Ammophila arenaria

advertisement

m

UNIVERSITEIT

GENT

rrestrial ology

Performance comparison of local and non-local genotypes of

Ammophila arenaria In the Flemish coast and evaluation of the effects on a specialist herbivore

Eline Vermote1, Charlotte Van Moorleghem1, Eduardo de la Peña1 terre strial Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Gent

Introduction

Ammophila arenaria

or marram grass, is a sand-fixing plant species that occurs naturally in Mediterranean and Atlantic Europe coastal dunes. For this reason, it is commonly used for the stabilization and restoration of dune areas (in Europe and elsewhere). Current and traditional management practices often rely on the introduction of allopatric marram stands for sand fixation. However, the introduction of such exogenous plant material can have important effects at local level. To optimize the current management and conservation strategies of these natural systems it is necessary to assess: (I) what type of plant material is optimal (in terms of growth and survival) for re-vegetation purposes and (II) what are the effects are on the associated community.

Materials and methods

2

Laboratory experiment: we compared the growth of three aphid isolates of the specialist species

Schizaphis rufula

on 9 populations of

1 Field experiment: In three Flemish nature reserves, we conducted (3) common garden experiments; where, we compared the growth and survival of 17 different

European populations of

America (location not shown).

Ammophila

A. arenaria

(see map) and 2 populations from North-

I DePanne

arenaria

('local and non- local genotypes).

I , De Panne

Z .T erY de

3, FI et Zwin

4, Du in noord

5, Oostuoorne

G, G reat Stene

7. Blakeney Point

3

3, Ynyslai

.

Cheuret

IO, KeremrrH

I I , Schotland

12, Cantabria

13, Galicia

14, Sao Jacinto

15, Comporta

1G, Valencia

17, Israel

Ter Yde

,J *.

a

1

Ter Yde

V ,

W esthoek Het Zwin d

Het Zwin

Non-Loca Non-Loca Non-Loca i

Results

Growth curves of aphids on different plant populations

A

B

>

(U

3

V)

C

D

35

% survival of different plant populations

30

{/)

"O

25

-C

Q.

(U

20 o

0)

-Q z

E

3

15

10

5

0

V

& & & & & & & &

S?

T7

V V

^A*

^ ^ ^

&

Date

1 7^

Chevret

Comporta

De Panne

^G a licië

^ H e t Zwin

Schotland

Ter Yde

Valencia

Ynyslas

* A'

^ £

« r f f "

$ S

«Ö

N r'

^

¿íP

v>S

o»’

S ' *

°

À?

S S S

öV

b

& & . &

k V

<b° <

c

Population

Results of field experiment

Effect

Distance

Type III tests of fixed effects

Num DF Den DF F Value

1 796 6,06

Effect

Condition

Type III tests of fixed effects

Num DF Den DF F Value

1 210 2,91

Pr>F

0,0141

Pr>F

0,0893

30

{/) 25

"jO

IE

Q .2 0

(U o

15

0)

-Q

E

3 z

10

5 o

^

vH? O?

^

o ?

Growth curves of different aphid populations

o ?

^

vH? vH? o ?

^ ^

xd? o ?

Het Zwin

Ter Yde

Westhoek

Discussion

o ?

Date

^

1) The results of the field experiment show that the percentage of plant survival differed between the

A. arenaria

populations compared (A). This means that depending on what type of population we introduce in the dunes, the chance of survival will vary. According to our analysis, the more distant the population is, the less likely is the chance of survival. Moreover, the field experiment also shows that plant growth (so called

condition)

of the surviving plants depended on the geographical distance (B). Our results indicate that we should be cautious when selecting plant material for re­ vegetation purposes and preferably consider plant populations closely related to those of the target site.

2) The laboratory experiment shows that plant origin had a strong influence on the population growth of the aphids (C). Also, the performance of the different aphid populations compared was clearly different (D). As in the field experiment, the geographical distance of

A. arenaria

(to the aphid population) was related to the aphid growth. In general, aphids performed better in local

A. arenaria

populations, or closely related ones, than in populations at greater distance. This observation supports the conclusion of the previous experiment, and indicates that local populations (or closely related ones) should be considered in the restoration of coastal dunes.

Download