SPATIOTEMPORAL VISUALIZATION OF UNIT PRICES OF MAJOR COST ITEMS OF

advertisement

SPATIOTEMPORAL VISUALIZATION OF UNIT

PRICES OF MAJOR COST ITEMS OF

TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS ACROSS IOWA

USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS

(GIS)

DEEPANSHI JAIN

GIS CERTIFICATE CANDIDATE

MASTER OF SCIENCE CANDIDATE

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL, CONSTRUCTION, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

CRP 595

GIS ADVISOR: DR. KEVIN KANE

AGENDA

• Motivation/Background

• Introduction

• Research Problem

• Methodology

• Spatial Questions

• GIS Tool: Spatial Analyst

• Exploring Data

• Quantity effect considered

• Results

• Creating precise predictions

• Time effect considered

• Evaluation: Cross validation

• Conclusions

• Further analysis

BACKGROUND

• Construction industry is driven by time and cost.

• Highway construction is a costly investment.

• Funding sources are limited.

• Efficient utilization of funds requires

“better estimation”.

• Estimation department strives for accuracy in estimating unit price.

• Closer the unit price == better cost estimate.

Iowa DOT (http://www.iowadot.gov/program_management/Final%202014-

2018%20Highway%20Program%20Brochure.pdf)

INTRODUCTION

• Iowa Department Of

Transportation Projects

• Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA)

Pavements across Iowa

• Identified major cost items of construction HMA Pavements:

• Asphalt Binder 64-22

• Asphalt Binder 58-28

• Hot Mix Asphalt Mixture

RESEARCH PROBLEM

• Unit price estimation using available historical bid data for various locations.

• New project == New location

• Adjustment of unit price for new location??

• Exploring inbuilt tools in GIS to assist estimator to quantify unit price

METHODOLOGY

Historical Bid Data

Identify Major Cost Items

Explore Data

Spatial Interpolation Techniques

Identify better interpolation Technique and parameters

POSSIBLE FACTORS AFFECTING UNIT PRICE

• Location of project

• Quantity

• Time

• Location of Asphalt plant

• Labor Cost

• Population Density

SPATIAL QUESTIONS

• How are unit prices of Asphalt binder 64-22 related to location ?

• How quantity of material affects the unit price spatially?

• Does asphalt binder plant location have any effect on unit prices?

• Does Urban /rural location of projects have any effect on prices?

• Does population density have any effect on unit price?

ARCGIS GEOSTATISTICAL ANALYST AND SPATIAL

ANALYST

• Compliment each other.

• Geostatistical analyst has some additional features like:

• exploratory data analysis

• More statistical models and tools

• Variety of surfaces e.g. prediction, probability, etc.

• Spatial analyst has some additional features like:

• Map algebra

• Data conversion

• Combinational operators

INTERPOLATION METHODS

Point

Interpolation

Kriging

Natural

Neighbor

Spline

Spatial

Interpolation

Methods

Trend

Methods

Inverse

Distance

Weighting

Topo

to Raster

Geostatistical

Techniques

Deterministic

Techniques

Spatial

Interpolation Methods in GIS

GIS PROCESS

• Explore the data

• Findings

• Parameters

• Predictions

• Cross Validation

DATA EXPLORATION

2011

2012

2013

2014

FINDINGS

• Histograms: Not symmetrical

• Normal Quantile Plot: Way off from normality

• Trend Analysis: A order two polynomial directional trend observed for data of years 2011, 2012, 2014. No particular trend observed for 2013.

• Kriging model will be very difficult to fit.

INVERSE DISTANCE WEIGHTING (IDW)

• Simpler to apply (Henley, 1981)

• Applicable for dataset of small sizes (Rasmunsen- Rhodes and Mayers, 1993)

• Flexible to model the variables with a trend or anisotropy present (Tomczak,

1998)

• Bette interpolation technique for Construction cost index (Zhang, 2013)

AVERAGE ERROR FOR ASPHALT

BINDER 64-22 IN VARIOUS CASES

Cases

Inverse Quantity

No Quantity

Quantity

2011

19.17

3.505

-11.075

AVERAGE ERROR FOR ASPHALT BINDER 64-

22 IN VARIOUS CASES

Cases

Inverse Quantity

No Quantity

Quantity

2012

-5.414

-2.05

-2.39

AVERAGE ERROR FOR

ASPHALT BINDER 64-22 IN

VARIOUS CASES

Cases/Year

Inverse Quantity

No Quantity

Quantity

2013

4.7655

5.59

13.5427

AVERAGE ERROR FOR ASPHALT

BINDER 64-22 IN VARIOUS

CASES

Cases/Year

Inverse Quantity

No Quantity

Quantity

2014

5.370608

0.938

-3.044

RESULTS

Image Source:http://quoteimg.com/unit-elastic-demand-curve/2/

How quantity of material affects the unit price spatially?

• General assumption that unit price decreases with quantity is not true in case of asphalt binder 64-22

• Using IDW without any quantity effect gives better results in terms of least error .

RESULTS

ASPHALT BINDER 2011-

2014 USING IDW

How are unit prices of Asphalt binder 64-22 related to location ?

• For each year the relationship with location shows repeated high cost zones and repeated low cost zones.

INFLATION CONSIDERED

• All year data was extrapolated to 2014 by using the developed average inflation rate of unit price.

• More data points

• Better distribution

• Better interpolation result

ASPHALT BINDER 64-22 ,

INFLATION INCLUDED

• Zero average standard error

More data points, distributed better

ASPHALT PLANT

LOCATION

Does asphalt binder plant location have any effect on unit prices?

• Low cost regions have more asphalt plants located nearby.

• Transportation cost maybe one of the major component of unit price.

CONCLUSIONS

• IDW is most suitable for Asphalt Binder 64-22 data.

• Considering quantity, and 1/quantity as weights shows that better interpolation results are obtained when no weight is given.

• By increasing the number of data points IDW results improved.

• Transportation cost maybe a major component of unit price of asphalt binder

64-22.

FURTHER ANALYSIS

• Analysis of interpolation results using:

• Average weekly Labor cost for county.

• Population density of Iowa

THANK YOU!

Questions?

Download