Design of a Dam Sediment Mitigation System to Aid Water Quality Restoration of the Chesapeake Bay Sheri Gravette Kevin Cazenas 100% 80% 150,000,000 60% 100,000,000 Sediment Deposition Expected Threshold 50,000,000 0 40% 20% Percent Capacity Conowingo Reservoir Sediment Deposition 200,000,000 0% Alternatives 1. No mitigation (baseline) • Sediment continues accumulation at Conowingo Reservoir • • 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% • • • Island made using processed dredged sediment (after 2 years) Flow velocity increases, Rouse number decreases around island (i.e. more sediment through dam at steady-state) Same sub-alternatives above apply (after island construction) Island, 5 million 5 million Island, 3 million 3 million • 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 Plasma HighGrade Utility 0.6 0.5 Lightweight Aggregate 0.4 0.3 0.2 • 0.1 0 -$1 $0 $1 • • 2% initial decrease in scour 0.4% decrease in scour after maximum dredging for 20 years . Ecological Impact Simulates monetary value of Chesapeake Bay impact Business Reuse Model (0.5) Simulates cost of processing dredged sediment into products Recommendation $2 Cost (Billions, Net Present Value, discount factor=5%) • • Sediment Scour potential (0.5) - Amount of Product(s) Produced - Product Revenue - Annual Cost Sediment Removal Model Simulates reservoir activity after mitigation alternatives applied Ecological Impact Model Minimize Susquehanna Sediment Impact to Chesapeake Bay 3. Dredging & Artificial Island Island, 1 million For every 1 million cubic yards dredged: Business Reuse Model Value Hierarchy Analysis Percent Decrease in Scour After 20 years Compared to Baseline Product Alternatives Sediment Amount (removed) Mechanical removal of sediment via pipeline (1, 3, 5 million cubic yards per year) Sub-alternatives (action taken with sediment): • Quarry (baseline) • Low-Temp Washing – Topsoil • Rotary Kiln – Lightweight Aggregate • Plasma Arc Vitrification – • Low Grade Tile • High Grade Tile Results Total Percent Decrease in Scour Rouse Number (particle fall velocity divided by bed shear stress) with artificial island location Yellow-Blue is trapped sediment (at 30,000 cfs.) Primary Design Alternatives - Flow Rates - Sediment Deposition Costs of - Velocity Profiles Remediation/ Sediment Ecological Recovery - Reservoir Bathymetry Sediment Scoured Removal Impact Model Model 2. Hydraulic Dredging • Scouring events occur due to sediment build-up at Conowingo Reservoir (area behind dam) • • Sediment scour exponentially increases as flow rate increases • Max Recorded Flow Rates: • 1. (1972) Hurricane Agnes: 1,120,000 cubic ft. per second 2. (2011) Tropical Storm Lee: 709,000 cubic ft. per second Stakeholder Tension: Sediment needs to be managed. Dam owners do not want to take responsibility. Relicensing may result in payment for system. Major storms (>300,000cfs) cause scouring events Scouring events cause sediment plumes along Chesapeake Bay Sediment plumes cause large algae blooms which damages aquatic ecosystem health Method of Analysis Need to create a system to reduce the environmental impact of scouring events while facilitating current (Chesapeake Bay TMDL) ecological regulations. Year • Rayhan Ain Need & Design Alternatives 1929 1936 1943 1950 1957 1964 1971 1978 1985 1992 1999 2006 2013 2020 2027 Sediment Deposition (tons) Context Said Masoud Plasma high-grade is only alternative with a chance to turn a profit, but has high variability Lightweight aggregate does not have a chance to turn a profit, but has a low uncertainty Best option • Dredge 5 million cubic yards annually Rank • Produce high-grade architectural tile for maximum product and 1 profit potential • Further analysis on plasma gas arc vitrification is needed to solidify 2 profitability. Best (non-Plasma) option – • Construct an artificial island* from sediment dredged • After island construction, dredge 1 million cubic yards annually • Produce lightweight aggregate. • This is the safest option, as it provides low uncertainty and beneficial reuse Department of System Engineering & Operations Research George Mason University Alternative Combo (Product, Mitigation) Plasma - High-Grade Tile, 5 million Plasma - High-Grade Tile, 5 million with Island 3 Plasma - High-Grade Tile, 3 million with Island 4 Plasma - High-Grade Tile, 3 million 5 Lightweight Aggregate, 1 million with Island