AN INEQUALITY AND ITS q-ANALOGUE MINGJIN WANG Department of Mathematics East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, People’s Republic of China EMail: wmj@jpu.edu.cn An Inequality and its q-Analogue Mingjin Wang vol. 8, iss. 2, art. 50, 2007 Title Page Contents Received: 16 July, 2006 Accepted: 11 June, 2007 Communicated by: JJ II J. Sándor J I 2000 AMS Sub. Class.: Primary 26D15; Secondary 33D15. Page 1 of 14 Key words: Gould-Hsu inversions; Carlitz inversions; Grüss inequality; q-series. Abstract: In this paper, we establish a new inequality and its q-analogue by means of the Gould-Hsu inversions, the Carlitz inversions and the Grüss inequality. Go Back Full Screen Close Contents 1 Introduction and Some Known Results 3 2 A New Inequality 6 3 A q-Analogue of the Inequality 9 An Inequality and its q-Analogue Mingjin Wang vol. 8, iss. 2, art. 50, 2007 Title Page Contents JJ II J I Page 2 of 14 Go Back Full Screen Close 1. Introduction and Some Known Results q-series, which are also called basic hypergeometric series, plays a very important role in many fields, such as affine root systems, Lie algebras and groups, number theory, orthogonal polynomials and physics, etc. In this paper, first we establish an inequality by means of the Gould-Hsu inversions, and then we obtain a q-analogue of the inequality. We first state some notations and known results which will be used in the next sections. It is supposed in this paper that 0 < q < 1. The q-shifted factorial is defined by (1.1) (a; q)0 = 1, (a; q)n = n−1 Y (1 − aq k ), (a; q)∞ = k=0 ∞ Y (1 − aq k ). An Inequality and its q-Analogue Mingjin Wang vol. 8, iss. 2, art. 50, 2007 Title Page k=0 The q-binomial coefficient is defined by hni (q; q)n (1.2) = . k (q; q)k (q; q)n−k Contents JJ II J I Page 3 of 14 The following inverse series relations are due to Gould-Hsu [4]: Go Back Theorem 1.1. Let {ai } and {bj } be two real or complex sequences such that the polynomials defined by n−1 ψ(x, n) = Q (a + xb ), (n = 1, 2, . . . ), k k k=0 ψ(x, 0) = 1, differ from zero for any non-negative integer x. Then we have the following inverse Full Screen Close series relations n P (−1)k nk ψ(k, n)g(k), f (n) = (1.3) g(n) = where n k = k=0 n P (−1)k k=0 n ak +kbk f (k), k ψ(n, k+1) An Inequality and its q-Analogue n! . k!(n−k)! Carlitz [2] gave the following q-analogue of the Gould-Hsu inverse series relations: Theorem 1.2. Let {ai } and {bj } be two real or complex sequences such that the polynomials defined by n−1 φ(x, n) = Q (a + q x b ), (n = 1, 2, . . . ), k k k=0 φ(x, 0) = 1, differ from zero for x = q n with n being non-negative integers. Then we have the following inverse series relations n n−k P k n ( 2 ) f (n) = (−1) q φ(k, n)g(k); k k=0 (1.4) n ak +qk bk P g(n) = (−1)k nk φ(n; f (k). k+1) k=0 We also need the following inequality, which is well known in the literature as the Grüss inequality [5]: Mingjin Wang vol. 8, iss. 2, art. 50, 2007 Title Page Contents JJ II J I Page 4 of 14 Go Back Full Screen Close Theorem 1.3. We have Z b Z b Z b 1 1 1 (1.5) f (x)g(x)dx − f (x)dx g(x)dx b−a a b−a a b−a a (M − m)(N − n) ≤ , 4 provided that f, g : [a, b] → R are integrable on [a, b] and m ≤ f (x) ≤ M, n ≤ g(x) ≤ N for all x ∈ [a, b], where m, M, n, N are given constants. The discrete version of the Grüss inequality can be stated as: An Inequality and its q-Analogue Mingjin Wang vol. 8, iss. 2, art. 50, 2007 Theorem 1.4. If a ≤ ai ≤ A and b ≤ bi ≤ B for i = 1, 2, . . . , n, then we have n n n 1 X 1X 1 X (A − a)(B − b) ai b i − ai · bi ≤ , (1.6) n n i=1 n i=1 4 i=1 JJ II where a, A, ai , b, B, bi are real numbers. J I Title Page Contents Page 5 of 14 Go Back Full Screen Close 2. A New Inequality In this section we obtain an inequality about series by using both the Gould-Hsu inversions and the Grüss inequality. P Theorem 2.1. Suppose 0 ≤ a ≤ f (k) ≤ A, g(k) = ki=0 ki f (i), k = 1, 2, . . . , n, then the following inequality holds 2 n X n (2.1) (−1)n+k f (k)g(k) − f (n)g(n) (n + 1) k k=0 n n 2 n−3 ≤ 3(n + 1) 2 A A −a , k0 k0 An Inequality and its q-Analogue Mingjin Wang vol. 8, iss. 2, art. 50, 2007 Title Page ], [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal x . where k0 = [ n−1 2 Proof. Letting ai = −1, bi = 0 in (1.3), we have n P n+k n f (n) = (−1) g(k), k k=0 (2.2) n P n g(n) = f (k). k k=0 Since 0 ≤ a ≤ f (k) ≤ A, we obtain k k k X X X k k k a· ≤ g(k) = f (i) ≤ A · . i i i i=0 i=0 i=0 P Substituting ki=0 ki = 2k into the above inequality we get (2.3) a · 2k ≤ g(k) ≤ A · 2k , k = 0, 1, . . . , n. Contents JJ II J I Page 6 of 14 Go Back Full Screen Close On the other hand, we know that n n!/(k + 1)!(n − k − 1)! n−k k+1 = = , n n!/(k)!(n − k)! k+1 k consequently n (k+1) (n) ≥ 1 when k ≤ k0 , k n ) (k+1 ≤ 1, when k ≥ k0 , (nk) where k0 = [ n−1 ]. So, we get 2 n n ≤ , k = 0, 1, . . . , n. (2.4) 1≤ k k0 Let Ak = nk f (k) and Bk = (−1)n+k nk g(k), then n (2.5) a ≤ Ak ≤ A . k0 From (2.3) and (2.4), we know that 0 ≤ Bk ≤ 2n A kn0 if n − k is even, −2n−1 A n ≤ B ≤ 0, if n − k is odd. k k0 So, for k = 1, 2, . . . , n, we have (2.6) n−1 −2 n n n A ≤ Bk ≤ 2 A . k0 k0 An Inequality and its q-Analogue Mingjin Wang vol. 8, iss. 2, art. 50, 2007 Title Page Contents JJ II J I Page 7 of 14 Go Back Full Screen Close Combining (1.6), (2.5) and (2.6) we obtain ! ! n n n 1 X 1 X 1 X Ai Bi − Ai · Bi n + 1 n + 1 i=0 n + 1 i=0 i=0 A kn0 − a 2n A kn0 + 2n−1 A ≤ 4 which can be written as 2 n 1 X n+k n (−1) f (k)g(k) n + 1 k k=0 ! n 1 X n f (k) · − n + 1 k=0 k ≤ n k0 , An Inequality and its q-Analogue Mingjin Wang vol. 8, iss. 2, art. 50, 2007 Title Page ! 1 n n+k (−1) g(k) n + 1 k=0 k A kn0 − a 2n A kn0 + 2n−1 A n X Substituting (2.2) into the above inequality, we get (2.1). 4 Contents n k0 . JJ II J I Page 8 of 14 Go Back Full Screen Close A q-Analogue of the Inequality 3. In this section we give a q-analogue of the inequality (2.1) by means of the Carlitz inversions. First, we have the following lemma. Pk k Lemma 3.1. Suppose 0 ≤ f (k) ≤ A and g(k) = i=0 i f (i), then for any k = 1, 2, . . . , n, we have 0 ≤ g(k) ≤ A (3.1) n h X i=0 ni . i An Inequality and its q-Analogue Mingjin Wang vol. 8, iss. 2, art. 50, 2007 Proof. It is obvious that g(k) ≥ 0. If k ≤ n1 ≤ n2 , then we have hn i 2 k Since we get 1 − q n1 +1 1 − q n1 +2 1 − q n2 h n1 i = · · · · . 1 − q n1 +1−k 1 − q n1 +2−k 1 − q n2 −k k 1 − q n1 +1 1 − q n1 +2 1 − q n2 · · · · ≥ 1, 1 − q n1 +1−k 1 − q n1 +2−k 1 − q n2 −k Title Page Contents JJ II J I Page 9 of 14 hn i 2 k ≥ hn i 1 k . Go Back Full Screen Consequently, k k h i n h i X X X k n n g(k) = f (i) ≤ f (i) ≤ f (i). i i i i=0 i=0 i=0 The main result of this section is the following theorem. Close P Theorem 3.2. Suppose 0 ≤ a ≤ f (k) ≤ A, g(k) = ki=0 ki f (i), k = 1, 2, . . . , n, then the following inequality holds n h n i2 n−k X n+k ( ) 2 (3.2) (n + 1) (−1) q f (k)g(k) − f (n)g(n) i k=0 X ! n h i n−1 X n n n−1 A(n + 1)2 n + , ≤ A −a i i 4 k0 k0 i=0 i=0 where k0 = [ n−1 ], [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal x. 2 Proof. Letting ai = −1, bi = 0 in (1.4) we get n n−k P n+k n ( 2 ) f (n) = (−1) q g(k), k k=0 (3.3) n P n g(n) = f (k). k k=0 (3.4) a· i=0 i Mingjin Wang vol. 8, iss. 2, art. 50, 2007 Title Page Contents JJ II J I Page 10 of 14 Using the lemma, we have k X k An Inequality and its q-Analogue k n h i X X k n ≤ g(k) = f (i) ≤ A · . i i i=0 i=0 On the other hand, we notice that n (q; q)n /(q; q)k+1 (q; q)n−k−1 1 − q n−k k+1 = = , n (q; q)n /(q; q)k (q; q)n−k 1 − q k+1 k Go Back Full Screen Close consequently n [ k+1 ] [ n ] ≥ 1, when k ≤ k0 , k n ] [ k+1 ≤ 1, when k ≥ k0 , [ nk ] where k0 = [ n−1 ]. So, we have 2 hni n ≤ , 1≤ k k0 An Inequality and its q-Analogue (3.5) Let Ak = (3.6) k = 0, 1, . . . , n. n n−k n+k n ( 2 ) f (k) and B = (−1) q g(k), then k k k n a ≤ Ak ≤ A . k0 From (3.4) and (3.5), we know that h iP n n n 0 ≤ B ≤ A , if n − k is even, k k0 i i=0 h i n−1 P n−1 −A kn ≤ Bk ≤ 0, if n − k is odd. i 0 i=0 So, for k = 1, 2, . . . , n, we get n−1 X n h i n n n X n−1 −A ≤ Bk ≤ A . k0 i=0 i k0 i=0 i (3.7) Mingjin Wang vol. 8, iss. 2, art. 50, 2007 Title Page Contents JJ II J I Page 11 of 14 Go Back Full Screen Close Combining (1.6), (3.6) and (3.7) we obtain ! ! n n n 1 X 1 X 1 X Ai Bi − Ai · Bi n + 1 n + 1 i=0 n + 1 i=0 i=0 ! X X n−1 n h i n−1 1 n n n n , +A ≤ −a A A k0 i=0 i k0 i=0 i 4 k0 which can be written as n 1 X h n i2 n−k (−1)n+k q ( 2 ) f (k)g(k) n + 1 k k=0 ! ! n n h n i (n−k ) 1 X 1 X hni 2 f (k) (−1)n+k q g(k) − n + 1 k=0 k n + 1 k=0 k X ! n h i n−1 X A n n n n−1 ≤ A −a + . 4 k0 k0 i i i=0 i=0 Substituting (3.3) into the above inequality, we get (3.2). From [3], we know h n i n lim = . q→1 i i Let q → 1 in both sides of the inequality (3.2) to get 2 n X n n+k (−1) f (k)g(k) − f (n)g(n) (n + 1) k k=0 An Inequality and its q-Analogue Mingjin Wang vol. 8, iss. 2, art. 50, 2007 Title Page Contents JJ II J I Page 12 of 14 Go Back Full Screen Close "X # n n−1 X n n−1 A(n + 1)2 n n −a + ≤ A 2 2 k0 k0 4 i=0 i=0 n A(n + 1)2 n n n n n−1 2 n−3 A −a , = A − a [2 + 2 ] = 3(n + 1) 2 A k0 k0 k0 4 k0 which is the inequality (2.1). So the inequality (3.2) is the q-analogue of the inequality (2.1). An Inequality and its q-Analogue Mingjin Wang vol. 8, iss. 2, art. 50, 2007 Title Page Contents JJ II J I Page 13 of 14 Go Back Full Screen Close References [1] G.E. ANDREWS, R. ASKEY AND R. ROY, Special Functions, Cambridge University Press, 2000. [2] L. CARLITZ, Some inverse relations, Duke Math. J., 40 (1973), 893–901 [3] G. GASPER AND M. RAHMAN, Basic Hypergeometric Series, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, 35, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, 1990. An Inequality and its q-Analogue Mingjin Wang vol. 8, iss. 2, art. 50, 2007 [4] H.W. GOULD AND L.C. HSU, Some new inverse series relations, Duke Math. J., 40 (1973), 885–891 Title Page [5] G. R GRÜSS, Über dasR maximum Rdes absoluten Betrages von b b b 1 1 1 f (x)g(x)dx − ( b−a f (x)dx)( b−a g(x)dx), Math.Z., 39 (1935), b−a a a a 215–226. [6] MINGJIN WANG, An inequality about q-series, J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math., 7(4) (2006), Art. 136. [ONLINE: http://jipam.vu.edu.au/ article.php?sid=756]. Contents JJ II J I Page 14 of 14 Go Back Full Screen Close