JMP Analysis of Swimming Data Fit Model: Y: Time Construct Model Effects: Highlight XA, XB, XC, XD – Macros – Full Factorial Personality: Standard Least Squares Emphasis: Minimal Report Fit Model Output: Parameter Estimates: Right Click – Make into data table Delete row 1: Intercept Tables – Sort – sort by – Estimate Rename the last 3 columns; i: put the values from 1 to 15 (i – 0.5)/15: Cols – Formula: (i – 0.5)/15 z – Score: Cols – Formula: Probability – Normal Quantile[(i – 0.5)/15)] Add a column: Full Effect: Cols – Formula: Estimate*2 Term XC XB XA*XC XC*XD XA*XB*XC*XD XA*XD XB*XC*XD XA*XB*XC XD XA*XB*XD XA*XC*XD XB*XD XA*XB XB*XC XA Estimate –2.598125 –0.653125 –0.310625 –0.134375 –0.014375 0.015625 0.018125 0.021875 0.025625 0.045625 0.048125 0.065625 0.101875 0.454375 0.666875 i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 (i – 0.5)/15 0.03333333 0.1 0.16666667 0.23333333 0.3 0.36666667 0.43333333 0.5 0.56666667 0.63333333 0.7 0.76666667 0.83333333 0.9 0.96666667 z – Score –1.8339146 –1.2815516 –0.9674216 –0.7279133 –0.5244005 –0.3406948 –0.167894 0 0.167894 0.34069483 0.52440051 0.72791329 0.96742157 1.28155157 1.83391464 Full Effect –5.19625 –1.30625 –0.62125 –0.26875 –0.02875 0.03125 0.03625 0.04375 0.05125 0.09125 0.09625 0.13125 0.20375 0.90875 1.33375 Fit Y by X: Y, Response: z – Score X, Factor: Full Effect 1 Fit Y by X Output: Highlight the points you feel are most different from the rest (in upper right and lower left hand corner that appear to be furthest from a straight line going through (0, 0) and capturing a majority of the estimated full effects). Rows – Exclude Fit line Bivariate Fit of z - Score By Full Effect XA XB*XC XA*XC XB XC Term XA XB XC XA*XC XB*XC Parameter Estimate 0.666875 –0.653125 –2.598125 –0.310625 0.454375 Full Effect 1.33375 –1.30625 –5.19625 –0.62125 0.90875 2 Full Model in 3 Factors: Pseudo Replication Because XD is apparently not significant, either by itself or in combination with any other factor of interaction, look at a reduced model. Fit a full factorial in XA, XB and XC. Response: Time Summary of Fit RSquare RSquare Adj Root Mean Square Error Mean of Response Observations (or Sum Wgts) Analysis of Variance Source DF Sum of Squares Model 7 126.96559 Error 8 0.45115 C. Total 15 127.41674 Parameter Estimates Term Estimate Intercept 19.706875 XA 0.666875 XB –0.653125 XA*XB 0.101875 XC –2.598125 XA*XC –0.310625 XB*XC 0.454375 XA*XB*XC 0.021875 0.996459 0.993361 0.237474 19.70688 16 Mean Square 18.1379 0.0564 Std Error 0.059368 0.059368 0.059368 0.059368 0.059368 0.059368 0.059368 0.059368 t Ratio 331.94 11.23 –11.00 1.72 –43.76 –5.23 7.65 0.37 F Ratio 321.6304 Prob > F <.0001* Prob>|t| <.0001* <.0001* <.0001* 0.1245 <.0001* 0.0008* <.0001* 0.7221 Drop any terms that are not statistically significant to get the final prediction equation. Predicted Time = 19.706875 + 0.666875*XA – 0.653125*XB – 2.598125*XC – 0.310625*XA*XC + 0.454375*XB*XC If you want to get the fastest (lowest) predicted time choose: XA = –1, Wearing shirt? No XB = +1, Wearing goggles? Yes XC = +1, Wearing flippers? Yes XD = –1 or +1, Starting End? It doesn’t matter. Predicted Time = 19.706875 – 0.666875 – 0.653125 – 2.598125 + 0.310625 + 0.454375 Predicted Time = 16.55375 seconds. 3