Arizona Head Lettuce Insect Losses Workshop Why is this Process Important?

advertisement
Arizona Head Lettuce
Insect Losses Workshop
Head Lettuce Insect losses Workshop
Title:
Sponsor:
University of Arizona
Date:
5-02-06
Location:
Yuma Civic Center
California
3 hours
May 2, 2006
Arizona
3 hours
2005 Head Lettuce Insect Losses
Working Group
• Goal: To develop head lettuce insect losses,
control costs, and related insect control
information for the state of Arizona.
•
•
Crop Insect Loss and Impact
Assessment Working Group
Data has traditionally been provided using
incomplete surveys and “expert” opinion.
Your opportunity to ground the process with
“real world” data.
Why is this Process Important?
In combination with the Pesticide Use Database
(derived from 1080 data):
• Section 18 Emergency Exemptions
• Defense and Support of older A.I.s
• FQPA: next go-around – endosulfan/pyrethroids
• Quantitative database for measuring IPM
• Supports funding for UA Res / Extn programs
• Help to re-direct efforts of University
1
Why is this Process Important?
• Translates your job into economic terms for your
customers
Part 1.
x
Yuma
5/2/2006
• Confirms the importance of the PCA to the lettuce
industry
• Demonstrates value of new pest control technologies
• Shows importance of insect pests and their
management in desert lettuce production
Responses For Fall and
Spring Head Lettuce :
Percent (%) Reductions in Yield
x
x
Yuma
Yuma
5/2/2006
5/2/2006
1500
850
1050
1000
975
1100
1500
850
1050
5
1
2
9
5
3
1000
975
1100
6
1
2
11
4
5
2
Percent (%) Reductions in Yield
Insecticide Applications
x
Yuma
5/2/2006
1500
850
1050
5
1
2
9
5
3
1000
975
1100
6
1
2
11
4
5
100
3.5
90
3
8.50
9.00
Vertebrates, rodents, salt, poor crop management,
poor thinning and weeding,
bad market
Insect Management Fees
Insecticide Applications
100
3.5
90
3
8.50
9.00
100
4
90
4
14.50
15.00
100
100
4
3
22.50
21.00
3
Part 2.
Insecticide Treated Acres
and
Insect Losses
Thrips
100
100
30
85
1
3
Thrips
100
100
30
85
Thrips
100
100
30
85
1
3
32.50
32.00
4
100
Thrips
100
30
85
1
3
32.50
32.00
0.5
1
Major pests in 2004-2005
- Treated Acres and No. of Sprays
Major pests in 2004-2005
Fall
Head Lettuce
Spring
Head Lettuce
Fall
Head Lettuce
Beet armyworm
94% acres
3.6 sprays
Cabbage looper
98% acres
3.0 sprays
Thrips
86% acres
2.5 sprays
Green peach aphid
56% acres
2.2 sprays
Seedling pests
2.6 % loss
Beet armyworm
2.3 % loss
90
25
12.50
12.50
100
75
70
70
- % Reduction in Yield
Spring
Head Lettuce
Thrips
1.7% loss
Seedling pests
1.4% loss
5
Part 3.
Insecticide Use Survey
10
25
1
1.5
2004 ANNUAL STATISTICS BULLETIN
% Head Lettuce Acres Treated with Imidacloprid
100
80
100
Provado 1.6F
Admire 2F
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
0
1996
New additions: Assail, Oberon, Azadirachtin / Neem, Entrust
•
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2005
This is data that is currently used for regulatory processes
http://www.nass.usda.gov/az/
6
5
Head Lettuce – No. of Applications
4
% Head Lettuce Acres Treated
5
100
4
80
100
80
Success
3
3
2
Success
1
Lannate
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2
40
1
20
60
Lannate
40
20
Larvin
Larvin
0
60
0
2005
http://www.nass.usda.gov/az/
0
0
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2005
http://www.nass.usda.gov/az/
Let’s get started!
7
Download