Multiple Regression A single numerical response variable, Y. Multiple numerical explanatory

advertisement

Multiple Regression

A single numerical response variable, Y.

Multiple numerical explanatory variables, X

1

, X

2

,…, X k

1

Simple Linear Regression

Y

Y

 y | x

0

 

 

1 x

 

2

3

Multiple Regression

Y

Y

Y | x

1

, x

2

0

,...,

1 x

1 x k

 

2 x

2

...

  k x k

 

4

5

Conditions

Independent

Identically distributed

6

Example

Y, Response – Effectiveness score based on experienced teachers’ evaluations.

Explanatory – Test 1, Test 2,

Test 3, Test 4.

7

Bivariate Fit of EVAL By Test1

700

600

500

400

300

200

0 50

Test1

100 150

8

Bivariate Fit of EVAL By Test2

700

600

500

400

300

200

110 120 130 140 150 160 170

Test2

9

Bivariate Fit of EVAL By Test3

700

600

500

400

300

200

30 40 50 60

Test3

70 80 90

10

Bivariate Fit of EVAL By Test4

700

600

500

400

300

200

35 40 45 50 55

Test4

60 65 70

11

Individual Tests

None of the individual tests

(explanatory variables) appears to be strongly related to the evaluation (response variable).

12

Method of Least Squares

Choose estimates of the various parameters in the multiple regression model so that the sum of squared residuals,

(SS

Error be.

), is the smallest it can

13

Method of Least Squares

Finding the estimates involves solving k+1 simultaneous equations with k+1 unknowns (the estimates of the parameters).

Do this with a statistical analysis computer package, like JMP.

14

JMP

Analyze – Fit Model

Pick Role Variables

Y – EVAL

Construct Model Effects

Add – Test1, Test2, Test3, Test4

15

JMP

Analyze – Fit Model

Personality – Standard Least

Squares

Emphasis – Minimal Report

16

Response EVAL

Summary of Fit

RSquare

RSquare Adj

Root Mean Square Error

Mean of Response

Observations (or Sum Wgts)

Analysis of Variance

Source

Model

Error

C. Total

DF

4

18

22

0.802861

0.759052

37.53627

444.4783

23

Sum of

Squares

103286.25

25361.49

128647.74

Mean Square

25821.6

1409.0

F Ratio

18.3265

Prob > F

<.0001*

Parameter Estimates

Term

Intercept

Test1

Test2

Test3

Test4

Estim ate

-193.4994

1.1158539

2.243267

-1.367001

6.0482387

Std Error

125.3074

0.319746

0.628449

0.563965

1.202281

t Ratio

-1.54

3.49

3.57

-2.42

5.03

Prob>|t|

0.1399

0.0026*

0.0022*

0.0261*

<.0001*

17

Prediction Equation

Predicted Evaluation = –193.50

+ 1.116*Test1 + 2.243*Test2

– 1.367*Test3 + 6.048*Test4

18

Download