Score for the first half of 2013 = 4.1 Average Score for the second half of 2013 = 3.9* * The average score decrease is due to the fact that all partners, since the opening of Circle Reading in August 2012, are fully appreciating the performance management process and are engaging fully and openly in relation to such. Listed below is a sample of responses received from our partners in relation to the question below: "What would be the one thing about working at Circle that you would keep as it is?" "Our very strong dedication for our patients and our great customer service". "Going out of our way to make sure we deliver a great experience is the best feeling". "The new ideas of ways of working and openness of bringing in new ideas and processes". "Culture of transparency". "The flexibility of my role and that I am allowed to make decisions on my own". "Support received from my peer group at times when things are difficult". "Being part of a company that is dedicated to it's patients and where all partners are continuously striving to do things better". "The friendliness and helpfulness that exists between departments". "The multidisciplinary team, the supportive staff, and how everyone gets involved, without the blame culture". "I enjoy working at Circle Reading due to the friendliness and helpfulness of colleagues and the positive working environment". "The partners' pride in their working environment". "The willingness to improve processes to make working here efficient, productive and practical, especially when it comes to the patients". "Partners support one another, regardless of hierarchy. I think that is what makes the hospital so unique". - 64 - Initiatives Partner Recognition Award: Every quarter our partners are able to make nominations for another member of staff, who they believe has gone ‘the extra mile’. Each quarter, 3 members of staff are recognised for their contributions. Staff Forums – The General Manager holds regular staff forums, to allow staff to ask questions and hear the latest news and business developments. A weekly update report is also produced by the leadership team, which outlines what we are doing well and areas which may need improvement. This report is sent to all departmental leads, who then cascade the information through their departmental meetings, to their respective teams. A Voice for Change – Staff at all levels of the business are encouraged to share their ideas with the leadership team and Executive Board. These ideas are then reviewed and implemented if practical and beneficial to the hospital. Staff are given incentives to strategically review their department and strive for excellence which enhance the quality of our services wherever possible. - 65 - Staff Continued Professional Development Our staff are our greatest asset. Hence we invest in their continued professional development. Mandatory Training: A suite of mandatory training courses are attended by all staff; compliance being monitored by Departmental Leads, the HR Lead and the Governance & Assurance Lead. Training days are provided throughout the year, and training is provided by both internal and external trainers. A 'new' suite of mandatory training courses were launched in April 2014 via 'EduCare' to facilitate and improve the quality and accessibility of 'on-line' mandatory training tools. Clinical Training: In conjunction we have also invited expert external speakers to hold training sessions with clinical staff. Examples include: The deteriorating patient – for adults and paediatrics Epidurals Critical Care We believe the preservation of our culture and founding beliefs across the company is vital if we are to maintain our differential and the high standards our patients have come to expect from us. New Starters: We welcome new starters to Circle Reading by introducing them to our General Manager, the Credo and the principles that drive our business; best patient experience, clinical outcome and value at all times. We provide new starters with the support required in their first 12 weeks, giving them every chance of succeeding to full partnership. We carefully manage the probationary period. We coach new starters by a series of 'face to face' sessions on the learning principles we want to promote and which will give them a better understanding of what working in the partnership means. Training Sessions we implement for New Starters: The Circle Credo. Tetra-map – (personality analysis and improving communication). Explaining the Partnership. Understanding the performance review process. - 66 - Measuring the process: Feedback and review from all sessions is gathered through evaluation forms. The information is correlated and fed to all departmental leads for review and change implemented as required. Regular meetings with departmental leads are less formal and focused more on developing ‘ownership’ encouraging self-awareness, self-appraisal and self-management. This form of reflection is designed to keep our principles high on our personal agendas so raising quality in our day to day working practice. New from April 2013: Monthly induction sessions for new partners have been set up in a way that enables departmental leads and individual partners to access and book. The ‘Introduction to Circle Partnership’ has been included in the formal mandatory sessions required for all new partners to attend with reference to the new starter’s handbook. - 67 - Resuscitation Training provided by our Hospital Partnership ADULT BASIC LIFE SUPPORT 1. Recognition of cardiac arrest in the adult. 2. Adult Basic Life Support as per Resuscitation Council UK Guidelines 2010. 3. Recognition and emergency treatment of the choking adult as per Resuscitation Council UK Guidelines 2010. 4. Safe positioning of the adult into the recovery position. PAEDIATRIC BASIC LIFE SUPPORT 1. Recognition of cardiac arrest in the child. 2. Paediatric Basic Life Support as per Resuscitation Council UK Guidelines 2010. 3. Recognition and emergency treatment of the choking child as per Resuscitation Council UK Guidelines 2010. 4. Safe positioning of the child into the recovery position. 5. Familiarisation and contents of the Broselow system. IMMEDIATE LIFE SUPPORT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Causes and prevention of cardiac arrest lecture. ABCDE Approach to assessing a patient lecture. Resuscitation Council UK ALS Algorithm lecture. Initial resuscitation and defibrillation demonstration and practical. Emergency treatment of Airway and Breathing problems demonstration and practical. Scenario based practical. Candidates are continually assessed throughout the course. RECOGNITION AND TREATMENT OF THE DETERIORATING ADULT (RaToDa) Following the Resuscitation Council UK guidelines and reference to “Treating the Critically Ill Patient” by Philip Jevon. 1. Identify a variety of likely conditions which cause deterioration in an adult patient at Circle Reading. Revise and understand the emergency treatment of these conditions. Lecture and group discussion. 2. Demonstrate and understand a systematic A-E assessment of an adult patient. Demonstration, lectures and practical. 3. Discuss when and how to call for help at Circle Reading. - 68 - RECOGNITION AND TREATMENT OF THE DETERIORATING CHILD (RaToDchi) Following the Resuscitation Council UK guidelines and reference to “Advanced Paediatric Life Support Manual” by ALSG (Advanced Life Support Group). 1. Pre-Course quiz of basic paediatric emergency knowledge. 2. Understand basic anatomical differences of a child. Lecture and discussion. 3. Identify a variety of likely conditions which cause deterioration in a paediatric patient at Circle Reading. Revise and understand the emergency treatment of these conditions. Lecture and group discussion. 4. Demonstrate and understand a systematic A-E assessment of a paediatric patient. Demonstration, lectures and practical. 5. Discuss when and how to call for help at Circle Reading. ANAPHYLAXIS 1. 2. 3. 4. Signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis. Lecture and discussion. Basic aetiology of anaphylaxis. Lecture and discussion. Revision of Resuscitation Council UK Anaphylaxis algorithm. Lecture and Discussion. Practical scenario of anaphylactic emergency. ALS ALGORITHM AND DEFIBRILLATOR UPDATE Revision of RCUK ALS algorithms. Lecture and discussion. 1. Tachycardia 2. Bradycardia Practical use of Zoll R-Series defibrillator for cardioversion and pacing. Scenario based practical. Circle Reading actively encourages and supports clinical partners to undertake nationally recognised external UK Resuscitation Courses including: 1. Advanced Life Support (ALS). 2. Emergency Paediatric Life Support (EPLS). - 69 - Patient Comment…… ‘Made me feel at ease and less nervous. Took the trouble to make me comfortable'. - 70 - The Care Quality Commission Circle Reading has been inspected by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) on two occasions during 2013/14, as responsive inspections. The Care Quality Commission's role is to independently regulate the quality of all health and social care services in England. The inspections took place on the 14th of January 2014 and the 20th of January 2014. The inspections covered 2 areas under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010 and the Care Quality Commission (Registration) Regulations 2009: Management of Medicines Assessing and Monitoring the Quality of Service Provision All assessed outcomes were found compliant. Below is an extract of some of the comments noted within the report:“We found that the provider ensured safety of people who use the service because there were robust systems in place for the management of medicines”. “We found that the provider had an effective system in place to identify, assess and manage risks to health, safety and welfare of people who use the service”. Circle Reading is required to register with the Care Quality Commission and its current registration status is ‘approved’. Circle Reading has no conditions on registration. The Care Quality Commission has not taken enforcement action against Circle Reading during 2013 or 2014 to date. Circle Reading has not participated in any special reviews or investigations by the CQC during the reporting period. - 71 - Data Quality The Quality of our data is very important to us, as it could not only affect patient safety and outcomes, but also impacts our improvement plans. Circle Reading will be taking the following actions to improve data quality: - improve the validation process of data. - increase the auditing of data quality and collection. - increase training process for staff to ensure accurate data collection. - 72 - Information Governance Attainment Levels Information Governance is of vital importance to us at Circle Reading, and as such is placed very highly on our Governance & Assurance Agenda. All staff are required to undertake Information Governance and Information Security mandatory training, which is monitored on a quarterly basis. Patient Information Guides pre and post admission are also available which highlight best practice with regards to information governance and data protection. As a supporting business provider for NHS patients, Circle Reading participates in the National Assessment of information governance compliance called the Information Governance Toolkit. The first assessment for Circle Reading was undertaken in March 2014. Circle Reading's Information Governance Assessment Report (IG Toolkit version 11 Assessment) overall score for 2013 / 2014 is 66% and was graded 'satisfactory' (RAG rated 'Green'). In May 2014, Circle Reading achieved ISO 27001 accreditation with zero-non conformities. An Information Governance Strategy (Approved February 2013): Circle Reading places great importance on information security (IS) and aims to protect all patient, organisational and staff data. We also recognise that information is at its most valuable when accurate, reliable and accessible. Information Security is a keystone element of clinical and corporate governance as well as service planning and patient care. To ensure the highest standards of compliance, Circle Reading is in the process of implementing a suite of Information Security processes, forums and monitoring systems, as well as instilling a culture of accountability and always providing the best for our patients with regards to their care and information. The aims of the Strategy are: 1. To support the provision of high quality care by promoting the correct and safe use of information in line with legislation. 2. To encourage responsible staff who work together and promote shared learning. 3. To develop a range of monitoring tools which continuously improve compliance. 4. To enable Circle Reading to understand its own performance, learn from previous incidents and implement improvement plans. 5. Reinforce an active information Security Culture and ethos amongst the staff. 6. Minimise the risk of information breaches. 7. Minimise the inappropriate use of information. - 73 - Current Protocols in Place Protocol Current Position Improvements Required Business Continuity Business Continuity / Major Incident Plan in place. Available to all Senior Management Team members and Departmental Leads via the network. Business continuity tool kit to be produced and kept on Reception. Business continuity review day to be held on in conjunction with the Clinical Governance & Risk Management Committee and Executive Board Chair and the Senior Management Team. Monitoring of Business Continuity events through the Datix Incident Reporting System and reported through the Clinical Governance & Risk Management Committee and the Executive Board. Plans to be reviewed. Fire Desktop drills to be carried out. Early morning and evening desktop drill to be arranged. Annual inspections for Fire, Health and Safety and Infection Prevention and Control to be arranged. Annual Business Impact Assessment to be completed. Incident Management Reporting Incidents now reported through the Datix Incident Reporting System. Continuous ongoing training implemented since initial launch of system in November 2012. Further configurations completed as and when required. Monthly reviews of all incidents. Physical Security Compliant. Security team in place during the evenings and Review of camera angles to be weekends. organised to ensure all areas of the hospital site are recorded. Any incidents raised through the normal reporting route. Annual IS audit reviews physical security. Risk Management Strategic Risk Register completed by the Governance & Assurance Lead on a monthly basis. Register sent and reviewed at the Executive Board, Integrated Governance Board and Clinical Governance & Risk Management Committee. Information Security Risks and incidents reported on Corporate Governance Dashboard. - 74 - Policies Information Security Policies in place and available to all staff electronically through the Content And Learning Management System (CALMS). All Information Security Policies have been loaded onto the Content And Learning Management System (CALMS). Policy Quality Review Team established previously by the corporate governance team to review and standardise all corporate policies. Training - Annual Information Governance and Information Security Training. Content And Learning Management System (CALMS) and 'EduCare' both incorporate Information Governance and Information Security training modules which are available for all staff to undertake. Mandatory Training. 'Face to Face' Training. Information Asset Ownership Forum to be formed and for training to be made available within this forum for all members. Further SIRO and Caldicott Guardian Training. Plans for 2014 - Root Cause Analysis training for Lead Nurse, Deputy Lead Nurse, Theatre Lead and the Governance & Assurance Lead. Review of e-learning training materials for Departmental Leads. - 75 - Information Security Objectives - 2014 Objective Plan Monitoring Develop additional audits with IAO forum to build on the foundation of audits already in place. IAO forum to become established. Audit compliance to be assessed by General Manager & Corporate Head of Governance and Risk. Targeted training for key staff members. In conjunction with Staff wide initiatives, to review and develop more in-depth training for key personnel. Training effectiveness to be monitored and evaluation forms completed. Training for IAOs CALMS / 'EduCare' e-learning Mandatory training Ensure accurate data presentation. Quality review to be undertaken by Lead Nurse and Governance & Assurance Lead. Compliance figures to be reported to the Clinical Governance & Risk Management Committee. On-going. On-going review of data quality to take place with continued triangulation to ensure highest accuracy levels of compliance. Successfully complete the IG toolkit. IG toolkit initial training has taken place. Identify whether further training needed. On-going. Planned approach to completing the tool kit (Circle wide). Reduce the number of information security incidents / near misses reported. Monthly review of Information Security Incidents. Investigations to identify changes to processes to be implemented. Continue to embed DATIX as the incident reporting tool. On-going review of Information Security Incidents reported. Further training to be provided for report creation. Patient Guide Information guide to be created informing patients regarding Information Security. Content to be agreed. - 76 - Involvement in Local Networks Circle Reading hospital works constructively with commissioners and other partners to develop effective and integrated care pathways that improve the health of the local community. There is an established Clinical Governance and Risk Management committee which monitors and reviews performance, governance and quality standards in line with other external organisations. Network partners: Critical Care Network ALS Provider Network Controlled Drugs Compliance Berkshire MDT Speciality Group New Initiatives Patient Enhanced Recovery Post Hip and Knee Surgery Programme The objective of the programme is to improve the patients' experience by improving our efficiency and this is to be measured by length of stay and outcomes achieved. 2014 Revision of the Patient Pathway Objective: So all staff are aware of the daily goals not only for their speciality but also in relation to other teams involved in the patients care. We are working in conjunction with our Circle partners to review and implement the revision of the patient pathway in line with best practice, using a multi-disciplinary approach. - 77 - Pain Audit At Circle Reading we aim to improve pain control and subsequently patients’ recovery and satisfaction with care given. We use a common tool for pain assessment throughout the hospital to help raise standards of patient care. A simple numerical rating scale requires the patient to choose a number between 0-3 to represent their level of pain. Zero indicates that the patient has no pain and 3 means that their pain is severe (as bad as can be imagined). Once we have assessed the level of pain we use the 'Who' ladder to help us decide on which analgesia to use depending on the severity of the pain. We evaluate the effectiveness after 20-30 minutes and then give further analgesia if needed. This is charted on a pain and nausea chart to help with continuity of care. This helps us assess and evaluate how we can improve on pain management. Objective: Areas that we are working towards moving forward in 2014: To re-evaluation of our pain auditing process using a multi-disciplinary approach. To continue to monitor the compliances and frequencies of our audit programme on a monthly basis. - 78 - Thank you Thank you for taking the time to read our Quality Account, we hope you found it interesting and useful in understanding our commitment to quality for our patients and partners. Should you have any further questions, we would be pleased to hear from you. Please contact our General Manager, Adrian Peake on 0118 922 6888 or email adrian.peake@circlepartnership.co.uk - 79 -