To: Terrance Pendleton
Personal and Confidential
MATH Survey Evaluation Results for 2013 Fall
Terrance Pendleton,
In the attachment you will find the evaluation results of the survey MATH 166 L1
(F2013) [Terrance Pendleton].
If you have questions or comments contact your Class Climate MATH Administrator
or email course-evaluation@iastate.edu
- ISU MATH Online Course Evaluation Administrator
Terrance Pendleton, MATH 166 L1 (F2013) [Terrance Pendleton], Lecture
Terrance Pendleton
MATH 166 L1 (F2013) [Terrance Pendleton]
(F2013MATH_166_L1L418431162) Lecture Lecture
No. of course participants = 33
No. of responses = 24
Legend
Absolute Frequencies of answers
Relative Frequencies of answers
Question text
Std. Dev.
25
25%
Mean
0
50
0%
50%
Median
0
0%
Quantile
25
25%
Left pole
n=No. of responses
av.=Mean
md=Median
dev.=Std. Dev.
ab.=Abstention
Right pole
1
2
3
Scale
4
5
Histogram
1. Overall Instructor (REQUIRED)
1.1)
Overall rating of this instructor
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
2
8.3%
22
91.7%
Very Poor
1
2
3
4
5
0
0%
0
0%
1
4.2%
11
45.8%
12
50%
Very Good
n=24
av.=4.92
md=5
dev.=0.28
Very Good
n=24
av.=4.46
md=4.5
dev.=0.59
Strongly Agree
n=24
av.=4.83
md=5
dev.=0.38
Strongly Agree
n=24
av.=4.88
md=5
dev.=0.34
Strongly Agree
n=24
av.=4.79
md=5
dev.=0.41
Strongly Agree
n=24
av.=4.75
md=5
dev.=0.61
Strongly Agree
n=24
av.=4.79
md=5
dev.=0.41
Strongly Agree
n=24
av.=4.83
md=5
dev.=0.48
2. Overall Course (REQUIRED)
2.1)
Overall rating of this course
Very Poor
1
2
3
4
5
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
4
16.7%
20
83.3%
3. About Instructor
3.1)
3.2)
3.3)
3.4)
3.5)
3.6)
The instructor was sufficiently prepared to present
and discuss the course material.
The instructor wrote clearly and used the board
and/or visual equipment effectively.
The instructor encouraged questions and
responded well to them.
The instructor was available during office hours.
The instructor spoke in a clear and
understandable way.
The instructor made the course interesting.
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
5
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
3
12.5%
21
87.5%
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
5
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
5
20.8%
19
79.2%
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
5
0
0%
0
0%
2
8.3%
2
8.3%
20
83.3%
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
5
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
5
20.8%
19
79.2%
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
5
0
0%
0
0%
1
4.2%
2
8.3%
21
87.5%
Strongly Disagree
1
12/30/2013
Class Climate evaluation
2
3
4
5
Page 1
Terrance Pendleton, MATH 166 L1 (F2013) [Terrance Pendleton], Lecture
3.7)
3.8)
The instructor used homework and/or quizzes in
an appropriate and useful way.
The instructor was timely, clear, and fair in
announcing and administering course policies.
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
5
20.8%
19
79.2%
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
5
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
6
25%
18
75%
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
5
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
7
29.2%
17
70.8%
Strongly Agree
n=24
av.=4.79
md=5
dev.=0.41
Strongly Agree
n=24
av.=4.75
md=5
dev.=0.44
Strongly Agree
n=24
av.=4.71
md=5
dev.=0.46
Strongly Agree
n=24
av.=4.79
md=5
dev.=0.41
Strongly Agree
n=24
av.=4.88
md=5
dev.=0.34
Strongly Agree
n=24
av.=4.04
md=4
dev.=1.08
More than 12
n=24
av.=2.17
md=2
dev.=1.13
4. About Course
4.1)
4.2)
4.3)
4.4)
The exams fairly reflected the course material.
The exams were graded in a prompt and fair way.
The homework/quizzes were returned in a timely
manner.
The textbook was useful in helping me learn the
course material.
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
5
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
5
20.8%
19
79.2%
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
5
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
3
12.5%
21
87.5%
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
5
1
4.2%
1
4.2%
4
16.7%
8
33.3%
10
41.7%
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
5
9
37.5%
6
25%
5
20.8%
4
16.7%
0
0%
5. About You
5.1)
5.2)
On average, how many hours each week did you
devote to this course outside the classroom?
How many times did you use the Math Help Room
(Carver 385) throughout the semester?
Less than 3
1
2
3
4
5
4
80%
0
0%
0
0%
1
20%
0
0%
Less than 3
More than 12
1
5.3)
2
3
4
5
0
0%
0
0%
n=5
av.=1.6
md=1
dev.=1.34
ab.=19
If you went to the Help Room, was that beneficial to you? Why or why not?
Didn't use the Help Room.
I haven't been there.
Our instructor never told us about the Help Room; otherwise, I would have definitely gone.
5.4)
How many times did you attend a Supplemental
Instruction (SI) session throughout the semester?
11
84.6%
1
7.7%
More than 12
1
5.5)
1
7.7%
Less than 3
2
3
4
n=13
av.=1.23
md=1
dev.=0.6
ab.=11
5
If you took advantage of Supplemental Instruction, were they beneficial to you? Why or why not?
Didn't use SI.
I didn't use it.
12/30/2013
Class Climate evaluation
Page 2
Terrance Pendleton, MATH 166 L1 (F2013) [Terrance Pendleton], Lecture
Yes, they offered additional practice.
Yes, they went over difficult material and made it easier to comprehend.
5.6)
0
0%
What grade do you expect from this course?
3
12.5%
4
16.7%
16
66.7%
A, A-
1
5.7)
1
4.2%
F
2
3
4
n=24
av.=4.46
md=5
dev.=0.88
5
Additional Comments
Awesome Professor! Willing to help in any way possiable and returns quizzes and test back by the next class period which is nice!
Dr. P is my favorite teacher/professor that has ever instructed me.
Fantastic instructor
Glad to have one of the most helpful, devoted, interesting math teachers I've ever had for Calc II. The course would've been a lot harder if
I had a bad instructor
Honestly the best math teacher that I have ever had. He shows a genuine enthusiasm for math.
I should have kept more up to date with assignments from the book to understand the content better.
6. Demographic (REQUIRED) - These questions are only requested for research purposes. They will not be associated
with you individually and will not be disclosed to the instructor. An answer is required for both questions.
6.1)
6.2)
Gender
Female
20.8%
Male
79.2%
n=24
From what type of college/university did you transfer?
Community College
0%
4-year University/College
0%
Did not transfer to ISU
12/30/2013
Class Climate evaluation
n=24
100%
Page 3
Terrance Pendleton, MATH 166 L1 (F2013) [Terrance Pendleton], Lecture
Histogram for scaled questions
Overall rating of this instructor
Very Poor
Overall rating of this course
Very Good
100%
92%
Very Poor
av. = 4.92
75%
The instructor was sufficiently prepared to present and
discuss the course material.
Very Good
100%
Strongly Disagree
av. = 4.46
75%
46%
n = 24
av. = 4.83
83%
dev. = 0.59
50%
25%
100%
75%
dev. = 0.28
50%
Strongly Agree
n = 24
25%
dev. = 0.38
50%
50%
n = 24
25%
17%
8%
The instructor wrote clearly and used the board and/or
visual equipment effectively.
Strongly Disagree
The instructor encouraged questions and responded
well to them.
Strongly Agree
100%
Strongly Disagree
av. = 4.88
The instructor was available during office hours.
Strongly Agree
100%
Strongly Disagree
av. = 4.79
Strongly Agree
100%
av. = 4.75
88%
75%
75%
dev. = 0.34
50%
dev. = 0.41
50%
n = 24
25%
83%
75%
79%
dev. = 0.61
50%
n = 24
25%
n = 24
25%
21%
13%
8%
The instructor spoke in a clear and understandable
way.
Strongly Disagree
The instructor made the course interesting.
Strongly Agree
100%
Strongly Disagree
av. = 4.79
The instructor used homework and/or quizzes in an
appropriate and useful way.
Strongly Agree
100%
Strongly Disagree
av. = 4.83
8%
Strongly Agree
100%
av. = 4.79
88%
75%
75%
79%
75%
dev. = 0.41
50%
dev. = 0.48
50%
n = 24
25%
79%
dev. = 0.41
50%
n = 24
25%
n = 24
25%
21%
21%
8%
The instructor was timely, clear, and fair in announcing
and administering course policies.
Strongly Disagree
The exams fairly reflected the course material.
Strongly Agree
100%
Strongly Disagree
av. = 4.75
75%
Strongly Agree
100%
Strongly Disagree
av. = 4.71
75%
75%
71%
n = 24
25%
av. = 4.79
79%
dev. = 0.41
50%
25%
n = 24
29%
n = 24
25%
21%
The homework/quizzes were returned in a timely
manner.
Strongly Disagree
100%
dev. = 0.46
50%
25%
Strongly Agree
75%
dev. = 0.44
50%
The exams were graded in a prompt and fair way.
The textbook was useful in helping me learn the course
material.
Strongly Agree
100%
Strongly Disagree
av. = 4.88
On average, how many hours each week did you
devote to this course outside the classroom?
Strongly Agree
100%
Less than 3
av. = 4.04
More than 12
100%
av. = 2.17
88%
75%
75%
75%
dev. = 0.34
50%
dev. = 1.08
50%
dev. = 1.13
50%
42%
n = 24
25%
13%
12/30/2013
33%
25%
n = 24
17%
Class Climate evaluation
38%
25%
25%
n = 24
21%
17%
Page 4
Terrance Pendleton, MATH 166 L1 (F2013) [Terrance Pendleton], Lecture
How many times did you use the Math Help Room
(Carver 385) throughout the semester?
Less than 3
More than 12
100%
75%
How many times did you attend a Supplemental
Instruction (SI) session throughout the semester?
Less than 3
av. = 1.6
More than 12
100%
75%
80%
F
av. = 1.23
85%
n=5
100%
av. = 4.46
67%
dev. = 0.6
50%
25%
A, A-
75%
dev. = 1.34
50%
What grade do you expect from this course?
n = 13
25%
n = 24
25%
20%
8%
12/30/2013
dev. = 0.88
50%
8%
Class Climate evaluation
13%
17%
Page 5
Terrance Pendleton, MATH 166 L1 (F2013) [Terrance Pendleton], Lecture
Profile
Subunit:
Name of the instructor:
Name of the course:
(Name of the survey)
MATH
Terrance Pendleton
MATH 166 L1 (F2013) [Terrance Pendleton]
Values used in the profile line: Mean
1. Overall Instructor (REQUIRED)
1.1)
Overall rating of this instructor
Very Poor
Very Good
Very Poor
Very Good
n=24
av.=4.92 md=5.00 dev.=0.28
n=24
av.=4.46 md=4.50 dev.=0.59
n=24
av.=4.83 md=5.00 dev.=0.38
n=24
av.=4.88 md=5.00 dev.=0.34
n=24
av.=4.79 md=5.00 dev.=0.41
n=24
av.=4.75 md=5.00 dev.=0.61
n=24
av.=4.79 md=5.00 dev.=0.41
n=24
av.=4.83 md=5.00 dev.=0.48
n=24
av.=4.79 md=5.00 dev.=0.41
n=24
av.=4.75 md=5.00 dev.=0.44
n=24
av.=4.71 md=5.00 dev.=0.46
n=24
av.=4.79 md=5.00 dev.=0.41
n=24
av.=4.88 md=5.00 dev.=0.34
n=24
av.=4.04 md=4.00 dev.=1.08
2. Overall Course (REQUIRED)
2.1)
Overall rating of this course
3. About Instructor
3.1)
3.2)
3.3)
3.4)
3.5)
3.6)
3.7)
3.8)
The instructor was sufficiently prepared to
present and discuss the course material.
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly Agree
The instructor wrote clearly and used the board
and/or visual equipment effectively.
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly Agree
The instructor encouraged questions and
responded well to them.
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly Agree
The instructor was available during office
hours.
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly Agree
The instructor spoke in a clear and
understandable way.
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly Agree
The instructor made the course interesting.
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly Agree
The instructor used homework and/or quizzes
in an appropriate and useful way.
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly Agree
The instructor was timely, clear, and fair in
announcing and administering course policies.
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly Agree
The exams fairly reflected the course material.
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly Agree
The exams were graded in a prompt and fair
way.
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly Agree
The homework/quizzes were returned in a
timely manner.
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly Agree
The textbook was useful in helping me learn
the course material.
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly Agree
4. About Course
4.1)
4.2)
4.3)
4.4)
12/30/2013
Class Climate evaluation
Page 6
Terrance Pendleton, MATH 166 L1 (F2013) [Terrance Pendleton], Lecture
5. About You
5.1)
5.2)
5.4)
5.6)
On average, how many hours each week did
you devote to this course outside the
classroom?
How many times did you use the Math Help
Room (Carver 385) throughout the semester?
Less than 3
More than 12
Less than 3
More than 12
How many times did you attend a
Supplemental Instruction (SI) session
throughout the semester?
What grade do you expect from this course?
Less than 3
More than 12
12/30/2013
F
A, A-
Class Climate evaluation
n=24
av.=2.17 md=2.00 dev.=1.13
n=5
av.=1.60 md=1.00 dev.=1.34
n=13
av.=1.23 md=1.00 dev.=0.60
n=24
av.=4.46 md=5.00 dev.=0.88
Page 7