The Global Energy Challenge – Towards an Age of Electrochemistry? Michael Eikerling Department of Chemistry, SFU Summer Seminar Series on Climate Change, June 27, 2012 The Problem of Climate Change 1. Understanding relationship between climate and chemistry of atmosphere, biological matter, and oceans 2. Predicting impact on climate of different infrastructures for energy conversion and storage (“sources”, production, transportation, consumption, efficiency of energy use) “In every case, after a bit of discussion, the audiences have agreed that energy is the single most important issue we face.” R.E. Smalley (1996 Nobel Prize), MRS Bulletin 30 (2005) 413. What is Energy? D - Not trivial… q fundamental physical property of objects (like atom number, volume) q practical definition: ability of a system to perform work q different forms (kinetic, potential, thermal, chemical, nuclear, mass, …) q What can be measured? Changes in energy distribution (during process) Can there be an energy crisis? è Thermodynamics è fundamental laws that govern distribution and transformation of energy U - Something familiar? (1) You cannot win è you can’t get something for nothing because matter and energy are conserved (always) (2) You cannot break even è you cannot return to the same energy state because entropy always increases (3) You cannot get out of the game è absolute zero of temperature is unattainable C.P. Snow, English physicist and novelist Foundations of Thermodynamics Two main approaches: phenomenology (observations) vs. formal machinery (mathematics) Empirical laws (“laws of experience”) THE ENERGY OF THE UNIVERSE IS CONSERVED. THE ENTROPY OF THE UNIVERSE INCREASES. q relationships between macroscopic properties of matter q always obeyed – consistent with any observation q basis for powerful theoretical formalism (> 50,000,000 math. relationships) q set of rules with capabilities to predict … … spontaneous direction of reaction or process … equilibrium constant of reaction that has never been run … how equilibrium constant depends on temperature … state (fate) of matter Thermodynamics ALBERT EINSTEIN: “A theory is the more impressive the greater the simplicity of its premises, the more different kinds of things it relates, and the more extended its area of applicability. Therefore the deep impression that classical thermodynamics made upon me. It is the only physical theory of universal content which I am convinced will never be overthrown, within the framework of applicability of its basic concepts.” SIR ARTHUR EDDINGTON (1928): “…if your theory is found to be against the Second Law of Thermodynamics, I can give you no hope; there is nothing for it but to collapse in deepest humiliation.” Global Energy – Estimates Basic energy demand è 2500 kcal per capita (average): 7.5 1016 basic demand consumption J p.d. Energy consumption = avg.efficiency (~5%) è global (~ 86% from fossil fuels): 14 1017 J p.d.* Earth is a closed system (no exchange of matter with universe): è only significant external source of energy is the SUN è energy from sun hitting the earth: 1.5 1022 J p.d. è 10000 times global energy consumption è photosynthesis (“biomass production”): < 1% efficient è currently used: stored sun (fossil fuels) è economic action predicated upon unlimited access to fossil fuels * > 220 Millions of Barrels oil equivalent per day Three-Course Recipe for Disaster Increasing power demand: double by 2050, triple by Finite resources: peak in oil extraction2 21001 Miserable energy efficiency of “developed” societies3,4 NOW global average energy efficiency ~ 40% 1 D.G. Nocera, Chem. Soc. Rev. 38 (2009) 13. I.S. Nashawi et al., Energy Fuels 24 (2010) 1788. 3 G. Deutscher, The Entropy Crisis, World Scientific Pub., 2008. 4 V. Smil, Visions of Discovery, ch. 35, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010. 2 ~ 1% A Global Energy: Drivers of a Transition Increasing power demand: double by 2050, triple by 21001 Finite resources: peak in oil extraction2 Miserable energy efficiency of “developed” societies3,4 q energy is conserved quantity q issue: rate of entropy production3 è fatal implications (climate, economy) è is CO2 the problem? 1 D.G. Nocera, Chem. Soc. Rev. 38 (2009) 13. I.S. Nashawi et al., Energy Fuels 24 (2010) 1788. 3 G. Deutscher, The Entropy Crisis, World Scientific Pub., 2008. 4 V. Smil, Visions of Discovery, ch. 35, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010. 2 E A fi w Global Energy: Drivers of a Transition Increasing power demand: double by 2050, triple by 21001 Finite resources: peak in oil extraction2 Miserable energy efficiency of “developed” societies3,4 A d b A simple problem in thermodynamics: Calculate rate of T increase (ΔT/year) - energy consumption rate: ~ 15 TW - use key theorem of thermodynamics - uncertainty: # of degrees of freedom - fundamental issue: large numbers! 1 D.G. Nocera, Chem. Soc. Rev. 38 (2009) 13. I.S. Nashawi et al., Energy Fuels 24 (2010) 1788. 3 G. Deutscher, The Entropy Crisis, World Scientific Pub., 2008. 4 V. Smil, Visions of Discovery, ch. 35, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010. 2 A Global Energy: Drivers of a Transition Increasing power demand: double by 2050, triple by 21001 Finite resources: peak in oil extraction2 Miserable energy efficiency of “developed” societies3,4 è reduce inefficient use è exploit abundant source(s) è develop efficient technologies Re So im gr Po An è a case for electrochemistry Towards an Age of Electrochemistry? Evaluation of energy technologies: EFFICIENCY v abundance of resources v infrastructural needs (costs) main asset Electrochemical energy conversion and storage Characteristics: q diverse technologies: photoelectrochemistry, batteries, fuel cells, ... q compatible with conventional and renewable sources q complex materials and phenomena (interfaces, nanomaterials) Prediction of a Technical Revolution Energy conversion in combustion engines ¢ limited by Carnot efficiency ¢ unacceptable levels of atmospheric pollution vs. Electrochemical energy conversion ¢ direct generation of electricity ¢ highly efficient, silent, no pollution Practical realization could take a long time! Source: Friedrich W. Ostwald (1909 Nobel prize), Z. Elektrochemie, Vol. 1, p. 122-125, 1894. P b What is Electrochemistry? Attempt 1: branch of thermodynamics expand concepts of free energy, chemical potential, td. equilibrium è additional state variable: electrostatic potential of a phase Attempt 2: surface science with a joystick heterogeneous systems (phases of matter, interfaces) è additional parameter: applied voltage (potential difference) Attempt 3: process-based separation of electrons from reactant in interfacial reactions q intermittent storage of electricity: capacitor, rechargeable battery q electron transfer and recombination with ions: fuel cell, battery Ba Fu What is an Electrochemical System? q glass of water – electrochemical perspective: homogeneous dielectric medium, polarizable Apply voltage: - capacitance (energy storage) - dielectric response function q add ions to water – electrochemical perspective: liquid electrolyte, activity of ions Apply voltage: - ion transport - ionic conductivity What is an Electrochemical System? q dip metal stripe into electrolyte – electrochemical/electrified interface apply voltage: add/extract electrons from metal – charged state è adsorption of molecules, dissolution/deposition of metal è polarization of charge and ion redistribution at or near interface è formation of electrochemical double layer electrostatic potential + ϕ + + + + + + + + metal electrolyte What is an Electrochemical System? q insert two metal stripes and connect them via cable – electrochemical cell: apply voltage: current flux (electrons in metal, ions in electrolyte) è galvanic cell (generate electrical power: battery, fuel cell) è electrolytic cell Electrochemical Energy Conversion: Principles KEY SYSTEM: metal|electrolyte interface è charge separation, charge transfer ϕ ϕ‡ ϕM Metal H H O Solution - + - à + - à + - à 𝛅 - ϕo KEY PARAMETER: specific interfacial area è design of nanostructured materials DEFAULT: heterogeneous media è transport and reaction σ Helmholtz plane nanostructured thin film (3M) S Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage Batteries, fuel cells, supercapacitors è complementary technologies Ragone plot W dr ele So Is Co Co rate of discharge è dynamics available energy è range M. Winter et al, Chem Rev. 104 (2004) 4245. Fuel Cell Technology: Versatility portable q energy efficiency (range) q power density (dynamics) q fuel flexibility and scalability q zero emission vehicle technology mobile stationary q durability and life=me q rapid response to load changes q wide range of opera=ng condi=ons Blueprint for Electrochemistry? low entropy input Important distinctions – biological energy conversion: è microscopic charge separation è much smaller power density Charge separation; water as source of electrons Efficiency of photosynthesis: < 1% Efficiency of photovoltaics: ~ 18% (Si) è efficiency of H2 production: ~ 12% Recombination of fuel with O2; water production Efficiency of respiration: up to 90% Efficiency of fuel cell: ~ 60% M. Hambourger et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 38 (2009) 25. Pr ef Bi -m -m Electrochemical Processes: Unrivalled Efficiency 2 H2 + O2 ΔH = - Q Direct H2 combustion 2 H2O Electrochemical Processes: Unrivalled Efficiency O2 2 H2 L - ΔH Reversible electrochemical process (const. T, P) 2 H2O Electrochemical Processes: Unrivalled Efficiency 4 eO2 2 H2 ΔG 4 H+ Reversible thermodynamic efficiency: ηrev = ΔH ΔG ΔS = 1−T ΔH ΔH 2 H2O TΔS Electrochemical Processes: Unrivalled Efficiency FCV 4 e- Wrev Anode Cathode 2 H2 O2 Pt ΔG =– Wrev 4 H+ Polymer Electrolyte Membrane electrocatalysis ΔH separation & proton conduction 2 H2O TΔS Electrochemical Processes: Unrivalled Efficiency Faster! Qr Joule heating FCV Wout 4 e- O2 2 H2 Qp Joule heating Pt kinetics Qa – Wout 4 H+ kinetics Qc – Qc Irreversible processes (finite rate) è heat losses Thermal efficiency: ηirr = − Wout Wout ΔG = ⋅ ΔH Wrev ΔH inefficiencies – Qp – Qr 2 H2O – Qa TΔS Electrochemical Processes: Unrivalled Efficiency Qr FCV Wout 4 e- O2 2 H2 - Wout Qp Pt load Qa 4 H+ Qc Ho as - Qirr Increasing the load (rate or current) è 2 H2O TΔS Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells Thermodynamic efficiency ηrev = ΔG ΔS = 1−T ΔH ΔH H2/O2 cell: ε th = 83% Voltage efficiency W ΔG ηirr ( j0 ) = out ⋅ Wrev ΔH ε V (1 A cm-2 ) ≈ 60 − 65% Power density P el = j0 ⋅ E ( j0 ) P el ≈ 1.0 − 2.0 W cm-2 1 T F T m D g A W ( [ Scientific Challenges: Hierarchy of Scales φ0 φ ‡ φM MEA H + -O H - OH + H H H H OH O O - O+ + H -O + H Solution Pt metal Ļ OHP Fig. 1. Levels of the structural hierarchy involved in understanding, designing and optimizing an electrochemical system. microscopic nanocomposite single cell with cell, stack. From left to right: electrified interface, nanocomposite medium, electrochemical electrochemical interface mul.func.onal materials membrane-­‐electrode assembly (MEA) fundamental phenomena, innovative materials, diagnostics Merit function: fuel cell stack fabrication, testing, engineering optimization “power density” cost at given lifetime è materials, engineering, mass production, … Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells Thermodynamic efficiency Chemistry è simple water-producing reaction ΔG ΔS ηrev = = 1−T Thermodynamics è unrivalled reversible efficiency! ΔH ΔH Materials science è complex heterogeneous materials H2/O2 cell: ε th = 83% System design è intricate coupling of phenomena Operation è current response vs. (load, conditions) Voltage efficiency ηirr ( j0 ) = Wout ΔG ⋅ Wrev ΔH ε V (1 A cm-2 ) ≈ 60% Power density P el = j0 ⋅ E ( j0 ) P el ; 1.0 − 2.0 W cm-2 Fuel Cell Vehicles: On Track – But … Fuel cell vehicles: no scientific curiosity! q 1000s of fuel cell vehicles (FCV) tested q remarkable progress (performance, cost) q firm commitment to commercialization FCV C u m an DOE Hydrogen Program Record #10004, Sept 2010. Fuel Cell Vehicles: On Track – But … Fuel cell vehicles: no scientific curiosity! q 1000s of fuel cell vehicles (FCV) tested q remarkable progress (performance, cost) q firm commitment to commercialization FCV q investments into engineering have been success! q limitations at materials level persist: è performance è cost è durability and lifetime “In the rush to do something – to find technological solutions to global scale problems – we should not forget that we must ultimately understand them …”, Whitesides & Crabtree, “Don’t Forget LongTerm Fundamental Research in Energy”, Science 315 (2007) 796. Ma re