Iowa State University
Dear Mr./Dear Ms Zachary Voller (as private and confidential)
Survey Evaluation Results
Zachary Voller,
In the attachment you will find the evaluation results of the survey MATH 140 Section J2 (F2010)
[Zachary Voller].
For the following period: 2010 Fall
The overall indicator is listed first. It consists of the following scales:
The overall indicator is followed by the individual question categories mentioned above. In the second
part of the analysis the average values of all individual questions are listed.
If you have questions or comments contact your department subunit administrator for the Class Climate
software or email course-evaluation@iastate.edu
- ISU Online Course Evaluation System support team
Zachary Voller, MATH 140 Section J2 (F2010) [Zachary Voller]
Zachary Voller
MATH 140 Section J2 (F2010) [Zachary Voller] (F2010MATH_140_J2L950656707xx)
No. of responses = 15
Legend
Relative Frequencies of answers
Question text
Std. Dev.
25%
Mean
0%
Median
50%
0%
Quantile
25%
Left pole
Right pole
1
2
3
Scale
4
n=No. of responses
av.=Mean
md=Median
dev.=Std. Dev.
ab.=Abstention
5
Histogram
1. Overall Instructor
1.1)
Overall rating of this instructor
6.7%
0%
13.3% 46.7% 33.3%
Very Poor
1
2
3
4
Very Good
n=15
av.=4
md=4
dev.=1.07
Very Good
n=15
av.=3.53
md=4
dev.=1.13
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=4.13
md=4
dev.=0.99
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=4.13
md=4
dev.=0.74
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=4
md=4
dev.=1
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=3.93
md=4
dev.=1.16
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=4.47
md=4
dev.=0.52
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=3.8
md=4
dev.=1.32
5
2. Overall Course
2.1)
Overall rating of this course
6.7%
6.7% 33.3% 33.3%
20%
Very Poor
1
2
3
4
5
6.7%
0%
0%
60%
33.3%
3. About Instructor
3.1)
3.2)
3.3)
3.4)
3.5)
3.6)
The instructor was sufficiently prepared to present
and discuss the course material.
The instructor wrote clearly and used the board
and/or visual equipment effectively.
The instructor encouraged questions and
responded well to them.
The instructor was available during office hours.
The instructor spoke in a clear and
understandable way.
The instructor made the course interesting.
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
0%
6.7%
0%
5
66.7% 26.7%
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
5
6.7%
0%
6.7%
60%
26.7%
Strongly Disagree
1
2
6.7%
6.7%
3
4
5
6.7% 46.7% 33.3%
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
0%
0%
0%
4
5
53.3% 46.7%
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
5
13.3%
0%
13.3%
40%
33.3%
Strongly Disagree
1
01/11/2011
4
Class Climate evaluation
2
3
4
5
Page 1
Zachary Voller, MATH 140 Section J2 (F2010) [Zachary Voller]
3.7)
The instructor used homework and/or quizzes in
an appropriate and useful way.
0%
1
3.8)
The instructor was timely, clear, and fair in
announcing and administering course policies.
0%
13.3% 66.7%
20%
Strongly Disagree
0%
2
3
6.7% 13.3%
4
5
40%
40%
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=4.07
md=4
dev.=0.59
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=4.13
md=4
dev.=0.92
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=3.53
md=4
dev.=1.25
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=3.6
md=4
dev.=1.18
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=4
md=4
dev.=1.13
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=3.33
md=3
dev.=1.11
More than 12
n=15
av.=2.53
md=2
dev.=0.99
More than 12
n=5
av.=3.4
md=4
dev.=1.82
ab.=10
5
4. About Course
4.1)
The exams fairly reflected the course material.
6.7% 13.3% 26.7% 26.7% 26.7%
Strongly Disagree
1
4.2)
4.3)
The exams were graded in a prompt and fair way.
The homework/quizzes were returned in a timely
manner.
6.7%
The textbook was useful in helping me learn the
course material.
3
4
5
6.7% 33.3% 26.7% 26.7%
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
6.7%
6.7%
0%
4
5
53.3% 33.3%
Strongly Disagree
1
4.4)
2
2
3
4
5
6.7% 13.3% 33.3% 33.3% 13.3%
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
5
13.3%
40%
26.7%
20%
0%
5. About You
5.1)
5.2)
On average, how many hours each week did you
devote to this course outside the classroom?
How many times did you use the Math Help Room
(Carver 385) throughout the semester?
Less than 3
1
2
3
4
5
20%
20%
0%
20%
40%
Less than 3
1
5.3)
2
3
4
5
If you went to the Help Room, how beneficial was that to you?
It helped me get questions answered on the take home exam.
didn't know about this help room
helped me do assignments
not very beneficial. There was almost always too many students and not enough tutors. Many times the tutors were more knowledgable
in high level math and had trouble helping with the problems we were assigned.
the help room was very beneficial.
5.4)
How many times did you attend a Supplemental
Instruction (SI) session throughout the semester?
66.7%
0%
33.3%
0%
More than 12
1
01/11/2011
0%
Less than 3
Class Climate evaluation
2
3
4
5
n=3
av.=2
md=1
dev.=1.73
ab.=12
Page 2
Zachary Voller, MATH 140 Section J2 (F2010) [Zachary Voller]
5.5)
If you took advantage of Supplemental Instruction, how beneficial were those sessions to you?
I meet with my instructor during office hours for SI
5.6)
0%
What grade do you expect from this course?
60%
13.3% 13.3%
A, A-
1
5.7)
13.3%
F
2
3
4
5
n=15
av.=3.27
md=3
dev.=0.88
Additional Comments
I feel like I grasped a good understanding of the concepts we were taught, yet the whole class seemed to do very poor on exams.
My only complaint is that Zach was like any other high-school math teacher. The problems he gave us for examples were much easier
than homework. Tests were usually well gaged from examples, however I am worried about the difficulty of the Final and if I will be
prepared by being in Zach's lecture.
The course seemed a little unorganized.
The teacher was just awful. He was the worst teacher I have ever had. his test were way above the level of homework that was given and
the reviews that were given. Also the test were far to long to finish in 50 minutes. I suggest to get a different teacher for the next students
who take this course. the exam average was way below 50% and the quiz average was 54%. I like the teacher just not his teaching
methods.
6. Demographic - These questions are only requested for research purposes
6.1)
6.2)
6.3)
Gender
Female
20%
Male
80%
n=15
Did you transfer to ISU?
Yes
33.3%
No
66.7%
n=15
If yes to question 6.2, from which did you transfer?
01/11/2011
Community College
80%
4-year University/College
20%
Class Climate evaluation
n=5
Page 3
Zachary Voller, MATH 140 Section J2 (F2010) [Zachary Voller]
Histogram for scaled questions
Overall rating of this instructor
Very Poor
Overall rating of this course
Very Good
100%
Very Poor
av. = 4
75%
The instructor was sufficiently prepared to present and
discuss the course material.
Very Good
100%
Strongly Disagree
av. = 3.53
75%
100%
av. = 4.13
75%
dev. = 1.07
50%
Strongly Agree
dev. = 1.13
50%
dev. = 0.99
60%
50%
47%
33%
25%
n = 15
33%
25%
33%
n = 15
33%
25%
n = 15
20%
13%
The instructor wrote clearly and used the board and/or
visual equipment effectively.
Strongly Disagree
The instructor encouraged questions and responded
well to them.
Strongly Agree
100%
Strongly Disagree
av. = 4.13
75%
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
100%
av. = 4
75%
67%
Strongly Agree
100%
av. = 3.93
75%
dev. = 0.74
50%
The instructor was available during office hours.
dev. = 1
60%
50%
dev. = 1.16
50%
47%
25%
27%
n = 15
The instructor spoke in a clear and understandable
way.
Strongly Disagree
25%
Strongly Disagree
av. = 4.47
75%
n = 15
The instructor made the course interesting.
Strongly Agree
100%
27%
Strongly Disagree
100%
av. = 3.8
Strongly Agree
100%
av. = 4.07
75%
dev. = 0.52
67%
dev. = 1.32
50%
53%
n = 15
The instructor used homework and/or quizzes in an
appropriate and useful way.
Strongly Agree
75%
50%
33%
25%
dev. = 0.59
50%
47%
40%
n = 15
25%
33%
25%
n = 15
n = 15
25%
20%
13%
The instructor was timely, clear, and fair in announcing
and administering course policies.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
av. = 4.13
75%
13%
The exams fairly reflected the course material.
Strongly Agree
100%
13%
Strongly Agree
100%
Strongly Disagree
av. = 3.53
75%
n = 15
dev. = 1.18
50%
25%
13%
27%
27%
27%
n = 15
33%
25%
27%
27%
n = 15
13%
The homework/quizzes were returned in a timely
manner.
The textbook was useful in helping me learn the course
material.
Strongly Agree
100%
Strongly Disagree
av. = 4
75%
100%
Less than 3
av. = 3.33
75%
More than 12
100%
av. = 2.53
75%
dev. = 1.11
50%
53%
On average, how many hours each week did you
devote to this course outside the classroom?
Strongly Agree
dev. = 1.13
50%
av. = 3.6
40%
25%
Strongly Disagree
100%
dev. = 1.25
50%
40%
Strongly Agree
75%
dev. = 0.92
50%
The exams were graded in a prompt and fair way.
dev. = 0.99
50%
40%
25%
33%
n = 15
33%
25%
33%
n = 15
25%
n = 15
27%
20%
13%
01/11/2011
13%
Class Climate evaluation
13%
Page 4
Zachary Voller, MATH 140 Section J2 (F2010) [Zachary Voller]
How many times did you use the Math Help Room
(Carver 385) throughout the semester?
Less than 3
How many times did you attend a Supplemental
Instruction (SI) session throughout the semester?
More than 12
100%
Less than 3
av. = 3.4
75%
More than 12
F
100%
av. = 2
75%
50%
A, A-
100%
av. = 3.27
75%
67%
dev. = 1.82
What grade do you expect from this course?
dev. = 1.73
50%
dev. = 0.88
60%
50%
40%
n=5
25%
20%
20%
25%
33%
n=3
n = 15
25%
20%
13%
01/11/2011
Class Climate evaluation
13%
13%
Page 5
Zachary Voller, MATH 140 Section J2 (F2010) [Zachary Voller]
Profile
Subunit:
Name of the instructor:
Name of the course:
(Name of the survey)
MATH
Zachary Voller
MATH 140 Section J2 (F2010) [Zachary Voller]
1.1)
Overall rating of this instructor
Very Poor
Very Good
n=15
av.=4
2.1)
Overall rating of this course
Very Poor
Very Good
n=15
av.=3.53
3.1)
The instructor was sufficiently prepared to present and discuss the course
material.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=4.13
3.2)
The instructor wrote clearly and used the board and/or visual equipment
effectively.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=4.13
3.3)
The instructor encouraged questions and responded well to them.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=4
3.4)
The instructor was available during office hours.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=3.93
3.5)
The instructor spoke in a clear and understandable way.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=4.47
3.6)
The instructor made the course interesting.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=3.8
3.7)
The instructor used homework and/or quizzes in an appropriate and useful
way.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=4.07
3.8)
The instructor was timely, clear, and fair in announcing and administering
course policies.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=4.13
4.1)
The exams fairly reflected the course material.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=3.53
4.2)
The exams were graded in a prompt and fair way.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=3.6
4.3)
The homework/quizzes were returned in a timely manner.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=4
4.4)
The textbook was useful in helping me learn the course material.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
n=15
av.=3.33
5.1)
On average, how many hours each week did you devote to this course outside
the classroom?
Less than 3
More than 12
n=15
av.=2.53
5.2)
How many times did you use the Math Help Room (Carver 385) throughout the
semester?
Less than 3
More than 12
n=5
av.=3.4
5.4)
How many times did you attend a Supplemental Instruction (SI) session
throughout the semester?
Less than 3
More than 12
n=3
av.=2
5.6)
What grade do you expect from this course?
A, A-
n=15
av.=3.27
01/11/2011
F
Class Climate evaluation
Page 6