RECEIVED, 11/22/2014 12:09 A.M. John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Florida Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS
OF FLORIDA et al.,
Appellants,
v.
KEN DETZNER, et al.,
Appellees.
Case No.:
L.T. No.:
SC14-1905
2012-CA-00412;
2012-CA-00490
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, SECOND JUDICIAL
CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA, CERTIFIED BY
THE DISTRICT COURT FOR IMMEDIATE RESOLUTION
APPENDIX TO APPELLANTS’ INITIAL BRIEF
PERKINS COIE LLP
John M. Devaney
Marc Erik Elias
700 13th Street, NW, Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20005
THE MILLS FIRM, P.A.
John S. Mills
Andrew D. Manko
Courtney R. Brewer
203 North Gadsden Street, Suite 1A
Tallahassee, FL 32301
MESSER CAPARELLO, P.A.
Mark Herron
Robert J. Telfer III
2618 Centennial Place
Tallahassee, FL 32308
KING, BLACKWELL, ZEHNDER &
WERMUTH, P.A.
David B. King
Thomas A. Zehnder
Frederick S. Wermuth
Vincent Falcone III
P.O. Box 1631
Orlando, FL 32802-1631
Counsel for Romo Appellants
GELBER SCHACHTER &
GREENBERG, P.A.
Adam Schachter
Gerald E. Greenberg
1441 Brickell Avenue, Ste. 1420
Miami, Florida 33131-3426
Counsel for Coalition Appellants
INDEX
Coalition Plaintiffs’ Remedial Map A and Data ......................... App. 1-36 (SR16:2212-47)
Coalition Plaintiffs’ Remedial Map B and Data ....................... App. 37-72 (SR16:2248-83)
Romo Plaintiffs’ Remedial Map and Data................................. App. 73-74 (SR16:2284-85)
Joint Trial Exhibit 1 ............................................................. App. 75-160 (SR24:3462-3548)
Remedial Plan H000C9057 and Data ........................................ App. 161-164 (SR7:746-49)
Final Judgment (07/10/14) .............................................. App. 165-205 (R86:11289-11329)
Order Approving Remedial Redistricting Plan (08/22/14).... App. 206-209 (SR16:2306-09)
1
PERKINS COIE LLP
Respectfully submitted,
John M. Devaney (pro hac pending)
jdevaney@perkinscoie.com
Marc Erik Elias (pro hac pending)
melias@perkinscoie.com
700 13th Street, NW, Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: (202) 654-6200
Facsimile: (202) 654-6211
THE MILLS FIRM, P.A.
and
MESSER CAPARELLO, P.A.
Mark Herron
Florida Bar No. 199737
mherron@lawfla.com
Robert J. Telfer III
Florida Bar No. 0128694
rtelfer@lawfla.com
2618 Centennial Place
Tallahassee, FL 32308
Telephone: (850) 222-0720
Facsimile: (850) 558-0659
/s/ John S. Mills
John S. Mills
Florida Bar No. 0107719
jmills@mills-appeals.com
Andrew D. Manko
Florida Bar No. 018853
amanko@mills-appeals.com
Courtney Brewer
Florida Bar No. 0890901
cbrewer@mills-appeals.com
service@mills-appeals.com (secondary)
203 North Gadsden Street, Suite 1A
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Telephone: (850) 765-0897
Facsimile: (850) 270-2474
and
KING, BLACKWELL, ZEHNDER &
WERMUTH, P.A.
David B. King
Florida Bar No.: 0093426
Counsel for Appellants Rene Romo,
dking@kbzwlaw.com
Benjamin Weaver, William Everett
Thomas A. Zehnder
Warinner, Jessica Barrett, June Keener, Florida Bar No.: 0063274
Richard Quinn Boylan, and Bonita
tzehnder@kbzwlaw.com
Agan
Frederick S. Wermuth
Florida Bar No.: 0184111
fwermuth@kbzwlaw.com
Vincent Falcone III
Florida Bar No.: 0058553
vfalcone@kbzwlaw.com
P.O. Box 1631
Orlando, FL 32802-1631
Telephone: (407) 422-2472
2
Facsimile: (407) 648-0161
Gerald E. Greenberg
ggreenberg@gsgpa.com
Adam M. Schachter
aschachter@gsgpa.com
Gelbert Schachter & Greenberg, P.A.
1441 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1420
Miami, FL 33131
Telephone: (305) 728-0950
Facsimile: (305) 728-0951
Counsel for Appellants The League of
Women Voters of Florida, Common
Cause, Brenda Ann Holt, Roland
Sanchez-Medina Jr., J. Steele Olmstead,
and Robert Allen Schaeffer
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been
furnished by email to the following attorneys on November 21, 2014:
Michael B. DeSanctis
Jessica Ring Amunson
Paul Smith
Jenner & Block, LLP
1099 New York Avenue NW
Suite 900
Washington, DC 20001
mdesanctis@jenner.com
jamunson@jenner.com
psmith@jenner.com
Ronald G. Meyer
Lynn Hearn
Meyer, Brooks, Demma
and Blohm, P.A.
131 North Gadsden Street
Post Office Box 1547
Tallahassee, Florida 32302
rmeyer@meyerbrookslaw.com
lhearn@meyerbrookslaw.com
David B. King
Thomas A. Zehnder
Frederick S. Wermuth
Vincent Falcone, III
King, Blackwell, Zehnder &
Wermuth, P.A.
J. Gerald Hebert
191 Somervelle Street, #415
Alexandria, VA 22304
hebert@voterlaw.com
3
Counsel for Coalition Plaintiffs
Post Office Box 1631
Orlando, FL 32802-1631
dking@kbzwlaw.com
tzehnder@kbzwlaw.com
fwermuth@kbzwlaw.com
vfalcone@kbzwlaw.com
aprice@kbzwlaw.com
courtfilings@kbzwlaw.com
George T. Levesque
The Florida Senate
422 The Capitol
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1300
levesque.george@flsenate.gov
glevesque4@comcast.net
everette.shirlyne@flsenate.gov
Counsel for Coalition Plaintiffs
Michael A. Carvin
Louis K. Fisher
Jones Day
51 Louisiana Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20001
macarvin@jonesday.com
lkfisher@jonesday.com
Blaine Winship
Office of the Attorney General
of Florida
The Capitol, Suite PL-01
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
blaine.winship@myfloridalegal.com
Raoul G. Cantero
Jason N. Zakia
Jesse L. Green
White & Case LLP
200 South Biscayne Blvd., Ste. 4900
Miami, FL 33131
rcantero@whitecase.com
jzakia@whitecase.com
jgreen@whitecase.com
ldominguez@whitecase.com
lorozco@whitecase.com
Counsel for Attorney General Pam
Bondi
Counsel for Fla. Senate & Senate Pres.
Counsel for Florida Secretary of State
Ken Detzner
J. Andrew Atkinson
Ashley Davis
Dep. of State
500 S. Bronough Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399
jandrew.atkinson@dos.myflorida.com
ashley.davis@dos.myflorida.com
diane.wint@dos.myflorida.com
Abba Khanna
Kevin J. Hamilton
Perkins Coie, LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
akhanna@perkinscoie.com
rkelly@perkinscoie.com
khamilton@perkinscoie.com
Charles T. Wells
George N. Meros, Jr.
Jason L. Unger
Andy Bardos
Gray Robinson, P.A.
301 South Bronough Street, Suite 600
Tallahassee, FL 32301
4
jstarr@perkinscoie.com
rspear@perkinscoie.com
charles.wells@gray-robinson.com
george.meros@gray-robinson.com
jason.unger@gray-robinson.com
andy.bardos@gray-robinson.com
croberts@gray-robinson.com
tbarreiro@gray-robinson.com
mwilkinson@gray-robinson.com
John M. Devaney
Mark Erik Elias
Perkins Coie, LLP
700 Thirteenth Street, NW, Suite 700
Washington, DC 2005
jdevaney@perkinscoie.com
melias@perkinscoie.com
efrost@perkinscoie.com
syarborough@perkinscoie.com
Matthew J. Carson
General Counsel
Florida House of Representatives
422 The Capitol
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1300
matthew.carson@myfloridahouse.gov
Mark Herron
Robert J. Telfer, III
Angelina Perez
Messer, Caparello & Self, P.A.
Post Office Box 1876
Tallahassee, FL 32302-1876
mherron@lawfla.com
rtelfer@lawfla.com
aperez@lawfla.com
clowell@lawfla.com
bmorton@lawfla.com
statecourtpleadings@lawfla.com
Counsel for Fla. House and Speaker
Allison J. Riggs, Pro Hac Vice
Anita S. Earls
Southern Coalition For Social Justice
1415 W. Highway 54, Suite 101
Durham, NC 27707
allison@southerncoalition.org
anita@southerncoalition.org
Victor L. Goode
Dorcas R. Gilmore
NAACP
4805 Mt. Hope Drive
Baltimore, MD 21215-3297
vgoode@naacpnet.org
dgilmore@naacpnet.org
Counsel for Romo Plaintiffs
Nancy Adudu
ACLU of Florida Foundation
4500 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 340
Miami, FL 33137
nabudu@aclufl.org
Counsel for NAACP
Counsel for NAACP
/s/ John S. Mills
Attorney
5
Coalition Remedial Map A
App. 1
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID Pop Dev
1
1
2
1
3
1
4
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
8
0
9
1
10
1
11
1
12
0
13
1
14
1
15
1
16
1
17
0
18
0
19
1
20
1
21
1
22
1
23
1
24
1
25
0
26
1
27
1
TPOP10 %AllBlkPop10 %AllBlkVAP10 %AllHispPop10 %AllHispVAP10
696345
15.03623
13.19172
5.16741
4.548123
696345
14.09057
13.36839
5.141992
4.618951
696345
16.29235
14.35587
8.678169
7.736473
696345
10.89201
9.637358
7.227308
6.453191
696345
48.48918
45.11974
6.712765
6.140477
696345
10.86473
9.457108
9.247284
7.810965
696345
12.39802
11.186
19.20456
17.56085
696344
10.84277
9.124648
8.938972
7.656963
696345
14.44787
13.1361
40.15897
37.23666
696345
28.50943
25.77652
20.45193
19.17688
696345
8.031076
6.74588
9.778773
8.141735
696344
5.238072
4.338227
11.58551
9.935627
696345
6.661928
5.293462
8.606222
7.243767
696345
28.66367
25.62865
27.28332
25.61204
696345
14.30699
12.72498
17.2584
14.98514
696345
7.340758
5.829445
11.00776
8.758595
696344
9.701958
8.358917
17.55038
14.35251
696344
12.98884
11.06876
14.12032
12.05479
696345
8.201538
6.466457
17.87218
14.83137
696345
54.02322
50.0578
19.12256
18.53966
696345
13.14564
11.22658
20.02743
18.28904
696345
12.11928
10.33147
19.63265
17.71708
696345
12.03513
10.98851
37.28497
36.731
696345
57.71019
54.9152
31.77462
33.15138
696344
8.210741
7.704848
70.1995
70.69013
696345
10.74826
10.02387
68.81273
68.91428
696345
8.64715
7.707506
73.7215
75.04417
App. 2
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %SRWPop10 %SRWVAP10 %NHBPop10 %NHBVAP10
1
75.08146
77.55918
14.6627
12.93548
2
77.89716
79.25415
13.82102
13.17278
3
71.30847
74.11441
15.78126
13.97919
4
76.24454
78.53087
10.34674
9.242904
5
42.06478
45.78721
47.61663
44.46453
6
77.64255
80.51977
10.29518
9.052636
7
64.21702
67.01907
11.16918
10.23271
8
77.3665
80.405
10.26705
8.730809
9
43.18018
47.0715
11.94623
11.03589
10
46.03365
49.74025
27.01549
24.53526
11
80.12063
83.15391
7.460957
6.339611
12
79.8028
82.5825
4.687482
3.956698
13
80.48367
83.51926
6.24159
5.019666
14
42.24414
46.54393
26.64498
24.0093
15
64.72395
68.55688
13.33621
11.98289
16
79.6249
83.53614
6.942248
5.554176
17
70.83898
75.44005
9.073389
7.921222
18
70.60217
74.66248
12.36415
10.62066
19
72.2738
77.07897
7.537212
6.000675
20
25.21451
29.46217
52.58816
48.87476
21
62.80723
66.63148
12.30367
10.57754
22
65.66055
69.40981
11.39952
9.770594
23
47.53535
49.18909
10.64717
9.77758
24
11.47262
12.64457
54.29966
51.66604
25
21.13251
21.22231
6.433315
5.955081
26
19.68579
20.1678
9.154226
8.553305
27
17.86255
17.47026
6.408031
5.474851
%HBPop10 %HBVAP10 %HxBPop10
0.3735217 0.2562323
4.793888
0.2695503 0.1956056
4.872441
0.5110973
0.376689
8.167072
0.5452757 0.3944543
6.682033
0.872556 0.6552056
5.840209
0.5695453 0.4044719
8.677739
1.228845
0.953292
17.97572
0.5757212 0.3938388
8.363252
2.501634
2.100209
37.65734
1.493943
1.241264
18.95799
0.5701197 0.4062693
9.208653
0.5505899
0.381529
11.03492
0.4203376 0.2737968
8.185884
2.018683
1.619349
25.26463
0.9707832 0.7420936
16.28762
0.3985094 0.2752692
10.60925
0.6285686 0.4376946
16.92181
0.6246912
0.44811
13.49563
0.6643259 0.4657817
17.20785
1.435065
1.183043
17.6875
0.8419677 0.6490359
19.18546
0.7197582 0.5608779
18.9129
1.387961
1.21093
35.897
3.410522
3.249158
28.3641
1.777426
1.749768
68.42207
1.594037
1.470561
67.21869
2.23912
2.232656
71.48238
App. 3
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %HxBVAP10 %OthPop10 %OthVAP10 %AsianPOP10 %AsianVAP10 %WIndiesPOPACS
1
4.291891
5.088426
4.957209
2.411879
2.572291
0.730423
2
4.423346
3.139823
2.954118
1.445117
1.426792
0.598725
3
7.359784
4.232098
4.16993
2.788417
2.893664
1.10827
4
6.058736
6.181419
5.77304
4.347414
4.27415
0.651345
5
5.485271
3.605828
3.607782
2.332177
2.433432
1.721386
6
7.406493
2.814984
2.616628
1.579677
1.543427
1.220392
7
16.60755
5.409244
5.187366
3.936985
3.932559
1.985401
8
7.263124
3.427473
3.207229
1.929506
1.943081
2.008909
9
35.13645
4.714617
4.655951
3.321629
3.396708
3.423149
10
17.93562
6.498934
6.547617
4.665791
4.845111
6.873585
11
7.735466
2.63964
2.364745
1.372452
1.275331
1.141441
12
9.554098
3.92421
3.525174
2.585791
2.434961
0.8334238
13
6.969971
4.668519
4.217301
3.258729
3.061924
0.3781195
14
23.99269
3.827557
3.834731
2.619966
2.724427
2.442238
15
14.24305
4.681444
4.475084
3.26232
3.235801
1.478094
16
8.483327
2.425091
2.151087
1.455457
1.363579
1.122681
17
13.91481
2.537252
2.286221
1.355077
1.291905
1.801179
18
11.60668
2.913359
2.662078
1.82855
1.766757
3.654917
19
14.36559
2.316811
2.088987
1.344161
1.273957
2.327203
20
17.35662
3.074769
3.123408
1.944151
2.052927
19.52139
21
17.64001
4.86167
4.501941
3.46897
3.311276
5.797062
22
17.15621
3.307269
3.102512
2.102406
2.057875
5.788601
23
35.52007
4.532523
4.30233
3.277686
3.230594
4.554684
24
29.90222
2.453094
2.538006
1.691977
1.822861
22.89483
25
68.94036
2.234671
2.132477
1.747987
1.726959
3.158369
26
67.44373
2.347256
2.364609
1.72831
1.788281
3.469486
27
72.81152
2.007913
2.010717
1.5129
1.575746
2.077445
App. 4
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %HaitianPOPACS %SpkOnlyEng %SpkSpanish %SpkOther ACSHispTot %ACSMexican
1
0.1871403
92.29557
3.649182
4.053087
29388
36.95386
2
0.1564047
93.29364
3.862614
2.813175
29470
29.94231
3
0.2653208
89.92537
6.048874
4.011415
48487
23.35678
4
0.2043435
88.21306
5.02977
6.738768
39240
25.24974
5
0.6808653
91.06433
4.788207
4.107962
37734
26.95977
6
0.3231617
88.79327
6.309529
4.882614
55154
22.3157
7
0.4571698
80.6245
13.57126
5.79333
111296
12.71115
8
0.5561223
89.15794
6.206201
4.635709
55327
26.3
9
1.333546
61.51694
32.0345
6.40663
230591
10.65523
10
3.688652
72.95089
16.21821
10.81951
120255
22.19783
11
0.3066378
89.51823
7.085017
3.385037
58379
23.36114
12
0.1091668
86.63418
7.551672
5.809793
66021
20.59496
13
0.05160762
86.62268
5.889977
7.476715
51612
32.58738
14
0.8761909
74.28982
20.81555
4.894307
164646
15.32621
15
0.3523467
82.50156
12.27279
5.217608
100222
34.55529
16
0.7082896
86.46965
7.584703
5.942677
64564
52.8251
17
0.5005734
82.50031
13.97127
3.499906
105136
57.71096
18
1.760646
82.78322
10.74884
6.458298
79950
29.17574
19
1.625322
79.55676
14.20959
6.206348
107726
35.03889
20
9.907381
68.26076
16.64894
15.0816
130482
21.08643
21
3.036792
72.11935
15.76187
12.1183
119888
13.40251
22
4.003601
71.70814
16.31803
11.96836
131049
17.72543
23
1.511455
54.71569
32.81433
12.46826
225834
5.128546
24
15.22171
51.32713
29.07296
19.60275
201119
3.118054
25
1.753488
27.96248
67.11534
4.914265
441167
8.939698
26
1.351733
31.76353
63.93917
4.292304
448386
4.945962
27
0.7832751
24.733
71.13072
4.128692
492370
3.430956
App. 5
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %ACSPuerto Rican %ACSCuban %ACS C.Amer %ACS S.Amer %LessHighSch
1
21.01538
8.32993
11.1372
8.397985
12.8732
2
21.74415
17.64167
8.591788
7.634883
17.12778
3
31.31767
14.79572
8.245509
12.94574
15.18713
4
28.23649
12.7472
7.459225
13.04281
8.711435
5
28.83871
12.30455
12.90348
8.403562
17.82774
6
42.501
9.455343
5.910723
9.883236
12.7893
7
46.31882
10.01923
5.146636
14.76783
9.846055
8
34.39912
10.32588
6.821263
10.45782
10.82175
9
54.1617
5.391798
5.836308
14.26855
15.88203
10
40.90225
6.608457
6.516153
13.11546
14.31971
11
39.88078
10.70248
5.493414
10.94914
15.32377
12
31.17644
15.76317
3.403463
14.30757
11.98152
13
29.25289
10.422
5.169341
11.62327
12.18718
14
31.31992
25.41999
6.834056
9.094056
17.8175
15
29.34186
11.69105
5.798128
8.549021
14.22144
16
13.34954
7.660616
8.156248
10.48417
11.57654
17
18.81278
8.966481
5.115279
3.889248
19.73744
18
19.6773
11.22201
16.32645
16.10256
12.66041
19
17.00054
15.45402
12.78893
11.53111
12.1164
20
19.59964
12.56878
14.59512
21.97238
21.11191
21
18.55482
12.44578
9.985153
32.41943
10.05632
22
16.11611
18.36489
18.01082
20.05052
12.44542
23
13.02018
24.00037
7.846028
38.45081
11.53918
24
13.13004
29.13797
21.8761
18.92561
25.0494
25
5.215485
51.48708
11.21661
16.03792
22.72741
26
6.565325
52.45168
11.66785
17.33908
19.1799
27
5.719276
55.78183
17.22566
11.93411
25.59521
App. 6
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %HighSchOnly %SomeCollege %Bachelor %Graduate %NoIncome %SSIncome
1
29.24716
33.30256 16.03475
8.53666
11.65461
29.7578
2
33.88038
28.62953 12.37043
7.874243
14.6162
32.49209
3
33.59997
28.57389 13.02297
9.56894
14.10677
32.30352
4
26.19185
31.97825 21.93917
11.13381
10.70595
23.83128
5
35.07445
29.43721 11.60303
5.966263
14.96802
23.87272
6
33.15398
32.02326 14.29182
7.681516
10.95375
39.56285
7
25.56261
31.20339 22.44961
10.91165
12.32376
22.82267
8
29.59509
33.07799 16.73408
9.770291
11.02841
37.93589
9
34.3284
29.68176 14.32453
5.674745
13.65955
27.7856
10
28.55532
29.06655 19.33104
8.696656
11.81572
22.3403
11
37.15926
30.18083 11.25472
6.058255
10.70044
50.78608
12
32.18284
30.44918 17.32136
8.057488
10.95155
36.18729
13
30.78663
30.75511 17.43909
8.818148
9.675097
36.83078
14
30.64373
26.96142 16.63695
7.941525
11.73552
24.78725
15
30.8434
29.14667 16.79483
8.973473
12.23336
26.89931
16
31.16186
29.63429 17.17263
10.44717
9.365619
43.33065
17
35.36628
27.18817 11.52299
6.13794
12.12919
46.17101
18
29.70091
30.19217 17.65382
9.793116
10.81474
38.57643
19
30.04655
28.90449 18.30026
10.53029
10.38314
40.85117
20
33.67713
26.95591 12.64682
5.572052
14.2441
28.75529
21
28.69325
28.65031 20.89567
11.70254
11.2655
38.51535
22
25.16621
27.60659 22.16346
12.59341
9.981172
33.14476
23
25.95901
27.36797 21.63961
13.47766
12.63792
27.19591
24
31.71642
24.0193 12.46934
6.740451
17.92549
24.57836
25
28.99978
24.33278
15.945
7.957636
16.37898
27.48339
26
27.11766
27.44174 17.49805
8.753987
17.88737
26.77847
27
25.29485
20.21769 17.66189
11.21167
15.26643
29.58202
App. 7
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %PublicAsst %Retirement %Poverty-100 %Poverty-100-149 %Poverty-150+
1
9.527489
25.04618
12.89835
9.308992
77.7916
2
9.250313
21.28965
15.55548
10.30008
74.104
3
8.366512
20.27058
18.10207
9.893779
71.99054
4
4.111761
19.04102
7.794871
6.294634
85.89876
5
12.12046
15.36209
21.23734
11.10349
67.62776
6
6.636548
24.34061
12.73281
9.477632
77.77262
7
5.248349
14.05878
11.03049
7.464291
81.50211
8
5.981009
24.8975
10.21728
8.899364
80.88379
9
9.289001
15.9915
13.43143
11.9365
74.60059
10
7.692151
12.85024
12.40146
11.0704
76.5181
11
6.199944
34.32314
11.50072
9.539297
78.94803
12
5.590569
23.50265
9.940679
8.179036
81.86884
13
5.615667
21.85465
10.97199
9.316339
79.71064
14
11.17285
13.31862
18.1431
10.76195
71.09313
15
7.135971
16.943
11.5073
9.086252
79.39425
16
4.391818
26.48542
10.6222
8.812268
80.56313
17
6.77738
28.10685
13.57762
11.0587
75.34518
18
5.23162
22.47549
9.827724
8.165328
82.00286
19
4.082074
25.36768
10.09863
8.540139
81.33682
20
11.99633
12.32465
19.04959
12.56244
68.37717
21
4.093661
18.50382
8.117324
7.265109
84.62074
22
4.953421
15.98351
11.54482
8.430034
80.0182
23
6.56498
11.69915
10.71531
7.747526
81.53096
24
18.14189
9.782816
21.50283
13.81205
64.68184
25
13.15253
11.09595
13.26045
11.60458
75.11801
26
12.1122
10.86816
11.50134
9.397028
79.09914
27
17.81159
9.526864
18.09081
12.38869
69.51682
App. 8
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID CensusHseUnts10 %LiveHse1yr+ %OwnHse %RentHse %SeasonalHse %1detachedHse
1
344454
78.8843 70.98347 29.01807
4.516894
65.1363
2
335430
80.20581
72.7536 27.23189
4.894424
56.15822
3
322543
79.49286 70.96091 29.03109
1.944541
56.26987
4
307719
81.50999
73.8252 26.17527
1.210556
62.77985
5
309956
77.48669 59.68971 40.29936
0.5338642
56.11496
6
359001
84.30141 76.13451 23.85954
5.092899
64.49368
7
297400
81.84752 70.45181 29.54376
0.6862888
63.03194
8
352173
84.51195
77.3966
22.6034
3.857953
63.20369
9
319262
79.4865 67.87611 32.10538
4.810101
60.05053
10
305974
78.96884 61.24145 38.75634
1.064858
57.70163
11
359611
84.35986 82.84651
17.1527
4.241051
67.46442
12
337234
83.8303 79.26054 20.73661
3.012049
61.09488
13
390233
84.09101 71.98285 28.01895
6.351737
46.91417
14
327198
77.84692 58.25293 41.74554
0.8306091
51.98116
15
292755
80.49082 70.64333 29.35249
0.9945281
59.70224
16
399077
83.5805 74.70654
25.2924
7.942572
54.80319
17
356050
84.27269 79.00166 20.99168
6.643338
60.4389
18
361695
84.68315 76.48808
23.5105
7.271815
56.3793
19
445670
82.78207 73.82213 26.16841
14.49886
47.07843
20
298997
81.58482
61.8642 38.13565
2.233226
39.11018
21
326757
85.98403 79.04742 20.94893
4.12932
46.19051
22
398676
82.46366 68.52467 31.47749
7.320745
39.09128
23
369815
82.53352 69.58732 30.41118
7.247443
31.62713
24
273068
84.24386 58.92605 41.07365
1.390888
43.76385
25
259457
86.42365 68.53799 31.45511
2.803536
44.29919
26
261668
86.14795 71.86613 28.13477
2.938064
57.35106
27
277707
85.19665 56.29058 43.70897
1.287533
45.27035
App. 9
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %1attachedHse %2unitHse %3unitHse %5unitHse %10unitHse %20unitHse
1
3.63166
2.504944
3.800429
4.124823
2.833818
2.9533
2
2.300233
2.438222
3.133229
3.085756
2.146103
1.598896
3
2.761704
2.082682
4.337399
5.41002
4.194688
1.859817
4
6.137828
1.273818
3.892506
5.851911
6.674478
3.788319
5
4.805667
2.836258
4.364514
6.175817
6.776687
3.101272
6
4.461695
1.544701
2.477104
3.254252
3.83486
3.452246
7
6.530028
1.082992
3.690102
6.374697
9.289226
4.348186
8
4.453835
1.731729
3.060618
5.441352
5.564291
3.626425
9
4.484969
1.904722
3.444586
5.589901
6.077301
2.630643
10
4.292989
2.299574
3.729385
7.603137
10.27999
6.526423
11
2.34812
1.048661
1.559894
1.357267
0.699107
0.7719683
12
6.401865
1.328988
3.084062
3.863404
3.855623
2.134785
13
5.006708
2.915108
4.168207
5.161794
7.286478
8.768588
14
4.959997
3.142931
5.148871
7.056634
10.78427
5.34959
15
3.655507
2.790802
3.434015
4.202327
5.374995
2.502685
16
6.844154
3.080442
3.331529
4.953321
5.131554
4.647593
17
4.194729
2.063998
2.403833
2.772772
1.950524
1.414608
18
7.184076
2.231116
4.368775
5.116733
7.061246
5.97595
19
6.747422
2.736284
4.674466
7.177765
8.63521
7.639515
20
7.438066
3.610027
6.173259
6.535726
7.191429
14.68342
21
10.60567
1.734405
5.647552
7.251497
8.011974
11.24441
22
6.568085
3.587656
6.462426
5.828473
7.305199
10.96604
23
6.2007
2.270478
3.245462
4.417295
6.765726
10.96234
24
6.700951
4.5412
4.759866
4.640869
5.938463
9.513667
25
12.45471
1.654562
4.721596
6.518073
7.655898
8.461057
26
14.61832
1.500694
2.521166
3.978982
4.458035
5.505792
27
10.47576
2.150491
3.794184
6.545379
7.009527
9.009842
App. 10
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %50unit+Hse %MobileHse %Veterans %CarDrive %DriveAlone
1
5.011381
9.825914
21.16316 89.77576
77.36066
2
3.89723
25.05412
16.96377 92.37202
79.71341
3
1.745777
21.13179
16.79252
90.3242
79.18867
4
2.802468
6.638952
16.89169 91.85102
81.8049
5
3.614233
12.03446
14.55205 92.14417
79.26063
6
5.35543
10.97311
16.66953 90.42741
80.5164
7
2.13463
3.367547
12.18139 90.81446
82.3483
8
3.223584
9.489202
18.89255 92.29553
83.29012
9
1.324469
13.9675
11.46529 92.04355
80.75357
10
3.380911
4.076792
9.953268 89.10054
78.20264
11
0.5569974
23.93523
19.67594 91.57384
79.85318
12
1.739201
16.18036
15.68968 91.36988
81.68648
13
8.838377
10.82529
15.94963 89.03423
80.00812
14
6.160569
5.298787
11.7067 89.08185
79.31813
15
1.859826
16.30005
13.87563 91.32641
80.825
16
4.52322
12.58899
16.39023 89.73104
79.47461
17
1.067717
23.16229
17.47371 92.11532
78.23372
18
4.647368
6.924175
14.95412 91.63812
81.62651
19
6.881025
8.188226
15.94553 89.80672
76.53433
20
11.70213
3.37171
8.522147 89.34018
76.53513
21
6.512978
2.767749
12.25479 91.62138
81.51089
22
17.98199
2.113927
11.44306 87.47138
77.33602
23
30.91461
3.499513
8.062249 86.67152
77.69141
24
17.78204
2.268894
5.127551 84.88239
74.92523
25
8.702312
5.310544
5.318224 91.57755
80.92856
26
5.32337
4.564448
5.711554 88.32805
78.0837
27
14.57388
1.051232
4.148322 86.10441
76.65005
%CarPool %WorkHome
12.41257
5.10801
12.60917
3.171147
11.11441
3.623907
10.02477
4.379957
12.83582
1.846947
9.887735
4.404085
8.450364
5.454196
9.005741
3.81338
11.23913
3.458569
10.87211
4.059052
11.69765
4.65718
9.678638
5.660846
9.020088
4.563174
9.762156
3.679841
10.49149
4.458297
10.24461
5.555774
13.85186
3.546579
9.997504
4.727474
13.25472
5.401808
12.79899
2.615316
10.10156
4.93719
10.12948
5.572492
8.971165
4.906453
9.939977
2.431193
10.63174
3.826569
10.24096
3.707032
9.449147
3.721691
App. 11
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %Management
1
32.07041
2
32.67813
3
33.43815
4
38.46128
5
28.38063
6
30.80787
7
39.25056
8
35.23495
9
26.72962
10
32.25953
11
27.92587
12
36.6693
13
36.11233
14
31.88717
15
34.29842
16
31.97427
17
27.18078
18
33.23909
19
30.49267
20
24.83568
21
36.35048
22
36.86475
23
38.53753
24
24.90498
25
27.00284
26
31.59445
27
31.97827
%Service
19.84291
19.13098
18.75417
14.15565
19.70048
19.85132
15.35608
18.26739
21.43027
20.33202
20.61889
15.79932
16.06128
19.02718
15.29356
18.47374
18.7496
18.72218
19.40114
24.12827
17.06378
18.21845
17.36767
25.18962
17.46974
17.58901
19.00983
%Sales
26.97775
25.19988
26.03107
29.40008
29.01457
27.7909
29.617
25.24712
29.17937
27.6859
28.10182
30.34592
29.63546
28.62575
28.65195
28.2516
26.23277
28.2976
28.47319
27.42744
30.69642
27.82
29.85984
27.58823
29.1186
31.49658
27.09177
%Private G12PRE_Tot %G12PRE_D_Oba
63.37828
354884
30.09631
57.76484
330720
33.79354
62.07983
326352
44.01199
69.5398
374140
31.88272
66.25826
312508
63.57373
67.15003
347227
45.49099
70.44045
326775
48.60837
67.98737
363932
42.07874
76.71299
276963
59.64334
74.95808
287350
57.81312
67.76073
369663
40.19093
69.31427
343828
44.6322
68.87986
342419
49.94729
73.55181
294049
64.97897
71.08533
303581
45.4597
67.42188
359428
44.79673
68.79626
297980
41.08464
67.62415
343320
47.49825
67.11646
321882
38.68095
72.40831
262215
82.636
69.06261
324062
60.58748
68.90765
327330
54.33996
67.46227
287307
61.46352
69.12913
260549
87.49602
72.39502
236035
48.65973
66.7821
267270
53.02391
66.74738
244205
52.95223
App. 12
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %G12PRE_R_Rom %G12USS_D_Nel %G12USS_R_Mac G10GOV_Tot %G10GOV_D_Sin
1
68.45617
35.78553
61.20062
230285
30.32112
2
64.79983
43.52069
53.51228
232967
41.30972
3
54.53559
50.54966
46.34539
216519
44.22476
4
66.99685
38.51307
58.17043
248081
33.40482
5
35.42309
67.37506
30.1642
197470
62.46873
6
53.26631
51.79689
45.02111
232494
44.14092
7
50.21865
54.8914
42.63448
203778
46.77296
8
56.62431
49.41876
47.09805
248869
40.38189
9
39.33811
64.43504
32.80619
148321
50.72512
10
41.2142
62.65325
35.28105
172609
53.77877
11
58.76514
47.83441
48.55511
260177
39.22868
12
53.8909
52.48866
43.77716
221875
43.40597
13
48.4938
57.36321
39.04456
228174
48.52656
14
33.81035
69.28854
28.33702
165041
60.95879
15
53.27705
52.12434
44.94732
192579
43.66572
16
54.07564
50.3426
46.63989
249234
44.12961
17
57.78677
47.1491
49.15949
202106
39.42832
18
51.64832
53.56576
44.44583
223587
47.31268
19
60.46688
42.60947
54.43937
223862
35.40574
20
16.93648
83.75442
15.00925
142118
78.07878
21
38.84319
65.6398
32.86234
201688
61.43797
22
44.93844
58.83501
39.62962
207872
53.28519
23
37.887
64.72702
33.79683
157602
60.07855
24
12.12632
87.27065
11.67766
138326
84.78522
25
50.73527
50.70602
47.07765
131259
40.6715
26
46.2869
54.84174
43.52633
152049
48.75994
27
46.43107
55.10358
43.31173
143843
47.46355
App. 13
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %G10GOV_R_Sco %G10CFO_D_Aus %G10CFO_R_Atw %G10ATG_D_Gel %G10ATG_R_Bon
1
63.69585
25.31355
70.113
25.22865
69.18208
2
54.26477
36.17503
59.88307
32.53769
61.76248
3
51.60563
36.62117
57.76442
38.07894
57.43861
4
63.58084
25.25209
70.96066
26.89748
69.47772
5
34.92936
59.74454
37.27198
57.21304
39.08573
6
51.58241
36.34767
59.21733
38.14842
57.90427
7
49.59809
35.17199
61.64161
39.01823
58.06261
8
55.08922
32.46217
63.31648
34.32892
61.38145
9
45.27814
43.79862
52.43023
45.06242
51.29794
10
43.29786
44.35474
52.74437
47.24094
49.9295
11
55.36692
30.82362
63.64026
33.40944
62.30268
12
51.8693
31.91598
63.07832
34.73389
61.40389
13
46.59777
35.68924
59.89331
39.83401
55.94397
14
35.78565
50.404
45.94761
51.61145
45.44901
15
52.48288
34.51152
61.47116
34.63024
62.10725
16
51.6647
32.96535
63.15578
37.84005
58.58447
17
55.43724
31.19291
64.19393
32.3568
63.13734
18
49.27075
35.07523
61.72236
40.80532
55.12518
19
61.03716
26.78234
69.4892
29.06149
67.05345
20
19.93062
73.27286
24.73224
75.71833
21.46929
21
36.10725
50.45401
47.38222
57.46492
39.8842
22
44.10839
41.0484
56.6024
47.97755
48.34821
23
37.60739
51.4813
45.66549
57.14555
39.35305
24
13.69302
81.95455
15.85885
83.66045
13.93955
25
57.11837
33.70994
63.20707
35.73833
60.998
26
49.00196
40.90259
55.91833
43.90219
52.60674
27
50.59058
38.32809
58.68127
44.13923
52.71535
App. 14
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %G10AGR_D_Mad %G10AGR_R_Put %G10USS_D_Mee %G10USS_R_Rub %G10USS_I_Cri
1
23.81854
66.8924
13.05326
65.00434
20.01795
2
32.77344
60.01087
14.2658
59.4095
24.24568
3
35.54062
57.29191
20.90103
53.20988
24.06987
4
25.39366
67.38432
13.74867
65.99887
19.04012
5
58.01721
37.04422
39.94807
35.46509
23.17973
6
35.804
57.8428
19.47501
52.47471
26.57582
7
35.5714
59.50121
20.92914
55.13658
22.55364
8
31.42913
60.89961
15.52885
55.5127
27.60348
9
42.19947
52.66603
26.66461
47.1479
24.49041
10
44.81416
50.80432
30.08222
47.36531
21.34932
11
30.02037
62.80785
14.76923
54.57055
29.08126
12
30.44378
63.30084
12.34852
47.54734
38.62505
13
34.32903
59.3084
14.56789
40.9705
42.82579
14
48.57597
47.14352
29.16536
34.18388
35.38395
15
29.33783
66.40782
16.66718
49.52315
32.43467
16
32.39963
61.17274
12.84535
47.49593
38.60149
17
27.75168
66.06789
13.5319
52.47969
32.36503
18
34.50491
59.72149
15.64898
50.43451
32.86077
19
25.57934
67.50687
9.369236
59.53568
29.76626
20
72.75108
22.64305
50.68032
19.04128
29.43653
21
51.95647
43.93212
19.02119
35.70488
44.56203
22
43.30933
51.87897
17.58039
43.11037
38.49926
23
53.18047
41.57446
23.67423
36.42004
39.02781
24
82.71277
14.21234
63.69251
13.18466
22.40403
25
33.84042
61.01126
15.99221
59.81954
23.31915
26
41.30902
53.30586
20.7442
50.99708
27.33256
27
39.55757
55.77799
17.51869
54.62394
26.98295
App. 15
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID G08PRE_Tot %G08PRE_D_Oba %G08PRE_R_McC G06GOV_Tot %G06GOV_D_Dav
1
359439
31.97594
66.78796
204884
31.46951
2
330058
34.87599
63.75455
204125
39.79277
3
334483
46.41103
52.29205
185068
44.77381
4
364543
33.75459
65.31136
206651
27.96889
5
321495
63.23146
35.93213
172734
55.02449
6
351871
49.08873
49.67161
214780
45.15411
7
326192
50.40651
48.66858
171126
38.20752
8
366753
43.84068
54.88353
223464
41.61118
9
262598
58.07508
41.00755
121942
43.97009
10
281745
58.62216
40.77694
137807
44.33737
11
361982
42.91208
55.95748
228657
37.77842
12
343118
46.6204
52.08121
206690
41.40065
13
345146
51.11721
47.32548
222103
43.25831
14
281789
65.03057
33.95981
150073
54.88263
15
300279
45.90864
52.94609
174731
38.99365
16
356383
48.08282
50.76982
238435
41.14622
17
296000
42.99121
55.71858
186204
38.05182
18
338787
51.04771
48.04671
208178
46.83684
19
321165
42.32622
56.79417
191085
32.37617
20
254703
80.40384
19.04493
129378
73.81394
21
319953
63.50214
35.86933
199972
64.05047
22
323214
56.67236
42.52848
205404
53.97071
23
280666
61.76559
37.49546
154514
61.51158
24
250473
86.15739
13.46932
112584
79.99715
25
228771
45.53374
53.89538
105643
37.35221
26
264189
49.49109
49.88928
124956
46.35632
27
240628
48.52054
50.89765
122978
43.91273
App. 16
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %G06GOV_R_Cri %G06CFO_D_Sin %G06CFO_R_Lee %G06ATG_D_Cam %G06ATG_R_McC
1
66.52057
35.09494
64.90054
31.25829
68.73825
2
57.01849
52.14124
47.81977
43.67496
56.28599
3
55.78814
55.04617
48.73174
44.82557
55.14981
4
69.70738
39.12466
60.84768
28.94017
71.03425
5
42.67023
65.54411
34.37367
58.10579
41.79555
6
52.14126
53.79021
46.18464
46.01921
53.95289
7
59.32997
49.61996
50.34749
38.00753
61.98297
8
54.81241
49.7195
50.2805
42.33319
57.66772
9
52.87104
53.48605
46.3984
45.38786
54.53355
10
53.24693
55.61972
44.33592
44.80164
55.17308
11
58.29343
49.62224
50.35958
41.07964
58.90112
12
54.48595
50.07878
49.90376
43.17842
56.80559
13
52.23883
54.05572
45.94475
47.33128
52.70057
14
42.28609
60.77848
39.24094
55.28071
44.72548
15
57.60168
44.50285
55.4743
39.50439
60.47909
16
55.694
50.33406
49.66551
46.14113
53.84595
17
58.23559
46.23435
53.74405
40.52707
59.38651
18
50.88434
52.66688
47.32014
50.51885
49.47675
19
65.0925
42.35077
57.44107
35.1749
64.67489
20
23.97162
79.68101
20.25926
76.41868
23.54094
21
34.05377
70.97749
29.00941
67.99458
32.00955
22
43.90129
61.35775
38.65751
57.81075
42.22335
23
36.43941
69.9668
30.01527
64.68713
35.30861
24
18.42624
84.60224
15.38805
80.81738
19.173
25
61.08119
45.68285
54.29268
40.13307
59.86087
26
52.01031
53.4752
46.51119
48.50714
51.46333
27
54.64067
51.56624
48.39417
47.67575
52.28756
App. 17
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %G06AGR_D_Cop %G06AGR_R_Bro %G06USS_D_Nel %G06USS_R_Har GENRV12
1
28.62488
71.37663
43.99265
54.29124
489574
2
33.04285
66.91253
58.11382
40.22456
441354
3
39.47338
60.49686
57.93426
40.33126
451707
4
27.61595
72.34992
44.37468
54.17622
490653
5
51.52442
48.37738
68.37587
29.99547
426556
6
43.76283
56.20344
60.70535
37.80035
484647
7
35.60236
64.37768
57.83176
40.73933
451340
8
35.77655
64.22345
58.70867
39.67593
483335
9
41.01482
58.93209
60.74369
37.62944
419013
10
42.1143
57.87595
62.64498
36.02802
414468
11
36.94055
63.03455
56.50418
41.43145
497326
12
38.42378
61.55901
59.61547
38.26008
478685
13
39.82838
60.18855
62.34542
35.55236
468468
14
51.23935
48.77254
69.37196
28.59318
417841
15
35.14322
64.84672
56.34906
41.86988
418216
16
39.69854
60.29624
56.40486
41.922
483759
17
36.28855
63.6769
55.99702
42.206
422941
18
44.38683
55.59675
63.04112
35.69372
476446
19
32.74873
67.05603
50.16571
47.93965
442874
20
74.07121
25.91206
81.065
16.9544
404064
21
63.659
36.33638
75.9642
22.87578
464021
22
52.75271
47.26133
67.08039
31.52979
484313
23
61.91266
38.08127
71.87414
26.42227
435288
24
80.36465
19.63816
83.49323
14.58447
391100
25
38.61058
61.41976
49.70652
48.5511
342092
26
46.65751
53.31903
56.28922
42.13919
395633
27
44.68048
55.30289
54.89281
43.37626
357842
App. 18
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %GENRVDEM12 %GENRVREP12 %GENRVIND12 %GENRVB12 %GENRVH12
1
29.05935
51.86754
19.0727
11.30881
1.986217
2
45.55595
39.03896
15.39875
10.32844
2.009045
3
40.61482
38.81697
20.56134
12.64824
4.910706
4
28.13822
50.61113
21.25209
9.072196
3.731558
5
61.06795
23.03144
15.88068
46.08422
3.094084
6
36.27238
37.57333
26.16069
8.370009
5.100826
7
35.27762
37.66296
27.04923
9.92201
13.8594
8
33.44802
43.45392
23.09868
7.880042
4.621225
9
42.79247
27.57576
29.62844
10.36937
33.92973
10
44.43576
30.3775
25.18071
22.90454
13.69418
11
34.13938
43.40634
22.45549
5.244246
5.506649
12
33.2724
40.22875
26.50156
3.818795
6.681847
13
35.20582
37.52316
27.27294
4.483978
3.935808
14
50.19852
24.52847
25.26416
25.50085
15.73254
15
37.71376
38.1401
24.14685
12.39933
9.026675
16
32.09697
43.45428
24.4473
4.947298
3.613576
17
36.00928
41.25871
22.73556
7.289669
7.297235
18
36.24062
38.05405
25.69777
9.604866
6.334401
19
27.52318
46.53129
25.9155
4.654371
7.067247
20
65.62872
13.29294
21.05359
47.98324
10.80497
21
46.74551
25.81693
27.41514
8.903908
11.56542
22
40.77095
31.778
27.42297
7.652696
9.181872
23
47.13339
24.88996
27.9523
9.668541
26.31844
24
68.60854
10.44004
20.94221
55.19816
22.91869
25
32.35825
38.42592
29.1977
6.320522
58.07853
26
35.55315
35.16618
29.28547
9.342244
57.29628
27
35.80603
35.87533
28.31725
7.038302
60.51693
App. 19
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %GENRVDEMB12 %GENRVREPB12 %GENRVINDB12 %GENRVBDEM12 %GENRVBREP12
1
31.24477
1.286181
8.184203
80.28719
5.899034
2
19.72417
1.065003
5.891441
86.99792
4.025447
3
26.36542
1.289502
6.925288
84.6621
3.957433
4
25.00127
1.009564
7.102442
77.54364
5.632062
5
66.14214
5.23096
28.03809
87.64746
2.614269
6
18.8813
0.7951762
4.64953
81.82423
3.56958
7
22.04344
1.157729
6.285836
78.37524
4.394623
8
19.21307
0.8527434
4.689012
81.55276
4.702392
9
19.26874
1.436657
5.739164
79.51852
3.820571
10
42.5651
2.585283
12.69475
82.57806
3.42877
11
12.56125
0.6633592
2.976441
81.77217
5.490587
12
8.624976
0.5603186
2.714037
75.14771
5.902626
13
9.853997
0.535885
2.949164
77.36837
4.484433
14
42.34088
3.322275
13.5425
83.34819
3.195593
15
26.4473
1.376107
7.832769
80.44199
4.232876
16
12.50773
0.5289847
2.863038
81.14737
4.646304
17
16.60823
0.7415473
4.306454
82.0408
4.197074
18
21.4876
1.056771
5.496749
81.076
4.18688
19
13.03274
0.4731287
3.195002
77.06787
4.730025
20
61.73458
10.29565
28.85859
84.437
2.852236
21
14.66053
1.403219
6.123636
76.96776
4.068642
22
14.89018
0.9323934
4.627559
79.32979
3.871786
23
16.36821
1.503558
5.642172
79.79375
3.870646
24
68.81355
13.86202
31.16782
85.53178
2.621827
25
15.48399
0.7622554
3.455042
79.27111
4.634169
26
21.22138
1.073105
4.820348
80.7608
4.039393
27
15.81843
0.8038823
3.807324
80.47328
4.097515
App. 20
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %GENRVBIND12 %GENRVDEMH12 %GENRVREPH12 %GENRVINDH12 %GENRVHDEM12
1
13.80294
1.952667
1.534675
3.257831
28.56849
2
8.783591
1.643266
1.706326
3.637273
37.26176
3
11.25794
5.324866
3.190391
7.270906
44.04021
4
16.63784
4.324175
2.448807
5.874907
32.60691
5
9.661962
2.242705
3.088292
6.225273
44.26428
6
14.53223
6.421757
2.701293
6.67182
45.66563
7
17.13635
17.74755
7.242864
17.95403
45.17449
8
13.74485
5.784148
2.889615
6.192899
41.86515
9
16.39854
39.27532
17.37403
41.55477
49.53436
10
13.95631
15.01042
7.618443
18.63538
48.70679
11
12.74491
7.940089
2.931844
6.753405
49.22588
12
18.83479
8.675834
4.156951
7.978149
43.2015
13
17.93773
4.939731
2.269831
4.832309
44.18592
14
13.4168
14.98117
11.85286
20.94654
47.80109
15
15.25378
10.29767
5.44236
12.67205
43.02402
16
14.14783
4.872096
1.928987
4.942249
43.27555
17
13.43129
9.121591
4.033811
10.18948
45.01183
18
14.70652
7.823151
3.839896
7.933941
44.75812
19
17.78974
10.56664
3.58947
9.450829
41.15147
20
12.66228
8.260741
13.95778
16.63571
50.17522
21
18.85468
11.1881
8.785769
14.80206
45.22044
22
16.58257
9.988909
6.333777
11.2745
44.3545
23
16.31184
22.82201
27.28464
31.35371
40.87167
24
11.82509
15.46316
47.68925
34.96246
46.28996
25
15.9606
53.39446
58.24788
63.02774
29.74854
26
15.11052
45.26518
66.21912
61.20245
28.08768
27
15.31803
48.33722
70.98935
62.6521
28.59966
App. 21
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %GENRVHREP12 %GENRVHIND12 GENRV10 %GENRVDEM10 %GENRVREP10
1
40.0761
31.28342
485732
30.9854
50.86797
2
33.15665
27.87865
427750
49.23367
36.51151
3
25.21865
30.4436
432616
42.63897
38.11648
4
33.21317
33.45895
465984
30.34053
49.7457
5
22.98833
31.95181
402905
62.06351
23.28762
6
19.89806
34.21787
465198
37.75983
37.21791
7
19.68251
35.04068
424052
36.07293
38.65398
8
27.17138
30.95451
457350
34.98787
43.9285
9
14.12042
36.28684
375985
43.53339
29.23335
10
16.89982
34.26654
377098
45.08828
31.41359
11
23.11035
27.53962
484948
35.75971
42.66849
12
25.02736
31.64296
459975
34.6958
40.11414
13
21.64009
33.4852
454635
36.23104
37.93681
14
18.4797
33.63707
384658
50.98529
25.43428
15
22.99542
33.89844
392887
39.01834
38.57572
16
23.19661
33.4363
463610
32.82587
43.63625
17
22.80725
31.74675
408494
37.65906
40.76412
18
23.06826
32.18688
459821
37.32583
38.00022
19
23.63334
34.65606
414340
28.35304
47.2286
20
17.17172
32.41485
375545
65.17754
14.44887
21
19.61205
35.08739
439797
48.13266
26.0004
22
21.92089
33.6729
456068
41.5824
32.58154
23
25.80372
33.30016
399126
48.52177
25.70817
24
21.72366
31.94734
361369
69.29095
11.06238
25
38.53796
31.68581
319207
32.40123
40.04424
26
40.64266
31.28201
365123
35.77452
36.81527
27
42.08353
29.31634
332630
35.79322
38.17455
App. 22
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %GENRVIND10 %GENRVB10 %GENRVH10 %GENRVDEMB10 %GENRVREPB10
1
18.14396
10.98754
1.784729
28.59022
1.40763
2
14.20386
10.37849
1.735593
18.51118
1.144207
3
19.22721
12.22678
4.414538
24.53012
1.388737
4
19.88201
9.555907
3.370287
24.9466
1.072875
5
14.57217
44.15979
2.70709
63.04602
5.115798
6
24.9943
8.146423
4.69542
17.78342
0.8397974
7
25.26058
9.437757
12.61708
20.7599
1.201857
8
21.0821
7.453372
4.244452
17.6175
0.8670679
9
27.16917
9.868213
31.50525
18.24669
1.381092
10
23.47878
22.22764
12.6853
41.10935
2.644775
11
21.55324
5.080545
5.147562
11.71691
0.6935048
12
25.18833
3.538671
5.965324
7.729084
0.5392516
13
25.81763
4.079976
3.471576
8.745196
0.5189188
14
23.56327
24.88106
14.13515
40.99603
3.472172
15
22.39524
11.76496
8.138982
24.60045
1.377021
16
23.53487
4.716896
3.135825
11.63394
0.5600538
17
21.55111
6.919074
6.528125
15.15455
0.7578714
18
24.67264
8.967185
5.653504
19.6059
1.01698
19
24.47724
4.090843
6.218082
11.16549
0.4532749
20
20.36747
45.55859
10.03422
58.99637
9.984888
21
25.86534
7.864765
10.07669
12.61822
1.368617
22
25.84023
7.188182
8.038275
13.76316
0.903132
23
25.76329
9.032235
24.10492
14.96465
1.495985
24
19.63533
55.89716
21.50074
69.11612
14.92145
25
27.52195
6.402742
55.43989
15.70963
0.8026662
26
27.40665
9.443119
55.5317
21.37711
1.128544
27
26.03554
7.035144
59.23759
15.98955
0.8048512
App. 23
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %GENRVINDB10 %GENRVBDEM10 %GENRVBREP10 %GENRVBIND10 %GENRVDEMH10
1
7.780463
80.62582
6.51677
12.84804
1.700929
2
5.712922
87.81367
4.025319
7.818624
1.386534
3
6.363308
85.54494
4.329332
10.00662
4.732656
4
7.091433
79.20681
5.585124
14.75443
3.761441
5
26.02024
88.6068
2.697811
8.586347
1.967551
6
4.41289
82.42869
3.836715
13.53933
5.754364
7
5.772139
79.34834
4.922416
15.44939
16.06676
8
4.307242
82.70066
5.110303
12.18317
5.235069
9
5.397839
80.49483
4.091313
14.86133
36.65834
10
12.07052
83.3894
3.737772
12.74994
13.82545
11
2.731482
82.47017
5.824337
11.58779
7.161969
12
2.50561
75.78178
6.11292
17.83498
7.611284
13
2.664088
77.65917
4.825058
16.85805
4.218092
14
13.05854
84.00744
3.549375
12.36691
13.01812
15
7.253262
81.58709
4.515068
13.80698
9.07383
16
2.766932
80.96305
5.181087
13.80556
4.077958
17
3.972284
82.48302
4.465044
12.37263
7.896772
18
5.088585
81.60939
4.309655
14.00092
6.946257
19
2.728286
77.38643
5.233038
16.32448
8.994024
20
27.55167
84.40205
3.166699
12.31728
7.667575
21
5.458221
77.22398
4.52456
17.95079
9.566527
22
4.335208
79.61749
4.093585
15.5843
8.602962
23
5.306921
80.39112
4.257975
15.13731
20.4577
24
32.30312
85.67737
2.953043
11.34731
14.29895
25
3.530938
79.49897
5.020061
15.17761
49.52188
26
4.992605
80.98553
4.39978
14.48998
42.64169
27
3.783977
81.35123
4.367335
14.00368
45.35315
App. 24
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %GENRVREPH10 %GENRVINDH10 %GENRVHDEM10 %GENRVHREP10 %GENRVHIND10
1
1.418153
2.954692
29.53051
40.41989
30.03807
2
1.608421
3.114044
39.3319
33.83621
25.48491
3
2.990333
6.434239
45.71159
25.81946
28.02388
4
2.313563
5.243559
33.86183
34.14836
30.93282
5
2.735886
5.544012
45.10865
23.53535
29.84322
6
2.529788
6.272307
46.2757
20.05219
33.38827
7
6.913424
16.26897
45.93574
21.18012
32.57201
8
2.718671
5.775833
43.15372
28.13724
28.68844
9
17.13537
38.4711
50.65384
15.89971
33.17631
10
7.361979
17.46143
49.14082
18.23104
32.31876
11
2.85521
6.318287
49.75364
23.66703
26.45515
12
3.813782
7.066287
44.26911
25.64598
29.83709
13
2.077415
4.278558
44.02205
22.70164
31.81905
14
11.23729
19.45542
46.95615
20.21997
32.43213
15
5.140573
11.60726
43.50002
24.36439
31.93858
16
1.754802
4.365319
42.68813
24.41876
32.76242
17
3.774344
9.021412
45.55443
23.56845
29.78213
18
3.480167
6.985456
45.8609
23.39206
30.48546
19
3.261842
8.12471
41.01071
24.77488
31.98261
20
12.88194
15.22833
49.80495
18.54948
30.91049
21
7.961591
13.09041
45.69578
20.54291
33.6011
22
5.722977
9.994145
44.50355
23.19695
32.12766
23
26.37708
28.67701
41.18014
28.13146
30.64994
24
46.69302
32.6935
46.08157
24.02409
29.85701
25
57.5072
59.43405
28.94252
41.53745
29.50477
26
65.59615
58.82899
27.47054
43.48759
29.03398
27
70.78595
61.34616
27.4038
45.61667
26.96227
App. 25
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID GENVT12 %GENVTDEM12 %GENVTREP12 %GENVTIND12 %GENVTB12 %GENVTH12
1
355917
28.69433
55.84982
15.45023
11.41755
1.687472
2
331465
46.00003
41.80411
12.20068
10.41709
1.740455
3
327560
40.86885
42.06802
17.05458
12.79491
4.241971
4
373662
27.65199
54.60363
17.74358
9.082808
3.162751
5
312137
63.30746
24.14645
12.53232
47.6057
2.55689
6
347984
36.41403
41.25362
22.32948
8.479413
4.386409
7
330207
35.19338
41.54879
23.26086
9.966173
12.03851
8
365563
33.10702
46.93418
19.95798
7.863487
4.096968
9
279240
43.94786
30.82008
25.21057
11.44535
29.86356
10
288714
44.86031
33.9128
21.22481
23.36568
11.51451
11
371625
33.32661
47.2479
19.42388
5.195829
4.572082
12
345495
33.09165
43.77545
23.12508
3.988191
6.051028
13
344126
35.7157
40.68597
23.58497
4.45796
3.468497
14
294955
51.94962
26.78476
21.25477
26.42335
13.78854
15
305280
38.03688
41.69746
20.26468
12.93042
7.832482
16
360388
32.02382
46.75322
21.2188
4.79289
3.086951
17
299437
35.44318
45.32773
19.22341
7.554177
5.784522
18
345614
36.17273
41.37014
22.45019
9.878362
5.506721
19
323141
26.75674
51.28195
21.92944
4.497417
5.621076
20
264327
69.65577
12.78946
17.53018
52.18423
9.55521
21
327016
48.36063
26.8733
24.74711
9.63592
10.56217
22
329571
41.72121
33.77846
24.48516
8.001007
8.450986
23
289572
48.81791
26.07469
25.09911
10.42711
26.34647
24
262837
72.38517
9.764987
17.84414
59.07159
20.69648
25
238005
32.26235
41.98819
25.72383
6.960778
55.17951
26
268360
36.1343
38.35221
25.512
9.699657
56.11455
27
246340
36.14719
38.60275
25.25128
7.075181
59.66185
App. 26
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %GENVTDEMB12 %GENVTREPB12 %GENVTINDB12 %GENVTBDEM12 %GENVTBREP12
1
33.39143
1.018719
8.197854
83.91859
4.983143
2
20.3333
0.7700301
5.885117
89.78829
3.090156
3
27.43184
0.9825977
6.737792
87.62139
3.230655
4
26.36342
0.8537834
7.343781
80.26164
5.132738
5
67.74136
4.098448
29.39312
90.08446
2.078805
6
19.69775
0.6429546
4.582835
84.5901
3.128071
7
22.90489
0.9723245
6.35863
80.88365
4.053602
8
19.97571
0.7157261
4.582026
84.10213
4.271899
9
21.46349
1.206107
6.318361
82.41552
3.24781
10
44.50115
2.025309
12.74988
85.43878
2.93952
11
13.1417
0.5137113
2.910617
84.2923
4.671397
12
9.313391
0.5025059
2.93882
77.27702
5.51564
13
10.07998
0.4235381
2.853552
80.75745
3.865458
14
43.7668
2.613825
13.97467
86.04771
2.649576
15
28.14268
1.195657
8.457261
82.78614
3.855702
16
12.66615
0.4101061
2.548712
84.62919
4.000463
17
18.06181
0.573942
4.45259
84.74359
3.443855
18
22.81431
0.9099111
5.534147
83.54179
3.810668
19
13.50189
0.3668994
2.95782
80.32753
4.183582
20
65.26595
8.806129
31.72195
87.11731
2.158232
21
15.81946
1.261948
6.580004
79.3945
3.519406
22
15.70243
0.7428766
4.775949
81.88024
3.136259
23
17.57744
1.329713
5.923225
82.29449
3.325164
24
71.62387
12.5302
33.5366
87.76649
2.071337
25
17.69724
0.6664398
3.71913
82.02451
4.02004
26
22.49356
0.833641
4.86241
83.79562
3.296197
27
16.27716
0.588891
3.790753
83.16025
3.213036
App. 27
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %GENVTBIND12 %GENVTDEMH12 %GENVTREPH12 %GENVTINDH12 %GENVTHDEM12
1
11.09334
1.618557
1.354268
3.015094
27.52248
2
6.892757
1.412044
1.511193
3.55827
37.32016
3
8.980936
4.650781
2.759837
6.800444
44.80748
4
14.34633
3.696105
2.171217
5.197508
32.31511
5
7.737811
1.846098
2.680111
5.695588
45.70856
6
12.06832
5.704928
2.341247
5.956012
47.3598
7
14.84093
15.96407
6.292412
16.29106
46.66935
8
11.62944
5.217844
2.626855
5.692238
42.16465
9
13.9174
36.18888
14.23741
37.79511
53.25635
10
11.58168
12.88006
6.393561
16.67619
50.18048
11
10.88094
6.931772
2.42048
5.706251
50.52675
12
17.04042
8.009272
3.823673
7.418394
43.80082
13
15.0968
4.495269
2.024127
4.284025
46.28854
14
11.24113
13.32916
10.46036
19.00402
50.21883
15
13.25429
9.107898
4.781058
11.67076
44.23069
16
11.28351
4.355775
1.62618
4.383419
45.18652
17
11.33068
7.646283
3.190204
8.180744
46.85064
18
12.57725
6.958198
3.429127
6.971169
45.70723
19
14.42235
9.094169
2.885109
7.517322
43.28892
20
10.65631
7.158957
13.4769
15.98507
52.18751
21
16.89886
10.05647
8.324988
13.93478
46.04517
22
14.61565
9.068297
6.040027
10.63869
44.76878
23
14.2578
22.06376
27.94384
32.98844
40.8824
24
10.13062
13.66061
48.28177
34.12507
47.77749
25
13.74419
49.70568
55.71377
61.18842
29.0619
26
12.78909
42.15221
65.90136
61.14308
27.14342
27
13.52918
45.67803
71.02235
62.25645
27.67485
App. 28
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %GENVTHREP12 %GENVTHIND12 GENVT10 %GENVTDEM10 %GENVTREP10
1
44.82185
27.60573
233448
29.21207
59.78805
2
36.29745
24.94366
231067
48.98017
41.78052
3
27.36956
27.34077
217182
41.22165
45.73722
4
37.48519
29.15891
247842
27.97226
58.62808
5
25.31011
27.9163
196913
63.51028
27.49184
6
22.01913
30.31971
234903
36.14513
45.79678
7
21.71715
31.47766
206832
33.33092
49.20225
8
30.09281
27.72919
252245
32.33801
52.24009
9
14.69343
31.90632
150230
41.43447
40.15443
10
18.83047
30.73938
174709
42.31207
41.89882
11
25.01324
24.24225
264014
32.27291
51.40409
12
27.66191
28.35071
224328
32.55055
48.57218
13
23.7433
29.13036
231518
35.16487
45.8189
14
20.31965
29.29432
165775
51.52767
32.84814
15
25.45272
30.19531
194362
37.25677
47.81902
16
24.62921
30.13034
250307
30.80457
51.48398
17
24.99856
27.18665
204638
34.65534
49.96726
18
25.76188
28.42056
226706
34.74456
46.54222
19
26.32129
29.32724
224905
24.24535
57.91156
20
18.03856
29.32652
143567
69.93668
16.49961
21
21.18124
32.6491
203961
50.15027
29.765
22
24.14189
30.82364
210224
41.16419
39.22197
23
27.65559
31.42662
159280
50.40369
30.81994
24
22.78025
29.42204
139790
75.73003
11.29552
25
42.39473
28.52509
133881
28.99515
51.64437
26
45.04114
27.79818
154275
35.28439
45.9368
27
45.95328
26.34942
146827
34.00465
47.55665
App. 29
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %GENVTIND10 %GENVTB10 %GENVTH10 %GENVTDEMB10 %GENVTREPB10
1
10.99388
9.557589
1.062335
28.57834
0.9048963
2
9.142803
8.752872
1.100979
16.54046
0.6152827
3
13.002
10.14679
2.560986
22.32871
0.7711436
4
13.36133
7.886879
2.11425
23.42233
0.7453288
5
8.88108
41.55642
1.563127
60.85559
2.948185
6
17.99934
6.838142
2.91482
16.73733
0.4666381
7
17.44169
8.056297
7.833411
20.1613
0.808718
8
15.4227
6.211025
2.824238
16.66033
0.5942037
9
18.23804
10.12248
19.64454
21.01949
0.925005
10
15.74847
19.88507
7.76205
41.29297
1.625661
11
16.30027
4.113039
2.719174
11.14254
0.3794745
12
18.85899
3.133804
3.77795
7.652698
0.3836235
13
19.01666
2.9691
2.078024
7.137681
0.289407
14
15.6067
23.02217
8.398733
40.00234
2.045763
15
14.89077
10.16402
4.604295
23.41845
0.9263842
16
17.70386
3.418602
1.703908
9.706119
0.3127231
17
15.29628
5.539538
3.213968
13.98235
0.4410672
18
18.69029
7.530899
3.368239
18.69033
0.6653146
19
17.48561
2.478824
2.978591
8.468888
0.2364756
20
13.45504
48.37532
6.170638
62.13772
6.627829
21
20.08374
7.470056
6.173729
12.17652
1.013029
22
19.59862
6.077327
5.136426
12.51257
0.5590996
23
18.75565
9.438725
19.66788
15.88257
1.146873
24
12.94799
62.78131
15.68853
74.83068
11.64028
25
19.32836
6.9629
49.06447
20.33025
0.5351306
26
18.75936
9.7579
51.38097
24.01764
0.7125823
27
18.41351
6.31151
56.67691
15.975
0.4668748
App. 30
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %GENVTINDB10 %GENVTBDEM10 %GENVTBREP10 %GENVTBIND10 %GENVTDEMH10
1
6.078317
87.34762
5.660631
6.991753
0.9032921
2
4.028212
92.55872
2.936959
4.207664
0.7669403
3
4.405411
90.71107
3.475972
5.645051
2.691955
4
6.338517
83.07157
5.540492
10.73822
2.186738
5
22.63266
93.00501
1.950385
4.836857
1.077083
6
3.105414
88.4704
3.125195
8.174065
3.890184
7
5.247401
83.41235
4.939086
11.3605
10.31201
8
3.31851
86.74284
4.997766
8.240251
3.558863
9
5.423555
86.03932
3.669363
9.771815
26.07033
10
10.71818
87.86449
3.425348
8.488529
8.902507
11
1.947252
87.42978
4.74261
7.717101
4.067836
12
2.359004
79.48791
5.945946
14.1963
4.741167
13
1.646717
84.53593
4.466104
10.54699
2.527852
14
10.84184
89.5323
2.918905
7.349666
7.566144
15
6.564854
85.84156
4.35839
9.617818
5.041913
16
1.493885
87.46056
4.709594
7.736356
2.269603
17
2.913552
87.47353
3.978476
8.045166
4.058208
18
3.750118
86.22972
4.111755
9.307093
4.217449
19
1.487566
82.83408
5.524663
10.49327
4.716756
20
27.21437
89.83312
2.260587
7.569366
4.349342
21
5.102165
81.74718
4.036492
13.71751
5.27633
22
3.339725
84.75266
3.608328
10.77019
5.106486
23
5.409386
84.81442
3.744845
10.74897
14.26329
24
36.64641
90.26458
2.094301
7.557941
9.169398
25
3.852842
84.65994
3.969105
10.69513
38.55329
26
4.941087
86.84735
3.35459
9.499136
32.77303
27
3.295606
86.06885
3.517859
9.614762
35.43703
App. 31
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %GENVTREPH10 %GENVTINDH10 %GENVTHDEM10 %GENVTHREP10 %GENVTHIND10
1
0.9894393
1.88194
24.83871
55.68548
19.47581
2
1.135269
2.456688
34.1195
43.08176
20.40094
3
1.986248
4.058361
43.32974
35.47285
20.6041
4
1.711572
3.533142
28.9313
47.46183
22.32825
5
1.810289
3.796889
43.76218
31.83886
21.57245
6
1.716894
3.881176
48.2401
26.97532
23.9667
7
4.793349
11.41511
43.8773
30.10739
25.41661
8
2.036836
3.94057
40.74958
37.67546
21.51881
9
10.27949
25.38779
54.9878
21.01179
23.57007
10
4.928895
11.97209
48.52887
26.60571
24.29024
11
1.717583
3.178808
48.27971
32.4697
19.05558
12
2.803756
4.524181
40.84956
36.0472
22.58407
13
1.499826
2.591592
42.77697
33.07005
23.71648
14
7.810262
12.22557
46.41959
30.54658
22.71781
15
3.411805
7.207519
40.79786
35.43413
23.30987
16
1.137598
2.331092
41.03165
34.3728
24.2204
17
2.18382
4.322408
43.75855
33.95165
20.57169
18
2.48024
3.920042
43.50445
34.27187
21.75223
19
1.97626
3.725271
38.39379
38.42365
21.86894
20
9.912191
10.53476
49.2945
26.50412
22.97099
21
6.032054
8.356321
42.86055
29.08196
27.18393
22
4.315133
6.215868
40.92424
32.95055
23.71736
23
24.92565
25.24269
36.55313
39.05896
24.07189
24
45.30082
27.74033
44.26155
32.61593
22.89453
25
53.62732
52.4288
22.78346
56.44714
20.6537
26
64.13665
55.06721
22.50593
57.34092
20.10521
27
70.92057
58.88815
21.26128
59.50827
19.13191
App. 32
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %PRIVTDEMB10 %PRIVTREPB10 %PRIVTBDEM10 %PRIVTBREP10 %PRIVTDEMH10
1
24.26237
0.6717985
89.70757
6.579849
0.6611673
2
15.02931
0.5018153
94.74796
2.73599
0.4716718
3
18.7476
0.5764879
93.46186
3.843851
1.397963
4
19.42507
0.545429
86.87902
7.047368
1.239898
5
57.07965
2.143131
95.9549
1.766283
0.5534883
6
16.50416
0.3865149
91.5401
3.321505
2.822777
7
17.70629
0.5451488
88.52234
5.515464
6.832319
8
15.7447
0.4702476
89.89503
5.749648
2.510701
9
18.28395
0.6678361
90.16357
4.732824
18.82353
10
38.21219
1.168664
91.86385
3.851609
6.268824
11
9.802108
0.2706274
91.0203
5.543987
2.430205
12
6.060082
0.273663
86.1002
7.612967
2.803609
13
5.544665
0.2290761
88.1068
5.582524
1.855859
14
38.27449
1.607974
93.66984
3.047855
4.113719
15
20.54709
0.663744
90.85188
4.973139
2.537578
16
9.445144
0.2656679
90.87149
5.406204
1.332637
17
11.2142
0.2714525
92.52289
3.992879
2.524583
18
17.98069
0.4886179
91.56588
4.105665
2.681166
19
7.414299
0.2198212
84.74216
8.77193
2.669892
20
61.60179
5.339664
94.08482
2.049851
2.572222
21
9.933309
0.7532065
89.13043
4.090697
2.665034
22
11.01731
0.4269032
90.98605
3.859562
2.909606
23
15.78478
0.952525
90.73939
3.459004
9.063993
24
78.93791
11.45387
93.90785
1.803016
5.331927
25
22.60129
0.4207263
90.3621
4.138307
31.80116
26
25.40239
0.5540627
92.34365
3.223727
22.63557
27
15.50337
0.3073528
91.83161
3.261779
28.94526
App. 33
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID %PRIVTREPH10 %PRIVTHDEM10 %PRIVTHREP10 TotVAP10 DMVTot10 DMVNewTot10
1
0.7091206
23.11015
65.65874
541696
600690
613310
2
0.8648649
33.53175
53.1746
549064
508651
538842
3
1.379261
38.8
51.2
554038
531583
555342
4
1.213484
23.30097
65.88072
539733
576503
587647
5
1.28524
40
45.53672
529910
515890
529359
6
1.296642
47.0965
33.51836
562709
601153
611890
7
3.396566
41.84382
42.0964
543590
556993
562114
8
1.619599
37.3317
51.57079
559112
599105
608958
9
7.038439
55.64126
29.89933
520710
594544
607905
10
3.539963
47.10686
36.46757
528574
559616
571285
11
1.19813
42.73041
46.4761
574988
594847
612103
12
1.979202
37.18478
51.39844
548058
581882
590310
13
1.16862
44.39708
42.87454
578166
596904
602136
14
5.544238
43.29774
45.19573
535709
553306
563967
15
2.319007
35.38238
54.79187
528370
525261
537229
16
0.8303936
36.53199
48.14815
571804
578395
585326
17
1.51633
42.5897
45.60582
552440
533342
551600
18
1.789705
41.65049
45.87379
556783
565537
576728
19
1.445491
29.89583
56.51042
568936
574436
582539
20
8.043415
48.55172
38.16092
525932
531079
541662
21
4.639752
40.80574
42.9996
544654
558436
565818
22
3.216922
38.6
46.72
579627
587555
594611
23
23.75769
32.63037
54.02865
552468
579668
587531
24
43.15867
40.42648
43.29927
525767
529567
535644
25
52.36105
17.18365
69.60665
534871
541858
552411
26
63.58423
16.13209
72.52962
541358
555113
567361
27
74.39252
15.82238
72.85754
550152
527449
535540
App. 34
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID DifDMV-VAP RelMagDifDMV-VAP
BlackDMV10 DifBDMV-BVAP HispDMV10
1
71614
55
72925
1466
12354
2
-10222
49
53556
-19845
9816
3
1304
50
69114
-10423
26728
4
47914
54
54664
2648
22937
5
-551
49
230134
-8960
19888
6
49181
54
50474
-2742
33208
7
18524
51
55679
-5127
81395
8
49846
54
50444
-573
28728
9
87195
57
59862
-8539
208758
10
42711
53
137066
818
92080
11
37115
53
32577
-6211
36534
12
42252
53
21875
-1901
38667
13
23970
51
27502
-3103
25973
14
28258
52
137527
232
109528
15
8859
50
61952
-5283
54012
16
13522
51
32528
-805
29519
17
-840
49
39449
-6729
51773
18
19945
51
58538
-3091
42815
19
13603
51
33457
-3333
60830
20
15730
51
265252
1982
71507
21
21164
51
56302
-4844
78836
22
14984
51
57066
-2818
69568
23
35063
52
55439
-5269
165385
24
9877
50
283816
-4910
143098
25
17540
51
32519
-8692
328445
26
26003
52
46015
-8250
328401
27
-14612
48
32758
-9645
342666
App. 35
Coalition Remedial Map A
District ID DifHDMV-HVAP AsianVAP10 AsianDMV10 DifADMV-AVAP
1
-12283
13934
12504
-1430
2
-15545
7834
5693
-2141
3
-16135
16032
11283
-4749
4
-11893
23069
20072
-2997
5
-12651
12895
11199
-1696
6
-10745
8685
5782
-2903
7
-14064
21377
13036
-8341
8
-14083
10864
7160
-3704
9
14863
17687
11014
-6673
10
-9284
25610
13529
-12081
11
-10280
7333
4833
-2500
12
-15786
13345
9177
-4168
13
-15908
17703
15219
-2484
14
-27678
14595
11088
-3507
15
-25165
17097
10768
-6329
16
-20563
7797
5696
-2101
17
-27516
7137
4780
-2357
18
-24304
9837
5629
-4208
19
-23551
7248
4319
-2929
20
-25999
10797
5498
-5299
21
-20776
18035
9331
-8704
22
-33125
11928
6456
-5472
23
-37542
17848
9269
-8579
24
-31201
9584
4895
-4689
25
-49656
9237
5201
-4036
26
-44672
9681
4886
-4795
27
-70191
8669
4613
-4056
App. 36
Coalition Remedial Map B
App. 37
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID Pop Dev
1
1
2
1
3
1
4
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
8
0
9
0
10
1
11
1
12
0
13
1
14
1
15
1
16
1
17
1
18
0
19
1
20
1
21
1
22
1
23
1
24
1
25
0
26
1
27
1
TPOP10 %AllBlkPop10 %AllBlkVAP10 %AllHispPop10 %AllHispVAP10
696345
15.03623
13.19172
5.16741
4.548123
696345
14.09057
13.36839
5.141992
4.618951
696345
16.29235
14.35587
8.678169
7.736473
696345
10.89201
9.637358
7.227308
6.453191
696345
48.48918
45.11974
6.712765
6.140477
696345
10.84491
9.439997
9.265235
7.819644
696345
12.28759
11.06184
18.30989
16.70303
696344
10.84277
9.124648
8.938972
7.656963
696344
12.44342
11.34897
42.06182
39.30269
696345
30.00036
27.4048
20.08789
18.49506
696345
8.691813
7.291963
9.114592
7.504179
696344
5.238072
4.338227
11.58551
9.935627
696345
6.661928
5.293462
8.606222
7.243767
696345
28.66367
25.62865
27.28332
25.61204
696345
14.30699
12.72498
17.2584
14.98514
696345
7.340758
5.829445
11.00776
8.758595
696345
9.684999
8.344933
17.55251
14.35199
696344
12.98884
11.06876
14.12032
12.05479
696345
8.201538
6.466457
17.87218
14.83137
696345
54.02322
50.0578
19.12256
18.53966
696345
13.14564
11.22658
20.02743
18.28904
696345
12.11928
10.33147
19.63265
17.71708
696345
12.03513
10.98851
37.28497
36.731
696345
57.71019
54.9152
31.77462
33.15138
696344
8.210741
7.704848
70.1995
70.69013
696345
10.74826
10.02387
68.81273
68.91428
696345
8.64715
7.707506
73.7215
75.04417
App. 38
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %SRWPop10 %SRWVAP10 %NHBPop10 %NHBVAP10
1
75.08146
77.55918
14.6627
12.93548
2
77.89716
79.25415
13.82102
13.17278
3
71.30847
74.11441
15.78126
13.97919
4
76.24454
78.53087
10.34674
9.242904
5
42.06478
45.78721
47.61663
44.46453
6
77.63393
80.51987
10.27565
9.036286
7
65.39977
68.18713
11.14706
10.17708
8
77.3665
80.405
10.26705
8.730809
9
42.0377
45.45393
9.760837
9.082286
10
45.77401
49.71885
28.53341
26.21683
11
80.3369
83.42742
8.186028
6.930295
12
79.8028
82.5825
4.687482
3.956698
13
80.48367
83.51926
6.24159
5.019666
14
42.24414
46.54393
26.64498
24.0093
15
64.72395
68.55688
13.33621
11.98289
16
79.6249
83.53614
6.942248
5.554176
17
70.85065
75.45284
9.057436
7.907803
18
70.60217
74.66248
12.36415
10.62066
19
72.2738
77.07897
7.537212
6.000675
20
25.21451
29.46217
52.58816
48.87476
21
62.80723
66.63148
12.30367
10.57754
22
65.66055
69.40981
11.39952
9.770594
23
47.53535
49.18909
10.64717
9.77758
24
11.47262
12.64457
54.29966
51.66604
25
21.13251
21.22231
6.433315
5.955081
26
19.68579
20.1678
9.154226
8.553305
27
17.86255
17.47026
6.408031
5.474851
%HBPop10 %HBVAP10 %HxBPop10
0.3735217 0.2562323
4.793888
0.2695503 0.1956056
4.872441
0.5110973
0.376689
8.167072
0.5452757 0.3944543
6.682033
0.872556 0.6552056
5.840209
0.569258 0.4037104
8.695977
1.140527
0.884756
17.16936
0.5757212 0.3938388
8.363252
2.682582
2.266682
39.37924
1.466945
1.187979
18.62094
0.5057838 0.3616681
8.608808
0.5505899
0.381529
11.03492
0.4203376 0.2737968
8.185884
2.018683
1.619349
25.26463
0.9707832 0.7420936
16.28762
0.3985094 0.2752692
10.60925
0.6275625 0.4371302
16.92494
0.6246912
0.44811
13.49563
0.6643259 0.4657817
17.20785
1.435065
1.183043
17.6875
0.8419677 0.6490359
19.18546
0.7197582 0.5608779
18.9129
1.387961
1.21093
35.897
3.410522
3.249158
28.3641
1.777426
1.749768
68.42207
1.594037
1.470561
67.21869
2.23912
2.232656
71.48238
App. 39
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %HxBVAP10 %OthPop10 %OthVAP10 %AsianPOP10 %AsianVAP10 %WIndiesPOPACS
1
4.291891
5.088426
4.957209
2.411879
2.572291
0.730423
2
4.423346
3.139823
2.954118
1.445117
1.426792
0.598725
3
7.359784
4.232098
4.16993
2.788417
2.893664
1.10827
4
6.058736
6.181419
5.77304
4.347414
4.27415
0.651345
5
5.485271
3.605828
3.607782
2.332177
2.433432
1.721386
6
7.415934
2.82518
2.624206
1.588724
1.552089
1.228092
7
15.81827
5.143284
4.932763
3.688689
3.682141
1.995925
8
7.263124
3.427473
3.207229
1.929506
1.943081
2.008909
9
37.03601
6.139638
6.161096
4.589973
4.774109
3.349719
10
17.30708
5.604693
5.569265
3.763939
3.854815
7.31474
11
7.14251
2.362478
2.138107
1.245934
1.165278
0.9034364
12
9.554098
3.92421
3.525174
2.585791
2.434961
0.8334238
13
6.969971
4.668519
4.217301
3.258729
3.061924
0.3781195
14
23.99269
3.827557
3.834731
2.619966
2.724427
2.442238
15
14.24305
4.681444
4.475084
3.26232
3.235801
1.478094
16
8.483327
2.425091
2.151087
1.455457
1.363579
1.122681
17
13.91486
2.539402
2.287376
1.354357
1.291118
1.844025
18
11.60668
2.913359
2.662078
1.82855
1.766757
3.654917
19
14.36559
2.316811
2.088987
1.344161
1.273957
2.327203
20
17.35662
3.074769
3.123408
1.944151
2.052927
19.52139
21
17.64001
4.86167
4.501941
3.46897
3.311276
5.797062
22
17.15621
3.307269
3.102512
2.102406
2.057875
5.788601
23
35.52007
4.532523
4.30233
3.277686
3.230594
4.554684
24
29.90222
2.453094
2.538006
1.691977
1.822861
22.89483
25
68.94036
2.234671
2.132477
1.747987
1.726959
3.158369
26
67.44373
2.347256
2.364609
1.72831
1.788281
3.469486
27
72.81152
2.007913
2.010717
1.5129
1.575746
2.077445
App. 40
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %HaitianPOPACS %SpkOnlyEng %SpkSpanish %SpkOther ACSHispTot %ACSMexican
1
0.1871403
92.29557
3.649182
4.053087
29388
36.95386
2
0.1564047
93.29364
3.862614
2.813175
29470
29.94231
3
0.2653208
89.92537
6.048874
4.011415
48487
23.35678
4
0.2043435
88.21306
5.02977
6.738768
39240
25.24974
5
0.6808653
91.06433
4.788207
4.107962
37734
26.95977
6
0.3231355
88.73081
6.356044
4.903833
55535
22.75682
7
0.5176908
81.23283
13.12229
5.636542
108578
14.5453
8
0.5561223
89.15794
6.206201
4.635709
55327
26.3
9
1.191932
58.68719
33.93106
7.374282
243511
7.078941
10
3.921566
74.18188
15.57143
10.2195
113871
26.83651
11
0.2425423
90.16067
6.43914
3.391414
52228
28.80447
12
0.1091668
86.63418
7.551672
5.809793
66021
20.59496
13
0.05160762
86.62268
5.889977
7.476715
51612
32.58738
14
0.8761909
74.28982
20.81555
4.894307
164646
15.32621
15
0.3523467
82.50156
12.27279
5.217608
100222
34.55529
16
0.7082896
86.46965
7.584703
5.942677
64564
52.8251
17
0.5233902
82.39679
14.06965
3.501186
107150
56.75968
18
1.760646
82.78322
10.74884
6.458298
79950
29.17574
19
1.625322
79.55676
14.20959
6.206348
107726
35.03889
20
9.907381
68.26076
16.64894
15.0816
130482
21.08643
21
3.036792
72.11935
15.76187
12.1183
119888
13.40251
22
4.003601
71.70814
16.31803
11.96836
131049
17.72543
23
1.511455
54.71569
32.81433
12.46826
225834
5.128546
24
15.22171
51.32713
29.07296
19.60275
201119
3.118054
25
1.753488
27.96248
67.11534
4.914265
441167
8.939698
26
1.351733
31.76353
63.93917
4.292304
448386
4.945962
27
0.7832751
24.733
71.13072
4.128692
492370
3.430956
App. 41
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %ACSPuerto Rican %ACSCuban %ACS C.Amer %ACS S.Amer %LessHighSch
1
21.01538
8.32993
11.1372
8.397985
12.8732
2
21.74415
17.64167
8.591788
7.634883
17.12778
3
31.31767
14.79572
8.245509
12.94574
15.18713
4
28.23649
12.7472
7.459225
13.04281
8.711435
5
28.83871
12.30455
12.90348
8.403562
17.82774
6
42.34267
9.338255
5.868371
9.804627
12.72462
7
44.5827
10.31793
5.770967
14.15572
10.08089
8
34.39912
10.32588
6.821263
10.45782
10.82175
9
55.23529
6.127855
5.571001
15.97053
13.72812
10
39.47625
5.321812
7.033398
10.90796
16.10412
11
37.66179
10.60925
4.478441
9.125373
15.55903
12
31.17644
15.76317
3.403463
14.30757
11.98152
13
29.25289
10.422
5.169341
11.62327
12.18718
14
31.31992
25.41999
6.834056
9.094056
17.8175
15
29.34186
11.69105
5.798128
8.549021
14.22144
16
13.34954
7.660616
8.156248
10.48417
11.57654
17
19.74522
8.923939
5.092861
3.942137
19.68617
18
19.6773
11.22201
16.32645
16.10256
12.66041
19
17.00054
15.45402
12.78893
11.53111
12.1164
20
19.59964
12.56878
14.59512
21.97238
21.11191
21
18.55482
12.44578
9.985153
32.41943
10.05632
22
16.11611
18.36489
18.01082
20.05052
12.44542
23
13.02018
24.00037
7.846028
38.45081
11.53918
24
13.13004
29.13797
21.8761
18.92561
25.0494
25
5.215485
51.48708
11.21661
16.03792
22.72741
26
6.565325
52.45168
11.66785
17.33908
19.1799
27
5.719276
55.78183
17.22566
11.93411
25.59521
App. 42
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %HighSchOnly %SomeCollege %Bachelor %Graduate %NoIncome %SSIncome
1
29.24716
33.30256 16.03475
8.53666
11.65461
29.7578
2
33.88038
28.62953 12.37043
7.874243
14.6162
32.49209
3
33.59997
28.57389 13.02297
9.56894
14.10677
32.30352
4
26.19185
31.97825 21.93917
11.13381
10.70595
23.83128
5
35.07445
29.43721 11.60303
5.966263
14.96802
23.87272
6
33.0798
32.04957 14.40273
7.702568
10.9152
39.26728
7
25.74451
31.04981
22.294
10.80159
12.02539
23.22163
8
29.59509
33.07799 16.73408
9.770291
11.02841
37.93589
9
30.6342
30.55071 17.79703
7.25732
13.03801
22.98868
10
31.95117
28.52048 16.15344
7.193776
12.89529
25.42091
11
37.18334
29.96706 11.17934
6.084175
10.62489
51.35828
12
32.18284
30.44918 17.32136
8.057488
10.95155
36.18729
13
30.78663
30.75511 17.43909
8.818148
9.675097
36.83078
14
30.64373
26.96142 16.63695
7.941525
11.73552
24.78725
15
30.8434
29.14667 16.79483
8.973473
12.23336
26.89931
16
31.16186
29.63429 17.17263
10.44717
9.365619
43.33065
17
35.38348
27.22063 11.50144
6.130653
12.14195
46.12202
18
29.70091
30.19217 17.65382
9.793116
10.81474
38.57643
19
30.04655
28.90449 18.30026
10.53029
10.38314
40.85117
20
33.67713
26.95591 12.64682
5.572052
14.2441
28.75529
21
28.69325
28.65031 20.89567
11.70254
11.2655
38.51535
22
25.16621
27.60659 22.16346
12.59341
9.981172
33.14476
23
25.95901
27.36797 21.63961
13.47766
12.63792
27.19591
24
31.71642
24.0193 12.46934
6.740451
17.92549
24.57836
25
28.99978
24.33278
15.945
7.957636
16.37898
27.48339
26
27.11766
27.44174 17.49805
8.753987
17.88737
26.77847
27
25.29485
20.21769 17.66189
11.21167
15.26643
29.58202
App. 43
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %PublicAsst %Retirement %Poverty-100 %Poverty-100-149 %Poverty-150+
1
9.527489
25.04618
12.89835
9.308992
77.7916
2
9.250313
21.28965
15.55548
10.30008
74.104
3
8.366512
20.27058
18.10207
9.893779
71.99054
4
4.111761
19.04102
7.794871
6.294634
85.89876
5
12.12046
15.36209
21.23734
11.10349
67.62776
6
6.580359
24.22548
12.64886
9.408445
77.93301
7
5.277099
14.13516
10.88504
7.381145
81.73228
8
5.981009
24.8975
10.21728
8.899364
80.88379
9
8.097859
13.13212
12.05689
11.46145
76.46926
10
8.847844
15.08751
13.93442
11.69843
74.32903
11
6.324944
34.25356
11.54606
9.667597
78.77525
12
5.590569
23.50265
9.940679
8.179036
81.86884
13
5.615667
21.85465
10.97199
9.316339
79.71064
14
11.17285
13.31862
18.1431
10.76195
71.09313
15
7.135971
16.943
11.5073
9.086252
79.39425
16
4.391818
26.48542
10.6222
8.812268
80.56313
17
6.833024
28.11525
13.63553
11.00738
75.32951
18
5.23162
22.47549
9.827724
8.165328
82.00286
19
4.082074
25.36768
10.09863
8.540139
81.33682
20
11.99633
12.32465
19.04959
12.56244
68.37717
21
4.093661
18.50382
8.117324
7.265109
84.62074
22
4.953421
15.98351
11.54482
8.430034
80.0182
23
6.56498
11.69915
10.71531
7.747526
81.53096
24
18.14189
9.782816
21.50283
13.81205
64.68184
25
13.15253
11.09595
13.26045
11.60458
75.11801
26
12.1122
10.86816
11.50134
9.397028
79.09914
27
17.81159
9.526864
18.09081
12.38869
69.51682
App. 44
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID CensusHseUnts10 %LiveHse1yr+ %OwnHse %RentHse %SeasonalHse %1detachedHse
1
344454
78.8843 70.98347 29.01807
4.516894
65.1363
2
335430
80.20581
72.7536 27.23189
4.894424
56.15822
3
322543
79.49286 70.96091 29.03109
1.944541
56.26987
4
307719
81.50999
73.8252 26.17527
1.210556
62.77985
5
309956
77.48669 59.68971 40.29936
0.5338642
56.11496
6
358603
84.28905 76.24697 23.74754
5.080142
64.5219
7
299574
82.0421 70.62955 29.36874
0.6258078
63.78112
8
352173
84.51195
77.3966
22.6034
3.857953
63.20369
9
295876
79.7199 64.81994
35.1749
2.454677
59.15604
10
326157
78.03334 63.25251 36.72939
3.544932
58.22862
11
360852
84.72412 83.13142 16.86765
4.152961
66.94672
12
337234
83.8303 79.26054 20.73661
3.012049
61.09488
13
390233
84.09101 71.98285 28.01895
6.351737
46.91417
14
327198
77.84692 58.25293 41.74554
0.8306091
51.98116
15
292755
80.49082 70.64333 29.35249
0.9945281
59.70224
16
399077
83.5805 74.70654
25.2924
7.942572
54.80319
17
356236
84.24177 78.94521 21.04334
6.640884
60.41925
18
361695
84.68315 76.48808
23.5105
7.271815
56.3793
19
445670
82.78207 73.82213 26.16841
14.49886
47.07843
20
298997
81.58482
61.8642 38.13565
2.233226
39.11018
21
326757
85.98403 79.04742 20.94893
4.12932
46.19051
22
398676
82.46366 68.52467 31.47749
7.320745
39.09128
23
369815
82.53352 69.58732 30.41118
7.247443
31.62713
24
273068
84.24386 58.92605 41.07365
1.390888
43.76385
25
259457
86.42365 68.53799 31.45511
2.803536
44.29919
26
261668
86.14795 71.86613 28.13477
2.938064
57.35106
27
277707
85.19665 56.29058 43.70897
1.287533
45.27035
App. 45
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %1attachedHse %2unitHse %3unitHse %5unitHse %10unitHse %20unitHse
1
3.63166
2.504944
3.800429
4.124823
2.833818
2.9533
2
2.300233
2.438222
3.133229
3.085756
2.146103
1.598896
3
2.761704
2.082682
4.337399
5.41002
4.194688
1.859817
4
6.137828
1.273818
3.892506
5.851911
6.674478
3.788319
5
4.805667
2.836258
4.364514
6.175817
6.776687
3.101272
6
4.49615
1.549593
2.430123
3.218027
3.838737
3.453087
7
6.351885
1.353756
3.753451
6.175737
8.713102
4.178463
8
4.453835
1.731729
3.060618
5.441352
5.564291
3.626425
9
5.235067
1.706304
3.761808
7.405624
9.297188
3.837898
10
3.544663
2.132433
3.319974
6.143378
7.887712
5.896502
11
2.527045
1.151291
1.70875
1.43283
0.6677668
0.4734697
12
6.401865
1.328988
3.084062
3.863404
3.855623
2.134785
13
5.006708
2.915108
4.168207
5.161794
7.286478
8.768588
14
4.959997
3.142931
5.148871
7.056634
10.78427
5.34959
15
3.655507
2.790802
3.434015
4.202327
5.374995
2.502685
16
6.844154
3.080442
3.331529
4.953321
5.131554
4.647593
17
4.192244
2.068352
2.400137
2.757512
1.93779
1.414086
18
7.184076
2.231116
4.368775
5.116733
7.061246
5.97595
19
6.747422
2.736284
4.674466
7.177765
8.63521
7.639515
20
7.438066
3.610027
6.173259
6.535726
7.191429
14.68342
21
10.60567
1.734405
5.647552
7.251497
8.011974
11.24441
22
6.568085
3.587656
6.462426
5.828473
7.305199
10.96604
23
6.2007
2.270478
3.245462
4.417295
6.765726
10.96234
24
6.700951
4.5412
4.759866
4.640869
5.938463
9.513667
25
12.45471
1.654562
4.721596
6.518073
7.655898
8.461057
26
14.61832
1.500694
2.521166
3.978982
4.458035
5.505792
27
10.47576
2.150491
3.794184
6.545379
7.009527
9.009842
App. 46
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %50unit+Hse %MobileHse %Veterans %CarDrive %DriveAlone
1
5.011381
9.825914
21.16316 89.77576
77.36066
2
3.89723
25.05412
16.96377 92.37202
79.71341
3
1.745777
21.13179
16.79252
90.3242
79.18867
4
2.802468
6.638952
16.89169 91.85102
81.8049
5
3.614233
12.03446
14.55205 92.14417
79.26063
6
5.355416
11.00211
16.64239 90.40205
80.48729
7
2.116942
3.464696
12.16069
90.7766
82.17392
8
3.223584
9.489202
18.89255 92.29553
83.29012
9
2.692152
6.696563
10.38648 91.40749
81.36916
10
2.052841
10.45931
10.48301 89.74799
77.70127
11
0.6044798
24.23627
19.9015 91.36655
79.65043
12
1.739201
16.18036
15.68968 91.36988
81.68648
13
8.838377
10.82529
15.94963 89.03423
80.00812
14
6.160569
5.298787
11.7067 89.08185
79.31813
15
1.859826
16.30005
13.87563 91.32641
80.825
16
4.52322
12.58899
16.39023 89.73104
79.47461
17
1.058456
23.22091
17.44979 92.08921
78.19647
18
4.647368
6.924175
14.95412 91.63812
81.62651
19
6.881025
8.188226
15.94553 89.80672
76.53433
20
11.70213
3.37171
8.522147 89.34018
76.53513
21
6.512978
2.767749
12.25479 91.62138
81.51089
22
17.98199
2.113927
11.44306 87.47138
77.33602
23
30.91461
3.499513
8.062249 86.67152
77.69141
24
17.78204
2.268894
5.127551 84.88239
74.92523
25
8.702312
5.310544
5.318224 91.57755
80.92856
26
5.32337
4.564448
5.711554 88.32805
78.0837
27
14.57388
1.051232
4.148322 86.10441
76.65005
%CarPool %WorkHome
12.41257
5.10801
12.60917
3.171147
11.11441
3.623907
10.02477
4.379957
12.83582
1.846947
9.900215
4.439759
8.591769
5.364819
9.005741
3.81338
10.02068
3.618934
12.01216
3.83463
11.69087
4.809613
9.678638
5.660846
9.020088
4.563174
9.762156
3.679841
10.49149
4.458297
10.24461
5.555774
13.8593
3.595777
9.997504
4.727474
13.25472
5.401808
12.79899
2.615316
10.10156
4.93719
10.12948
5.572492
8.971165
4.906453
9.939977
2.431193
10.63174
3.826569
10.24096
3.707032
9.449147
3.721691
App. 47
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %Management
1
32.07041
2
32.67813
3
33.43815
4
38.46128
5
28.38063
6
30.96136
7
38.95654
8
35.23495
9
29.96135
10
29.17665
11
28.19279
12
36.6693
13
36.11233
14
31.88717
15
34.29842
16
31.97427
17
27.08839
18
33.23909
19
30.49267
20
24.83568
21
36.35048
22
36.86475
23
38.53753
24
24.90498
25
27.00284
26
31.59445
27
31.97827
%Service
19.84291
19.13098
18.75417
14.15565
19.70048
19.77656
15.28143
18.26739
20.3065
22.26852
19.90224
15.79932
16.06128
19.02718
15.29356
18.47374
18.78333
18.72218
19.40114
24.12827
17.06378
18.21845
17.36767
25.18962
17.46974
17.58901
19.00983
%Sales
26.97775
25.19988
26.03107
29.40008
29.01457
27.81819
29.62407
25.24712
29.30424
27.27068
28.19237
30.34592
29.63546
28.62575
28.65195
28.2516
26.29011
28.2976
28.47319
27.42744
30.69642
27.82
29.85984
27.58823
29.1186
31.49658
27.09177
%Private G12PRE_Tot %G12PRE_D_Oba
63.37828
354884
30.09631
57.76484
330720
33.79354
62.07983
326352
44.01199
69.5398
374140
31.88272
66.25826
312508
63.57373
67.19605
347551
45.41952
70.26379
330077
47.98335
67.98737
363932
42.07874
76.80759
278822
60.6871
75.65818
283237
58.04786
67.01327
368432
39.85376
69.31427
343828
44.6322
68.87986
342419
49.94729
73.55181
294049
64.97897
71.08533
303581
45.4597
67.42188
359428
44.79673
68.81567
297839
41.09838
67.62415
343320
47.49825
67.11646
321882
38.68095
72.40831
262215
82.636
69.06261
324062
60.58748
68.90765
327330
54.33996
67.46227
287307
61.46352
69.12913
260549
87.49602
72.39502
236035
48.65973
66.7821
267270
53.02391
66.74738
244205
52.95223
App. 48
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %G12PRE_R_Rom %G12USS_D_Nel %G12USS_R_Mac G10GOV_Tot %G10GOV_D_Sin
1
68.45617
35.78553
61.20062
230285
30.32112
2
64.79983
43.52069
53.51228
232967
41.30972
3
54.53559
50.54966
46.34539
216519
44.22476
4
66.99685
38.51307
58.17043
248081
33.40482
5
35.42309
67.37506
30.1642
197470
62.46873
6
53.33146
51.72395
45.09246
231976
44.11491
7
50.83087
54.40834
43.11698
209427
46.58043
8
56.62431
49.41876
47.09805
248869
40.38189
9
38.22116
65.52465
31.96083
150235
53.26122
10
41.08997
62.52697
35.18227
161101
51.97298
11
59.09937
47.6227
48.76404
263713
39.33177
12
53.8909
52.48866
43.77716
221875
43.40597
13
48.4938
57.36321
39.04456
228174
48.52656
14
33.81035
69.28854
28.33702
165041
60.95879
15
53.27705
52.12434
44.94732
192579
43.66572
16
54.07564
50.3426
46.63989
249234
44.12961
17
57.77551
47.16703
49.14296
203053
39.5808
18
51.64832
53.56576
44.44583
223587
47.31268
19
60.46688
42.60947
54.43937
223862
35.40574
20
16.93648
83.75442
15.00925
142118
78.07878
21
38.84319
65.6398
32.86234
201688
61.43797
22
44.93844
58.83501
39.62962
207872
53.28519
23
37.887
64.72702
33.79683
157602
60.07855
24
12.12632
87.27065
11.67766
138326
84.78522
25
50.73527
50.70602
47.07765
131259
40.6715
26
46.2869
54.84174
43.52633
152049
48.75994
27
46.43107
55.10358
43.31173
143843
47.46355
App. 49
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %G10GOV_R_Sco %G10CFO_D_Aus %G10CFO_R_Atw %G10ATG_D_Gel %G10ATG_R_Bon
1
63.69585
25.31355
70.113
25.22865
69.18208
2
54.26477
36.17503
59.88307
32.53769
61.76248
3
51.60563
36.62117
57.76442
38.07894
57.43861
4
63.58084
25.25209
70.96066
26.89748
69.47772
5
34.92936
59.74454
37.27198
57.21304
39.08573
6
51.62732
36.31603
59.26162
38.1171
57.94902
7
49.78107
34.83051
61.98642
38.76163
58.2928
8
55.08922
32.46217
63.31648
34.32892
61.38145
9
43.193
44.11361
52.49025
46.50633
50.18236
10
44.74398
45.02636
51.78806
46.66544
50.29246
11
55.27031
30.7802
63.68568
33.42672
62.28033
12
51.8693
31.91598
63.07832
34.73389
61.40389
13
46.59777
35.68924
59.89331
39.83401
55.94397
14
35.78565
50.404
45.94761
51.61145
45.44901
15
52.48288
34.51152
61.47116
34.63024
62.10725
16
51.6647
32.96535
63.15578
37.84005
58.58447
17
55.27966
31.3813
64.0098
32.54366
62.93616
18
49.27075
35.07523
61.72236
40.80532
55.12518
19
61.03716
26.78234
69.4892
29.06149
67.05345
20
19.93062
73.27286
24.73224
75.71833
21.46929
21
36.10725
50.45401
47.38222
57.46492
39.8842
22
44.10839
41.0484
56.6024
47.97755
48.34821
23
37.60739
51.4813
45.66549
57.14555
39.35305
24
13.69302
81.95455
15.85885
83.66045
13.93955
25
57.11837
33.70994
63.20707
35.73833
60.998
26
49.00196
40.90259
55.91833
43.90219
52.60674
27
50.59058
38.32809
58.68127
44.13923
52.71535
App. 50
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %G10AGR_D_Mad %G10AGR_R_Put %G10USS_D_Mee %G10USS_R_Rub %G10USS_I_Cri
1
23.81854
66.8924
13.05326
65.00434
20.01795
2
32.77344
60.01087
14.2658
59.4095
24.24568
3
35.54062
57.29191
20.90103
53.20988
24.06987
4
25.39366
67.38432
13.74867
65.99887
19.04012
5
58.01721
37.04422
39.94807
35.46509
23.17973
6
35.79382
57.87746
19.4337
52.49886
26.61987
7
35.25583
59.82673
20.66695
55.36063
22.59191
8
31.42913
60.89961
15.52885
55.5127
27.60348
9
44.29148
50.73163
27.32642
47.99847
23.1747
10
43.82903
51.68914
30.10061
45.81558
22.75571
11
29.98039
62.84263
14.98436
54.65355
28.77812
12
30.44378
63.30084
12.34852
47.54734
38.62505
13
34.32903
59.3084
14.56789
40.9705
42.82579
14
48.57597
47.14352
29.16536
34.18388
35.38395
15
29.33783
66.40782
16.66718
49.52315
32.43467
16
32.39963
61.17274
12.84535
47.49593
38.60149
17
27.93796
65.87277
13.71378
52.35666
32.29808
18
34.50491
59.72149
15.64898
50.43451
32.86077
19
25.57934
67.50687
9.369236
59.53568
29.76626
20
72.75108
22.64305
50.68032
19.04128
29.43653
21
51.95647
43.93212
19.02119
35.70488
44.56203
22
43.30933
51.87897
17.58039
43.11037
38.49926
23
53.18047
41.57446
23.67423
36.42004
39.02781
24
82.71277
14.21234
63.69251
13.18466
22.40403
25
33.84042
61.01126
15.99221
59.81954
23.31915
26
41.30902
53.30586
20.7442
50.99708
27.33256
27
39.55757
55.77799
17.51869
54.62394
26.98295
App. 51
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID G08PRE_Tot %G08PRE_D_Oba %G08PRE_R_McC G06GOV_Tot %G06GOV_D_Dav
1
359439
31.97594
66.78796
204884
31.46951
2
330058
34.87599
63.75455
204125
39.79277
3
334483
46.41103
52.29205
185068
44.77381
4
364543
33.75459
65.31136
206651
27.96889
5
321495
63.23146
35.93213
172734
55.02449
6
351161
49.0362
49.72876
214076
45.13911
7
331502
49.8733
49.20332
176882
38.1045
8
366753
43.84068
54.88353
223464
41.61118
9
269440
59.27256
39.99258
124112
43.93209
10
267209
58.52572
40.71382
127156
45.05175
11
363024
42.68699
56.18279
231324
37.66535
12
343118
46.6204
52.08121
206690
41.40065
13
345146
51.11721
47.32548
222103
43.25831
14
281789
65.03057
33.95981
150073
54.88263
15
300279
45.90864
52.94609
174731
38.99365
16
356383
48.08282
50.76982
238435
41.14622
17
298064
43.23199
55.47298
186970
38.17404
18
338787
51.04771
48.04671
208178
46.83684
19
321165
42.32622
56.79417
191085
32.37617
20
254703
80.40384
19.04493
129378
73.81394
21
319953
63.50214
35.86933
199972
64.05047
22
323214
56.67236
42.52848
205404
53.97071
23
280666
61.76559
37.49546
154514
61.51158
24
250473
86.15739
13.46932
112584
79.99715
25
228771
45.53374
53.89538
105643
37.35221
26
264189
49.49109
49.88928
124956
46.35632
27
240628
48.52054
50.89765
122978
43.91273
App. 52
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %G06GOV_R_Cri %G06CFO_D_Sin %G06CFO_R_Lee %G06ATG_D_Cam %G06ATG_R_McC
1
66.52057
35.09494
64.90054
31.25829
68.73825
2
57.01849
52.14124
47.81977
43.67496
56.28599
3
55.78814
55.04617
48.73174
44.82557
55.14981
4
69.70738
39.12466
60.84768
28.94017
71.03425
5
42.67023
65.54411
34.37367
58.10579
41.79555
6
52.17026
53.77068
46.21622
46.00893
53.97589
7
59.40966
49.67332
50.30628
37.89278
62.08884
8
54.81241
49.7195
50.2805
42.33319
57.66772
9
53.50651
54.4636
45.50183
44.66792
55.29987
10
52.04395
54.99426
44.90625
46.12772
53.82121
11
58.40423
49.62042
50.36522
40.96949
59.01332
12
54.48595
50.07878
49.90376
43.17842
56.80559
13
52.23883
54.05572
45.94475
47.33128
52.70057
14
42.28609
60.77848
39.24094
55.28071
44.72548
15
57.60168
44.50285
55.4743
39.50439
60.47909
16
55.694
50.33406
49.66551
46.14113
53.84595
17
58.11628
46.34485
53.6193
40.65005
59.25094
18
50.88434
52.66688
47.32014
50.51885
49.47675
19
65.0925
42.35077
57.44107
35.1749
64.67489
20
23.97162
79.68101
20.25926
76.41868
23.54094
21
34.05377
70.97749
29.00941
67.99458
32.00955
22
43.90129
61.35775
38.65751
57.81075
42.22335
23
36.43941
69.9668
30.01527
64.68713
35.30861
24
18.42624
84.60224
15.38805
80.81738
19.173
25
61.08119
45.68285
54.29268
40.13307
59.86087
26
52.01031
53.4752
46.51119
48.50714
51.46333
27
54.64067
51.56624
48.39417
47.67575
52.28756
App. 53
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %G06AGR_D_Cop %G06AGR_R_Bro %G06USS_D_Nel %G06USS_R_Har GENRV12
1
28.62488
71.37663
43.99265
54.29124
489574
2
33.04285
66.91253
58.11382
40.22456
441354
3
39.47338
60.49686
57.93426
40.33126
451707
4
27.61595
72.34992
44.37468
54.17622
490653
5
51.52442
48.37738
68.37587
29.99547
426556
6
43.7907
56.18562
60.66019
37.85568
484894
7
35.3271
64.65826
57.91251
40.67166
453358
8
35.77655
64.22345
58.70867
39.67593
483335
9
40.49711
59.48301
61.88424
36.65504
423382
10
43.65038
56.28375
61.58736
36.88885
410770
11
36.72815
63.24949
56.59483
41.37642
494517
12
38.42378
61.55901
59.61547
38.26008
478685
13
39.82838
60.18855
62.34542
35.55236
468468
14
51.23935
48.77254
69.37196
28.59318
417841
15
35.14322
64.84672
56.34906
41.86988
418216
16
39.69854
60.29624
56.40486
41.922
483759
17
36.3932
63.56295
56.09376
42.09678
422808
18
44.38683
55.59675
63.04112
35.69372
476446
19
32.74873
67.05603
50.16571
47.93965
442874
20
74.07121
25.91206
81.065
16.9544
404064
21
63.659
36.33638
75.9642
22.87578
464021
22
52.75271
47.26133
67.08039
31.52979
484313
23
61.91266
38.08127
71.87414
26.42227
435288
24
80.36465
19.63816
83.49323
14.58447
391100
25
38.61058
61.41976
49.70652
48.5511
342092
26
46.65751
53.31903
56.28922
42.13919
395633
27
44.68048
55.30289
54.89281
43.37626
357842
App. 54
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %GENRVDEM12 %GENRVREP12 %GENRVIND12 %GENRVB12 %GENRVH12
1
29.05935
51.86754
19.0727
11.30881
1.986217
2
45.55595
39.03896
15.39875
10.32844
2.009045
3
40.61482
38.81697
20.56134
12.64824
4.910706
4
28.13822
50.61113
21.25209
9.072196
3.731558
5
61.06795
23.03144
15.88068
46.08422
3.094084
6
36.19637
37.61915
26.19005
8.339761
5.096578
7
35.10868
38.26711
26.62002
9.811452
12.76916
8
33.44802
43.45392
23.09868
7.880042
4.621225
9
42.02163
27.58762
30.38462
8.594839
35.83313
10
45.36285
29.2312
25.39621
24.23741
13.77145
11
34.23583
43.83489
21.92402
5.862286
4.595393
12
33.2724
40.22875
26.50156
3.818795
6.681847
13
35.20582
37.52316
27.27294
4.483978
3.935808
14
50.19852
24.52847
25.26416
25.50085
15.73254
15
37.71376
38.1401
24.14685
12.39933
9.026675
16
32.09697
43.45428
24.4473
4.947298
3.613576
17
36.02723
41.24047
22.73964
7.28463
7.295273
18
36.24062
38.05405
25.69777
9.604866
6.334401
19
27.52318
46.53129
25.9155
4.654371
7.067247
20
65.62872
13.29294
21.05359
47.98324
10.80497
21
46.74551
25.81693
27.41514
8.903908
11.56542
22
40.77095
31.778
27.42297
7.652696
9.181872
23
47.13339
24.88996
27.9523
9.668541
26.31844
24
68.60854
10.44004
20.94221
55.19816
22.91869
25
32.35825
38.42592
29.1977
6.320522
58.07853
26
35.55315
35.16618
29.28547
9.342244
57.29628
27
35.80603
35.87533
28.31725
7.038302
60.51693
App. 55
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %GENRVDEMB12 %GENRVREPB12 %GENRVINDB12 %GENRVBDEM12 %GENRVBREP12
1
31.24477
1.286181
8.184203
80.28719
5.899034
2
19.72417
1.065003
5.891441
86.99792
4.025447
3
26.36542
1.289502
6.925288
84.6621
3.957433
4
25.00127
1.009564
7.102442
77.54364
5.632062
5
66.14214
5.23096
28.03809
87.64746
2.614269
6
18.84465
0.7938031
4.638014
81.78986
3.580702
7
21.92652
1.144754
6.264294
78.46046
4.464828
8
19.21307
0.8527434
4.689012
81.55276
4.702392
9
15.75217
1.410947
5.206657
77.01503
4.528841
10
44.31541
2.73417
13.04927
82.94094
3.297509
11
14.1664
0.6610663
3.270675
82.73198
4.943084
12
8.624976
0.5603186
2.714037
75.14771
5.902626
13
9.853997
0.535885
2.949164
77.36837
4.484433
14
42.34088
3.322275
13.5425
83.34819
3.195593
15
26.4473
1.376107
7.832769
80.44199
4.232876
16
12.50773
0.5289847
2.863038
81.14737
4.646304
17
16.57826
0.7438291
4.299756
81.99026
4.211039
18
21.4876
1.056771
5.496749
81.076
4.18688
19
13.03274
0.4731287
3.195002
77.06787
4.730025
20
61.73458
10.29565
28.85859
84.437
2.852236
21
14.66053
1.403219
6.123636
76.96776
4.068642
22
14.89018
0.9323934
4.627559
79.32979
3.871786
23
16.36821
1.503558
5.642172
79.79375
3.870646
24
68.81355
13.86202
31.16782
85.53178
2.621827
25
15.48399
0.7622554
3.455042
79.27111
4.634169
26
21.22138
1.073105
4.820348
80.7608
4.039393
27
15.81843
0.8038823
3.807324
80.47328
4.097515
App. 56
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %GENRVBIND12 %GENRVDEMH12 %GENRVREPH12 %GENRVINDH12 %GENRVHDEM12
1
13.80294
1.952667
1.534675
3.257831
28.56849
2
8.783591
1.643266
1.706326
3.637273
37.26176
3
11.25794
5.324866
3.190391
7.270906
44.04021
4
16.63784
4.324175
2.448807
5.874907
32.60691
5
9.661962
2.242705
3.088292
6.225273
44.26428
6
14.56515
6.405757
2.724038
6.665669
45.49427
7
16.99602
16.41976
6.684651
16.68655
45.14597
8
13.74485
5.784148
2.889615
6.192899
41.86515
9
18.40666
42.3406
18.66594
42.3964
49.65296
10
13.67316
14.66483
7.844395
18.92926
48.30561
11
12.2318
6.554559
2.527091
5.63744
48.83168
12
18.83479
8.675834
4.156951
7.978149
43.2015
13
17.93773
4.939731
2.269831
4.832309
44.18592
14
13.4168
14.98117
11.85286
20.94654
47.80109
15
15.25378
10.29767
5.44236
12.67205
43.02402
16
14.14783
4.872096
1.928987
4.942249
43.27555
17
13.42208
9.119914
4.039158
10.2023
45.03809
18
14.70652
7.823151
3.839896
7.933941
44.75812
19
17.78974
10.56664
3.58947
9.450829
41.15147
20
12.66228
8.260741
13.95778
16.63571
50.17522
21
18.85468
11.1881
8.785769
14.80206
45.22044
22
16.58257
9.988909
6.333777
11.2745
44.3545
23
16.31184
22.82201
27.28464
31.35371
40.87167
24
11.82509
15.46316
47.68925
34.96246
46.28996
25
15.9606
53.39446
58.24788
63.02774
29.74854
26
15.11052
45.26518
66.21912
61.20245
28.08768
27
15.31803
48.33722
70.98935
62.6521
28.59966
App. 57
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %GENRVHREP12 %GENRVHIND12 GENRV10 %GENRVDEM10 %GENRVREP10
1
40.0761
31.28342
485732
30.9854
50.86797
2
33.15665
27.87865
427750
49.23367
36.51151
3
25.21865
30.4436
432616
42.63897
38.11648
4
33.21317
33.45895
465984
30.34053
49.7457
5
22.98833
31.95181
402905
62.06351
23.28762
6
20.10683
34.25323
464122
37.70388
37.24516
7
20.03282
34.78666
429274
35.91156
39.16869
8
27.17138
30.95451
457350
34.98787
43.9285
9
14.37074
35.94993
379382
42.82833
29.32084
10
16.65046
34.90781
366808
45.92975
30.31504
11
24.10561
26.89549
484012
35.88692
43.05368
12
25.02736
31.64296
459975
34.6958
40.11414
13
21.64009
33.4852
454635
36.23104
37.93681
14
18.4797
33.63707
384658
50.98529
25.43428
15
22.99542
33.89844
392887
39.01834
38.57572
16
23.19661
33.4363
463610
32.82587
43.63625
17
22.83352
31.80094
412178
37.79459
40.52836
18
23.06826
32.18688
459821
37.32583
38.00022
19
23.63334
34.65606
414340
28.35304
47.2286
20
17.17172
32.41485
375545
65.17754
14.44887
21
19.61205
35.08739
439797
48.13266
26.0004
22
21.92089
33.6729
456068
41.5824
32.58154
23
25.80372
33.30016
399126
48.52177
25.70817
24
21.72366
31.94734
361369
69.29095
11.06238
25
38.53796
31.68581
319207
32.40123
40.04424
26
40.64266
31.28201
365123
35.77452
36.81527
27
42.08353
29.31634
332630
35.79322
38.17455
App. 58
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %GENRVIND10 %GENRVB10 %GENRVH10 %GENRVDEMB10 %GENRVREPB10
1
18.14396
10.98754
1.784729
28.59022
1.40763
2
14.20386
10.37849
1.735593
18.51118
1.144207
3
19.22721
12.22678
4.414538
24.53012
1.388737
4
19.88201
9.555907
3.370287
24.9466
1.072875
5
14.57217
44.15979
2.70709
63.04602
5.115798
6
25.03566
8.124157
4.69424
17.76081
0.8365006
7
24.90228
9.332967
11.62684
20.63843
1.189478
8
21.0821
7.453372
4.244452
17.6175
0.8670679
9
27.82683
8.188316
33.53111
14.95541
1.340369
10
23.71322
23.61535
12.32961
43.05946
2.838181
11
21.03543
5.683537
4.262291
13.22821
0.6953475
12
25.18833
3.538671
5.965324
7.729084
0.5392516
13
25.81763
4.079976
3.471576
8.745196
0.5189188
14
23.56327
24.88106
14.13515
40.99603
3.472172
15
22.39524
11.76496
8.138982
24.60045
1.377021
16
23.53487
4.716896
3.135825
11.63394
0.5600538
17
21.63871
7.0028
6.939963
15.26566
0.7734258
18
24.67264
8.967185
5.653504
19.6059
1.01698
19
24.47724
4.090843
6.218082
11.16549
0.4532749
20
20.36747
45.55859
10.03422
58.99637
9.984888
21
25.86534
7.864765
10.07669
12.61822
1.368617
22
25.84023
7.188182
8.038275
13.76316
0.903132
23
25.76329
9.032235
24.10492
14.96465
1.495985
24
19.63533
55.89716
21.50074
69.11612
14.92145
25
27.52195
6.402742
55.43989
15.70963
0.8026662
26
27.40665
9.443119
55.5317
21.37711
1.128544
27
26.03554
7.035144
59.23759
15.98955
0.8048512
App. 59
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %GENRVINDB10 %GENRVBDEM10 %GENRVBREP10 %GENRVBIND10 %GENRVDEMH10
1
7.780463
80.62582
6.51677
12.84804
1.700929
2
5.712922
87.81367
4.025319
7.818624
1.386534
3
6.363308
85.54494
4.329332
10.00662
4.732656
4
7.091433
79.20681
5.585124
14.75443
3.761441
5
26.02024
88.6068
2.697811
8.586347
1.967551
6
4.412372
82.4272
3.834934
13.59731
5.754549
7
5.768062
79.41294
4.992013
15.39038
14.80744
8
4.307242
82.70066
5.110303
12.18317
5.235069
9
4.968267
78.22308
4.799613
16.88395
39.86201
10
12.40716
83.74681
3.643374
12.45858
12.99192
11
2.973068
83.52539
5.267367
11.00367
5.884961
12
2.50561
75.78178
6.11292
17.83498
7.611284
13
2.664088
77.65917
4.825058
16.85805
4.218092
14
13.05854
84.00744
3.549375
12.36691
13.01812
15
7.253262
81.58709
4.515068
13.80698
9.07383
16
2.766932
80.96305
5.181087
13.80556
4.077958
17
4.054266
82.38983
4.476164
12.52772
8.427216
18
5.088585
81.60939
4.309655
14.00092
6.946257
19
2.728286
77.38643
5.233038
16.32448
8.994024
20
27.55167
84.40205
3.166699
12.31728
7.667575
21
5.458221
77.22398
4.52456
17.95079
9.566527
22
4.335208
79.61749
4.093585
15.5843
8.602962
23
5.306921
80.39112
4.257975
15.13731
20.4577
24
32.30312
85.67737
2.953043
11.34731
14.29895
25
3.530938
79.49897
5.020061
15.17761
49.52188
26
4.992605
80.98553
4.39978
14.48998
42.64169
27
3.783977
81.35123
4.367335
14.00368
45.35315
App. 60
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %GENRVREPH10 %GENRVINDH10 %GENRVHDEM10 %GENRVHREP10 %GENRVHIND10
1
1.418153
2.954692
29.53051
40.41989
30.03807
2
1.608421
3.114044
39.3319
33.83621
25.48491
3
2.990333
6.434239
45.71159
25.81946
28.02388
4
2.313563
5.243559
33.86183
34.14836
30.93282
5
2.735886
5.544012
45.10865
23.53535
29.84322
6
2.54479
6.259252
46.22022
20.19094
33.38229
7
6.379765
15.18069
45.73541
21.49226
32.51387
8
2.718671
5.775833
43.15372
28.13724
28.68844
9
18.48469
39.605
50.91462
16.1637
32.86744
10
7.368837
17.12653
48.39694
18.1179
32.93902
11
2.435396
5.173159
49.5492
24.6001
25.53078
12
3.813782
7.066287
44.26911
25.64598
29.83709
13
2.077415
4.278558
44.02205
22.70164
31.81905
14
11.23729
19.45542
46.95615
20.21997
32.43213
15
5.140573
11.60726
43.50002
24.36439
31.93858
16
1.754802
4.365319
42.68813
24.41876
32.76242
17
3.934175
9.699518
45.89407
22.975
30.24296
18
3.480167
6.985456
45.8609
23.39206
30.48546
19
3.261842
8.12471
41.01071
24.77488
31.98261
20
12.88194
15.22833
49.80495
18.54948
30.91049
21
7.961591
13.09041
45.69578
20.54291
33.6011
22
5.722977
9.994145
44.50355
23.19695
32.12766
23
26.37708
28.67701
41.18014
28.13146
30.64994
24
46.69302
32.6935
46.08157
24.02409
29.85701
25
57.5072
59.43405
28.94252
41.53745
29.50477
26
65.59615
58.82899
27.47054
43.48759
29.03398
27
70.78595
61.34616
27.4038
45.61667
26.96227
App. 61
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID GENVT12 %GENVTDEM12 %GENVTREP12 %GENVTIND12 %GENVTB12 %GENVTH12
1
355917
28.69433
55.84982
15.45023
11.41755
1.687472
2
331465
46.00003
41.80411
12.20068
10.41709
1.740455
3
327560
40.86885
42.06802
17.05458
12.79491
4.241971
4
373662
27.65199
54.60363
17.74358
9.082808
3.162751
5
312137
63.30746
24.14645
12.53232
47.6057
2.55689
6
348317
36.33271
41.2983
22.36727
8.446329
4.395709
7
333497
34.97573
42.1587
22.86287
9.774001
11.07536
8
365563
33.10702
46.93418
19.95798
7.863487
4.096968
9
280542
43.20993
30.91124
25.86957
9.481647
31.90289
10
285256
45.8816
32.42631
21.68088
24.94531
11.55558
11
370310
33.40607
47.73028
18.85825
5.782453
3.778186
12
345495
33.09165
43.77545
23.12508
3.988191
6.051028
13
344126
35.7157
40.68597
23.58497
4.45796
3.468497
14
294955
51.94962
26.78476
21.25477
26.42335
13.78854
15
305280
38.03688
41.69746
20.26468
12.93042
7.832482
16
360388
32.02382
46.75322
21.2188
4.79289
3.086951
17
299293
35.46224
45.31212
19.22063
7.546117
5.783964
18
345614
36.17273
41.37014
22.45019
9.878362
5.506721
19
323141
26.75674
51.28195
21.92944
4.497417
5.621076
20
264327
69.65577
12.78946
17.53018
52.18423
9.55521
21
327016
48.36063
26.8733
24.74711
9.63592
10.56217
22
329571
41.72121
33.77846
24.48516
8.001007
8.450986
23
289572
48.81791
26.07469
25.09911
10.42711
26.34647
24
262837
72.38517
9.764987
17.84414
59.07159
20.69648
25
238005
32.26235
41.98819
25.72383
6.960778
55.17951
26
268360
36.1343
38.35221
25.512
9.699657
56.11455
27
246340
36.14719
38.60275
25.25128
7.075181
59.66185
App. 62
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %GENVTDEMB12 %GENVTREPB12 %GENVTINDB12 %GENVTBDEM12 %GENVTBREP12
1
33.39143
1.018719
8.197854
83.91859
4.983143
2
20.3333
0.7700301
5.885117
89.78829
3.090156
3
27.43184
0.9825977
6.737792
87.62139
3.230655
4
26.36342
0.8537834
7.343781
80.26164
5.132738
5
67.74136
4.098448
29.39312
90.08446
2.078805
6
19.66054
0.6430354
4.579702
84.57172
3.14412
7
22.65031
0.9480931
6.274345
81.05289
4.089459
8
19.97571
0.7157261
4.582026
84.10213
4.271899
9
17.56364
1.210807
5.839477
80.04135
3.947368
10
46.58619
2.184912
13.05662
85.68538
2.840158
11
14.79961
0.493918
3.110233
85.49947
4.076962
12
9.313391
0.5025059
2.93882
77.27702
5.51564
13
10.07998
0.4235381
2.853552
80.75745
3.865458
14
43.7668
2.613825
13.97467
86.04771
2.649576
15
28.14268
1.195657
8.457261
82.78614
3.855702
16
12.66615
0.4101061
2.548712
84.62919
4.000463
17
18.02781
0.5766281
4.460592
84.71995
3.462475
18
22.81431
0.9099111
5.534147
83.54179
3.810668
19
13.50189
0.3668994
2.95782
80.32753
4.183582
20
65.26595
8.806129
31.72195
87.11731
2.158232
21
15.81946
1.261948
6.580004
79.3945
3.519406
22
15.70243
0.7428766
4.775949
81.88024
3.136259
23
17.57744
1.329713
5.923225
82.29449
3.325164
24
71.62387
12.5302
33.5366
87.76649
2.071337
25
17.69724
0.6664398
3.71913
82.02451
4.02004
26
22.49356
0.833641
4.86241
83.79562
3.296197
27
16.27716
0.588891
3.790753
83.16025
3.213036
App. 63
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %GENVTBIND12 %GENVTDEMH12 %GENVTREPH12 %GENVTINDH12 %GENVTHDEM12
1
11.09334
1.618557
1.354268
3.015094
27.52248
2
6.892757
1.412044
1.511193
3.55827
37.32016
3
8.980936
4.650781
2.759837
6.800444
44.80748
4
14.34633
3.696105
2.171217
5.197508
32.31511
5
7.737811
1.846098
2.680111
5.695588
45.70856
6
12.1278
5.701169
2.368456
5.977487
47.12298
7
14.67665
14.71156
5.827252
15.13633
46.45874
8
11.62944
5.217844
2.626855
5.692238
42.16465
9
15.93233
39.30722
15.62518
38.96659
53.23851
10
11.34799
12.59245
6.498519
16.79494
49.99848
11
10.14337
5.657769
2.071853
4.649598
50.02502
12
17.04042
8.009272
3.823673
7.418394
43.80082
13
15.0968
4.495269
2.024127
4.284025
46.28854
14
11.24113
13.32916
10.46036
19.00402
50.21883
15
13.25429
9.107898
4.781058
11.67076
44.23069
16
11.28351
4.355775
1.62618
4.383419
45.18652
17
11.36152
7.64114
3.188414
8.196294
46.84882
18
12.57725
6.958198
3.429127
6.971169
45.70723
19
14.42235
9.094169
2.885109
7.517322
43.28892
20
10.65631
7.158957
13.4769
15.98507
52.18751
21
16.89886
10.05647
8.324988
13.93478
46.04517
22
14.61565
9.068297
6.040027
10.63869
44.76878
23
14.2578
22.06376
27.94384
32.98844
40.8824
24
10.13062
13.66061
48.28177
34.12507
47.77749
25
13.74419
49.70568
55.71377
61.18842
29.0619
26
12.78909
42.15221
65.90136
61.14308
27.14342
27
13.52918
45.67803
71.02235
62.25645
27.67485
App. 64
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %GENVTHREP12 %GENVTHIND12 GENVT10 %GENVTDEM10 %GENVTREP10
1
44.82185
27.60573
233448
29.21207
59.78805
2
36.29745
24.94366
231067
48.98017
41.78052
3
27.36956
27.34077
217182
41.22165
45.73722
4
37.48519
29.15891
247842
27.97226
58.62808
5
25.31011
27.9163
196913
63.51028
27.49184
6
22.25198
30.41604
234366
36.09056
45.8296
7
22.18161
31.24594
212500
33.27765
49.53835
8
30.09281
27.72919
252245
32.33801
52.24009
9
15.1395
31.59741
152466
40.92125
40.46017
10
18.2356
31.51109
162712
43.11483
40.46782
11
26.17397
23.20778
267713
32.4254
51.63477
12
27.66191
28.35071
224328
32.55055
48.57218
13
23.7433
29.13036
231518
35.16487
45.8189
14
20.31965
29.29432
165775
51.52767
32.84814
15
25.45272
30.19531
194362
37.25677
47.81902
16
24.62921
30.13034
250307
30.80457
51.48398
17
24.97834
27.23702
205579
34.77933
49.81297
18
25.76188
28.42056
226706
34.74456
46.54222
19
26.32129
29.32724
224905
24.24535
57.91156
20
18.03856
29.32652
143567
69.93668
16.49961
21
21.18124
32.6491
203961
50.15027
29.765
22
24.14189
30.82364
210224
41.16419
39.22197
23
27.65559
31.42662
159280
50.40369
30.81994
24
22.78025
29.42204
139790
75.73003
11.29552
25
42.39473
28.52509
133881
28.99515
51.64437
26
45.04114
27.79818
154275
35.28439
45.9368
27
45.95328
26.34942
146827
34.00465
47.55665
App. 65
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %GENVTIND10 %GENVTB10 %GENVTH10 %GENVTDEMB10 %GENVTREPB10
1
10.99388
9.557589
1.062335
28.57834
0.9048963
2
9.142803
8.752872
1.100979
16.54046
0.6152827
3
13.002
10.14679
2.560986
22.32871
0.7711436
4
13.36133
7.886879
2.11425
23.42233
0.7453288
5
8.88108
41.55642
1.563127
60.85559
2.948185
6
18.04485
6.819249
2.924486
16.72066
0.4617863
7
17.15388
7.887529
7.195765
19.76101
0.7875063
8
15.4227
6.211025
2.824238
16.66033
0.5942037
9
18.57398
8.563221
21.78781
17.43841
0.9645312
10
16.29996
21.77774
7.018536
44.7137
1.770799
11
15.91742
4.550395
2.317034
12.37458
0.3761764
12
18.85899
3.133804
3.77795
7.652698
0.3836235
13
19.01666
2.9691
2.078024
7.137681
0.289407
14
15.6067
23.02217
8.398733
40.00234
2.045763
15
14.89077
10.16402
4.604295
23.41845
0.9263842
16
17.70386
3.418602
1.703908
9.706119
0.3127231
17
15.32063
5.642113
3.386533
14.18342
0.4550559
18
18.69029
7.530899
3.368239
18.69033
0.6653146
19
17.48561
2.478824
2.978591
8.468888
0.2364756
20
13.45504
48.37532
6.170638
62.13772
6.627829
21
20.08374
7.470056
6.173729
12.17652
1.013029
22
19.59862
6.077327
5.136426
12.51257
0.5590996
23
18.75565
9.438725
19.66788
15.88257
1.146873
24
12.94799
62.78131
15.68853
74.83068
11.64028
25
19.32836
6.9629
49.06447
20.33025
0.5351306
26
18.75936
9.7579
51.38097
24.01764
0.7125823
27
18.41351
6.31151
56.67691
15.975
0.4668748
App. 66
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %GENVTINDB10 %GENVTBDEM10 %GENVTBREP10 %GENVTBIND10 %GENVTDEMH10
1
6.078317
87.34762
5.660631
6.991753
0.9032921
2
4.028212
92.55872
2.936959
4.207664
0.7669403
3
4.405411
90.71107
3.475972
5.645051
2.691955
4
6.338517
83.07157
5.540492
10.73822
2.186738
5
22.63266
93.00501
1.950385
4.836857
1.077083
6
3.107044
88.4933
3.103492
8.221749
3.896718
7
5.231537
83.37212
4.946006
11.3776
9.413844
8
3.31851
86.74284
4.997766
8.240251
3.558863
9
5.561637
83.33334
4.557292
12.06342
28.99136
10
10.61383
88.52264
3.290532
7.944123
7.828603
11
2.046324
88.17928
4.268593
7.158102
3.440967
12
2.359004
79.48791
5.945946
14.1963
4.741167
13
1.646717
84.53593
4.466104
10.54699
2.527852
14
10.84184
89.5323
2.918905
7.349666
7.566144
15
6.564854
85.84156
4.35839
9.617818
5.041913
16
1.493885
87.46056
4.709594
7.736356
2.269603
17
3.016256
87.42995
4.017588
8.190361
4.345515
18
3.750118
86.22972
4.111755
9.307093
4.217449
19
1.487566
82.83408
5.524663
10.49327
4.716756
20
27.21437
89.83312
2.260587
7.569366
4.349342
21
5.102165
81.74718
4.036492
13.71751
5.27633
22
3.339725
84.75266
3.608328
10.77019
5.106486
23
5.409386
84.81442
3.744845
10.74897
14.26329
24
36.64641
90.26458
2.094301
7.557941
9.169398
25
3.852842
84.65994
3.969105
10.69513
38.55329
26
4.941087
86.84735
3.35459
9.499136
32.77303
27
3.295606
86.06885
3.517859
9.614762
35.43703
App. 67
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %GENVTREPH10 %GENVTINDH10 %GENVTHDEM10 %GENVTHREP10 %GENVTHIND10
1
0.9894393
1.88194
24.83871
55.68548
19.47581
2
1.135269
2.456688
34.1195
43.08176
20.40094
3
1.986248
4.058361
43.32974
35.47285
20.6041
4
1.711572
3.533142
28.9313
47.46183
22.32825
5
1.810289
3.796889
43.76218
31.83886
21.57245
6
1.742871
3.889716
48.08871
27.31252
24.00058
7
4.435304
10.70175
43.53541
30.5343
25.51174
8
2.036836
3.94057
40.74958
37.67546
21.51881
9
11.69757
27.84703
54.45077
21.72251
23.73943
10
4.583422
10.5799
48.09107
26.42732
24.57093
11
1.506153
2.595452
48.15412
33.5644
17.83008
12
2.803756
4.524181
40.84956
36.0472
22.58407
13
1.499826
2.591592
42.77697
33.07005
23.71648
14
7.810262
12.22557
46.41959
30.54658
22.71781
15
3.411805
7.207519
40.79786
35.43413
23.30987
16
1.137598
2.331092
41.03165
34.3728
24.2204
17
2.247937
4.619634
44.62798
33.06521
20.89917
18
2.48024
3.920042
43.50445
34.27187
21.75223
19
1.97626
3.725271
38.39379
38.42365
21.86894
20
9.912191
10.53476
49.2945
26.50412
22.97099
21
6.032054
8.356321
42.86055
29.08196
27.18393
22
4.315133
6.215868
40.92424
32.95055
23.71736
23
24.92565
25.24269
36.55313
39.05896
24.07189
24
45.30082
27.74033
44.26155
32.61593
22.89453
25
53.62732
52.4288
22.78346
56.44714
20.6537
26
64.13665
55.06721
22.50593
57.34092
20.10521
27
70.92057
58.88815
21.26128
59.50827
19.13191
App. 68
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %PRIVTDEMB10 %PRIVTREPB10 %PRIVTBDEM10 %PRIVTBREP10 %PRIVTDEMH10
1
24.26237
0.6717985
89.70757
6.579849
0.6611673
2
15.02931
0.5018153
94.74796
2.73599
0.4716718
3
18.7476
0.5764879
93.46186
3.843851
1.397963
4
19.42507
0.545429
86.87902
7.047368
1.239898
5
57.07965
2.143131
95.9549
1.766283
0.5534883
6
16.49331
0.3859469
91.54668
3.321454
2.825076
7
17.27386
0.5247291
88.55116
5.437352
6.136768
8
15.7447
0.4702476
89.89503
5.749648
2.510701
9
14.14632
0.6910535
87.56104
6.219481
21.04717
10
44.2159
1.344533
92.37608
3.652663
5.195404
11
10.86463
0.2838396
91.71989
5.269161
2.058903
12
6.060082
0.273663
86.1002
7.612967
2.803609
13
5.544665
0.2290761
88.1068
5.582524
1.855859
14
38.27449
1.607974
93.66984
3.047855
4.113719
15
20.54709
0.663744
90.85188
4.973139
2.537578
16
9.445144
0.2656679
90.87149
5.406204
1.332637
17
11.36789
0.2800491
92.43823
4.042925
2.620999
18
17.98069
0.4886179
91.56588
4.105665
2.681166
19
7.414299
0.2198212
84.74216
8.77193
2.669892
20
61.60179
5.339664
94.08482
2.049851
2.572222
21
9.933309
0.7532065
89.13043
4.090697
2.665034
22
11.01731
0.4269032
90.98605
3.859562
2.909606
23
15.78478
0.952525
90.73939
3.459004
9.063993
24
78.93791
11.45387
93.90785
1.803016
5.331927
25
22.60129
0.4207263
90.3621
4.138307
31.80116
26
25.40239
0.5540627
92.34365
3.223727
22.63557
27
15.50337
0.3073528
91.83161
3.261779
28.94526
App. 69
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID %PRIVTREPH10 %PRIVTHDEM10 %PRIVTHREP10 TotVAP10 DMVTot10 DMVNewTot10
1
0.7091206
23.11015
65.65874
541696
600690
613310
2
0.8648649
33.53175
53.1746
549064
508651
538842
3
1.379261
38.8
51.2
554038
531583
555342
4
1.213484
23.30097
65.88072
539733
576503
587647
5
1.28524
40
45.53672
529910
515890
529359
6
1.32017
46.98847
34.04528
562532
600839
611338
7
3.106005
41.47373
42.43099
545009
559758
564989
8
1.619599
37.3317
51.57079
559112
599105
608958
9
8.095605
54.729
30.60894
527114
591380
599597
10
3.294516
46.49318
38.33704
519117
566262
582187
11
1.069006
41.75343
47.67123
576772
588488
606729
12
1.979202
37.18478
51.39844
548058
581882
590310
13
1.16862
44.39708
42.87454
578166
596904
602136
14
5.544238
43.29774
45.19573
535709
553306
563967
15
2.319007
35.38238
54.79187
528370
525261
537229
16
0.8303936
36.53199
48.14815
571804
578395
585326
17
1.557557
43.04435
45.41331
552467
533768
552057
18
1.789705
41.65049
45.87379
556783
565537
576728
19
1.445491
29.89583
56.51042
568936
574436
582539
20
8.043415
48.55172
38.16092
525932
531079
541662
21
4.639752
40.80574
42.9996
544654
558436
565818
22
3.216922
38.6
46.72
579627
587555
594611
23
23.75769
32.63037
54.02865
552468
579668
587531
24
43.15867
40.42648
43.29927
525767
529567
535644
25
52.36105
17.18365
69.60665
534871
541858
552411
26
63.58423
16.13209
72.52962
541358
555113
567361
27
74.39252
15.82238
72.85754
550152
527449
535540
App. 70
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID DifDMV-VAP RelMagDifDMV-VAP
BlackDMV10 DifBDMV-BVAP HispDMV10
1
71614
55
72925
1466
12354
2
-10222
49
53556
-19845
9816
3
1304
50
69114
-10423
26728
4
47914
54
54664
2648
22937
5
-551
49
230134
-8960
19888
6
48806
53
50301
-2802
33076
7
19980
51
55892
-4396
76248
8
49846
54
50444
-573
28728
9
72483
56
51004
-8818
221610
10
63070
55
142979
716
90441
11
29957
52
35529
-6529
30584
12
42252
53
21875
-1901
38667
13
23970
51
27502
-3103
25973
14
28258
52
137527
232
109528
15
8859
50
61952
-5283
54012
16
13522
51
32528
-805
29519
17
-410
49
39402
-6701
51789
18
19945
51
58538
-3091
42815
19
13603
51
33457
-3333
60830
20
15730
51
265252
1982
71507
21
21164
51
56302
-4844
78836
22
14984
51
57066
-2818
69568
23
35063
52
55439
-5269
165385
24
9877
50
283816
-4910
143098
25
17540
51
32519
-8692
328445
26
26003
52
46015
-8250
328401
27
-14612
48
32758
-9645
342666
App. 71
Coalition Remedial Map B
District ID DifHDMV-HVAP AsianVAP10 AsianDMV10 DifADMV-AVAP
1
-12283
13934
12504
-1430
2
-15545
7834
5693
-2141
3
-16135
16032
11283
-4749
4
-11893
23069
20072
-2997
5
-12651
12895
11199
-1696
6
-10912
8731
5798
-2933
7
-14785
20068
12229
-7839
8
-14083
10864
7160
-3704
9
14440
25165
14160
-11005
10
-5570
20011
11350
-8661
11
-12698
6721
4661
-2060
12
-15786
13345
9177
-4168
13
-15908
17703
15219
-2484
14
-27678
14595
11088
-3507
15
-25165
17097
10768
-6329
16
-20563
7797
5696
-2101
17
-27501
7133
4776
-2357
18
-24304
9837
5629
-4208
19
-23551
7248
4319
-2929
20
-25999
10797
5498
-5299
21
-20776
18035
9331
-8704
22
-33125
11928
6456
-5472
23
-37542
17848
9269
-8579
24
-31201
9584
4895
-4689
25
-49656
9237
5201
-4036
26
-44672
9681
4886
-4795
27
-70191
8669
4613
-4056
App. 72
Romo Remedial Map
Holmes
Jackson
Santa Rosa
Escambia
01
Okaloosa
Walton
Washington
Nassau
Gadsden
Leon
Calhoun
Jefferson
Madison
Liberty
Bay
Taylor
Gulf
05
Suwannee 02
Wakulla
04
Hamilton
Baker
Duval
Columbia
Union
Bradford Clay
Lafayette
St. Johns
Franklin
Gilchrist
Alachua
Putnam
Dixie
06
Flagler
Levy
Marion
03
Volusia
Sumter
Citrus
07
Lake
Hernando
Seminole
11
10
Orange
Pasco
Brevard
12
09
15
Pinellas Hillsborough
13
08
Osceola
Polk
14
Indian River
Manatee
Hardee
Okeechobee
17
16
St. Lucie
Highlands
DeSoto
Sarasota
Martin
18
Glades
Charlotte
Palm Beach
Lee
19
Hendry
20
21
22
Broward
Collier
23
24
25
Miami-Dade
27
26
Monroe
App. 73
Population Summary Report: Romo_Remedial_Map
District
Population
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
Total Population:
Ideal District Population:
Summary Statistics
Population Range:
Ratio Range:
Absolute Range:
Absolute Overall Range:
Relative Range:
Relative Overall Range:
Absolute Mean Deviation:
Relative Mean Deviation:
Standard Deviation:
696,345
696,345
696,345
696,345
696,345
696,345
696,345
696,344
696,345
696,345
696,345
696,344
696,345
696,345
696,345
696,345
696,344
696,344
696,345
696,345
696,345
696,345
696,345
696,345
696,344
696,345
696,345
Deviation Black Alone Black Alone Hispanic
or in Part or in Part
Origin
Percent
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
104,704
99,586
101,327
79,986
337,652
74,378
83,135
75,503
91,940
202,042
72,066
36,475
46,390
199,598
99,626
51,117
67,559
90,447
57,111
376,188
91,539
84,392
83,806
401,862
57,175
74,845
60,214
15.0%
14.3%
14.6%
11.5%
48.5%
10.7%
11.9%
10.8%
13.2%
29.0%
10.3%
5.2%
6.7%
28.7%
14.3%
7.3%
9.7%
13.0%
8.2%
54.0%
13.1%
12.1%
12.0%
57.7%
8.2%
10.7%
8.6%
35,983
34,941
62,494
52,042
46,744
43,997
132,860
62,246
296,365
137,134
75,008
80,675
59,929
189,986
120,178
76,652
122,211
98,326
124,452
133,159
139,460
136,711
259,632
221,261
488,830
479,174
513,356
Hispanic
Origin
Percent
5.2%
5.0%
9.0%
7.5%
6.7%
6.3%
19.1%
8.9%
42.6%
19.7%
10.8%
11.6%
8.6%
27.3%
17.3%
11.0%
17.6%
14.1%
17.9%
19.1%
20.0%
19.6%
37.3%
31.8%
70.2%
68.8%
73.7%
Voting Age Black Alone Black Alone Hispanic Hispanic
Population or in Part or in Part Origin VAP Origin VAP
(VAP)
VAP
VAP Percent
Percent
541,696
550,252
568,942
538,540
529,910
559,487
542,549
559,112
520,226
529,157
564,253
548,058
578,166
535,709
528,370
571,804
552,440
556,783
568,936
525,932
544,654
579,627
552,468
525,767
534,871
541,358
550,152
71,459
75,121
71,061
54,423
239,094
52,316
58,253
51,017
62,739
138,848
49,652
23,776
30,605
137,295
67,235
33,333
46,178
61,629
36,790
263,270
61,146
59,884
60,708
288,726
41,211
54,265
42,403
13.2%
13.7%
12.5%
10.1%
45.1%
9.4%
10.7%
9.1%
12.1%
26.2%
8.8%
4.3%
5.3%
25.6%
12.7%
5.8%
8.4%
11.1%
6.5%
50.1%
11.2%
10.3%
11.0%
54.9%
7.7%
10.0%
7.7%
24,637
24,922
45,239
35,794
32,539
29,646
94,157
42,811
206,476
97,886
50,419
54,453
41,881
137,206
79,177
50,082
79,289
67,119
84,381
97,506
99,612
102,693
202,927
174,299
378,101
373,073
412,857
4.5%
4.5%
8.0%
6.6%
6.1%
5.3%
17.4%
7.7%
39.7%
18.5%
8.9%
9.9%
7.2%
25.6%
15.0%
8.8%
14.4%
12.1%
14.8%
18.5%
18.3%
17.7%
36.7%
33.2%
70.7%
68.9%
75.0%
18,801,310
696,345
696,344 to 696,345
1.00
-1 to 0
1.00
0.00% to 0.00%
0.00%
0.19
0.00%
0.40
App. 74
26
5
10
Scale bar for insets
27
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
0
Cutler Bay
Palmetto Bay
Holmes Beach
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
16
Bradenton
Palmetto
St. Petersburg
PINELLAS
13 Pinellas Park
Seminole
Largo
Clearwater
Oldsmar
Treasure Island
Belleair
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
14
Tampa
12
St. Leo
15
MANATEE
17
Plant City
Zephyrhills
11
St. Augustine
Dade City
HILLSBOROUGH
Temple Terrace
PASCO
Green Cove Springs
ST. JOHNS
6
10
Ocoee
Apopka
Kissimmee
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
9
11
13
8
HIL
OR O
LSB
14
12
17
UGH
Titusville
Oak Hill
LEE
19
9
4
10
OSCEOLA
ORANGE
7
VOLUSIA
FLAGLER
25
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
COLLIER
DESOTO
HARDEE
POLK
10
LAKE
5
6
DUVAL
PUTNAM
CLAY
CHARLOTTE
SARASOTA
16
MANATEE
PASCO
MARION
F
D
OR
15
ALACHUA
AD
BR
HERNANDO
CITRUS
LEVY
VOLUSIA 6
SEMINOLE
Deltona
Oviedo
St. Cloud
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
Casselberry
Winter Springs
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Longwood
Maitland
7
5
ORANGE
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
LAKE
CS/SB 1174 passed
House (80-39) 2-Feb-2012
Senate (32-5) 9-Feb-2012
16-Feb-2012
Ch. 2012-2,
Laws of Fla.
Orlando Area
Eustis
H000C9047
25-Jan-2012
*****
3
DIXIE
E
N
UNIO
BAKER
26
20
8
18
MONROE
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
27
23
24
21
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Florida City
Homestead
MIAMI-DADE
Coral Gables
Miami
Miami Beach
24 North Miami
Aventura
Starke
CLAY
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
LA
FA
YE
TT
E
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Doral
Hialeah
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
Dania Beach
3
Orange Park
Jacksonville
GULF
HAMILTON
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
23
Cooper City
Fort Lauderdale
Lauderhill
DUVAL
5
Miles
60
MADISON
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
Davie
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Southwest Ranches
Sunrise
Plantation
Oakland Park
Pompano Beach
Baldwin
4
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
R
BROWARD
Tamarac
Deerfield Beach
Boca Raton
22
Delray Beach
NASSAU
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Parkland
21
Lantana
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
30
2
JACKSON
GILCHRIST
20
Wellington
Palm Springs
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
HNS
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
E
NN
Belle Glade
18
1
SANTA ROSA
A
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
South Florida
BIA
COLU
M
A
ESC
JO
ST.
OK
App. 75
App. 76
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
13.25%
12.91%
50.06%
9.02%
9.03%
9.12%
12.40%
11.14%
7.73%
4.34%
5.29%
25.63%
12.72%
5.83%
8.36%
11.07%
6.47%
50.06%
11.23%
10.33%
10.99%
54.92%
7.70%
10.02%
7.71%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
11
16
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
37.9%
62.1%
35.8%
64.2%
71.6%
28.4%
41.8%
58.2%
47.6%
52.4%
42.6%
57.4%
62.5%
37.5%
46.1%
53.9%
40.6%
59.4%
45.3%
54.7%
50.7%
49.3%
65.8%
34.2%
46.0%
54.0%
45.3%
54.7%
41.6%
58.4%
47.9%
52.1%
39.0%
61.0%
83.0%
17.0%
60.9%
39.1%
54.7%
45.3%
61.9%
38.1%
87.8%
12.2%
49.0%
51.0%
53.4%
46.6%
53.3%
46.7%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
10
17
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
42.1%
57.9%
37.2%
62.8%
67.2%
32.8%
43.1%
56.9%
47.5%
52.5%
42.3%
57.7%
55.1%
44.9%
45.6%
54.4%
41.9%
58.1%
45.6%
54.4%
51.0%
49.0%
63.0%
37.0%
45.4%
54.6%
46.1%
53.9%
41.6%
58.4%
49.0%
51.0%
36.7%
63.3%
79.6%
20.4%
63.0%
37.0%
54.7%
45.3%
61.5%
38.5%
86.1%
13.9%
41.6%
58.4%
49.9%
50.1%
48.4%
51.6%
0.40
0.37
0.46
0.57
0.45
0.09
0.33
0.60
0.34
0.48
0.39
0.49
0.40
0.46
0.36
0.44
0.42
0.67
0.50
0.25
0.48
0.28
0.18
0.27
0.38
0.40
0.18
0.46
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
34.4%
65.6%
29.4%
70.6%
62.8%
37.2%
35.0%
65.0%
35.3%
64.7%
33.9%
66.1%
46.8%
53.2%
35.6%
64.4%
33.6%
66.4%
33.6%
66.4%
37.3%
62.7%
52.3%
47.7%
36.0%
64.0%
34.3%
65.7%
32.7%
67.3%
36.2%
63.8%
27.9%
72.1%
74.7%
25.3%
51.6%
48.4%
42.0%
58.0%
53.0%
47.0%
83.8%
16.2%
34.8%
65.2%
42.2%
57.8%
39.5%
60.5%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2179.0
8120.3
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
0.34%
132
520
7,864
0.44%
77
450
2,103
1.10%
144
707
1,536
0.25%
111
396
3,198
0.89%
35
184
578
0.39%
95
271
2,412
2.34%
71
274
1,908
0.69%
67
298
1,400
0.38%
87
334
2,911
0.38%
58
184
1,068
0.27%
34
110
418
1.62%
43
162
523
0.74%
50
204
875
0.28%
60
178
1,193
0.44%
116
504
7,092
0.45%
69
224
1,891
0.47%
83
238
1,367
1.18%
84
393
2,698
0.65%
34
112
264
0.56%
50
187
360
1.21%
37
124
283
3.25%
20
73
120
1.75%
103
365
3,383
1.47%
184
551
4,900
2.23%
40
130
578
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
20
7
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
46.1%
53.9%
43.6%
56.4%
75.2%
24.8%
49.5%
50.5%
55.0%
45.0%
51.2%
48.8%
68.0%
32.0%
53.5%
46.5%
49.8%
50.2%
54.5%
45.5%
59.5%
40.5%
71.0%
29.0%
53.7%
46.3%
51.9%
48.1%
49.0%
51.0%
54.7%
45.3%
43.9%
56.1%
84.8%
15.2%
66.6%
33.4%
59.7%
40.3%
65.7%
34.3%
88.2%
11.8%
51.9%
48.1%
55.8%
44.2%
56.0%
44.0%
4.55%
4.75%
6.99%
6.72%
11.08%
5.69%
16.97%
7.66%
41.39%
14.20%
7.38%
9.94%
7.24%
25.61%
14.99%
8.76%
14.35%
12.05%
14.83%
18.54%
18.29%
17.72%
36.73%
33.15%
70.69%
68.91%
75.04%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.30
0.38
0.42
0.37
0.13
0.04
0.26
0.21
0.41
0.32
0.20
0.33
0.40
0.43
0.25
0.26
0.47
0.35
0.47
0.30
0.22
0.26
0.13
0.23
0.28
0.32
0.20
0.43
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
35.1%
64.9%
31.1%
68.9%
63.7%
36.3%
36.7%
63.3%
39.1%
60.9%
35.9%
64.1%
48.6%
51.4%
38.4%
61.6%
35.3%
64.7%
36.1%
63.9%
41.6%
58.4%
53.2%
46.8%
35.8%
64.2%
39.2%
60.8%
33.9%
66.1%
42.5%
57.5%
30.3%
69.7%
77.9%
22.1%
59.0%
41.0%
49.8%
50.2%
59.2%
40.8%
85.7%
14.3%
37.0%
63.0%
45.5%
54.5%
45.6%
54.4%
Convex
Hull
0.72
0.82
0.78
0.79
0.73
0.29
0.72
0.77
0.76
0.80
0.73
0.71
0.81
0.82
0.69
0.75
0.81
0.82
0.82
0.70
0.74
0.60
0.61
0.57
0.73
0.73
0.46
0.81
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
6
21
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
34.0%
66.0%
30.7%
69.3%
63.7%
36.3%
35.2%
64.8%
36.3%
63.7%
34.0%
66.0%
47.3%
52.7%
35.4%
64.6%
33.2%
66.8%
32.5%
67.5%
36.7%
63.3%
50.7%
49.3%
30.6%
69.4%
34.6%
65.4%
29.6%
70.4%
36.6%
63.4%
27.5%
72.5%
76.2%
23.8%
54.2%
45.8%
45.5%
54.5%
56.1%
43.9%
85.3%
14.7%
35.7%
64.3%
43.7%
56.3%
41.5%
58.5%
Miller (R)
Southerland (R)
Yoho (R)
Crenshaw (R)
Brown (D)
DeSantis (R)
Mica (R)
Posey (R)
Grayson (D)
Webster (R)
Nugent (R)
Bilirakis (R)
Jolly (R)
Castor (D)
Ross (R)
Buchanan (R)
Rooney (R)
Murphy (D)
Radel--Vacancy (R)
Hastings (D)
Deutch (D)
Frankel (D)
Wasserman Schultz (D)
Wilson (D)
Diaz-Balart (R)
Garcia (D)
Ros-Lehtinen (R)
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
17.9%
16.7%
48.7%
17.8%
20.1%
15.7%
28.8%
20.4%
15.2%
12.5%
14.8%
29.5%
16.9%
13.0%
13.8%
15.8%
9.6%
51.1%
19.2%
17.7%
23.9%
64.1%
16.1%
20.9%
17.7%
2013-2014 Incumbent
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
20
66.3%
49.8%
58.7%
63.9%
33.1%
56.5%
56.7%
56.3%
47.9%
56.1%
54.4%
48.2%
41.7%
34.6%
50.2%
48.0%
53.3%
51.0%
60.3%
19.2%
36.0%
43.5%
36.7%
13.3%
60.3%
51.5%
55.1%
I_Cri
4
20.4%
28.7%
23.4%
19.4%
18.2%
25.7%
23.2%
28.0%
23.3%
23.5%
30.4%
39.2%
43.5%
35.8%
32.9%
39.0%
32.9%
33.2%
30.2%
29.7%
44.9%
38.8%
39.4%
22.6%
23.5%
27.6%
27.2%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
10
17
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
40.0%
60.0%
36.9%
63.1%
71.0%
29.0%
45.9%
54.1%
49.6%
50.4%
44.4%
55.6%
60.6%
39.4%
47.6%
52.4%
43.6%
56.4%
47.2%
52.8%
51.9%
48.1%
65.7%
34.3%
46.4%
53.6%
48.6%
51.4%
43.6%
56.4%
51.5%
48.5%
42.7%
57.3%
80.8%
19.2%
63.9%
36.1%
57.1%
42.9%
62.2%
37.8%
86.5%
13.5%
45.8%
54.2%
49.8%
50.2%
48.8%
51.2%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
40.4%
59.6%
30.7%
69.3%
59.4%
40.6%
43.8%
56.2%
39.0%
61.0%
43.2%
56.8%
45.7%
54.3%
38.9%
61.1%
40.6%
59.4%
43.2%
56.8%
45.3%
54.7%
56.5%
43.5%
40.4%
59.6%
42.5%
57.5%
39.6%
60.4%
47.9%
52.1%
33.3%
66.7%
75.5%
24.5%
65.3%
34.7%
55.1%
44.9%
62.8%
37.2%
81.3%
18.7%
38.0%
62.0%
47.1%
52.9%
44.6%
55.4%
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
17
10
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
50.7%
49.3%
41.2%
58.8%
66.1%
33.9%
51.4%
48.6%
49.6%
50.4%
49.7%
50.3%
54.4%
45.6%
49.9%
50.1%
49.9%
50.1%
50.1%
49.9%
54.0%
46.0%
60.8%
39.2%
44.5%
55.5%
50.3%
49.7%
46.3%
53.7%
52.7%
47.3%
42.5%
57.5%
79.7%
20.3%
71.0%
29.0%
61.3%
38.7%
70.0%
30.0%
84.6%
15.4%
45.7%
54.3%
53.5%
46.5%
51.6%
48.4%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
41.8%
58.2%
30.9%
69.1%
58.5%
41.5%
43.6%
56.4%
38.1%
61.9%
42.3%
57.7%
45.5%
54.5%
39.1%
60.9%
42.2%
57.8%
43.2%
56.8%
47.3%
52.7%
55.3%
44.7%
39.5%
60.5%
46.1%
53.9%
40.6%
59.4%
50.5%
49.5%
35.3%
64.7%
76.4%
23.6%
68.0%
32.0%
57.8%
42.2%
64.7%
35.3%
80.8%
19.2%
40.1%
59.9%
48.5%
51.5%
47.7%
52.3%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
35.3%
64.7%
29.7%
70.3%
57.5%
42.5%
41.4%
58.6%
35.5%
64.5%
35.8%
64.2%
41.5%
58.5%
35.2%
64.8%
38.0%
62.0%
38.4%
61.6%
39.8%
60.2%
51.2%
48.8%
35.2%
64.8%
39.7%
60.3%
36.3%
63.7%
44.4%
55.6%
32.8%
67.2%
74.1%
25.9%
63.7%
36.3%
52.7%
47.3%
61.9%
38.1%
80.4%
19.6%
38.6%
61.4%
46.7%
53.3%
44.7%
55.3%
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
55.3%
44.7%
47.2%
52.8%
70.8%
29.2%
58.6%
41.4%
58.7%
41.3%
59.7%
40.3%
62.4%
37.6%
58.4%
41.6%
57.8%
42.2%
60.9%
39.1%
63.7%
36.3%
70.8%
29.2%
57.4%
42.6%
57.4%
42.6%
57.0%
43.0%
63.9%
36.1%
51.2%
48.8%
82.7%
17.3%
76.9%
23.1%
68.0%
32.0%
73.1%
26.9%
85.1%
14.9%
50.6%
49.4%
57.2%
42.8%
55.9%
44.1%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
24%
46
-30%
21
-27%
61
-27%
61
0%
410
28%
383
-75%
27
-74%
65
-74%
64
Enacted Plan (2012): H000C9047
Page 2 of 4
App. 77
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
43.5%
34.9%
60.7%
36.6%
35.0%
35.0%
43.4%
36.8%
37.0%
34.7%
36.2%
51.0%
39.0%
32.8%
37.7%
37.3%
28.3%
65.2%
48.1%
41.6%
48.5%
69.3%
32.4%
35.8%
35.8%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
40.3%
32.7%
61.0%
34.7%
34.1%
33.4%
42.7%
35.7%
35.1%
33.3%
35.2%
50.2%
37.7%
32.1%
36.0%
36.2%
27.5%
65.6%
46.8%
40.8%
47.1%
68.6%
32.4%
35.6%
35.8%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
19.2%
21.0%
19.0%
24.6%
27.3%
23.1%
30.8%
24.5%
21.7%
26.5%
27.3%
25.3%
24.1%
24.4%
22.7%
25.7%
25.9%
21.1%
27.4%
27.4%
28.0%
20.9%
29.2%
29.3%
28.3%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
17.7%
19.6%
18.1%
23.4%
25.6%
21.1%
28.3%
22.8%
20.9%
25.2%
25.8%
23.6%
22.4%
23.5%
21.6%
24.7%
24.5%
20.4%
25.9%
25.8%
25.8%
19.6%
27.5%
27.4%
26.0%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
40.6%
46.3%
20.0%
40.8%
38.7%
43.5%
26.5%
39.8%
43.2%
40.2%
37.5%
24.5%
38.1%
43.5%
41.3%
38.1%
46.5%
13.3%
25.8%
31.8%
24.9%
10.4%
38.4%
35.2%
35.9%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
38.8%
45.5%
21.2%
40.0%
39.4%
43.9%
28.3%
40.3%
42.2%
40.1%
37.9%
25.4%
38.6%
43.6%
40.8%
38.0%
47.2%
14.5%
26.0%
32.6%
25.7%
11.1%
40.1%
36.8%
38.2%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
83.8%
79.7%
86.0%
82.2%
76.4%
81.6%
78.0%
80.4%
84.3%
75.1%
77.4%
83.3%
80.4%
81.2%
82.1%
81.1%
77.0%
84.4%
77.0%
79.3%
79.8%
85.5%
79.3%
80.8%
80.5%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
85.3%
80.9%
86.8%
83.1%
77.4%
82.7%
79.2%
81.4%
84.6%
75.8%
77.8%
84.0%
81.6%
81.0%
82.6%
81.6%
77.6%
84.4%
77.3%
79.9%
80.4%
85.7%
79.5%
81.0%
81.4%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
10.9%
4.1%
22.7%
4.0%
1.2%
2.9%
12.5%
3.8%
30.5%
4.0%
1.3%
2.5%
49.6%
6.9%
70.0%
5.8%
7.2%
5.3%
7.9%
3.1%
18.7%
3.6%
0.7%
1.9%
7.7%
13.3%
17.3%
17.7%
1.0%
6.8%
7.9%
4.6%
19.2%
5.8%
0.9%
2.9%
9.7%
37.5%
17.8%
43.5%
1.5%
20.3%
9.7%
10.1%
21.9%
13.1%
1.2%
5.1%
6.0%
4.8%
14.4%
6.8%
0.6%
2.7%
3.8%
6.7%
8.6%
8.7%
0.6%
4.2%
4.5%
3.9%
9.9%
5.0%
0.5%
2.3%
25.5%
15.7%
42.3%
15.0%
3.4%
11.9%
12.4%
9.0%
26.4%
10.3%
1.4%
5.5%
4.9%
3.6%
12.5%
4.9%
0.5%
1.9%
7.3%
7.3%
16.6%
9.1%
0.8%
4.1%
9.6%
6.3%
21.5%
7.8%
1.1%
3.8%
4.7%
7.1%
13.0%
10.6%
0.5%
3.6%
48.0%
10.8%
61.7%
8.3%
10.4%
14.1%
8.9%
11.6%
14.7%
11.2%
1.4%
8.8%
7.7%
9.2%
14.9%
10.0%
1.0%
6.4%
9.7%
26.3%
16.4%
22.8%
1.5%
27.3%
55.2%
22.9%
68.8%
15.5%
13.9%
47.7%
6.3%
58.1%
15.5%
53.4%
0.8%
58.3%
9.3%
57.3%
21.2%
45.3%
1.1%
66.2%
7.0%
60.5%
15.8%
48.3%
0.8%
71.0%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
10.7%
3.7%
21.0%
3.4%
1.3%
2.8%
12.9%
3.4%
29.9%
3.5%
1.4%
2.4%
47.2%
6.3%
67.5%
5.3%
6.9%
5.0%
7.8%
2.8%
17.8%
3.2%
0.8%
1.7%
7.4%
12.2%
16.3%
16.1%
1.0%
6.5%
7.5%
4.2%
17.6%
5.2%
0.9%
2.7%
9.3%
35.2%
16.9%
41.2%
1.5%
20.2%
9.5%
9.2%
21.0%
11.7%
1.2%
4.9%
5.8%
4.4%
13.3%
6.1%
0.7%
2.6%
3.5%
6.0%
7.7%
7.6%
0.5%
3.8%
4.1%
3.5%
8.8%
4.3%
0.5%
2.1%
24.9%
14.1%
41.0%
13.0%
3.5%
11.3%
11.8%
8.1%
24.6%
9.1%
1.4%
5.2%
4.7%
3.1%
11.6%
4.1%
0.6%
1.8%
6.9%
6.5%
15.2%
8.0%
0.8%
3.8%
9.0%
5.7%
19.6%
7.0%
1.0%
3.5%
4.2%
6.2%
11.4%
9.2%
0.5%
3.4%
45.6%
10.1%
59.0%
7.7%
10.3%
13.1%
7.9%
10.1%
12.6%
9.6%
1.4%
8.0%
7.2%
8.1%
13.8%
8.6%
1.0%
5.8%
9.0%
24.1%
15.0%
20.5%
1.5%
26.4%
55.9%
21.5%
69.1%
14.3%
15.1%
46.7%
6.4%
55.4%
15.7%
49.5%
0.8%
57.5%
9.4%
55.5%
21.4%
42.6%
1.1%
65.6%
7.0%
59.2%
16.0%
45.4%
0.8%
70.8%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
40.7%
30.0%
35.9%
31.9%
50.9%
16.8%
42.6%
25.2%
46.1%
20.9%
43.2%
28.1%
50.7%
16.2%
46.7%
21.2%
50.8%
24.9%
44.3%
25.8%
44.6%
23.1%
47.1%
20.3%
43.6%
24.4%
42.7%
24.5%
45.8%
24.0%
45.9%
23.5%
41.8%
25.4%
50.0%
18.9%
45.7%
20.6%
44.6%
23.3%
41.2%
28.1%
46.1%
24.1%
28.9%
41.5%
27.5%
43.5%
27.4%
45.6%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
38.7%
28.9%
34.8%
30.9%
50.7%
15.4%
41.3%
25.2%
45.3%
19.9%
41.9%
27.2%
49.5%
14.3%
46.2%
20.1%
50.0%
24.8%
43.2%
25.1%
44.4%
21.9%
47.8%
18.5%
43.0%
23.0%
43.3%
23.2%
45.1%
23.0%
44.7%
23.1%
41.3%
23.9%
50.2%
17.3%
45.2%
19.7%
44.4%
22.0%
40.9%
25.8%
46.3%
21.7%
29.8%
38.5%
28.1%
40.6%
28.6%
42.1%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
42.5%
45.7%
11.8%
33.0%
54.0%
12.9%
61.5%
27.6%
11.0%
34.6%
48.5%
16.8%
32.6%
49.7%
17.7%
32.3%
52.2%
15.4%
41.6%
39.2%
19.2%
33.9%
50.0%
16.1%
33.7%
50.6%
15.7%
32.6%
48.6%
18.9%
35.2%
45.8%
19.0%
51.5%
32.8%
15.6%
37.3%
47.8%
14.9%
30.8%
51.5%
17.7%
34.7%
50.0%
15.4%
34.8%
46.6%
18.7%
24.4%
58.0%
17.6%
69.9%
16.6%
13.5%
50.1%
29.8%
20.1%
41.2%
39.2%
19.6%
50.4%
30.8%
18.8%
75.7%
11.3%
13.0%
29.0%
51.6%
19.3%
35.3%
45.9%
18.8%
34.0%
47.6%
18.4%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
40.3%
43.8%
15.8%
32.6%
50.0%
17.3%
63.7%
21.4%
14.9%
34.5%
44.6%
20.9%
34.0%
42.6%
23.4%
33.1%
46.9%
20.0%
44.1%
29.6%
26.4%
35.4%
43.5%
21.2%
34.3%
47.2%
18.4%
33.1%
43.8%
23.1%
35.7%
40.7%
23.6%
52.0%
26.8%
21.3%
38.0%
41.7%
20.3%
32.0%
46.8%
21.2%
35.4%
45.3%
19.2%
36.2%
41.4%
22.5%
26.8%
51.3%
22.0%
69.7%
12.8%
17.5%
48.4%
26.9%
24.8%
41.7%
33.8%
24.5%
48.8%
26.1%
25.1%
72.4%
9.8%
17.8%
32.3%
42.0%
25.7%
36.1%
38.4%
25.5%
36.1%
38.6%
25.2%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
8.7%
2.2%
18.3%
1.9%
0.7%
1.9%
11.0%
2.1%
28.3%
2.0%
1.0%
1.8%
46.1%
3.5%
68.9%
3.0%
4.0%
3.1%
6.4%
1.8%
16.4%
2.1%
0.4%
1.3%
6.4%
7.7%
16.0%
10.6%
0.7%
4.5%
6.2%
2.8%
16.7%
3.6%
0.6%
2.0%
10.0%
23.3%
20.3%
30.6%
1.1%
12.9%
8.3%
5.3%
21.1%
7.1%
0.8%
3.2%
4.8%
2.4%
12.7%
3.6%
0.4%
1.6%
3.1%
3.8%
7.7%
4.8%
0.4%
2.8%
3.0%
2.1%
7.2%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
23.0%
8.4%
40.0%
7.6%
2.1%
7.9%
10.2%
4.6%
23.5%
5.1%
0.9%
3.4%
3.4%
1.7%
9.7%
2.3%
0.3%
1.1%
5.6%
3.3%
14.1%
4.2%
0.5%
2.3%
7.5%
3.4%
18.7%
4.2%
0.7%
2.5%
2.6%
3.1%
8.8%
4.9%
0.3%
2.0%
48.4%
6.3%
62.1%
4.5%
6.9%
10.1%
7.5%
6.2%
12.2%
5.3%
1.1%
6.1%
6.1%
5.2%
12.5%
5.3%
0.6%
4.4%
9.4%
19.7%
15.9%
14.3%
1.2%
25.0%
62.8%
15.7%
74.8%
9.2%
11.8%
45.4%
7.0%
49.1%
20.4%
38.6%
0.6%
53.7%
9.8%
51.4%
24.0%
32.8%
0.7%
64.2%
6.3%
56.7%
16.1%
35.5%
0.5%
70.9%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
10.8%
3.6%
23.3%
3.4%
0.9%
2.6%
12.8%
3.2%
32.4%
3.4%
1.1%
2.2%
52.1%
5.5%
72.7%
4.6%
5.6%
4.3%
7.8%
2.7%
19.3%
3.2%
0.6%
1.7%
7.8%
11.6%
18.2%
15.9%
0.8%
6.0%
7.9%
4.1%
20.0%
5.2%
0.7%
2.6%
10.9%
33.5%
20.1%
40.5%
1.3%
17.0%
9.9%
8.6%
23.2%
11.5%
1.0%
4.4%
6.0%
3.9%
15.1%
5.9%
0.5%
2.2%
4.0%
6.1%
9.3%
8.0%
0.5%
3.8%
4.5%
3.5%
10.1%
4.5%
0.4%
2.1%
26.4%
13.8%
43.8%
13.3%
2.6%
10.5%
12.9%
7.8%
28.1%
9.1%
1.2%
4.8%
4.8%
3.1%
12.7%
4.4%
0.4%
1.6%
7.6%
5.8%
18.1%
7.7%
0.6%
3.2%
9.9%
5.5%
22.8%
7.0%
0.9%
3.4%
4.5%
5.6%
13.5%
9.2%
0.4%
2.9%
52.2%
9.6%
65.3%
7.2%
9.0%
13.6%
9.6%
10.6%
15.8%
10.1%
1.3%
8.3%
8.0%
8.5%
15.7%
9.1%
0.8%
6.1%
10.4%
26.3%
17.6%
22.1%
1.4%
28.0%
59.1%
20.7%
71.6%
13.7%
12.6%
48.3%
7.0%
55.2%
17.7%
49.7%
0.7%
55.7%
9.7%
56.1%
22.5%
42.2%
0.9%
65.9%
7.1%
59.7%
16.3%
45.7%
0.6%
71.0%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
89.9%
85.1%
91.9%
89.0%
81.7%
86.7%
84.2%
85.7%
89.7%
79.6%
84.7%
89.6%
85.9%
87.4%
87.6%
86.4%
83.3%
89.8%
81.8%
84.8%
85.0%
90.3%
84.8%
86.9%
86.3%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
86.7%
82.4%
89.0%
85.0%
79.2%
84.1%
81.1%
82.8%
87.2%
77.3%
80.8%
86.0%
82.8%
84.6%
84.9%
83.6%
80.7%
87.1%
79.4%
81.9%
82.3%
87.8%
82.0%
83.8%
83.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
36.3%
40.3%
31.6%
45.1%
52.1%
24.6%
40.8%
35.8%
44.9%
29.5%
40.7%
37.7%
54.5%
21.6%
45.1%
30.1%
50.1%
33.8%
41.0%
36.2%
43.1%
33.1%
46.5%
30.6%
41.0%
35.6%
41.1%
34.6%
44.4%
34.5%
43.6%
34.5%
39.1%
38.6%
49.7%
26.8%
43.1%
29.4%
42.0%
33.4%
36.7%
39.1%
44.2%
32.7%
22.8%
56.5%
22.5%
57.4%
21.3%
59.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
38.8%
31.6%
35.1%
34.9%
53.1%
16.8%
41.8%
28.8%
46.7%
21.9%
42.2%
30.1%
53.2%
14.9%
47.3%
22.3%
51.8%
26.9%
43.8%
27.8%
46.4%
24.1%
50.3%
20.4%
44.3%
25.5%
45.2%
24.6%
47.0%
25.4%
45.7%
25.8%
43.5%
26.7%
52.3%
18.3%
46.1%
21.2%
44.8%
24.3%
40.9%
27.7%
47.8%
22.8%
29.1%
42.4%
27.2%
45.0%
27.7%
46.0%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
16.7%
0.9%
1.4%
22.8%
1.2%
1.3%
67.3%
1.9%
2.1%
16.2%
1.3%
0.9%
13.7%
7.5%
3.3%
15.7%
2.5%
1.6%
17.8%
23.4%
9.1%
18.1%
4.7%
2.4%
11.9%
2.1%
1.1%
6.1%
2.9%
2.0%
5.7%
1.9%
1.2%
38.5%
4.2%
5.6%
20.6%
2.6%
2.4%
9.5%
1.4%
0.9%
11.4%
2.6%
1.6%
18.0%
2.7%
1.8%
7.7%
2.8%
1.5%
61.6%
2.7%
8.3%
10.1%
2.8%
4.8%
11.2%
3.1%
3.4%
15.9%
9.2%
24.0%
78.9%
5.4%
43.7%
22.9%
31.9%
52.4%
25.5%
22.7%
63.6%
15.6%
29.2%
74.3%
Enacted Plan (2012): H000C9047
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Hendry
Hendry
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
Pinellas
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
Polk
Polk
App. 78
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
202,969
82.1%
731.7
5
44,367
17.9%
237.1
20
450,832
25.8%
534.4
21
272,465
15.6%
71.3
22
300,591
17.2%
131.1
23
526,114
30.1%
192.8
24
129,757
7.4%
25.3
25
68,307
3.9%
368.0
3
174,485
91.4%
577.8
5
16,380
8.6%
65.7
19
155,389
48.3%
333.7
25
166,131
51.7%
1,971.3
4
595,916
69.0%
788.3
5
268,347
31.0%
130.2
20
17,250
44.1%
652.1
25
21,890
55.9%
537.9
12
103,884
8.5%
78.3
14
603,911
49.1%
453.9
15
409,751
33.3%
421.6
17
111,680
9.1%
311.9
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
5
17,490
5.9%
312.1
10
259,974
87.5%
803.7
11
19,588
6.6%
41.1
17
77,798
12.6%
179.0
19
540,956
87.4%
1,033.4
2
4,028
21.0%
337.4
3
15,196
79.0%
378.3
16
316,897
98.2%
468.1
17
5,936
1.8%
424.6
3
52,727
15.9%
433.7
5
9,248
2.8%
301.4
11
269,323
81.3%
927.5
23
170,231
6.8%
90.6
24
566,588
22.7%
95.0
25
440,016
17.6%
505.3
26
623,255
25.0%
1,162.4
27
696,345
27.9%
577.8
5
279,015
24.3%
196.1
7
176,778
15.4%
72.5
8
14,940
1.3%
238.0
9
356,415
31.1%
248.4
10
318,808
27.8%
248.3
18
272,237
20.6%
449.8
20
228,263
17.3%
1,511.6
21
423,880
32.1%
193.0
22
395,754
30.0%
228.6
12
127,763
13.9%
121.4
13
696,345
76.0%
418.0
14
92,434
10.1%
68.7
9
71,245
11.8%
154.1
10
117,563
19.5%
347.5
15
286,594
47.6%
453.2
17
126,693
21.0%
1,055.8
Area%
75.5%
24.5%
40.4%
5.4%
9.9%
14.6%
1.9%
27.8%
89.8%
10.2%
14.5%
85.5%
85.8%
14.2%
54.8%
45.2%
6.2%
35.9%
33.3%
24.6%
79.5%
20.5%
27.0%
69.5%
3.6%
14.8%
85.2%
47.1%
52.9%
52.4%
47.6%
26.1%
18.1%
55.8%
3.7%
3.9%
20.8%
47.8%
23.8%
19.5%
7.2%
23.7%
24.8%
24.7%
18.9%
63.4%
8.1%
9.6%
20.0%
68.7%
11.3%
7.7%
17.3%
22.5%
52.5%
County
Putnam
Putnam
Seminole
Seminole
Volusia
Volusia
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
5
25,467
34.2%
259.7
6
48,897
65.8%
567.3
5
36,031
8.5%
33.5
7
386,687
91.5%
311.8
6
361,713
73.1%
1,238.5
7
132,880
26.9%
194.0
Area%
31.4%
68.6%
9.7%
90.3%
86.5%
13.5%
Cities included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Apopka
5
32,604
78.5%
28.7
Apopka
7
8,938
21.5%
3.9
Boynton Beach
20
19,971
29.3%
3.1
Boynton Beach
22
48,246
70.7%
13.4
Deerfield Beach
20
26,242
35.0%
4.0
Deerfield Beach
21
33,897
45.2%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Fort Lauderdale
20
59,527
36.0%
13.3
Fort Lauderdale
22
105,994
64.0%
25.1
Fort Lauderdale
23
0
0.0%
0.2
Gainesville
3
92,999
74.8%
41.5
Gainesville
5
31,355
25.2%
20.9
Hialeah
25
162,856
72.5%
16.5
Hialeah
27
61,813
27.5%
6.3
Homestead
26
42,640
70.5%
7.0
Homestead
27
17,872
29.5%
8.6
Jacksonville
4
553,437
67.3%
744.5
Jacksonville
5
268,347
32.7%
130.2
Lake Worth
20
10,654
30.5%
1.6
Lake Worth
22
24,256
69.5%
5.0
Lantana
20
4,654
44.7%
1.1
Lantana
22
5,769
55.3%
1.7
Margate
20
14,727
27.6%
2.3
Margate
21
38,557
72.4%
6.8
Miami
24
148,279
37.1%
22.3
Miami
27
251,178
62.9%
33.8
Miramar
24
88,380
72.4%
17.1
Miramar
25
33,661
27.6%
14.2
Oakland Park
20
20,289
49.1%
4.2
Oakland Park
22
21,074
50.9%
3.9
Orange Park
3
6,415
76.3%
2.8
Orange Park
5
1,997
23.7%
2.5
Orlando
5
77,913
32.7%
22.9
Orlando
7
13,291
5.6%
5.1
Orlando
9
68,550
28.8%
60.2
Orlando
10
78,546
33.0%
22.5
Pembroke Pines
23
99,005
64.0%
18.4
Pembroke Pines
24
21,119
13.6%
4.3
Pembroke Pines
25
34,626
22.4%
12.1
Plantation
20
13,381
15.8%
2.7
Plantation
22
67,640
79.6%
18.4
Plantation
23
3,934
4.6%
0.9
Pompano Beach
20
46,314
46.4%
11.3
Pompano Beach
21
1,447
1.4%
2.0
Pompano Beach
22
52,084
52.2%
12.2
Riviera Beach
18
4,202
12.9%
2.4
Riviera Beach
20
28,156
86.7%
7.3
Riviera Beach
22
130
0.4%
0.5
Royal Palm Beach
18
14,868
43.6%
5.5
Royal Palm Beach
20
16,165
47.3%
5.2
Royal Palm Beach
21
3,107
9.1%
0.7
St. Petersburg
13
152,335
62.2%
68.9
St. Petersburg
14
92,434
37.8%
68.7
Sanford
5
30,131
56.2%
13.9
Sanford
7
23,439
43.8%
12.7
City
Counties and Cities
Area%
88.1%
11.9%
19.1%
80.9%
24.6%
57.3%
18.2%
34.5%
65.1%
0.4%
66.5%
33.5%
72.4%
27.6%
44.8%
55.2%
85.1%
14.9%
24.5%
75.5%
39.5%
60.5%
25.2%
74.8%
39.7%
60.3%
54.5%
45.5%
52.1%
47.9%
52.2%
47.8%
20.7%
4.6%
54.4%
20.3%
52.9%
12.4%
34.7%
12.3%
83.8%
3.9%
44.4%
7.7%
47.9%
23.8%
71.2%
5.0%
48.7%
45.5%
5.8%
50.1%
49.9%
52.3%
47.7%
Cities included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Sunrise
20
62,665
74.2%
9.4
Sunrise
22
1,257
1.5%
0.2
Sunrise
23
20,517
24.3%
8.7
Tampa
14
288,792
86.0%
145.6
Tampa
15
46,917
14.0%
29.7
West Palm Beach
18
20,572
20.6%
35.2
West Palm Beach
20
48,784
48.8%
15.6
West Palm Beach
22
30,563
30.6%
7.2
Winter Haven
10
25,035
73.9%
23.6
Winter Haven
17
8,839
26.1%
16.4
City
Area%
51.5%
0.9%
47.5%
83.1%
16.9%
60.7%
26.9%
12.4%
59.0%
41.0%
Enacted Plan (2012): H000C9047
Page 4 of 4
Homestead
0
10
Scale bar for insets
5
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
Florida City
18
Largo
13
Holmes Beach
Anna Maria
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
11
Bradenton
9
St. Leo
13
12
St. Augustine
Plant City
Zephyrhills
Dade City
HILLSBOROUGH
MANATEE
Palmetto
St. Petersburg
10 Pinellas Park
Tampa
5
Temple Terrace
PASCO
Green Cove Springs
PINELLAS
Oldsmar
Treasure Island
Seminole
Belleair
Clearwater
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
Starke
CLAY
ST. JOHNS
7
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
JEF
FE
RS
ON
DIXIE
E
Eustis
5
Ocoee
Apopka
3
Maitland
Kissimmee
15
24
10
9
LEVY
6
OR O
LSB
Titusville
Oak Hill
DUVAL
DESOTO
14
CHARLOTTE
LEE
12
8
HARDEE
POLK
LAKE
3
PUTNAM
CLAY
MARION
SARASOTA
13
MANATEE
11
HIL
PASCO
HERNANDO
5
F
D
OR
UGH
ALACHUA
AD
BR
N
UNIO
CITRUS
VOLUSIA
SEMINOLE
Deltona
Oviedo
7
St. Cloud
Orlando
Belle Isle
8
Winter Park
Winter Springs
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
LAKE
Orlando Area
See Martinez v. Bush
234 F. Supp. 2d 1275
(S.D. Fla. 2002)
27-Mar-2002
Ch. 2002-12,
Laws of Fla.
21-Mar-2002
*****
S19C0017 (2002)
Benchmark
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
LA
FA
YE
TT
BAKER
4
23
MONROE
25
HENDRY
GLADES
COLLIER
16
HIGHLANDS
15
OSCEOLA
ORANGE
24
VOLUSIA
FLAGLER
7
10
18
21
20
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
22
17
19
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Cutler Bay
Miami
Miami Beach
North Miami
17
Coral Gables
Palmetto Bay
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
21
Hialeah
Doral
Medley
Aventura
Hollywood
Dania Beach
Lawtey
Orange Park
Jacksonville
GULF
HAMILTON
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Hialeah Gardens
Miami Gardens
Miramar
Davie
Fort Lauderdale
Oakland Park
6
DUVAL
3
Miles
60
WAKULLA
MADISON
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
MIAMI-DADE
20
Plantation
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Southwest Ranches
BROWARD
Lauderhill
Pompano Beach
Baldwin
Callahan
50
LIBERTY
LEON
R
Sunrise
Tamarac
Boca Raton
Delray Beach
4
NASSAU
Jacksonville Area
40
2
GADSDEN
E
Deerfield Beach
19
22
Lantana
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
30
BAY
SH
WA
JACKSON
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Parkland
Wellington
Palm Springs
20
WALTON
N
TO
I NG
GILCHRIST
23
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
1
HOLMES
E
NN
HNS
Belle Glade
Jupiter
Tequesta
Palm Beach Gardens
16
SANTA ROSA
A
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
South Florida
BIA
COLU
M
A
ESC
JO
ST.
OK
App. 79
App. 80
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Dist.
13.91%
21.71%
49.87%
14.64%
6.12%
13.83%
9.77%
10.63%
5.66%
5.19%
26.78%
15.32%
4.92%
6.08%
9.47%
8.73%
57.73%
7.81%
11.86%
12.33%
9.22%
6.89%
53.99%
8.81%
10.33%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
11
14
30.9%
69.1%
44.1%
55.9%
71.5%
28.5%
36.1%
63.9%
41.2%
58.8%
41.2%
58.8%
43.0%
57.0%
51.8%
48.2%
45.4%
54.6%
51.0%
49.0%
66.3%
33.7%
49.6%
50.4%
44.2%
55.8%
39.1%
60.9%
47.7%
52.3%
44.8%
55.2%
88.9%
11.1%
54.8%
45.2%
63.1%
36.9%
62.9%
37.1%
53.7%
46.3%
49.0%
51.0%
83.7%
16.3%
47.0%
53.0%
53.4%
46.6%
Pop.
Dev.
295,644
-2,187
41,174
-37,290
48,073
233,188
116,382
116,097
109,263
57,204
-62,456
-22,546
145,854
61,460
162,611
117,225
101,366
-41,185
16,445
40,074
-4,618
-2,844
-2,086
-12,238
102,888
110,831
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
8
17
32.9%
67.1%
50.7%
49.3%
67.3%
32.7%
39.4%
60.6%
41.9%
58.1%
42.3%
57.7%
43.6%
56.4%
50.0%
50.0%
46.1%
53.9%
51.4%
48.6%
63.5%
36.5%
47.1%
52.9%
45.2%
54.8%
37.0%
63.0%
44.3%
55.7%
45.4%
54.6%
87.1%
12.9%
49.2%
50.8%
65.0%
35.0%
63.4%
36.6%
48.5%
51.5%
49.6%
50.4%
80.7%
19.3%
46.2%
53.8%
48.1%
51.9%
0.30
0.38
0.28
0.14
0.18
0.43
0.26
0.22
0.20
0.29
0.40
0.28
0.37
0.51
0.24
0.34
0.38
0.40
0.10
0.21
0.28
0.20
0.15
0.38
0.54
0.47
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
6
19
27.1%
72.9%
47.3%
52.7%
63.0%
37.0%
31.4%
68.6%
32.7%
67.3%
35.2%
64.8%
34.3%
65.7%
39.3%
60.7%
33.4%
66.6%
37.6%
62.4%
53.1%
46.9%
39.5%
60.5%
33.6%
66.4%
28.1%
71.9%
36.2%
63.8%
34.4%
65.6%
85.1%
14.9%
41.2%
58.8%
54.0%
46.0%
54.3%
45.7%
41.0%
59.0%
35.8%
64.2%
75.4%
24.6%
35.8%
64.2%
41.1%
58.9%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2440.3
10064.6 65,757.2
0.26%
132
440
5,241
0.29%
224
865
11,143
1.06%
141
675
2,097
0.41%
174
739
4,369
0.41%
120
446
4,801
0.44%
120
527
3,025
0.52%
114
430
2,223
1.26%
86
337
1,159
0.48%
59
284
800
0.25%
38
149
449
1.62%
45
204
460
0.89%
85
361
2,098
0.25%
86
290
2,948
0.44%
95
288
1,718
0.99%
110
424
3,251
0.45%
133
616
5,250
2.99%
17
69
99
2.31%
206
653
3,196
0.68%
38
191
234
0.97%
31
197
218
2.07%
30
113
140
0.46%
65
379
499
1.15%
111
605
3,703
0.74%
67
334
1,912
1.58%
113
450
4,724
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
21
4
37.7%
62.3%
52.4%
47.6%
75.2%
24.8%
44.3%
55.7%
50.5%
49.5%
48.5%
51.5%
50.6%
49.4%
58.5%
41.5%
54.0%
46.0%
59.8%
40.2%
71.4%
28.6%
56.9%
43.1%
50.9%
49.1%
44.0%
56.0%
55.4%
44.6%
51.9%
48.1%
89.2%
10.8%
57.3%
42.7%
69.0%
31.0%
66.9%
33.1%
56.3%
43.7%
54.4%
45.6%
85.5%
14.5%
54.7%
45.3%
55.7%
44.3%
4.44%
5.01%
10.57%
6.40%
9.11%
7.92%
9.84%
23.86%
11.73%
6.48%
25.84%
18.06%
9.63%
13.85%
17.83%
13.83%
29.13%
67.18%
18.64%
30.20%
77.12%
14.75%
17.84%
14.60%
72.22%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.18
0.34
0.19
0.06
0.10
0.30
0.14
0.15
0.13
0.12
0.25
0.14
0.20
0.44
0.26
0.23
0.17
0.26
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.14
0.04
0.13
0.22
0.29
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
19
27.4%
72.6%
42.7%
57.3%
63.9%
36.1%
32.6%
67.4%
34.6%
65.4%
36.1%
63.9%
36.5%
63.5%
42.3%
57.7%
36.0%
64.0%
42.0%
58.0%
53.7%
46.3%
39.4%
60.6%
38.2%
61.8%
30.4%
69.6%
38.1%
61.9%
38.4%
61.6%
86.7%
13.3%
46.8%
53.2%
61.5%
38.5%
60.7%
39.3%
44.8%
55.2%
44.0%
56.0%
78.8%
21.2%
38.7%
61.3%
43.7%
56.3%
Convex
Hull
0.63
0.85
0.63
0.42
0.56
0.77
0.53
0.64
0.56
0.47
0.79
0.55
0.76
0.87
0.68
0.63
0.61
0.80
0.36
0.64
0.46
0.53
0.46
0.64
0.72
0.80
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
6
19
26.8%
73.2%
44.6%
55.4%
63.7%
36.3%
32.2%
67.8%
31.4%
68.6%
35.3%
64.7%
34.8%
65.2%
40.4%
59.6%
32.1%
67.9%
36.9%
63.1%
51.5%
48.5%
33.5%
66.5%
33.5%
66.5%
27.7%
72.3%
36.3%
63.7%
33.5%
66.5%
86.5%
13.5%
43.3%
56.7%
56.4%
43.6%
57.8%
42.2%
42.7%
57.3%
39.1%
60.9%
76.8%
23.2%
36.6%
63.4%
42.0%
58.0%
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Dist.
D_Mee
5
13.8%
20.0%
48.8%
17.2%
14.0%
19.2%
18.2%
23.3%
13.1%
14.6%
30.6%
20.2%
12.4%
9.6%
17.8%
14.3%
66.0%
18.2%
20.3%
24.4%
20.0%
14.3%
54.1%
19.4%
20.7%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
20
65.9%
52.4%
32.7%
62.2%
53.5%
57.6%
57.5%
53.7%
48.8%
41.2%
34.4%
47.8%
48.8%
59.9%
54.9%
53.4%
11.9%
52.6%
34.0%
34.6%
54.7%
48.6%
18.3%
55.6%
54.0%
12.95%
21.34%
46.84%
12.84%
4.26%
10.88%
8.28%
7.25%
3.34%
3.21%
25.35%
11.93%
3.88%
4.41%
7.00%
5.34%
55.96%
6.76%
5.57%
7.99%
7.77%
3.70%
50.13%
6.30%
11.00%
I_Cri
6
20.3%
27.6%
18.5%
20.6%
32.5%
23.2%
24.3%
23.1%
38.1%
44.2%
35.0%
31.9%
38.7%
30.5%
27.3%
32.3%
22.2%
29.2%
45.6%
41.0%
25.3%
37.2%
27.6%
25.0%
25.2%
2.79%
3.13%
7.54%
3.88%
4.78%
4.79%
6.17%
15.99%
6.87%
3.84%
18.98%
10.12%
6.30%
7.49%
9.90%
8.49%
22.02%
63.88%
11.13%
19.76%
72.18%
9.73%
13.23%
8.90%
64.29%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
18
32.9%
67.1%
46.6%
53.4%
60.3%
39.7%
33.5%
66.5%
40.3%
59.7%
39.2%
60.8%
40.9%
59.1%
41.4%
58.6%
42.2%
57.8%
45.3%
54.7%
57.4%
42.6%
42.2%
57.8%
42.0%
58.0%
33.7%
66.3%
43.5%
56.5%
43.8%
56.2%
82.3%
17.7%
46.0%
54.0%
67.8%
32.2%
64.2%
35.8%
45.2%
54.8%
50.5%
49.5%
75.6%
24.4%
42.1%
57.9%
45.2%
54.8%
Miller (R)
Southerland (R)
Brown (D)
Crenshaw (R)
Nugent (R)
Stearns (R)
Mica (R)
Webster (R)
Bilirakis (R)
Young (R)
Castor (D)
Ross (R)
Buchanan (R)
Mack (R)
Posey (R)
Rooney (R)
Wilson (D)
Ros-Lehtinen (R)
Deutch (D)
Wasserman Schultz (D)
Diaz-Balart (R)
West (R)
Hastings (D)
Adams (R)
Rivera (R)
2013-2014 Incumbent
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
10
15
32.5%
67.5%
45.1%
54.9%
71.2%
28.8%
37.3%
62.7%
43.6%
56.4%
43.1%
56.9%
46.2%
53.8%
52.5%
47.5%
47.2%
52.8%
52.1%
47.9%
66.5%
33.5%
49.4%
50.6%
47.4%
52.6%
42.7%
57.3%
48.1%
51.9%
47.8%
52.2%
87.4%
12.6%
51.0%
49.0%
65.9%
34.1%
63.8%
36.2%
49.1%
50.9%
52.1%
47.9%
82.1%
17.9%
49.0%
51.0%
49.5%
50.5%
0.16%
0.26%
0.66%
0.22%
0.14%
0.19%
0.21%
0.59%
0.15%
0.12%
0.83%
0.30%
0.14%
0.18%
0.42%
0.23%
2.10%
1.84%
0.25%
0.47%
1.42%
0.20%
0.82%
0.33%
1.12%
2000 Census Population
Black
Hisp.
Hisp.Blk
VAP
VAP
VAP
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
15
10
35.8%
64.2%
57.3%
42.7%
66.9%
33.1%
44.3%
55.7%
49.2%
50.8%
48.7%
51.3%
49.7%
50.3%
52.0%
48.0%
48.5%
51.5%
54.3%
45.7%
61.3%
38.7%
47.1%
52.9%
49.7%
50.3%
43.2%
56.8%
50.4%
49.6%
49.6%
50.4%
85.6%
14.4%
53.0%
47.0%
73.0%
27.0%
71.5%
28.5%
51.7%
48.3%
56.6%
43.4%
79.3%
20.7%
50.7%
49.3%
51.6%
48.4%
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
7
18
32.0%
68.0%
49.7%
50.3%
59.3%
40.7%
34.2%
65.8%
41.3%
58.7%
40.0%
60.0%
40.6%
59.4%
41.0%
59.0%
42.2%
57.8%
47.5%
52.5%
55.8%
44.2%
42.1%
57.9%
45.3%
54.7%
35.6%
64.4%
43.1%
56.9%
46.3%
53.7%
81.6%
18.4%
49.2%
50.8%
70.5%
29.5%
66.0%
34.0%
47.7%
52.3%
53.0%
47.0%
76.5%
23.5%
41.1%
58.9%
46.5%
53.5%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
6
19
29.1%
70.9%
37.9%
62.1%
58.2%
41.8%
31.3%
68.7%
36.8%
63.2%
35.7%
64.3%
38.5%
61.5%
37.6%
62.4%
37.1%
62.9%
40.0%
60.0%
52.2%
47.8%
37.8%
62.2%
39.0%
61.0%
33.3%
66.7%
36.3%
63.7%
40.7%
59.3%
81.1%
18.9%
46.7%
53.3%
66.3%
33.7%
63.0%
37.0%
45.5%
54.5%
47.3%
52.7%
73.8%
26.2%
37.7%
62.3%
44.9%
55.1%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
24
1
45.6%
54.4%
64.2%
35.8%
71.4%
28.6%
50.1%
49.9%
58.1%
41.9%
54.2%
45.8%
57.4%
42.6%
60.5%
39.5%
60.1%
39.9%
64.0%
36.0%
71.1%
28.9%
58.8%
41.2%
56.9%
43.1%
51.6%
48.4%
59.7%
40.3%
60.8%
39.2%
86.0%
14.0%
57.5%
42.5%
78.8%
21.2%
74.6%
25.4%
55.9%
44.1%
64.3%
35.7%
82.9%
17.1%
59.9%
40.1%
55.2%
44.8%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
Plan: Benchmark (2002)
Page 2 of 5
App. 81
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Dist.
Dems
32.7%
52.1%
61.6%
38.3%
36.1%
39.0%
35.5%
39.0%
34.6%
36.4%
52.1%
41.6%
33.3%
28.7%
36.9%
36.8%
70.7%
36.4%
50.3%
49.6%
36.0%
36.9%
66.0%
36.0%
35.4%
Dems
30.8%
49.4%
61.8%
35.9%
34.2%
36.9%
34.2%
37.9%
33.3%
35.4%
51.2%
40.6%
32.3%
27.8%
35.7%
35.6%
70.3%
36.4%
48.8%
48.3%
35.8%
36.2%
66.3%
34.8%
35.2%
NPA-Oth
18.7%
15.8%
18.8%
19.8%
23.4%
20.7%
24.9%
26.9%
26.7%
27.2%
24.8%
24.2%
24.1%
25.9%
25.4%
24.1%
20.1%
29.3%
27.1%
27.2%
28.5%
27.8%
20.6%
26.9%
30.3%
NPA-Oth
17.8%
14.3%
17.8%
18.6%
22.4%
19.4%
23.7%
24.8%
25.4%
25.7%
23.1%
22.5%
23.2%
24.5%
23.1%
23.1%
18.9%
27.0%
25.5%
25.2%
26.4%
26.4%
19.9%
25.1%
28.4%
RV who are:
Reps
50.5%
34.8%
19.5%
44.3%
42.4%
42.5%
40.9%
35.2%
40.0%
37.4%
24.0%
35.3%
43.5%
46.4%
38.9%
40.3%
9.6%
34.2%
24.1%
24.5%
35.7%
36.0%
13.1%
38.4%
34.5%
RV who are:
Reps
49.5%
33.6%
20.6%
43.1%
41.6%
41.7%
40.8%
36.2%
40.1%
37.8%
24.8%
36.0%
43.5%
46.8%
39.9%
40.1%
10.3%
36.5%
24.2%
25.2%
37.6%
36.7%
14.1%
38.9%
36.2%
Blks who
are Dems
80.7%
88.3%
86.3%
82.6%
79.9%
82.2%
80.9%
78.9%
75.6%
77.9%
83.6%
82.1%
80.3%
76.7%
79.9%
80.0%
85.7%
80.0%
77.7%
79.3%
80.5%
77.3%
84.9%
78.2%
80.1%
Blks who
are Dems
81.0%
89.5%
87.1%
83.5%
80.8%
83.3%
81.3%
80.0%
76.3%
78.2%
84.3%
83.1%
80.3%
77.3%
81.2%
80.5%
85.8%
81.0%
77.9%
79.7%
81.2%
77.6%
84.8%
79.3%
80.0%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.9%
1.9%
31.2%
1.9%
1.4%
1.5%
19.5%
2.2%
34.8%
1.8%
1.6%
1.9%
49.5%
6.5%
69.1%
5.4%
7.2%
5.0%
13.3%
3.5%
30.5%
3.4%
1.3%
2.5%
5.0%
6.3%
11.6%
8.5%
0.7%
3.6%
12.5%
5.1%
27.9%
5.9%
1.4%
3.2%
8.6%
6.6%
20.2%
8.6%
0.9%
3.4%
9.1%
19.2%
18.9%
24.6%
1.2%
8.9%
5.1%
6.8%
11.7%
8.6%
0.7%
4.2%
4.3%
3.7%
9.4%
4.6%
0.5%
2.2%
26.9%
15.9%
43.9%
14.9%
3.6%
12.2%
14.7%
12.1%
29.8%
13.8%
1.6%
6.3%
4.0%
3.8%
9.9%
5.2%
0.5%
2.1%
4.5%
6.8%
12.3%
10.1%
0.5%
3.6%
7.8%
14.2%
17.5%
19.2%
1.0%
6.2%
7.5%
7.3%
16.9%
9.2%
0.9%
4.5%
56.8%
20.0%
69.3%
13.9%
15.2%
40.0%
6.6%
52.7%
14.5%
43.3%
0.8%
62.5%
9.4%
11.5%
14.9%
11.0%
1.5%
8.9%
10.6%
20.9%
17.4%
18.4%
1.8%
20.0%
9.0%
64.0%
20.1%
50.8%
1.1%
74.3%
5.1%
8.0%
11.0%
9.2%
0.7%
5.4%
52.8%
9.7%
67.5%
7.1%
11.4%
14.0%
7.5%
11.6%
16.8%
14.9%
0.9%
6.1%
9.2%
61.3%
20.8%
51.9%
1.1%
66.7%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.5%
1.8%
28.4%
1.6%
1.5%
1.4%
18.8%
1.8%
32.3%
1.5%
1.6%
1.7%
47.0%
5.9%
66.4%
5.0%
6.9%
4.7%
13.3%
3.1%
29.1%
2.9%
1.4%
2.3%
4.7%
5.8%
10.5%
7.6%
0.7%
3.4%
12.3%
4.6%
26.4%
5.2%
1.4%
3.1%
8.3%
6.1%
19.1%
7.7%
0.9%
3.3%
8.9%
17.5%
18.3%
22.3%
1.2%
8.6%
4.7%
6.0%
10.5%
7.4%
0.7%
3.8%
3.8%
3.3%
8.2%
4.0%
0.5%
2.0%
26.3%
14.3%
42.6%
13.0%
3.8%
11.6%
14.0%
11.0%
28.0%
12.2%
1.5%
6.1%
4.0%
3.3%
9.6%
4.4%
0.5%
1.9%
4.0%
6.1%
10.8%
8.8%
0.5%
3.4%
7.4%
12.9%
16.2%
17.3%
1.0%
6.1%
7.0%
6.4%
15.3%
8.0%
0.9%
4.0%
57.0%
18.8%
69.2%
12.9%
16.0%
39.4%
6.5%
51.7%
14.5%
40.5%
0.8%
62.9%
8.2%
9.9%
12.7%
9.3%
1.5%
8.0%
9.9%
18.9%
15.9%
16.3%
1.8%
19.1%
9.1%
61.9%
20.5%
47.6%
1.1%
73.3%
4.6%
7.1%
9.6%
8.1%
0.6%
4.9%
50.9%
9.2%
65.4%
6.8%
11.5%
13.4%
7.0%
10.5%
15.3%
13.3%
0.9%
5.9%
9.2%
59.2%
20.8%
49.2%
1.2%
65.8%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
30.2%
39.8%
43.5%
31.0%
51.6%
16.4%
36.0%
32.4%
47.2%
24.7%
44.1%
27.9%
45.1%
21.8%
49.5%
17.8%
42.8%
25.5%
44.4%
23.5%
47.4%
20.2%
46.2%
19.8%
44.0%
24.8%
41.4%
25.9%
49.8%
18.8%
46.2%
25.2%
48.5%
21.6%
28.5%
44.5%
47.2%
19.5%
43.0%
25.6%
27.7%
44.5%
41.9%
25.3%
48.6%
20.4%
45.7%
21.7%
29.4%
40.2%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.3%
39.5%
41.3%
29.9%
51.0%
15.1%
34.8%
31.5%
46.4%
24.0%
42.5%
26.8%
44.5%
21.2%
48.4%
16.3%
42.2%
24.6%
44.2%
22.6%
48.1%
18.5%
46.1%
18.2%
44.3%
23.6%
41.1%
24.3%
48.3%
17.1%
45.1%
24.7%
48.9%
19.3%
29.9%
40.6%
46.8%
18.6%
42.5%
23.5%
28.5%
41.4%
41.6%
24.0%
48.7%
18.9%
44.7%
20.3%
29.8%
37.5%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
31.4%
58.0%
10.6%
52.3%
38.4%
9.3%
62.5%
26.9%
10.6%
36.8%
50.9%
12.3%
33.1%
50.4%
16.5%
36.8%
49.6%
13.5%
33.1%
50.2%
16.7%
36.6%
46.7%
16.7%
32.9%
48.5%
18.6%
35.4%
45.6%
19.0%
52.6%
32.3%
15.2%
39.6%
45.5%
15.0%
31.3%
51.3%
17.4%
24.8%
57.5%
17.7%
33.5%
50.1%
16.3%
33.8%
49.3%
16.9%
77.7%
10.2%
12.1%
34.6%
45.9%
19.4%
52.6%
27.5%
19.9%
52.0%
29.7%
18.2%
34.9%
47.1%
17.9%
35.7%
44.0%
20.3%
70.7%
16.2%
13.1%
34.0%
48.3%
17.8%
33.7%
46.3%
20.0%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
30.6%
54.4%
15.0%
50.3%
36.9%
12.8%
64.5%
20.9%
14.6%
36.0%
47.7%
16.4%
33.6%
46.3%
20.1%
36.8%
45.9%
17.3%
33.9%
44.9%
21.2%
38.0%
39.3%
22.8%
33.3%
43.4%
23.3%
36.0%
40.5%
23.6%
52.9%
26.3%
20.8%
41.1%
38.7%
20.2%
32.1%
47.0%
21.0%
27.0%
51.1%
21.9%
35.5%
42.7%
21.8%
35.2%
44.1%
20.7%
74.4%
8.8%
16.8%
36.9%
36.8%
26.3%
50.5%
24.9%
24.6%
50.2%
25.5%
24.3%
36.7%
38.4%
24.9%
36.6%
38.5%
24.9%
70.3%
12.7%
17.0%
34.9%
42.0%
23.1%
35.5%
37.8%
26.7%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
10.1%
1.0%
28.1%
0.8%
1.0%
1.0%
17.0%
1.2%
30.3%
0.9%
0.9%
1.2%
45.6%
3.2%
67.2%
2.7%
3.9%
2.9%
11.5%
1.9%
27.4%
1.7%
0.9%
1.7%
4.0%
3.3%
10.4%
4.4%
0.4%
2.2%
10.3%
2.6%
24.6%
2.9%
0.9%
2.0%
6.9%
3.8%
18.0%
5.0%
0.6%
2.3%
8.4%
10.6%
19.3%
14.7%
0.9%
5.6%
4.1%
3.8%
10.2%
4.5%
0.5%
2.9%
2.8%
2.0%
6.7%
2.5%
0.3%
1.5%
24.2%
8.6%
41.5%
7.6%
2.2%
8.1%
12.4%
5.6%
27.5%
6.7%
1.0%
3.5%
2.9%
1.8%
7.9%
2.5%
0.3%
1.2%
2.6%
3.0%
8.5%
4.7%
0.3%
2.1%
6.4%
6.8%
16.3%
10.4%
0.6%
3.6%
5.9%
3.6%
14.8%
4.6%
0.6%
2.7%
64.7%
12.9%
75.4%
7.9%
13.1%
36.9%
5.5%
49.8%
13.6%
32.4%
0.5%
63.0%
7.5%
5.9%
11.9%
5.1%
1.1%
5.9%
10.5%
14.2%
16.9%
10.8%
1.4%
16.9%
10.5%
58.7%
26.0%
36.4%
0.8%
73.8%
4.0%
4.6%
9.2%
5.0%
0.4%
3.8%
53.7%
5.9%
68.6%
3.9%
7.5%
11.0%
6.4%
6.6%
15.7%
8.7%
0.6%
4.1%
9.8%
54.7%
24.7%
39.5%
0.8%
63.8%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
12.1%
1.7%
33.3%
1.5%
1.1%
1.3%
19.9%
1.9%
35.7%
1.6%
1.2%
1.7%
51.8%
5.1%
71.7%
4.3%
5.7%
4.0%
13.5%
2.9%
31.9%
2.8%
1.1%
2.2%
5.1%
5.4%
12.4%
7.7%
0.5%
3.1%
12.7%
4.3%
29.4%
5.0%
1.1%
2.8%
8.5%
5.7%
21.0%
7.7%
0.7%
3.0%
9.5%
16.1%
20.6%
21.6%
1.0%
7.3%
5.4%
6.1%
12.6%
7.8%
0.6%
3.8%
4.3%
3.3%
9.6%
4.3%
0.4%
2.0%
27.6%
13.9%
45.1%
13.3%
2.8%
10.7%
15.6%
10.1%
32.1%
12.0%
1.3%
5.1%
3.8%
3.2%
10.0%
4.6%
0.4%
1.7%
4.3%
5.5%
12.8%
8.7%
0.4%
2.9%
8.0%
12.0%
18.6%
17.2%
0.8%
5.2%
7.8%
6.1%
18.3%
8.0%
0.8%
3.8%
61.2%
18.0%
72.4%
12.3%
14.1%
40.6%
6.4%
51.8%
14.4%
41.1%
0.6%
62.0%
10.1%
10.4%
16.1%
9.9%
1.3%
8.3%
11.6%
20.6%
18.9%
17.5%
1.6%
20.3%
9.9%
63.2%
22.4%
47.7%
1.0%
74.9%
5.4%
7.4%
11.7%
8.5%
0.6%
5.1%
57.0%
8.4%
71.0%
6.0%
9.6%
13.9%
7.8%
10.2%
18.0%
13.5%
0.8%
5.4%
9.8%
59.7%
22.8%
48.9%
0.9%
65.7%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.8%
93.3%
92.3%
87.9%
85.1%
87.8%
86.6%
84.3%
80.8%
84.9%
90.0%
88.2%
86.5%
82.8%
85.8%
85.3%
90.5%
86.2%
82.8%
84.0%
86.2%
82.1%
90.4%
83.6%
85.3%
Blks who
are Dems
84.3%
90.5%
89.2%
85.2%
82.3%
85.0%
83.6%
81.8%
78.1%
81.1%
86.3%
84.8%
83.7%
80.3%
82.7%
82.7%
88.0%
82.8%
80.2%
81.6%
83.0%
79.6%
87.6%
80.8%
82.9%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
25.4%
55.0%
40.9%
39.3%
52.9%
23.9%
31.9%
45.3%
45.2%
34.1%
40.4%
38.1%
44.3%
30.6%
50.9%
24.8%
39.5%
36.6%
43.4%
33.4%
46.5%
30.6%
47.5%
28.5%
42.9%
34.1%
38.4%
39.5%
51.3%
26.8%
43.4%
36.8%
47.7%
29.2%
22.5%
58.0%
45.2%
27.6%
39.6%
35.4%
21.6%
59.2%
38.7%
36.2%
46.4%
30.2%
44.8%
30.2%
24.3%
54.0%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.4%
44.3%
41.4%
32.1%
53.7%
16.4%
34.9%
35.5%
47.5%
26.2%
42.9%
29.6%
45.5%
23.7%
51.0%
17.8%
43.0%
27.4%
46.3%
24.6%
50.5%
20.3%
48.7%
19.6%
46.1%
25.2%
43.2%
27.3%
51.1%
18.5%
46.0%
27.8%
50.9%
19.8%
29.2%
44.0%
47.8%
20.0%
42.7%
25.1%
27.7%
45.5%
41.7%
26.5%
50.0%
21.0%
46.3%
22.3%
29.0%
41.6%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
23.4%
0.6%
0.7%
26.9%
0.6%
1.0%
65.5%
1.7%
1.9%
24.9%
0.9%
1.3%
8.9%
2.7%
1.6%
20.6%
1.5%
1.4%
17.2%
3.5%
1.7%
16.3%
10.3%
4.0%
8.7%
2.6%
2.0%
5.4%
1.9%
1.2%
40.4%
4.2%
5.8%
23.3%
3.4%
2.3%
7.5%
1.7%
0.9%
7.3%
2.8%
1.5%
15.1%
6.5%
2.5%
12.5%
2.8%
1.9%
79.3%
4.5%
33.3%
13.3%
26.7%
66.4%
9.5%
2.8%
4.9%
16.1%
6.5%
14.2%
28.5%
28.9%
76.5%
8.1%
2.9%
2.9%
69.3%
2.3%
8.9%
13.6%
6.0%
3.1%
27.4%
29.6%
63.0%
Plan: Benchmark (2002)
Page 3 of 5
County
Alachua
Alachua
Brevard
Brevard
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Charlotte
Charlotte
Charlotte
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Duval
Hendry
Hendry
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Jefferson
Jefferson
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lake
Leon
Leon
Levy
Levy
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Marion
Marion
Martin
Martin
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Monroe
Monroe
Okaloosa
Okaloosa
Orange
Orange
Orange
App. 82
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
49,719
20.1%
237.8
6
197,617
79.9%
731.0
15
412,898
76.0%
1,054.5
24
130,478
24.0%
502.5
17
177,356
10.1%
26.8
19
219,615
12.6%
52.0
20
578,649
33.1%
185.4
21
121,267
6.9%
38.7
22
290,553
16.6%
150.4
23
360,626
20.6%
869.5
13
21,084
13.2%
84.1
14
32,239
20.2%
158.5
16
106,655
66.7%
615.6
3
16,284
8.5%
116.8
6
174,581
91.5%
526.7
14
207,963
64.7%
347.6
25
113,557
35.3%
1,957.4
3
245,902
28.5%
106.3
4
503,072
58.2%
551.1
6
115,289
13.3%
261.0
16
31,098
79.5%
584.6
23
8,042
20.5%
605.4
9
342,526
27.9%
459.7
11
579,196
47.1%
407.8
12
307,504
25.0%
398.3
2
7,422
50.3%
463.2
4
7,339
49.7%
173.3
3
25,216
8.5%
318.5
5
138,616
46.7%
500.1
6
49,887
16.8%
73.7
8
83,333
28.1%
264.6
2
258,998
94.0%
658.4
4
16,489
6.0%
43.4
5
31,168
76.4%
1,327.2
6
9,633
23.6%
85.6
11
28,153
8.7%
32.4
13
294,680
91.3%
860.3
3
9,036
2.7%
366.9
5
16,874
5.1%
136.9
6
220,261
66.5%
691.4
8
85,127
25.7%
467.4
16
141,437
96.7%
459.1
23
4,881
3.3%
293.7
17
477,804
19.1%
72.0
18
639,709
25.6%
640.4
20
113,078
4.5%
32.5
21
572,234
22.9%
101.5
25
693,610
27.8%
1,584.9
18
73,081
100.0%
2,555.4
25
9
0.0%
1,182.1
1
163,753
90.6%
1,057.3
2
17,069
9.4%
24.8
3
230,416
20.1%
100.4
7
9,695
0.8%
3.7
8
629,271
54.9%
417.2
Area%
24.5%
75.5%
67.7%
32.3%
2.0%
3.9%
14.0%
2.9%
11.4%
65.7%
9.8%
18.5%
71.7%
18.2%
81.8%
15.1%
84.9%
11.6%
60.0%
28.4%
49.1%
50.9%
36.3%
32.2%
31.5%
72.8%
27.2%
27.5%
43.2%
6.4%
22.9%
93.8%
6.2%
93.9%
6.1%
3.6%
96.4%
22.1%
8.2%
41.6%
28.1%
61.0%
39.0%
3.0%
26.3%
1.3%
4.2%
65.2%
68.4%
31.6%
97.7%
2.3%
10.0%
0.4%
41.6%
County
Orange
Osceola
Osceola
Osceola
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pasco
Pasco
Pinellas
Pinellas
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
Polk
Putnam
Putnam
Seminole
Seminole
Seminole
St. Lucie
St. Lucie
Volusia
Volusia
Volusia
Walton
Walton
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
24
276,574
24.1%
481.9
8
7,877
2.9%
10.0
12
29,358
10.9%
35.1
15
231,450
86.1%
1,460.8
16
126,730
9.6%
192.1
19
516,804
39.1%
181.9
22
403,706
30.6%
348.8
23
272,894
20.7%
1,660.3
5
269,877
58.1%
668.0
9
194,820
41.9%
200.4
9
216,203
23.6%
139.7
10
633,889
69.2%
448.6
11
66,450
7.3%
19.8
5
65,564
10.9%
226.9
12
505,337
83.9%
1,664.5
15
31,194
5.2%
119.2
3
41,424
55.7%
611.2
7
32,940
44.3%
215.8
3
26,327
6.2%
14.4
7
193,250
45.7%
137.6
24
203,141
48.1%
193.3
16
240,125
86.4%
414.4
23
37,664
13.6%
273.7
3
14,731
3.0%
224.4
7
290,822
58.8%
473.9
24
189,040
38.2%
734.2
1
36,591
66.5%
1,030.5
2
18,452
33.5%
209.1
Area%
48.0%
0.7%
2.3%
97.0%
8.1%
7.6%
14.6%
69.7%
76.9%
23.1%
23.0%
73.8%
3.3%
11.3%
82.8%
5.9%
73.9%
26.1%
4.2%
39.8%
56.0%
60.2%
39.8%
15.7%
33.1%
51.3%
83.1%
16.9%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Altamonte Springs
7
11,684
28.2%
3.4
Altamonte Springs
24
29,812
71.8%
6.3
Apopka
3
3,988
9.6%
7.8
Apopka
8
3,927
9.5%
1.9
Apopka
24
33,627
80.9%
22.9
Atlantis
19
29
1.4%
0.0
Atlantis
22
1,976
98.6%
1.4
Auburndale
5
2
0.0%
0.3
Auburndale
12
13,505
100.0%
20.1
Aventura
17
2,206
6.2%
0.2
Aventura
20
33,556
93.8%
3.3
Bal Harbour
18
1,523
60.6%
0.3
Bal Harbour
20
990
39.4%
0.3
Boca Raton
19
19,240
22.8%
10.9
Boca Raton
22
65,152
77.2%
20.4
Boynton Beach
19
17,012
24.9%
4.0
Boynton Beach
22
31,687
46.5%
9.1
Boynton Beach
23
19,518
28.6%
3.4
Bradenton
11
9,794
19.8%
3.1
Bradenton
13
39,752
80.2%
13.8
Casselberry
7
12,084
46.1%
4.1
Casselberry
24
14,157
53.9%
3.4
Clearwater
9
77,929
72.4%
23.6
Clearwater
10
29,756
27.6%
15.7
Clewiston
16
5,303
74.1%
3.3
Clewiston
23
1,852
25.9%
1.4
Cocoa
15
11,051
64.5%
5.8
Cocoa
24
6,089
35.5%
9.6
Coconut Creek
19
25,475
48.1%
5.3
Coconut Creek
22
27,434
51.9%
6.7
Cooper City
20
17,054
59.7%
5.5
Cooper City
22
11,493
40.3%
2.8
Coral Springs
19
77,479
64.0%
14.4
Coral Springs
22
43,617
36.0%
9.6
Cutler Bay
18
18,922
47.0%
5.8
Cutler Bay
25
21,364
53.0%
4.4
Dania Beach
20
29,561
99.7%
6.2
Dania Beach
22
78
0.3%
2.2
Davenport
12
2,727
94.4%
2.9
Davenport
15
161
5.6%
0.5
Davie
20
84,064
91.4%
29.2
Davie
22
7,236
7.9%
6.2
Davie
23
692
0.8%
0.3
Daytona Beach
7
49,175
80.6%
27.6
Daytona Beach
24
11,830
19.4%
36.1
DeBary
3
2,044
10.6%
11.8
DeBary
7
17,276
89.4%
10.0
Deerfield Beach
19
23,459
31.3%
6.7
Deerfield Beach
22
29,805
39.7%
6.3
Deerfield Beach
23
21,754
29.0%
3.3
DeLand
3
5,734
21.2%
2.1
DeLand
7
21,297
78.8%
15.7
Delray Beach
19
19,060
31.5%
4.8
Delray Beach
22
24,547
40.6%
7.9
Delray Beach
23
16,915
27.9%
3.5
Counties and Cities
Area%
35.0%
65.0%
23.9%
5.8%
70.3%
2.8%
97.2%
1.5%
98.5%
5.7%
94.3%
51.3%
48.7%
34.8%
65.2%
24.4%
55.1%
20.4%
18.3%
81.7%
54.8%
45.2%
60.1%
39.9%
69.3%
30.7%
37.9%
62.1%
43.9%
56.1%
66.5%
33.5%
59.9%
40.1%
56.6%
43.4%
74.0%
26.0%
85.7%
14.3%
81.8%
17.3%
0.9%
43.3%
56.7%
54.3%
45.7%
41.2%
38.5%
20.4%
11.6%
88.4%
29.8%
48.7%
21.4%
Cities included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Deltona
7
56,341
66.1%
26.9
Deltona
24
28,841
33.9%
14.1
Destin
1
10,457
85.0%
6.3
Destin
2
1,848
15.0%
2.2
Doral
21
9,605
21.0%
9.1
Doral
25
36,099
79.0%
6.1
Eatonville
3
2,124
98.4%
1.1
Eatonville
8
0
0.0%
0.0
Eatonville
24
35
1.6%
0.0
Fanning Springs
5
486
63.6%
2.2
Fanning Springs
6
278
36.4%
1.7
Florida City
18
0
0.0%
2.7
Florida City
25
11,245
100.0%
3.3
Fort Lauderdale
19
3,260
2.0%
0.9
Fort Lauderdale
20
36,301
21.9%
6.6
Fort Lauderdale
22
62,122
37.5%
17.7
Fort Lauderdale
23
63,838
38.6%
13.3
Fort Pierce
16
16,741
40.3%
16.8
Fort Pierce
23
24,849
59.7%
9.7
Gainesville
3
36,710
29.5%
21.6
Gainesville
6
87,644
70.5%
40.8
Golf
19
0
0.0%
0.0
Golf
22
252
100.0%
0.8
Green Cove Springs
3
3,349
48.5%
6.8
Green Cove Springs
6
3,559
51.5%
3.1
Gulfport
10
11,303
94.0%
3.5
Gulfport
11
726
6.0%
0.4
Haines City
12
20,436
99.5%
19.4
Haines City
15
99
0.5%
0.3
Hallandale Beach
17
15,223
41.0%
2.2
Hallandale Beach
20
21,890
59.0%
2.4
Hialeah
17
0
0.0%
0.4
Hialeah
18
5
0.0%
0.4
Hialeah
21
204,437
91.0%
17.9
Hialeah
25
20,227
9.0%
4.2
Hollywood
17
59,379
42.2%
8.6
Hollywood
20
81,206
57.7%
18.5
Hollywood
22
183
0.1%
3.7
Hypoluxo
22
2,015
77.9%
0.5
Hypoluxo
23
573
22.1%
0.3
Jacksonville
3
245,902
29.9%
106.3
Jacksonville
4
462,018
56.2%
509.3
Jacksonville
6
113,864
13.9%
259.0
Jupiter
16
12,494
22.7%
5.0
Jupiter
22
42,662
77.3%
18.2
Lake Park
22
1,157
14.2%
0.3
Lake Park
23
6,998
85.8%
2.0
Lake Worth
22
8,845
25.3%
3.0
Lake Worth
23
26,065
74.7%
3.7
Lakeland
5
8,280
8.5%
6.1
Lakeland
12
89,142
91.5%
68.2
Lantana
22
2,648
25.4%
1.2
Lantana
23
7,775
74.6%
1.7
Lauderdale Lakes
20
938
2.9%
0.1
Lauderdale Lakes
23
31,655
97.1%
3.6
City
Area%
65.6%
34.4%
74.3%
25.7%
59.9%
40.1%
97.3%
1.7%
1.0%
55.6%
44.4%
44.8%
55.2%
2.4%
17.0%
46.0%
34.6%
63.4%
36.6%
34.6%
65.4%
3.9%
96.1%
69.1%
30.9%
89.7%
10.3%
98.3%
1.7%
48.1%
51.9%
1.7%
1.8%
78.4%
18.2%
27.9%
60.1%
11.9%
61.9%
38.1%
12.2%
58.2%
29.6%
21.6%
78.4%
13.7%
86.3%
45.1%
54.9%
8.2%
91.8%
42.2%
57.8%
2.8%
97.2%
Plan: Benchmark (2002)
Page 4 of 5
App. 83
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Lauderhill
20
11,902
17.8%
1.8
Lauderhill
23
54,985
82.2%
6.7
Leesburg
5
5,244
26.1%
30.0
Leesburg
6
14,873
73.9%
11.0
Maitland
3
702
4.5%
0.3
Maitland
7
5,336
33.9%
2.0
Maitland
24
9,713
61.7%
4.1
Margate
19
42,477
79.7%
7.4
Margate
23
10,807
20.3%
1.6
Medley
21
671
80.1%
0.6
Medley
25
167
19.9%
5.3
Miami
17
77,377
19.4%
8.4
Miami
18
312,331
78.2%
42.4
Miami
20
9,749
2.4%
5.3
Miami
21
0
0.0%
0.0
Miami Beach
18
75,056
85.5%
6.1
Miami Beach
20
12,723
14.5%
9.0
Miami Gardens
17
102,818
95.9%
17.8
Miami Gardens
21
4,349
4.1%
1.2
Miami Lakes
21
14,096
48.0%
3.6
Miami Lakes
25
15,265
52.0%
3.0
Miami Shores
17
8,602
82.0%
2.1
Miami Shores
20
1,891
18.0%
1.6
Miami Springs
18
2
0.0%
0.1
Miami Springs
21
13,807
100.0%
2.9
Minneola
5
9,402
100.0%
5.9
Minneola
8
1
0.0%
4.8
Miramar
17
45,060
36.9%
5.5
Miramar
21
58,246
47.7%
21.0
Miramar
23
18,735
15.4%
4.8
Monticello
2
357
14.2%
0.9
Monticello
4
2,149
85.8%
3.0
Mount Dora
3
2,000
16.2%
2.3
Mount Dora
8
10,370
83.8%
7.1
Niceville
1
12,602
98.8%
11.8
Niceville
2
147
1.2%
0.1
North Lauderdale
20
1,516
3.7%
0.2
North Lauderdale
23
39,507
96.3%
4.4
North Miami
17
49,611
84.4%
5.2
North Miami
20
9,175
15.6%
4.8
North Miami Beach 17
34,570
83.3%
4.3
North Miami Beach 20
6,953
16.7%
1.1
Oakland Park
20
16,601
40.1%
2.5
Oakland Park
22
9,007
21.8%
1.8
Oakland Park
23
15,755
38.1%
3.8
Ocala
6
38,913
69.1%
34.4
Ocala
8
17,402
30.9%
10.4
Ocoee
3
683
1.9%
0.2
Ocoee
8
34,896
98.1%
15.5
Opa-locka
17
14,897
97.9%
3.5
Opa-locka
21
322
2.1%
1.0
Orange Park
3
4,159
49.4%
3.7
Orange Park
6
4,253
50.6%
1.6
Orlando
3
75,376
31.6%
22.4
Orlando
8
154,969
65.0%
64.9
Area%
21.4%
78.6%
73.1%
26.9%
4.6%
31.4%
64.0%
81.9%
18.1%
9.6%
90.4%
14.9%
75.6%
9.5%
0.0%
40.4%
59.6%
93.5%
6.5%
54.6%
45.4%
56.6%
43.4%
2.9%
97.1%
55.1%
44.9%
17.4%
67.3%
15.3%
23.6%
76.4%
24.2%
75.8%
99.5%
0.5%
3.9%
96.1%
51.6%
48.4%
79.2%
20.8%
31.2%
22.6%
46.3%
76.8%
23.2%
1.1%
98.9%
77.8%
22.2%
70.1%
29.9%
20.2%
58.6%
Cities included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Orlando
24
7,955
3.3%
23.4
Palatka
3
6,907
65.4%
6.7
Palatka
7
3,651
34.6%
2.4
Palm Beach Gardens 16
8,443
17.4%
34.1
Palm Beach Gardens 22
40,009
82.6%
21.2
Palm Beach Gardens 23
0
0.0%
0.1
Palm Springs
19
8,050
42.5%
0.9
Palm Springs
22
10,878
57.5%
2.4
Palm Springs
23
0
0.0%
0.0
Palmetto
11
4,371
34.7%
1.4
Palmetto
13
8,235
65.3%
4.2
Palmetto Bay
18
1,710
7.3%
2.1
Palmetto Bay
21
15,201
64.9%
4.1
Palmetto Bay
25
6,499
27.8%
2.2
Parkland
19
5,686
23.7%
4.3
Parkland
22
18,276
76.3%
8.5
Pembroke Pines
17
37,436
24.2%
6.7
Pembroke Pines
20
42,721
27.6%
7.2
Pembroke Pines
21
63,021
40.7%
17.6
Pembroke Pines
23
11,572
7.5%
3.3
Pierson
3
1,127
64.9%
3.8
Pierson
7
609
35.1%
5.0
Pinecrest
18
11,736
64.4%
5.1
Pinecrest
21
6,487
35.6%
2.4
Plant City
9
26,571
76.5%
17.5
Plant City
12
8,150
23.5%
10.6
Plantation
20
67,850
79.9%
17.3
Plantation
22
9,568
11.3%
3.3
Plantation
23
7,537
8.9%
1.4
Polk City
5
779
49.9%
1.2
Polk City
12
783
50.1%
0.7
Pompano Beach
19
12,998
13.0%
4.5
Pompano Beach
22
47,088
47.2%
10.6
Pompano Beach
23
39,759
39.8%
10.3
Port St. Lucie
16
164,575
100.0%
106.3
Port St. Lucie
23
28
0.0%
8.9
Riviera Beach
22
8,044
24.8%
4.8
Riviera Beach
23
24,444
75.2%
5.4
Rockledge
15
24,924
100.0%
13.4
Rockledge
24
2
0.0%
0.1
Royal Palm Beach
16
21,312
62.4%
6.6
Royal Palm Beach
19
2
0.0%
0.1
Royal Palm Beach
22
5,798
17.0%
2.6
Royal Palm Beach
23
7,028
20.6%
2.1
Sanford
3
23,295
43.5%
10.2
Sanford
7
30,275
56.5%
16.3
South Daytona
7
4,363
35.6%
1.6
South Daytona
24
7,889
64.4%
3.5
Southwest Ranches 20
6,729
91.6%
10.2
Southwest Ranches 23
616
8.4%
2.8
St. Petersburg
10
179,045
73.1%
118.2
St. Petersburg
11
65,724
26.9%
19.4
Sunny Isles Beach
18
0
0.0%
0.4
Sunny Isles Beach
20
20,832
100.0%
1.5
Sunrise
20
70,981
84.1%
16.8
City
Counties and Cities (2)
Area%
21.1%
73.9%
26.1%
61.6%
38.3%
0.1%
27.9%
71.8%
0.4%
24.8%
75.2%
24.7%
48.9%
26.4%
33.6%
66.4%
19.2%
20.7%
50.6%
9.4%
43.2%
56.8%
67.6%
32.4%
62.3%
37.7%
78.9%
14.8%
6.3%
62.7%
37.3%
17.8%
41.8%
40.4%
92.2%
7.8%
47.3%
52.7%
99.6%
0.4%
58.1%
0.6%
22.5%
18.8%
38.6%
61.4%
31.2%
68.8%
78.3%
21.7%
85.9%
14.1%
20.2%
79.8%
91.8%
Cities included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Sunrise
23
13,458
15.9%
1.5
Surfside
18
5,744
100.0%
0.9
Surfside
20
0
0.0%
0.0
Tallahassee
2
174,994
96.5%
98.4
Tallahassee
4
6,382
3.5%
5.0
Tamarac
19
28,253
46.8%
5.2
Tamarac
20
9,957
16.5%
2.5
Tamarac
23
22,217
36.8%
4.4
Tampa
9
41,764
12.4%
28.2
Tampa
11
293,945
87.6%
147.0
Tavares
5
2,682
19.2%
2.6
Tavares
8
11,269
80.8%
8.3
Temple Terrace
9
7,839
31.9%
2.3
Temple Terrace
11
10,237
41.7%
2.6
Temple Terrace
12
6,465
26.3%
2.2
Wellington
16
38,303
67.8%
37.5
Wellington
19
7,335
13.0%
2.6
Wellington
23
10,870
19.2%
5.0
West Palm Beach
19
3,338
3.3%
1.7
West Palm Beach
22
29,860
29.9%
25.7
West Palm Beach
23
66,721
66.8%
30.7
Weston
20
65,333
100.0%
22.9
Weston
23
0
0.0%
3.5
Williston
5
5
0.2%
3.1
Williston
6
2,763
99.8%
3.6
Wilton Manors
20
8,495
73.0%
1.4
Wilton Manors
22
2,626
22.6%
0.5
Wilton Manors
23
511
4.4%
0.1
Winter Park
3
2,892
10.4%
0.8
Winter Park
7
4,312
15.5%
1.7
Winter Park
8
14,116
50.7%
5.0
Winter Park
24
6,532
23.5%
2.8
Winter Springs
7
11,950
35.9%
3.4
Winter Springs
24
21,332
64.1%
11.4
City
Area%
8.2%
96.6%
3.4%
95.2%
4.8%
42.9%
20.6%
36.4%
16.1%
83.9%
24.0%
76.0%
32.6%
36.3%
31.1%
83.1%
5.9%
11.0%
2.9%
44.3%
52.8%
86.8%
13.2%
46.5%
53.5%
70.5%
26.3%
3.1%
7.5%
16.6%
48.7%
27.2%
22.9%
77.1%
Plan: Benchmark (2002)
Page 5 of 5
App. 84
25
0
Cutler Bay
18
5
10
Scale bar for insets
Palmetto Bay
Miles
20
13
Tampa
9
Bradenton
St. Leo
13
12
Plant City
Zephyrhills
26
St. Augustine
Dade City
HILLSBOROUGH
Temple Terrace
PASCO
5
MANATEE
Palmetto
St. Petersburg
Holmes Beach
Anna Maria
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
Treasure Island
11
PINELLAS
Oldsmar
Pinellas Park
10
Largo
Clearwater
Seminole
Belleair
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
Green Cove Springs
ST. JOHNS
7
8
Ocoee
Apopka
Maitland
3
Kissimmee
St. Cloud
27
Orlando
Belle Isle
Oviedo
Winter Springs 24
Winter Park
Deltona
SEMINOLE
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
26
LAKE
28-Nov-2011
*****
PCS 7032 by Senate
Reapportionment
Committee (23-3)
6-Dec-2011
S000C9002
Orlando Area
Eustis
6
DIXIE
10
26
15
Titusville
Oak Hill
DESOTO
12
LEE
14
4
10
21
HENDRY
GLADES
18
23
27
OSCEOLA
ORANGE
24
VOLUSIA
FLAGLER
HIGHLANDS
COLLIER
POLK
HARDEE
8
LAKE
3
7
DUVAL
PUTNAM
CLAY
CHARLOTTE
SARASOTA
13
UGH
9
OR O
LSB
MANATEE
HIL
11
5
HERNANDO
F
D
OR
MARION
AD
BR
ALACHUA
CITRUS
PASCO
LEVY
VOLUSIA 7
E
N
UNIO
BAKER
15
MONROE
25
19
20
17
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
16
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
Florida City
Homestead
MIAMI-DADE
Coral Gables
Miami
Miami Beach
17 North Miami
Aventura
CLAY
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
LA
FA
YE
TT
E
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Doral
Hialeah
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
Starke
6
Orange Park
Jacksonville
GULF
HAMILTON
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
20
Dania Beach
Fort Lauderdale
Lauderhill
Oakland Park
DUVAL
3
Miles
60
MADISON
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
21
Davie
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Southwest Ranches
Sunrise
Plantation
22
Pompano Beach
Baldwin
4
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
R
BROWARD
Tamarac
Deerfield Beach
Boca Raton
Delray Beach
NASSAU
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Parkland
19
Lantana
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
30
2
JACKSON
GILCHRIST
23
Wellington
Palm Springs
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
HNS
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
E
NN
Belle Glade
16
1
SANTA ROSA
A
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
South Florida
BIA
COLU
M
A
ESC
JO
ST.
OK
App. 85
App. 86
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
49.96%
12.96%
4.91%
13.24%
9.06%
12.85%
10.13%
5.30%
25.82%
9.56%
4.63%
5.74%
9.12%
11.17%
56.30%
5.61%
11.35%
9.31%
8.34%
8.60%
51.79%
9.18%
12.32%
8.80%
11.96%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
11
16
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
71.5%
28.5%
35.8%
64.2%
46.1%
53.9%
37.9%
62.1%
41.7%
58.3%
49.1%
50.9%
46.1%
53.9%
50.4%
49.6%
65.5%
34.5%
42.1%
57.9%
44.6%
55.4%
38.3%
61.7%
42.6%
57.4%
48.2%
51.8%
88.7%
11.3%
50.9%
49.1%
61.1%
38.9%
60.4%
39.6%
49.8%
50.2%
53.4%
46.6%
84.1%
15.9%
47.7%
52.3%
56.0%
44.0%
39.2%
60.8%
61.5%
38.5%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
11
16
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
67.1%
32.9%
37.3%
62.7%
45.3%
54.7%
42.2%
57.8%
43.1%
56.9%
47.3%
52.7%
46.4%
53.6%
50.5%
49.5%
63.1%
36.9%
42.1%
57.9%
45.5%
54.5%
36.5%
63.5%
42.3%
57.7%
49.3%
50.7%
86.9%
13.1%
47.3%
52.7%
62.9%
37.1%
60.5%
39.5%
42.2%
57.8%
53.9%
46.1%
80.9%
19.1%
47.3%
52.7%
51.3%
48.7%
41.0%
59.0%
54.5%
45.5%
0.40
0.37
0.46
0.09
0.45
0.46
0.57
0.33
0.35
0.27
0.39
0.38
0.62
0.58
0.22
0.34
0.54
0.42
0.14
0.26
0.28
0.38
0.16
0.48
0.57
0.57
0.56
0.53
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
62.7%
37.3%
29.4%
70.6%
35.2%
64.8%
34.5%
65.5%
34.9%
65.1%
38.0%
62.0%
34.0%
66.0%
37.1%
62.9%
52.0%
48.0%
33.5%
66.5%
33.7%
66.3%
27.6%
72.4%
33.9%
66.1%
36.7%
63.3%
84.8%
15.2%
38.2%
61.8%
51.6%
48.4%
51.6%
48.4%
35.6%
64.4%
40.8%
59.2%
76.2%
23.8%
35.3%
64.7%
44.2%
55.8%
32.7%
67.3%
46.2%
53.8%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2220.0
8456.9
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
1.10%
144
702
1,538
0.44%
77
451
2,102
0.41%
65
214
1,574
0.34%
132
518
7,873
0.25%
111
394
3,195
0.81%
62
267
1,055
0.78%
54
175
616
0.28%
37
119
425
1.53%
43
170
562
0.50%
116
504
6,592
0.26%
60
200
1,631
0.42%
95
270
1,587
0.39%
95
271
2,412
0.45%
69
222
2,000
3.31%
18
63
109
1.98%
197
692
4,283
0.66%
36
116
264
1.12%
37
132
291
1.79%
103
351
3,166
0.54%
55
213
382
1.19%
84
417
2,690
0.92%
36
196
580
1.72%
52
204
1,194
0.35%
80
341
2,821
2.25%
69
310
1,981
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
20
7
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
75.1%
24.9%
43.6%
56.4%
55.6%
44.4%
46.1%
53.9%
49.4%
50.6%
55.9%
44.1%
54.1%
45.9%
59.2%
40.8%
70.8%
29.2%
49.4%
50.6%
51.2%
48.8%
43.4%
56.6%
51.2%
48.8%
55.0%
45.0%
89.0%
11.0%
53.8%
46.2%
66.7%
33.3%
64.3%
35.7%
52.7%
47.3%
58.7%
41.3%
85.9%
14.1%
55.1%
44.9%
58.1%
41.9%
48.2%
51.8%
67.3%
32.7%
4.55%
4.75%
11.09%
6.72%
9.65%
7.01%
5.69%
15.93%
15.74%
7.36%
24.76%
15.49%
8.02%
13.67%
7.66%
12.15%
31.89%
70.01%
18.61%
37.34%
71.45%
17.24%
18.60%
17.57%
74.13%
7.16%
40.22%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.29
0.38
0.42
0.04
0.13
0.43
0.37
0.26
0.19
0.25
0.38
0.25
0.33
0.51
0.27
0.41
0.51
0.35
0.11
0.25
0.21
0.32
0.11
0.19
0.19
0.36
0.31
0.26
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
63.7%
36.3%
31.1%
68.9%
36.9%
63.1%
35.2%
64.8%
36.6%
63.4%
40.3%
59.7%
35.3%
64.7%
41.2%
58.8%
53.5%
46.5%
34.4%
65.6%
38.6%
61.4%
30.0%
70.0%
35.9%
64.1%
42.8%
57.2%
86.6%
13.4%
44.0%
56.0%
58.9%
41.1%
58.0%
42.0%
37.7%
62.3%
49.0%
51.0%
79.3%
20.7%
39.0%
61.0%
47.3%
52.7%
34.6%
65.4%
48.1%
51.9%
Convex
Hull
0.71
0.82
0.78
0.29
0.73
0.77
0.79
0.72
0.66
0.74
0.77
0.66
0.75
0.95
0.61
0.76
0.87
0.83
0.38
0.59
0.55
0.73
0.58
0.74
0.73
0.92
0.71
0.75
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
6
21
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
63.6%
36.4%
30.7%
69.3%
33.3%
66.7%
34.1%
65.9%
35.1%
64.9%
36.5%
63.5%
31.7%
68.3%
36.4%
63.6%
50.7%
49.3%
29.4%
70.6%
34.0%
66.0%
27.2%
72.8%
34.0%
66.0%
37.0%
63.0%
86.3%
13.7%
40.4%
59.6%
54.2%
45.8%
54.7%
45.3%
36.6%
63.4%
44.4%
55.6%
77.7%
22.3%
36.3%
63.7%
45.2%
54.8%
32.7%
67.3%
46.3%
53.7%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
48.6%
16.7%
13.5%
17.9%
17.7%
21.2%
14.8%
14.8%
29.2%
14.6%
12.4%
9.2%
15.7%
16.0%
65.2%
15.8%
19.4%
22.4%
17.0%
16.5%
52.8%
20.1%
23.6%
16.3%
28.2%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
20
66.3%
49.8%
33.2%
63.9%
47.3%
58.7%
56.6%
52.9%
50.3%
42.3%
34.0%
52.7%
48.5%
60.5%
56.3%
50.7%
12.4%
54.7%
36.0%
37.8%
59.8%
44.3%
18.0%
56.7%
51.4%
57.6%
48.2%
I_Cri
4
20.4%
28.7%
18.2%
19.4%
39.3%
23.4%
25.7%
25.9%
35.0%
42.9%
36.8%
32.6%
39.1%
30.3%
28.0%
33.3%
22.4%
29.5%
44.6%
39.7%
23.2%
39.2%
29.2%
23.1%
24.9%
26.1%
23.6%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
12
15
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
70.9%
29.1%
36.9%
63.1%
47.9%
52.1%
40.1%
59.9%
45.9%
54.1%
50.1%
49.9%
47.0%
53.0%
51.6%
48.4%
65.8%
34.2%
43.6%
56.4%
47.9%
52.1%
42.2%
57.8%
44.4%
55.6%
51.8%
48.2%
87.3%
12.7%
47.6%
52.4%
63.9%
36.1%
61.0%
39.0%
46.6%
53.4%
56.1%
43.9%
81.9%
18.1%
49.6%
50.4%
51.3%
48.7%
42.0%
58.0%
59.9%
40.1%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
59.3%
40.7%
30.8%
69.2%
44.2%
55.8%
40.5%
59.5%
43.7%
56.3%
40.9%
59.1%
40.6%
59.4%
45.2%
54.8%
56.3%
43.7%
39.8%
60.2%
42.0%
58.0%
33.3%
66.7%
43.2%
56.8%
48.2%
51.8%
81.9%
18.1%
44.3%
55.7%
65.0%
35.0%
61.8%
38.2%
38.4%
61.6%
54.8%
45.2%
76.5%
23.5%
38.9%
61.1%
47.9%
52.1%
38.4%
61.6%
45.4%
54.6%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
17
10
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
66.0%
34.0%
41.2%
58.8%
51.3%
48.7%
50.8%
49.2%
51.3%
48.7%
50.1%
49.9%
45.3%
54.7%
53.8%
46.2%
61.2%
38.8%
46.1%
53.9%
49.9%
50.1%
42.5%
57.5%
49.7%
50.3%
53.0%
47.0%
85.2%
14.8%
51.7%
48.3%
70.8%
29.2%
69.1%
30.9%
46.0%
54.0%
60.9%
39.1%
80.6%
19.4%
49.3%
50.7%
53.7%
46.3%
48.9%
51.1%
54.3%
45.7%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
58.4%
41.6%
30.9%
69.1%
44.4%
55.6%
41.9%
58.1%
43.5%
56.5%
40.8%
59.2%
39.7%
60.3%
47.1%
52.9%
55.6%
44.4%
40.4%
59.6%
45.6%
54.4%
35.3%
64.7%
42.3%
57.7%
50.8%
49.2%
81.4%
18.6%
47.2%
52.8%
67.7%
32.3%
63.7%
36.3%
40.5%
59.5%
57.5%
42.5%
77.4%
22.6%
38.0%
62.0%
49.3%
50.7%
40.1%
59.9%
45.4%
54.6%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
57.4%
42.6%
29.7%
70.3%
40.2%
59.8%
35.4%
64.6%
41.3%
58.7%
37.0%
63.0%
35.3%
64.7%
39.8%
60.2%
51.1%
48.9%
36.0%
64.0%
39.3%
60.7%
32.9%
67.1%
35.8%
64.2%
44.7%
55.3%
80.9%
19.1%
44.4%
55.6%
63.4%
36.6%
61.0%
39.0%
39.1%
60.9%
52.4%
47.6%
75.1%
24.9%
35.5%
64.5%
47.5%
52.5%
35.8%
64.2%
41.1%
58.9%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
19%
44
-23%
23
-23%
64
-23%
64
0%
410
16%
347
-43%
63
-43%
144
-47%
129
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
70.7%
29.3%
47.2%
52.8%
61.3%
38.7%
55.3%
44.7%
58.5%
41.5%
59.0%
41.0%
58.7%
41.3%
63.4%
36.6%
70.8%
29.2%
56.9%
43.1%
57.1%
42.9%
51.2%
48.8%
59.7%
40.3%
64.1%
35.9%
85.7%
14.3%
56.2%
43.8%
76.5%
23.5%
72.4%
27.6%
50.8%
49.2%
67.9%
32.1%
83.5%
16.5%
58.5%
41.5%
57.0%
43.0%
56.5%
43.5%
62.4%
37.6%
Plan: S000C9002
Page 2 of 4
App. 87
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
60.6%
35.0%
37.0%
43.5%
36.5%
38.7%
36.2%
35.8%
50.9%
38.5%
32.2%
28.0%
35.0%
37.7%
70.2%
34.1%
48.1%
47.3%
33.0%
40.7%
66.0%
35.0%
37.5%
36.1%
43.6%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
60.8%
32.8%
35.4%
40.3%
34.7%
37.6%
35.1%
34.9%
50.2%
36.9%
31.3%
27.1%
33.4%
36.6%
69.6%
33.9%
46.7%
45.8%
32.9%
39.9%
66.5%
34.1%
37.5%
34.3%
42.7%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
19.1%
21.0%
25.4%
19.2%
24.5%
25.5%
26.1%
27.5%
24.9%
22.4%
24.6%
25.8%
23.1%
25.7%
20.5%
28.3%
27.4%
28.3%
29.4%
27.5%
20.8%
27.4%
29.3%
20.8%
30.4%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
18.1%
19.6%
24.0%
17.7%
23.4%
23.6%
24.6%
26.1%
23.3%
21.1%
23.7%
24.4%
21.1%
24.6%
19.3%
26.2%
25.9%
26.1%
27.6%
26.0%
20.2%
25.7%
27.4%
20.0%
27.8%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
20.1%
46.3%
39.2%
40.5%
40.8%
36.9%
38.8%
37.6%
24.9%
40.7%
44.0%
47.1%
43.5%
37.7%
9.9%
37.8%
25.8%
25.9%
37.7%
32.6%
12.6%
38.5%
33.2%
44.9%
27.0%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
21.3%
45.4%
39.0%
38.8%
40.0%
37.7%
39.2%
38.1%
25.8%
40.4%
44.1%
47.7%
43.9%
37.7%
10.5%
39.7%
26.1%
26.6%
39.4%
33.3%
13.8%
39.3%
35.2%
43.9%
28.6%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
86.0%
79.7%
78.1%
83.9%
82.3%
80.4%
77.5%
77.3%
83.8%
82.6%
79.2%
76.8%
81.6%
81.2%
85.6%
78.0%
77.0%
78.4%
79.4%
78.1%
84.5%
76.7%
81.6%
84.2%
78.4%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
86.8%
80.9%
79.3%
85.3%
83.1%
81.5%
78.5%
77.7%
84.3%
83.1%
79.3%
77.4%
82.7%
81.7%
85.7%
79.8%
77.3%
79.0%
79.9%
78.4%
84.5%
77.6%
81.7%
84.5%
79.8%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
49.5%
6.9%
70.0%
5.8%
7.1%
5.3%
12.6%
3.8%
30.6%
4.0%
1.3%
2.5%
4.4%
6.8%
9.6%
9.0%
0.6%
4.0%
10.9%
4.1%
22.7%
4.0%
1.2%
2.9%
7.9%
3.1%
18.8%
3.6%
0.7%
1.9%
11.3%
11.8%
24.2%
14.6%
1.3%
6.2%
9.4%
9.8%
20.8%
11.8%
1.1%
6.0%
4.5%
4.0%
10.0%
5.1%
0.5%
2.3%
25.6%
14.7%
42.7%
14.0%
3.3%
10.8%
8.4%
7.9%
18.9%
9.7%
0.9%
4.5%
3.8%
3.4%
9.7%
4.7%
0.5%
1.9%
4.1%
6.4%
11.6%
9.5%
0.4%
3.3%
7.9%
4.6%
19.2%
5.8%
0.9%
2.9%
9.7%
6.4%
21.6%
7.8%
1.1%
3.9%
56.0%
21.9%
68.9%
15.1%
14.7%
45.0%
4.3%
54.8%
10.0%
44.8%
0.6%
63.0%
9.0%
11.8%
14.9%
11.4%
1.4%
9.0%
8.1%
26.7%
13.9%
23.2%
1.4%
27.7%
7.1%
59.2%
17.2%
53.8%
0.9%
60.2%
6.1%
8.9%
12.0%
9.9%
0.8%
6.0%
49.7%
10.7%
63.1%
8.2%
11.3%
14.5%
7.9%
14.0%
17.8%
18.6%
1.0%
7.2%
12.2%
62.9%
26.6%
48.4%
1.4%
74.8%
7.1%
4.2%
17.5%
5.9%
0.8%
2.4%
9.4%
36.4%
17.3%
42.4%
1.5%
19.1%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
47.2%
6.3%
67.6%
5.3%
6.9%
5.0%
12.9%
3.4%
29.9%
3.5%
1.4%
2.4%
4.1%
6.1%
8.9%
7.9%
0.6%
3.8%
10.7%
3.7%
20.9%
3.5%
1.3%
2.8%
7.8%
2.8%
17.7%
3.2%
0.8%
1.7%
10.8%
11.1%
22.7%
13.4%
1.3%
6.1%
8.8%
8.8%
19.1%
10.5%
1.1%
5.7%
4.1%
3.5%
8.8%
4.4%
0.5%
2.1%
24.9%
13.2%
41.3%
12.2%
3.4%
10.3%
7.9%
7.1%
17.1%
8.5%
0.9%
4.3%
3.9%
3.0%
9.5%
3.9%
0.5%
1.7%
3.7%
5.6%
10.1%
8.2%
0.4%
3.1%
7.5%
4.2%
17.6%
5.2%
0.9%
2.7%
9.1%
5.7%
19.7%
7.0%
1.0%
3.6%
56.6%
20.4%
69.1%
13.8%
15.8%
43.7%
4.6%
53.3%
10.7%
41.5%
0.6%
63.0%
8.0%
10.3%
12.9%
9.8%
1.4%
8.1%
7.6%
24.5%
12.7%
20.8%
1.4%
26.7%
7.2%
56.4%
17.6%
49.9%
0.9%
59.2%
5.6%
7.8%
10.8%
8.5%
0.8%
5.5%
47.3%
10.0%
60.6%
7.6%
11.1%
13.5%
7.6%
12.9%
16.8%
17.0%
1.1%
6.9%
12.1%
61.5%
26.5%
46.3%
1.4%
74.1%
6.9%
3.8%
16.2%
5.1%
0.8%
2.2%
9.2%
33.9%
16.9%
39.6%
1.4%
18.9%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
50.8%
16.8%
35.9%
31.9%
47.9%
24.0%
40.8%
29.9%
42.6%
25.1%
46.8%
20.8%
43.0%
25.1%
44.4%
23.1%
47.1%
20.2%
45.7%
24.1%
42.5%
25.3%
41.0%
26.0%
43.2%
28.1%
45.9%
23.5%
47.7%
22.6%
26.6%
47.0%
45.7%
20.6%
40.2%
29.1%
29.1%
41.4%
44.3%
23.4%
50.3%
18.7%
46.0%
21.0%
28.2%
42.4%
48.8%
25.8%
51.0%
15.9%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
50.7%
15.4%
34.9%
30.9%
46.9%
23.3%
38.8%
28.9%
41.4%
25.2%
46.4%
19.5%
42.4%
24.0%
44.3%
21.9%
47.9%
18.4%
45.0%
22.8%
43.1%
24.0%
40.5%
24.5%
41.9%
27.2%
44.7%
23.0%
47.9%
20.4%
27.8%
43.5%
45.2%
19.6%
39.7%
26.8%
29.9%
38.4%
44.2%
22.1%
50.7%
17.1%
45.3%
19.8%
28.8%
39.5%
47.7%
25.3%
49.7%
14.1%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
61.3%
27.7%
11.0%
33.0%
54.0%
12.9%
34.5%
48.0%
17.5%
42.5%
45.7%
11.8%
34.6%
48.6%
16.8%
36.1%
47.7%
16.2%
34.7%
47.8%
17.5%
34.7%
46.0%
19.3%
51.2%
33.3%
15.5%
35.7%
49.6%
14.7%
30.3%
51.9%
17.8%
24.1%
58.3%
17.6%
32.3%
52.2%
15.4%
35.2%
46.2%
18.6%
76.9%
10.6%
12.6%
33.0%
48.5%
18.5%
50.0%
30.0%
20.0%
49.1%
31.9%
19.1%
29.6%
51.0%
19.4%
40.3%
39.8%
19.9%
71.3%
15.5%
13.2%
32.5%
49.6%
17.9%
36.7%
44.6%
18.7%
32.6%
52.0%
15.3%
41.7%
39.7%
18.7%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
63.5%
21.6%
14.9%
32.7%
50.0%
17.3%
35.3%
43.0%
21.7%
40.4%
43.8%
15.8%
34.6%
44.6%
20.9%
37.7%
40.5%
21.9%
35.5%
42.0%
22.5%
35.4%
40.8%
23.8%
51.8%
27.3%
20.9%
36.5%
44.8%
18.7%
31.2%
47.4%
21.4%
26.3%
51.9%
21.9%
33.1%
46.9%
20.0%
36.5%
41.1%
22.4%
73.5%
9.1%
17.4%
34.4%
40.5%
25.1%
48.4%
26.9%
24.7%
47.3%
27.2%
25.5%
32.9%
41.2%
25.9%
40.7%
34.6%
24.7%
70.7%
12.0%
17.3%
34.0%
42.4%
23.6%
38.1%
36.3%
25.7%
33.3%
48.7%
18.0%
43.9%
30.3%
25.8%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
46.0%
3.5%
69.0%
3.0%
4.0%
3.1%
11.0%
2.1%
28.3%
2.0%
1.0%
1.8%
3.7%
3.7%
9.0%
5.0%
0.4%
2.6%
8.7%
2.2%
18.3%
1.9%
0.7%
1.9%
6.3%
1.8%
16.3%
2.1%
0.4%
1.3%
9.4%
6.5%
22.4%
8.3%
0.9%
4.0%
7.8%
5.3%
18.5%
6.1%
0.8%
4.1%
3.0%
2.1%
7.3%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
22.7%
7.7%
39.9%
7.1%
1.9%
7.0%
6.5%
3.6%
16.0%
4.4%
0.5%
2.5%
2.8%
1.7%
7.8%
2.2%
0.3%
1.1%
2.2%
2.8%
7.6%
4.4%
0.2%
1.9%
6.2%
2.8%
16.7%
3.6%
0.6%
2.0%
7.7%
3.4%
18.9%
4.3%
0.7%
2.6%
63.8%
14.5%
75.1%
8.7%
12.6%
42.2%
4.0%
49.9%
10.3%
31.6%
0.4%
62.1%
7.7%
6.4%
12.6%
5.5%
1.1%
6.2%
8.0%
20.2%
13.6%
14.8%
1.1%
25.3%
8.0%
50.2%
22.9%
38.8%
0.7%
55.5%
4.6%
4.9%
9.6%
5.1%
0.5%
4.2%
50.6%
6.2%
63.9%
4.4%
7.6%
10.6%
6.7%
8.1%
17.0%
11.3%
0.7%
4.8%
13.1%
58.9%
31.0%
36.8%
0.9%
74.7%
5.5%
2.1%
14.9%
2.9%
0.5%
1.4%
9.8%
21.8%
20.0%
28.8%
1.0%
11.7%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
51.9%
5.5%
72.7%
4.6%
5.6%
4.3%
12.9%
3.2%
32.5%
3.4%
1.1%
2.2%
4.7%
6.1%
10.7%
8.4%
0.5%
3.6%
10.8%
3.6%
23.3%
3.4%
0.9%
2.6%
7.9%
2.7%
19.3%
3.2%
0.6%
1.7%
11.6%
10.1%
25.6%
12.8%
1.1%
5.3%
9.8%
8.6%
22.1%
10.5%
1.0%
5.5%
4.5%
3.6%
10.2%
4.7%
0.4%
2.1%
26.3%
12.7%
44.0%
12.4%
2.5%
9.4%
8.8%
6.3%
20.5%
8.1%
0.7%
3.6%
3.7%
3.0%
9.8%
4.2%
0.4%
1.6%
3.9%
5.1%
11.9%
8.2%
0.3%
2.7%
7.9%
4.1%
20.0%
5.2%
0.7%
2.6%
10.0%
5.6%
23.0%
7.0%
0.9%
3.5%
60.1%
19.7%
71.9%
13.3%
13.4%
45.6%
4.3%
53.5%
10.1%
42.0%
0.5%
62.3%
9.8%
10.8%
16.1%
10.3%
1.3%
8.5%
8.8%
26.7%
15.0%
22.4%
1.2%
28.4%
7.9%
56.4%
19.7%
50.1%
0.8%
57.8%
6.3%
8.2%
12.6%
9.0%
0.6%
5.7%
54.1%
9.5%
66.7%
7.1%
10.0%
14.2%
8.1%
12.2%
18.9%
16.8%
0.9%
6.3%
13.0%
62.4%
28.7%
45.6%
1.1%
75.7%
6.9%
3.4%
18.1%
4.9%
0.6%
1.9%
10.5%
32.4%
19.4%
39.3%
1.3%
15.8%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
91.9%
85.2%
83.3%
89.9%
89.0%
86.0%
82.4%
84.6%
90.1%
88.4%
85.4%
83.1%
86.7%
86.6%
90.4%
85.1%
81.9%
83.4%
85.1%
83.4%
89.8%
81.9%
87.2%
89.2%
85.0%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
89.0%
82.4%
80.7%
86.7%
85.1%
83.0%
79.6%
80.7%
86.6%
85.5%
82.6%
80.5%
84.1%
83.6%
87.9%
80.9%
79.4%
80.9%
82.1%
80.7%
87.2%
79.4%
84.4%
86.9%
81.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
52.0%
24.7%
31.6%
45.0%
46.6%
33.4%
36.4%
40.1%
40.9%
35.8%
45.9%
29.5%
39.8%
36.5%
42.7%
33.2%
46.8%
30.4%
44.1%
34.8%
40.7%
35.5%
38.0%
39.4%
40.7%
37.7%
43.8%
34.4%
46.0%
30.8%
20.9%
60.3%
43.2%
29.3%
35.9%
40.0%
22.9%
56.4%
41.7%
33.5%
50.2%
26.6%
44.9%
29.3%
22.9%
56.6%
46.8%
34.7%
55.0%
21.3%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
53.1%
16.9%
35.1%
34.9%
48.5%
25.3%
38.9%
31.6%
41.9%
28.7%
47.9%
21.4%
43.3%
26.7%
46.3%
24.1%
50.6%
20.2%
47.2%
25.3%
44.7%
25.5%
42.5%
27.5%
42.2%
30.1%
45.7%
25.8%
49.7%
21.1%
27.0%
47.1%
46.0%
21.2%
39.7%
28.9%
29.2%
42.2%
44.6%
24.3%
52.8%
18.0%
46.7%
21.7%
27.8%
44.0%
48.5%
27.9%
53.4%
14.8%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
67.5%
1.9%
2.1%
22.7%
1.2%
1.3%
7.7%
3.1%
1.8%
16.7%
0.9%
1.4%
16.0%
1.3%
0.9%
19.5%
5.6%
3.0%
14.9%
3.3%
2.9%
5.8%
2.0%
1.2%
38.5%
3.9%
4.9%
13.3%
2.6%
1.8%
6.8%
1.4%
0.9%
6.8%
2.6%
1.4%
15.7%
2.5%
1.6%
18.2%
2.7%
1.9%
79.0%
5.2%
40.1%
10.0%
25.2%
64.3%
10.4%
2.9%
4.9%
13.5%
9.6%
24.4%
25.4%
32.3%
54.1%
8.1%
3.0%
3.2%
63.5%
2.6%
8.6%
14.7%
8.1%
3.5%
35.0%
26.7%
76.2%
13.5%
1.6%
1.0%
17.3%
21.2%
8.1%
Plan: S000C9002
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Charlotte
Charlotte
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Hendry
Hendry
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
Pinellas
Pinellas
App. 88
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
44,367
17.9%
237.1
6
202,969
82.1%
731.7
17
158,418
9.1%
26.9
19
291,062
16.7%
76.5
20
498,412
28.5%
194.5
21
74,161
4.2%
368.0
22
285,796
16.3%
125.6
23
440,217
25.2%
531.3
12
24,702
15.4%
476.0
13
135,276
84.6%
382.3
3
18,544
9.7%
67.1
6
172,321
90.3%
576.5
14
162,201
50.4%
557.5
21
159,319
49.6%
1,747.5
3
268,347
31.0%
131.5
4
595,916
69.0%
786.9
21
21,890
55.9%
537.9
23
17,250
44.1%
652.1
9
549,582
44.7%
495.8
11
581,964
47.3%
455.0
12
97,680
7.9%
315.0
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
3
17,490
5.9%
312.1
8
85,032
28.6%
319.8
26
194,530
65.5%
525.0
12
84,611
13.7%
183.1
14
534,143
86.3%
1,029.3
2
4,028
21.0%
337.4
6
15,196
79.0%
378.3
11
40,946
12.7%
57.0
12
73,038
22.6%
626.9
13
208,849
64.7%
208.8
3
9,248
2.8%
301.4
6
54,891
16.6%
442.9
26
267,159
80.6%
918.3
17
537,927
21.5%
84.7
18
623,255
25.0%
546.5
20
197,933
7.9%
98.6
21
440,975
17.7%
507.6
25
696,345
27.9%
1,193.7
12
33,183
83.0%
765.7
16
6,813
17.0%
126.2
3
279,325
24.4%
196.2
8
341,246
29.8%
257.6
15
14,940
1.3%
238.0
24
174,303
15.2%
70.2
27
336,142
29.3%
241.3
16
265,425
20.1%
432.7
19
405,282
30.7%
187.9
22
410,549
31.1%
256.3
23
238,878
18.1%
1,506.1
9
146,762
16.0%
130.5
10
696,345
76.0%
408.6
11
73,435
8.0%
69.0
Area%
24.5%
75.5%
2.0%
5.8%
14.7%
27.8%
9.5%
40.2%
55.5%
44.5%
10.4%
89.6%
24.2%
75.8%
14.3%
85.7%
45.2%
54.8%
39.2%
35.9%
24.9%
79.5%
20.5%
27.0%
27.6%
45.4%
15.1%
84.9%
47.1%
52.9%
6.4%
70.2%
23.4%
18.1%
26.6%
55.2%
3.5%
22.5%
4.1%
20.9%
49.1%
85.8%
14.2%
19.6%
25.7%
23.7%
7.0%
24.0%
18.2%
7.9%
10.8%
63.2%
21.5%
67.2%
11.3%
Area%
88.5%
11.5%
77.3%
22.7%
24.8%
75.2%
57.0%
18.2%
24.9%
80.1%
19.9%
3.1%
0.1%
64.8%
32.0%
33.5%
66.5%
78.8%
21.2%
25.4%
74.6%
35.5%
64.5%
27.6%
72.4%
13.1%
86.9%
15.0%
85.0%
10.9%
89.1%
13.1%
33.5%
53.4%
75.5%
24.5%
9.6%
55.2%
35.2%
59.3%
Cities included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Apopka
3
32,910
79.2%
28.8
Apopka
24
8,632
20.8%
3.8
Boynton Beach
22
45,941
67.3%
12.8
Boynton Beach
23
22,276
32.7%
3.7
Bradenton
11
13,759
27.8%
4.2
Bradenton
13
35,787
72.2%
12.7
Deerfield Beach
19
33,758
45.0%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Deerfield Beach
23
26,381
35.2%
4.0
Delray Beach
22
44,980
74.3%
13.0
Delray Beach
23
15,542
25.7%
3.2
Fort Lauderdale
19
2,951
1.8%
1.2
Fort Lauderdale
20
3
0.0%
0.0
Fort Lauderdale
22
104,084
62.9%
25.0
Fort Lauderdale
23
58,483
35.3%
12.3
Gainesville
3
31,355
25.2%
20.9
Gainesville
6
92,999
74.8%
41.5
Gulfport
10
8,688
72.2%
3.1
Gulfport
11
3,341
27.8%
0.8
Haines City
8
7,243
35.3%
5.0
Haines City
27
13,292
64.7%
14.7
Hallandale Beach
17
11,743
31.6%
1.6
Hallandale Beach
20
25,370
68.4%
3.0
Hialeah
18
61,813
27.5%
6.3
Hialeah
21
162,856
72.5%
16.5
Hollywood
17
25,988
18.5%
4.0
Hollywood
20
114,780
81.5%
26.7
Jacksonville
3
268,347
32.7%
131.5
Jacksonville
4
553,437
67.3%
743.1
Lake Park
22
913
11.2%
0.3
Lake Park
23
7,242
88.8%
2.1
Lake Wales
8
1,346
9.5%
2.6
Lake Wales
12
4,691
33.0%
6.7
Lake Wales
27
8,188
57.6%
10.6
Lake Worth
22
24,256
69.5%
5.0
Lake Worth
23
10,654
30.5%
1.6
Lakeland
5
16,579
17.0%
7.1
Lakeland
8
53,685
55.1%
41.0
Lakeland
12
27,158
27.9%
26.1
Lantana
22
5,769
55.3%
1.7
City
Polk
Polk
Polk
Polk
Putnam
Putnam
Sarasota
Sarasota
Seminole
Seminole
Volusia
Volusia
Area%
5.8%
26.6%
57.5%
10.1%
31.5%
68.5%
40.2%
59.8%
9.7%
90.3%
86.3%
13.7%
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
5
58,870
9.8%
116.6
8
270,067
44.9%
534.3
12
181,640
30.2%
1,156.1
27
91,518
15.2%
203.5
3
22,993
30.9%
260.5
7
51,371
69.1%
566.4
12
27,228
7.2%
291.5
13
352,220
92.8%
433.9
3
36,031
8.5%
33.5
24
386,687
91.5%
311.8
7
359,239
72.6%
1,235.9
24
135,354
27.4%
196.5
County
Cities included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Lantana
23
4,654
44.7%
1.2
Loxahatchee Groves 16
1,681
52.9%
7.0
Loxahatchee Groves 23
1,499
47.1%
5.5
Margate
19
40,585
76.2%
7.2
Margate
23
12,699
23.8%
1.9
Miami
17
133,006
33.3%
19.4
Miami
18
251,178
62.9%
33.8
Miami
20
15,273
3.8%
2.9
Miami Gardens
17
106,208
99.1%
18.2
Miami Gardens
21
959
0.9%
0.8
Miramar
17
65,355
53.6%
11.2
Miramar
21
56,686
46.4%
20.1
North Miami
17
49,611
84.4%
5.2
North Miami
20
9,175
15.6%
4.8
North Miami Beach 17
34,570
83.3%
4.3
North Miami Beach 20
6,953
16.7%
1.1
North Palm Beach
16
5,256
43.7%
1.2
North Palm Beach
22
6,759
56.3%
4.6
Oakland Park
22
18,318
44.3%
3.2
Oakland Park
23
23,045
55.7%
4.9
Orange Park
3
4,161
49.5%
3.8
Orange Park
6
4,251
50.5%
1.5
Orlando
3
77,913
32.7%
22.9
Orlando
8
92,383
38.8%
29.5
Orlando
27
68,004
28.5%
58.3
Palatka
3
10,530
99.7%
8.9
Palatka
7
28
0.3%
0.2
Palmetto
11
4,371
34.7%
1.4
Palmetto
13
8,235
65.3%
4.2
Pembroke Pines
17
35,074
22.7%
6.2
Pembroke Pines
20
102,221
66.1%
22.5
Pembroke Pines
21
17,455
11.3%
6.2
Plantation
20
9,435
11.1%
4.1
Plantation
22
62,139
73.1%
15.1
Plantation
23
13,381
15.8%
2.7
Pompano Beach
19
15,204
15.2%
5.6
Pompano Beach
22
52,076
52.2%
11.5
Pompano Beach
23
32,565
32.6%
8.3
Riviera Beach
22
4,332
13.3%
2.9
Riviera Beach
23
28,156
86.7%
7.3
Royal Palm Beach
16
14,734
43.2%
5.0
Royal Palm Beach
19
3,107
9.1%
0.7
Royal Palm Beach
23
16,299
47.7%
5.7
Sanford
3
30,131
56.2%
13.9
Sanford
24
23,439
43.8%
12.7
St. Petersburg
10
174,675
71.4%
69.4
St. Petersburg
11
70,094
28.6%
68.2
Sunrise
20
21,774
25.8%
8.9
Sunrise
23
62,665
74.2%
9.4
Tampa
9
54,542
16.2%
32.1
Tampa
11
281,167
83.8%
143.1
Temple Terrace
9
15,136
61.7%
4.5
Temple Terrace
11
9,405
38.3%
2.6
Venice
12
1,298
6.3%
6.1
Venice
13
19,450
93.7%
10.5
City
Counties and Cities
Area%
40.7%
55.9%
44.1%
78.8%
21.2%
34.5%
60.3%
5.2%
95.8%
4.2%
35.7%
64.3%
51.6%
48.4%
79.2%
20.8%
20.6%
79.4%
39.8%
60.2%
71.1%
28.9%
20.7%
26.6%
52.7%
98.1%
1.9%
24.8%
75.2%
17.7%
64.6%
17.7%
18.7%
69.0%
12.3%
22.1%
45.1%
32.8%
28.4%
71.6%
43.9%
5.8%
50.3%
52.3%
47.7%
50.5%
49.5%
48.5%
51.5%
18.3%
81.7%
63.1%
36.9%
37.0%
63.0%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
West Palm Beach
16
24,749
24.8%
36.9
West Palm Beach
22
30,563
30.6%
7.2
West Palm Beach
23
44,607
44.6%
14.0
Wilton Manors
22
8,321
71.5%
1.4
Wilton Manors
23
3,311
28.5%
0.6
Winter Haven
8
33,849
99.9%
35.2
Winter Haven
12
3
0.0%
1.0
Winter Haven
27
22
0.1%
3.8
Area%
63.5%
12.4%
24.1%
70.1%
29.9%
88.0%
2.4%
9.6%
Plan: S000C9002
Page 4 of 4
25
0
Cutler Bay
18
5
10
Scale bar for insets
Palmetto Bay
Miles
20
Holmes Beach
13
St. Pete Beach
St. Petersburg
Bradenton
Palmetto
11
PINELLAS
Oldsmar
9
10 Pinellas Park
Seminole
Largo
Clearwater
Treasure Island
Belleair
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
13
Tampa
St. Leo
MANATEE
12
Plant City
Zephyrhills
26
St. Augustine
Dade City
HILLSBOROUGH
Temple Terrace
PASCO
5
Green Cove Springs
ST. JOHNS
7
6
DIXIE
26
Ocoee
Edgewood 8
Kissimmee
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
Windermere
26
10
15
Titusville
Oak Hill
13
DESOTO
LEE
14
4
10
OSCEOLA
27
ORANGE
24
VOLUSIA
FLAGLER
21
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
COLLIER
POLK
HARDEE
8
LAKE
3
7
DUVAL
PUTNAM
CLAY
CHARLOTTE
SARASOTA
12
UGH
9
OR O
LSB
MANATEE
HIL
11
5
HERNANDO
F
D
OR
MARION
AD
BR
ALACHUA
CITRUS
PASCO
LEVY
VOLUSIA 7
SEMINOLE
Deltona
Oviedo
St. Cloud
27
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
Casselberry
Winter Springs
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Longwood
Maitland
24
3
LAKE
Apopka
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
Eustis
Orlando Area
30-Dec-2011
*****
CS/SB 7032 by Senate
Reapportionment
Committee (21-5)
11-Jan-2012
S000C9006
E
N
UNIO
BAKER
18
23
15
MONROE
25
19
20
17
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
16
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
Florida City
Homestead
MIAMI-DADE
Coral Gables
Miami
Miami Beach
17 North Miami
Aventura
Starke
CLAY
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
LA
FA
YE
TT
E
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Doral
Hialeah
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
Dania Beach
6
Orange Park
Jacksonville
GULF
HAMILTON
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
20
Fort Lauderdale
Lauderhill
Oakland Park
DUVAL
3
Miles
60
MADISON
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
21
Davie
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Southwest Ranches
Sunrise
Plantation
22
Pompano Beach
Baldwin
4
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
R
BROWARD
Tamarac
Deerfield Beach
Boca Raton
Delray Beach
NASSAU
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Parkland
19
Lantana
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
30
2
JACKSON
GILCHRIST
23
Wellington
Palm Springs
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
HNS
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
E
NN
Belle Glade
16
1
SANTA ROSA
A
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
South Florida
BIA
COLU
M
A
ESC
JO
ST.
OK
App. 89
App. 90
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
49.96%
12.96%
4.91%
13.24%
9.06%
12.55%
8.96%
5.65%
27.14%
9.29%
4.67%
5.74%
9.12%
11.17%
56.30%
5.61%
11.35%
9.30%
8.37%
8.58%
51.80%
9.25%
12.32%
8.84%
12.17%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
11
16
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
71.5%
28.5%
35.8%
64.2%
46.1%
53.9%
37.9%
62.1%
41.7%
58.3%
48.5%
51.5%
45.7%
54.3%
51.3%
48.7%
66.6%
33.4%
40.2%
59.8%
45.7%
54.3%
38.3%
61.7%
42.6%
57.4%
48.2%
51.8%
88.7%
11.3%
50.9%
49.1%
61.1%
38.9%
60.5%
39.5%
49.8%
50.2%
53.4%
46.6%
84.1%
15.9%
47.8%
52.2%
56.0%
44.0%
39.3%
60.7%
62.0%
38.0%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
11
16
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
67.1%
32.9%
37.3%
62.7%
45.3%
54.7%
42.2%
57.8%
43.1%
56.9%
47.0%
53.0%
46.4%
53.6%
51.5%
48.5%
63.3%
36.7%
41.1%
58.9%
46.1%
53.9%
36.5%
63.5%
42.3%
57.7%
49.3%
50.7%
86.8%
13.2%
47.4%
52.6%
62.9%
37.1%
60.5%
39.5%
42.1%
57.9%
53.9%
46.1%
80.9%
19.1%
47.4%
52.6%
51.3%
48.7%
41.0%
59.0%
54.7%
45.3%
0.39
0.37
0.46
0.09
0.45
0.46
0.57
0.33
0.43
0.28
0.45
0.38
0.66
0.20
0.22
0.34
0.54
0.43
0.14
0.26
0.28
0.38
0.16
0.48
0.60
0.57
0.56
0.49
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
62.7%
37.3%
29.4%
70.6%
35.2%
64.8%
34.5%
65.5%
34.9%
65.1%
37.6%
62.4%
33.7%
66.3%
37.8%
62.2%
53.0%
47.0%
31.5%
68.5%
34.9%
65.1%
27.6%
72.4%
33.9%
66.1%
36.8%
63.2%
84.7%
15.3%
38.2%
61.8%
51.6%
48.4%
51.6%
48.4%
35.4%
64.6%
40.8%
59.2%
76.2%
23.8%
35.4%
64.6%
44.1%
55.9%
32.7%
67.3%
46.6%
53.4%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2235.2
8551.0
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
1.10%
144
704
1,539
0.44%
77
451
2,102
0.41%
65
214
1,574
0.34%
132
522
7,872
0.25%
111
393
3,195
0.75%
57
293
1,112
0.70%
54
185
626
0.28%
34
108
409
1.63%
44
185
581
0.47%
116
466
7,185
0.27%
80
227
1,025
0.42%
95
270
1,587
0.39%
95
271
2,412
0.45%
69
232
2,000
3.32%
18
66
112
1.98%
197
693
4,284
0.66%
36
116
264
1.13%
37
131
293
1.78%
103
351
3,161
0.54%
55
212
382
1.19%
84
427
2,690
0.93%
35
191
579
1.72%
52
205
1,194
0.36%
80
350
2,796
2.30%
71
342
1,951
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
20
7
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
75.1%
24.9%
43.6%
56.4%
55.6%
44.4%
46.1%
53.9%
49.4%
50.6%
55.4%
44.6%
53.9%
46.1%
60.0%
40.0%
71.5%
28.5%
48.2%
51.8%
51.8%
48.2%
43.4%
56.6%
51.2%
48.8%
55.0%
45.0%
89.0%
11.0%
53.8%
46.2%
66.7%
33.3%
64.4%
35.6%
52.7%
47.3%
58.7%
41.3%
85.9%
14.1%
55.2%
44.8%
58.1%
41.9%
48.2%
51.8%
67.7%
32.3%
4.55%
4.75%
11.09%
6.72%
9.65%
7.01%
5.69%
15.10%
14.86%
7.30%
26.32%
15.92%
7.33%
13.67%
7.66%
12.15%
31.89%
70.01%
18.61%
37.48%
71.32%
17.22%
18.60%
17.49%
74.13%
7.20%
41.30%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.28
0.38
0.42
0.04
0.13
0.43
0.36
0.26
0.16
0.23
0.44
0.21
0.42
0.25
0.27
0.41
0.47
0.32
0.11
0.25
0.22
0.32
0.11
0.19
0.20
0.36
0.29
0.21
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
63.7%
36.3%
31.1%
68.9%
36.9%
63.1%
35.2%
64.8%
36.6%
63.4%
39.9%
60.1%
35.4%
64.6%
42.1%
57.9%
53.8%
46.2%
33.4%
66.6%
39.1%
60.9%
30.0%
70.0%
35.9%
64.1%
42.9%
57.1%
86.5%
13.5%
44.0%
56.0%
58.9%
41.1%
58.0%
42.0%
37.5%
62.5%
49.0%
51.0%
79.2%
20.8%
39.1%
60.9%
47.3%
52.7%
34.6%
65.4%
48.3%
51.7%
Convex
Hull
0.71
0.82
0.78
0.29
0.73
0.77
0.79
0.72
0.69
0.70
0.83
0.63
0.85
0.68
0.61
0.76
0.87
0.84
0.38
0.59
0.55
0.73
0.60
0.74
0.75
0.92
0.71
0.73
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
6
21
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
63.7%
36.3%
30.7%
69.3%
33.3%
66.7%
34.1%
65.9%
35.1%
64.9%
36.1%
63.9%
31.6%
68.4%
37.2%
62.8%
51.5%
48.5%
27.9%
72.1%
35.0%
65.0%
27.2%
72.8%
34.0%
66.0%
37.0%
63.0%
86.2%
13.8%
40.5%
59.5%
54.2%
45.8%
54.7%
45.3%
36.3%
63.7%
44.4%
55.6%
77.7%
22.3%
36.3%
63.7%
45.1%
54.9%
32.8%
67.2%
46.6%
53.4%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
48.7%
16.7%
13.5%
17.9%
17.7%
20.9%
14.3%
15.1%
30.7%
13.9%
12.7%
9.2%
15.7%
16.0%
65.1%
15.9%
19.4%
22.4%
16.8%
16.5%
52.9%
20.2%
23.6%
16.3%
28.5%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
20
66.3%
49.8%
33.1%
63.9%
47.3%
58.7%
56.6%
53.2%
50.0%
41.2%
34.2%
53.9%
47.9%
60.5%
56.3%
50.7%
12.5%
54.7%
36.0%
37.8%
59.9%
44.3%
18.0%
56.7%
51.5%
57.5%
47.9%
I_Cri
4
20.4%
28.7%
18.2%
19.4%
39.3%
23.4%
25.7%
25.9%
35.7%
43.7%
35.1%
32.3%
39.4%
30.3%
28.0%
33.3%
22.4%
29.5%
44.6%
39.7%
23.2%
39.2%
29.1%
23.1%
24.9%
26.1%
23.6%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
11
16
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
70.9%
29.1%
36.9%
63.1%
47.9%
52.1%
40.1%
59.9%
45.9%
54.1%
49.5%
50.5%
46.8%
53.2%
52.4%
47.6%
66.4%
33.6%
41.9%
58.1%
48.9%
51.1%
42.2%
57.8%
44.4%
55.6%
51.8%
48.2%
87.1%
12.9%
47.6%
52.4%
63.9%
36.1%
61.0%
39.0%
46.4%
53.6%
56.1%
43.9%
81.9%
18.1%
49.7%
50.3%
51.2%
48.8%
42.1%
57.9%
60.3%
39.7%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
59.3%
40.7%
30.8%
69.2%
44.2%
55.8%
40.5%
59.5%
43.7%
56.3%
40.7%
59.3%
40.9%
59.1%
45.6%
54.4%
56.8%
43.2%
38.2%
61.8%
42.9%
57.1%
33.3%
66.7%
43.2%
56.8%
48.3%
51.7%
81.7%
18.3%
44.3%
55.7%
65.0%
35.0%
61.8%
38.2%
38.3%
61.7%
54.8%
45.2%
76.4%
23.6%
39.0%
61.0%
47.9%
52.1%
38.5%
61.5%
45.7%
54.3%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
18
9
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
66.0%
34.0%
41.2%
58.8%
51.3%
48.7%
50.7%
49.3%
51.3%
48.7%
50.0%
50.0%
45.9%
54.1%
54.4%
45.6%
61.0%
39.0%
44.6%
55.4%
50.8%
49.2%
42.5%
57.5%
49.7%
50.3%
53.0%
47.0%
85.1%
14.9%
51.7%
48.3%
70.8%
29.2%
69.1%
30.9%
45.9%
54.1%
60.9%
39.1%
80.5%
19.5%
49.4%
50.6%
53.7%
46.3%
48.9%
51.1%
54.3%
45.7%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
58.5%
41.5%
30.9%
69.1%
44.4%
55.6%
41.8%
58.2%
43.6%
56.4%
40.6%
59.4%
40.1%
59.9%
47.7%
52.3%
55.7%
44.3%
39.1%
60.9%
46.4%
53.6%
35.3%
64.7%
42.3%
57.7%
50.9%
49.1%
81.3%
18.7%
47.3%
52.7%
67.7%
32.3%
63.7%
36.3%
40.4%
59.6%
57.5%
42.5%
77.3%
22.7%
38.0%
62.0%
49.2%
50.8%
40.1%
59.9%
45.5%
54.5%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
57.4%
42.6%
29.7%
70.3%
40.2%
59.8%
35.4%
64.6%
41.3%
58.7%
36.7%
63.3%
35.4%
64.6%
40.1%
59.9%
51.8%
48.2%
33.7%
66.3%
40.7%
59.3%
32.9%
67.1%
35.8%
64.2%
44.8%
55.2%
80.8%
19.2%
44.4%
55.6%
63.4%
36.6%
61.0%
39.0%
39.0%
61.0%
52.4%
47.6%
75.1%
24.9%
35.5%
64.5%
47.4%
52.6%
35.8%
64.2%
41.4%
58.6%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
16%
43
-20%
24
-19%
67
-19%
67
0%
410
22%
365
-59%
45
-59%
103
-58%
103
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
70.7%
29.3%
47.2%
52.8%
61.3%
38.7%
55.3%
44.7%
58.5%
41.5%
58.9%
41.1%
59.0%
41.0%
63.9%
36.1%
70.8%
29.2%
55.2%
44.8%
58.1%
41.9%
51.2%
48.8%
59.7%
40.3%
64.2%
35.8%
85.6%
14.4%
56.2%
43.8%
76.5%
23.5%
72.4%
27.6%
50.7%
49.3%
67.9%
32.1%
83.4%
16.6%
58.5%
41.5%
57.0%
43.0%
56.6%
43.4%
62.4%
37.6%
Plan: S000C9006
Page 2 of 4
App. 91
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
60.6%
35.0%
37.0%
43.5%
36.5%
38.5%
35.5%
36.6%
51.6%
37.0%
33.0%
28.0%
35.0%
37.7%
70.2%
34.2%
48.1%
47.3%
32.8%
40.7%
66.0%
35.1%
37.4%
36.1%
43.6%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
60.8%
32.8%
35.4%
40.3%
34.7%
37.4%
34.4%
35.6%
51.1%
35.6%
32.1%
27.1%
33.4%
36.6%
69.6%
33.9%
46.7%
45.8%
32.9%
39.9%
66.5%
34.2%
37.5%
34.3%
42.7%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
19.1%
21.0%
25.4%
19.2%
24.5%
25.3%
26.2%
27.3%
25.0%
21.9%
25.0%
25.8%
23.1%
25.7%
20.5%
28.3%
27.4%
28.4%
29.3%
27.5%
20.9%
27.4%
29.3%
20.8%
30.6%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
18.1%
19.6%
24.0%
17.7%
23.4%
23.4%
24.8%
25.8%
23.3%
20.7%
24.0%
24.4%
21.1%
24.6%
19.3%
26.2%
25.9%
26.1%
27.7%
26.0%
20.2%
25.8%
27.4%
20.0%
27.9%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
20.1%
46.3%
39.2%
40.5%
40.8%
37.3%
39.4%
37.1%
23.9%
42.5%
43.0%
47.1%
43.5%
37.7%
9.9%
37.8%
25.8%
25.9%
37.8%
32.6%
12.6%
38.4%
33.2%
44.9%
26.7%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
21.3%
45.4%
39.0%
38.8%
40.0%
38.1%
39.7%
37.5%
25.1%
42.2%
42.9%
47.7%
43.9%
37.7%
10.6%
39.7%
26.1%
26.6%
39.6%
33.3%
13.8%
39.2%
35.2%
43.9%
28.4%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
86.0%
79.7%
78.1%
83.9%
82.3%
80.6%
77.3%
77.7%
83.7%
82.4%
79.2%
76.8%
81.6%
81.1%
85.6%
78.0%
77.0%
78.4%
79.4%
78.1%
84.5%
76.5%
81.6%
84.1%
78.3%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
86.8%
80.9%
79.3%
85.3%
83.1%
81.6%
78.3%
78.1%
84.3%
82.9%
79.0%
77.4%
82.7%
81.7%
85.7%
79.8%
77.3%
79.0%
79.7%
78.5%
84.5%
77.5%
81.7%
84.5%
79.7%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
49.5%
6.9%
70.0%
5.8%
7.1%
5.3%
12.6%
3.8%
30.6%
4.0%
1.3%
2.5%
4.4%
6.8%
9.6%
9.0%
0.6%
4.0%
10.9%
4.1%
22.7%
4.0%
1.2%
2.9%
7.9%
3.1%
18.8%
3.6%
0.7%
1.9%
11.1%
11.0%
24.0%
13.7%
1.3%
5.8%
8.3%
9.1%
18.6%
11.1%
1.0%
5.6%
4.7%
4.0%
10.4%
5.0%
0.6%
2.3%
27.4%
15.9%
44.9%
14.9%
3.7%
12.0%
8.1%
8.0%
18.7%
10.0%
0.8%
4.5%
3.8%
3.2%
9.5%
4.4%
0.5%
1.8%
4.1%
6.4%
11.6%
9.5%
0.4%
3.3%
7.9%
4.6%
19.2%
5.8%
0.9%
2.9%
9.7%
6.4%
21.6%
7.8%
1.1%
3.9%
56.0%
21.9%
68.9%
15.1%
14.7%
45.0%
4.3%
54.8%
10.0%
44.8%
0.6%
63.0%
9.0%
11.8%
14.9%
11.4%
1.4%
9.0%
8.1%
26.8%
13.9%
23.3%
1.4%
27.7%
7.2%
59.1%
17.3%
53.6%
0.9%
60.1%
6.1%
8.9%
12.0%
9.9%
0.8%
6.0%
49.7%
10.7%
63.1%
8.2%
11.3%
14.5%
8.0%
13.8%
17.8%
18.3%
1.0%
7.1%
12.2%
62.9%
26.6%
48.4%
1.4%
74.8%
7.1%
4.2%
17.5%
5.9%
0.8%
2.4%
9.5%
37.2%
17.5%
43.2%
1.5%
19.8%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
47.2%
6.3%
67.6%
5.3%
6.9%
5.0%
12.9%
3.4%
29.9%
3.5%
1.4%
2.4%
4.1%
6.1%
8.9%
7.9%
0.6%
3.8%
10.7%
3.7%
20.9%
3.5%
1.3%
2.8%
7.8%
2.8%
17.7%
3.2%
0.8%
1.7%
10.6%
10.5%
22.5%
12.7%
1.3%
5.7%
7.9%
8.2%
17.3%
9.8%
1.0%
5.2%
4.3%
3.5%
9.1%
4.3%
0.6%
2.1%
26.5%
14.1%
43.3%
12.9%
3.7%
11.3%
7.6%
7.3%
17.0%
8.8%
0.9%
4.3%
3.8%
2.8%
9.1%
3.8%
0.5%
1.6%
3.7%
5.6%
10.1%
8.2%
0.4%
3.1%
7.5%
4.2%
17.6%
5.2%
0.9%
2.7%
9.1%
5.7%
19.7%
7.0%
1.0%
3.6%
56.5%
20.4%
69.0%
13.9%
15.7%
43.8%
4.6%
53.2%
10.8%
41.4%
0.6%
63.0%
8.0%
10.3%
12.9%
9.8%
1.4%
8.1%
7.6%
24.6%
12.7%
20.9%
1.4%
26.8%
7.1%
56.5%
17.2%
50.0%
0.9%
59.2%
5.6%
7.8%
10.8%
8.5%
0.8%
5.5%
47.4%
10.0%
60.6%
7.6%
11.1%
13.5%
7.6%
12.7%
16.8%
16.7%
1.1%
6.8%
12.1%
61.5%
26.5%
46.3%
1.4%
74.1%
6.9%
3.8%
16.2%
5.2%
0.8%
2.2%
9.4%
34.6%
17.1%
40.3%
1.5%
19.6%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
50.8%
16.8%
35.9%
31.9%
47.9%
24.0%
40.8%
29.9%
42.6%
25.1%
46.7%
20.7%
42.7%
25.5%
44.8%
22.9%
47.0%
20.0%
44.9%
24.7%
43.8%
24.8%
41.0%
26.0%
43.2%
28.1%
46.0%
23.5%
47.7%
22.6%
26.6%
46.9%
45.7%
20.6%
40.2%
29.1%
29.0%
41.4%
44.4%
23.4%
50.3%
18.7%
46.1%
20.9%
28.2%
42.4%
48.9%
25.8%
50.9%
16.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
50.7%
15.4%
34.9%
30.9%
46.9%
23.3%
38.8%
28.9%
41.4%
25.2%
46.2%
19.7%
42.1%
24.4%
44.5%
21.8%
47.9%
18.1%
44.3%
23.7%
44.0%
23.6%
40.5%
24.5%
41.9%
27.2%
44.7%
23.0%
47.9%
20.4%
27.8%
43.5%
45.2%
19.6%
39.8%
26.8%
29.9%
38.4%
44.2%
22.0%
50.7%
17.1%
45.3%
19.7%
28.8%
39.5%
47.8%
25.3%
49.6%
14.3%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
61.3%
27.7%
11.0%
33.0%
54.0%
12.9%
34.5%
48.0%
17.5%
42.5%
45.7%
11.8%
34.6%
48.6%
16.8%
35.9%
48.0%
16.1%
34.1%
48.1%
17.8%
35.6%
45.4%
19.0%
52.1%
32.5%
15.3%
34.2%
51.3%
14.5%
31.0%
50.9%
18.1%
24.1%
58.3%
17.6%
32.3%
52.2%
15.4%
35.2%
46.2%
18.6%
76.8%
10.6%
12.6%
33.0%
48.5%
18.5%
50.0%
30.0%
20.0%
49.1%
31.9%
19.1%
29.5%
51.1%
19.4%
40.3%
39.8%
19.9%
71.2%
15.5%
13.2%
32.6%
49.6%
17.9%
36.7%
44.6%
18.7%
32.7%
52.0%
15.3%
41.7%
39.4%
18.9%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
63.5%
21.6%
14.9%
32.7%
50.0%
17.3%
35.3%
43.0%
21.7%
40.4%
43.8%
15.8%
34.6%
44.6%
20.9%
37.3%
40.9%
21.8%
34.7%
42.6%
22.7%
36.2%
40.2%
23.6%
53.0%
26.1%
20.9%
34.9%
46.5%
18.5%
32.1%
46.3%
21.6%
26.3%
51.9%
21.9%
33.1%
46.9%
20.0%
36.5%
41.1%
22.4%
73.5%
9.1%
17.4%
34.4%
40.5%
25.1%
48.4%
26.9%
24.7%
47.4%
27.2%
25.5%
32.9%
41.2%
25.8%
40.7%
34.6%
24.7%
70.7%
12.0%
17.3%
34.1%
42.3%
23.5%
38.1%
36.3%
25.7%
33.3%
48.7%
18.0%
44.0%
29.9%
26.0%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
46.0%
3.5%
69.0%
3.0%
4.0%
3.1%
11.0%
2.1%
28.3%
2.0%
1.0%
1.8%
3.7%
3.7%
9.0%
5.0%
0.4%
2.6%
8.7%
2.2%
18.3%
1.9%
0.7%
1.9%
6.3%
1.8%
16.3%
2.1%
0.4%
1.3%
9.2%
6.1%
22.2%
7.8%
0.8%
3.8%
6.9%
4.9%
16.7%
5.7%
0.7%
3.7%
3.2%
2.1%
7.5%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
24.7%
8.3%
42.6%
7.5%
2.2%
7.7%
6.2%
3.7%
15.9%
4.6%
0.5%
2.6%
2.7%
1.6%
7.4%
2.2%
0.3%
1.1%
2.2%
2.8%
7.6%
4.4%
0.2%
1.9%
6.2%
2.8%
16.7%
3.6%
0.6%
2.0%
7.7%
3.4%
18.9%
4.3%
0.7%
2.5%
63.7%
14.6%
75.0%
8.7%
12.5%
42.2%
4.0%
49.9%
10.4%
31.6%
0.4%
62.1%
7.7%
6.4%
12.6%
5.5%
1.1%
6.2%
8.0%
20.3%
13.7%
14.8%
1.1%
25.4%
7.8%
50.2%
22.4%
39.0%
0.6%
55.4%
4.6%
4.9%
9.5%
5.1%
0.5%
4.1%
50.7%
6.2%
64.0%
4.4%
7.6%
10.6%
6.7%
8.0%
16.8%
11.0%
0.7%
4.7%
13.0%
58.9%
31.0%
36.8%
0.9%
74.8%
5.5%
2.1%
15.0%
3.0%
0.5%
1.4%
10.0%
22.6%
20.3%
29.6%
1.1%
12.3%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
51.9%
5.5%
72.7%
4.6%
5.6%
4.3%
12.9%
3.2%
32.5%
3.4%
1.1%
2.2%
4.7%
6.1%
10.7%
8.4%
0.5%
3.6%
10.8%
3.6%
23.3%
3.4%
0.9%
2.6%
7.9%
2.7%
19.3%
3.2%
0.6%
1.7%
11.4%
9.4%
25.4%
12.0%
1.1%
5.0%
8.6%
8.0%
19.6%
9.9%
0.9%
5.1%
4.7%
3.5%
10.6%
4.5%
0.4%
2.1%
28.6%
13.8%
46.7%
13.2%
2.9%
10.5%
8.3%
6.4%
20.2%
8.4%
0.7%
3.6%
3.7%
2.8%
9.6%
4.0%
0.4%
1.5%
3.9%
5.1%
11.9%
8.2%
0.3%
2.7%
7.9%
4.1%
20.0%
5.2%
0.7%
2.6%
10.0%
5.6%
23.0%
7.0%
0.9%
3.5%
60.1%
19.7%
71.9%
13.3%
13.4%
45.6%
4.3%
53.5%
10.1%
42.0%
0.5%
62.3%
9.8%
10.8%
16.1%
10.3%
1.3%
8.5%
8.7%
26.8%
14.9%
22.5%
1.2%
28.4%
8.0%
56.3%
19.9%
49.8%
0.8%
57.7%
6.3%
8.2%
12.5%
9.0%
0.6%
5.7%
54.1%
9.5%
66.7%
7.1%
9.9%
14.2%
8.1%
12.0%
18.8%
16.5%
0.9%
6.2%
13.0%
62.4%
28.7%
45.6%
1.1%
75.7%
7.0%
3.4%
18.1%
5.0%
0.6%
1.9%
10.7%
33.1%
19.7%
40.1%
1.3%
16.5%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
91.9%
85.2%
83.3%
89.9%
89.0%
86.1%
82.4%
85.0%
90.0%
87.8%
85.3%
83.1%
86.7%
86.5%
90.4%
85.2%
81.9%
83.3%
85.0%
83.4%
89.8%
81.8%
87.2%
89.2%
84.9%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
89.0%
82.4%
80.7%
86.7%
85.1%
83.1%
79.4%
81.2%
86.4%
85.0%
82.8%
80.5%
84.1%
83.6%
87.9%
80.9%
79.4%
80.8%
82.2%
80.7%
87.2%
79.3%
84.4%
86.9%
81.4%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
52.0%
24.7%
31.6%
45.0%
46.6%
33.4%
36.4%
40.2%
40.9%
35.8%
45.7%
29.6%
39.7%
36.7%
43.1%
32.8%
47.0%
30.2%
42.5%
35.5%
42.0%
35.3%
38.0%
39.4%
40.7%
37.7%
43.8%
34.4%
46.0%
30.8%
20.9%
60.3%
43.2%
29.3%
35.9%
40.0%
22.9%
56.5%
41.7%
33.5%
50.1%
26.6%
44.9%
29.4%
22.9%
56.6%
46.9%
34.7%
54.7%
21.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
53.1%
16.9%
35.1%
34.9%
48.5%
25.3%
38.9%
31.6%
41.9%
28.7%
47.4%
21.8%
43.1%
27.0%
46.5%
24.0%
50.6%
19.9%
45.9%
26.2%
45.8%
25.1%
42.5%
27.5%
42.2%
30.1%
45.8%
25.8%
49.7%
21.1%
27.0%
47.1%
46.0%
21.2%
39.7%
28.8%
29.2%
42.3%
44.6%
24.3%
52.8%
18.0%
46.9%
21.7%
27.8%
44.0%
48.5%
27.8%
53.3%
14.9%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
67.5%
1.9%
2.1%
22.7%
1.2%
1.3%
7.7%
3.1%
1.8%
16.7%
0.9%
1.4%
16.0%
1.3%
0.9%
19.2%
5.1%
2.8%
13.5%
3.1%
2.6%
6.1%
1.9%
1.2%
41.3%
4.1%
5.5%
13.6%
2.8%
1.8%
6.0%
1.3%
0.8%
6.8%
2.6%
1.4%
15.7%
2.5%
1.6%
18.2%
2.7%
1.9%
78.9%
5.2%
40.0%
10.0%
25.2%
64.3%
10.4%
2.9%
4.9%
13.5%
9.6%
24.5%
24.8%
32.4%
54.1%
8.0%
3.0%
3.2%
63.6%
2.6%
8.6%
14.5%
7.8%
3.4%
35.0%
26.8%
76.3%
13.5%
1.6%
1.0%
18.0%
22.3%
8.6%
Plan: S000C9006
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Charlotte
Charlotte
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Hendry
Hendry
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
Pinellas
Pinellas
App. 92
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
44,367
17.9%
237.1
6
202,969
82.1%
731.7
17
158,418
9.1%
26.9
19
291,062
16.7%
76.5
20
498,412
28.5%
194.5
21
74,161
4.2%
368.0
22
285,796
16.3%
125.6
23
440,217
25.2%
531.3
12
24,702
15.4%
476.0
13
135,276
84.6%
382.3
3
18,544
9.7%
67.1
6
172,321
90.3%
576.5
14
162,201
50.4%
557.5
21
159,319
49.6%
1,747.5
3
268,347
31.0%
131.5
4
595,916
69.0%
786.9
21
21,890
55.9%
537.9
23
17,250
44.1%
652.1
9
549,582
44.7%
495.8
11
581,964
47.3%
455.0
12
97,680
7.9%
315.0
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
3
17,490
5.9%
312.1
8
85,032
28.6%
319.8
26
194,530
65.5%
525.0
12
84,611
13.7%
183.1
14
534,143
86.3%
1,029.3
2
4,028
21.0%
337.4
6
15,196
79.0%
378.3
11
40,946
12.7%
57.0
12
73,038
22.6%
626.9
13
208,849
64.7%
208.8
3
9,248
2.8%
301.4
6
54,891
16.6%
442.9
26
267,159
80.6%
918.3
17
537,927
21.5%
84.7
18
623,255
25.0%
546.5
20
197,933
7.9%
98.6
21
440,975
17.7%
507.6
25
696,345
27.9%
1,193.7
12
33,183
83.0%
765.7
16
6,813
17.0%
126.2
3
279,325
24.4%
196.2
8
341,246
29.8%
257.6
15
14,940
1.3%
238.0
24
174,303
15.2%
70.2
27
336,142
29.3%
241.3
16
265,425
20.1%
432.7
19
405,282
30.7%
187.9
22
410,549
31.1%
256.3
23
238,878
18.1%
1,506.1
9
146,762
16.0%
130.5
10
696,345
76.0%
408.6
11
73,435
8.0%
69.0
Area%
24.5%
75.5%
2.0%
5.8%
14.7%
27.8%
9.5%
40.2%
55.5%
44.5%
10.4%
89.6%
24.2%
75.8%
14.3%
85.7%
45.2%
54.8%
39.2%
35.9%
24.9%
79.5%
20.5%
27.0%
27.6%
45.4%
15.1%
84.9%
47.1%
52.9%
6.4%
70.2%
23.4%
18.1%
26.6%
55.2%
3.5%
22.5%
4.1%
20.9%
49.1%
85.8%
14.2%
19.6%
25.7%
23.7%
7.0%
24.0%
18.2%
7.9%
10.8%
63.2%
21.5%
67.2%
11.3%
Area%
88.5%
11.5%
77.3%
22.7%
24.8%
75.2%
57.0%
18.2%
24.9%
80.1%
19.9%
3.1%
0.1%
64.8%
32.0%
33.5%
66.5%
78.8%
21.2%
25.4%
74.6%
35.5%
64.5%
27.6%
72.4%
13.1%
86.9%
15.0%
85.0%
10.9%
89.1%
13.1%
33.5%
53.4%
75.5%
24.5%
9.6%
55.2%
35.2%
59.3%
Cities included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Apopka
3
32,910
79.2%
28.8
Apopka
24
8,632
20.8%
3.8
Boynton Beach
22
45,941
67.3%
12.8
Boynton Beach
23
22,276
32.7%
3.7
Bradenton
11
13,759
27.8%
4.2
Bradenton
13
35,787
72.2%
12.7
Deerfield Beach
19
33,758
45.0%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Deerfield Beach
23
26,381
35.2%
4.0
Delray Beach
22
44,980
74.3%
13.0
Delray Beach
23
15,542
25.7%
3.2
Fort Lauderdale
19
2,951
1.8%
1.2
Fort Lauderdale
20
3
0.0%
0.0
Fort Lauderdale
22
104,084
62.9%
25.0
Fort Lauderdale
23
58,483
35.3%
12.3
Gainesville
3
31,355
25.2%
20.9
Gainesville
6
92,999
74.8%
41.5
Gulfport
10
8,688
72.2%
3.1
Gulfport
11
3,341
27.8%
0.8
Haines City
8
7,243
35.3%
5.0
Haines City
27
13,292
64.7%
14.7
Hallandale Beach
17
11,743
31.6%
1.6
Hallandale Beach
20
25,370
68.4%
3.0
Hialeah
18
61,813
27.5%
6.3
Hialeah
21
162,856
72.5%
16.5
Hollywood
17
25,988
18.5%
4.0
Hollywood
20
114,780
81.5%
26.7
Jacksonville
3
268,347
32.7%
131.5
Jacksonville
4
553,437
67.3%
743.1
Lake Park
22
913
11.2%
0.3
Lake Park
23
7,242
88.8%
2.1
Lake Wales
8
1,346
9.5%
2.6
Lake Wales
12
4,691
33.0%
6.7
Lake Wales
27
8,188
57.6%
10.6
Lake Worth
22
24,256
69.5%
5.0
Lake Worth
23
10,654
30.5%
1.6
Lakeland
5
16,579
17.0%
7.1
Lakeland
8
53,685
55.1%
41.0
Lakeland
12
27,158
27.9%
26.1
Lantana
22
5,769
55.3%
1.7
City
Polk
Polk
Polk
Polk
Putnam
Putnam
Sarasota
Sarasota
Seminole
Seminole
Volusia
Volusia
Area%
5.8%
26.6%
57.5%
10.1%
31.5%
68.5%
40.2%
59.8%
9.7%
90.3%
86.3%
13.7%
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
5
58,870
9.8%
116.6
8
270,067
44.9%
534.3
12
181,640
30.2%
1,156.1
27
91,518
15.2%
203.5
3
22,993
30.9%
260.5
7
51,371
69.1%
566.4
12
27,228
7.2%
291.5
13
352,220
92.8%
433.9
3
36,031
8.5%
33.5
24
386,687
91.5%
311.8
7
359,239
72.6%
1,235.9
24
135,354
27.4%
196.5
County
Cities included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Lantana
23
4,654
44.7%
1.2
Loxahatchee Groves 16
1,681
52.9%
7.0
Loxahatchee Groves 23
1,499
47.1%
5.5
Margate
19
40,585
76.2%
7.2
Margate
23
12,699
23.8%
1.9
Miami
17
133,006
33.3%
19.4
Miami
18
251,178
62.9%
33.8
Miami
20
15,273
3.8%
2.9
Miami Gardens
17
106,208
99.1%
18.2
Miami Gardens
21
959
0.9%
0.8
Miramar
17
65,355
53.6%
11.2
Miramar
21
56,686
46.4%
20.1
North Miami
17
49,611
84.4%
5.2
North Miami
20
9,175
15.6%
4.8
North Miami Beach 17
34,570
83.3%
4.3
North Miami Beach 20
6,953
16.7%
1.1
North Palm Beach
16
5,256
43.7%
1.2
North Palm Beach
22
6,759
56.3%
4.6
Oakland Park
22
18,318
44.3%
3.2
Oakland Park
23
23,045
55.7%
4.9
Orange Park
3
4,161
49.5%
3.8
Orange Park
6
4,251
50.5%
1.5
Orlando
3
77,913
32.7%
22.9
Orlando
8
92,383
38.8%
29.5
Orlando
27
68,004
28.5%
58.3
Palatka
3
10,530
99.7%
8.9
Palatka
7
28
0.3%
0.2
Palmetto
11
4,371
34.7%
1.4
Palmetto
13
8,235
65.3%
4.2
Pembroke Pines
17
35,074
22.7%
6.2
Pembroke Pines
20
102,221
66.1%
22.5
Pembroke Pines
21
17,455
11.3%
6.2
Plantation
20
9,435
11.1%
4.1
Plantation
22
62,139
73.1%
15.1
Plantation
23
13,381
15.8%
2.7
Pompano Beach
19
15,204
15.2%
5.6
Pompano Beach
22
52,076
52.2%
11.5
Pompano Beach
23
32,565
32.6%
8.3
Riviera Beach
22
4,332
13.3%
2.9
Riviera Beach
23
28,156
86.7%
7.3
Royal Palm Beach
16
14,734
43.2%
5.0
Royal Palm Beach
19
3,107
9.1%
0.7
Royal Palm Beach
23
16,299
47.7%
5.7
Sanford
3
30,131
56.2%
13.9
Sanford
24
23,439
43.8%
12.7
St. Petersburg
10
174,675
71.4%
69.4
St. Petersburg
11
70,094
28.6%
68.2
Sunrise
20
21,774
25.8%
8.9
Sunrise
23
62,665
74.2%
9.4
Tampa
9
54,542
16.2%
32.1
Tampa
11
281,167
83.8%
143.1
Temple Terrace
9
15,136
61.7%
4.5
Temple Terrace
11
9,405
38.3%
2.6
Venice
12
1,298
6.3%
6.1
Venice
13
19,450
93.7%
10.5
City
Counties and Cities
Area%
40.7%
55.9%
44.1%
78.8%
21.2%
34.5%
60.3%
5.2%
95.8%
4.2%
35.7%
64.3%
51.6%
48.4%
79.2%
20.8%
20.6%
79.4%
39.8%
60.2%
71.1%
28.9%
20.7%
26.6%
52.7%
98.1%
1.9%
24.8%
75.2%
17.7%
64.6%
17.7%
18.7%
69.0%
12.3%
22.1%
45.1%
32.8%
28.4%
71.6%
43.9%
5.8%
50.3%
52.3%
47.7%
50.5%
49.5%
48.5%
51.5%
18.3%
81.7%
63.1%
36.9%
37.0%
63.0%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
West Palm Beach
16
24,749
24.8%
36.9
West Palm Beach
22
30,563
30.6%
7.2
West Palm Beach
23
44,607
44.6%
14.0
Wilton Manors
22
8,321
71.5%
1.4
Wilton Manors
23
3,311
28.5%
0.6
Winter Haven
8
33,849
99.9%
35.2
Winter Haven
12
3
0.0%
1.0
Winter Haven
27
22
0.1%
3.8
Area%
63.5%
12.4%
24.1%
70.1%
29.9%
88.0%
2.4%
9.6%
Plan: S000C9006
Page 4 of 4
25
0
Cutler Bay
18
5
10
Scale bar for insets
Palmetto Bay
Miles
20
Holmes Beach
13
St. Pete Beach
St. Petersburg
Bradenton
Palmetto
11
PINELLAS
Oldsmar
9
10 Pinellas Park
Seminole
Largo
Clearwater
Treasure Island
Belleair
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
13
Tampa
St. Leo
MANATEE
12
Plant City
Zephyrhills
26
St. Augustine
Dade City
HILLSBOROUGH
Temple Terrace
PASCO
5
Green Cove Springs
ST. JOHNS
7
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Ocoee
Apopka
Winter Springs
Kissimmee
26
10
15
Titusville
Oak Hill
13
DESOTO
LEE
14
4
10
OSCEOLA
27
ORANGE
24
VOLUSIA
FLAGLER
21
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
COLLIER
POLK
HARDEE
8
LAKE
3
7
DUVAL
PUTNAM
CLAY
CHARLOTTE
SARASOTA
12
UGH
9
OR O
LSB
MANATEE
HIL
11
5
HERNANDO
F
D
OR
MARION
AD
BR
ALACHUA
CITRUS
PASCO
LEVY
VOLUSIA 7
SEMINOLE
Deltona
Oviedo
St. Cloud
27
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
Casselberry
Edgewood 8
Maitland
Longwood
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
3
24
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
26
LAKE
30-Dec-2011
*****
CS/SB 7032, 1st eng.
Passed Senate (34-6)
17-Jan-2012
S004C9014
Congressional Plan
Orlando Area
Eustis
6
DIXIE
E
N
UNIO
BAKER
18
23
15
MONROE
25
19
20
17
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
16
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
Florida City
Homestead
MIAMI-DADE
Coral Gables
Miami
Miami Beach
17 North Miami
Aventura
Starke
CLAY
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
LA
FA
YE
TT
E
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Doral
Hialeah
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
Dania Beach
6
Orange Park
Jacksonville
GULF
HAMILTON
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
20
Fort Lauderdale
Lauderhill
Oakland Park
DUVAL
3
Miles
60
MADISON
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
21
Davie
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Southwest Ranches
Sunrise
Plantation
22
Pompano Beach
Baldwin
4
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
R
BROWARD
Tamarac
Deerfield Beach
Boca Raton
Delray Beach
NASSAU
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Parkland
19
Lantana
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
30
2
JACKSON
GILCHRIST
23
Wellington
Palm Springs
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
HNS
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
E
NN
Belle Glade
16
1
SANTA ROSA
A
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
South Florida
BIA
COLU
M
A
ESC
JO
ST.
OK
App. 93
App. 94
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
49.96%
12.96%
4.91%
13.24%
9.06%
12.55%
8.96%
5.65%
27.14%
9.29%
4.67%
5.74%
9.12%
11.17%
56.30%
5.61%
11.35%
9.30%
8.37%
8.58%
51.80%
9.25%
12.32%
8.84%
12.17%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
11
16
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
71.5%
28.5%
35.8%
64.2%
46.1%
53.9%
37.9%
62.1%
41.7%
58.3%
48.5%
51.5%
45.7%
54.3%
51.3%
48.7%
66.6%
33.4%
40.2%
59.8%
45.7%
54.3%
38.3%
61.7%
42.6%
57.4%
48.2%
51.8%
88.7%
11.3%
50.9%
49.1%
61.1%
38.9%
60.5%
39.5%
49.8%
50.2%
53.4%
46.6%
84.1%
15.9%
47.8%
52.2%
56.0%
44.0%
39.3%
60.7%
62.0%
38.0%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
11
16
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
67.1%
32.9%
37.3%
62.7%
45.3%
54.7%
42.2%
57.8%
43.1%
56.9%
47.0%
53.0%
46.4%
53.6%
51.5%
48.5%
63.3%
36.7%
41.1%
58.9%
46.1%
53.9%
36.5%
63.5%
42.3%
57.7%
49.3%
50.7%
86.8%
13.2%
47.4%
52.6%
62.9%
37.1%
60.5%
39.5%
42.1%
57.9%
53.9%
46.1%
80.9%
19.1%
47.4%
52.6%
51.3%
48.7%
41.0%
59.0%
54.7%
45.3%
0.39
0.37
0.46
0.09
0.45
0.46
0.57
0.33
0.43
0.28
0.45
0.38
0.66
0.20
0.22
0.34
0.54
0.43
0.14
0.26
0.28
0.38
0.16
0.48
0.60
0.57
0.56
0.49
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
62.7%
37.3%
29.4%
70.6%
35.2%
64.8%
34.5%
65.5%
34.9%
65.1%
37.6%
62.4%
33.7%
66.3%
37.8%
62.2%
53.0%
47.0%
31.5%
68.5%
34.9%
65.1%
27.6%
72.4%
33.9%
66.1%
36.8%
63.2%
84.7%
15.3%
38.2%
61.8%
51.6%
48.4%
51.6%
48.4%
35.4%
64.6%
40.8%
59.2%
76.2%
23.8%
35.4%
64.6%
44.1%
55.9%
32.7%
67.3%
46.6%
53.4%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2235.2
8548.4
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
1.10%
144
703
1,539
0.44%
77
451
2,102
0.41%
65
214
1,574
0.34%
132
521
7,872
0.25%
111
393
3,195
0.75%
57
293
1,112
0.70%
54
185
626
0.28%
34
108
409
1.63%
44
185
581
0.47%
116
466
7,185
0.27%
80
227
1,025
0.42%
95
270
1,587
0.39%
95
271
2,412
0.45%
69
232
2,000
3.32%
18
66
113
1.98%
197
693
4,284
0.66%
36
116
264
1.13%
37
131
293
1.78%
103
350
3,160
0.54%
55
212
382
1.19%
84
427
2,690
0.93%
35
191
579
1.72%
52
205
1,194
0.36%
80
350
2,796
2.30%
71
342
1,951
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
20
7
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
75.1%
24.9%
43.6%
56.4%
55.6%
44.4%
46.1%
53.9%
49.4%
50.6%
55.4%
44.6%
53.9%
46.1%
60.0%
40.0%
71.5%
28.5%
48.2%
51.8%
51.8%
48.2%
43.4%
56.6%
51.2%
48.8%
55.0%
45.0%
89.0%
11.0%
53.8%
46.2%
66.7%
33.3%
64.4%
35.6%
52.7%
47.3%
58.7%
41.3%
85.9%
14.1%
55.2%
44.8%
58.1%
41.9%
48.2%
51.8%
67.7%
32.3%
4.55%
4.75%
11.09%
6.72%
9.65%
7.01%
5.69%
15.10%
14.86%
7.30%
26.32%
15.92%
7.33%
13.67%
7.66%
12.15%
31.89%
70.01%
18.61%
37.48%
71.32%
17.22%
18.60%
17.49%
74.13%
7.20%
41.30%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.28
0.38
0.42
0.04
0.13
0.43
0.36
0.26
0.16
0.23
0.44
0.21
0.42
0.25
0.27
0.41
0.47
0.33
0.11
0.25
0.22
0.32
0.11
0.19
0.20
0.36
0.29
0.21
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
63.7%
36.3%
31.1%
68.9%
36.9%
63.1%
35.2%
64.8%
36.6%
63.4%
39.9%
60.1%
35.4%
64.6%
42.1%
57.9%
53.8%
46.2%
33.4%
66.6%
39.1%
60.9%
30.0%
70.0%
35.9%
64.1%
42.9%
57.1%
86.5%
13.5%
44.0%
56.0%
58.9%
41.1%
58.0%
42.0%
37.5%
62.5%
49.0%
51.0%
79.2%
20.8%
39.1%
60.9%
47.3%
52.7%
34.6%
65.4%
48.3%
51.7%
Convex
Hull
0.71
0.82
0.78
0.29
0.73
0.77
0.79
0.72
0.69
0.70
0.83
0.63
0.85
0.68
0.61
0.76
0.87
0.84
0.38
0.59
0.55
0.73
0.60
0.74
0.75
0.92
0.71
0.73
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
6
21
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
63.7%
36.3%
30.7%
69.3%
33.3%
66.7%
34.1%
65.9%
35.1%
64.9%
36.1%
63.9%
31.6%
68.4%
37.2%
62.8%
51.5%
48.5%
27.9%
72.1%
35.0%
65.0%
27.2%
72.8%
34.0%
66.0%
37.0%
63.0%
86.2%
13.8%
40.5%
59.5%
54.2%
45.8%
54.7%
45.3%
36.3%
63.7%
44.4%
55.6%
77.7%
22.3%
36.3%
63.7%
45.1%
54.9%
32.8%
67.2%
46.6%
53.4%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
48.7%
16.7%
13.5%
17.9%
17.7%
20.9%
14.3%
15.1%
30.7%
13.9%
12.7%
9.2%
15.7%
16.0%
65.1%
15.9%
19.4%
22.4%
16.8%
16.5%
52.9%
20.2%
23.6%
16.3%
28.5%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
20
66.3%
49.8%
33.1%
63.9%
47.3%
58.7%
56.6%
53.2%
50.0%
41.2%
34.2%
53.9%
47.9%
60.5%
56.3%
50.7%
12.5%
54.7%
36.0%
37.8%
60.0%
44.3%
18.0%
56.7%
51.5%
57.5%
47.9%
I_Cri
4
20.4%
28.7%
18.2%
19.4%
39.3%
23.4%
25.7%
25.9%
35.7%
43.7%
35.1%
32.3%
39.4%
30.3%
28.0%
33.3%
22.4%
29.5%
44.6%
39.7%
23.2%
39.2%
29.1%
23.1%
24.9%
26.1%
23.6%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
11
16
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
70.9%
29.1%
36.9%
63.1%
47.9%
52.1%
40.1%
59.9%
45.9%
54.1%
49.5%
50.5%
46.8%
53.2%
52.4%
47.6%
66.4%
33.6%
41.9%
58.1%
48.9%
51.1%
42.2%
57.8%
44.4%
55.6%
51.8%
48.2%
87.2%
12.8%
47.6%
52.4%
63.9%
36.1%
61.0%
39.0%
46.3%
53.7%
56.1%
43.9%
81.9%
18.1%
49.7%
50.3%
51.2%
48.8%
42.1%
57.9%
60.3%
39.7%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
59.3%
40.7%
30.8%
69.2%
44.2%
55.8%
40.5%
59.5%
43.7%
56.3%
40.7%
59.3%
40.9%
59.1%
45.6%
54.4%
56.8%
43.2%
38.2%
61.8%
42.9%
57.1%
33.3%
66.7%
43.2%
56.8%
48.3%
51.7%
81.7%
18.3%
44.3%
55.7%
65.0%
35.0%
61.8%
38.2%
38.2%
61.8%
54.8%
45.2%
76.4%
23.6%
39.0%
61.0%
47.9%
52.1%
38.5%
61.5%
45.7%
54.3%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
18
9
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
66.0%
34.0%
41.2%
58.8%
51.3%
48.7%
50.7%
49.3%
51.3%
48.7%
50.0%
50.0%
45.9%
54.1%
54.4%
45.6%
61.0%
39.0%
44.6%
55.4%
50.8%
49.2%
42.5%
57.5%
49.7%
50.3%
53.0%
47.0%
85.1%
14.9%
51.7%
48.3%
70.8%
29.2%
69.1%
30.9%
45.8%
54.2%
60.9%
39.1%
80.5%
19.5%
49.4%
50.6%
53.7%
46.3%
48.9%
51.1%
54.3%
45.7%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
58.5%
41.5%
30.9%
69.1%
44.4%
55.6%
41.8%
58.2%
43.6%
56.4%
40.6%
59.4%
40.1%
59.9%
47.7%
52.3%
55.7%
44.3%
39.1%
60.9%
46.4%
53.6%
35.3%
64.7%
42.3%
57.7%
50.9%
49.1%
81.3%
18.7%
47.3%
52.7%
67.7%
32.3%
63.7%
36.3%
40.3%
59.7%
57.5%
42.5%
77.3%
22.7%
38.0%
62.0%
49.2%
50.8%
40.1%
59.9%
45.5%
54.5%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
57.4%
42.6%
29.7%
70.3%
40.2%
59.8%
35.4%
64.6%
41.3%
58.7%
36.7%
63.3%
35.4%
64.6%
40.1%
59.9%
51.8%
48.2%
33.7%
66.3%
40.7%
59.3%
32.9%
67.1%
35.8%
64.2%
44.8%
55.2%
80.8%
19.2%
44.4%
55.6%
63.4%
36.6%
61.0%
39.0%
38.9%
61.1%
52.4%
47.6%
75.1%
24.9%
35.5%
64.5%
47.4%
52.6%
35.8%
64.2%
41.4%
58.6%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
16%
43
-20%
24
-19%
67
-19%
67
0%
410
21%
364
-58%
46
-59%
105
-57%
105
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
70.7%
29.3%
47.2%
52.8%
61.3%
38.7%
55.3%
44.7%
58.5%
41.5%
58.9%
41.1%
59.0%
41.0%
63.9%
36.1%
70.8%
29.2%
55.2%
44.8%
58.1%
41.9%
51.2%
48.8%
59.7%
40.3%
64.2%
35.8%
85.6%
14.4%
56.2%
43.8%
76.5%
23.5%
72.4%
27.6%
50.6%
49.4%
67.9%
32.1%
83.4%
16.6%
58.5%
41.5%
57.0%
43.0%
56.6%
43.4%
62.4%
37.6%
Plan: S004C9014
Page 2 of 4
App. 95
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
60.6%
35.0%
37.0%
43.5%
36.5%
38.5%
35.5%
36.6%
51.6%
37.0%
33.0%
28.0%
35.0%
37.7%
70.2%
34.2%
48.1%
47.3%
32.8%
40.7%
66.0%
35.1%
37.4%
36.1%
43.6%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
60.8%
32.8%
35.4%
40.3%
34.7%
37.4%
34.4%
35.6%
51.1%
35.6%
32.1%
27.1%
33.4%
36.6%
69.6%
33.9%
46.7%
45.8%
32.9%
39.9%
66.5%
34.2%
37.5%
34.3%
42.7%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
19.1%
21.0%
25.4%
19.2%
24.5%
25.3%
26.2%
27.3%
25.0%
21.9%
25.0%
25.8%
23.1%
25.7%
20.5%
28.3%
27.4%
28.4%
29.3%
27.5%
20.9%
27.4%
29.3%
20.8%
30.6%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
18.1%
19.6%
24.0%
17.7%
23.4%
23.4%
24.8%
25.8%
23.3%
20.7%
24.0%
24.4%
21.1%
24.6%
19.3%
26.2%
25.9%
26.1%
27.7%
26.0%
20.2%
25.8%
27.4%
20.0%
27.9%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
20.1%
46.3%
39.2%
40.5%
40.8%
37.3%
39.4%
37.1%
23.9%
42.5%
43.0%
47.1%
43.5%
37.7%
9.9%
37.8%
25.8%
25.9%
37.8%
32.6%
12.6%
38.4%
33.2%
44.9%
26.7%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
21.3%
45.4%
39.0%
38.8%
40.0%
38.1%
39.7%
37.5%
25.1%
42.2%
42.9%
47.7%
43.9%
37.7%
10.6%
39.7%
26.1%
26.6%
39.6%
33.3%
13.8%
39.2%
35.2%
43.9%
28.4%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
86.0%
79.7%
78.1%
83.9%
82.3%
80.6%
77.3%
77.7%
83.7%
82.4%
79.2%
76.8%
81.6%
81.1%
85.6%
78.0%
77.0%
78.4%
79.4%
78.1%
84.5%
76.5%
81.6%
84.1%
78.3%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
86.8%
80.9%
79.3%
85.3%
83.1%
81.6%
78.3%
78.1%
84.3%
82.9%
79.0%
77.4%
82.7%
81.7%
85.7%
79.8%
77.3%
79.0%
79.7%
78.5%
84.5%
77.5%
81.7%
84.5%
79.7%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
49.5%
6.9%
70.0%
5.8%
7.1%
5.3%
12.6%
3.8%
30.6%
4.0%
1.3%
2.5%
4.4%
6.8%
9.6%
9.0%
0.6%
4.0%
10.9%
4.1%
22.7%
4.0%
1.2%
2.9%
7.9%
3.1%
18.8%
3.6%
0.7%
1.9%
11.1%
11.0%
24.0%
13.7%
1.3%
5.8%
8.3%
9.1%
18.6%
11.1%
1.0%
5.6%
4.7%
4.0%
10.4%
5.0%
0.6%
2.3%
27.4%
15.9%
44.9%
14.9%
3.7%
12.0%
8.1%
8.0%
18.7%
10.0%
0.8%
4.5%
3.8%
3.2%
9.5%
4.4%
0.5%
1.8%
4.1%
6.4%
11.6%
9.5%
0.4%
3.3%
7.9%
4.6%
19.2%
5.8%
0.9%
2.9%
9.7%
6.4%
21.6%
7.8%
1.1%
3.9%
56.0%
21.9%
68.9%
15.1%
14.7%
45.0%
4.3%
54.8%
10.0%
44.8%
0.6%
63.0%
9.0%
11.8%
14.9%
11.4%
1.4%
9.0%
8.1%
26.8%
13.9%
23.3%
1.4%
27.7%
7.2%
59.1%
17.3%
53.6%
0.9%
60.1%
6.1%
8.9%
12.0%
9.9%
0.8%
6.0%
49.7%
10.7%
63.1%
8.2%
11.3%
14.5%
8.0%
13.8%
17.8%
18.3%
1.0%
7.1%
12.2%
62.9%
26.6%
48.4%
1.4%
74.8%
7.1%
4.2%
17.5%
5.9%
0.8%
2.4%
9.5%
37.2%
17.5%
43.2%
1.5%
19.8%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
47.2%
6.3%
67.6%
5.3%
6.9%
5.0%
12.9%
3.4%
29.9%
3.5%
1.4%
2.4%
4.1%
6.1%
8.9%
7.9%
0.6%
3.8%
10.7%
3.7%
20.9%
3.5%
1.3%
2.8%
7.8%
2.8%
17.7%
3.2%
0.8%
1.7%
10.6%
10.5%
22.5%
12.7%
1.3%
5.7%
7.9%
8.2%
17.3%
9.8%
1.0%
5.2%
4.3%
3.5%
9.1%
4.3%
0.6%
2.1%
26.5%
14.1%
43.3%
12.9%
3.7%
11.3%
7.6%
7.3%
17.0%
8.8%
0.9%
4.3%
3.8%
2.8%
9.1%
3.8%
0.5%
1.6%
3.7%
5.6%
10.1%
8.2%
0.4%
3.1%
7.5%
4.2%
17.6%
5.2%
0.9%
2.7%
9.1%
5.7%
19.7%
7.0%
1.0%
3.6%
56.5%
20.4%
69.0%
13.9%
15.7%
43.8%
4.6%
53.2%
10.8%
41.4%
0.6%
63.0%
8.0%
10.3%
12.9%
9.8%
1.4%
8.1%
7.6%
24.6%
12.7%
20.9%
1.4%
26.8%
7.1%
56.5%
17.2%
50.0%
0.9%
59.2%
5.6%
7.8%
10.8%
8.5%
0.8%
5.5%
47.4%
10.0%
60.6%
7.6%
11.1%
13.5%
7.6%
12.7%
16.8%
16.7%
1.1%
6.8%
12.1%
61.5%
26.5%
46.3%
1.4%
74.1%
6.9%
3.8%
16.2%
5.2%
0.8%
2.2%
9.4%
34.6%
17.1%
40.3%
1.5%
19.6%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
50.8%
16.8%
35.9%
31.9%
47.9%
24.0%
40.8%
29.9%
42.6%
25.1%
46.7%
20.7%
42.7%
25.5%
44.8%
22.9%
47.0%
20.0%
44.9%
24.7%
43.8%
24.8%
41.0%
26.0%
43.2%
28.1%
46.0%
23.5%
47.7%
22.6%
26.6%
46.9%
45.7%
20.6%
40.2%
29.1%
29.0%
41.4%
44.4%
23.4%
50.3%
18.7%
46.1%
20.9%
28.2%
42.4%
48.9%
25.8%
50.9%
16.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
50.7%
15.4%
34.9%
30.9%
46.9%
23.3%
38.8%
28.9%
41.4%
25.2%
46.2%
19.7%
42.1%
24.4%
44.5%
21.8%
47.9%
18.1%
44.3%
23.7%
44.0%
23.6%
40.5%
24.5%
41.9%
27.2%
44.7%
23.0%
47.9%
20.4%
27.8%
43.5%
45.2%
19.6%
39.8%
26.8%
29.9%
38.4%
44.2%
22.0%
50.7%
17.1%
45.3%
19.7%
28.8%
39.5%
47.8%
25.3%
49.6%
14.3%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
61.3%
27.7%
11.0%
33.0%
54.0%
12.9%
34.5%
48.0%
17.5%
42.5%
45.7%
11.8%
34.6%
48.6%
16.8%
35.9%
48.0%
16.1%
34.1%
48.1%
17.8%
35.6%
45.4%
19.0%
52.1%
32.5%
15.3%
34.2%
51.3%
14.5%
31.0%
50.9%
18.1%
24.1%
58.3%
17.6%
32.3%
52.2%
15.4%
35.2%
46.2%
18.6%
76.8%
10.6%
12.6%
33.0%
48.5%
18.5%
50.0%
30.0%
20.0%
49.1%
31.9%
19.1%
29.4%
51.1%
19.4%
40.3%
39.8%
19.9%
71.2%
15.5%
13.2%
32.6%
49.6%
17.9%
36.7%
44.6%
18.7%
32.7%
52.0%
15.3%
41.7%
39.4%
18.9%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
63.5%
21.6%
14.9%
32.7%
50.0%
17.3%
35.3%
43.0%
21.7%
40.4%
43.8%
15.8%
34.6%
44.6%
20.9%
37.3%
40.9%
21.8%
34.7%
42.6%
22.7%
36.2%
40.2%
23.6%
53.0%
26.1%
20.9%
34.9%
46.5%
18.5%
32.1%
46.3%
21.6%
26.3%
51.9%
21.9%
33.1%
46.9%
20.0%
36.5%
41.1%
22.4%
73.5%
9.1%
17.4%
34.4%
40.5%
25.1%
48.4%
26.9%
24.7%
47.4%
27.2%
25.5%
32.9%
41.2%
25.8%
40.7%
34.6%
24.7%
70.7%
12.0%
17.3%
34.1%
42.3%
23.5%
38.1%
36.3%
25.7%
33.3%
48.7%
18.0%
44.0%
29.9%
26.0%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
46.1%
3.5%
69.0%
3.0%
4.0%
3.1%
11.0%
2.1%
28.3%
2.0%
1.0%
1.8%
3.7%
3.7%
9.0%
5.0%
0.4%
2.6%
8.7%
2.2%
18.3%
1.9%
0.7%
1.9%
6.3%
1.8%
16.3%
2.1%
0.4%
1.3%
9.2%
6.1%
22.2%
7.8%
0.8%
3.8%
6.9%
4.9%
16.7%
5.7%
0.7%
3.7%
3.2%
2.1%
7.5%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
24.7%
8.3%
42.6%
7.5%
2.2%
7.7%
6.2%
3.7%
15.9%
4.6%
0.5%
2.6%
2.7%
1.6%
7.4%
2.2%
0.3%
1.1%
2.2%
2.8%
7.6%
4.4%
0.2%
1.9%
6.2%
2.8%
16.7%
3.6%
0.6%
2.0%
7.7%
3.4%
18.9%
4.3%
0.7%
2.5%
63.7%
14.6%
75.0%
8.7%
12.5%
42.2%
4.0%
49.9%
10.4%
31.6%
0.4%
62.1%
7.7%
6.4%
12.6%
5.5%
1.1%
6.2%
8.0%
20.3%
13.7%
14.8%
1.1%
25.4%
7.8%
50.2%
22.4%
39.0%
0.6%
55.4%
4.6%
4.9%
9.5%
5.1%
0.5%
4.1%
50.7%
6.2%
64.0%
4.4%
7.6%
10.6%
6.7%
8.0%
16.8%
11.0%
0.7%
4.7%
13.0%
58.9%
31.0%
36.8%
0.9%
74.8%
5.5%
2.1%
15.0%
3.0%
0.5%
1.4%
10.0%
22.6%
20.3%
29.6%
1.1%
12.3%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
51.9%
5.5%
72.7%
4.6%
5.6%
4.3%
12.9%
3.2%
32.5%
3.4%
1.1%
2.2%
4.7%
6.1%
10.7%
8.4%
0.5%
3.6%
10.8%
3.6%
23.3%
3.4%
0.9%
2.6%
7.9%
2.7%
19.3%
3.2%
0.6%
1.7%
11.4%
9.4%
25.4%
12.0%
1.1%
5.0%
8.6%
8.0%
19.6%
9.9%
0.9%
5.1%
4.7%
3.5%
10.6%
4.5%
0.4%
2.1%
28.6%
13.8%
46.7%
13.2%
2.9%
10.5%
8.3%
6.4%
20.2%
8.4%
0.7%
3.6%
3.7%
2.8%
9.6%
4.0%
0.4%
1.5%
3.9%
5.1%
11.9%
8.2%
0.3%
2.7%
7.9%
4.1%
20.0%
5.2%
0.7%
2.6%
10.0%
5.6%
23.0%
7.0%
0.9%
3.5%
60.1%
19.7%
71.9%
13.3%
13.4%
45.6%
4.3%
53.5%
10.1%
42.0%
0.5%
62.3%
9.8%
10.8%
16.1%
10.3%
1.3%
8.5%
8.7%
26.8%
14.9%
22.5%
1.2%
28.4%
8.0%
56.3%
19.9%
49.8%
0.8%
57.7%
6.3%
8.2%
12.5%
9.0%
0.6%
5.7%
54.1%
9.5%
66.7%
7.1%
9.9%
14.2%
8.1%
12.0%
18.8%
16.5%
0.9%
6.2%
13.0%
62.4%
28.7%
45.6%
1.1%
75.7%
7.0%
3.4%
18.1%
5.0%
0.6%
1.9%
10.7%
33.1%
19.7%
40.1%
1.3%
16.5%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
91.9%
85.2%
83.3%
89.9%
89.0%
86.1%
82.4%
85.0%
90.0%
87.8%
85.3%
83.1%
86.7%
86.5%
90.4%
85.2%
81.9%
83.3%
85.0%
83.4%
89.8%
81.8%
87.2%
89.2%
84.9%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
89.0%
82.4%
80.7%
86.7%
85.1%
83.1%
79.4%
81.2%
86.4%
85.0%
82.8%
80.5%
84.1%
83.6%
87.9%
80.9%
79.4%
80.8%
82.2%
80.7%
87.2%
79.3%
84.4%
86.9%
81.4%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
52.0%
24.7%
31.6%
45.0%
46.6%
33.4%
36.4%
40.2%
40.9%
35.8%
45.7%
29.6%
39.7%
36.7%
43.1%
32.8%
47.0%
30.2%
42.5%
35.5%
42.0%
35.3%
38.0%
39.4%
40.7%
37.7%
43.8%
34.4%
46.0%
30.8%
20.9%
60.3%
43.2%
29.3%
35.9%
40.0%
22.9%
56.5%
41.7%
33.5%
50.1%
26.6%
44.9%
29.4%
22.9%
56.6%
46.9%
34.7%
54.7%
21.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
53.1%
16.9%
35.1%
34.9%
48.5%
25.3%
38.9%
31.6%
41.9%
28.7%
47.4%
21.8%
43.1%
27.0%
46.5%
24.0%
50.6%
19.9%
45.9%
26.2%
45.8%
25.1%
42.5%
27.5%
42.2%
30.1%
45.8%
25.8%
49.7%
21.1%
27.0%
47.1%
46.0%
21.2%
39.7%
28.8%
29.2%
42.3%
44.6%
24.3%
52.8%
18.0%
46.9%
21.7%
27.8%
44.0%
48.5%
27.8%
53.3%
14.9%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
67.5%
1.9%
2.1%
22.7%
1.2%
1.3%
7.7%
3.1%
1.8%
16.7%
0.9%
1.4%
16.0%
1.3%
0.9%
19.2%
5.1%
2.8%
13.5%
3.1%
2.6%
6.1%
1.9%
1.2%
41.3%
4.1%
5.5%
13.6%
2.8%
1.8%
6.0%
1.3%
0.8%
6.8%
2.6%
1.4%
15.7%
2.5%
1.6%
18.2%
2.7%
1.9%
78.9%
5.2%
40.0%
10.0%
25.2%
64.3%
10.4%
2.9%
4.9%
13.5%
9.6%
24.5%
24.8%
32.4%
54.1%
8.0%
3.0%
3.2%
63.6%
2.6%
8.6%
14.5%
7.8%
3.4%
35.0%
26.8%
76.3%
13.5%
1.6%
1.0%
18.0%
22.3%
8.6%
Plan: S004C9014
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Brevard
Brevard
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Duval
Hamilton
Hamilton
Hendry
Hendry
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Lee
Lee
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Orange
Orange
Orange
Osceola
Osceola
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pasco
Pasco
Pasco
Pinellas
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
Polk
App. 96
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
222,394
89.9%
748.5
6
24,942
10.1%
220.3
15
459,457
84.6%
958.0
24
83,919
15.4%
599.0
17
89,204
5.1%
14.3
19
468,151
26.8%
171.8
20
620,796
35.5%
206.9
23
480,968
27.5%
548.4
25
88,947
5.1%
381.5
3
29,250
15.3%
214.4
6
161,615
84.7%
429.1
14
208,269
64.8%
348.4
25
113,251
35.2%
1,956.6
3
416,181
48.2%
237.9
4
432,992
50.1%
581.8
6
15,090
1.7%
98.7
2
7,374
49.8%
147.6
6
7,425
50.2%
371.5
16
21,890
55.9%
537.9
23
17,250
44.1%
652.1
9
204,492
16.6%
135.4
11
696,345
56.6%
526.9
12
271,655
22.1%
355.1
27
56,734
4.6%
248.4
1
11,489
57.7%
389.8
2
8,438
42.3%
99.2
14
488,076
78.9%
910.7
27
130,678
21.1%
301.7
13
316,897
98.2%
492.8
27
5,936
1.8%
399.9
3
0
0.0%
0.0
5
153,586
46.4%
525.8
6
177,712
53.6%
1,136.8
17
607,141
24.3%
95.2
18
623,255
25.0%
1,551.9
20
75,549
3.0%
31.2
21
696,344
27.9%
237.3
25
494,146
19.8%
515.6
8
672,919
58.7%
476.3
15
36,668
3.2%
304.7
26
436,369
38.1%
222.2
15
62,192
23.1%
1,196.1
26
206,493
76.9%
309.8
16
197,468
15.0%
187.1
19
228,194
17.3%
111.2
22
696,345
52.7%
375.1
23
198,127
15.0%
1,709.6
5
135,325
29.1%
358.0
9
271,655
58.5%
375.0
12
57,717
12.4%
135.4
9
220,198
24.0%
180.6
10
696,344
76.0%
427.6
12
366,973
60.9%
689.5
26
53,483
8.9%
113.8
27
181,639
30.2%
1,207.3
Area%
77.3%
22.7%
61.5%
38.5%
1.1%
13.0%
15.6%
41.5%
28.8%
33.3%
66.7%
15.1%
84.9%
25.9%
63.3%
10.7%
28.4%
71.6%
45.2%
54.8%
10.7%
41.6%
28.1%
19.6%
79.7%
20.3%
75.1%
24.9%
55.2%
44.8%
0.0%
31.6%
68.4%
3.9%
63.8%
1.3%
9.8%
21.2%
47.5%
30.4%
22.2%
79.4%
20.6%
7.9%
4.7%
15.7%
71.7%
41.2%
43.2%
15.6%
29.7%
70.3%
34.3%
5.7%
60.0%
County
Putnam
Putnam
Seminole
Seminole
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
6
52,227
70.2%
585.1
24
22,137
29.8%
241.9
7
399,292
94.5%
338.3
8
23,426
5.5%
7.0
Area%
70.8%
29.2%
98.0%
2.0%
Cities included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Alachua
3
7,774
85.8%
25.0
Alachua
6
1,285
14.2%
10.1
Altamonte Springs
7
31,943
77.0%
7.6
Altamonte Springs
8
9,553
23.0%
2.0
Clearwater
9
18,256
17.0%
5.8
Clearwater
10
89,429
83.0%
33.4
Coral Springs
19
120,559
99.6%
23.9
Coral Springs
23
537
0.4%
0.1
Davie
20
88,782
96.5%
34.7
Davie
25
3,210
3.5%
1.1
Deerfield Beach
19
44,395
59.2%
10.8
Deerfield Beach
23
30,623
40.8%
5.4
Dunedin
9
35,321
100.0%
28.3
Dunedin
10
0
0.0%
0.0
Edgewood
8
1,772
70.8%
1.2
Edgewood
26
731
29.2%
0.3
Fort Lauderdale
19
91,541
55.3%
22.0
Fort Lauderdale
20
2,700
1.6%
1.5
Fort Lauderdale
23
71,280
43.1%
15.1
Haines City
12
2,603
12.7%
2.5
Haines City
26
17,932
87.3%
17.2
Hallandale Beach
17
11,743
31.6%
1.6
Hallandale Beach
20
25,370
68.4%
3.0
Jacksonville
3
416,181
50.6%
237.9
Jacksonville
4
391,938
47.7%
540.0
Jacksonville
6
13,665
1.7%
96.7
Jasper
2
1,512
33.3%
1.5
Jasper
6
3,034
66.7%
0.8
Lake Park
16
1,157
14.2%
0.3
Lake Park
23
6,998
85.8%
2.0
Marineland
4
0
0.0%
0.0
Marineland
24
16
100.0%
0.3
Miami
17
114,121
28.6%
11.6
Miami
21
285,336
71.4%
44.5
Miami Lakes
17
8,357
28.5%
1.9
Miami Lakes
25
21,004
71.5%
4.7
Miramar
17
57,203
46.9%
8.7
Miramar
20
40,704
33.4%
10.8
Miramar
25
24,134
19.8%
11.8
North Palm Beach
16
12,015
100.0%
5.8
North Palm Beach
23
0
0.0%
0.0
Oakland Park
19
28,115
68.0%
5.0
Oakland Park
23
13,248
32.0%
3.2
Orlando
8
164,375
69.0%
49.6
Orlando
26
73,925
31.0%
61.1
Palm Beach
16
5,321
63.7%
6.7
Palm Beach
22
3,027
36.3%
4.3
Palm Beach Gardens 16
48,167
99.4%
30.3
Palm Beach Gardens 23
285
0.6%
25.1
Palmetto Bay
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Palmetto Bay
21
23,410
100.0%
8.4
Pembroke Pines
20
98,526
63.7%
17.8
Pembroke Pines
25
56,224
36.3%
17.0
Plantation
20
73,078
86.0%
19.5
Plantation
23
11,877
14.0%
2.4
City
Counties and Cities
Area%
71.2%
28.8%
79.1%
20.9%
14.8%
85.2%
99.6%
0.4%
97.0%
3.0%
66.5%
33.5%
100.0%
0.0%
81.3%
18.7%
57.0%
3.9%
39.0%
12.6%
87.4%
35.5%
64.5%
27.2%
61.7%
11.1%
63.8%
36.2%
13.6%
86.4%
5.5%
94.5%
20.6%
79.4%
28.7%
71.3%
27.9%
34.5%
37.6%
99.5%
0.5%
61.2%
38.8%
44.8%
55.2%
60.8%
39.2%
54.7%
45.3%
0.0%
100.0%
51.2%
48.8%
89.0%
11.0%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Pompano Beach
19
35,064
35.1%
6.7
Pompano Beach
23
64,781
64.9%
18.7
Riviera Beach
16
4,306
13.3%
2.9
Riviera Beach
23
28,182
86.7%
7.4
Southwest Ranches 20
2,058
28.0%
4.3
Southwest Ranches 25
5,287
72.0%
8.8
St. Cloud
15
35,180
100.0%
17.1
St. Cloud
26
3
0.0%
0.7
Sunrise
20
16,402
19.4%
4.1
Sunrise
23
68,037
80.6%
14.2
Tamarac
19
40,387
66.8%
8.0
Tamarac
23
20,040
33.2%
4.1
Tampa
9
12,959
3.9%
8.1
Tampa
11
289,842
86.3%
145.8
Tampa
12
32,908
9.8%
21.4
Temple Terrace
11
24,541
100.0%
7.1
Temple Terrace
12
0
0.0%
0.0
West Palm Beach
16
18,215
18.2%
4.8
West Palm Beach
22
21,753
21.8%
9.4
West Palm Beach
23
59,951
60.0%
43.9
Winter Haven
12
28,322
83.6%
27.1
Winter Haven
27
5,552
16.4%
12.8
Area%
26.4%
73.6%
28.1%
71.9%
32.8%
67.2%
96.2%
3.8%
22.5%
77.5%
66.4%
33.6%
4.6%
83.2%
12.2%
99.6%
0.4%
8.2%
16.1%
75.6%
67.8%
32.2%
Plan: S004C9014
Page 4 of 4
26
5
10
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
0
Scale bar for insets
27
Oldsmar
Holmes Beach
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
14
16
Bradenton
Palmetto
St. Petersburg
Pinellas Park
Treasure Island
Seminole
13 Largo PINELLAS
Clearwater
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
St. Leo
St. Augustine
9
17
15 Plant City
Zephyrhills
Dade City
HILLSBOROUGH
MANATEE
Tampa
Temple Terrace
PASCO
12
Green Cove Springs
Eustis
9
10
Ocoee
Apopka
Windermere
Winter Springs 7
Kissimmee
Oviedo
St. Cloud
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
6
Deltona
SEMINOLE
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
Maitland
LAKE
5
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
11
Orlando Area
8
VOLUSIA
13
17
Titusville
Oak Hill
DESOTO
HARDEE
POLK
9
10
LAKE
PUTNAM
LEE
19
CHARLOTTE
SARASOTA
16
UGH
4
CLAY
MARION
15
OR O
LSB
MANATEE
HIL
14
PASCO
12
HERNANDO
CITRUS
F
6
COLLIER
25
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
OSCEOLA
ORANGE
7
VOLUSIA
FLAGLER
10
26
8
MONROE
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
20
21
27
23
24
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
18
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Florida City
Homestead
Cutler Bay
Palmetto Bay
Coral Gables
Miami
Miami Beach
24 North Miami
Aventura
Starke
CLAY
ST. JOHNS
6-Dec-2011
*****
Workshop by House
Congressional
Subcommittee
8-Dec-2011
H000C9001
LEVY
11
5
AD
BR
ALACHUA
BIA
L AS
MIAMI-DADE
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Doral
Hialeah
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
Dania Beach
4
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
DIXIE
E
D
OR
DUVAL
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
23
Lawtey
Orange Park
Jacksonville
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
N
UNIO
BAKER
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
Davie
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Fort Lauderdale
Lauderhill
DUVAL
3
GULF
L
PINE
Southwest Ranches
Sunrise
Plantation
Oakland Park
Pompano Beach
5
Baldwin
Miles
60
3
HAMILTON
LA
FA
YE
TT
MADISON
R
BROWARD
Tamarac
Deerfield Beach
Boca Raton
22
Delray Beach
NASSAU
3
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Parkland
21
Lantana
Lake Worth
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
E
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Springs
30
2
JACKSON
GILCHRIST
20
Wellington
Palm Beach
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
HNS
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
NE
Belle Glade
18
1
SANTA ROSA
AN
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
A
ESC
COLU
M
South Florida
JO
ST.
OK
App. 97
App. 98
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
14.92%
10.07%
47.53%
10.36%
10.74%
9.12%
13.52%
11.46%
9.32%
4.46%
4.77%
26.07%
9.51%
5.83%
9.19%
10.98%
5.76%
50.21%
11.21%
10.16%
9.93%
55.73%
8.25%
10.02%
7.71%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
12
15
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
38.2%
61.8%
33.0%
67.0%
69.6%
30.4%
47.0%
53.0%
50.1%
49.9%
42.6%
57.4%
54.2%
45.8%
52.2%
47.8%
39.5%
60.5%
45.7%
54.3%
49.7%
50.3%
64.7%
35.3%
46.7%
53.3%
45.3%
54.7%
41.8%
58.2%
48.0%
52.0%
38.4%
61.6%
83.2%
16.8%
60.9%
39.1%
54.3%
45.7%
61.2%
38.8%
88.4%
11.6%
49.4%
50.6%
53.4%
46.6%
53.3%
46.7%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
8
19
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
42.0%
58.0%
34.6%
65.4%
66.0%
34.0%
46.9%
53.1%
49.5%
50.5%
42.3%
57.7%
47.9%
52.1%
49.0%
51.0%
41.5%
58.5%
45.2%
54.8%
50.0%
50.0%
62.9%
37.1%
46.2%
53.8%
46.1%
53.9%
42.0%
58.0%
49.1%
50.9%
36.5%
63.5%
80.0%
20.0%
63.0%
37.0%
54.4%
45.6%
60.9%
39.1%
86.5%
13.5%
42.2%
57.8%
49.9%
50.1%
48.4%
51.6%
0.39
0.37
0.46
0.35
0.50
0.11
0.36
0.63
0.34
0.35
0.33
0.43
0.53
0.42
0.34
0.36
0.42
0.66
0.54
0.26
0.49
0.29
0.17
0.27
0.47
0.47
0.18
0.46
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
34.2%
65.8%
26.3%
73.7%
61.3%
38.7%
38.9%
61.1%
37.0%
63.0%
33.9%
66.1%
41.5%
58.5%
38.6%
61.4%
33.6%
66.4%
34.8%
65.2%
36.7%
63.3%
51.2%
48.8%
34.2%
65.8%
34.3%
65.7%
33.3%
66.7%
36.4%
63.6%
27.6%
72.4%
75.1%
24.9%
51.6%
48.4%
41.6%
58.4%
52.2%
47.8%
84.4%
15.6%
35.5%
64.5%
42.3%
57.7%
39.5%
60.5%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2214.9
7852.7
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
0.38%
152
688
6,419
0.40%
60
211
1,422
1.04%
149
638
2,007
0.46%
106
334
3,125
1.03%
30
123
440
0.39%
95
272
2,419
1.41%
94
303
2,427
1.38%
61
213
985
0.35%
106
388
3,811
0.37%
70
238
2,079
0.27%
36
131
415
1.29%
47
184
590
1.05%
47
190
619
0.27%
60
183
1,173
0.47%
116
503
7,041
0.44%
69
220
1,993
0.42%
83
234
1,372
1.19%
74
347
2,096
0.65%
34
110
264
0.56%
52
188
369
1.16%
37
124
288
3.38%
17
58
110
1.68%
103
345
3,980
1.47%
184
551
4,900
2.23%
40
130
578
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
21
6
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
46.5%
53.5%
40.1%
59.9%
73.6%
26.4%
54.9%
45.1%
57.1%
42.9%
51.2%
48.8%
61.0%
39.0%
58.5%
41.5%
48.2%
51.8%
55.3%
44.7%
58.6%
41.4%
70.2%
29.8%
54.5%
45.5%
51.9%
48.1%
49.1%
50.9%
54.7%
45.3%
43.4%
56.6%
85.0%
15.0%
66.6%
33.4%
59.4%
40.6%
65.0%
35.0%
88.8%
11.2%
52.4%
47.6%
55.8%
44.2%
56.0%
44.0%
4.55%
4.75%
6.69%
6.74%
10.87%
8.69%
18.85%
7.66%
25.47%
26.56%
7.17%
9.11%
7.06%
18.57%
22.04%
8.75%
15.26%
12.06%
13.69%
18.55%
18.30%
17.58%
37.56%
33.15%
70.08%
68.91%
75.04%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.32
0.38
0.42
0.17
0.40
0.06
0.35
0.37
0.41
0.33
0.27
0.32
0.46
0.30
0.22
0.22
0.44
0.35
0.52
0.32
0.22
0.27
0.13
0.23
0.41
0.42
0.20
0.43
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
35.2%
64.8%
27.7%
72.3%
62.3%
37.7%
40.9%
59.1%
41.1%
58.9%
35.9%
64.1%
42.1%
57.9%
41.6%
58.4%
35.1%
64.9%
36.8%
63.2%
40.8%
59.2%
53.0%
47.0%
34.9%
65.1%
39.3%
60.7%
34.3%
65.7%
42.6%
57.4%
30.0%
70.0%
78.2%
21.8%
59.0%
41.0%
49.5%
50.5%
58.6%
41.4%
86.2%
13.8%
37.7%
62.3%
45.5%
54.5%
45.6%
54.4%
Convex
Hull
0.74
0.82
0.78
0.67
0.81
0.37
0.78
0.84
0.76
0.82
0.76
0.85
0.86
0.82
0.73
0.74
0.82
0.81
0.87
0.70
0.74
0.61
0.61
0.55
0.87
0.82
0.46
0.81
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
5
22
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
34.6%
65.4%
27.1%
72.9%
62.2%
37.8%
38.9%
61.1%
38.2%
61.8%
34.0%
66.0%
37.5%
62.5%
39.7%
60.3%
33.7%
66.3%
33.3%
66.7%
36.1%
63.9%
49.7%
50.3%
31.7%
68.3%
34.7%
65.3%
29.4%
70.6%
36.7%
63.3%
27.2%
72.8%
76.7%
23.3%
54.2%
45.8%
45.1%
54.9%
55.4%
44.6%
85.9%
14.1%
36.3%
63.7%
43.7%
56.3%
41.5%
58.5%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
18.7%
13.5%
47.1%
20.9%
21.6%
15.7%
22.7%
23.1%
17.0%
13.1%
14.6%
28.1%
15.1%
13.0%
14.4%
15.9%
9.3%
51.3%
19.2%
17.5%
23.0%
65.0%
16.6%
20.9%
17.7%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
21
66.3%
49.8%
59.2%
66.5%
34.5%
52.6%
55.2%
56.3%
48.8%
54.6%
57.5%
47.6%
42.8%
34.0%
50.9%
48.0%
52.8%
50.9%
60.5%
18.9%
36.0%
43.8%
37.4%
12.9%
59.7%
51.5%
55.1%
I_Cri
3
20.4%
28.7%
22.1%
20.0%
18.4%
26.5%
23.2%
28.0%
28.5%
22.3%
25.5%
39.3%
42.6%
37.9%
34.0%
39.0%
32.7%
33.2%
30.3%
29.8%
44.9%
38.7%
39.6%
22.1%
23.8%
27.6%
27.2%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
13
14
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
39.8%
60.2%
34.9%
65.1%
69.1%
30.9%
50.6%
49.4%
51.7%
48.3%
44.4%
55.6%
53.1%
46.9%
52.5%
47.5%
42.4%
57.6%
47.5%
52.5%
51.1%
48.9%
65.0%
35.0%
47.2%
52.8%
48.7%
51.3%
43.5%
56.5%
51.5%
48.5%
42.3%
57.7%
81.3%
18.7%
63.9%
36.1%
56.9%
43.1%
61.6%
38.4%
86.9%
13.1%
46.3%
53.7%
49.8%
50.2%
48.8%
51.2%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
38.3%
61.7%
29.5%
70.5%
58.1%
41.9%
47.2%
52.8%
39.8%
60.2%
43.1%
56.9%
43.5%
56.5%
39.9%
60.1%
39.3%
60.7%
44.1%
55.9%
45.3%
54.7%
55.4%
44.6%
40.3%
59.7%
42.5%
57.5%
39.8%
60.2%
48.0%
52.0%
33.3%
66.7%
75.7%
24.3%
65.3%
34.7%
54.9%
45.1%
62.3%
37.7%
81.6%
18.4%
38.5%
61.5%
47.1%
52.9%
44.5%
55.5%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
18
9
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
48.8%
51.2%
39.6%
60.4%
65.0%
35.0%
54.7%
45.3%
50.5%
49.5%
49.7%
50.3%
50.4%
49.6%
50.8%
49.2%
49.5%
50.5%
51.7%
48.3%
53.6%
46.4%
60.5%
39.5%
44.7%
55.3%
50.4%
49.6%
46.3%
53.7%
52.8%
47.2%
42.5%
57.5%
79.9%
20.1%
71.0%
29.0%
61.1%
38.9%
69.5%
30.5%
84.9%
15.1%
46.2%
53.8%
53.5%
46.5%
51.6%
48.4%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
39.4%
60.6%
29.8%
70.2%
57.6%
42.4%
46.8%
53.2%
38.6%
61.4%
42.3%
57.7%
43.9%
56.1%
39.8%
60.2%
41.1%
58.9%
44.4%
55.6%
47.1%
52.9%
54.8%
45.2%
39.1%
60.9%
46.2%
53.8%
40.5%
59.5%
50.7%
49.3%
35.3%
64.7%
76.7%
23.3%
68.0%
32.0%
57.6%
42.4%
64.2%
35.8%
81.2%
18.8%
40.7%
59.3%
48.5%
51.5%
47.7%
52.3%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
6
21
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
34.3%
65.7%
28.4%
71.6%
56.2%
43.8%
44.4%
55.6%
36.1%
63.9%
35.8%
64.2%
38.5%
61.5%
36.8%
63.2%
36.4%
63.6%
40.0%
60.0%
39.9%
60.1%
49.8%
50.2%
35.2%
64.8%
39.7%
60.3%
36.2%
63.8%
44.5%
55.5%
32.9%
67.1%
74.3%
25.7%
63.7%
36.3%
52.5%
47.5%
61.4%
38.6%
80.6%
19.4%
39.2%
60.8%
46.7%
53.3%
44.7%
55.3%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
16%
43
-20%
24
-23%
64
-24%
63
0%
410
20%
359
-54%
51
-55%
115
-58%
102
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
53.8%
46.2%
45.3%
54.7%
70.0%
30.0%
62.5%
37.5%
59.5%
40.5%
59.7%
40.3%
59.5%
40.5%
59.0%
41.0%
56.6%
43.4%
61.5%
38.5%
63.2%
36.8%
70.3%
29.7%
58.5%
41.5%
57.4%
42.6%
56.9%
43.1%
64.0%
36.0%
51.2%
48.8%
82.8%
17.2%
76.9%
23.1%
67.8%
32.2%
72.7%
27.3%
85.4%
14.6%
51.1%
48.9%
57.2%
42.8%
55.9%
44.1%
Plan: H000C9001
Page 2 of 4
App. 99
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
43.7%
29.5%
60.4%
40.3%
36.6%
35.0%
42.8%
38.0%
37.4%
36.9%
35.4%
50.2%
36.7%
32.8%
38.2%
37.5%
28.0%
65.3%
48.1%
41.3%
47.7%
69.8%
32.9%
35.8%
35.8%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
41.0%
28.0%
59.8%
38.7%
35.8%
33.4%
41.7%
37.3%
35.2%
35.3%
34.4%
49.4%
35.6%
32.1%
36.7%
36.4%
27.1%
65.8%
46.7%
40.5%
46.3%
69.3%
32.8%
35.6%
35.8%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
19.2%
21.5%
19.1%
26.0%
27.1%
23.1%
26.3%
28.2%
20.5%
25.3%
27.4%
24.8%
26.5%
24.4%
22.3%
25.6%
25.8%
21.1%
27.4%
27.5%
28.4%
20.5%
29.2%
29.3%
28.3%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
17.9%
20.3%
17.8%
24.8%
25.2%
21.1%
24.1%
26.0%
19.8%
23.9%
26.1%
23.0%
25.0%
23.5%
21.1%
24.6%
24.4%
20.4%
25.9%
25.9%
26.1%
19.4%
27.4%
27.4%
26.0%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
39.8%
50.4%
21.1%
35.3%
37.1%
43.5%
32.0%
34.5%
44.4%
39.5%
38.1%
25.8%
37.9%
43.5%
41.0%
38.0%
47.1%
13.2%
25.8%
32.0%
25.3%
10.2%
38.0%
35.2%
35.9%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
38.4%
50.2%
21.8%
34.9%
38.2%
43.9%
33.1%
36.0%
42.8%
39.3%
38.5%
26.8%
38.3%
43.6%
40.7%
37.9%
47.6%
14.3%
26.0%
32.8%
26.2%
10.8%
39.6%
36.8%
38.2%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
83.5%
77.4%
86.1%
82.5%
77.9%
81.6%
81.3%
78.1%
84.9%
78.1%
77.3%
83.4%
76.9%
81.2%
83.1%
81.1%
76.8%
84.4%
77.0%
79.2%
78.7%
85.7%
79.0%
80.8%
80.5%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
84.3%
78.8%
86.9%
83.1%
79.0%
82.7%
82.5%
79.1%
85.2%
79.0%
77.6%
84.2%
77.8%
81.0%
83.6%
81.6%
77.5%
84.4%
77.3%
79.8%
79.3%
85.8%
79.4%
81.0%
81.4%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
13.1%
3.8%
26.7%
3.5%
1.4%
2.7%
9.2%
3.9%
25.4%
4.7%
1.1%
2.6%
47.0%
6.7%
67.7%
5.7%
6.3%
5.0%
9.3%
5.9%
19.8%
7.2%
0.9%
3.1%
9.4%
15.0%
20.4%
19.3%
1.1%
7.7%
7.9%
4.6%
19.2%
5.8%
0.9%
2.9%
11.6%
22.4%
22.5%
26.5%
1.4%
10.4%
9.7%
21.8%
20.2%
27.9%
1.4%
10.6%
7.7%
4.2%
18.6%
5.6%
0.8%
2.4%
3.8%
6.3%
8.4%
8.4%
0.5%
3.8%
4.2%
3.9%
9.4%
5.0%
0.5%
2.3%
25.6%
11.0%
43.2%
10.6%
3.2%
7.9%
8.9%
13.8%
19.2%
16.9%
1.2%
8.1%
4.9%
3.6%
12.5%
4.9%
0.5%
1.9%
8.0%
7.5%
18.2%
9.3%
0.8%
4.2%
9.6%
6.3%
21.3%
7.8%
1.1%
3.9%
4.1%
6.4%
11.6%
9.5%
0.4%
3.3%
48.1%
10.8%
61.8%
8.3%
10.5%
14.1%
8.9%
11.6%
14.6%
11.2%
1.4%
8.8%
7.5%
9.1%
14.7%
10.0%
0.9%
6.3%
8.7%
26.9%
14.7%
23.4%
1.4%
27.8%
55.6%
22.9%
68.8%
15.5%
14.2%
48.0%
6.9%
57.7%
16.6%
52.3%
0.9%
58.6%
9.3%
57.3%
21.2%
45.3%
1.1%
66.2%
7.0%
60.5%
15.8%
48.3%
0.8%
71.0%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
13.0%
3.4%
25.0%
3.1%
1.5%
2.6%
8.9%
3.6%
23.6%
4.2%
1.1%
2.4%
45.5%
6.0%
65.5%
5.1%
6.4%
4.7%
9.1%
5.4%
18.8%
6.4%
1.0%
2.9%
9.0%
13.7%
19.3%
17.6%
1.2%
7.3%
7.5%
4.2%
17.6%
5.2%
0.9%
2.7%
11.1%
20.5%
21.3%
24.2%
1.4%
10.3%
9.1%
20.1%
19.0%
25.8%
1.3%
10.3%
7.6%
3.8%
17.3%
5.0%
0.9%
2.3%
3.5%
5.7%
7.5%
7.5%
0.5%
3.5%
3.8%
3.4%
8.3%
4.3%
0.5%
2.1%
24.7%
9.9%
41.4%
9.3%
3.2%
7.5%
8.6%
12.4%
18.2%
14.8%
1.2%
7.7%
4.7%
3.1%
11.6%
4.1%
0.6%
1.8%
7.6%
6.7%
16.7%
8.0%
0.9%
4.0%
8.9%
5.7%
19.4%
6.9%
1.0%
3.5%
3.7%
5.7%
10.3%
8.3%
0.4%
3.1%
45.9%
9.9%
59.3%
7.6%
10.4%
12.8%
7.8%
10.1%
12.6%
9.6%
1.4%
8.0%
7.1%
8.0%
13.7%
8.6%
0.9%
5.7%
8.1%
24.6%
13.4%
21.0%
1.4%
26.9%
56.2%
21.4%
69.1%
14.3%
15.3%
46.8%
6.9%
55.1%
16.7%
48.5%
0.9%
57.7%
9.5%
55.5%
21.4%
42.6%
1.1%
65.6%
7.0%
59.2%
16.0%
45.4%
0.8%
70.8%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
39.7%
29.6%
34.8%
33.9%
51.0%
16.9%
47.6%
18.9%
47.0%
20.4%
43.2%
28.2%
50.4%
16.6%
48.6%
18.4%
48.8%
26.1%
48.0%
24.3%
44.2%
23.3%
47.6%
20.3%
43.7%
23.8%
42.7%
24.4%
45.9%
24.3%
46.0%
23.6%
41.1%
26.0%
50.2%
18.4%
45.7%
20.6%
44.5%
23.3%
40.7%
28.6%
46.5%
23.7%
29.0%
41.5%
27.5%
43.5%
27.4%
45.6%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
38.2%
28.3%
33.5%
33.0%
50.3%
15.7%
47.2%
18.6%
45.9%
18.9%
41.9%
27.2%
49.4%
14.8%
47.7%
16.8%
47.5%
26.0%
47.1%
23.6%
44.0%
22.3%
48.0%
18.7%
43.8%
22.3%
43.3%
23.2%
45.3%
23.0%
44.7%
23.2%
40.6%
24.5%
50.3%
17.2%
45.2%
19.7%
44.3%
22.0%
40.2%
26.2%
47.0%
21.4%
29.7%
38.6%
28.1%
40.6%
28.6%
42.1%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
43.2%
45.4%
11.4%
26.8%
59.6%
13.6%
61.2%
28.1%
10.7%
38.9%
43.3%
17.8%
34.0%
48.7%
17.3%
32.3%
52.2%
15.4%
40.1%
44.1%
15.8%
35.0%
46.9%
18.1%
34.1%
50.6%
15.2%
34.3%
48.2%
17.5%
34.3%
46.3%
19.4%
50.1%
34.3%
15.6%
35.3%
47.4%
17.3%
30.8%
51.5%
17.7%
35.5%
49.8%
14.7%
34.9%
46.5%
18.6%
24.2%
58.2%
17.6%
70.1%
16.4%
13.5%
50.2%
29.8%
20.1%
40.8%
39.5%
19.7%
49.6%
31.3%
19.1%
76.5%
10.9%
12.6%
29.7%
51.0%
19.3%
35.3%
45.9%
18.8%
34.0%
47.6%
18.4%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
41.3%
43.0%
15.7%
27.5%
54.6%
17.9%
62.4%
22.6%
14.9%
39.1%
38.8%
22.1%
35.7%
41.0%
23.3%
33.1%
46.9%
20.0%
42.4%
35.5%
22.1%
37.3%
38.4%
24.3%
34.2%
48.1%
17.7%
35.1%
43.3%
21.5%
34.9%
41.4%
23.8%
50.9%
28.2%
21.0%
36.0%
41.2%
22.8%
32.0%
46.8%
21.2%
36.2%
45.1%
18.6%
36.3%
41.3%
22.4%
26.3%
51.8%
21.9%
69.8%
12.7%
17.5%
48.4%
26.9%
24.8%
41.4%
34.1%
24.6%
47.9%
26.6%
25.5%
73.2%
9.4%
17.4%
32.8%
41.4%
25.7%
36.1%
38.4%
25.5%
36.1%
38.6%
25.2%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
11.1%
2.1%
22.8%
1.7%
0.9%
1.8%
7.0%
2.2%
21.4%
2.5%
0.7%
1.8%
44.2%
3.4%
66.4%
2.9%
3.7%
3.0%
7.7%
3.3%
17.5%
4.2%
0.5%
2.0%
7.5%
8.4%
18.4%
11.3%
0.8%
5.0%
6.2%
2.8%
16.7%
3.6%
0.6%
2.0%
10.0%
10.9%
21.9%
14.9%
0.8%
5.6%
9.1%
12.5%
21.7%
17.6%
1.0%
6.7%
6.0%
2.1%
15.9%
2.8%
0.5%
1.4%
3.1%
3.5%
7.6%
4.7%
0.3%
2.4%
2.8%
2.1%
6.9%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
22.0%
5.7%
39.4%
5.4%
1.8%
5.0%
7.9%
7.3%
18.3%
8.6%
0.9%
5.4%
3.4%
1.7%
9.7%
2.3%
0.3%
1.1%
6.2%
3.3%
15.6%
4.2%
0.5%
2.4%
7.5%
3.4%
18.6%
4.2%
0.7%
2.5%
2.3%
2.8%
7.8%
4.5%
0.2%
1.9%
48.6%
6.2%
62.3%
4.4%
7.1%
9.9%
7.5%
6.2%
12.2%
5.3%
1.1%
6.1%
6.0%
5.1%
12.4%
5.2%
0.6%
4.3%
8.4%
20.3%
14.2%
14.9%
1.1%
25.5%
63.5%
15.4%
75.1%
9.0%
12.0%
46.1%
7.6%
48.9%
21.6%
37.7%
0.7%
54.0%
9.8%
51.4%
24.1%
32.8%
0.7%
64.2%
6.3%
56.7%
16.1%
35.5%
0.5%
70.9%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
13.4%
3.3%
27.9%
3.0%
1.1%
2.4%
9.1%
3.4%
26.6%
4.1%
0.9%
2.3%
49.4%
5.4%
70.4%
4.6%
5.0%
4.1%
9.5%
5.0%
20.7%
6.3%
0.7%
2.6%
9.3%
12.8%
21.1%
17.0%
0.9%
6.6%
7.9%
4.1%
20.0%
5.2%
0.7%
2.6%
12.3%
19.3%
24.4%
24.2%
1.2%
8.4%
10.4%
18.6%
22.4%
24.9%
1.2%
8.9%
7.5%
3.4%
19.3%
4.7%
0.6%
2.0%
4.0%
5.7%
9.2%
7.9%
0.5%
3.3%
4.1%
3.4%
9.6%
4.5%
0.4%
2.0%
26.3%
9.4%
44.5%
9.3%
2.5%
6.9%
9.3%
12.1%
20.4%
15.3%
1.0%
7.2%
4.8%
3.1%
12.7%
4.4%
0.4%
1.6%
8.3%
5.9%
19.7%
7.8%
0.7%
3.3%
9.8%
5.5%
22.6%
6.9%
0.9%
3.5%
3.9%
5.1%
12.0%
8.2%
0.3%
2.7%
52.3%
9.6%
65.2%
7.2%
9.2%
13.7%
9.6%
10.6%
15.8%
10.1%
1.3%
8.4%
7.8%
8.4%
15.5%
9.0%
0.8%
6.0%
9.4%
26.9%
15.8%
22.6%
1.3%
28.5%
59.7%
20.7%
71.8%
13.7%
12.9%
48.9%
7.7%
55.0%
19.1%
48.6%
0.8%
56.3%
9.7%
56.1%
22.5%
42.2%
0.9%
65.9%
7.1%
59.7%
16.3%
45.7%
0.6%
71.0%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
89.0%
82.3%
92.0%
89.1%
83.2%
86.7%
88.1%
83.2%
89.8%
82.9%
84.8%
89.7%
82.0%
87.4%
89.0%
86.5%
83.2%
89.8%
81.9%
84.7%
83.6%
90.5%
84.3%
86.9%
86.3%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
86.3%
80.1%
89.0%
85.4%
80.6%
84.1%
84.2%
80.6%
87.5%
80.6%
80.7%
86.1%
79.1%
84.6%
86.1%
83.6%
80.5%
87.1%
79.4%
81.8%
81.2%
88.0%
81.5%
83.8%
83.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
36.0%
40.3%
29.9%
47.3%
52.3%
24.8%
49.4%
26.1%
45.7%
29.1%
40.7%
37.7%
54.7%
22.7%
49.4%
25.4%
46.1%
35.0%
46.6%
33.5%
42.5%
33.7%
46.9%
30.1%
41.3%
35.3%
41.2%
34.5%
44.3%
35.1%
43.7%
34.5%
38.0%
39.3%
50.0%
26.2%
43.1%
29.4%
41.8%
33.5%
36.3%
39.5%
44.3%
32.6%
22.9%
56.4%
22.5%
57.4%
21.3%
59.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
38.3%
30.9%
33.6%
37.2%
52.8%
17.3%
49.2%
20.5%
47.5%
21.0%
42.2%
30.1%
53.1%
15.4%
49.9%
18.3%
48.2%
28.7%
48.8%
25.6%
45.9%
24.6%
50.1%
20.6%
45.4%
24.6%
45.2%
24.6%
47.4%
25.5%
45.7%
25.9%
42.5%
27.5%
52.3%
18.1%
46.1%
21.2%
44.7%
24.3%
40.2%
28.2%
48.5%
22.3%
29.0%
42.4%
27.2%
45.0%
27.7%
46.0%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
19.2%
0.8%
1.3%
18.0%
1.4%
1.2%
64.3%
1.9%
2.0%
16.7%
3.1%
1.5%
15.9%
7.6%
3.6%
15.7%
2.5%
1.6%
19.4%
8.8%
3.6%
19.2%
13.0%
5.0%
14.6%
1.5%
1.0%
6.1%
3.0%
1.7%
5.5%
1.9%
1.2%
36.6%
3.2%
3.6%
15.5%
4.6%
3.9%
9.5%
1.4%
0.9%
13.1%
2.5%
1.7%
17.9%
2.7%
1.8%
6.9%
2.6%
1.4%
61.7%
2.7%
8.0%
10.0%
2.8%
4.8%
11.1%
3.1%
3.3%
13.7%
9.6%
24.8%
79.2%
5.3%
44.0%
23.7%
31.4%
52.8%
25.5%
22.7%
63.6%
15.6%
29.2%
74.3%
Plan: H000C9001
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Alachua
Baker
Baker
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Citrus
Citrus
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Duval
Hendry
Hendry
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Nassau
Nassau
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pasco
Pasco
App. 100
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
158,514
64.1%
353.3
5
61,783
25.0%
403.6
11
27,039
10.9%
211.9
3
25,445
93.8%
533.2
5
1,670
6.2%
55.7
20
455,445
26.1%
535.5
21
272,224
15.6%
70.9
22
294,581
16.9%
130.1
23
498,411
28.5%
188.9
24
136,412
7.8%
24.0
25
90,993
5.2%
373.5
11
97,587
69.1%
440.8
12
43,649
30.9%
332.5
19
160,728
50.0%
338.0
25
160,792
50.0%
1,967.0
3
242,229
28.0%
399.4
4
347,132
40.2%
252.3
5
274,902
31.8%
266.7
20
13,550
34.6%
55.7
25
25,590
65.4%
1,134.3
14
500,590
40.7%
422.5
15
671,902
54.7%
593.6
17
56,734
4.6%
249.7
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
5
19,463
6.6%
323.9
10
136,671
46.0%
537.9
11
140,918
47.4%
295.1
17
83,137
13.4%
178.2
19
535,617
86.6%
1,034.3
2
4,028
21.0%
337.4
3
15,196
79.0%
378.3
16
316,897
98.2%
447.9
17
5,936
1.8%
444.8
5
12,293
3.7%
439.9
11
319,005
96.3%
1,222.7
23
197,933
7.9%
99.3
24
559,932
22.4%
86.2
25
418,970
16.8%
505.4
26
623,255
25.0%
1,162.5
27
696,345
27.9%
577.7
3
73,314
100.0%
725.7
5
0
0.0%
0.2
17
34,658
86.7%
786.4
18
5,338
13.3%
105.5
5
297,714
26.0%
216.0
7
273,627
23.9%
95.2
8
14,941
1.3%
245.0
10
559,674
48.8%
447.0
18
266,900
20.2%
446.6
20
227,350
17.2%
1,504.3
21
424,120
32.1%
193.0
22
401,764
30.4%
239.0
9
7,204
1.6%
63.4
12
457,493
98.4%
805.1
Area%
36.5%
41.7%
21.9%
90.5%
9.5%
40.5%
5.4%
9.8%
14.3%
1.8%
28.2%
57.0%
43.0%
14.7%
85.3%
43.5%
27.5%
29.0%
4.7%
95.3%
33.4%
46.9%
19.7%
79.5%
20.5%
28.0%
46.5%
25.5%
14.7%
85.3%
47.1%
52.9%
50.2%
49.8%
26.5%
73.5%
4.1%
3.5%
20.8%
47.8%
23.8%
100.0%
0.0%
88.2%
11.8%
21.5%
9.5%
24.4%
44.6%
18.7%
63.1%
8.1%
10.0%
7.3%
92.7%
Area%
68.2%
27.6%
4.1%
42.7%
57.3%
64.1%
35.9%
39.2%
60.8%
Area%
19.1%
80.9%
4.7%
95.3%
1.0%
99.0%
24.6%
57.3%
18.2%
99.8%
0.2%
89.7%
10.3%
99.7%
0.3%
44.4%
55.6%
34.8%
64.8%
0.4%
61.9%
38.1%
92.8%
7.2%
64.5%
35.5%
72.4%
27.6%
86.5%
13.5%
44.8%
55.2%
43.9%
25.6%
30.5%
0.2%
88.9%
10.9%
27.4%
72.6%
24.5%
75.5%
79.4%
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
13
696,344
76.0%
415.0
14
195,755
21.4%
168.0
15
24,443
2.7%
25.1
9
420,456
69.8%
858.0
17
181,639
30.2%
1,152.6
4
158,348
83.3%
526.3
6
31,691
16.7%
295.2
11
70,995
76.0%
227.5
12
22,425
24.0%
352.3
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Boynton Beach
20
19,978
29.3%
3.2
Boynton Beach
22
48,239
70.7%
13.4
Coconut Creek
20
433
0.8%
0.6
Coconut Creek
21
52,476
99.2%
11.4
Cutler Bay
26
0
0.0%
0.1
Cutler Bay
27
40,286
100.0%
10.1
Deerfield Beach
20
26,242
35.0%
4.0
Deerfield Beach
21
33,897
45.2%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Doral
25
45,704
100.0%
15.2
Doral
27
0
0.0%
0.0
Eagle Lake
9
2,255
100.0%
3.2
Eagle Lake
17
0
0.0%
0.4
Eatonville
5
2,145
99.4%
1.1
Eatonville
7
14
0.6%
0.0
Fanning Springs
3
278
36.4%
1.7
Fanning Springs
11
486
63.6%
2.2
Fort Lauderdale
20
60,588
36.6%
13.4
Fort Lauderdale
22
104,933
63.4%
25.0
Fort Lauderdale
23
0
0.0%
0.2
Gainesville
3
81,681
65.7%
38.6
Gainesville
5
42,673
34.3%
23.8
Glen Ridge
20
219
100.0%
0.2
Glen Ridge
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Hallandale Beach
23
25,370
68.4%
3.0
Hallandale Beach
24
11,743
31.6%
1.6
Hialeah
25
162,856
72.5%
16.5
Hialeah
27
61,813
27.5%
6.3
Hollywood
23
114,568
81.4%
26.6
Hollywood
24
26,200
18.6%
4.1
Homestead
26
42,640
70.5%
7.0
Homestead
27
17,872
29.5%
8.6
Jacksonville
3
228,149
27.8%
384.4
Jacksonville
4
318,733
38.8%
223.5
Jacksonville
5
274,902
33.5%
266.7
Lake Park
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Lake Park
20
7,242
88.8%
2.1
Lake Park
22
913
11.2%
0.3
Lake Wales
9
2,512
17.7%
5.5
Lake Wales
17
11,713
82.3%
14.5
Lake Worth
20
10,654
30.5%
1.6
Lake Worth
22
24,256
69.5%
5.0
Lakeland
9
85,375
87.6%
59.0
County
Pinellas
Pinellas
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
St. Johns
St. Johns
Sumter
Sumter
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Lakeland
17
12,047
12.4%
15.3
Lantana
20
4,654
44.7%
1.2
Lantana
22
5,769
55.3%
1.7
Largo
13
75,782
97.6%
17.3
Largo
14
1,866
2.4%
1.3
Leesburg
10
10,423
51.8%
32.4
Leesburg
11
9,694
48.2%
8.6
Loxahatchee Groves 18
1,681
52.9%
7.0
Loxahatchee Groves 20
1,499
47.1%
5.5
Maitland
5
9
0.1%
0.0
Maitland
7
15,742
99.9%
6.4
Margate
20
14,535
27.3%
2.2
Margate
21
38,749
72.7%
6.9
Miami
23
15,273
3.8%
2.9
Miami
24
133,006
33.3%
19.4
Miami
27
251,178
62.9%
33.8
Miami Shores
23
0
0.0%
0.7
Miami Shores
24
10,493
100.0%
3.1
Miramar
24
65,355
53.6%
11.2
Miramar
25
56,686
46.4%
20.1
Newberry
3
2,398
48.4%
20.3
Newberry
11
2,552
51.6%
34.3
North Miami
23
9,175
15.6%
4.8
North Miami
24
49,611
84.4%
5.2
North Miami Beach 23
6,953
16.7%
1.1
North Miami Beach 24
34,570
83.3%
4.3
North Palm Beach
18
12,015
100.0%
5.8
North Palm Beach
20
0
0.0%
0.0
Oakland Park
20
20,289
49.1%
4.2
Oakland Park
22
21,074
50.9%
3.9
Opa-locka
24
14,894
97.9%
2.6
Opa-locka
25
325
2.1%
1.9
Orlando
5
75,594
31.7%
22.5
Orlando
7
59,991
25.2%
19.3
Orlando
10
102,715
43.1%
68.9
Palm Beach Gardens 18
48,452
100.0%
55.3
Palm Beach Gardens 20
0
0.0%
0.1
Pembroke Pines
23
107,607
69.5%
20.0
Pembroke Pines
24
12,856
8.3%
3.1
Pembroke Pines
25
34,287
22.2%
11.7
Pinellas Park
13
49,079
100.0%
16.2
Pinellas Park
14
0
0.0%
0.0
Plantation
20
13,381
15.8%
2.7
Plantation
22
67,448
79.4%
18.3
Plantation
23
4,126
4.9%
0.9
Pompano Beach
20
46,314
46.4%
11.3
Pompano Beach
21
1,447
1.4%
2.0
Pompano Beach
22
52,084
52.2%
12.2
Riviera Beach
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Riviera Beach
20
28,156
86.7%
7.3
Riviera Beach
22
4,332
13.3%
2.9
Royal Palm Beach
18
14,734
43.2%
5.1
Royal Palm Beach
20
16,299
47.7%
5.6
Royal Palm Beach
21
3,107
9.1%
0.7
St. Petersburg
13
67,666
27.6%
19.0
Counties and Cities
Area%
20.6%
40.7%
59.3%
93.0%
7.0%
79.0%
21.0%
55.9%
44.1%
0.0%
100.0%
24.2%
75.8%
5.2%
34.5%
60.3%
17.9%
82.1%
35.7%
64.3%
37.2%
62.8%
48.4%
51.6%
20.8%
79.2%
99.5%
0.5%
52.1%
47.9%
57.7%
42.3%
20.3%
17.4%
62.2%
99.9%
0.1%
57.5%
9.0%
33.5%
100.0%
0.0%
12.3%
83.5%
4.2%
44.4%
7.7%
47.9%
0.4%
71.2%
28.4%
45.0%
49.1%
5.8%
13.8%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
St. Petersburg
14
177,103
72.4%
118.6
Sunrise
20
62,665
74.2%
9.4
Sunrise
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Sunrise
23
21,774
25.8%
8.9
Tampa
14
274,305
81.7%
128.2
Tampa
15
61,404
18.3%
47.1
Temple Terrace
14
13,608
55.5%
3.9
Temple Terrace
15
10,933
44.5%
3.2
West Palm Beach
18
20,693
20.7%
35.3
West Palm Beach
20
48,663
48.7%
15.5
West Palm Beach
22
30,563
30.6%
7.2
Wildwood
11
6,709
100.0%
27.9
Wildwood
12
0
0.0%
12.0
Wilton Manors
20
3,311
28.5%
0.6
Wilton Manors
22
8,321
71.5%
1.4
Winter Haven
9
33,851
99.9%
35.3
Winter Haven
17
23
0.1%
4.6
Area%
86.2%
51.5%
0.0%
48.4%
73.1%
26.9%
54.6%
45.4%
60.8%
26.8%
12.5%
69.9%
30.1%
29.9%
70.1%
88.4%
11.6%
Plan: H000C9001
Page 4 of 4
26
5
10
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
0
27
Scale bar for insets
Palmetto Bay
Cutler Bay
Oldsmar
14
16
Bradenton
Palmetto
St. Petersburg
Holmes Beach
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
Treasure Island
Pinellas Park
13 PINELLAS
Seminole
Largo
Clearwater
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
Temple Terrace
St. Leo
MANATEE
HILLSBOROUGH
Tampa
12
PASCO
Green Cove Springs
17
15
Plant City
Zephyrhills
10
St. Augustine
Dade City
ST. JOHNS
6
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
10
Ocoee
Apopka
5
Maitland
Kissimmee
Deltona
Oviedo
13
17
8
AD
BR
ALACHUA
O
LSB
17
15
Titusville
Oak Hill
DESOTO
HARDEE
POLK
LAKE
LEE
19
CHARLOTTE
10
5
9
6
DUVAL
PUTNAM
CLAY
4
MARION
SARASOTA
16
F
D
OR
GH
R OU
MANATEE
14
HIL
12
HERNANDO
CITRUS
11
PASCO
LEVY
BIA
VOLUSIA 6
7 SEMINOLE
St. Cloud
9
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
Winter Springs
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
LAKE
6-Dec-2011
*****
Workshop by House
Congressional
Subcommittee
8-Dec-2011
H000C9003
Orlando Area
Eustis
3
DIXIE
E
N
UNIO
BAKER
COLLIER
25
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
OSCEOLA
ORANGE
7
VOLUSIA
FLAGLER
10
26
8
MONROE
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
20
21
27
23
24
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
18
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Florida City
Homestead
MIAMI-DADE
Coral Gables
Miami
Miami Beach
24 North Miami
Aventura
Starke
CLAY
Orange Park
Jacksonville
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
LA
FA
YE
TT
E
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Doral
Hialeah
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
Dania Beach
Lawtey
3
DUVAL
GULF
HAMILTON
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
23
Oakland Park
Fort Lauderdale
Lauderhill
Pompano Beach
Baldwin
5
Miles
60
MADISON
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
Davie
Plantation
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Southwest Ranches
BROWARD
Sunrise
Tamarac
Deerfield Beach
4
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
R
Boca Raton
22
Delray Beach
NASSAU
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Parkland
21
Lantana
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
30
JACKSON
GILCHRIST
20
Wellington
Palm Springs
20
BAY
2
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
HNS
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
E
NN
Belle Glade
18
1
SANTA ROSA
A
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
A
ESC
COLU
M
South Florida
JO
ST.
OK
App. 101
App. 102
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
13.96%
11.77%
48.27%
9.64%
10.45%
9.78%
11.97%
11.74%
7.27%
4.64%
5.16%
24.61%
13.06%
5.83%
9.12%
10.98%
5.76%
50.21%
11.21%
10.16%
9.93%
55.73%
8.25%
10.02%
7.71%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
11
16
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
37.4%
62.6%
34.8%
65.2%
69.6%
30.4%
44.8%
55.2%
48.6%
51.4%
43.9%
56.1%
62.4%
37.6%
44.3%
55.7%
40.7%
59.3%
45.3%
54.7%
50.1%
49.9%
65.2%
34.8%
46.6%
53.4%
45.3%
54.7%
41.7%
58.3%
48.0%
52.0%
38.4%
61.6%
83.2%
16.8%
60.9%
39.1%
54.3%
45.7%
61.2%
38.8%
88.4%
11.6%
49.4%
50.6%
53.4%
46.6%
53.3%
46.7%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
10
17
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
41.8%
58.2%
36.4%
63.6%
65.4%
34.6%
45.4%
54.6%
48.4%
51.6%
43.1%
56.9%
56.0%
44.0%
43.3%
56.7%
42.1%
57.9%
45.6%
54.4%
50.2%
49.8%
63.0%
37.0%
45.9%
54.1%
46.1%
53.9%
41.2%
58.8%
49.1%
50.9%
36.5%
63.5%
80.0%
20.0%
63.0%
37.0%
54.4%
45.6%
60.9%
39.1%
86.5%
13.5%
42.2%
57.8%
49.9%
50.1%
48.4%
51.6%
0.40
0.37
0.46
0.58
0.53
0.10
0.34
0.59
0.23
0.52
0.44
0.51
0.42
0.35
0.37
0.53
0.42
0.52
0.54
0.26
0.49
0.29
0.17
0.27
0.47
0.47
0.18
0.46
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
34.0%
66.0%
28.3%
71.7%
60.9%
39.1%
37.4%
62.6%
36.1%
63.9%
34.7%
65.3%
47.1%
52.9%
34.6%
65.4%
33.8%
66.2%
33.6%
66.4%
37.0%
63.0%
51.6%
48.4%
35.7%
64.3%
34.3%
65.7%
32.8%
67.2%
36.4%
63.6%
27.6%
72.4%
75.1%
24.9%
51.6%
48.4%
41.6%
58.4%
52.2%
47.8%
84.4%
15.6%
35.5%
64.5%
42.3%
57.7%
39.5%
60.5%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2149.4
7643.5
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
0.34%
125
519
8,094
0.43%
60
354
1,509
1.07%
144
660
1,715
0.35%
107
360
3,076
0.89%
37
135
627
0.48%
95
297
1,614
2.30%
44
161
784
0.60%
74
266
1,882
0.35%
83
313
2,873
0.43%
56
166
1,029
0.27%
40
114
446
1.51%
43
146
545
0.82%
52
162
1,107
0.28%
60
178
1,193
0.45%
144
556
8,477
0.44%
69
220
1,993
0.42%
83
234
1,372
1.19%
74
347
2,096
0.65%
34
110
264
0.56%
52
188
369
1.16%
37
124
288
3.38%
17
58
110
1.68%
103
345
3,980
1.47%
184
551
4,900
2.23%
40
130
578
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
21
6
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
45.7%
54.3%
42.3%
57.7%
73.5%
26.5%
52.4%
47.6%
55.8%
44.2%
52.4%
47.6%
68.0%
32.0%
51.9%
48.1%
49.9%
50.1%
54.5%
45.5%
58.9%
41.1%
70.6%
29.4%
54.2%
45.8%
51.9%
48.1%
48.9%
51.1%
54.7%
45.3%
43.4%
56.6%
85.0%
15.0%
66.6%
33.4%
59.4%
40.6%
65.0%
35.0%
88.8%
11.2%
52.4%
47.6%
55.8%
44.2%
56.0%
44.0%
4.55%
4.75%
6.72%
6.66%
11.12%
7.17%
16.53%
8.77%
40.16%
12.55%
7.40%
11.29%
7.19%
23.92%
16.34%
8.76%
14.86%
12.06%
13.69%
18.55%
18.30%
17.58%
37.56%
33.15%
70.08%
68.91%
75.04%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.34
0.38
0.42
0.38
0.15
0.05
0.30
0.43
0.23
0.38
0.33
0.37
0.47
0.43
0.32
0.53
0.47
0.34
0.52
0.32
0.22
0.27
0.13
0.23
0.41
0.42
0.20
0.43
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
34.7%
65.3%
30.0%
70.0%
61.9%
38.1%
39.1%
60.9%
40.1%
59.9%
36.6%
63.4%
49.4%
50.6%
36.7%
63.3%
35.5%
64.5%
35.8%
64.2%
41.0%
59.0%
53.2%
46.8%
35.8%
64.2%
39.2%
60.8%
34.1%
65.9%
42.6%
57.4%
30.0%
70.0%
78.2%
21.8%
59.0%
41.0%
49.5%
50.5%
58.6%
41.4%
86.2%
13.8%
37.7%
62.3%
45.5%
54.5%
45.6%
54.4%
Convex
Hull
0.74
0.82
0.78
0.85
0.78
0.35
0.72
0.88
0.66
0.79
0.78
0.75
0.82
0.81
0.75
0.87
0.81
0.78
0.87
0.70
0.74
0.61
0.61
0.55
0.87
0.82
0.46
0.81
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
6
21
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
33.6%
66.4%
29.6%
70.4%
61.7%
38.3%
37.5%
62.5%
37.2%
62.8%
35.1%
64.9%
47.7%
52.3%
33.6%
66.4%
33.5%
66.5%
32.3%
67.7%
36.2%
63.8%
50.3%
49.7%
30.9%
69.1%
34.6%
65.4%
29.8%
70.2%
36.7%
63.3%
27.2%
72.8%
76.7%
23.3%
54.2%
45.8%
45.1%
54.9%
55.4%
44.6%
85.9%
14.1%
36.3%
63.7%
43.7%
56.3%
41.5%
58.5%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
18.0%
15.7%
47.0%
19.4%
20.9%
16.5%
28.8%
19.3%
15.3%
12.6%
14.7%
28.5%
17.0%
13.0%
14.3%
15.9%
9.3%
51.3%
19.2%
17.5%
23.0%
65.0%
16.6%
20.9%
17.7%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
20
66.3%
49.8%
59.3%
64.9%
34.8%
54.0%
56.0%
55.6%
47.4%
56.4%
54.4%
48.6%
42.5%
34.1%
50.1%
48.0%
54.3%
50.9%
60.5%
18.9%
36.0%
43.8%
37.4%
12.9%
59.7%
51.5%
55.1%
I_Cri
4
20.4%
28.7%
22.7%
19.4%
18.1%
26.6%
23.2%
27.9%
23.8%
24.3%
30.3%
38.8%
42.8%
37.4%
32.9%
39.0%
31.4%
33.2%
30.3%
29.8%
44.9%
38.7%
39.6%
22.1%
23.8%
27.6%
27.2%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
11
16
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
39.2%
60.8%
36.4%
63.6%
69.2%
30.8%
48.7%
51.3%
50.6%
49.4%
45.5%
54.5%
60.9%
39.1%
45.7%
54.3%
43.7%
56.3%
47.0%
53.0%
51.4%
48.6%
65.4%
34.6%
46.9%
53.1%
48.6%
51.4%
43.6%
56.4%
51.5%
48.5%
42.3%
57.7%
81.3%
18.7%
63.9%
36.1%
56.9%
43.1%
61.6%
38.4%
86.9%
13.1%
46.3%
53.7%
49.8%
50.2%
48.8%
51.2%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
39.6%
60.4%
30.0%
70.0%
58.1%
41.9%
46.0%
54.0%
39.4%
60.6%
43.4%
56.6%
46.1%
53.9%
38.3%
61.7%
40.8%
59.2%
43.0%
57.0%
45.2%
54.8%
56.0%
44.0%
39.8%
60.2%
42.5%
57.5%
39.9%
60.1%
48.0%
52.0%
33.3%
66.7%
75.7%
24.3%
65.3%
34.7%
54.9%
45.1%
62.3%
37.7%
81.6%
18.4%
38.5%
61.5%
47.1%
52.9%
44.5%
55.5%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
18
9
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
50.0%
50.0%
40.6%
59.4%
64.9%
35.1%
53.4%
46.6%
50.0%
50.0%
50.2%
49.8%
55.3%
44.7%
48.2%
51.8%
50.1%
49.9%
49.7%
50.3%
53.7%
46.3%
61.0%
39.0%
43.7%
56.3%
50.3%
49.7%
46.9%
53.1%
52.8%
47.2%
42.5%
57.5%
79.9%
20.1%
71.0%
29.0%
61.1%
38.9%
69.5%
30.5%
84.9%
15.1%
46.2%
53.8%
53.5%
46.5%
51.6%
48.4%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
40.9%
59.1%
30.3%
69.7%
57.3%
42.7%
45.7%
54.3%
38.2%
61.8%
42.5%
57.5%
45.9%
54.1%
38.7%
61.3%
42.5%
57.5%
42.7%
57.3%
47.1%
52.9%
55.3%
44.7%
39.0%
61.0%
46.1%
53.9%
40.9%
59.1%
50.7%
49.3%
35.3%
64.7%
76.7%
23.3%
68.0%
32.0%
57.6%
42.4%
64.2%
35.8%
81.2%
18.8%
40.7%
59.3%
48.5%
51.5%
47.7%
52.3%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
34.6%
65.4%
29.1%
70.9%
56.1%
43.9%
43.4%
56.6%
35.7%
64.3%
36.1%
63.9%
41.9%
58.1%
34.7%
65.3%
38.1%
61.9%
38.2%
61.8%
39.8%
60.2%
50.7%
49.3%
34.8%
65.2%
39.7%
60.3%
36.3%
63.7%
44.5%
55.5%
32.9%
67.1%
74.3%
25.7%
63.7%
36.3%
52.5%
47.5%
61.4%
38.6%
80.6%
19.4%
39.2%
60.8%
46.7%
53.3%
44.7%
55.3%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
11%
41
-13%
26
-17%
69
-17%
69
0%
410
18%
353
-48%
57
-49%
129
-52%
116
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
54.5%
45.5%
46.5%
53.5%
69.7%
30.3%
60.9%
39.1%
59.0%
41.0%
59.9%
40.1%
63.3%
36.7%
57.0%
43.0%
57.8%
42.2%
60.9%
39.1%
63.3%
36.7%
70.7%
29.3%
57.3%
42.7%
57.4%
42.6%
56.9%
43.1%
64.0%
36.0%
51.2%
48.8%
82.8%
17.2%
76.9%
23.1%
67.8%
32.2%
72.7%
27.3%
85.4%
14.6%
51.1%
48.9%
57.2%
42.8%
55.9%
44.1%
Plan: H000C9003
Page 2 of 4
App. 103
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
44.2%
32.9%
59.7%
38.3%
35.9%
35.6%
43.9%
36.6%
36.9%
35.3%
35.8%
50.5%
38.3%
32.8%
37.9%
37.5%
28.0%
65.3%
48.1%
41.3%
47.7%
69.8%
32.9%
35.8%
35.8%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
40.9%
30.8%
59.7%
36.5%
35.0%
34.1%
42.8%
35.5%
35.1%
33.8%
34.7%
49.5%
37.2%
32.1%
36.4%
36.4%
27.1%
65.8%
46.7%
40.5%
46.3%
69.3%
32.8%
35.6%
35.8%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
18.8%
21.2%
19.1%
25.4%
26.9%
23.6%
30.5%
23.9%
21.7%
26.2%
27.4%
25.2%
24.9%
24.4%
22.4%
25.6%
25.8%
21.1%
27.4%
27.5%
28.4%
20.5%
29.2%
29.3%
28.3%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
17.2%
19.9%
18.1%
24.3%
25.1%
21.5%
27.9%
22.4%
20.9%
24.8%
26.1%
23.5%
23.3%
23.5%
21.1%
24.6%
24.4%
20.4%
25.9%
25.9%
26.1%
19.4%
27.4%
27.4%
26.0%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
40.3%
47.9%
21.2%
38.0%
38.1%
42.3%
26.7%
40.6%
43.3%
40.0%
37.9%
25.3%
37.9%
43.5%
41.2%
38.0%
47.1%
13.2%
25.8%
32.0%
25.3%
10.2%
38.0%
35.2%
35.9%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
38.6%
47.2%
22.2%
37.3%
38.9%
42.9%
28.2%
41.0%
42.2%
39.9%
38.2%
26.1%
38.4%
43.6%
41.0%
37.9%
47.6%
14.3%
26.0%
32.8%
26.2%
10.8%
39.6%
36.8%
38.2%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
83.5%
79.3%
86.0%
82.3%
78.0%
81.2%
78.0%
80.8%
84.5%
74.9%
77.5%
83.5%
79.8%
81.2%
83.2%
81.1%
76.8%
84.4%
77.0%
79.2%
78.7%
85.7%
79.0%
80.8%
80.5%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
85.0%
80.5%
86.8%
83.0%
79.1%
82.5%
79.3%
81.8%
84.8%
75.9%
77.7%
84.1%
80.9%
81.0%
83.4%
81.6%
77.5%
84.4%
77.3%
79.8%
79.3%
85.8%
79.4%
81.0%
81.4%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
11.6%
4.0%
23.6%
3.7%
1.3%
2.9%
11.2%
3.7%
28.9%
4.1%
1.2%
2.4%
47.8%
6.8%
68.9%
5.8%
6.5%
5.1%
8.5%
4.4%
19.3%
5.3%
0.8%
2.4%
9.1%
13.0%
20.3%
16.8%
1.1%
6.8%
8.4%
6.1%
19.9%
7.7%
0.9%
3.5%
9.3%
36.3%
17.0%
42.1%
1.5%
19.1%
10.2%
8.6%
23.1%
11.0%
1.2%
4.5%
6.1%
4.9%
14.7%
6.9%
0.6%
2.8%
4.1%
7.6%
9.1%
9.7%
0.6%
4.7%
4.4%
3.9%
9.7%
5.0%
0.5%
2.3%
24.3%
14.4%
40.9%
14.0%
3.1%
10.5%
12.8%
9.7%
27.5%
11.3%
1.4%
5.8%
4.9%
3.6%
12.5%
4.9%
0.5%
1.9%
7.6%
7.7%
17.4%
9.7%
0.8%
4.2%
9.6%
6.3%
21.3%
7.8%
1.1%
3.9%
4.1%
6.4%
11.6%
9.5%
0.4%
3.3%
48.1%
10.8%
61.8%
8.3%
10.5%
14.1%
8.9%
11.6%
14.6%
11.2%
1.4%
8.8%
7.5%
9.1%
14.7%
10.0%
0.9%
6.3%
8.7%
26.9%
14.7%
23.4%
1.4%
27.8%
55.6%
22.9%
68.8%
15.5%
14.2%
48.0%
6.9%
57.7%
16.6%
52.3%
0.9%
58.6%
9.3%
57.3%
21.2%
45.3%
1.1%
66.2%
7.0%
60.5%
15.8%
48.3%
0.8%
71.0%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
11.3%
3.6%
21.7%
3.3%
1.3%
2.8%
11.6%
3.3%
28.5%
3.6%
1.3%
2.3%
45.5%
6.2%
66.3%
5.3%
6.3%
4.8%
8.4%
4.0%
18.2%
4.8%
0.9%
2.3%
8.8%
11.9%
19.4%
15.3%
1.2%
6.5%
7.9%
5.6%
18.3%
7.0%
0.9%
3.4%
9.3%
34.0%
16.8%
39.5%
1.5%
19.2%
9.7%
7.8%
21.7%
9.7%
1.2%
4.3%
5.9%
4.5%
13.5%
6.2%
0.7%
2.7%
3.8%
6.7%
8.2%
8.5%
0.6%
4.3%
4.0%
3.5%
8.7%
4.3%
0.5%
2.1%
23.9%
13.0%
39.8%
12.1%
3.3%
10.1%
12.1%
8.8%
25.6%
10.1%
1.4%
5.4%
4.7%
3.1%
11.6%
4.1%
0.6%
1.8%
7.1%
6.8%
15.7%
8.4%
0.8%
4.0%
8.9%
5.7%
19.4%
6.9%
1.0%
3.5%
3.7%
5.7%
10.3%
8.3%
0.4%
3.1%
45.9%
9.9%
59.3%
7.6%
10.4%
12.8%
7.8%
10.1%
12.6%
9.6%
1.4%
8.0%
7.1%
8.0%
13.7%
8.6%
0.9%
5.7%
8.1%
24.6%
13.4%
21.0%
1.4%
26.9%
56.2%
21.4%
69.1%
14.3%
15.3%
46.8%
6.9%
55.1%
16.7%
48.5%
0.9%
57.7%
9.5%
55.5%
21.4%
42.6%
1.1%
65.6%
7.0%
59.2%
16.0%
45.4%
0.8%
70.8%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
40.1%
30.3%
35.6%
32.5%
50.8%
17.2%
45.5%
21.0%
46.1%
21.3%
44.4%
25.8%
51.0%
15.9%
45.6%
22.5%
50.7%
25.0%
44.4%
25.7%
44.3%
23.2%
47.1%
20.3%
43.6%
23.7%
42.7%
24.5%
46.7%
23.9%
46.0%
23.6%
41.1%
26.0%
50.2%
18.4%
45.7%
20.6%
44.5%
23.3%
40.7%
28.6%
46.5%
23.7%
29.0%
41.5%
27.5%
43.5%
27.4%
45.6%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
38.0%
29.1%
34.5%
31.5%
50.4%
15.9%
44.7%
21.1%
45.3%
19.9%
43.2%
24.7%
49.7%
14.1%
45.2%
21.3%
49.8%
25.0%
43.5%
24.9%
44.1%
22.2%
48.0%
18.4%
43.1%
22.4%
43.3%
23.2%
46.0%
22.7%
44.7%
23.2%
40.6%
24.5%
50.3%
17.2%
45.2%
19.7%
44.3%
22.0%
40.2%
26.2%
47.0%
21.4%
29.7%
38.6%
28.1%
40.6%
28.6%
42.1%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
43.6%
45.4%
11.0%
30.7%
56.0%
13.3%
60.1%
28.9%
11.0%
36.7%
45.8%
17.5%
33.4%
49.3%
17.4%
33.0%
51.3%
15.6%
42.2%
39.2%
18.7%
33.4%
50.6%
16.0%
33.6%
50.6%
15.8%
33.2%
48.5%
18.4%
34.7%
46.1%
19.3%
50.7%
33.6%
15.7%
36.4%
47.6%
15.9%
30.8%
51.5%
17.7%
34.8%
50.5%
14.6%
34.9%
46.5%
18.6%
24.2%
58.2%
17.6%
70.1%
16.4%
13.5%
50.2%
29.8%
20.1%
40.8%
39.5%
19.7%
49.6%
31.3%
19.1%
76.5%
10.9%
12.6%
29.7%
51.0%
19.3%
35.3%
45.9%
18.8%
34.0%
47.6%
18.4%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
41.0%
43.6%
15.4%
30.6%
51.8%
17.6%
62.3%
22.8%
14.9%
36.6%
41.7%
21.7%
34.9%
42.0%
23.1%
33.9%
45.8%
20.4%
44.1%
29.9%
26.0%
35.1%
44.3%
20.7%
34.3%
47.3%
18.4%
33.7%
43.5%
22.8%
35.2%
41.1%
23.7%
51.1%
27.7%
21.3%
37.5%
41.3%
21.2%
32.0%
46.8%
21.2%
35.8%
45.5%
18.7%
36.3%
41.3%
22.4%
26.3%
51.8%
21.9%
69.8%
12.7%
17.5%
48.4%
26.9%
24.8%
41.4%
34.1%
24.6%
47.9%
26.6%
25.5%
73.2%
9.4%
17.4%
32.8%
41.4%
25.7%
36.1%
38.4%
25.5%
36.1%
38.6%
25.2%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
9.3%
2.2%
19.1%
1.8%
0.8%
1.9%
9.7%
2.1%
26.9%
2.2%
0.9%
1.7%
44.2%
3.5%
67.6%
3.0%
3.6%
3.1%
7.0%
2.5%
16.9%
3.1%
0.5%
1.6%
7.4%
7.4%
18.5%
9.8%
0.8%
4.5%
6.7%
3.7%
17.5%
4.7%
0.7%
2.5%
9.7%
21.7%
19.5%
28.3%
1.0%
11.8%
8.5%
4.4%
21.8%
5.7%
0.8%
2.8%
4.9%
2.5%
13.1%
3.6%
0.4%
1.7%
3.4%
4.2%
8.1%
5.2%
0.4%
3.2%
2.9%
2.1%
7.2%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
21.6%
7.7%
38.3%
7.1%
1.9%
7.0%
10.6%
5.0%
24.8%
5.6%
1.0%
3.6%
3.4%
1.7%
9.7%
2.3%
0.3%
1.1%
5.7%
3.4%
14.4%
4.5%
0.4%
2.3%
7.5%
3.4%
18.6%
4.2%
0.7%
2.5%
2.3%
2.8%
7.8%
4.5%
0.2%
1.9%
48.6%
6.2%
62.3%
4.4%
7.1%
9.9%
7.5%
6.2%
12.2%
5.3%
1.1%
6.1%
6.0%
5.1%
12.4%
5.2%
0.6%
4.3%
8.4%
20.3%
14.2%
14.9%
1.1%
25.5%
63.5%
15.4%
75.1%
9.0%
12.0%
46.1%
7.6%
48.9%
21.6%
37.7%
0.7%
54.0%
9.8%
51.4%
24.1%
32.8%
0.7%
64.2%
6.3%
56.7%
16.1%
35.5%
0.5%
70.9%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
11.6%
3.5%
24.4%
3.3%
1.0%
2.6%
11.4%
3.1%
30.6%
3.6%
1.0%
2.2%
50.2%
5.4%
71.7%
4.6%
5.1%
4.2%
8.6%
3.8%
20.0%
4.7%
0.6%
2.1%
9.1%
11.3%
21.1%
15.1%
0.9%
5.9%
8.4%
5.3%
20.8%
6.9%
0.8%
3.2%
10.3%
32.0%
19.0%
38.7%
1.3%
15.8%
10.4%
7.4%
24.7%
9.7%
1.0%
3.9%
6.1%
4.0%
15.5%
6.0%
0.5%
2.3%
4.3%
6.9%
9.8%
9.0%
0.5%
4.3%
4.3%
3.4%
9.9%
4.5%
0.4%
2.1%
24.9%
12.6%
42.1%
12.4%
2.4%
9.2%
13.4%
8.4%
29.3%
10.0%
1.2%
5.1%
4.8%
3.1%
12.7%
4.4%
0.4%
1.6%
7.8%
6.1%
18.9%
8.2%
0.6%
3.3%
9.8%
5.5%
22.6%
6.9%
0.9%
3.5%
3.9%
5.1%
12.0%
8.2%
0.3%
2.7%
52.3%
9.6%
65.2%
7.2%
9.2%
13.7%
9.6%
10.6%
15.8%
10.1%
1.3%
8.4%
7.8%
8.4%
15.5%
9.0%
0.8%
6.0%
9.4%
26.9%
15.8%
22.6%
1.3%
28.5%
59.7%
20.7%
71.8%
13.7%
12.9%
48.9%
7.7%
55.0%
19.1%
48.6%
0.8%
56.3%
9.7%
56.1%
22.5%
42.2%
0.9%
65.9%
7.1%
59.7%
16.3%
45.7%
0.6%
71.0%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
89.3%
84.8%
92.0%
89.0%
83.2%
86.5%
84.6%
86.1%
89.7%
79.2%
84.9%
89.8%
85.1%
87.4%
88.8%
86.5%
83.2%
89.8%
81.9%
84.7%
83.6%
90.5%
84.3%
86.9%
86.3%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
86.3%
82.1%
89.0%
85.1%
80.6%
83.7%
81.1%
83.2%
87.4%
77.0%
80.8%
86.3%
82.0%
84.6%
86.2%
83.6%
80.5%
87.1%
79.4%
81.8%
81.2%
88.0%
81.5%
83.8%
83.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
35.7%
40.9%
31.4%
45.5%
51.6%
25.7%
46.2%
29.1%
44.3%
30.2%
42.7%
34.8%
55.0%
21.3%
43.4%
31.8%
49.5%
34.0%
41.1%
36.3%
42.6%
33.4%
46.8%
30.5%
41.1%
34.9%
41.1%
34.6%
45.5%
34.0%
43.7%
34.5%
38.0%
39.3%
50.0%
26.2%
43.1%
29.4%
41.8%
33.5%
36.3%
39.5%
44.3%
32.6%
22.9%
56.4%
22.5%
57.4%
21.3%
59.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
38.2%
31.8%
34.7%
35.6%
52.8%
17.6%
46.2%
23.6%
46.7%
22.0%
43.9%
27.3%
53.4%
14.7%
46.0%
23.4%
51.4%
27.2%
44.1%
27.5%
46.0%
24.5%
50.5%
20.2%
44.5%
24.8%
45.2%
24.6%
48.2%
24.9%
45.7%
25.9%
42.5%
27.5%
52.3%
18.1%
46.1%
21.2%
44.7%
24.3%
40.2%
28.2%
48.5%
22.3%
29.0%
42.4%
27.2%
45.0%
27.7%
46.0%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
16.9%
0.8%
1.3%
22.3%
1.3%
1.3%
66.0%
1.9%
2.0%
16.5%
2.2%
1.2%
16.0%
6.7%
3.2%
16.3%
3.3%
2.0%
16.4%
20.2%
8.0%
19.6%
3.6%
2.0%
12.3%
2.1%
1.2%
6.5%
3.1%
2.3%
5.8%
1.9%
1.2%
36.5%
3.9%
4.9%
20.9%
2.9%
2.5%
9.5%
1.4%
0.9%
12.3%
2.8%
1.7%
17.9%
2.7%
1.8%
6.9%
2.6%
1.4%
61.7%
2.7%
8.0%
10.0%
2.8%
4.8%
11.1%
3.1%
3.3%
13.7%
9.6%
24.8%
79.2%
5.3%
44.0%
23.7%
31.4%
52.8%
25.5%
22.7%
63.6%
15.6%
29.2%
74.3%
Plan: H000C9003
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Brevard
Brevard
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Duval
Hendry
Hendry
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Indian River
Indian River
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Osceola
Osceola
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
App. 104
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
203,021
82.1%
720.9
5
44,315
17.9%
247.9
8
533,973
98.3%
1,215.7
17
9,403
1.7%
341.3
20
455,445
26.1%
535.5
21
272,224
15.6%
70.9
22
294,581
16.9%
130.1
23
498,411
28.5%
188.9
24
136,412
7.8%
24.0
25
90,993
5.2%
373.5
3
172,269
90.3%
576.5
5
18,596
9.7%
67.1
19
160,728
50.0%
338.0
25
160,792
50.0%
1,967.0
3
27,776
3.2%
87.3
4
568,144
65.7%
699.6
5
268,343
31.0%
131.5
20
13,550
34.6%
55.7
25
25,590
65.4%
1,134.3
12
167,520
13.6%
111.7
14
540,275
44.0%
432.3
15
521,431
42.4%
721.8
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
8
91,796
66.5%
189.0
17
46,232
33.5%
428.0
5
17,490
5.9%
312.1
10
279,562
94.1%
844.8
17
83,137
13.4%
178.2
19
535,617
86.6%
1,034.3
2
4,028
21.0%
337.4
3
15,196
79.0%
378.3
16
316,897
98.2%
467.4
17
5,936
1.8%
425.3
5
15,015
4.5%
407.3
11
316,283
95.5%
1,255.3
23
197,933
7.9%
99.3
24
559,932
22.4%
86.2
25
418,970
16.8%
505.4
26
623,255
25.0%
1,162.5
27
696,345
27.9%
577.7
17
34,658
86.7%
786.4
18
5,338
13.3%
105.5
5
299,709
26.2%
207.6
7
203,044
17.7%
130.4
8
70,576
6.2%
209.7
9
379,876
33.1%
262.9
10
192,751
16.8%
192.6
9
241,786
90.0%
360.1
17
26,899
10.0%
1,145.8
18
266,900
20.2%
446.6
20
227,350
17.2%
1,504.3
21
424,120
32.1%
193.0
22
401,764
30.4%
239.0
12
64,128
7.0%
48.5
Area%
74.4%
25.6%
78.1%
21.9%
40.5%
5.4%
9.8%
14.3%
1.8%
28.2%
89.6%
10.4%
14.7%
85.3%
9.5%
76.2%
14.3%
4.7%
95.3%
8.8%
34.2%
57.0%
79.5%
20.5%
30.6%
69.4%
27.0%
73.0%
14.7%
85.3%
47.1%
52.9%
52.4%
47.6%
24.5%
75.5%
4.1%
3.5%
20.8%
47.8%
23.8%
88.2%
11.8%
20.7%
13.0%
20.9%
26.2%
19.2%
23.9%
76.1%
18.7%
63.1%
8.1%
10.0%
8.0%
Area%
73.4%
18.6%
8.0%
25.9%
19.2%
46.9%
41.3%
58.7%
10.2%
89.8%
55.9%
44.1%
89.5%
10.5%
Area%
97.5%
2.5%
37.1%
62.9%
19.1%
80.9%
4.7%
95.3%
63.3%
36.7%
1.0%
99.0%
24.6%
57.3%
18.2%
49.4%
50.6%
99.8%
0.2%
3.2%
96.8%
34.8%
64.8%
0.4%
23.5%
76.5%
66.6%
33.4%
92.8%
7.2%
49.0%
51.0%
64.5%
35.5%
72.4%
27.6%
86.5%
13.5%
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
13
696,344
76.0%
446.5
14
156,070
17.0%
113.2
9
74,682
12.4%
161.2
10
196,660
32.7%
520.7
15
174,914
29.1%
385.5
17
155,839
25.9%
943.1
5
32,877
44.2%
341.3
6
41,487
55.8%
485.7
4
54,887
28.9%
83.4
6
135,152
71.1%
738.1
10
27,372
29.3%
324.1
11
66,048
70.7%
255.8
6
424,010
85.7%
1,281.5
7
70,583
14.3%
150.9
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Auburndale
10
13,507
100.0%
19.9
Auburndale
17
0
0.0%
0.5
Bartow
15
12,714
73.5%
19.4
Bartow
17
4,584
26.5%
32.9
Boynton Beach
20
19,978
29.3%
3.2
Boynton Beach
22
48,239
70.7%
13.4
Coconut Creek
20
433
0.8%
0.6
Coconut Creek
21
52,476
99.2%
11.4
Coleman
10
691
98.3%
1.7
Coleman
11
12
1.7%
1.0
Cutler Bay
26
0
0.0%
0.1
Cutler Bay
27
40,286
100.0%
10.1
Deerfield Beach
20
26,242
35.0%
4.0
Deerfield Beach
21
33,897
45.2%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Deltona
6
41,027
48.2%
20.3
Deltona
7
44,155
51.8%
20.8
Doral
25
45,704
100.0%
15.2
Doral
27
0
0.0%
0.0
Dundee
10
155
4.2%
0.4
Dundee
17
3,562
95.8%
11.1
Fort Lauderdale
20
60,588
36.6%
13.4
Fort Lauderdale
22
104,933
63.4%
25.0
Fort Lauderdale
23
0
0.0%
0.2
Fort Meade
15
1,208
21.5%
1.2
Fort Meade
17
4,418
78.5%
4.0
Gainesville
3
93,101
74.9%
41.6
Gainesville
5
31,253
25.1%
20.8
Glen Ridge
20
219
100.0%
0.2
Glen Ridge
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Gulfport
13
5,509
45.8%
1.9
Gulfport
14
6,520
54.2%
2.0
Hallandale Beach
23
25,370
68.4%
3.0
Hallandale Beach
24
11,743
31.6%
1.6
Hialeah
25
162,856
72.5%
16.5
Hialeah
27
61,813
27.5%
6.3
Hollywood
23
114,568
81.4%
26.6
Hollywood
24
26,200
18.6%
4.1
County
Pinellas
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
Polk
Polk
Putnam
Putnam
St. Johns
St. Johns
Sumter
Sumter
Volusia
Volusia
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Homestead
26
42,640
70.5%
7.0
Homestead
27
17,872
29.5%
8.6
Jacksonville
3
27,776
3.4%
87.3
Jacksonville
4
525,665
64.0%
655.8
Jacksonville
5
268,343
32.7%
131.5
Lake Hamilton
10
68
5.5%
1.0
Lake Hamilton
17
1,163
94.5%
3.2
Lake Park
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Lake Park
20
7,242
88.8%
2.1
Lake Park
22
913
11.2%
0.3
Lake Worth
20
10,654
30.5%
1.6
Lake Worth
22
24,256
69.5%
5.0
Lakeland
10
33,694
34.6%
33.5
Lakeland
15
63,728
65.4%
40.8
Lantana
20
4,654
44.7%
1.2
Lantana
22
5,769
55.3%
1.7
Loxahatchee Groves 18
1,681
52.9%
7.0
Loxahatchee Groves 20
1,499
47.1%
5.5
Margate
20
14,535
27.3%
2.2
Margate
21
38,749
72.7%
6.9
Miami
23
15,273
3.8%
2.9
Miami
24
133,006
33.3%
19.4
Miami
27
251,178
62.9%
33.8
Miami Shores
23
0
0.0%
0.7
Miami Shores
24
10,493
100.0%
3.1
Miramar
24
65,355
53.6%
11.2
Miramar
25
56,686
46.4%
20.1
North Miami
23
9,175
15.6%
4.8
North Miami
24
49,611
84.4%
5.2
North Miami Beach 23
6,953
16.7%
1.1
North Miami Beach 24
34,570
83.3%
4.3
North Palm Beach
18
12,015
100.0%
5.8
North Palm Beach
20
0
0.0%
0.0
Oakland Park
20
20,289
49.1%
4.2
Oakland Park
22
21,074
50.9%
3.9
Oldsmar
12
5,101
37.5%
5.7
Oldsmar
13
8,490
62.5%
3.9
Opa-locka
24
14,894
97.9%
2.6
Opa-locka
25
325
2.1%
1.9
Orange City
6
9,811
92.6%
6.5
Orange City
7
788
7.4%
0.7
Orange Park
3
4,251
50.5%
1.5
Orange Park
5
4,161
49.5%
3.8
Orlando
5
77,843
32.7%
22.6
Orlando
7
30,467
12.8%
12.0
Orlando
9
102,331
42.9%
68.9
Orlando
10
27,659
11.6%
7.2
Palm Beach Gardens 18
48,452
100.0%
55.3
Palm Beach Gardens 20
0
0.0%
0.1
Pembroke Pines
23
107,607
69.5%
20.0
Pembroke Pines
24
12,856
8.3%
3.1
Pembroke Pines
25
34,287
22.2%
11.7
Plantation
20
13,381
15.8%
2.7
Plantation
22
67,448
79.4%
18.3
Plantation
23
4,126
4.9%
0.9
Counties and Cities
Area%
44.8%
55.2%
10.0%
75.0%
15.0%
23.1%
76.9%
0.2%
88.9%
10.9%
24.5%
75.5%
45.1%
54.9%
40.7%
59.3%
55.9%
44.1%
24.2%
75.8%
5.2%
34.5%
60.3%
17.9%
82.1%
35.7%
64.3%
48.4%
51.6%
20.8%
79.2%
99.5%
0.5%
52.1%
47.9%
59.4%
40.6%
57.7%
42.3%
90.9%
9.1%
28.9%
71.1%
20.4%
10.8%
62.2%
6.5%
99.9%
0.1%
57.5%
9.0%
33.5%
12.3%
83.5%
4.2%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Pompano Beach
20
46,314
46.4%
11.3
Pompano Beach
21
1,447
1.4%
2.0
Pompano Beach
22
52,084
52.2%
12.2
Riviera Beach
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Riviera Beach
20
28,156
86.7%
7.3
Riviera Beach
22
4,332
13.3%
2.9
Rockledge
8
24,926
100.0%
13.4
Rockledge
17
0
0.0%
0.0
Royal Palm Beach
18
14,734
43.2%
5.1
Royal Palm Beach
20
16,299
47.7%
5.6
Royal Palm Beach
21
3,107
9.1%
0.7
St. Cloud
9
27,108
77.0%
11.0
St. Cloud
17
8,075
23.0%
6.8
St. Petersburg
13
96,485
39.4%
40.9
St. Petersburg
14
148,284
60.6%
96.7
Sunrise
20
62,665
74.2%
9.4
Sunrise
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Sunrise
23
21,774
25.8%
8.9
Tampa
12
7,411
2.2%
2.4
Tampa
14
281,381
83.8%
143.2
Tampa
15
46,917
14.0%
29.7
Tarpon Springs
12
2,498
10.6%
1.8
Tarpon Springs
13
20,986
89.4%
15.5
Temple Terrace
14
0
0.0%
0.0
Temple Terrace
15
24,541
100.0%
7.1
Vero Beach
8
14,999
98.5%
13.3
Vero Beach
17
221
1.5%
0.0
West Palm Beach
18
20,693
20.7%
35.3
West Palm Beach
20
48,663
48.7%
15.5
West Palm Beach
22
30,563
30.6%
7.2
Wildwood
10
709
10.6%
31.1
Wildwood
11
6,000
89.4%
8.8
Wilton Manors
20
3,311
28.5%
0.6
Wilton Manors
22
8,321
71.5%
1.4
Winter Haven
10
16,513
48.7%
19.1
Winter Haven
17
17,361
51.3%
20.8
Area%
44.4%
7.7%
47.9%
0.4%
71.2%
28.4%
99.7%
0.3%
45.0%
49.1%
5.8%
61.8%
38.2%
29.7%
70.3%
51.5%
0.0%
48.4%
1.4%
81.7%
16.9%
10.3%
89.7%
0.1%
99.9%
99.8%
0.2%
60.8%
26.8%
12.5%
77.9%
22.1%
29.9%
70.1%
47.9%
52.1%
Plan: H000C9003
Page 4 of 4
26
5
10
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
0
Scale bar for insets
27
Oldsmar
14
Bradenton
16 Palmetto
St. Petersburg
Holmes Beach
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
Treasure Island
Pinellas Park
13 PINELLAS
Seminole
Largo
Clearwater
Dunedin
Tampa
MANATEE
Plant City
Zephyrhills
Eustis
9
Ocoee
Apopka
5
Maitland
Winter Springs
Kissimmee
7 Oviedo
St. Cloud
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
Deltona
SEMINOLE
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
LAKE
6-Dec-2011
*****
Workshop by House
Congressional
Subcommittee
8-Dec-2011
H000C9005
Orlando Area
17 10
9
11
St. Augustine
Dade City
HILLSBOROUGH
15
Temple Terrace
PASCO
12
St. Leo
ST. JOHNS
DIXIE
E
8
6
VOLUSIA
13
OR O
LSB
Titusville
Oak Hill
11
15
DESOTO
17
HARDEE
POLK
9
10
LAKE
5
19
CHARLOTTE
LEE
DUVAL
PUTNAM
CLAY
MARION
UGH
F
D
OR
SARASOTA
16
MANATEE
14
HIL
12
HERNANDO
CITRUS
PASCO
LEVY
ALACHUA
AD
BR
N
UNIO
BAKER
4
OSCEOLA
ORANGE
7
VOLUSIA
COLLIER
25
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
6
FLAGLER
10
26
8
MONROE
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
20
21
27
23
24
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
18
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Florida City
Homestead
Cutler Bay
Palmetto Bay
Coral Gables
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
Green Cove Springs
4
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
E
MIAMI-DADE
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Miami
Miami Beach
24 North Miami
Aventura
Starke
CLAY
Orange Park
Jacksonville
GULF
LA
FA
YE
TT
3
HAMILTON
R
Doral
Hialeah
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
Dania Beach
Lawtey
DUVAL
5
Miles
60
MADISON
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
23
Fort Lauderdale
Lauderhill
Oakland Park
Pompano Beach
3
Baldwin
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
Davie
Plantation
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Southwest Ranches
BROWARD
Sunrise
Tamarac
Coral Springs
Boca Raton
22
Delray Beach
NASSAU
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
E
SUMT
Deerfield Beach
21
Lantana
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
30
2
JACKSON
GILCHRIST
Parkland
Wellington
Palm Springs
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
S
20
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
E
NN
Belle Glade
18
1
SANTA ROSA
A
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
South Florida
BIA
COLU
M
A
ESC
N
JOH
ST.
OK
App. 105
App. 106
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
14.43%
10.87%
48.10%
10.08%
10.71%
9.19%
13.80%
10.82%
8.75%
4.30%
5.12%
24.58%
11.14%
5.80%
9.50%
10.98%
5.76%
50.21%
11.21%
10.16%
9.93%
55.73%
8.25%
10.02%
7.71%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
12
15
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
35.6%
64.4%
35.6%
64.4%
69.7%
30.3%
47.2%
52.8%
50.0%
50.0%
43.8%
56.2%
56.1%
43.9%
48.6%
51.4%
38.9%
61.1%
46.0%
54.0%
50.0%
50.0%
65.2%
34.8%
46.3%
53.7%
45.3%
54.7%
41.7%
58.3%
48.0%
52.0%
38.4%
61.6%
83.2%
16.8%
60.9%
39.1%
54.3%
45.7%
61.2%
38.8%
88.4%
11.6%
49.4%
50.6%
53.4%
46.6%
53.3%
46.7%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
9
18
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
38.9%
61.1%
37.4%
62.6%
65.4%
34.6%
46.9%
53.1%
49.5%
50.5%
43.1%
56.9%
49.5%
50.5%
46.7%
53.3%
41.8%
58.2%
45.6%
54.4%
50.2%
49.8%
63.0%
37.0%
46.3%
53.7%
46.0%
54.0%
41.7%
58.3%
49.1%
50.9%
36.5%
63.5%
80.0%
20.0%
63.0%
37.0%
54.4%
45.6%
60.9%
39.1%
86.5%
13.5%
42.2%
57.8%
49.9%
50.1%
48.4%
51.6%
0.39
0.37
0.46
0.42
0.38
0.10
0.28
0.64
0.32
0.40
0.43
0.41
0.57
0.35
0.38
0.38
0.48
0.61
0.54
0.26
0.49
0.29
0.17
0.27
0.47
0.47
0.18
0.46
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
31.6%
68.4%
28.8%
71.2%
60.9%
39.1%
38.8%
61.2%
37.0%
63.0%
34.5%
65.5%
43.0%
57.0%
36.5%
63.5%
33.9%
66.1%
34.6%
65.4%
36.9%
63.1%
51.6%
48.4%
34.2%
65.8%
34.3%
65.7%
33.6%
66.4%
36.4%
63.6%
27.6%
72.4%
75.1%
24.9%
51.6%
48.4%
41.6%
58.4%
52.2%
47.8%
84.4%
15.6%
35.5%
64.5%
42.3%
57.7%
39.5%
60.5%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2219.5
7791.8
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
0.35%
135
592
6,070
0.42%
66
239
1,303
1.07%
144
645
1,704
0.47%
115
385
2,900
1.01%
30
125
444
0.49%
91
304
2,063
1.61%
86
316
2,344
1.06%
58
216
1,108
0.33%
133
474
5,691
0.38%
57
206
1,448
0.27%
40
114
447
1.51%
43
139
546
0.86%
60
193
1,101
0.27%
60
173
1,350
0.46%
116
417
6,453
0.44%
69
220
1,993
0.42%
83
234
1,372
1.19%
74
347
2,096
0.65%
34
110
264
0.56%
52
188
369
1.16%
37
124
288
3.38%
17
58
110
1.68%
103
345
3,980
1.47%
184
551
4,900
2.23%
40
130
578
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
21
6
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
43.8%
56.2%
42.9%
57.1%
73.6%
26.4%
55.2%
44.8%
57.0%
43.0%
52.0%
48.0%
62.6%
37.4%
55.5%
44.5%
47.9%
52.1%
55.5%
44.5%
58.8%
41.2%
70.6%
29.4%
54.2%
45.8%
51.9%
48.1%
48.8%
51.2%
54.7%
45.3%
43.4%
56.6%
85.0%
15.0%
66.6%
33.4%
59.4%
40.6%
65.0%
35.0%
88.8%
11.2%
52.4%
47.6%
55.8%
44.2%
56.0%
44.0%
4.55%
4.75%
6.34%
6.87%
11.13%
8.68%
18.66%
9.72%
28.64%
20.77%
6.90%
9.25%
7.18%
23.89%
17.72%
8.80%
14.63%
12.06%
13.69%
18.55%
18.30%
17.58%
37.56%
33.15%
70.08%
68.91%
75.04%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.33
0.38
0.42
0.22
0.29
0.05
0.25
0.36
0.28
0.29
0.30
0.32
0.43
0.43
0.36
0.37
0.57
0.47
0.52
0.32
0.22
0.27
0.13
0.23
0.41
0.42
0.20
0.43
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
32.7%
67.3%
30.2%
69.8%
61.9%
38.1%
40.8%
59.2%
41.0%
59.0%
36.5%
63.5%
43.6%
56.4%
39.5%
60.5%
35.2%
64.8%
36.9%
63.1%
41.0%
59.0%
53.2%
46.8%
35.0%
65.0%
39.2%
60.8%
34.3%
65.7%
42.6%
57.4%
30.0%
70.0%
78.2%
21.8%
59.0%
41.0%
49.5%
50.5%
58.6%
41.4%
86.2%
13.8%
37.7%
62.3%
45.5%
54.5%
45.6%
54.4%
Convex
Hull
0.73
0.82
0.78
0.73
0.84
0.35
0.73
0.83
0.69
0.70
0.78
0.78
0.77
0.81
0.76
0.75
0.87
0.80
0.87
0.70
0.74
0.61
0.61
0.55
0.87
0.82
0.46
0.81
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
6
21
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
31.8%
68.2%
29.8%
70.2%
61.7%
38.3%
38.9%
61.1%
38.2%
61.8%
34.7%
65.3%
39.7%
60.3%
37.4%
62.6%
33.7%
66.3%
33.3%
66.7%
36.2%
63.8%
50.3%
49.7%
31.3%
68.7%
34.6%
65.4%
29.4%
70.6%
36.7%
63.3%
27.2%
72.8%
76.7%
23.3%
54.2%
45.8%
45.1%
54.9%
55.4%
44.6%
85.9%
14.1%
36.3%
63.7%
43.7%
56.3%
41.5%
58.5%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
17.4%
15.1%
47.0%
20.8%
21.6%
16.1%
24.2%
21.7%
16.3%
13.0%
14.7%
28.5%
15.2%
13.0%
14.7%
15.9%
9.3%
51.3%
19.2%
17.5%
23.0%
65.0%
16.6%
20.9%
17.7%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
20
66.3%
49.8%
61.6%
64.1%
34.8%
52.5%
55.3%
55.9%
48.3%
56.2%
56.6%
47.3%
42.5%
34.1%
50.7%
48.0%
53.1%
50.9%
60.5%
18.9%
36.0%
43.8%
37.4%
12.9%
59.7%
51.5%
55.1%
I_Cri
4
20.4%
28.7%
21.1%
20.8%
18.2%
26.8%
23.2%
28.0%
27.5%
22.0%
27.2%
39.8%
42.7%
37.4%
34.0%
39.0%
32.3%
33.2%
30.3%
29.8%
44.9%
38.7%
39.6%
22.1%
23.8%
27.6%
27.2%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
12
15
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
37.3%
62.7%
37.6%
62.4%
69.2%
30.8%
50.6%
49.4%
51.6%
48.4%
45.5%
54.5%
54.9%
45.1%
49.5%
50.5%
41.8%
58.2%
47.9%
52.1%
51.4%
48.6%
65.4%
34.6%
46.7%
53.3%
48.6%
51.4%
43.6%
56.4%
51.5%
48.5%
42.3%
57.7%
81.3%
18.7%
63.9%
36.1%
56.9%
43.1%
61.6%
38.4%
86.9%
13.1%
46.3%
53.7%
49.8%
50.2%
48.8%
51.2%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
36.2%
63.8%
31.3%
68.7%
58.1%
41.9%
47.3%
52.7%
39.8%
60.2%
43.1%
56.9%
44.3%
55.7%
38.9%
61.1%
40.3%
59.7%
44.1%
55.9%
45.2%
54.8%
56.0%
44.0%
39.8%
60.2%
42.5%
57.5%
40.0%
60.0%
48.0%
52.0%
33.3%
66.7%
75.7%
24.3%
65.3%
34.7%
54.9%
45.1%
62.3%
37.7%
81.6%
18.4%
38.5%
61.5%
47.1%
52.9%
44.5%
55.5%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
19
8
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
46.0%
54.0%
41.8%
58.2%
64.9%
35.1%
54.5%
45.5%
50.4%
49.6%
49.9%
50.1%
51.3%
48.7%
50.2%
49.8%
50.3%
49.7%
51.4%
48.6%
53.7%
46.3%
61.0%
39.0%
43.9%
56.1%
50.3%
49.7%
46.7%
53.3%
52.8%
47.2%
42.5%
57.5%
79.9%
20.1%
71.0%
29.0%
61.1%
38.9%
69.5%
30.5%
84.9%
15.1%
46.2%
53.8%
53.5%
46.5%
51.6%
48.4%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
37.2%
62.8%
31.5%
68.5%
57.4%
42.6%
46.7%
53.3%
38.6%
61.4%
42.5%
57.5%
44.5%
55.5%
39.2%
60.8%
42.1%
57.9%
44.4%
55.6%
47.0%
53.0%
55.3%
44.7%
38.6%
61.4%
46.1%
53.9%
40.8%
59.2%
50.7%
49.3%
35.3%
64.7%
76.7%
23.3%
68.0%
32.0%
57.6%
42.4%
64.2%
35.8%
81.2%
18.8%
40.7%
59.3%
48.5%
51.5%
47.7%
52.3%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
32.5%
67.5%
30.3%
69.7%
56.1%
43.9%
43.9%
56.1%
36.1%
63.9%
36.1%
63.9%
39.5%
60.5%
35.6%
64.4%
36.9%
63.1%
39.9%
60.1%
39.8%
60.2%
50.7%
49.3%
34.7%
65.3%
39.7%
60.3%
36.3%
63.7%
44.5%
55.5%
32.9%
67.1%
74.3%
25.7%
63.7%
36.3%
52.5%
47.5%
61.4%
38.6%
80.6%
19.4%
39.2%
60.8%
46.7%
53.3%
44.7%
55.3%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
22%
45
-27%
22
-28%
60
-28%
60
0%
410
20%
360
-55%
50
-55%
114
-58%
103
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
51.0%
49.0%
47.5%
52.5%
69.7%
30.3%
62.9%
37.1%
59.5%
40.5%
59.6%
40.4%
60.2%
39.8%
58.5%
41.5%
57.0%
43.0%
61.4%
38.6%
63.3%
36.7%
70.8%
29.2%
58.3%
41.7%
57.3%
42.7%
56.7%
43.3%
64.0%
36.0%
51.2%
48.8%
82.8%
17.2%
76.9%
23.1%
67.8%
32.2%
72.7%
27.3%
85.4%
14.6%
51.1%
48.9%
57.2%
42.8%
55.9%
44.1%
Plan: H000C9005
Page 2 of 4
App. 107
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
41.2%
31.8%
59.6%
39.9%
36.6%
34.9%
43.1%
37.2%
38.9%
36.1%
35.7%
50.5%
36.8%
32.8%
38.8%
37.5%
28.0%
65.3%
48.1%
41.3%
47.7%
69.8%
32.9%
35.8%
35.8%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
38.4%
30.2%
59.7%
38.3%
35.7%
33.4%
42.2%
36.3%
36.3%
34.5%
34.7%
49.5%
35.9%
32.1%
37.1%
36.4%
27.1%
65.8%
46.7%
40.5%
46.3%
69.3%
32.8%
35.6%
35.8%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
18.7%
22.1%
19.1%
26.0%
27.1%
24.1%
27.4%
26.0%
20.4%
25.8%
27.4%
25.2%
26.0%
24.5%
21.8%
25.6%
25.8%
21.1%
27.4%
27.5%
28.4%
20.5%
29.2%
29.3%
28.3%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
17.1%
20.9%
18.2%
24.8%
25.2%
22.0%
25.2%
24.0%
19.7%
24.4%
26.1%
23.5%
24.4%
23.5%
20.5%
24.6%
24.4%
20.4%
25.9%
25.9%
26.1%
19.4%
27.4%
27.4%
26.0%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
42.9%
47.7%
21.2%
35.7%
37.2%
42.5%
30.4%
37.7%
43.3%
39.7%
37.9%
25.3%
38.2%
43.4%
41.2%
38.0%
47.1%
13.2%
25.8%
32.0%
25.3%
10.2%
38.0%
35.2%
35.9%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
41.7%
47.3%
22.2%
35.3%
38.2%
43.1%
31.7%
38.7%
41.4%
39.5%
38.2%
26.1%
38.8%
43.6%
40.7%
37.9%
47.6%
14.3%
26.0%
32.8%
26.2%
10.8%
39.6%
36.8%
38.2%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
83.2%
78.8%
86.0%
82.2%
77.9%
80.6%
80.7%
79.2%
85.3%
77.4%
77.5%
83.5%
77.7%
81.2%
83.5%
81.1%
76.8%
84.4%
77.0%
79.2%
78.7%
85.7%
79.0%
80.8%
80.5%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
84.5%
79.9%
86.8%
82.8%
79.0%
81.7%
82.0%
80.4%
85.7%
78.3%
77.7%
84.1%
78.7%
81.0%
83.9%
81.6%
77.5%
84.4%
77.3%
79.8%
79.3%
85.8%
79.4%
81.0%
81.4%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
12.4%
3.8%
26.9%
3.7%
1.3%
2.6%
10.0%
3.8%
26.0%
4.4%
1.1%
2.5%
47.6%
6.8%
68.6%
5.8%
6.5%
5.1%
9.1%
5.9%
19.5%
7.2%
0.9%
3.1%
9.3%
15.0%
20.4%
19.2%
1.1%
7.7%
7.9%
6.6%
19.0%
8.5%
0.9%
3.7%
11.6%
25.7%
22.2%
30.1%
1.5%
12.4%
9.4%
16.0%
20.4%
21.1%
1.3%
7.3%
6.9%
4.1%
16.3%
5.3%
0.7%
2.5%
3.7%
6.4%
8.4%
8.7%
0.5%
3.8%
4.3%
3.9%
9.7%
5.0%
0.5%
2.3%
24.2%
14.4%
40.8%
14.0%
3.1%
10.5%
10.7%
10.9%
23.1%
13.0%
1.3%
6.6%
4.9%
3.6%
12.5%
4.9%
0.5%
1.9%
8.2%
7.4%
18.5%
9.0%
0.8%
4.2%
9.6%
6.3%
21.3%
7.8%
1.1%
3.9%
4.1%
6.4%
11.6%
9.5%
0.4%
3.3%
48.1%
10.8%
61.8%
8.3%
10.5%
14.1%
8.9%
11.6%
14.6%
11.2%
1.4%
8.8%
7.5%
9.1%
14.7%
10.0%
0.9%
6.3%
8.7%
26.9%
14.7%
23.4%
1.4%
27.8%
55.6%
22.9%
68.8%
15.5%
14.2%
48.0%
6.9%
57.7%
16.6%
52.3%
0.9%
58.6%
9.3%
57.3%
21.2%
45.3%
1.1%
66.2%
7.0%
60.5%
15.8%
48.3%
0.8%
71.0%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
12.5%
3.4%
25.7%
3.2%
1.4%
2.5%
10.0%
3.5%
25.2%
3.9%
1.1%
2.4%
45.4%
6.2%
66.1%
5.3%
6.3%
4.8%
8.8%
5.4%
18.3%
6.5%
0.9%
3.0%
9.0%
13.8%
19.4%
17.7%
1.2%
7.4%
7.4%
6.1%
17.4%
7.8%
0.9%
3.6%
11.1%
23.7%
21.0%
27.7%
1.5%
12.3%
9.2%
14.3%
19.8%
18.7%
1.3%
6.9%
6.8%
3.7%
15.0%
4.6%
0.8%
2.4%
3.5%
5.8%
7.6%
7.7%
0.5%
3.6%
4.0%
3.5%
8.6%
4.3%
0.5%
2.1%
23.8%
13.0%
39.7%
12.1%
3.3%
10.1%
9.9%
9.8%
21.2%
11.5%
1.3%
6.2%
4.7%
3.1%
11.6%
4.1%
0.6%
1.8%
7.8%
6.6%
17.0%
7.9%
0.9%
4.0%
8.9%
5.7%
19.4%
6.9%
1.0%
3.5%
3.7%
5.7%
10.3%
8.3%
0.4%
3.1%
45.9%
9.9%
59.3%
7.6%
10.4%
12.8%
7.8%
10.1%
12.6%
9.6%
1.4%
8.0%
7.1%
8.0%
13.7%
8.6%
0.9%
5.7%
8.1%
24.6%
13.4%
21.0%
1.4%
26.9%
56.2%
21.4%
69.1%
14.3%
15.3%
46.8%
6.9%
55.1%
16.7%
48.5%
0.9%
57.7%
9.5%
55.5%
21.4%
42.6%
1.1%
65.6%
7.0%
59.2%
16.0%
45.4%
0.8%
70.8%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
39.4%
30.9%
35.8%
32.3%
50.7%
17.2%
47.3%
19.3%
46.8%
20.6%
44.2%
25.3%
50.4%
16.4%
48.9%
18.7%
48.3%
26.5%
47.7%
24.2%
44.3%
23.2%
47.1%
20.3%
43.2%
24.4%
42.7%
24.4%
46.2%
24.7%
46.0%
23.6%
41.1%
26.0%
50.2%
18.4%
45.7%
20.6%
44.5%
23.3%
40.7%
28.6%
46.5%
23.7%
29.0%
41.5%
27.5%
43.5%
27.4%
45.6%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
37.3%
29.5%
34.5%
31.6%
50.4%
15.9%
47.0%
18.9%
45.7%
19.1%
43.0%
24.1%
49.3%
14.6%
48.0%
17.1%
47.2%
26.4%
46.7%
23.6%
44.1%
22.2%
48.0%
18.5%
42.7%
23.2%
43.3%
23.2%
45.5%
23.5%
44.7%
23.2%
40.6%
24.5%
50.3%
17.2%
45.2%
19.7%
44.3%
22.0%
40.2%
26.2%
47.0%
21.4%
29.7%
38.6%
28.1%
40.6%
28.6%
42.1%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
39.9%
49.3%
10.8%
29.7%
56.3%
14.1%
60.1%
28.9%
11.0%
38.5%
43.7%
17.9%
34.0%
48.7%
17.3%
32.1%
51.8%
16.0%
40.6%
42.7%
16.7%
34.0%
49.1%
16.9%
36.0%
49.0%
15.0%
33.5%
48.4%
18.1%
34.6%
46.1%
19.3%
50.7%
33.6%
15.7%
35.2%
47.6%
17.2%
30.8%
51.5%
17.7%
36.0%
50.0%
14.0%
34.9%
46.5%
18.6%
24.2%
58.2%
17.6%
70.1%
16.4%
13.5%
50.2%
29.8%
20.1%
40.8%
39.5%
19.7%
49.6%
31.3%
19.1%
76.5%
10.9%
12.6%
29.7%
51.0%
19.3%
35.3%
45.9%
18.8%
34.0%
47.6%
18.4%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
38.4%
46.4%
15.1%
29.9%
51.6%
18.5%
62.3%
22.8%
14.9%
38.6%
39.2%
22.2%
35.6%
41.1%
23.3%
33.2%
46.0%
20.9%
43.0%
33.9%
23.1%
36.0%
41.7%
22.3%
35.4%
47.1%
17.5%
34.4%
43.5%
22.1%
35.2%
41.1%
23.7%
51.0%
27.7%
21.3%
36.2%
41.4%
22.4%
32.0%
46.8%
21.2%
36.6%
45.3%
18.0%
36.3%
41.3%
22.4%
26.3%
51.8%
21.9%
69.8%
12.7%
17.5%
48.4%
26.9%
24.8%
41.4%
34.1%
24.6%
47.9%
26.6%
25.5%
73.2%
9.4%
17.4%
32.8%
41.4%
25.7%
36.1%
38.4%
25.5%
36.1%
38.6%
25.2%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
10.7%
2.0%
23.9%
1.7%
0.9%
1.7%
8.1%
2.2%
23.0%
2.4%
0.8%
1.7%
44.0%
3.5%
67.4%
3.0%
3.6%
3.1%
7.5%
3.3%
17.3%
4.2%
0.5%
2.0%
7.6%
8.5%
18.5%
11.5%
0.8%
5.1%
6.3%
4.0%
16.8%
5.3%
0.6%
2.6%
10.3%
13.4%
22.2%
17.9%
0.9%
7.0%
8.5%
8.2%
21.2%
11.8%
0.9%
4.4%
5.5%
2.1%
13.8%
2.6%
0.4%
1.5%
3.1%
3.5%
7.6%
4.9%
0.4%
2.5%
2.9%
2.1%
7.2%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
21.6%
7.7%
38.2%
7.1%
1.9%
7.0%
8.9%
5.8%
20.9%
6.6%
0.9%
4.3%
3.4%
1.7%
9.7%
2.3%
0.3%
1.1%
6.4%
3.3%
15.8%
4.1%
0.5%
2.4%
7.5%
3.4%
18.6%
4.2%
0.7%
2.5%
2.3%
2.8%
7.8%
4.5%
0.2%
1.9%
48.6%
6.2%
62.3%
4.4%
7.1%
9.9%
7.5%
6.2%
12.2%
5.3%
1.1%
6.1%
6.0%
5.1%
12.4%
5.2%
0.6%
4.3%
8.4%
20.3%
14.2%
14.9%
1.1%
25.5%
63.5%
15.4%
75.1%
9.0%
12.0%
46.1%
7.6%
48.9%
21.6%
37.7%
0.7%
54.0%
9.8%
51.4%
24.1%
32.8%
0.7%
64.2%
6.3%
56.7%
16.1%
35.5%
0.5%
70.9%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
12.6%
3.3%
28.2%
3.2%
1.0%
2.3%
10.0%
3.3%
27.4%
3.8%
0.9%
2.3%
50.0%
5.4%
71.4%
4.6%
5.1%
4.2%
9.2%
5.0%
20.3%
6.4%
0.7%
2.7%
9.3%
12.8%
21.1%
17.0%
0.9%
6.6%
7.9%
5.8%
19.9%
7.7%
0.8%
3.3%
12.4%
22.4%
24.1%
27.5%
1.3%
10.1%
9.8%
13.3%
22.1%
18.5%
1.1%
6.0%
6.8%
3.3%
16.9%
4.4%
0.5%
2.0%
4.0%
5.8%
9.2%
8.1%
0.5%
3.4%
4.3%
3.4%
9.9%
4.5%
0.4%
2.1%
24.9%
12.5%
42.0%
12.4%
2.4%
9.2%
11.2%
9.5%
24.6%
11.5%
1.1%
6.0%
4.8%
3.1%
12.6%
4.4%
0.4%
1.6%
8.5%
5.8%
20.1%
7.5%
0.6%
3.3%
9.8%
5.5%
22.6%
6.9%
0.9%
3.5%
3.9%
5.1%
12.0%
8.2%
0.3%
2.7%
52.3%
9.6%
65.2%
7.2%
9.2%
13.7%
9.6%
10.6%
15.8%
10.1%
1.3%
8.4%
7.8%
8.4%
15.5%
9.0%
0.8%
6.0%
9.4%
26.9%
15.8%
22.6%
1.3%
28.5%
59.7%
20.7%
71.8%
13.7%
12.9%
48.9%
7.7%
55.0%
19.1%
48.6%
0.8%
56.3%
9.7%
56.1%
22.5%
42.2%
0.9%
65.9%
7.1%
59.7%
16.3%
45.7%
0.6%
71.0%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
88.8%
84.3%
92.0%
88.6%
83.2%
85.7%
87.4%
84.4%
90.4%
82.1%
84.9%
89.8%
82.5%
87.4%
89.4%
86.5%
83.2%
89.8%
81.9%
84.7%
83.6%
90.5%
84.3%
86.9%
86.3%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
86.0%
81.6%
89.0%
84.9%
80.6%
83.1%
83.6%
81.7%
88.0%
79.9%
80.8%
86.3%
79.8%
84.6%
86.5%
83.6%
80.5%
87.1%
79.4%
81.8%
81.2%
88.0%
81.5%
83.8%
83.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
34.6%
42.9%
32.0%
44.4%
51.7%
25.6%
49.1%
26.6%
45.8%
29.2%
42.8%
34.2%
54.3%
22.3%
48.9%
26.3%
45.4%
35.5%
46.2%
33.6%
42.6%
33.4%
46.8%
30.5%
40.4%
35.8%
41.2%
34.5%
44.4%
35.4%
43.7%
34.5%
38.0%
39.3%
50.0%
26.2%
43.1%
29.4%
41.8%
33.5%
36.3%
39.5%
44.3%
32.6%
22.9%
56.4%
22.5%
57.4%
21.3%
59.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
37.5%
32.6%
34.7%
35.6%
52.8%
17.6%
48.9%
20.8%
47.3%
21.3%
44.1%
26.4%
53.0%
15.3%
50.0%
18.9%
47.7%
29.0%
48.3%
25.6%
46.0%
24.6%
50.5%
20.2%
43.8%
25.9%
45.2%
24.5%
47.4%
25.9%
45.7%
25.9%
42.5%
27.5%
52.3%
18.1%
46.1%
21.2%
44.7%
24.3%
40.2%
28.2%
48.5%
22.3%
29.0%
42.4%
27.2%
45.0%
27.7%
46.0%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
20.5%
0.8%
1.2%
19.3%
1.4%
1.3%
65.7%
1.9%
2.0%
16.6%
3.1%
1.6%
16.1%
7.7%
3.6%
15.8%
3.9%
2.1%
20.0%
11.3%
4.6%
18.5%
8.4%
3.2%
12.6%
1.4%
1.1%
6.2%
3.1%
1.7%
5.8%
1.9%
1.2%
36.3%
3.9%
4.9%
16.8%
3.5%
3.0%
9.4%
1.4%
0.8%
13.3%
2.6%
1.7%
17.9%
2.7%
1.8%
6.9%
2.6%
1.4%
61.7%
2.7%
8.0%
10.0%
2.8%
4.8%
11.1%
3.1%
3.3%
13.7%
9.6%
24.8%
79.2%
5.3%
44.0%
23.7%
31.4%
52.8%
25.5%
22.7%
63.6%
15.6%
29.2%
74.3%
Plan: H000C9005
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Alachua
Brevard
Brevard
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Duval
Hendry
Hendry
Hernando
Hernando
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
Pinellas
App. 108
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
142,034
57.4%
384.3
5
44,317
17.9%
237.1
11
60,985
24.7%
347.5
6
64,569
11.9%
410.9
8
478,807
88.1%
1,146.1
20
455,445
26.1%
535.5
21
272,224
15.6%
70.9
22
294,581
16.9%
130.1
23
498,411
28.5%
188.9
24
136,412
7.8%
24.0
25
90,993
5.2%
373.5
3
172,269
90.3%
576.5
5
18,596
9.7%
67.1
19
160,728
50.0%
338.0
25
160,792
50.0%
1,967.0
3
89,611
10.4%
305.1
4
506,306
58.6%
481.8
5
268,346
31.0%
131.6
20
13,550
34.6%
55.7
25
25,590
65.4%
1,134.3
11
3,800
2.2%
57.2
12
168,978
97.8%
531.8
14
538,817
43.8%
432.5
15
690,409
56.2%
833.2
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
5
17,490
5.9%
312.1
10
273,099
91.9%
798.1
11
6,463
2.2%
46.7
17
83,137
13.4%
178.2
19
535,617
86.6%
1,034.3
2
4,028
21.0%
337.4
3
15,196
79.0%
378.3
15
5,936
1.8%
267.8
16
316,897
98.2%
624.9
5
15,019
4.5%
407.9
11
316,279
95.5%
1,254.7
23
197,933
7.9%
99.3
24
559,932
22.4%
86.2
25
418,970
16.8%
505.4
26
623,255
25.0%
1,162.5
27
696,345
27.9%
577.7
17
34,658
86.7%
786.4
18
5,338
13.3%
105.5
5
299,700
26.2%
207.1
7
273,626
23.9%
99.2
8
79,510
6.9%
300.0
9
69,874
6.1%
87.3
10
423,246
36.9%
309.7
18
266,900
20.2%
446.6
20
227,350
17.2%
1,504.3
21
424,120
32.1%
193.0
22
401,764
30.4%
239.0
12
62,670
6.8%
47.9
13
696,344
76.0%
446.6
Area%
39.7%
24.5%
35.9%
26.4%
73.6%
40.5%
5.4%
9.8%
14.3%
1.8%
28.2%
89.6%
10.4%
14.7%
85.3%
33.2%
52.5%
14.3%
4.7%
95.3%
9.7%
90.3%
34.2%
65.8%
79.5%
20.5%
27.0%
69.0%
4.0%
14.7%
85.3%
47.1%
52.9%
30.0%
70.0%
24.5%
75.5%
4.1%
3.5%
20.8%
47.8%
23.8%
88.2%
11.8%
20.6%
9.9%
29.9%
8.7%
30.9%
18.7%
63.1%
8.1%
10.0%
7.9%
73.4%
Area%
18.7%
37.4%
62.6%
41.3%
58.7%
Area%
19.1%
80.9%
4.7%
95.3%
1.0%
99.0%
24.6%
57.3%
18.2%
99.8%
0.2%
3.2%
96.8%
34.8%
64.8%
0.4%
66.6%
33.4%
92.8%
7.2%
49.0%
51.0%
64.5%
35.5%
72.4%
27.6%
34.7%
65.3%
86.5%
13.5%
44.8%
55.2%
34.7%
50.3%
15.0%
0.2%
88.9%
10.9%
24.5%
75.5%
85.2%
14.8%
40.7%
59.3%
55.9%
44.1%
24.2%
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
14
157,528
17.2%
113.6
9
357,786
59.4%
751.1
17
244,309
40.6%
1,259.4
5
32,877
44.2%
341.3
6
41,487
55.8%
485.7
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Boynton Beach
20
19,978
29.3%
3.2
Boynton Beach
22
48,239
70.7%
13.4
Coconut Creek
20
433
0.8%
0.6
Coconut Creek
21
52,476
99.2%
11.4
Cutler Bay
26
0
0.0%
0.1
Cutler Bay
27
40,286
100.0%
10.1
Deerfield Beach
20
26,242
35.0%
4.0
Deerfield Beach
21
33,897
45.2%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Doral
25
45,704
100.0%
15.2
Doral
27
0
0.0%
0.0
Dundee
9
4
0.1%
0.4
Dundee
17
3,713
99.9%
11.1
Fort Lauderdale
20
60,588
36.6%
13.4
Fort Lauderdale
22
104,933
63.4%
25.0
Fort Lauderdale
23
0
0.0%
0.2
Gainesville
3
93,046
74.8%
41.6
Gainesville
5
31,308
25.2%
20.8
Glen Ridge
20
219
100.0%
0.2
Glen Ridge
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Gulfport
13
5,509
45.8%
1.9
Gulfport
14
6,520
54.2%
2.0
Hallandale Beach
23
25,370
68.4%
3.0
Hallandale Beach
24
11,743
31.6%
1.6
Hialeah
25
162,856
72.5%
16.5
Hialeah
27
61,813
27.5%
6.3
High Springs
3
2,183
40.8%
7.6
High Springs
11
3,167
59.2%
14.4
Hollywood
23
114,568
81.4%
26.6
Hollywood
24
26,200
18.6%
4.1
Homestead
26
42,640
70.5%
7.0
Homestead
27
17,872
29.5%
8.6
Jacksonville
3
88,186
10.7%
303.1
Jacksonville
4
465,252
56.6%
440.0
Jacksonville
5
268,346
32.7%
131.6
Lake Park
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Lake Park
20
7,242
88.8%
2.1
Lake Park
22
913
11.2%
0.3
Lake Worth
20
10,654
30.5%
1.6
Lake Worth
22
24,256
69.5%
5.0
Lakeland
9
86,624
88.9%
63.3
Lakeland
17
10,798
11.1%
11.0
Lantana
20
4,654
44.7%
1.2
Lantana
22
5,769
55.3%
1.7
Loxahatchee Groves 18
1,681
52.9%
7.0
Loxahatchee Groves 20
1,499
47.1%
5.5
Margate
20
14,535
27.3%
2.2
County
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
Putnam
Putnam
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Margate
21
38,749
72.7%
6.9
Marineland
4
0
0.0%
0.0
Marineland
6
16
100.0%
0.3
Miami
23
15,273
3.8%
2.9
Miami
24
133,006
33.3%
19.4
Miami
27
251,178
62.9%
33.8
Miami Shores
23
0
0.0%
0.7
Miami Shores
24
10,493
100.0%
3.1
Miramar
24
65,355
53.6%
11.2
Miramar
25
56,686
46.4%
20.1
North Miami
23
9,175
15.6%
4.8
North Miami
24
49,611
84.4%
5.2
North Miami Beach 23
6,953
16.7%
1.1
North Miami Beach 24
34,570
83.3%
4.3
North Palm Beach
18
12,015
100.0%
5.8
North Palm Beach
20
0
0.0%
0.0
Oakland Park
20
20,289
49.1%
4.2
Oakland Park
22
21,074
50.9%
3.9
Oldsmar
12
5,101
37.5%
5.6
Oldsmar
13
8,490
62.5%
4.1
Opa-locka
24
14,894
97.9%
2.6
Opa-locka
25
325
2.1%
1.9
Orange Park
3
4,251
50.5%
1.5
Orange Park
5
4,161
49.5%
3.8
Orlando
5
77,843
32.7%
22.6
Orlando
7
43,409
18.2%
16.5
Orlando
9
31,083
13.0%
36.8
Orlando
10
85,965
36.1%
34.8
Palm Beach Gardens 18
48,452
100.0%
55.3
Palm Beach Gardens 20
0
0.0%
0.1
Pembroke Pines
23
107,607
69.5%
20.0
Pembroke Pines
24
12,856
8.3%
3.1
Pembroke Pines
25
34,287
22.2%
11.7
Plantation
20
13,381
15.8%
2.7
Plantation
22
67,448
79.4%
18.3
Plantation
23
4,126
4.9%
0.9
Pompano Beach
20
46,314
46.4%
11.3
Pompano Beach
21
1,447
1.4%
2.0
Pompano Beach
22
52,084
52.2%
12.2
Riviera Beach
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Riviera Beach
20
28,156
86.7%
7.3
Riviera Beach
22
4,332
13.3%
2.9
Royal Palm Beach
18
14,734
43.2%
5.1
Royal Palm Beach
20
16,299
47.7%
5.6
Royal Palm Beach
21
3,107
9.1%
0.7
St. Petersburg
13
95,027
38.8%
40.5
St. Petersburg
14
149,742
61.2%
97.1
Sunrise
20
62,665
74.2%
9.4
Sunrise
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Sunrise
23
21,774
25.8%
8.9
Tampa
14
281,167
83.8%
143.1
Tampa
15
54,542
16.2%
32.1
Tarpon Springs
12
2,498
10.6%
1.8
Tarpon Springs
13
20,986
89.4%
15.5
Temple Terrace
14
10
0.0%
0.0
Counties and Cities
Area%
75.8%
5.5%
94.5%
5.2%
34.5%
60.3%
17.9%
82.1%
35.7%
64.3%
48.4%
51.6%
20.8%
79.2%
99.5%
0.5%
52.1%
47.9%
57.9%
42.1%
57.7%
42.3%
28.9%
71.1%
20.4%
14.9%
33.2%
31.5%
99.9%
0.1%
57.5%
9.0%
33.5%
12.3%
83.5%
4.2%
44.4%
7.7%
47.9%
0.4%
71.2%
28.4%
45.0%
49.1%
5.8%
29.4%
70.6%
51.5%
0.0%
48.4%
81.7%
18.3%
10.3%
89.7%
0.1%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Temple Terrace
15
24,531
100.0%
7.1
Titusville
6
43,418
99.2%
27.5
Titusville
8
343
0.8%
6.7
Umatilla
10
1,148
33.2%
2.0
Umatilla
11
2,308
66.8%
2.1
West Palm Beach
18
20,693
20.7%
35.3
West Palm Beach
20
48,663
48.7%
15.5
West Palm Beach
22
30,563
30.6%
7.2
Wilton Manors
20
3,311
28.5%
0.6
Wilton Manors
22
8,321
71.5%
1.4
Winter Haven
9
18,702
55.2%
20.9
Winter Haven
17
15,172
44.8%
19.0
Area%
99.9%
80.3%
19.7%
48.6%
51.4%
60.8%
26.8%
12.5%
29.9%
70.1%
52.3%
47.7%
Plan: H000C9005
Page 4 of 4
26
5
10
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
0
27
Scale bar for insets
Palmetto Bay
Cutler Bay
Oldsmar
14
Bradenton
12
St. Leo
MANATEE
HILLSBOROUGH
Temple Terrace
PASCO
Tampa
Palmetto 16
St. Petersburg
Holmes Beach
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
Treasure Island
Pinellas Park
13 PINELLAS
Seminole
Largo
Clearwater
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
Green Cove Springs
15
17
Plant City
Zephyrhills
10
11
St. Augustine
Dade City
ST. JOHNS
6
10
Ocoee
Apopka
5
Maitland
Kissimmee
E
11
17
HIL
OR
LSB
14
12
Oak Hill
Titusville
8
17
H
OUG
LEE
19
CHARLOTTE
DESOTO
HARDEE
POLK
10
LAKE
5
9
6
DUVAL
PUTNAM
CLAY
4
MARION
15
F
D
OR
SARASOTA
16
MANATEE
PASCO
13
ALACHUA
AD
BR
HERNANDO
CITRUS
LEVY
BIA
VOLUSIA 6
SEMINOLE
Deltona
Oviedo
St. Cloud
9
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
Winter Springs
7
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
LAKE
6-Dec-2011
*****
Workshop by House
Congressional
Subcommittee
8-Dec-2011
H000C9007
Orlando Area
Eustis
DIXIE
3
N
UNIO
BAKER
COLLIER
25
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
OSCEOLA
ORANGE
7
VOLUSIA
FLAGLER
10
26
8
MONROE
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
20
21
27
23
24
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
18
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Florida City
Homestead
MIAMI-DADE
Coral Gables
Miami
Miami Beach
24 North Miami
Aventura
CLAY
Jacksonville Beach
4
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
LA
FA
YE
TT
E
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Doral
Hialeah
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
Starke
3
Orange Park
Jacksonville
Atlantic Beach
GULF
HAMILTON
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
23
Dania Beach
Fort Lauderdale
DUVAL
5
Miles
60
MADISON
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
Davie
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Plantation
Lauderhill
Oakland Park
Pompano Beach
Baldwin
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
R
Southwest Ranches
BROWARD
Sunrise
Tamarac
Deerfield Beach
Boca Raton
22
Delray Beach
NASSAU
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Parkland
21
Lantana
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
30
2
JACKSON
GILCHRIST
20
Wellington
Palm Springs
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
HNS
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
E
NN
Belle Glade
18
1
SANTA ROSA
A
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
A
ESC
COLU
M
South Florida
JO
ST.
OK
App. 109
App. 110
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
13.71%
12.45%
48.27%
9.47%
10.48%
9.32%
11.97%
11.07%
7.50%
4.70%
5.16%
24.61%
13.12%
5.82%
9.59%
10.98%
5.76%
50.21%
11.21%
10.16%
9.93%
55.73%
8.25%
10.02%
7.71%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
11
16
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
37.3%
62.7%
35.6%
64.4%
69.6%
30.4%
43.4%
56.6%
48.6%
51.4%
42.6%
57.4%
62.4%
37.6%
44.0%
56.0%
40.6%
59.4%
45.4%
54.6%
50.1%
49.9%
65.2%
34.8%
46.8%
53.2%
45.3%
54.7%
44.1%
55.9%
48.0%
52.0%
38.4%
61.6%
83.2%
16.8%
60.9%
39.1%
54.3%
45.7%
61.2%
38.8%
88.4%
11.6%
49.4%
50.6%
53.4%
46.6%
53.3%
46.7%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
10
17
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
41.9%
58.1%
36.9%
63.1%
65.4%
34.6%
44.3%
55.7%
48.4%
51.6%
42.2%
57.8%
56.0%
44.0%
43.0%
57.0%
42.1%
57.9%
45.7%
54.3%
50.2%
49.8%
63.0%
37.0%
46.0%
54.0%
46.0%
54.0%
43.0%
57.0%
49.1%
50.9%
36.5%
63.5%
80.0%
20.0%
63.0%
37.0%
54.4%
45.6%
60.9%
39.1%
86.5%
13.5%
42.2%
57.8%
49.9%
50.1%
48.4%
51.6%
0.40
0.37
0.46
0.59
0.55
0.10
0.32
0.61
0.31
0.52
0.34
0.53
0.42
0.35
0.37
0.42
0.44
0.41
0.54
0.26
0.49
0.29
0.17
0.27
0.47
0.47
0.18
0.46
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
34.0%
66.0%
29.0%
71.0%
60.9%
39.1%
36.3%
63.7%
36.2%
63.8%
33.8%
66.2%
47.1%
52.9%
34.3%
65.7%
33.8%
66.2%
33.7%
66.3%
37.0%
63.0%
51.6%
48.4%
35.8%
64.2%
34.2%
65.8%
34.5%
65.5%
36.4%
63.6%
27.6%
72.4%
75.1%
24.9%
51.6%
48.4%
41.6%
58.4%
52.2%
47.8%
84.4%
15.6%
35.5%
64.5%
42.3%
57.7%
39.5%
60.5%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2173.6
7932.1
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
0.34%
125
531
8,306
0.44%
60
357
1,568
1.07%
144
662
1,715
0.32%
110
384
3,043
0.90%
36
148
618
0.38%
109
366
2,856
2.30%
44
161
784
0.55%
76
281
1,579
0.38%
83
303
2,898
0.43%
56
167
1,027
0.27%
40
114
446
1.51%
43
147
546
0.82%
50
195
863
0.28%
60
203
1,227
0.59%
151
659
7,495
0.44%
69
220
1,993
0.42%
83
234
1,372
1.19%
74
347
2,096
0.65%
34
110
264
0.56%
52
188
369
1.16%
37
124
288
3.38%
17
58
110
1.68%
103
345
3,980
1.47%
184
551
4,900
2.23%
40
130
578
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
22
5
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
45.6%
54.4%
43.1%
56.9%
73.5%
26.5%
51.1%
48.9%
55.9%
44.1%
51.2%
48.8%
68.0%
32.0%
51.5%
48.5%
49.9%
50.1%
54.6%
45.4%
58.9%
41.1%
70.6%
29.4%
54.4%
45.6%
51.9%
48.1%
51.0%
49.0%
54.7%
45.3%
43.4%
56.6%
85.0%
15.0%
66.6%
33.4%
59.4%
40.6%
65.0%
35.0%
88.8%
11.2%
52.4%
47.6%
55.8%
44.2%
56.0%
44.0%
4.55%
4.75%
6.86%
6.76%
11.13%
6.52%
16.51%
7.79%
40.16%
12.50%
7.46%
11.32%
7.19%
23.92%
16.06%
8.80%
16.53%
12.06%
13.69%
18.55%
18.30%
17.58%
37.56%
33.15%
70.08%
68.91%
75.04%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.32
0.38
0.42
0.37
0.15
0.05
0.26
0.36
0.27
0.38
0.25
0.40
0.46
0.43
0.32
0.28
0.38
0.22
0.52
0.32
0.22
0.27
0.13
0.23
0.41
0.42
0.20
0.43
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
34.7%
65.3%
30.7%
69.3%
61.9%
38.1%
38.0%
62.0%
40.1%
59.9%
35.8%
64.2%
49.4%
50.6%
36.3%
63.7%
35.5%
64.5%
35.9%
64.1%
41.0%
59.0%
53.2%
46.8%
35.9%
64.1%
39.2%
60.8%
35.7%
64.3%
42.6%
57.4%
30.0%
70.0%
78.2%
21.8%
59.0%
41.0%
49.5%
50.5%
58.6%
41.4%
86.2%
13.8%
37.7%
62.3%
45.5%
54.5%
45.6%
54.4%
Convex
Hull
0.73
0.82
0.78
0.85
0.82
0.35
0.69
0.88
0.66
0.79
0.70
0.76
0.82
0.81
0.75
0.70
0.82
0.73
0.87
0.70
0.74
0.61
0.61
0.55
0.87
0.82
0.46
0.81
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
6
21
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
33.6%
66.4%
30.3%
69.7%
61.7%
38.3%
36.4%
63.6%
37.2%
62.8%
33.9%
66.1%
47.7%
52.3%
33.0%
67.0%
33.4%
66.6%
32.3%
67.7%
36.2%
63.8%
50.3%
49.7%
31.2%
68.8%
34.5%
65.5%
31.9%
68.1%
36.7%
63.3%
27.2%
72.8%
76.7%
23.3%
54.2%
45.8%
45.1%
54.9%
55.4%
44.6%
85.9%
14.1%
36.3%
63.7%
43.7%
56.3%
41.5%
58.5%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
17.9%
16.3%
47.0%
18.7%
20.9%
15.6%
28.8%
19.0%
15.2%
12.6%
14.7%
28.5%
16.8%
12.9%
15.9%
15.9%
9.3%
51.3%
19.2%
17.5%
23.0%
65.0%
16.6%
20.9%
17.7%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
20
66.3%
49.8%
59.2%
64.3%
34.8%
55.1%
55.9%
56.3%
47.4%
56.5%
54.3%
48.6%
42.5%
34.1%
50.1%
48.1%
52.9%
50.9%
60.5%
18.9%
36.0%
43.8%
37.4%
12.9%
59.7%
51.5%
55.1%
I_Cri
4
20.4%
28.7%
22.9%
19.4%
18.1%
26.2%
23.2%
28.1%
23.8%
24.5%
30.5%
38.8%
42.8%
37.4%
33.0%
39.0%
31.2%
33.2%
30.3%
29.8%
44.9%
38.7%
39.6%
22.1%
23.8%
27.6%
27.2%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
11
16
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
39.3%
60.7%
37.0%
63.0%
69.2%
30.8%
47.4%
52.6%
50.5%
49.5%
44.3%
55.7%
60.9%
39.1%
45.3%
54.7%
43.7%
56.3%
47.1%
52.9%
51.4%
48.6%
65.4%
34.6%
47.1%
52.9%
48.5%
51.5%
46.0%
54.0%
51.5%
48.5%
42.3%
57.7%
81.3%
18.7%
63.9%
36.1%
56.9%
43.1%
61.6%
38.4%
86.9%
13.1%
46.3%
53.7%
49.8%
50.2%
48.8%
51.2%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
40.0%
60.0%
30.4%
69.6%
58.1%
41.9%
45.1%
54.9%
39.5%
60.5%
43.2%
56.8%
46.1%
53.9%
37.8%
62.2%
40.8%
59.2%
43.1%
56.9%
45.2%
54.8%
56.0%
44.0%
39.7%
60.3%
42.5%
57.5%
40.6%
59.4%
48.0%
52.0%
33.3%
66.7%
75.7%
24.3%
65.3%
34.7%
54.9%
45.1%
62.3%
37.7%
81.6%
18.4%
38.5%
61.5%
47.1%
52.9%
44.5%
55.5%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
18
9
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
50.3%
49.7%
40.9%
59.1%
64.9%
35.1%
52.5%
47.5%
50.1%
49.9%
49.7%
50.3%
55.3%
44.7%
47.8%
52.2%
50.0%
50.0%
49.7%
50.3%
53.7%
46.3%
61.0%
39.0%
43.7%
56.3%
50.3%
49.7%
47.9%
52.1%
52.8%
47.2%
42.5%
57.5%
79.9%
20.1%
71.0%
29.0%
61.1%
38.9%
69.5%
30.5%
84.9%
15.1%
46.2%
53.8%
53.5%
46.5%
51.6%
48.4%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
41.2%
58.8%
30.6%
69.4%
57.3%
42.7%
44.8%
55.2%
38.4%
61.6%
42.4%
57.6%
45.9%
54.1%
38.4%
61.6%
42.4%
57.6%
42.8%
57.2%
47.1%
52.9%
55.3%
44.7%
39.0%
61.0%
46.1%
53.9%
41.4%
58.6%
50.7%
49.3%
35.3%
64.7%
76.7%
23.3%
68.0%
32.0%
57.6%
42.4%
64.2%
35.8%
81.2%
18.8%
40.7%
59.3%
48.5%
51.5%
47.7%
52.3%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
34.7%
65.3%
29.5%
70.5%
56.1%
43.9%
42.5%
57.5%
35.9%
64.1%
35.7%
64.3%
41.9%
58.1%
34.4%
65.6%
38.1%
61.9%
38.2%
61.8%
39.8%
60.2%
50.7%
49.3%
34.9%
65.1%
39.6%
60.4%
37.2%
62.8%
44.5%
55.5%
32.9%
67.1%
74.3%
25.7%
63.7%
36.3%
52.5%
47.5%
61.4%
38.6%
80.6%
19.4%
39.2%
60.8%
46.7%
53.3%
44.7%
55.3%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
16%
43
-20%
24
-19%
67
-19%
67
0%
410
18%
355
-50%
55
-51%
125
-54%
112
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
54.8%
45.2%
46.9%
53.1%
69.7%
30.3%
59.9%
40.1%
59.1%
40.9%
59.7%
40.3%
63.3%
36.7%
56.6%
43.4%
57.9%
42.1%
60.9%
39.1%
63.3%
36.7%
70.7%
29.3%
57.4%
42.6%
57.3%
42.7%
57.5%
42.5%
64.0%
36.0%
51.2%
48.8%
82.8%
17.2%
76.9%
23.1%
67.8%
32.2%
72.7%
27.3%
85.4%
14.6%
51.1%
48.9%
57.2%
42.8%
55.9%
44.1%
Plan: H000C9007
Page 2 of 4
App. 111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
44.2%
33.6%
59.7%
37.5%
35.9%
35.1%
43.9%
36.2%
37.0%
35.3%
35.8%
50.5%
38.2%
32.8%
38.7%
37.5%
28.0%
65.3%
48.1%
41.3%
47.7%
69.8%
32.9%
35.8%
35.8%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
40.9%
31.5%
59.7%
35.7%
35.1%
33.6%
42.8%
35.2%
35.1%
33.9%
34.7%
49.5%
37.1%
32.1%
37.3%
36.4%
27.1%
65.8%
46.7%
40.5%
46.3%
69.3%
32.8%
35.6%
35.8%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
18.8%
21.3%
19.1%
25.0%
26.8%
22.9%
30.5%
23.8%
21.6%
26.2%
27.4%
25.2%
25.1%
24.4%
23.5%
25.6%
25.8%
21.1%
27.4%
27.5%
28.4%
20.5%
29.2%
29.3%
28.3%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
17.2%
20.0%
18.1%
23.9%
25.1%
20.9%
27.9%
22.3%
20.9%
24.8%
26.1%
23.5%
23.5%
23.4%
22.3%
24.6%
24.4%
20.4%
25.9%
25.9%
26.1%
19.4%
27.4%
27.4%
26.0%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
40.4%
47.1%
21.2%
39.3%
38.1%
43.5%
26.7%
41.0%
43.2%
39.9%
37.9%
25.3%
37.8%
43.5%
39.2%
38.0%
47.1%
13.2%
25.8%
32.0%
25.3%
10.2%
38.0%
35.2%
35.9%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
38.6%
46.4%
22.2%
38.6%
38.9%
44.0%
28.2%
41.5%
42.1%
39.9%
38.2%
26.1%
38.3%
43.8%
39.1%
37.9%
47.6%
14.3%
26.0%
32.8%
26.2%
10.8%
39.6%
36.8%
38.2%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
84.1%
79.4%
86.0%
82.2%
78.1%
81.7%
78.0%
80.8%
84.3%
75.0%
77.5%
83.5%
79.4%
81.2%
82.5%
81.1%
76.8%
84.4%
77.0%
79.2%
78.7%
85.7%
79.0%
80.8%
80.5%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
85.5%
80.6%
86.8%
83.0%
79.1%
82.9%
79.3%
81.8%
84.6%
75.9%
77.7%
84.1%
80.5%
81.1%
83.0%
81.6%
77.5%
84.4%
77.3%
79.8%
79.3%
85.8%
79.4%
81.0%
81.4%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
11.0%
4.0%
22.6%
3.8%
1.2%
2.9%
12.1%
3.8%
30.4%
4.1%
1.3%
2.5%
47.8%
6.8%
68.9%
5.8%
6.5%
5.1%
8.3%
3.8%
19.2%
4.6%
0.8%
2.2%
9.1%
12.9%
20.3%
16.8%
1.1%
6.7%
7.9%
4.5%
19.3%
5.6%
0.9%
2.8%
9.3%
36.3%
17.0%
42.1%
1.5%
19.1%
10.0%
8.7%
22.9%
11.1%
1.2%
4.5%
6.0%
4.8%
14.5%
6.9%
0.6%
2.8%
4.2%
7.6%
9.2%
9.7%
0.6%
4.7%
4.4%
3.9%
9.7%
5.0%
0.5%
2.3%
24.3%
14.4%
40.9%
14.0%
3.1%
10.5%
12.7%
9.8%
27.2%
11.3%
1.4%
5.8%
4.9%
3.6%
12.5%
4.9%
0.5%
1.9%
8.3%
10.1%
18.5%
12.5%
0.9%
5.5%
9.6%
6.3%
21.3%
7.8%
1.1%
3.9%
4.1%
6.4%
11.6%
9.5%
0.4%
3.3%
48.1%
10.8%
61.8%
8.3%
10.5%
14.1%
8.9%
11.6%
14.6%
11.2%
1.4%
8.8%
7.5%
9.1%
14.7%
10.0%
0.9%
6.3%
8.7%
26.9%
14.7%
23.4%
1.4%
27.8%
55.6%
22.9%
68.8%
15.5%
14.2%
48.0%
6.9%
57.7%
16.6%
52.3%
0.9%
58.6%
9.3%
57.3%
21.2%
45.3%
1.1%
66.2%
7.0%
60.5%
15.8%
48.3%
0.8%
71.0%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
10.8%
3.6%
20.9%
3.3%
1.3%
2.8%
12.4%
3.4%
29.8%
3.6%
1.4%
2.4%
45.5%
6.2%
66.3%
5.3%
6.3%
4.8%
8.2%
3.5%
18.2%
4.1%
0.8%
2.0%
8.7%
11.8%
19.2%
15.2%
1.1%
6.4%
7.5%
4.0%
17.6%
4.9%
0.9%
2.6%
9.3%
34.0%
16.8%
39.5%
1.5%
19.2%
9.6%
7.8%
21.6%
9.9%
1.2%
4.2%
5.9%
4.5%
13.4%
6.2%
0.7%
2.7%
3.8%
6.7%
8.3%
8.5%
0.6%
4.3%
4.0%
3.5%
8.7%
4.3%
0.5%
2.1%
23.9%
13.0%
39.8%
12.1%
3.3%
10.1%
11.9%
8.9%
25.1%
10.1%
1.4%
5.5%
4.7%
3.1%
11.6%
4.0%
0.6%
1.7%
7.8%
9.1%
16.8%
11.1%
0.9%
5.3%
8.9%
5.7%
19.4%
6.9%
1.0%
3.5%
3.7%
5.7%
10.3%
8.3%
0.4%
3.1%
45.9%
9.9%
59.3%
7.6%
10.4%
12.8%
7.8%
10.1%
12.6%
9.6%
1.4%
8.0%
7.1%
8.0%
13.7%
8.6%
0.9%
5.7%
8.1%
24.6%
13.4%
21.0%
1.4%
26.9%
56.2%
21.4%
69.1%
14.3%
15.3%
46.8%
6.9%
55.1%
16.7%
48.5%
0.9%
57.7%
9.5%
55.5%
21.4%
42.6%
1.1%
65.6%
7.0%
59.2%
16.0%
45.4%
0.8%
70.8%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
40.4%
30.1%
35.8%
32.1%
50.8%
17.2%
44.2%
22.6%
46.2%
21.1%
43.0%
28.8%
51.0%
15.9%
45.7%
22.5%
50.8%
24.9%
44.5%
25.6%
44.3%
23.2%
47.1%
20.3%
43.5%
23.7%
42.6%
24.5%
46.8%
22.7%
46.0%
23.6%
41.1%
26.0%
50.2%
18.4%
45.7%
20.6%
44.5%
23.3%
40.7%
28.6%
46.5%
23.7%
29.0%
41.5%
27.5%
43.5%
27.4%
45.6%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
38.4%
29.0%
34.7%
31.1%
50.4%
15.9%
43.3%
22.7%
45.5%
19.8%
41.8%
27.5%
49.7%
14.1%
45.2%
21.4%
49.9%
24.8%
43.6%
24.8%
44.1%
22.2%
48.0%
18.4%
43.1%
22.3%
43.3%
23.3%
46.1%
21.3%
44.7%
23.2%
40.6%
24.5%
50.3%
17.2%
45.2%
19.7%
44.3%
22.0%
40.2%
26.2%
47.0%
21.4%
29.7%
38.6%
28.1%
40.6%
28.6%
42.1%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
43.6%
45.3%
11.1%
31.5%
55.3%
13.3%
60.1%
28.9%
11.0%
35.8%
47.1%
17.2%
33.4%
49.2%
17.4%
32.5%
52.2%
15.3%
42.2%
39.2%
18.7%
33.1%
51.1%
15.8%
33.7%
50.5%
15.8%
33.2%
48.4%
18.4%
34.7%
46.1%
19.3%
50.7%
33.6%
15.7%
36.2%
47.6%
16.1%
30.8%
51.6%
17.6%
36.0%
48.7%
15.4%
34.9%
46.5%
18.6%
24.2%
58.2%
17.6%
70.1%
16.4%
13.5%
50.2%
29.8%
20.1%
40.8%
39.5%
19.7%
49.6%
31.3%
19.1%
76.5%
10.9%
12.6%
29.7%
51.0%
19.3%
35.3%
45.9%
18.8%
34.0%
47.6%
18.4%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
41.0%
43.6%
15.3%
31.4%
50.9%
17.7%
62.3%
22.8%
14.9%
35.7%
43.0%
21.3%
35.0%
41.9%
23.1%
33.2%
46.9%
19.8%
44.1%
29.9%
26.0%
34.8%
44.7%
20.5%
34.3%
47.2%
18.5%
33.7%
43.5%
22.8%
35.2%
41.1%
23.7%
51.1%
27.7%
21.3%
37.5%
41.2%
21.3%
32.0%
46.8%
21.2%
37.0%
43.3%
19.6%
36.3%
41.3%
22.4%
26.3%
51.8%
21.9%
69.8%
12.7%
17.5%
48.4%
26.9%
24.8%
41.4%
34.1%
24.6%
47.9%
26.6%
25.5%
73.2%
9.4%
17.4%
32.8%
41.4%
25.7%
36.1%
38.4%
25.5%
36.1%
38.6%
25.2%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
8.9%
2.2%
18.3%
1.8%
0.7%
1.9%
10.5%
2.1%
28.3%
2.1%
1.0%
1.7%
44.1%
3.5%
67.6%
3.0%
3.6%
3.1%
6.8%
2.2%
16.9%
2.6%
0.5%
1.5%
7.3%
7.4%
18.2%
9.9%
0.8%
4.5%
6.2%
2.6%
16.5%
3.3%
0.6%
2.0%
9.7%
21.7%
19.5%
28.3%
1.0%
11.8%
8.4%
4.4%
21.8%
5.8%
0.8%
2.8%
4.8%
2.4%
12.8%
3.6%
0.4%
1.6%
3.4%
4.2%
8.2%
5.2%
0.4%
3.2%
2.9%
2.1%
7.2%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
21.6%
7.7%
38.3%
7.1%
1.9%
7.0%
10.3%
5.0%
24.2%
5.7%
1.0%
3.7%
3.4%
1.7%
9.7%
2.3%
0.3%
1.1%
6.7%
5.0%
16.4%
6.5%
0.6%
3.2%
7.5%
3.4%
18.6%
4.2%
0.7%
2.5%
2.3%
2.8%
7.8%
4.5%
0.2%
1.9%
48.6%
6.2%
62.3%
4.4%
7.1%
9.9%
7.5%
6.2%
12.2%
5.3%
1.1%
6.1%
6.0%
5.1%
12.4%
5.2%
0.6%
4.3%
8.4%
20.3%
14.2%
14.9%
1.1%
25.5%
63.5%
15.4%
75.1%
9.0%
12.0%
46.1%
7.6%
48.9%
21.6%
37.7%
0.7%
54.0%
9.8%
51.4%
24.1%
32.8%
0.7%
64.2%
6.3%
56.7%
16.1%
35.5%
0.5%
70.9%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
11.0%
3.5%
23.2%
3.3%
0.9%
2.6%
12.3%
3.2%
32.3%
3.5%
1.1%
2.2%
50.2%
5.4%
71.7%
4.6%
5.1%
4.2%
8.3%
3.3%
19.9%
4.1%
0.6%
1.9%
9.1%
11.2%
21.0%
15.0%
0.9%
5.8%
7.9%
4.0%
20.0%
5.0%
0.7%
2.6%
10.3%
32.0%
19.0%
38.7%
1.3%
15.8%
10.3%
7.4%
24.6%
9.8%
1.0%
3.9%
6.0%
3.9%
15.2%
5.9%
0.5%
2.2%
4.3%
6.9%
9.9%
9.0%
0.6%
4.3%
4.3%
3.4%
9.9%
4.5%
0.4%
2.1%
24.9%
12.6%
42.1%
12.4%
2.4%
9.2%
13.3%
8.4%
29.0%
10.0%
1.2%
5.1%
4.8%
3.1%
12.7%
4.4%
0.4%
1.6%
8.7%
8.3%
20.2%
10.9%
0.7%
4.5%
9.8%
5.5%
22.6%
6.9%
0.9%
3.5%
3.9%
5.1%
12.0%
8.2%
0.3%
2.7%
52.3%
9.6%
65.2%
7.2%
9.2%
13.7%
9.6%
10.6%
15.8%
10.1%
1.3%
8.4%
7.8%
8.4%
15.5%
9.0%
0.8%
6.0%
9.4%
26.9%
15.8%
22.6%
1.3%
28.5%
59.7%
20.7%
71.8%
13.7%
12.9%
48.9%
7.7%
55.0%
19.1%
48.6%
0.8%
56.3%
9.7%
56.1%
22.5%
42.2%
0.9%
65.9%
7.1%
59.7%
16.3%
45.7%
0.6%
71.0%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
90.1%
84.8%
92.0%
88.9%
83.3%
86.9%
84.6%
85.9%
89.7%
79.1%
84.9%
89.8%
84.7%
87.5%
88.1%
86.5%
83.2%
89.8%
81.9%
84.7%
83.6%
90.5%
84.3%
86.9%
86.3%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
86.9%
82.1%
89.0%
85.0%
80.8%
84.2%
81.1%
83.2%
87.2%
77.0%
80.8%
86.3%
81.8%
84.6%
85.5%
83.6%
80.5%
87.1%
79.4%
81.8%
81.2%
88.0%
81.5%
83.8%
83.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
35.9%
40.6%
31.6%
45.1%
51.6%
25.7%
43.8%
32.0%
44.7%
29.7%
40.1%
38.5%
55.0%
21.3%
43.4%
31.9%
50.0%
33.7%
41.2%
36.3%
42.6%
33.4%
46.8%
30.5%
41.0%
34.9%
41.1%
34.7%
46.7%
31.3%
43.7%
34.5%
38.0%
39.3%
50.0%
26.2%
43.1%
29.4%
41.8%
33.5%
36.3%
39.5%
44.3%
32.6%
22.9%
56.4%
22.5%
57.4%
21.3%
59.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
38.5%
31.8%
35.0%
35.2%
52.8%
17.6%
44.3%
25.7%
46.9%
21.8%
41.9%
30.5%
53.4%
14.7%
45.9%
23.5%
51.6%
27.0%
44.2%
27.4%
46.0%
24.5%
50.5%
20.2%
44.6%
24.7%
45.2%
24.7%
48.5%
23.1%
45.7%
25.9%
42.5%
27.5%
52.3%
18.1%
46.1%
21.2%
44.7%
24.3%
40.2%
28.2%
48.5%
22.3%
29.0%
42.4%
27.2%
45.0%
27.7%
46.0%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
16.5%
0.8%
1.4%
23.3%
1.3%
1.3%
66.0%
1.9%
2.0%
16.6%
1.7%
1.1%
15.9%
6.8%
3.2%
15.5%
2.3%
1.5%
16.4%
20.2%
8.0%
19.4%
3.6%
2.0%
12.0%
2.1%
1.1%
6.5%
3.1%
2.3%
5.8%
1.9%
1.2%
36.5%
3.9%
4.9%
19.9%
2.9%
2.5%
9.5%
1.4%
0.8%
14.1%
4.3%
2.4%
17.9%
2.7%
1.8%
6.9%
2.6%
1.4%
61.7%
2.7%
8.0%
10.0%
2.8%
4.8%
11.1%
3.1%
3.3%
13.7%
9.6%
24.8%
79.2%
5.3%
44.0%
23.7%
31.4%
52.8%
25.5%
22.7%
63.6%
15.6%
29.2%
74.3%
Plan: H000C9007
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Hendry
Hendry
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Osceola
Osceola
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
Pinellas
Pinellas
App. 112
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
203,023
82.1%
720.9
5
44,313
17.9%
247.9
20
455,445
26.1%
535.5
21
272,224
15.6%
70.9
22
294,581
16.9%
130.1
23
498,411
28.5%
188.9
24
136,412
7.8%
24.0
25
90,993
5.2%
373.5
3
172,269
90.3%
576.5
5
18,596
9.7%
67.1
19
160,728
50.0%
338.0
25
160,792
50.0%
1,967.0
4
595,891
68.9%
786.9
5
268,372
31.1%
131.6
20
13,550
34.6%
55.7
25
25,590
65.4%
1,134.3
12
167,520
13.6%
110.4
14
540,275
44.0%
432.7
15
521,431
42.4%
722.7
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
5
17,490
5.9%
312.1
10
279,156
94.0%
844.7
11
406
0.1%
0.1
17
83,137
13.4%
178.2
19
535,617
86.6%
1,034.3
2
4,028
21.0%
337.4
3
15,196
79.0%
378.3
16
318,460
98.6%
566.2
17
4,373
1.4%
326.5
3
27,774
8.4%
298.7
5
15,019
4.5%
407.9
11
288,505
87.1%
956.1
23
197,933
7.9%
99.3
24
559,932
22.4%
86.2
25
418,970
16.8%
505.4
26
623,255
25.0%
1,162.5
27
696,345
27.9%
577.7
8
14,941
37.4%
682.1
17
19,717
49.3%
104.3
18
5,338
13.3%
105.5
5
299,678
26.2%
207.2
7
175,297
15.3%
60.5
9
379,876
33.1%
262.9
10
192,753
16.8%
193.2
17
98,352
8.6%
279.5
9
241,786
90.0%
360.1
17
26,899
10.0%
1,145.8
18
266,900
20.2%
446.6
20
227,350
17.2%
1,504.3
21
424,120
32.1%
193.0
22
401,764
30.4%
239.0
12
64,128
7.0%
48.5
13
696,344
76.0%
446.5
14
156,070
17.0%
113.2
Area%
74.4%
25.6%
40.5%
5.4%
9.8%
14.3%
1.8%
28.2%
89.6%
10.4%
14.7%
85.3%
85.7%
14.3%
4.7%
95.3%
8.7%
34.2%
57.1%
79.5%
20.5%
27.0%
73.0%
0.0%
14.7%
85.3%
47.1%
52.9%
63.4%
36.6%
18.0%
24.5%
57.5%
4.1%
3.5%
20.8%
47.8%
23.8%
76.5%
11.7%
11.8%
20.7%
6.0%
26.2%
19.3%
27.9%
23.9%
76.1%
18.7%
63.1%
8.1%
10.0%
8.0%
73.4%
18.6%
Area%
85.8%
14.2%
19.1%
80.9%
4.7%
95.3%
1.0%
99.0%
24.6%
57.3%
18.2%
29.2%
70.8%
99.8%
0.2%
5.1%
94.9%
89.7%
10.3%
34.8%
64.8%
0.4%
66.6%
33.4%
92.8%
7.2%
49.0%
51.0%
64.5%
35.5%
72.4%
27.6%
86.5%
13.5%
44.8%
55.2%
85.0%
15.0%
98.9%
1.1%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Auburndale
10
13,109
97.1%
17.5
Auburndale
15
398
2.9%
2.9
Boynton Beach
20
19,978
29.3%
3.2
Boynton Beach
22
48,239
70.7%
13.4
Coconut Creek
20
433
0.8%
0.6
Coconut Creek
21
52,476
99.2%
11.4
Cutler Bay
26
0
0.0%
0.1
Cutler Bay
27
40,286
100.0%
10.1
Deerfield Beach
20
26,242
35.0%
4.0
Deerfield Beach
21
33,897
45.2%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Deltona
6
22,646
26.6%
12.0
Deltona
7
62,536
73.4%
29.1
Doral
25
45,704
100.0%
15.2
Doral
27
0
0.0%
0.0
Dundee
10
201
5.4%
0.6
Dundee
17
3,516
94.6%
10.9
Eagle Lake
10
2,255
100.0%
3.2
Eagle Lake
15
0
0.0%
0.4
Fort Lauderdale
20
60,588
36.6%
13.4
Fort Lauderdale
22
104,933
63.4%
25.0
Fort Lauderdale
23
0
0.0%
0.2
Gainesville
3
93,103
74.9%
41.6
Gainesville
5
31,251
25.1%
20.8
Glen Ridge
20
219
100.0%
0.2
Glen Ridge
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Gulfport
13
5,509
45.8%
1.9
Gulfport
14
6,520
54.2%
2.0
Hallandale Beach
23
25,370
68.4%
3.0
Hallandale Beach
24
11,743
31.6%
1.6
Hialeah
25
162,856
72.5%
16.5
Hialeah
27
61,813
27.5%
6.3
Hollywood
23
114,568
81.4%
26.6
Hollywood
24
26,200
18.6%
4.1
Homestead
26
42,640
70.5%
7.0
Homestead
27
17,872
29.5%
8.6
Jacksonville
4
553,412
67.3%
743.0
Jacksonville
5
268,372
32.7%
131.6
Lady Lake
10
13,520
97.1%
8.3
Lady Lake
11
406
2.9%
0.1
Polk
Polk
Polk
Polk
Putnam
Putnam
Sarasota
Sarasota
St. Johns
St. Johns
Volusia
Volusia
Area%
8.0%
26.9%
7.0%
58.1%
41.3%
58.7%
91.1%
8.9%
6.7%
93.3%
85.2%
14.8%
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
9
74,682
12.4%
161.2
10
224,436
37.3%
540.9
15
174,914
29.1%
140.7
17
128,063
21.3%
1,167.8
5
32,877
44.2%
341.3
6
41,487
55.8%
485.7
16
377,885
99.6%
661.1
17
1,563
0.4%
64.2
4
27,140
14.3%
55.1
6
162,899
85.7%
766.5
6
396,263
80.1%
1,220.3
7
98,330
19.9%
212.1
County
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Lake Park
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Lake Park
20
7,242
88.8%
2.1
Lake Park
22
913
11.2%
0.3
Lake Wales
10
0
0.0%
0.0
Lake Wales
17
14,225
100.0%
19.9
Lake Worth
20
10,654
30.5%
1.6
Lake Worth
22
24,256
69.5%
5.0
Lakeland
10
22,802
23.4%
25.8
Lakeland
15
74,620
76.6%
48.5
Lantana
20
4,654
44.7%
1.2
Lantana
22
5,769
55.3%
1.7
Loxahatchee Groves 18
1,681
52.9%
7.0
Loxahatchee Groves 20
1,499
47.1%
5.5
Margate
20
14,535
27.3%
2.2
Margate
21
38,749
72.7%
6.9
Miami
23
15,273
3.8%
2.9
Miami
24
133,006
33.3%
19.4
Miami
27
251,178
62.9%
33.8
Miami Shores
23
0
0.0%
0.7
Miami Shores
24
10,493
100.0%
3.1
Miramar
24
65,355
53.6%
11.2
Miramar
25
56,686
46.4%
20.1
Mulberry
15
1
0.0%
0.1
Mulberry
17
3,816
100.0%
5.7
North Miami
23
9,175
15.6%
4.8
North Miami
24
49,611
84.4%
5.2
North Miami Beach 23
6,953
16.7%
1.1
North Miami Beach 24
34,570
83.3%
4.3
North Palm Beach
18
12,015
100.0%
5.8
North Palm Beach
20
0
0.0%
0.0
North Port
16
55,822
97.3%
79.7
North Port
17
1,535
2.7%
24.5
Oakland Park
20
20,289
49.1%
4.2
Oakland Park
22
21,074
50.9%
3.9
Oldsmar
12
5,101
37.5%
5.7
Oldsmar
13
8,490
62.5%
3.9
Opa-locka
24
14,894
97.9%
2.6
Opa-locka
25
325
2.1%
1.9
Orange City
6
4,674
44.1%
2.4
Orange City
7
5,925
55.9%
4.8
Orange Park
3
4,251
50.5%
1.5
Orange Park
5
4,161
49.5%
3.8
Orlando
5
77,843
32.7%
22.6
Orlando
7
30,467
12.8%
11.9
Orlando
9
102,331
42.9%
68.9
Orlando
10
27,659
11.6%
7.2
Palm Beach Gardens 18
48,452
100.0%
55.3
Palm Beach Gardens 20
0
0.0%
0.1
Pembroke Pines
23
107,607
69.5%
20.0
Pembroke Pines
24
12,856
8.3%
3.1
Pembroke Pines
25
34,287
22.2%
11.7
Plantation
20
13,381
15.8%
2.7
Plantation
22
67,448
79.4%
18.3
Plantation
23
4,126
4.9%
0.9
Pompano Beach
20
46,314
46.4%
11.3
Counties and Cities
Area%
0.2%
88.9%
10.9%
0.2%
99.8%
24.5%
75.5%
34.8%
65.2%
40.7%
59.3%
55.9%
44.1%
24.2%
75.8%
5.2%
34.5%
60.3%
17.9%
82.1%
35.7%
64.3%
1.0%
99.0%
48.4%
51.6%
20.8%
79.2%
99.5%
0.5%
76.5%
23.5%
52.1%
47.9%
59.4%
40.6%
57.7%
42.3%
33.3%
66.7%
28.9%
71.1%
20.5%
10.8%
62.2%
6.5%
99.9%
0.1%
57.5%
9.0%
33.5%
12.3%
83.5%
4.2%
44.4%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Pompano Beach
21
1,447
1.4%
2.0
Pompano Beach
22
52,084
52.2%
12.2
Riviera Beach
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Riviera Beach
20
28,156
86.7%
7.3
Riviera Beach
22
4,332
13.3%
2.9
Royal Palm Beach
18
14,734
43.2%
5.1
Royal Palm Beach
20
16,299
47.7%
5.6
Royal Palm Beach
21
3,107
9.1%
0.7
St. Cloud
9
27,108
77.0%
11.0
St. Cloud
17
8,075
23.0%
6.8
St. Petersburg
13
96,485
39.4%
40.9
St. Petersburg
14
148,284
60.6%
96.7
Sunrise
20
62,665
74.2%
9.4
Sunrise
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Sunrise
23
21,774
25.8%
8.9
Tampa
12
7,411
2.2%
2.4
Tampa
14
281,381
83.8%
143.2
Tampa
15
46,917
14.0%
29.7
Tarpon Springs
12
2,498
10.6%
1.8
Tarpon Springs
13
20,986
89.4%
15.5
Temple Terrace
14
0
0.0%
0.0
Temple Terrace
15
24,541
100.0%
7.1
West Palm Beach
18
20,693
20.7%
35.3
West Palm Beach
20
48,663
48.7%
15.5
West Palm Beach
22
30,563
30.6%
7.2
Wilton Manors
20
3,311
28.5%
0.6
Wilton Manors
22
8,321
71.5%
1.4
Winter Haven
10
31,911
94.2%
31.3
Winter Haven
15
200
0.6%
0.3
Winter Haven
17
1,763
5.2%
8.3
Area%
7.7%
47.9%
0.4%
71.2%
28.4%
45.0%
49.1%
5.8%
61.8%
38.2%
29.7%
70.3%
51.5%
0.0%
48.4%
1.4%
81.7%
16.9%
10.3%
89.7%
0.1%
99.9%
60.8%
26.8%
12.5%
29.9%
70.1%
78.4%
0.7%
20.9%
Plan: H000C9007
Page 4 of 4
26
5
10
Scale bar for insets
27
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
0
Miami Beach
Miami
Oldsmar
14
Bradenton
16 Palmetto
Tampa
MANATEE
Plant City
Zephyrhills
6
17
10
St. Augustine
Dade City
HILLSBOROUGH
15
St. Leo
ST. JOHNS
Temple Terrace
PASCO
12
Green Cove Springs
St. Petersburg
Holmes Beach
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
Treasure Island
Pinellas Park
13 PINELLAS
Seminole
Largo
Clearwater
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
Starke
CLAY
4
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
10
Ocoee
Apopka
5
Maitland
Winter Springs
Kissimmee
7 Oviedo
St. Cloud
9
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
6
Deltona
SEMINOLE
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
LAKE
6-Dec-2011
*****
Workshop by House
Congressional
Subcommittee
8-Dec-2011
H000C9009
Orlando11
Area
Eustis
DIXIE
8
AD
BR
OR O
LSB
15
Titusville
Oak Hill
LEE
19
CHARLOTTE
DESOTO
17
HARDEE
POLK
10
LAKE
5
PUTNAM
CLAY
MARION
SARASOTA
16
MANATEE
14
HIL
12
HERNANDO
F
UGH
ALACHUA
CITRUS
PASCO
13
11
VOLUSIA
LEVY
E
9
6
DUVAL
4
COLLIER
25
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
OSCEOLA
ORANGE
7
VOLUSIA
FLAGLER
10
26
8
MONROE
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
20
21
27
23
24
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
18
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Florida City
Homestead
Cutler Bay
Aventura
24 North Miami
Coral Gables
Palmetto Bay
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Hialeah
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
Dania Beach
Orange Park
Jacksonville
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
D
OR
R
Doral
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
23
Lawtey
DUVAL
GULF
N
UNIO
BAKER
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
MIAMI-DADE
Davie
Fort Lauderdale
Lauderhill
Oakland Park
Pompano Beach
3
Baldwin
5
Miles
60
3
HAMILTON
LA
FA
YE
TT
MADISON
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
Sunrise
Plantation
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Southwest Ranches
BROWARD
Tamarac
Deerfield Beach
Boca Raton
22
Delray Beach
NASSAU
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Parkland
21
Lantana
Lake Worth
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
GILCHRIST
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
30
2
JACKSON
E
20
Wellington
Palm Springs
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
HNS
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
E
NN
Belle Glade
18
1
SANTA ROSA
A
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
South Florida
BIA
COLU
M
A
ESC
JO
ST.
OK
App. 113
App. 114
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
14.66%
10.99%
48.10%
9.85%
10.71%
9.12%
11.99%
12.76%
8.63%
4.30%
5.12%
24.58%
11.14%
5.80%
9.47%
10.98%
5.76%
50.21%
11.21%
10.16%
9.93%
55.73%
8.25%
10.02%
7.71%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
12
15
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
37.2%
62.8%
34.7%
65.3%
69.7%
30.3%
47.0%
53.0%
50.0%
50.0%
42.6%
57.4%
60.5%
39.5%
46.3%
53.7%
38.4%
61.6%
46.0%
54.0%
50.0%
50.0%
65.2%
34.8%
46.3%
53.7%
45.3%
54.7%
41.7%
58.3%
48.0%
52.0%
38.4%
61.6%
83.2%
16.8%
60.9%
39.1%
54.3%
45.7%
61.2%
38.8%
88.4%
11.6%
49.4%
50.6%
53.4%
46.6%
53.3%
46.7%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
10
17
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
40.8%
59.2%
36.6%
63.4%
65.4%
34.6%
47.0%
53.0%
49.5%
50.5%
42.3%
57.7%
54.2%
45.8%
44.5%
55.5%
40.8%
59.2%
45.6%
54.4%
50.2%
49.8%
63.0%
37.0%
46.3%
53.7%
46.0%
54.0%
41.6%
58.4%
49.1%
50.9%
36.5%
63.5%
80.0%
20.0%
63.0%
37.0%
54.4%
45.6%
60.9%
39.1%
86.5%
13.5%
42.2%
57.8%
49.9%
50.1%
48.4%
51.6%
0.41
0.37
0.46
0.54
0.36
0.10
0.36
0.64
0.34
0.60
0.44
0.43
0.57
0.35
0.38
0.38
0.48
0.59
0.54
0.26
0.49
0.29
0.17
0.27
0.47
0.47
0.18
0.46
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
33.2%
66.8%
28.1%
71.9%
60.9%
39.1%
38.9%
61.1%
37.0%
63.0%
33.9%
66.1%
45.1%
54.9%
36.1%
63.9%
33.1%
66.9%
34.6%
65.4%
36.9%
63.1%
51.6%
48.4%
34.2%
65.8%
34.3%
65.7%
33.6%
66.4%
36.4%
63.6%
27.6%
72.4%
75.1%
24.9%
51.6%
48.4%
41.6%
58.4%
52.2%
47.8%
84.4%
15.6%
35.5%
64.5%
42.3%
57.7%
39.5%
60.5%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2175.2
7552.5
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
0.36%
120
534
6,088
0.42%
70
268
1,370
1.07%
144
645
1,704
0.45%
101
351
2,841
1.01%
30
126
444
0.39%
95
271
2,412
2.19%
52
198
1,256
0.63%
68
230
1,584
0.33%
125
427
5,286
0.38%
57
206
1,448
0.27%
40
114
447
1.51%
43
139
546
0.86%
60
193
1,101
0.27%
60
173
1,350
0.45%
124
424
7,096
0.44%
69
220
1,993
0.42%
83
234
1,372
1.19%
74
347
2,096
0.65%
34
110
264
0.56%
52
188
369
1.16%
37
124
288
3.38%
17
58
110
1.68%
103
345
3,980
1.47%
184
551
4,900
2.23%
40
130
578
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
21
6
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
45.0%
55.0%
42.2%
57.8%
73.6%
26.4%
54.7%
45.3%
57.0%
43.0%
51.2%
48.8%
66.4%
33.6%
53.5%
46.5%
47.7%
52.3%
55.5%
44.5%
58.8%
41.2%
70.6%
29.4%
54.2%
45.8%
51.9%
48.1%
48.8%
51.2%
54.7%
45.3%
43.4%
56.6%
85.0%
15.0%
66.6%
33.4%
59.4%
40.6%
65.0%
35.0%
88.8%
11.2%
52.4%
47.6%
55.8%
44.2%
56.0%
44.0%
4.55%
4.75%
6.61%
6.79%
11.13%
8.64%
18.67%
7.66%
38.50%
13.52%
6.73%
9.25%
7.18%
23.89%
17.72%
8.80%
14.62%
12.06%
13.69%
18.55%
18.30%
17.58%
37.56%
33.15%
70.08%
68.91%
75.04%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.35
0.38
0.42
0.27
0.24
0.05
0.29
0.35
0.41
0.40
0.38
0.36
0.43
0.43
0.36
0.37
0.57
0.50
0.52
0.32
0.22
0.27
0.13
0.23
0.41
0.42
0.20
0.43
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
34.1%
65.9%
29.7%
70.3%
61.9%
38.1%
40.8%
59.2%
41.0%
59.0%
35.9%
64.1%
47.4%
52.6%
37.9%
62.1%
34.5%
65.5%
36.9%
63.1%
41.0%
59.0%
53.2%
46.8%
35.0%
65.0%
39.2%
60.8%
34.3%
65.7%
42.6%
57.4%
30.0%
70.0%
78.2%
21.8%
59.0%
41.0%
49.5%
50.5%
58.6%
41.4%
86.2%
13.8%
37.7%
62.3%
45.5%
54.5%
45.6%
54.4%
Convex
Hull
0.75
0.82
0.78
0.77
0.79
0.35
0.72
0.83
0.76
0.84
0.81
0.83
0.77
0.81
0.76
0.75
0.87
0.82
0.87
0.70
0.74
0.61
0.61
0.55
0.87
0.82
0.46
0.81
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
6
21
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
33.1%
66.9%
29.3%
70.7%
61.7%
38.3%
38.9%
61.1%
38.2%
61.8%
34.0%
66.0%
45.7%
54.3%
34.1%
65.9%
33.0%
67.0%
33.3%
66.7%
36.2%
63.8%
50.3%
49.7%
31.3%
68.7%
34.6%
65.4%
29.4%
70.6%
36.7%
63.3%
27.2%
72.8%
76.7%
23.3%
54.2%
45.8%
45.1%
54.9%
55.4%
44.6%
85.9%
14.1%
36.3%
63.7%
43.7%
56.3%
41.5%
58.5%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
18.0%
15.0%
47.0%
20.5%
21.6%
15.7%
27.4%
20.1%
16.0%
13.0%
14.7%
28.5%
15.2%
13.0%
14.7%
15.9%
9.3%
51.3%
19.2%
17.5%
23.0%
65.0%
16.6%
20.9%
17.7%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
20
66.3%
49.8%
60.0%
64.9%
34.8%
52.5%
55.3%
56.3%
49.1%
54.6%
57.3%
47.3%
42.5%
34.1%
50.7%
48.0%
53.1%
50.9%
60.5%
18.9%
36.0%
43.8%
37.4%
12.9%
59.7%
51.5%
55.1%
I_Cri
4
20.4%
28.7%
22.0%
20.1%
18.2%
27.0%
23.2%
28.0%
23.5%
25.3%
26.7%
39.8%
42.7%
37.4%
34.0%
39.0%
32.2%
33.2%
30.3%
29.8%
44.9%
38.7%
39.6%
22.1%
23.8%
27.6%
27.2%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
12
15
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
38.9%
61.1%
36.6%
63.4%
69.2%
30.8%
50.5%
49.5%
51.6%
48.4%
44.4%
55.6%
59.1%
40.9%
47.3%
52.7%
41.2%
58.8%
47.9%
52.1%
51.4%
48.6%
65.4%
34.6%
46.7%
53.3%
48.6%
51.4%
43.6%
56.4%
51.5%
48.5%
42.3%
57.7%
81.3%
18.7%
63.9%
36.1%
56.9%
43.1%
61.6%
38.4%
86.9%
13.1%
46.3%
53.7%
49.8%
50.2%
48.8%
51.2%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
37.9%
62.1%
30.4%
69.6%
58.1%
41.9%
47.0%
53.0%
39.8%
60.2%
43.2%
56.8%
44.7%
55.3%
39.2%
60.8%
39.5%
60.5%
44.1%
55.9%
45.2%
54.8%
56.0%
44.0%
39.8%
60.2%
42.5%
57.5%
40.0%
60.0%
48.0%
52.0%
33.3%
66.7%
75.7%
24.3%
65.3%
34.7%
54.9%
45.1%
62.3%
37.7%
81.6%
18.4%
38.5%
61.5%
47.1%
52.9%
44.5%
55.5%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
17
10
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
47.9%
52.1%
41.0%
59.0%
64.9%
35.1%
54.4%
45.6%
50.4%
49.6%
49.7%
50.3%
54.0%
46.0%
48.6%
51.4%
49.5%
50.5%
51.4%
48.6%
53.7%
46.3%
61.0%
39.0%
43.9%
56.1%
50.3%
49.7%
46.7%
53.3%
52.8%
47.2%
42.5%
57.5%
79.9%
20.1%
71.0%
29.0%
61.1%
38.9%
69.5%
30.5%
84.9%
15.1%
46.2%
53.8%
53.5%
46.5%
51.6%
48.4%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
39.0%
61.0%
30.6%
69.4%
57.4%
42.6%
46.7%
53.3%
38.6%
61.4%
42.3%
57.7%
44.5%
55.5%
39.6%
60.4%
41.4%
58.6%
44.4%
55.6%
47.0%
53.0%
55.3%
44.7%
38.6%
61.4%
46.1%
53.9%
40.8%
59.2%
50.7%
49.3%
35.3%
64.7%
76.7%
23.3%
68.0%
32.0%
57.6%
42.4%
64.2%
35.8%
81.2%
18.8%
40.7%
59.3%
48.5%
51.5%
47.7%
52.3%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
33.5%
66.5%
29.4%
70.6%
56.1%
43.9%
44.3%
55.7%
36.1%
63.9%
35.8%
64.2%
40.2%
59.8%
35.5%
64.5%
36.6%
63.4%
39.9%
60.1%
39.8%
60.2%
50.7%
49.3%
34.7%
65.3%
39.7%
60.3%
36.3%
63.7%
44.5%
55.5%
32.9%
67.1%
74.3%
25.7%
63.7%
36.3%
52.5%
47.5%
61.4%
38.6%
80.6%
19.4%
39.2%
60.8%
46.7%
53.3%
44.7%
55.3%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
11%
41
-13%
26
-17%
69
-17%
69
0%
410
19%
358
-53%
52
-53%
119
-56%
107
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
52.7%
47.3%
46.9%
53.1%
69.7%
30.3%
62.3%
37.7%
59.5%
40.5%
59.7%
40.3%
62.1%
37.9%
57.4%
42.6%
56.6%
43.4%
61.4%
38.6%
63.3%
36.7%
70.8%
29.2%
58.3%
41.7%
57.3%
42.7%
56.8%
43.2%
64.0%
36.0%
51.2%
48.8%
82.8%
17.2%
76.9%
23.1%
67.8%
32.2%
72.7%
27.3%
85.4%
14.6%
51.1%
48.9%
57.2%
42.8%
55.9%
44.1%
Plan: H000C9009
Page 2 of 4
App. 115
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
42.4%
31.8%
59.6%
39.5%
36.6%
35.0%
42.8%
37.7%
38.1%
36.1%
35.7%
50.5%
36.8%
32.8%
38.8%
37.5%
28.0%
65.3%
48.1%
41.3%
47.7%
69.8%
32.9%
35.8%
35.8%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
39.6%
29.9%
59.7%
37.9%
35.7%
33.4%
41.9%
36.7%
35.7%
34.5%
34.7%
49.5%
35.9%
32.1%
37.0%
36.4%
27.1%
65.8%
46.7%
40.5%
46.3%
69.3%
32.8%
35.6%
35.8%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
18.9%
21.8%
19.1%
26.2%
27.1%
23.1%
30.2%
24.3%
20.4%
25.8%
27.4%
25.2%
26.0%
24.5%
21.8%
25.6%
25.8%
21.1%
27.4%
27.5%
28.4%
20.5%
29.2%
29.3%
28.3%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
17.2%
20.5%
18.2%
25.1%
25.2%
21.1%
27.6%
22.6%
19.7%
24.4%
26.1%
23.5%
24.4%
23.5%
20.5%
24.6%
24.4%
20.4%
25.9%
25.9%
26.1%
19.4%
27.4%
27.4%
26.0%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
41.6%
48.3%
21.2%
35.9%
37.2%
43.5%
27.9%
39.0%
43.9%
39.7%
37.9%
25.3%
38.2%
43.4%
41.2%
38.0%
47.1%
13.2%
25.8%
32.0%
25.3%
10.2%
38.0%
35.2%
35.9%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
40.4%
47.7%
22.2%
35.5%
38.2%
43.9%
29.6%
39.6%
42.2%
39.5%
38.2%
26.1%
38.8%
43.6%
40.7%
37.9%
47.6%
14.3%
26.0%
32.8%
26.2%
10.8%
39.6%
36.8%
38.2%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
83.3%
78.7%
86.0%
82.2%
77.9%
81.6%
77.8%
81.2%
85.1%
77.4%
77.5%
83.5%
77.7%
81.2%
83.5%
81.1%
76.8%
84.4%
77.0%
79.2%
78.7%
85.7%
79.0%
80.8%
80.5%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
84.6%
79.9%
86.8%
82.7%
79.0%
82.7%
79.3%
82.2%
85.4%
78.3%
77.7%
84.1%
78.7%
81.0%
83.9%
81.6%
77.5%
84.4%
77.3%
79.8%
79.3%
85.8%
79.4%
81.0%
81.4%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
12.5%
4.0%
26.4%
3.8%
1.4%
2.8%
10.2%
3.8%
26.8%
4.4%
1.1%
2.5%
47.6%
6.8%
68.6%
5.8%
6.5%
5.1%
8.8%
5.8%
19.0%
7.1%
0.9%
3.0%
9.3%
15.0%
20.4%
19.2%
1.1%
7.7%
7.9%
4.6%
19.2%
5.8%
0.9%
2.9%
9.3%
34.7%
17.2%
41.1%
1.5%
17.8%
11.6%
9.5%
25.7%
11.7%
1.4%
5.1%
6.8%
3.9%
16.3%
5.2%
0.7%
2.3%
3.7%
6.4%
8.4%
8.7%
0.5%
3.8%
4.3%
3.9%
9.7%
5.0%
0.5%
2.3%
24.2%
14.4%
40.8%
14.0%
3.1%
10.5%
10.7%
10.9%
23.1%
13.0%
1.3%
6.6%
4.9%
3.6%
12.5%
4.9%
0.5%
1.9%
8.2%
7.4%
18.5%
9.0%
0.8%
4.2%
9.6%
6.3%
21.3%
7.8%
1.1%
3.9%
4.1%
6.4%
11.6%
9.5%
0.4%
3.3%
48.1%
10.8%
61.8%
8.3%
10.5%
14.1%
8.9%
11.6%
14.6%
11.2%
1.4%
8.8%
7.5%
9.1%
14.7%
10.0%
0.9%
6.3%
8.7%
26.9%
14.7%
23.4%
1.4%
27.8%
55.6%
22.9%
68.8%
15.5%
14.2%
48.0%
6.9%
57.7%
16.6%
52.3%
0.9%
58.6%
9.3%
57.3%
21.2%
45.3%
1.1%
66.2%
7.0%
60.5%
15.8%
48.3%
0.8%
71.0%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
12.6%
3.6%
25.0%
3.4%
1.4%
2.8%
10.4%
3.4%
26.1%
3.8%
1.2%
2.3%
45.4%
6.2%
66.1%
5.3%
6.3%
4.8%
8.5%
5.4%
17.9%
6.4%
0.9%
2.9%
9.0%
13.8%
19.4%
17.7%
1.2%
7.4%
7.5%
4.2%
17.6%
5.2%
0.9%
2.7%
9.1%
32.2%
16.9%
38.1%
1.4%
17.6%
11.1%
8.7%
24.3%
10.5%
1.4%
4.8%
6.7%
3.6%
14.9%
4.6%
0.8%
2.2%
3.5%
5.8%
7.6%
7.7%
0.5%
3.6%
4.0%
3.5%
8.6%
4.3%
0.5%
2.1%
23.8%
13.0%
39.7%
12.1%
3.3%
10.1%
9.9%
9.8%
21.2%
11.5%
1.3%
6.2%
4.7%
3.1%
11.6%
4.1%
0.6%
1.8%
7.8%
6.6%
16.9%
7.9%
0.9%
4.0%
8.9%
5.7%
19.4%
6.9%
1.0%
3.5%
3.7%
5.7%
10.3%
8.3%
0.4%
3.1%
45.9%
9.9%
59.3%
7.6%
10.4%
12.8%
7.8%
10.1%
12.6%
9.6%
1.4%
8.0%
7.1%
8.0%
13.7%
8.6%
0.9%
5.7%
8.1%
24.6%
13.4%
21.0%
1.4%
26.9%
56.2%
21.4%
69.1%
14.3%
15.3%
46.8%
6.9%
55.1%
16.7%
48.5%
0.9%
57.7%
9.5%
55.5%
21.4%
42.6%
1.1%
65.6%
7.0%
59.2%
16.0%
45.4%
0.8%
70.8%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
39.5%
30.6%
35.4%
32.7%
50.7%
17.2%
47.2%
19.0%
46.8%
20.6%
43.2%
28.1%
50.7%
16.1%
45.7%
22.1%
49.1%
26.1%
47.7%
24.2%
44.3%
23.2%
47.1%
20.3%
43.2%
24.4%
42.7%
24.4%
46.2%
24.7%
46.0%
23.6%
41.1%
26.0%
50.2%
18.4%
45.7%
20.6%
44.5%
23.3%
40.7%
28.6%
46.5%
23.7%
29.0%
41.5%
27.5%
43.5%
27.4%
45.6%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
37.4%
29.2%
34.3%
31.9%
50.4%
15.9%
46.8%
18.7%
45.7%
19.1%
41.9%
27.2%
49.6%
14.3%
45.4%
20.9%
48.0%
26.0%
46.7%
23.6%
44.1%
22.2%
48.0%
18.5%
42.7%
23.2%
43.3%
23.2%
45.5%
23.5%
44.7%
23.2%
40.6%
24.5%
50.3%
17.2%
45.2%
19.7%
44.3%
22.0%
40.2%
26.2%
47.0%
21.4%
29.7%
38.6%
28.1%
40.6%
28.6%
42.1%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
41.5%
47.5%
11.0%
29.6%
56.6%
13.8%
60.1%
28.9%
11.0%
38.0%
43.9%
18.0%
34.0%
48.7%
17.3%
32.3%
52.2%
15.4%
40.6%
40.8%
18.6%
34.6%
49.5%
15.9%
34.9%
50.1%
15.1%
33.5%
48.4%
18.1%
34.6%
46.1%
19.3%
50.7%
33.6%
15.7%
35.2%
47.6%
17.2%
30.8%
51.5%
17.7%
36.0%
50.0%
14.0%
34.9%
46.5%
18.6%
24.2%
58.2%
17.6%
70.1%
16.4%
13.5%
50.2%
29.8%
20.1%
40.8%
39.5%
19.7%
49.6%
31.3%
19.1%
76.5%
10.9%
12.6%
29.7%
51.0%
19.3%
35.3%
45.9%
18.8%
34.0%
47.6%
18.4%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
39.8%
44.8%
15.4%
29.6%
52.2%
18.2%
62.3%
22.8%
14.9%
38.2%
39.4%
22.3%
35.6%
41.1%
23.3%
33.1%
46.9%
20.0%
43.0%
31.3%
25.8%
36.4%
42.7%
20.9%
34.6%
47.8%
17.5%
34.4%
43.5%
22.1%
35.2%
41.1%
23.7%
51.0%
27.7%
21.3%
36.2%
41.4%
22.4%
32.0%
46.8%
21.2%
36.6%
45.4%
18.0%
36.3%
41.3%
22.4%
26.3%
51.8%
21.9%
69.8%
12.7%
17.5%
48.4%
26.9%
24.8%
41.4%
34.1%
24.6%
47.9%
26.6%
25.5%
73.2%
9.4%
17.4%
32.8%
41.4%
25.7%
36.1%
38.4%
25.5%
36.1%
38.6%
25.2%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
10.6%
2.2%
22.7%
1.8%
0.9%
1.9%
8.5%
2.2%
24.3%
2.3%
0.8%
1.7%
44.0%
3.5%
67.4%
3.0%
3.6%
3.1%
7.2%
3.3%
16.8%
4.2%
0.5%
2.0%
7.6%
8.5%
18.5%
11.5%
0.8%
5.1%
6.2%
2.8%
16.7%
3.6%
0.6%
2.0%
9.5%
20.3%
19.8%
27.1%
1.0%
10.8%
9.6%
4.9%
24.1%
6.2%
0.9%
3.1%
5.3%
1.9%
13.8%
2.6%
0.4%
1.3%
3.1%
3.5%
7.6%
4.9%
0.4%
2.5%
2.9%
2.1%
7.2%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
21.6%
7.7%
38.2%
7.1%
1.9%
7.0%
8.9%
5.8%
20.9%
6.6%
0.9%
4.3%
3.4%
1.7%
9.7%
2.3%
0.3%
1.1%
6.4%
3.3%
15.8%
4.1%
0.5%
2.4%
7.5%
3.4%
18.6%
4.2%
0.7%
2.5%
2.3%
2.8%
7.8%
4.5%
0.2%
1.9%
48.6%
6.2%
62.3%
4.4%
7.1%
9.9%
7.5%
6.2%
12.2%
5.3%
1.1%
6.1%
6.0%
5.1%
12.4%
5.2%
0.6%
4.3%
8.4%
20.3%
14.2%
14.9%
1.1%
25.5%
63.5%
15.4%
75.1%
9.0%
12.0%
46.1%
7.6%
48.9%
21.6%
37.7%
0.7%
54.0%
9.8%
51.4%
24.1%
32.8%
0.7%
64.2%
6.3%
56.7%
16.1%
35.5%
0.5%
70.9%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
12.7%
3.5%
27.4%
3.3%
1.1%
2.5%
10.3%
3.2%
28.3%
3.8%
0.9%
2.2%
50.0%
5.4%
71.4%
4.6%
5.1%
4.2%
8.9%
4.9%
19.8%
6.3%
0.7%
2.6%
9.3%
12.8%
21.1%
17.0%
0.9%
6.6%
7.9%
4.1%
20.0%
5.2%
0.7%
2.6%
10.2%
30.7%
19.2%
38.0%
1.2%
14.7%
12.0%
8.1%
27.4%
10.3%
1.2%
4.4%
6.7%
3.1%
17.0%
4.4%
0.5%
1.9%
4.0%
5.8%
9.2%
8.1%
0.5%
3.4%
4.3%
3.4%
9.9%
4.5%
0.4%
2.1%
24.9%
12.5%
42.0%
12.4%
2.4%
9.2%
11.2%
9.5%
24.6%
11.5%
1.1%
6.0%
4.8%
3.1%
12.6%
4.4%
0.4%
1.6%
8.5%
5.8%
20.0%
7.5%
0.6%
3.3%
9.8%
5.5%
22.6%
6.9%
0.9%
3.5%
3.9%
5.1%
12.0%
8.2%
0.3%
2.7%
52.3%
9.6%
65.2%
7.2%
9.2%
13.7%
9.6%
10.6%
15.8%
10.1%
1.3%
8.4%
7.8%
8.4%
15.5%
9.0%
0.8%
6.0%
9.4%
26.9%
15.8%
22.6%
1.3%
28.5%
59.7%
20.7%
71.8%
13.7%
12.9%
48.9%
7.7%
55.0%
19.1%
48.6%
0.8%
56.3%
9.7%
56.1%
22.5%
42.2%
0.9%
65.9%
7.1%
59.7%
16.3%
45.7%
0.6%
71.0%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
88.9%
84.2%
92.0%
88.8%
83.2%
86.7%
84.3%
86.5%
90.3%
82.1%
84.9%
89.8%
82.5%
87.4%
89.4%
86.5%
83.2%
89.8%
81.9%
84.7%
83.6%
90.5%
84.3%
86.9%
86.3%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
86.1%
81.4%
89.0%
85.0%
80.6%
84.1%
80.9%
83.5%
87.8%
79.9%
80.8%
86.3%
79.8%
84.6%
86.5%
83.6%
80.5%
87.1%
79.4%
81.8%
81.2%
88.0%
81.5%
83.8%
83.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
35.0%
41.6%
31.4%
45.4%
51.7%
25.6%
49.1%
26.3%
45.8%
29.2%
40.7%
37.7%
54.3%
21.8%
43.6%
31.7%
46.6%
35.0%
46.2%
33.6%
42.6%
33.4%
46.8%
30.5%
40.4%
35.8%
41.2%
34.5%
44.4%
35.4%
43.7%
34.5%
38.0%
39.3%
50.0%
26.2%
43.1%
29.4%
41.8%
33.5%
36.3%
39.5%
44.3%
32.6%
22.9%
56.4%
22.5%
57.4%
21.3%
59.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
37.6%
32.0%
34.5%
35.8%
52.8%
17.6%
48.9%
20.7%
47.3%
21.3%
42.2%
30.1%
53.2%
15.0%
46.2%
23.0%
48.8%
28.7%
48.3%
25.6%
46.0%
24.6%
50.5%
20.2%
43.8%
25.9%
45.2%
24.5%
47.4%
26.0%
45.7%
25.9%
42.5%
27.5%
52.3%
18.1%
46.1%
21.2%
44.7%
24.3%
40.2%
28.2%
48.5%
22.3%
29.0%
42.4%
27.2%
45.0%
27.7%
46.0%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
19.5%
0.9%
1.3%
20.3%
1.4%
1.3%
65.7%
1.9%
2.0%
16.3%
3.1%
1.5%
16.1%
7.7%
3.6%
15.7%
2.5%
1.6%
16.6%
19.3%
7.5%
22.0%
3.8%
2.2%
12.5%
1.3%
1.0%
6.2%
3.1%
1.7%
5.8%
1.9%
1.2%
36.3%
3.9%
4.9%
16.8%
3.5%
3.0%
9.4%
1.4%
0.8%
13.3%
2.6%
1.7%
17.9%
2.7%
1.8%
6.9%
2.6%
1.4%
61.7%
2.7%
8.0%
10.0%
2.8%
4.8%
11.1%
3.1%
3.3%
13.7%
9.6%
24.8%
79.2%
5.3%
44.0%
23.7%
31.4%
52.8%
25.5%
22.7%
63.6%
15.6%
29.2%
74.3%
Plan: H000C9009
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Duval
Gilchrist
Gilchrist
Hendry
Hendry
Hernando
Hernando
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Nassau
Nassau
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Osceola
Osceola
Osceola
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
App. 116
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
203,019
82.1%
731.8
5
44,317
17.9%
237.1
20
455,445
26.1%
535.5
21
272,224
15.6%
70.9
22
294,581
16.9%
130.1
23
498,411
28.5%
188.9
24
136,412
7.8%
24.0
25
90,993
5.2%
373.5
3
172,269
90.3%
576.5
5
18,596
9.7%
67.1
19
160,728
50.0%
338.0
25
160,792
50.0%
1,967.0
3
78,825
9.1%
236.2
4
517,092
59.8%
550.7
5
268,346
31.0%
131.6
3
3,584
21.2%
88.3
11
13,355
78.8%
266.9
20
13,550
34.6%
55.7
25
25,590
65.4%
1,134.3
11
3,800
2.2%
57.2
12
168,978
97.8%
531.8
14
538,817
43.8%
432.5
15
690,409
56.2%
833.2
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
5
17,490
5.9%
312.1
10
207,677
69.9%
657.4
11
71,885
24.2%
187.4
17
83,137
13.4%
178.2
19
535,617
86.6%
1,034.3
2
4,028
21.0%
337.4
3
15,196
79.0%
378.3
15
5,936
1.8%
267.8
16
316,897
98.2%
624.9
5
15,019
4.5%
407.9
11
316,279
95.5%
1,254.7
23
197,933
7.9%
99.3
24
559,932
22.4%
86.2
25
418,970
16.8%
505.4
26
623,255
25.0%
1,162.5
27
696,345
27.9%
577.7
3
19,531
26.6%
376.7
4
53,783
73.4%
349.2
17
34,658
86.7%
786.4
18
5,338
13.3%
105.5
5
299,700
26.2%
207.1
7
273,627
23.9%
99.2
8
14,940
1.3%
238.0
9
364,932
31.8%
264.8
10
192,757
16.8%
194.2
9
262,136
97.6%
831.3
10
5,472
2.0%
31.0
17
1,077
0.4%
643.7
18
266,900
20.2%
446.6
20
227,350
17.2%
1,504.3
Area%
75.5%
24.5%
40.5%
5.4%
9.8%
14.3%
1.8%
28.2%
89.6%
10.4%
14.7%
85.3%
25.7%
60.0%
14.3%
24.9%
75.1%
4.7%
95.3%
9.7%
90.3%
34.2%
65.8%
79.5%
20.5%
27.0%
56.8%
16.2%
14.7%
85.3%
47.1%
52.9%
30.0%
70.0%
24.5%
75.5%
4.1%
3.5%
20.8%
47.8%
23.8%
51.9%
48.1%
88.2%
11.8%
20.6%
9.9%
23.7%
26.4%
19.4%
55.2%
2.1%
42.7%
18.7%
63.1%
Area%
8.1%
10.0%
7.9%
73.4%
18.7%
7.9%
29.4%
62.6%
41.3%
58.7%
57.2%
42.8%
19.0%
81.0%
Area%
19.1%
80.9%
49.9%
50.1%
4.7%
95.3%
1.0%
99.0%
24.6%
57.3%
18.2%
99.8%
0.2%
1.4%
1.8%
96.8%
100.0%
0.0%
34.8%
64.8%
0.4%
66.6%
33.4%
92.8%
7.2%
49.0%
51.0%
76.5%
23.5%
64.5%
35.5%
72.4%
27.6%
86.5%
13.5%
44.8%
55.2%
26.8%
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
21
424,120
32.1%
193.0
22
401,764
30.4%
239.0
12
62,670
6.8%
47.9
13
696,344
76.0%
446.6
14
157,528
17.2%
113.6
9
69,277
11.5%
159.5
10
289,586
48.1%
591.9
17
243,232
40.4%
1,259.2
5
32,877
44.2%
341.3
6
41,487
55.8%
485.7
4
125,470
66.0%
469.8
6
64,569
34.0%
351.7
10
853
0.9%
110.0
11
92,567
99.1%
469.8
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Boynton Beach
20
19,978
29.3%
3.2
Boynton Beach
22
48,239
70.7%
13.4
Callahan
3
417
37.1%
0.7
Callahan
4
706
62.9%
0.7
Coconut Creek
20
433
0.8%
0.6
Coconut Creek
21
52,476
99.2%
11.4
Cutler Bay
26
0
0.0%
0.1
Cutler Bay
27
40,286
100.0%
10.1
Deerfield Beach
20
26,242
35.0%
4.0
Deerfield Beach
21
33,897
45.2%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Doral
25
45,704
100.0%
15.2
Doral
27
0
0.0%
0.0
Dundee
9
4
0.1%
0.2
Dundee
10
0
0.0%
0.2
Dundee
17
3,713
99.9%
11.1
Eustis
10
18,558
100.0%
12.1
Eustis
11
0
0.0%
0.0
Fort Lauderdale
20
60,588
36.6%
13.4
Fort Lauderdale
22
104,933
63.4%
25.0
Fort Lauderdale
23
0
0.0%
0.2
Gainesville
3
93,046
74.8%
41.6
Gainesville
5
31,308
25.2%
20.8
Glen Ridge
20
219
100.0%
0.2
Glen Ridge
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Gulfport
13
5,509
45.8%
1.9
Gulfport
14
6,520
54.2%
2.0
Haines City
9
14,456
70.4%
15.1
Haines City
10
6,079
29.6%
4.6
Hallandale Beach
23
25,370
68.4%
3.0
Hallandale Beach
24
11,743
31.6%
1.6
Hialeah
25
162,856
72.5%
16.5
Hialeah
27
61,813
27.5%
6.3
Hollywood
23
114,568
81.4%
26.6
Hollywood
24
26,200
18.6%
4.1
Homestead
26
42,640
70.5%
7.0
Homestead
27
17,872
29.5%
8.6
Jacksonville
3
77,400
9.4%
234.2
County
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
Pinellas
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
Polk
Putnam
Putnam
St. Johns
St. Johns
Sumter
Sumter
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Jacksonville
4
476,038
57.9%
508.9
Jacksonville
5
268,346
32.7%
131.6
Lake Hamilton
9
1,163
94.5%
3.2
Lake Hamilton
10
68
5.5%
1.0
Lake Park
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Lake Park
20
7,242
88.8%
2.1
Lake Park
22
913
11.2%
0.3
Lake Worth
20
10,654
30.5%
1.6
Lake Worth
22
24,256
69.5%
5.0
Lakeland
10
86,624
88.9%
63.3
Lakeland
17
10,798
11.1%
11.0
Lantana
20
4,654
44.7%
1.2
Lantana
22
5,769
55.3%
1.7
Leesburg
10
9,219
45.8%
33.3
Leesburg
11
10,898
54.2%
7.7
Loxahatchee Groves 18
1,681
52.9%
7.0
Loxahatchee Groves 20
1,499
47.1%
5.5
Margate
20
14,535
27.3%
2.2
Margate
21
38,749
72.7%
6.9
Miami
23
15,273
3.8%
2.9
Miami
24
133,006
33.3%
19.4
Miami
27
251,178
62.9%
33.8
Miami Shores
23
0
0.0%
0.7
Miami Shores
24
10,493
100.0%
3.1
Miramar
24
65,355
53.6%
11.2
Miramar
25
56,686
46.4%
20.1
North Miami
23
9,175
15.6%
4.8
North Miami
24
49,611
84.4%
5.2
North Miami Beach 23
6,953
16.7%
1.1
North Miami Beach 24
34,570
83.3%
4.3
North Palm Beach
18
12,015
100.0%
5.8
North Palm Beach
20
0
0.0%
0.0
Oakland Park
20
20,289
49.1%
4.2
Oakland Park
22
21,074
50.9%
3.9
Oldsmar
12
5,101
37.5%
5.6
Oldsmar
13
8,490
62.5%
4.1
Opa-locka
24
14,894
97.9%
2.6
Opa-locka
25
325
2.1%
1.9
Orange Park
3
4,251
50.5%
1.5
Orange Park
5
4,161
49.5%
3.8
Orlando
5
77,843
32.7%
22.6
Orlando
7
43,408
18.2%
16.5
Orlando
9
89,386
37.5%
63.6
Orlando
10
27,663
11.6%
8.1
Palm Beach Gardens 18
48,452
100.0%
55.3
Palm Beach Gardens 20
0
0.0%
0.1
Pembroke Pines
23
107,607
69.5%
20.0
Pembroke Pines
24
12,856
8.3%
3.1
Pembroke Pines
25
34,287
22.2%
11.7
Plantation
20
13,381
15.8%
2.7
Plantation
22
67,448
79.4%
18.3
Plantation
23
4,126
4.9%
0.9
Pompano Beach
20
46,314
46.4%
11.3
Pompano Beach
21
1,447
1.4%
2.0
Pompano Beach
22
52,084
52.2%
12.2
Counties and Cities
Area%
58.2%
15.0%
76.9%
23.1%
0.2%
88.9%
10.9%
24.5%
75.5%
85.2%
14.8%
40.7%
59.3%
81.1%
18.9%
55.9%
44.1%
24.2%
75.8%
5.2%
34.5%
60.3%
17.9%
82.1%
35.7%
64.3%
48.4%
51.6%
20.8%
79.2%
99.5%
0.5%
52.1%
47.9%
57.9%
42.1%
57.7%
42.3%
28.9%
71.1%
20.4%
14.9%
57.4%
7.3%
99.9%
0.1%
57.5%
9.0%
33.5%
12.3%
83.5%
4.2%
44.4%
7.7%
47.9%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Riviera Beach
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Riviera Beach
20
28,156
86.7%
7.3
Riviera Beach
22
4,332
13.3%
2.9
Royal Palm Beach
18
14,734
43.2%
5.1
Royal Palm Beach
20
16,299
47.7%
5.6
Royal Palm Beach
21
3,107
9.1%
0.7
St. Augustine
4
5,091
39.2%
5.8
St. Augustine
6
7,884
60.8%
7.0
St. Petersburg
13
95,027
38.8%
40.5
St. Petersburg
14
149,742
61.2%
97.1
Sunrise
20
62,665
74.2%
9.4
Sunrise
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Sunrise
23
21,774
25.8%
8.9
Tampa
14
281,167
83.8%
143.1
Tampa
15
54,542
16.2%
32.1
Tarpon Springs
12
2,498
10.6%
1.8
Tarpon Springs
13
20,986
89.4%
15.5
Temple Terrace
14
10
0.0%
0.0
Temple Terrace
15
24,531
100.0%
7.1
West Palm Beach
18
20,693
20.7%
35.3
West Palm Beach
20
48,663
48.7%
15.5
West Palm Beach
22
30,563
30.6%
7.2
Wilton Manors
20
3,311
28.5%
0.6
Wilton Manors
22
8,321
71.5%
1.4
Winter Haven
10
18,693
55.2%
20.9
Winter Haven
17
15,181
44.8%
19.0
Area%
0.4%
71.2%
28.4%
45.0%
49.1%
5.8%
45.1%
54.9%
29.4%
70.6%
51.5%
0.0%
48.4%
81.7%
18.3%
10.3%
89.7%
0.1%
99.9%
60.8%
26.8%
12.5%
29.9%
70.1%
52.3%
47.7%
Plan: H000C9009
Page 4 of 4
26
5
10
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
0
27
Scale bar for insets
Palmetto Bay
Cutler Bay
Oldsmar
14
16
Bradenton
Palmetto
Tampa
12
15
MANATEE
17
Plant City
Zephyrhills
11
St. Augustine
Dade City
HILLSBOROUGH
St. Leo
ST. JOHNS
6
Temple Terrace
PASCO
Green Cove Springs
St. Petersburg
Holmes Beach
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
Treasure Island
Pinellas Park
13 PINELLAS
Seminole
Largo
Clearwater
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
CLAY
10
Ocoee
Apopka
5
Kissimmee
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
9
11
13
PASCO
Titusville
8
Oak Hill
DESOTO
HARDEE
LEE
19
CHARLOTTE
SARASOTA
16
UGH
POLK
10
LAKE
5
6
DUVAL
PUTNAM
CLAY
MARION
17
OR O
LSB
MANATEE
HIL
14
12
F
D
OR
15
ALACHUA
AD
BR
HERNANDO
CITRUS
LEVY
VOLUSIA 6
SEMINOLE
Deltona
Oviedo
St. Cloud
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
Casselberry
Winter Springs
7
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Longwood
Maitland
ORANGE
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
LAKE
6-Dec-2011
*****
Workshop by House
Congressional
Subcommittee
8-Dec-2011
H000C9011
Orlando Area
Eustis
3
DIXIE
E
N
UNIO
BAKER
4
COLLIER
25
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
OSCEOLA
9
ORANGE
7
VOLUSIA
FLAGLER
10
26
8
MONROE
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
20
21
27
23
24
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
18
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Florida City
Homestead
MIAMI-DADE
Coral Gables
Miami
Miami Beach
24 North Miami
Tampa Bay Area
Starke
3
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
LA
FA
YE
TT
E
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Doral
Hialeah
Aventura
Hollywood
Dania Beach
Miami Gardens
23
Fort Lauderdale
Orange Park
Jacksonville
GULF
HAMILTON
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
Pembroke Pines
Davie
Plantation
Oakland Park
DUVAL
5
Miles
60
MADISON
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
Southwest Ranches
Weston
Lauderhill
Pompano Beach
Baldwin
4
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
R
BROWARD
Sunrise
Tamarac
Deerfield Beach
Boca Raton
22
Delray Beach
NASSAU
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Parkland
21
Lantana
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
30
2
JACKSON
GILCHRIST
20
Wellington
Palm Springs
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
HNS
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
E
NN
Belle Glade
18
1
SANTA ROSA
A
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
South Florida
BIA
COLU
M
A
ESC
JO
ST.
OK
App. 117
App. 118
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
13.29%
12.98%
48.09%
9.10%
10.46%
9.17%
11.53%
12.07%
7.62%
4.70%
5.16%
24.60%
12.95%
5.83%
9.64%
10.98%
5.76%
50.21%
11.21%
10.16%
9.93%
55.73%
8.25%
10.02%
7.71%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
11
16
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
37.9%
62.1%
35.7%
64.3%
69.7%
30.3%
41.9%
58.1%
48.5%
51.5%
42.7%
57.3%
61.3%
38.7%
47.0%
53.0%
40.5%
59.5%
45.4%
54.6%
50.1%
49.9%
65.2%
34.8%
46.5%
53.5%
45.3%
54.7%
42.8%
57.2%
48.0%
52.0%
38.4%
61.6%
83.2%
16.8%
60.9%
39.1%
54.3%
45.7%
61.2%
38.8%
88.4%
11.6%
49.4%
50.6%
53.4%
46.6%
53.3%
46.7%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
10
17
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
42.2%
57.8%
37.2%
62.8%
65.4%
34.6%
43.2%
56.8%
48.5%
51.5%
42.3%
57.7%
55.0%
45.0%
44.9%
55.1%
41.9%
58.1%
45.7%
54.3%
50.2%
49.8%
63.0%
37.0%
45.3%
54.7%
46.1%
53.9%
42.5%
57.5%
49.1%
50.9%
36.5%
63.5%
80.0%
20.0%
63.0%
37.0%
54.4%
45.6%
60.9%
39.1%
86.5%
13.5%
42.2%
57.8%
49.9%
50.1%
48.4%
51.6%
0.42
0.37
0.46
0.57
0.45
0.10
0.32
0.67
0.32
0.66
0.42
0.51
0.42
0.35
0.37
0.60
0.42
0.64
0.54
0.26
0.49
0.29
0.17
0.27
0.47
0.47
0.18
0.46
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
34.4%
65.6%
29.4%
70.6%
60.9%
39.1%
35.1%
64.9%
36.3%
63.7%
33.9%
66.1%
45.5%
54.5%
36.0%
64.0%
33.6%
66.4%
33.7%
66.3%
36.9%
63.1%
51.6%
48.4%
36.0%
64.0%
34.3%
65.7%
33.9%
66.1%
36.4%
63.6%
27.6%
72.4%
75.1%
24.9%
51.6%
48.4%
41.6%
58.4%
52.2%
47.8%
84.4%
15.6%
35.5%
64.5%
42.3%
57.7%
39.5%
60.5%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2143.0
7636.3
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
0.34%
132
518
7,866
0.44%
77
447
2,102
1.06%
144
642
1,704
0.25%
111
383
3,129
0.89%
33
138
579
0.39%
95
265
2,289
2.31%
48
170
1,190
0.72%
70
249
1,577
0.38%
83
324
2,814
0.43%
56
166
1,027
0.27%
40
113
446
1.51%
43
144
546
0.80%
41
158
782
0.28%
60
178
1,193
0.50%
124
486
7,729
0.44%
69
220
1,993
0.42%
83
234
1,372
1.19%
74
347
2,096
0.65%
34
110
264
0.56%
52
188
369
1.16%
37
124
288
3.38%
17
58
110
1.68%
103
345
3,980
1.47%
184
551
4,900
2.23%
40
130
578
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
21
6
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
46.1%
53.9%
43.5%
56.5%
73.6%
26.4%
49.6%
50.4%
55.8%
44.2%
51.3%
48.7%
67.1%
32.9%
54.1%
45.9%
49.7%
50.3%
54.6%
45.4%
58.9%
41.1%
70.6%
29.4%
54.0%
46.0%
51.9%
48.1%
50.0%
50.0%
54.7%
45.3%
43.4%
56.6%
85.0%
15.0%
66.6%
33.4%
59.4%
40.6%
65.0%
35.0%
88.8%
11.2%
52.4%
47.6%
55.8%
44.2%
56.0%
44.0%
4.55%
4.75%
7.00%
6.72%
11.12%
5.72%
16.21%
7.73%
39.59%
15.90%
7.37%
11.32%
7.19%
23.91%
15.24%
8.76%
15.85%
12.06%
13.69%
18.55%
18.30%
17.58%
37.56%
33.15%
70.08%
68.91%
75.04%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.34
0.38
0.42
0.37
0.13
0.05
0.27
0.38
0.41
0.52
0.32
0.34
0.47
0.44
0.33
0.39
0.47
0.41
0.52
0.32
0.22
0.27
0.13
0.23
0.41
0.42
0.20
0.43
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
35.1%
64.9%
31.1%
68.9%
61.9%
38.1%
36.7%
63.3%
40.2%
59.8%
35.9%
64.1%
47.9%
52.1%
38.4%
61.6%
35.2%
64.8%
35.9%
64.1%
41.0%
59.0%
53.2%
46.8%
35.7%
64.3%
39.2%
60.8%
35.0%
65.0%
42.6%
57.4%
30.0%
70.0%
78.2%
21.8%
59.0%
41.0%
49.5%
50.5%
58.6%
41.4%
86.2%
13.8%
37.7%
62.3%
45.5%
54.5%
45.6%
54.4%
Convex
Hull
0.74
0.82
0.78
0.79
0.73
0.35
0.70
0.86
0.73
0.90
0.83
0.71
0.82
0.81
0.75
0.81
0.81
0.83
0.87
0.70
0.74
0.61
0.61
0.55
0.87
0.82
0.46
0.81
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
6
21
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
34.1%
65.9%
30.7%
69.3%
61.7%
38.3%
35.2%
64.8%
37.3%
62.7%
34.0%
66.0%
46.5%
53.5%
35.4%
64.6%
33.2%
66.8%
32.3%
67.7%
36.2%
63.8%
50.3%
49.7%
31.0%
69.0%
34.6%
65.4%
30.4%
69.6%
36.7%
63.3%
27.2%
72.8%
76.7%
23.3%
54.2%
45.8%
45.1%
54.9%
55.4%
44.6%
85.9%
14.1%
36.3%
63.7%
43.7%
56.3%
41.5%
58.5%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
17.9%
16.7%
47.0%
17.8%
20.9%
15.7%
27.7%
20.8%
15.2%
12.6%
14.8%
28.5%
17.0%
13.0%
14.9%
15.9%
9.3%
51.3%
19.2%
17.5%
23.0%
65.0%
16.6%
20.9%
17.7%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
20
66.3%
49.8%
58.7%
63.9%
34.8%
56.4%
55.8%
56.3%
48.8%
55.8%
54.5%
48.6%
42.5%
34.1%
50.2%
48.0%
52.4%
50.9%
60.5%
18.9%
36.0%
43.8%
37.4%
12.9%
59.7%
51.5%
55.1%
I_Cri
4
20.4%
28.7%
23.4%
19.4%
18.2%
25.7%
23.3%
28.0%
23.5%
23.3%
30.4%
38.8%
42.7%
37.4%
32.8%
39.0%
32.7%
33.2%
30.3%
29.8%
44.9%
38.7%
39.6%
22.1%
23.8%
27.6%
27.2%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
11
16
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
40.1%
59.9%
36.9%
63.1%
69.2%
30.8%
46.1%
53.9%
50.5%
49.5%
44.4%
55.6%
59.6%
40.4%
48.0%
52.0%
43.5%
56.5%
47.1%
52.9%
51.4%
48.6%
65.4%
34.6%
46.8%
53.2%
48.6%
51.4%
44.6%
55.4%
51.5%
48.5%
42.3%
57.7%
81.3%
18.7%
63.9%
36.1%
56.9%
43.1%
61.6%
38.4%
86.9%
13.1%
46.3%
53.7%
49.8%
50.2%
48.8%
51.2%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
40.5%
59.5%
30.7%
69.3%
58.1%
41.9%
43.8%
56.2%
39.7%
60.3%
43.2%
56.8%
44.8%
55.2%
39.0%
61.0%
40.6%
59.4%
43.1%
56.9%
45.2%
54.8%
56.0%
44.0%
40.0%
60.0%
42.5%
57.5%
40.2%
59.8%
48.0%
52.0%
33.3%
66.7%
75.7%
24.3%
65.3%
34.7%
54.9%
45.1%
62.3%
37.7%
81.6%
18.4%
38.5%
61.5%
47.1%
52.9%
44.5%
55.5%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
17
10
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
50.7%
49.3%
41.2%
58.8%
64.9%
35.1%
51.4%
48.6%
50.2%
49.8%
49.7%
50.3%
54.1%
45.9%
49.5%
50.5%
49.9%
50.1%
49.7%
50.3%
53.7%
46.3%
61.0%
39.0%
44.1%
55.9%
50.3%
49.7%
46.8%
53.2%
52.8%
47.2%
42.5%
57.5%
79.9%
20.1%
71.0%
29.0%
61.1%
38.9%
69.5%
30.5%
84.9%
15.1%
46.2%
53.8%
53.5%
46.5%
51.6%
48.4%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
41.8%
58.2%
30.9%
69.1%
57.3%
42.7%
43.6%
56.4%
38.6%
61.4%
42.3%
57.7%
44.4%
55.6%
39.4%
60.6%
42.2%
57.8%
42.8%
57.2%
47.0%
53.0%
55.3%
44.7%
39.3%
60.7%
46.1%
53.9%
41.1%
58.9%
50.7%
49.3%
35.3%
64.7%
76.7%
23.3%
68.0%
32.0%
57.6%
42.4%
64.2%
35.8%
81.2%
18.8%
40.7%
59.3%
48.5%
51.5%
47.7%
52.3%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
35.4%
64.6%
29.7%
70.3%
56.1%
43.9%
41.4%
58.6%
36.1%
63.9%
35.8%
64.2%
40.3%
59.7%
35.6%
64.4%
37.9%
62.1%
38.2%
61.8%
39.8%
60.2%
50.7%
49.3%
35.1%
64.9%
39.7%
60.3%
36.8%
63.2%
44.5%
55.5%
32.9%
67.1%
74.3%
25.7%
63.7%
36.3%
52.5%
47.5%
61.4%
38.6%
80.6%
19.4%
39.2%
60.8%
46.7%
53.3%
44.7%
55.3%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
22%
45
-27%
22
-24%
63
-24%
63
0%
410
21%
362
-56%
48
-57%
110
-59%
99
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
55.3%
44.7%
47.2%
52.8%
69.7%
30.3%
58.7%
41.3%
59.3%
40.7%
59.7%
40.3%
62.6%
37.4%
57.7%
42.3%
57.8%
42.2%
60.9%
39.1%
63.3%
36.7%
70.8%
29.2%
57.1%
42.9%
57.4%
42.6%
57.3%
42.7%
64.0%
36.0%
51.2%
48.8%
82.8%
17.2%
76.9%
23.1%
67.8%
32.2%
72.7%
27.3%
85.4%
14.6%
51.1%
48.9%
57.2%
42.8%
55.9%
44.1%
Plan: H000C9011
Page 2 of 4
App. 119
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
43.5%
34.9%
59.6%
36.4%
36.0%
35.0%
42.8%
37.2%
36.9%
35.3%
35.7%
50.5%
38.6%
32.8%
38.7%
37.5%
28.0%
65.3%
48.1%
41.3%
47.7%
69.8%
32.9%
35.8%
35.8%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
40.3%
32.8%
59.7%
34.6%
35.1%
33.5%
42.1%
36.2%
35.0%
33.9%
34.8%
49.5%
37.5%
32.1%
37.1%
36.4%
27.1%
65.8%
46.7%
40.5%
46.3%
69.3%
32.8%
35.6%
35.8%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
19.2%
21.0%
19.1%
24.6%
26.8%
23.1%
30.2%
25.2%
21.7%
26.2%
27.4%
25.2%
24.7%
24.4%
22.7%
25.6%
25.8%
21.1%
27.4%
27.5%
28.4%
20.5%
29.2%
29.3%
28.3%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
17.7%
19.6%
18.2%
23.6%
25.2%
21.1%
27.7%
23.4%
20.9%
24.8%
26.1%
23.5%
23.0%
23.5%
21.5%
24.6%
24.4%
20.4%
25.9%
25.9%
26.1%
19.4%
27.4%
27.4%
26.0%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
40.5%
46.3%
21.2%
40.7%
38.1%
43.4%
27.7%
38.6%
43.3%
39.9%
37.9%
25.3%
37.8%
43.5%
40.2%
38.0%
47.1%
13.2%
25.8%
32.0%
25.3%
10.2%
38.0%
35.2%
35.9%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
38.8%
45.5%
22.2%
40.0%
38.9%
43.9%
29.5%
39.4%
42.2%
39.9%
38.2%
26.1%
38.4%
43.6%
39.8%
37.9%
47.6%
14.3%
26.0%
32.8%
26.2%
10.8%
39.6%
36.8%
38.2%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
83.9%
79.7%
86.1%
82.3%
78.2%
81.5%
77.0%
80.9%
84.3%
75.0%
77.5%
83.5%
79.7%
81.2%
82.7%
81.1%
76.8%
84.4%
77.0%
79.2%
78.7%
85.7%
79.0%
80.8%
80.5%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
85.3%
80.9%
86.8%
83.1%
79.1%
82.7%
78.3%
81.9%
84.6%
75.9%
77.7%
84.1%
80.9%
81.0%
83.1%
81.6%
77.5%
84.4%
77.3%
79.8%
79.3%
85.8%
79.4%
81.0%
81.4%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
10.9%
4.1%
22.8%
3.9%
1.2%
2.9%
12.6%
3.8%
30.6%
4.0%
1.3%
2.5%
47.6%
6.8%
68.6%
5.8%
6.5%
5.1%
8.0%
3.1%
18.9%
3.7%
0.7%
1.9%
9.1%
12.6%
20.2%
16.4%
1.1%
6.5%
7.9%
4.7%
19.3%
5.9%
0.9%
2.9%
8.8%
35.9%
16.1%
42.4%
1.4%
18.8%
10.8%
11.6%
24.1%
14.7%
1.3%
5.7%
5.9%
4.8%
14.2%
6.8%
0.6%
2.7%
4.2%
7.6%
9.2%
9.7%
0.6%
4.7%
4.4%
3.9%
9.8%
5.0%
0.5%
2.3%
24.2%
14.4%
40.9%
14.0%
3.1%
10.5%
12.7%
9.4%
26.9%
10.8%
1.4%
5.6%
4.9%
3.6%
12.5%
4.9%
0.5%
1.9%
8.5%
8.3%
18.9%
10.2%
0.9%
4.5%
9.6%
6.3%
21.3%
7.8%
1.1%
3.9%
4.1%
6.4%
11.6%
9.5%
0.4%
3.3%
48.1%
10.8%
61.8%
8.3%
10.5%
14.1%
8.9%
11.6%
14.6%
11.2%
1.4%
8.8%
7.5%
9.1%
14.7%
10.0%
0.9%
6.3%
8.7%
26.9%
14.7%
23.4%
1.4%
27.8%
55.6%
22.9%
68.8%
15.5%
14.2%
48.0%
6.9%
57.7%
16.6%
52.3%
0.9%
58.6%
9.3%
57.3%
21.2%
45.3%
1.1%
66.2%
7.0%
60.5%
15.8%
48.3%
0.8%
71.0%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
10.7%
3.7%
20.9%
3.5%
1.3%
2.8%
12.9%
3.4%
29.9%
3.5%
1.4%
2.4%
45.4%
6.2%
66.1%
5.3%
6.3%
4.8%
7.8%
2.8%
17.9%
3.3%
0.8%
1.8%
8.8%
11.6%
19.3%
14.9%
1.2%
6.2%
7.5%
4.2%
17.7%
5.2%
0.9%
2.7%
8.4%
33.5%
15.3%
39.8%
1.3%
18.6%
10.5%
10.4%
23.1%
13.0%
1.3%
5.5%
5.8%
4.4%
13.2%
6.1%
0.7%
2.6%
3.8%
6.7%
8.3%
8.5%
0.6%
4.3%
4.0%
3.5%
8.7%
4.3%
0.5%
2.1%
23.9%
13.0%
39.8%
12.1%
3.3%
10.1%
11.9%
8.5%
24.9%
9.6%
1.4%
5.3%
4.7%
3.1%
11.6%
4.1%
0.6%
1.8%
8.0%
7.6%
17.3%
9.2%
0.9%
4.3%
8.9%
5.7%
19.4%
6.9%
1.0%
3.5%
3.7%
5.7%
10.3%
8.3%
0.4%
3.1%
45.9%
9.9%
59.3%
7.6%
10.4%
12.8%
7.8%
10.1%
12.6%
9.6%
1.4%
8.0%
7.1%
8.0%
13.7%
8.6%
0.9%
5.7%
8.1%
24.6%
13.4%
21.0%
1.4%
26.9%
56.2%
21.4%
69.1%
14.3%
15.3%
46.8%
6.9%
55.1%
16.7%
48.5%
0.9%
57.7%
9.5%
55.5%
21.4%
42.6%
1.1%
65.6%
7.0%
59.2%
16.0%
45.4%
0.8%
70.8%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
40.8%
29.9%
35.9%
31.9%
50.7%
17.2%
42.4%
24.9%
46.1%
20.9%
43.1%
28.3%
50.9%
16.3%
46.4%
20.6%
50.8%
24.9%
44.5%
25.6%
44.3%
23.2%
47.1%
20.3%
43.5%
24.2%
42.7%
24.5%
46.6%
22.7%
46.0%
23.6%
41.1%
26.0%
50.2%
18.4%
45.7%
20.6%
44.5%
23.3%
40.7%
28.6%
46.5%
23.7%
29.0%
41.5%
27.5%
43.5%
27.4%
45.6%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
38.7%
28.9%
34.9%
30.8%
50.4%
15.9%
41.1%
25.1%
45.5%
19.7%
41.8%
27.0%
49.7%
14.5%
46.0%
19.1%
50.0%
24.8%
43.6%
24.8%
44.1%
22.2%
48.0%
18.4%
43.1%
22.6%
43.3%
23.2%
45.8%
22.0%
44.7%
23.2%
40.6%
24.5%
50.3%
17.2%
45.2%
19.7%
44.3%
22.0%
40.2%
26.2%
47.0%
21.4%
29.7%
38.6%
28.1%
40.6%
28.6%
42.1%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
42.5%
45.7%
11.8%
33.0%
54.0%
12.9%
60.0%
28.9%
11.0%
34.5%
48.6%
16.9%
33.5%
49.0%
17.5%
32.3%
52.2%
15.4%
40.9%
40.7%
18.3%
33.9%
49.3%
16.8%
33.6%
50.7%
15.7%
33.2%
48.4%
18.4%
34.7%
46.1%
19.3%
50.7%
33.6%
15.7%
36.8%
47.8%
15.4%
30.8%
51.5%
17.7%
35.8%
49.1%
15.1%
34.9%
46.5%
18.6%
24.2%
58.2%
17.6%
70.1%
16.4%
13.5%
50.2%
29.8%
20.1%
40.8%
39.5%
19.7%
49.6%
31.3%
19.1%
76.5%
10.9%
12.6%
29.7%
51.0%
19.3%
35.3%
45.9%
18.8%
34.0%
47.6%
18.4%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
40.4%
43.8%
15.8%
32.7%
50.0%
17.3%
62.3%
22.8%
14.9%
34.5%
44.5%
21.0%
34.9%
42.0%
23.1%
33.1%
46.9%
20.0%
43.3%
31.1%
25.6%
36.0%
42.2%
21.8%
34.2%
47.3%
18.4%
33.7%
43.5%
22.8%
35.2%
41.1%
23.7%
51.0%
27.7%
21.3%
37.9%
41.3%
20.8%
32.0%
46.8%
21.2%
36.7%
44.3%
19.1%
36.3%
41.3%
22.4%
26.3%
51.8%
21.9%
69.8%
12.7%
17.5%
48.4%
26.9%
24.8%
41.4%
34.1%
24.6%
47.9%
26.6%
25.5%
73.2%
9.4%
17.4%
32.8%
41.4%
25.7%
36.1%
38.4%
25.5%
36.1%
38.6%
25.2%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
8.7%
2.2%
18.3%
1.9%
0.7%
1.9%
11.0%
2.1%
28.3%
2.0%
1.0%
1.8%
44.0%
3.5%
67.4%
3.0%
3.6%
3.1%
6.4%
1.8%
16.4%
2.1%
0.4%
1.3%
7.4%
7.2%
18.5%
9.7%
0.8%
4.4%
6.2%
2.8%
16.7%
3.5%
0.6%
2.0%
8.7%
21.9%
17.7%
29.2%
1.0%
11.9%
9.4%
5.8%
24.0%
7.7%
0.9%
3.4%
4.7%
2.4%
12.6%
3.6%
0.4%
1.6%
3.4%
4.2%
8.2%
5.2%
0.4%
3.2%
3.0%
2.1%
7.2%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
21.6%
7.7%
38.3%
7.1%
1.9%
7.0%
10.4%
4.8%
24.1%
5.3%
1.0%
3.6%
3.4%
1.7%
9.7%
2.3%
0.3%
1.1%
6.6%
3.7%
16.2%
4.8%
0.5%
2.5%
7.5%
3.4%
18.6%
4.2%
0.7%
2.5%
2.3%
2.8%
7.8%
4.5%
0.2%
1.9%
48.6%
6.2%
62.3%
4.4%
7.1%
9.9%
7.5%
6.2%
12.2%
5.3%
1.1%
6.1%
6.0%
5.1%
12.4%
5.2%
0.6%
4.3%
8.4%
20.3%
14.2%
14.9%
1.1%
25.5%
63.5%
15.4%
75.1%
9.0%
12.0%
46.1%
7.6%
48.9%
21.6%
37.7%
0.7%
54.0%
9.8%
51.4%
24.1%
32.8%
0.7%
64.2%
6.3%
56.7%
16.1%
35.5%
0.5%
70.9%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
10.9%
3.6%
23.4%
3.4%
0.9%
2.6%
12.9%
3.2%
32.5%
3.4%
1.1%
2.2%
50.0%
5.4%
71.4%
4.6%
5.1%
4.2%
7.9%
2.7%
19.4%
3.2%
0.6%
1.7%
9.1%
11.0%
21.0%
14.7%
0.9%
5.7%
7.9%
4.2%
20.1%
5.3%
0.7%
2.7%
9.7%
32.0%
18.0%
39.4%
1.2%
15.7%
11.2%
9.8%
25.9%
13.0%
1.1%
4.9%
5.9%
3.9%
14.9%
5.9%
0.5%
2.2%
4.3%
6.9%
9.9%
9.0%
0.6%
4.3%
4.3%
3.5%
10.0%
4.5%
0.4%
2.1%
24.9%
12.6%
42.1%
12.4%
2.4%
9.2%
13.3%
8.1%
28.9%
9.5%
1.3%
4.9%
4.8%
3.1%
12.7%
4.4%
0.4%
1.6%
8.8%
6.5%
20.5%
8.6%
0.7%
3.6%
9.8%
5.5%
22.6%
6.9%
0.9%
3.5%
3.9%
5.1%
12.0%
8.2%
0.3%
2.7%
52.3%
9.6%
65.2%
7.2%
9.2%
13.7%
9.6%
10.6%
15.8%
10.1%
1.3%
8.4%
7.8%
8.4%
15.5%
9.0%
0.8%
6.0%
9.4%
26.9%
15.8%
22.6%
1.3%
28.5%
59.7%
20.7%
71.8%
13.7%
12.9%
48.9%
7.7%
55.0%
19.1%
48.6%
0.8%
56.3%
9.7%
56.1%
22.5%
42.2%
0.9%
65.9%
7.1%
59.7%
16.3%
45.7%
0.6%
71.0%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
89.9%
85.2%
92.0%
89.0%
83.3%
86.8%
83.4%
86.2%
89.6%
79.1%
85.0%
89.8%
85.2%
87.4%
88.3%
86.5%
83.2%
89.8%
81.9%
84.7%
83.6%
90.5%
84.3%
86.9%
86.3%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
86.8%
82.4%
89.0%
85.1%
80.8%
84.0%
80.1%
83.4%
87.1%
77.0%
80.8%
86.3%
82.1%
84.6%
85.6%
83.6%
80.5%
87.1%
79.4%
81.8%
81.2%
88.0%
81.5%
83.8%
83.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
36.3%
40.2%
31.6%
45.0%
51.7%
25.7%
41.0%
35.4%
44.8%
29.4%
40.5%
37.7%
54.5%
22.0%
45.2%
29.3%
50.1%
33.8%
41.2%
36.3%
42.6%
33.4%
46.8%
30.5%
40.8%
35.4%
41.1%
34.6%
46.4%
32.5%
43.7%
34.5%
38.0%
39.3%
50.0%
26.2%
43.1%
29.4%
41.8%
33.5%
36.3%
39.5%
44.3%
32.6%
22.9%
56.4%
22.5%
57.4%
21.3%
59.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
38.8%
31.6%
35.1%
34.9%
52.8%
17.6%
41.7%
28.5%
46.8%
21.8%
42.1%
29.9%
53.3%
15.3%
47.5%
20.9%
51.7%
26.9%
44.2%
27.4%
46.0%
24.5%
50.5%
20.2%
44.3%
25.1%
45.2%
24.6%
48.1%
24.1%
45.7%
25.9%
42.5%
27.5%
52.3%
18.1%
46.1%
21.2%
44.7%
24.3%
40.2%
28.2%
48.5%
22.3%
29.0%
42.4%
27.2%
45.0%
27.7%
46.0%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
16.7%
0.9%
1.4%
22.7%
1.2%
1.3%
65.7%
1.9%
2.0%
16.3%
1.3%
1.0%
16.2%
6.8%
3.2%
15.7%
2.4%
1.6%
14.4%
21.5%
8.3%
21.7%
4.8%
2.4%
11.8%
2.1%
1.1%
6.5%
3.1%
2.3%
5.8%
1.9%
1.2%
36.5%
3.9%
4.9%
20.6%
2.7%
2.4%
9.5%
1.4%
0.9%
13.3%
2.8%
1.7%
17.9%
2.7%
1.8%
6.9%
2.6%
1.4%
61.7%
2.7%
8.0%
10.0%
2.8%
4.8%
11.1%
3.1%
3.3%
13.7%
9.6%
24.8%
79.2%
5.3%
44.0%
23.7%
31.4%
52.8%
25.5%
22.7%
63.6%
15.6%
29.2%
74.3%
Plan: H000C9011
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Hendry
Hendry
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Osceola
Osceola
Osceola
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
Pinellas
App. 120
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
203,019
82.1%
731.8
5
44,317
17.9%
237.1
20
455,445
26.1%
535.5
21
272,224
15.6%
70.9
22
294,581
16.9%
130.1
23
498,411
28.5%
188.9
24
136,412
7.8%
24.0
25
90,993
5.2%
373.5
3
172,269
90.3%
576.5
5
18,596
9.7%
67.1
19
160,728
50.0%
338.0
25
160,792
50.0%
1,967.0
4
595,916
69.0%
787.0
5
268,347
31.0%
131.4
20
13,550
34.6%
55.7
25
25,590
65.4%
1,134.3
12
167,519
13.6%
110.4
14
540,276
44.0%
432.6
15
433,974
35.3%
444.0
17
87,457
7.1%
278.7
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
5
17,490
5.9%
312.1
10
252,037
84.8%
791.0
11
27,525
9.3%
53.9
17
83,137
13.4%
178.2
19
535,617
86.6%
1,034.3
2
4,028
21.0%
337.4
3
15,196
79.0%
378.3
16
316,897
98.2%
468.1
17
5,936
1.8%
424.6
3
54,893
16.6%
437.0
5
15,019
4.5%
407.9
11
261,386
78.9%
817.7
23
197,933
7.9%
99.3
24
559,932
22.4%
86.2
25
418,970
16.8%
505.4
26
623,255
25.0%
1,162.5
27
696,345
27.9%
577.7
17
34,658
86.7%
786.4
18
5,338
13.3%
105.5
5
299,699
26.2%
207.1
7
148,157
12.9%
52.2
8
14,941
1.3%
114.8
9
447,658
39.1%
402.4
10
235,501
20.6%
226.7
9
248,686
92.6%
787.6
10
18,922
7.0%
74.6
17
1,077
0.4%
643.7
18
266,900
20.2%
446.6
20
227,350
17.2%
1,504.3
21
424,120
32.1%
193.0
22
401,764
30.4%
239.0
12
64,128
7.0%
48.5
13
696,345
76.0%
446.3
Area%
75.5%
24.5%
40.5%
5.4%
9.8%
14.3%
1.8%
28.2%
89.6%
10.4%
14.7%
85.3%
85.7%
14.3%
4.7%
95.3%
8.7%
34.2%
35.1%
22.0%
79.5%
20.5%
27.0%
68.4%
4.7%
14.7%
85.3%
47.1%
52.9%
52.4%
47.6%
26.3%
24.5%
49.2%
4.1%
3.5%
20.8%
47.8%
23.8%
88.2%
11.8%
20.6%
5.2%
11.4%
40.1%
22.6%
52.3%
5.0%
42.7%
18.7%
63.1%
8.1%
10.0%
8.0%
73.4%
Area%
18.6%
24.1%
16.8%
59.1%
41.3%
58.7%
87.3%
12.7%
Area%
95.4%
4.6%
19.1%
80.9%
4.7%
95.3%
1.0%
99.0%
24.6%
57.3%
18.2%
99.8%
0.2%
11.4%
88.6%
34.8%
64.8%
0.4%
66.6%
33.4%
92.8%
7.2%
49.0%
51.0%
64.5%
35.5%
72.4%
27.6%
86.5%
13.5%
44.8%
55.2%
85.0%
15.0%
92.2%
7.8%
0.2%
88.9%
10.9%
24.5%
75.5%
0.0%
100.0%
40.7%
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
14
156,069
17.0%
113.3
10
189,885
31.5%
484.6
15
262,371
43.6%
337.9
17
149,839
24.9%
1,188.1
5
32,877
44.2%
341.3
6
41,487
55.8%
485.7
6
369,123
74.6%
1,251.0
7
125,470
25.4%
181.5
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Auburndale
10
13,492
99.9%
19.5
Auburndale
15
15
0.1%
0.9
Boynton Beach
20
19,978
29.3%
3.2
Boynton Beach
22
48,239
70.7%
13.4
Coconut Creek
20
433
0.8%
0.6
Coconut Creek
21
52,476
99.2%
11.4
Cutler Bay
26
0
0.0%
0.1
Cutler Bay
27
40,286
100.0%
10.1
Deerfield Beach
20
26,242
35.0%
4.0
Deerfield Beach
21
33,897
45.2%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Doral
25
45,704
100.0%
15.2
Doral
27
0
0.0%
0.0
Dundee
10
805
21.7%
1.3
Dundee
17
2,912
78.3%
10.1
Fort Lauderdale
20
60,588
36.6%
13.4
Fort Lauderdale
22
104,933
63.4%
25.0
Fort Lauderdale
23
0
0.0%
0.2
Gainesville
3
93,046
74.8%
41.6
Gainesville
5
31,308
25.2%
20.8
Glen Ridge
20
219
100.0%
0.2
Glen Ridge
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Gulfport
13
5,509
45.8%
1.9
Gulfport
14
6,520
54.2%
2.0
Hallandale Beach
23
25,370
68.4%
3.0
Hallandale Beach
24
11,743
31.6%
1.6
Hialeah
25
162,856
72.5%
16.5
Hialeah
27
61,813
27.5%
6.3
Hollywood
23
114,568
81.4%
26.6
Hollywood
24
26,200
18.6%
4.1
Homestead
26
42,640
70.5%
7.0
Homestead
27
17,872
29.5%
8.6
Jacksonville
4
553,437
67.3%
743.2
Jacksonville
5
268,347
32.7%
131.4
Lake Hamilton
10
1,226
99.6%
3.8
Lake Hamilton
17
5
0.4%
0.3
Lake Park
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Lake Park
20
7,242
88.8%
2.1
Lake Park
22
913
11.2%
0.3
Lake Worth
20
10,654
30.5%
1.6
Lake Worth
22
24,256
69.5%
5.0
Lakeland
10
0
0.0%
0.0
Lakeland
15
97,422
100.0%
74.3
Lantana
20
4,654
44.7%
1.2
County
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
Polk
Putnam
Putnam
Volusia
Volusia
Cities included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Lantana
22
5,769
55.3%
1.7
Loxahatchee Groves 18
1,681
52.9%
7.0
Loxahatchee Groves 20
1,499
47.1%
5.5
Margate
20
14,535
27.3%
2.2
Margate
21
38,749
72.7%
6.9
Miami
23
15,273
3.8%
2.9
Miami
24
133,006
33.3%
19.4
Miami
27
251,178
62.9%
33.8
Miami Shores
23
0
0.0%
0.7
Miami Shores
24
10,493
100.0%
3.1
Miramar
24
65,355
53.6%
11.2
Miramar
25
56,686
46.4%
20.1
North Miami
23
9,175
15.6%
4.8
North Miami
24
49,611
84.4%
5.2
North Miami Beach 23
6,953
16.7%
1.1
North Miami Beach 24
34,570
83.3%
4.3
North Palm Beach
18
12,015
100.0%
5.8
North Palm Beach
20
0
0.0%
0.0
Oakland Park
20
20,289
49.1%
4.2
Oakland Park
22
21,074
50.9%
3.9
Oldsmar
12
5,101
37.5%
5.7
Oldsmar
13
8,490
62.5%
3.9
Opa-locka
24
14,894
97.9%
2.6
Opa-locka
25
325
2.1%
1.9
Orange Park
3
4,251
50.5%
1.5
Orange Park
5
4,161
49.5%
3.8
Orlando
5
77,842
32.7%
22.6
Orlando
7
29,854
12.5%
11.8
Orlando
9
102,941
43.2%
68.2
Orlando
10
27,663
11.6%
8.1
Palm Beach Gardens 18
48,452
100.0%
55.3
Palm Beach Gardens 20
0
0.0%
0.1
Pembroke Pines
23
107,607
69.5%
20.0
Pembroke Pines
24
12,856
8.3%
3.1
Pembroke Pines
25
34,287
22.2%
11.7
Plantation
20
13,381
15.8%
2.7
Plantation
22
67,448
79.4%
18.3
Plantation
23
4,126
4.9%
0.9
Pompano Beach
20
46,314
46.4%
11.3
Pompano Beach
21
1,447
1.4%
2.0
Pompano Beach
22
52,084
52.2%
12.2
Riviera Beach
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Riviera Beach
20
28,156
86.7%
7.3
Riviera Beach
22
4,332
13.3%
2.9
Royal Palm Beach
18
14,734
43.2%
5.1
Royal Palm Beach
20
16,299
47.7%
5.6
Royal Palm Beach
21
3,107
9.1%
0.7
St. Petersburg
13
96,486
39.4%
40.7
St. Petersburg
14
148,283
60.6%
96.9
Sunrise
20
62,665
74.2%
9.4
Sunrise
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Sunrise
23
21,774
25.8%
8.9
Tampa
12
7,411
2.2%
2.4
Tampa
14
281,381
83.8%
143.2
Tampa
15
46,917
14.0%
29.7
City
Counties and Cities
Area%
59.3%
55.9%
44.1%
24.2%
75.8%
5.2%
34.5%
60.3%
17.9%
82.1%
35.7%
64.3%
48.4%
51.6%
20.8%
79.2%
99.5%
0.5%
52.1%
47.9%
59.4%
40.6%
57.7%
42.3%
28.9%
71.1%
20.4%
10.7%
61.7%
7.3%
99.9%
0.1%
57.5%
9.0%
33.5%
12.3%
83.5%
4.2%
44.4%
7.7%
47.9%
0.4%
71.2%
28.4%
45.0%
49.1%
5.8%
29.6%
70.4%
51.5%
0.0%
48.4%
1.4%
81.7%
16.9%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Tarpon Springs
12
2,498
10.6%
1.8
Tarpon Springs
13
20,986
89.4%
15.5
Umatilla
10
3,133
90.7%
4.0
Umatilla
11
323
9.3%
0.2
West Palm Beach
18
20,693
20.7%
35.3
West Palm Beach
20
48,663
48.7%
15.5
West Palm Beach
22
30,563
30.6%
7.2
Wilton Manors
20
3,311
28.5%
0.6
Wilton Manors
22
8,321
71.5%
1.4
Winter Haven
10
27,345
80.7%
24.7
Winter Haven
17
6,529
19.3%
15.2
Area%
10.3%
89.7%
95.5%
4.5%
60.8%
26.8%
12.5%
29.9%
70.1%
61.9%
38.1%
Plan: H000C9011
Page 4 of 4
26
5
10
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
0
Scale bar for insets
27
13
Bradenton
16 Palmetto
St. Petersburg
Holmes Beach
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
Treasure Island
14
PINELLAS
Oldsmar
Pinellas Park
Largo
Clearwater
Seminole
Belleair
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
Tampa
MANATEE
17
Plant City
6
10
11
St. Augustine
Dade City
Zephyrhills
15
St. Leo
HILLSBOROUGH
Temple Terrace
PASCO
12
Green Cove Springs
ST. JOHNS
10
Ocoee
Apopka
5
Maitland
Winter Springs
Kissimmee
9
7
Oviedo
St. Cloud
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
6
Deltona
SEMINOLE
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
LAKE
6-Dec-2011
*****
Workshop by House
Congressional
Subcommittee
8-Dec-2011
H000C9013
Orlando11
Area
Eustis
DIXIE
13
8
AD
BR
OR O
LSB
UGH
Titusville
Oak Hill
LEE
19
CHARLOTTE
DESOTO
17
HARDEE
POLK
10
LAKE
5
PUTNAM
9
6
DUVAL
CLAY
MARION
SARASOTA
16
MANATEE
HIL
14
12
HERNANDO
F
D
OR
15
ALACHUA
CITRUS
PASCO
11
LEVY
VOLUSIA
E
N
UNIO
BAKER
4
COLLIER
25
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
OSCEOLA
ORANGE
7
VOLUSIA
FLAGLER
10
26
8
MONROE
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
20
21
27
23
24
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
18
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Florida City
Homestead
Cutler Bay
Palmetto Bay
Coral Gables
Miami
Miami Beach
24 North Miami
Aventura
Starke
CLAY
4
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
LA
FA
YE
TT
E
MIAMI-DADE
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Doral
Hialeah
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
Dania Beach
Lawtey
Orange Park
Jacksonville
GULF
3
HAMILTON
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
23
Fort Lauderdale
Lauderhill
DUVAL
5
Miles
60
MADISON
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
Davie
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Southwest Ranches
Sunrise
Plantation
Oakland Park
Pompano Beach
3
Baldwin
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
R
BROWARD
Tamarac
Deerfield Beach
Boca Raton
22
Delray Beach
NASSAU
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Parkland
21
Lantana
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
30
2
JACKSON
GILCHRIST
20
Wellington
Palm Springs
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
HNS
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
E
NN
Belle Glade
18
1
SANTA ROSA
A
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
South Florida
BIA
COLU
M
A
ESC
JO
ST.
OK
App. 121
App. 122
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
14.64%
10.99%
48.10%
9.85%
10.53%
9.12%
11.99%
11.62%
8.65%
4.38%
5.00%
24.52%
12.39%
5.80%
9.65%
10.98%
5.76%
50.21%
11.21%
10.16%
9.93%
55.73%
8.25%
10.02%
7.71%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
10
17
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
36.2%
63.8%
34.7%
65.3%
69.7%
30.3%
47.0%
53.0%
49.3%
50.7%
42.6%
57.4%
61.4%
38.6%
44.9%
55.1%
39.2%
60.8%
46.3%
53.7%
49.5%
50.5%
65.2%
34.8%
46.9%
53.1%
45.3%
54.7%
42.7%
57.3%
48.0%
52.0%
38.4%
61.6%
83.2%
16.8%
60.9%
39.1%
54.3%
45.7%
61.2%
38.8%
88.4%
11.6%
49.4%
50.6%
53.4%
46.6%
53.3%
46.7%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
9
18
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
40.1%
59.9%
36.6%
63.4%
65.4%
34.6%
47.0%
53.0%
49.2%
50.8%
42.3%
57.7%
54.6%
45.4%
43.7%
56.3%
41.3%
58.7%
45.7%
54.3%
49.9%
50.1%
62.9%
37.1%
46.5%
53.5%
46.0%
54.0%
42.4%
57.6%
49.1%
50.9%
36.5%
63.5%
80.0%
20.0%
63.0%
37.0%
54.4%
45.6%
60.9%
39.1%
86.5%
13.5%
42.2%
57.8%
49.9%
50.1%
48.4%
51.6%
0.40
0.37
0.46
0.49
0.36
0.10
0.36
0.53
0.34
0.51
0.40
0.49
0.53
0.34
0.38
0.41
0.48
0.65
0.54
0.26
0.49
0.29
0.17
0.27
0.47
0.47
0.18
0.46
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
32.7%
67.3%
28.1%
71.9%
60.9%
39.1%
38.9%
61.1%
36.5%
63.5%
33.9%
66.1%
46.0%
54.0%
35.1%
64.9%
33.5%
66.5%
34.9%
65.1%
36.4%
63.6%
51.6%
48.4%
35.2%
64.8%
34.3%
65.7%
33.7%
66.3%
36.4%
63.6%
27.6%
72.4%
75.1%
24.9%
51.6%
48.4%
41.6%
58.4%
52.2%
47.8%
84.4%
15.6%
35.5%
64.5%
42.3%
57.7%
39.5%
60.5%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2170.5
7658.1
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
0.35%
135
594
7,041
0.42%
70
268
1,370
1.07%
144
647
1,704
0.45%
101
351
2,841
0.89%
33
148
451
0.39%
95
281
2,406
2.31%
69
234
1,898
0.60%
69
247
1,493
0.33%
106
399
4,386
0.39%
60
195
1,538
0.27%
39
114
414
1.51%
43
140
546
0.83%
44
143
634
0.27%
60
173
1,350
0.51%
116
470
6,902
0.44%
69
220
1,993
0.42%
83
234
1,372
1.19%
74
347
2,096
0.65%
34
110
264
0.56%
52
188
369
1.16%
37
124
288
3.38%
17
58
110
1.68%
103
345
3,980
1.47%
184
551
4,900
2.23%
40
130
578
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
21
6
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
44.5%
55.5%
42.2%
57.8%
73.6%
26.4%
54.7%
45.3%
56.4%
43.6%
51.2%
48.8%
67.2%
32.8%
52.2%
47.8%
48.1%
51.9%
55.8%
44.2%
58.3%
41.7%
70.6%
29.4%
54.7%
45.3%
51.9%
48.1%
49.9%
50.1%
54.7%
45.3%
43.4%
56.6%
85.0%
15.0%
66.6%
33.4%
59.4%
40.6%
65.0%
35.0%
88.8%
11.2%
52.4%
47.6%
55.8%
44.2%
56.0%
44.0%
4.55%
4.75%
6.50%
6.79%
11.12%
8.64%
16.88%
7.66%
40.34%
13.22%
6.82%
9.17%
7.24%
23.84%
16.77%
8.80%
15.85%
12.06%
13.69%
18.55%
18.30%
17.58%
37.56%
33.15%
70.08%
68.91%
75.04%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.34
0.38
0.42
0.25
0.24
0.05
0.29
0.26
0.38
0.43
0.31
0.35
0.51
0.40
0.35
0.39
0.57
0.39
0.52
0.32
0.22
0.27
0.13
0.23
0.41
0.42
0.20
0.43
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
33.5%
66.5%
29.7%
70.3%
61.9%
38.1%
40.8%
59.2%
40.7%
59.3%
35.9%
64.1%
48.0%
52.0%
36.9%
63.1%
35.0%
65.0%
37.1%
62.9%
40.6%
59.4%
53.1%
46.9%
35.7%
64.3%
39.2%
60.8%
34.7%
65.3%
42.6%
57.4%
30.0%
70.0%
78.2%
21.8%
59.0%
41.0%
49.5%
50.5%
58.6%
41.4%
86.2%
13.8%
37.7%
62.3%
45.5%
54.5%
45.6%
54.4%
Convex
Hull
0.74
0.82
0.78
0.75
0.79
0.35
0.72
0.75
0.76
0.84
0.73
0.76
0.82
0.76
0.76
0.80
0.87
0.80
0.87
0.70
0.74
0.61
0.61
0.55
0.87
0.82
0.46
0.81
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
6
21
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
32.6%
67.4%
29.3%
70.7%
61.7%
38.3%
38.9%
61.1%
37.7%
62.3%
34.0%
66.0%
46.5%
53.5%
32.8%
67.2%
33.5%
66.5%
33.6%
66.4%
35.8%
64.2%
50.3%
49.7%
31.8%
68.2%
34.6%
65.4%
30.3%
69.7%
36.7%
63.3%
27.2%
72.8%
76.7%
23.3%
54.2%
45.8%
45.1%
54.9%
55.4%
44.6%
85.9%
14.1%
36.3%
63.7%
43.7%
56.3%
41.5%
58.5%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
17.8%
15.0%
47.0%
20.5%
21.1%
15.7%
28.2%
19.2%
16.2%
13.1%
14.5%
28.4%
16.1%
13.0%
14.7%
15.9%
9.3%
51.3%
19.2%
17.5%
23.0%
65.0%
16.6%
20.9%
17.7%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
21
66.3%
49.8%
60.6%
64.9%
34.8%
52.5%
55.5%
56.3%
48.6%
55.4%
56.9%
47.0%
42.9%
34.1%
50.2%
48.0%
52.5%
50.9%
60.5%
18.9%
36.0%
43.8%
37.4%
12.9%
59.7%
51.5%
55.1%
I_Cri
3
20.4%
28.7%
21.5%
20.1%
18.2%
27.0%
23.4%
28.0%
23.2%
25.4%
26.9%
39.8%
42.6%
37.5%
33.6%
39.0%
32.8%
33.2%
30.3%
29.8%
44.9%
38.7%
39.6%
22.1%
23.8%
27.6%
27.2%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
12
15
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
37.9%
62.1%
36.6%
63.4%
69.2%
30.8%
50.5%
49.5%
51.0%
49.0%
44.4%
55.6%
59.9%
40.1%
46.0%
54.0%
42.1%
57.9%
48.2%
51.8%
50.9%
49.1%
65.4%
34.6%
47.3%
52.7%
48.6%
51.4%
44.5%
55.5%
51.5%
48.5%
42.3%
57.7%
81.3%
18.7%
63.9%
36.1%
56.9%
43.1%
61.6%
38.4%
86.9%
13.1%
46.3%
53.7%
49.8%
50.2%
48.8%
51.2%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
37.6%
62.4%
30.4%
69.6%
58.1%
41.9%
47.0%
53.0%
39.6%
60.4%
43.2%
56.8%
45.1%
54.9%
38.3%
61.7%
39.7%
60.3%
44.5%
55.5%
44.8%
55.2%
55.9%
44.1%
40.6%
59.4%
42.5%
57.5%
40.1%
59.9%
48.0%
52.0%
33.3%
66.7%
75.7%
24.3%
65.3%
34.7%
54.9%
45.1%
62.3%
37.7%
81.6%
18.4%
38.5%
61.5%
47.1%
52.9%
44.5%
55.5%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
17
10
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
47.7%
52.3%
41.0%
59.0%
64.9%
35.1%
54.4%
45.6%
50.3%
49.7%
49.7%
50.3%
54.3%
45.7%
47.7%
52.3%
49.7%
50.3%
51.8%
48.2%
53.3%
46.7%
61.0%
39.0%
44.7%
55.3%
50.3%
49.7%
46.7%
53.3%
52.8%
47.2%
42.5%
57.5%
79.9%
20.1%
71.0%
29.0%
61.1%
38.9%
69.5%
30.5%
84.9%
15.1%
46.2%
53.8%
53.5%
46.5%
51.6%
48.4%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
38.8%
61.2%
30.6%
69.4%
57.4%
42.6%
46.7%
53.3%
38.4%
61.6%
42.3%
57.7%
44.9%
55.1%
38.7%
61.3%
41.5%
58.5%
44.8%
55.2%
46.6%
53.4%
55.3%
44.7%
39.4%
60.6%
46.1%
53.9%
41.0%
59.0%
50.7%
49.3%
35.3%
64.7%
76.7%
23.3%
68.0%
32.0%
57.6%
42.4%
64.2%
35.8%
81.2%
18.8%
40.7%
59.3%
48.5%
51.5%
47.7%
52.3%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
33.3%
66.7%
29.4%
70.6%
56.1%
43.9%
44.3%
55.7%
35.8%
64.2%
35.8%
64.2%
40.7%
59.3%
34.4%
65.6%
36.7%
63.3%
40.3%
59.7%
39.3%
60.7%
50.6%
49.4%
35.4%
64.6%
39.7%
60.3%
36.8%
63.2%
44.5%
55.5%
32.9%
67.1%
74.3%
25.7%
63.7%
36.3%
52.5%
47.5%
61.4%
38.6%
80.6%
19.4%
39.2%
60.8%
46.7%
53.3%
44.7%
55.3%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
19%
44
-23%
23
-22%
65
-22%
65
0%
410
17%
352
-47%
58
-49%
130
-52%
117
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
52.3%
47.7%
46.9%
53.1%
69.7%
30.3%
62.3%
37.7%
59.3%
40.7%
59.7%
40.3%
62.3%
37.7%
56.6%
43.4%
56.8%
43.2%
61.7%
38.3%
62.9%
37.1%
70.8%
29.2%
58.5%
41.5%
57.3%
42.7%
57.3%
42.7%
64.0%
36.0%
51.2%
48.8%
82.8%
17.2%
76.9%
23.1%
67.8%
32.2%
72.7%
27.3%
85.4%
14.6%
51.1%
48.9%
57.2%
42.8%
55.9%
44.1%
Plan: H000C9013
Page 2 of 4
App. 123
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
43.0%
31.8%
59.6%
39.5%
36.1%
35.0%
43.4%
36.8%
37.6%
36.5%
35.3%
50.4%
38.2%
32.8%
38.5%
37.5%
28.0%
65.3%
48.1%
41.3%
47.7%
69.8%
32.9%
35.8%
35.8%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
40.0%
29.9%
59.7%
37.9%
35.2%
33.4%
42.4%
35.8%
35.2%
34.9%
34.2%
49.5%
37.1%
32.1%
36.9%
36.4%
27.1%
65.8%
46.7%
40.5%
46.3%
69.3%
32.8%
35.6%
35.8%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
18.5%
21.8%
19.1%
26.2%
26.9%
23.1%
30.5%
24.0%
20.7%
25.7%
27.4%
25.2%
25.3%
24.5%
22.8%
25.6%
25.8%
21.1%
27.4%
27.5%
28.4%
20.5%
29.2%
29.3%
28.3%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
16.9%
20.5%
18.2%
25.1%
25.0%
21.1%
27.9%
22.3%
20.0%
24.4%
26.1%
23.5%
23.6%
23.5%
21.6%
24.6%
24.4%
20.4%
25.9%
25.9%
26.1%
19.4%
27.4%
27.4%
26.0%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
41.4%
48.3%
21.2%
35.9%
37.9%
43.5%
27.1%
40.3%
44.0%
39.3%
38.3%
25.3%
37.6%
43.4%
40.2%
38.0%
47.1%
13.2%
25.8%
32.0%
25.3%
10.2%
38.0%
35.2%
35.9%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
40.0%
47.7%
22.2%
35.5%
39.0%
43.9%
28.7%
40.9%
42.5%
39.2%
38.7%
26.1%
38.2%
43.6%
39.9%
37.9%
47.6%
14.3%
26.0%
32.8%
26.2%
10.8%
39.6%
36.8%
38.2%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
83.3%
78.7%
86.0%
82.2%
77.8%
81.6%
77.8%
80.8%
85.0%
77.8%
77.1%
83.5%
79.0%
81.2%
82.6%
81.1%
76.8%
84.4%
77.0%
79.2%
78.7%
85.7%
79.0%
80.8%
80.5%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
84.6%
79.9%
86.8%
82.7%
79.0%
82.7%
79.3%
81.7%
85.3%
78.4%
77.5%
84.1%
80.1%
81.0%
83.1%
81.6%
77.5%
84.4%
77.3%
79.8%
79.3%
85.8%
79.4%
81.0%
81.4%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
12.4%
3.9%
25.9%
3.7%
1.3%
2.8%
10.2%
3.8%
26.8%
4.4%
1.1%
2.5%
47.6%
6.8%
68.6%
5.8%
6.5%
5.1%
8.8%
5.8%
19.0%
7.1%
0.9%
3.0%
9.2%
13.4%
20.4%
17.1%
1.1%
7.1%
7.9%
4.6%
19.2%
5.8%
0.9%
2.9%
9.2%
36.7%
16.9%
43.0%
1.5%
19.1%
10.4%
9.2%
23.5%
11.7%
1.2%
4.9%
7.0%
4.0%
16.9%
5.4%
0.7%
2.4%
3.8%
6.4%
8.5%
8.6%
0.6%
3.8%
4.2%
4.0%
9.5%
5.1%
0.5%
2.3%
24.1%
14.4%
40.7%
13.9%
3.1%
10.5%
11.9%
10.5%
25.3%
12.1%
1.4%
6.6%
4.9%
3.6%
12.5%
4.9%
0.5%
1.9%
8.5%
8.1%
19.1%
10.0%
0.9%
4.5%
9.6%
6.3%
21.3%
7.8%
1.1%
3.9%
4.1%
6.4%
11.6%
9.5%
0.4%
3.3%
48.1%
10.8%
61.8%
8.3%
10.5%
14.1%
8.9%
11.6%
14.6%
11.2%
1.4%
8.8%
7.5%
9.1%
14.7%
10.0%
0.9%
6.3%
8.7%
26.9%
14.7%
23.4%
1.4%
27.8%
55.6%
22.9%
68.8%
15.5%
14.2%
48.0%
6.9%
57.7%
16.6%
52.3%
0.9%
58.6%
9.3%
57.3%
21.2%
45.3%
1.1%
66.2%
7.0%
60.5%
15.8%
48.3%
0.8%
71.0%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
12.4%
3.5%
24.4%
3.2%
1.4%
2.7%
10.4%
3.4%
26.1%
3.8%
1.2%
2.3%
45.4%
6.2%
66.1%
5.3%
6.3%
4.8%
8.5%
5.4%
17.9%
6.4%
0.9%
2.9%
8.9%
12.3%
19.4%
15.6%
1.2%
6.9%
7.4%
4.2%
17.6%
5.2%
0.9%
2.7%
9.2%
34.1%
16.7%
40.1%
1.4%
18.9%
10.0%
8.5%
22.2%
10.5%
1.2%
4.6%
6.9%
3.7%
15.6%
4.7%
0.8%
2.3%
3.5%
5.8%
7.6%
7.6%
0.5%
3.6%
3.9%
3.5%
8.5%
4.4%
0.5%
2.1%
23.7%
12.9%
39.5%
12.1%
3.2%
10.1%
11.1%
9.5%
23.3%
10.7%
1.4%
6.2%
4.7%
3.1%
11.6%
4.1%
0.6%
1.8%
8.0%
7.2%
17.2%
8.6%
0.9%
4.3%
8.9%
5.7%
19.4%
6.9%
1.0%
3.5%
3.7%
5.7%
10.3%
8.3%
0.4%
3.1%
45.9%
9.9%
59.3%
7.6%
10.4%
12.8%
7.8%
10.1%
12.6%
9.6%
1.4%
8.0%
7.1%
8.0%
13.7%
8.6%
0.9%
5.7%
8.1%
24.6%
13.4%
21.0%
1.4%
26.9%
56.2%
21.4%
69.1%
14.3%
15.3%
46.8%
6.9%
55.1%
16.7%
48.5%
0.9%
57.7%
9.5%
55.5%
21.4%
42.6%
1.1%
65.6%
7.0%
59.2%
16.0%
45.4%
0.8%
70.8%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
39.5%
30.7%
35.4%
32.7%
50.7%
17.2%
47.2%
19.0%
45.8%
21.8%
43.2%
28.2%
50.9%
15.9%
45.5%
22.4%
48.6%
26.2%
47.9%
24.2%
44.0%
23.3%
47.1%
20.3%
43.4%
24.9%
42.7%
24.4%
46.1%
23.6%
46.0%
23.6%
41.1%
26.0%
50.2%
18.4%
45.7%
20.6%
44.5%
23.3%
40.7%
28.6%
46.5%
23.7%
29.0%
41.5%
27.5%
43.5%
27.4%
45.6%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
37.4%
29.3%
34.3%
31.9%
50.4%
15.9%
46.8%
18.7%
44.9%
20.2%
41.9%
27.2%
49.7%
14.1%
45.2%
21.3%
47.6%
26.0%
47.0%
23.6%
43.8%
22.3%
48.0%
18.5%
42.7%
23.6%
43.3%
23.2%
45.5%
22.6%
44.7%
23.2%
40.6%
24.5%
50.3%
17.2%
45.2%
19.7%
44.3%
22.0%
40.2%
26.2%
47.0%
21.4%
29.7%
38.6%
28.1%
40.6%
28.6%
42.1%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
42.2%
47.2%
10.6%
29.6%
56.6%
13.8%
60.1%
28.9%
11.0%
38.0%
43.9%
18.0%
33.6%
49.1%
17.3%
32.3%
52.2%
15.4%
41.3%
40.0%
18.7%
33.8%
50.6%
15.6%
34.4%
50.3%
15.3%
34.0%
48.0%
18.0%
34.1%
46.6%
19.3%
50.6%
33.6%
15.8%
36.5%
47.2%
16.3%
30.8%
51.5%
17.7%
35.6%
49.1%
15.3%
34.9%
46.5%
18.6%
24.2%
58.2%
17.6%
70.1%
16.4%
13.5%
50.2%
29.8%
20.1%
40.8%
39.5%
19.7%
49.6%
31.3%
19.1%
76.5%
10.9%
12.6%
29.7%
51.0%
19.3%
35.3%
45.9%
18.8%
34.0%
47.6%
18.4%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
40.2%
44.8%
15.0%
29.6%
52.2%
18.2%
62.3%
22.8%
14.9%
38.2%
39.4%
22.3%
35.1%
41.7%
23.2%
33.1%
46.9%
20.0%
43.6%
30.5%
25.9%
35.5%
43.9%
20.6%
34.3%
47.8%
17.9%
34.8%
43.2%
22.0%
34.7%
41.6%
23.8%
51.0%
27.7%
21.3%
37.5%
40.9%
21.7%
32.0%
46.8%
21.2%
36.5%
44.3%
19.2%
36.3%
41.3%
22.4%
26.3%
51.8%
21.9%
69.8%
12.7%
17.5%
48.4%
26.9%
24.8%
41.4%
34.1%
24.6%
47.9%
26.6%
25.5%
73.2%
9.4%
17.4%
32.8%
41.4%
25.7%
36.1%
38.4%
25.5%
36.1%
38.6%
25.2%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
10.5%
2.1%
22.1%
1.7%
0.9%
1.9%
8.5%
2.2%
24.3%
2.3%
0.8%
1.7%
44.0%
3.5%
67.4%
3.0%
3.6%
3.1%
7.2%
3.3%
16.8%
4.2%
0.5%
2.0%
7.5%
7.7%
18.4%
10.1%
0.8%
4.8%
6.2%
2.8%
16.6%
3.5%
0.6%
2.0%
9.6%
21.8%
19.7%
29.0%
1.0%
11.6%
8.8%
4.8%
22.3%
6.1%
0.8%
3.0%
5.5%
2.0%
14.3%
2.7%
0.4%
1.4%
3.1%
3.5%
7.6%
4.8%
0.4%
2.5%
2.9%
2.1%
7.1%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
21.4%
7.6%
38.0%
7.0%
1.9%
6.9%
9.7%
5.6%
22.4%
6.2%
1.0%
4.3%
3.4%
1.7%
9.7%
2.3%
0.3%
1.1%
6.6%
3.6%
16.2%
4.6%
0.5%
2.5%
7.5%
3.4%
18.6%
4.2%
0.7%
2.5%
2.3%
2.8%
7.8%
4.5%
0.2%
1.9%
48.6%
6.2%
62.3%
4.4%
7.1%
9.9%
7.5%
6.2%
12.2%
5.3%
1.1%
6.1%
6.0%
5.1%
12.4%
5.2%
0.6%
4.3%
8.4%
20.3%
14.2%
14.9%
1.1%
25.5%
63.5%
15.4%
75.1%
9.0%
12.0%
46.1%
7.6%
48.9%
21.6%
37.7%
0.7%
54.0%
9.8%
51.4%
24.1%
32.8%
0.7%
64.2%
6.3%
56.7%
16.1%
35.5%
0.5%
70.9%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
12.6%
3.4%
27.0%
3.2%
1.1%
2.5%
10.3%
3.2%
28.3%
3.8%
0.9%
2.2%
50.0%
5.4%
71.4%
4.6%
5.1%
4.2%
8.9%
4.9%
19.8%
6.3%
0.7%
2.6%
9.2%
11.6%
21.0%
15.4%
0.9%
6.2%
7.9%
4.1%
20.0%
5.2%
0.7%
2.6%
10.2%
32.4%
18.9%
39.7%
1.3%
15.7%
10.7%
7.9%
25.2%
10.3%
1.0%
4.2%
6.8%
3.2%
17.5%
4.5%
0.6%
1.9%
4.0%
5.7%
9.3%
8.0%
0.5%
3.4%
4.2%
3.5%
9.7%
4.6%
0.4%
2.1%
24.7%
12.5%
41.9%
12.4%
2.4%
9.1%
12.3%
9.2%
26.7%
10.7%
1.2%
5.9%
4.8%
3.1%
12.6%
4.4%
0.4%
1.6%
8.9%
6.5%
20.7%
8.4%
0.7%
3.6%
9.8%
5.5%
22.6%
6.9%
0.9%
3.5%
3.9%
5.1%
12.0%
8.2%
0.3%
2.7%
52.3%
9.6%
65.2%
7.2%
9.2%
13.7%
9.6%
10.6%
15.8%
10.1%
1.3%
8.4%
7.8%
8.4%
15.5%
9.0%
0.8%
6.0%
9.4%
26.9%
15.8%
22.6%
1.3%
28.5%
59.7%
20.7%
71.8%
13.7%
12.9%
48.9%
7.7%
55.0%
19.1%
48.6%
0.8%
56.3%
9.7%
56.1%
22.5%
42.2%
0.9%
65.9%
7.1%
59.7%
16.3%
45.7%
0.6%
71.0%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
89.0%
84.2%
92.0%
88.8%
82.9%
86.8%
84.5%
86.1%
90.2%
82.7%
84.3%
89.8%
84.0%
87.4%
88.3%
86.5%
83.2%
89.8%
81.9%
84.7%
83.6%
90.5%
84.3%
86.9%
86.3%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
86.1%
81.4%
89.0%
85.0%
80.4%
84.1%
81.0%
83.2%
87.7%
80.3%
80.5%
86.3%
81.1%
84.6%
85.4%
83.6%
80.5%
87.1%
79.4%
81.8%
81.2%
88.0%
81.5%
83.8%
83.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
34.9%
41.9%
31.4%
45.4%
51.7%
25.6%
49.1%
26.3%
43.8%
30.7%
40.7%
37.7%
54.9%
21.3%
43.2%
31.8%
46.1%
35.1%
46.6%
33.6%
42.0%
33.6%
46.7%
30.5%
40.2%
36.4%
41.2%
34.5%
45.1%
34.1%
43.7%
34.5%
38.0%
39.3%
50.0%
26.2%
43.1%
29.4%
41.8%
33.5%
36.3%
39.5%
44.3%
32.6%
22.9%
56.4%
22.5%
57.4%
21.3%
59.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
37.6%
32.2%
34.5%
35.8%
52.8%
17.6%
48.9%
20.7%
46.3%
22.3%
42.2%
30.1%
53.4%
14.8%
46.0%
23.3%
48.2%
28.8%
48.7%
25.6%
45.5%
24.6%
50.5%
20.3%
43.7%
26.3%
45.2%
24.5%
47.7%
24.8%
45.7%
25.9%
42.5%
27.5%
52.3%
18.1%
46.1%
21.2%
44.7%
24.3%
40.2%
28.2%
48.5%
22.3%
29.0%
42.4%
27.2%
45.0%
27.7%
46.0%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
18.9%
0.8%
1.3%
20.3%
1.4%
1.3%
65.7%
1.9%
2.0%
16.3%
3.1%
1.5%
15.8%
6.7%
3.5%
15.7%
2.5%
1.6%
16.9%
21.2%
7.9%
19.6%
3.9%
2.1%
13.2%
1.4%
1.0%
6.3%
3.1%
1.7%
5.7%
1.9%
1.2%
36.1%
3.9%
4.9%
19.5%
3.2%
3.1%
9.4%
1.4%
0.8%
13.4%
2.8%
1.8%
17.9%
2.7%
1.8%
6.9%
2.6%
1.4%
61.7%
2.7%
8.0%
10.0%
2.8%
4.8%
11.1%
3.1%
3.3%
13.7%
9.6%
24.8%
79.2%
5.3%
44.0%
23.7%
31.4%
52.8%
25.5%
22.7%
63.6%
15.6%
29.2%
74.3%
Plan: H000C9013
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Alachua
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Duval
Hendry
Hendry
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Nassau
Nassau
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Osceola
Osceola
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
App. 124
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
173,242
70.0%
554.9
5
44,323
17.9%
237.1
11
29,771
12.0%
176.9
20
455,445
26.1%
535.5
21
272,224
15.6%
70.9
22
294,581
16.9%
130.1
23
498,411
28.5%
188.9
24
136,412
7.8%
24.0
25
90,993
5.2%
373.5
3
172,269
90.3%
576.5
5
18,596
9.7%
67.1
19
160,728
50.0%
338.0
25
160,792
50.0%
1,967.0
3
78,825
9.1%
236.2
4
517,092
59.8%
550.7
5
268,346
31.0%
131.6
20
13,550
34.6%
55.7
25
25,590
65.4%
1,134.3
14
535,017
43.5%
431.3
15
595,703
48.5%
549.5
17
98,506
8.0%
285.0
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
5
17,490
5.9%
312.1
10
204,724
68.9%
656.1
11
74,838
25.2%
188.7
17
83,137
13.4%
178.2
19
535,617
86.6%
1,034.3
2
4,028
21.0%
337.4
3
15,196
79.0%
378.3
16
316,897
98.2%
624.9
17
5,936
1.8%
267.8
5
15,019
4.5%
407.9
11
316,279
95.5%
1,254.7
23
197,933
7.9%
99.3
24
559,932
22.4%
86.2
25
418,970
16.8%
505.4
26
623,255
25.0%
1,162.5
27
696,345
27.9%
577.7
3
19,531
26.6%
376.7
4
53,783
73.4%
349.2
17
34,658
86.7%
786.4
18
5,338
13.3%
105.5
5
299,694
26.2%
207.2
7
273,627
23.9%
106.2
8
14,941
1.3%
231.7
9
364,902
31.8%
264.1
10
192,792
16.8%
194.2
9
263,213
98.0%
1,474.9
10
5,472
2.0%
31.0
18
266,900
20.2%
446.6
20
227,350
17.2%
1,504.3
21
424,120
32.1%
193.0
22
401,764
30.4%
239.0
12
58,869
6.4%
80.2
Area%
57.3%
24.5%
18.3%
40.5%
5.4%
9.8%
14.3%
1.8%
28.2%
89.6%
10.4%
14.7%
85.3%
25.7%
60.0%
14.3%
4.7%
95.3%
34.1%
43.4%
22.5%
79.5%
20.5%
27.0%
56.7%
16.3%
14.7%
85.3%
47.1%
52.9%
70.0%
30.0%
24.5%
75.5%
4.1%
3.5%
20.8%
47.8%
23.8%
51.9%
48.1%
88.2%
11.8%
20.7%
10.6%
23.1%
26.3%
19.4%
97.9%
2.1%
18.7%
63.1%
8.1%
10.0%
13.2%
Area%
10.0%
90.0%
19.1%
80.9%
49.9%
50.1%
4.7%
95.3%
1.0%
99.0%
24.6%
57.3%
18.2%
99.8%
0.2%
1.4%
98.6%
30.9%
69.1%
99.0%
1.0%
100.0%
0.0%
44.4%
55.6%
34.8%
64.8%
0.4%
66.6%
33.4%
92.8%
7.2%
49.0%
51.0%
74.6%
25.4%
64.5%
35.5%
72.4%
27.6%
86.5%
13.5%
Cities included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Bartow
10
38
0.2%
5.2
Bartow
17
17,260
99.8%
47.0
Boynton Beach
20
19,978
29.3%
3.2
Boynton Beach
22
48,239
70.7%
13.4
Callahan
3
417
37.1%
0.7
Callahan
4
706
62.9%
0.7
Coconut Creek
20
433
0.8%
0.6
Coconut Creek
21
52,476
99.2%
11.4
Cutler Bay
26
0
0.0%
0.1
Cutler Bay
27
40,286
100.0%
10.1
Deerfield Beach
20
26,242
35.0%
4.0
Deerfield Beach
21
33,897
45.2%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Doral
25
45,704
100.0%
15.2
Doral
27
0
0.0%
0.0
Dundee
9
4
0.1%
0.2
Dundee
17
3,713
99.9%
11.3
Dunedin
12
3,084
8.7%
8.8
Dunedin
13
32,237
91.3%
19.6
Eagle Lake
10
2,255
100.0%
3.6
Eagle Lake
17
0
0.0%
0.0
Eustis
10
18,558
100.0%
12.1
Eustis
11
0
0.0%
0.0
Fanning Springs
3
278
36.4%
1.7
Fanning Springs
11
486
63.6%
2.2
Fort Lauderdale
20
60,588
36.6%
13.4
Fort Lauderdale
22
104,933
63.4%
25.0
Fort Lauderdale
23
0
0.0%
0.2
Gainesville
3
93,040
74.8%
41.6
Gainesville
5
31,314
25.2%
20.8
Glen Ridge
20
219
100.0%
0.2
Glen Ridge
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Gulfport
13
5,509
45.8%
1.9
Gulfport
14
6,520
54.2%
2.0
Haines City
9
13,325
64.9%
14.7
Haines City
10
7,210
35.1%
5.0
Hallandale Beach
23
25,370
68.4%
3.0
Hallandale Beach
24
11,743
31.6%
1.6
Hialeah
25
162,856
72.5%
16.5
Hialeah
27
61,813
27.5%
6.3
Hollywood
23
114,568
81.4%
26.6
Hollywood
24
26,200
18.6%
4.1
City
Area%
68.0%
18.8%
7.9%
30.4%
4.2%
57.5%
41.3%
58.7%
57.2%
42.8%
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
13
696,345
76.0%
413.6
14
161,328
17.6%
114.4
9
68,230
11.3%
159.2
10
293,357
48.7%
611.4
15
100,641
16.7%
84.5
17
139,867
23.2%
1,155.4
5
32,877
44.2%
341.3
6
41,487
55.8%
485.7
4
125,470
66.0%
469.8
6
64,569
34.0%
351.7
County
Pinellas
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
Polk
Polk
Putnam
Putnam
St. Johns
St. Johns
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Homestead
26
42,640
70.5%
7.0
Homestead
27
17,872
29.5%
8.6
Jacksonville
3
77,400
9.4%
234.2
Jacksonville
4
476,038
57.9%
508.9
Jacksonville
5
268,346
32.7%
131.6
Lake Hamilton
9
1,163
94.5%
3.2
Lake Hamilton
10
68
5.5%
1.0
Lake Park
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Lake Park
20
7,242
88.8%
2.1
Lake Park
22
913
11.2%
0.3
Lake Wales
10
0
0.0%
0.0
Lake Wales
17
14,225
100.0%
19.9
Lake Worth
20
10,654
30.5%
1.6
Lake Worth
22
24,256
69.5%
5.0
Lakeland
10
54,001
55.4%
41.2
Lakeland
15
43,421
44.6%
33.1
Lantana
20
4,654
44.7%
1.2
Lantana
22
5,769
55.3%
1.7
Leesburg
10
8,015
39.8%
32.9
Leesburg
11
12,102
60.2%
8.1
Loxahatchee Groves 18
1,681
52.9%
7.0
Loxahatchee Groves 20
1,499
47.1%
5.5
Maitland
5
4
0.0%
0.1
Maitland
7
15,747
100.0%
6.3
Margate
20
14,535
27.3%
2.2
Margate
21
38,749
72.7%
6.9
Miami
23
15,273
3.8%
2.9
Miami
24
133,006
33.3%
19.4
Miami
27
251,178
62.9%
33.8
Miami Shores
23
0
0.0%
0.7
Miami Shores
24
10,493
100.0%
3.1
Miramar
24
65,355
53.6%
11.2
Miramar
25
56,686
46.4%
20.1
Newberry
3
2,398
48.4%
20.3
Newberry
11
2,552
51.6%
34.3
North Miami
23
9,175
15.6%
4.8
North Miami
24
49,611
84.4%
5.2
North Miami Beach 23
6,953
16.7%
1.1
North Miami Beach 24
34,570
83.3%
4.3
North Palm Beach
18
12,015
100.0%
5.8
North Palm Beach
20
0
0.0%
0.0
Oakland Park
20
20,289
49.1%
4.2
Oakland Park
22
21,074
50.9%
3.9
Opa-locka
24
14,894
97.9%
2.6
Opa-locka
25
325
2.1%
1.9
Orange Park
3
4,251
50.5%
1.5
Orange Park
5
4,161
49.5%
3.8
Orlando
5
77,843
32.7%
22.6
Orlando
7
61,132
25.7%
20.6
Orlando
9
71,662
30.1%
59.5
Orlando
10
27,663
11.6%
8.1
Palm Beach Gardens 18
48,452
100.0%
55.3
Palm Beach Gardens 20
0
0.0%
0.1
Pembroke Pines
23
107,607
69.5%
20.0
Pembroke Pines
24
12,856
8.3%
3.1
Counties and Cities
Area%
44.8%
55.2%
26.8%
58.2%
15.0%
76.9%
23.1%
0.2%
88.9%
10.9%
0.2%
99.8%
24.5%
75.5%
55.5%
44.5%
40.7%
59.3%
80.3%
19.7%
55.9%
44.1%
1.4%
98.6%
24.2%
75.8%
5.2%
34.5%
60.3%
17.9%
82.1%
35.7%
64.3%
37.2%
62.8%
48.4%
51.6%
20.8%
79.2%
99.5%
0.5%
52.1%
47.9%
57.7%
42.3%
28.9%
71.1%
20.4%
18.6%
53.7%
7.3%
99.9%
0.1%
57.5%
9.0%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Pembroke Pines
25
34,287
22.2%
11.7
Plantation
20
13,381
15.8%
2.7
Plantation
22
67,448
79.4%
18.3
Plantation
23
4,126
4.9%
0.9
Pompano Beach
20
46,314
46.4%
11.3
Pompano Beach
21
1,447
1.4%
2.0
Pompano Beach
22
52,084
52.2%
12.2
Riviera Beach
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Riviera Beach
20
28,156
86.7%
7.3
Riviera Beach
22
4,332
13.3%
2.9
Royal Palm Beach
18
14,734
43.2%
5.1
Royal Palm Beach
20
16,299
47.7%
5.6
Royal Palm Beach
21
3,107
9.1%
0.7
St. Augustine
4
5,091
39.2%
5.8
St. Augustine
6
7,884
60.8%
7.0
St. Petersburg
13
91,227
37.3%
39.7
St. Petersburg
14
153,542
62.7%
97.9
Sunrise
20
62,665
74.2%
9.4
Sunrise
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Sunrise
23
21,774
25.8%
8.9
Tampa
14
277,367
82.6%
141.9
Tampa
15
58,342
17.4%
33.3
Tarpon Springs
12
20,986
89.4%
15.5
Tarpon Springs
13
2,498
10.6%
1.8
Temple Terrace
14
10
0.0%
0.0
Temple Terrace
15
24,531
100.0%
7.1
West Palm Beach
18
20,693
20.7%
35.3
West Palm Beach
20
48,663
48.7%
15.5
West Palm Beach
22
30,563
30.6%
7.2
Wilton Manors
20
3,311
28.5%
0.6
Wilton Manors
22
8,321
71.5%
1.4
Winter Haven
10
32,110
94.8%
31.4
Winter Haven
17
1,764
5.2%
8.5
Area%
33.5%
12.3%
83.5%
4.2%
44.4%
7.7%
47.9%
0.4%
71.2%
28.4%
45.0%
49.1%
5.8%
45.1%
54.9%
28.8%
71.2%
51.5%
0.0%
48.4%
81.0%
19.0%
89.7%
10.3%
0.1%
99.9%
60.8%
26.8%
12.5%
29.9%
70.1%
78.7%
21.3%
Plan: H000C9013
Page 4 of 4
26
5
10
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
0
Scale bar for insets
27
Oldsmar
Holmes Beach
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
14
16
Bradenton
Palmetto
St. Petersburg
Pinellas Park
Treasure Island
Seminole
13 Largo PINELLAS
Clearwater
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
St. Leo
St. Augustine
9
17
15 Plant City
Zephyrhills
Dade City
HILLSBOROUGH
MANATEE
Tampa
Temple Terrace
PASCO
12
Green Cove Springs
Eustis
9
10
Ocoee
Apopka
Windermere
Winter Springs 7
Kissimmee
Oviedo
St. Cloud
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
6
Deltona
SEMINOLE
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
Maitland
LAKE
5
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
11
Orlando Area
8
VOLUSIA
13
17
Titusville
Oak Hill
DESOTO
HARDEE
POLK
9
10
LAKE
PUTNAM
LEE
19
CHARLOTTE
SARASOTA
16
UGH
4
CLAY
MARION
15
OR O
LSB
MANATEE
HIL
14
PASCO
12
HERNANDO
CITRUS
F
6
COLLIER
25
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
OSCEOLA
ORANGE
7
VOLUSIA
FLAGLER
10
26
8
MONROE
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
20
21
27
23
24
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
18
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Florida City
Homestead
Cutler Bay
Palmetto Bay
Coral Gables
Miami
Miami Beach
24 North Miami
Aventura
Starke
CLAY
ST. JOHNS
4-Jan-2012
*****
PCB CRS 12-01
Not reported by
House Congressional
Subcommittee
9-Jan-2012
H000C9033
LEVY
11
5
AD
BR
ALACHUA
BIA
L AS
MIAMI-DADE
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Doral
Hialeah
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
Dania Beach
4
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
DIXIE
E
D
OR
DUVAL
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
23
Lawtey
Orange Park
Jacksonville
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
N
UNIO
BAKER
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
Davie
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Fort Lauderdale
Lauderhill
DUVAL
3
GULF
L
PINE
Southwest Ranches
Sunrise
Plantation
Oakland Park
Pompano Beach
5
Baldwin
Miles
60
3
HAMILTON
LA
FA
YE
TT
MADISON
R
BROWARD
Tamarac
Deerfield Beach
Boca Raton
22
Delray Beach
NASSAU
3
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Parkland
21
Lantana
Lake Worth
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
E
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Springs
30
2
JACKSON
GILCHRIST
20
Wellington
Palm Beach
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
HNS
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
NE
Belle Glade
18
1
SANTA ROSA
AN
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
A
ESC
COLU
M
South Florida
JO
ST.
OK
App. 125
App. 126
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
14.92%
10.07%
47.53%
10.36%
10.74%
9.12%
13.52%
11.46%
9.32%
4.46%
4.77%
26.07%
9.51%
5.83%
9.19%
10.98%
5.76%
50.21%
11.21%
10.16%
9.93%
55.73%
8.25%
10.02%
7.71%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
12
15
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
38.2%
61.8%
33.0%
67.0%
69.6%
30.4%
47.0%
53.0%
50.1%
49.9%
42.6%
57.4%
54.2%
45.8%
52.2%
47.8%
39.5%
60.5%
45.7%
54.3%
49.7%
50.3%
64.7%
35.3%
46.7%
53.3%
45.3%
54.7%
41.8%
58.2%
48.0%
52.0%
38.4%
61.6%
83.2%
16.8%
60.9%
39.1%
54.3%
45.7%
61.2%
38.8%
88.4%
11.6%
49.4%
50.6%
53.4%
46.6%
53.3%
46.7%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
8
19
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
42.0%
58.0%
34.6%
65.4%
66.0%
34.0%
46.9%
53.1%
49.5%
50.5%
42.3%
57.7%
47.9%
52.1%
49.0%
51.0%
41.5%
58.5%
45.2%
54.8%
50.0%
50.0%
62.9%
37.1%
46.2%
53.8%
46.1%
53.9%
42.0%
58.0%
49.1%
50.9%
36.5%
63.5%
80.0%
20.0%
63.0%
37.0%
54.4%
45.6%
60.9%
39.1%
86.4%
13.6%
42.2%
57.8%
49.9%
50.1%
48.4%
51.6%
0.39
0.37
0.46
0.35
0.50
0.11
0.36
0.63
0.34
0.35
0.33
0.43
0.56
0.42
0.34
0.36
0.42
0.66
0.54
0.26
0.49
0.29
0.17
0.27
0.48
0.47
0.18
0.46
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
34.2%
65.8%
26.3%
73.7%
61.3%
38.7%
38.9%
61.1%
37.0%
63.0%
33.9%
66.1%
41.5%
58.5%
38.6%
61.4%
33.6%
66.4%
34.8%
65.2%
36.7%
63.3%
51.2%
48.8%
34.2%
65.8%
34.3%
65.7%
33.3%
66.7%
36.4%
63.6%
27.6%
72.4%
75.1%
24.9%
51.6%
48.4%
41.6%
58.4%
52.2%
47.8%
84.3%
15.7%
35.5%
64.5%
42.2%
57.8%
39.5%
60.5%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2212.9
7873.0
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
0.38%
152
688
6,419
0.40%
60
211
1,422
1.04%
149
639
2,006
0.46%
106
334
3,125
1.03%
30
123
440
0.39%
95
272
2,419
1.41%
94
303
2,428
1.38%
61
213
985
0.35%
106
400
3,823
0.37%
68
241
2,066
0.27%
36
131
415
1.29%
47
184
590
1.05%
47
190
619
0.27%
60
183
1,173
0.47%
116
502
7,040
0.44%
69
221
1,993
0.42%
83
234
1,372
1.19%
74
347
2,096
0.65%
34
110
264
0.56%
52
188
369
1.16%
37
126
288
3.38%
17
59
111
1.68%
103
345
3,980
1.47%
184
551
4,900
2.23%
40
130
578
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
21
6
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
46.5%
53.5%
40.1%
59.9%
73.6%
26.4%
54.9%
45.1%
57.1%
42.9%
51.2%
48.8%
61.0%
39.0%
58.5%
41.5%
48.2%
51.8%
55.3%
44.7%
58.6%
41.4%
70.2%
29.8%
54.5%
45.5%
51.9%
48.1%
49.1%
50.9%
54.7%
45.3%
43.4%
56.6%
85.0%
15.0%
66.6%
33.4%
59.4%
40.6%
65.0%
35.0%
88.8%
11.2%
52.4%
47.6%
55.8%
44.2%
56.0%
44.0%
4.55%
4.75%
6.69%
6.74%
10.87%
8.69%
18.85%
7.66%
25.47%
26.56%
7.17%
9.11%
7.06%
18.57%
22.04%
8.75%
15.26%
12.06%
13.69%
18.55%
18.30%
17.58%
37.56%
33.15%
70.08%
68.91%
75.04%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.32
0.38
0.42
0.17
0.40
0.06
0.35
0.37
0.41
0.33
0.27
0.30
0.45
0.30
0.22
0.22
0.44
0.35
0.51
0.32
0.22
0.27
0.13
0.23
0.39
0.42
0.20
0.43
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
35.2%
64.8%
27.7%
72.3%
62.3%
37.7%
40.9%
59.1%
41.1%
58.9%
35.9%
64.1%
42.1%
57.9%
41.6%
58.4%
35.1%
64.9%
36.8%
63.2%
40.8%
59.2%
53.0%
47.0%
34.9%
65.1%
39.3%
60.7%
34.3%
65.7%
42.6%
57.4%
30.0%
70.0%
78.2%
21.8%
59.0%
41.0%
49.5%
50.5%
58.6%
41.4%
86.1%
13.9%
37.7%
62.3%
45.5%
54.5%
45.6%
54.4%
Convex
Hull
0.74
0.82
0.78
0.67
0.81
0.37
0.78
0.84
0.76
0.82
0.76
0.83
0.86
0.82
0.73
0.74
0.82
0.81
0.87
0.70
0.74
0.61
0.61
0.55
0.86
0.82
0.46
0.81
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
5
22
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
34.6%
65.4%
27.1%
72.9%
62.2%
37.8%
38.9%
61.1%
38.2%
61.8%
34.0%
66.0%
37.5%
62.5%
39.7%
60.3%
33.7%
66.3%
33.3%
66.7%
36.1%
63.9%
49.7%
50.3%
31.7%
68.3%
34.7%
65.3%
29.4%
70.6%
36.7%
63.3%
27.2%
72.8%
76.7%
23.3%
54.2%
45.8%
45.1%
54.9%
55.4%
44.6%
85.8%
14.2%
36.3%
63.7%
43.7%
56.3%
41.5%
58.5%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
18.7%
13.5%
47.1%
20.9%
21.6%
15.7%
22.7%
23.1%
17.0%
13.1%
14.6%
28.1%
15.1%
13.0%
14.4%
15.9%
9.3%
51.3%
19.2%
17.5%
23.0%
64.9%
16.6%
20.9%
17.7%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
21
66.3%
49.8%
59.2%
66.5%
34.5%
52.6%
55.2%
56.3%
48.8%
54.6%
57.5%
47.6%
42.8%
34.0%
50.9%
48.0%
52.8%
50.9%
60.5%
18.9%
36.0%
43.8%
37.4%
12.9%
59.7%
51.5%
55.1%
I_Cri
3
20.4%
28.7%
22.1%
20.0%
18.4%
26.5%
23.2%
28.0%
28.5%
22.3%
25.5%
39.3%
42.6%
37.9%
34.0%
39.0%
32.7%
33.2%
30.3%
29.8%
44.9%
38.7%
39.6%
22.2%
23.8%
27.6%
27.2%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
13
14
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
39.8%
60.2%
34.9%
65.1%
69.1%
30.9%
50.6%
49.4%
51.7%
48.3%
44.4%
55.6%
53.1%
46.9%
52.5%
47.5%
42.4%
57.6%
47.5%
52.5%
51.1%
48.9%
65.0%
35.0%
47.2%
52.8%
48.7%
51.3%
43.5%
56.5%
51.5%
48.5%
42.3%
57.7%
81.3%
18.7%
63.9%
36.1%
56.9%
43.1%
61.6%
38.4%
86.8%
13.2%
46.3%
53.7%
49.8%
50.2%
48.8%
51.2%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
38.3%
61.7%
29.5%
70.5%
58.1%
41.9%
47.2%
52.8%
39.8%
60.2%
43.1%
56.9%
43.5%
56.5%
39.9%
60.1%
39.3%
60.7%
44.2%
55.8%
45.3%
54.7%
55.4%
44.6%
40.3%
59.7%
42.5%
57.5%
39.8%
60.2%
48.0%
52.0%
33.3%
66.7%
75.7%
24.3%
65.3%
34.7%
54.9%
45.1%
62.3%
37.7%
81.5%
18.5%
38.5%
61.5%
47.1%
52.9%
44.6%
55.4%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
18
9
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
48.8%
51.2%
39.6%
60.4%
65.0%
35.0%
54.7%
45.3%
50.5%
49.5%
49.7%
50.3%
50.4%
49.6%
50.8%
49.2%
49.5%
50.5%
51.7%
48.3%
53.6%
46.4%
60.5%
39.5%
44.7%
55.3%
50.4%
49.6%
46.3%
53.7%
52.8%
47.2%
42.5%
57.5%
79.9%
20.1%
71.0%
29.0%
61.1%
38.9%
69.5%
30.5%
84.9%
15.1%
46.2%
53.8%
53.5%
46.5%
51.6%
48.4%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
39.4%
60.6%
29.8%
70.2%
57.6%
42.4%
46.8%
53.2%
38.6%
61.4%
42.3%
57.7%
43.8%
56.2%
39.8%
60.2%
41.1%
58.9%
44.4%
55.6%
47.1%
52.9%
54.8%
45.2%
39.1%
60.9%
46.2%
53.8%
40.5%
59.5%
50.7%
49.3%
35.3%
64.7%
76.7%
23.3%
68.0%
32.0%
57.6%
42.4%
64.2%
35.8%
81.1%
18.9%
40.7%
59.3%
48.5%
51.5%
47.7%
52.3%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
6
21
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
34.3%
65.7%
28.4%
71.6%
56.2%
43.8%
44.4%
55.6%
36.1%
63.9%
35.8%
64.2%
38.5%
61.5%
36.8%
63.2%
36.4%
63.6%
40.0%
60.0%
39.9%
60.1%
49.8%
50.2%
35.2%
64.8%
39.7%
60.3%
36.2%
63.8%
44.5%
55.5%
32.9%
67.1%
74.3%
25.7%
63.7%
36.3%
52.5%
47.5%
61.4%
38.6%
80.6%
19.4%
39.2%
60.8%
46.7%
53.3%
44.7%
55.3%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
19%
44
-23%
23
-25%
62
-25%
62
0%
410
23%
368
-62%
42
-62%
97
-62%
93
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
53.8%
46.2%
45.3%
54.7%
70.0%
30.0%
62.5%
37.5%
59.5%
40.5%
59.7%
40.3%
59.5%
40.5%
59.0%
41.0%
56.6%
43.4%
61.5%
38.5%
63.2%
36.8%
70.3%
29.7%
58.5%
41.5%
57.4%
42.6%
56.9%
43.1%
64.0%
36.0%
51.2%
48.8%
82.8%
17.2%
76.9%
23.1%
67.8%
32.2%
72.7%
27.3%
85.4%
14.6%
51.1%
48.9%
57.2%
42.8%
55.9%
44.1%
Plan: H000C9033
Page 2 of 4
App. 127
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
43.7%
29.5%
60.4%
40.3%
36.6%
35.0%
42.8%
38.0%
37.4%
36.9%
35.4%
50.2%
36.7%
32.8%
38.2%
37.5%
28.0%
65.3%
48.1%
41.3%
47.8%
69.8%
32.9%
35.8%
35.8%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
41.0%
28.0%
59.8%
38.7%
35.8%
33.4%
41.7%
37.3%
35.2%
35.3%
34.4%
49.4%
35.6%
32.1%
36.7%
36.4%
27.1%
65.8%
46.7%
40.5%
46.3%
69.3%
32.8%
35.6%
35.8%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
19.2%
21.5%
19.1%
26.0%
27.1%
23.1%
26.3%
28.2%
20.5%
25.3%
27.4%
24.8%
26.5%
24.4%
22.3%
25.6%
25.8%
21.1%
27.4%
27.5%
28.4%
20.5%
29.2%
29.3%
28.3%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
17.9%
20.3%
17.8%
24.8%
25.2%
21.1%
24.1%
26.0%
19.8%
23.9%
26.1%
23.0%
25.0%
23.5%
21.1%
24.6%
24.4%
20.4%
25.9%
25.9%
26.1%
19.4%
27.4%
27.4%
26.0%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
39.8%
50.4%
21.1%
35.3%
37.1%
43.5%
32.0%
34.5%
44.4%
39.5%
38.1%
25.8%
37.9%
43.5%
41.0%
38.0%
47.1%
13.2%
25.8%
32.0%
25.3%
10.2%
38.0%
35.2%
35.9%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
38.4%
50.2%
21.8%
34.9%
38.2%
43.9%
33.1%
36.0%
42.8%
39.3%
38.5%
26.8%
38.3%
43.6%
40.7%
37.9%
47.6%
14.3%
26.0%
32.8%
26.2%
10.9%
39.6%
36.8%
38.2%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
83.5%
77.4%
86.1%
82.5%
77.9%
81.6%
81.3%
78.1%
84.9%
78.1%
77.3%
83.4%
76.9%
81.2%
83.1%
81.1%
76.8%
84.4%
77.0%
79.2%
78.7%
85.7%
79.0%
80.8%
80.5%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
84.3%
78.8%
86.9%
83.1%
79.0%
82.7%
82.5%
79.1%
85.2%
79.0%
77.6%
84.2%
77.8%
81.0%
83.6%
81.6%
77.5%
84.4%
77.3%
79.8%
79.3%
85.8%
79.4%
81.0%
81.4%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
13.1%
3.8%
26.7%
3.5%
1.4%
2.7%
9.2%
3.9%
25.4%
4.7%
1.1%
2.6%
47.0%
6.7%
67.7%
5.7%
6.3%
5.0%
9.3%
5.9%
19.8%
7.2%
0.9%
3.1%
9.4%
15.0%
20.4%
19.3%
1.1%
7.7%
7.9%
4.6%
19.2%
5.8%
0.9%
2.9%
11.6%
22.4%
22.5%
26.5%
1.4%
10.4%
9.7%
21.8%
20.2%
27.9%
1.4%
10.6%
7.7%
4.2%
18.6%
5.6%
0.8%
2.4%
3.8%
6.3%
8.4%
8.4%
0.5%
3.8%
4.2%
3.9%
9.4%
5.0%
0.5%
2.3%
25.6%
11.0%
43.2%
10.6%
3.2%
7.9%
8.9%
13.8%
19.2%
16.9%
1.2%
8.1%
4.9%
3.6%
12.5%
4.9%
0.5%
1.9%
8.0%
7.5%
18.2%
9.3%
0.8%
4.2%
9.6%
6.3%
21.3%
7.8%
1.1%
3.9%
4.1%
6.4%
11.6%
9.5%
0.4%
3.3%
48.1%
10.8%
61.8%
8.3%
10.5%
14.1%
8.9%
11.6%
14.6%
11.2%
1.4%
8.8%
7.5%
9.1%
14.7%
10.0%
0.9%
6.3%
8.7%
26.9%
14.7%
23.4%
1.4%
27.8%
55.6%
22.9%
68.8%
15.5%
14.2%
48.0%
6.9%
57.7%
16.6%
52.3%
0.9%
58.6%
9.3%
57.3%
21.2%
45.3%
1.1%
66.2%
7.0%
60.5%
15.8%
48.3%
0.8%
71.0%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
13.0%
3.4%
25.0%
3.1%
1.5%
2.6%
8.9%
3.6%
23.6%
4.2%
1.1%
2.4%
45.5%
6.0%
65.5%
5.1%
6.4%
4.7%
9.1%
5.4%
18.8%
6.4%
1.0%
2.9%
9.0%
13.7%
19.3%
17.6%
1.2%
7.3%
7.5%
4.2%
17.6%
5.2%
0.9%
2.7%
11.1%
20.5%
21.3%
24.2%
1.4%
10.3%
9.1%
20.1%
19.0%
25.8%
1.3%
10.3%
7.6%
3.8%
17.3%
5.0%
0.9%
2.3%
3.5%
5.7%
7.5%
7.5%
0.5%
3.5%
3.8%
3.4%
8.3%
4.3%
0.5%
2.1%
24.7%
9.9%
41.4%
9.3%
3.2%
7.5%
8.6%
12.4%
18.2%
14.8%
1.2%
7.7%
4.7%
3.1%
11.6%
4.1%
0.6%
1.8%
7.6%
6.7%
16.7%
8.0%
0.9%
4.0%
8.9%
5.7%
19.4%
6.9%
1.0%
3.5%
3.7%
5.7%
10.3%
8.3%
0.4%
3.1%
45.9%
9.9%
59.3%
7.6%
10.4%
12.8%
7.8%
10.1%
12.6%
9.6%
1.4%
8.0%
7.1%
8.0%
13.7%
8.6%
0.9%
5.7%
8.1%
24.6%
13.4%
21.0%
1.4%
26.9%
56.1%
21.4%
69.0%
14.3%
15.2%
46.7%
6.9%
55.1%
16.7%
48.5%
0.9%
57.7%
9.4%
55.5%
21.4%
42.6%
1.1%
65.6%
7.0%
59.2%
16.0%
45.4%
0.8%
70.8%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
39.7%
29.6%
34.8%
33.9%
51.0%
16.9%
47.6%
18.9%
47.0%
20.4%
43.2%
28.2%
50.4%
16.6%
48.6%
18.4%
48.8%
26.0%
48.0%
24.3%
44.2%
23.3%
47.6%
20.3%
43.7%
23.8%
42.7%
24.4%
45.9%
24.3%
46.0%
23.6%
41.1%
26.0%
50.2%
18.4%
45.7%
20.6%
44.5%
23.3%
40.7%
28.6%
46.5%
23.7%
29.0%
41.5%
27.5%
43.5%
27.4%
45.6%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
38.2%
28.3%
33.5%
33.0%
50.3%
15.7%
47.2%
18.6%
45.9%
18.9%
41.9%
27.2%
49.4%
14.8%
47.7%
16.8%
47.5%
26.0%
47.1%
23.6%
44.0%
22.3%
48.0%
18.7%
43.8%
22.3%
43.3%
23.2%
45.3%
23.0%
44.7%
23.2%
40.6%
24.5%
50.3%
17.2%
45.2%
19.7%
44.3%
22.0%
40.2%
26.2%
47.0%
21.4%
29.7%
38.6%
28.1%
40.6%
28.6%
42.1%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
43.2%
45.4%
11.4%
26.8%
59.6%
13.6%
61.2%
28.1%
10.7%
38.9%
43.3%
17.8%
34.0%
48.7%
17.3%
32.3%
52.2%
15.4%
40.1%
44.1%
15.8%
35.0%
46.9%
18.1%
34.1%
50.6%
15.2%
34.3%
48.2%
17.5%
34.3%
46.3%
19.4%
50.1%
34.3%
15.6%
35.3%
47.4%
17.3%
30.8%
51.5%
17.7%
35.5%
49.8%
14.7%
34.9%
46.5%
18.6%
24.2%
58.2%
17.6%
70.1%
16.4%
13.5%
50.2%
29.8%
20.1%
40.8%
39.5%
19.7%
49.6%
31.3%
19.1%
76.4%
11.0%
12.6%
29.7%
51.0%
19.3%
35.3%
45.9%
18.8%
34.0%
47.6%
18.4%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
41.3%
43.0%
15.7%
27.5%
54.6%
17.9%
62.4%
22.6%
14.9%
39.1%
38.8%
22.1%
35.7%
41.0%
23.3%
33.1%
46.9%
20.0%
42.4%
35.5%
22.1%
37.3%
38.4%
24.3%
34.2%
48.1%
17.7%
35.1%
43.3%
21.5%
34.9%
41.4%
23.8%
50.9%
28.2%
21.0%
36.0%
41.2%
22.8%
32.0%
46.8%
21.2%
36.2%
45.1%
18.6%
36.3%
41.3%
22.4%
26.3%
51.8%
21.9%
69.8%
12.7%
17.5%
48.4%
26.9%
24.8%
41.4%
34.1%
24.6%
47.9%
26.6%
25.5%
73.2%
9.4%
17.4%
32.8%
41.4%
25.7%
36.1%
38.4%
25.5%
36.1%
38.6%
25.2%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
11.1%
2.1%
22.8%
1.7%
0.9%
1.8%
7.0%
2.2%
21.4%
2.5%
0.7%
1.8%
44.2%
3.4%
66.4%
2.9%
3.7%
3.0%
7.7%
3.3%
17.5%
4.2%
0.5%
2.0%
7.5%
8.4%
18.4%
11.3%
0.8%
5.0%
6.2%
2.8%
16.7%
3.6%
0.6%
2.0%
10.0%
10.9%
21.9%
14.9%
0.8%
5.6%
9.1%
12.5%
21.7%
17.6%
1.0%
6.7%
6.0%
2.1%
15.9%
2.8%
0.5%
1.4%
3.1%
3.5%
7.6%
4.7%
0.3%
2.4%
2.8%
2.1%
6.9%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
22.0%
5.7%
39.4%
5.4%
1.8%
5.0%
7.9%
7.3%
18.3%
8.6%
0.9%
5.4%
3.4%
1.7%
9.7%
2.3%
0.3%
1.1%
6.2%
3.3%
15.6%
4.2%
0.5%
2.4%
7.5%
3.4%
18.6%
4.2%
0.7%
2.5%
2.3%
2.8%
7.8%
4.5%
0.2%
1.9%
48.6%
6.2%
62.3%
4.4%
7.1%
9.9%
7.5%
6.2%
12.2%
5.3%
1.1%
6.1%
6.0%
5.1%
12.4%
5.2%
0.6%
4.3%
8.5%
20.3%
14.3%
14.9%
1.1%
25.6%
63.3%
15.5%
75.0%
9.0%
12.0%
45.9%
7.6%
48.9%
21.6%
37.7%
0.7%
54.0%
9.8%
51.4%
24.0%
32.8%
0.7%
64.2%
6.3%
56.7%
16.1%
35.5%
0.5%
70.9%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
13.4%
3.3%
27.9%
3.0%
1.1%
2.4%
9.1%
3.4%
26.6%
4.1%
0.9%
2.3%
49.4%
5.4%
70.4%
4.6%
5.0%
4.1%
9.5%
5.0%
20.7%
6.3%
0.7%
2.6%
9.3%
12.8%
21.1%
17.0%
0.9%
6.6%
7.9%
4.1%
20.0%
5.2%
0.7%
2.6%
12.3%
19.3%
24.4%
24.2%
1.2%
8.4%
10.4%
18.6%
22.4%
24.9%
1.2%
8.9%
7.5%
3.4%
19.3%
4.7%
0.6%
2.0%
4.0%
5.7%
9.2%
7.9%
0.5%
3.3%
4.1%
3.4%
9.6%
4.5%
0.4%
2.0%
26.3%
9.4%
44.5%
9.3%
2.5%
6.9%
9.3%
12.1%
20.4%
15.3%
1.0%
7.2%
4.8%
3.1%
12.7%
4.4%
0.4%
1.6%
8.3%
5.9%
19.7%
7.8%
0.7%
3.3%
9.8%
5.5%
22.6%
6.9%
0.9%
3.5%
3.9%
5.1%
12.0%
8.2%
0.3%
2.7%
52.3%
9.6%
65.2%
7.2%
9.2%
13.7%
9.6%
10.6%
15.8%
10.1%
1.3%
8.4%
7.8%
8.4%
15.5%
9.0%
0.8%
6.0%
9.4%
26.9%
15.8%
22.6%
1.3%
28.5%
59.7%
20.7%
71.8%
13.7%
12.9%
48.9%
7.7%
55.0%
19.1%
48.6%
0.8%
56.3%
9.7%
56.1%
22.5%
42.2%
0.9%
65.9%
7.1%
59.7%
16.3%
45.7%
0.6%
71.0%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
89.0%
82.3%
92.0%
89.1%
83.2%
86.7%
88.1%
83.2%
89.8%
82.9%
84.8%
89.7%
82.0%
87.4%
89.0%
86.5%
83.2%
89.8%
81.9%
84.7%
83.6%
90.5%
84.3%
86.9%
86.3%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
86.3%
80.1%
89.0%
85.4%
80.6%
84.1%
84.2%
80.6%
87.5%
80.6%
80.7%
86.1%
79.1%
84.6%
86.1%
83.6%
80.5%
87.1%
79.4%
81.8%
81.2%
88.0%
81.5%
83.8%
83.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
36.0%
40.3%
29.9%
47.3%
52.3%
24.8%
49.4%
26.1%
45.7%
29.1%
40.7%
37.7%
54.7%
22.7%
49.4%
25.4%
46.1%
35.0%
46.6%
33.5%
42.5%
33.7%
46.9%
30.1%
41.3%
35.3%
41.2%
34.5%
44.3%
35.1%
43.7%
34.5%
38.0%
39.3%
50.0%
26.2%
43.1%
29.4%
41.8%
33.5%
36.3%
39.5%
44.3%
32.6%
22.9%
56.4%
22.5%
57.4%
21.3%
59.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
38.3%
30.9%
33.6%
37.2%
52.8%
17.3%
49.2%
20.5%
47.5%
21.0%
42.2%
30.1%
53.1%
15.4%
49.9%
18.3%
48.2%
28.7%
48.8%
25.6%
45.9%
24.6%
50.1%
20.6%
45.4%
24.6%
45.2%
24.6%
47.4%
25.5%
45.7%
25.9%
42.5%
27.5%
52.3%
18.1%
46.1%
21.2%
44.7%
24.3%
40.2%
28.2%
48.5%
22.3%
29.0%
42.4%
27.2%
45.0%
27.7%
46.0%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
19.2%
0.8%
1.3%
18.0%
1.4%
1.2%
64.3%
1.9%
2.0%
16.7%
3.1%
1.5%
15.9%
7.6%
3.6%
15.7%
2.5%
1.6%
19.4%
8.8%
3.6%
19.2%
13.0%
5.0%
14.6%
1.5%
1.0%
6.1%
3.0%
1.7%
5.5%
1.9%
1.2%
36.6%
3.2%
3.6%
15.5%
4.6%
3.9%
9.5%
1.4%
0.9%
13.1%
2.5%
1.7%
17.9%
2.7%
1.8%
6.9%
2.6%
1.4%
61.7%
2.7%
8.0%
10.0%
2.8%
4.8%
11.1%
3.1%
3.3%
13.8%
9.6%
24.8%
79.1%
5.3%
43.7%
23.7%
31.4%
52.8%
25.5%
22.7%
63.6%
15.6%
29.2%
74.3%
Plan: H000C9033
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Alachua
Baker
Baker
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Citrus
Citrus
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Duval
Hendry
Hendry
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pasco
Pasco
Pinellas
Pinellas
App. 128
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
158,514
64.1%
353.3
5
61,783
25.0%
403.6
11
27,039
10.9%
211.9
3
25,445
93.8%
533.2
5
1,670
6.2%
55.7
20
455,445
26.1%
535.5
21
272,224
15.6%
70.9
22
294,581
16.9%
130.1
23
498,411
28.5%
188.9
24
136,412
7.8%
24.0
25
90,993
5.2%
373.5
11
97,567
69.1%
440.8
12
43,669
30.9%
332.5
19
160,728
50.0%
338.0
25
160,792
50.0%
1,967.0
3
242,229
28.0%
399.4
4
347,132
40.2%
252.3
5
274,902
31.8%
266.7
20
13,550
34.6%
55.7
25
25,590
65.4%
1,134.3
14
500,590
40.7%
422.5
15
671,902
54.7%
593.6
17
56,734
4.6%
249.7
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
5
19,463
6.6%
323.9
10
136,671
46.0%
537.9
11
140,918
47.4%
295.1
17
83,137
13.4%
178.2
19
535,617
86.6%
1,034.3
2
4,028
21.0%
337.4
3
15,196
79.0%
378.3
16
316,897
98.2%
447.9
17
5,936
1.8%
444.8
5
12,293
3.7%
439.9
11
319,005
96.3%
1,222.7
23
197,933
7.9%
98.6
24
559,932
22.4%
86.9
25
418,970
16.8%
505.4
26
623,255
25.0%
1,162.4
27
696,345
27.9%
577.8
17
34,658
86.7%
786.4
18
5,338
13.3%
105.5
5
297,714
26.0%
216.0
7
273,627
23.9%
95.2
8
14,941
1.3%
245.0
10
559,674
48.8%
447.0
18
266,900
20.2%
446.7
20
227,350
17.2%
1,504.3
21
424,120
32.1%
193.0
22
401,764
30.4%
239.0
9
7,204
1.6%
63.4
12
457,493
98.4%
805.1
13
696,344
76.0%
415.0
14
195,755
21.4%
168.0
Area%
36.5%
41.7%
21.9%
90.5%
9.5%
40.5%
5.4%
9.8%
14.3%
1.8%
28.2%
57.0%
43.0%
14.7%
85.3%
43.5%
27.5%
29.0%
4.7%
95.3%
33.4%
46.9%
19.7%
79.5%
20.5%
28.0%
46.5%
25.5%
14.7%
85.3%
47.1%
52.9%
50.2%
49.8%
26.5%
73.5%
4.1%
3.6%
20.8%
47.8%
23.8%
88.2%
11.8%
21.5%
9.5%
24.4%
44.6%
18.7%
63.1%
8.1%
10.0%
7.3%
92.7%
68.2%
27.6%
County
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
St. Johns
St. Johns
Sumter
Sumter
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
15
24,443
2.7%
25.1
9
420,456
69.8%
858.4
17
181,639
30.2%
1,152.2
4
158,348
83.3%
526.3
6
31,691
16.7%
295.2
11
71,015
76.0%
240.0
12
22,405
24.0%
339.8
Area%
4.1%
42.7%
57.3%
64.1%
35.9%
41.4%
58.6%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Boynton Beach
20
19,978
29.3%
3.2
Boynton Beach
22
48,239
70.7%
13.4
Coconut Creek
20
433
0.8%
0.6
Coconut Creek
21
52,476
99.2%
11.4
Deerfield Beach
20
26,242
35.0%
4.0
Deerfield Beach
21
33,897
45.2%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Eatonville
5
2,145
99.4%
1.1
Eatonville
7
14
0.6%
0.0
Fanning Springs
3
278
36.4%
1.7
Fanning Springs
11
486
63.6%
2.2
Fort Lauderdale
20
60,588
36.6%
13.4
Fort Lauderdale
22
104,933
63.4%
25.0
Fort Lauderdale
23
0
0.0%
0.2
Gainesville
3
81,681
65.7%
38.6
Gainesville
5
42,673
34.3%
23.8
Hallandale Beach
23
25,370
68.4%
3.0
Hallandale Beach
24
11,743
31.6%
1.6
Hialeah
25
162,856
72.5%
16.5
Hialeah
27
61,813
27.5%
6.3
Hollywood
23
114,568
81.4%
26.6
Hollywood
24
26,200
18.6%
4.1
Homestead
26
42,640
70.5%
7.0
Homestead
27
17,872
29.5%
8.6
Jacksonville
3
228,149
27.8%
384.4
Jacksonville
4
318,733
38.8%
223.5
Jacksonville
5
274,902
33.5%
266.7
Lake Park
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Lake Park
20
7,242
88.8%
2.1
Lake Park
22
913
11.2%
0.3
Lake Wales
9
2,512
17.7%
5.5
Lake Wales
17
11,713
82.3%
14.5
Lake Worth
20
10,654
30.5%
1.6
Lake Worth
22
24,256
69.5%
5.0
Lakeland
9
85,375
87.6%
59.0
Lakeland
17
12,047
12.4%
15.3
Lantana
20
4,654
44.7%
1.2
Lantana
22
5,769
55.3%
1.7
Largo
13
75,782
97.6%
17.3
Largo
14
1,866
2.4%
1.3
Leesburg
10
10,423
51.8%
32.4
Leesburg
11
9,694
48.2%
8.6
Loxahatchee Groves 18
1,681
52.9%
7.0
Loxahatchee Groves 20
1,499
47.1%
5.5
Maitland
5
9
0.1%
0.0
Maitland
7
15,742
99.9%
6.4
Margate
20
14,535
27.3%
2.2
Margate
21
38,749
72.7%
6.9
Miami
23
15,273
3.8%
2.9
Miami
24
133,006
33.3%
19.4
62.9%
33.8
27
251,178
Miami
Miramar
24
65,355
53.6%
11.2
Miramar
25
56,686
46.4%
20.1
Newberry
3
2,398
48.4%
20.3
Newberry
11
2,552
51.6%
34.3
Counties and Cities
Area%
19.1%
80.9%
4.7%
95.3%
24.6%
57.3%
18.2%
99.7%
0.3%
44.4%
55.6%
34.8%
64.8%
0.4%
61.9%
38.1%
64.5%
35.5%
72.4%
27.6%
86.5%
13.5%
44.8%
55.2%
43.9%
25.6%
30.5%
0.2%
88.9%
10.9%
27.4%
72.6%
24.5%
75.5%
79.4%
20.6%
40.7%
59.3%
93.0%
7.0%
79.0%
21.0%
55.9%
44.1%
0.0%
100.0%
24.2%
75.8%
5.2%
34.5%
60.3%
35.7%
64.3%
37.2%
62.8%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
North Miami
23
9,175
15.6%
4.8
North Miami
24
49,611
84.4%
5.2
North Miami Beach 23
6,953
16.7%
1.1
North Miami Beach 24
34,570
83.3%
4.3
Oakland Park
20
20,289
49.1%
4.2
Oakland Park
22
21,074
50.9%
3.9
Opa-locka
24
14,894
97.9%
2.6
Opa-locka
25
325
2.1%
1.9
Orlando
5
75,594
31.7%
22.5
Orlando
7
59,991
25.2%
19.3
Orlando
10
102,715
43.1%
68.9
Pembroke Pines
23
107,607
69.5%
20.0
Pembroke Pines
24
12,856
8.3%
3.1
Pembroke Pines
25
34,287
22.2%
11.7
Plantation
20
13,381
15.8%
2.7
Plantation
22
67,448
79.4%
18.3
Plantation
23
4,126
4.9%
0.9
Pompano Beach
20
46,314
46.4%
11.3
Pompano Beach
21
1,447
1.4%
2.0
Pompano Beach
22
52,084
52.2%
12.2
Riviera Beach
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Riviera Beach
20
28,156
86.7%
7.3
Riviera Beach
22
4,332
13.3%
2.9
Royal Palm Beach
18
14,734
43.2%
5.1
Royal Palm Beach
20
16,299
47.7%
5.6
Royal Palm Beach
21
3,107
9.1%
0.7
St. Petersburg
13
67,666
27.6%
19.0
St. Petersburg
14
177,103
72.4%
118.6
Sunrise
20
62,665
74.2%
9.4
Sunrise
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Sunrise
23
21,774
25.8%
8.9
Tampa
14
274,305
81.7%
128.2
Tampa
15
61,404
18.3%
47.1
Temple Terrace
14
13,608
55.5%
3.9
Temple Terrace
15
10,933
44.5%
3.2
West Palm Beach
18
20,693
20.7%
35.3
West Palm Beach
20
48,663
48.7%
15.6
West Palm Beach
22
30,563
30.6%
7.2
Wilton Manors
20
3,311
28.5%
0.6
Wilton Manors
22
8,321
71.5%
1.4
Winter Haven
9
33,851
99.9%
35.3
Winter Haven
17
23
0.1%
4.6
Area%
48.4%
51.6%
20.8%
79.2%
52.1%
47.9%
57.7%
42.3%
20.3%
17.4%
62.2%
57.5%
9.0%
33.5%
12.3%
83.5%
4.2%
44.4%
7.7%
47.9%
0.4%
71.2%
28.4%
45.0%
49.1%
5.8%
13.8%
86.2%
51.5%
0.0%
48.4%
73.1%
26.9%
54.6%
45.4%
60.8%
26.9%
12.4%
29.9%
70.1%
88.4%
11.6%
Plan: H000C9033
Page 4 of 4
26
5
10
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
0
27
Scale bar for insets
Palmetto Bay
Cutler Bay
Oldsmar
14
16
Bradenton
Palmetto
St. Petersburg
Holmes Beach
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
Treasure Island
Pinellas Park
13 PINELLAS
Seminole
Largo
Clearwater
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
Temple Terrace
St. Leo
MANATEE
HILLSBOROUGH
Tampa
12
PASCO
Green Cove Springs
17
15
Plant City
Zephyrhills
10
St. Augustine
Dade City
ST. JOHNS
6
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
10
Ocoee
Apopka
5
Maitland
Kissimmee
Deltona
Oviedo
13
17
8
AD
BR
ALACHUA
O
LSB
17
15
Titusville
Oak Hill
DESOTO
HARDEE
POLK
LAKE
LEE
19
CHARLOTTE
10
5
9
6
DUVAL
PUTNAM
CLAY
4
MARION
SARASOTA
16
F
D
OR
GH
R OU
MANATEE
14
HIL
12
HERNANDO
CITRUS
11
PASCO
LEVY
BIA
VOLUSIA 6
7 SEMINOLE
St. Cloud
9
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
Winter Springs
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
LAKE
4-Jan-2012
*****
PCB CRS 12-02
Not reported by
House Congressional
Subcommittee
9-Jan-2012
H000C9035
Orlando Area
Eustis
3
DIXIE
E
N
UNIO
BAKER
COLLIER
25
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
OSCEOLA
ORANGE
7
VOLUSIA
FLAGLER
10
26
8
MONROE
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
20
21
27
23
24
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
18
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Florida City
Homestead
MIAMI-DADE
Coral Gables
Miami
Miami Beach
24 North Miami
Aventura
Starke
CLAY
Orange Park
Jacksonville
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
LA
FA
YE
TT
E
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Doral
Hialeah
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
Dania Beach
Lawtey
3
DUVAL
GULF
HAMILTON
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
23
Oakland Park
Fort Lauderdale
Lauderhill
Pompano Beach
Baldwin
5
Miles
60
MADISON
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
Davie
Plantation
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Southwest Ranches
BROWARD
Sunrise
Tamarac
Deerfield Beach
4
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
R
Boca Raton
22
Delray Beach
NASSAU
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Parkland
21
Lantana
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
30
JACKSON
GILCHRIST
20
Wellington
Palm Springs
20
BAY
2
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
HNS
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
E
NN
Belle Glade
18
1
SANTA ROSA
A
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
A
ESC
COLU
M
South Florida
JO
ST.
OK
App. 129
App. 130
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
14.02%
11.77%
48.21%
9.64%
10.45%
9.78%
11.97%
11.74%
7.27%
4.64%
5.16%
24.61%
13.06%
5.83%
9.12%
10.98%
5.76%
50.21%
11.21%
10.16%
9.93%
55.73%
8.25%
10.02%
7.71%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
11
16
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
37.5%
62.5%
34.8%
65.2%
69.6%
30.4%
44.8%
55.2%
48.6%
51.4%
43.9%
56.1%
62.4%
37.6%
44.3%
55.7%
40.7%
59.3%
45.3%
54.7%
50.1%
49.9%
65.2%
34.8%
46.6%
53.4%
45.3%
54.7%
41.7%
58.3%
48.0%
52.0%
38.4%
61.6%
83.2%
16.8%
60.9%
39.1%
54.3%
45.7%
61.2%
38.8%
88.4%
11.6%
49.4%
50.6%
53.4%
46.6%
53.3%
46.7%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
10
17
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
41.9%
58.1%
36.4%
63.6%
65.4%
34.6%
45.4%
54.6%
48.4%
51.6%
43.1%
56.9%
56.0%
44.0%
43.3%
56.7%
42.1%
57.9%
45.6%
54.4%
50.2%
49.8%
63.0%
37.0%
45.9%
54.1%
46.1%
53.9%
41.2%
58.8%
49.1%
50.9%
36.5%
63.5%
80.0%
20.0%
63.0%
37.0%
54.4%
45.6%
60.9%
39.1%
86.4%
13.6%
42.2%
57.8%
49.9%
50.1%
48.4%
51.6%
0.40
0.37
0.46
0.58
0.53
0.11
0.34
0.59
0.23
0.52
0.44
0.51
0.42
0.35
0.37
0.53
0.42
0.52
0.54
0.26
0.49
0.29
0.17
0.27
0.48
0.47
0.18
0.46
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
34.0%
66.0%
28.3%
71.7%
60.8%
39.2%
37.4%
62.6%
36.1%
63.9%
34.7%
65.3%
47.1%
52.9%
34.6%
65.4%
33.8%
66.2%
33.6%
66.4%
37.0%
63.0%
51.6%
48.4%
35.7%
64.3%
34.3%
65.7%
32.8%
67.2%
36.4%
63.6%
27.6%
72.4%
75.1%
24.9%
51.6%
48.4%
41.6%
58.4%
52.2%
47.8%
84.3%
15.7%
35.5%
64.5%
42.2%
57.8%
39.5%
60.5%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2149.4
7644.0
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
0.35%
125
517
8,086
0.43%
60
354
1,509
1.07%
144
658
1,723
0.35%
107
360
3,076
0.89%
37
135
627
0.48%
95
298
1,615
2.30%
44
161
784
0.60%
74
266
1,883
0.35%
83
313
2,873
0.43%
56
166
1,029
0.27%
40
114
446
1.51%
43
146
545
0.82%
52
162
1,107
0.28%
60
178
1,193
0.45%
144
557
8,476
0.44%
69
221
1,993
0.42%
83
234
1,372
1.19%
74
347
2,096
0.65%
34
110
264
0.56%
52
188
369
1.16%
37
126
288
3.38%
17
59
111
1.68%
103
345
3,980
1.47%
184
551
4,900
2.23%
40
130
578
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
21
6
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
45.7%
54.3%
42.3%
57.7%
73.5%
26.5%
52.4%
47.6%
55.8%
44.2%
52.4%
47.6%
68.0%
32.0%
51.9%
48.1%
49.9%
50.1%
54.5%
45.5%
58.9%
41.1%
70.6%
29.4%
54.2%
45.8%
51.9%
48.1%
48.9%
51.1%
54.7%
45.3%
43.4%
56.6%
85.0%
15.0%
66.6%
33.4%
59.4%
40.6%
65.0%
35.0%
88.8%
11.2%
52.4%
47.6%
55.8%
44.2%
56.0%
44.0%
4.55%
4.75%
6.73%
6.66%
11.12%
7.17%
16.53%
8.77%
40.16%
12.55%
7.40%
11.29%
7.19%
23.92%
16.34%
8.76%
14.86%
12.06%
13.69%
18.55%
18.30%
17.58%
37.56%
33.15%
70.08%
68.91%
75.04%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.34
0.38
0.42
0.38
0.15
0.05
0.30
0.43
0.23
0.38
0.33
0.37
0.47
0.43
0.32
0.53
0.47
0.34
0.51
0.32
0.22
0.27
0.13
0.23
0.39
0.42
0.20
0.43
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
34.7%
65.3%
30.0%
70.0%
61.8%
38.2%
39.1%
60.9%
40.1%
59.9%
36.6%
63.4%
49.4%
50.6%
36.7%
63.3%
35.5%
64.5%
35.8%
64.2%
41.0%
59.0%
53.2%
46.8%
35.8%
64.2%
39.2%
60.8%
34.1%
65.9%
42.6%
57.4%
30.0%
70.0%
78.2%
21.8%
59.0%
41.0%
49.5%
50.5%
58.6%
41.4%
86.1%
13.9%
37.7%
62.3%
45.5%
54.5%
45.6%
54.4%
Convex
Hull
0.74
0.82
0.78
0.85
0.78
0.35
0.72
0.88
0.66
0.79
0.78
0.75
0.82
0.81
0.75
0.87
0.81
0.78
0.87
0.70
0.74
0.61
0.61
0.55
0.86
0.82
0.46
0.81
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
6
21
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
33.7%
66.3%
29.6%
70.4%
61.7%
38.3%
37.5%
62.5%
37.2%
62.8%
35.1%
64.9%
47.7%
52.3%
33.6%
66.4%
33.5%
66.5%
32.3%
67.7%
36.2%
63.8%
50.3%
49.7%
30.9%
69.1%
34.6%
65.4%
29.8%
70.2%
36.7%
63.3%
27.2%
72.8%
76.7%
23.3%
54.2%
45.8%
45.1%
54.9%
55.4%
44.6%
85.8%
14.2%
36.3%
63.7%
43.7%
56.3%
41.5%
58.5%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
18.0%
15.7%
47.0%
19.4%
20.9%
16.5%
28.8%
19.3%
15.3%
12.6%
14.7%
28.5%
17.0%
13.0%
14.3%
15.9%
9.3%
51.3%
19.2%
17.5%
23.0%
64.9%
16.6%
20.9%
17.7%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
20
66.3%
49.8%
59.3%
64.9%
34.9%
54.0%
56.0%
55.6%
47.4%
56.4%
54.4%
48.6%
42.5%
34.1%
50.1%
48.0%
54.3%
50.9%
60.5%
18.9%
36.0%
43.8%
37.4%
12.9%
59.7%
51.5%
55.1%
I_Cri
4
20.4%
28.7%
22.7%
19.4%
18.1%
26.6%
23.2%
27.9%
23.8%
24.3%
30.3%
38.8%
42.8%
37.4%
32.9%
39.0%
31.4%
33.2%
30.3%
29.8%
44.9%
38.7%
39.6%
22.2%
23.8%
27.6%
27.2%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
11
16
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
39.3%
60.7%
36.4%
63.6%
69.2%
30.8%
48.7%
51.3%
50.6%
49.4%
45.5%
54.5%
60.9%
39.1%
45.7%
54.3%
43.7%
56.3%
47.0%
53.0%
51.4%
48.6%
65.4%
34.6%
46.9%
53.1%
48.6%
51.4%
43.6%
56.4%
51.5%
48.5%
42.3%
57.7%
81.3%
18.7%
63.9%
36.1%
56.9%
43.1%
61.6%
38.4%
86.8%
13.2%
46.3%
53.7%
49.8%
50.2%
48.8%
51.2%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
39.6%
60.4%
30.0%
70.0%
58.0%
42.0%
46.0%
54.0%
39.4%
60.6%
43.4%
56.6%
46.1%
53.9%
38.3%
61.7%
40.8%
59.2%
43.0%
57.0%
45.2%
54.8%
56.0%
44.0%
39.8%
60.2%
42.5%
57.5%
39.9%
60.1%
48.0%
52.0%
33.3%
66.7%
75.7%
24.3%
65.3%
34.7%
54.9%
45.1%
62.3%
37.7%
81.5%
18.5%
38.5%
61.5%
47.1%
52.9%
44.6%
55.4%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
18
9
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
50.0%
50.0%
40.6%
59.4%
64.9%
35.1%
53.4%
46.6%
50.0%
50.0%
50.2%
49.8%
55.3%
44.7%
48.2%
51.8%
50.1%
49.9%
49.7%
50.3%
53.7%
46.3%
61.0%
39.0%
43.7%
56.3%
50.3%
49.7%
46.9%
53.1%
52.8%
47.2%
42.5%
57.5%
79.9%
20.1%
71.0%
29.0%
61.1%
38.9%
69.5%
30.5%
84.9%
15.1%
46.2%
53.8%
53.5%
46.5%
51.6%
48.4%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
40.9%
59.1%
30.3%
69.7%
57.3%
42.7%
45.7%
54.3%
38.2%
61.8%
42.5%
57.5%
45.9%
54.1%
38.7%
61.3%
42.5%
57.5%
42.7%
57.3%
47.1%
52.9%
55.3%
44.7%
39.0%
61.0%
46.1%
53.9%
40.9%
59.1%
50.7%
49.3%
35.3%
64.7%
76.7%
23.3%
68.0%
32.0%
57.6%
42.4%
64.2%
35.8%
81.1%
18.9%
40.7%
59.3%
48.5%
51.5%
47.7%
52.3%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
34.6%
65.4%
29.1%
70.9%
56.1%
43.9%
43.4%
56.6%
35.7%
64.3%
36.1%
63.9%
41.9%
58.1%
34.7%
65.3%
38.1%
61.9%
38.2%
61.8%
39.8%
60.2%
50.7%
49.3%
34.8%
65.2%
39.7%
60.3%
36.3%
63.7%
44.5%
55.5%
32.9%
67.1%
74.3%
25.7%
63.7%
36.3%
52.5%
47.5%
61.4%
38.6%
80.6%
19.4%
39.2%
60.8%
46.7%
53.3%
44.7%
55.3%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
11%
41
-13%
26
-17%
69
-17%
69
0%
410
21%
362
-56%
48
-56%
111
-56%
107
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
54.5%
45.5%
46.5%
53.5%
69.7%
30.3%
60.9%
39.1%
59.0%
41.0%
59.9%
40.1%
63.3%
36.7%
57.0%
43.0%
57.8%
42.2%
60.9%
39.1%
63.3%
36.7%
70.7%
29.3%
57.3%
42.7%
57.4%
42.6%
56.9%
43.1%
64.0%
36.0%
51.2%
48.8%
82.8%
17.2%
76.9%
23.1%
67.8%
32.2%
72.7%
27.3%
85.4%
14.6%
51.1%
48.9%
57.2%
42.8%
55.9%
44.1%
Plan: H000C9035
Page 2 of 4
App. 131
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
44.2%
32.9%
59.6%
38.3%
35.9%
35.6%
43.9%
36.6%
36.9%
35.3%
35.8%
50.5%
38.3%
32.8%
37.9%
37.5%
28.0%
65.3%
48.1%
41.3%
47.8%
69.8%
32.9%
35.8%
35.8%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
40.9%
30.8%
59.7%
36.5%
35.0%
34.1%
42.8%
35.5%
35.1%
33.8%
34.7%
49.5%
37.2%
32.1%
36.4%
36.4%
27.1%
65.8%
46.7%
40.5%
46.3%
69.3%
32.8%
35.6%
35.8%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
18.8%
21.2%
19.1%
25.4%
26.9%
23.6%
30.5%
23.9%
21.7%
26.2%
27.4%
25.2%
24.9%
24.4%
22.4%
25.6%
25.8%
21.1%
27.4%
27.5%
28.4%
20.5%
29.2%
29.3%
28.3%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
17.2%
19.9%
18.1%
24.3%
25.1%
21.5%
27.9%
22.4%
20.9%
24.8%
26.1%
23.5%
23.3%
23.5%
21.1%
24.6%
24.4%
20.4%
25.9%
25.9%
26.1%
19.4%
27.4%
27.4%
26.0%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
40.3%
47.9%
21.2%
38.0%
38.1%
42.3%
26.7%
40.6%
43.3%
40.0%
37.9%
25.3%
37.9%
43.5%
41.2%
38.0%
47.1%
13.2%
25.8%
32.0%
25.3%
10.2%
38.0%
35.2%
35.9%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
38.6%
47.2%
22.2%
37.3%
38.9%
42.9%
28.2%
41.0%
42.2%
39.9%
38.2%
26.1%
38.4%
43.6%
41.0%
37.9%
47.6%
14.3%
26.0%
32.8%
26.2%
10.9%
39.6%
36.8%
38.2%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
83.5%
79.3%
86.1%
82.3%
78.0%
81.2%
78.0%
80.8%
84.5%
74.9%
77.5%
83.5%
79.8%
81.2%
83.2%
81.1%
76.8%
84.4%
77.0%
79.2%
78.7%
85.7%
79.0%
80.8%
80.5%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
84.9%
80.5%
86.8%
83.0%
79.1%
82.5%
79.3%
81.8%
84.8%
75.9%
77.7%
84.1%
80.9%
81.0%
83.4%
81.6%
77.5%
84.4%
77.3%
79.8%
79.3%
85.8%
79.4%
81.0%
81.4%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
11.6%
4.0%
23.7%
3.7%
1.3%
2.9%
11.2%
3.7%
28.9%
4.1%
1.2%
2.4%
47.7%
6.8%
68.8%
5.8%
6.5%
5.1%
8.5%
4.4%
19.3%
5.3%
0.8%
2.4%
9.1%
13.0%
20.3%
16.8%
1.1%
6.8%
8.4%
6.1%
19.9%
7.7%
0.9%
3.5%
9.3%
36.3%
17.0%
42.1%
1.5%
19.1%
10.2%
8.6%
23.1%
11.0%
1.2%
4.5%
6.1%
4.9%
14.7%
6.9%
0.6%
2.8%
4.1%
7.6%
9.1%
9.7%
0.6%
4.7%
4.4%
3.9%
9.7%
5.0%
0.5%
2.3%
24.3%
14.4%
40.9%
14.0%
3.1%
10.5%
12.8%
9.7%
27.5%
11.3%
1.4%
5.8%
4.9%
3.6%
12.5%
4.9%
0.5%
1.9%
7.6%
7.7%
17.4%
9.7%
0.8%
4.2%
9.6%
6.3%
21.3%
7.8%
1.1%
3.9%
4.1%
6.4%
11.6%
9.5%
0.4%
3.3%
48.1%
10.8%
61.8%
8.3%
10.5%
14.1%
8.9%
11.6%
14.6%
11.2%
1.4%
8.8%
7.5%
9.1%
14.7%
10.0%
0.9%
6.3%
8.7%
26.9%
14.7%
23.4%
1.4%
27.8%
55.6%
22.9%
68.8%
15.5%
14.2%
48.0%
6.9%
57.7%
16.6%
52.3%
0.9%
58.6%
9.3%
57.3%
21.2%
45.3%
1.1%
66.2%
7.0%
60.5%
15.8%
48.3%
0.8%
71.0%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
11.3%
3.6%
21.8%
3.3%
1.4%
2.8%
11.6%
3.3%
28.5%
3.6%
1.3%
2.3%
45.5%
6.2%
66.2%
5.3%
6.3%
4.8%
8.4%
4.0%
18.2%
4.8%
0.9%
2.3%
8.8%
11.9%
19.4%
15.3%
1.2%
6.5%
7.9%
5.6%
18.3%
7.0%
0.9%
3.4%
9.3%
34.0%
16.8%
39.5%
1.5%
19.2%
9.7%
7.8%
21.7%
9.7%
1.2%
4.3%
5.9%
4.5%
13.5%
6.2%
0.7%
2.7%
3.8%
6.7%
8.2%
8.5%
0.6%
4.3%
4.0%
3.5%
8.7%
4.3%
0.5%
2.1%
23.9%
13.0%
39.8%
12.1%
3.3%
10.1%
12.1%
8.8%
25.6%
10.1%
1.4%
5.4%
4.7%
3.1%
11.6%
4.1%
0.6%
1.8%
7.1%
6.8%
15.7%
8.4%
0.8%
4.0%
8.9%
5.7%
19.4%
6.9%
1.0%
3.5%
3.7%
5.7%
10.3%
8.3%
0.4%
3.1%
45.9%
9.9%
59.3%
7.6%
10.4%
12.8%
7.8%
10.1%
12.6%
9.6%
1.4%
8.0%
7.1%
8.0%
13.7%
8.6%
0.9%
5.7%
8.1%
24.6%
13.4%
21.0%
1.4%
26.9%
56.1%
21.4%
69.0%
14.3%
15.2%
46.7%
6.9%
55.1%
16.7%
48.5%
0.9%
57.7%
9.4%
55.5%
21.4%
42.6%
1.1%
65.6%
7.0%
59.2%
16.0%
45.4%
0.8%
70.8%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
40.0%
30.4%
35.6%
32.5%
50.8%
17.2%
45.5%
21.0%
46.1%
21.3%
44.4%
25.8%
51.0%
15.9%
45.6%
22.5%
50.7%
25.0%
44.4%
25.7%
44.3%
23.2%
47.1%
20.3%
43.6%
23.7%
42.7%
24.5%
46.7%
23.9%
46.0%
23.6%
41.1%
26.0%
50.2%
18.4%
45.7%
20.6%
44.5%
23.3%
40.7%
28.6%
46.5%
23.7%
29.0%
41.5%
27.5%
43.5%
27.4%
45.6%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
38.0%
29.1%
34.5%
31.5%
50.4%
15.8%
44.7%
21.1%
45.3%
19.9%
43.2%
24.7%
49.7%
14.1%
45.2%
21.3%
49.8%
25.0%
43.5%
24.9%
44.1%
22.2%
48.0%
18.4%
43.1%
22.4%
43.3%
23.2%
46.0%
22.7%
44.7%
23.2%
40.6%
24.5%
50.3%
17.2%
45.2%
19.7%
44.3%
22.0%
40.2%
26.2%
47.0%
21.4%
29.7%
38.6%
28.1%
40.6%
28.6%
42.1%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
43.6%
45.4%
11.0%
30.7%
56.0%
13.3%
60.0%
29.0%
11.0%
36.7%
45.8%
17.5%
33.4%
49.3%
17.4%
33.0%
51.3%
15.6%
42.2%
39.2%
18.7%
33.4%
50.6%
16.0%
33.6%
50.6%
15.8%
33.2%
48.5%
18.4%
34.7%
46.1%
19.3%
50.7%
33.6%
15.7%
36.4%
47.6%
15.9%
30.8%
51.5%
17.7%
34.8%
50.5%
14.6%
34.9%
46.5%
18.6%
24.2%
58.2%
17.6%
70.1%
16.4%
13.5%
50.2%
29.8%
20.1%
40.8%
39.5%
19.7%
49.6%
31.3%
19.1%
76.4%
11.0%
12.6%
29.7%
51.0%
19.3%
35.3%
45.9%
18.8%
34.0%
47.6%
18.4%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
41.1%
43.5%
15.4%
30.6%
51.8%
17.6%
62.3%
22.9%
14.9%
36.6%
41.7%
21.7%
34.9%
42.0%
23.1%
33.9%
45.8%
20.4%
44.1%
29.9%
26.0%
35.1%
44.3%
20.7%
34.3%
47.3%
18.4%
33.7%
43.5%
22.8%
35.2%
41.1%
23.7%
51.1%
27.7%
21.3%
37.5%
41.3%
21.2%
32.0%
46.8%
21.2%
35.8%
45.5%
18.7%
36.3%
41.3%
22.4%
26.3%
51.8%
21.9%
69.8%
12.7%
17.5%
48.4%
26.9%
24.8%
41.4%
34.1%
24.6%
47.9%
26.6%
25.5%
73.2%
9.4%
17.4%
32.8%
41.4%
25.7%
36.1%
38.4%
25.5%
36.1%
38.6%
25.2%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
9.3%
2.2%
19.1%
1.8%
0.8%
1.9%
9.7%
2.1%
26.9%
2.2%
0.9%
1.7%
44.1%
3.5%
67.6%
3.0%
3.6%
3.1%
7.0%
2.5%
16.9%
3.1%
0.5%
1.6%
7.4%
7.4%
18.5%
9.8%
0.8%
4.5%
6.7%
3.7%
17.5%
4.7%
0.7%
2.5%
9.7%
21.7%
19.5%
28.3%
1.0%
11.8%
8.5%
4.4%
21.8%
5.7%
0.8%
2.8%
4.9%
2.5%
13.1%
3.6%
0.4%
1.7%
3.4%
4.2%
8.1%
5.2%
0.4%
3.2%
2.9%
2.1%
7.2%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
21.6%
7.7%
38.3%
7.1%
1.9%
7.0%
10.6%
5.0%
24.8%
5.6%
1.0%
3.6%
3.4%
1.7%
9.7%
2.3%
0.3%
1.1%
5.7%
3.4%
14.4%
4.5%
0.4%
2.3%
7.5%
3.4%
18.6%
4.2%
0.7%
2.5%
2.3%
2.8%
7.8%
4.5%
0.2%
1.9%
48.6%
6.2%
62.3%
4.4%
7.1%
9.9%
7.5%
6.2%
12.2%
5.3%
1.1%
6.1%
6.0%
5.1%
12.4%
5.2%
0.6%
4.3%
8.5%
20.3%
14.3%
14.9%
1.1%
25.6%
63.3%
15.5%
75.0%
9.0%
12.0%
45.9%
7.6%
48.9%
21.6%
37.7%
0.7%
54.0%
9.8%
51.4%
24.0%
32.8%
0.7%
64.2%
6.3%
56.7%
16.1%
35.5%
0.5%
70.9%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
11.6%
3.5%
24.4%
3.3%
1.0%
2.6%
11.4%
3.1%
30.6%
3.6%
1.0%
2.2%
50.1%
5.4%
71.6%
4.6%
5.1%
4.2%
8.6%
3.8%
20.0%
4.7%
0.6%
2.1%
9.1%
11.3%
21.1%
15.1%
0.9%
5.9%
8.4%
5.3%
20.8%
6.9%
0.8%
3.2%
10.3%
32.0%
19.0%
38.7%
1.3%
15.8%
10.4%
7.4%
24.7%
9.7%
1.0%
3.9%
6.1%
4.0%
15.5%
6.0%
0.5%
2.3%
4.3%
6.9%
9.8%
9.0%
0.5%
4.3%
4.3%
3.4%
9.9%
4.5%
0.4%
2.1%
24.9%
12.6%
42.1%
12.4%
2.4%
9.2%
13.4%
8.4%
29.3%
10.0%
1.2%
5.1%
4.8%
3.1%
12.7%
4.4%
0.4%
1.6%
7.8%
6.1%
18.9%
8.2%
0.6%
3.3%
9.8%
5.5%
22.6%
6.9%
0.9%
3.5%
3.9%
5.1%
12.0%
8.2%
0.3%
2.7%
52.3%
9.6%
65.2%
7.2%
9.2%
13.7%
9.6%
10.6%
15.8%
10.1%
1.3%
8.4%
7.8%
8.4%
15.5%
9.0%
0.8%
6.0%
9.4%
26.9%
15.8%
22.6%
1.3%
28.5%
59.7%
20.7%
71.8%
13.7%
12.9%
48.9%
7.7%
55.0%
19.1%
48.6%
0.8%
56.3%
9.7%
56.1%
22.5%
42.2%
0.9%
65.9%
7.1%
59.7%
16.3%
45.7%
0.6%
71.0%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
89.4%
84.8%
92.0%
89.0%
83.2%
86.5%
84.6%
86.1%
89.7%
79.2%
84.9%
89.8%
85.1%
87.4%
88.8%
86.5%
83.2%
89.8%
81.9%
84.7%
83.6%
90.5%
84.3%
86.9%
86.3%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
86.2%
82.1%
89.0%
85.1%
80.6%
83.7%
81.1%
83.2%
87.4%
77.0%
80.8%
86.3%
82.0%
84.6%
86.2%
83.6%
80.5%
87.1%
79.4%
81.8%
81.2%
88.0%
81.5%
83.8%
83.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
35.7%
41.0%
31.4%
45.5%
51.7%
25.6%
46.2%
29.1%
44.3%
30.2%
42.7%
34.8%
55.0%
21.3%
43.4%
31.8%
49.5%
34.0%
41.1%
36.3%
42.6%
33.4%
46.8%
30.5%
41.1%
34.9%
41.1%
34.6%
45.5%
34.0%
43.7%
34.5%
38.0%
39.3%
50.0%
26.2%
43.1%
29.4%
41.8%
33.5%
36.3%
39.5%
44.3%
32.6%
22.9%
56.4%
22.5%
57.4%
21.3%
59.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
38.2%
31.8%
34.7%
35.6%
52.8%
17.6%
46.2%
23.6%
46.7%
22.0%
43.9%
27.3%
53.4%
14.7%
46.0%
23.4%
51.4%
27.2%
44.1%
27.5%
46.0%
24.5%
50.5%
20.2%
44.5%
24.8%
45.2%
24.6%
48.2%
24.9%
45.7%
25.9%
42.5%
27.5%
52.3%
18.1%
46.1%
21.2%
44.7%
24.3%
40.2%
28.2%
48.5%
22.3%
29.0%
42.4%
27.2%
45.0%
27.7%
46.0%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
17.0%
0.8%
1.3%
22.3%
1.3%
1.3%
66.0%
1.9%
2.0%
16.5%
2.2%
1.2%
16.0%
6.7%
3.2%
16.3%
3.3%
2.0%
16.4%
20.2%
8.0%
19.6%
3.6%
2.0%
12.3%
2.1%
1.2%
6.5%
3.1%
2.3%
5.8%
1.9%
1.2%
36.5%
3.9%
4.9%
20.9%
2.9%
2.5%
9.5%
1.4%
0.9%
12.3%
2.8%
1.7%
17.9%
2.7%
1.8%
6.9%
2.6%
1.4%
61.7%
2.7%
8.0%
10.0%
2.8%
4.8%
11.1%
3.1%
3.3%
13.8%
9.6%
24.8%
79.1%
5.3%
43.7%
23.7%
31.4%
52.8%
25.5%
22.7%
63.6%
15.6%
29.2%
74.3%
Plan: H000C9035
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Brevard
Brevard
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Duval
Hendry
Hendry
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Indian River
Indian River
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Osceola
Osceola
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
App. 132
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
203,021
82.1%
720.9
5
44,315
17.9%
247.9
8
533,973
98.3%
1,215.8
17
9,403
1.7%
341.2
20
455,445
26.1%
535.5
21
272,224
15.6%
70.9
22
294,581
16.9%
130.1
23
498,411
28.5%
188.9
24
136,412
7.8%
24.0
25
90,993
5.2%
373.5
3
172,269
90.3%
568.5
5
18,596
9.7%
75.1
19
160,728
50.0%
338.0
25
160,792
50.0%
1,967.0
3
27,776
3.2%
87.3
4
568,144
65.7%
699.6
5
268,343
31.0%
131.5
20
13,550
34.6%
55.7
25
25,590
65.4%
1,134.3
12
167,520
13.6%
111.7
14
540,275
44.0%
432.3
15
521,431
42.4%
721.8
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
8
91,796
66.5%
189.0
17
46,232
33.5%
428.0
5
17,490
5.9%
312.1
10
279,562
94.1%
844.8
17
83,137
13.4%
178.2
19
535,617
86.6%
1,034.3
2
4,028
21.0%
337.4
3
15,196
79.0%
378.3
16
316,897
98.2%
467.4
17
5,936
1.8%
425.3
5
15,015
4.5%
407.3
11
316,283
95.5%
1,255.3
23
197,933
7.9%
98.6
24
559,932
22.4%
86.9
25
418,970
16.8%
505.4
26
623,255
25.0%
1,162.4
27
696,345
27.9%
577.8
17
34,658
86.7%
786.4
18
5,338
13.3%
105.5
5
299,709
26.2%
207.6
7
203,044
17.7%
130.4
8
70,576
6.2%
209.7
9
379,876
33.1%
262.9
10
192,751
16.8%
192.6
9
241,786
90.0%
360.1
17
26,899
10.0%
1,145.8
18
266,900
20.2%
446.7
20
227,350
17.2%
1,504.3
21
424,120
32.1%
193.0
22
401,764
30.4%
239.0
12
64,128
7.0%
48.5
Area%
74.4%
25.6%
78.1%
21.9%
40.5%
5.4%
9.8%
14.3%
1.8%
28.2%
88.3%
11.7%
14.7%
85.3%
9.5%
76.2%
14.3%
4.7%
95.3%
8.8%
34.2%
57.0%
79.5%
20.5%
30.6%
69.4%
27.0%
73.0%
14.7%
85.3%
47.1%
52.9%
52.4%
47.6%
24.5%
75.5%
4.1%
3.6%
20.8%
47.8%
23.8%
88.2%
11.8%
20.7%
13.0%
20.9%
26.2%
19.2%
23.9%
76.1%
18.7%
63.1%
8.1%
10.0%
8.0%
Area%
37.1%
62.9%
19.1%
80.9%
4.7%
95.3%
63.3%
36.7%
24.6%
57.3%
18.2%
49.4%
50.6%
3.2%
96.8%
34.8%
64.8%
0.4%
23.5%
76.5%
66.6%
33.4%
49.0%
51.0%
64.5%
35.5%
72.4%
27.6%
86.5%
13.5%
44.8%
55.2%
10.0%
75.0%
15.0%
23.1%
76.9%
0.2%
Cities included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Bartow
15
12,714
73.5%
19.4
Bartow
17
4,584
26.5%
32.9
Boynton Beach
20
19,978
29.3%
3.2
Boynton Beach
22
48,239
70.7%
13.4
Coconut Creek
20
433
0.8%
0.6
Coconut Creek
21
52,476
99.2%
11.4
Coleman
10
691
98.3%
1.7
Coleman
11
12
1.7%
1.0
Deerfield Beach
20
26,242
35.0%
4.0
Deerfield Beach
21
33,897
45.2%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Deltona
6
41,027
48.2%
20.3
Deltona
7
44,155
51.8%
20.8
Dundee
10
155
4.2%
0.4
Dundee
17
3,562
95.8%
11.1
Fort Lauderdale
20
60,588
36.6%
13.4
Fort Lauderdale
22
104,933
63.4%
25.0
Fort Lauderdale
23
0
0.0%
0.2
Fort Meade
15
1,208
21.5%
1.2
Fort Meade
17
4,418
78.5%
4.0
Gainesville
3
93,101
74.9%
41.6
Gainesville
5
31,253
25.1%
20.8
Gulfport
13
5,509
45.8%
1.9
Gulfport
14
6,520
54.2%
2.0
Hallandale Beach
23
25,370
68.4%
3.0
Hallandale Beach
24
11,743
31.6%
1.6
Hialeah
25
162,856
72.5%
16.5
Hialeah
27
61,813
27.5%
6.3
Hollywood
23
114,568
81.4%
26.6
Hollywood
24
26,200
18.6%
4.1
Homestead
26
42,640
70.5%
7.0
Homestead
27
17,872
29.5%
8.6
Jacksonville
3
27,776
3.4%
87.3
Jacksonville
4
525,665
64.0%
655.8
Jacksonville
5
268,343
32.7%
131.5
Lake Hamilton
10
68
5.5%
1.0
Lake Hamilton
17
1,163
94.5%
3.2
Lake Park
18
0
0.0%
0.0
City
Area%
73.4%
18.6%
8.0%
25.9%
19.2%
46.9%
41.3%
58.7%
10.2%
89.8%
55.9%
44.1%
89.5%
10.5%
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
13
696,344
76.0%
446.5
14
156,070
17.0%
113.2
9
74,682
12.4%
161.2
10
196,660
32.7%
521.3
15
174,914
29.1%
385.5
17
155,839
25.9%
942.6
5
32,877
44.2%
341.3
6
41,487
55.8%
485.7
4
54,887
28.9%
83.4
6
135,152
71.1%
738.1
10
27,372
29.3%
324.1
11
66,048
70.7%
255.8
6
424,010
85.7%
1,281.5
7
70,583
14.3%
150.9
County
Pinellas
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
Polk
Polk
Putnam
Putnam
St. Johns
St. Johns
Sumter
Sumter
Volusia
Volusia
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Lake Park
20
7,242
88.8%
2.1
Lake Park
22
913
11.2%
0.3
Lake Worth
20
10,654
30.5%
1.6
Lake Worth
22
24,256
69.5%
5.0
Lakeland
10
33,694
34.6%
33.5
Lakeland
15
63,728
65.4%
40.8
Lantana
20
4,654
44.7%
1.2
Lantana
22
5,769
55.3%
1.7
Loxahatchee Groves 18
1,681
52.9%
7.0
Loxahatchee Groves 20
1,499
47.1%
5.5
Margate
20
14,535
27.3%
2.2
Margate
21
38,749
72.7%
6.9
Miami
23
15,273
3.8%
2.9
Miami
24
133,006
33.3%
19.4
Miami
27
251,178
62.9%
33.8
Miramar
24
65,355
53.6%
11.2
Miramar
25
56,686
46.4%
20.1
North Miami
23
9,175
15.6%
4.8
North Miami
24
49,611
84.4%
5.2
North Miami Beach 23
6,953
16.7%
1.1
North Miami Beach 24
34,570
83.3%
4.3
Oakland Park
20
20,289
49.1%
4.2
Oakland Park
22
21,074
50.9%
3.9
Oldsmar
12
5,101
37.5%
5.7
Oldsmar
13
8,490
62.5%
3.9
Opa-locka
24
14,894
97.9%
2.6
Opa-locka
25
325
2.1%
1.9
Orange City
6
9,811
92.6%
6.5
Orange City
7
788
7.4%
0.7
Orange Park
3
6,415
76.3%
2.8
Orange Park
5
1,997
23.7%
2.5
Orlando
5
77,843
32.7%
22.6
Orlando
7
30,467
12.8%
12.0
Orlando
9
102,331
42.9%
68.9
Orlando
10
27,659
11.6%
7.2
Pembroke Pines
23
107,607
69.5%
20.0
Pembroke Pines
24
12,856
8.3%
3.1
Pembroke Pines
25
34,287
22.2%
11.7
Plantation
20
13,381
15.8%
2.7
Plantation
22
67,448
79.4%
18.3
Plantation
23
4,126
4.9%
0.9
Pompano Beach
20
46,314
46.4%
11.3
Pompano Beach
21
1,447
1.4%
2.0
Pompano Beach
22
52,084
52.2%
12.2
Riviera Beach
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Riviera Beach
20
28,156
86.7%
7.3
Riviera Beach
22
4,332
13.3%
2.9
Royal Palm Beach
18
14,734
43.2%
5.1
Royal Palm Beach
20
16,299
47.7%
5.6
Royal Palm Beach
21
3,107
9.1%
0.7
St. Cloud
9
27,108
77.0%
11.0
St. Cloud
17
8,075
23.0%
6.8
St. Petersburg
13
96,485
39.4%
40.9
St. Petersburg
14
148,284
60.6%
96.7
Sunrise
20
62,665
74.2%
9.4
Counties and Cities
Area%
88.9%
10.9%
24.5%
75.5%
45.1%
54.9%
40.7%
59.3%
55.9%
44.1%
24.2%
75.8%
5.2%
34.5%
60.3%
35.7%
64.3%
48.4%
51.6%
20.8%
79.2%
52.1%
47.9%
59.4%
40.6%
57.7%
42.3%
90.9%
9.1%
52.2%
47.8%
20.4%
10.8%
62.2%
6.5%
57.5%
9.0%
33.5%
12.3%
83.5%
4.2%
44.4%
7.7%
47.9%
0.4%
71.2%
28.4%
45.0%
49.1%
5.8%
61.8%
38.2%
29.7%
70.3%
51.5%
Cities included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Sunrise
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Sunrise
23
21,774
25.8%
8.9
Tampa
12
7,411
2.2%
2.4
Tampa
14
281,381
83.8%
143.2
Tampa
15
46,917
14.0%
29.7
Tarpon Springs
12
2,498
10.6%
1.8
Tarpon Springs
13
20,986
89.4%
15.5
Vero Beach
8
14,999
98.5%
13.3
Vero Beach
17
221
1.5%
0.0
West Palm Beach
18
20,693
20.7%
35.3
West Palm Beach
20
48,663
48.7%
15.6
West Palm Beach
22
30,563
30.6%
7.2
Wildwood
10
709
10.6%
31.1
Wildwood
11
6,000
89.4%
8.8
Wilton Manors
20
3,311
28.5%
0.6
Wilton Manors
22
8,321
71.5%
1.4
Winter Haven
10
16,513
48.7%
19.1
Winter Haven
17
17,361
51.3%
20.8
City
Area%
0.0%
48.4%
1.4%
81.7%
16.9%
10.3%
89.7%
99.8%
0.2%
60.8%
26.9%
12.4%
77.9%
22.1%
29.9%
70.1%
47.9%
52.1%
Plan: H000C9035
Page 4 of 4
26
5
10
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
0
Scale bar for insets
27
Oldsmar
14
Bradenton
16 Palmetto
St. Petersburg
Holmes Beach
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
Treasure Island
Pinellas Park
13 PINELLAS
Seminole
Largo
Clearwater
Dunedin
Tampa
MANATEE
Plant City
Zephyrhills
Eustis
9
Ocoee
Apopka
5
Maitland
Winter Springs
Kissimmee
7 Oviedo
St. Cloud
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
Deltona
SEMINOLE
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
LAKE
4-Jan-2012
*****
PCB CRS 12-03
Not reported by
House Congressional
Subcommittee
9-Jan-2012
H000C9037
Orlando Area
17 10
9
11
St. Augustine
Dade City
HILLSBOROUGH
15
Temple Terrace
PASCO
12
St. Leo
ST. JOHNS
DIXIE
E
8
6
VOLUSIA
13
OR O
LSB
Titusville
Oak Hill
11
15
DESOTO
17
HARDEE
POLK
9
10
LAKE
5
19
CHARLOTTE
LEE
DUVAL
PUTNAM
CLAY
MARION
UGH
F
D
OR
SARASOTA
16
MANATEE
14
HIL
12
HERNANDO
CITRUS
PASCO
LEVY
ALACHUA
AD
BR
N
UNIO
BAKER
4
OSCEOLA
ORANGE
7
VOLUSIA
COLLIER
25
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
6
FLAGLER
10
26
8
MONROE
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
20
21
27
23
24
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
18
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Florida City
Homestead
Cutler Bay
Palmetto Bay
Coral Gables
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
Green Cove Springs
4
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
E
MIAMI-DADE
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Miami
Miami Beach
24 North Miami
Aventura
Starke
CLAY
Orange Park
Jacksonville
GULF
LA
FA
YE
TT
3
HAMILTON
R
Doral
Hialeah
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
Dania Beach
Lawtey
DUVAL
5
Miles
60
MADISON
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
23
Fort Lauderdale
Lauderhill
Oakland Park
Pompano Beach
3
Baldwin
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
Davie
Plantation
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Southwest Ranches
BROWARD
Sunrise
Tamarac
Coral Springs
Boca Raton
22
Delray Beach
NASSAU
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
E
SUMT
Deerfield Beach
21
Lantana
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
30
2
JACKSON
GILCHRIST
Parkland
Wellington
Palm Springs
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
S
20
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
E
NN
Belle Glade
18
1
SANTA ROSA
A
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
South Florida
BIA
COLU
M
A
ESC
N
JOH
ST.
OK
App. 133
App. 134
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
14.49%
10.87%
48.05%
10.08%
10.71%
9.19%
13.80%
10.82%
8.75%
4.30%
5.12%
24.58%
11.14%
5.80%
9.50%
10.98%
5.76%
50.21%
11.21%
10.16%
9.93%
55.73%
8.25%
10.02%
7.71%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
12
15
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
35.6%
64.4%
35.6%
64.4%
69.7%
30.3%
47.2%
52.8%
50.0%
50.0%
43.8%
56.2%
56.1%
43.9%
48.6%
51.4%
38.9%
61.1%
46.0%
54.0%
50.0%
50.0%
65.2%
34.8%
46.3%
53.7%
45.3%
54.7%
41.7%
58.3%
48.0%
52.0%
38.4%
61.6%
83.2%
16.8%
60.9%
39.1%
54.3%
45.7%
61.2%
38.8%
88.4%
11.6%
49.4%
50.6%
53.4%
46.6%
53.3%
46.7%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
9
18
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
38.9%
61.1%
37.4%
62.6%
65.4%
34.6%
46.9%
53.1%
49.5%
50.5%
43.1%
56.9%
49.5%
50.5%
46.7%
53.3%
41.8%
58.2%
45.6%
54.4%
50.2%
49.8%
63.0%
37.0%
46.3%
53.7%
46.0%
54.0%
41.7%
58.3%
49.1%
50.9%
36.5%
63.5%
80.0%
20.0%
63.0%
37.0%
54.4%
45.6%
60.9%
39.1%
86.4%
13.6%
42.2%
57.8%
49.9%
50.1%
48.4%
51.6%
0.39
0.37
0.46
0.42
0.38
0.10
0.28
0.64
0.32
0.40
0.43
0.41
0.57
0.35
0.38
0.38
0.48
0.61
0.54
0.26
0.49
0.29
0.17
0.27
0.48
0.47
0.18
0.46
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
31.6%
68.4%
28.8%
71.2%
60.9%
39.1%
38.8%
61.2%
37.0%
63.0%
34.5%
65.5%
43.0%
57.0%
36.5%
63.5%
33.9%
66.1%
34.6%
65.4%
36.9%
63.1%
51.6%
48.4%
34.2%
65.8%
34.3%
65.7%
33.6%
66.4%
36.4%
63.6%
27.6%
72.4%
75.1%
24.9%
51.6%
48.4%
41.6%
58.4%
52.2%
47.8%
84.3%
15.7%
35.5%
64.5%
42.2%
57.8%
39.5%
60.5%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2219.5
7790.6
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
0.35%
135
590
6,062
0.42%
66
239
1,303
1.06%
144
643
1,712
0.47%
115
385
2,900
1.01%
30
125
444
0.49%
91
304
2,063
1.61%
86
316
2,344
1.06%
58
216
1,108
0.33%
133
474
5,691
0.38%
57
206
1,448
0.27%
40
114
447
1.51%
43
139
546
0.86%
60
193
1,101
0.27%
60
173
1,350
0.46%
116
417
6,453
0.44%
69
221
1,993
0.42%
83
234
1,372
1.19%
74
347
2,096
0.65%
34
110
264
0.56%
52
188
369
1.16%
37
126
288
3.38%
17
59
111
1.68%
103
345
3,980
1.47%
184
551
4,900
2.23%
40
130
578
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
21
6
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
43.8%
56.2%
42.9%
57.1%
73.6%
26.4%
55.2%
44.8%
57.0%
43.0%
52.0%
48.0%
62.6%
37.4%
55.5%
44.5%
47.9%
52.1%
55.5%
44.5%
58.8%
41.2%
70.6%
29.4%
54.2%
45.8%
51.9%
48.1%
48.8%
51.2%
54.7%
45.3%
43.4%
56.6%
85.0%
15.0%
66.6%
33.4%
59.4%
40.6%
65.0%
35.0%
88.8%
11.2%
52.4%
47.6%
55.8%
44.2%
56.0%
44.0%
4.55%
4.75%
6.35%
6.87%
11.12%
8.68%
18.66%
9.72%
28.64%
20.77%
6.90%
9.25%
7.18%
23.89%
17.72%
8.80%
14.63%
12.06%
13.69%
18.55%
18.30%
17.58%
37.56%
33.15%
70.08%
68.91%
75.04%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.33
0.38
0.42
0.22
0.29
0.05
0.25
0.36
0.28
0.29
0.30
0.32
0.43
0.43
0.36
0.37
0.57
0.47
0.51
0.32
0.22
0.27
0.13
0.23
0.39
0.42
0.20
0.43
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
32.7%
67.3%
30.2%
69.8%
61.9%
38.1%
40.8%
59.2%
41.0%
59.0%
36.5%
63.5%
43.6%
56.4%
39.5%
60.5%
35.2%
64.8%
36.9%
63.1%
41.0%
59.0%
53.2%
46.8%
35.0%
65.0%
39.2%
60.8%
34.3%
65.7%
42.6%
57.4%
30.0%
70.0%
78.2%
21.8%
59.0%
41.0%
49.5%
50.5%
58.6%
41.4%
86.1%
13.9%
37.7%
62.3%
45.5%
54.5%
45.6%
54.4%
Convex
Hull
0.73
0.82
0.78
0.73
0.84
0.35
0.73
0.83
0.69
0.70
0.78
0.78
0.77
0.81
0.76
0.75
0.87
0.80
0.87
0.70
0.74
0.61
0.61
0.55
0.86
0.82
0.46
0.81
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
6
21
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
31.8%
68.2%
29.8%
70.2%
61.7%
38.3%
38.9%
61.1%
38.2%
61.8%
34.7%
65.3%
39.7%
60.3%
37.4%
62.6%
33.7%
66.3%
33.3%
66.7%
36.2%
63.8%
50.3%
49.7%
31.3%
68.7%
34.6%
65.4%
29.4%
70.6%
36.7%
63.3%
27.2%
72.8%
76.7%
23.3%
54.2%
45.8%
45.1%
54.9%
55.4%
44.6%
85.8%
14.2%
36.3%
63.7%
43.7%
56.3%
41.5%
58.5%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
17.4%
15.1%
47.0%
20.8%
21.6%
16.1%
24.2%
21.7%
16.3%
13.0%
14.7%
28.5%
15.2%
13.0%
14.7%
15.9%
9.3%
51.3%
19.2%
17.5%
23.0%
64.9%
16.6%
20.9%
17.7%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
20
66.3%
49.8%
61.5%
64.1%
34.8%
52.5%
55.3%
55.9%
48.3%
56.2%
56.6%
47.3%
42.5%
34.1%
50.7%
48.0%
53.1%
50.9%
60.5%
18.9%
36.0%
43.8%
37.4%
12.9%
59.7%
51.5%
55.1%
I_Cri
4
20.4%
28.7%
21.1%
20.8%
18.2%
26.8%
23.2%
28.0%
27.5%
22.0%
27.2%
39.8%
42.7%
37.4%
34.0%
39.0%
32.3%
33.2%
30.3%
29.8%
44.9%
38.7%
39.6%
22.2%
23.8%
27.6%
27.2%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
12
15
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
37.3%
62.7%
37.6%
62.4%
69.2%
30.8%
50.6%
49.4%
51.6%
48.4%
45.5%
54.5%
54.9%
45.1%
49.5%
50.5%
41.8%
58.2%
47.9%
52.1%
51.4%
48.6%
65.4%
34.6%
46.7%
53.3%
48.6%
51.4%
43.6%
56.4%
51.5%
48.5%
42.3%
57.7%
81.3%
18.7%
63.9%
36.1%
56.9%
43.1%
61.6%
38.4%
86.8%
13.2%
46.3%
53.7%
49.8%
50.2%
48.8%
51.2%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
36.2%
63.8%
31.3%
68.7%
58.1%
41.9%
47.3%
52.7%
39.8%
60.2%
43.1%
56.9%
44.3%
55.7%
38.9%
61.1%
40.3%
59.7%
44.1%
55.9%
45.2%
54.8%
56.0%
44.0%
39.8%
60.2%
42.5%
57.5%
40.0%
60.0%
48.0%
52.0%
33.3%
66.7%
75.7%
24.3%
65.3%
34.7%
54.9%
45.1%
62.3%
37.7%
81.5%
18.5%
38.5%
61.5%
47.1%
52.9%
44.6%
55.4%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
19
8
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
46.0%
54.0%
41.8%
58.2%
64.9%
35.1%
54.5%
45.5%
50.4%
49.6%
49.9%
50.1%
51.3%
48.7%
50.2%
49.8%
50.3%
49.7%
51.4%
48.6%
53.7%
46.3%
61.0%
39.0%
43.9%
56.1%
50.3%
49.7%
46.7%
53.3%
52.8%
47.2%
42.5%
57.5%
79.9%
20.1%
71.0%
29.0%
61.1%
38.9%
69.5%
30.5%
84.9%
15.1%
46.2%
53.8%
53.5%
46.5%
51.6%
48.4%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
37.3%
62.7%
31.5%
68.5%
57.4%
42.6%
46.7%
53.3%
38.6%
61.4%
42.5%
57.5%
44.5%
55.5%
39.2%
60.8%
42.1%
57.9%
44.4%
55.6%
47.0%
53.0%
55.3%
44.7%
38.6%
61.4%
46.1%
53.9%
40.8%
59.2%
50.7%
49.3%
35.3%
64.7%
76.7%
23.3%
68.0%
32.0%
57.6%
42.4%
64.2%
35.8%
81.1%
18.9%
40.7%
59.3%
48.5%
51.5%
47.7%
52.3%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
32.5%
67.5%
30.3%
69.7%
56.1%
43.9%
43.9%
56.1%
36.1%
63.9%
36.1%
63.9%
39.5%
60.5%
35.6%
64.4%
36.9%
63.1%
39.9%
60.1%
39.8%
60.2%
50.7%
49.3%
34.7%
65.3%
39.7%
60.3%
36.3%
63.7%
44.5%
55.5%
32.9%
67.1%
74.3%
25.7%
63.7%
36.3%
52.5%
47.5%
61.4%
38.6%
80.6%
19.4%
39.2%
60.8%
46.7%
53.3%
44.7%
55.3%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
22%
45
-27%
22
-28%
60
-28%
60
0%
410
22%
366
-60%
44
-60%
102
-60%
97
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
51.0%
49.0%
47.5%
52.5%
69.7%
30.3%
62.9%
37.1%
59.5%
40.5%
59.6%
40.4%
60.2%
39.8%
58.5%
41.5%
57.0%
43.0%
61.4%
38.6%
63.3%
36.7%
70.8%
29.2%
58.3%
41.7%
57.3%
42.7%
56.7%
43.3%
64.0%
36.0%
51.2%
48.8%
82.8%
17.2%
76.9%
23.1%
67.8%
32.2%
72.7%
27.3%
85.4%
14.6%
51.1%
48.9%
57.2%
42.8%
55.9%
44.1%
Plan: H000C9037
Page 2 of 4
App. 135
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
41.2%
31.8%
59.6%
39.9%
36.6%
34.9%
43.1%
37.2%
38.9%
36.1%
35.7%
50.5%
36.8%
32.8%
38.8%
37.5%
28.0%
65.3%
48.1%
41.3%
47.8%
69.8%
32.9%
35.8%
35.8%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
38.4%
30.2%
59.7%
38.3%
35.7%
33.4%
42.2%
36.3%
36.3%
34.5%
34.7%
49.5%
35.9%
32.1%
37.1%
36.4%
27.1%
65.8%
46.7%
40.5%
46.3%
69.3%
32.8%
35.6%
35.8%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
18.7%
22.1%
19.1%
26.0%
27.1%
24.1%
27.4%
26.0%
20.4%
25.8%
27.4%
25.2%
26.0%
24.5%
21.8%
25.6%
25.8%
21.1%
27.4%
27.5%
28.4%
20.5%
29.2%
29.3%
28.3%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
17.1%
20.9%
18.2%
24.8%
25.2%
22.0%
25.2%
24.0%
19.7%
24.4%
26.1%
23.5%
24.4%
23.5%
20.5%
24.6%
24.4%
20.4%
25.9%
25.9%
26.1%
19.4%
27.4%
27.4%
26.0%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
42.9%
47.7%
21.2%
35.7%
37.2%
42.5%
30.4%
37.7%
43.3%
39.7%
37.9%
25.3%
38.2%
43.4%
41.2%
38.0%
47.1%
13.2%
25.8%
32.0%
25.3%
10.2%
38.0%
35.2%
35.9%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
41.7%
47.3%
22.2%
35.3%
38.2%
43.1%
31.7%
38.7%
41.4%
39.5%
38.2%
26.1%
38.8%
43.6%
40.7%
37.9%
47.6%
14.3%
26.0%
32.8%
26.2%
10.9%
39.6%
36.8%
38.2%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
83.2%
78.8%
86.1%
82.2%
77.9%
80.6%
80.7%
79.2%
85.3%
77.4%
77.5%
83.5%
77.7%
81.2%
83.5%
81.1%
76.8%
84.4%
77.0%
79.2%
78.7%
85.7%
79.0%
80.8%
80.5%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
84.4%
79.9%
86.8%
82.8%
79.0%
81.7%
82.0%
80.4%
85.7%
78.3%
77.7%
84.1%
78.7%
81.0%
83.9%
81.6%
77.5%
84.4%
77.3%
79.8%
79.3%
85.8%
79.4%
81.0%
81.4%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
12.5%
3.8%
27.0%
3.7%
1.3%
2.6%
10.0%
3.8%
26.0%
4.4%
1.1%
2.5%
47.6%
6.8%
68.6%
5.8%
6.4%
5.1%
9.1%
5.9%
19.5%
7.2%
0.9%
3.1%
9.3%
15.0%
20.4%
19.2%
1.1%
7.7%
7.9%
6.6%
19.0%
8.5%
0.9%
3.7%
11.6%
25.7%
22.2%
30.1%
1.5%
12.4%
9.4%
16.0%
20.4%
21.1%
1.3%
7.3%
6.9%
4.1%
16.3%
5.3%
0.7%
2.5%
3.7%
6.4%
8.4%
8.7%
0.5%
3.8%
4.3%
3.9%
9.7%
5.0%
0.5%
2.3%
24.2%
14.4%
40.8%
14.0%
3.1%
10.5%
10.7%
10.9%
23.1%
13.0%
1.3%
6.6%
4.9%
3.6%
12.5%
4.9%
0.5%
1.9%
8.2%
7.4%
18.5%
9.0%
0.8%
4.2%
9.6%
6.3%
21.3%
7.8%
1.1%
3.9%
4.1%
6.4%
11.6%
9.5%
0.4%
3.3%
48.1%
10.8%
61.8%
8.3%
10.5%
14.1%
8.9%
11.6%
14.6%
11.2%
1.4%
8.8%
7.5%
9.1%
14.7%
10.0%
0.9%
6.3%
8.7%
26.9%
14.7%
23.4%
1.4%
27.8%
55.6%
22.9%
68.8%
15.5%
14.2%
48.0%
6.9%
57.7%
16.6%
52.3%
0.9%
58.6%
9.3%
57.3%
21.2%
45.3%
1.1%
66.2%
7.0%
60.5%
15.8%
48.3%
0.8%
71.0%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
12.6%
3.4%
25.7%
3.2%
1.4%
2.5%
10.0%
3.5%
25.2%
3.9%
1.1%
2.4%
45.3%
6.2%
66.1%
5.3%
6.3%
4.8%
8.8%
5.4%
18.3%
6.5%
0.9%
3.0%
9.0%
13.8%
19.4%
17.7%
1.2%
7.4%
7.4%
6.1%
17.4%
7.8%
0.9%
3.6%
11.1%
23.7%
21.0%
27.7%
1.5%
12.3%
9.2%
14.3%
19.8%
18.7%
1.3%
6.9%
6.8%
3.7%
15.0%
4.6%
0.8%
2.4%
3.5%
5.8%
7.6%
7.7%
0.5%
3.6%
4.0%
3.5%
8.6%
4.3%
0.5%
2.1%
23.8%
13.0%
39.7%
12.1%
3.3%
10.1%
9.9%
9.8%
21.2%
11.5%
1.3%
6.2%
4.7%
3.1%
11.6%
4.1%
0.6%
1.8%
7.8%
6.6%
17.0%
7.9%
0.9%
4.0%
8.9%
5.7%
19.4%
6.9%
1.0%
3.5%
3.7%
5.7%
10.3%
8.3%
0.4%
3.1%
45.9%
9.9%
59.3%
7.6%
10.4%
12.8%
7.8%
10.1%
12.6%
9.6%
1.4%
8.0%
7.1%
8.0%
13.7%
8.6%
0.9%
5.7%
8.1%
24.6%
13.4%
21.0%
1.4%
26.9%
56.1%
21.4%
69.0%
14.3%
15.2%
46.7%
6.9%
55.1%
16.7%
48.5%
0.9%
57.7%
9.4%
55.5%
21.4%
42.6%
1.1%
65.6%
7.0%
59.2%
16.0%
45.4%
0.8%
70.8%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
39.3%
30.9%
35.8%
32.3%
50.8%
17.2%
47.3%
19.3%
46.8%
20.6%
44.2%
25.3%
50.4%
16.4%
48.9%
18.7%
48.3%
26.5%
47.7%
24.2%
44.3%
23.2%
47.1%
20.3%
43.2%
24.4%
42.7%
24.4%
46.2%
24.7%
46.0%
23.6%
41.1%
26.0%
50.2%
18.4%
45.7%
20.6%
44.5%
23.3%
40.7%
28.6%
46.5%
23.7%
29.0%
41.5%
27.5%
43.5%
27.4%
45.6%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
37.3%
29.5%
34.5%
31.6%
50.4%
15.8%
47.0%
18.9%
45.7%
19.1%
43.0%
24.1%
49.3%
14.6%
48.0%
17.1%
47.2%
26.4%
46.7%
23.6%
44.1%
22.2%
48.0%
18.5%
42.7%
23.2%
43.3%
23.2%
45.5%
23.5%
44.7%
23.2%
40.6%
24.5%
50.3%
17.2%
45.2%
19.7%
44.3%
22.0%
40.2%
26.2%
47.0%
21.4%
29.7%
38.6%
28.1%
40.6%
28.6%
42.1%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
39.9%
49.3%
10.8%
29.7%
56.3%
14.1%
60.0%
29.0%
11.0%
38.5%
43.7%
17.9%
34.0%
48.7%
17.3%
32.1%
51.8%
16.0%
40.6%
42.7%
16.7%
34.0%
49.1%
16.9%
36.0%
49.0%
15.0%
33.5%
48.4%
18.1%
34.6%
46.1%
19.3%
50.7%
33.6%
15.7%
35.2%
47.6%
17.2%
30.8%
51.5%
17.7%
36.0%
50.0%
14.0%
34.9%
46.5%
18.6%
24.2%
58.2%
17.6%
70.1%
16.4%
13.5%
50.2%
29.8%
20.1%
40.8%
39.5%
19.7%
49.6%
31.3%
19.1%
76.4%
11.0%
12.6%
29.7%
51.0%
19.3%
35.3%
45.9%
18.8%
34.0%
47.6%
18.4%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
38.5%
46.4%
15.2%
29.9%
51.6%
18.5%
62.2%
22.8%
14.9%
38.6%
39.2%
22.2%
35.6%
41.1%
23.3%
33.2%
46.0%
20.9%
43.0%
33.9%
23.1%
36.0%
41.7%
22.3%
35.4%
47.1%
17.5%
34.4%
43.5%
22.1%
35.2%
41.1%
23.7%
51.0%
27.7%
21.3%
36.2%
41.4%
22.4%
32.0%
46.8%
21.2%
36.6%
45.3%
18.0%
36.3%
41.3%
22.4%
26.3%
51.8%
21.9%
69.8%
12.7%
17.5%
48.4%
26.9%
24.8%
41.4%
34.1%
24.6%
47.9%
26.6%
25.5%
73.2%
9.4%
17.4%
32.8%
41.4%
25.7%
36.1%
38.4%
25.5%
36.1%
38.6%
25.2%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
10.8%
2.0%
23.9%
1.7%
0.9%
1.7%
8.1%
2.2%
23.0%
2.4%
0.8%
1.7%
44.0%
3.5%
67.4%
3.0%
3.6%
3.1%
7.5%
3.3%
17.3%
4.2%
0.5%
2.0%
7.6%
8.5%
18.5%
11.5%
0.8%
5.1%
6.3%
4.0%
16.8%
5.3%
0.6%
2.6%
10.3%
13.4%
22.2%
17.9%
0.9%
7.0%
8.5%
8.2%
21.2%
11.8%
0.9%
4.4%
5.5%
2.1%
13.8%
2.6%
0.4%
1.5%
3.1%
3.5%
7.6%
4.9%
0.4%
2.5%
2.9%
2.1%
7.2%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
21.6%
7.7%
38.2%
7.1%
1.9%
7.0%
8.9%
5.8%
20.9%
6.6%
0.9%
4.3%
3.4%
1.7%
9.7%
2.3%
0.3%
1.1%
6.4%
3.3%
15.8%
4.1%
0.5%
2.4%
7.5%
3.4%
18.6%
4.2%
0.7%
2.5%
2.3%
2.8%
7.8%
4.5%
0.2%
1.9%
48.6%
6.2%
62.3%
4.4%
7.1%
9.9%
7.5%
6.2%
12.2%
5.3%
1.1%
6.1%
6.0%
5.1%
12.4%
5.2%
0.6%
4.3%
8.5%
20.3%
14.3%
14.9%
1.1%
25.6%
63.3%
15.5%
75.0%
9.0%
12.0%
45.9%
7.6%
48.9%
21.6%
37.7%
0.7%
54.0%
9.8%
51.4%
24.0%
32.8%
0.7%
64.2%
6.3%
56.7%
16.1%
35.5%
0.5%
70.9%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
12.6%
3.3%
28.2%
3.2%
1.0%
2.3%
10.0%
3.3%
27.4%
3.8%
0.9%
2.3%
50.0%
5.4%
71.4%
4.6%
5.0%
4.2%
9.2%
5.0%
20.3%
6.4%
0.7%
2.7%
9.3%
12.8%
21.1%
17.0%
0.9%
6.6%
7.9%
5.8%
19.9%
7.7%
0.8%
3.3%
12.4%
22.4%
24.1%
27.5%
1.3%
10.1%
9.8%
13.3%
22.1%
18.5%
1.1%
6.0%
6.8%
3.3%
16.9%
4.4%
0.5%
2.0%
4.0%
5.8%
9.2%
8.1%
0.5%
3.4%
4.3%
3.4%
9.9%
4.5%
0.4%
2.1%
24.9%
12.5%
42.0%
12.4%
2.4%
9.2%
11.2%
9.5%
24.6%
11.5%
1.1%
6.0%
4.8%
3.1%
12.6%
4.4%
0.4%
1.6%
8.5%
5.8%
20.1%
7.5%
0.6%
3.3%
9.8%
5.5%
22.6%
6.9%
0.9%
3.5%
3.9%
5.1%
12.0%
8.2%
0.3%
2.7%
52.3%
9.6%
65.2%
7.2%
9.2%
13.7%
9.6%
10.6%
15.8%
10.1%
1.3%
8.4%
7.8%
8.4%
15.5%
9.0%
0.8%
6.0%
9.4%
26.9%
15.8%
22.6%
1.3%
28.5%
59.7%
20.7%
71.8%
13.7%
12.9%
48.9%
7.7%
55.0%
19.1%
48.6%
0.8%
56.3%
9.7%
56.1%
22.5%
42.2%
0.9%
65.9%
7.1%
59.7%
16.3%
45.7%
0.6%
71.0%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
88.8%
84.3%
92.0%
88.6%
83.2%
85.7%
87.4%
84.4%
90.4%
82.1%
84.9%
89.8%
82.5%
87.4%
89.4%
86.5%
83.2%
89.8%
81.9%
84.7%
83.6%
90.5%
84.3%
86.9%
86.3%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
85.9%
81.6%
89.0%
84.9%
80.6%
83.1%
83.6%
81.7%
88.0%
79.9%
80.8%
86.3%
79.8%
84.6%
86.5%
83.6%
80.5%
87.1%
79.4%
81.8%
81.2%
88.0%
81.5%
83.8%
83.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
34.6%
43.0%
32.0%
44.4%
51.7%
25.6%
49.1%
26.6%
45.8%
29.2%
42.8%
34.2%
54.3%
22.3%
48.9%
26.3%
45.4%
35.5%
46.2%
33.6%
42.6%
33.4%
46.8%
30.5%
40.4%
35.8%
41.2%
34.5%
44.4%
35.4%
43.7%
34.5%
38.0%
39.3%
50.0%
26.2%
43.1%
29.4%
41.8%
33.5%
36.3%
39.5%
44.3%
32.6%
22.9%
56.4%
22.5%
57.4%
21.3%
59.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
37.5%
32.6%
34.7%
35.6%
52.8%
17.6%
48.9%
20.8%
47.3%
21.3%
44.1%
26.4%
53.0%
15.3%
50.0%
18.9%
47.7%
29.0%
48.3%
25.6%
46.0%
24.6%
50.5%
20.2%
43.8%
25.9%
45.2%
24.5%
47.4%
25.9%
45.7%
25.9%
42.5%
27.5%
52.3%
18.1%
46.1%
21.2%
44.7%
24.3%
40.2%
28.2%
48.5%
22.3%
29.0%
42.4%
27.2%
45.0%
27.7%
46.0%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
20.5%
0.8%
1.2%
19.3%
1.4%
1.3%
65.8%
1.9%
2.0%
16.6%
3.1%
1.6%
16.1%
7.7%
3.6%
15.8%
3.9%
2.1%
20.0%
11.3%
4.6%
18.5%
8.4%
3.2%
12.6%
1.4%
1.1%
6.2%
3.1%
1.7%
5.8%
1.9%
1.2%
36.3%
3.9%
4.9%
16.8%
3.5%
3.0%
9.4%
1.4%
0.8%
13.3%
2.6%
1.7%
17.9%
2.7%
1.8%
6.9%
2.6%
1.4%
61.7%
2.7%
8.0%
10.0%
2.8%
4.8%
11.1%
3.1%
3.3%
13.8%
9.6%
24.8%
79.1%
5.3%
43.7%
23.7%
31.4%
52.8%
25.5%
22.7%
63.6%
15.6%
29.2%
74.3%
Plan: H000C9037
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Alachua
Brevard
Brevard
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Duval
Hendry
Hendry
Hernando
Hernando
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
Pinellas
App. 136
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
142,034
57.4%
384.3
5
44,317
17.9%
237.1
11
60,985
24.7%
347.5
6
64,569
11.9%
410.9
8
478,807
88.1%
1,146.1
20
455,445
26.1%
535.5
21
272,224
15.6%
70.9
22
294,581
16.9%
130.1
23
498,411
28.5%
188.9
24
136,412
7.8%
24.0
25
90,993
5.2%
373.5
3
172,269
90.3%
568.5
5
18,596
9.7%
75.1
19
160,728
50.0%
338.0
25
160,792
50.0%
1,967.0
3
89,611
10.4%
305.1
4
506,306
58.6%
481.8
5
268,346
31.0%
131.6
20
13,550
34.6%
55.7
25
25,590
65.4%
1,134.3
11
3,800
2.2%
57.2
12
168,978
97.8%
531.8
14
538,817
43.8%
432.5
15
690,409
56.2%
833.2
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
5
17,490
5.9%
312.1
10
273,099
91.9%
798.1
11
6,463
2.2%
46.7
17
83,137
13.4%
178.2
19
535,617
86.6%
1,034.3
2
4,028
21.0%
337.4
3
15,196
79.0%
378.3
15
5,936
1.8%
267.8
16
316,897
98.2%
624.9
5
15,019
4.5%
407.9
11
316,279
95.5%
1,254.7
23
197,933
7.9%
98.6
24
559,932
22.4%
86.9
25
418,970
16.8%
505.4
26
623,255
25.0%
1,162.4
27
696,345
27.9%
577.8
17
34,658
86.7%
786.4
18
5,338
13.3%
105.5
5
299,700
26.2%
207.1
7
273,626
23.9%
99.2
8
79,510
6.9%
300.0
9
69,874
6.1%
87.3
10
423,246
36.9%
309.7
18
266,900
20.2%
446.7
20
227,350
17.2%
1,504.3
21
424,120
32.1%
193.0
22
401,764
30.4%
239.0
12
62,670
6.8%
47.9
13
696,344
76.0%
446.6
Area%
39.7%
24.5%
35.9%
26.4%
73.6%
40.5%
5.4%
9.8%
14.3%
1.8%
28.2%
88.3%
11.7%
14.7%
85.3%
33.2%
52.5%
14.3%
4.7%
95.3%
9.7%
90.3%
34.2%
65.8%
79.5%
20.5%
27.0%
69.0%
4.0%
14.7%
85.3%
47.1%
52.9%
30.0%
70.0%
24.5%
75.5%
4.1%
3.6%
20.8%
47.8%
23.8%
88.2%
11.8%
20.6%
9.9%
29.9%
8.7%
30.9%
18.7%
63.1%
8.1%
10.0%
7.9%
73.4%
County
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
Putnam
Putnam
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
14
157,528
17.2%
113.6
9
357,786
59.4%
751.1
17
244,309
40.6%
1,259.4
5
32,877
44.2%
341.3
6
41,487
55.8%
485.7
Area%
18.7%
37.4%
62.6%
41.3%
58.7%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Boynton Beach
20
19,978
29.3%
3.2
Boynton Beach
22
48,239
70.7%
13.4
Coconut Creek
20
433
0.8%
0.6
Coconut Creek
21
52,476
99.2%
11.4
Deerfield Beach
20
26,242
35.0%
4.0
Deerfield Beach
21
33,897
45.2%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Dundee
9
4
0.1%
0.4
Dundee
17
3,713
99.9%
11.1
Fort Lauderdale
20
60,588
36.6%
13.4
Fort Lauderdale
22
104,933
63.4%
25.0
Fort Lauderdale
23
0
0.0%
0.2
Gainesville
3
93,046
74.8%
41.6
Gainesville
5
31,308
25.2%
20.8
Gulfport
13
5,509
45.8%
1.9
Gulfport
14
6,520
54.2%
2.0
Hallandale Beach
23
25,370
68.4%
3.0
Hallandale Beach
24
11,743
31.6%
1.6
Hialeah
25
162,856
72.5%
16.5
Hialeah
27
61,813
27.5%
6.3
High Springs
3
2,183
40.8%
7.6
High Springs
11
3,167
59.2%
14.4
Hollywood
23
114,568
81.4%
26.6
Hollywood
24
26,200
18.6%
4.1
Homestead
26
42,640
70.5%
7.0
Homestead
27
17,872
29.5%
8.6
Jacksonville
3
88,186
10.7%
303.1
Jacksonville
4
465,252
56.6%
440.0
Jacksonville
5
268,346
32.7%
131.6
Lake Park
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Lake Park
20
7,242
88.8%
2.1
Lake Park
22
913
11.2%
0.3
Lake Worth
20
10,654
30.5%
1.6
Lake Worth
22
24,256
69.5%
5.0
Lakeland
9
86,624
88.9%
63.3
Lakeland
17
10,798
11.1%
11.0
Lantana
20
4,654
44.7%
1.2
Lantana
22
5,769
55.3%
1.7
Loxahatchee Groves 18
1,681
52.9%
7.0
Loxahatchee Groves 20
1,499
47.1%
5.5
Margate
20
14,535
27.3%
2.2
Margate
21
38,749
72.7%
6.9
Marineland
4
0
0.0%
0.0
Marineland
6
16
100.0%
0.3
Miami
23
15,273
3.8%
2.9
Miami
24
133,006
33.3%
19.4
Miami
27
251,178
62.9%
33.8
Miramar
24
65,355
53.6%
11.2
Miramar
25
56,686
46.4%
20.1
North Miami
23
9,175
15.6%
4.8
North Miami
24
49,611
84.4%
5.2
6,953
16.7%
1.1
North Miami Beach 23
North Miami Beach 24
34,570
83.3%
4.3
Oakland Park
20
20,289
49.1%
4.2
Oakland Park
22
21,074
50.9%
3.9
Counties and Cities
Area%
19.1%
80.9%
4.7%
95.3%
24.6%
57.3%
18.2%
3.2%
96.8%
34.8%
64.8%
0.4%
66.6%
33.4%
49.0%
51.0%
64.5%
35.5%
72.4%
27.6%
34.7%
65.3%
86.5%
13.5%
44.8%
55.2%
34.7%
50.3%
15.0%
0.2%
88.9%
10.9%
24.5%
75.5%
85.2%
14.8%
40.7%
59.3%
55.9%
44.1%
24.2%
75.8%
5.5%
94.5%
5.2%
34.5%
60.3%
35.7%
64.3%
48.4%
51.6%
20.8%
79.2%
52.1%
47.9%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Oldsmar
12
5,101
37.5%
5.6
Oldsmar
13
8,490
62.5%
4.1
Opa-locka
24
14,894
97.9%
2.6
Opa-locka
25
325
2.1%
1.9
Orange Park
3
6,415
76.3%
2.8
Orange Park
5
1,997
23.7%
2.5
Orlando
5
77,843
32.7%
22.6
Orlando
7
43,409
18.2%
16.5
Orlando
9
31,083
13.0%
36.8
Orlando
10
85,965
36.1%
34.8
Pembroke Pines
23
107,607
69.5%
20.0
Pembroke Pines
24
12,856
8.3%
3.1
Pembroke Pines
25
34,287
22.2%
11.7
Plantation
20
13,381
15.8%
2.7
Plantation
22
67,448
79.4%
18.3
Plantation
23
4,126
4.9%
0.9
Pompano Beach
20
46,314
46.4%
11.3
Pompano Beach
21
1,447
1.4%
2.0
Pompano Beach
22
52,084
52.2%
12.2
Riviera Beach
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Riviera Beach
20
28,156
86.7%
7.3
Riviera Beach
22
4,332
13.3%
2.9
Royal Palm Beach
18
14,734
43.2%
5.1
Royal Palm Beach
20
16,299
47.7%
5.6
Royal Palm Beach
21
3,107
9.1%
0.7
St. Petersburg
13
95,027
38.8%
40.5
St. Petersburg
14
149,742
61.2%
97.1
Sunrise
20
62,665
74.2%
9.4
Sunrise
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Sunrise
23
21,774
25.8%
8.9
Tampa
14
281,167
83.8%
143.1
Tampa
15
54,542
16.2%
32.1
Tarpon Springs
12
2,498
10.6%
1.8
Tarpon Springs
13
20,986
89.4%
15.5
Temple Terrace
14
10
0.0%
0.0
Temple Terrace
15
24,531
100.0%
7.1
Titusville
6
43,418
99.2%
27.5
Titusville
8
343
0.8%
6.7
Umatilla
10
1,148
33.2%
2.0
Umatilla
11
2,308
66.8%
2.1
West Palm Beach
18
20,693
20.7%
35.3
West Palm Beach
20
48,663
48.7%
15.6
West Palm Beach
22
30,563
30.6%
7.2
Wilton Manors
20
3,311
28.5%
0.6
Wilton Manors
22
8,321
71.5%
1.4
Winter Haven
9
18,702
55.2%
20.9
Winter Haven
17
15,172
44.8%
19.0
Area%
57.9%
42.1%
57.7%
42.3%
52.2%
47.8%
20.4%
14.9%
33.2%
31.5%
57.5%
9.0%
33.5%
12.3%
83.5%
4.2%
44.4%
7.7%
47.9%
0.4%
71.2%
28.4%
45.0%
49.1%
5.8%
29.4%
70.6%
51.5%
0.0%
48.4%
81.7%
18.3%
10.3%
89.7%
0.1%
99.9%
80.3%
19.7%
48.6%
51.4%
60.8%
26.9%
12.4%
29.9%
70.1%
52.3%
47.7%
Plan: H000C9037
Page 4 of 4
26
5
10
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
0
27
Scale bar for insets
Palmetto Bay
Cutler Bay
Oldsmar
14
Bradenton
12
St. Leo
MANATEE
HILLSBOROUGH
Temple Terrace
PASCO
Tampa
Palmetto 16
St. Petersburg
Holmes Beach
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
Treasure Island
Pinellas Park
13 PINELLAS
Seminole
Largo
Clearwater
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
Green Cove Springs
15
17
Plant City
Zephyrhills
10
11
St. Augustine
Dade City
ST. JOHNS
6
10
Ocoee
Apopka
5
Maitland
Kissimmee
E
11
17
HIL
OR
LSB
14
12
Oak Hill
Titusville
8
17
H
OUG
LEE
19
CHARLOTTE
DESOTO
HARDEE
POLK
10
LAKE
5
9
6
DUVAL
PUTNAM
CLAY
4
MARION
15
F
D
OR
SARASOTA
16
MANATEE
PASCO
13
ALACHUA
AD
BR
HERNANDO
CITRUS
LEVY
BIA
VOLUSIA 6
SEMINOLE
Deltona
Oviedo
St. Cloud
9
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
Winter Springs
7
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
LAKE
4-Jan-2012
*****
PCB CRS 12-04
Not reported by
House Congressional
Subcommittee
9-Jan-2012
H000C9039
Orlando Area
Eustis
DIXIE
3
N
UNIO
BAKER
COLLIER
25
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
OSCEOLA
ORANGE
7
VOLUSIA
FLAGLER
10
26
8
MONROE
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
20
21
27
23
24
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
18
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Florida City
Homestead
MIAMI-DADE
Coral Gables
Miami
Miami Beach
24 North Miami
Aventura
CLAY
Jacksonville Beach
4
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
LA
FA
YE
TT
E
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Doral
Hialeah
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
Starke
3
Orange Park
Jacksonville
Atlantic Beach
GULF
HAMILTON
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
23
Dania Beach
Fort Lauderdale
DUVAL
5
Miles
60
MADISON
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
Davie
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Plantation
Lauderhill
Oakland Park
Pompano Beach
Baldwin
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
R
Southwest Ranches
BROWARD
Sunrise
Tamarac
Deerfield Beach
Boca Raton
22
Delray Beach
NASSAU
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Parkland
21
Lantana
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
30
2
JACKSON
GILCHRIST
20
Wellington
Palm Springs
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
HNS
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
E
NN
Belle Glade
18
1
SANTA ROSA
A
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
A
ESC
COLU
M
South Florida
JO
ST.
OK
App. 137
App. 138
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
13.76%
12.45%
48.21%
9.47%
10.48%
9.32%
11.97%
11.07%
7.50%
4.70%
5.16%
24.61%
13.12%
5.82%
9.59%
10.98%
5.76%
50.21%
11.21%
10.16%
9.93%
55.73%
8.25%
10.02%
7.71%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
11
16
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
37.3%
62.7%
35.6%
64.4%
69.6%
30.4%
43.4%
56.6%
48.6%
51.4%
42.6%
57.4%
62.4%
37.6%
44.0%
56.0%
40.6%
59.4%
45.4%
54.6%
50.1%
49.9%
65.2%
34.8%
46.8%
53.2%
45.3%
54.7%
44.1%
55.9%
48.0%
52.0%
38.4%
61.6%
83.2%
16.8%
60.9%
39.1%
54.3%
45.7%
61.2%
38.8%
88.4%
11.6%
49.4%
50.6%
53.4%
46.6%
53.3%
46.7%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
10
17
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
41.9%
58.1%
36.9%
63.1%
65.4%
34.6%
44.3%
55.7%
48.4%
51.6%
42.2%
57.8%
56.0%
44.0%
42.9%
57.1%
42.1%
57.9%
45.7%
54.3%
50.2%
49.8%
63.0%
37.0%
46.0%
54.0%
46.0%
54.0%
43.0%
57.0%
49.1%
50.9%
36.5%
63.5%
80.0%
20.0%
63.0%
37.0%
54.4%
45.6%
60.9%
39.1%
86.4%
13.6%
42.2%
57.8%
49.9%
50.1%
48.4%
51.6%
0.40
0.37
0.46
0.59
0.55
0.11
0.32
0.61
0.31
0.52
0.35
0.53
0.42
0.35
0.37
0.42
0.44
0.41
0.54
0.26
0.49
0.29
0.17
0.27
0.48
0.47
0.18
0.46
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
34.0%
66.0%
29.0%
71.0%
60.8%
39.2%
36.3%
63.7%
36.2%
63.8%
33.8%
66.2%
47.1%
52.9%
34.3%
65.7%
33.8%
66.2%
33.7%
66.3%
37.0%
63.0%
51.6%
48.4%
35.8%
64.2%
34.2%
65.8%
34.5%
65.5%
36.4%
63.6%
27.6%
72.4%
75.1%
24.9%
51.6%
48.4%
41.6%
58.4%
52.2%
47.8%
84.3%
15.7%
35.5%
64.5%
42.2%
57.8%
39.5%
60.5%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2173.6
7930.6
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
0.34%
125
529
8,298
0.44%
60
357
1,568
1.07%
144
659
1,723
0.32%
110
384
3,043
0.90%
36
148
618
0.38%
109
366
2,856
2.30%
44
161
784
0.55%
76
281
1,579
0.38%
83
303
2,898
0.43%
56
167
1,027
0.27%
40
114
446
1.51%
43
147
546
0.82%
50
195
863
0.28%
60
203
1,227
0.59%
151
659
7,495
0.44%
69
221
1,993
0.42%
83
234
1,372
1.19%
74
347
2,096
0.65%
34
110
264
0.56%
52
188
369
1.16%
37
126
288
3.38%
17
59
111
1.68%
103
345
3,980
1.47%
184
551
4,900
2.23%
40
130
578
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
22
5
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
45.7%
54.3%
43.1%
56.9%
73.5%
26.5%
51.1%
48.9%
55.9%
44.1%
51.2%
48.8%
68.0%
32.0%
51.5%
48.5%
49.9%
50.1%
54.6%
45.4%
58.9%
41.1%
70.6%
29.4%
54.4%
45.6%
51.9%
48.1%
51.0%
49.0%
54.7%
45.3%
43.4%
56.6%
85.0%
15.0%
66.6%
33.4%
59.4%
40.6%
65.0%
35.0%
88.8%
11.2%
52.4%
47.6%
55.8%
44.2%
56.0%
44.0%
4.55%
4.75%
6.87%
6.76%
11.12%
6.52%
16.51%
7.79%
40.16%
12.50%
7.46%
11.32%
7.19%
23.92%
16.06%
8.80%
16.53%
12.06%
13.69%
18.55%
18.30%
17.58%
37.56%
33.15%
70.08%
68.91%
75.04%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.31
0.38
0.42
0.37
0.15
0.05
0.26
0.36
0.27
0.38
0.25
0.40
0.46
0.43
0.32
0.28
0.38
0.22
0.51
0.32
0.22
0.27
0.13
0.23
0.39
0.42
0.20
0.43
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
34.7%
65.3%
30.7%
69.3%
61.8%
38.2%
38.0%
62.0%
40.1%
59.9%
35.8%
64.2%
49.4%
50.6%
36.3%
63.7%
35.5%
64.5%
35.9%
64.1%
41.0%
59.0%
53.2%
46.8%
35.9%
64.1%
39.2%
60.8%
35.7%
64.3%
42.6%
57.4%
30.0%
70.0%
78.2%
21.8%
59.0%
41.0%
49.5%
50.5%
58.6%
41.4%
86.1%
13.9%
37.7%
62.3%
45.5%
54.5%
45.6%
54.4%
Convex
Hull
0.73
0.82
0.78
0.85
0.82
0.35
0.69
0.88
0.66
0.79
0.70
0.76
0.82
0.81
0.75
0.70
0.82
0.73
0.87
0.70
0.74
0.61
0.61
0.55
0.86
0.82
0.46
0.81
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
6
21
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
33.6%
66.4%
30.3%
69.7%
61.7%
38.3%
36.4%
63.6%
37.2%
62.8%
33.9%
66.1%
47.7%
52.3%
33.0%
67.0%
33.4%
66.6%
32.3%
67.7%
36.2%
63.8%
50.3%
49.7%
31.2%
68.8%
34.5%
65.5%
31.9%
68.1%
36.7%
63.3%
27.2%
72.8%
76.7%
23.3%
54.2%
45.8%
45.1%
54.9%
55.4%
44.6%
85.8%
14.2%
36.3%
63.7%
43.7%
56.3%
41.5%
58.5%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
17.9%
16.3%
47.0%
18.7%
20.9%
15.6%
28.8%
19.0%
15.2%
12.6%
14.7%
28.5%
16.8%
12.9%
15.9%
15.9%
9.3%
51.3%
19.2%
17.5%
23.0%
64.9%
16.6%
20.9%
17.7%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
20
66.3%
49.8%
59.2%
64.3%
34.9%
55.1%
55.9%
56.3%
47.4%
56.5%
54.3%
48.6%
42.5%
34.1%
50.1%
48.1%
52.9%
50.9%
60.5%
18.9%
36.0%
43.8%
37.4%
12.9%
59.7%
51.5%
55.1%
I_Cri
4
20.4%
28.7%
22.9%
19.4%
18.1%
26.2%
23.2%
28.1%
23.8%
24.5%
30.5%
38.8%
42.8%
37.4%
33.0%
39.0%
31.2%
33.2%
30.3%
29.8%
44.9%
38.7%
39.6%
22.2%
23.8%
27.6%
27.2%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
11
16
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
39.3%
60.7%
37.0%
63.0%
69.2%
30.8%
47.4%
52.6%
50.5%
49.5%
44.3%
55.7%
60.9%
39.1%
45.3%
54.7%
43.7%
56.3%
47.1%
52.9%
51.4%
48.6%
65.4%
34.6%
47.1%
52.9%
48.5%
51.5%
46.0%
54.0%
51.5%
48.5%
42.3%
57.7%
81.3%
18.7%
63.9%
36.1%
56.9%
43.1%
61.6%
38.4%
86.8%
13.2%
46.3%
53.7%
49.8%
50.2%
48.8%
51.2%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
40.0%
60.0%
30.4%
69.6%
58.0%
42.0%
45.1%
54.9%
39.5%
60.5%
43.2%
56.8%
46.1%
53.9%
37.8%
62.2%
40.8%
59.2%
43.1%
56.9%
45.2%
54.8%
56.0%
44.0%
39.7%
60.3%
42.5%
57.5%
40.6%
59.4%
48.0%
52.0%
33.3%
66.7%
75.7%
24.3%
65.3%
34.7%
54.9%
45.1%
62.3%
37.7%
81.5%
18.5%
38.5%
61.5%
47.1%
52.9%
44.6%
55.4%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
18
9
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
50.3%
49.7%
40.9%
59.1%
64.9%
35.1%
52.5%
47.5%
50.1%
49.9%
49.7%
50.3%
55.3%
44.7%
47.8%
52.2%
50.0%
50.0%
49.7%
50.3%
53.7%
46.3%
61.0%
39.0%
43.7%
56.3%
50.3%
49.7%
47.9%
52.1%
52.8%
47.2%
42.5%
57.5%
79.9%
20.1%
71.0%
29.0%
61.1%
38.9%
69.5%
30.5%
84.9%
15.1%
46.2%
53.8%
53.5%
46.5%
51.6%
48.4%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
41.2%
58.8%
30.6%
69.4%
57.3%
42.7%
44.8%
55.2%
38.4%
61.6%
42.4%
57.6%
45.9%
54.1%
38.4%
61.6%
42.4%
57.6%
42.8%
57.2%
47.1%
52.9%
55.3%
44.7%
39.0%
61.0%
46.1%
53.9%
41.4%
58.6%
50.7%
49.3%
35.3%
64.7%
76.7%
23.3%
68.0%
32.0%
57.6%
42.4%
64.2%
35.8%
81.1%
18.9%
40.7%
59.3%
48.5%
51.5%
47.7%
52.3%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
34.7%
65.3%
29.5%
70.5%
56.1%
43.9%
42.5%
57.5%
35.9%
64.1%
35.7%
64.3%
41.9%
58.1%
34.4%
65.6%
38.1%
61.9%
38.2%
61.8%
39.8%
60.2%
50.7%
49.3%
34.9%
65.1%
39.6%
60.4%
37.2%
62.8%
44.5%
55.5%
32.9%
67.1%
74.3%
25.7%
63.7%
36.3%
52.5%
47.5%
61.4%
38.6%
80.6%
19.4%
39.2%
60.8%
46.7%
53.3%
44.7%
55.3%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
16%
43
-20%
24
-19%
67
-19%
67
0%
410
21%
363
-57%
47
-57%
109
-57%
104
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
54.8%
45.2%
46.9%
53.1%
69.7%
30.3%
59.9%
40.1%
59.1%
40.9%
59.7%
40.3%
63.3%
36.7%
56.6%
43.4%
57.9%
42.1%
60.9%
39.1%
63.3%
36.7%
70.7%
29.3%
57.4%
42.6%
57.3%
42.7%
57.5%
42.5%
64.0%
36.0%
51.2%
48.8%
82.8%
17.2%
76.9%
23.1%
67.8%
32.2%
72.7%
27.3%
85.4%
14.6%
51.1%
48.9%
57.2%
42.8%
55.9%
44.1%
Plan: H000C9039
Page 2 of 4
App. 139
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
44.2%
33.6%
59.6%
37.5%
35.9%
35.1%
43.9%
36.2%
37.0%
35.3%
35.8%
50.5%
38.2%
32.8%
38.7%
37.5%
28.0%
65.3%
48.1%
41.3%
47.8%
69.8%
32.9%
35.8%
35.8%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
40.9%
31.5%
59.7%
35.7%
35.1%
33.6%
42.8%
35.2%
35.1%
33.9%
34.7%
49.5%
37.1%
32.1%
37.3%
36.4%
27.1%
65.8%
46.7%
40.5%
46.3%
69.3%
32.8%
35.6%
35.8%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
18.8%
21.3%
19.1%
25.0%
26.8%
22.9%
30.5%
23.8%
21.6%
26.2%
27.4%
25.2%
25.1%
24.4%
23.5%
25.6%
25.8%
21.1%
27.4%
27.5%
28.4%
20.5%
29.2%
29.3%
28.3%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
17.2%
20.0%
18.1%
23.9%
25.1%
20.9%
27.9%
22.3%
20.9%
24.8%
26.1%
23.5%
23.5%
23.4%
22.3%
24.6%
24.4%
20.4%
25.9%
25.9%
26.1%
19.4%
27.4%
27.4%
26.0%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
40.3%
47.1%
21.2%
39.3%
38.1%
43.5%
26.7%
41.0%
43.2%
39.9%
37.9%
25.3%
37.8%
43.5%
39.2%
38.0%
47.1%
13.2%
25.8%
32.0%
25.3%
10.2%
38.0%
35.2%
35.9%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
38.5%
46.4%
22.2%
38.6%
38.9%
44.0%
28.2%
41.5%
42.1%
39.9%
38.2%
26.1%
38.3%
43.8%
39.1%
37.9%
47.6%
14.3%
26.0%
32.8%
26.2%
10.9%
39.6%
36.8%
38.2%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
84.1%
79.4%
86.1%
82.2%
78.1%
81.7%
78.0%
80.8%
84.3%
75.0%
77.5%
83.5%
79.4%
81.2%
82.5%
81.1%
76.8%
84.4%
77.0%
79.2%
78.7%
85.7%
79.0%
80.8%
80.5%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
85.5%
80.6%
86.8%
83.0%
79.1%
82.9%
79.3%
81.8%
84.6%
75.9%
77.7%
84.1%
80.5%
81.1%
83.0%
81.6%
77.5%
84.4%
77.3%
79.8%
79.3%
85.8%
79.4%
81.0%
81.4%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
11.0%
4.0%
22.7%
3.8%
1.2%
2.9%
12.1%
3.8%
30.4%
4.1%
1.3%
2.5%
47.7%
6.8%
68.8%
5.8%
6.5%
5.1%
8.3%
3.8%
19.2%
4.6%
0.8%
2.2%
9.1%
12.9%
20.3%
16.8%
1.1%
6.7%
7.9%
4.5%
19.3%
5.6%
0.9%
2.8%
9.3%
36.3%
17.0%
42.1%
1.5%
19.1%
10.0%
8.7%
22.9%
11.1%
1.2%
4.5%
6.0%
4.8%
14.5%
6.9%
0.6%
2.8%
4.2%
7.6%
9.2%
9.7%
0.6%
4.7%
4.4%
3.9%
9.7%
5.0%
0.5%
2.3%
24.3%
14.4%
40.9%
14.0%
3.1%
10.5%
12.7%
9.8%
27.2%
11.3%
1.4%
5.8%
4.9%
3.6%
12.5%
4.9%
0.5%
1.9%
8.3%
10.1%
18.5%
12.5%
0.9%
5.5%
9.6%
6.3%
21.3%
7.8%
1.1%
3.9%
4.1%
6.4%
11.6%
9.5%
0.4%
3.3%
48.1%
10.8%
61.8%
8.3%
10.5%
14.1%
8.9%
11.6%
14.6%
11.2%
1.4%
8.8%
7.5%
9.1%
14.7%
10.0%
0.9%
6.3%
8.7%
26.9%
14.7%
23.4%
1.4%
27.8%
55.6%
22.9%
68.8%
15.5%
14.2%
48.0%
6.9%
57.7%
16.6%
52.3%
0.9%
58.6%
9.3%
57.3%
21.2%
45.3%
1.1%
66.2%
7.0%
60.5%
15.8%
48.3%
0.8%
71.0%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
10.9%
3.6%
21.0%
3.3%
1.3%
2.8%
12.4%
3.4%
29.8%
3.6%
1.4%
2.4%
45.5%
6.2%
66.2%
5.3%
6.3%
4.8%
8.2%
3.5%
18.2%
4.1%
0.8%
2.0%
8.7%
11.8%
19.2%
15.2%
1.1%
6.4%
7.5%
4.0%
17.6%
4.9%
0.9%
2.6%
9.3%
34.0%
16.8%
39.5%
1.5%
19.2%
9.6%
7.8%
21.6%
9.9%
1.2%
4.2%
5.9%
4.5%
13.4%
6.2%
0.7%
2.7%
3.8%
6.7%
8.3%
8.5%
0.6%
4.3%
4.0%
3.5%
8.7%
4.3%
0.5%
2.1%
23.9%
13.0%
39.8%
12.1%
3.3%
10.1%
11.9%
8.9%
25.2%
10.1%
1.4%
5.5%
4.7%
3.1%
11.6%
4.0%
0.6%
1.7%
7.8%
9.1%
16.8%
11.1%
0.9%
5.3%
8.9%
5.7%
19.4%
6.9%
1.0%
3.5%
3.7%
5.7%
10.3%
8.3%
0.4%
3.1%
45.9%
9.9%
59.3%
7.6%
10.4%
12.8%
7.8%
10.1%
12.6%
9.6%
1.4%
8.0%
7.1%
8.0%
13.7%
8.6%
0.9%
5.7%
8.1%
24.6%
13.4%
21.0%
1.4%
26.9%
56.1%
21.4%
69.0%
14.3%
15.2%
46.7%
6.9%
55.1%
16.7%
48.5%
0.9%
57.7%
9.4%
55.5%
21.4%
42.6%
1.1%
65.6%
7.0%
59.2%
16.0%
45.4%
0.8%
70.8%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
40.4%
30.2%
35.8%
32.1%
50.8%
17.2%
44.2%
22.6%
46.2%
21.1%
43.0%
28.8%
51.0%
15.9%
45.7%
22.5%
50.8%
24.9%
44.5%
25.6%
44.3%
23.2%
47.1%
20.3%
43.5%
23.7%
42.6%
24.5%
46.8%
22.7%
46.0%
23.6%
41.1%
26.0%
50.2%
18.4%
45.7%
20.6%
44.5%
23.3%
40.7%
28.6%
46.5%
23.7%
29.0%
41.5%
27.5%
43.5%
27.4%
45.6%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
38.4%
29.0%
34.7%
31.1%
50.4%
15.9%
43.3%
22.7%
45.5%
19.8%
41.8%
27.5%
49.7%
14.1%
45.2%
21.4%
49.9%
24.8%
43.6%
24.8%
44.1%
22.2%
48.0%
18.4%
43.1%
22.3%
43.3%
23.3%
46.1%
21.3%
44.7%
23.2%
40.6%
24.5%
50.3%
17.2%
45.2%
19.7%
44.3%
22.0%
40.2%
26.2%
47.0%
21.4%
29.7%
38.6%
28.1%
40.6%
28.6%
42.1%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
43.6%
45.3%
11.1%
31.5%
55.3%
13.3%
60.0%
29.0%
11.0%
35.8%
47.1%
17.2%
33.4%
49.2%
17.4%
32.5%
52.2%
15.3%
42.2%
39.2%
18.7%
33.1%
51.1%
15.8%
33.7%
50.5%
15.8%
33.2%
48.4%
18.4%
34.7%
46.1%
19.3%
50.7%
33.6%
15.7%
36.2%
47.6%
16.1%
30.8%
51.6%
17.6%
36.0%
48.7%
15.4%
34.9%
46.5%
18.6%
24.2%
58.2%
17.6%
70.1%
16.4%
13.5%
50.2%
29.8%
20.1%
40.8%
39.5%
19.7%
49.6%
31.3%
19.1%
76.4%
11.0%
12.6%
29.7%
51.0%
19.3%
35.3%
45.9%
18.8%
34.0%
47.6%
18.4%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
41.1%
43.6%
15.3%
31.4%
50.9%
17.7%
62.3%
22.9%
14.9%
35.7%
43.0%
21.3%
35.0%
41.9%
23.1%
33.2%
46.9%
19.8%
44.1%
29.9%
26.0%
34.8%
44.7%
20.5%
34.3%
47.2%
18.5%
33.7%
43.5%
22.8%
35.2%
41.1%
23.7%
51.1%
27.7%
21.3%
37.5%
41.2%
21.3%
32.0%
46.8%
21.2%
37.0%
43.3%
19.6%
36.3%
41.3%
22.4%
26.3%
51.8%
21.9%
69.8%
12.7%
17.5%
48.4%
26.9%
24.8%
41.4%
34.1%
24.6%
47.9%
26.6%
25.5%
73.2%
9.4%
17.4%
32.8%
41.4%
25.7%
36.1%
38.4%
25.5%
36.1%
38.6%
25.2%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
8.9%
2.2%
18.4%
1.8%
0.7%
1.9%
10.5%
2.1%
28.3%
2.1%
1.0%
1.7%
44.1%
3.5%
67.6%
3.0%
3.6%
3.1%
6.8%
2.2%
16.9%
2.6%
0.5%
1.5%
7.3%
7.4%
18.2%
9.9%
0.8%
4.5%
6.2%
2.6%
16.5%
3.3%
0.6%
2.0%
9.7%
21.7%
19.5%
28.3%
1.0%
11.8%
8.4%
4.4%
21.8%
5.8%
0.8%
2.8%
4.8%
2.4%
12.8%
3.6%
0.4%
1.6%
3.4%
4.2%
8.2%
5.2%
0.4%
3.2%
2.9%
2.1%
7.2%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
21.6%
7.7%
38.3%
7.1%
1.9%
7.0%
10.3%
5.0%
24.2%
5.7%
1.0%
3.7%
3.4%
1.7%
9.7%
2.3%
0.3%
1.1%
6.7%
5.0%
16.4%
6.5%
0.6%
3.2%
7.5%
3.4%
18.6%
4.2%
0.7%
2.5%
2.3%
2.8%
7.8%
4.5%
0.2%
1.9%
48.6%
6.2%
62.3%
4.4%
7.1%
9.9%
7.5%
6.2%
12.2%
5.3%
1.1%
6.1%
6.0%
5.1%
12.4%
5.2%
0.6%
4.3%
8.5%
20.3%
14.3%
14.9%
1.1%
25.6%
63.3%
15.5%
75.0%
9.0%
12.0%
45.9%
7.6%
48.9%
21.6%
37.7%
0.7%
54.0%
9.8%
51.4%
24.0%
32.8%
0.7%
64.2%
6.3%
56.7%
16.1%
35.5%
0.5%
70.9%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
11.0%
3.5%
23.3%
3.3%
1.0%
2.6%
12.3%
3.2%
32.3%
3.5%
1.1%
2.2%
50.1%
5.4%
71.6%
4.6%
5.1%
4.2%
8.3%
3.3%
19.9%
4.1%
0.6%
1.9%
9.1%
11.2%
21.0%
15.0%
0.9%
5.8%
7.9%
4.0%
20.0%
5.0%
0.7%
2.6%
10.3%
32.0%
19.0%
38.7%
1.3%
15.8%
10.3%
7.4%
24.6%
9.8%
1.0%
3.9%
6.0%
3.9%
15.2%
5.9%
0.5%
2.2%
4.3%
6.9%
9.9%
9.0%
0.6%
4.3%
4.3%
3.4%
9.9%
4.5%
0.4%
2.1%
24.9%
12.6%
42.1%
12.4%
2.4%
9.2%
13.3%
8.4%
29.0%
10.0%
1.2%
5.1%
4.8%
3.1%
12.7%
4.4%
0.4%
1.6%
8.7%
8.3%
20.2%
10.9%
0.7%
4.5%
9.8%
5.5%
22.6%
6.9%
0.9%
3.5%
3.9%
5.1%
12.0%
8.2%
0.3%
2.7%
52.3%
9.6%
65.2%
7.2%
9.2%
13.7%
9.6%
10.6%
15.8%
10.1%
1.3%
8.4%
7.8%
8.4%
15.5%
9.0%
0.8%
6.0%
9.4%
26.9%
15.8%
22.6%
1.3%
28.5%
59.7%
20.7%
71.8%
13.7%
12.9%
48.9%
7.7%
55.0%
19.1%
48.6%
0.8%
56.3%
9.7%
56.1%
22.5%
42.2%
0.9%
65.9%
7.1%
59.7%
16.3%
45.7%
0.6%
71.0%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
90.1%
84.8%
92.0%
88.9%
83.3%
86.9%
84.6%
85.9%
89.7%
79.1%
84.9%
89.8%
84.7%
87.5%
88.1%
86.5%
83.2%
89.8%
81.9%
84.7%
83.6%
90.5%
84.3%
86.9%
86.3%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
86.9%
82.1%
89.0%
85.0%
80.8%
84.2%
81.1%
83.2%
87.2%
77.0%
80.8%
86.3%
81.8%
84.6%
85.5%
83.6%
80.5%
87.1%
79.4%
81.8%
81.2%
88.0%
81.5%
83.8%
83.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
35.9%
40.6%
31.6%
45.1%
51.7%
25.6%
43.8%
32.0%
44.7%
29.7%
40.1%
38.5%
55.0%
21.3%
43.4%
31.9%
50.0%
33.7%
41.2%
36.3%
42.6%
33.4%
46.8%
30.5%
41.0%
34.9%
41.1%
34.7%
46.7%
31.3%
43.7%
34.5%
38.0%
39.3%
50.0%
26.2%
43.1%
29.4%
41.8%
33.5%
36.3%
39.5%
44.3%
32.6%
22.9%
56.4%
22.5%
57.4%
21.3%
59.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
38.5%
31.8%
35.0%
35.2%
52.8%
17.6%
44.3%
25.7%
46.9%
21.8%
41.9%
30.5%
53.4%
14.7%
45.9%
23.5%
51.6%
27.0%
44.2%
27.4%
46.0%
24.5%
50.5%
20.2%
44.6%
24.7%
45.2%
24.7%
48.5%
23.1%
45.7%
25.9%
42.5%
27.5%
52.3%
18.1%
46.1%
21.2%
44.7%
24.3%
40.2%
28.2%
48.5%
22.3%
29.0%
42.4%
27.2%
45.0%
27.7%
46.0%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
16.6%
0.8%
1.4%
23.3%
1.3%
1.3%
66.0%
1.9%
2.0%
16.6%
1.7%
1.1%
15.9%
6.8%
3.2%
15.5%
2.3%
1.5%
16.4%
20.2%
8.0%
19.4%
3.6%
2.0%
12.0%
2.1%
1.1%
6.5%
3.1%
2.3%
5.8%
1.9%
1.2%
36.5%
3.9%
4.9%
19.9%
2.9%
2.5%
9.5%
1.4%
0.8%
14.1%
4.3%
2.4%
17.9%
2.7%
1.8%
6.9%
2.6%
1.4%
61.7%
2.7%
8.0%
10.0%
2.8%
4.8%
11.1%
3.1%
3.3%
13.8%
9.6%
24.8%
79.1%
5.3%
43.7%
23.7%
31.4%
52.8%
25.5%
22.7%
63.6%
15.6%
29.2%
74.3%
Plan: H000C9039
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Hendry
Hendry
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Osceola
Osceola
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
Pinellas
Pinellas
App. 140
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
203,023
82.1%
720.9
5
44,313
17.9%
247.9
20
455,445
26.1%
535.5
21
272,224
15.6%
70.9
22
294,581
16.9%
130.1
23
498,411
28.5%
188.9
24
136,412
7.8%
24.0
25
90,993
5.2%
373.5
3
172,269
90.3%
568.5
5
18,596
9.7%
75.1
19
160,728
50.0%
338.0
25
160,792
50.0%
1,967.0
4
595,891
68.9%
786.9
5
268,372
31.1%
131.6
20
13,550
34.6%
55.7
25
25,590
65.4%
1,134.3
12
167,520
13.6%
110.4
14
540,275
44.0%
432.7
15
521,431
42.4%
722.7
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
5
17,490
5.9%
312.1
10
279,156
94.0%
844.7
11
406
0.1%
0.1
17
83,137
13.4%
178.2
19
535,617
86.6%
1,034.3
2
4,028
21.0%
337.4
3
15,196
79.0%
378.3
16
318,460
98.6%
566.2
17
4,373
1.4%
326.5
3
27,774
8.4%
298.7
5
15,019
4.5%
407.9
11
288,505
87.1%
956.1
23
197,933
7.9%
98.6
24
559,932
22.4%
86.9
25
418,970
16.8%
505.4
26
623,255
25.0%
1,162.4
27
696,345
27.9%
577.8
8
14,941
37.4%
682.1
17
19,717
49.3%
104.3
18
5,338
13.3%
105.5
5
299,678
26.2%
207.2
7
175,297
15.3%
60.5
9
379,876
33.1%
262.9
10
192,753
16.8%
193.2
17
98,352
8.6%
279.5
9
241,786
90.0%
360.1
17
26,899
10.0%
1,145.8
18
266,900
20.2%
446.7
20
227,350
17.2%
1,504.3
21
424,120
32.1%
193.0
401,764
30.4%
239.0
22
12
64,128
7.0%
48.5
13
696,344
76.0%
446.5
14
156,070
17.0%
113.2
Area%
74.4%
25.6%
40.5%
5.4%
9.8%
14.3%
1.8%
28.2%
88.3%
11.7%
14.7%
85.3%
85.7%
14.3%
4.7%
95.3%
8.7%
34.2%
57.1%
79.5%
20.5%
27.0%
73.0%
0.0%
14.7%
85.3%
47.1%
52.9%
63.4%
36.6%
18.0%
24.5%
57.5%
4.1%
3.6%
20.8%
47.8%
23.8%
76.5%
11.7%
11.8%
20.7%
6.0%
26.2%
19.3%
27.9%
23.9%
76.1%
18.7%
63.1%
8.1%
10.0%
8.0%
73.4%
18.6%
Polk
Polk
Polk
Polk
Putnam
Putnam
Sarasota
Sarasota
St. Johns
St. Johns
Volusia
Volusia
County
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
9
74,682
12.4%
161.2
10
224,436
37.3%
541.3
15
174,914
29.1%
140.3
17
128,063
21.3%
1,167.8
5
32,877
44.2%
341.3
6
41,487
55.8%
485.7
16
377,885
99.6%
661.1
17
1,563
0.4%
64.2
4
27,140
14.3%
55.1
6
162,899
85.7%
766.5
6
396,263
80.1%
1,220.3
7
98,330
19.9%
212.1
Area%
8.0%
26.9%
7.0%
58.1%
41.3%
58.7%
91.1%
8.9%
6.7%
93.3%
85.2%
14.8%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Auburndale
10
13,109
97.1%
17.5
Auburndale
15
398
2.9%
2.9
Boynton Beach
20
19,978
29.3%
3.2
Boynton Beach
22
48,239
70.7%
13.4
Coconut Creek
20
433
0.8%
0.6
Coconut Creek
21
52,476
99.2%
11.4
Deerfield Beach
20
26,242
35.0%
4.0
Deerfield Beach
21
33,897
45.2%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Deltona
6
22,646
26.6%
12.0
Deltona
7
62,536
73.4%
29.1
Dundee
10
201
5.4%
0.6
Dundee
17
3,516
94.6%
10.9
Fort Lauderdale
20
60,588
36.6%
13.4
Fort Lauderdale
22
104,933
63.4%
25.0
Fort Lauderdale
23
0
0.0%
0.2
Gainesville
3
93,103
74.9%
41.6
Gainesville
5
31,251
25.1%
20.8
Gulfport
13
5,509
45.8%
1.9
Gulfport
14
6,520
54.2%
2.0
Hallandale Beach
23
25,370
68.4%
3.0
Hallandale Beach
24
11,743
31.6%
1.6
Hialeah
25
162,856
72.5%
16.5
Hialeah
27
61,813
27.5%
6.3
Hollywood
23
114,568
81.4%
26.6
Hollywood
24
26,200
18.6%
4.1
Homestead
26
42,640
70.5%
7.0
Homestead
27
17,872
29.5%
8.6
Jacksonville
4
553,412
67.3%
743.0
Jacksonville
5
268,372
32.7%
131.6
Lady Lake
10
13,520
97.1%
8.3
Lady Lake
11
406
2.9%
0.1
Lake Park
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Lake Park
20
7,242
88.8%
2.1
Lake Park
22
913
11.2%
0.3
Lake Wales
10
0
0.0%
0.0
Lake Wales
17
14,225
100.0%
19.9
Lake Worth
20
10,654
30.5%
1.6
Lake Worth
22
24,256
69.5%
5.0
Lakeland
10
22,802
23.4%
25.8
Lakeland
15
74,620
76.6%
48.5
Lantana
20
4,654
44.7%
1.2
Lantana
22
5,769
55.3%
1.7
Loxahatchee Groves 18
1,681
52.9%
7.0
Loxahatchee Groves 20
1,499
47.1%
5.5
Margate
20
14,535
27.3%
2.2
Margate
21
38,749
72.7%
6.9
Miami
23
15,273
3.8%
2.9
Miami
24
133,006
33.3%
19.4
Miami
27
251,178
62.9%
33.8
Miramar
24
65,355
53.6%
11.2
Miramar
25
56,686
46.4%
20.1
Mulberry
15
1
0.0%
0.1
Mulberry
17
3,816
100.0%
5.7
North Miami
23
9,175
15.6%
4.8
Counties and Cities
Area%
85.8%
14.2%
19.1%
80.9%
4.7%
95.3%
24.6%
57.3%
18.2%
29.2%
70.8%
5.1%
94.9%
34.8%
64.8%
0.4%
66.6%
33.4%
49.0%
51.0%
64.5%
35.5%
72.4%
27.6%
86.5%
13.5%
44.8%
55.2%
85.0%
15.0%
98.9%
1.1%
0.2%
88.9%
10.9%
0.2%
99.8%
24.5%
75.5%
34.8%
65.2%
40.7%
59.3%
55.9%
44.1%
24.2%
75.8%
5.2%
34.5%
60.3%
35.7%
64.3%
1.0%
99.0%
48.4%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
North Miami
24
49,611
84.4%
5.2
North Miami Beach 23
6,953
16.7%
1.1
North Miami Beach 24
34,570
83.3%
4.3
North Port
16
55,822
97.3%
79.7
North Port
17
1,535
2.7%
24.5
Oakland Park
20
20,289
49.1%
4.2
Oakland Park
22
21,074
50.9%
3.9
Oldsmar
12
5,101
37.5%
5.7
Oldsmar
13
8,490
62.5%
3.9
Opa-locka
24
14,894
97.9%
2.6
Opa-locka
25
325
2.1%
1.9
Orange City
6
4,674
44.1%
2.4
Orange City
7
5,925
55.9%
4.8
Orange Park
3
6,415
76.3%
2.8
Orange Park
5
1,997
23.7%
2.5
Orlando
5
77,843
32.7%
22.6
Orlando
7
30,467
12.8%
11.9
Orlando
9
102,331
42.9%
68.9
Orlando
10
27,659
11.6%
7.2
Pembroke Pines
23
107,607
69.5%
20.0
Pembroke Pines
24
12,856
8.3%
3.1
Pembroke Pines
25
34,287
22.2%
11.7
Plantation
20
13,381
15.8%
2.7
Plantation
22
67,448
79.4%
18.3
Plantation
23
4,126
4.9%
0.9
Pompano Beach
20
46,314
46.4%
11.3
Pompano Beach
21
1,447
1.4%
2.0
Pompano Beach
22
52,084
52.2%
12.2
Riviera Beach
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Riviera Beach
20
28,156
86.7%
7.3
Riviera Beach
22
4,332
13.3%
2.9
Royal Palm Beach
18
14,734
43.2%
5.1
Royal Palm Beach
20
16,299
47.7%
5.6
Royal Palm Beach
21
3,107
9.1%
0.7
St. Cloud
9
27,108
77.0%
11.0
St. Cloud
17
8,075
23.0%
6.8
St. Petersburg
13
96,485
39.4%
40.9
St. Petersburg
14
148,284
60.6%
96.7
Sunrise
20
62,665
74.2%
9.4
Sunrise
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Sunrise
23
21,774
25.8%
8.9
Tampa
12
7,411
2.2%
2.4
Tampa
14
281,381
83.8%
143.2
Tampa
15
46,917
14.0%
29.7
Tarpon Springs
12
2,498
10.6%
1.8
Tarpon Springs
13
20,986
89.4%
15.5
West Palm Beach
18
20,693
20.7%
35.3
West Palm Beach
20
48,663
48.7%
15.6
West Palm Beach
22
30,563
30.6%
7.2
Wilton Manors
20
3,311
28.5%
0.6
Wilton Manors
22
8,321
71.5%
1.4
Winter Haven
10
31,911
94.2%
31.3
Winter Haven
15
200
0.6%
0.3
Winter Haven
17
1,763
5.2%
8.3
Area%
51.6%
20.8%
79.2%
76.5%
23.5%
52.1%
47.9%
59.4%
40.6%
57.7%
42.3%
33.3%
66.7%
52.2%
47.8%
20.5%
10.8%
62.2%
6.5%
57.5%
9.0%
33.5%
12.3%
83.5%
4.2%
44.4%
7.7%
47.9%
0.4%
71.2%
28.4%
45.0%
49.1%
5.8%
61.8%
38.2%
29.7%
70.3%
51.5%
0.0%
48.4%
1.4%
81.7%
16.9%
10.3%
89.7%
60.8%
26.9%
12.4%
29.9%
70.1%
78.4%
0.7%
20.9%
Plan: H000C9039
Page 4 of 4
26
5
10
Scale bar for insets
27
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
0
Miami Beach
Miami
Oldsmar
14
Bradenton
16 Palmetto
Tampa
MANATEE
Plant City
Zephyrhills
6
17
10
St. Augustine
Dade City
HILLSBOROUGH
15
St. Leo
ST. JOHNS
Temple Terrace
PASCO
12
Green Cove Springs
St. Petersburg
Holmes Beach
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
Treasure Island
Pinellas Park
13 PINELLAS
Seminole
Largo
Clearwater
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
Starke
CLAY
4
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
10
Ocoee
Apopka
5
Maitland
Winter Springs
Kissimmee
7 Oviedo
St. Cloud
9
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
6
Deltona
SEMINOLE
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
LAKE
4-Jan-2012
*****
HB 6003 adopted by
House Congressional
Subcommittee (10-4)
9-Jan-2012
H000C9041
Orlando11
Area
Eustis
DIXIE
8
AD
BR
OR O
LSB
15
Titusville
Oak Hill
LEE
19
CHARLOTTE
DESOTO
17
HARDEE
POLK
10
LAKE
5
PUTNAM
CLAY
MARION
SARASOTA
16
MANATEE
14
HIL
12
HERNANDO
F
UGH
ALACHUA
CITRUS
PASCO
13
11
VOLUSIA
LEVY
E
9
6
DUVAL
4
COLLIER
25
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
OSCEOLA
ORANGE
7
VOLUSIA
FLAGLER
10
26
8
MONROE
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
20
21
27
23
24
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
18
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Florida City
Homestead
Cutler Bay
Aventura
24 North Miami
Coral Gables
Palmetto Bay
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Hialeah
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
Dania Beach
Orange Park
Jacksonville
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
D
OR
R
Doral
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
23
Lawtey
DUVAL
GULF
N
UNIO
BAKER
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
MIAMI-DADE
Davie
Fort Lauderdale
Lauderhill
Oakland Park
Pompano Beach
3
Baldwin
5
Miles
60
3
HAMILTON
LA
FA
YE
TT
MADISON
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
Sunrise
Plantation
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Southwest Ranches
BROWARD
Tamarac
Deerfield Beach
Boca Raton
22
Delray Beach
NASSAU
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Parkland
21
Lantana
Lake Worth
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
GILCHRIST
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
30
2
JACKSON
E
20
Wellington
Palm Springs
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
HNS
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
E
NN
Belle Glade
18
1
SANTA ROSA
A
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
South Florida
BIA
COLU
M
A
ESC
JO
ST.
OK
App. 141
App. 142
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
14.72%
10.99%
48.05%
9.85%
10.71%
9.12%
11.99%
12.76%
8.63%
4.30%
5.12%
24.58%
11.14%
5.80%
9.47%
10.98%
5.76%
50.21%
11.21%
10.16%
9.93%
55.73%
8.25%
10.02%
7.71%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
12
15
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
37.2%
62.8%
34.7%
65.3%
69.7%
30.3%
47.0%
53.0%
50.0%
50.0%
42.6%
57.4%
60.5%
39.5%
46.3%
53.7%
38.4%
61.6%
46.0%
54.0%
50.0%
50.0%
65.2%
34.8%
46.3%
53.7%
45.3%
54.7%
41.7%
58.3%
48.0%
52.0%
38.4%
61.6%
83.2%
16.8%
60.9%
39.1%
54.3%
45.7%
61.2%
38.8%
88.4%
11.6%
49.4%
50.6%
53.4%
46.6%
53.3%
46.7%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
10
17
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
40.8%
59.2%
36.6%
63.4%
65.4%
34.6%
47.0%
53.0%
49.5%
50.5%
42.3%
57.7%
54.2%
45.8%
44.5%
55.5%
40.8%
59.2%
45.6%
54.4%
50.2%
49.8%
63.0%
37.0%
46.3%
53.7%
46.0%
54.0%
41.6%
58.4%
49.1%
50.9%
36.5%
63.5%
80.0%
20.0%
63.0%
37.0%
54.4%
45.6%
60.9%
39.1%
86.4%
13.6%
42.2%
57.8%
49.9%
50.1%
48.4%
51.6%
0.41
0.37
0.46
0.54
0.36
0.10
0.36
0.64
0.34
0.60
0.44
0.43
0.57
0.35
0.38
0.38
0.48
0.59
0.54
0.26
0.49
0.29
0.17
0.27
0.48
0.47
0.18
0.46
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
33.3%
66.7%
28.1%
71.9%
60.9%
39.1%
38.9%
61.1%
37.0%
63.0%
33.9%
66.1%
45.1%
54.9%
36.1%
63.9%
33.1%
66.9%
34.6%
65.4%
36.9%
63.1%
51.6%
48.4%
34.2%
65.8%
34.3%
65.7%
33.6%
66.4%
36.4%
63.6%
27.6%
72.4%
75.1%
24.9%
51.6%
48.4%
41.6%
58.4%
52.2%
47.8%
84.3%
15.7%
35.5%
64.5%
42.2%
57.8%
39.5%
60.5%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2175.2
7548.8
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
0.36%
120
530
6,082
0.42%
70
268
1,370
1.06%
144
641
1,709
0.45%
101
351
2,841
1.01%
30
126
444
0.39%
95
271
2,412
2.19%
52
198
1,256
0.63%
68
230
1,584
0.33%
125
427
5,286
0.38%
57
206
1,448
0.27%
40
114
447
1.51%
43
140
546
0.86%
60
193
1,101
0.27%
60
173
1,350
0.45%
124
424
7,096
0.44%
69
221
1,993
0.42%
83
234
1,372
1.19%
74
347
2,096
0.65%
34
110
264
0.56%
52
188
369
1.16%
37
126
288
3.38%
17
59
111
1.68%
103
345
3,980
1.47%
184
551
4,900
2.23%
40
130
578
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
21
6
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
45.1%
54.9%
42.2%
57.8%
73.6%
26.4%
54.7%
45.3%
57.0%
43.0%
51.2%
48.8%
66.4%
33.6%
53.5%
46.5%
47.7%
52.3%
55.5%
44.5%
58.8%
41.2%
70.6%
29.4%
54.2%
45.8%
51.9%
48.1%
48.8%
51.2%
54.7%
45.3%
43.4%
56.6%
85.0%
15.0%
66.6%
33.4%
59.4%
40.6%
65.0%
35.0%
88.8%
11.2%
52.4%
47.6%
55.8%
44.2%
56.0%
44.0%
4.55%
4.75%
6.62%
6.79%
11.12%
8.64%
18.67%
7.66%
38.50%
13.52%
6.73%
9.25%
7.18%
23.89%
17.72%
8.80%
14.62%
12.06%
13.69%
18.55%
18.30%
17.58%
37.56%
33.15%
70.08%
68.91%
75.04%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.35
0.38
0.42
0.27
0.24
0.05
0.29
0.35
0.41
0.40
0.38
0.36
0.43
0.43
0.35
0.37
0.57
0.50
0.51
0.32
0.22
0.27
0.13
0.23
0.39
0.42
0.20
0.43
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
34.1%
65.9%
29.7%
70.3%
61.9%
38.1%
40.8%
59.2%
41.0%
59.0%
35.9%
64.1%
47.4%
52.6%
37.9%
62.1%
34.5%
65.5%
36.9%
63.1%
41.0%
59.0%
53.2%
46.8%
35.0%
65.0%
39.2%
60.8%
34.3%
65.7%
42.6%
57.4%
30.0%
70.0%
78.2%
21.8%
59.0%
41.0%
49.5%
50.5%
58.6%
41.4%
86.1%
13.9%
37.7%
62.3%
45.5%
54.5%
45.6%
54.4%
Convex
Hull
0.74
0.82
0.78
0.76
0.79
0.35
0.72
0.83
0.76
0.84
0.81
0.83
0.77
0.81
0.76
0.75
0.87
0.82
0.87
0.70
0.74
0.61
0.61
0.55
0.86
0.82
0.46
0.81
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
6
21
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
33.1%
66.9%
29.3%
70.7%
61.7%
38.3%
38.9%
61.1%
38.2%
61.8%
34.0%
66.0%
45.7%
54.3%
34.1%
65.9%
33.0%
67.0%
33.3%
66.7%
36.2%
63.8%
50.3%
49.7%
31.3%
68.7%
34.6%
65.4%
29.4%
70.6%
36.7%
63.3%
27.2%
72.8%
76.7%
23.3%
54.2%
45.8%
45.1%
54.9%
55.4%
44.6%
85.8%
14.2%
36.3%
63.7%
43.7%
56.3%
41.5%
58.5%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
18.0%
15.0%
47.0%
20.5%
21.6%
15.7%
27.4%
20.1%
16.0%
13.0%
14.7%
28.5%
15.2%
13.0%
14.7%
15.9%
9.3%
51.3%
19.2%
17.5%
23.0%
64.9%
16.6%
20.9%
17.7%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
20
66.3%
49.8%
60.0%
64.9%
34.8%
52.5%
55.3%
56.3%
49.1%
54.6%
57.3%
47.3%
42.5%
34.1%
50.7%
48.0%
53.1%
50.9%
60.5%
18.9%
36.0%
43.8%
37.4%
12.9%
59.7%
51.5%
55.1%
I_Cri
4
20.4%
28.7%
22.0%
20.1%
18.2%
27.0%
23.2%
28.0%
23.5%
25.3%
26.7%
39.8%
42.7%
37.4%
34.0%
39.0%
32.2%
33.2%
30.3%
29.8%
44.9%
38.7%
39.6%
22.2%
23.8%
27.6%
27.2%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
12
15
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
38.9%
61.1%
36.6%
63.4%
69.2%
30.8%
50.5%
49.5%
51.6%
48.4%
44.4%
55.6%
59.1%
40.9%
47.3%
52.7%
41.2%
58.8%
47.9%
52.1%
51.4%
48.6%
65.4%
34.6%
46.7%
53.3%
48.6%
51.4%
43.6%
56.4%
51.5%
48.5%
42.3%
57.7%
81.3%
18.7%
63.9%
36.1%
56.9%
43.1%
61.6%
38.4%
86.8%
13.2%
46.3%
53.7%
49.8%
50.2%
48.8%
51.2%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
38.0%
62.0%
30.4%
69.6%
58.1%
41.9%
47.0%
53.0%
39.8%
60.2%
43.2%
56.8%
44.7%
55.3%
39.2%
60.8%
39.5%
60.5%
44.1%
55.9%
45.2%
54.8%
56.0%
44.0%
39.8%
60.2%
42.5%
57.5%
40.0%
60.0%
48.0%
52.0%
33.3%
66.7%
75.7%
24.3%
65.3%
34.7%
54.9%
45.1%
62.3%
37.7%
81.5%
18.5%
38.5%
61.5%
47.1%
52.9%
44.6%
55.4%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
17
10
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
47.9%
52.1%
41.0%
59.0%
65.0%
35.0%
54.4%
45.6%
50.4%
49.6%
49.7%
50.3%
54.0%
46.0%
48.6%
51.4%
49.5%
50.5%
51.4%
48.6%
53.7%
46.3%
61.0%
39.0%
43.9%
56.1%
50.3%
49.7%
46.7%
53.3%
52.8%
47.2%
42.5%
57.5%
79.9%
20.1%
71.0%
29.0%
61.1%
38.9%
69.5%
30.5%
84.9%
15.1%
46.2%
53.8%
53.5%
46.5%
51.6%
48.4%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
39.0%
61.0%
30.6%
69.4%
57.4%
42.6%
46.7%
53.3%
38.6%
61.4%
42.3%
57.7%
44.5%
55.5%
39.6%
60.4%
41.4%
58.6%
44.4%
55.6%
47.0%
53.0%
55.3%
44.7%
38.6%
61.4%
46.1%
53.9%
40.8%
59.2%
50.7%
49.3%
35.3%
64.7%
76.7%
23.3%
68.0%
32.0%
57.6%
42.4%
64.2%
35.8%
81.1%
18.9%
40.7%
59.3%
48.5%
51.5%
47.7%
52.3%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
33.5%
66.5%
29.4%
70.6%
56.2%
43.8%
44.3%
55.7%
36.1%
63.9%
35.8%
64.2%
40.2%
59.8%
35.5%
64.5%
36.6%
63.4%
39.9%
60.1%
39.8%
60.2%
50.7%
49.3%
34.7%
65.3%
39.7%
60.3%
36.3%
63.7%
44.5%
55.5%
32.9%
67.1%
74.3%
25.7%
63.7%
36.3%
52.5%
47.5%
61.4%
38.6%
80.6%
19.4%
39.2%
60.8%
46.7%
53.3%
44.7%
55.3%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
11%
41
-13%
26
-17%
69
-17%
69
0%
410
22%
366
-60%
44
-59%
103
-60%
98
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
52.7%
47.3%
46.9%
53.1%
69.7%
30.3%
62.3%
37.7%
59.5%
40.5%
59.7%
40.3%
62.1%
37.9%
57.4%
42.6%
56.6%
43.4%
61.4%
38.6%
63.3%
36.7%
70.8%
29.2%
58.3%
41.7%
57.3%
42.7%
56.8%
43.2%
64.0%
36.0%
51.2%
48.8%
82.8%
17.2%
76.9%
23.1%
67.8%
32.2%
72.7%
27.3%
85.4%
14.6%
51.1%
48.9%
57.2%
42.8%
55.9%
44.1%
Plan: H000C9041
Page 2 of 4
App. 143
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
42.4%
31.8%
59.6%
39.5%
36.6%
35.0%
42.8%
37.7%
38.1%
36.1%
35.7%
50.5%
36.8%
32.8%
38.8%
37.5%
28.0%
65.3%
48.1%
41.3%
47.8%
69.8%
32.9%
35.8%
35.8%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
39.6%
29.9%
59.7%
37.9%
35.7%
33.4%
41.9%
36.7%
35.7%
34.5%
34.7%
49.5%
35.9%
32.1%
37.0%
36.4%
27.1%
65.8%
46.7%
40.5%
46.3%
69.3%
32.8%
35.6%
35.8%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
18.9%
21.8%
19.1%
26.2%
27.1%
23.1%
30.2%
24.3%
20.4%
25.8%
27.4%
25.2%
26.0%
24.5%
21.8%
25.6%
25.8%
21.1%
27.4%
27.5%
28.4%
20.5%
29.2%
29.3%
28.3%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
17.2%
20.5%
18.2%
25.1%
25.2%
21.1%
27.6%
22.6%
19.7%
24.4%
26.1%
23.5%
24.4%
23.5%
20.5%
24.6%
24.4%
20.4%
25.9%
25.9%
26.1%
19.4%
27.4%
27.4%
26.0%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
41.5%
48.3%
21.2%
35.9%
37.2%
43.5%
27.9%
39.0%
43.9%
39.7%
37.9%
25.3%
38.2%
43.4%
41.2%
38.0%
47.1%
13.2%
25.8%
32.0%
25.3%
10.2%
38.0%
35.2%
35.9%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
40.4%
47.7%
22.2%
35.5%
38.2%
43.9%
29.6%
39.6%
42.2%
39.5%
38.2%
26.1%
38.8%
43.6%
40.7%
37.9%
47.6%
14.3%
26.0%
32.8%
26.2%
10.9%
39.6%
36.8%
38.2%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
83.2%
78.7%
86.1%
82.2%
77.9%
81.6%
77.8%
81.2%
85.1%
77.4%
77.5%
83.5%
77.7%
81.2%
83.5%
81.1%
76.8%
84.4%
77.0%
79.2%
78.7%
85.7%
79.0%
80.8%
80.5%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
84.6%
79.9%
86.8%
82.7%
79.0%
82.7%
79.3%
82.2%
85.4%
78.3%
77.7%
84.1%
78.7%
81.0%
83.9%
81.6%
77.5%
84.4%
77.3%
79.8%
79.3%
85.8%
79.4%
81.0%
81.4%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
12.6%
4.0%
26.5%
3.8%
1.4%
2.8%
10.2%
3.8%
26.8%
4.4%
1.1%
2.5%
47.6%
6.8%
68.6%
5.8%
6.4%
5.1%
8.8%
5.8%
19.0%
7.1%
0.9%
3.0%
9.3%
15.0%
20.4%
19.2%
1.1%
7.7%
7.9%
4.6%
19.2%
5.8%
0.9%
2.9%
9.3%
34.7%
17.2%
41.1%
1.5%
17.8%
11.6%
9.5%
25.7%
11.7%
1.4%
5.1%
6.8%
3.9%
16.3%
5.2%
0.7%
2.3%
3.7%
6.4%
8.4%
8.7%
0.5%
3.8%
4.3%
3.9%
9.7%
5.0%
0.5%
2.3%
24.2%
14.4%
40.8%
14.0%
3.1%
10.5%
10.7%
10.9%
23.1%
13.0%
1.3%
6.6%
4.9%
3.6%
12.5%
4.9%
0.5%
1.9%
8.2%
7.4%
18.5%
9.0%
0.8%
4.2%
9.6%
6.3%
21.3%
7.8%
1.1%
3.9%
4.1%
6.4%
11.6%
9.5%
0.4%
3.3%
48.1%
10.8%
61.8%
8.3%
10.5%
14.1%
8.9%
11.6%
14.6%
11.2%
1.4%
8.8%
7.5%
9.1%
14.7%
10.0%
0.9%
6.3%
8.7%
26.9%
14.7%
23.4%
1.4%
27.8%
55.6%
22.9%
68.8%
15.5%
14.2%
48.0%
6.9%
57.7%
16.6%
52.3%
0.9%
58.6%
9.3%
57.3%
21.2%
45.3%
1.1%
66.2%
7.0%
60.5%
15.8%
48.3%
0.8%
71.0%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
12.6%
3.6%
25.1%
3.4%
1.4%
2.8%
10.4%
3.4%
26.1%
3.8%
1.2%
2.3%
45.4%
6.2%
66.1%
5.3%
6.3%
4.8%
8.5%
5.4%
17.9%
6.4%
0.9%
2.9%
9.0%
13.8%
19.4%
17.7%
1.2%
7.4%
7.5%
4.2%
17.6%
5.2%
0.9%
2.7%
9.1%
32.2%
16.9%
38.1%
1.4%
17.6%
11.1%
8.7%
24.3%
10.5%
1.4%
4.8%
6.7%
3.6%
14.9%
4.6%
0.8%
2.2%
3.5%
5.8%
7.6%
7.7%
0.5%
3.6%
4.0%
3.5%
8.6%
4.3%
0.5%
2.1%
23.8%
13.0%
39.7%
12.1%
3.3%
10.1%
9.9%
9.8%
21.2%
11.5%
1.3%
6.2%
4.7%
3.1%
11.6%
4.1%
0.6%
1.8%
7.8%
6.6%
16.9%
7.9%
0.9%
4.0%
8.9%
5.7%
19.4%
6.9%
1.0%
3.5%
3.7%
5.7%
10.3%
8.3%
0.4%
3.1%
45.9%
9.9%
59.3%
7.6%
10.4%
12.8%
7.8%
10.1%
12.6%
9.6%
1.4%
8.0%
7.1%
8.0%
13.7%
8.6%
0.9%
5.7%
8.1%
24.6%
13.4%
21.0%
1.4%
26.9%
56.1%
21.4%
69.0%
14.3%
15.2%
46.7%
6.9%
55.1%
16.7%
48.5%
0.9%
57.7%
9.4%
55.5%
21.4%
42.6%
1.1%
65.6%
7.0%
59.2%
16.0%
45.4%
0.8%
70.8%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
39.4%
30.7%
35.4%
32.7%
50.8%
17.2%
47.2%
19.0%
46.8%
20.6%
43.2%
28.1%
50.7%
16.1%
45.7%
22.1%
49.1%
26.1%
47.7%
24.2%
44.3%
23.2%
47.1%
20.3%
43.2%
24.4%
42.7%
24.4%
46.2%
24.7%
46.0%
23.6%
41.1%
26.0%
50.2%
18.4%
45.7%
20.6%
44.5%
23.3%
40.7%
28.6%
46.5%
23.7%
29.0%
41.5%
27.5%
43.5%
27.4%
45.6%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
37.4%
29.2%
34.3%
31.9%
50.4%
15.8%
46.8%
18.7%
45.7%
19.1%
41.9%
27.2%
49.6%
14.3%
45.4%
20.9%
48.0%
26.0%
46.7%
23.6%
44.1%
22.2%
48.0%
18.5%
42.7%
23.2%
43.3%
23.2%
45.5%
23.5%
44.7%
23.2%
40.6%
24.5%
50.3%
17.2%
45.2%
19.7%
44.3%
22.0%
40.2%
26.2%
47.0%
21.4%
29.7%
38.6%
28.1%
40.6%
28.6%
42.1%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
41.5%
47.5%
11.0%
29.6%
56.6%
13.8%
60.1%
28.9%
11.0%
38.0%
43.9%
18.0%
34.0%
48.7%
17.3%
32.3%
52.2%
15.4%
40.6%
40.8%
18.6%
34.6%
49.5%
15.9%
34.9%
50.1%
15.1%
33.5%
48.4%
18.1%
34.6%
46.1%
19.3%
50.7%
33.6%
15.7%
35.2%
47.6%
17.2%
30.8%
51.5%
17.7%
36.0%
50.0%
14.0%
34.9%
46.5%
18.6%
24.2%
58.2%
17.6%
70.1%
16.4%
13.5%
50.2%
29.8%
20.1%
40.8%
39.5%
19.7%
49.6%
31.3%
19.1%
76.4%
11.0%
12.6%
29.7%
51.0%
19.3%
35.3%
45.9%
18.8%
34.0%
47.6%
18.4%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
39.8%
44.8%
15.4%
29.6%
52.2%
18.2%
62.3%
22.8%
14.9%
38.2%
39.4%
22.3%
35.6%
41.1%
23.3%
33.1%
46.9%
20.0%
43.0%
31.3%
25.8%
36.4%
42.7%
20.9%
34.6%
47.8%
17.5%
34.4%
43.5%
22.1%
35.2%
41.1%
23.7%
51.0%
27.7%
21.3%
36.2%
41.4%
22.4%
32.0%
46.8%
21.2%
36.6%
45.4%
18.0%
36.3%
41.3%
22.4%
26.3%
51.8%
21.9%
69.8%
12.7%
17.5%
48.4%
26.9%
24.8%
41.4%
34.1%
24.6%
47.9%
26.6%
25.5%
73.2%
9.4%
17.4%
32.8%
41.4%
25.7%
36.1%
38.4%
25.5%
36.1%
38.6%
25.2%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
10.6%
2.2%
22.6%
1.8%
0.9%
1.9%
8.5%
2.2%
24.3%
2.3%
0.8%
1.7%
44.0%
3.5%
67.4%
3.0%
3.6%
3.1%
7.2%
3.3%
16.8%
4.2%
0.5%
2.0%
7.6%
8.5%
18.5%
11.5%
0.8%
5.1%
6.2%
2.8%
16.7%
3.6%
0.6%
2.0%
9.5%
20.3%
19.8%
27.1%
1.0%
10.8%
9.6%
4.9%
24.1%
6.2%
0.9%
3.1%
5.3%
1.9%
13.8%
2.6%
0.4%
1.3%
3.1%
3.5%
7.6%
4.9%
0.4%
2.5%
2.9%
2.1%
7.2%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
21.6%
7.7%
38.2%
7.1%
1.9%
7.0%
8.9%
5.8%
20.9%
6.6%
0.9%
4.3%
3.4%
1.7%
9.7%
2.3%
0.3%
1.1%
6.4%
3.3%
15.8%
4.1%
0.5%
2.4%
7.5%
3.4%
18.6%
4.2%
0.7%
2.5%
2.3%
2.8%
7.8%
4.5%
0.2%
1.9%
48.6%
6.2%
62.3%
4.4%
7.1%
9.9%
7.5%
6.2%
12.2%
5.3%
1.1%
6.1%
6.0%
5.1%
12.4%
5.2%
0.6%
4.3%
8.5%
20.3%
14.3%
14.9%
1.1%
25.6%
63.3%
15.5%
75.0%
9.0%
12.0%
45.9%
7.6%
48.9%
21.6%
37.7%
0.7%
54.0%
9.8%
51.4%
24.0%
32.8%
0.7%
64.2%
6.3%
56.7%
16.1%
35.5%
0.5%
70.9%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
12.7%
3.5%
27.4%
3.3%
1.1%
2.5%
10.3%
3.2%
28.3%
3.8%
0.9%
2.2%
50.0%
5.4%
71.4%
4.6%
5.0%
4.2%
8.9%
4.9%
19.8%
6.3%
0.7%
2.6%
9.3%
12.8%
21.1%
17.0%
0.9%
6.6%
7.9%
4.1%
20.0%
5.2%
0.7%
2.6%
10.2%
30.7%
19.2%
38.0%
1.2%
14.7%
12.0%
8.1%
27.4%
10.3%
1.2%
4.4%
6.7%
3.1%
17.0%
4.4%
0.5%
1.9%
4.0%
5.8%
9.2%
8.1%
0.5%
3.4%
4.3%
3.4%
9.9%
4.5%
0.4%
2.1%
24.9%
12.5%
42.0%
12.4%
2.4%
9.2%
11.2%
9.5%
24.6%
11.5%
1.1%
6.0%
4.8%
3.1%
12.6%
4.4%
0.4%
1.6%
8.5%
5.8%
20.0%
7.5%
0.6%
3.3%
9.8%
5.5%
22.6%
6.9%
0.9%
3.5%
3.9%
5.1%
12.0%
8.2%
0.3%
2.7%
52.3%
9.6%
65.2%
7.2%
9.2%
13.7%
9.6%
10.6%
15.8%
10.1%
1.3%
8.4%
7.8%
8.4%
15.5%
9.0%
0.8%
6.0%
9.4%
26.9%
15.8%
22.6%
1.3%
28.5%
59.7%
20.7%
71.8%
13.7%
12.9%
48.9%
7.7%
55.0%
19.1%
48.6%
0.8%
56.3%
9.7%
56.1%
22.5%
42.2%
0.9%
65.9%
7.1%
59.7%
16.3%
45.7%
0.6%
71.0%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
89.0%
84.2%
92.0%
88.8%
83.2%
86.7%
84.3%
86.5%
90.3%
82.1%
84.9%
89.8%
82.5%
87.4%
89.4%
86.5%
83.2%
89.8%
81.9%
84.7%
83.6%
90.5%
84.3%
86.9%
86.3%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
86.0%
81.4%
89.0%
85.0%
80.6%
84.1%
80.9%
83.5%
87.8%
79.9%
80.8%
86.3%
79.8%
84.6%
86.5%
83.6%
80.5%
87.1%
79.4%
81.8%
81.2%
88.0%
81.5%
83.8%
83.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
35.0%
41.7%
31.4%
45.4%
51.7%
25.6%
49.1%
26.3%
45.8%
29.2%
40.7%
37.7%
54.3%
21.8%
43.6%
31.7%
46.6%
35.0%
46.2%
33.6%
42.6%
33.4%
46.8%
30.5%
40.4%
35.8%
41.2%
34.5%
44.4%
35.4%
43.7%
34.5%
38.0%
39.3%
50.0%
26.2%
43.1%
29.4%
41.8%
33.5%
36.3%
39.5%
44.3%
32.6%
22.9%
56.4%
22.5%
57.4%
21.3%
59.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
37.6%
32.0%
34.5%
35.8%
52.8%
17.6%
48.9%
20.7%
47.3%
21.3%
42.2%
30.1%
53.2%
15.0%
46.2%
23.0%
48.8%
28.7%
48.3%
25.6%
46.0%
24.6%
50.5%
20.2%
43.8%
25.9%
45.2%
24.5%
47.4%
26.0%
45.7%
25.9%
42.5%
27.5%
52.3%
18.1%
46.1%
21.2%
44.7%
24.3%
40.2%
28.2%
48.5%
22.3%
29.0%
42.4%
27.2%
45.0%
27.7%
46.0%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
19.6%
0.9%
1.3%
20.3%
1.4%
1.3%
65.8%
1.9%
2.0%
16.3%
3.1%
1.5%
16.1%
7.7%
3.6%
15.7%
2.5%
1.6%
16.6%
19.3%
7.5%
22.0%
3.8%
2.2%
12.5%
1.3%
1.0%
6.2%
3.1%
1.7%
5.8%
1.9%
1.2%
36.3%
3.9%
4.9%
16.8%
3.5%
3.0%
9.4%
1.4%
0.8%
13.3%
2.6%
1.7%
17.9%
2.7%
1.8%
6.9%
2.6%
1.4%
61.7%
2.7%
8.0%
10.0%
2.8%
4.8%
11.1%
3.1%
3.3%
13.8%
9.6%
24.8%
79.1%
5.3%
43.7%
23.7%
31.4%
52.8%
25.5%
22.7%
63.6%
15.6%
29.2%
74.3%
Plan: H000C9041
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Duval
Gilchrist
Gilchrist
Hendry
Hendry
Hernando
Hernando
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Nassau
Nassau
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Osceola
Osceola
Osceola
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
App. 144
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
203,019
82.1%
731.8
5
44,317
17.9%
237.1
20
455,445
26.1%
535.5
21
272,224
15.6%
70.9
22
294,581
16.9%
130.1
23
498,411
28.5%
188.9
24
136,412
7.8%
24.0
25
90,993
5.2%
373.5
3
172,485
90.4%
571.8
5
18,380
9.6%
71.8
19
160,728
50.0%
338.0
25
160,792
50.0%
1,967.0
3
78,609
9.1%
235.8
4
517,092
59.8%
550.7
5
268,562
31.1%
132.0
3
3,584
21.2%
88.3
11
13,355
78.8%
266.9
20
13,550
34.6%
55.7
25
25,590
65.4%
1,134.3
11
3,800
2.2%
57.2
12
168,978
97.8%
531.8
14
538,817
43.8%
432.5
15
690,409
56.2%
833.3
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
5
17,490
5.9%
312.1
10
207,677
69.9%
657.4
11
71,885
24.2%
187.4
17
83,137
13.4%
178.2
19
535,617
86.6%
1,034.3
2
4,028
21.0%
337.4
3
15,196
79.0%
378.3
15
5,936
1.8%
267.8
16
316,897
98.2%
624.9
5
15,019
4.5%
407.9
11
316,279
95.5%
1,254.7
23
197,933
7.9%
98.6
24
559,932
22.4%
86.9
25
418,970
16.8%
505.4
26
623,255
25.0%
1,162.4
27
696,345
27.9%
577.8
3
19,531
26.6%
376.7
4
53,783
73.4%
349.2
17
34,658
86.7%
786.4
18
5,338
13.3%
105.5
5
299,700
26.2%
207.1
7
273,627
23.9%
99.2
8
14,940
1.3%
238.0
9
364,932
31.8%
264.8
10
192,757
16.8%
194.2
9
262,136
97.6%
831.3
10
5,472
2.0%
31.0
17
1,077
0.4%
643.7
18
266,900
20.2%
446.7
20
227,350
17.2%
1,504.3
Area%
75.5%
24.5%
40.5%
5.4%
9.8%
14.3%
1.8%
28.2%
88.8%
11.2%
14.7%
85.3%
25.7%
60.0%
14.4%
24.9%
75.1%
4.7%
95.3%
9.7%
90.3%
34.2%
65.8%
79.5%
20.5%
27.0%
56.8%
16.2%
14.7%
85.3%
47.1%
52.9%
30.0%
70.0%
24.5%
75.5%
4.1%
3.6%
20.8%
47.8%
23.8%
51.9%
48.1%
88.2%
11.8%
20.6%
9.9%
23.7%
26.4%
19.4%
55.2%
2.1%
42.7%
18.7%
63.1%
County
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
Pinellas
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
Polk
Putnam
Putnam
St. Johns
St. Johns
Sumter
Sumter
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
21
424,120
32.1%
193.0
22
401,764
30.4%
239.0
12
62,670
6.8%
47.9
13
696,344
76.0%
446.6
14
157,528
17.2%
113.6
9
69,277
11.5%
159.5
10
289,586
48.1%
591.9
17
243,232
40.4%
1,259.2
5
32,877
44.2%
341.3
6
41,487
55.8%
485.7
4
125,470
66.0%
469.8
6
64,569
34.0%
351.7
10
853
0.9%
110.0
11
92,567
99.1%
469.8
Area%
8.1%
10.0%
7.9%
73.4%
18.7%
7.9%
29.4%
62.6%
41.3%
58.7%
57.2%
42.8%
19.0%
81.0%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Boynton Beach
20
19,978
29.3%
3.2
Boynton Beach
22
48,239
70.7%
13.4
Callahan
3
417
37.1%
0.7
Callahan
4
706
62.9%
0.7
Coconut Creek
20
433
0.8%
0.6
Coconut Creek
21
52,476
99.2%
11.4
Deerfield Beach
20
26,242
35.0%
4.0
Deerfield Beach
21
33,897
45.2%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Dundee
9
4
0.1%
0.2
Dundee
10
0
0.0%
0.2
Dundee
17
3,713
99.9%
11.1
Fort Lauderdale
20
60,588
36.6%
13.4
Fort Lauderdale
22
104,933
63.4%
25.0
Fort Lauderdale
23
0
0.0%
0.2
Gainesville
3
93,046
74.8%
41.6
Gainesville
5
31,308
25.2%
20.8
Gulfport
13
5,509
45.8%
1.9
Gulfport
14
6,520
54.2%
2.0
Haines City
9
14,456
70.4%
15.1
Haines City
10
6,079
29.6%
4.6
Hallandale Beach
23
25,370
68.4%
3.0
Hallandale Beach
24
11,743
31.6%
1.6
Hialeah
25
162,856
72.5%
16.5
Hialeah
27
61,813
27.5%
6.3
Hollywood
23
114,568
81.4%
26.6
Hollywood
24
26,200
18.6%
4.1
Homestead
26
42,640
70.5%
7.0
Homestead
27
17,872
29.5%
8.6
Jacksonville
3
77,184
9.4%
233.7
Jacksonville
4
476,038
57.9%
508.9
Jacksonville
5
268,562
32.7%
132.0
Lake Hamilton
9
1,163
94.5%
3.2
Lake Hamilton
10
68
5.5%
1.0
Lake Park
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Lake Park
20
7,242
88.8%
2.1
Lake Park
22
913
11.2%
0.3
Lake Worth
20
10,654
30.5%
1.6
Lake Worth
22
24,256
69.5%
5.0
Lakeland
10
86,624
88.9%
63.3
Lakeland
17
10,798
11.1%
11.0
Lantana
20
4,654
44.7%
1.2
Lantana
22
5,769
55.3%
1.7
Leesburg
10
9,219
45.8%
33.3
Leesburg
11
10,898
54.2%
7.7
Loxahatchee Groves 18
1,681
52.9%
7.0
Loxahatchee Groves 20
1,499
47.1%
5.5
Margate
20
14,535
27.3%
2.2
Margate
21
38,749
72.7%
6.9
Miami
23
15,273
3.8%
2.9
Miami
24
133,006
33.3%
19.4
Miami
27
251,178
62.9%
33.8
24
65,355
53.6%
11.2
Miramar
Miramar
25
56,686
46.4%
20.1
North Miami
23
9,175
15.6%
4.8
Counties and Cities
Area%
19.1%
80.9%
49.9%
50.1%
4.7%
95.3%
24.6%
57.3%
18.2%
1.4%
1.8%
96.8%
34.8%
64.8%
0.4%
66.6%
33.4%
49.0%
51.0%
76.5%
23.5%
64.5%
35.5%
72.4%
27.6%
86.5%
13.5%
44.8%
55.2%
26.7%
58.2%
15.1%
76.9%
23.1%
0.2%
88.9%
10.9%
24.5%
75.5%
85.2%
14.8%
40.7%
59.3%
81.1%
18.9%
55.9%
44.1%
24.2%
75.8%
5.2%
34.5%
60.3%
35.7%
64.3%
48.4%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
North Miami
24
49,611
84.4%
5.2
North Miami Beach 23
6,953
16.7%
1.1
North Miami Beach 24
34,570
83.3%
4.3
Oakland Park
20
20,289
49.1%
4.2
Oakland Park
22
21,074
50.9%
3.9
Oldsmar
12
5,101
37.5%
5.6
Oldsmar
13
8,490
62.5%
4.1
Opa-locka
24
14,894
97.9%
2.6
Opa-locka
25
325
2.1%
1.9
Orange Park
3
6,415
76.3%
2.8
Orange Park
5
1,997
23.7%
2.5
Orlando
5
77,843
32.7%
22.6
Orlando
7
43,408
18.2%
16.5
Orlando
9
89,386
37.5%
63.6
Orlando
10
27,663
11.6%
8.1
Pembroke Pines
23
107,607
69.5%
20.0
Pembroke Pines
24
12,856
8.3%
3.1
Pembroke Pines
25
34,287
22.2%
11.7
Plantation
20
13,381
15.8%
2.7
Plantation
22
67,448
79.4%
18.3
Plantation
23
4,126
4.9%
0.9
Pompano Beach
20
46,314
46.4%
11.3
Pompano Beach
21
1,447
1.4%
2.0
Pompano Beach
22
52,084
52.2%
12.2
Riviera Beach
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Riviera Beach
20
28,156
86.7%
7.3
Riviera Beach
22
4,332
13.3%
2.9
Royal Palm Beach
18
14,734
43.2%
5.1
Royal Palm Beach
20
16,299
47.7%
5.6
Royal Palm Beach
21
3,107
9.1%
0.7
St. Augustine
4
5,091
39.2%
5.8
St. Augustine
6
7,884
60.8%
7.0
St. Petersburg
13
95,027
38.8%
40.5
St. Petersburg
14
149,742
61.2%
97.1
Sunrise
20
62,665
74.2%
9.4
Sunrise
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Sunrise
23
21,774
25.8%
8.9
Tampa
14
281,167
83.8%
143.1
Tampa
15
54,542
16.2%
32.1
Tarpon Springs
12
2,498
10.6%
1.8
Tarpon Springs
13
20,986
89.4%
15.5
West Palm Beach
18
20,693
20.7%
35.3
West Palm Beach
20
48,663
48.7%
15.6
West Palm Beach
22
30,563
30.6%
7.2
Wilton Manors
20
3,311
28.5%
0.6
Wilton Manors
22
8,321
71.5%
1.4
Winter Haven
10
18,693
55.2%
20.9
Winter Haven
17
15,181
44.8%
19.0
Area%
51.6%
20.8%
79.2%
52.1%
47.9%
57.9%
42.1%
57.7%
42.3%
52.2%
47.8%
20.4%
14.9%
57.4%
7.3%
57.5%
9.0%
33.5%
12.3%
83.5%
4.2%
44.4%
7.7%
47.9%
0.4%
71.2%
28.4%
45.0%
49.1%
5.8%
45.1%
54.9%
29.4%
70.6%
51.5%
0.0%
48.4%
81.7%
18.3%
10.3%
89.7%
60.8%
26.9%
12.4%
29.9%
70.1%
52.3%
47.7%
Plan: H000C9041
Page 4 of 4
26
5
10
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
0
27
Scale bar for insets
Palmetto Bay
Cutler Bay
Oldsmar
14
16
Bradenton
Palmetto
Tampa
12
15
MANATEE
17
Plant City
Zephyrhills
11
St. Augustine
Dade City
HILLSBOROUGH
St. Leo
ST. JOHNS
6
Temple Terrace
PASCO
Green Cove Springs
St. Petersburg
Holmes Beach
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
Treasure Island
Pinellas Park
13 PINELLAS
Seminole
Largo
Clearwater
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
CLAY
10
Ocoee
Apopka
5
Kissimmee
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
9
11
13
PASCO
Titusville
8
Oak Hill
DESOTO
HARDEE
LEE
19
CHARLOTTE
SARASOTA
16
UGH
POLK
10
LAKE
5
6
DUVAL
PUTNAM
CLAY
MARION
17
OR O
LSB
MANATEE
HIL
14
12
F
D
OR
15
ALACHUA
AD
BR
HERNANDO
CITRUS
LEVY
VOLUSIA 6
SEMINOLE
Deltona
Oviedo
St. Cloud
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
Casselberry
Winter Springs
7
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Longwood
Maitland
ORANGE
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
LAKE
4-Jan-2012
*****
HB 6005 adopted by
House Congressional
Subcommittee (10-4)
9-Jan-2012
H000C9043
Orlando Area
Eustis
3
DIXIE
E
N
UNIO
BAKER
4
COLLIER
25
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
OSCEOLA
9
ORANGE
7
VOLUSIA
FLAGLER
10
26
8
MONROE
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
20
21
27
23
24
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
18
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Florida City
Homestead
MIAMI-DADE
Coral Gables
Miami
Miami Beach
24 North Miami
Tampa Bay Area
Starke
3
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
LA
FA
YE
TT
E
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Doral
Hialeah
Aventura
Hollywood
Dania Beach
Miami Gardens
23
Fort Lauderdale
Orange Park
Jacksonville
GULF
HAMILTON
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
Pembroke Pines
Davie
Plantation
Oakland Park
DUVAL
5
Miles
60
MADISON
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
Southwest Ranches
Weston
Lauderhill
Pompano Beach
Baldwin
4
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
R
BROWARD
Sunrise
Tamarac
Deerfield Beach
Boca Raton
22
Delray Beach
NASSAU
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Parkland
21
Lantana
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
30
2
JACKSON
GILCHRIST
20
Wellington
Palm Springs
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
HNS
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
E
NN
Belle Glade
18
1
SANTA ROSA
A
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
South Florida
BIA
COLU
M
A
ESC
JO
ST.
OK
App. 145
App. 146
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
13.35%
12.98%
48.03%
9.10%
10.46%
9.17%
11.53%
12.08%
7.62%
4.70%
5.16%
24.60%
12.95%
5.83%
9.64%
10.98%
5.76%
50.21%
11.21%
10.16%
9.93%
55.73%
8.25%
10.02%
7.71%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
11
16
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
38.0%
62.0%
35.7%
64.3%
69.7%
30.3%
41.9%
58.1%
48.5%
51.5%
42.7%
57.3%
61.3%
38.7%
47.0%
53.0%
40.5%
59.5%
45.4%
54.6%
50.1%
49.9%
65.2%
34.8%
46.5%
53.5%
45.3%
54.7%
42.8%
57.2%
48.0%
52.0%
38.4%
61.6%
83.2%
16.8%
60.9%
39.1%
54.3%
45.7%
61.2%
38.8%
88.4%
11.6%
49.4%
50.6%
53.4%
46.6%
53.3%
46.7%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
10
17
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
42.2%
57.8%
37.2%
62.8%
65.4%
34.6%
43.2%
56.8%
48.5%
51.5%
42.3%
57.7%
55.0%
45.0%
44.9%
55.1%
41.9%
58.1%
45.7%
54.3%
50.2%
49.8%
63.0%
37.0%
45.3%
54.7%
46.1%
53.9%
42.5%
57.5%
49.1%
50.9%
36.5%
63.5%
80.0%
20.0%
63.0%
37.0%
54.4%
45.6%
60.9%
39.1%
86.4%
13.6%
42.2%
57.8%
49.9%
50.1%
48.4%
51.6%
0.42
0.37
0.46
0.56
0.45
0.10
0.32
0.67
0.32
0.66
0.42
0.51
0.42
0.35
0.37
0.60
0.42
0.64
0.54
0.26
0.49
0.29
0.17
0.27
0.48
0.47
0.18
0.46
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
34.5%
65.5%
29.4%
70.6%
60.8%
39.2%
35.1%
64.9%
36.3%
63.7%
33.9%
66.1%
45.5%
54.5%
36.0%
64.0%
33.6%
66.4%
33.7%
66.3%
36.9%
63.1%
51.6%
48.4%
36.0%
64.0%
34.3%
65.7%
33.9%
66.1%
36.4%
63.6%
27.6%
72.4%
75.1%
24.9%
51.6%
48.4%
41.6%
58.4%
52.2%
47.8%
84.3%
15.7%
35.5%
64.5%
42.2%
57.8%
39.5%
60.5%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2142.5
7631.7
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
0.34%
132
515
7,858
0.44%
77
447
2,102
1.06%
144
639
1,712
0.25%
111
383
3,129
0.89%
33
138
579
0.39%
95
265
2,289
2.31%
48
170
1,190
0.72%
69
247
1,576
0.38%
83
324
2,814
0.43%
56
166
1,027
0.27%
40
113
446
1.51%
43
144
546
0.80%
41
158
782
0.28%
60
178
1,193
0.50%
124
485
7,730
0.44%
69
221
1,993
0.42%
83
234
1,372
1.19%
74
347
2,096
0.65%
34
110
264
0.56%
52
188
369
1.16%
37
126
288
3.38%
17
59
111
1.68%
103
345
3,980
1.47%
184
551
4,900
2.23%
40
130
578
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
20
7
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
46.2%
53.8%
43.5%
56.5%
73.6%
26.4%
49.6%
50.4%
55.8%
44.2%
51.3%
48.7%
67.1%
32.9%
54.1%
45.9%
49.7%
50.3%
54.6%
45.4%
58.9%
41.1%
70.6%
29.4%
54.0%
46.0%
51.9%
48.1%
50.0%
50.0%
54.7%
45.3%
43.4%
56.6%
85.0%
15.0%
66.6%
33.4%
59.4%
40.6%
65.0%
35.0%
88.8%
11.2%
52.4%
47.6%
55.8%
44.2%
56.0%
44.0%
4.55%
4.75%
7.01%
6.72%
11.12%
5.72%
16.21%
7.73%
39.59%
15.91%
7.37%
11.32%
7.19%
23.91%
15.24%
8.76%
15.84%
12.06%
13.69%
18.55%
18.30%
17.58%
37.56%
33.15%
70.08%
68.91%
75.04%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.34
0.38
0.42
0.37
0.13
0.05
0.27
0.38
0.41
0.52
0.32
0.34
0.47
0.44
0.33
0.39
0.47
0.41
0.51
0.32
0.22
0.27
0.13
0.23
0.39
0.42
0.20
0.43
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
35.2%
64.8%
31.1%
68.9%
61.9%
38.1%
36.7%
63.3%
40.2%
59.8%
35.9%
64.1%
47.9%
52.1%
38.4%
61.6%
35.2%
64.8%
35.9%
64.1%
41.0%
59.0%
53.2%
46.8%
35.7%
64.3%
39.2%
60.8%
35.0%
65.0%
42.6%
57.4%
30.0%
70.0%
78.2%
21.8%
59.0%
41.0%
49.5%
50.5%
58.6%
41.4%
86.1%
13.9%
37.7%
62.3%
45.5%
54.5%
45.6%
54.4%
Convex
Hull
0.74
0.82
0.78
0.79
0.73
0.35
0.70
0.86
0.73
0.90
0.83
0.71
0.82
0.81
0.75
0.81
0.81
0.83
0.87
0.70
0.74
0.61
0.61
0.55
0.86
0.82
0.46
0.81
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
6
21
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
34.1%
65.9%
30.7%
69.3%
61.7%
38.3%
35.2%
64.8%
37.3%
62.7%
34.0%
66.0%
46.5%
53.5%
35.4%
64.6%
33.2%
66.8%
32.3%
67.7%
36.2%
63.8%
50.3%
49.7%
31.0%
69.0%
34.6%
65.4%
30.4%
69.6%
36.7%
63.3%
27.2%
72.8%
76.7%
23.3%
54.2%
45.8%
45.1%
54.9%
55.4%
44.6%
85.8%
14.2%
36.3%
63.7%
43.7%
56.3%
41.5%
58.5%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
17.9%
16.7%
46.9%
17.8%
20.9%
15.7%
27.7%
20.8%
15.2%
12.6%
14.8%
28.5%
17.0%
13.0%
14.9%
15.9%
9.3%
51.3%
19.2%
17.5%
23.0%
64.9%
16.6%
20.9%
17.7%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
20
66.3%
49.8%
58.7%
63.9%
34.9%
56.4%
55.8%
56.3%
48.8%
55.8%
54.5%
48.6%
42.5%
34.1%
50.2%
48.0%
52.4%
50.9%
60.5%
18.9%
36.0%
43.8%
37.4%
12.9%
59.7%
51.5%
55.1%
I_Cri
4
20.4%
28.7%
23.4%
19.4%
18.2%
25.7%
23.3%
28.0%
23.5%
23.3%
30.4%
38.8%
42.7%
37.4%
32.8%
39.0%
32.7%
33.2%
30.3%
29.8%
44.9%
38.7%
39.6%
22.2%
23.8%
27.6%
27.2%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
11
16
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
40.1%
59.9%
36.9%
63.1%
69.2%
30.8%
46.1%
53.9%
50.5%
49.5%
44.4%
55.6%
59.6%
40.4%
48.0%
52.0%
43.5%
56.5%
47.1%
52.9%
51.4%
48.6%
65.4%
34.6%
46.8%
53.2%
48.6%
51.4%
44.7%
55.3%
51.5%
48.5%
42.3%
57.7%
81.3%
18.7%
63.9%
36.1%
56.9%
43.1%
61.6%
38.4%
86.8%
13.2%
46.3%
53.7%
49.8%
50.2%
48.8%
51.2%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
40.5%
59.5%
30.7%
69.3%
58.0%
42.0%
43.8%
56.2%
39.7%
60.3%
43.2%
56.8%
44.8%
55.2%
39.0%
61.0%
40.6%
59.4%
43.1%
56.9%
45.2%
54.8%
56.0%
44.0%
40.0%
60.0%
42.5%
57.5%
40.2%
59.8%
48.0%
52.0%
33.3%
66.7%
75.7%
24.3%
65.3%
34.7%
54.9%
45.1%
62.3%
37.7%
81.5%
18.5%
38.5%
61.5%
47.1%
52.9%
44.6%
55.4%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
17
10
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
50.7%
49.3%
41.2%
58.8%
64.9%
35.1%
51.4%
48.6%
50.2%
49.8%
49.7%
50.3%
54.1%
45.9%
49.5%
50.5%
49.9%
50.1%
49.7%
50.3%
53.7%
46.3%
61.0%
39.0%
44.1%
55.9%
50.3%
49.7%
46.8%
53.2%
52.8%
47.2%
42.5%
57.5%
79.9%
20.1%
71.0%
29.0%
61.1%
38.9%
69.5%
30.5%
84.9%
15.1%
46.2%
53.8%
53.5%
46.5%
51.6%
48.4%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
41.8%
58.2%
30.9%
69.1%
57.3%
42.7%
43.6%
56.4%
38.6%
61.4%
42.3%
57.7%
44.4%
55.6%
39.4%
60.6%
42.2%
57.8%
42.8%
57.2%
47.0%
53.0%
55.3%
44.7%
39.3%
60.7%
46.1%
53.9%
41.1%
58.9%
50.7%
49.3%
35.3%
64.7%
76.7%
23.3%
68.0%
32.0%
57.6%
42.4%
64.2%
35.8%
81.1%
18.9%
40.7%
59.3%
48.5%
51.5%
47.7%
52.3%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
35.4%
64.6%
29.7%
70.3%
56.1%
43.9%
41.4%
58.6%
36.1%
63.9%
35.8%
64.2%
40.3%
59.7%
35.6%
64.4%
37.9%
62.1%
38.2%
61.8%
39.8%
60.2%
50.7%
49.3%
35.1%
64.9%
39.7%
60.3%
36.8%
63.2%
44.5%
55.5%
32.9%
67.1%
74.3%
25.7%
63.7%
36.3%
52.5%
47.5%
61.4%
38.6%
80.6%
19.4%
39.2%
60.8%
46.7%
53.3%
44.7%
55.3%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
22%
45
-27%
22
-24%
63
-24%
63
0%
410
24%
371
-65%
39
-64%
92
-64%
88
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
55.3%
44.7%
47.2%
52.8%
69.7%
30.3%
58.7%
41.3%
59.3%
40.7%
59.7%
40.3%
62.6%
37.4%
57.7%
42.3%
57.8%
42.2%
60.9%
39.1%
63.3%
36.7%
70.8%
29.2%
57.1%
42.9%
57.4%
42.6%
57.4%
42.6%
64.0%
36.0%
51.2%
48.8%
82.8%
17.2%
76.9%
23.1%
67.8%
32.2%
72.7%
27.3%
85.4%
14.6%
51.1%
48.9%
57.2%
42.8%
55.9%
44.1%
Plan: H000C9043
Page 2 of 4
App. 147
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
43.5%
34.9%
59.6%
36.4%
36.0%
35.0%
42.8%
37.2%
36.9%
35.3%
35.7%
50.5%
38.6%
32.8%
38.7%
37.5%
28.0%
65.3%
48.1%
41.3%
47.8%
69.8%
32.9%
35.8%
35.8%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
40.4%
32.8%
59.7%
34.6%
35.1%
33.5%
42.1%
36.2%
35.0%
33.9%
34.8%
49.5%
37.5%
32.1%
37.1%
36.4%
27.1%
65.8%
46.7%
40.5%
46.3%
69.3%
32.8%
35.6%
35.8%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
19.2%
21.0%
19.1%
24.6%
26.8%
23.1%
30.2%
25.2%
21.7%
26.2%
27.4%
25.2%
24.7%
24.4%
22.7%
25.6%
25.8%
21.1%
27.4%
27.5%
28.4%
20.5%
29.2%
29.3%
28.3%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
17.7%
19.6%
18.2%
23.6%
25.2%
21.1%
27.7%
23.4%
20.9%
24.8%
26.1%
23.5%
23.0%
23.5%
21.5%
24.6%
24.4%
20.4%
25.9%
25.9%
26.1%
19.4%
27.4%
27.4%
26.0%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
40.4%
46.3%
21.2%
40.7%
38.1%
43.4%
27.7%
38.6%
43.3%
39.9%
37.9%
25.3%
37.8%
43.5%
40.2%
38.0%
47.1%
13.2%
25.8%
32.0%
25.3%
10.2%
38.0%
35.2%
35.9%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
38.8%
45.5%
22.2%
40.0%
38.9%
43.9%
29.5%
39.4%
42.2%
39.9%
38.2%
26.1%
38.4%
43.6%
39.8%
37.9%
47.6%
14.3%
26.0%
32.8%
26.2%
10.9%
39.6%
36.8%
38.2%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
83.9%
79.7%
86.1%
82.3%
78.2%
81.5%
77.0%
80.9%
84.3%
75.0%
77.5%
83.5%
79.7%
81.2%
82.7%
81.1%
76.8%
84.4%
77.0%
79.2%
78.7%
85.7%
79.0%
80.8%
80.5%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
85.3%
80.9%
86.8%
83.1%
79.1%
82.7%
78.3%
82.0%
84.6%
75.9%
77.7%
84.1%
80.9%
81.0%
83.1%
81.6%
77.5%
84.4%
77.3%
79.8%
79.3%
85.8%
79.4%
81.0%
81.4%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
11.0%
4.1%
22.8%
3.9%
1.2%
2.9%
12.6%
3.8%
30.6%
4.0%
1.3%
2.5%
47.6%
6.8%
68.6%
5.8%
6.4%
5.1%
8.0%
3.1%
18.9%
3.7%
0.7%
1.9%
9.1%
12.6%
20.2%
16.4%
1.1%
6.5%
7.9%
4.7%
19.3%
5.9%
0.9%
2.9%
8.8%
35.9%
16.1%
42.4%
1.4%
18.8%
10.8%
11.6%
24.1%
14.7%
1.3%
5.7%
5.9%
4.8%
14.2%
6.8%
0.6%
2.7%
4.2%
7.6%
9.2%
9.7%
0.6%
4.7%
4.4%
3.9%
9.8%
5.0%
0.5%
2.3%
24.2%
14.4%
40.9%
14.0%
3.1%
10.5%
12.7%
9.4%
26.9%
10.8%
1.4%
5.6%
4.9%
3.6%
12.5%
4.9%
0.5%
1.9%
8.5%
8.3%
18.9%
10.2%
0.9%
4.5%
9.6%
6.3%
21.3%
7.8%
1.1%
3.9%
4.1%
6.4%
11.6%
9.5%
0.4%
3.3%
48.1%
10.8%
61.8%
8.3%
10.5%
14.1%
8.9%
11.6%
14.6%
11.2%
1.4%
8.8%
7.5%
9.1%
14.7%
10.0%
0.9%
6.3%
8.7%
26.9%
14.7%
23.4%
1.4%
27.8%
55.6%
22.9%
68.8%
15.5%
14.2%
48.0%
6.9%
57.7%
16.6%
52.3%
0.9%
58.6%
9.3%
57.3%
21.2%
45.3%
1.1%
66.2%
7.0%
60.5%
15.8%
48.3%
0.8%
71.0%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
10.7%
3.7%
21.0%
3.5%
1.3%
2.8%
12.9%
3.4%
29.9%
3.5%
1.4%
2.4%
45.3%
6.2%
66.1%
5.3%
6.3%
4.8%
7.8%
2.8%
17.9%
3.3%
0.8%
1.8%
8.8%
11.6%
19.3%
14.9%
1.2%
6.2%
7.5%
4.2%
17.7%
5.2%
0.9%
2.7%
8.4%
33.5%
15.3%
39.8%
1.3%
18.6%
10.5%
10.4%
23.1%
13.0%
1.3%
5.5%
5.8%
4.4%
13.2%
6.1%
0.7%
2.6%
3.8%
6.7%
8.3%
8.5%
0.6%
4.3%
4.0%
3.5%
8.7%
4.3%
0.5%
2.1%
23.9%
13.0%
39.8%
12.1%
3.3%
10.1%
11.9%
8.5%
24.9%
9.6%
1.4%
5.3%
4.7%
3.1%
11.6%
4.1%
0.6%
1.8%
8.0%
7.6%
17.3%
9.2%
0.9%
4.4%
8.9%
5.7%
19.4%
6.9%
1.0%
3.5%
3.7%
5.7%
10.3%
8.3%
0.4%
3.1%
45.9%
9.9%
59.3%
7.6%
10.4%
12.8%
7.8%
10.1%
12.6%
9.6%
1.4%
8.0%
7.1%
8.0%
13.7%
8.6%
0.9%
5.7%
8.1%
24.6%
13.4%
21.0%
1.4%
26.9%
56.1%
21.4%
69.0%
14.3%
15.2%
46.7%
6.9%
55.1%
16.7%
48.5%
0.9%
57.7%
9.4%
55.5%
21.4%
42.6%
1.1%
65.6%
7.0%
59.2%
16.0%
45.4%
0.8%
70.8%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
40.8%
30.0%
35.9%
31.9%
50.8%
17.2%
42.4%
24.9%
46.1%
20.9%
43.1%
28.3%
50.9%
16.3%
46.4%
20.6%
50.8%
24.9%
44.5%
25.6%
44.3%
23.2%
47.1%
20.3%
43.5%
24.2%
42.7%
24.5%
46.6%
22.7%
46.0%
23.6%
41.1%
26.0%
50.2%
18.4%
45.7%
20.6%
44.5%
23.3%
40.7%
28.6%
46.5%
23.7%
29.0%
41.5%
27.5%
43.5%
27.4%
45.6%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
38.7%
28.9%
34.9%
30.8%
50.4%
15.8%
41.1%
25.1%
45.5%
19.7%
41.8%
27.0%
49.7%
14.5%
46.0%
19.2%
50.0%
24.8%
43.6%
24.8%
44.1%
22.2%
48.0%
18.4%
43.1%
22.6%
43.3%
23.2%
45.8%
22.0%
44.7%
23.2%
40.6%
24.5%
50.3%
17.2%
45.2%
19.7%
44.3%
22.0%
40.2%
26.2%
47.0%
21.4%
29.7%
38.6%
28.1%
40.6%
28.6%
42.1%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
42.6%
45.6%
11.8%
33.0%
54.0%
12.9%
60.0%
29.0%
11.0%
34.5%
48.6%
16.9%
33.5%
49.0%
17.5%
32.3%
52.2%
15.4%
40.9%
40.7%
18.3%
33.9%
49.3%
16.8%
33.6%
50.7%
15.7%
33.2%
48.4%
18.4%
34.7%
46.1%
19.3%
50.7%
33.6%
15.7%
36.8%
47.8%
15.4%
30.8%
51.5%
17.7%
35.8%
49.1%
15.1%
34.9%
46.5%
18.6%
24.2%
58.2%
17.6%
70.1%
16.4%
13.5%
50.2%
29.8%
20.1%
40.8%
39.5%
19.7%
49.6%
31.3%
19.1%
76.4%
11.0%
12.6%
29.7%
51.0%
19.3%
35.3%
45.9%
18.8%
34.0%
47.6%
18.4%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
40.4%
43.7%
15.8%
32.7%
50.0%
17.3%
62.2%
22.8%
14.9%
34.5%
44.5%
21.0%
34.9%
42.0%
23.1%
33.1%
46.9%
20.0%
43.3%
31.1%
25.6%
36.0%
42.2%
21.8%
34.2%
47.3%
18.4%
33.7%
43.5%
22.8%
35.2%
41.1%
23.7%
51.0%
27.7%
21.3%
37.9%
41.3%
20.8%
32.0%
46.8%
21.2%
36.7%
44.3%
19.1%
36.3%
41.3%
22.4%
26.3%
51.8%
21.9%
69.8%
12.7%
17.5%
48.4%
26.9%
24.8%
41.4%
34.1%
24.6%
47.9%
26.6%
25.5%
73.2%
9.4%
17.4%
32.8%
41.4%
25.7%
36.1%
38.4%
25.5%
36.1%
38.6%
25.2%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
8.7%
2.2%
18.3%
1.9%
0.7%
1.9%
11.0%
2.1%
28.3%
2.0%
1.0%
1.8%
44.0%
3.5%
67.4%
3.0%
3.6%
3.1%
6.4%
1.8%
16.4%
2.1%
0.4%
1.3%
7.4%
7.2%
18.5%
9.7%
0.8%
4.4%
6.2%
2.8%
16.7%
3.5%
0.6%
2.0%
8.7%
21.9%
17.7%
29.2%
1.0%
11.9%
9.4%
5.8%
24.0%
7.7%
0.9%
3.4%
4.7%
2.4%
12.6%
3.6%
0.4%
1.6%
3.4%
4.2%
8.2%
5.2%
0.4%
3.2%
3.0%
2.1%
7.2%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
21.6%
7.7%
38.3%
7.1%
1.9%
7.0%
10.4%
4.8%
24.1%
5.3%
1.0%
3.6%
3.4%
1.7%
9.7%
2.3%
0.3%
1.1%
6.6%
3.7%
16.3%
4.8%
0.5%
2.5%
7.5%
3.4%
18.6%
4.2%
0.7%
2.5%
2.3%
2.8%
7.8%
4.5%
0.2%
1.9%
48.6%
6.2%
62.3%
4.4%
7.1%
9.9%
7.5%
6.2%
12.2%
5.3%
1.1%
6.1%
6.0%
5.1%
12.4%
5.2%
0.6%
4.3%
8.5%
20.3%
14.3%
14.9%
1.1%
25.6%
63.3%
15.5%
75.0%
9.0%
12.0%
45.9%
7.6%
48.9%
21.6%
37.7%
0.7%
54.0%
9.8%
51.4%
24.0%
32.8%
0.7%
64.2%
6.3%
56.7%
16.1%
35.5%
0.5%
70.9%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
10.9%
3.6%
23.4%
3.4%
1.0%
2.6%
12.9%
3.2%
32.5%
3.4%
1.1%
2.2%
49.9%
5.4%
71.4%
4.6%
5.0%
4.2%
7.9%
2.7%
19.4%
3.2%
0.6%
1.7%
9.1%
11.0%
21.0%
14.7%
0.9%
5.7%
7.9%
4.2%
20.1%
5.3%
0.7%
2.7%
9.7%
32.0%
18.0%
39.4%
1.2%
15.7%
11.2%
9.8%
25.9%
13.0%
1.1%
4.9%
5.9%
3.9%
14.9%
5.9%
0.5%
2.2%
4.3%
6.9%
9.9%
9.0%
0.6%
4.3%
4.3%
3.5%
10.0%
4.5%
0.4%
2.1%
24.9%
12.6%
42.1%
12.4%
2.4%
9.2%
13.3%
8.1%
28.9%
9.5%
1.3%
4.9%
4.8%
3.1%
12.7%
4.4%
0.4%
1.6%
8.8%
6.5%
20.5%
8.6%
0.7%
3.6%
9.8%
5.5%
22.6%
6.9%
0.9%
3.5%
3.9%
5.1%
12.0%
8.2%
0.3%
2.7%
52.3%
9.6%
65.2%
7.2%
9.2%
13.7%
9.6%
10.6%
15.8%
10.1%
1.3%
8.4%
7.8%
8.4%
15.5%
9.0%
0.8%
6.0%
9.4%
26.9%
15.8%
22.6%
1.3%
28.5%
59.7%
20.7%
71.8%
13.7%
12.9%
48.9%
7.7%
55.0%
19.1%
48.6%
0.8%
56.3%
9.7%
56.1%
22.5%
42.2%
0.9%
65.9%
7.1%
59.7%
16.3%
45.7%
0.6%
71.0%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
89.9%
85.2%
92.0%
89.0%
83.3%
86.8%
83.4%
86.2%
89.6%
79.1%
85.0%
89.8%
85.2%
87.4%
88.3%
86.5%
83.2%
89.8%
81.9%
84.7%
83.6%
90.5%
84.3%
86.9%
86.3%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
86.7%
82.4%
89.0%
85.1%
80.8%
84.0%
80.1%
83.4%
87.1%
77.0%
80.8%
86.3%
82.1%
84.6%
85.6%
83.6%
80.5%
87.1%
79.4%
81.8%
81.2%
88.0%
81.5%
83.8%
83.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
36.3%
40.2%
31.6%
45.0%
51.7%
25.6%
41.0%
35.4%
44.8%
29.4%
40.5%
37.7%
54.5%
22.0%
45.2%
29.3%
50.1%
33.8%
41.2%
36.3%
42.6%
33.4%
46.8%
30.5%
40.8%
35.4%
41.1%
34.6%
46.4%
32.5%
43.7%
34.5%
38.0%
39.3%
50.0%
26.2%
43.1%
29.4%
41.8%
33.5%
36.3%
39.5%
44.3%
32.6%
22.9%
56.4%
22.5%
57.4%
21.3%
59.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
38.8%
31.6%
35.1%
34.9%
52.8%
17.6%
41.7%
28.5%
46.8%
21.8%
42.1%
29.9%
53.3%
15.3%
47.5%
20.9%
51.7%
26.9%
44.2%
27.4%
46.0%
24.5%
50.5%
20.2%
44.3%
25.1%
45.2%
24.6%
48.1%
24.1%
45.7%
25.9%
42.5%
27.5%
52.3%
18.1%
46.1%
21.2%
44.7%
24.3%
40.2%
28.2%
48.5%
22.3%
29.0%
42.4%
27.2%
45.0%
27.7%
46.0%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
16.7%
0.9%
1.4%
22.7%
1.2%
1.3%
65.7%
1.9%
2.0%
16.3%
1.3%
1.0%
16.2%
6.8%
3.2%
15.7%
2.4%
1.6%
14.4%
21.5%
8.3%
21.7%
4.8%
2.4%
11.8%
2.1%
1.1%
6.5%
3.1%
2.3%
5.8%
1.9%
1.2%
36.5%
3.9%
4.9%
20.6%
2.7%
2.4%
9.5%
1.4%
0.9%
13.3%
2.8%
1.7%
17.9%
2.7%
1.8%
6.9%
2.6%
1.4%
61.7%
2.7%
8.0%
10.0%
2.8%
4.8%
11.1%
3.1%
3.3%
13.8%
9.6%
24.8%
79.1%
5.3%
43.7%
23.7%
31.4%
52.8%
25.5%
22.7%
63.6%
15.6%
29.2%
74.3%
Plan: H000C9043
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Hendry
Hendry
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Osceola
Osceola
Osceola
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
Pinellas
App. 148
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
203,019
82.1%
731.8
5
44,317
17.9%
237.1
20
455,445
26.1%
535.5
21
272,224
15.6%
70.9
22
294,581
16.9%
130.1
23
498,411
28.5%
188.9
24
136,412
7.8%
24.0
25
90,993
5.2%
373.5
3
172,269
90.3%
568.5
5
18,596
9.7%
75.1
19
160,728
50.0%
338.0
25
160,792
50.0%
1,967.0
4
595,916
69.0%
787.0
5
268,347
31.0%
131.4
20
13,550
34.6%
55.7
25
25,590
65.4%
1,134.3
12
167,519
13.6%
110.4
14
540,276
44.0%
432.6
15
433,974
35.3%
444.0
17
87,457
7.1%
278.7
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
5
17,490
5.9%
312.1
10
252,037
84.8%
791.1
11
27,525
9.3%
53.7
17
83,137
13.4%
178.2
19
535,617
86.6%
1,034.3
2
4,028
21.0%
337.4
3
15,196
79.0%
378.3
16
316,897
98.2%
468.1
17
5,936
1.8%
424.6
3
54,893
16.6%
437.0
5
15,019
4.5%
407.9
11
261,386
78.9%
817.7
23
197,933
7.9%
98.6
24
559,932
22.4%
86.9
25
418,970
16.8%
505.4
26
623,255
25.0%
1,162.4
27
696,345
27.9%
577.8
17
34,658
86.7%
786.4
18
5,338
13.3%
105.5
5
299,699
26.2%
207.1
7
148,157
12.9%
52.2
8
14,941
1.3%
114.8
9
447,658
39.1%
402.4
10
235,501
20.6%
226.7
9
248,686
92.6%
787.6
74.6
10
18,922
7.0%
17
1,077
0.4%
643.7
18
266,900
20.2%
446.7
20
227,350
17.2%
1,504.3
21
424,120
32.1%
193.0
22
401,764
30.4%
239.0
12
64,128
7.0%
48.5
13
696,345
76.0%
446.3
Area%
75.5%
24.5%
40.5%
5.4%
9.8%
14.3%
1.8%
28.2%
88.3%
11.7%
14.7%
85.3%
85.7%
14.3%
4.7%
95.3%
8.7%
34.2%
35.1%
22.0%
79.5%
20.5%
27.0%
68.4%
4.6%
14.7%
85.3%
47.1%
52.9%
52.4%
47.6%
26.3%
24.5%
49.2%
4.1%
3.6%
20.8%
47.8%
23.8%
88.2%
11.8%
20.6%
5.2%
11.4%
40.1%
22.6%
52.3%
5.0%
42.7%
18.7%
63.1%
8.1%
10.0%
8.0%
73.4%
County
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
Polk
Putnam
Putnam
Volusia
Volusia
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
14
156,069
17.0%
113.3
10
189,885
31.5%
483.6
15
262,371
43.6%
337.9
17
149,839
24.9%
1,189.1
5
32,877
44.2%
341.3
6
41,487
55.8%
485.7
6
369,123
74.6%
1,251.0
7
125,470
25.4%
181.5
Area%
18.6%
24.1%
16.8%
59.1%
41.3%
58.7%
87.3%
12.7%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Auburndale
10
13,492
99.9%
19.5
Auburndale
15
15
0.1%
0.9
Boynton Beach
20
19,978
29.3%
3.2
Boynton Beach
22
48,239
70.7%
13.4
Coconut Creek
20
433
0.8%
0.6
Coconut Creek
21
52,476
99.2%
11.4
Deerfield Beach
20
26,242
35.0%
4.0
Deerfield Beach
21
33,897
45.2%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Dundee
10
805
21.7%
1.3
Dundee
17
2,912
78.3%
10.1
Fort Lauderdale
20
60,588
36.6%
13.4
Fort Lauderdale
22
104,933
63.4%
25.0
Fort Lauderdale
23
0
0.0%
0.2
Gainesville
3
93,046
74.8%
41.6
Gainesville
5
31,308
25.2%
20.8
Gulfport
13
5,509
45.8%
1.9
Gulfport
14
6,520
54.2%
2.0
Hallandale Beach
23
25,370
68.4%
3.0
Hallandale Beach
24
11,743
31.6%
1.6
Hialeah
25
162,856
72.5%
16.5
Hialeah
27
61,813
27.5%
6.3
Hollywood
23
114,568
81.4%
26.6
Hollywood
24
26,200
18.6%
4.1
Homestead
26
42,640
70.5%
7.0
Homestead
27
17,872
29.5%
8.6
Jacksonville
4
553,437
67.3%
743.2
Jacksonville
5
268,347
32.7%
131.4
Lake Park
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Lake Park
20
7,242
88.8%
2.1
Lake Park
22
913
11.2%
0.3
Lake Worth
20
10,654
30.5%
1.6
Lake Worth
22
24,256
69.5%
5.0
Lantana
20
4,654
44.7%
1.2
Lantana
22
5,769
55.3%
1.7
Loxahatchee Groves 18
1,681
52.9%
7.0
Loxahatchee Groves 20
1,499
47.1%
5.5
Margate
20
14,535
27.3%
2.2
Margate
21
38,749
72.7%
6.9
Miami
23
15,273
3.8%
2.9
Miami
24
133,006
33.3%
19.4
Miami
27
251,178
62.9%
33.8
Miramar
24
65,355
53.6%
11.2
Miramar
25
56,686
46.4%
20.1
North Miami
23
9,175
15.6%
4.8
North Miami
24
49,611
84.4%
5.2
North Miami Beach 23
6,953
16.7%
1.1
North Miami Beach 24
34,570
83.3%
4.3
Oakland Park
20
20,289
49.1%
4.2
Oakland Park
22
21,074
50.9%
3.9
Oldsmar
12
5,101
37.5%
5.7
Oldsmar
13
8,490
62.5%
3.9
Opa-locka
24
14,894
97.9%
2.6
Opa-locka
25
325
2.1%
1.9
Orange Park
3
6,415
76.3%
2.8
Counties and Cities
Area%
95.4%
4.6%
19.1%
80.9%
4.7%
95.3%
24.6%
57.3%
18.2%
11.4%
88.6%
34.8%
64.8%
0.4%
66.6%
33.4%
49.0%
51.0%
64.5%
35.5%
72.4%
27.6%
86.5%
13.5%
44.8%
55.2%
85.0%
15.0%
0.2%
88.9%
10.9%
24.5%
75.5%
40.7%
59.3%
55.9%
44.1%
24.2%
75.8%
5.2%
34.5%
60.3%
35.7%
64.3%
48.4%
51.6%
20.8%
79.2%
52.1%
47.9%
59.4%
40.6%
57.7%
42.3%
52.2%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Orange Park
5
1,997
23.7%
2.5
Orlando
5
77,842
32.7%
22.6
Orlando
7
29,854
12.5%
11.8
Orlando
9
102,941
43.2%
68.2
Orlando
10
27,663
11.6%
8.1
Pembroke Pines
23
107,607
69.5%
20.0
Pembroke Pines
24
12,856
8.3%
3.1
Pembroke Pines
25
34,287
22.2%
11.7
Plantation
20
13,381
15.8%
2.7
Plantation
22
67,448
79.4%
18.3
Plantation
23
4,126
4.9%
0.9
Pompano Beach
20
46,314
46.4%
11.3
Pompano Beach
21
1,447
1.4%
2.0
Pompano Beach
22
52,084
52.2%
12.2
Riviera Beach
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Riviera Beach
20
28,156
86.7%
7.3
Riviera Beach
22
4,332
13.3%
2.9
Royal Palm Beach
18
14,734
43.2%
5.1
Royal Palm Beach
20
16,299
47.7%
5.6
Royal Palm Beach
21
3,107
9.1%
0.7
St. Petersburg
13
96,486
39.4%
40.7
St. Petersburg
14
148,283
60.6%
96.9
Sunrise
20
62,665
74.2%
9.4
Sunrise
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Sunrise
23
21,774
25.8%
8.9
Tampa
12
7,411
2.2%
2.4
Tampa
14
281,381
83.8%
143.2
Tampa
15
46,917
14.0%
29.7
Tarpon Springs
12
2,498
10.6%
1.8
Tarpon Springs
13
20,986
89.4%
15.5
West Palm Beach
18
20,693
20.7%
35.3
West Palm Beach
20
48,663
48.7%
15.6
West Palm Beach
22
30,563
30.6%
7.2
Wilton Manors
20
3,311
28.5%
0.6
Wilton Manors
22
8,321
71.5%
1.4
Winter Haven
10
27,408
80.9%
24.7
Winter Haven
17
6,466
19.1%
15.2
Area%
47.8%
20.4%
10.7%
61.7%
7.3%
57.5%
9.0%
33.5%
12.3%
83.5%
4.2%
44.4%
7.7%
47.9%
0.4%
71.2%
28.4%
45.0%
49.1%
5.8%
29.6%
70.4%
51.5%
0.0%
48.4%
1.4%
81.7%
16.9%
10.3%
89.7%
60.8%
26.9%
12.4%
29.9%
70.1%
61.9%
38.1%
Plan: H000C9043
Page 4 of 4
26
5
10
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
0
Scale bar for insets
27
13
Bradenton
16 Palmetto
St. Petersburg
Holmes Beach
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
Treasure Island
14
PINELLAS
Oldsmar
Pinellas Park
Largo
Clearwater
Seminole
Belleair
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
Tampa
MANATEE
17
Plant City
6
10
11
St. Augustine
Dade City
Zephyrhills
15
St. Leo
HILLSBOROUGH
Temple Terrace
PASCO
12
Green Cove Springs
ST. JOHNS
10
Ocoee
Apopka
5
Maitland
Winter Springs
Kissimmee
9
7
Oviedo
St. Cloud
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
6
Deltona
SEMINOLE
Sanford
DeBary
Lake Mary
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
LAKE
4-Jan-2012
*****
HB 6007 adopted by
House Congressional
Subcommittee (11-3)
9-Jan-2012
H000C9045
Orlando11
Area
Eustis
DIXIE
13
8
AD
BR
OR O
LSB
UGH
Titusville
Oak Hill
LEE
19
CHARLOTTE
DESOTO
17
HARDEE
POLK
10
LAKE
5
PUTNAM
9
6
DUVAL
CLAY
MARION
SARASOTA
16
MANATEE
HIL
14
12
HERNANDO
F
D
OR
15
ALACHUA
CITRUS
PASCO
11
LEVY
VOLUSIA
E
N
UNIO
BAKER
4
COLLIER
25
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
OSCEOLA
ORANGE
7
VOLUSIA
FLAGLER
10
26
8
MONROE
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
20
21
27
23
24
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
18
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Florida City
Homestead
Cutler Bay
Palmetto Bay
Coral Gables
Miami
Miami Beach
24 North Miami
Aventura
Starke
CLAY
4
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
LA
FA
YE
TT
E
MIAMI-DADE
Pinecrest
South Miami
Sweetwater
Doral
Hialeah
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
Dania Beach
Lawtey
Orange Park
Jacksonville
GULF
3
HAMILTON
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Medley
Miami Lakes
Miramar
23
Fort Lauderdale
Lauderhill
DUVAL
5
Miles
60
MADISON
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
Davie
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Southwest Ranches
Sunrise
Plantation
Oakland Park
Pompano Beach
3
Baldwin
Callahan
50
WAKULLA
LEON
R
BROWARD
Tamarac
Deerfield Beach
Boca Raton
22
Delray Beach
NASSAU
Jacksonville Area
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Parkland
21
Lantana
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
30
2
JACKSON
GILCHRIST
20
Wellington
Palm Springs
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
HNS
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
E
NN
Belle Glade
18
1
SANTA ROSA
A
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
South Florida
BIA
COLU
M
A
ESC
JO
ST.
OK
App. 149
App. 150
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
23.83%
14.70%
10.99%
48.05%
9.85%
10.53%
9.12%
11.99%
11.62%
8.65%
4.38%
5.00%
24.52%
12.39%
5.80%
9.65%
10.98%
5.76%
50.21%
11.21%
10.16%
9.93%
55.73%
8.25%
10.02%
7.71%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
10
17
30.5%
69.5%
47.0%
53.0%
36.3%
63.7%
34.7%
65.3%
69.7%
30.3%
47.0%
53.0%
49.3%
50.7%
42.6%
57.4%
61.4%
38.6%
44.9%
55.1%
39.2%
60.8%
46.3%
53.7%
49.5%
50.5%
65.2%
34.8%
46.9%
53.1%
45.3%
54.7%
42.7%
57.3%
48.0%
52.0%
38.4%
61.6%
83.2%
16.8%
60.9%
39.1%
54.3%
45.7%
61.2%
38.8%
88.4%
11.6%
49.4%
50.6%
53.4%
46.6%
53.3%
46.7%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
-1
-1
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
9
18
32.3%
67.7%
53.5%
46.5%
40.2%
59.8%
36.6%
63.4%
65.4%
34.6%
47.0%
53.0%
49.2%
50.8%
42.3%
57.7%
54.6%
45.4%
43.7%
56.3%
41.3%
58.7%
45.7%
54.3%
49.9%
50.1%
62.9%
37.1%
46.5%
53.5%
46.0%
54.0%
42.4%
57.6%
49.1%
50.9%
36.5%
63.5%
80.0%
20.0%
63.0%
37.0%
54.4%
45.6%
60.9%
39.1%
86.4%
13.6%
42.2%
57.8%
49.9%
50.1%
48.4%
51.6%
0.40
0.37
0.46
0.49
0.36
0.10
0.36
0.53
0.34
0.51
0.40
0.49
0.53
0.34
0.38
0.41
0.48
0.65
0.54
0.26
0.49
0.29
0.17
0.27
0.48
0.47
0.18
0.46
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
7
20
26.5%
73.5%
50.5%
49.5%
32.7%
67.3%
28.1%
71.9%
60.9%
39.1%
38.9%
61.1%
36.5%
63.5%
33.9%
66.1%
46.0%
54.0%
35.1%
64.9%
33.5%
66.5%
34.9%
65.1%
36.4%
63.6%
51.6%
48.4%
35.2%
64.8%
34.3%
65.7%
33.7%
66.3%
36.4%
63.6%
27.6%
72.4%
75.1%
24.9%
51.6%
48.4%
41.6%
58.4%
52.2%
47.8%
84.3%
15.7%
35.5%
64.5%
42.2%
57.8%
39.5%
60.5%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2170.5
7660.5
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.31%
167
550
10,076
0.36%
135
591
7,033
0.42%
70
268
1,370
1.06%
144
645
1,712
0.45%
101
351
2,841
0.89%
33
148
451
0.39%
95
281
2,406
2.31%
69
234
1,898
0.60%
69
248
1,493
0.33%
106
399
4,386
0.39%
60
195
1,538
0.27%
39
114
414
1.51%
43
141
546
0.83%
44
144
634
0.27%
60
173
1,350
0.51%
116
471
6,902
0.44%
69
221
1,993
0.42%
83
234
1,372
1.19%
74
347
2,096
0.65%
34
110
264
0.56%
52
188
369
1.16%
37
126
288
3.38%
17
59
111
1.68%
103
345
3,980
1.47%
184
551
4,900
2.23%
40
130
578
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
21
6
36.9%
63.1%
55.4%
44.6%
44.5%
55.5%
42.2%
57.8%
73.6%
26.4%
54.7%
45.3%
56.4%
43.6%
51.2%
48.8%
67.2%
32.8%
52.2%
47.8%
48.1%
51.9%
55.8%
44.2%
58.3%
41.7%
70.6%
29.4%
54.7%
45.3%
51.9%
48.1%
49.9%
50.1%
54.7%
45.3%
43.4%
56.6%
85.0%
15.0%
66.6%
33.4%
59.4%
40.6%
65.0%
35.0%
88.8%
11.2%
52.4%
47.6%
55.8%
44.2%
56.0%
44.0%
4.55%
4.75%
6.51%
6.79%
11.12%
8.64%
16.88%
7.66%
40.34%
13.22%
6.82%
9.17%
7.24%
23.84%
16.77%
8.80%
15.85%
12.06%
13.69%
18.55%
18.30%
17.58%
37.56%
33.15%
70.08%
68.91%
75.04%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.34
0.38
0.42
0.25
0.24
0.05
0.29
0.26
0.38
0.43
0.30
0.35
0.51
0.40
0.35
0.38
0.57
0.39
0.51
0.32
0.22
0.27
0.13
0.23
0.39
0.42
0.20
0.43
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
6
21
26.7%
73.3%
45.5%
54.5%
33.5%
66.5%
29.7%
70.3%
61.9%
38.1%
40.8%
59.2%
40.7%
59.3%
35.9%
64.1%
48.0%
52.0%
36.9%
63.1%
35.0%
65.0%
37.1%
62.9%
40.6%
59.4%
53.1%
46.9%
35.7%
64.3%
39.2%
60.8%
34.7%
65.3%
42.6%
57.4%
30.0%
70.0%
78.2%
21.8%
59.0%
41.0%
49.5%
50.5%
58.6%
41.4%
86.1%
13.9%
37.7%
62.3%
45.5%
54.5%
45.6%
54.4%
Convex
Hull
0.74
0.82
0.78
0.75
0.79
0.35
0.72
0.75
0.76
0.84
0.73
0.76
0.82
0.76
0.76
0.80
0.87
0.80
0.87
0.70
0.74
0.61
0.61
0.55
0.86
0.82
0.46
0.81
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
6
21
26.3%
73.7%
47.4%
52.6%
32.7%
67.3%
29.3%
70.7%
61.7%
38.3%
38.9%
61.1%
37.7%
62.3%
34.0%
66.0%
46.5%
53.5%
32.8%
67.2%
33.5%
66.5%
33.6%
66.4%
35.8%
64.2%
50.3%
49.7%
31.8%
68.2%
34.6%
65.4%
30.3%
69.7%
36.7%
63.3%
27.2%
72.8%
76.7%
23.3%
54.2%
45.8%
45.1%
54.9%
55.4%
44.6%
85.8%
14.2%
36.3%
63.7%
43.7%
56.3%
41.5%
58.5%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
21.5%
17.8%
15.0%
47.0%
20.5%
21.1%
15.7%
28.2%
19.2%
16.2%
13.1%
14.5%
28.4%
16.1%
13.0%
14.7%
15.9%
9.3%
51.3%
19.2%
17.5%
23.0%
64.9%
16.6%
20.9%
17.7%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
21
66.3%
49.8%
60.6%
64.9%
34.8%
52.5%
55.5%
56.3%
48.6%
55.4%
56.9%
47.0%
42.9%
34.1%
50.2%
48.0%
52.5%
50.9%
60.5%
18.9%
36.0%
43.8%
37.4%
12.9%
59.7%
51.5%
55.1%
I_Cri
3
20.4%
28.7%
21.5%
20.1%
18.2%
27.0%
23.4%
28.0%
23.2%
25.4%
26.9%
39.8%
42.6%
37.5%
33.6%
39.0%
32.8%
33.2%
30.3%
29.8%
44.9%
38.7%
39.6%
22.2%
23.8%
27.6%
27.2%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
12
15
32.4%
67.6%
47.5%
52.5%
38.0%
62.0%
36.6%
63.4%
69.2%
30.8%
50.5%
49.5%
51.0%
49.0%
44.4%
55.6%
59.9%
40.1%
46.0%
54.0%
42.1%
57.9%
48.2%
51.8%
50.9%
49.1%
65.4%
34.6%
47.3%
52.7%
48.6%
51.4%
44.5%
55.5%
51.5%
48.5%
42.3%
57.7%
81.3%
18.7%
63.9%
36.1%
56.9%
43.1%
61.6%
38.4%
86.8%
13.2%
46.3%
53.7%
49.8%
50.2%
48.8%
51.2%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
7
20
32.1%
67.9%
48.9%
51.1%
37.6%
62.4%
30.4%
69.6%
58.1%
41.9%
47.0%
53.0%
39.6%
60.4%
43.2%
56.8%
45.1%
54.9%
38.3%
61.7%
39.7%
60.3%
44.5%
55.5%
44.8%
55.2%
55.9%
44.1%
40.6%
59.4%
42.5%
57.5%
40.1%
59.9%
48.0%
52.0%
33.3%
66.7%
75.7%
24.3%
65.3%
34.7%
54.9%
45.1%
62.3%
37.7%
81.5%
18.5%
38.5%
61.5%
47.1%
52.9%
44.6%
55.4%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
17
10
35.1%
64.9%
59.7%
40.3%
47.7%
52.3%
41.0%
59.0%
64.9%
35.1%
54.4%
45.6%
50.3%
49.7%
49.7%
50.3%
54.3%
45.7%
47.7%
52.3%
49.7%
50.3%
51.8%
48.2%
53.3%
46.7%
61.0%
39.0%
44.7%
55.3%
50.3%
49.7%
46.7%
53.3%
52.8%
47.2%
42.5%
57.5%
79.9%
20.1%
71.0%
29.0%
61.1%
38.9%
69.5%
30.5%
84.9%
15.1%
46.2%
53.8%
53.5%
46.5%
51.6%
48.4%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
9
18
31.3%
68.7%
52.0%
48.0%
38.8%
61.2%
30.6%
69.4%
57.4%
42.6%
46.7%
53.3%
38.4%
61.6%
42.3%
57.7%
44.9%
55.1%
38.7%
61.3%
41.5%
58.5%
44.8%
55.2%
46.6%
53.4%
55.3%
44.7%
39.4%
60.6%
46.1%
53.9%
41.0%
59.0%
50.7%
49.3%
35.3%
64.7%
76.7%
23.3%
68.0%
32.0%
57.6%
42.4%
64.2%
35.8%
81.1%
18.9%
40.7%
59.3%
48.5%
51.5%
47.7%
52.3%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
39.4%
60.6%
33.3%
66.7%
29.4%
70.6%
56.1%
43.9%
44.3%
55.7%
35.8%
64.2%
35.8%
64.2%
40.7%
59.3%
34.4%
65.6%
36.7%
63.3%
40.3%
59.7%
39.3%
60.7%
50.6%
49.4%
35.4%
64.6%
39.7%
60.3%
36.8%
63.2%
44.5%
55.5%
32.9%
67.1%
74.3%
25.7%
63.7%
36.3%
52.5%
47.5%
61.4%
38.6%
80.6%
19.4%
39.2%
60.8%
46.7%
53.3%
44.7%
55.3%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
19%
44
-23%
23
-22%
65
-22%
65
0%
410
21%
362
-56%
48
-57%
110
-57%
106
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
25
2
44.8%
55.2%
66.7%
33.3%
52.3%
47.7%
46.9%
53.1%
69.7%
30.3%
62.3%
37.7%
59.3%
40.7%
59.7%
40.3%
62.3%
37.7%
56.6%
43.4%
56.8%
43.2%
61.7%
38.3%
62.9%
37.1%
70.8%
29.2%
58.5%
41.5%
57.3%
42.7%
57.3%
42.7%
64.0%
36.0%
51.2%
48.8%
82.8%
17.2%
76.9%
23.1%
67.8%
32.2%
72.7%
27.3%
85.4%
14.6%
51.1%
48.9%
57.2%
42.8%
55.9%
44.1%
Plan: H000C9045
Page 2 of 4
App. 151
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
43.1%
31.8%
59.6%
39.5%
36.1%
35.0%
43.4%
36.8%
37.6%
36.5%
35.3%
50.4%
38.2%
32.8%
38.5%
37.5%
28.0%
65.3%
48.1%
41.3%
47.8%
69.8%
32.9%
35.8%
35.8%
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
40.1%
29.9%
59.7%
37.9%
35.2%
33.4%
42.4%
35.8%
35.2%
34.9%
34.2%
49.5%
37.1%
32.1%
36.9%
36.4%
27.1%
65.8%
46.7%
40.5%
46.3%
69.3%
32.8%
35.6%
35.8%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.5%
18.5%
21.8%
19.1%
26.2%
26.9%
23.1%
30.5%
24.0%
20.7%
25.7%
27.4%
25.2%
25.3%
24.5%
22.8%
25.6%
25.8%
21.1%
27.4%
27.5%
28.4%
20.5%
29.2%
29.3%
28.3%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
16.9%
20.5%
18.2%
25.1%
25.0%
21.1%
27.9%
22.3%
20.0%
24.4%
26.1%
23.5%
23.6%
23.5%
21.6%
24.6%
24.4%
20.4%
25.9%
25.9%
26.1%
19.4%
27.4%
27.4%
26.0%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
32.7%
41.4%
48.3%
21.2%
35.9%
37.9%
43.5%
27.1%
40.3%
44.0%
39.3%
38.3%
25.3%
37.6%
43.4%
40.2%
38.0%
47.1%
13.2%
25.8%
32.0%
25.3%
10.2%
38.0%
35.2%
35.9%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
31.7%
40.0%
47.7%
22.2%
35.5%
39.0%
43.9%
28.7%
40.9%
42.5%
39.2%
38.7%
26.1%
38.2%
43.6%
39.9%
37.9%
47.6%
14.3%
26.0%
32.8%
26.2%
10.9%
39.6%
36.8%
38.2%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
88.5%
83.3%
78.7%
86.1%
82.2%
77.8%
81.6%
77.8%
80.8%
85.0%
77.8%
77.1%
83.5%
79.0%
81.2%
82.6%
81.1%
76.8%
84.4%
77.0%
79.2%
78.7%
85.7%
79.0%
80.8%
80.5%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
89.7%
84.6%
79.9%
86.8%
82.7%
79.0%
82.7%
79.3%
81.7%
85.3%
78.4%
77.5%
84.1%
80.1%
81.0%
83.1%
81.6%
77.5%
84.4%
77.3%
79.8%
79.3%
85.8%
79.4%
81.0%
81.4%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
21.8%
2.2%
37.2%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
12.5%
3.9%
25.9%
3.7%
1.4%
2.8%
10.2%
3.8%
26.8%
4.4%
1.1%
2.5%
47.6%
6.8%
68.6%
5.8%
6.4%
5.1%
8.8%
5.8%
19.0%
7.1%
0.9%
3.0%
9.2%
13.4%
20.4%
17.1%
1.1%
7.1%
7.9%
4.6%
19.2%
5.8%
0.9%
2.9%
9.2%
36.7%
16.9%
43.0%
1.5%
19.1%
10.4%
9.2%
23.5%
11.7%
1.2%
4.9%
7.0%
4.0%
16.9%
5.4%
0.7%
2.4%
3.8%
6.4%
8.5%
8.6%
0.6%
3.8%
4.2%
4.0%
9.5%
5.1%
0.5%
2.3%
24.1%
14.4%
40.7%
13.9%
3.1%
10.5%
11.9%
10.5%
25.3%
12.1%
1.4%
6.6%
4.9%
3.6%
12.5%
4.9%
0.5%
1.9%
8.5%
8.1%
19.1%
10.0%
0.9%
4.5%
9.6%
6.3%
21.3%
7.8%
1.1%
3.9%
4.1%
6.4%
11.6%
9.5%
0.4%
3.3%
48.1%
10.8%
61.8%
8.3%
10.5%
14.1%
8.9%
11.6%
14.6%
11.2%
1.4%
8.8%
7.5%
9.1%
14.7%
10.0%
0.9%
6.3%
8.7%
26.9%
14.7%
23.4%
1.4%
27.8%
55.6%
22.9%
68.8%
15.5%
14.2%
48.0%
6.9%
57.7%
16.6%
52.3%
0.9%
58.6%
9.3%
57.3%
21.2%
45.3%
1.1%
66.2%
7.0%
60.5%
15.8%
48.3%
0.8%
71.0%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
21.0%
1.8%
34.7%
1.5%
1.8%
1.7%
12.5%
3.5%
24.5%
3.2%
1.4%
2.7%
10.4%
3.4%
26.1%
3.8%
1.2%
2.3%
45.3%
6.2%
66.1%
5.3%
6.3%
4.8%
8.5%
5.4%
17.9%
6.4%
0.9%
2.9%
8.9%
12.3%
19.4%
15.6%
1.2%
6.9%
7.4%
4.2%
17.6%
5.2%
0.9%
2.7%
9.2%
34.1%
16.7%
40.1%
1.4%
18.9%
10.0%
8.5%
22.2%
10.5%
1.2%
4.7%
6.9%
3.7%
15.6%
4.7%
0.8%
2.3%
3.5%
5.8%
7.6%
7.6%
0.5%
3.6%
3.9%
3.5%
8.5%
4.4%
0.5%
2.1%
23.7%
12.9%
39.5%
12.1%
3.2%
10.1%
11.1%
9.5%
23.3%
10.7%
1.4%
6.2%
4.7%
3.1%
11.6%
4.1%
0.6%
1.8%
8.0%
7.2%
17.2%
8.6%
0.9%
4.3%
8.9%
5.7%
19.4%
6.9%
1.0%
3.5%
3.7%
5.7%
10.3%
8.3%
0.4%
3.1%
45.9%
9.9%
59.3%
7.6%
10.4%
12.8%
7.8%
10.1%
12.6%
9.6%
1.4%
8.0%
7.1%
8.0%
13.7%
8.6%
0.9%
5.7%
8.1%
24.6%
13.4%
21.0%
1.4%
26.9%
56.1%
21.4%
69.0%
14.3%
15.2%
46.7%
6.9%
55.1%
16.7%
48.5%
0.9%
57.7%
9.4%
55.5%
21.4%
42.6%
1.1%
65.6%
7.0%
59.2%
16.0%
45.4%
0.8%
70.8%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
44.6%
30.0%
39.5%
30.7%
35.4%
32.7%
50.8%
17.2%
47.2%
19.0%
45.8%
21.8%
43.2%
28.2%
50.9%
15.9%
45.5%
22.4%
48.6%
26.2%
47.9%
24.2%
44.0%
23.3%
47.1%
20.3%
43.4%
24.9%
42.7%
24.4%
46.1%
23.6%
46.0%
23.6%
41.1%
26.0%
50.2%
18.4%
45.7%
20.6%
44.5%
23.3%
40.7%
28.6%
46.5%
23.7%
29.0%
41.5%
27.5%
43.5%
27.4%
45.6%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
42.3%
28.8%
37.4%
29.4%
34.3%
31.9%
50.4%
15.8%
46.8%
18.7%
44.9%
20.2%
41.9%
27.2%
49.7%
14.1%
45.2%
21.3%
47.6%
26.0%
47.0%
23.6%
43.8%
22.3%
48.0%
18.5%
42.7%
23.6%
43.3%
23.2%
45.5%
22.6%
44.7%
23.2%
40.6%
24.5%
50.3%
17.2%
45.2%
19.7%
44.3%
22.0%
40.2%
26.2%
47.0%
21.4%
29.7%
38.6%
28.1%
40.6%
28.6%
42.1%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
54.9%
36.0%
9.1%
42.2%
47.2%
10.6%
29.6%
56.6%
13.8%
60.0%
29.0%
11.0%
38.0%
43.9%
18.0%
33.6%
49.1%
17.3%
32.3%
52.2%
15.4%
41.3%
40.0%
18.7%
33.8%
50.6%
15.6%
34.4%
50.3%
15.3%
34.0%
48.0%
18.0%
34.1%
46.6%
19.3%
50.6%
33.6%
15.8%
36.5%
47.2%
16.3%
30.8%
51.5%
17.7%
35.6%
49.1%
15.3%
34.9%
46.5%
18.6%
24.2%
58.2%
17.6%
70.1%
16.4%
13.5%
50.2%
29.8%
20.1%
40.8%
39.5%
19.7%
49.6%
31.3%
19.1%
76.4%
11.0%
12.6%
29.7%
51.0%
19.3%
35.3%
45.9%
18.8%
34.0%
47.6%
18.4%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
53.0%
34.5%
12.5%
40.3%
44.8%
15.0%
29.6%
52.2%
18.2%
62.2%
22.8%
14.9%
38.2%
39.4%
22.3%
35.1%
41.7%
23.2%
33.1%
46.9%
20.0%
43.6%
30.5%
25.9%
35.5%
43.9%
20.6%
34.3%
47.8%
17.9%
34.8%
43.2%
22.0%
34.7%
41.6%
23.8%
51.0%
27.7%
21.3%
37.5%
40.9%
21.7%
32.0%
46.8%
21.2%
36.5%
44.3%
19.2%
36.3%
41.3%
22.4%
26.3%
51.8%
21.9%
69.8%
12.7%
17.5%
48.4%
26.9%
24.8%
41.4%
34.1%
24.6%
47.9%
26.6%
25.5%
73.2%
9.4%
17.4%
32.8%
41.4%
25.7%
36.1%
38.4%
25.5%
36.1%
38.6%
25.2%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
19.2%
1.2%
32.7%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
10.5%
2.1%
22.2%
1.7%
0.9%
1.9%
8.5%
2.2%
24.3%
2.3%
0.8%
1.7%
44.0%
3.5%
67.4%
3.0%
3.6%
3.1%
7.2%
3.3%
16.8%
4.2%
0.5%
2.0%
7.5%
7.7%
18.4%
10.1%
0.8%
4.8%
6.2%
2.8%
16.6%
3.5%
0.6%
2.0%
9.6%
21.8%
19.7%
29.0%
1.0%
11.6%
8.8%
4.8%
22.3%
6.1%
0.8%
3.0%
5.5%
2.0%
14.3%
2.7%
0.4%
1.4%
3.1%
3.5%
7.6%
4.8%
0.4%
2.5%
2.9%
2.1%
7.1%
2.6%
0.3%
1.5%
21.4%
7.6%
38.0%
7.0%
1.9%
6.9%
9.7%
5.6%
22.4%
6.2%
1.0%
4.3%
3.4%
1.7%
9.7%
2.3%
0.3%
1.1%
6.6%
3.6%
16.2%
4.6%
0.5%
2.5%
7.5%
3.4%
18.6%
4.2%
0.7%
2.5%
2.3%
2.8%
7.8%
4.5%
0.2%
1.9%
48.6%
6.2%
62.3%
4.4%
7.1%
9.9%
7.5%
6.2%
12.2%
5.3%
1.1%
6.1%
6.0%
5.1%
12.4%
5.2%
0.6%
4.3%
8.5%
20.3%
14.3%
14.9%
1.1%
25.6%
63.3%
15.5%
75.0%
9.0%
12.0%
45.9%
7.6%
48.9%
21.6%
37.7%
0.7%
54.0%
9.8%
51.4%
24.0%
32.8%
0.7%
64.2%
6.3%
56.7%
16.1%
35.5%
0.5%
70.9%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
22.3%
2.0%
38.1%
1.6%
1.3%
1.8%
12.7%
3.4%
27.0%
3.2%
1.1%
2.5%
10.3%
3.2%
28.3%
3.8%
0.9%
2.2%
49.9%
5.4%
71.4%
4.6%
5.0%
4.2%
8.9%
4.9%
19.8%
6.3%
0.7%
2.6%
9.2%
11.6%
21.0%
15.4%
0.9%
6.2%
7.9%
4.1%
20.0%
5.2%
0.7%
2.6%
10.2%
32.4%
18.9%
39.7%
1.3%
15.7%
10.7%
7.9%
25.2%
10.3%
1.0%
4.2%
6.8%
3.2%
17.5%
4.5%
0.6%
1.9%
4.0%
5.7%
9.3%
8.0%
0.5%
3.4%
4.2%
3.5%
9.7%
4.6%
0.4%
2.1%
24.7%
12.5%
41.9%
12.4%
2.4%
9.1%
12.3%
9.2%
26.7%
10.7%
1.2%
5.9%
4.8%
3.1%
12.6%
4.4%
0.4%
1.6%
8.9%
6.5%
20.7%
8.4%
0.7%
3.6%
9.8%
5.5%
22.6%
6.9%
0.9%
3.5%
3.9%
5.1%
12.0%
8.2%
0.3%
2.7%
52.3%
9.6%
65.2%
7.2%
9.2%
13.7%
9.6%
10.6%
15.8%
10.1%
1.3%
8.4%
7.8%
8.4%
15.5%
9.0%
0.8%
6.0%
9.4%
26.9%
15.8%
22.6%
1.3%
28.5%
59.7%
20.7%
71.8%
13.7%
12.9%
48.9%
7.7%
55.0%
19.1%
48.6%
0.8%
56.3%
9.7%
56.1%
22.5%
42.2%
0.9%
65.9%
7.1%
59.7%
16.3%
45.7%
0.6%
71.0%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
93.5%
89.0%
84.2%
92.0%
88.8%
82.9%
86.8%
84.5%
86.1%
90.2%
82.7%
84.3%
89.8%
84.0%
87.4%
88.3%
86.5%
83.2%
89.8%
81.9%
84.7%
83.6%
90.5%
84.3%
86.9%
86.3%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
90.7%
86.1%
81.4%
89.0%
85.0%
80.4%
84.1%
81.0%
83.2%
87.7%
80.3%
80.5%
86.3%
81.1%
84.6%
85.4%
83.6%
80.5%
87.1%
79.4%
81.8%
81.2%
88.0%
81.5%
83.8%
83.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
42.6%
37.7%
34.9%
42.0%
31.4%
45.4%
51.7%
25.6%
49.1%
26.3%
43.8%
30.7%
40.7%
37.7%
54.9%
21.3%
43.2%
31.8%
46.1%
35.1%
46.6%
33.6%
42.0%
33.6%
46.7%
30.5%
40.2%
36.4%
41.2%
34.5%
45.1%
34.1%
43.7%
34.5%
38.0%
39.3%
50.0%
26.2%
43.1%
29.4%
41.8%
33.5%
36.3%
39.5%
44.3%
32.6%
22.9%
56.4%
22.5%
57.4%
21.3%
59.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
42.7%
30.9%
37.6%
32.2%
34.5%
35.8%
52.8%
17.6%
48.9%
20.7%
46.3%
22.3%
42.2%
30.1%
53.4%
14.8%
46.0%
23.3%
48.2%
28.8%
48.7%
25.6%
45.5%
24.6%
50.5%
20.3%
43.7%
26.3%
45.2%
24.5%
47.7%
24.8%
45.7%
25.9%
42.5%
27.5%
52.3%
18.1%
46.1%
21.2%
44.7%
24.3%
40.2%
28.2%
48.5%
22.3%
29.0%
42.4%
27.2%
45.0%
27.7%
46.0%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
29.1%
0.6%
1.0%
18.9%
0.8%
1.3%
20.3%
1.4%
1.3%
65.7%
1.9%
2.0%
16.3%
3.1%
1.5%
15.8%
6.7%
3.5%
15.7%
2.5%
1.6%
16.9%
21.2%
7.9%
19.6%
3.9%
2.1%
13.2%
1.4%
1.0%
6.3%
3.1%
1.7%
5.7%
1.9%
1.2%
36.1%
3.9%
4.9%
19.5%
3.2%
3.1%
9.4%
1.4%
0.8%
13.4%
2.8%
1.8%
17.9%
2.7%
1.8%
6.9%
2.6%
1.4%
61.7%
2.7%
8.0%
10.0%
2.8%
4.8%
11.1%
3.1%
3.3%
13.8%
9.6%
24.8%
79.1%
5.3%
43.7%
23.7%
31.4%
52.8%
25.5%
22.7%
63.6%
15.6%
29.2%
74.3%
Plan: H000C9045
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Alachua
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Duval
Hendry
Hendry
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Nassau
Nassau
Okeechobee
Okeechobee
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Osceola
Osceola
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
App. 152
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
173,242
70.0%
554.9
5
44,323
17.9%
237.1
11
29,771
12.0%
176.9
20
455,445
26.1%
535.5
21
272,224
15.6%
70.9
22
294,581
16.9%
130.1
23
498,411
28.5%
188.9
24
136,412
7.8%
24.0
25
90,993
5.2%
373.5
3
172,269
90.3%
568.5
5
18,596
9.7%
75.1
19
160,728
50.0%
338.0
25
160,792
50.0%
1,967.0
3
78,825
9.1%
236.2
4
517,092
59.8%
550.7
5
268,346
31.0%
131.6
20
13,550
34.6%
55.7
25
25,590
65.4%
1,134.3
14
535,017
43.5%
431.3
15
595,703
48.5%
549.5
17
98,506
8.0%
285.0
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
5
17,490
5.9%
312.1
10
204,724
68.9%
656.1
11
74,838
25.2%
188.7
17
83,137
13.4%
178.2
19
535,617
86.6%
1,034.3
2
4,028
21.0%
337.4
3
15,196
79.0%
378.3
16
316,897
98.2%
624.9
17
5,936
1.8%
267.8
5
15,019
4.5%
407.9
11
316,279
95.5%
1,254.7
23
197,933
7.9%
98.6
24
559,932
22.4%
86.9
25
418,970
16.8%
505.4
26
623,255
25.0%
1,162.4
27
696,345
27.9%
577.8
3
19,531
26.6%
376.7
4
53,783
73.4%
349.2
17
34,658
86.7%
786.4
18
5,338
13.3%
105.5
5
299,694
26.2%
207.2
7
273,627
23.9%
106.2
8
14,941
1.3%
231.7
9
364,902
31.8%
264.1
10
192,792
16.8%
194.2
9
263,213
98.0%
1,474.9
10
5,472
2.0%
31.0
18
266,900
20.2%
446.7
20
227,350
17.2%
1,504.3
21
424,120
32.1%
193.0
22
401,764
30.4%
239.0
12
58,869
6.4%
80.2
Area%
57.3%
24.5%
18.3%
40.5%
5.4%
9.8%
14.3%
1.8%
28.2%
88.3%
11.7%
14.7%
85.3%
25.7%
60.0%
14.3%
4.7%
95.3%
34.1%
43.4%
22.5%
79.5%
20.5%
27.0%
56.7%
16.3%
14.7%
85.3%
47.1%
52.9%
70.0%
30.0%
24.5%
75.5%
4.1%
3.6%
20.8%
47.8%
23.8%
51.9%
48.1%
88.2%
11.8%
20.7%
10.6%
23.1%
26.3%
19.4%
97.9%
2.1%
18.7%
63.1%
8.1%
10.0%
13.2%
County
Pinellas
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
Polk
Polk
Putnam
Putnam
St. Johns
St. Johns
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
13
696,345
76.0%
413.6
14
161,328
17.6%
114.4
9
68,230
11.3%
159.2
10
293,357
48.7%
611.4
15
100,641
16.7%
84.5
17
139,867
23.2%
1,155.4
5
32,877
44.2%
341.3
6
41,487
55.8%
485.7
4
125,470
66.0%
469.8
6
64,569
34.0%
351.7
Area%
68.0%
18.8%
7.9%
30.4%
4.2%
57.5%
41.3%
58.7%
57.2%
42.8%
Cities included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Bartow
10
38
0.2%
5.2
Bartow
17
17,260
99.8%
47.0
Boynton Beach
20
19,978
29.3%
3.2
Boynton Beach
22
48,239
70.7%
13.4
Callahan
3
417
37.1%
0.7
Callahan
4
706
62.9%
0.7
Coconut Creek
20
433
0.8%
0.6
Coconut Creek
21
52,476
99.2%
11.4
Deerfield Beach
20
26,242
35.0%
4.0
Deerfield Beach
21
33,897
45.2%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Dundee
9
4
0.1%
0.2
Dundee
17
3,713
99.9%
11.3
Dunedin
12
3,084
8.7%
8.8
Dunedin
13
32,237
91.3%
19.6
Fanning Springs
3
278
36.4%
1.7
Fanning Springs
11
486
63.6%
2.2
Fort Lauderdale
20
60,588
36.6%
13.4
Fort Lauderdale
22
104,933
63.4%
25.0
Fort Lauderdale
23
0
0.0%
0.2
Gainesville
3
93,040
74.8%
41.6
Gainesville
5
31,314
25.2%
20.8
Gulfport
13
5,509
45.8%
1.9
Gulfport
14
6,520
54.2%
2.0
Haines City
9
13,325
64.9%
14.7
Haines City
10
7,210
35.1%
5.0
Hallandale Beach
23
25,370
68.4%
3.0
Hallandale Beach
24
11,743
31.6%
1.6
Hialeah
25
162,856
72.5%
16.5
Hialeah
27
61,813
27.5%
6.3
Hollywood
23
114,568
81.4%
26.6
Hollywood
24
26,200
18.6%
4.1
Homestead
26
42,640
70.5%
7.0
Homestead
27
17,872
29.5%
8.6
Jacksonville
3
77,400
9.4%
234.2
Jacksonville
4
476,038
57.9%
508.9
Jacksonville
5
268,346
32.7%
131.6
Lake Hamilton
9
1,163
94.5%
3.2
Lake Hamilton
10
68
5.5%
1.0
Lake Park
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Lake Park
20
7,242
88.8%
2.1
Lake Park
22
913
11.2%
0.3
Lake Worth
20
10,654
30.5%
1.6
Lake Worth
22
24,256
69.5%
5.0
Lakeland
10
54,001
55.4%
41.2
Lakeland
15
43,421
44.6%
33.1
Lantana
20
4,654
44.7%
1.2
Lantana
22
5,769
55.3%
1.7
Leesburg
10
8,015
39.8%
32.9
Leesburg
11
12,102
60.2%
8.1
Loxahatchee Groves 18
1,681
52.9%
7.0
Loxahatchee Groves 20
1,499
47.1%
5.5
Maitland
5
4
0.0%
0.1
6.3
7
15,747
100.0%
Maitland
Margate
20
14,535
27.3%
2.2
City
Counties and Cities
Area%
10.0%
90.0%
19.1%
80.9%
49.9%
50.1%
4.7%
95.3%
24.6%
57.3%
18.2%
1.4%
98.6%
30.9%
69.1%
44.4%
55.6%
34.8%
64.8%
0.4%
66.6%
33.4%
49.0%
51.0%
74.6%
25.4%
64.5%
35.5%
72.4%
27.6%
86.5%
13.5%
44.8%
55.2%
26.8%
58.2%
15.0%
76.9%
23.1%
0.2%
88.9%
10.9%
24.5%
75.5%
55.5%
44.5%
40.7%
59.3%
80.3%
19.7%
55.9%
44.1%
1.4%
98.6%
24.2%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Margate
21
38,749
72.7%
6.9
Miami
23
15,273
3.8%
2.9
Miami
24
133,006
33.3%
19.4
Miami
27
251,178
62.9%
33.8
Miramar
24
65,355
53.6%
11.2
Miramar
25
56,686
46.4%
20.1
Newberry
3
2,398
48.4%
20.3
Newberry
11
2,552
51.6%
34.3
North Miami
23
9,175
15.6%
4.8
North Miami
24
49,611
84.4%
5.2
North Miami Beach 23
6,953
16.7%
1.1
North Miami Beach 24
34,570
83.3%
4.3
Oakland Park
20
20,289
49.1%
4.2
Oakland Park
22
21,074
50.9%
3.9
Opa-locka
24
14,894
97.9%
2.6
Opa-locka
25
325
2.1%
1.9
Orange Park
3
6,415
76.3%
2.8
Orange Park
5
1,997
23.7%
2.5
Orlando
5
77,843
32.7%
22.6
Orlando
7
61,132
25.7%
20.6
Orlando
9
71,662
30.1%
59.5
Orlando
10
27,663
11.6%
8.1
Pembroke Pines
23
107,607
69.5%
20.0
Pembroke Pines
24
12,856
8.3%
3.1
Pembroke Pines
25
34,287
22.2%
11.7
Plantation
20
13,381
15.8%
2.7
Plantation
22
67,448
79.4%
18.3
Plantation
23
4,126
4.9%
0.9
Pompano Beach
20
46,314
46.4%
11.3
Pompano Beach
21
1,447
1.4%
2.0
Pompano Beach
22
52,084
52.2%
12.2
Riviera Beach
18
0
0.0%
0.0
Riviera Beach
20
28,156
86.7%
7.3
Riviera Beach
22
4,332
13.3%
2.9
Royal Palm Beach
18
14,734
43.2%
5.1
Royal Palm Beach
20
16,299
47.7%
5.6
Royal Palm Beach
21
3,107
9.1%
0.7
St. Augustine
4
5,091
39.2%
5.8
St. Augustine
6
7,884
60.8%
7.0
St. Petersburg
13
91,227
37.3%
39.7
St. Petersburg
14
153,542
62.7%
97.9
Sunrise
20
62,665
74.2%
9.4
Sunrise
22
0
0.0%
0.0
Sunrise
23
21,774
25.8%
8.9
Tampa
14
277,367
82.6%
141.9
Tampa
15
58,342
17.4%
33.3
Tarpon Springs
12
20,986
89.4%
15.5
Tarpon Springs
13
2,498
10.6%
1.8
West Palm Beach
18
20,693
20.7%
35.3
West Palm Beach
20
48,663
48.7%
15.6
West Palm Beach
22
30,563
30.6%
7.2
Wilton Manors
20
3,311
28.5%
0.6
Wilton Manors
22
8,321
71.5%
1.4
Winter Haven
10
32,110
94.8%
31.4
Winter Haven
17
1,764
5.2%
8.5
Area%
75.8%
5.2%
34.5%
60.3%
35.7%
64.3%
37.2%
62.8%
48.4%
51.6%
20.8%
79.2%
52.1%
47.9%
57.7%
42.3%
52.2%
47.8%
20.4%
18.6%
53.7%
7.3%
57.5%
9.0%
33.5%
12.3%
83.5%
4.2%
44.4%
7.7%
47.9%
0.4%
71.2%
28.4%
45.0%
49.1%
5.8%
45.1%
54.9%
28.8%
71.2%
51.5%
0.0%
48.4%
81.0%
19.0%
89.7%
10.3%
60.8%
26.9%
12.4%
29.9%
70.1%
78.7%
21.3%
Plan: H000C9045
Page 4 of 4
Homestead
0
5
10
Scale bar for insets
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
26
Cutler Bay
3
13
16
Bradenton
Palmetto
St. Petersburg
Holmes Beach
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
Treasure Island
Tampa
14
St. Leo
Plant City
Zephyrhills
MANATEE
15
17
11
St. Augustine
Dade City
HILLSBOROUGH
Temple Terrace
PASCO
12
Green Cove Springs
PINELLAS
Oldsmar
Pinellas Park
Largo
Clearwater
Seminole
Belleair
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
CLAY
10
Ocoee
Apopka
11
Sanford
Casselberry
Kissimmee
13
8
6
14
Titusville
7
Oak Hill
16
MANATEE
H
RO
SBO
ILL
12
HERNANDO
11
CITRUS
VOLUSIA
SEMINOLE
Deltona
Oviedo
St. Cloud
9
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
Maitland
6
DeBary
Winter Springs
Lake Mary
Longwood
LAKE
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
Eustis
Orlando Area
BIA
PASCO
LEVY
F
DESOTO
HARDEE
LEE
19
CHARLOTTE
15
POLK
LAKE
9
SEMINOL
E
COLLIER
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
17
10
26
8
OSCEOLA
7
VOLUSIA
6
ORANGE
25
10
DUVAL
PUTNAM
CLAY
MARION
3
D
OR
UGH
ALACHUA
AD
BR
N
UNIO
BAKER
18
MONROE
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
20
24
27
23
21
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Florida City
Coral Gables
Palmetto Bay
Pinecrest
27
Miami
Miami Beach
24 North Miami
Aventura
Starke
2
ST. JOHNS
6
15-Feb-2013
*****
Provided with
expert report of
Stephen Ansolabehere
Romo Map A
E
E
NE
MIAMI-DADE
Hialeah
South Miami
Sweetwater
Doral
Medley
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
23
Lawtey
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
DIXIE
LA
FA
YE
TT
5
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Miami Lakes
Miramar
Cooper City
Fort Lauderdale
Jacksonville Beach
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
HAMILTON
4
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
Davie
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Plantation
Orange Park
4
Atlantic Beach
GULF
MADISON
L AS
Southwest Ranches
BROWARD
Lauderhill
Miles
60
Jacksonville
50
WAKULLA
LEON
L
PINE
Sunrise
Oakland Park
5
DUVAL
Callahan
40
LIBERTY
GADSDEN
R
Tamarac
Pompano Beach
Deerfield Beach
Baldwin
NASSAU
Jacksonville Area
30
2
JACKSON
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Delray Beach
Boca Raton 22
21
Lantana
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Palm Beach
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
GILCHRIST
Parkland
Wellington
Palm Springs
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
WALTON
HOLMES
HNS
20
PALM BEACH
West Palm Beach
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
IA
MB
Belle Glade
18
1
SANTA ROSA
AN
W
SU
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
A
ESC
COLU
M
South Florida
JO
ST.
OK
App. 153
App. 154
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
13.65%
13.99%
10.11%
45.12%
8.79%
8.32%
8.73%
12.56%
28.94%
6.78%
3.89%
11.34%
21.73%
8.16%
6.09%
12.01%
10.76%
6.36%
52.23%
10.94%
12.20%
9.76%
54.34%
6.37%
13.77%
4.43%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
11
16
30.5%
69.5%
33.8%
66.2%
46.8%
53.2%
32.6%
67.4%
64.2%
35.8%
42.4%
57.6%
46.3%
53.7%
42.4%
57.6%
63.6%
36.4%
60.5%
39.5%
40.4%
59.6%
46.1%
53.9%
55.5%
44.5%
62.4%
37.6%
42.1%
57.9%
46.6%
53.4%
42.7%
57.3%
48.4%
51.6%
39.3%
60.7%
83.0%
17.0%
61.1%
38.9%
56.0%
44.0%
61.0%
39.0%
88.1%
11.9%
44.8%
55.2%
58.6%
41.4%
49.4%
50.6%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
-1
0
-1
-1
0
-1
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
11
16
32.3%
67.7%
42.9%
57.1%
47.9%
52.1%
34.3%
65.7%
64.1%
35.9%
43.5%
56.5%
47.1%
52.9%
42.3%
57.7%
56.1%
43.9%
56.4%
43.6%
41.5%
58.5%
46.2%
53.8%
55.0%
45.0%
59.2%
40.8%
43.5%
56.5%
46.8%
53.2%
42.1%
57.9%
49.4%
50.6%
37.0%
63.0%
80.2%
19.8%
63.4%
36.6%
55.4%
44.6%
61.1%
38.9%
86.1%
13.9%
37.2%
62.8%
54.5%
45.5%
45.3%
54.7%
0.37
0.37
0.29
0.59
0.47
0.12
0.26
0.50
0.36
0.46
0.26
0.47
0.38
0.57
0.28
0.33
0.32
0.39
0.42
0.26
0.49
0.28
0.22
0.28
0.37
0.42
0.17
0.59
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
5
22
26.5%
73.5%
37.4%
62.6%
40.5%
59.5%
26.6%
73.4%
61.6%
38.4%
35.2%
64.8%
34.5%
65.5%
33.6%
66.4%
48.0%
52.0%
48.2%
51.8%
32.3%
67.7%
34.2%
65.8%
41.9%
58.1%
48.5%
51.5%
31.6%
68.4%
35.5%
64.5%
35.1%
64.9%
36.3%
63.7%
28.2%
71.8%
75.0%
25.0%
52.1%
47.9%
43.4%
56.6%
52.5%
47.5%
84.0%
16.0%
30.2%
69.8%
47.8%
52.2%
35.6%
64.4%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2323.5
8597.0
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.20%
241
1010
13,146
0.41%
91
356
3,858
0.42%
67
385
1,675
0.66%
206
711
3,911
0.28%
117
384
2,773
0.71%
46
228
839
0.38%
127
476
4,525
2.37%
47
204
782
1.35%
51
190
533
0.37%
93
361
3,221
0.33%
60
173
1,069
0.35%
31
91
428
1.68%
48
169
505
0.61%
101
367
2,671
0.30%
71
205
1,243
0.47%
119
494
4,385
0.49%
67
264
1,500
0.47%
83
249
1,414
1.36%
79
385
2,369
0.60%
34
118
268
0.62%
41
166
305
1.10%
37
136
294
3.22%
20
74
115
1.66%
105
379
3,695
1.70%
196
553
5,287
2.00%
20
73
187
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
20
7
36.9%
63.1%
44.6%
55.4%
54.2%
45.8%
40.3%
59.7%
69.1%
30.9%
49.9%
50.1%
54.2%
45.8%
50.8%
49.2%
69.0%
31.0%
65.7%
34.3%
49.4%
50.6%
55.4%
44.6%
63.4%
36.6%
68.0%
32.0%
50.4%
49.6%
52.6%
47.4%
50.5%
49.5%
55.0%
45.0%
44.3%
55.7%
84.7%
15.3%
66.8%
33.2%
60.8%
39.2%
64.9%
35.1%
88.5%
11.5%
47.9%
52.1%
60.7%
39.3%
52.1%
47.9%
4.55%
4.53%
8.35%
6.65%
6.14%
5.90%
14.05%
8.61%
41.72%
19.53%
7.81%
8.50%
7.10%
26.91%
17.16%
8.53%
12.10%
14.47%
14.19%
19.79%
16.89%
18.40%
36.68%
32.82%
69.36%
64.97%
77.57%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.27
0.38
0.16
0.38
0.14
0.10
0.24
0.20
0.25
0.24
0.19
0.31
0.45
0.66
0.22
0.25
0.37
0.23
0.27
0.29
0.20
0.24
0.14
0.20
0.27
0.32
0.22
0.45
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
8
19
26.7%
73.3%
34.3%
65.7%
41.5%
58.5%
28.2%
71.8%
59.4%
40.6%
36.8%
63.2%
38.6%
61.4%
36.0%
64.0%
49.7%
50.3%
50.3%
49.7%
34.7%
65.3%
37.2%
62.8%
45.9%
54.1%
48.6%
51.4%
33.2%
66.8%
39.8%
60.2%
35.4%
64.6%
43.0%
57.0%
30.5%
69.5%
78.2%
21.8%
59.6%
40.4%
50.6%
49.4%
58.8%
41.2%
85.7%
14.3%
32.4%
67.6%
50.5%
49.5%
41.9%
58.1%
Convex
Hull
0.71
0.82
0.62
0.82
0.76
0.71
0.70
0.74
0.76
0.74
0.65
0.67
0.79
0.91
0.60
0.67
0.80
0.68
0.77
0.70
0.75
0.62
0.53
0.56
0.76
0.65
0.49
0.84
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
5
22
26.3%
73.7%
35.0%
65.0%
40.1%
59.9%
27.7%
72.3%
61.0%
39.0%
35.5%
64.5%
35.5%
64.5%
33.3%
66.7%
48.4%
51.6%
49.4%
50.6%
31.8%
68.2%
33.2%
66.8%
41.3%
58.7%
46.3%
53.7%
29.0%
71.0%
35.6%
64.4%
29.6%
70.4%
37.1%
62.9%
27.7%
72.3%
76.8%
23.2%
54.8%
45.2%
46.7%
53.3%
55.5%
44.5%
85.5%
14.5%
30.9%
69.1%
49.3%
50.7%
37.4%
62.6%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
14.4%
21.9%
14.4%
40.5%
17.8%
19.1%
15.2%
29.4%
33.0%
15.1%
12.8%
18.7%
26.5%
13.1%
13.4%
16.6%
15.8%
9.6%
53.0%
19.2%
18.9%
22.9%
64.4%
13.3%
25.7%
14.2%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
21
66.3%
61.0%
52.4%
66.4%
36.0%
56.2%
56.9%
56.6%
46.9%
46.0%
55.7%
47.0%
38.0%
38.5%
52.9%
47.3%
51.8%
50.2%
59.8%
18.8%
35.5%
42.8%
37.1%
13.1%
64.7%
45.8%
58.7%
I_Cri
3
20.4%
24.5%
25.7%
19.2%
23.5%
26.1%
24.0%
28.2%
23.7%
21.0%
29.2%
40.2%
43.3%
35.0%
34.0%
39.3%
31.6%
34.0%
30.6%
28.1%
45.3%
38.4%
39.9%
22.4%
22.0%
28.5%
27.1%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
12
15
32.4%
67.6%
34.9%
65.1%
49.2%
50.8%
34.1%
65.9%
63.8%
36.2%
46.5%
53.5%
48.1%
51.9%
44.2%
55.8%
61.7%
38.3%
61.2%
38.8%
43.2%
56.8%
48.0%
52.0%
56.4%
43.6%
62.2%
37.8%
43.4%
56.6%
49.8%
50.2%
44.1%
55.9%
52.2%
47.8%
42.9%
57.1%
81.3%
18.7%
64.2%
35.8%
58.0%
42.0%
61.5%
38.5%
86.3%
13.7%
41.9%
58.1%
55.2%
44.8%
44.6%
55.4%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
8
19
32.1%
67.9%
40.8%
59.2%
46.0%
54.0%
28.8%
71.2%
56.3%
43.7%
43.7%
56.3%
39.3%
60.7%
43.1%
56.9%
46.4%
53.6%
47.2%
52.8%
39.0%
61.0%
44.0%
56.0%
48.0%
52.0%
53.1%
46.9%
38.3%
61.7%
43.4%
56.6%
40.2%
59.8%
48.8%
51.2%
33.7%
66.3%
74.8%
25.2%
65.9%
34.1%
55.6%
44.4%
62.5%
37.5%
81.1%
18.9%
33.5%
66.5%
51.7%
48.3%
41.8%
58.2%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
17
10
35.1%
64.9%
51.7%
48.3%
54.7%
45.3%
39.2%
60.8%
65.6%
34.4%
51.3%
48.7%
49.6%
50.4%
49.5%
50.5%
55.2%
44.8%
56.2%
43.8%
49.5%
50.5%
51.3%
48.7%
56.8%
43.2%
56.6%
43.4%
43.3%
56.7%
51.2%
48.8%
46.4%
53.6%
53.3%
46.7%
42.6%
57.4%
78.9%
21.1%
71.6%
28.4%
61.9%
38.1%
69.6%
30.4%
84.5%
15.5%
41.9%
58.1%
57.7%
42.3%
49.0%
51.0%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
10
17
31.3%
68.7%
43.4%
56.6%
46.5%
53.5%
29.1%
70.9%
58.2%
41.8%
43.5%
56.5%
38.0%
62.0%
42.9%
57.1%
46.4%
53.6%
46.4%
53.6%
40.5%
59.5%
44.4%
55.6%
50.2%
49.8%
51.3%
48.7%
38.0%
62.0%
46.9%
53.1%
40.8%
59.2%
51.1%
48.9%
35.8%
64.2%
75.6%
24.4%
68.6%
31.4%
58.3%
41.7%
64.3%
35.7%
80.7%
19.3%
35.8%
64.2%
52.5%
47.5%
45.0%
55.0%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
32.8%
67.2%
41.1%
58.9%
27.8%
72.2%
51.6%
48.4%
41.3%
58.7%
34.6%
65.4%
35.9%
64.1%
42.6%
57.4%
44.6%
55.4%
36.1%
63.9%
39.1%
60.9%
42.8%
57.2%
47.8%
52.2%
33.4%
66.6%
41.1%
58.9%
36.1%
63.9%
44.9%
55.1%
33.2%
66.8%
73.5%
26.5%
64.5%
35.5%
53.5%
46.5%
61.6%
38.4%
80.1%
19.9%
34.2%
65.8%
51.0%
49.0%
41.8%
58.2%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
19%
44
-23%
23
-31%
57
-31%
57
0%
410
27%
382
-75%
28
-76%
61
-75%
60
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
24
3
44.8%
55.2%
58.8%
41.2%
60.6%
39.4%
45.1%
54.9%
69.5%
30.5%
58.8%
41.2%
59.1%
40.9%
59.7%
40.3%
63.1%
36.9%
63.8%
36.2%
57.8%
42.2%
61.4%
38.6%
65.9%
34.1%
67.8%
32.2%
56.3%
43.7%
58.4%
41.6%
56.8%
43.2%
64.2%
35.8%
51.6%
48.4%
81.9%
18.1%
77.4%
22.6%
68.4%
31.6%
72.9%
27.1%
85.0%
15.0%
47.5%
52.5%
61.0%
39.0%
53.3%
46.7%
Plan: RomoMap_A
Page 2 of 4
App. 155
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
49.4%
43.8%
31.0%
62.1%
35.4%
35.0%
35.2%
44.0%
46.6%
35.4%
34.7%
40.4%
48.0%
35.2%
33.8%
39.4%
37.4%
28.7%
64.3%
48.6%
42.6%
47.8%
69.4%
30.3%
39.8%
32.2%
Dems
29.1%
45.8%
41.9%
28.7%
61.1%
33.8%
33.7%
33.6%
43.2%
46.2%
33.8%
33.3%
39.5%
47.2%
34.0%
33.0%
37.9%
36.3%
27.9%
64.7%
47.1%
41.9%
46.4%
68.9%
30.2%
39.4%
32.3%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.1%
20.8%
21.4%
15.9%
25.2%
25.9%
23.3%
31.1%
25.6%
22.4%
26.7%
26.4%
26.3%
24.8%
24.7%
21.4%
26.0%
26.0%
21.6%
27.2%
27.2%
28.0%
20.8%
28.1%
29.7%
28.6%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
13.9%
19.7%
19.9%
14.6%
24.2%
23.9%
21.3%
28.6%
24.2%
21.5%
25.4%
24.9%
24.4%
23.6%
23.8%
19.9%
24.9%
24.5%
20.9%
25.7%
25.7%
25.8%
19.5%
26.5%
27.9%
26.1%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
39.1%
37.3%
49.9%
23.0%
41.0%
40.4%
43.2%
25.7%
28.2%
43.8%
40.0%
34.1%
26.5%
41.2%
42.3%
40.7%
37.7%
46.1%
13.7%
25.6%
30.9%
25.6%
10.3%
41.8%
30.9%
39.1%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
36.6%
36.5%
49.1%
23.3%
40.4%
41.1%
43.5%
27.5%
29.2%
43.1%
39.9%
34.7%
27.5%
41.2%
42.4%
40.7%
37.7%
46.8%
14.8%
25.7%
31.7%
26.4%
11.0%
43.2%
32.4%
41.6%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
87.0%
85.4%
77.4%
87.7%
81.7%
77.1%
81.2%
77.9%
82.8%
81.6%
75.7%
82.6%
81.9%
78.0%
81.3%
83.9%
80.8%
76.9%
84.2%
77.1%
80.0%
78.6%
85.7%
80.0%
81.6%
76.5%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
87.9%
86.1%
79.2%
88.6%
82.4%
78.5%
82.4%
79.0%
83.5%
82.5%
76.3%
82.9%
82.8%
78.8%
81.0%
84.7%
81.3%
77.6%
84.3%
77.5%
80.1%
79.1%
85.8%
79.7%
81.8%
78.3%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
10.3%
1.9%
19.6%
1.6%
1.1%
1.6%
12.5%
5.4%
25.4%
6.1%
1.2%
3.5%
9.7%
3.9%
26.2%
4.5%
1.1%
2.6%
46.1%
3.1%
66.1%
2.2%
5.3%
3.1%
7.7%
3.4%
18.5%
4.2%
0.7%
2.0%
7.0%
10.9%
16.0%
14.2%
0.8%
5.8%
7.4%
5.0%
18.0%
6.2%
0.8%
3.1%
9.9%
38.0%
17.8%
43.6%
1.6%
20.9%
26.4%
14.3%
47.3%
15.1%
3.2%
8.5%
5.3%
5.1%
12.9%
7.2%
0.7%
2.7%
3.4%
5.6%
7.8%
7.5%
0.5%
3.4%
10.7%
3.9%
22.4%
4.5%
1.1%
2.4%
21.5%
17.1%
37.3%
17.3%
2.7%
12.0%
7.6%
9.2%
17.4%
11.5%
0.9%
5.4%
5.2%
3.5%
12.8%
4.7%
0.6%
1.9%
11.0%
6.9%
24.4%
8.1%
1.1%
4.0%
9.2%
6.8%
20.6%
8.3%
1.1%
4.2%
4.7%
7.0%
12.9%
10.5%
0.5%
3.6%
50.0%
13.0%
65.1%
9.2%
10.7%
20.0%
8.7%
11.1%
14.2%
10.7%
1.4%
8.4%
9.2%
10.0%
17.6%
10.6%
1.1%
6.9%
8.6%
26.5%
14.6%
22.8%
1.5%
28.0%
54.4%
22.5%
67.7%
15.5%
13.7%
45.1%
4.3%
56.2%
11.3%
53.9%
0.5%
54.3%
13.5%
52.7%
27.9%
41.5%
1.6%
61.6%
3.0%
64.6%
7.2%
53.4%
0.5%
73.2%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
10.4%
1.7%
18.5%
1.4%
1.2%
1.6%
12.1%
4.9%
23.7%
5.5%
1.3%
3.3%
10.2%
3.6%
26.1%
4.0%
1.2%
2.5%
44.2%
2.7%
63.1%
2.0%
5.2%
2.8%
7.5%
3.1%
17.4%
3.7%
0.7%
1.9%
6.8%
10.1%
15.3%
13.1%
0.9%
5.6%
7.0%
4.4%
16.5%
5.5%
0.8%
2.8%
9.4%
35.7%
16.9%
41.3%
1.5%
20.8%
25.5%
13.3%
45.8%
14.0%
3.3%
8.2%
5.2%
4.8%
12.0%
6.5%
0.7%
2.7%
3.1%
5.0%
6.9%
6.6%
0.5%
3.2%
10.1%
3.4%
20.9%
3.9%
1.2%
2.2%
20.7%
15.5%
35.7%
15.1%
2.8%
11.4%
7.2%
8.4%
16.2%
10.2%
1.0%
5.2%
4.9%
3.0%
11.8%
4.0%
0.6%
1.7%
10.5%
6.3%
22.6%
7.2%
1.1%
3.8%
8.7%
6.1%
18.9%
7.4%
1.0%
3.8%
4.2%
6.2%
11.3%
9.1%
0.5%
3.3%
48.3%
12.2%
63.2%
8.7%
10.8%
18.7%
7.7%
9.6%
12.2%
9.1%
1.4%
7.7%
8.6%
8.8%
16.1%
9.2%
1.1%
6.2%
8.1%
24.3%
13.3%
20.4%
1.5%
27.1%
54.8%
21.2%
67.8%
14.4%
14.6%
44.4%
4.4%
52.9%
11.5%
48.9%
0.5%
53.1%
13.7%
50.6%
28.1%
38.9%
1.7%
60.6%
3.0%
63.7%
7.4%
50.5%
0.5%
73.3%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
40.3%
34.2%
48.7%
24.6%
34.4%
34.1%
45.5%
24.1%
42.3%
24.5%
45.2%
22.7%
43.7%
27.7%
50.9%
16.0%
49.0%
17.9%
48.1%
24.1%
45.1%
24.9%
45.8%
22.2%
46.9%
20.3%
42.8%
25.5%
44.2%
23.8%
44.8%
24.7%
45.2%
23.7%
42.2%
24.9%
45.9%
22.8%
46.0%
20.5%
44.8%
22.6%
40.1%
29.4%
47.0%
23.1%
28.0%
43.5%
30.6%
38.8%
25.5%
47.9%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
38.1%
33.7%
46.9%
24.1%
33.0%
33.1%
44.4%
23.4%
41.6%
24.4%
44.0%
21.4%
42.3%
26.8%
49.6%
14.1%
48.9%
16.7%
47.7%
23.5%
44.3%
24.2%
45.2%
21.1%
47.6%
18.5%
42.3%
24.4%
44.5%
22.5%
44.3%
23.4%
44.3%
23.1%
41.8%
23.3%
45.9%
21.0%
45.5%
19.5%
44.6%
21.5%
39.8%
27.1%
47.4%
20.7%
29.0%
40.4%
31.0%
36.1%
26.7%
44.3%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
49.2%
41.9%
8.9%
42.1%
44.0%
13.9%
28.6%
58.1%
13.3%
63.5%
27.5%
8.9%
33.5%
49.0%
17.4%
32.8%
50.7%
16.6%
32.4%
51.9%
15.6%
42.3%
38.2%
19.4%
44.3%
39.4%
16.3%
32.1%
51.9%
16.0%
32.5%
48.2%
19.3%
39.5%
42.3%
18.2%
47.9%
35.9%
16.2%
33.6%
49.5%
16.9%
31.7%
50.6%
17.7%
36.3%
50.2%
13.5%
34.9%
46.2%
18.9%
24.8%
57.7%
17.5%
69.3%
16.9%
13.8%
50.7%
29.3%
20.0%
42.1%
38.5%
19.3%
49.8%
31.3%
18.9%
76.2%
11.2%
12.6%
25.9%
55.5%
18.6%
40.0%
40.8%
19.3%
30.6%
51.0%
18.4%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
46.2%
41.9%
11.9%
42.1%
40.3%
17.5%
28.3%
54.0%
17.8%
63.3%
24.2%
12.5%
33.6%
44.8%
21.6%
33.6%
44.1%
22.3%
33.1%
46.7%
20.1%
44.7%
28.6%
26.6%
47.0%
31.5%
21.5%
33.0%
47.7%
19.3%
33.2%
43.5%
23.4%
40.4%
37.0%
22.6%
48.7%
29.1%
22.2%
33.8%
44.6%
21.6%
33.0%
45.7%
21.3%
37.6%
44.6%
17.8%
36.2%
41.1%
22.7%
27.1%
51.0%
21.8%
68.6%
13.2%
18.1%
48.8%
26.6%
24.6%
42.9%
32.8%
24.3%
48.0%
26.8%
25.1%
72.9%
9.5%
17.6%
29.5%
45.8%
24.7%
40.5%
33.6%
25.9%
32.6%
41.9%
25.5%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
8.8%
1.1%
16.6%
0.8%
0.6%
1.1%
9.9%
2.8%
21.5%
3.1%
0.7%
2.1%
8.5%
2.2%
24.7%
2.3%
0.9%
1.8%
41.6%
1.6%
60.9%
1.1%
3.1%
1.9%
6.1%
2.0%
16.1%
2.5%
0.4%
1.4%
5.8%
6.3%
14.5%
8.3%
0.6%
4.0%
5.7%
2.8%
15.4%
3.5%
0.6%
2.1%
10.1%
23.6%
20.1%
30.6%
1.1%
13.1%
24.2%
8.3%
48.1%
9.2%
2.1%
5.4%
4.2%
2.6%
11.4%
3.8%
0.4%
1.7%
2.7%
3.1%
6.7%
4.1%
0.3%
2.2%
8.5%
2.1%
19.2%
2.4%
0.6%
1.6%
18.7%
9.2%
34.4%
8.9%
1.7%
7.9%
6.5%
4.9%
15.9%
5.9%
0.7%
3.6%
3.6%
1.6%
9.9%
2.2%
0.3%
1.1%
8.3%
3.2%
20.6%
3.7%
0.6%
2.3%
7.2%
3.6%
17.8%
4.5%
0.7%
2.7%
2.6%
3.0%
8.7%
4.9%
0.3%
2.0%
52.5%
8.1%
67.8%
5.1%
7.7%
15.4%
7.3%
6.0%
11.9%
5.1%
1.1%
5.9%
7.5%
5.5%
15.1%
5.6%
0.7%
4.6%
8.8%
20.0%
14.6%
14.4%
1.2%
25.8%
62.4%
15.2%
74.1%
9.0%
11.6%
43.3%
4.0%
45.9%
13.1%
38.3%
0.3%
48.6%
14.5%
44.8%
31.8%
28.8%
1.1%
57.7%
2.6%
61.5%
7.1%
40.4%
0.3%
73.7%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
10.5%
1.7%
20.3%
1.4%
0.8%
1.5%
12.5%
4.6%
26.3%
5.2%
0.9%
2.9%
9.8%
3.3%
27.8%
3.9%
1.0%
2.3%
47.6%
2.6%
67.7%
1.9%
4.2%
2.7%
7.6%
3.0%
19.1%
3.8%
0.6%
1.9%
7.0%
9.6%
16.6%
12.9%
0.7%
5.1%
7.4%
4.3%
18.7%
5.6%
0.7%
2.8%
11.0%
33.9%
20.0%
40.5%
1.4%
17.5%
27.5%
12.2%
50.0%
13.1%
2.6%
7.1%
5.3%
4.3%
13.5%
6.4%
0.5%
2.3%
3.6%
5.0%
8.4%
6.9%
0.4%
3.1%
10.9%
3.4%
23.2%
4.0%
0.9%
2.2%
22.3%
15.1%
38.7%
15.5%
2.2%
10.5%
7.9%
8.0%
18.6%
10.2%
0.8%
4.8%
5.0%
3.0%
13.0%
4.2%
0.4%
1.6%
11.2%
5.6%
25.9%
6.8%
0.8%
3.2%
9.5%
5.9%
21.8%
7.4%
0.9%
3.7%
4.5%
5.6%
13.5%
9.1%
0.4%
2.9%
54.4%
11.7%
68.8%
8.0%
9.4%
20.2%
9.4%
10.2%
15.4%
9.6%
1.3%
8.0%
9.8%
9.1%
18.8%
9.6%
0.9%
6.6%
9.4%
26.6%
15.9%
22.0%
1.4%
28.9%
58.7%
20.3%
70.9%
13.7%
12.5%
45.9%
4.5%
52.5%
12.6%
50.1%
0.4%
51.0%
14.4%
50.8%
30.0%
38.0%
1.3%
60.6%
3.0%
64.1%
7.2%
51.0%
0.3%
73.4%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
92.6%
91.3%
83.1%
93.0%
88.3%
82.3%
86.7%
84.3%
88.2%
87.0%
80.3%
89.3%
88.1%
82.8%
87.7%
89.9%
86.4%
83.3%
89.5%
82.2%
85.2%
83.3%
90.5%
84.9%
87.4%
82.8%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
89.8%
88.3%
80.2%
90.1%
84.5%
79.7%
83.8%
81.1%
85.6%
84.2%
78.2%
85.7%
84.4%
80.1%
84.9%
86.7%
83.5%
80.8%
86.8%
79.6%
82.5%
80.9%
88.0%
82.7%
84.4%
79.0%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
35.5%
44.1%
46.6%
33.1%
29.7%
47.9%
44.8%
32.8%
41.5%
34.3%
43.0%
32.1%
40.5%
38.0%
54.9%
21.3%
49.2%
25.7%
46.9%
33.3%
42.7%
34.5%
44.3%
32.0%
46.2%
30.6%
40.5%
36.3%
42.9%
34.5%
42.4%
35.6%
43.1%
34.6%
39.8%
37.8%
44.1%
32.3%
43.1%
29.2%
42.6%
32.6%
35.8%
40.2%
45.1%
31.9%
21.6%
58.8%
25.7%
52.5%
20.1%
61.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
38.0%
37.0%
47.8%
25.9%
33.0%
37.3%
46.0%
25.7%
42.3%
27.5%
45.3%
23.7%
42.5%
29.8%
53.3%
14.8%
50.6%
18.5%
49.0%
25.6%
45.3%
26.5%
47.3%
23.1%
50.0%
20.4%
43.3%
27.1%
46.7%
24.0%
45.5%
25.7%
45.5%
25.9%
44.2%
26.2%
47.0%
22.8%
46.1%
21.0%
45.1%
23.6%
39.7%
29.1%
49.2%
21.5%
28.2%
44.5%
30.3%
40.2%
25.9%
48.1%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
15.1%
0.5%
0.9%
18.3%
1.6%
1.4%
20.5%
1.3%
1.3%
57.2%
0.6%
1.4%
16.2%
1.6%
1.0%
12.2%
5.3%
2.9%
14.3%
2.4%
1.6%
17.5%
23.2%
9.2%
46.9%
7.2%
3.9%
9.9%
2.3%
1.2%
5.2%
2.5%
1.6%
18.0%
1.8%
1.3%
30.1%
5.0%
5.6%
14.1%
3.5%
2.5%
9.2%
1.3%
0.9%
18.0%
2.1%
1.5%
17.3%
2.9%
2.0%
7.6%
2.8%
1.5%
69.3%
2.9%
11.9%
9.9%
2.6%
4.7%
13.7%
3.3%
3.6%
14.4%
9.4%
24.7%
78.4%
5.3%
40.6%
13.7%
32.0%
46.7%
33.4%
19.3%
55.8%
7.5%
32.9%
76.7%
Plan: RomoMap_A
Page 3 of 4
County
Brevard
Brevard
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Charlotte
Charlotte
Citrus
Citrus
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Columbia
Columbia
Duval
Duval
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Jefferson
Jefferson
Lee
Lee
Leon
Leon
Manatee
Manatee
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Orange
Orange
Orange
Osceola
Osceola
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
Polk
Seminole
Seminole
St. Lucie
St. Lucie
App. 156
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
7
94,745
17.4%
227.7
8
448,631
82.6%
1,329.3
20
481,994
27.6%
891.5
21
300,190
17.2%
75.5
22
306,530
17.5%
135.1
23
509,736
29.2%
198.0
24
149,616
8.6%
22.7
16
106,386
66.5%
278.9
17
53,592
33.5%
579.4
3
14,315
10.1%
57.9
11
126,921
89.9%
715.3
3
29,032
15.2%
341.6
4
161,833
84.8%
302.0
19
107,812
33.5%
306.2
25
213,708
66.5%
1,998.8
2
54,709
81.0%
431.0
5
12,822
19.0%
370.3
4
461,197
53.4%
647.3
5
403,066
46.6%
271.1
12
11,451
0.9%
20.4
14
696,345
56.6%
505.3
15
521,430
42.4%
740.0
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
2
1,153
7.8%
209.8
5
13,608
92.2%
426.7
17
30,221
4.9%
104.5
19
588,533
95.1%
1,108.0
2
116,165
42.2%
211.5
5
159,322
57.8%
490.3
15
112,322
34.8%
653.4
16
210,511
65.2%
239.2
23
186,609
7.5%
96.4
24
546,729
21.9%
91.9
25
443,497
17.8%
506.1
26
623,255
25.0%
1,549.9
27
696,345
27.9%
186.9
7
252,767
22.1%
319.6
9
354,714
31.0%
255.9
10
538,475
47.0%
427.8
8
22,115
8.2%
1,202.7
9
246,570
91.8%
303.2
18
319,813
24.2%
543.0
20
214,351
16.2%
1,477.6
21
396,155
30.0%
192.1
22
389,815
29.5%
170.3
12
220,197
24.0%
180.5
13
696,345
76.0%
427.6
9
95,060
15.8%
223.4
11
6,173
1.0%
179.4
17
500,862
83.2%
1,607.8
7
348,832
82.5%
291.3
10
73,886
17.5%
54.0
8
47,575
17.1%
483.9
18
230,214
82.9%
204.3
Area%
14.6%
85.4%
67.4%
5.7%
10.2%
15.0%
1.7%
32.5%
67.5%
7.5%
92.5%
53.1%
46.9%
13.3%
86.7%
53.8%
46.2%
70.5%
29.5%
1.6%
39.9%
58.5%
79.5%
20.5%
33.0%
67.0%
8.6%
91.4%
30.1%
69.9%
73.2%
26.8%
4.0%
3.8%
20.8%
63.8%
7.7%
31.9%
25.5%
42.6%
79.9%
20.1%
22.8%
62.0%
8.1%
7.1%
29.7%
70.3%
11.1%
8.9%
80.0%
84.4%
15.6%
70.3%
29.7%
County
Volusia
Volusia
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
6
410,609
83.0%
1,381.0
10
83,984
17.0%
51.4
Area%
96.4%
3.6%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Clearwater
12
18,493
17.2%
5.9
Clearwater
13
89,192
82.8%
33.4
Coconut Creek
20
5,030
9.5%
1.7
Coconut Creek
21
47,879
90.5%
10.3
Deerfield Beach
20
26,242
35.0%
4.0
Deerfield Beach
21
33,897
45.2%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Deltona
6
5,117
6.0%
3.4
Deltona
10
80,065
94.0%
37.6
Edgewood
7
1,123
44.9%
0.7
Edgewood
10
1,380
55.1%
0.8
Fort Lauderdale
20
61,929
37.4%
12.1
Fort Lauderdale
22
103,592
62.6%
26.3
Fort Lauderdale
23
0
0.0%
0.2
Hallandale Beach
23
21,890
59.0%
2.4
Hallandale Beach
24
15,223
41.0%
2.2
Hollywood
23
97,137
69.0%
24.6
Hollywood
24
43,631
31.0%
6.1
Jacksonville
4
418,718
51.0%
603.5
Jacksonville
5
403,066
49.0%
271.1
Lake City
2
7,439
61.8%
7.7
Lake City
5
4,607
38.2%
4.7
Margate
20
14,535
27.3%
2.2
Margate
21
38,749
72.7%
6.9
Miami
24
126,597
31.7%
21.1
Miami
27
272,860
68.3%
35.0
Miramar
20
89,888
73.7%
27.3
Miramar
24
32,153
26.3%
4.0
North Miami
23
9,175
15.6%
4.8
North Miami
24
49,611
84.4%
5.1
North Miami Beach 23
7,827
18.8%
1.2
North Miami Beach 24
33,696
81.2%
4.2
Oakland Park
20
22,053
53.3%
4.6
Oakland Park
22
19,310
46.7%
3.5
Orlando
7
59,957
25.2%
18.6
Orlando
9
72,199
30.3%
60.8
Orlando
10
106,144
44.5%
31.3
Pembroke Pines
23
116,399
75.2%
28.3
Pembroke Pines
24
38,351
24.8%
6.5
Plantation
20
17,652
20.8%
3.7
Plantation
22
67,303
79.2%
18.2
Pompano Beach
20
41,041
41.1%
8.9
Pompano Beach
21
1,447
1.4%
2.0
Pompano Beach
22
57,357
57.4%
14.6
Port St. Lucie
8
19,347
11.8%
46.0
Port St. Lucie
18
145,256
88.2%
69.3
Riviera Beach
18
7,923
24.4%
3.5
Riviera Beach
20
24,565
75.6%
6.7
Sanford
7
5,214
9.7%
7.5
Sanford
10
48,356
90.3%
19.0
33.7%
3.9
20
28,480
Sunrise
Sunrise
22
6,341
7.5%
1.1
Sunrise
23
49,618
58.8%
13.3
Tallahassee
2
68,681
37.9%
54.2
Tallahassee
5
112,695
62.1%
49.3
Counties and Cities
Area%
15.0%
85.0%
14.4%
85.6%
24.6%
57.3%
18.2%
8.4%
91.6%
45.4%
54.6%
31.3%
68.3%
0.5%
51.9%
48.1%
80.1%
19.9%
69.0%
31.0%
62.1%
37.9%
24.2%
75.8%
37.6%
62.4%
87.4%
12.6%
48.5%
51.5%
22.0%
78.0%
56.8%
43.2%
16.8%
54.9%
28.3%
81.3%
18.7%
16.9%
83.1%
35.0%
7.7%
57.3%
39.9%
60.1%
34.4%
65.6%
28.2%
71.8%
21.4%
5.9%
72.7%
52.3%
47.7%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Tamarac
20
27,864
46.1%
6.3
Tamarac
21
32,563
53.9%
5.8
Tampa
14
294,105
87.6%
149.1
Tampa
15
41,604
12.4%
26.2
West Palm Beach
18
45,479
45.5%
41.0
West Palm Beach
20
54,440
54.5%
17.1
Area%
51.9%
48.1%
85.1%
14.9%
70.6%
29.4%
Plan: RomoMap_A
Page 4 of 4
Homestead
0
5
10
Scale bar for insets
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
26
Cutler Bay
PINELLAS
Oldsmar
16
Bradenton
Palmetto
St. Petersburg
Holmes Beach
St. Pete Beach
Gulfport
Treasure Island
13
Pinellas Park
Largo
Clearwater
Seminole
Belleair
Dunedin
Tarpon Springs
New Port Richey
Port Richey
Tampa Bay Area
Tampa
14
St. Leo
Plant City
Zephyrhills
MANATEE
15
17
11
St. Augustine
Dade City
HILLSBOROUGH
Temple Terrace
PASCO
12
Green Cove Springs
ST. JOHNS
6
10
Ocoee
Apopka
11
Sanford
Casselberry
Kissimmee
13
8
6
14
Titusville
7
Oak Hill
16
MANATEE
H
RO
SBO
ILL
12
HERNANDO
11
CITRUS
VOLUSIA
SEMINOLE
Deltona
Oviedo
St. Cloud
9
Orlando
Belle Isle
Winter Park
Lake Buena Vista
OSCEOLA
Bay Lake
ORANGE
Maitland
6
DeBary
Winter Springs
Lake Mary
Longwood
LAKE
Windermere
Winter Garden
Mount Dora
Eustis
Orlando Area
BIA
PASCO
LEVY
F
DESOTO
HARDEE
LEE
19
CHARLOTTE
15
POLK
LAKE
3
PUTNAM
CLAY
MARION
UGH
ALACHUA
AD
BR
9
SEMINOL
E
COLLIER
HENDRY
GLADES
HIGHLANDS
17
7
26
8
OSCEOLA
ORANGE
25
10
VOLUSIA
6
10
18
MONROE
MIAMI-DADE
BROWARD
20
24
27
23
21
PALM BEACH
MARTIN
ST. LUCIE
ER
"
INDIAN RIV
BREVARD
E
Florida City
Coral Gables
Palmetto Bay
Pinecrest
27
Miami
Miami Beach
24 North Miami
Aventura
Starke
CLAY
3
15-Feb-2013
*****
Provided with
expert report of
Stephen Ansolabehere
Romo Map B
EE
MIAMI-DADE
Hialeah
South Miami
Sweetwater
Doral
Medley
Miami Gardens
Hollywood
23
Lawtey
DIXIE
E
D
OR
DUVAL
22
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
Legend
BE
Miami Lakes
Miramar
Cooper City
Fort Lauderdale
JEF
FE
RS
ON
Congressional Plan
FRANKLIN
TAYLOR
N
UNIO
BAKER
4
NASSAU
O
CH
EE
25
Davie
Pembroke Pines
Weston
Plantation
Jacksonville Beach
Atlantic Beach
GULF
LA
FA
YE
TT
2
HAMILTON
L AS
Southwest Ranches
BROWARD
Lauderhill
Orange Park
Jacksonville
Miles
60
MADISON
L
PINE
Sunrise
Oakland Park
5
DUVAL
50
WAKULLA
LEON
R
Tamarac
Pompano Beach
Deerfield Beach
Baldwin
NASSAU
4
Callahan
40
LIBERTY
5
GADSDEN
E
SUMT
Coral Springs
Delray Beach
Boca Raton 22
21
Lantana
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
Greenacres
Jacksonville Area
30
JACKSON
GILCHRIST
Parkland
Wellington
Palm Beach
20
BAY
SH
WA
N
TO
I NG
HNS
20
PALM BEACH
Palm Springs
OKALOOSA
Scale bar for statewide map
0 5 10
IA
MB
West Palm Beach
Riviera Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
Jupiter
Tequesta
WALTON
HOLMES
N
Royal Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
18
1
SANTA ROSA
AN
W
SU
Belle Glade
Pahokee
MARTIN
Jupiter Island
N
U
O
LH
CA
A
ESC
COLU
M
South Florida
JO
ST.
OK
App. 157
App. 158
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
13.19%
13.88%
10.60%
11.13%
47.28%
8.79%
8.32%
8.73%
12.56%
28.94%
6.78%
3.89%
11.34%
21.73%
8.16%
6.09%
12.01%
10.76%
6.36%
52.23%
10.94%
12.20%
9.76%
54.34%
6.37%
13.77%
4.43%
Black
VAP
2012 US Pres
D_Oba
R_Rom
11
16
30.5%
69.5%
35.1%
64.9%
43.0%
57.0%
34.1%
65.9%
65.8%
34.2%
42.4%
57.6%
46.3%
53.7%
42.4%
57.6%
63.6%
36.4%
60.5%
39.5%
40.4%
59.6%
46.1%
53.9%
55.5%
44.5%
62.4%
37.6%
42.1%
57.9%
46.6%
53.4%
42.7%
57.3%
48.4%
51.6%
39.3%
60.7%
83.0%
17.0%
61.1%
38.9%
56.0%
44.0%
61.0%
39.0%
88.1%
11.9%
44.8%
55.2%
58.6%
41.4%
49.4%
50.6%
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
-1
0
0
-1
-1
0
-1
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2010 Gov
D_Sin
R_Sco
11
16
32.3%
67.7%
44.3%
55.7%
44.4%
55.6%
35.5%
64.5%
65.6%
34.4%
43.5%
56.5%
47.1%
52.9%
42.3%
57.7%
56.1%
43.9%
56.4%
43.6%
41.5%
58.5%
46.2%
53.8%
55.0%
45.0%
59.2%
40.8%
43.5%
56.5%
46.8%
53.2%
42.1%
57.9%
49.4%
50.6%
37.0%
63.0%
80.2%
19.8%
63.4%
36.6%
55.4%
44.6%
61.1%
38.9%
86.1%
13.9%
37.2%
62.8%
54.5%
45.5%
45.3%
54.7%
0.37
0.37
0.31
0.49
0.54
0.13
0.26
0.50
0.36
0.46
0.26
0.47
0.38
0.57
0.28
0.33
0.32
0.39
0.42
0.26
0.49
0.28
0.22
0.28
0.37
0.42
0.17
0.59
Reock
2010 CFO
D_Aus
R_Atw
5
22
26.5%
73.5%
39.1%
60.9%
36.9%
63.1%
27.8%
72.2%
63.0%
37.0%
35.2%
64.8%
34.5%
65.5%
33.6%
66.4%
48.0%
52.0%
48.2%
51.8%
32.3%
67.7%
34.2%
65.8%
41.9%
58.1%
48.5%
51.5%
31.6%
68.4%
35.5%
64.5%
35.1%
64.9%
36.3%
63.7%
28.2%
71.8%
75.0%
25.0%
52.1%
47.9%
43.4%
56.6%
52.5%
47.5%
84.0%
16.0%
30.2%
69.8%
47.8%
52.2%
35.6%
64.4%
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk
Length
Perim
Area
VAP
(miles)
(miles)
(sq.mi)
2310.8
8883.7
65,757.2
0.26%
127
397
4,759
0.20%
232
966
13,022
0.41%
97
494
3,659
0.43%
59
358
1,469
0.64%
204
931
4,440
0.28%
117
384
2,773
0.71%
46
228
839
0.38%
127
476
4,525
2.37%
47
204
782
1.35%
51
190
533
0.37%
93
361
3,221
0.33%
60
173
1,069
0.35%
31
91
428
1.68%
48
169
505
0.61%
101
367
2,671
0.30%
71
205
1,243
0.47%
119
494
4,385
0.49%
67
264
1,500
0.47%
83
249
1,414
1.36%
79
385
2,369
0.60%
34
118
268
0.62%
41
166
305
1.10%
37
136
294
3.22%
20
74
115
1.66%
105
379
3,695
1.70%
196
553
5,287
2.00%
20
73
187
2012 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Mac
20
7
36.9%
63.1%
45.6%
54.4%
50.8%
49.2%
41.8%
58.2%
70.4%
29.6%
49.9%
50.1%
54.2%
45.8%
50.8%
49.2%
69.0%
31.0%
65.7%
34.3%
49.4%
50.6%
55.4%
44.6%
63.4%
36.6%
68.0%
32.0%
50.4%
49.6%
52.6%
47.4%
50.5%
49.5%
55.0%
45.0%
44.3%
55.7%
84.7%
15.3%
66.8%
33.2%
60.8%
39.2%
64.9%
35.1%
88.5%
11.5%
47.9%
52.1%
60.7%
39.3%
52.1%
47.9%
4.55%
4.53%
8.51%
6.86%
5.78%
5.90%
14.05%
8.61%
41.72%
19.53%
7.81%
8.50%
7.10%
26.91%
17.16%
8.53%
12.10%
14.47%
14.19%
19.79%
16.89%
18.40%
36.68%
32.82%
69.36%
64.97%
77.57%
Hisp.
VAP
PolsbyPopper
0.26
0.38
0.18
0.19
0.14
0.06
0.24
0.20
0.25
0.24
0.19
0.31
0.45
0.66
0.22
0.25
0.37
0.23
0.27
0.29
0.20
0.24
0.14
0.20
0.27
0.32
0.22
0.45
2010 Att.Gen
D_Gel
R_Bon
8
19
26.7%
73.3%
35.5%
64.5%
38.1%
61.9%
29.4%
70.6%
61.3%
38.7%
36.8%
63.2%
38.6%
61.4%
36.0%
64.0%
49.7%
50.3%
50.3%
49.7%
34.7%
65.3%
37.2%
62.8%
45.9%
54.1%
48.6%
51.4%
33.2%
66.8%
39.8%
60.2%
35.4%
64.6%
43.0%
57.0%
30.5%
69.5%
78.2%
21.8%
59.6%
40.4%
50.6%
49.4%
58.8%
41.2%
85.7%
14.3%
32.4%
67.6%
50.5%
49.5%
41.9%
58.1%
Convex
Hull
0.69
0.82
0.63
0.72
0.75
0.38
0.70
0.74
0.76
0.74
0.65
0.67
0.79
0.91
0.60
0.67
0.80
0.68
0.77
0.70
0.75
0.62
0.53
0.56
0.76
0.65
0.49
0.84
2010 Cm.Ag
D_Mad
R_Put
5
22
26.3%
73.7%
36.6%
63.4%
36.6%
63.4%
28.9%
71.1%
62.5%
37.5%
35.5%
64.5%
35.5%
64.5%
33.3%
66.7%
48.4%
51.6%
49.4%
50.6%
31.8%
68.2%
33.2%
66.8%
41.3%
58.7%
46.3%
53.7%
29.0%
71.0%
35.6%
64.4%
29.6%
70.4%
37.1%
62.9%
27.7%
72.3%
76.8%
23.2%
54.8%
45.2%
46.7%
53.3%
55.5%
44.5%
85.5%
14.5%
30.9%
69.1%
49.3%
50.7%
37.4%
62.6%
D_Mee
3
13.3%
14.8%
19.1%
15.3%
43.1%
17.8%
19.1%
15.2%
29.4%
33.0%
15.1%
12.8%
18.7%
26.5%
13.1%
13.4%
16.6%
15.8%
9.6%
53.0%
19.2%
18.9%
22.9%
64.4%
13.3%
25.7%
14.2%
2010 US Sen
R_Rub
21
66.3%
59.6%
55.6%
65.3%
34.4%
56.2%
56.9%
56.6%
46.9%
46.0%
55.7%
47.0%
38.0%
38.5%
52.9%
47.3%
51.8%
50.2%
59.8%
18.8%
35.5%
42.8%
37.1%
13.1%
64.7%
45.8%
58.7%
I_Cri
3
20.4%
25.6%
25.3%
19.4%
22.5%
26.1%
24.0%
28.2%
23.7%
21.0%
29.2%
40.2%
43.3%
35.0%
34.0%
39.3%
31.6%
34.0%
30.6%
28.1%
45.3%
38.4%
39.9%
22.4%
22.0%
28.5%
27.1%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba
R_McC
12
15
32.4%
67.6%
36.1%
63.9%
45.5%
54.5%
35.4%
64.6%
65.7%
34.3%
46.5%
53.5%
48.1%
51.9%
44.2%
55.8%
61.7%
38.3%
61.2%
38.8%
43.2%
56.8%
48.0%
52.0%
56.4%
43.6%
62.2%
37.8%
43.4%
56.6%
49.8%
50.2%
44.1%
55.9%
52.2%
47.8%
42.9%
57.1%
81.3%
18.7%
64.2%
35.8%
58.0%
42.0%
61.5%
38.5%
86.3%
13.7%
41.9%
58.1%
55.2%
44.8%
44.6%
55.4%
2006 Gov
D_Dav
R_Cri
8
19
32.1%
67.9%
41.8%
58.2%
42.9%
57.1%
29.7%
70.3%
58.7%
41.3%
43.7%
56.3%
39.3%
60.7%
43.1%
56.9%
46.4%
53.6%
47.2%
52.8%
39.0%
61.0%
44.0%
56.0%
48.0%
52.0%
53.1%
46.9%
38.3%
61.7%
43.4%
56.6%
40.2%
59.8%
48.8%
51.2%
33.7%
66.3%
74.8%
25.2%
65.9%
34.1%
55.6%
44.4%
62.5%
37.5%
81.1%
18.9%
33.5%
66.5%
51.7%
48.3%
41.8%
58.2%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
Census and Elections Attributes
2006 CFO
D_Sin
R_Lee
17
10
35.1%
64.9%
53.0%
47.0%
51.9%
48.1%
40.2%
59.8%
67.2%
32.8%
51.3%
48.7%
49.6%
50.4%
49.5%
50.5%
55.2%
44.8%
56.2%
43.8%
49.5%
50.5%
51.3%
48.7%
56.8%
43.2%
56.6%
43.4%
43.3%
56.7%
51.2%
48.8%
46.4%
53.6%
53.3%
46.7%
42.6%
57.4%
78.9%
21.1%
71.6%
28.4%
61.9%
38.1%
69.6%
30.4%
84.5%
15.5%
41.9%
58.1%
57.7%
42.3%
49.0%
51.0%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
2006 Att.Gen
D_Cam
R_McC
10
17
31.3%
68.7%
44.5%
55.5%
43.5%
56.5%
29.9%
70.1%
60.5%
39.5%
43.5%
56.5%
38.0%
62.0%
42.9%
57.1%
46.4%
53.6%
46.4%
53.6%
40.5%
59.5%
44.4%
55.6%
50.2%
49.8%
51.3%
48.7%
38.0%
62.0%
46.9%
53.1%
40.8%
59.2%
51.1%
48.9%
35.8%
64.2%
75.6%
24.4%
68.6%
31.4%
58.3%
41.7%
64.3%
35.7%
80.7%
19.3%
35.8%
64.2%
52.5%
47.5%
45.0%
55.0%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop
R_Bro
7
20
28.6%
71.4%
33.3%
66.7%
38.6%
61.4%
28.7%
71.3%
54.0%
46.0%
41.3%
58.7%
34.6%
65.4%
35.9%
64.1%
42.6%
57.4%
44.6%
55.4%
36.1%
63.9%
39.1%
60.9%
42.8%
57.2%
47.8%
52.2%
33.4%
66.6%
41.1%
58.9%
36.1%
63.9%
44.9%
55.1%
33.2%
66.8%
73.5%
26.5%
64.5%
35.5%
53.5%
46.5%
61.6%
38.4%
80.1%
19.9%
34.2%
65.8%
51.0%
49.0%
41.8%
58.2%
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
14%
42
-17%
25
-27%
61
-27%
61
0%
410
27%
380
-73%
30
-74%
65
-74%
64
2006 US Sen
D_Nel
R_Har
24
3
44.8%
55.2%
59.9%
40.1%
57.9%
42.1%
46.0%
54.0%
71.2%
28.8%
58.8%
41.2%
59.1%
40.9%
59.7%
40.3%
63.1%
36.9%
63.8%
36.2%
57.8%
42.2%
61.4%
38.6%
65.9%
34.1%
67.8%
32.2%
56.3%
43.7%
58.4%
41.6%
56.8%
43.2%
64.2%
35.8%
51.6%
48.4%
81.9%
18.1%
77.4%
22.6%
68.4%
31.6%
72.9%
27.1%
85.0%
15.0%
47.5%
52.5%
61.0%
39.0%
53.3%
46.7%
Plan: RomoMap_B
Page 2 of 4
App. 159
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
Dems
31.0%
49.6%
40.6%
32.4%
64.1%
35.4%
35.0%
35.2%
44.0%
46.6%
35.4%
34.7%
40.4%
48.0%
35.2%
33.8%
39.4%
37.4%
28.7%
64.3%
48.6%
42.6%
47.8%
69.4%
30.3%
39.8%
32.2%
Dems
29.1%
46.1%
38.6%
30.1%
63.1%
33.8%
33.7%
33.6%
43.2%
46.2%
33.8%
33.3%
39.5%
47.2%
34.0%
33.0%
37.9%
36.3%
27.9%
64.7%
47.1%
41.9%
46.4%
68.9%
30.2%
39.4%
32.3%
NPA-Oth
19.1%
15.2%
21.3%
21.3%
15.4%
25.2%
25.9%
23.3%
31.1%
25.6%
22.4%
26.7%
26.4%
26.3%
24.8%
24.7%
21.4%
26.0%
26.0%
21.6%
27.2%
27.2%
28.0%
20.8%
28.1%
29.7%
28.6%
NPA-Oth
18.1%
14.0%
20.0%
19.9%
14.2%
24.2%
23.9%
21.3%
28.6%
24.2%
21.5%
25.4%
24.9%
24.4%
23.6%
23.8%
19.9%
24.9%
24.5%
20.9%
25.7%
25.7%
25.8%
19.5%
26.5%
27.9%
26.1%
RV who are:
Reps
51.9%
38.7%
40.2%
48.5%
21.5%
41.0%
40.4%
43.2%
25.7%
28.2%
43.8%
40.0%
34.1%
26.5%
41.2%
42.3%
40.7%
37.7%
46.1%
13.7%
25.6%
30.9%
25.6%
10.3%
41.8%
30.9%
39.1%
RV who are:
Reps
50.9%
36.3%
39.5%
47.7%
21.7%
40.4%
41.1%
43.5%
27.5%
29.2%
43.1%
39.9%
34.7%
27.5%
41.2%
42.4%
40.7%
37.7%
46.8%
14.8%
25.7%
31.7%
26.4%
11.0%
43.2%
32.4%
41.6%
Blks who
are Dems
80.3%
87.3%
83.1%
78.4%
87.9%
81.7%
77.1%
81.2%
77.9%
82.8%
81.6%
75.7%
82.6%
81.9%
78.0%
81.3%
83.9%
80.8%
76.9%
84.2%
77.1%
80.0%
78.6%
85.7%
80.0%
81.6%
76.5%
Blks who
are Dems
80.6%
88.1%
84.1%
80.0%
88.9%
82.4%
78.5%
82.4%
79.0%
83.5%
82.5%
76.3%
82.9%
82.8%
78.8%
81.0%
84.7%
81.3%
77.6%
84.3%
77.5%
80.1%
79.1%
85.8%
79.7%
81.8%
78.3%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.3%
2.0%
31.2%
2.0%
1.3%
1.5%
10.9%
1.9%
20.7%
1.6%
1.1%
1.7%
9.6%
5.6%
20.8%
6.6%
1.1%
3.5%
10.7%
3.9%
27.8%
4.4%
1.2%
2.6%
48.2%
2.9%
67.2%
2.1%
5.9%
3.0%
7.7%
3.4%
18.5%
4.2%
0.7%
2.0%
7.0%
10.9%
16.0%
14.2%
0.8%
5.8%
7.4%
5.0%
18.0%
6.2%
0.8%
3.1%
9.9%
38.0%
17.8%
43.6%
1.6%
20.9%
26.4%
14.3%
47.3%
15.1%
3.2%
8.5%
5.3%
5.1%
12.9%
7.2%
0.7%
2.7%
3.4%
5.6%
7.8%
7.5%
0.5%
3.4%
10.7%
3.9%
22.4%
4.5%
1.1%
2.4%
21.5%
17.1%
37.3%
17.3%
2.7%
12.0%
7.6%
9.2%
17.4%
11.5%
0.9%
5.4%
5.2%
3.5%
12.8%
4.7%
0.6%
1.9%
11.0%
6.9%
24.4%
8.1%
1.1%
4.0%
9.2%
6.8%
20.6%
8.3%
1.1%
4.2%
4.7%
7.0%
12.9%
10.5%
0.5%
3.6%
50.0%
13.0%
65.1%
9.2%
10.7%
20.0%
8.7%
11.1%
14.2%
10.7%
1.4%
8.4%
9.2%
10.0%
17.6%
10.6%
1.1%
6.9%
8.6%
26.5%
14.6%
22.8%
1.5%
28.0%
54.4%
22.5%
67.7%
15.5%
13.7%
45.1%
4.3%
56.2%
11.3%
53.9%
0.5%
54.3%
13.5%
52.7%
27.9%
41.5%
1.6%
61.6%
3.0%
64.6%
7.2%
53.4%
0.5%
73.2%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.0%
1.8%
28.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
10.9%
1.7%
19.3%
1.4%
1.2%
1.6%
9.3%
5.1%
19.2%
5.9%
1.1%
3.3%
11.3%
3.5%
27.9%
3.9%
1.3%
2.5%
46.1%
2.5%
63.9%
1.8%
5.8%
2.7%
7.5%
3.1%
17.4%
3.7%
0.7%
1.9%
6.8%
10.1%
15.3%
13.1%
0.9%
5.6%
7.0%
4.4%
16.5%
5.5%
0.8%
2.8%
9.4%
35.7%
16.9%
41.3%
1.5%
20.8%
25.5%
13.3%
45.8%
14.0%
3.3%
8.2%
5.2%
4.8%
12.0%
6.5%
0.7%
2.7%
3.1%
5.0%
6.9%
6.6%
0.5%
3.2%
10.1%
3.4%
20.9%
3.9%
1.2%
2.2%
20.7%
15.5%
35.7%
15.1%
2.8%
11.4%
7.2%
8.4%
16.2%
10.2%
1.0%
5.2%
4.9%
3.0%
11.8%
4.0%
0.6%
1.7%
10.5%
6.3%
22.6%
7.2%
1.1%
3.8%
8.7%
6.1%
18.9%
7.4%
1.0%
3.8%
4.2%
6.2%
11.3%
9.1%
0.5%
3.3%
48.3%
12.2%
63.2%
8.7%
10.8%
18.7%
7.7%
9.6%
12.2%
9.1%
1.4%
7.7%
8.6%
8.8%
16.1%
9.2%
1.1%
6.2%
8.1%
24.3%
13.3%
20.4%
1.5%
27.1%
54.8%
21.2%
67.8%
14.4%
14.6%
44.4%
4.4%
52.9%
11.5%
48.9%
0.5%
53.1%
13.7%
50.6%
28.1%
38.9%
1.7%
60.6%
3.0%
63.7%
7.4%
50.5%
0.5%
73.3%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
29.6%
40.4%
40.3%
34.4%
47.4%
25.6%
35.3%
33.1%
46.6%
23.2%
42.3%
24.5%
45.2%
22.7%
43.7%
27.7%
50.9%
16.0%
49.0%
17.9%
48.1%
24.1%
45.1%
24.9%
45.8%
22.2%
46.9%
20.3%
42.8%
25.5%
44.2%
23.8%
44.8%
24.7%
45.2%
23.7%
42.2%
24.9%
45.9%
22.8%
46.0%
20.5%
44.8%
22.6%
40.1%
29.4%
47.0%
23.1%
28.0%
43.5%
30.6%
38.8%
25.5%
47.9%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
28.6%
40.1%
38.3%
33.7%
45.6%
25.1%
33.9%
32.0%
45.5%
22.6%
41.6%
24.4%
44.0%
21.4%
42.3%
26.8%
49.6%
14.1%
48.9%
16.7%
47.7%
23.5%
44.3%
24.2%
45.2%
21.1%
47.6%
18.5%
42.3%
24.4%
44.5%
22.5%
44.3%
23.4%
44.3%
23.1%
41.8%
23.3%
45.9%
21.0%
45.5%
19.5%
44.6%
21.5%
39.8%
27.1%
47.4%
20.7%
29.0%
40.4%
31.0%
36.1%
26.7%
44.3%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
29.2%
59.8%
11.0%
49.5%
41.4%
9.1%
38.7%
47.2%
14.1%
30.1%
56.7%
13.2%
65.9%
25.6%
8.5%
33.5%
49.0%
17.4%
32.8%
50.7%
16.6%
32.4%
51.9%
15.6%
42.3%
38.2%
19.4%
44.3%
39.4%
16.3%
32.1%
51.9%
16.0%
32.5%
48.2%
19.3%
39.5%
42.3%
18.2%
47.9%
35.9%
16.2%
33.6%
49.5%
16.9%
31.7%
50.6%
17.7%
36.3%
50.2%
13.5%
34.9%
46.2%
18.9%
24.8%
57.7%
17.5%
69.3%
16.9%
13.8%
50.7%
29.3%
20.0%
42.1%
38.5%
19.3%
49.8%
31.3%
18.9%
76.2%
11.2%
12.6%
25.9%
55.5%
18.6%
40.0%
40.8%
19.3%
30.6%
51.0%
18.4%
Voters who are:
Dems
Reps
NPA-Oth
28.7%
55.8%
15.5%
46.6%
41.3%
12.1%
38.5%
43.6%
17.9%
29.7%
52.6%
17.7%
65.5%
22.4%
12.1%
33.6%
44.8%
21.6%
33.6%
44.1%
22.3%
33.1%
46.7%
20.1%
44.7%
28.6%
26.6%
47.0%
31.5%
21.5%
33.0%
47.7%
19.3%
33.2%
43.5%
23.4%
40.4%
37.0%
22.6%
48.7%
29.1%
22.2%
33.8%
44.6%
21.6%
33.0%
45.7%
21.3%
37.6%
44.6%
17.8%
36.2%
41.1%
22.7%
27.1%
51.0%
21.8%
68.6%
13.2%
18.1%
48.8%
26.6%
24.6%
42.9%
32.8%
24.3%
48.0%
26.8%
25.1%
72.9%
9.5%
17.6%
29.5%
45.8%
24.7%
40.5%
33.6%
25.9%
32.6%
41.9%
25.5%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
9.6%
1.1%
28.6%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
9.5%
1.1%
17.7%
0.8%
0.7%
1.2%
7.6%
2.9%
17.3%
3.3%
0.7%
2.1%
9.4%
2.2%
26.2%
2.2%
0.9%
1.8%
43.7%
1.5%
62.0%
1.0%
3.2%
1.8%
6.1%
2.0%
16.1%
2.5%
0.4%
1.4%
5.8%
6.3%
14.5%
8.3%
0.6%
4.0%
5.7%
2.8%
15.4%
3.5%
0.6%
2.1%
10.1%
23.6%
20.1%
30.6%
1.1%
13.1%
24.2%
8.3%
48.1%
9.2%
2.1%
5.4%
4.2%
2.6%
11.4%
3.8%
0.4%
1.7%
2.7%
3.1%
6.7%
4.1%
0.3%
2.2%
8.5%
2.1%
19.2%
2.4%
0.6%
1.6%
18.7%
9.2%
34.4%
8.9%
1.7%
7.9%
6.5%
4.9%
15.9%
5.9%
0.7%
3.6%
3.6%
1.6%
9.9%
2.2%
0.3%
1.1%
8.3%
3.2%
20.6%
3.7%
0.6%
2.3%
7.2%
3.6%
17.8%
4.5%
0.7%
2.7%
2.6%
3.0%
8.7%
4.9%
0.3%
2.0%
52.5%
8.1%
67.8%
5.1%
7.7%
15.4%
7.3%
6.0%
11.9%
5.1%
1.1%
5.9%
7.5%
5.5%
15.1%
5.6%
0.7%
4.6%
8.8%
20.0%
14.6%
14.4%
1.2%
25.8%
62.4%
15.2%
74.1%
9.0%
11.6%
43.3%
4.0%
45.9%
13.1%
38.3%
0.3%
48.6%
14.5%
44.8%
31.8%
28.8%
1.1%
57.7%
2.6%
61.5%
7.1%
40.4%
0.3%
73.7%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are:
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
Black
Hisp.
11.4%
1.7%
33.4%
1.6%
1.0%
1.4%
11.1%
1.7%
21.5%
1.4%
0.8%
1.5%
9.7%
4.7%
21.7%
5.7%
0.8%
3.0%
10.7%
3.3%
29.3%
3.8%
1.0%
2.3%
49.8%
2.4%
68.8%
1.7%
4.6%
2.7%
7.6%
3.0%
19.1%
3.8%
0.6%
1.9%
7.0%
9.6%
16.6%
12.9%
0.7%
5.1%
7.4%
4.3%
18.7%
5.6%
0.7%
2.8%
11.0%
33.9%
20.0%
40.5%
1.4%
17.5%
27.5%
12.2%
50.0%
13.1%
2.6%
7.1%
5.3%
4.3%
13.5%
6.4%
0.5%
2.3%
3.6%
5.0%
8.4%
6.9%
0.4%
3.1%
10.9%
3.4%
23.2%
4.0%
0.9%
2.2%
22.3%
15.1%
38.7%
15.5%
2.2%
10.5%
7.9%
8.0%
18.6%
10.2%
0.8%
4.8%
5.0%
3.0%
13.0%
4.2%
0.4%
1.6%
11.2%
5.6%
25.9%
6.8%
0.8%
3.2%
9.5%
5.9%
21.8%
7.4%
0.9%
3.7%
4.5%
5.6%
13.5%
9.1%
0.4%
2.9%
54.4%
11.7%
68.8%
8.0%
9.4%
20.2%
9.4%
10.2%
15.4%
9.6%
1.3%
8.0%
9.8%
9.1%
18.8%
9.6%
0.9%
6.6%
9.4%
26.6%
15.9%
22.0%
1.4%
28.9%
58.7%
20.3%
70.9%
13.7%
12.5%
45.9%
4.5%
52.5%
12.6%
50.1%
0.4%
51.0%
14.4%
50.8%
30.0%
38.0%
1.3%
60.6%
3.0%
64.1%
7.2%
51.0%
0.3%
73.4%
Voter Registration and Turnout
Blks who
are Dems
87.3%
92.6%
88.6%
84.1%
93.5%
88.3%
82.3%
86.7%
84.3%
88.2%
87.0%
80.3%
89.3%
88.1%
82.8%
87.7%
89.9%
86.4%
83.3%
89.5%
82.2%
85.2%
83.3%
90.5%
84.9%
87.4%
82.8%
Blks who
are Dems
83.9%
89.9%
86.0%
81.2%
90.4%
84.5%
79.7%
83.8%
81.1%
85.6%
84.2%
78.2%
85.7%
84.4%
80.1%
84.9%
86.7%
83.5%
80.8%
86.8%
79.6%
82.5%
80.9%
88.0%
82.7%
84.4%
79.0%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
24.8%
55.7%
36.2%
43.7%
44.8%
34.8%
30.8%
46.7%
46.1%
31.3%
41.5%
34.3%
43.0%
32.1%
40.5%
38.0%
54.9%
21.3%
49.2%
25.7%
46.9%
33.3%
42.7%
34.5%
44.3%
32.0%
46.2%
30.6%
40.5%
36.3%
42.9%
34.5%
42.4%
35.6%
43.1%
34.6%
39.8%
37.8%
44.1%
32.3%
43.1%
29.2%
42.6%
32.6%
35.8%
40.2%
45.1%
31.9%
21.6%
58.8%
25.7%
52.5%
20.1%
61.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems
Reps
27.5%
44.8%
38.3%
36.8%
46.2%
27.3%
34.0%
36.2%
47.1%
24.7%
42.3%
27.5%
45.3%
23.7%
42.5%
29.8%
53.3%
14.8%
50.6%
18.5%
49.0%
25.6%
45.3%
26.5%
47.3%
23.1%
50.0%
20.4%
43.3%
27.1%
46.7%
24.0%
45.5%
25.7%
45.5%
25.9%
44.2%
26.2%
47.0%
22.8%
46.1%
21.0%
45.1%
23.6%
39.7%
29.1%
49.2%
21.5%
28.2%
44.5%
30.3%
40.2%
25.9%
48.1%
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are:
Reps who
Black
Hisp
are Hisp.
24.3%
0.7%
0.7%
16.3%
0.5%
1.0%
14.4%
1.7%
1.4%
21.7%
1.3%
1.3%
58.2%
0.5%
1.3%
16.2%
1.6%
1.0%
12.2%
5.3%
2.9%
14.3%
2.4%
1.6%
17.5%
23.2%
9.2%
46.9%
7.2%
3.9%
9.9%
2.3%
1.2%
5.2%
2.5%
1.6%
18.0%
1.8%
1.3%
30.1%
5.0%
5.6%
14.1%
3.5%
2.5%
9.2%
1.3%
0.9%
18.0%
2.1%
1.5%
17.3%
2.9%
2.0%
7.6%
2.8%
1.5%
69.3%
2.9%
11.9%
9.9%
2.6%
4.7%
13.7%
3.3%
3.6%
14.4%
9.4%
24.7%
78.4%
5.3%
40.6%
13.7%
32.0%
46.7%
33.4%
19.3%
55.8%
7.5%
32.9%
76.7%
Plan: RomoMap_B
Page 3 of 4
County
Alachua
Alachua
Brevard
Brevard
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Charlotte
Charlotte
Citrus
Citrus
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Columbia
Columbia
Duval
Duval
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Jefferson
Jefferson
Lee
Lee
Leon
Leon
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Orange
Orange
Orange
Osceola
Osceola
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
Polk
App. 160
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
3
206,457
83.5%
629.7
5
40,879
16.5%
339.1
7
94,745
17.4%
227.7
8
448,631
82.6%
1,329.3
20
481,994
27.6%
891.5
21
300,190
17.2%
75.5
22
306,530
17.5%
135.1
23
509,736
29.2%
198.0
24
149,616
8.6%
22.7
16
106,386
66.5%
278.9
17
53,592
33.5%
579.4
3
14,315
10.1%
57.9
11
126,921
89.9%
715.3
3
95,457
50.0%
576.0
4
95,408
50.0%
67.5
19
107,812
33.5%
306.2
25
213,708
66.5%
1,998.8
2
55,051
81.5%
431.3
5
12,480
18.5%
370.1
4
527,623
61.0%
675.3
5
336,640
39.0%
243.2
12
11,451
0.9%
20.4
14
696,345
56.6%
505.3
15
521,430
42.4%
740.0
1
11,489
57.7%
388.6
2
8,438
42.3%
100.4
2
4,671
31.6%
287.2
5
10,090
68.4%
349.3
17
30,221
4.9%
104.5
19
588,533
95.1%
1,108.0
2
140,825
51.1%
310.0
5
134,662
48.9%
391.8
15
112,322
34.8%
653.4
16
210,511
65.2%
239.2
3
305,751
92.3%
1,568.3
5
25,547
7.7%
94.3
23
186,609
7.5%
96.4
24
546,729
21.9%
91.9
25
443,497
17.8%
506.1
26
623,255
25.0%
1,549.9
27
696,345
27.9%
186.9
7
252,767
22.1%
319.6
9
354,714
31.0%
255.9
10
538,475
47.0%
427.8
8
22,115
8.2%
1,202.7
9
246,570
91.8%
303.2
18
319,813
24.2%
543.0
20
214,351
16.2%
1,477.6
21
396,155
30.0%
192.1
22
389,815
29.5%
170.3
12
220,197
24.0%
180.5
13
696,345
76.0%
427.6
9
95,060
15.8%
223.4
11
6,173
1.0%
179.4
17
500,862
83.2%
1,607.8
Area%
65.0%
35.0%
14.6%
85.4%
67.4%
5.7%
10.2%
15.0%
1.7%
32.5%
67.5%
7.5%
92.5%
89.5%
10.5%
13.3%
86.7%
53.8%
46.2%
73.5%
26.5%
1.6%
39.9%
58.5%
79.5%
20.5%
45.1%
54.9%
8.6%
91.4%
44.2%
55.8%
73.2%
26.8%
94.3%
5.7%
4.0%
3.8%
20.8%
63.8%
7.7%
31.9%
25.5%
42.6%
79.9%
20.1%
22.8%
62.0%
8.1%
7.1%
29.7%
70.3%
11.1%
8.9%
80.0%
County
Seminole
Seminole
St. Lucie
St. Lucie
Volusia
Volusia
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
7
348,832
82.5%
291.3
10
73,886
17.5%
54.0
8
47,575
17.1%
483.9
18
230,214
82.9%
204.3
6
410,609
83.0%
1,381.0
10
83,984
17.0%
51.4
Area%
84.4%
15.6%
70.3%
29.7%
96.4%
3.6%
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Clearwater
12
18,493
17.2%
5.9
Clearwater
13
89,192
82.8%
33.4
Coconut Creek
20
5,030
9.5%
1.7
Coconut Creek
21
47,879
90.5%
10.3
Deerfield Beach
20
26,242
35.0%
4.0
Deerfield Beach
21
33,897
45.2%
9.3
Deerfield Beach
22
14,879
19.8%
3.0
Deltona
6
5,117
6.0%
3.4
Deltona
10
80,065
94.0%
37.6
Edgewood
7
1,123
44.9%
0.7
Edgewood
10
1,380
55.1%
0.8
Fort Lauderdale
20
61,929
37.4%
12.1
Fort Lauderdale
22
103,592
62.6%
26.3
Fort Lauderdale
23
0
0.0%
0.2
Gainesville
3
99,359
79.9%
43.3
Gainesville
5
24,995
20.1%
19.1
Hallandale Beach
23
21,890
59.0%
2.4
Hallandale Beach
24
15,223
41.0%
2.2
Hollywood
23
97,137
69.0%
24.6
Hollywood
24
43,631
31.0%
6.1
Jacksonville
4
485,144
59.0%
631.4
Jacksonville
5
336,640
41.0%
243.2
Lake City
2
7,781
64.6%
7.9
Lake City
5
4,265
35.4%
4.5
Margate
20
14,535
27.3%
2.2
Margate
21
38,749
72.7%
6.9
Miami
24
126,597
31.7%
21.1
Miami
27
272,860
68.3%
35.0
Miramar
20
89,888
73.7%
27.3
Miramar
24
32,153
26.3%
4.0
North Miami
23
9,175
15.6%
4.8
North Miami
24
49,611
84.4%
5.1
North Miami Beach 23
7,827
18.8%
1.2
North Miami Beach 24
33,696
81.2%
4.2
Oakland Park
20
22,053
53.3%
4.6
Oakland Park
22
19,310
46.7%
3.5
Ocala
3
46,208
82.1%
35.3
Ocala
5
10,107
17.9%
9.6
Orlando
7
59,957
25.2%
18.6
Orlando
9
72,199
30.3%
60.8
Orlando
10
106,144
44.5%
31.3
Pembroke Pines
23
116,399
75.2%
28.3
Pembroke Pines
24
38,351
24.8%
6.5
Plantation
20
17,652
20.8%
3.7
Plantation
22
67,303
79.2%
18.2
Pompano Beach
20
41,041
41.1%
8.9
Pompano Beach
21
1,447
1.4%
2.0
Pompano Beach
22
57,357
57.4%
14.6
Port St. Lucie
8
19,347
11.8%
46.0
145,256
88.2%
69.3
18
Port St. Lucie
Riviera Beach
18
7,923
24.4%
3.5
Riviera Beach
20
24,565
75.6%
6.7
Sanford
7
5,214
9.7%
7.5
Sanford
10
48,356
90.3%
19.0
Sunrise
20
28,480
33.7%
3.9
Counties and Cities
Area%
15.0%
85.0%
14.4%
85.6%
24.6%
57.3%
18.2%
8.4%
91.6%
45.4%
54.6%
31.3%
68.3%
0.5%
69.4%
30.6%
51.9%
48.1%
80.1%
19.9%
72.2%
27.8%
64.0%
36.0%
24.2%
75.8%
37.6%
62.4%
87.4%
12.6%
48.5%
51.5%
22.0%
78.0%
56.8%
43.2%
78.7%
21.3%
16.8%
54.9%
28.3%
81.3%
18.7%
16.9%
83.1%
35.0%
7.7%
57.3%
39.9%
60.1%
34.4%
65.6%
28.2%
71.8%
21.4%
Cities included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop
Pop%
Total Area
Sunrise
22
6,341
7.5%
1.1
Sunrise
23
49,618
58.8%
13.3
Tallahassee
2
77,302
42.6%
60.1
Tallahassee
5
104,074
57.4%
43.3
Tamarac
20
27,864
46.1%
6.3
Tamarac
21
32,563
53.9%
5.8
Tampa
14
294,105
87.6%
149.1
Tampa
15
41,604
12.4%
26.2
West Palm Beach
18
45,479
45.5%
41.0
West Palm Beach
20
54,440
54.5%
17.1
City
Area%
5.9%
72.7%
58.1%
41.9%
51.9%
48.1%
85.1%
14.9%
70.6%
29.4%
Plan: RomoMap_B
Page 4 of 4
Weston
23
Pembroke Pines
Atlantic Beach
Jacksonville
Baldwin
Jacksonville Beach
Miami Gardens
CLAY
Green Cove Springs
Starke
St. Augustine
Tampa Bay Area
Aventura
St. Leo Dade City
Port Richey
24 North Miami
Medley Hialeah
New Port Richey
12
Miami Beach
Doral
PASCO
Zephyrhills
South Miami
MIAMI-DADE
Dunedin
Pinecrest Coral Gables
Palmetto Bay
Cutler Bay
Belleair Largo
PINELLAS
13 Pinellas Park
14
Homestead
Treasure Island
Scale bar for insets
0
5
10
Gulfport
Miles
20
Map produced by professional staff:
Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment
404 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100
Office: 103 SOB; Phone: (850) 487-5855;
Website: http://www.flsenate.gov/session/redistricting
5
HILLSBOROUGH
Deltona
Apopka
Ocoee
7
16
Bradenton
MANATEE
HIL
10
ORANGE
15
POLK
BREVARD
GH
R OU
17
SARASOTA
INDIAN RIVE
HARDEE
HIGHLANDS
DESOTO
LEE
Oak Hill
ST. LUCIE
MARTIN
19
HENDRY
20
COLLIER
21
BROWARD
Oviedo
Belle Isle
Bay Lake Lake Buena Vista
Kissimmee
18
PALM BEACH
25
Titusville
Orlando
R
GLADES
CHARLOTTE
VOLUSIA 6
8
OSCEOLA
MIAMI-DADE
8
ORANGE
OSCEOLA
16
7
9
MANATEE
Winter Park
Windermere
10
O
LSB
SEMINOLE
Winter Garden
17
12
13 14
LAKE
Sanford
Winter Springs
Maitland
St. Pete Beach
Palmetto
DeBary
Lake Mary
St. Petersburg
Holmes Beach
LAKE
Mount Dora
Tampa
Seminole
Florida City
Eustis
Plant City
Clearwater
27
26
Temple Terrace
Oldsmar
Orlando Area
15
PASCO
Congressional Districts
established by
Ch. 2014-255, Laws of Fla.
13-Aug-2014
11
Tarpon Springs
Miami
Sweetwater
ST. JOHNS
6
11
VOLUSIA
EE
Miami Lakes
Hollywood
3
FLAGLER
MARION
HERNANDO
by Sen. Galvano and
Rep. Corcoran
7-Aug-2014
*****
Orange Park
6
5
CITRUS
"
PUTNAM
OB
Miramar
Dania Beach
ALACHUA
H
EEC
25
Cooper City
CLAY
OK
Southwest Ranches
Davie
Fort Lauderdale
D
NS
Remedial Plan
H000C9057
5
DUVAL
Pompano Beach
Plantation
A
R
B
R
BROWARD
D
ION OR
F
LEVY
Parkland Deerfield Beach
Sunrise Lauderhill Oakland Park
UN
SUMTE
4
Delray Beach
10
Callahan
NASSAU
4
County boundary
Interstate
US Highway
Major road
Sea, lake, or river
District boundary & number
H
ST. JO
Lantana
Boca Raton
Tamarac
3
DUVAL
BAKER
GILCHR IST
FRANKLIN
E
DIXIE
Jacksonville Area
22
Coral Springs
LA
FA
YE
TT
TAYLOR
E
21
GULF
WAKULLA
NE
Lake Worth
Boynton Beach
20
LIBERTY
HAMILTON
MADISON
N
WA
SU
Greenacres
LEON
Palm Beach
Palm Springs
Wellington
2
Miles
0 5 10 20 30 40 50 60
Loxahatchee Groves West Palm Beach
PALM BEACH
BAY
NASSAU
GADSDEN
Scale bar for statewide map
Riviera Beach
Royal Palm Beach
ON
GT
BIA
BIA
Palm Beach Gardens
Belle Glade
IN
SH
WA
HO
AM
ESC
Jupiter
Pahokee
WALTON
Legend
JACKSON
COLUM
1
Tequesta
18
SANTA ROSA
UN
Jupiter Island
CA
L
MARTIN
OKALOOSA
HOLMES
JEF
FER
SON
South Florida
26
9
St. Cloud
22
23
24
27
MONROE
App. 161
8/15/2014
Dist.
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Pop.
Dev.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
-1
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
Black
VAP
Hisp.
VAP
13.19%
23.83%
13.25%
12.91%
48.11%
9.00%
10.87%
9.12%
11.23%
12.21%
7.72%
4.34%
5.29%
25.63%
12.72%
5.83%
8.34%
11.07%
6.47%
50.06%
11.23%
10.33%
10.99%
54.92%
7.70%
10.02%
7.71%
4.55%
4.75%
6.99%
6.72%
10.29%
5.89%
17.39%
7.66%
38.37%
16.89%
7.38%
9.94%
7.24%
25.61%
14.99%
8.76%
14.35%
12.05%
14.83%
18.54%
18.29%
17.72%
36.73%
33.15%
70.69%
68.91%
75.04%
2012 US Pres
D_Oba R_Rom
Total 11
16
1 30.5% 69.5%
2 47.0% 53.0%
3 37.9% 62.1%
4 35.8% 64.2%
5 69.3% 30.7%
6 42.3% 57.7%
7 48.6% 51.4%
8 42.6% 57.4%
9 60.5% 39.5%
10 47.6% 52.4%
11 40.6% 59.4%
12 45.3% 54.7%
13 50.7% 49.3%
14 65.8% 34.2%
15 46.0% 54.0%
16 45.3% 54.7%
17 41.6% 58.4%
18 47.9% 52.1%
19 39.0% 61.0%
20 83.0% 17.0%
21 60.9% 39.1%
22 54.7% 45.3%
23 61.9% 38.1%
24 87.8% 12.2%
25 49.0% 51.0%
26 53.4% 46.6%
27 53.3% 46.7%
Dist.
Remedial Plan (Congressional Districts--H000C9057)
Page 2 of 4
Census and Elections Attributes
2010 Census Population and Geography
Hisp.Blk Length Perim Area Reock Convex PolsbyVAP (miles) (miles) (sq.mi)
Hull Popper
2164.6 7735.3 65,757.2 0.40 0.73 0.32
0.26% 127
397 4,759 0.37 0.82 0.38
0.31% 167
550 10,076 0.46 0.78 0.42
0.34% 132
520 7,864 0.57 0.79 0.37
0.44% 77
450 2,103 0.45 0.73 0.13
1.02% 143
583 2,031 0.13 0.42 0.08
0.27% 111
331 2,908 0.30 0.79 0.33
0.95% 34
141
569
0.61 0.85 0.36
0.39% 95
271 2,412 0.34 0.76 0.41
2.24% 52
183 1,056 0.51 0.81 0.39
0.78% 70
253 1,584 0.42 0.83 0.31
0.38% 83
316 2,722 0.50 0.73 0.34
0.38% 58
184 1,068 0.40 0.81 0.40
0.27% 34
110
418
0.46 0.82 0.43
1.62% 43
162
523
0.36 0.69 0.25
0.74% 50
204
875
0.44 0.75 0.26
0.28% 60
178 1,193 0.42 0.81 0.47
0.44% 124
505 7,751 0.64 0.83 0.38
0.45% 69
224 1,891 0.50 0.82 0.47
0.47% 83
238 1,367 0.25 0.70 0.30
1.18% 84
393 2,698 0.48 0.74 0.22
0.65% 34
112
264
0.28 0.60 0.26
0.56% 50
187
360
0.18 0.61 0.13
1.21% 37
124
283
0.27 0.57 0.23
3.25% 20
73
120
0.38 0.73 0.28
1.75% 103
365 3,383 0.40 0.73 0.32
1.47% 184
551 4,900 0.18 0.46 0.20
2.23% 40
130
578
0.46 0.81 0.43
2012 US Sen
D_Nel R_Mac
20
7
36.9% 63.1%
55.4% 44.6%
46.1% 53.9%
43.6% 56.4%
73.4% 26.6%
49.8% 50.2%
55.8% 44.2%
51.2% 48.8%
66.4% 33.6%
54.6% 45.4%
49.8% 50.2%
54.5% 45.5%
59.5% 40.5%
71.0% 29.0%
53.7% 46.3%
51.9% 48.1%
49.0% 51.0%
54.7% 45.3%
43.9% 56.1%
84.8% 15.2%
66.6% 33.4%
59.7% 40.3%
65.7% 34.3%
88.2% 11.8%
51.9% 48.1%
55.8% 44.2%
56.0% 44.0%
2010 Gov
D_Sin R_Sco
10
17
32.3% 67.7%
53.5% 46.5%
42.1% 57.9%
37.2% 62.8%
65.2% 34.8%
43.4% 56.6%
48.1% 51.9%
42.3% 57.7%
55.0% 45.0%
45.0% 55.0%
41.9% 58.1%
45.6% 54.4%
51.0% 49.0%
63.0% 37.0%
45.4% 54.6%
46.1% 53.9%
41.7% 58.3%
49.0% 51.0%
36.7% 63.3%
79.6% 20.4%
63.0% 37.0%
54.7% 45.3%
61.5% 38.5%
86.1% 13.9%
41.6% 58.4%
49.9% 50.1%
48.4% 51.6%
2010 CFO
D_Aus R_Atw
7
20
26.5% 73.5%
50.5% 49.5%
34.4% 65.6%
29.4% 70.6%
60.7% 39.3%
35.2% 64.8%
36.2% 63.8%
33.9% 66.1%
44.9% 55.1%
36.1% 63.9%
33.6% 66.4%
33.6% 66.4%
37.3% 62.7%
52.3% 47.7%
36.0% 64.0%
34.3% 65.7%
32.9% 67.1%
36.2% 63.8%
27.9% 72.1%
74.7% 25.3%
51.6% 48.4%
42.0% 58.0%
53.0% 47.0%
83.8% 16.2%
34.8% 65.2%
42.2% 57.8%
39.5% 60.5%
District lines and
City and County Boundaries
Number of Counties
Counties with only one district
Counties split into more than one district
Aggregate number of county splits
Aggregate number of county splits with population
Number of Cities
Cities with only one district
Cities split into more than one district
Aggregate number of city splits
Aggregate number of city splits with population
2010 Att.Gen
2010 Cm.Ag
2010 US Sen
D_Gel R_Bon D_Mad R_Put D_Mee R_Rub
6
21
6
21
3
20
26.7% 73.3% 26.3% 73.7% 13.3% 66.3%
45.5% 54.5% 47.4% 52.6% 21.5% 49.8%
35.1% 64.9% 34.0% 66.0% 17.9% 58.7%
31.1% 68.9% 30.7% 69.3% 16.7% 63.9%
61.8% 38.2% 61.4% 38.6% 46.7% 35.0%
36.9% 63.1% 35.4% 64.6% 17.9% 56.2%
39.8% 60.2% 37.2% 62.8% 21.1% 56.1%
35.9% 64.1% 34.0% 66.0% 15.7% 56.3%
47.6% 52.4% 45.9% 54.1% 27.0% 49.1%
38.5% 61.5% 35.6% 64.4% 20.9% 55.7%
35.2% 64.8% 33.2% 66.8% 15.2% 54.4%
36.1% 63.9% 32.5% 67.5% 12.5% 48.2%
41.6% 58.4% 36.7% 63.3% 14.8% 41.7%
53.2% 46.8% 50.7% 49.3% 29.5% 34.6%
35.8% 64.2% 30.6% 69.4% 16.9% 50.2%
39.2% 60.8% 34.6% 65.4% 13.0% 48.0%
34.1% 65.9% 29.8% 70.2% 14.0% 53.2%
42.5% 57.5% 36.6% 63.4% 15.8% 51.0%
30.3% 69.7% 27.5% 72.5% 9.6% 60.3%
77.9% 22.1% 76.2% 23.8% 51.1% 19.2%
59.0% 41.0% 54.2% 45.8% 19.2% 36.0%
49.8% 50.2% 45.5% 54.5% 17.7% 43.5%
59.2% 40.8% 56.1% 43.9% 23.9% 36.7%
85.7% 14.3% 85.3% 14.7% 64.1% 13.3%
37.0% 63.0% 35.7% 64.3% 16.1% 60.3%
45.5% 54.5% 43.7% 56.3% 20.9% 51.5%
45.6% 54.4% 41.5% 58.5% 17.7% 55.1%
I_Cri
4
20.4%
28.7%
23.4%
19.4%
18.3%
25.9%
22.8%
28.0%
23.8%
23.3%
30.4%
39.2%
43.5%
35.8%
32.9%
39.0%
32.8%
33.2%
30.2%
29.7%
44.9%
38.8%
39.4%
22.6%
23.5%
27.6%
27.2%
2008 US Pres
D_Oba R_McC
11
16
32.4% 67.6%
47.5% 52.5%
40.0% 60.0%
36.9% 63.1%
68.9% 31.1%
46.4% 53.6%
50.5% 49.5%
44.4% 55.6%
59.0% 41.0%
48.4% 51.6%
43.5% 56.5%
47.2% 52.8%
51.9% 48.1%
65.7% 34.3%
46.4% 53.6%
48.6% 51.4%
43.8% 56.2%
51.5% 48.5%
42.7% 57.3%
80.8% 19.2%
63.9% 36.1%
57.1% 42.9%
62.2% 37.8%
86.5% 13.5%
45.8% 54.2%
49.8% 50.2%
48.8% 51.2%
2006 Gov
D_Dav R_Cri
7
20
32.1% 67.9%
48.9% 51.1%
40.4% 59.6%
30.7% 69.3%
58.1% 41.9%
43.9% 56.1%
39.3% 60.7%
43.2% 56.8%
44.7% 55.3%
39.1% 60.9%
40.6% 59.4%
43.2% 56.8%
45.3% 54.7%
56.5% 43.5%
40.4% 59.6%
42.5% 57.5%
39.7% 60.3%
47.9% 52.1%
33.3% 66.7%
75.5% 24.5%
65.3% 34.7%
55.1% 44.9%
62.8% 37.2%
81.3% 18.7%
38.0% 62.0%
47.1% 52.9%
44.6% 55.4%
Benchmark
(2002 Congress)
67
37
30
83
83
410
300
110
254
244
New/proposed plan
and % change from 2002
0%
67
46 24%
21 -30%
61 -27%
61 -27%
0%
410
382 27%
28 -75%
66 -74%
65 -73%
2006 CFO
2006 Att.Gen
D_Sin R_Lee D_Cam R_McC
17
10
9
18
35.1% 64.9% 31.3% 68.7%
59.7% 40.3% 52.0% 48.0%
50.7% 49.3% 41.8% 58.2%
41.2% 58.8% 30.9% 69.1%
65.0% 35.0% 57.4% 42.6%
51.5% 48.5% 43.7% 56.3%
49.6% 50.4% 38.2% 61.8%
49.7% 50.3% 42.3% 57.7%
54.4% 45.6% 44.2% 55.8%
49.6% 50.4% 39.6% 60.4%
49.9% 50.1% 42.2% 57.8%
50.1% 49.9% 43.2% 56.8%
54.0% 46.0% 47.3% 52.7%
60.8% 39.2% 55.3% 44.7%
44.5% 55.5% 39.5% 60.5%
50.3% 49.7% 46.1% 53.9%
46.4% 53.6% 40.7% 59.3%
52.7% 47.3% 50.5% 49.5%
42.5% 57.5% 35.3% 64.7%
79.7% 20.3% 76.4% 23.6%
71.0% 29.0% 68.0% 32.0%
61.3% 38.7% 57.8% 42.2%
70.0% 30.0% 64.7% 35.3%
84.6% 15.4% 80.8% 19.2%
45.7% 54.3% 40.1% 59.9%
53.5% 46.5% 48.5% 51.5%
51.6% 48.4% 47.7% 52.3%
2006 Cm.Ag
D_Cop R_Bro
7
20
28.6% 71.4%
39.4% 60.6%
35.3% 64.7%
29.7% 70.3%
56.1% 43.9%
41.5% 58.5%
35.8% 64.2%
35.8% 64.2%
40.0% 60.0%
35.8% 64.2%
38.0% 62.0%
38.4% 61.6%
39.8% 60.2%
51.2% 48.8%
35.2% 64.8%
39.7% 60.3%
36.4% 63.6%
44.4% 55.6%
32.8% 67.2%
74.1% 25.9%
63.7% 36.3%
52.7% 47.3%
61.9% 38.1%
80.4% 19.6%
38.6% 61.4%
46.7% 53.3%
44.7% 55.3%
2006 US Sen
D_Nel R_Har
25
2
44.8% 55.2%
66.7% 33.3%
55.3% 44.7%
47.2% 52.8%
69.8% 30.2%
58.8% 41.2%
58.6% 41.4%
59.7% 40.3%
62.8% 37.2%
57.8% 42.2%
57.8% 42.2%
60.9% 39.1%
63.7% 36.3%
70.8% 29.2%
57.4% 42.6%
57.4% 42.6%
57.1% 42.9%
63.9% 36.1%
51.2% 48.8%
82.7% 17.3%
76.9% 23.1%
68.0% 32.0%
73.1% 26.9%
85.1% 14.9%
50.6% 49.4%
57.2% 42.8%
55.9% 44.1%
App. 162
8/15/2014
Voter Registration and Turnout
Dems
29.1%
51.8%
40.3%
32.7%
60.2%
34.3%
35.1%
33.4%
41.7%
36.5%
35.1%
33.3%
35.2%
50.2%
37.7%
32.1%
36.0%
36.2%
27.5%
65.6%
46.8%
40.8%
47.1%
68.6%
32.4%
35.6%
35.8%
RV who are:
Reps NPA-Oth
51.9% 19.1%
32.7% 15.5%
40.6% 19.2%
46.3% 21.0%
20.9% 18.9%
40.8% 24.9%
37.9% 27.0%
43.5% 23.1%
28.4% 29.9%
38.1% 25.4%
43.3% 21.7%
40.2% 26.5%
37.5% 27.3%
24.5% 25.3%
38.1% 24.1%
43.5% 24.4%
41.2% 22.7%
38.1% 25.7%
46.5% 25.9%
13.3% 21.1%
25.8% 27.4%
31.8% 27.4%
24.9% 28.0%
10.4% 20.9%
38.4% 29.2%
35.2% 29.3%
35.9% 28.3%
2012 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are: Blks who
Black Hisp. Black Hisp. Black Hisp. are Dems
11.3% 2.0% 31.2% 2.0% 1.3% 1.5% 80.3%
21.8% 2.2% 37.2% 1.8% 1.8% 1.9% 88.5%
10.9% 4.1% 22.7% 4.0% 1.2% 2.9% 83.8%
12.5% 3.8% 30.5% 4.0% 1.3% 2.5% 79.7%
47.6% 6.4% 68.0% 5.4% 6.6% 4.9% 86.1%
7.9% 3.2% 18.8% 3.9% 0.7% 1.9% 82.1%
9.5% 13.6% 21.2% 17.7% 1.2% 7.1% 78.1%
7.9% 4.6% 19.2% 5.8% 0.9% 2.9% 81.6%
8.4% 34.5% 15.6% 41.1% 1.3% 17.6% 77.1%
10.8% 12.4% 24.0% 15.7% 1.3% 6.0% 81.0%
6.0% 4.8% 14.4% 6.8% 0.6% 2.7% 84.3%
3.8% 6.7% 8.6% 8.7% 0.6% 4.2% 75.1%
4.5% 3.9% 9.9% 5.0% 0.5% 2.3% 77.4%
25.5% 15.7% 42.3% 15.0% 3.4% 11.9% 83.3%
12.4% 9.0% 26.4% 10.3% 1.4% 5.5% 80.4%
4.9% 3.6% 12.5% 4.9% 0.5% 1.9% 81.2%
7.3% 7.3% 16.6% 9.1% 0.8% 4.1% 82.1%
9.6% 6.3% 21.5% 7.8% 1.1% 3.8% 81.1%
4.7% 7.1% 13.0% 10.6% 0.5% 3.6% 77.0%
48.0% 10.8% 61.7% 8.3% 10.4% 14.1% 84.4%
8.9% 11.6% 14.7% 11.2% 1.4% 8.8% 77.0%
7.7% 9.2% 14.9% 10.0% 1.0% 6.4% 79.3%
9.7% 26.3% 16.4% 22.8% 1.5% 27.3% 79.8%
55.2% 22.9% 68.8% 15.5% 13.9% 47.7% 85.5%
6.3% 58.1% 15.5% 53.4% 0.8% 58.3% 79.3%
9.3% 57.3% 21.2% 45.3% 1.1% 66.2% 80.8%
7.0% 60.5% 15.8% 48.3% 0.8% 71.0% 80.5%
Hisp. who are:
Dems Reps
28.6% 40.1%
42.3% 28.8%
38.7% 28.9%
34.8% 30.9%
50.6% 16.1%
41.3% 24.6%
45.5% 19.7%
41.9% 27.2%
49.7% 14.5%
46.4% 18.5%
50.0% 24.8%
43.2% 25.1%
44.4% 21.9%
47.8% 18.5%
43.0% 23.0%
43.3% 23.2%
45.1% 23.0%
44.7% 23.1%
41.3% 23.9%
50.2% 17.3%
45.2% 19.7%
44.4% 22.0%
40.9% 25.8%
46.3% 21.7%
29.8% 38.5%
28.1% 40.6%
28.6% 42.1%
Voters who are:
Dems Reps NPA-Oth
28.7% 55.8% 15.5%
53.0% 34.5% 12.5%
40.3% 43.8% 15.8%
32.6% 50.0% 17.3%
62.8% 22.4% 14.8%
34.2% 44.6% 21.2%
35.0% 41.9% 23.2%
33.1% 46.9% 20.0%
42.8% 31.9% 25.4%
36.2% 41.8% 21.9%
34.3% 47.3% 18.4%
33.1% 43.8% 23.1%
35.7% 40.7% 23.6%
52.0% 26.8% 21.3%
38.0% 41.7% 20.3%
32.0% 46.8% 21.2%
35.5% 45.3% 19.2%
36.2% 41.4% 22.5%
26.8% 51.3% 22.0%
69.7% 12.8% 17.5%
48.4% 26.9% 24.8%
41.7% 33.8% 24.5%
48.8% 26.1% 25.1%
72.4% 9.8% 17.8%
32.3% 42.0% 25.7%
36.1% 38.4% 25.5%
36.1% 38.6% 25.2%
2012 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are: Blks who
Black Hisp. Black Hisp. Black Hisp. are Dems
11.4% 1.7% 33.4% 1.6% 1.0% 1.4% 83.9%
22.3% 2.0% 38.1% 1.6% 1.3% 1.8% 90.7%
10.8% 3.6% 23.3% 3.4% 0.9% 2.6% 86.7%
12.8% 3.2% 32.4% 3.4% 1.1% 2.2% 82.4%
49.9% 5.1% 70.7% 4.3% 5.2% 4.0% 89.0%
7.8% 2.8% 19.4% 3.4% 0.6% 1.8% 84.9%
9.6% 11.8% 22.2% 15.9% 1.0% 6.1% 80.8%
7.9% 4.1% 20.0% 5.2% 0.7% 2.6% 84.1%
9.2% 30.5% 17.2% 37.9% 1.1% 14.6% 80.1%
11.1% 10.4% 25.7% 13.8% 1.1% 5.0% 83.6%
5.9% 3.9% 15.1% 5.9% 0.5% 2.2% 87.1%
4.0% 6.1% 9.3% 8.0% 0.5% 3.8% 77.3%
4.5% 3.5% 10.1% 4.5% 0.4% 2.1% 80.8%
26.4% 13.8% 43.8% 13.3% 2.6% 10.5% 86.0%
12.9% 7.8% 28.1% 9.1% 1.2% 4.8% 82.8%
4.8% 3.1% 12.7% 4.4% 0.4% 1.6% 84.6%
7.5% 5.8% 18.1% 7.7% 0.6% 3.2% 84.9%
9.9% 5.5% 22.8% 7.0% 0.9% 3.4% 83.6%
4.5% 5.6% 13.5% 9.2% 0.4% 2.9% 80.7%
52.2% 9.6% 65.3% 7.2% 9.0% 13.6% 87.1%
9.6% 10.6% 15.8% 10.1% 1.3% 8.3% 79.4%
8.0% 8.5% 15.7% 9.1% 0.8% 6.1% 81.9%
10.4% 26.3% 17.6% 22.1% 1.4% 28.0% 82.3%
59.1% 20.7% 71.6% 13.7% 12.6% 48.3% 87.8%
7.0% 55.2% 17.7% 49.7% 0.7% 55.7% 82.0%
9.7% 56.1% 22.5% 42.2% 0.9% 65.9% 83.8%
7.1% 59.7% 16.3% 45.7% 0.6% 71.0% 83.1%
Hisp. who are:
Dems Reps
27.5% 44.8%
42.7% 30.9%
38.8% 31.6%
35.1% 34.9%
53.0% 17.7%
41.9% 28.0%
47.0% 21.7%
42.2% 30.1%
53.2% 15.3%
48.1% 20.2%
51.7% 26.9%
43.8% 27.8%
46.4% 24.1%
50.3% 20.4%
44.3% 25.5%
45.2% 24.6%
47.1% 25.4%
45.7% 25.8%
43.5% 26.7%
52.3% 18.3%
46.1% 21.2%
44.8% 24.3%
40.9% 27.7%
47.8% 22.8%
29.1% 42.4%
27.2% 45.0%
27.7% 46.0%
Dems
31.0%
54.3%
43.5%
34.9%
60.1%
36.1%
35.9%
35.0%
42.5%
37.4%
36.9%
34.7%
36.2%
51.0%
39.0%
32.8%
37.8%
37.3%
28.3%
65.2%
48.1%
41.6%
48.5%
69.3%
32.4%
35.8%
35.8%
RV who are:
Reps NPA-Oth
50.9% 18.1%
31.7% 14.0%
38.8% 17.7%
45.5% 19.6%
22.0% 17.9%
40.1% 23.8%
38.7% 25.4%
43.9% 21.1%
30.1% 27.3%
39.0% 23.6%
42.2% 20.8%
40.1% 25.2%
37.9% 25.8%
25.4% 23.6%
38.6% 22.4%
43.6% 23.5%
40.5% 21.7%
38.0% 24.7%
47.2% 24.5%
14.5% 20.4%
26.0% 25.9%
32.6% 25.8%
25.7% 25.8%
11.1% 19.6%
40.1% 27.5%
36.8% 27.4%
38.2% 26.0%
2010 General Election Registered Voters
RV who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are: Blks who
Black Hisp. Black Hisp. Black Hisp. are Dems
11.0% 1.8% 28.6% 1.7% 1.4% 1.4% 80.6%
21.0% 1.8% 34.7% 1.5% 1.8% 1.7% 89.7%
10.7% 3.7% 21.0% 3.4% 1.3% 2.8% 85.3%
12.9% 3.4% 29.9% 3.5% 1.4% 2.4% 80.9%
45.1% 5.8% 65.3% 4.9% 6.3% 4.6% 86.9%
7.8% 2.9% 17.8% 3.4% 0.8% 1.8% 82.9%
9.2% 12.5% 20.2% 16.1% 1.2% 6.8% 79.0%
7.5% 4.2% 17.6% 5.2% 0.9% 2.7% 82.7%
8.0% 32.2% 14.7% 38.6% 1.3% 17.4% 78.2%
10.5% 11.0% 22.9% 13.7% 1.3% 5.6% 81.9%
5.8% 4.4% 13.3% 6.1% 0.7% 2.6% 84.6%
3.5% 6.0% 7.7% 7.6% 0.5% 3.8% 75.8%
4.1% 3.5% 8.8% 4.3% 0.5% 2.1% 77.8%
24.9% 14.1% 41.0% 13.0% 3.5% 11.3% 84.0%
11.8% 8.1% 24.6% 9.1% 1.4% 5.2% 81.6%
4.7% 3.1% 11.6% 4.1% 0.6% 1.8% 81.0%
7.0% 7.0% 15.3% 8.5% 0.8% 4.0% 82.5%
9.0% 5.7% 19.6% 7.0% 1.0% 3.5% 81.6%
4.2% 6.2% 11.4% 9.2% 0.5% 3.4% 77.6%
45.6% 10.1% 59.0% 7.7% 10.3% 13.1% 84.4%
7.9% 10.1% 12.6% 9.6% 1.4% 8.0% 77.3%
7.2% 8.1% 13.8% 8.6% 1.0% 5.8% 79.9%
9.0% 24.1% 15.0% 20.5% 1.5% 26.4% 80.4%
55.9% 21.5% 69.1% 14.3% 15.1% 46.7% 85.7%
6.4% 55.4% 15.7% 49.5% 0.8% 57.5% 79.5%
9.4% 55.5% 21.4% 42.6% 1.1% 65.6% 81.0%
7.0% 59.2% 16.0% 45.4% 0.8% 70.8% 81.4%
Hisp. who are:
Dems Reps
29.6% 40.4%
44.6% 30.0%
40.7% 30.0%
35.9% 31.9%
51.0% 17.4%
42.3% 24.6%
46.2% 20.9%
43.2% 28.1%
51.0% 16.3%
46.6% 20.1%
50.8% 24.9%
44.3% 25.8%
44.6% 23.1%
47.1% 20.3%
43.6% 24.4%
42.7% 24.5%
46.1% 23.3%
45.9% 23.5%
41.8% 25.4%
50.0% 18.9%
45.7% 20.6%
44.6% 23.3%
41.2% 28.1%
46.1% 24.1%
28.9% 41.5%
27.5% 43.5%
27.4% 45.6%
Voters who are:
Dems Reps NPA-Oth
29.2% 59.8% 11.0%
54.9% 36.0% 9.1%
42.5% 45.7% 11.8%
33.0% 54.0% 12.9%
60.6% 28.5% 10.9%
34.1% 48.7% 17.1%
33.3% 49.1% 17.6%
32.3% 52.2% 15.4%
40.7% 41.3% 18.0%
34.0% 49.2% 16.8%
33.6% 50.7% 15.7%
32.6% 48.6% 18.9%
35.2% 45.8% 19.0%
51.5% 32.8% 15.6%
37.3% 47.8% 14.9%
30.8% 51.5% 17.7%
34.8% 49.8% 15.4%
34.8% 46.6% 18.7%
24.4% 58.0% 17.6%
69.9% 16.6% 13.5%
50.1% 29.8% 20.1%
41.2% 39.2% 19.6%
50.4% 30.8% 18.8%
75.7% 11.3% 13.0%
29.0% 51.6% 19.3%
35.3% 45.9% 18.8%
34.0% 47.6% 18.4%
2010 General Election Voter Turnout
Voters who are:
Dems who are:
Reps who are: Blks who
Black Hisp. Black Hisp. Black Hisp. are Dems
9.6% 1.1% 28.6% 0.9% 0.9% 1.0% 87.3%
19.2% 1.2% 32.7% 0.9% 1.1% 1.3% 93.5%
8.7% 2.2% 18.3% 1.9% 0.7% 1.9% 89.9%
11.0% 2.1% 28.3% 2.0% 1.0% 1.8% 85.1%
43.7% 3.3% 66.2% 2.8% 3.6% 2.9% 92.0%
6.3% 1.9% 16.4% 2.3% 0.4% 1.3% 88.9%
7.9% 7.8% 19.9% 10.6% 0.8% 4.7% 83.3%
6.2% 2.8% 16.7% 3.6% 0.6% 2.0% 86.7%
8.1% 20.6% 16.6% 27.6% 0.9% 11.0% 83.3%
9.3% 6.0% 23.6% 8.0% 0.9% 3.5% 86.3%
4.8% 2.4% 12.8% 3.6% 0.4% 1.6% 89.7%
3.1% 3.8% 7.7% 4.8% 0.4% 2.8% 79.6%
3.0% 2.1% 7.2% 2.6% 0.3% 1.5% 84.7%
23.0% 8.4% 40.0% 7.6% 2.1% 7.9% 89.6%
10.2% 4.6% 23.5% 5.1% 0.9% 3.4% 85.9%
3.4% 1.7% 9.7% 2.3% 0.3% 1.1% 87.4%
5.7% 3.4% 14.3% 4.5% 0.5% 2.3% 87.4%
7.5% 3.4% 18.7% 4.2% 0.7% 2.5% 86.4%
2.6% 3.1% 8.8% 4.9% 0.3% 2.0% 83.3%
48.4% 6.3% 62.1% 4.5% 6.9% 10.1% 89.8%
7.5% 6.2% 12.2% 5.3% 1.1% 6.1% 81.8%
6.1% 5.2% 12.5% 5.3% 0.6% 4.4% 84.8%
9.4% 19.7% 15.9% 14.3% 1.2% 25.0% 85.0%
62.8% 15.7% 74.8% 9.2% 11.8% 45.4% 90.3%
7.0% 49.1% 20.4% 38.6% 0.6% 53.7% 84.8%
9.8% 51.4% 24.0% 32.8% 0.7% 64.2% 86.9%
6.3% 56.7% 16.1% 35.5% 0.5% 70.9% 86.3%
Hisp. who are:
Dems Reps
24.8% 55.7%
42.6% 37.7%
36.3% 40.3%
31.6% 45.1%
52.0% 25.4%
41.2% 34.9%
44.9% 29.3%
40.7% 37.7%
54.5% 22.1%
45.7% 28.7%
50.1% 33.8%
41.0% 36.2%
43.1% 33.1%
46.5% 30.6%
41.0% 35.6%
41.1% 34.6%
45.2% 33.5%
43.6% 34.5%
39.1% 38.6%
49.7% 26.8%
43.1% 29.4%
42.0% 33.4%
36.7% 39.1%
44.2% 32.7%
22.8% 56.5%
22.5% 57.4%
21.3% 59.5%
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dist.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Remedial Plan (Congressional Districts--H000C9057)
Page 3 of 4
2010 Primary Turnout
Dems who are: Reps who
Black Hisp are Hisp.
24.3% 0.7% 0.7%
29.1% 0.6% 1.0%
16.7% 0.9% 1.4%
22.8% 1.2% 1.3%
64.1% 1.9% 2.0%
16.4% 1.4% 1.0%
17.7% 7.5% 3.4%
15.7% 2.5% 1.6%
13.1% 19.7% 7.5%
21.3% 5.0% 2.4%
11.9% 2.1% 1.1%
6.1% 2.9% 2.0%
5.7% 1.9% 1.2%
38.5% 4.2% 5.6%
20.6% 2.6% 2.4%
9.5% 1.4% 0.9%
11.5% 2.7% 1.6%
18.0% 2.7% 1.8%
7.7% 2.8% 1.5%
61.6% 2.7% 8.3%
10.1% 2.8% 4.8%
11.2% 3.1% 3.4%
15.9% 9.2% 24.0%
78.9% 5.4% 43.7%
22.9% 31.9% 52.4%
25.5% 22.7% 63.6%
15.6% 29.2% 74.3%
App. 163
8/15/2014
County
Alachua
Alachua
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Broward
Clay
Clay
Collier
Collier
Duval
Duval
Hendry
Hendry
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
Holmes
Holmes
Lake
Lake
Lake
Lee
Lee
Madison
Madison
Manatee
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Marion
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Counties and Cities
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop Pop% Total Area Area%
3 202,969 82.1% 731.7 75.5%
5 44,367 17.9% 237.1 24.5%
20 450,832 25.8% 534.4 40.4%
21 272,465 15.6%
71.3 5.4%
22 300,591 17.2% 131.1 9.9%
23 526,114 30.1% 192.8 14.6%
24 129,757 7.4%
25.3 1.9%
25 68,307 3.9% 368.0 27.8%
3 174,485 91.4% 577.8 89.8%
5 16,380 8.6%
65.7 10.2%
19 155,389 48.3% 333.7 14.5%
25 166,131 51.7% 1,971.3 85.5%
4 595,916 69.0% 788.3 85.8%
5 268,347 31.0% 130.2 14.2%
20 17,250 44.1% 652.1 54.8%
25 21,890 55.9% 537.9 45.2%
12 103,884 8.5%
78.3 6.2%
14 603,911 49.1% 453.9 35.9%
15 409,751 33.3% 421.6 33.3%
17 111,680 9.1% 311.9 24.6%
1 11,489 57.7% 388.6 79.5%
2
8,438 42.3% 100.4 20.5%
5 19,357 6.5% 332.0 28.7%
10 252,144 84.9% 791.4 68.4%
11 25,551 8.6%
33.6 2.9%
17 77,798 12.6% 179.0 14.8%
19 540,956 87.4% 1,033.4 85.2%
2
4,028 21.0% 337.4 47.1%
3 15,196 79.0% 378.3 52.9%
16 316,897 98.2% 468.1 52.4%
17
5,936 1.8% 424.6 47.6%
3 52,727 15.9% 433.7 26.1%
5 15,211 4.6% 482.5 29.0%
11 263,360 79.5% 746.3 44.9%
23 170,231 6.8%
90.6 3.7%
24 566,588 22.7%
95.0 3.9%
25 440,016 17.6% 505.3 20.8%
26 623,255 25.0% 1,162.4 47.8%
27 696,345 27.9% 577.8 23.8%
5 283,419 24.7% 197.6 19.7%
7 164,544 14.4%
66.6 6.6%
8 14,940 1.3% 238.0 23.7%
9 453,526 39.6% 275.1 27.4%
10 229,527 20.0% 225.9 22.5%
County
Osceola
Osceola
Osceola
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pinellas
Pinellas
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
Polk
Putnam
Putnam
Volusia
Volusia
Counties included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop Pop% Total Area Area%
9 242,818 90.4% 781.3 51.9%
10 24,790 9.2%
80.9 5.4%
17
1,077 0.4% 643.7 42.7%
18 272,237 20.6% 449.8 18.9%
20 228,263 17.3% 1,511.6 63.4%
21 423,880 32.1% 193.0 8.1%
22 395,754 30.0% 228.6 9.6%
12 127,763 13.9% 121.4 20.0%
13 696,345 76.0% 418.0 68.7%
14 92,434 10.1%
68.7 11.3%
10 189,884 31.5% 486.0 24.2%
15 286,594 47.6% 453.2 22.5%
17 125,617 20.9% 1,071.4 53.3%
5 49,264 66.2% 586.4 70.9%
6 25,100 33.8% 240.6 29.1%
6 385,510 77.9% 1,275.2 89.0%
7 109,083 22.1% 157.3 11.0%
Cities included in more than one district
Dist. Total Pop Pop% Total Area Area%
Apopka
5 32,494 78.2%
28.7 88.1%
Apopka
7
9,048 21.8%
3.9 11.9%
Boynton Beach
20 19,971 29.3%
3.1 19.1%
Boynton Beach
22 48,246 70.7%
13.4 80.9%
DeBary
6
1,468 7.6%
4.5 20.7%
DeBary
7 17,852 92.4%
17.3 79.3%
Deerfield Beach 20 26,242 35.0%
4.0 24.6%
Deerfield Beach 21 33,897 45.2%
9.3 57.3%
Deerfield Beach 22 14,879 19.8%
3.0 18.2%
Fort Lauderdale 20 59,527 36.0%
13.3 34.5%
Fort Lauderdale 22 105,994 64.0%
25.1 65.1%
Fort Lauderdale 23
0 0.0%
0.2 0.4%
Gainesville
3 92,999 74.8%
41.5 66.5%
Gainesville
5 31,355 25.2%
20.9 33.5%
Hialeah
25 162,856 72.5%
16.5 72.4%
Hialeah
27 61,813 27.5%
6.3 27.6%
Homestead
26 42,640 70.5%
7.0 44.8%
Homestead
27 17,872 29.5%
8.6 55.2%
Jacksonville
4 553,437 67.3% 744.5 85.1%
Jacksonville
5 268,347 32.7% 130.2 14.9%
Lake Worth
20 10,654 30.5%
1.6 24.5%
Lake Worth
22 24,256 69.5%
5.0 75.5%
Lantana
20
4,654 44.7%
1.1 39.5%
Lantana
22
5,769 55.3%
1.7 60.5%
Margate
20 14,727 27.6%
2.3 25.2%
Margate
21 38,557 72.4%
6.8 74.8%
Miami
24 148,279 37.1%
22.3 39.7%
Miami
27 251,178 62.9%
33.8 60.3%
Miramar
24 88,380 72.4%
17.1 54.5%
Miramar
25 33,661 27.6%
14.2 45.5%
Oakland Park
20 20,289 49.1%
4.2 52.1%
Oakland Park
22 21,074 50.9%
3.9 47.9%
Ocoee
5 12,527 35.2%
4.9 31.4%
Ocoee
10 23,052 64.8%
10.8 68.6%
Orange Park
3
6,415 76.3%
2.8 52.2%
Orange Park
5
1,997 23.7%
2.5 47.8%
Orlando
5 75,847 31.8%
20.1 18.2%
Orlando
9 132,724 55.7%
79.7 72.0%
Orlando
10 29,729 12.5%
10.8 9.8%
Pembroke Pines 23 99,005 64.0%
18.4 52.9%
Pembroke Pines 24 21,119 13.6%
4.3 12.4%
Pembroke Pines 25 34,626 22.4%
12.1 34.7%
Plantation
20 13,381 15.8%
2.7 12.3%
Plantation
22 67,640 79.6%
18.4 83.8%
Plantation
23
3,934 4.6%
0.9 3.9%
City
Remedial Plan (Congressional Districts--H000C9057)
Page 4 of 4
Cities included in more than one district
City
Dist. Total Pop Pop% Total Area Area%
Pompano Beach 20 46,314 46.4%
11.3 44.4%
Pompano Beach 21
1,447 1.4%
2.0 7.7%
Pompano Beach 22 52,084 52.2%
12.2 47.9%
Riviera Beach
18
4,202 12.9%
2.4 23.8%
Riviera Beach
20 28,156 86.7%
7.3 71.2%
Riviera Beach
22
130 0.4%
0.5 5.0%
Royal Palm Beach 18 14,868 43.6%
5.5 48.7%
Royal Palm Beach 20 16,165 47.3%
5.2 45.5%
Royal Palm Beach 21
3,107 9.1%
0.7 5.8%
St. Petersburg
13 152,335 62.2%
68.9 50.1%
St. Petersburg
14 92,434 37.8%
68.7 49.9%
Sunrise
20 62,665 74.2%
9.4 51.5%
Sunrise
22
1,257 1.5%
0.2 0.9%
Sunrise
23 20,517 24.3%
8.7 47.5%
Tampa
14 288,792 86.0% 145.6 83.1%
Tampa
15 46,917 14.0%
29.7 16.9%
West Palm Beach 18 20,572 20.6%
35.2 60.7%
West Palm Beach 20 48,784 48.8%
15.6 26.9%
West Palm Beach 22 30,563 30.6%
7.2 12.4%
Winter Haven
10 26,104 77.1%
23.3 58.5%
Winter Haven
17
7,770 22.9%
16.6 41.5%
App. 164
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO: 2012-CA-412
RENE ROMO, et al,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
KEN DETZNER and PAM BONDI,
Defendants.
--------------------------~/
CASE NO: 2012-CA-490
THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS
OF FLORIDA, et al,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
KEN DETZNER, et al,
Defendants.
--------------------------~/
FINAL JUDGMENT
This case is before me following a lengthy bench trial. Plaintiffs claim that the
congressional redistricting plan adopted by the Legislature violates Article III, Section 20 of the
Florida Constitution. For the reasons set forth below, I agree, fmding that districts 5 and 10 were
drawn in contravention of the constitutional mandates of Article Ill, Section 20, thus making the
redistricting map unconstitutional as drawn.
INTRODUCilON
President George Washington, in his farewell address of 1796, warned the new nation of
the dangers of political parties.
"However combinations or associations of the above description may now and then
answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines,
by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the
I
App. 165
people and to usurp for themselves the reins of govenunent, destroying afterwards the very
engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion ....Without looking forward to an extremity of
this kind (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight), the common and continual
mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to
discourage and restrain it."
His countrymen did not heed Washington's warning and quickly divided themselves into
opposing political factions. Though the names have changed over the years, the two major
political parties have been battling each other for control over our nation's government ever
since. To many, it seems that Washington's fears have been realized. Certain in the rightness of
their cause, of the superiority of their ideas and their members, they consider those in the
opposing camp to be not only wrong, but a threat to the very foundations of our country. Any
idea of the other party is to be opposed fervently. They must win elections and gain or remain in
power because, to the partisans, their party's interest is synonymous with the country' s interest.
In short, winning is everything.
One of the ways in which political parties seek to gain or maintain an advantage over the
other is through the redistricting process. Every ten years, based on new census data,
congressional seats are reapportioned among the states based upon shifting population figures.
To many citizens this process is of mild interest, but to the political parties it is a high stakes
proposition, a zero sum game in which one party wins and the other loses - for years to come.
Subtle shifts in a district boundary line can make the difference between a district that is "safe"
for a political party or one that is "competitive" between the two. It can make a big difference in
the ability to recruit candidates for particular districts, the amount of time, energy and resources
2
App. 166
necessary to give a party's candidate a real chance of success, and ultimately, whether the party
can maintain a majority of seats in congress.
Historically, the political party in control ofthe state legislature has been able to draw the
new districts in a manner that protects their party and its incumbents. Voter populations are
shifted and clustered based upon how they are likely to vote. The result has often been maps with
districts that have unusual boundaries and bizarre shapes, as if some abstract artist had been
given free rein. This practice has come to be called political gerrymandering and has been
criticized as allowing, in effect, the representatives to choose their voters instead of vice versa.
In 2010, the voters of Florida passed two amendments to the Florida Constitution,
commonly referred to as the Fair Districts Amendments, aimed at eliminating such political
gerrymandering. These amendments are now codified in the Constitution as Article III Section
20, pertaining to congressional redistricting and Article Ill Section 21 , pertaining to state
legislative redistricting. These amendments significantly decrease the Legislature's discretion in
drawing district boundaries. Specifically forbidden is the drawing of a redistricting plan with the
intent to favor or disfavor a political party or incumbent. Section 20 reads as follows:
Standards for establishing congressional district boundaries.-In establishing
congressional district boundaries:
(a)No apportionment plan or individual district shall be drawn with the intent to
favor or disfavor a political party or an incumbent; and districts shall not be drawn
with the intent or result of denying or abridging the equal opportunity of racial or
language minorities to participate in the political process or to diminish their
ability to elect representatives of their choice; and districts shall consist of
contiguous territory.
(b)Unless compliance with the standards in this subsection conflicts with the
standards in subsection l(a) or with federal law, districts shall be as nearly equal
in population as is practicable; districts shall be compact; and districts shall,
where feasible. utilize existing political and geographical boundaries.
3
App. 167
(c)The order in which the standards within subsections l(a) and (b) of this section
are set forth shall not be read to establish any priority of one standard over the
other within that subsection.
Art. I£1, § 20, Fla. Const.
Subsection (a) contains tier-one requirements which must be followed. In addition to
prohibiting intent to favor or disfavor a political party or incumbent, this subsection contains two
distinct protections for racial and language minorities. The first, which prohibits districts which
are drawn with "the intent or result of denying or abridging the equal opportunity of racial or
language minorities to participate in the political process," is similar to Section II to of the
Voting Rights Act. Commonly referred to as the "vote dilution" provision, this section requires
majority minority districts where certain preconditions are met. The second minority protection
prohibits a plan or district from "diminish[ing] their ability to elect representatives of their
choice." Commonly referred to as "retrogression," this clause tracks Section 5 of the Voting
Rights Act and prohibits backsliding in the ability of minority groups to elected candidates of
their choice. 1
Subsection (b) contains provisions requiring compactness and the following of political
and geographic boundaries, where feasible? These traditional redistricting principles, tier-two
requirements, must be followed unless doing so would conflict with tier-one requirements.
More than one witness during trial explained their opposition to the passage of these
amendments by opining that "you can't take politics out of politics" or that the amendments
would be "impossible to implement." Perhaps, but they are now a part of our organic law and I
am bound to interpret and apply them as best I can in order to give effect to will of the voters as
so expressed. See Re: Senate Joint Resolution ofLegislative Apportionment 1176, 83 So. 3d
1
The contiguity requirement is not at issue in this case.
~ The equal population requirement is not at issue in this case.
4
App. 168
597, 597 (Fla. 2012).3 Any act oflegislation that is in conflict with the organic law of the
constitution is not a valid law. This is a fundamental principle of our political and legal system.
This is a case of first impression interpreting Article III Section 20, dealing with
congressional re-districting. The Florida Supreme Court, however, has interpreted the
analogue provision in Article III Section 21, which applies to state legislative plans. See
Apportionment I, 83 So. 3d 597. This lengthy and comprehensive opinion interprets key
terms and explains how the various criteria are to be analyzed in reviewing a redistricting
plan for constitutionality. It therefore provides me with a detailed road map for reviewing
the congressional plan challenged by Plaintiffs.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
A law passed by the legislature is entitled to a presumption of constitutionality.
The burden to show otherwise is on those who challenge the law, and that burden is
generally said to be beyond a reasonable doubt. This is, in fact, the standard I applied
when considering motions for summary judgment earlier in this case. The Plaintiffs ask
that I reconsider this decision in light of the Florida Supreme Court's holding to the
contrary in Apportionment I, and its subsequent language in League of Women Voters of
Fla. v. Fla. House of Representatives, 132 So. 3d 135 (Fla. 2013).
In Apportionment I, the Florida Supreme Court specifically rejected the argument
that those who challenge redistricting plans must prove facial invalidity beyond a
reasonable doubt. It stated that the plans still come to the Court ..with an initial
presumption of validity" .. . and that the review of the plans would be done "with
deference to the role of the Legislature in apportionment. .. " but stated that its
3
Hereaft.er Apportionment I.
5
App. 169
constitutionally required independent review brought with it a lesser degree of deference
than would be appropriate with other legislation.!d. at 606-607.
The question is whether this different standard of review is a consequence of the
nature of the act reviewed (a redistricting plan), the nature of the new criteria required by
the Fair District Amendments (the expanded scope of review}, or the specific
constitutional mandate that the State House and Senate plans be reviewed by the Florida
Supreme Court irrespective of a specific challenge (the procedural process of obtaining
review). It was this latter factor, the constitutional requirement of an independent review,
which I felt distinguished this case from Apportionment I and thus required the traditional
standard of review. Upon reflection, however, I'm not convinced that the different
procedural process requires a different standard of review.
It is true that the constitutional mandate for review by the Florida Supreme Court
is unique. But should the procedural manner in which a plan is brought before the court
for review make a difference in the standard applied in that review? The other two factors
noted by the Supreme Court in Apportionment /, the nature of the legislation and the
criteria to be applied, are the same in this case. The rights protected are just the same and
just as important when redistricting occurs for Congress as it is when it occurs for the
State House and Senate. Should the voters be entitled to less constitutional protection
when the redistricting is for the former rather than the latter? Should actions on the part
of the legislature in the redistricting process be deemed in violation of the constitution in
one instance but not the other?
6
App. 170
I think not, and now conclude that it is the nature of the legislation and the nature
of what is reviewed that requires a different standard of review. In Apportionment/, the
Florida Supreme Court observed:
We conclude that the beyond a reasonable doubt standard is ill-suited for
an original proceeding before this Court in which we are constitutionally
obligated to enter a declaratory judgment on the validity of the legislative
plans. Unlike a legislative act promulgated separate and apart from an
express constitutional mandate, the Legislature adopts a joint resolution of
legislative apportionment solely pursuant to the "instructions" of the
citizens as expressed in specific requirements of the Florida Constitution
governing this process.
Apportionment), 83 So. 3d 597 at 607-608;
There is a difference between the Court's role in reviewing a legislative
apportionment plan to determine compliance with constitutionally
mandated criteria and the Court's role in interpreting statutes; this Court
has stated its responsibility in construing statutes differently. For example,
in Tyne v. Time Warner Entertainment, 901 So. 2d 802, 810 (Fla. 2006), in
upholding a statute as constitutional, the Court stated that it had "an
obligation to give a statute a constitutional construction where such a
construction is possible." This Court has stated that it is
"committed to the fundamental principle that it has the duty
if reasonably possible, and consistent with constitutional
rights, to resolve doubts as to the validity of a statute in
favor of its constitutional validity and to construe a statute,
if reasonabl[y] possible, in such a manner as to support its
constitutionality -- to adopt a reasonable interpretation of a
statute which removes it farthest from constitutional
infirmity."
Apportionment/, 83 So. 3d at 607, n. 5 (quoting Corn v. State, 332 So. 2d 4, 8
(Fla. 1976)).
As this language suggests, the reason for the different standard is because
apportionment plans cannot be interpreted. The lines are where they are. It is not
a question of searching for a reasonable interpretation of a statute which would
7
App. 171
make it constitutional. Rather, the inquiry is into the process, the end result, and
the motive behind the legislation.
I will therefore, in this case, apply the standard of review articulated in
Apportionment /, deferring to the Legislature's decision to draw a district in a
certain way, so long as that decision does not violate the constitutional
requirements, with an understanding of my limited role in this process and the
important role of the Legislature. My duty "is not to select the best plan., but to
determine whether Plaintiffs have proved the plan invalid. Apportionment I. 83
So. 3d 597 at 608.4
CHALLENGE TO PLAN AS A WHOLE VERUS A CHALLENGE
TO INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS
Plaintiffs distinguish between their challenge to the redistricting plan as a whole, as being
drawn with the intent generally to favor the Republican Party, and their challenge to several
individual districts, as being specifically drawn with such intent. I find this to be a false
dichotomy, a distinction without difference. The redistricting plan is the result of a single act of
legislation. If one or more districts do not meet constitutional muster, then the entire act is
unconstitutional. The districts are part of an integrated indivisible whole. So in that sense, if there
is a problem with a part of the map, there is a problem with the entire plan.
5
4
As a practical matter, it may make little difference as most of the material facts are not in dispute. Rather, the
parties differ as to what inferences and legal conclusions may be properly drawn from those facts. Nor do I interpret
Apportionment I as significantly reducing the burden on the Plaintiffs to demonstrate the lack of compliance with
constitutional requirements. It remains a high burden.
5
This is consistent with the approach taken by the Court in Apportionment I . The Court invalidated the entire
Senate plan but gave specific instructions as to which districts required corrective action. Id. at 684-686.
8
App. 172
That does not mean, however, that portions of the map not affected by those individual
districts found to be improperly drawn would need to be changed in a redrawn map, even if a
general intent to favor or disfavor a political party or incumbents was proven. What would be the
point if the other districts are otherwise in compliance? Such a remedy would go far beyond
correcting the effect of such noncompliance, but rather would require a useless act that would
encourage continued litigation. Therefore, I have focused on those portions of the map that I find
are in need of corrective action in order to bring the entire plan into compliance with the
constitution.
EVIDENCE RECEIVED UNDER SEAL OR IN CLOSED PROCEEDINGS
A portion of the trial was closed to the public and certain exhibits entered under seal,
pursuant to an order of the Florida Supreme Court. Whether this evidence will ever be made
public awaits determination by that court of the correctness of my ruling that the associational
I
privilege of the non·parties from whom the evidence was obtained should yield to the interest in
disclosure. 6 For purposes of such review, I will briefly explain how I weighed and balanced the
appropriate factors and why I tipped the scales in favor of disclosure. Rather than file a partially
redacted order, any reference to such evidence here will be general in nature so as not to reveal
the specific information contained in the exhibits and testimony.
As noted in my previous Orders, I found that the non·parties, the political consultants,
had cognizable First Amendment Rights in the documents and testimony sought by the Plaintiffs
in this case. 7 The privilege is not absolute, however, and I had to weigh and balance the
competing interests to determine whether that privilege should yield in favor of disclosure.
6
The 1111 DCA has withdrawn its order reversing my ruling and passed the matter to the Supreme Court. Members of
the original panel have set forth in their dissents their reasons for the initial reversal order which I hope to address
here.
7
I did not find that a trade secret privilege applied.
9
App. 173
Specifically, I considered the factors set forth in Perry v. Schwarzenegger, 591 F. 3rd 1147 (9th
Circ. 201 0) and determined that the privilege should yield. In the interest of time, I did not
elaborate in detail my reasons for that conclusion, announced in open court. I thought it
important that the parties know what could and could not be used at trial and that the non-parties
have time to obtain a stay if further review was deemed appropriate by the appellate court. The
reasons I decided that the associational privilege should yield are as follows:
The case before me of is of the highest importance, going, as it does, to the very
foundation of our representative democracy. "Indeed, as [this Court] succinctly stated, it is
"difficult to imagine a more compelling, competing government interest" than the interest
represented by the challengers' article III, section 20(a), claims." League of Women Voters, 132
So. 3d 135, 147.
The required disclosure was narrowly tailored and limited. Out of approximately 1800
pages of documents, I required the disclosure of less than a third of those. The disclosure was
only to the Plaintiffs' attorneys with instructions that they not disclose it to third parties other
than staff or retained experts, including to their own clients. I felt that the Plaintiffs' attorneys
were in the best position to determine which of these documents were most probative of their
claims. As it turned out, they actually offered as evidence only a very small portion of those
documents as exhibits.
The documents for which the political consultants claimed privilege evidenced a
conspiracy to influence and manipulate the Legislature into a violation of its constitutional duty
set forth in Article 3, Section 20 of the Florida Constitution. That was, at least, a reasonable
conclusion to be drawn from this and other evidence made available to me in the case to that
point. As such, I viewed any chilling effect the release of these documents might have on such
10
App. 174
behavior in the future to be not such a bad thing, and the danger to the legitimate exercise of First
Amendment rights rather slight.
Some of the communications, and a good deal of the map work product of the non-party
political consultants, were transmitted to persons outside of their group, and made very public by
submission to the legislature. If this did not constitute an outright waiver of the privilege as to
these items, it lessened the strength of a legitimate claim to its protection.
Unlike the politically hot button issue of homosexual marriage, present in Perry, the
underlying subject matter here was redistricting. Although political partisans are no doubt
deeply interested in the process, the redistricting process does not address controversial issues of
social and moral values that divide the population. It does not arouse the type of intense passions
that might justify a real fear of physical danger or mass public reprisals against the members if
the information was made public.
The evidence was highly relevant and not available from other sources. When I
considered this factor, I tried my best to look at it from the perspective of the judge rather than
the ultimate fact finder, the two roles I play in a non jury trial. One ofthe principal theories of
the Plaintiffs in this case was that legislative staff and leaders collaborated with these political
consultants to produce a redistricting map that violated the constitution by favoring the
Republican Party and its incumbents.
While it is true that the documents claimed as privileged contain no glaring "smoking
gun" in terms of direct communications between the consultants and specific staff or legislators,
that does not mean they are not highly relevant. Under their theory of the case, it was essential
for the Plaintiffs to first prove that there was a secretive shadow process of map drawing by the
11
App. 175
political consultants which found its way into the enacted congressional map before they could
prove the second prong •• the connection of this process to the Legislature.
Nor was this evidence available from other sources. Yes, the Plaintiffs engaged in
extensive discovery and obtained e·mails and other documentation which they argued was
compelling evidence in support of their claim. But the Plaintiffs' advocacy on this point should
not be confused with the reality of what they actually had - which were bits and pieces of
information which they sought to weave into a narrative consistent with their theory. The
legislature had, in fact, destroyed e-mails and other evidence of communication regarding the
redistricting process and so had many of the non·party political consultants.
Throughout the discovery process, these political consultants maintained that they were
told by legislative leaders that they could not "have a seat at the table" in the drawing of the
redistricting maps, and that they abided by that admonition. They denied having any input in the
Legislative map drawing efforts or otherwise trying to influence how the maps were drawn. They
denied that they submitted maps in the public submission process for redistricting. Any map
drawing on their part was described as a hobby, something for personal use only, an exercise
done to see what could be done on a map and to anticipate what the Legislature might produce.
What this additional evidence gave the Plaintiffs was the ability to confront these denials,
to lay bear not only the fact that some of these consultants were submitting maps to the
legislature, but to show how extensive and organized that effort was, and what lengths they went
to in order to conceal what they were doing. Notably, even in the face of this evidence, the non·
party witnesses at trial did their best to evade answering direct questions on the subject, often
using semantic distinctions to avoid admitting what they had done.
12
App. 176
At the time I considered the
issue~
the Plaintiffs did have some evidence that suggested
otherwise but, considering the high burden on them to prove their case, I couldn't say that it
would have been enough, or that this additional evidence wouldn't be crucial to the case. After
all, I had not heard all of the evidence nor had the opportunity to view it in context. Now that I
have, I can say that the evidence filed under seal was very helpful to me in evaluating whether
Plaintiffs had proved that first prong of their theory.
Moroever, as noted above, without sufficient proof of this secret, organized campaign to
subvert the supposedly open and transparent redistricting process, the question of whether the
Plaintiffs could sufficiently tie the Legislature to that effort becomes moot. To conclude that this
evidence was not highly relevant to this central issue of legislative intent would have been to prejudge the case and determine ahead of time that the Plaintiffs would not be able to prove that
connection. This I was not prepared to do.
For all of these reasons, I tipped the scales in favor of the First Amendment privileges of
the non-parties yielding to the need and interest of disclosure in this particular case.
DETERMING LEGISLATIVE INTENT GENERALLY
One of Plaintiffs' claims is that the entire redistricting process was infected by improper
intent. Specifically, they argue that, despite the Legislature' s assertion that its redistricting
process was open, transparent and non-partisan, a secret, highly partisan map drawing campaign
was being conducted in the shadows that was intended to, and did, favor the Republican Party
and its incumbents.
The first question in evaluating this claim is to ask, whose intent? The language in
Section 20 prohibits a map being "drawn" to favor or disfavor a political party or an incumbent,
not "adopted" or "enacted." Yet, the challenge is to an act passed by the Legislature, a collective
13
App. 177
body. When I asked the attorneys at the beginning of trial about this issue, I posed the
hypothetical of a staff member charged with actually drawing the map, who did so with the
intent to favor a political party, but hid this intent from other staff and members of the
Legislature. Both sides agreed that it is the Legislature's intent that is at issue, not the staff
member. Plaintiffs' attorneys conceded that, without more, this would be insufficient to show
improper intent as contemplated by Article III, Section 20 -- though they assert that the evidence
indeed shows more.
There are some real problems in trying to make such a determination of legislative intent
in this case. First, when we speak oflegislative intent generally, we are concerned with trying to
ascertain the meaning of language used in the enacted law. The goal is to interpret the language
so as to give it the effect intended. In such a situation, we look to such things as the common
meaning of the words used, legislative history, staff reports, statement of legislative intent in the
enactment clause, transcripts of committee hearings, and statements made on the floor of the
House and Senate. Some legal scholars suggest that one can never determine legislative intent
from such sources, or indeed at al1.8
This problem is exacerbated in a case like the one before me. Here, we are looking at
something entirely different. See, e.g., League of Women Voters ofF/a. v. Fla. House of
Representatives9, 132 So. 3d 135, 150 (Fla. 2013) ("In this context, however, the ·intent'
standard in the specific constitutional mandate of article III section 20(a), is entirely different
1
"Anyway, it is utterly impossible to discern what the Members of Congress intended except to the extent that intent
is manifested in the only remnant of'history' that bears the unanimous endorsement of the majority in each House:
the text of the enrolled bill that became law." Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Disl. v. United States ex.
rei. Wilson, 559 US 280, 302 (2010) (Scalia, J .• concurring).
9
Apportionment IV
14
App. 178
than a traditional lawsuit that seeks to determine legislative intent through statutory
construction."). It is not the meaning of the words used in the legislation that must be
interpreted. We can see clearly where the lines are drawn on the map. Rather, the question is
what was the motive in drawing these lines.
In this inquiry, it is extremely unlikely that the bill's sponsor would stand up on the floor
of the House or Senate and advise his or her colleagues that the intent of the legislation is to
favor the Republican Party. Nor would you expect such comments at committee meetings, or
anywhere else in public for that matter. Even if a legislator expressed such intent on the floor,
can we asswne that all of his or her colleagues were convinced and so motivated in their votes?
Do we look to evidence of improper intent of the leaders? If so, how many other
legislators, if any, would need to be "in on it" in order to find it sufficient proof of the body's
intent? What if legislative leaders and staff knew that partisan groups or individuals were
drawing maps with intent to favor a political party and submitting them to the Legislature
through third persons in order to conceal the identity of the map drawer, but they didn't inform
legislative members of this? On the flip side, if leaders took reasonable precautions to insulate
the staff map drawers from partisan influence, should we conclude that the Legislature therefore
had no improper partisan intent in adopting the map? How does that inform us as to what was
motivating the members of the legislature?
Certainly, the actions and statements of legislators and staff, especially those directly
involved in the map drawing process would be relevant on the issue of intent. As the Florida
Supreme Court has explained,
the communications of individual legislators or legislative staff members,
if part of a broader process to develop portions of the map, could directly
relate to whether the plan as a whole or any specific districts were drawn
with unconstitutional intent. ... [I]f evidence exists to demonstrate that
15
App. 179
there was an entirely different, separate process that was undertaken
contrary to the transparent [redistricting] effort in an attempt to favor a
political party or an incumbent in violation of the Florida Constitution,
clearly that would be important evidence in support of the claim that the
Legislature thwarted the constitutional mandate.
Apportionment W, 132 So. 3d at 149-150. See also, e.g., Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234, 254
(200 1) (finding "some support" for district court's conclusion that racial considerations
predominated in drawing of district boundaries in email sent from legislative staff member to
two senators); Texas v. United States, 887 F. Supp. 2d 133, 165 (D.D.C. 2012) (noting that an
"email sent between staff members on the eve of the Senate Redistricting Committee's markup
of the proposed plan" fueled the court's "skepticism about the legislative process that created" a
challenged district).
It is very difficult, however, to know when such evidence establishes not just individual
intent or motive, but the intent or motive of the collective body. It seems that the more reliable
focus in such an inquiry would be on what was actually produced by the Legislature, the enacted
map. Specifically, an analysis of the extent to which the plan does or does not comply with tier
two requirements is a good place to start. Can one draw a map that meets tier-two requirements
but nonetheless favors a political party or an incumbent? Sure, but it is more difficult.
Furthermore, a failure to comply with tier-two requirements not only supports an
inference of improper intent, it is an independent ground for finding a map unconstitutional. See
Apportionment I, 83 So. 3d 597 640-641. Additional direct and circumstantial evidence of intent
may serve to strengthen or weaken this inference of improper intent. Therefore, I first examine
the map for apparent failure to comply with tier-two requirements of compactness and utilization
of political and geographical boundaries where feasible, then consider any additional evidence
that supports the inference that such districts are also in violation of tier-one requirements.
16
App. 180
SPECIFICALLY CHALLENGED DISTRICTS
The tier-two standards at issue in this case are compactness and the requirement that
districts follow geographic and political boundaries where feasible. Because Florida and many
of its counties are cities are not perfectly square or round, there is often tension between these
two requirements.
An evaluation as to compactness "begins by looking at the shape of a district."
Apportionment /, 83 So. 3d 597, 634 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). A district
"should not have an unusual shape, a bizarre design, or an unnecessary appendage unless it is
necessary to comply with some other requirement." /d.; see also /d. at 636 (emphasizing that
"non-compact and 'bizarrely shaped districts' require close examination"). Districts "containing
... fmger-like extensions, narrow and bizarrely shaped tentacles, and hook-like shapes ... are
constitutionally suspect and often indicative of racial and partisan gerrymandering." ld at 638
(internal quotation marks and alteration omitted). Thus, for example, the Florida Supreme Court
struck down several Florida Senate districts in the Initial 2012 Senate Plan in part because those
districts had ''visually bizarre and unusual shapes." /d.
The compactness review should also utilize "quantitative geometric measures of
compactness" derived from "commonly used redistricting software." /d. at 635. For example,
the Florida Supreme Court has relied on the Reock method and the Area/Convex Hull method to
assess compactness of voting districts. See Id. The Reock method "measures the ratio between
the area of the district and the area of the smallest circle that can fit around the district." /d. The
Area/Convex Hull method "measures the ratio between the area of the district and the area of the
minimum convex bounding polygon that can enclose the district." Apportionment I, 83 So. 3d
597, 635.
17
App. 181
Tier-two mandates also direct the Legislature to draw districts utilizing existing political
and geographical boundaries where feasible. Political boundaries include "cities and counties,"
/d.at 637, while geographical boundaries include "rivers, railways, interstates and state roads,"
/d at 638. This requirement is more flexible than the compactness requirement. But ''the choice
of boundaries" is not "left entirely to the discretion of the Legislature," Id at 63 7, and it may not
use any bowuiary (e.g. , a "creek or minor road") that suits its purposes, ld. at 638. In addition,
although no priority of importance is given to either, the requirement to use existing boWldaries
contains the modifier, "where feasible."
A. Congressional District S
Congressional District 5 does not adhere to the tier-two standards in Article III Section
20. It is visually not compact, bizarrely shaped, and does not follow traditional political
boundaries as it winds from Jacksonville to Orlando. At one point, District 5 narrows to the
width of Highway 17. The district has a Reock score of only 0.09. Enacted District 5 has
majority black voting age population (BV AP), but the benchmark districting was only a plurality
BVAP district. The Defendants' argwnent that the vote dilution provision of Article III Section
20 and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act required a majority BVAP district and that this
configuration was necessary to achieve that end, is not supported by the evidence.
Plaintiffs have shown that a more tier-two compliant district could have been drawn that
would not have been retrogressive. The plans proposed by the House of Representatives prior to
conference committee plan 9047 being adopted were all more compact and split fewer counties.
While not model tier-two compliant districts, these iterations did avoid the narrow appendage
jutting from the body of the district into Seminole County. Such appendages are particularly
suspect of prohibited intent to benefit a political party or incwnbent. Furthennore, the House's
18
App. 182
various iterations achieved a BVAP of between 47 and 48 percent. The House's chief map
drawer, Alex Kelly, testified that he performed a functional analysis on these iterations, and that
this level of minority population would not have been retrogressive. Indeed, this is higher than
the BVAP of benchmark district when it was enacted.
The vote dilution provisions in Article III, Section 20 and in the Voting Rights Act do
not require the creation of a majority-minority district wherever possible, but only where
certain conditions-conditions first announced in Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30, 50-51
(1986}-are satisfied.
Fi.rs4 three preconditions must be present: (i) the minority population is
sufficiently large and geographically compact to be a majority of the voting-age population; (ii)
the minority population is politically cohesive; and (iii) the majority population votes
sufficiently as a bloc to enable it usually to defeat the candidates preferred by minorities.
Apportionment/, 83 So. 3d at 622 (citing Gingles, 478 U.S. at 50-51).
The Legislature made no effort during the redistricting process to determine if the
Gingles preconditions existed for this district, nor does the evidence introduced at trial
demonstrate that they exist now. The minority population is not sufficiently large and
geographically compact to constitute a majority of the voting age population. To achieve a
BVAP over 50%, the district connects two far flung urban populations in a winding district
which picks up rural black population centers along the way. The Gingles compactness inquiry
certainly is focused on more than just district lines. See League of United Latin Am. Citizens v.
Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 433 (2006). But it also doesn't ignore such lines. See /d District 5 is
simply not compact for the purpose of the Gingles analysis.
Nor does the evidence prove the third precondition. There is no dispute that there is
racially polarized voting in Northeast Florida. However, Defendants have not shown that this
19
App. 183
polarization is legally significant. Because "the extent of bloc voting necessary to demonstrate
that a minority's ability to elect its preferred representatives is impaired varies according to
several factual circumstances, the degree of bloc voting which constitutes the threshold of legal
significance will vary from district to district." Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. at 50. The
evidence is Wldisputed that the benchmark district. which was never majority-minority, elected
an African-American to Congress during its entire existence. Additionally, analysis by Dr.
Brunell, an expert retained by the House, suggested that there would be a 50/50 ability to elect a
minority candidate of choice with a BVAP as low as 43.6 %. Thus, the evidence does not
establish that the majority population votes sufficiently as a bloc to enable it usually to defeat
the candidates preferred by minorities.
I also find that the decision to increase the district to majority BVAP, which was
accomplished in large part by creating the finger-like appendage jutting into District 7 and
Seminole County, was done with the intent of benefiting the Republican Party. I reach this
conclusion based in part on the inference that the Florida Supreme Court suggested could be
drawn from oddly shaped appendages that had no legal justification. See Apportionment I, 83 So.
3d at 618 (..W]here the shape of a district in relation to the demographics is so highly irregular
and without justification that it cannot be rationally Wlderstood as anything other than an effort
to favor or disfavor a political party, improper intent may be inferred"). This inference is also
buttressed by the evidence of improper intent in the redistricting process generally, and as
specifically related to the drawing of District 5, the most significant of which I will outline now.
1. In General
Plaintiffs' theory of the case regarding improper intent is that Republican leadership in
the House and the Senate, their key staff members, and a small group of Republican political
20
App. 184
consultants conspired to avoid the effective application of the Fair District Amendments to the
redistricting process and thereby successfully fashioned a congressional map that favors the
Republican Party and its incumbents. The strategy they carne up with, according to the Plaintiffs,
was to present to the public a redistricting process that was transparent and open to the public,
and free from partisan influences, but to hide from the public another secretive process. In this
secretive process, the political consultants would make suggestions and submit their own
partisan maps to the Legislature through that public process, but conceal their actions by using
proxies, third persons who would be viewed as "concerned citizens," to speak at public forums
from scripts written by the consultants and to submit proposed maps in their names to the
Legislature, which were drawn by the consultants.
What is clear to me from the evidence, as described in more detail below, is that this
group of Republican political consultants or operatives 10did in fact conspire to manipulate and
influence the redistricting process. They accomplished this by writing scripts for and organizing
groups of people to attend the public hearings to advocate for adoption of certain components or
characteristics in the maps, and by submitting maps and partial maps through the public process,
all with the intention of obtaining enacted maps for the State House and Senate and for Congress
that would favor the Republican Party.
They made a mockery of the Legislature's proclaimed transparent and open process of
redistricting by doing all of this in the shadow of that process, utilizing the access it gave them to
the decision makers, but going to great lengths to conceal from the public their plan and their
participation in it. They were successful in their efforts to influence the redistricting process and
the congressional plan under review here. And they might have successfully concealed their
10
Although one of this group took umbrage at the tenn operative. another self-described himself as such. I wilt use
the terms interchangeably to refer to the same group.
21
App. 185
scheme and their actions from the public had it not been for the Plaintiffs' determined efforts to
uncover it in this case.
The closer question is whether the Legislature in general, or the leadership and staff
principally involved in drawing the maps, knowingly joined in this plan, or were duped by the
operatives in the same way as the general public. The Defendants argue that if such a conspiracy
existed, there is no proofthat anyone in the Legislature was a part of it. If portions ofthe
operatives' maps found their way into the enacted maps, they say, it was not because leadership
or staff were told or knew they came from this group, but rather because the staff, unaware of
their origins, saw the proposals as improving the draft maps they were working on.
The most compelling evidence in support of this contention of the Defendants is the
testimony of the staff members who did the bulk of the actual map drawing for the Legislature. 1
had the ability to judge the demeanor of Alex Kelly, John Guthrie and Jason Poreda at trial and
found each to be frank, straightforward and credible. I conclude that they were not a part of the
conspiracy, nor directly aware of it, and that significant efforts were made by them and their
bosses to insulate them from direct partisan influence. I accept that their motivation in drawing
draft maps for consideration of the Legislature was to produce a final map which would comply
with all the requirements of the Fair District Amendments, as their superiors had directed them.
That being said, the circumstantial evidence introduced at trial convinces me that the
political operatives managed to find other avenues, other ways to infiltrate and influence the
Legislature, to obtain the necessary cooperation and collaboration to ensure that their plan was
realized, at least in part. They managed to taint the redistricting process and the resulting map
with improper partisan intent. There is just too much circumstantial evidence of it, too many
coincidences, for me to conclude otherwise.
22
App. 186
a. Destrudion of Records
The Legislative Defendants argue that despite the extensive discovery conducted by the
Plaintiffs, there is a paucity of documentary evidence that ties the activities of the operatives with
a single legislator so as to prove improper legislative intent. I note, however, that the Legislators
and the political operatives systematically deleted almost all of their e-mails and other
documentation relating to redistricting. There was no legal duty on the part of the Legislature to
preserve these records, but you have to wonder why they didn't. Litigation over their plans was
"a moral certainty... as their lawyers put it earlier in this case, and intent would be a key issue in
any challenge.
b. Early Meetings of Legislative Leaders and Staff with Political Consultants
In December of 2010 and January of 2011, Legislative leaders, staff members and
attorneys met with a group of Republican political consultants to discuss the upcoming 2012
redistricting process. The attendees for one or both included Senator Gaetz, Representative
Weatherford, legislative staff members Alex Kelly, Chris Clark and John Guthrie, counsel for the
House and Senate, Richard Heffley, Marc Reichelderfer, Patrick Bainter, Benjamin Ginsberg,
Joel Springer, Andrew Palmer, and Frank Terraferma.
Clark was the chief legislative aide for Gaetz during the 2012 Redistricting Process and
Guthrie was the Senate staff member in charge of map drawing. Heffiey was a political
consultant who has worked with a number of Republican legislators and candidates, including
Gaetz. He was, at the time, under contract with The Republican Party of Florida (RPOF) to
provide unspecified services relating to redistricting. Reichelderfer was a political consultant
who had worked with a number of Republican legislators and candidates, including Speaker
Dean Cannon. Bainter was a political consultant who had worked with a number of Republican
23
App. 187
legislators and candidates, including Representative Daniel Webster. Bainter was the owner of
Data Targeting, Inc. ("Data Targeting"), a political consulting and polling firm located in
Gainesville, Florida. Ginsberg was an attorney based in Washington, D.C., recognized in the
area of redistricting and had represented the National Republican Party in redistricting matters.
He also either was or came to be counsel for Heffley, Reichelderfer and Terraferma. Springer
was employed by the RPOF as director of Senate campaigns. Palmer was employed by the RPOF
as director of House campaigns. Terraferma was a political consultant who worked with a
number of Republican legislators and candidates, including Weatherford.
The meetings were not open to the public, and there is no written record of what was
discussed at either meeting. No one who testified at trial about them seemed to be able to
remember much about what was discussed, though all seemed to agree that the political
consultants were told that they would not have a "seat at the table" in the redistricting process.
No one clearly articulated what that meant exactly, but there was testimony that they were told
that they could still participate in redistricting through the public process "just like any other
citizen." One witness testified that the participants discussed whether a privilege could be
identified to prevent disclosure of redistricting-related communications among political
consultants, legislators, and legislative staff members, and concluded that no privilege would
apply.
Reichelderfer prepared a memorandum following the December, 2010 meeting that
included the following notations: "What is our best operational theory of the language in
[Amendments] 5 and 6 related to retrogression of minority districts?"; "Central FL Hispanic
seats? Pros and Cons"; "Evolution of maps - Should they start less compliant and evolve through
the process - or - should the first map be as near as compliant as possible and change very little?
24
App. 188
Or other recommendations?"; "Communications with outside non-lawyers - how can we make
that work?"
There is nothing necessarily sinister about such meetings. Most of the attendees were
friends or professional colleagues and perhaps it could be considered a courtesy extended. But it
doesn't look good if you are promoting openness, transparency and neutrality in the redistricting
process. There was really no reason to convene two meetings just to tell active political partisans
of the Republican Party that they would not "have a seat at the table." A letter or e-mail would
suffice, or some general public announcement as to what the protocol would be going forward.
And there are a few curious things about these meetings and their connection to
subsequent events that are troubling. First, this was a highly partisan group and all the political
consultants were very interested in the redistricting process. It is inconceivable to me that, if as
testified to, they were advised that they could participate in the public process "just like any
other citizen," they would not have done so. How could these political consultants, who were
intensely interested in the process, whose jobs or livelihoods were tied into protecting their
clients' and their party's interests with respect to redistricting, not take the opportunity to submit
proposed maps through the public portal, to attend at least some of the public hearings and speak
out?
The reality, and the irony, is that there would be absolutely nothing wrong about the
attendees at those meetings submitting proposed maps or partial maps. The difference is, if done
in the open, then those reviewing the submissions could take into account the source in
evaluating whether it was neutral or whether it might tend to favor or disfavor a political party or
an incumbent. One of the political consultants lamented that if he had submitted maps in his
own name, he would probably have come under attack, accused of trying to favor his party or its
25
App. 189
incumbents. Well, of course his submission might be closely scrutinized, in the same way that a
proposed map submitted by the Florida Democratic Party might be taken with a grain of salt.
That's how it should be if one is concerned about improper partisan intent influencing the
drawing of the map.
Regardless, given the circumstances, it's hard to imagine that the legislative leaders and
staffers would not have expected active participation in the public redistricting process by those
political consultants at the meetings. And when the process was under way and maps were being
submitted by members of the public, and public hearings were being held, and these political
consultants were not in attendance, and none of the maps coming from the public had any of
their names on them, I would think that the staff and legislative leaders would find it extremely
strange, that they might even ask why not But they didn't.
One of the things that the Defendants tout as showing that there was no improper partisan
intent in the drafting of the maps is to point to the fact that as things progressed, each succeeding
map that was drawn was an improvement over the one before it in terms of compactness, leaving
cities and counties intact and following geographical boundaries. Coincidentally, though, that
corresponds with a strategy suggested from Reichelderfer's notes, i.e., start with less compliant
maps and work toward a more compliant map.
The Defendants also tout the opportunity for the public to have input by submitting
proposed maps or partial maps, and by attending public hearings which were held throughout the
state. And, the Defendants point out, all of this was open, transparent and on the record.
Although that sounds like a good idea - who can argue that openness and transparency are not
good things when it comes to government - it provided the means by which partisan maps,
secretly drawn and submitted by political operatives, could be incorporated into the enacted map
26
App. 190
with no one in the general public the wiser. Staff members were encouraged to consider maps
submitted by the public and if they contained concepts or configurations that made the draft map
"better," to incorporate them.
Paid political operatives aside, when you think about it, anybody who would go to all the
trouble of drawing a map and presenting it to the legislature for consideration is probably more
likely to be motivated by personal or party politics than by an altruistic desire to draw the most
constitutionally compliant map possible, free of any partisan intent. And if so, relying upon
publicly submitted maps may not be the best way to protect against partisan influence.
If you choose, however, to accept and perhaps rely upon publicly submitted maps, it
seems to me that you should have a way to address the possible, nay probable, partisan intent of
the drafters of at least some ofthose maps. The Legislatw'e' s answer was apparently to ignore it.
Both the Senate and the House leadership instructed their staff not to consider the potential
political performance of any district drawn (except in the House as to districts involving tier one
minority issues), nor were they to concern themselves with the origins or the author of any
publicly submitted map.
This seems on its face a neutral approach, and I appreciate the dilemma that arises: If I
start evaluating a proposed map for political performance because of suspicion that it is the result
of improper panisan intent, and make ..corrections," haven't I now altered the map with the
intent to favor or disfavor a political party? While I appreciate this concern, I don't know that it
is a satisfactory answer to say that, as long as the improper intent behind a submitted map did not
originate with me, and I am not expressly told about it, I don't have to worry about it. Turning a
blind eye to the probability of improper intent in these maps is not the same as neutrality.
27
App. 191
Perhaps it would be best to have it out on the table for all to see and evaluate.
Considering political performance is not the same as intending to favor or disfavor a political
party or incumbent, and an open process would assist in evaluating which was in play in a
particular situation. And in truth, every single legislator or senator could very easily detennine
on their own the potential political performance of any district on a proposed map and vote on it
accordingly. Any interested citizen could access such information and advise their
representative of his or her concerns or feelings about a particular district. You might insulate the
staffers from political consultants and partisan influences but you can't insulate the entire
Legislature.
c. Continued Involvement of the Political Consultants in the Redistricting Process
On June 1, 2011, Senator Gaetz sent an email to legislators providing information about
upcoming public hearings about the redistricting process. The metadata for the email reveals that
a "blind copy" of it was sent to Heffley and Terrafenna. At trial, Senator Gaetz had no
explanation for why this was done, pointing out only that the information in the e-mail was
public infonnation and that he wasn't sure someone else in his office had not sent it out under his
name. Again, there would be absolutely nothing wrong with sending this information to Heffley
and Terraferma, but why secretly send a blind copy? And if Senator Gaetz did not send it out,
someone in his office was keeping these operatives in the loop.
Two of the consultants, Reichelderfer and Hefley, were directly involved in the
redistricting process, acting as go betweens for leadership of the two chambers regarding the
redistricting process. This was purportedly because of a lack of a good working relationship
between the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate. Yet, by all accounts, the
actual staff members of each chamber who were working on the maps got along well with each
28
App. 192
other, as did the chairmen of the redistricting committees. Regardless, in their insider roles,
Hefley and Reichelderer did not have to speak directly to staff map drawers, or even leadership,
to infect and manipulate the map drawing and adoption process.
As noted above, the House and Senate destroyed most e-mails and other records of
communications concerning the redistricting process, as did the political consultants. What was
recovered, however, allowed the Plaintiffs to show that Kirk Pepper, Deputy Chief of Staff to
then Speaker Dean Cannon, was regularly sending to Reichelderfer copies of various draft maps
of the Legislature well before they were disclosed to the public.
The Defendants acknowledge that this was improper, but say it is not evidence of
improper intent on the part of the Legislature because: I) It was done without permission from
his boss; 2) It was not done for the purpose of influencing the actual drafting of the maps; 3)
Pepper had no map drawing responsibilities and gave no directions on how the maps should be
drawn; and 4) He was simply trying to give his friend, Reichelderfer, a heads up on what to
expect so that he could get ahead of his competition and better advise his clients.
Pepper and Reichelderfer apparently did communicate about the political performance of
the maps, however, as evidenced by a series of e-mails between the two. For example, on
November 27, 2011, right after receiving an early unpublished copy of the Senate' s first draft
congressional map from Pepper, Reichelderfer advised Pepper that the district of Representative
Daniel Webster was "a bit messed up," and Pepper responded by inquiring "performance or
geography?" Mr. Pepper testified that, though it may seem that they were discussing political
performance, his reply to his friend was actually a signal reminding him that they should not
discuss such things. Perhaps, but that is a very unusual and illogical interpretation.
29
App. 193
In an email exchange with Reichelderfer, Representative Cannon commented that "we
are in fine shape" as long as "the Senate accommodates the concerns that you [Reichelderfer]
and Rich [Heffley] identified in the map that they put out tomorrow." The Defendants explained
this exchange by saying that the concerns referred to was the general concern by the House that
the Senate map would be so far different than the House map that it would make reconciliation
of the two maps difficult. Again, perhaps, but this seems a stretch given the language used.
In October of2011, Frank Terraferma e-mailed Chairman Weatherford reporting that
Pepper was at the Republican Party of Florida huddled on a computer with Rich Hefley and
working on "congressional redistricting ifl had to guess." Now, it's certainly possible that
Terrafenna was mistaken or simply speculating without any basis, as was suggested at trial, but
one has to wonder why he would make this assumption if Pepper really had nothing to do with
the redistricting process. Maybe not officialJy, but as noted above, he was heavily involved in
helping his friend, Reichelderfer with inside information. From November 2011 until January
2012, Pepper transmitted at least 24 draft maps to Reichelderfer. In most cases, Pepper provided
the draft maps to Reichelderfer before their release to the public. In many cases, Pepper
provided Reichelderfer with draft maps that were never released to the public.
Reichelderfer made a number of modifications to these and other maps that he received
from Pepper. Some of those revisions combine a District 5 with a Black VAP of over 500/o and a
Hispanic V AP of District 9 over 40%. (Compare CP Ex. 885 with CP Ex. I 050}. As a result of
such changes, the performance of Districts 5, 7, 9, and 10 went from being four Democratic
perfonning or leaning seats in early maps such as HOOOC900 1 to two Democratic and two
Republican performing seats in the enacted map, HOOOC9047 based on the results of the 2008
30
App. 194
presidential election. 11 Ind~ many of the maps and partial maps the consultants focused on
seemed to be in the Central Florida area, which coincidentally were the areas in the enacted map
I have found to be problematic.
d. Prior Finding of Partisan Intent in State Senate Plan
The Florida Supreme Court found improper partisan intent present in the State Senate
Map. The same process and the same people were involved in drafting the congressional map. It
seems unlikely that the same taint would not affect that map as well. Thete is a difference in that
the fonner was drawn without any input from the House and the latter the result of a
collaborative effort. I note, however, that my concerns with Districts 5 and 10 involve changes to
the House's map in deference to the Senate. The problems that I find in Districts 5 and 10 were
not present, at least to the same degree, in the House version.
2. Evidence of Partisan Intent SpecificaUy Related to District 5
The decision to change District 5 to make it a majority BVAP was made at a non-public
meeting attended by Alex Kelly and John Guthrie, the chief map drawers for the House and
Senate respectively, and Will Weatherford and Don Gaetz, chainnen of the redistricting
committees in their respective chambers. They had been given direction before the meeting from
their respective chamber leaders, Speaker of the House Dean Cannon and Senate President, Mike
Haridopolis. Notably, Alex Kelly testified that Speaker Cannon told him that the Senate would
likely request to push District 5 over 500/o BVAP and that they should be prepared to accede to
that request. Speaker Weatherford 12 testified that the House only went along with this request
because the Senate made a "compelling" argument for it, but he could not remember the
substance of the argument. The reason given at trial for this change was that the District was
11
12
Demographic, election, and compactness data are derived from Joint Exhibit 1, unless otherwise stated.
Then Chairman Weatherford
31
App. 195
very close to 50% BVAP and that it seemed prudent to avoid a possible VRA suit by bumping it
up enough to create a majority-minority district. That justification is not compelling, without
some showing that it was legally necessary to create a majority-minority district.
The changes also increased the Republican performance of neighboring District 7. 13 In
the version of District 7 House Plan 9043, Alex Sink (D) would have received 48.5% ofthe twoparty vote in the 2010 gubernatorial election, Barack Obama (D) would have received 50.5% of
the two-party vote in the 2008 presidential election, and Jim Davis (D) would have received
39.7% of the two-party vote in the 2006 gubernatorial election. In the enacted version ofDistrict
7, Alex Sink (D) would have received 47.5% of the two-party vote in the 2010 gubernatorial
election, Barack Obama (D) would have received 49.6% of the two-party vote in the 2008
presidential election, and Jim Davis (D) would have received 39.0% of the two-party vote in the
2006 gubernatorial election.
The change resulted in a decrease in registered Democrats in
District 7 from 36.00/o to 35.0% based on 2010 general election data.
Based on the above, I find that Plaintiffs have proved that District 5 unnecessarily
subjugates tier-two principals of compactness. They have also proved portions of District 5 were
drawn to benefit the Republican Party, in violation of tier-one. Accordingly, District 5 is invalid
and must be redrawn. Any surrounding districts affect by such a change must likewise be
redrawn.
Congressional District 10
District 10 is overall fairly compact. It has a Reock Score of .39 and a Convex Hull
Score of .73. However, there is an odd-shaped appendage which wraps under and around
District 5, running between District 5 and 9. Such appendages render a district not compact
13
The i.n<:reased Republican performance is admittedly marginal, particularly when comparing enacted CD 7 with
me analogue district in Senate map 9014. However, close political races are almost always won or lost on the
margins.
32
App. 196
pursuant to tier-two standards and should be avoided unless necessary to comply with tier-one
requirements. See Apportionment I, 83 So. 3d at 634 (..Compact districts should not have an
unusual shape. a bizarre design. or an unnecessary appendage unless it is necessary to comply
with some other requirement"). Plaintiffs have shown that the district could be drawn in a more
compact fashion, avoiding this appendage. Plaintiffs adduced multiple iterations emanating from
the House redistricting suite which did not contain this appendage and were otherwise more
compact. Indeed these iterations were more compact in Central Florida generally, as the chart
below will show.
Defendants contend that this appendage, and the configuration of Central Florida
generally, is necessary to achieve tier-one minority protection in both Districts 5 and 9. Because
the appendage is highly populated and white majority, they argue that placing its population in
either of those districts would have impermissibly lowered the minority V AP. I cannot agree.
While the creation of a Hispanic influence district in CD 9 may be a legitimate goal, there
is no evidence before me to suggest that it was entitled to tier-one protection. There was no
Hispanic opportunity district in Central Florida under the benchmark plan. There was no
evidence that a district without the appendage would lead to retrogression elsewhere. Indeed
33
App. 197
House plan 9043 had a non-retrogressive BVAP of 48.03% in CD 5 and a HV AP of 39.59% in
CD 9. 14 Nor is District 9 entitled to vote-dilution protection. There was no evidence to suggest
that a Hispanic majority district could be created in Central Florida. Defendants cannot justify
deviation from a tier-two constitutional requirement because of a desire to create a Hispanic
influence district.
I also find that District 10 was drawn to benefit the Republican Party and the incumbent.
l reach this conclusion based in part on the inference that the Florida Supreme Court suggested
could be drawn from oddly shaped appendages that had no legal justification. See Apportionment
I , 83 So. 3d at 618. This inference is also buttressed by the general evidence of improper intent
outlined above in my analysis of District 5 and the following evidence related specifically to the
drawing of District 10.
The appendage benefited the incumbent Representative Webster by returning to District
10 territory that was part of his benchmark District 8 and improved the Republican performance
of District 10 in two out of the three elections relied upon by the Florida Supreme Court in
Apportionment I. 1n the version of District 10 in HOOOC9043, Alex Sink (D) would have taken
44.9% of the two-party vote in the 2010 gubernatorial election, Barack Obama (D) would have
received 48.0% of the two-party vote in the 2008 presidential election, and Jim Davis (D) would
have received 39.00/o of the two-party vote in the 2006 gubernatorial election. 1n the enacted
version of District 10, Alex Sink (D) would have received 45.6% of the two-party vote in the
2010 gubernatorial eJection, Barack Obama (D) would have received 47.6% of the two-party
vote in the 2008 presidential election, and Jim Davis (D) would have received 38.9% of the two-
14
It is true that CD 9 in plan 9043 did not keep Osceola County whole. The goal of keeping cities and counties
whole is laudable and required where " feasible." Compactness on the other hand has no such modifier in its
constitutional prescription, "suggesting that in balancing this criterion with compactness. more flexibility is
pennitted." /d. at 636.
34
App. 198
party vote in the 2006 gubernatorial election. In addition, the change lowered the number of
registered Democrats in District 10 from 37.2% in HOOOC9043 to 36.8% in HOOOC9047 based
on 20 10 general election data.
Dr. Ansolabehere also testified that the changes between House plan 9043 and adopted
plan 9047 altered the boundaries of that district primarily by moving 80,000 voting age people
out of District 10 into District 9, while moving 71,000 voting age people out of District 9 to
District l 0. Dr. Ansolabehere testified that these changes were not necessary to make District 9
a minority-performing district, because without them District 9 was already a minorityperfonning district, and the populations that were shifted were majority white populations. As a
result of this appendage, the decrease in Democratic registration in District I 0 and corresponding
increase in Democratic registration in the already comfortably Democratic District 9 were of
significant Republican benefit for a competitive district such as District 10.
Plaintiffs have proved that District 10 unnecessarily subjugates tier-two principles of
compactness.
They have also proved portions of District 10 were drawn to benefit the
Republican Party, in violation of tier-one.
Accordingly, District 10 is invalid and must be
redrawn, as must the surrounding districts affected by such change.
Districts 13 & 14
Plaintiffs claim that Districts 13 and 14 are unconstitutional because they violate the tiertwo standard, requiring that, where feasible, districts should utilize existing political and
geographic boundaries. Plaintiffs point to District 14, which reaches across Tampa Bay to take in
a portion of South St. Petersburg, splitting the city of St. Petersburg and Pinellas County.
Plaintiffs suggest that this configuration is not justified by any tier-one consideration. They
35
App. 199
suggest that it is indicative of improper intent to benefit the Republican Party and the incwnbent,
the late Republican Congressman Bill Young.
The benchmark predecessor to District 14 (District 11 in 2002) had a BYAP population
of26.78% and a HVAP of25.84%. As adopted, Congressional District 14 has a BVAP of
25.63% and a HY AP of25.61%. Romo Plaintiffs proposed maps A and B have a BYAP of
21.73% and a HYAP of26.91%
Plaintiffs have not proved tier-two deviations. While the Romo Plaintiffs' proposed map
does increase the compactness of District 13, it causes District 14 to become less compact under
both Reock and Convex Hull measurements. On a regional level, the Romo proposed map
causes every district which touched District 13 and 14 to become less compact than the adopted
plan, 9047. As the chart below shows. the Romo maps would decrease the compactness in five
of the six districts, while increasing the compactness in only one. The legislature was not
required to make this tradeoff in compactness to avoid splitting Pinellas County.
Nor have Plaintiffs proved that the decision to include portions of Pinellas County in
District 14 was the result of partisan mal-intent to benefit the Republican Party. Unlike Districts
5 and 10, there are no flagrant tier-two deviations from which I can infer unlawful intent. The
36
App. 200
decision to have District 14 invade Pinellas County was made early in the process by the
professional staff, as most if not all of the iterations emanating from both houses broke into
Pinellas County. Thus, unlike changes made to District 5 by the leaders during conference
committee, this decision was made by the Staff whom I have found were insulated from the
political consultants. I simply cannot conclude, on partisan effect alone, that the decision to
incorporate portions of South St. Petersburg into District 14 was done with the intent to benefit
the Republican Party or the incumbant member of Congress.
Districts 21 & 22
Plaintiffs contend that Districts 21 and 22 are invalid. They point to testimony from Alex
Kelly along with redistricting iterations emanating from the House redistricting suite. They
suggest it was possible to draw Districts 21 and 22 stacked on top of each other north to south
rather than in the adopted configuration with the districts running parallel to each other down the
coast. This configuration could have avoided county and city splits. Plaintiffs contend that
failure to adopt this configuration was an unnecessary deviation from tier-two requirements and
evidenced an intent to benefit the incumbents in that area.
Plaintiffs have not met their burden of proving unnecessary deviation from tier-two
requirements. The iteration Plaintiffs point to might be more compliant with tier-two in a
vacuum, but they have not shown that it could be achieved without violating tier-one
requirements for minority protection in neighboring District 20. 15 Alex Kelly did testify that this
configuration could be accomplished without retrogression. However, the inquiry does not end
there because the benchmark district was a majority black district. CP 905, which was discussed
extensively at trial, does not attain majority BVAP status in District 20. There was no testimony
at trial about District 20 and whether it met the Gingles preconditions such that it was protected
u The Romo Plaintiffs' proposed map adopts the same general configuration as the Legislature's enacted map.
37
App. 201
under the vote dilution provisions of Section 2 of the VRA. Because District 20 was a majority
black district in the benchmark, I am reluctant to invalidate the Legislature's plan absent a
showing that more tier-two compliant districts could be drawn while not violating either tier-one
requirement regarding racial minority protection. See Apportionment /, 83 So. 3d 597, 641 ("If
an alternative plan can achieve the same constitutional objectives that prevent vote dilution and
retrogression ... without subordinating one standard to another demonstrates that it was not
necessary for the Legislature to subordinate a standard in its plan").
Plaintiffs did produce a couple of draft iterations that achieved majority black status for
District 20. 16 However, after visually examining these districts I don't find sufficient tier-two
improvements to justify invalidating the Legislature's product. 17 These districts have a more
irregular boundary in Hendry County, compared to the enacted plan. Additionally, the stacked
configuration of Districts 21 and 22 causes both districts to be deeply invaded by tentacles
reaching from District 20. In enacted plan 9047, District 21 has no such appendage invading it
and is quite visually compact. Furthennore, these iterations cause District 23 to become more
visually non-compact, creating two distinct areas, joined by a narrower section.
Plaintiffs have not met their burden of showing unnecessary deviation from tier-two
requirements given the various tradeoffs required to draw compact districts in the region as a
whole. Nor have they shown that improper intent led to the adoption of Districts 21 and 22. My
"duty 'is not to select the best plan, but rather to decide whether the one adopted by the
legislature is valid.'" Apportionment I, 83 So. 3d at 608 (quoting In reApportionment Law-
1992,591 So. 2d at 285).
1
'
11
CP 909; CP913.
Plaintiffs did not provide compactness scores for these districts, so my analysis is limited to the ocular test.
38
App. 202
Districts 2S, 26, & 27
Plaintiffs contend that these districts are invalid because the Legislature unnecessarily
split Hendry County between two districts and unnecessarily split the city of Homestead They
also contend that the configuration was done to benefit the Republican Party.
Plaintiffs have not proved invalidity. A regional view of South Florida shows that any
tier-two differences between the enacted map and Romo Plaintiffs' maps are de minimis. Indeed
the enacted plan splits the same number of counties, while splitting one less city. Were I to
invalidate the enacted plan based on the objective tier-two evidence before me, I would be
selecting a plan l found subjectively better rather than determining if Plaintiffs have proved the
enacted plan invalid. Id. Nor do I find based on the totality of the evidence that this
configuration was based on unlawful partisan intent. Moreover, I credit the testimony of
Professor Moreno that Romo A & B could have a retrogressive effect on the Hispanic majority
districts in South Florida.
CD20
0.48
0.74
0.49
CD21
0.28
0 .60
0.28
0.62
CD22
0.18
0.61
0.22
0.53
CD23
0.27
0.57
0.28
0.56
CD24
0.38
0.73
0.37
0.76
CD25
0.40
0.73
0.42
0.65
CD26
0.18
0.46
0.1 7
0.49
CD27
0.46
0.81
0.59
0.84
0.35
0.67
0.36
0.66
The South Florida Regional Compactness Chart contains compactness scores for all districts
included in Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, and Monroe Counties.
39
App. 203
SouJit Florida Rexional County and CJ!y SpUt Clrart
Split Counties
Counties Splits
Split Cities
City Solits
CONGRESSIONAL PLAN
5
19
18
45
ROMOA&B
5
18
19
42
This table uses the same 9 districts included in the South Florida Regional Compactness Table. "
CONCLUSION
As I fmd the Legislature's remaining affirmative defenses to be without merit, I find the
Congressional Redistricting plan adopted by the Legislature to be constitutionally invalid.
1
'-rbe specifie counties and cities split are as follows:
Congressional Plan Split Counties by Djsaict
Romo A &. B Split Couptjes By District
Bro~-20,21,22,23,24,25
Bro~d-20,21,22,23,24
Collier- 19,25
Hendcy- 20, 25
Miami-Dade- 23, 24, 25, 26, 27
Palm Beach· 18, 20, 21,22
Collier- 19, 25
Miami-Dade· 23, 24, 25, 26, 27
Palm Beach· 18, 20, 21, 22
St. Lucie- 8, 18
Conmssional Plan Split Cities by District
Boynton Beach- 20, 22
Deerfield Beach- 20, 21, 22
Fort Lauderdale- 20, 22. 23
Hialeah- 25, 27
Homestead. 26, 27
Lake Worth- 20, 22
Lantana-20,22
Margate- 20, 21
Miami- 24, 27
Miramar- 24, 25
Oakland Park- 20, 22
Pembroke Pines- 23, 24, 25
Plantation- 20, 22, 23
Pompano Beach- 20, 21,22
Riviera Beach- 18, 20, 22
Royal Palm Beach- 18, 20, 21
Sunrise- 20, 22, 23
West Palm Beach· 18, 20, 22
Romo A & B Split Citjes by District
Coconut Creek- 20,21
Deerfield Beach- 20, 21, 22
Fort Lauderdale- 20, 22, 23
Hallandale Beach- 23, 24
Hollywood- 23,24
Marg~~te· 20, 21
Miami- 24, 27
Miramar- 20, 24
North Miami- 23, 24
Oakland Parle- 20,22
Pembroke Pines- 23,24
Plantation- 20,22
Pompano Beach- 20,21.22
Port St. Lucie- 8, 18
Riviera Beach- 18, 20
North Miami Beac:b- 23, 24
Sunrise- 20, 22, 23
Tamarac- 20, 21
West Palm Beach- 18, 20
40
App. 204
Specifically, Districts 5 and 10 were drawn in contravention of Article Ill Section 20 ofthe
Florida Constitution. They will need to be withdrawn, as will any other districts affected thereby.
All additional challenges to the plan are rejected. Jurisdiction is reserved to consider any pending
or post-judgment motions, and to enter such further orders as may be necessary to effectuate this
judgment or to otherwise fashion an appropriate equitable remedy.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida, this((__'(""'
day of July, 2014.
Copies to:
All Counsel of Record
41
App. 205
App. 206
App. 207
App. 208
App. 209