PUBLICATIONS DE L’INSTITUT MATHÉMATIQUE Nouvelle série, tome 94 (108) (2013), 205–217

advertisement
PUBLICATIONS DE L’INSTITUT MATHÉMATIQUE
Nouvelle série, tome 94 (108) (2013), 205–217
DOI: 10.2298/PIM1308205M
ON RICCI TYPE IDENTITIES IN MANIFOLDS
WITH NON-SYMMETRIC AFFINE CONNECTION
Svetislav M. Minčić
Abstract. In [18], using polylinear mappings, we obtained several curvature
tensors in the space LN with non-symmetric affine connection ∇. By the same
method, we here examine Ricci type identities.
1. Introduction
Consider N -dimensional differentiable manifold MN on which a non-symmetric
1
affine connection ∇ is defined. If X(MN ) is a Lie algebra of smooth vector fields
2
and X, Y ∈ X(MN ), then the mapping ∇: X(MN ) × X(MN ) → X(MN ) given by
2
(1.1)
1
∇X Y = ∇Y X + [X, Y ]
2
defines an other non-symmetric connection ∇ on MN [14]. That means that we
have
θ
θ
θ
θ
θ
θ
∇Y1 +Y2 X = ∇Y1 X + ∇Y2 X,
θ
θ
∇f Y X = f ∇Y X,
θ
∇Y (X1 + X2 ) = ∇Y X1 + ∇Y X2 ,
θ
∇Y (f X) = Y f · X + f ∇Y X,
for θ = 1, 2 and X, Y, X1 , X2 , Y1 , Y2 ∈ X(MN ), f ∈ F(MN ), where F (MN ) is an
1
2
algebra of smooth real functions on MN . In that case we write LN = (MN , ∇, ∇)
1
2
and LN call a space on non-symmetric connections ∇, ∇.
If we introduce local coordinates x1 , . . . , xN and put ∂/∂xi = ∂i , in view of
(1.1) it will be
(1.2)
2
1
∇∂j ∂k = ∇∂k ∂j .
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 53C05; Secondary 53B05.
Key words and phrases: non-symmetric connection, curvature tensors, independent curvature
tensors, Ricci type identities.
205
206
MINČIĆ
1
Denoting coefficients of the connection ∇ in the base ∂1 , . . . , ∂N with Lijk , we have
1
2
1
∇∂k ∂j = Lijk ∂i , ∇∂k ∂j = ∇∂j ∂k = Likj ∂i , where = denotes “equal with respect
(1.2)
(1.2)
to (1.2)".
Further, if we take by definition
θ
θ
θ
T (X, Y ) = ∇Y X − ∇X Y + [X, Y ], θ ∈ {1, 2},
it follows
2
1
T (X, Y ) = −T (X, Y ) ≡ −T (X, Y ),
2
1
1
2
(T (X, Y ) = T (X, Y )) ⇔ (∇ = ∇ = ∇).
We proved in [18] how it is possible to obtain several curvature tensors in LN by
polylinear mappings. It is proved that among these tensors there are 5 independent
ones:
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
(1.3)
R(X; Y, Z) = ∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X + ∇[Y,Z] X,
(1.4)
R(X; Y, Z) = ∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X + ∇[Y,Z] X,
3
2
1
1
2
2
(1.5)
R(X; Y, Z) = ∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X + ∇ 1
(1.6)
R(X; Y, Z) = ∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X + ∇ 2
∇Y Z
4
2
1
1
2
2
∇Y Z
1
X − ∇2
∇Z Y
1
X − ∇1
∇Z Y
X,
X,
(1.7)
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
5
1 1 1
R(X; Y, Z) = (∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X + ∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X + ∇[Y,Z] X + ∇[Y,Z] X),
2
while the rest can be expressed as linear combinations of these five tensors. For
X = ∂/∂xj ≡ ∂j , Y = ∂k , Z = ∂l , one obtains
1
(1.8)
Rijkl = Lijk,l − Lijl,k +Lpjk Lipl − Lpjl Lipk ,
(1.9)
Rijkl = Likj,l − Lilj,k +Lpkj Lilp − Lplj Likp ,
(1.10)
Rijkl = Lijk,l − Lilj,k +Lpjk Lilp − Lplj Lipk +Lplk (Lipj − Lijp ),
(1.11)
Rijkl = Lijk,l − Lilj,k +Lpjk Lilp − Lplj Lipk +Lpkl (Lipj − Lijp ),
(1.12)
Rijkl =
2
3
4
5
1 i
(L +Likj,l −Lijl,k −Lilj,k +Lpjk Lipl +Lpkj Lilk −Lpjl Likp −Lplj Lipk )
2 jk,l
2. Identities for a vector and for a covector by both connections
2.1.
(2.1)
Consider an expression
ν
µ
µ
ν
(∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X)(ω), µ, ν ∈ {1, 2}.
ON RICCI TYPE IDENTITIES...
207
Let us quote the relations (for µ = 1, 2)
µ
µ
µ
(∇Y X)(ω) = Y [X(ω)] − X(∇Y ω),
µ
(∇Y ω)(X) = Y [ω(X)] − ω(∇Y X).
and denote
µ
ν
b) ∇Z ω = ω ∈ X∗ (MN ).
a) ∇Y X = X ∈ X(MN ),
(2.2)
Then we have
µ
ν
ν
ν
(∇Z ∇Y X)(ω) = (∇Z X)(ω) = Z[X(ω)] − X(∇Z ω)
(2a)
(2)
µ
µ
= Z[(∇Y X)(ω)] − (∇Y X)(ω)
(2)
µ
(2.3)
µ
ν
ν
= Z{Y [X(ω)] − X(∇Y X)} − {Y [X(∇Z ω)] − X(∇Y ∇Z ω)}
(2b)
µ
µ
ν
ν
= ZY [X(ω)] − Z[X(∇Y ω)] − Y [X(∇Z ω)] + X(∇Y ∇Z ω),
and one gets
ν
(2.4)
µ
µ
ν
µ
ν
µ
ν
(∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X)(ω) = [Z, Y ][X(ω)] − X(∇Z ∇Y ω − ∇Y ∇Z ω),
i.e.,
µ
ν
µ
ν
µ
ν
µ
ν
(∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X)(ω) = [Z, Y ][X(ω)]−(∇Z ∇Y ω − ∇Y ∇Z ω)(X), µ, ν ∈ {1, 2}.
From
ν
ν
ν
ν
(2.5) (∇[Z,Y ] X)(ω) = ∇[Z,Y ] [X(ω)] − X(∇[Z,Y ] ω) = [Z, Y ][X(ω)] + (∇[Y,Z] ω)(X),
we find the first addend on the right side and substitute in (2.7). We obtain
ν
µ
ν
µ
ν
(2.6) (∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X + ∇[Y,Z] X)(ω)
ν
µ
µ
ν
ν
= −(∇Z ∇Y ω − ∇Y ∇Z ω + ∇[Y,Z] ω)(X),
µ, ν ∈ {1, 2}
Definition 2.1. The equations (2.4) for µ, ν ∈ {1, 2} are Ricci type identities
for a vector in LN .
1
2.2.
(2.7)
Taking µ = ν = 1, we obtain the corresponding identity for ∇:
1
1
1
1
1
1
R(X; Y, Z)(ω) = −(∇Z ∇Y ω − ∇Y ∇Z ω + ∇[Y,Z] ω)(X).
Denoting
1
(2.8)
1
1
1
1
1
R(ω; Y, Z) = ∇Z ∇Y ω − ∇Y ∇Z ω + ∇[Y,Z] ω,
the equation (2.7) gives a relation
(2.9)
1
1
R(X; Y, Z)(ω) = −R(ω; Y, Z)(X).
208
MINČIĆ
In order to write the equation (2.4) in local coordinates for µ = ν = 1, we take
X = X j ∂j , Y = ∂k , Z = ∂l , ω = dxi . For the left side in (2.4) we obtain
1
1
1
1
L = (∇∂l ∇∂k X − ∇∂k ∇∂l X)(dxi )
1
1
= [∇∂l (X |jk ∂j ) − ∇∂k (X |jl ∂j )](dxi )
1
=
1
[(X |jk ),l ∂j
+
X |jk Lpjl ∂p
1
=
− (X |jl ),k ∂j − X |jl Lpjk ∂p ](dxi )
1
(X |jk ),l δji
+
1
X |jk Lpjl δpi
−
−
X |jl Lpjk δpi
1
1
1
1
(X |jl ),k δji
1
= (X |ik ),l + X |jk Lijl − (X |il ),k − X |jl Lijk
1
=
+
Lpkl X |ip
1 1
=
1
1
X |ik| l
−
X |il| k
1
X |ik| l
−
X |ik| l
1 1
+
1
−
Lplk X |ip
1 1
1
p
Tkl
X |ip .
1 1
1
For the right-hand side in (2.4) we obtain
1
1
1
1
R = [∂l , ∂k ](X(dxi )) + X(∇∂l ∇∂k dxi − ∇∂k ∇∂l dxi )
1
1
= 0 + X[∇∂l (−Lipl dxp ) − ∇∂l (−Lipk dxp )]
= X(Ripkl dxp ) = Ripkl dxp (X) = Ripkl X p ,
1
1
1
and from L = R, we have
p
X |ikl − X |ilk = Ripkl X p − Tkl
X |ip ,
(2.10)
1
1
1
1
i.e., the known identity in local coordinates. So, we have proved the following
theorem.
1
Theorem 2.1. In the space LN , with non-symmetric affine connection ∇ by
equation (2.4) for µ = ν = 1 the first Ricci type identity for a vector is given. That
1
1
identity can be written in forms (2.5), (2.6), (2.9), here R is given by (1.3) and R
by (2.8). The corresponding identity in local coordinates is (2.10).
2.3. By using equation (2.4) and the condition X(ω) = ω(X) ∈ F(MN ), we
obtain the equation analogous to (2.4) (X and ω have changed the roles):
(2.11)
ν
µ
µ
ν
ν
µ
µ
ν
(∇Z ∇Y ω − ∇Y ∇Z ω)(X) = [Z, Y ][ω(X)] − ω(∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X).
Definition 2.2. Equations (2.11) for µ, ν ∈ {1, 2} are Ricci type identities for
a covector in LN .
Equation (2.11) can be obtained also by consideration of the expression on the
left-hand side in (2.11). The known Ricci identity for a covariant vector in local
ON RICCI TYPE IDENTITIES...
209
coordinates can be obtained from (2.11) by substituting ω = ωj xj , X = ∂i , Y = ∂k ,
Z = ∂l :
p
ωj | kl − ωj | lk = −Rpjkl ωp − Tkl
ωj | p .
(2.12)
1
1
1
1
So, the following theorem is valid.
1
Theorem 2.2. In the space LN , with non-symmetric affine connection ∇, by
equation (2.11) for µ = ν = 1, the first Ricci type identity for a covector is given.
The corresponding identity in local coordinates is (2.12).
For µ = ν = 2 from (2.4) is obtained
2.4.
2
(2.13)
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
(∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X)(ω) = [Z, Y ][X(ω)] − X(∇Z ∇Y ω − ∇Y ∇Z ω).
From here
2
2
(2.14)
R(X; Y, Z)(ω) = −R(ω; Y, Z)(X),
2
2
2
where R is expressed by ∇ analogously to (2.8) and R is given in (1.3). Surpassing
to local coordinates, from (2.13) one obtains
p
X |ikl − X |ilk = Ripkl X p + Tkl
X |ip ,
(2.15)
2
2
2
2
and also equations similar to (2.11), (2.12) (for a covector).
Thus, we state
2
Theorem 2.3. In the space LN with non-symmetric affine connection ∇, defined by (1.1), the second Ricci type identity for a vector is given by equation (2.13).
The corresponding identity in local coordinates is (2.15).
3. Identities for a vector and covector
obtained by combinations of both connections
3.1.
Putting µ = 1, ν = 2 into (2.4), we get the identity
2
(3.1)
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
(∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X)(ω) = [Z, Y ][X(ω)] − (∇Z ∇Y ω − ∇Y ∇Z ω)(X).
and from (2.6)
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
(3.2) (∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X + ∇[Y,Z] X)(ω) = −(∇Z ∇Y ω − ∇Y ∇Z ω + ∇[Y,Z] ω)(X)
Analogously to (1.5), let us put
3
(3.3)
2
1
1
2
2
R(ω; Y, Z) = ∇Z ∇Y ω − ∇Y ∇Z ω + ∇ 1
∇Y Z
1
ω − ∇2
∇Y Z
ω ∈ X∗ (MN )
210
MINČIĆ
and (3.2) becomes
3
1
2
(3.4) (R(X; Y, Z) + ∇ 2
∇Y Z
2
X − ∇1
∇Y Z
X + ∇[Y,Z] X)(ω)
3
1
2
= −(R(ω; Y, Z) + ∇ 2
∇Z Y
ω − ∇1
2
∇Y Z
ω + ∇[Y,Z] ω)(X).
Because of
1
2
(∇ 2
∇Z Y
2
X − ∇1
∇Y Z
1
2
X + ∇[Y,Z] X)(ω) = (∇ 2
∇Z Y
1
X − ∇1
∇Y Z+[Z,Y ]
2
= (∇ 2
∇Z Y
X − ∇2
∇Z Y
X)(ω)
X)(ω)
and
1
−(∇ 2
2
∇Z Y
2
ω − ∇1
∇Y Z
1
ω + ∇[Y,Z] ω)(X) = −(∇ 2
∇Z Y
2
1
= (∇ 2
∇Z Y
2
ω − ∇2
∇Z Y
∇Z Y
1
[ω(X)] − ω(∇ 2
∇Z Y
2
= (∇ 2
∇Z Y
∇Y Z+[Z,Y ]
ω)(X)
ω)(X)
2
= ∇2
2
ω − ∇1
X − ∇2
∇Z Y
1
X) − ∇ 2
∇Z Y
1
[ω(X)] + ω(∇ 2
∇Z Y
X)
X)(ω),
we see that the right-hand sides of these equations are identical and from (3.4):
3
3
(3.5)
R(X; Y, Z)(ω) = −R(ω; Y, Z)(X).
3.2. If we put X = X j ∂j , Y = ∂k , Z = ∂l , ω = dxi , equation (3.1) will be
written in local coordinates as follows. For the left-hand side L we have
2
1
1
2
L = (∇∂l ∇∂k X − ∇∂k ∇∂l X)(dxi )
2
1
= [∇∂l (X |jk ∂j ) − ∇∂k (X |jl ∂j )](dxi )
1
(3.6)
2
= [(X |jk ),l ∂j + X |jk Lplj ∂p − (X |jl ),k ∂j − X |jl Lpjk ∂p ](dxi )
1
=
1
(X |ik ),l
+
1
=
X |ik| l
1 2
2
X |jk Lilj
−
(X |il ),k
−
−
2
1
X |il| k
2
X |jl Lijk
−
Lplk (X |ip
2 1
2
−
X |ip )
1
i
= X |ik| l − X |il| k − Lplk Tsp
X s,
2
1 2
2 1
where
X |ik| l = (X |ik ),l + X |pk Lilp − X |ip Lplk ,
1 2
X |il| k
2 1
1
=
(X |il ),k
2
1
+
X |pl Lipk
2
1
− X |ip Lplk .
2
ON RICCI TYPE IDENTITIES...
211
For the right-hand side one obtains
2
1
1
2
R = −(∇∂l ∇∂k dxi − ∇∂k ∇∂l dxi )(X)
(3.7)
= (Lipk,l dxp − Lipk Lpls dxs + Lilp,k dxp + Lilp Lpsk dxs )(X)
= (Lipk,l − Lisk Lslp − Lilp,k + Lils Lspk )X p .
By virtue of (3.6) and (3.7), from L = R it is
X |ik| l − X |il| k = Ripkl X p ,
(3.8)
1 2
3
2 1
and, analogously to that exposed above, for a covariant vector ω it is obtained
ωj | k| l − ωj | l| k = −Rpjkl ωp .
(3.9)
1 2
3
2 1
4
4
3.3. Introducing R(X; Y, Z) into (3.2) by virtue of (1.6) and defining R(ω; Y, Z)
according to
4
(3.10)
2
1
1
2
2
1
R(ω; Y, Z) = ∇Z ∇Y ω − ∇Y ∇Z ω + ∇ 2
∇Y Z
ω − ∇1
∇Y Z
ω ∈ X∗ (MN ),
equation (3.2) gives
4
1
2
(R(X; Y, Z) + ∇ 1
∇Z Y
4
X − ∇2
1
∇Y Z
2
= −(R(ω; Y, Z) + ∇ 1
∇Z Y
ω − ∇2
∇Y Z
2
X + ∇[Y,Z] X)(ω)
2
ω + ∇[Y,Z] ω)(X).
3
As in the case of R, we obtain
4
4
(3.11)
R(X; Y, Z)(ω) = −R(ω; Y, Z)(X).
Putting X = ∂j , Y = ∂k , Z = ∂l , ω = dxi and taking into consideration (3.10), we
get
4
2
2
2
1
Rpjkl ∂p (dxi ) = −[∇∂l ( − Lipk dxp ) − ∇∂k ( − Lilp dxp ) + ∇Lpkl ∂p dxi − ∇Lpkl ∂p dxi ](∂j ),
4
from where for R the value (1.11) is obtained. In view of (1.10), (1.11) it is
4
3
p
i
Rpjkl − Rpjkl = Tpj
Tkl
.
and, using (3.8) and (3.9), we obtain
(3.12)
i
s
Tkl
X p,
X |ik| l − X |il| k = Ripkl X p + Tps
1 2
(3.13)
2 1
4
p s
ωj | k| l − ωj | l| k = −Rpjkl ωp + Tsj
Tkl ωp .
1 2
2 1
Now, we can state the following theorem
4
212
MINČIĆ
1
Theorem 3.1. In the space LN with two non-symmetric affine connections ∇,
2
∇, linked by equation (1.1), the third Ricci type identity for a vector is given by
equation (3.1). This identity can be written also in forms (3.2), (3.5) and (3.11).
From (2.8), for µ = 1, ν = 2, one obtains the third Ricci type identity for a
covector. The corresponding identities in coordinates are (3.8), (3.9), (3.12) and
(3.13).
5
3.4. In order to obtain an identity in which R appears, let us start from the
expression which appears in (1.7). So,
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
(∇Z ∇Y X + ∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X − ∇Y ∇Z X)(ω)
1
1
1
1
(2.3) = ZY [X(ω)] − Z[X(∇Y ω)] − Y [X(∇Z ω)] + X(∇Y ∇Z ω)
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
+ ZY [X(ω)] − Z[X(∇Y ω)] − Y [X(∇Z ω)] + X(∇Y ∇Z ω)
− Y Z[X(ω)] + Y [X(∇Z ω)] + Z[X(∇Y ω)] − X(∇Z ∇Y ω)
1
2
1
2
− Y Z[X(ω)] + Y [X(∇Z ω)] + Z[X(∇Y ω)] − X(∇Z ∇Y ω) (ω),
that is
(3.14)
2
2
1
2
2
1
1 1 1
(∇Z ∇Y X + ∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X − ∇Y ∇Z X)(ω)
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
= [Z, Y ][X(ω)] + X(∇Y ∇Z ω + ∇Y ∇Z ω − ∇Z ∇Y ω − ∇Z ∇Y ω).
2
Definition 3.1. Equation (3.14) we call the combined Ricci type identity for
a vector in LN .
Using (1.7), from (3.14) it is obtained
5
0
(3.15) R(X; Y, Z)(ω)+(∇[Z,Y ] X)(ω)
2
2
1
2
2
1
1 1 1
= [Z, Y ][ω(X)]+ (∇Y ∇Z ω + ∇Y ∇Z ω − ∇Z ∇Y ω − ∇Z ∇Y ω)(X).
2
From
0
0
0
(∇[Z,Y ] X)(ω) = [Z, Y ][X(ω)] − X(∇[Z,Y ] ω) = [Z, Y ][ω(X)] + (∇[Y,Z] ω)(X),
we find the first addend of the right-hand side and substitute into (3.15). So,
5
0
R(X; Y, Z)(ω) + (∇[Z,Y ] X)(ω)
0
0
= (∇[Z,Y ] X)(ω) + (∇[Z,Y ] ω)(X)
2
2
1
2
2
1
1 1 1
+ (∇Y ∇Z ω + ∇Y ∇Z ω − ∇Z ∇Y ω − ∇Z ∇Y ω)(X),
2
ON RICCI TYPE IDENTITIES...
213
5
where R is given in (1.7). Denoting
(3.16)
5
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1 1 1
R(ω; Y, Z) = (∇Z ∇Y ω + ∇Z ∇Y ω − ∇Y ∇Z ω − ∇Y ∇Z ω + ∇[Y,Z] ω + ∇[Y,Z] ω)
2
the previous equation gives
5
5
(3.17)
R(X; Y, Z)(ω) = R(ω; Z, Y )(X).
Substituting here X = ∂j , Y = ∂k , Z = ∂l , ω = dxi and taking into consideration
5
(3.16), for Rijkl (1.12) is obtained.
5
5
Remark 3.1. We see that relation between R and R is not of the form relating
θ
θ
to R, R, θ = 1, 2, 3, 4. In fact using the corresponding values from [22]
5
0
8
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
1 1 2
(∇Z ∇Y X + ∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X − ∇Y ∇Z X + ∇[Y,Z] X + ∇[Y,Z] X)
2
R = R(X; Y, Z) + τ (τ (X, Y ), Z) + τ (τ (X, Z), Y ),
R=
0
= R(X; Y, Z) − τ (τ (X, Y ), Z) − τ (τ (X, Z), Y ).
5
0
8
We conclude that R − 2R = R and
5
5
8
R(X; Y, Z)(ω) = R(ω; Z, Y )(X) = −R(ω; Y, Z)(X).
So, we have
1
2
Theorem 3.2. In the space LN with two non-symmetric affine connections ∇,
∇, linked according to (1.1), by equation (3.14) the combined Ricci type identity
for a vector is given. Some other forms of (3.14) are (3.15)–(3.17). From (3.15)
combined Ricci type identity for a covector is obtained:
2
2
1
2
2
1
1 1 1
(∇Y ∇Z ω + ∇Y ∇Z ω − ∇Z ∇Y ω − ∇Z ∇Y ω)(X)
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1 1 1
= (∇Z ∇Y X + ∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X − ∇Y ∇Z X)(ω) + [Z, Y ][ω(X)].
2
From (3.14) and (3.18) we obtain the corresponding combined Ricci type identities for a vector and covector respectively local coordinates:
5
1 i
(X + X |ikl − X |il| k − X |il| k ) = Ripkl X p ,
2 1| kl
2
1 2
2 1
(3.18)
5
0
1
(ωj | kl + ωj | kl − ωj | l| k − ωj | l| k ) = (R − 2R)pjkl ωp ,
2 1
2
1 2
2 1
0
0
where Rijkl is defined by Lijk = 21 (Lijk + Lijk ), i.e., by symmetric connection coefficients.
214
MINČIĆ
θ
θ
Definition 3.2. The objects R, (θ = 1, . . . , 5), defined by R : X × X × X → X∗
θ
on MN , we call dual curvature tensors in relation to R.
4. Identities for a tensor field t of the type (r, s)
Let us consider a tensor field of the type (r, s), which will be denoted
4.1.
r
r
t ≡ t, i.e., consider a mapping t : (X ∗ )r × (X )s 7→ F (MN ). So,
s
s
r
t(ω 1 , . . . , ω r , X1 , . . . , Xs ) ∈ F(MN ),
s
is a differentiable function on MN .
As known, a covariant derivative
µ
ν
r
∇Y
µ
r
t is also of a type (r, s). As in (2.1), one
s
ν
r
can consider the expression (∇Z ∇Y t − ∇Y ∇Z t)(ω 1 , . . . , ω r , X1 , . . . , Xs ).
s
s
2
Let us examine nearer the case (r, s) = (2, 1), i.e., t ≡ t. We have
4.2.
1
2
µ
µ
µ
(∇Y t)(ω 1 , ω 2 ; X) = ∇Y [t(ω 1 , ω 2 ; X] − t(∇Y ω 1 , ω 2 ; X)
1
µ
µ
− t(ω 1 , ∇Y ω 2 ; X) − t(ω 1 , ω 2 ; ∇Y X).
µ
Denoting ∇Y t = t, we have
µ
ν
ν
(∇Z ∇Y t)(ω 1 , ω 2 ; X) = (∇Z t)(ω 1 , ω 2 ; X)
ν
ν
ν
ν
= ∇Z [t(ω 1 , ω 2 ; X] − t(∇Z ω 1 , ω 2 ; X) − t(ω 1 , ∇Z ω 2 ; X) − t(ω 1 , ω 2 ; ∇Z X)
(4)
ν
µ
µ
µ
ν
µ
ν
ν
= ∇Z [(∇Y t)(ω 1 , ω 2 ; X] − (∇Y t)(∇Z ω 1 , ω 2 ; X) − (∇Y t)(ω 1 , ∇Z ω 2 ; X) − (∇Y t)(ω 1 , ω 2 ; ∇Z X)
ν
µ
µ
µ
µ
= ∇Z {∇Y [t(ω 1 , ω 2 ; X] − t(∇Y ω 1 , ω 2 ; X) − t(ω 1 , ∇Y ω 2 ; X) − t(ω 1 , ω 2 ; ∇Y X)}
(4)
µ
µ
ν
ν
µ
ν
µ
ν
− {∇Y [t(∇Z ω 1 , ω 2 ; X] − t(∇Y ∇Z ω 1 , ω 2 ; X) − t(∇Z ω 1 , ∇Y ω 2 ; X) − t(∇Z ω 1 , ω 2 ; ∇Y X)}
µ
µ
ν
µ
ν
ν
µ
ν
− {∇Y [t(ω 1 , ∇Z ω 2 ; X] − t(∇Y ω 1 , ∇Z ω 2 ; X) − t(ω 1 , ∇Y ∇Z ω 2 ; X) − t(ω 1 , ∇Z ω 2 ; ∇Y X)}
µ
µ
ν
µ
ν
µ
ν
ν
− {∇Y [t(ω 1 , ω 2 ; ∇Z X] − t(∇Y ω 1 , ω 2 ; ∇Z X) − t(ω 1 , ∇Y ω 2 ; ∇Z X) − t(ω 1 , ω 2 ; ∇Y ∇Z X)}.
wherefrom
(4.1)
ν
µ
2
µ
ν
2
2
(∇Z ∇Y t − ∇Y ∇Z t)(ω 1 , ω 2 ; X) = [Z, Y ][t(ω 1 , ω 2 ; X)]
1
1
1
2 ν
µ
1
2
ν
µ
ν
= −t(∇Z ∇Y ω 1 − ∇Y ∇Z ω 1 , ω 2 ; X)
µ
µ
ν
− t(ω 1 , ∇Z ∇Y ω 2 − ∇Y ∇Z ω 2 ; X)
1
2
ν
µ
µ
ν
− t(ω 1 , ω 2 ; ∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X).
1
ON RICCI TYPE IDENTITIES...
215
In the general case, starting from
4.3.
µ
µ
r
r
(∇Y t)(ω 1 , . . . , ω r ; X1 , . . . , Xs ) = ∇Y [t(ω 1 , . . . , ω r ; X1 , . . . , Xs )]
(4.2)
s
s
r
X
µ
r
−
t(ω 1 , . . . , ω i−1 , ∇Y ω i , ω i+1 , . . . , ω r ; X1 , . . . , Xs )
−
i=1
s
X
j=1
s
µ
r
t(ω 1 , . . . , ω r ; X1 , . . . , Xj−1 , ∇Y Xj , Xj+1 , . . . , Xs ),
s
we get
µ
ν
µ
r
ν
r
s
s
r
(∇Z ∇Y t − ∇Y ∇Z t)(ω 1 , . . . , ω r ; X1 , . . . , Xs ) = [Z, Y ][t(ω 1 , . . . , ω r ; X1 , . . . , Xs )]
s
(4.3)
−
r
X
µ
µ
ν
ν
r
t(ω 1 , . . . , ω i−1 , ∇Z ∇Y ω i − ∇Y ∇Z ω i , ω i+1 , . . . , ω r ; X1 , . . . , Xs )
−
i=1
s
X
j=1
s
ν
r
µ
µ
ν
t(ω 1 , . . . , ω r ; X1 , . . . , Xj−1 , ∇Z ∇Y Xj − ∇Y ∇Z Xj , Xj+1 , . . . , Xs ).
s
Consider some particular cases, obtained from (4.2). For example:
1
1) For µ = ν = 1, r = 1, s = 0 that is for t = X, from (2.4) corresponding
0
identity is obtained, i.e., in coordinates, (2.10), and for r = 1, s = 0 it
follows (2.11), respectively (2.12)
2) For µ = ν = 2, r = 1, s = 0 analogous relation (2.13), and equations
corresponding to (2.11) and (2.12) are obtained.
3) For µ = 1, ν = 2, r = 1, s = 0 we obtain (3.1) and for r = 0, s = 1 the
corresponding equation follows, where the roles of X and ω are exchanged.
4) For r = 2, s = 1, relation (4.1) follows.
4.4.
Identities (4.3) can be written so that in them curvature tensors figure
1
explicitly. For example, for µ = ν = r = s = 1, ∇ ≡ ∇ we have
1
1
1
1
1
(∇Z ∇Y t − ∇Y ∇Z t)(ω; X) = [Z, Y ][t(ω; X)]
1
1
1
− t(∇Z ∇Y ω − ∇Y ∇Z ω; X) − t(ω; ∇Z ∇Y X − ∇Y ∇Z X)
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
= ∇[Z,Y ] [t(ω; X)] − t(R(ω; Y, Z) − ∇[Y,Z] ω; X) − t(ω; R(X; Y, Z) − ∇[Y,Z] X)
1
1
1
= ∇[Z,Y ] [t(ω; X)] − t(R(ω; Y, Z); X) + t(∇[Y,Z] ω; X) − t(ω; R(X; Y, Z)) + t(ω; ∇[Y,Z] X).
1
In view of (4.2) it is
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
(∇[Z,Y ] t)(ω; X) = ∇[Z,Y ] [t(ω; X)] + t(∇[Y,Z] ω; X) + t(ω; ∇[Y,Z] X),
216
MINČIĆ
the previous equation gives the identity
1
1
1
1
1
1
(∇Z ∇Y t − ∇Y ∇Z t)(ω; X)
1
(4.4)
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
= (∇[Z,Y ] t)(ω; X)] − t(R(ω; Y, Z); X) − t(ω; R(X; Y, Z)).
Herefrom, in the local coordinates one obtains
1
1
p i
tij | kl − tij | lk = Ripkl tpj − Rpjkl tip − Tkl
tj | p .
1
1
1
Finally, from the exposed, the following theorem is valid.
1
2
Theorem 4.1. In the space LN with two non-symmetric connections ∇, ∇,
linked with equation (1.1), equation (4.3) represents general Ricci type identity for
r
a tensor t of the type (r, s). The equations obtained previously for a vector and a
s
covector, also (4.4), are particular cases of (4.3).
θ
θ
In (4.3) we see how the quantities R and R can be introduced.
References
1. L. S. Das, R. Nivas, S. Ali, M. Ahmad, Study of submanifolds immersed in a manifolds with
quater symmetric semi symmetric connection, Tensor N.S. 65 (2004), 250–260.
2. T. Imai, Notes on semi-symmetric metric connections, Tensor N.S. 24 (1972), 293-296.
3. S. M. Minčić, Ricci identities in the space of non-symmetric affine connexion, Mat. Vesnik
10(25)(2) (1973), 161–172.
, On curvature tensors and pseudotensors of the space with non-symmetric affine
4.
connection, Math. Balkan. ?? (1974), 427–430 (in Russian).
5.
, Curvature tensors of the space of non-symmetric affine connexion, obtained from
the curvature pseudotensors, Mat. Vesnik 13(28) (1976), 421–435.
, New commutation formulas in the non-symetric affine connexion space, Publ. Inst.
6.
Math. (Beograd) (N.S) 22(36) (1977), 189–199.
7.
, Independent curvature tensors and pseudotensors of spaces with non-symmetric
affine connexion, Coll. Math. Soc. János Bolyai, 31 Dif. Geom., Budapest (Hungary), (1979),
445–460.
8.
, On curvature tensors of non-symmetric affine connection, Acta Comment. Univ.
Tartu. Math. 9 (2005), 13–20.
9.
, Some characteristics of curvature tensors of nonsymmetric affine connexion, Novi
Sad J. Math. 29(3) (1999), 169–186.
10. S. M. Minčić, Lj. S. Velimirović, Differential Geometry of Manifolds, Faculty of Science and
Mathematics, Univ. of Niš, 2011 (in Serbian).
11. C. Nitescu, Bianchi identities in a non symmetric connection space, Bul. Inst. Polit. Iasi
Sec.1, Mat. Mec. teor. Fiz. 20(24)(1-2) (1974),
12. H. D. Pande, Decomposition of curvature tensor in R − ⊕ recurent Finsler space with nonsymmetric connection (I), Prog. Math. 22(1,2) (1988), 61–68.
13. M. Prvanović, Une connexion non-symmetrique associé á l’ éspace Riemannien, Publ. Inst.
Math. 10(24) (1970), 53–64.
14.
, Four curvature tensors of non-symmetric affine connexion, Proc. Conf. “150 years
of Lobachevski geometry", Kazan 1976, Moscow 1997, 199–205 (in Russian).
15. U. P. Singh, On relative curvature tensors in the subspace of a Riemannian space, Revne Fac.
Sci. Instambul 33 (1968), 69–75.
ON RICCI TYPE IDENTITIES...
217
16. K. Yano, On semi-symmetric metric connection, Revne Roum. Math. Pures Appl. 15 (1970),
1579–1581.
17. N. Youssef, A. Sid-Ahmed, Linear connection and curvature tensors of the geometry of parallelisable manifolds, Reports Math. Phys. 60(1) (2007), 39.
18. S. M. Minčić, On curvature tensors obtained by two non-symmetric affine connections, submitted.
Faculty of Science and Mathematics
University of Niš
Niš
Serbia
svetislavmincic@yahoo.com
Download