Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 125
CHAPTER 6
Psychosocial predator stress model
of PTSD based on clinically relevant
risk factors for trauma-induced
psychopathology
Phillip R. Zoladz1 & David M. Diamond2−4
1 Department
of Psychology, Sociology, & Criminal Justice, Ohio Northern University, Ada, OH, USA
Research Service, VA Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA
3 Departments of Psychology and Molecular Pharmacology & Physiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
4 Center for Preclinical & Clinical Research on PTSD, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
2 Medical
6.1 Introduction
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a psychiatric disorder which is unique in
that it has a known etiological feature composed of a single trauma or repeated
life-threatening experiences, such as wartime combat, a motor vehicle accident,
rape or other assault to an individual or to a loved one (Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders-V [DSM-V]). The horrific triggering experience(s) can
transform a healthy individual into one with a cluster of debilitating symptoms,
including hypervigilance, cognitive deficits and pathologically intense and intrusive memories of the trauma, which can persist for a lifetime. PTSD is not a modern disorder, as the symptoms of traumatized individuals have been described
throughout recorded human history. For example, the biographer Plutarch wrote
of PTSD-like symptoms involving chronic anxiety, sleep disturbances, and alcohol abuse of Gaius Marius, a Roman General in the first century BC, who was
(Plutarch, 1920):
… tortured by his reflections and bringing into review his long wandering, his flights, and
his perils, as he was driven over land and sea, he fell into a state of dreadful despair, and
was prey to nightly terrors and harassing dreams … since above all things he dreaded the
sleepless nights, he gave himself up to drinking-bouts and drunkenness at unseasonable
hours and in a manner unsuited to his years, trying thus to induce sleep as a way of
escape from his anxious thoughts” (p. 594).
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: From Neurobiology to Treatment, First Edition.
Edited by J. Douglas Bremner.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
125
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
126
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 126
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: From Neurobiology to Treatment
In the 19th century, the emotional and physical toll of combat on soldiers in the
US Civil War was referred to as “soldier’s heart,” and following World War I,
trauma symptoms were referred to as “shell shock,” because of the presumed
relationship of the heightened anxiety and startle reactivity to the intense sounds
and stress of combat. In 1952, the persistent effects of psychological trauma were
formally termed “gross stress reaction” in DSM-I, and in 1980 the syndrome was
given its contemporary nomenclature, “post-traumatic stress disorder,” with the
publication of the DSM-III (Andreasen, 2010).
Logistical challenges and ethical restrictions limit the study of the biology of
PTSD under controlled conditions in human subjects. Therefore, insight into
the neurobiology and neuroendocrinology of the persistent effects of trauma on
brain and behavior may be achieved indirectly through translational approaches
involving the study of traumatic stress in animals. This approach has spawned
a vast amount of research on the effects of exposing animals, primarily rodents,
to strong stressful experiences followed by behavioral and physiological testing,
which, in theory, provides insight into PTSD in traumatized people. However,
we assert that there remain conceptual limitations to linking the study of stress
in animals to generating a syndrome which resembles clinical features of PTSD.
For example, people who experience a horrific event, as well as rats exposed
to a painful shock, can have a strong memory of the trauma, but an emotional
memory of an experience alone does not sufficiently represent the cluster of
symptoms that define PTSD. PTSD develops from the inability to cope with the
memory of the trauma; the memory itself is only one component of the entire
syndrome. A multifaceted goal for any animal model of PTSD, therefore, is to
administer a strong stressful (traumatic) experience to an animal, and then to
demonstrate that the animal has a conditioned fear memory for that experience,
and that the trauma produces a cluster of behavioral and biological abnormalities
that resemble those found in people diagnosed with PTSD.
This chapter reviews a subset of research studies that have addressed this
goal. First, we provide a description of the basic features of PTSD, followed
by a global review of diverse preclinical approaches that have modeled PTSD.
We then discuss our animal model of PTSD, which is based on predator exposure administered in the context of clinically relevant risk factors, including
social instability. The pathological outcomes generated in our model may
provide insight into behavioral and biological abnormalities that develop in
the subset of traumatized people that develop PTSD, as well as to provide
a model that optimizes the development of novel pharmacotherapies for
PTSD.
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 127
Psychosocial predator stress model of PTSD
127
6.2 General characteristics of PTSD
Q1
Individuals exposed to life-threatening trauma, such as wartime combat, motor
vehicle accidents, or natural disasters, are at risk for developing PTSD. People
who develop PTSD respond to a traumatic event with intense feelings of fear,
helplessness, or horror and subsequently endure chronic psychological distress
by repeatedly re-living their trauma through intrusive, flashback memories
(Ehlers et al., 2004; Hackmann et al., 2004; Reynolds et al., 1999; Speckens
et al., 2007). These characteristics of the disorder foster the development of
other debilitating symptoms, including persistent anxiety, exaggerated startle
and cognitive impairments, as well as a predisposition toward substance abuse
and comorbid psychiatric disorders, such as major depressive disorder (Nemeroff
et al., 2006; Stam et al., 2007).
Posttraumatic stress disorder is also characterized by a complex aberrant biological profile involving several physiological systems, including the
hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and the sympathetic nervous
system (SNS; Krystal & Neumeister, 2009; Pervanidou et al., 2010; Vidovic et al.,
2011; Zoladz & Diamond, 2013). For instance, although findings have been
mixed, extensive work has reported abnormally low baseline levels of cortisol in
PTSD, which has been associated with the presence of enhanced negative feedback of the HPA axis and an elevated density of glucocorticoid receptors in these
individuals (Yehuda, 2005, 2009). The reduced basal cortisol levels with PTSD
do not appear to reflect adrenal insufficiency, as PTSD patients display robust
HPA axis responsiveness, as evidenced by greater cortisol levels in response to,
and in anticipation of, acute laboratory stressors, compared with control subjects
(Bremner et al., 2003; Liberzon et al., 1999; Elzinga et al., 2003). People with
PTSD also demonstrate greater baseline and stress-induced elevations of SNS
activity (Buckley & Kaloupek, 2001), as measured by elevated baseline heart
rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (BP) and diastolic BP, findings that resonate
with research reporting an association between PTSD and increased risk for
cardiovascular disease (Boscarino & Chang, 1999; Kubzansky et al., 2007 ).
In response to traumatic reminders and standard laboratory stressors, people
with PTSD display significantly greater increases in HR, BP, skin conductance,
epinephrine, and norepinephrine than do control subjects. Another indication
of accentuated SNS activity in PTSD patients is the exaggerated responsiveness
(i.e., greater increases in HR, greater increases in BP, greater expression of
anxiety-like behavior) they exhibit following administration of yohimbine, an
α2 -adrenergic receptor antagonist that leads to increased central norepinephrine
activity (Bremner et al., 1996, 1997; Southwick et al., 1993, 1999). These
findings, as well as evidence of greater norepinephrine levels in PTSD patients
(Krystal & Neumeister, 2009; Amihaesei & Mungiu, 2012; Strawn & Geracioti,
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
128
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 128
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: From Neurobiology to Treatment
2008), have suggested a major role for exaggerated noradrenergic activity in the
hyperarousal component of PTSD (Strawn & Geracioti, 2008).
Whereas numerous brain regions contribute to the behavioral and physiological manifestations of PTSD, much of the research has focused on the involvement of three primary structures, the amygdala, prefrontal cortex (PFC) and
hippocampus (Bremner, 2007; Pitman et al., 2012; Zoladz & Diamond, 2013).
People with PTSD exhibit abnormal fear responses and diminished extinction
of conditioned fear, which is suggestive of amygdala hyperactivity (Elzinga &
Bremner, 2002; Koenigs & Grafman, 2009; Orr et al., 2000; Peri et al., 2000).
Studies have also shown that PTSD patients have decreased PFC volume (Carrion
et al., 2001; De Bellis et al., 2002; Fennema-Notestine et al., 2002; Rauch et al.,
2003; Woodward et al., 2006; Yamasue et al., 2003) and reduced activation of the
PFC in response to the presentation of trauma-related, or fear-eliciting, stimuli
(Bremner et al., 1999; Britton et al., 2005; Lanius et al., 2001; Lindauer et al.,
2004; Shin et al., 2004). PTSD patients are also impaired in tasks involving executive functioning, indicating impaired PFC functioning. Given the importance
of the PFC in inhibiting amygdala-modulated emotional responses, reduced PFC
activity in PTSD patients could promote amygdala hyperactivity, as well as the
hypervigilance component of the disorder. Moreover, repeated activation of the
traumatic memory, which would involve activation of the amygdala in conjunction with impaired PFC functioning, would contribute to traumatic memories
becoming even more intrusive and debilitating over time.
Extensive work has also shown that people with PTSD have cognitive
deficits that are suggestive of hippocampal dysfunction. This has been documented by reports of smaller hippocampal volume (Grossman et al., 2002;
Liberzon et al., 2008; Nutt & Malizia, 2004; Shin et al., 2006) and impaired
hippocampus-dependent learning and memory in PTSD patients (Bremner
et al., 1995; Gilbertson et al., 2001). However, close scrutiny of the literature
suggests that severe deficits in hippocampal functioning with PTSD are relatively
uncommon, with numerous studies that have not provided evidence of a
global hippocampal impairment of hippocampal functioning in PTSD (Zoladz &
Diamond, 2013). Moreover, impaired hippocampal functioning may actually
be a risk factor for, rather than an outcome of, PTSD (Gilbertson et al., 2002;
Pitman et al., 2006).
In summary, clinical research has provided strong evidence of increased sympathetic activation which underlies the hypervigilance component of PTSD, as
well as PFC and amygdala abnormalities. Thus, symptoms including impaired
attention, working memory, and executive functioning all point to impaired PFC
functioning in conjunction with hyper-responsiveness, and perhaps hypertrophy, of the amygdala in PTSD. However, whether there are hippocampus-specific
deficits in PTSD remains to be determined.
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 129
Psychosocial predator stress model of PTSD
129
6.3 Preclinical models of PTSD
Whereas clinical research is vital for the implementation of novel treatments, animal models of PTSD provide a crucial complementary component in this process.
In addition to their key role in establishing the safety and initial efficacy of novel
compounds, animal models are valuable in three key areas of treatment development. First, they allow the rapid, cost-effective development of proof of concept
studies to identify the most promising pharmacological candidates that can block
trauma-induced behavioral and physiological abnormalities. This approach, with
direct molecular assays of neural tissue, can improve our understanding of the
mechanism of action of these compounds. Second, animal research provides for
the assessment of the effects of interventions initiated prior to, or soon after,
trauma occurs, which provides the opportunity to develop preventive strategies
that would be high risk, expensive and potentially unethical to undertake in
people. Finally, animal studies provide for the study of direct tests for different
PTSD comorbidities and risk factors that might influence treatment responses in
people, such as early life abuse, gender, and traumatic brain injury.
The development of valid and informative animal models of psychiatric disorders, in general, and PTSD in particular, has been a challenge. The human
response to trauma can be considered to be composed of two distinct components, both of which should be included in animal models of PTSD. First, the
person with PTSD typically has a pathologically intense and intrusive memory for
the traumatic experience. Hence, the person commonly avoids any cues associated with the traumatic experience. Therefore, an animal model should include a
component in which the traumatized animal exhibits a powerful fear-provoking
memory for the stressful experience. Second, in patients with PTSD there are
numerous abnormalities in their physiology and behavior. That is, a person with
PTSD not only exhibits an intense memory for the traumatic event which may
last for a lifetime, he or she also experiences significant post-trauma changes
in physiology and behavior, including comorbid psychiatric disorders such as
depression. Therefore, a clinically relevant animal model of PTSD should generate a powerful memory of the traumatic experience, as well as persistent changes
in physiology and behavior in common with people with PTSD.
Preclinical researchers have used several types of stressors to model aspects
of PTSD in animals (Stam, 2007). Such stressors have included electric shock
(Garrick et al., 2001; Li et al., 2006; Milde et al., 2003; Pynoos et al., 1996; Rau
et al., 2005; Sawamura et al., 2004; Servatius et al., 1995; Shimizu et al., 2004,
2006; Siegmund & Wotjak, 2007a,b; Wakizono et al., 2007), underwater trauma
(Cohen & Zohar, 2005; Richter-Levin, 1998), stress–restress and single prolonged
stress paradigms (Harvey et al. , 2003; Khan & Liberzon, 2004; Kohda et al., 2007;
Liberzon et al., 1997; Takahashi et al., 2006) and exposure to predators (Adamec
& Shallow, 1993; Adamec et al., 1997, 1999a,b; 2006, 2007) or predator-related
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
130
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 130
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: From Neurobiology to Treatment
cues (Cohen & Zohar, 2005; Cohen et al., 2000, 2006; Goswami et al., 2013). The
stressors employed in these studies typically produce behavioral signs of anxiety
that persist beyond the time of the stress experience, and in some cases, exaggerated startle, cognitive impairments, enhanced fear conditioning, resistance to
fear extinction, and reduced social interaction.
Although these studies have reported physiological and behavioral changes
resembling those observed in people with PTSD, most have utilized only a small
set of assessments, such as stress-induced changes in anxiety, without assessing
the extensive abnormalities that make up routine symptoms of PTSD. Moreover,
many of these studies have evaluated stress-induced changes in responses for a
relatively short period of time. Finally, it is quite rare to find animal models of
PTSD that assess the animal’s memory for the traumatic experience; typically the
stress exposure is used only to disturb post-stress brain and behavior, instead of
assessing the memory for the trauma experience itself.
We consider all of the aforementioned approaches to have contributed toward
our understanding of how traumatic stress changes aspects of behavior and physiology, in general, and how a subset have enhanced our understanding of the
neurobiology and endocrinology of PTSD. In the following section, we discuss
our psychosocial predator-based animal model of PTSD and how our findings
may shed light on the development of novel pharmacotherapies for trauma, as
well as neurobiological and endocrine abnormalities observed in people diagnosed with PTSD.
6.4 Psychosocial predator stress model of PTSD
Pioneering research by Caroline and Robert Blanchard described how rats exhibit
a strong fear of a predator, such as a cat (Blanchard et al., 1975). Their work also
contributed to the development of studies examining predator scent, provided,
for example, by cat or fox urine, as a stress-provoking stimulus which can substitute for the live animal (Apfelbach et al., 2005; Rosen, 2004). Further evidence
of the effectiveness of predator exposure as a means with which to generate a
fear response are findings in which cat exposure or predator scent activates the
HPA axis (Morrow et al., 2000). At a functional level, extensive research demonstrates that predator exposure exerts a profound impairment of spatial memory
and a suppression of synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus (Diamond et al.,
1999; Mesches et al., 1999; Park et al., 2008; Vanelzakker et al., 2011; Woodson et al., 2003 ; Zoladz et al., 2012). It has also been reported that live predator
exposure can enhance synaptic plasticity in the amygdala (Vouimba et al., 2006).
Therefore, the ethological relevance and potency of predator exposure provides
a highly relevant approach toward producing an intense, purely psychological,
fear response in rodent models of PTSD.
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 131
Psychosocial predator stress model of PTSD
131
Based on these observations of the instinctual fear generated in rats
by cat exposure, our group has published a series of studies based on a
predator-exposure animal model of PTSD (Roth et al., 2011; Zoladz et al.,
2008, 2012, 2013). The primary components of the PTSD model were based
on trauma-induction features that are known to be associated with a greater
susceptibility of a subset of traumatized people to develop PTSD. Specifically, a
subset of the DSM-V criteria for the diagnosis of PTSD includes the following
three conditions: PTSD can be triggered by an event that involves threatened
death or a threat to one’s physical integrity; a person’s response to the event
involves intense fear, helplessness, or horror; and in the aftermath of the trauma,
the person feels as if the traumatic event were recurring, including a sense of
re-living the experience. Therefore, in our work, rats are immobilized and placed
in close proximity to a cat. As noted, rats have an instinctual and intense fear of
cats (Blanchard et al., 1990, 2003, 2005; Hubbard et al., 2004), which, in theory,
would be intensified by their inability to escape (Amat et al., 2005; Bland et al.,
2006, 2007; Maier & Watkins, 2005). Although there is no physical contact
between the rats and cat, the experience produces a profound physiological
stress response in the rats, including elevated HR, BP and corticosterone levels.
A core symptom of PTSD is the repeated “re-experiencing” of the traumatic
event that people with PTSD suffer in response to activation of intense and intrusive memories of their trauma. For this reason, we included a “re-experiencing”
component in our animal model of PTSD by giving rats the second cat exposure 10 days after the first. Moreover, the first predator exposure occurs during the light cycle, and the second predator exposure occurs during the dark
cycle, thereby adding an element of unpredictability as to when the rats might
re-experience the traumatic event. A lack of predictability in one’s environment
is a major factor in the development of PTSD, as a means with which to increase
the susceptibility of a subset of people to develop PTSD in response to trauma,
as well as to influence the later expression of PTSD symptoms (Orr et al., 1990;
Regehr et al., 2007; Solomon et al., 1988, 1989).
The second cat exposure occurred 10 days after the first, based on findings
of Chattarji’s group, who observed increased dendritic arborization of amygdala
neurons 10 days after a single immobilization experience (Mitra et al., 2005). In
theory, therefore, the second cat exposure on day 11 activated a sensitized amygdala with hypertrophied neurons, thereby reinforcing stress-induced changes in
brain and behavior that would have been initiated by the first cat exposure. The
second exposure of rats to the cat also relates to work showing that PTSD develops in some people only after they have repeated traumatic experiences and
work revealing that prolonged exposure to trauma increases the likelihood of
developing symptoms of PTSD (Gurvits et al., 1996; Resnick et al., 1995; Taylor
& Cahill, 2002). Thus, the repeated inescapable cat exposure served as a powerful reminder of the stress experience, as well as a manipulation that potentially
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
132
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 132
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: From Neurobiology to Treatment
increased the likelihood of the rats to exhibit physiological and behavioral sequelae that can be broadly applied to people who develop PTSD as a result of multiple
traumatic experiences.
An additional risk factor for PTSD is insufficient social support and an unstable
social life (Andrews et al., 2003; Boscarino, 1995; Brewin et al., 2000; Ullman
& Filipas, 2001). Therefore, we included daily social instability in the model to
increase the likelihood of producing long-lasting sequelae in the rats. Beginning
with the day of the first cat exposure, the stressed rats are exposed to unstable
housing conditions for the next 31 days. The rats are pair-housed, and every day,
their cohort pair combination is randomly changed, which results in the stressed
rats having different cage mates on a daily basis during the 31-day stress period.
Following this 31-day stress period, the rats are given a battery of physiological
and behavioral assessments to examine the development of PTSD-like sequelae in the animals. The social instability component is an integral component
of the model, as predator exposure alone does not produce persistent PTSD-like
changes in the behavior of the rats (Zoladz et al., 2008).
We have found that exposing rats to our psychosocial predator-based animal
model of PTSD results in a number of physiological and behavioral abnormalities, all of which are remarkably similar to those observed in people with PTSD.
For instance, 3 weeks after the second predator exposure, rats exposed to our
animal model of PTSD exhibit reduced growth rate, reduced thymus weight,
greater adrenal gland weight, increased anxiety, exaggerated startle, impaired
memory, greater cardiovascular and hormonal reactivity to an acute stressor
and an exaggerated physiological and behavioral response to the α2 -adrenergic
receptor antagonist, yohimbine (Zoladz et al., 2008). Importantly, these effects
depended on the combination of both cat exposures and daily social instability.
Thus two cat exposures in conjunction with social instability produced greater
anxiogenic effects on rat behavior than either cat exposure or social instability
alone (Zoladz et al., 2008).
As we mentioned earlier in this chapter, a pathologically intense memory of
the trauma is a hallmark feature of PTSD. Therefore, it was important to include
a method with which to measure the rat’s memory for the cat exposure experiences. To accomplish this goal, in recent work we measured the rat’s memory for
trauma indirectly by placing the rat in a fear conditioning chamber immediately
prior to each of the two cat exposures (Zoladz et al., 2012). It is notable that the
rats were not exposed to any aversive stimuli while they were in the chamber.
The rats were in the chamber for 3 minutes, and during the last 30 seconds of
each exposure, they were presented with a tone. Then, they were removed from
the chamber and immediately immobilized and given the 1-hour cat exposure.
The strategy behind this manipulation was to use a form of classical conditioning,
which traditionally involves the pairing of a neutral stimulus, such as a tone, with
a strong stimulus, such as shock to the tail. An illustration of the entire sequence
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 133
Psychosocial predator stress model of PTSD
133
Psychosocial stress animal model of PTSD
predator stress + unstable housing
Unstable housing
10 days
Cat stress
(day 1)
3 weeks
Cat stress
(day 11)
Behavioral and
physiological
measurements
(beginning on
day 32)
Figure 6.1 General description of the timeline of events in the psychosocial predator stress
model of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Rats were exposed to a fear-conditioning
chamber and tone followed by immobilization and cat exposure on days 1 and 11; unstable
housing occurring daily from the first day of cat exposure through day 31. Beginning on
day 32, fear conditioning memory testing, as well as all behavioral and physiological
assessments took place. (See color plate section for the color representation of this figure.)
of events in the psychosocial predator stress model, including the predator-based
fear conditioning component, is depicted in Figure 6.1.
As a result of the pairing of the two stimuli, cat-exposed rats exhibit evidence of
memory by displaying fear when later exposed only to the tone. In our case, rats
associated the chamber and the tone with the fear-provoking cat experience. The
association that rats form between the chamber and cue with the cat is analogous
to the panic response people with PTSD exhibit when they experience a cue, such
as an odor or a sound, that reminds them of their traumatic experience. Our test
of the rat’s memory of the cat was confirmed with the finding that psychosocially
stressed rats exhibited significant immobility (fear memory-induced freezing) in
response to being returned to the chamber, as well as the tone, paired with the cat
exposures. These findings are illustrated in Figure 6.2. Thus, our animal model
of PTSD is unique in that the rats stressed in this paradigm display a powerful
memory for the context and cue associated with the predator stress experiences,
and they exhibit physiological and behavioral symptoms that occur in people
with PTSD.
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
134
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 134
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: From Neurobiology to Treatment
Predator-based fear conditioning
Context memory
% time
freezing
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
50
40
*
No psychosocial stress
Psychosocial stress
Cue memory
*
30
20
10
0
Figure 6.2 Rats exhibited strong fear memory for the context and cue associated with cat
exposure. On days 1 and 11, rats were exposed to the fear conditioning chamber for
3 minutes, which terminated with a 20-second tone, followed by immobilization of the rats,
followed by cat exposure, which took place in another room. On day 32, rats were re-exposed
to the original chamber (context memory) and tone (cue memory) in a different chamber,
with an assessment of their conditioning fear (freezing). The group exposed to the
chamber/tone followed by cat exhibited significantly greater freezing in response to
re-exposure to the context (top) and cue (bottom) compared with the control group, which
had not been exposed to the cat. (Data adapted from Zoladz et al., 2008, 2012.) (See color plate
section for the color representation of this figure.)
As discussed, PTSD is characterized by an aberrant biological profile in multiple
physiological systems. One of the most extensively researched physiological systems in people with PTSD is the HPA axis. Empirical investigations of the adrenal
hormone, cortisol, have often reported abnormally low baseline levels of cortisol
in PTSD patients. One explanation for the presence of low baseline cortisol levels in people with PTSD is that the disorder is associated with enhanced negative
feedback inhibition of the HPA axis. Indeed, studies have reported that people
with PTSD display an increased number and sensitivity of glucocorticoid receptors and an increased suppression of cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone
(ACTH) following the administration of dexamethasone, a synthetic glucocorticoid (Duval et al., 2004; Goenjian et al., 1996; Grossman et al., 2003; Stein
et al., 1997; Yehuda et al., 1995, 2002, 2004) . Studies have also employed the
dexamethasone-corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) challenge paradigm to
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 135
Psychosocial predator stress model of PTSD
135
study abnormal HPA axis functioning in people with PTSD. An advantage of
this paradigm is that the subjects are treated with dexamethasone prior to CRH
administration, thereby activating negative feedback mechanisms before acute
HPA axis stimulation. Studies employing this paradigm have generally reported
reduced ACTH levels in dexamethasone-treated PTSD patients who were subsequently administered CRH (de Kloet et al., 2006; Rinne et al., 2002; Strohle
et al., 2008).
Based on the clinical findings of abnormal HPA activity in PTSD, we examined
the effects of our animal model on rat corticosterone levels at baseline and
following dexamethasone administration. We found that, at baseline, psychosocially stressed animals exhibited significantly lower corticosterone levels than
non-stressed rats. Following dexamethasone administration, psychosocially
stressed rats displayed a blunted increase in corticosterone levels and a more
rapid post-stressor recovery of those levels, relative to non-stressed control
animals, following administration of an acute stressor (Zoladz et al., 2012).
These findings bear resemblance to those from human studies employing the
dexamethasone–CRH challenge paradigm and suggest that our PTSD regimen
might result in enhanced negative feedback of the HPA axis.
One of the most promising areas of PTSD research is the study of the interaction of genetic and epigenetic factors with environmental stressors (Zoladz &
Diamond, 2013). Epigenetic alterations of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor
(BDNF) gene have been linked to brain functioning, memory, stress, and neuropsychiatric disorders (Domschke, 2012; Zovkic & Sweatt, 2013). Therefore, we
examined whether there was a link between our model and BDNF DNA methylation. We found that psychosocially stressed rats exhibited increased BDNF DNA
methylation in the dorsal hippocampus, with the most robust hypermethylation
detected in the dorsal CA1 subregion (Roth et al., 2011). On the other hand,
psychosocially stressed rats also displayed decreased methylation in the ventral
hippocampus (CA3). No changes in BDNF DNA methylation were detected in
the medial prefrontal cortex or basolateral amygdala. Finally, we also observed
decreased levels of BDNF mRNA in both the dorsal and ventral CA1 regions
of psychosocially stressed animals. These results provide evidence that traumatic
stress occurring in adulthood can induce CNS gene methylation and, specifically,
support the hypothesis that epigenetic marking of the BDNF gene may underlie
hippocampal dysfunction in response to traumatic stress. Furthermore, this work
provides support for the speculative notion that altered hippocampal BDNF DNA
methylation is a cellular mechanism underlying the persistent cognitive deficits
which are prominent features of the pathophysiology of PTSD.
One goal of our animal model of PTSD was to assess whether pharmacotherapeutic agents can block the stress-induced abnormalities. We recently examined
the differential effectiveness of amitriptyline (tricyclic antidepressant), clonidine
(noradrenergic antagonist), and tianeptine (glutamate modulator) in blocking
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
136
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 136
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: From Neurobiology to Treatment
the physiological and behavioral sequelae manifested by our psychosocial
predator stress model (Zoladz et al., 2013). We found that while each of the
drugs had some sort of therapeutic effects, tianeptine was the only agent
to prevent the effects of chronic psychosocial stress on our entire battery of
physiological and behavioral end-points. Specifically, tianeptine blocked the
expression of fear-conditioned memory in psychosocially stressed rats when
they were re-exposed to the context and cue that were paired with the two
cat exposures, and also prevented the effects of psychosocial stress on anxiety,
startle, cardiovascular reactivity, growth rate, adrenal gland weight and thymus
weight. Importantly, these salutary effects of tianeptine occurred in the absence
of any adverse side-effects. To emphasize that the design of our experiment
had clinical relevance, we did not begin the administration of pharmacological
agents until the day after the stress paradigm commenced (i.e., 1 day after
the first cat exposure). Treatment beginning 24 hours after exposing rats to an
intense stressor is potentially relevant to treatment applications begun in people
within 24 hours of a traumatic experience. This strategy may also highlight the
importance of beginning a treatment regimen as soon as possible after a person
experiences trauma.
6.5 Summary: the challenge of modeling PTSD
in animals
In this chapter we have addressed the challenge of translating stress research in
animals to clinically relevant factors involved in PTSD. Too often, research on
animals focuses on either the stress response alone or the memory of the stress
procedure, as measured by fear conditioning, which we have suggested addresses
only fragments of the broad spectrum of PTSD symptoms. We emphasized the
importance of appreciating the range of clinically relevant features of PTSD,
which includes the intrusive memory of the traumatic experience, in conjunction with risk factors, such as social support, and the chronic anxiety following
trauma, because all components interact to influence whether or not a traumatized individual will develop PTSD. Hence, PTSD results from the impaired ability
to cope with the traumatic experience and the memory it generated, rather
than PTSD being composed of a strong memory of the trauma alone. We therefore developed an animal model of PTSD which is based on clinically relevant
features of susceptibility of an individual to develop stress-induced psychopathology. Specifically, we administered predator exposure to immobilized rats to
provide them with a life-threatening experience in conjunction with an
inability to escape. In theory, this experience to the rat is analogous to the
PTSD induction feature involving a condition that evokes fear and horror in
conjunction with a life-threatening experience. However, despite the fact that
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 137
Psychosocial predator stress model of PTSD
137
this experience provokes a powerful stress response in rats, cat exposure alone
does not produce persistent PTSD-like abnormalities in behavior. It was only
when we combined predator exposure with social instability that we observed
persistent behavioral and physiological abnormalities in the rats, which are
remarkably similar to those found in people diagnosed with PTSD, including a
strong memory of the trauma, increased anxiety, exaggerated startle, impaired
memory for new information, increased cardiovascular and hormonal reactivity
to an acute stressor, abnormally low corticosterone levels, increased sensitivity
to dexamethasone, and an exaggerated physiological and behavioral response
to the α2 -adrenergic receptor antagonist, yohimbine. Moreover, we have
provided guidance for clinical research on PTSD with the finding of epigenetic
modifications (methylation) of the BDNF gene in the hippocampus, which may
provide the basis for impaired cognitive functioning in traumatized people.
Finally, our work has identified the antidepressant tianeptine as a potentially
useful pharmacological approach toward treatment of the cluster of symptoms
found in PTSD.
Acknowledgements
The authors were supported by Career Scientist and Merit Review Awards from
the Veterans Affairs Department during the production of this review. The opinions expressed in this chapter are those of the authors and not of the Department
of Veterans Affairs or the US Government.
References
Adamec R, Muir C, Grimes M et al. (2007) Involvement of noradrenergic and corticoid receptors
in the consolidation of the lasting anxiogenic effects of predator stress. Behav Brain Res 179,
192–207.
Adamec RE, Blundell J, Burton P (2006) Relationship of the predatory attack experience to
neural plasticity, pCREB expression and neuroendocrine response. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30,
356–375.
Adamec RE, Burton P, Shallow T et al. (1999a) NMDA receptors mediate lasting increases in
anxiety-like behavior produced by the stress of predator exposure--implications for anxiety
associated with posttraumatic stress disorder. Physiol Behav 65, 723–737.
Adamec RE, Burton P, Shallow T et al. (1999b) Unilateral block of NMDA receptors in the amygdala prevents predator stress-induced lasting increases in anxiety-like behavior and unconditioned startle--effective hemisphere depends on the behavior. Physiol Behav 65, 739–751.
Adamec RE, Shallow T, Budgell J (1997) Blockade of CCK(B) but not CCK(A) receptors before
and after the stress of predator exposure prevents lasting increases in anxiety-like behavior:
implications for anxiety associated with posttraumatic stress disorder. Behav Neurosci 111,
435–449.
Adamec RE, Shallow T (1993) Lasting effects on rodent anxiety of a single exposure to a cat.
Physiol Behav 54, 101–109.
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
138
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 138
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: From Neurobiology to Treatment
Amat J, Baratta MV, Paul E et al. (2005) Medial prefrontal cortex determines how stressor
controllability affects behavior and dorsal raphe nucleus. Nat Neurosci 8, 365–371.
Amihaesei IC, Mungiu OC (2012) Posttraumatic stress disorder: neuroendocrine and pharmacotherapeutic approach. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 116, 563–566.
Andreasen NC (2010) Posttraumatic stress disorder: a history and a critique. Ann NY Acad Sci
1208, 67–71.
Andrews B, Brewin CR, Rose S (2003) Gender, social support, and PTSD in victims of violent
crime. J Trauma Stress 16, 421–427.
Apfelbach R, Blanchard CD, Blanchard RJ et al. (2005) The effects of predator odors in
mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29,
1123–1144.
Blanchard DC, Canteras NS, Markham CM et al. (2005) Lesions of structures showing FOS
expression to cat presentation: effects on responsivity to a Cat, Cat odor, and nonpredator
threat. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29, 1243–1253.
Blanchard DC, Griebel G, Blanchard RJ (2003) Conditioning and residual emotionality effects
of predator stimuli: some reflections on stress and emotion. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol
Psychiatry 27, 1177–1185.
Blanchard RJ, Blanchard DC, Rodgers J et al. (1990) The characterization and modelling of
antipredator defensive behavior. [Review]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 14, 463–472.
Blanchard RJ, Mast M, Blanchard DC (1975) Stimulus control of defensive reactions in the
albino rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 88, 81–88.
Bland ST, Schmid MJ, Greenwood BN et al. (2006) Behavioral control of the stressor modulates stress-induced changes in neurogenesis and fibroblast growth factor-2. NeuroReport 17,
593–597.
Bland ST, Tamlyn JP, Barrientos RM et al. (2007) Expression of fibroblast growth factor-2 and
brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA in the medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus
after uncontrollable or controllable stress. Neuroscience 144, 1219–1228.
Boscarino JA (1995) Post-traumatic stress and associated disorders among Vietnam veterans:
the significance of combat exposure and social support. J Trauma Stress 8, 317–336.
Boscarino JA, Chang J (1999) Electrocardiogram abnormalities among men with stress-related
psychiatric disorders: implications for coronary heart disease and clinical research. Ann Behav
Med 21, 227–234.
Bremner JD (2007) Functional neuroimaging in post-traumatic stress disorder. Expert Rev Neurother 7, 393–405.
Bremner JD, Innis RB, Ng CK et al. (1997) Positron emission tomography measurement of
cerebral metabolic correlates of yohimbine administration in combat-related posttraumatic
stress disorder. Archiv Gen Psychiatry 54, 246–254.
Bremner JD, Krystal JH, Southwick SM et al. (1996) Noradrenergic mechanisms in stress and
anxiety: II. Clinical studies. Synapse 23, 39–51.
Bremner JD, Randall P, Scott TM et al. (1995) Deficits in short-term memory in adult survivors
of childhood abuse. Psychiatry Res 59, 97–107.
Bremner JD, Staib LH, Kaloupek D et al. (1999) Neural correlates of exposure to traumatic pictures and sound in Vietnam combat veterans with and without posttraumatic stress disorder:
A positron emission tomography study. Biol Psychiatry 45, 806–816.
Bremner JD, Vythilingam M, Vermetten E et al. (2003) Cortisol response to a cognitive stress
challenge in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) related to childhood abuse. Psychoneuroendocrinol 28, 733–750.
Brewin CR, Andrews B, Valentine JD (2000) Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress
disorder in trauma-exposed adults. J Consult Clin Psychol 68, 748–766.
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 139
Psychosocial predator stress model of PTSD
139
Britton JC, Phan KL, Taylor SF et al. (2005) Corticolimbic blood flow in posttraumatic stress
disorder during script-driven imagery. Biol Psychiatry 57, 832–840.
Buckley TC, Kaloupek DG (2001) A meta-analytic examination of basal cardiovascular activity
in posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychosom Med 63, 585–594.
Carrion VG, Weems CF, Eliez S et al. (2001) Attenuation of frontal asymmetry in pediatric
posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 50, 943–951.
Cohen H, Benjamin J, Kaplan Z et al. (2000) Administration of high-dose ketoconazole, an
inhibitor of steroid synthesis, prevents posttraumatic anxiety in an animal model. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 10, 429–435.
Cohen H, Kaplan Z, Matar MA et al. (2006) Anisomycin, a protein synthesis inhibitor, disrupts
traumatic memory consolidation and attenuates posttraumatic stress response in rats. Biol
Psychiatry 60, 767–776.
Cohen H, Zohar J (2004) An animal model of posttraumatic stress disorder: the use of cut-off
behavioral criteria. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1032, 167–178.
De Bellis MD, Keshavan MS, Shifflett H et al. (2002) Brain structures in pediatric
maltreatment-related posttraumatic stress disorder: a sociodemographically matched
study. Biol Psychiatry 52, 1066–1078.
de Kloet CS, Vermetten E, Geuze E et al. (2006) Assessment of HPA-axis function in posttraumatic stress disorder: pharmacological and non-pharmacological challenge tests, a review.
J Psychiatr Res 40, 550–567.
Diamond DM, Park CR, Heman KL et al. (1999) Exposing rats to a predator impairs spatial
working memory in the radial arm water maze. Hippocampus 9, 542–552.
Domschke K (2012) Patho-genetics of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatr Danub 24,
267–273.
Duval F, Crocq MA, Guillon MS et al. (2004) Increased adrenocorticotropin suppression after
dexamethasone administration in sexually abused adolescents with posttraumatic stress disorder. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1032, 273–275.
Ehlers A, Hackmann A, Michael T (2004) Intrusive re-experiencing in post-traumatic stress
disorder: phenomenology, theory, and therapy. Memory 12, 403–415.
Elzinga BM, Bremner JD (2002) Are the neural substrates of memory the final common pathway
in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)? J Affect Disord 70, 1–17.
Elzinga BM, Schmahl CG, Vermetten E et al. (2003) Higher cortisol levels following exposure
to traumatic reminders in abuse-related PTSD. Neuropsychopharmacology 28, 1656–1665.
Fennema-Notestine C, Stein MB, Kennedy CM et al. (2002) Brain morphometry in female
victims of intimate partner violence with and without posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 52, 1089–1101.
Garrick T, Morrow N, Shalev AY et al. (2001) Stress-induced enhancement of auditory startle:
an animal model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatry 64, 346–354.
Gilbertson MW, Gurvits TV, Lasko NB et al. (2001) Multivariate assessment of explicit memory
function in combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Stress 14, 413–432.
Gilbertson MW, Shenton ME, Ciszewski A et al. (2002) Smaller hippocampal volume predicts
pathologic vulnerability to psychological trauma. Nat Neurosci 5, 1242–1247.
Goenjian AK, Yehuda R, Pynoos RS et al. (1996) Basal cortisol, dexamethasone suppression of
cortisol, and MHPG in adolescents after the 1988 earthquake in Armenia. Am J Psychiatry 153,
929–934.
Goswami S, Rodriguez-Sierra O, Cascardi M et al. (2013) Animal models of post-traumatic stress
disorder: face validity. Front Neurosci 7, 89.
Grossman R, Buchsbaum MS, Yehuda R (2002) Neuroimaging studies in post-traumatic stress
disorder. Psychiatr Clin North Am 25, 317.
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
140
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 140
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: From Neurobiology to Treatment
Grossman R, Yehuda R, New A et al. (2003) Dexamethasone suppression test findings in subjects with personality disorders: associations with posttraumatic stress disorder and major
depression. Am J Psychiatry 160, 1291–1298.
Gurvits TV, Shenton ME, Hokama H et al. (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging study of hippocampal volume in chronic, combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 40,
1091–1099.
Hackmann A, Ehlers A, Speckens A et al. (2004) Characteristics and content of intrusive memories in PTSD and their changes with treatment. J Trauma Stress 17, 231–240.
Harvey BH, Naciti C, Brand L et al. (2003) Endocrine, cognitive and hippocampal/cortical 5HT
1A/2A receptor changes evoked by a time-dependent sensitisation (TDS) stress model in rats.
Brain Res 983, 97–107.
Hubbard DT, Blanchard DC, Yang M et al. (2004) Development of defensive behavior and conditioning to cat odor in the rat. Physiol Behav 80, 525–530.
Khan S, Liberzon I (2004) Topiramate attenuates exaggerated acoustic startle in an animal model
of PTSD. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 172, 225–229.
Koenigs M, Grafman J (2009) Posttraumatic stress disorder: the role of medial prefrontal cortex
and amygdala. Neuroscientist 15, 540–548.
Kohda K, Harada K, Kato K et al. (2007) Glucocorticoid receptor activation is involved in producing abnormal phenotypes of single-prolonged stress rats: A putative post-traumatic stress
disorder model. Neuroscience 148, 22–33.
Krystal JH, Neumeister A (2009) Noradrenergic and serotonergic mechanisms in the neurobiology of posttraumatic stress disorder and resilience. Brain Res 1293, 13–23.
Kubzansky LD, Koenen KC, Spiro A, III et al. (2007) Prospective study of posttraumatic stress
disorder symptoms and coronary heart disease in the Normative Aging Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64, 109–116.
Kubzansky LD, Koenen KC (2007) Is post-traumatic stress disorder related to development of
heart disease? Future Cardiol 3, 153–156.
Lanius RA, Williamson PC, Densmore M et al. (2001) Neural correlates of traumatic memories in
posttraumatic stress disorder: a functional MRI investigation. Am J Psychiatry 158, 1920–1922.
Li S, Murakami Y, Wang M et al. (2006) The effects of chronic valproate and diazepam in a
mouse model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 85, 324–331.
Liberzon I, Abelson JL, Flagel SB et al. (1999) Neuroendocrine and psychophysiologic responses
in PTSD: a symptom provocation study. Neuropsychopharmacology 21, 40–50.
Liberzon I, Krstov M, Young EA (1997) Stress-restress: effects on ACTH and fast feedback. Psychoneuroendocrinol 22, 443–453.
Liberzon I, Sripada CS (2008) The functional neuroanatomy of PTSD: a critical review. Prog
Brain Res 167, 151–169.
Lindauer RJ, Booij J, Habraken JB et al. (2004) Cerebral blood flow changes during script-driven
imagery in police officers with posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 56, 853–861.
Maier SF, Watkins LR (2005) Stressor controllability and learned helplessness: the roles of the
dorsal raphe nucleus, serotonin, and corticotropin-releasing factor. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29,
829–841.
Mesches MH, Fleshner M, Heman KL et al. (1999) Exposing rats to a predator blocks primed
burst potentiation in the hippocampus in vitro. J Neurosci 19:RC18.
Milde AM, Sundberg H, Roseth AG et al. (2003) Proactive sensitizing effects of acute stress on
acoustic startle responses and experimentally induced colitis in rats: relationship to corticosterone. Stress 6, 49–57.
Mitra R, Jadhav S, McEwen BS et al. (2005) Stress duration modulates the spatiotemporal patterns of spine formation in the basolateral amygdala. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102, 9371–9376.
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 141
Psychosocial predator stress model of PTSD
141
Morrow BA, Redmond AJ, Roth RH et al. (2000) The predator odor, TMT, displays a unique,
stress-like pattern of dopaminergic and endocrinological activation in the rat. Brain Res 864,
146–151.
Nemeroff CB, Bremner JD, Foa EB et al. (2006) Posttraumatic stress disorder: A
state-of-the-science review. J Psychiatr Res 40, 1–21.
Nutt DJ, Malizia AL (2004) Structural and functional brain changes in posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 65 Suppl 1, 11–17.
Orr SP, Claiborn JM, Altman B et al. (1990) Psychometric profile of posttraumatic stress disorder, anxious, and healthy Vietnam veterans: correlations with psychophysiologic responses.
J Consult Clin Psychol 58, 329–335.
Orr SP, Metzger LJ, Lasko NB et al. (2000) De novo conditioning in trauma-exposed individuals
with and without posttraumatic stress disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 109, 290–298.
Park CR, Zoladz PR, Conrad CD et al. (2008) Acute predator stress impairs the consolidation
and retrieval of hippocampus-dependent memory in male and female rats. Learn Mem 15,
271–280.
Peri T, Ben Shakhar G, Orr SP et al. (2000) Psychophysiologic assessment of aversive conditioning in posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 47, 512–519.
Pervanidou P, Chrousos GP (2010) Neuroendocrinology of post-traumatic stress disorder. Prog
Brain Res 182, 149–160.
Pitman RK, Gilbertson MW, Gurvits TV et al. (2006) Clarifying the origin of biological abnormalities in PTSD through the study of identical twins discordant for combat exposure. Ann N
Y Acad Sci 1071, 242–254.
Pitman RK, Rasmusson AM, Koenen KC et al. (2012) Biological studies of post-traumatic stress
disorder. Nat Rev Neurosci 13, 769–787.
Plutarch (1920) The Life of Marius, 9 edn. Chicago: Loeb Classical Library edition.
Pynoos RS, Ritzmann RF, Steinberg AM et al. (1996) A behavioral animal model of posttraumatic stress disorder featuring repeated exposure to situational reminders. Biol Psychiatry 39,
129–134.
Rau V, DeCola JP, Fanselow MS (2005) Stress-induced enhancement of fear learning: an animal
model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29, 1207–1223.
Rauch SL, Shin LM, Segal E et al. (2003) Selectively reduced regional cortical volumes in
post-traumatic stress disorder. NeuroReport 14, 913–916.
Regehr C, LeBlanc V, Jelley RB et al. (2007) Previous trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms as
predictors of subjective and biological response to stress. Can J Psychiatry 52, 675–683.
Resnick HS, Yehuda R, Pitman RK et al. (1995) Effect of previous trauma on acute plasma
cortisol level following rape. Am J Psychiatry 152, 1675–1677.
Reynolds M, Brewin CR (1999) Intrusive memories in depression and posttraumatic stress disorder. Behav Res Ther 37, 201–215.
Richter-Levin G (1998) Acute and long-term behavioral correlates of underwater trauma—
potential relevance to stress and post-stress syndromes. Psychiatry Res 79, 73–83.
Rinne T, de Kloet ER, Wouters L et al. (2002) Hyperresponsiveness of hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal axis to combined dexamethasone/corticotropin-releasing hormone
challenge in female borderline personality disorder subjects with a history of sustained
childhood abuse. Biol Psychiatry 52, 1102–1112.
Rosen JB (2004) The neurobiology of conditioned and unconditioned fear: a neurobehavioral
system analysis of the amygdala. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 3, 23–41.
Roth TL, Zoladz PR, Sweatt JD et al. (2011) Epigenetic modification of hippocampal Bdnf DNA
in adult rats in an animal model of post-traumatic stress disorder. J Psychiatr Res 45, 919–926.
Sawamura T, Shimizu K, Nibuya M et al. (2004) Effect of paroxetine on a model of posttraumatic
stress disorder in rats. Neurosci Lett 357, 37–40.
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
142
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 142
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: From Neurobiology to Treatment
Sawchuk CN, Roy-Byrne P, Goldberg J et al. (2005) The relationship between post-traumatic
stress disorder, depression and cardiovascular disease in an American Indian tribe. Psychol
Med 35, 1785–1794.
Servatius RJ, Ottenweller JE, Natelson BH (1995) Delayed startle sensitization distinguishes rats
exposed to one or three stress sessions: further evidence toward an animal model of PTSD.
Biol Psychiatry 38, 539–546.
Shimizu K, Kikuchi A, Wakizono T et al. (2006) [An animal model of posttraumatic stress disorder in rats using a shuttle box]. Nihon Shinkei Seishin Yakurigaku Zasshi 26, 93–99.
Shimizu K, Sawamura T, Nibuya M et al. (2004) [An animal model of posttraumatic stress
disorder and its validity: effect of paroxetine on a PTSD model in rats]. Nihon Shinkei Seishin
Yakurigaku Zasshi 24, 283–290.
Shin LM, Orr SP, Carson MA et al. (2004) Regional cerebral blood flow in the amygdala and
medial prefrontal cortex during traumatic imagery in male and female Vietnam veterans with
PTSD. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61, 168–176.
Shin LM, Rauch SL, Pitman RK (2006) Amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, and hippocampal
function in PTSD. Ann NY Acad Sci 1071, 67–79.
Siegmund A, Wotjak CT (2007a) Hyperarousal does not depend on trauma-related contextual
memory in an animal model of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Physiol Behav 90, 103–107.
Siegmund A, Wotjak CT (2007b) A mouse model of posttraumatic stress disorder that distinguishes between conditioned and sensitised fear. J Psychiatr Res41, 848–860.
Solomon Z, Mikulincer M, Avitzur E (1988) Coping, locus of control, social support, and
combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder: a prospective study. Journal of Personality &
Social Psychology 55, 279–285.
Solomon Z, Mikulincer M, Benbenishty R (1989) Locus of control and combat-related
post-traumatic stress disorder: the intervening role of battle intensity, threat appraisal and
coping. Br J Clin Psychol 28 ( Pt 2):131–144.
Southwick SM, Krystal JH, Morgan CA et al. (1993) Abnormal noradrenergic function in posttraumatic stress disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 50, 266–274.
Southwick SM, Morgan CA, III, Charney DS et al. (1999) Yohimbine use in a natural setting:
effects on posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 46, 442–444.
Speckens AE, Ehlers A, Hackmann A et al. (2007) Intrusive memories and rumination in
patients with post-traumatic stress disorder: a phenomenological comparison. Memory 15,
249–257.
Stam R (2007) PTSD and stress sensitisation: a tale of brain and body Part 1: human studies.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev 31, 530–557.
Stam R (2007) PTSD and stress sensitisation: a tale of brain and body Part 2: animal models.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev 31, 558–584.
Stein MB, Yehuda R, Koverola C et al. (1997) Enhanced dexamethasone suppression of plasma
cortisol in adult women traumatized by childhood sexual abuse. Biol Psychiatry 42, 680–686.
Strawn JR, Geracioti TD, Jr (2008) Noradrenergic dysfunction and the psychopharmacology of
posttraumatic stress disorder. Depress Anxiety 25, 260–271.
Strohle A, Scheel M, Modell S et al. (2008) Blunted ACTH response to dexamethasone
suppression-CRH stimulation in posttraumatic stress disorder. J Psychiatr Res 42, 1185–1188.
Takahashi T, Morinobu S, Iwamoto Y et al. (2006) Effect of paroxetine on enhanced contextual
fear induced by single prolonged stress in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 189, 165–173.
Taylor F, Cahill L (2002) Propranolol for reemergent posttraumatic stress disorder following an
event of retraumatization: a case study. J Trauma Stress 15, 433–437.
Ullman SE, Filipas HH (2001) Predictors of PTSD symptom severity and social reactions in sexual
assault victims. J Trauma Stress 14, 369–389.
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 143
Psychosocial predator stress model of PTSD
143
Vanelzakker MB, Zoladz PR, Thompson VM et al. (2011) Influence of Pre-Training Predator
Stress on the Expression of c-fos mRNA in the Hippocampus, Amygdala, and Striatum Following Long-Term Spatial Memory Retrieval. Front Behav Neurosci 5, 30.
Vidovic A, Gotovac K, Vilibic M et al. (2011) Repeated assessments of endocrine- and
immune-related changes in posttraumatic stress disorder. Neuroimmunomodulation 18,
199–211.
Vouimba RM, Munoz C, Diamond DM (2006) Differential effects of predator stress and the
antidepressant tianeptine on physiological plasticity in the hippocampus and basolateral
amygdala. Stress 9, 29–40.
Wakizono T, Sawamura T, Shimizu K et al. (2007) Stress vulnerabilities in an animal model of
post-traumatic stress disorder. Physiol Behav 90, 687–695.
Woodson JC, Macintosh D, Fleshner M et al. (2003) Emotion-induced amnesia in rats: working memory-specific impairment, corticosterone-memory correlation, and fear versus arousal
effects on memory. Learn Mem 10, 326–336.
Woodward SH, Kaloupek DG, Streeter CC et al. (2006) Decreased anterior cingulate volume in
combat-related PTSD. Biol Psychiatry 59, 582–587.
Yamasue H, Kasai K, Iwanami A et al. (2003) Voxel-based analysis of MRI reveals anterior
cingulate gray-matter volume reduction in posttraumatic stress disorder due to terrorism.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 9039–9043.
Yehuda R (2005) Neuroendocrine aspects of PTSD. Handb Exp Pharmacol 371–403.
Yehuda R (2009) Status of glucocorticoid alterations in post-traumatic stress disorder. Ann NY
Acad Sci 1179, 56–69.
Yehuda R, Boisoneau D, Lowy MT et al. (1995) Dose-response changes in plasma cortisol and
lymphocyte glucocorticoid receptors following dexamethasone administration in combat veterans with and without posttraumatic stress disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 52, 583–593.
Yehuda R, Golier JA, Halligan SL et al. (2004) The ACTH response to dexamethasone in PTSD.
Am J Psychiatry 161, 1397–1403.
Yehuda R, Halligan S, Grossman R et al. (2002) The cortisol and glucocorticoid receptor response
to low dose dexamethasone administration in aging combat veterans and holocaust survivors
with and without posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 52, 393.
Zoladz PR, Conrad CD, Fleshner M et al. (2008) Acute episodes of predator exposure in conjunction with chronic social instability as an animal model of post-traumatic stress disorder.
Stress 11, 259–281.
Zoladz PR, Conrad CD, Fleshner M et al. (2008) Acute episodes of predator exposure in conjunction with chronic social instability as an animal model of post-traumatic stress disorder.
Stress 11, 259–281.
Zoladz PR, Diamond DM (2013) Current status on behavioral and biological markers of PTSD:
A search for clarity in a conflicting literature. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37, 860–895.
Zoladz PR, Fleshner M, Diamond DM (2013) Differential effectiveness of tianeptine, clonidine
and amitriptyline in blocking traumatic memory expression, anxiety and hypertension in an
animal model of PTSD. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 44C, 1–16.
Zoladz PR, Fleshner M, Diamond DM (2012) Psychosocial animal model of PTSD produces a
long-lasting traumatic memory, an increase in general anxiety and PTSD-like glucocorticoid
abnormalities. Psychoneuroendocrinol 37, 1531–1545.
Zoladz PR, Park CR, Halonen JD et al. (2012) Differential expression of molecular markers of
synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and amygdala in response to spatial
learning, predator exposure, and stress-induced amnesia. Hippocampus 22, 577–589.
Zovkic IB, Sweatt JD (2013) Epigenetic mechanisms in learned fear: implications for PTSD.
Neuropsychopharmacology 38, 77–93.
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M. Page 144
Trim Size: 170mm x 244mm
Bremner
c06.tex V1 - 11/19/2015 2:17 P.M.
Queries in Chapter 6
Q1. We have shortend the running head since it exceeds the hsize value, please
confirm this is fine.