Charting Outcomes in the Match Characteristics of Applicants Who Matched to Their Preferred Specialty in the 2011 Main Residency Match 4th Edition Prepared by: National Resident Matching Program and Association of American Medical Colleges August 2011 www.aamc.org www.nrmp.org Questions about the contents of this publication may be directed to Mei Liang, Director of Research, National Resident Matching Program, (202) 778-4773 or mliang@aamc.org. Questions about the NRMP should be directed to Mona Signer, Executive Director, National Resident Matching Program, (866) 617-5834 or msigner@aamc.org. Questions about the AAMC data collections may be directed to Paul Jolly, Ph.D., Senior Director, Association of American Medical Colleges, (202) 828-0257 or pjolly@aamc.org. Copyright ©2011 National Resident Matching Program and Association of American Medical Colleges. All materials subject to this copyright may be photocopied for the purpose of nonprofit, scientific, or educational advancement. Suggested Citation National Resident Matching Program, Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011. National Resident Matching Program, Washington, DC 2011. 2011 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... ii Tables and Charts for All Specialties Chart 1. Active Applicants in the 2011 Main Residency Match ................................................................. 2 Table 1. Number of Applicants and Positions in the 2011 Main Residency Match .................................... 3 Chart 2. Ratio - Applicants Ranking Specialty First / Available Positions ................................................. 4 Chart 3. Match Rates ................................................................................................................................... 5 Table 2. Summary Statistics ........................................................................................................................ 6 Chart 4. Median Number of Contiguous Ranks .......................................................................................... 7 Chart 5. Mean Number of Different Specialties Ranked ............................................................................. 8 Chart 6. USMLE Step 1 Scores of Matched Applicants ............................................................................. 9 Chart 7. USMLE Step 2 Scores of Matched Applicants ...........................................................................10 Chart 8. Mean Number of Research Experiences......................................................................................11 Chart 9. Mean Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications ......................................................12 Chart 10. Mean Number of Work Experiences .........................................................................................13 Chart 11. Mean Number of Volunteer Experiences ..................................................................................14 Chart 12. Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who are Members of AOA ..........................................15 Chart 13. Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Graduating from One of the 40 Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding ..................................................................................................16 Chart 14. Percentage of Matched U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who Have a Graduate Degree ......................17 Tables and Charts for Individual Specialties Anesthesiology ..........................................................................................................................................18 Dermatology ..............................................................................................................................................31 Diagnostic Radiology ................................................................................................................................44 Emergency Medicine.................................................................................................................................57 Family Medicine........................................................................................................................................70 General Surgery .........................................................................................................................................83 Internal Medicine.......................................................................................................................................96 Internal Medicine/Pediatrics .................................................................................................................... 109 Neurological Surgery............................................................................................................................... 122 Neurology ............................................................................................................................................... 135 Obstetrics and Gynecology ..................................................................................................................... 148 Orthopaedic Surgery ................................................................................................................................ 161 Otolaryngology ........................................................................................................................................ 174 Pathology ................................................................................................................................................. 187 Pediatrics ................................................................................................................................................. 200 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ..................................................................................................... 213 Plastic Surgery ......................................................................................................................................... 226 Psychiatry ................................................................................................................................................ 239 Radiation Oncology ................................................................................................................................. 252 Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. i Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 2011 Introduction The first edition of Charting Outcomes in the Match was published in August 2006 using data from the 2005 Main Residency Match. Starting with the 2007 edition, Charting Outcomes in the Match was published biennially, based on the Main Match of the same year. Specialties that offered 50 or more positions in a given year are included in these reports. New specialties were added, including Otolaryngology and Neurology in 2007, and Neurological Surgery in 2009. No new specialties were added to the 2011 report; however, Transitional Year was excluded this year because it is not a specialty choice. Twelve measures are incorporated in the reports. Probability analysis was introduced in 2009 to evaluate the relationship between match success and contiguous ranks and USMLE Step 1 scores. For the purposes of this report, match success is defined as a match to the specialty of the applicant’s first-ranked program, because that is assumed to be the specialty of choice. Lack of success includes matching to another specialty as well as failure to match at all. No distinction was made based on whether applicants matched to their first, second, third, or last choice. the data sources used for Charting Outcomes do not include other important applicant factors such as course evaluations, reference letters, and the Medical School Performance Evaluation. Despite the fairly strong relationship between USMLE Step scores and match success, the distributions of scores show that program directors consider other qualifications, and a high score is not a guarantee of success. Even in the most competitive specialties a few individuals with higher scores are not successful. Neither is a lower score a bar to success. In the less competitive specialties, U.S. seniors with scores slightly above passing usually match to their preferred specialties. T he data also are reassuring because they indicate that at least some programs do not employ an arbitrary cutoff or decline to consider applicants with less than excellent test performance. T he data in this report support the follo wing straightforward advice one should give to an applicant. Rank all of the programs you really want, without regard to your estimate of your chances with those programs. Include a mix of both highly competitive and less competitive programs within your preferred specialty. Include all of the programs on your list where the program has expressed an interest in you and where you would accept a position. If you are applying to a competitive specialty and you would want to have a residency position in the event you are unsuccessful in matching to a program in your preferred specialty, also rank your most preferred programs in an alternate specialty. Include all of your qualifications in your application, but know that you do not have to be AOA, to have the highest USMLE scores, to have publications, or to have participated in research projects to match successfully. Combining data from the NRMP, the database of AAMC’s Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS), USMLE scores made available by the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) and the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG), and other AAMC data sources, we identified twelve applicant characteristics. NBME and ECFMG have granted permission to use USMLE scores, and the National Resident Matching Program and the Association of American Medical Colleges have collaborated to produce this report. Because graduating seniors from U.S. allopathic medical schools match at higher rates than do other applicant groups, and because some of those groups contain small numbers of applicants, this report distinguishes only two types of applicants: U.S. seniors and independent applicants.1 It should be noted, however, that the independent applicant category is a heterogeneous group. Moreover, because independent applicants match to their preferred specialties at much lo wer rates than do U.S. seniors, the specialty-specific probability graphs for independent applicants are less predictive of success. Summary So me general observations apply to all of the specialties in this report. Applicants who are successful in matching to their preferred specialty are more likely to: Rank more programs within their preferred specialty Be U.S. seniors Have higher USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 scores Be members of AOA Program directors and applicants will find the tables and charts for the specialty of their particular interest later in this report. For questions, comments or more information, please contact: Mei Liang, Director of Research National Resident Matching Program Tel: (202) 778-4773 Email: mliang@aamc.org Or Paul Jolly, Ph.D., Senior Director, Special Studies Association of American Medical Colleges Tel: (202) 828-0257 Email: pjolly@aamc.org Although some other measures seem to be related to match success for some specialties, the relationships were not consistent enough to draw broad conclusions across specialties. In addition, 1 Independent applicants are defined on page 2. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. ii Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Tables and Charts for All Specialties Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 1 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart 1 Active Applicants in the 2011 Main Residency Match by Applicant Type Students/Graduates of Fifth Pathway Programs Students/Graduates of Osteopathic Medical Schools 49 2,178 U.S. Citizen Students/Graduates of International Medical Schools Students/Graduates of Canadian Medical Schools 11 3,769 Non-U.S. Citizen Students/Graduates of International Medical Schools 6,659 Seniors of U.S. Allopathic Medical Schools 16,559 Previous Graduates of U.S. Allopathic Medical Schools 1,364 Chart 1 shows the number of active applicants (applicants who submitted rank order lists of programs) by applicant type. U.S. allopathic medical school seniors constitute 54.1 percent of the applicants in this report. The next largest group is non-U.S. citizen students and graduates of international medical schools (21.8%). For the remainder of this report, all applicants who are not U.S. allopathic seniors will be grouped into the "independent applicants" category. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 2 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table 1 Number of Applicants and Positions in the 2011 Main Residency Match by Preferred Specialty* Preferred Specialty Anesthesiology Total Positions Offered Total Number of Number of Applicants Applicants Per Position U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched Independent Applicants Not Matched Matched 1,404 1,612 1.1 1,095 41 242 372 519 1.4 307 80 56 76 Diagnostic Radiology 1,124 1,255 1.1 883 36 191 145 Emergency Medicine 1,626 2,025 1.2 1,259 137 330 299 Family Medicine 2,708 3,551 1.3 1,265 40 1,000 1,246 General Surgery 1,108 1,756 1.6 830 205 192 529 Internal Medicine 5,407 7,874 1.5 2,947 171 1,952 2,804 Internal Medicine/Pediatrics 365 434 1.2 302 43 44 45 Neurological Surgery 195 268 1.4 174 28 17 49 Neurology 605 755 1.2 360 15 210 170 Dermatology Obstetrics and Gynecology 234 1,205 1,509 1.3 890 57 291 271 Orthopaedic Surgery 670 974 1.5 621 186 47 120 Otolaryngology 283 364 1.3 267 45 11 41 Pathology 518 658 1.3 267 10 192 189 Pediatrics 2,601 2,988 1.1 1,734 78 595 581 373 484 1.3 178 19 174 113 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Psychiatry Radiation Oncology 108 197 1.8 74 94 7 22 1,097 1,597 1.5 630 28 402 537 171 211 1.2 154 27 10 20 *Preferred specialty is the specialty ranked first on an applicant's rank order list, excluding preliminary programs in specialties except Transitional Year. Note: For those specialties where both exist, PGY-1 and PGY-2 positions have been combined. Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Table 1 provides a summary of the numbers of applicants and positions for selected specialties. Only those specialties offering 50 or more positions are included. The numbers of applicants matched by applicant type (U.S. senior and independent applicants) also are provided in this table. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 3 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart 2 Ratio - Applicants Ranking Specialty First / Available Positions by Preferred Specialty 2.5 Independent Applicants U.S. Seniors 2.0 0.3 0.7 1.5 1.0 0.3 0.8 0.5 1.0 1.6 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.5 1.0 0.2 1.2 0.2 1.1 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.2 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.6 An es t he si ol D D og ia e rm gn y at os o Em tic lo gy R er a ge di ol nc og y Fa Me y di m ci ily ne M G ed en ic er In in al te I nt Su e rn e al rn rg al M er ed y M ed ic i ne N ic eu in /P ro ed e lo ia gi tri ca O l S cs bs te ur tri ge cs N eu ry an ro d O lo rth Gy ne gy op co ae lo di g c Su y O to rg Ph la ry ery ys ng ic al ol og M Pa ed y th ic ol in o e Pe gy an d di R eh atri ab cs i Pl as litat io ti c Su n rg R Ps ery ad yc ia tio hi at n r O nc y ol og y 0.0 Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Chart 2 shows the ratios of U.S. seniors and independent applicants to available positions in each specialty. All specialties except Dermatology, Neurological Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery, Otolaryngology, Plastic Surgery, and Radiation Oncology have enough positions to accommodate all U.S. seniors who prefer that specialty. As the number of applicants has increased in recent years, fewer specialties have offered enough positions for all applicants who prefer that specialty. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 4 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart 3 100 Match Rates Percent Matched by Preferred Specialty and Applicant Type U.S. Seniors 96 80 96 51 57 42 95 80 79 60 40 90 97 53 45 20 86 96 94 77 41 27 88 Independent Applicants 96 55 49 96 90 85 61 52 50 28 26 96 86 51 44 43 33 21 24 An es th es io lo gy D er D m ia gn at ol os og tic y Em R a er di ol ge og nc y y M ed Fa ic m in ily e M e G di en ci ne er al S In In ur te te ge rn rn ry al al M M ed ed ic ic in in e/ e N Pe eu di ro at lo ric gi s ca lS ur O bs ge te ry tri N cs eu ro an lo d gy G O y ne rth co op lo ae gy di c Su rg O er to y la ry ng Ph ol og ys y ic Pa al th M ol ed og ic y in P e e an di at d r ic R eh s ab ilit at Pl io as n tic Su rg er y Ps R yc ad hi ia at tio ry n O nc ol og y 0 Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Chart 3 shows the percentages of U.S. seniors and independent applicants who matched to their preferred specialty. Overall, 91.4 percent U.S. seniors matched to their preferred specialty, ranging from a high of 96.9 percent (Family Medicine) to a low of 44.0 percent (Plastic Surgery). For independent applicants, the overall match rate was 44.2 percent, ranging from a high of 60.6 percent (Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation) to a low of 21.2 percent (Otolaryngology). In general, independent applicants are less successful in matching to their preferred specialty than are U.S. seniors. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 5 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table 2 Summary Statistics All Specialties Combined U.S. Seniors Matched (n=14,237) Measure 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Mean number of contiguous ranks Mean number of distinct specialties ranked Mean USMLE Step 1 score Mean USMLE Step 2 score Mean number of research experiences Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications Mean number of work experiences Mean number of volunteer experiences Percentage who are AOA members Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding Percentage who have Ph.D. degree Percentage who have another graduate degree Independent Applicants Matched (n=5,963) Unmatched (n=7,491) 1.5 214 221 2.3 3.0 6.3 1.3 219 223 1.5 2.7 2.7 1.5 209 212 1.3 3.0 2.7 6.4 15.0 34.4 2.7 5.8 5.5 28.8 3.3 4.0 n/a n/a 4.0 2.8 n/a n/a 4.4 11.0 3.4 15.7 n/a n/a n/a n/a 10.4 1.2 226 235 2.3 3.2 Unmatched (n=1,340) 5.6r n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. r: Revised Sources. Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Table 2 provides summary statistics by applicant type and match outcome on the 12 measures presented in this report. Data on each of these measures will be displayed graphically by preferred specialty on the following pages. Of the 12 measures, only the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and Step 2 scores had significant missing data. Overall, there were Step 1 scores for 92.6 percent of applicants. Almost all of the applicants who did not have Step 1 scores were osteopathic medical school seniors and graduates who either take an alternative examination (the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination, or COMLEX-USA) or who take the USMLE exams but whose data are not shared with the AAMC. Step 2 scores were available for 83.4 percent of the applicants. In addition to missing Step 2 scores for the osteopathic applicants, only 83.0 percent of U.S. seniors had Step 2 scores. The missing data for U.S. seniors can be attributed to the fact that few medical schools require students to take and/or pass the Step 2 examination prior to the NRMP's rank order list deadline. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 6 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart 4 Median Number of Contiguous Ranks by Preferred Specialty, Applicant Type, and Match Status U.S. Seniors 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Matched Not Matched 16 6 yc y og O n tio tic e R Pl ad ia as R d ol hi y Ps rg Su ab eh at ry (r) n at ilit at di Pe 4 3 io ri c s y og th Pa la Ph ys ic al M O ed bs ic te in O cs rth an op ol og ol ry ng Su c G d an y y rg ol o ec yn eu N tri 5 2 nc 5 er gy gy ro rg al gi c ro N te In 11 10 8 2 lo er y s di eu M ed rn al 5 11 10 3 Su in ic Pe e/ in ic te In G at ric e y er al rn er en m Fa M ed Su al M M y ge nc Em er rg ic ed ic ed io ad R in e in gy lo lo tic os gn ia D 5 3 e 1 gy gy at o m er D 3 12 9 6 5 4 2 lo es io th es An 8 12 11 10 9 to 8 ily 3 10 O 11 ae di 11 9 er 13 lo 13 y ol nc yc n O Ps 2 og at ry hi y er rg Ph ys tio ia ic al M O ed bs ic te in R ad as tic Su ab eh R d an e 4 1 (r) n at ilit at di Pe 2 2 io ri c s y og ol Pa ry ng O O 5 2 1 to la th ol rg og er y y 1 Pl 2 rth op an cs tri 7 6 5 1 c ae di G d gi c lo ro eu N 6 Su ec yn eu N al gy ol o lo er rg Su di Pe e/ in ic M ed al 4 2 1 y s at ric e ic M ed al rn te In rn te In 8 6 2 1 in er rg Su al 6 ro 2 y e ic er ily m Fa Not Matched 5 2 1 ed M ed M y ge nc 5 Em er 5 in e ic lo io ad R tic os gn ia in gy gy m er D D 2 1 lo at o lo es io th es An 4 en 3 2 2 6 5 G 6 gy 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Matched gy Independent Applicants Source: NRMP Data Warehouse In general, applicants are more likely to be successful if they rank more programs in their desired specialty. To quantify this aspect of applicant behavior, we tallied the number of programs ranked in the first-choice specialty before a program in another specialty appeared on the applicant's rank order list. Chart 4 provides the median number of contiguous ranks by preferred specialty for U.S. seniors and independent applicants who matched and did not match. The top panel shows significant variation across the specialties for U.S. seniors. Neurological Surgery had the longest average contiguous rank list for matched U.S. seniors (16) and Transitional Year (2) had the shortest. In general, U.S. senior applicants who preferred the more competitive specialties submitted longer contiguous lists. For all specialties U.S. seniors who matched to their preferred specialty had median contiguous rank lists that were longer than U.S. seniors who did not match. A similar pattern can be found for independent applicants, although their lists are shorter than the lists submitted by U.S. seniors. Independent applicants who matched had longer contiguous lists compared with independent applicants who did not match to their preferred specialty. The principal message of these graphs is that applicants with longer rank order lists are more successful than those with shorter ones. The NRMP has been recommending longer lists for many years, but some applicants apparently do not heed the advice. Others may have shorter lists because they found only a few programs willing to entertain their applications or because they could not afford a large number of interview trips. Plastic Surgery (r): Revised Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 7 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart 5 Mean Number of Different Specialties Ranked by Preferred Specialty, Applicant Type, and Match Status U.S. Seniors 1.4 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.3 1.0 1.2 1.9 2.0 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.4 2.0 2.3 0.5 1.1 1.5 1.0 1.7 1.4 1.5 2.1 2.3 2.0 2.0 1.8 2.1 Not Matched 1.1 1.4 Matched 2.5 2.3 2.6 3.0 An es th es io lo gy D e r D m ia at gn ol os og tic y R Em ad er io ge lo gy nc y M ed Fa ic in m e ily M ed G ic en in e er al Su In rg In te er te rn y rn a al lM M ed ed ic ic in in e e/ Pe N eu di ro at ric lo gi s ca lS ur ge O bs ry te N tri e cs ur ol an og d y G y O ne rth co op lo ae gy di c Su rg O er to y la ry ng ol og Ph y ys P ic at al ho M lo ed gy ic in P e ed an ia tri d cs R eh ab ilit at Pl io as n t ic Su rg er y Ps R y c ad hi ia at tio ry n O nc ol og y 0.0 Independent Applicants 1.7 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.2 1.5 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.6 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.9 1.4 1.7 1.8 2.2 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.6 1.1 1.3 0.5 1.6 1.7 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.6 2.0 Not Matched 2.3 2.3 Matched 2.5 1.2 1.6 3.0 An es th es io lo gy D e rm D ia at gn ol os og tic y R Em ad er io ge lo gy nc y M ed Fa ic in m e ily M ed G ic en in e er al Su In rg In te er te rn y rn al al M M e ed di ci ic ne in e/ Pe N eu di ro at ric lo gi s ca lS ur ge O bs ry te N tri eu cs ro an lo gy d G y O n ec rth ol op og ae y di c Su rg O er to y la ry ng ol og Ph y ys Pa ic th al ol M og ed y ic in P e ed an ia tri d cs R eh ab ilit at Pl io as n t ic Su rg er y Ps R y ch ad ia ia try tio n O nc ol og y 0.0 Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Some applicants are interested in a single specialty while others consider two or more. Chart 5 displays the average number of different specialties ranked by applicant type, preferred specialty, and match outcome. The top chart shows the data for U.S. seniors. In general, seniors who preferred the more competitive specialties were more likely to rank more than one specialty. For almost all specialties, seniors who did not match to their preferred specialty were more likely to rank more than one specialty compared to seniors who matched. A similar pattern can be seen for the independent applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 8 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart 6 USMLE Step 1 Scores of Matched Applicants by Preferred Specialty and Applicant Type U.S. Seniors y og n O Ps yc nc hi rg Su ol er at ry y n io at tic tio ia e R ad an d Pl R as eh ab ilit at di O rth in O cs tri ic te ed bs Ph ys ic al M O te In ri c s y Pa Pe th ol ol og og y y to la c ry ng Su rg ol o op ae di d an er gy gy G N yn eu ec ro rg ro eu N al lo er y s al gi c lo in ic M ed In Su di Pe e/ al rn te at ric e ic M ed rg Su G in er y e ic er en m Fa rn D ia Em er al M ily M y ge nc ed ic ed io ad R tic gn in e in gy lo lo at o m er os An D es th es io lo gy gy 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 Independent Applicants y og O n rg ol nc yc Ps Su tic hi er at ry y n at ad ia tio as R d an e in Pl R eh ab ilit at di Pe O O io ri c s y th Pa ry ng ol ol og og y y er rg to la c rth op ae di yn G d an cs Ph ys ic al M O ed bs ic te tri Su ol o ec ro eu N ro eu N gy gy lo er rg Su al gi c lo in ic M ed al y s di Pe e/ al rn te In rn te In at ric e ic M ed Su al er en G in er rg ic ed M ily m Fa y e in e ic ed M y ge nc Em er tic os gn ia D in gy lo R ad io at o m er D An es th es io lo lo gy gy 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Step 1 scores are not available for the majority of Osteopathic seniors and graduates included within the independent applicant category. Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. USMLE Step 1 scores are a measure of a student’s understanding of important basic science concepts and the ability to apply that knowledge to the practice of medicine. Although such knowledge is only one facet of applicant qualifications considered by program directors in their selection process, it is the only one that is comparable across applicants and available during the interview season and prior to the NRMP’s ranking deadline. Overall, U.S. senior applicants have mean USMLE Step 1 scores of 225.2 (s.d. = 20.6) and independent applicants have mean scores of 212.8 (s.d. = 19.8), both well above the minimum passing score of 182. Chart 6 displays the Step 1 scores for matched U.S. seniors (top panel) and independent applicants (bottom panel) by specialty. The horizontal bars are the median values for successful applicants and the vertical lines show the interquartile ranges (the range of scores for applicants excluding the top and bottom quarters of the distribution). Scores generally are higher for the more competitive specialties, but there is substantial overlap when specialties are compared. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 9 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart 7 USMLE Step 2 Scores of Matched Applicants by Preferred Specialty and Applicant Type U.S. Seniors An es th es io lo gy D e r D m ia at gn ol os og tic y R Em ad er io ge lo gy nc y M ed Fa ic in m e ily M ed G ic en in e er al Su In rg In te er te rn y rn a al lM M ed ed ic ic in in e e/ Pe N eu di ro at ric lo gi s ca lS ur ge O bs ry te N tri e cs ur ol an og d y G y O ne rth co op lo ae gy di c Su rg O er to y la ry ng ol og Ph y ys P ic at al ho M lo ed gy ic in P e ed an ia tri d cs R eh ab ilit at Pl io as n t ic Su rg er y Ps R y c ad hi ia at tio ry n O nc ol og y 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 Independent Applicants An es th es io lo gy D e rm D ia at gn ol os og tic y R Em ad er io ge lo gy nc y M ed Fa ic in m e ily M ed G ic en in e er al Su In rg In te er te rn y rn a al lM M ed ed ic ic in in e e/ Pe N eu di at ro ric lo gi s ca lS ur ge O bs ry te N tri e cs ur ol an og d y G y O ne rth co op lo ae gy di c Su rg O er to y la ry ng ol og Ph y ys P ic at al ho M lo ed gy ic in P e ed an ia tri d cs R eh ab ilit at Pl io as n t ic Su rg er y Ps R y c ad hi ia at tio ry n O nc ol og y 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Approximately 20 percent of U.S. seniors did not take the Step 2 examination in time to be included in this report. Step 2 scores are not available for the majority of Osteopathic seniors and graduates included within the independent applicant category. Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. USMLE Step 2 scores are a measure of an applicant's ability to apply the medical knowledge, skills, and understanding of clinical science essential for providing patient care. Overall, U.S. senior applicants had mean USMLE step 2 scores of 234.3 (s.d. = 20.4) and independent applicants had mean scores of 215.9 (s.d. = 20.7), both well above the minimum passing score of 182. Chart 7 shows the Step 2 scores for matched U.S. seniors (top panel) and independent applicants (bottom panel) who matched by preferred specialty. The horizontal bars are the median values for successful applicants and the vertical lines show the interquartile ranges. As was the case for the Step 1 scores, the more competitive specialties have higher average Step 2 scores. For some specialties (e.g., Plastic Surgery, Family Medicine) the differences in median Step 2 scores between matched U.S. seniors and independent applicants are quite dramatic; other specialties (e.g., Otolaryngology, Radiation Oncology) show only minor differences. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 10 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart 8 Mean Number of Research Experiences by Preferred Specialty, Applicant Type, and Match Status U.S. Seniors 6.0 Matched Not Matched 2.1 1.6 3.8 3.7 1.9 1.7 2.0 1.6 2.5 2.2 3.5 3.3 2.9 2.8 2.2 2.2 2.9 2.2 3.4 3.0 1.9 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.6 2.3 An es th es io lo gy D e r D m ia at gn ol os og tic y R Em ad er io ge lo gy nc y M ed Fa ic in m e ily M ed G ic en in e er al Su In rg In te er te rn y rn a al lM M ed ed ic ic in in e e/ Pe N eu di ro at ric lo gi s ca lS ur ge O bs ry te N tri e cs ur ol an og d y G y O ne rth co op lo ae gy di c Su rg O er to y la ry ng ol og Ph y ys P ic at al ho M lo ed gy ic in P e ed an ia tri d cs R eh ab ilit at Pl io as n t ic Su rg er y Ps R y ch ad ia ia try tio n O nc ol og y 0.0 1.4 1.2 1.8 1.8 1.0 2.8 2.0 2.0 2.2 1.7 3.0 3.7 2.9 4.0 4.2 3.9 5.0 Independent Applicants 6.0 Matched Not Matched 2.9 3.9 1.5 1.4 2.6 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.2 2.0 1.7 3.7 2.6 2.5 1.5 1.2 1.9 1.9 3.4 2.5 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.1 2.1 1.7 1.0 1.0 An es th es io lo gy D e r D m ia at gn ol os og tic y R Em ad er io ge lo gy nc y M ed Fa ic in m e ily M ed G ic en in e er al Su In rg In te er te rn y rn a al lM M ed ed ic ic in in e e/ Pe N eu di ro at ric lo gi s ca lS ur ge O bs ry te N tri e cs ur ol an og d y G y O ne rth co op lo ae gy di c Su rg O er to y la ry ng ol og Ph y ys P ic at al ho M lo ed gy ic in P e ed an ia tri d cs R eh ab ilit at Pl io as n t ic Su rg er y Ps R y c ad hi ia at tio ry n O nc ol og y 0.0 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.4 1.3 2.0 2.3 1.9 3.3 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.4 5.0 Source: NRMP Data Warehouse The ERAS application allows applicants to self-report their participation in research projects. These experiences are not verified or evaluated and may vary greatly. Chart 8 shows the average number of research experiences by applicant type, preferred specialty, and match outcome. U.S. seniors averaged 2.3 research experiences with 85.0 percent reporting at least one experience. Independent applicants reported, on average, fewer experiences (1.4), and a smaller percentage (62.6%) listed having any research experiences. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 11 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart 9 Mean Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications by Preferred Specialty, Applicant Type, and Match Status U.S. Seniors 14.0 Matched 12.0 Not Matched 6.6 8.1 3.0 2.3 6.1 2.1 1.5 2.4 2.1 4.6 2.3 5.1 3.0 4.5 3.0 2.4 2.2 1.7 4.2 7.4 4.0 2.3 2.4 3.2 2.7 3.3 2.5 An es th es io lo gy D e r D m ia at gn ol os og tic y R Em ad er io ge lo gy nc y M ed Fa ic in m e ily M ed G ic en in e er al Su In rg In te er te rn y rn a al lM M ed ed ic ic in in e e/ Pe N eu di ro at ric lo gi s ca lS ur ge O bs ry te N tri e cs ur ol an og d y G y O ne rth co op lo ae gy di c Su rg O er to y la ry ng ol og y Pa th ol Ph og ys y ic al Pe M d ia ed tri ic cs in e & R eh Pl ab as . t ic Su rg er y Ps R y ch ad ia ia try tio n O nc ol og y 0.0 1.6 1.4 2.1 1.8 2.0 2.5 2.8 4.0 3.9 4.1 6.0 4.2 7.5 8.0 8.3 10.0 Independent Applicants Not Matched 12.7 10.6 7.3 2.4 2.3 2.0 2.7 6.9 7.0 4.9 6.6 5.0 6.0 2.1 2.9 4.9 5.9 1.7 2.2 2.5 2.6 4.1 3.9 An es th es io lo gy D e rm D ia at gn ol os og tic y R Em ad er io ge lo gy nc y M ed Fa ic in m e ily M ed G ic en in e er al Su In rg In te er te rn y rn a al lM M ed ed ic ic in in e e/ Pe N eu di at ro ric lo gi s ca lS ur ge O bs ry te N tri e cs ur ol an og d y G y O ne rth co op lo ae gy di c Su rg O er to y la ry ng ol og y Pa th ol Ph og ys y ic al Pe M d ia ed tri ic cs in e & R eh Pl ab as . t ic Su rg er y Ps R y c ad hi ia at tio ry n O nc ol og y 0.0 1.3 1.9 2.0 2.6 3.3 4.0 1.6 1.8 6.0 4.7 5.8 7.1 8.0 11.1 9.6 11.2 10.0 9.6 Matched 12.0 2.5 2.6 14.0 Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. The ERAS application also permits applicants to list their publications. This information is self-reported and may include peer-reviewed articles, abstracts, poster sessions, and invited national or regional presentations. Some residency programs may independently verify and even review publications for applicants in whom they have an interest, but most probably do not. Many applicants report abstracts, presentations, or publications, sometimes dozens or even hundreds. In the individual specialty sections, we distinguish between no publications, 1 to 5 publications, and more than 5 publications. Chart 9 shows the average number of publications by applicant type, preferred specialty, and match outcome. U.S. seniors averaged 3.2 publications with 68.4 percent reporting at least one publication. Independent applicants reported, on average, slightly fewer experiences (3.0); however, a smaller percentage (53.9%) listed any publications. For some competitive specialties such as Dermatology, Neurological Surgery, Plastic Surgery, and Radiation Oncology, independent applicants reported more publications than U.S. seniors, but this was not true for less competitive specialties like Family Medicine and Pediatrics. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 12 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart 10 Mean Number of Work Experiences by Preferred Specialty, Applicant Type, and Match Status U.S. Seniors 6.0 Matched Not Matched 2.2 2.8 2.7 2.3 2.5 2.8 2.7 2.8 3.0 2.4 2.7 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.3 2.8 1.0 2.9 2.3 4.0 2.4 2.5 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.7 2.8 3.0 2.9 2.5 3.1 2.0 2.6 2.8 3.0 2.6 2.8 4.0 2.9 3.7 5.0 An es th es io lo gy D e r D m ia at gn ol os og tic y R Em ad er io ge lo gy nc y M ed Fa ic in m e ily M ed G ic en in e er al Su In rg In te er te rn y rn a al lM M ed ed ic ic in in e e/ Pe N eu di ro at ric lo gi s ca lS ur ge O bs ry te N tri e cs ur ol an og d y G y O ne rth co op lo ae gy di c Su rg O er to y la ry ng ol og Ph y ys P ic at al ho M lo ed gy ic in P e ed an ia tri d cs R eh ab ilit at Pl io as n t ic Su rg er y Ps R y ch ad ia ia try tio n O nc ol og y 0.0 Independent Applicants 3.9 2.5 3.6 4.3 3.9 1.7 3.1 3.8 3.2 3.9 2.9 2.9 3.7 3.1 2.6 2.5 1.0 3.0 3.8 3.4 3.9 3.5 2.8 5.1 3.1 3.5 4.2 Not Matched 3.7 4.5 3.1 3.1 2.0 2.8 3.4 3.0 2.8 3.1 4.0 3.1 3.8 Matched 5.0 2.8 3.2 6.0 An es th es io lo gy D e rm D ia at gn ol os og tic y R Em ad er io ge lo gy nc y M ed Fa ic in m e ily M ed G ic en in e er al Su In rg In te er te rn y rn a al lM M ed ed ic ic in in e e/ Pe N eu di ro at ric lo gi s ca lS ur ge O bs ry te N tri e cs ur ol an og d y G y O ne rth co op lo gy ae di c Su rg O er to y la ry ng ol og Ph y ys P ic at al ho M lo ed gy ic in P e ed an ia tri d cs R eh ab ilit at Pl io as n t ic Su rg er y Ps R y c ad hi ia at tio ry n O nc ol og y 0.0 Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Chart 10 shows the average number of work experiences reported on the ERAS application by applicant type, preferred specialty, and match outcome. There is little variation across specialties or within specialties (matched or not matched) for either the U.S. seniors or independent applicants. Across all specialties, however, independent applicants averaged more work experiences than U.S. seniors (3.7 versus 2.7), and a higher proportion of independent applicants (89.0% versus 85.2%) reported at least one work experience. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 13 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart 11 Mean Number of Volunteer Experiences by Preferred Specialty, Applicant Type, and Match Status 5.9 5.2 5.9 4.5 7.1 6.3 3.3 6.2 5.2 7.4 6.7 4.6 7.0 6.3 6.3 5.5 6.3 5.6 5.2 3.8 5.8 7.5 7.8 7.4 6.1 5.3 6.2 6.1 6.7 Not Matched 5.0 6.2 5.8 5.7 6.1 7.5 7.1 Matched An es th es io lo gy D e r D m ia at gn ol os og tic y R Em ad er io ge lo gy nc y M ed Fa ic in m e ily M ed G ic en in e er al Su In rg In te er te rn y rn a al lM M ed ed ic ic in in e e/ Pe N eu di ro at ric lo gi s ca lS ur ge O bs ry te N tri e cs ur ol an og d y G y O ne rth co op lo ae gy di c Su rg O er to y la ry ng ol og Ph y ys P ic at al ho M lo ed gy ic in P e ed an ia tri d cs R eh ab ilit at Pl io as n t ic Su rg er y Ps R y ch ad ia ia try tio n O nc ol og y 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 6.1 5.1 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 7.9 3.0 3.8 2.6 4.1 4.1 5.5 3.5 3.3 3.0 2.0 5.0 5.5 4.1 5.2 4.4 3.2 3.1 2.4 3.2 2.1 5.1 5.3 3.7 3.3 2.4 4.3 3.6 4.2 Not Matched 2.7 5.3 3.9 3.9 2.9 2.7 4.1 6.1 6.3 Matched An es th es io lo gy D e rm D ia at gn ol os og tic y R Em ad er io ge lo gy nc y M ed Fa ic in m e ily M ed G ic en in e er al Su In rg In te er te rn y rn a al lM M ed ed ic ic in in e e/ Pe N eu di ro at ric lo gi s ca lS ur ge O bs ry te N tri e cs ur ol an og d y G y O ne rth co op lo gy ae di c Su rg O er to y la ry ng ol og Ph y ys P ic at al ho M lo ed gy ic in P e ed an ia tri d cs R eh ab ilit at Pl io as n t ic Su rg er y Ps R y c ad hi ia at tio ry n O nc ol og y 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Chart 11 provides the average number of volunteer experiences reported on the ERAS application by applicant type, preferred specialty, and match outcome. U.S. seniors who matched to Internal Medicine/Pediatrics averaged significantly more volunteer experiences than did unmatched seniors who preferred that specialty (7.8 versus 5.3). Matched U.S. seniors in all specialties averaged more volunteer experiences when compared to unmatched seniors in the same specialties, with several averaging at least one more experience. A similar pattern can be found for independent applicants. Matched applicants generally had more volunteer experiences when compared to unmatched applicants. Overall, U.S. seniors averaged twice as many volunteer experiences compared to independent applicants (6.4 versus 3.4), and a higher percentage of U.S. seniors (96.6% versus 80.8%) reported at least one volunteer experience. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 14 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart 12 Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who are Members of AOA by Preferred Specialty and Match Status U.S. Seniors Matched 55 50 Not Matched 51 45 46 40 42 35 30 y ol og tr y ia tio n O nc ch ia rg e Ps y R ad Su ic st Pl a ry b. s eh a ia an d e ic in si ca lM ed R tri c y lo g Pe d gy ho Pa t go lo ry O to la Su ed ry n rg e gy lo gy ec o yn G d 7 5 4 1 O rth an cs Ph y O bs te tri op a y N eu ro lo er s ric ca l ro lo ne / ci 6 4 0 12 11 11 11 0 Su rg at ci ed i M rn al 7 ne er y In te rn al M ne Su rg ed i ily M ci ne y ed i Fa m 12 5 1 In te Em er ge nc y M ad io l og og y ol R tic m at gn os D er D ia An e st he si ol o gy 0 6 0 ci 1 er al 6 9 G en 9 5 15 13 Pe di 14 10 ed i 15 25 24 N eu 20 ic 26 31 28 27 gi 25 Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Membership in Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA), the national medical honor society, is an honor reserved for students with high academic achievement. AOA membership is limited to students in medical schools that sponsor an AOA chapter. Most, but not all, allopathic schools in the U.S. and Canada participate, and there is one foreign chapter in Beirut. Among the independent applicants, only graduate U.S. physicians, Canadians, and a small number of others could legitimately claim membership. For that reason, AOA status for each specialty in Chart 9 is reported only for U.S. seniors. Data on AOA membership are self-reported on the ERAS application. Even for U.S. seniors, however, an analysis of its relationship with success in the Match is limited by the relatively small number of applicants who are members, by the fact that some schools do not have AOA chapters, and by the fact that other schools elect AOA members too late in the academic year for it to be considered in the application process. Overall, 14.5 percent of U.S. seniors included in this report claimed AOA membership on their ERAS application. Among applicants who matched to their preferred specialty, 15.4 percent reported AOA membership, compared to 6.6 percent of unmatched applicants. As with several of the other measures, the most competitive specialties are able to attract the greatest proportion of AOA members. All specialties attract some AOA applicants, but for most specialties AOA members account for fewer than one in five successful applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 15 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart 13 Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Graduating from One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding* by Preferred Specialty and Match Status U.S. Seniors Matched 60 Not Matched 33 35 25 22 24 34 35 40 30 39 31 37 26 31 25 27 33 45 36 40 34 37 33 32 24 35 30 28 37 20 25 31 29 30 31 33 44 40 45 53 50 5 10 An es th es i ol og D y er D ia m gn at ol os og tic y Em R a er di ge ol og nc y y M ed Fa ic m in ily e M ed G en ic in er e al S In I ur nt te er ge rn na ry al lM M ed ed ic ic in in e/ e N Pe eu di ro at lo ric gi ca s lS O u rg bs er te y tri N cs eu an ro lo d gy G O y ne rth co op lo ae gy di c Su rg O to er la y ry ng Ph ol og ys ic y Pa al M th ed ol og ic in y Pe e an di at d ric R eh s ab ilit Pl at as io n tic Su rg er y Ps R ad yc hi ia at tio ry n O nc ol og y 0 Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse, NIH *Source: http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls. Total awards include both direct and indirect costs. Awards to the 127 U.S. allopathic medical schools ranged from $1.08 to $459 million. The 40 medical schools with the highest NIH funding received $100 million or more. Some program directors may give preference to applicants with research experience or who graduated from a research-intensive medical school. To test this assumption, we obtained data on the amount of NIH grant awards and identified the 40 schools with the highest NIH funding ($100 million or more). This measure, by definition, is limited to graduates of U.S. medical schools. Overall, 34.6 percent of matched and 30.1 percent of unmatched U.S. seniors were graduates of one of the 40 medical schools with the highest NIH funding. Chart 13 shows the percentage of U.S. seniors who graduated from those schools by specialty and match outcome. For example, 31 percent of U.S. seniors who matched in Anesthesiology were graduates of one of the 40 medical schools with the highest NIH funding and 29 percent of seniors who did not match in Anesthesiology were graduates of those schools. Plastic Surgery had the highest percentage of matched U.S. seniors who were graduates of a medical school with the highest NIH funding. Dermatology, Neurological Surgery, Pathology, and Radiation Oncology also had higher percentages of matched applicants from those schools compared to the other specialties. For all specialties except Emergency Medicine, Family Medicine, Internal Medicine/Pediatrics and Transitional Year, smaller percentages of seniors who did not match to their preferred specialty were graduates of a medical school with the highest NIH funding compared to seniors who matched. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 16 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart 14 Percentage of Matched U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who Have a Graduate Degree U.S. Seniors Other Graduate Degree Ph.D. 8 32 22 14 24 10 15 28 13 5 1 4 4 2 1 7 7 5 9 17 10 10 15 12 8 3 2 1 An es th es i ol og D y er D ia m gn at o os lo tic gy Em R a er di ge ol og nc y y M ed Fa ic m in ily e M e G d en ic in er e al S In I ur nt te er ge rn na ry al lM M ed ed ic ic in in e/ e N Pe eu di ro at lo ric gi ca s lS O u rg bs er te y tri N cs eu an ro lo d gy G O y ne rth co op lo ae gy di c Su rg O to er la y ry ng Ph ol og ys ic y Pa al M th ed ol og ic in y Pe e an di d at R ric eh s ab ilit Pl at as io n tic Su rg er y Ps R ad yc hi ia at tio ry n O nc ol og y 0 2 3 4 4 6 10 13 11 9 8 12 12 9 11 8 16 11 20 Sources: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. Chart 14 shows by preferred specialty the percentage of matched U.S. allopathic seniors who have a graduate degree. Radiation Oncology, Pathology, Neurological Surgery, and Neurology had the highest percentages of matched applicants with Ph.D.s, while Neurology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Neurological Surgery, Psychiatry, General Surgery, and Emergency Medicine had the highest percentages with other graduate degrees. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 17 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 AN Anesthesiology Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 18 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table AN-1 Summary Statistics Anesthesiology U.S. Seniors Matched (n=1,095) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=41) Matched (n=242) Unmatched (n=234) 13.2 3.5 7.7 2.8 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.4 2.0 1.4 1.6 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 226 203 229 213 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 235 209 231 216 5. Mean number of research experiences 2.2 1.7 1.4 1.3 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 2.5 2.8 2.6 3.3 2.6 2.8 2.8 3.1 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 6.1 5.1 4.1 2.7 9. Percentage who are AOA members 8.9 0.0 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 31.4 29.3 n/a n/a 3.5 7.3 n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree 10.8 14.6 n/a n/a 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 19 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Chart AN-1 Anesthesiology U.S. Seniors Matched 400 Not Matched 371 300 200 100 0 9 7 19 12 1 2 16 8 3 26 4 32 4 3 49 31 5 38 2 1 6 78 53 2 0 7 8 1 9 86 63 1 10 11 81 73 0 0 12 70 0 13 0 14 15 0 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Independent Applicants Matched 400 Not Matched 300 200 111 100 24 54 24 21 26 21 16 3 4 17 2 0 1 2 5 19 4 6 18 4 10 7 2 8 12 2 9 9 3 10 9 0 11 14 12 0 8 0 13 6 1 14 2 2 15 28 7 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 20 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph AN-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Anesthesiology 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 21 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart AN-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Anesthesiology U.S. Seniors 900 800 Matched 804 Not Matched 700 600 500 400 300 185 200 93 100 15 13 0 1 11 2 13 3 2 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 900 Independent Applicants Matched 800 Not Matched 700 600 500 400 300 200 175 133 100 65 43 1 25 18 0 2 3 9 3 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 22 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart AN-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Anesthesiology U.S. Seniors Matched 280 247 233 240 Not Matched 210 200 160 121 120 76 80 40 0 119 50 2 1 <= 180 14 16 8 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 8 Between 201 and 210 2 2 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 2 Between 231 and 240 2 Between 241 and 250 0 22 Between 251 and 260 0 >260 1 0 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Independent Applicants Matched 280 Not Matched 240 200 160 117 120 80 40 0 0 0 <= 180 5 23 Between 181 and 190 37 35 3 Between 191 and 200 9 Between 201 and 210 15 32 20 Between 211 and 220 33 Between 221 and 230 31 50 22 Between 231 and 240 20 10 Between 241 and 250 8 4 Between 251 and 260 2 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 23 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph AN-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Anesthesiology 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 160 180 200 220 Independent Applicants 240 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 24 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart AN-4 200 USMLE Step 2 Scores Anesthesiology U.S. Seniors 198 Matched Not Matched 189 172 169 160 130 120 101 80 40 0 56 52 24 1 1 <= 180 3 2 Between 181 and 190 9 8 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 7 4 1 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 1 Between 241 and 250 0 Between 251 and 260 8 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 200 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 160 117 120 80 40 0 0 3 <= 180 2 18 Between 181 and 190 33 23 5 Between 191 and 200 6 Between 201 and 210 51 37 29 17 24 25 27 25 6 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 Between 241 and 250 12 8 Between 251 and 260 4 4 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 25 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart AN-5 Number of Research Projects Anesthesiology U.S. Seniors Matched 350 300 Not Matched 287 266 250 211 200 150 147 102 100 50 12 8 11 7 0 None 1 82 2 2 1 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Independent Applicants 350 Matched Not Matched 300 250 200 150 100 80 72 73 71 50 55 41 22 22 14 9 0 None 1 2 3 4 6 11 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 26 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart AN-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Anesthesiology U.S. Seniors 450 400 Matched 410 Not Matched 350 300 250 194 200 187 150 150 94 100 50 14 9 0 None 60 7 1 3 2 5 3 3 4 5 or More Publications Independent Applicants Matched 450 Not Matched 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 109 95 33 50 28 32 27 18 18 0 None 1 2 3 13 9 4 41 53 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 27 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart AN-7 300 Number of Work Experiences Anesthesiology U.S. Seniors 250 Matched 225 Not Matched 220 197 200 167 158 150 128 100 50 11 8 3 0 None 1 8 2 10 1 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Independent Applicants Matched 300 Not Matched 250 200 150 100 50 41 34 51 40 40 38 40 35 52 62 23 20 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 28 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart AN-8 200 Number of Volunteer Experiences Anesthesiology U.S. Seniors Matched 150 50 185 140 134 100 Not Matched 120 108 107 82 62 49 36 5 4 0 72 None 4 1 4 2 2 3 6 3 4 5 3 6 2 7 6 2 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Independent Applicants Matched 200 Not Matched 150 100 72 50 36 36 27 35 28 26 22 32 23 22 16 24 13 12 4 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 5 8 18 8 1 9 10 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 29 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart AN-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Anesthesiology Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 1,200 1,000 997 Matched 1,200 Not Matched 1,000 800 800 600 600 400 400 200 0 751 200 98 41 0 No 344 0 Yes 29 No Ph.D. Degree Yes Other Graduate Degree 1,200 1,200 1,057 1,000 1,000 800 800 600 600 400 400 200 200 0 12 38 No 38 3 0 Yes 977 35 No 118 6 Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 30 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 DM Dermatology Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 31 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table DM-1 Summary Statistics Dermatology U.S. Seniors Matched (n=307) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=80) Matched (n=56) Unmatched (n=76) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks 9.0 3.1 3.9 3.4 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 2.1 2.3 1.3 1.4 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 244 227 230 225 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 253 234 235 228 5. Mean number of research experiences 3.7 2.9 5.4 3.3 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 7.5 4.2 11.2 7.1 2.6 2.8 2.8 3.4 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 7.5 7.1 6.1 6.3 9. Percentage who are AOA members 50.8 13.8 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 43.6 25.0 n/a n/a 9.1 6.3 n/a n/a 8.1 13.8 n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 32 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DM-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Dermatology U.S. Seniors Matched 40 Not Matched 31 30 30 26 22 20 20 13 25 22 22 15 14 13 11 24 21 14 11 9 10 5 4 2 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 0 0 1 15 13 9 10 1 11 0 12 0 13 0 14 15 0 16 or More Contiguous Ranks 40 Independent Applicants Not Matched 28 30 20 Matched 19 18 9 8 10 7 5 5 6 3 2 2 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 1 7 8 3 1 9 3 1 10 2 2 11 1 0 12 1 0 13 0 0 14 0 0 15 0 2 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 33 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph DM-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Dermatology 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 34 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DM-2 160 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Dermatology U.S. Seniors Matched 150 Not Matched 140 120 100 80 60 83 63 45 40 23 20 11 9 3 0 1 2 3 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 160 Independent Applicants Matched 140 Not Matched 120 100 80 60 58 46 40 20 11 5 5 5 0 1 2 3 2 0 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 35 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DM-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Dermatology U.S. Seniors 100 Matched 90 Not Matched 84 76 80 65 70 60 50 40 20 10 0 31 28 30 0 1 <= 180 2 4 Between 181 and 190 1 5 Between 191 and 200 9 10 Between 201 and 210 9 14 7 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 19 12 Between 231 and 240 8 Between 241 and 250 0 Between 251 and 260 >260 2 0 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Independent Applicants 100 Matched 90 Not Matched 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 0 <= 180 1 0 Between 181 and 190 0 8 Between 191 and 200 9 8 Between 201 and 210 13 12 13 16 11 2 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 11 9 Between 241 and 250 3 5 Between 251 and 260 0 2 >260 1 8 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 36 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph DM-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Dermatology 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 160 180 200 220 Independent Applicants 240 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 37 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DM-4 100 USMLE Step 2 Scores Dermatology U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 90 80 73 59 60 43 40 23 20 0 0 0 <= 180 0 1 Between 181 and 190 0 4 Between 191 and 200 1 5 Between 201 and 210 5 13 6 Between 211 and 220 12 Between 221 and 230 16 12 Between 231 and 240 13 8 Between 241 and 250 3 Between 251 and 260 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 100 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 80 60 40 20 0 0 0 <= 180 0 6 Between 181 and 190 3 3 Between 191 and 200 4 6 Between 201 and 210 9 9 8 Between 211 and 220 14 Between 221 and 230 6 9 Between 231 and 240 9 11 Between 241 and 250 6 6 Between 251 and 260 9 5 >260 1 8 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 38 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DM-5 Number of Research Projects Dermatology U.S. Seniors 100 Matched 90 92 Not Matched 80 70 64 57 60 46 50 40 33 30 20 17 15 14 17 14 12 6 10 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects 100 Independent Applicants Matched 90 Not Matched 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 13 11 5 4 10 7 14 12 19 11 9 17 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 39 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DM-6 200 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Dermatology U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 181 150 100 50 17 16 25 33 26 25 10 10 30 8 6 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Publications 200 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 150 100 43 50 0 11 2 None 6 0 1 9 7 6 2 2 3 41 5 0 4 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 40 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DM-7 80 Number of Work Experiences Dermatology U.S. Seniors 70 Matched 64 58 60 50 Not Matched 47 47 48 43 40 30 21 16 20 10 14 12 9 8 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences 80 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 11 10 10 9 19 17 14 13 11 8 5 5 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 41 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DM-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Dermatology U.S. Seniors Matched 100 Not Matched 91 90 80 70 60 50 43 40 30 20 10 0 2 2 10 6 None 10 2 8 3 29 28 21 19 5 2 1 29 26 24 9 6 4 5 7 4 6 7 6 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences 100 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 6 7 0 None 9 1 1 16 7 6 2 7 4 3 6 5 5 3 4 8 5 6 6 7 2 7 4 3 8 8 4 9 8 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 42 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DM-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Dermatology Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership Matched 320 Not Matched 320 280 280 240 240 200 200 156 151 160 173 160 120 134 120 69 80 80 40 11 0 No 60 40 0 Yes 20 No Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree 320 320 280 279 280 240 240 200 200 160 160 120 120 80 75 No 282 69 80 28 40 0 Yes 40 5 0 Yes 25 No 11 Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 43 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 DR Diagnostic Radiology Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 44 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table DR-1 Summary Statistics Diagnostic Radiology U.S. Seniors Matched (n=883) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=36) Matched (n=191) Unmatched (n=145) 13.3 3.4 6.3 2.3 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.7 2.3 1.6 1.7 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 240 211 235 222 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 245 214 234 222 5. Mean number of research experiences 2.8 2.0 2.3 1.9 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 3.9 4.1 4.7 5.8 2.5 3.1 3.1 3.1 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 5.7 6.1 3.9 2.9 9. Percentage who are AOA members 26.4 5.6 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 36.7 27.8 n/a n/a 4.3 2.8 n/a n/a 9.4 19.4 n/a n/a 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 45 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DR-1 320 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Diagnostic Radiology U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 281 280 240 200 160 120 80 40 16 20 11 5 0 1 2 10 1 3 15 1 12 4 3 35 26 31 0 5 2 0 6 68 45 7 1 0 8 65 9 1 10 71 56 71 0 11 0 12 70 1 0 13 14 15 1 16 or More Contiguous Ranks 320 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 280 240 200 160 120 78 80 40 28 16 24 18 21 20 12 2 3 4 23 5 0 1 5 14 0 6 19 2 7 7 0 8 7 0 9 5 0 10 4 1 11 8 0 12 5 0 13 2 0 14 2 0 15 13 2 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 46 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph DR-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Diagnostic Radiology 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 47 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DR-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Diagnostic Radiology U.S. Seniors 500 493 Matched Not Matched 400 300 208 200 164 100 15 8 0 1 9 2 17 3 4 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 500 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 400 300 200 118 90 100 40 27 24 17 0 1 2 3 8 5 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 48 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DR-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Diagnostic Radiology U.S. Seniors Matched 280 Not Matched 240 240 209 200 160 160 115 120 80 40 0 66 56 0 3 <= 180 3 3 Between 181 and 190 10 5 Between 191 and 200 24 6 Between 201 and 210 7 5 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 3 Between 231 and 240 2 1 Between 241 and 250 0 Between 251 and 260 >260 0 1 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Independent Applicants Matched 280 Not Matched 240 200 160 120 80 63 40 0 0 0 <= 180 4 8 Between 181 and 190 3 16 Between 191 and 200 4 19 Between 201 and 210 16 22 18 Between 211 and 220 13 Between 221 and 230 24 23 Between 231 and 240 28 17 Between 241 and 250 21 10 Between 251 and 260 6 1 >260 20 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 49 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph DR-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Diagnostic Radiology 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 160 180 200 220 Independent Applicants 240 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 50 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DR-4 240 USMLE Step 2 Scores Diagnostic Radiology U.S. Seniors Matched 226 Not Matched 200 170 160 139 69 80 40 0 119 110 120 0 1 <= 180 1 2 Between 181 and 190 5 6 Between 191 and 200 13 31 6 5 Between 201 and 210 4 Between 211 and 220 4 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 3 Between 241 and 250 1 Between 251 and 260 4 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 240 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 200 160 120 80 63 40 0 0 1 <= 180 5 12 Between 181 and 190 7 10 Between 191 and 200 6 16 Between 201 and 210 12 24 17 Between 211 and 220 13 Between 221 and 230 23 18 Between 231 and 240 27 22 Between 241 and 250 21 7 Between 251 and 260 10 2 >260 20 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 51 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DR-5 Number of Research Projects Diagnostic Radiology U.S. Seniors Matched 250 Not Matched 235 188 200 145 150 138 116 100 61 50 6 13 6 6 3 0 None 1 2 3 4 2 5 or More Research Projects Independent Applicants 250 Matched Not Matched 200 150 100 50 41 34 42 30 43 30 34 18 17 14 21 12 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 52 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DR-6 280 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Diagnostic Radiology U.S. Seniors Matched 256 Not Matched 240 200 185 147 160 124 120 109 80 62 40 10 5 0 None 5 1 4 2 10 2 3 4 5 or More Publications 280 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 240 200 160 120 80 50 43 40 59 29 15 22 15 14 6 16 54 13 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 53 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DR-7 240 Number of Work Experiences Diagnostic Radiology U.S. Seniors Matched 200 179 159 160 120 Not Matched 201 123 121 100 80 40 7 7 6 4 0 None 1 2 9 3 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences 240 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 200 160 120 80 40 23 21 38 25 33 24 41 33 22 23 19 34 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 54 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DR-8 140 Number of Volunteer Experiences Diagnostic Radiology U.S. Seniors Matched 118 120 114 122 111 100 100 76 80 60 40 Not Matched 72 50 48 43 29 20 2 0 4 1 None 1 8 3 2 3 2 4 5 4 3 1 6 7 7 1 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences 140 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 120 100 80 60 40 28 34 31 30 20 29 22 29 10 19 13 10 8 17 6 6 2 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 3 8 6 2 9 15 7 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 55 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart DR-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Diagnostic Radiology Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 1,000 Matched 800 1,000 Not Matched 800 650 600 600 400 400 324 233 200 0 559 200 34 2 No 0 Yes 26 No Ph.D. Degree Yes Other Graduate Degree 1,000 1,000 845 800 800 600 600 400 400 200 200 0 10 35 No 38 1 0 Yes 800 29 No 83 7 Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 56 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 EM Emergency Medicine Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 57 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table EM-1 Summary Statistics Emergency Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched (n=1,259) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=137) Matched (n=330) Unmatched (n=299) 10.8 4.9 6.7 3.2 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.1 1.5 1.3 1.6 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 223 207 218 210 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 234 214 223 212 5. Mean number of research experiences 1.8 1.8 1.2 1.1 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.8 3.0 2.9 3.1 3.8 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 6.2 5.8 5.3 3.9 9. Percentage who are AOA members 9.1 0.7 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 30.9 32.8 n/a n/a 1.7 2.2 n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree 11.9 20.4 n/a n/a 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 58 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart EM-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Emergency Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched 180 Not Matched 167 160 145 136 140 100 80 109 102 83 69 60 66 46 40 20 122 114 120 27 14 17 17 19 11 31 27 11 10 13 8 11 5 5 5 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 1 12 13 0 14 15 0 16 or More Contiguous Ranks 180 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 160 140 128 120 100 80 60 40 55 36 26 34 24 20 26 24 36 10 30 20 13 7 27 22 6 5 17 25 6 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 12 1 8 1 13 10 14 1 3 0 15 7 5 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 59 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph EM-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Emergency Medicine 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 60 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart EM-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Emergency Medicine U.S. Seniors 1,200 Matched 1,177 Not Matched 1,000 800 600 400 200 77 69 50 11 0 1 2 9 2 3 1 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 1,200 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 1,000 800 600 400 261 176 200 84 45 1 31 17 0 2 3 7 6 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 61 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart EM-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Emergency Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched 280 Not Matched 262 240 219 212 200 118 120 76 80 40 158 154 160 40 7 0 6 <= 180 Between 181 and 190 34 28 16 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 27 8 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 7 Between 231 and 240 6 Between 241 and 250 3 12 Between 251 and 260 1 >260 1 1 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Independent Applicants Matched 280 Not Matched 240 200 181 160 120 87 80 40 0 2 2 <= 180 14 31 Between 181 and 190 19 36 Between 191 and 200 44 17 Between 201 and 210 23 37 36 Between 211 and 220 32 Between 221 and 230 20 19 Between 231 and 240 11 6 Between 241 and 250 6 4 Between 251 and 260 1 1 >260 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 62 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph EM-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Emergency Medicine 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 160 180 200 220 Independent Applicants 240 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 63 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart EM-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Emergency Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 240 250 218 203 200 164 142 150 102 100 40 50 0 72 71 3 1 <= 180 4 6 Between 181 and 190 21 Between 191 and 200 23 20 Between 201 and 210 17 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 10 Between 231 and 240 28 8 Between 241 and 250 3 Between 251 and 260 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 250 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 200 181 150 87 100 50 0 0 2 <= 180 12 24 Between 181 and 190 18 33 Between 191 and 200 51 17 Between 201 and 210 21 38 18 Between 211 and 220 25 Between 221 and 230 26 19 Between 231 and 240 15 12 Between 241 and 250 18 8 Between 251 and 260 4 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 64 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart EM-5 Number of Research Projects Emergency Medicine U.S. Seniors 300 Matched 337 350 Not Matched 305 270 250 195 200 150 84 100 34 50 34 32 68 19 10 8 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Independent Applicants 350 Matched Not Matched 300 250 200 150 137 120 108 100 77 66 41 50 23 17 13 11 8 8 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 65 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart EM-6 600 500 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Emergency Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched 508 Not Matched 400 300 217 200 183 164 114 100 58 34 73 14 7 0 None 1 2 21 3 3 4 5 or More Publications 600 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 500 400 300 200 167 163 100 55 49 35 29 23 16 16 11 0 None 1 2 3 4 34 31 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 66 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart EM-7 320 Number of Work Experiences Emergency Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched 280 283 247 228 240 Not Matched 214 200 160 155 132 120 80 40 27 16 28 22 27 17 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences 320 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 280 240 200 160 120 80 40 41 30 50 46 63 61 75 59 42 42 93 27 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 67 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart EM-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Emergency Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched 250 Not Matched 210 200 150 150 138 132 129 126 98 100 95 91 57 50 33 9 14 13 8 16 13 14 10 6 24 10 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences 250 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 200 150 100 61 50 37 43 24 32 29 44 32 46 32 47 31 20 22 20 20 18 19 10 11 9 22 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 68 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart EM-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Emergency Medicine Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 1,400 1,200 Matched 1,144 1,400 Not Matched 1,200 1,000 1,000 800 600 600 400 136 115 200 1 No 0 Yes Ph.D. Degree 45 No Yes 1,400 1,237 1,200 1,000 1,000 800 800 600 600 400 400 200 0 92 Other Graduate Degree 1,400 1,200 389 400 200 0 870 800 200 134 22 No 3 0 Yes 1,109 109 No 150 28 Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 69 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 FM Family Medicine Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 70 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table FM-1 Summary Statistics Family Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched (n=1,265) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=40) Matched (n=1,000) Unmatched (n=1,246) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks 8.0 4.7 5.2 2.6 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.1 1.4 1.3 1.5 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 213 201 204 198 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 225 205 208 202 5. Mean number of research experiences 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.0 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.9 2.9 3.7 3.7 4.5 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 6.7 5.0 4.2 2.7 9. Percentage who are AOA members 6.5 0.0 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 30.4 35.0 n/a n/a 0.9 0.0 n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree 11.1 35.0 n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 71 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart FM-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Family Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched 800 Not Matched 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 64 13 0 1 38 6 2 59 1 4 136 4 3 1 3 138 116 68 5 126 3 6 118 106 3 7 8 90 1 9 3 1 10 11 52 0 12 45 0 13 27 0 14 18 0 15 64 1 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Independent Applicants 800 Matched 736 Not Matched 700 600 500 400 300 200 209 209 128 100 103 82 92 47 73 36 71 20 69 21 54 13 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 43 19 9 48 13 10 25 11 5 22 12 7 15 4 13 14 14 3 11 15 4 23 27 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 72 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph FM-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Family Medicine 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 73 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart FM-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Family Medicine U.S. Seniors 1,200 Matched 1,180 Not Matched 1,000 800 600 400 200 29 0 82 1 6 4 3 2 1 0 3 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 1,200 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 1,000 800 775 767 600 343 400 201 200 93 25 0 1 2 3 23 7 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 74 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart FM-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Family Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched 450 Not Matched 400 350 300 268 250 217 210 200 169 150 150 113 77 100 50 23 0 <= 180 10 9 2 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 9 Between 201 and 210 5 4 1 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 0 Between 241 and 250 25 0 11 Between 251 and 260 0 >260 2 0 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Independent Applicants 450 392 400 Matched Not Matched 360 350 300 267 250 222 219 181 200 150 131 122 93 100 50 0 5 67 54 16 <= 180 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 33 21 Between 231 and 240 10 47 3 Between 241 and 250 3 0 Between 251 and 260 0 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 75 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph FM-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Family Medicine 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 160 180 200 220 Independent Applicants 240 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 76 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart FM-4 400 USMLE Step 2 Scores Family Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched 350 Not Matched 300 250 221 200 143 140 150 139 93 100 50 182 174 11 0 6 <= 180 85 42 35 5 3 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 4 Between 201 and 210 5 4 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 2 Between 231 and 240 2 Between 241 and 250 0 Between 251 and 260 9 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 400 Independent Applicants Matched 360 Not Matched 350 300 269 250 177 200 150 50 0 176 2 158 118 100 100 267 256 89 64 25 <= 180 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 42 42 Between 231 and 240 21 18 Between 241 and 250 49 4 4 Between 251 and 260 4 1 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 77 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart FM-5 Number of Research Projects Family Medicine U.S. Seniors 600 Matched Not Matched 500 400 383 359 283 300 200 139 100 63 18 10 0 None 6 1 3 2 0 3 4 38 3 5 or More Research Projects Independent Applicants 572 600 500 Matched Not Matched 465 372 400 268 300 200 160 156 100 79 62 38 26 23 25 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 78 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart FM-6 700 600 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Family Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched 614 Not Matched 500 400 300 227 200 149 121 87 100 23 5 0 None 67 4 2 1 2 4 2 3 4 5 or More Publications Independent Applicants 700 Matched 669 632 Not Matched 600 500 400 300 201 200 137 161 104 86 100 70 42 0 None 1 2 3 41 15 4 88 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 79 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart FM-7 550 Number of Work Experiences Family Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 500 450 400 350 300 200 150 263 250 225 250 211 164 152 100 50 6 0 8 4 None 1 5 2 12 5 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Independent Applicants Matched 550 Not Matched 516 500 450 400 350 290 300 250 200 150 100 113 101 151 145 183 168 175 162 129 113 50 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 80 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart FM-8 300 Number of Volunteer Experiences Family Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched 284 Not Matched 250 200 50 97 85 36 3 0 116 110 104 96 100 50 149 138 150 8 2 None 1 2 3 5 4 3 4 6 2 5 6 2 7 5 0 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences 300 Independent Applicants Matched 280 238 250 203 200 150 Not Matched 164 120 135 123 132 107 111 90 100 75 74 54 50 79 67 39 37 29 36 18 35 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 81 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart FM-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Family Medicine Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 1,400 1,200 1,183 Matched 1,400 Not Matched 1,200 1,000 1,000 800 800 600 600 400 82 40 No 200 0 0 Yes Ph.D. Degree 1,400 14 No Yes 1,400 1,253 1,200 1,000 1,000 800 800 600 600 400 400 200 26 Other Graduate Degree 1,200 0 385 400 200 0 880 40 No 1,124 200 12 0 0 Yes 141 26 No 14 Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 82 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 GS General Surgery Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 83 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table GS-1 Summary Statistics General Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched (n=830) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=205) Matched (n=192) Unmatched (n=529) 11.2 5.9 6.1 2.7 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.3 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 227 207 227 219 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 238 216 232 222 5. Mean number of research experiences 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.7 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 3.3 2.5 4.1 3.9 2.7 2.8 2.8 3.2 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 6.2 6.1 4.3 3.6 9. Percentage who are AOA members 13.1 1.0 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 32.0 24.4 n/a n/a 2.2 2.4 n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree 13.1 15.6 n/a n/a 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 84 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart GS-1 300 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty General Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 250 200 150 100 50 68 33 22 20 7 21 11 25 14 19 11 30 18 71 2 3 4 5 6 67 66 43 39 16 12 9 11 7 8 9 10 7 4 0 1 103 97 95 78 11 5 12 5 13 7 1 14 15 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Independent Applicants 300 Matched Not Matched 264 250 200 150 95 100 50 58 37 23 18 35 15 19 23 0 1 2 3 4 5 15 7 6 8 6 8 6 7 8 9 4 9 7 3 10 14 11 8 9 0 12 4 3 13 6 1 14 2 0 15 8 6 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 85 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph GS-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks General Surgery 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 86 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart GS-2 900 800 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked General Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched 804 Not Matched 700 600 500 400 300 179 200 100 25 23 1 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 900 Independent Applicants Matched 800 Not Matched 700 600 500 407 400 300 200 171 92 100 17 0 1 21 4 2 3 7 0 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 87 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart GS-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores General Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 198 210 180 149 150 133 126 120 82 90 51 60 30 0 0 3 <= 180 7 60 46 59 39 23 20 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 22 10 Between 231 and 240 4 Between 241 and 250 0 0 Between 251 and 260 >260 3 0 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Independent Applicants Matched 210 Not Matched 180 150 120 83 74 61 60 28 30 0 84 82 90 0 2 <= 180 6 Between 181 and 190 16 Between 191 and 200 54 16 Between 201 and 210 28 24 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 27 Between 231 and 240 27 32 Between 241 and 250 16 21 Between 251 and 260 27 5 8 >260 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 88 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph GS-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score General Surgery 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 160 180 200 220 Independent Applicants 240 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 89 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart GS-4 200 USMLE Step 2 Scores General Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 160 119 120 80 113 99 66 40 0 170 160 26 0 3 <= 180 1 8 Between 181 and 190 28 65 44 32 29 21 9 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 23 16 Between 241 and 250 3 Between 251 and 260 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 200 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 160 120 94 74 80 54 40 0 29 0 1 <= 180 4 Between 181 and 190 5 Between 191 and 200 72 57 11 Between 201 and 210 54 51 35 23 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 30 Between 231 and 240 31 Between 241 and 250 18 33 27 8 Between 251 and 260 10 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 90 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart GS-5 250 Number of Research Projects General Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 190 200 159 157 150 134 107 100 83 52 50 48 42 24 20 19 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Independent Applicants 250 Matched Not Matched 200 156 143 150 90 100 50 46 61 42 36 40 32 18 39 18 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 91 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart GS-6 240 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications General Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched 221 Not Matched 205 200 160 129 119 120 80 68 80 37 40 76 42 25 22 11 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Publications 240 Independent Applicants 200 Matched Not Matched 179 160 140 120 88 80 60 56 55 37 34 40 19 12 29 12 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 92 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart GS-7 Number of Work Experiences General Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched 180 140 161 152 160 Not Matched 157 132 125 120 103 100 80 60 39 40 37 42 35 30 22 20 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences 180 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 160 142 140 120 107 92 100 80 68 68 52 60 40 36 33 33 38 29 23 20 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 93 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart GS-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences General Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched 160 Not Matched 149 140 120 100 101 94 90 88 74 80 70 53 60 40 35 28 20 16 13 7 15 34 27 26 21 48 20 16 10 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Independent Applicants Matched 160 Not Matched 140 120 106 100 86 80 68 60 40 50 25 20 23 26 18 49 47 22 21 37 24 18 14 19 4 30 13 8 13 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 94 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart GS-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors General Surgery Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 900 800 700 Matched 721 900 Not Matched 800 700 600 600 500 500 400 400 300 266 300 203 200 200 109 100 0 564 100 2 No 155 0 Yes 50 No Ph.D. Degree 900 800 Other Graduate Degree 900 812 800 700 700 600 600 500 500 400 400 300 100 200 18 No 721 300 200 200 0 Yes 173 100 5 0 Yes 109 32 No Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 95 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 IM Internal Medicine Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 96 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table IM-1 Summary Statistics Internal Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched (n=2,947) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=171) Matched (n=1,952) Unmatched (n=2,804) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks 9.6 8.2 6.5 2.7 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.5 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 226 210 225 211 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 237 220 228 214 5. Mean number of research experiences 2.3 2.0 1.4 1.1 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 3.2 2.7 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.4 3.5 4.2 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 6.1 5.3 3.3 2.4 9. Percentage who are AOA members 15.5 4.7 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 37.1 32.7 n/a n/a 5.7 4.1 n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree 10.6 12.3 n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 97 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IM-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Internal Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched 1,500 Not Matched 1,200 900 600 300 0 61 31 1 71 10 2 67 16 103 3 148 8 5 4 5 8 6 10 6 7 332 322 259 233 209 268 8 8 9 7 10 232 172 11 11 9 12 244 137 7 13 7 89 1 14 15 49 6 37 4 14 15 27 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Independent Applicants 1,500 Matched Not Matched 1,390 1,200 900 547 600 300 291 205 173 296 172 151 152 103 124 65 138 73 117 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 28 94 21 9 100 35 10 58 13 11 75 20 12 69 5 13 98 47 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 98 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph IM-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Internal Medicine 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 99 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IM-2 3,200 2,800 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Internal Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched 2,835 Not Matched 2,400 2,000 1,600 1,200 800 400 145 101 24 0 1 11 2 2 0 3 0 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 3,200 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 2,800 2,400 2,000 1,600 1,817 1,506 1,200 738 800 355 400 191 76 0 1 2 3 49 13 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 100 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IM-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Internal Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched 600 Not Matched 526 500 502 425 396 369 400 300 258 257 200 100 100 88 23 0 <= 180 34 21 13 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 24 Between 201 and 210 23 18 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 18 Between 231 and 240 12 Between 241 and 250 7 Between 251 and 260 0 >260 3 1 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Independent Applicants 600 Matched 524 512 500 448 400 387 351 334 279 300 323 201 128 121 100 4 25 <= 180 297 287 193 200 0 Not Matched 62 Between 181 and 190 102 45 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 Between 241 and 250 Between 251 and 260 93 36 4 >260 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 101 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph IM-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Internal Medicine 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 160 180 200 220 Independent Applicants 240 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 102 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IM-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Internal Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 486 500 407 380 400 300 363 299 256 172 200 89 100 0 470 9 9 <= 180 16 9 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 21 19 9 Between 201 and 210 18 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 18 17 Between 231 and 240 Between 241 and 250 8 Between 251 and 260 37 6 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Independent Applicants 500 Matched 481 445 Not Matched 481 439 400 318 300 265 200 299 258 174 161 104 100 0 289 301 245 1 30 <= 180 77 50 Between 181 and 190 154 95 73 16 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 Between 241 and 250 Between 251 and 260 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 103 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IM-5 1,400 Number of Research Projects Internal Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched 1,200 Not Matched 1,000 800 600 734 636 501 449 328 400 200 42 40 32 23 0 None 1 299 2 18 16 3 4 5 or More Research Projects 1,400 Independent Applicants 1,232 Matched 1,200 Not Matched 1,000 800 751 698 564 600 407 338 400 224 196 200 91 70 86 99 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 104 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IM-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Internal Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched 1,500 Not Matched 1,200 900 915 714 600 474 373 271 300 73 28 0 None 200 1 2 33 15 12 10 3 4 5 or More Publications Independent Applicants 1,500 Matched 1,353 Not Matched 1,200 900 914 600 282 300 502 394 253 188 338 174 144 128 86 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 105 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IM-7 Number of Work Experiences Internal Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 629 617 514 472 408 400 307 300 200 100 35 35 33 25 None 1 2 29 14 0 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Independent Applicants Matched 1,100 Not Matched 1,065 1,000 900 800 700 565 600 500 400 300 200 234 223 352 278 413 384 313 310 356 263 100 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 106 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IM-8 700 Number of Volunteer Experiences Internal Medicine U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 600 489 500 391 400 300 287 237 200 100 334 327 215 163 131 99 None 25 13 12 10 0 274 1 2 24 17 3 4 19 5 14 6 8 7 21 8 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Independent Applicants 700 Matched 653 567 600 472 500 400 Not Matched 379 348 320 292 300 271 259 216 200 150 160 100 122 113 79 73 94 51 37 32 21 47 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 107 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IM-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Internal Medicine Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 2,800 2,400 2,491 Matched 2,800 Not Matched 2,400 2,000 2,000 1,600 1,600 1,200 800 456 400 400 163 8 No 0 Yes Ph.D. Degree 2,800 2,780 2,800 2,400 2,000 2,000 1,600 1,600 1,200 1,200 800 800 400 164 No 115 56 No Yes Other Graduate Degree 2,400 0 1,092 1,200 800 0 1,855 167 400 7 0 Yes 2,634 150 No 313 21 Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 108 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 IP Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 109 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table IP-1 Summary Statistics Internal Medicine/Pediatrics U.S. Seniors Matched (n=302) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=43) Matched (n=44) Unmatched (n=45) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks 8.6 3.7 5.6 1.6 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.2 2.0 1.8 2.2 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 230 219 217 218 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 242 224 221 217 5. Mean number of research experiences 1.9 2.0 1.5 1.3 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 2.3 2.4 1.7 2.2 2.9 2.6 3.1 5.1 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 7.8 7.4 5.3 3.7 9. Percentage who are AOA members 24.2 7.0 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 34.1 39.5 n/a n/a 3.3 0.0 n/a n/a 8.3 11.6 n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 110 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IP-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Internal Medicine/Pediatrics U.S. Seniors Matched 50 40 30 Not Matched 36 35 26 23 32 26 25 23 20 11 10 9 7 9 9 12 11 5 3 2 3 2 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 10 0 11 11 9 0 12 0 13 10 0 14 15 0 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Independent Applicants Matched 50 Not Matched 38 40 30 20 10 11 5 2 3 0 0 1 2 3 3 1 4 4 0 5 1 0 6 2 1 7 5 0 8 3 0 9 3 1 10 2 0 11 1 0 12 2 0 13 0 0 14 1 0 15 0 0 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 111 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph IP-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Internal Medicine/Pediatrics 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 112 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IP-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Internal Medicine/Pediatrics U.S. Seniors 250 Matched 236 Not Matched 200 150 100 60 50 26 10 6 0 1 2 6 1 0 3 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 250 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 200 150 100 50 18 16 19 15 1 7 5 0 2 3 5 2 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 113 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IP-3 80 USMLE Step 1 Scores Internal Medicine/Pediatrics U.S. Seniors Matched 70 Not Matched 64 56 60 50 47 44 40 33 30 30 20 10 13 2 0 0 <= 180 1 5 Between 181 and 190 8 5 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 8 5 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 12 6 Between 231 and 240 3 0 Between 241 and 250 3 Between 251 and 260 >260 0 0 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores 80 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 70 60 50 40 30 19 20 10 0 0 0 <= 180 3 3 Between 181 and 190 3 5 Between 191 and 200 4 8 Between 201 and 210 4 4 2 Between 211 and 220 7 Between 221 and 230 5 10 Between 231 and 240 2 2 Between 241 and 250 0 1 Between 251 and 260 7 0 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 114 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph IP-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Internal Medicine/Pediatrics 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 160 180 200 220 Independent Applicants 240 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 115 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IP-4 60 USMLE Step 2 Scores Internal Medicine/Pediatrics U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 50 52 46 44 40 46 40 35 30 22 20 8 10 0 0 0 <= 180 0 1 Between 181 and 190 5 Between 191 and 200 9 7 Between 201 and 210 11 8 4 2 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 4 0 Between 231 and 240 Between 241 and 250 Between 251 and 260 1 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 60 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 50 40 30 19 20 9 10 0 0 0 <= 180 2 2 Between 181 and 190 3 4 Between 191 and 200 2 Between 201 and 210 6 9 4 Between 211 and 220 4 Between 221 and 230 Step 2 Scores 4 7 Between 231 and 240 3 7 2 Between 241 and 250 0 1 Between 251 and 260 1 0 >260 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 116 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IP-5 Number of Research Projects Internal Medicine/Pediatrics U.S. Seniors Matched 100 86 90 80 70 60 Not Matched 73 58 50 40 40 30 23 22 20 10 10 10 8 8 4 3 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects 100 Independent Applicants Matched 90 Not Matched 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 22 16 13 7 10 11 5 0 None 1 1 1 2 3 8 1 4 1 3 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 117 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IP-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Internal Medicine/Pediatrics U.S. Seniors 125 Matched 118 Not Matched 100 75 50 50 47 41 29 20 25 17 7 4 3 0 None 1 2 8 1 3 4 5 or More Publications 125 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 100 75 50 25 21 20 5 5 7 6 6 3 0 None 1 2 3 1 1 4 5 9 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 118 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IP-7 Number of Work Experiences Internal Medicine/Pediatrics U.S. Seniors Matched 80 69 70 61 60 30 58 50 50 40 Not Matched 33 31 20 9 10 9 7 9 5 4 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences 80 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 70 60 50 40 30 19 20 10 6 3 7 3 7 6 8 8 12 5 5 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 119 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IP-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Internal Medicine/Pediatrics U.S. Seniors Matched 100 Not Matched 91 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 7 0 1 13 8 None 26 20 4 1 1 3 23 13 7 4 28 22 4 2 2 35 29 5 3 2 1 6 5 7 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences 100 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 3 8 5 3 5 4 4 4 8 7 5 3 7 2 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 2 7 4 4 8 3 0 9 4 2 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 120 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart IP-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Internal Medicine/Pediatrics Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 300 250 Matched 229 300 Not Matched 250 200 200 150 199 150 100 40 50 50 3 0 103 100 73 No 0 Yes 26 No Ph.D. Degree 300 300 250 250 200 200 150 150 100 100 0 43 277 50 10 No Yes Other Graduate Degree 292 50 17 0 0 Yes 38 No 25 5 Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 121 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 NS Neurological Surgery Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 122 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table NS-1 Summary Statistics Neurological Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched (n=174) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=28) Matched (n=17) Unmatched (n=49) 15.2 7.5 6.3 3.3 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.7 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 239 218 232 226 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 241 221 229 222 5. Mean number of research experiences 3.4 3.0 3.4 2.5 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 7.4 4.0 11.1 9.6 2.5 3.1 3.5 2.8 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 5.8 3.8 3.2 2.1 9. Percentage who are AOA members 25.3 0.0 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 44.8 35.7 n/a n/a 10.3 14.3 n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree 14.4 3.6 n/a n/a 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 123 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Chart NS-1 Neurological Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched 100 Not Matched 88 80 60 40 20 0 2 1 3 0 1 2 2 1 3 2 3 5 0 4 3 0 5 5 6 2 4 7 1 14 9 0 8 4 9 11 1 0 10 11 4 1 0 12 14 10 9 13 3 0 14 15 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Independent Applicants Matched 100 Not Matched 80 60 40 19 20 4 9 2 0 1 2 7 2 3 2 0 4 4 0 5 2 1 6 2 0 7 3 2 8 3 0 9 0 0 10 0 0 11 0 0 12 1 0 13 0 0 14 0 0 15 2 1 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 124 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph NS-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Neurological Surgery 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 125 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart NS-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Neurological Surgery U.S. Seniors 180 160 Matched 164 Not Matched 140 120 100 80 60 40 19 20 10 8 1 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 180 Independent Applicants Matched 160 Not Matched 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 28 12 13 4 0 1 7 1 2 3 0 0 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 126 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart NS-3 50 USMLE Step 1 Scores Neurological Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 40 37 35 32 34 30 20 16 8 10 0 1 2 <= 180 0 1 Between 181 and 190 3 3 2 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 7 7 6 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 5 Between 231 and 240 2 Between 241 and 250 0 0 Between 251 and 260 >260 1 0 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores 50 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 40 30 20 8 10 0 0 0 <= 180 1 2 Between 181 and 190 1 1 Between 191 and 200 1 Between 201 and 210 8 2 2 Between 211 and 220 6 Between 221 and 230 9 3 Between 231 and 240 4 7 Between 241 and 250 2 3 Between 251 and 260 1 1 >260 0 4 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 127 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph NS-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Neurological Surgery 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 160 180 200 220 Independent Applicants 240 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 128 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart NS-4 80 USMLE Step 2 Scores Neurological Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched 70 72 Not Matched 60 50 40 26 30 10 0 19 16 20 0 1 <= 180 1 1 Between 181 and 190 1 2 Between 191 and 200 7 3 Between 201 and 210 9 8 3 Between 211 and 220 5 2 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 5 Between 241 and 250 15 0 Between 251 and 260 6 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 80 Independent Applicants Matched 70 Not Matched 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 0 <= 180 0 4 Between 181 and 190 1 5 Between 191 and 200 3 4 Between 201 and 210 2 8 3 Between 211 and 220 8 Between 221 and 230 Step 2 Scores 5 7 Between 231 and 240 1 6 Between 241 and 250 0 2 Between 251 and 260 2 1 >260 0 4 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 129 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart NS-5 60 Number of Research Projects Neurological Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 42 41 37 40 31 17 20 6 3 7 3 5 6 4 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects 60 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 40 20 11 8 3 None 1 8 4 3 1 0 10 2 5 2 3 4 4 7 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 130 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart NS-6 100 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Neurological Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched 95 Not Matched 80 60 40 20 17 14 6 2 0 18 17 None 6 2 1 2 13 10 2 3 4 5 or More Publications 100 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 80 60 40 30 20 0 13 4 2 None 3 0 1 5 1 4 1 2 3 3 0 4 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 131 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart NS-7 Number of Work Experiences Neurological Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched 50 Not Matched 44 40 30 31 28 27 23 21 20 10 5 6 4 2 7 4 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences 50 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 40 30 20 9 10 3 12 9 2 6 2 1 6 4 2 0 0 None 11 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 132 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Number of Volunteer Experiences Chart NS-8 Neurological Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 30 26 23 23 20 20 14 10 16 14 13 9 7 9 3 5 3 3 5 3 2 1 1 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 0 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences 30 Independent Applicants 20 Matched Not Matched 18 10 8 3 4 6 5 4 4 1 2 2 1 3 1 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 2 0 6 7 1 0 8 0 0 9 1 0 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 133 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart NS-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Neurological Surgery Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 160 140 Matched 130 160 Not Matched 140 120 120 100 100 80 96 78 80 60 60 44 40 40 28 20 0 0 No 18 20 0 Yes No Ph.D. Degree 160 160 140 140 120 120 100 100 80 80 60 60 24 20 0 149 40 18 27 20 4 No Yes Other Graduate Degree 156 40 10 0 Yes 25 1 No Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 134 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 N Neurology Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 135 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table N-1 Summary Statistics Neurology U.S. Seniors Matched (n=360) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=15) Matched (n=210) Unmatched (n=170) 10.2 5.1 6.3 2.1 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.2 2.0 1.6 1.9 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 225 212 224 216 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 233 209 227 216 5. Mean number of research experiences 2.9 2.2 1.9 1.9 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 4.2 1.7 4.9 5.9 2.4 4.0 3.4 3.9 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 5.6 5.2 3.1 2.4 9. Percentage who are AOA members 11.9 0.0 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 32.5 26.7 n/a n/a 11.9 6.7 n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree 15.3 26.7 n/a n/a 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 136 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Chart N-1 Neurology U.S. Seniors Matched 100 Not Matched 90 80 70 60 46 50 40 30 20 10 36 30 4 4 8 3 8 2 0 1 2 3 1 0 4 38 34 26 1 0 5 6 0 7 8 9 2 1 0 10 22 18 17 14 9 36 0 11 0 12 14 0 13 1 0 14 15 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Independent Applicants 100 Matched 91 90 Not Matched 80 70 60 50 40 30 41 28 21 20 15 15 21 7 10 19 15 18 7 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 17 6 9 1 7 4 0 8 9 11 2 10 7 0 11 8 1 12 8 0 13 3 0 14 4 0 15 6 0 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 137 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph N-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Neurology 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 138 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart N-2 350 300 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Neurology U.S. Seniors Matched 284 Not Matched 250 200 150 100 66 50 6 0 8 5 1 2 2 2 1 3 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 350 Independent Applicants Matched 300 Not Matched 250 200 150 112 100 66 68 66 50 28 24 0 1 2 3 9 5 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 139 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart N-3 100 USMLE Step 1 Scores Neurology U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 80 71 60 62 56 49 50 40 16 20 0 1 <= 180 4 2 0 25 20 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 2 Between 201 and 210 10 4 1 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 1 0 Between 231 and 240 Between 241 and 250 1 0 Between 251 and 260 >260 0 0 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores 100 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 80 60 52 40 26 20 0 32 9 0 14 11 23 32 34 40 23 19 11 13 12 0 <= 180 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 Between 241 and 250 8 15 4 Between 251 and 260 2 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 140 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph N-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Neurology 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 160 180 200 220 Independent Applicants 240 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 141 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart N-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Neurology 70 U.S. Seniors 60 Matched 63 Not Matched 57 51 50 40 32 10 0 1 1 <= 180 6 34 31 30 20 46 28 11 2 Between 181 and 190 1 Between 191 and 200 3 1 Between 201 and 210 2 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 0 Between 231 and 240 1 0 Between 241 and 250 Between 251 and 260 4 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 70 Independent Applicants Matched 60 Not Matched 52 50 40 32 30 20 16 10 0 0 2 <= 180 21 26 30 27 27 28 22 17 11 23 10 2 2 Between 181 and 190 15 10 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Step 2 Scores Between 231 and 240 Between 241 and 250 Between 251 and 260 5 2 >260 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 142 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart N-5 100 Number of Research Projects Neurology U.S. Seniors Matched 65 60 60 40 78 77 80 Not Matched 48 32 20 3 4 2 3 2 1 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Independent Applicants 100 Matched Not Matched 80 60 57 50 54 36 40 37 30 30 25 21 16 20 17 7 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 143 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart N-6 150 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Neurology U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 113 100 83 51 50 46 40 27 9 3 0 None 0 1 0 2 3 0 3 4 5 or More Publications 150 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 100 74 66 55 62 50 26 15 19 18 17 12 13 3 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 144 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart N-7 100 Number of Work Experiences Neurology U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 82 80 67 63 61 60 51 36 40 20 2 0 2 None 3 2 1 2 5 1 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences 100 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 80 58 60 38 40 20 29 22 35 25 19 24 21 28 59 22 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 145 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Number of Volunteer Experiences Chart N-8 Neurology U.S. Seniors Matched 60 51 50 50 46 40 38 36 30 20 Not Matched 30 28 24 21 19 17 10 2 1 0 None 2 0 1 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 0 6 2 0 7 8 9 2 10 or More Volunteer Experiences 60 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 50 40 38 40 36 34 30 30 30 26 24 30 21 20 12 12 12 7 10 8 1 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 2 8 7 4 2 9 1 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 146 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart N-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Neurology Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 350 317 Matched 300 350 Not Matched 300 250 250 200 200 150 150 100 117 100 43 50 0 243 50 15 0 No 0 Yes 11 No Ph.D. Degree 350 Yes Other Graduate Degree 350 317 300 300 250 250 200 200 150 150 100 100 43 50 0 4 55 50 14 No 305 1 0 Yes 11 No 4 Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 147 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 OB Obstetrics and Gynecology Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 148 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table OB-1 Summary Statistics Obstetrics and Gynecology U.S. Seniors Matched (n=890) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=57) Matched (n=291) Unmatched (n=271) 11.0 5.4 8.2 2.8 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.5 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 220 202 218 206 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 233 210 223 212 5. Mean number of research experiences 2.2 2.2 1.5 1.2 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.9 2.9 2.3 3.0 3.8 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 7.5 6.3 5.1 3.2 9. Percentage who are AOA members 10.8 3.5 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 30.6 24.6 n/a n/a 1.3 7.0 n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree 14.9 12.3 n/a n/a 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 149 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Chart OB-1 Obstetrics and Gynecology U.S. Seniors Matched 150 Not Matched 126 100 100 88 100 92 82 68 54 50 50 29 11 6 10 5 6 4 14 36 29 7 5 5 6 4 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 10 2 11 0 12 1 0 13 1 0 14 15 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Independent Applicants Matched 150 Not Matched 126 100 57 50 31 31 16 14 22 12 15 12 25 21 10 8 18 4 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 22 19 17 9 2 1 10 17 11 1 12 13 11 0 13 14 25 1 5 2 15 3 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 150 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph OB-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Obstetrics and Gynecology 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 151 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart OB-2 1,000 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Obstetrics and Gynecology U.S. Seniors Matched 866 Not Matched 800 600 400 200 47 22 9 0 1 2 2 1 0 3 0 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 1,000 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 800 600 400 238 181 200 61 44 1 19 6 0 2 3 8 3 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 152 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart OB-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Obstetrics and Gynecology U.S. Seniors Matched 200 Not Matched 178 168 141 150 137 97 100 77 50 40 38 9 17 9 6 12 4 0 <= 180 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 4 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 2 Between 231 and 240 1 Between 241 and 250 0 4 Between 251 and 260 2 >260 1 0 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores 200 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 150 122 100 56 50 0 38 0 4 <= 180 7 Between 181 and 190 21 Between 191 and 200 56 28 Between 201 and 210 35 40 39 29 23 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 20 14 Between 231 and 240 14 8 Between 241 and 250 5 3 Between 251 and 260 0 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 153 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph OB-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Obstetrics and Gynecology 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 160 180 200 220 Independent Applicants 240 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 154 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart OB-4 USMLE Step 2 Scores Obstetrics and Gynecology U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 190 200 160 120 99 80 97 74 64 51 33 40 0 140 135 0 4 <= 180 7 12 3 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 7 Between 201 and 210 9 6 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 3 Between 231 and 240 2 Between 241 and 250 Between 251 and 260 8 2 1 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 200 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 160 122 120 80 31 40 0 0 1 <= 180 3 Between 181 and 190 44 37 46 15 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 23 36 29 Between 211 and 220 29 Between 221 and 230 27 40 22 Between 231 and 240 21 19 Between 241 and 250 11 3 Between 251 and 260 3 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 155 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart OB-5 Number of Research Projects Obstetrics and Gynecology U.S. Seniors 250 Matched Not Matched 225 221 200 150 145 120 91 100 88 50 14 14 10 6 None 1 2 9 4 0 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Independent Applicants 250 Matched Not Matched 200 150 100 116 98 71 70 57 44 50 34 17 19 10 12 14 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 156 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart OB-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Obstetrics and Gynecology U.S. Seniors 350 Matched 324 Not Matched 300 250 200 159 147 150 117 91 100 52 50 24 7 0 None 10 6 1 2 10 0 3 4 5 or More Publications 350 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 300 250 200 150 135 119 100 56 50 40 30 27 20 20 16 13 37 49 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 157 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart OB-7 Number of Work Experiences Obstetrics and Gynecology U.S. Seniors Matched 250 Not Matched 207 200 181 150 150 140 112 100 100 50 12 12 11 10 None 1 2 8 4 0 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences 250 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 200 150 100 50 82 52 35 33 27 50 47 50 46 60 44 36 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 158 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart OB-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Obstetrics and Gynecology U.S. Seniors Matched 250 250 Not Matched 200 150 100 63 52 50 13 0 3 17 None 7 2 1 96 82 6 2 71 9 1 3 103 84 4 7 5 59 3 6 7 11 6 2 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Independent Applicants Matched 250 Not Matched 200 150 100 56 50 26 54 36 34 21 47 26 33 26 25 22 39 23 14 14 9 15 7 13 5 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 17 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 159 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart OB-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Obstetrics and Gynecology Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 1,000 800 Matched 794 1,000 Not Matched 800 600 600 400 618 400 272 200 0 200 96 55 43 2 No 0 Yes 14 No Ph.D. Degree Yes Other Graduate Degree 1,000 1,000 878 800 800 600 600 400 400 200 200 53 0 No 12 757 133 50 4 0 Yes No 7 Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 160 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 ORS Orthopaedic Surgery Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 161 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table Summary Statistics ORS-1 Orthopaedic Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched (n=621) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=186) Matched (n=47) Unmatched (n=120) 11.5 5.7 5.1 2.9 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.6 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 240 225 230 220 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 245 231 232 223 5. Mean number of research experiences 2.9 2.8 3.5 2.5 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 4.5 3.0 5.0 6.0 2.7 2.7 3.1 2.6 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 6.3 5.5 5.2 4.4 9. Percentage who are AOA members 27.1 5.9 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 37.4 25.8 n/a n/a 2.4 1.6 n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree 10.3 18.3 n/a n/a 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 162 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty ORS-1 Orthopaedic Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched 125 Not Matched 117 100 75 50 27 25 25 13 6 10 6 46 37 23 18 13 11 11 14 9 50 41 36 28 22 19 58 49 47 8 4 3 50 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 3 0 0 14 15 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Independent Applicants Matched 125 Not Matched 100 75 61 50 25 20 11 5 12 3 6 6 6 3 4 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 3 7 4 4 8 1 1 9 2 1 10 1 0 11 1 1 12 1 0 13 0 0 14 0 0 15 2 3 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 163 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks ORS-1 Orthopaedic Surgery 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 164 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked ORS-2 Orthopaedic Surgery U.S. Seniors 600 Matched 577 Not Matched 500 400 300 200 136 100 43 39 1 6 5 0 2 0 3 0 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 600 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 500 400 300 200 100 69 33 36 14 1 12 0 0 2 3 1 0 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 165 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart USMLE Step 1 Scores ORS-3 Orthopaedic Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched 180 Not Matched 164 154 150 111 120 85 90 60 42 30 0 0 3 <= 180 2 4 Between 181 and 190 5 10 Between 191 and 200 12 23 Between 201 and 210 43 35 34 33 28 10 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 Between 241 and 250 3 Between 251 and 260 >260 3 3 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores 180 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 150 120 90 60 30 0 0 0 <= 180 0 8 Between 181 and 190 15 0 Between 191 and 200 6 17 Between 201 and 210 4 18 16 Between 211 and 220 18 Between 221 and 230 5 15 Between 231 and 240 6 14 Between 241 and 250 5 8 Between 251 and 260 1 0 >260 2 9 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 166 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score ORS-2 Orthopaedic Surgery 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 180 200 220 240 Independent Applicants 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 167 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart USMLE Step 2 Scores ORS-4 Orthopaedic Surgery 200 U.S. Seniors Matched 194 Not Matched 160 120 106 95 87 80 68 44 40 0 0 0 <= 180 0 1 Between 181 and 190 3 10 Between 191 and 200 7 8 Between 201 and 210 17 34 27 24 38 26 11 7 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 Between 241 and 250 Between 251 and 260 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 200 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 160 120 80 40 0 0 0 <= 180 0 5 Between 181 and 190 4 10 Between 191 and 200 18 2 Between 201 and 210 5 16 10 Between 211 and 220 23 Between 221 and 230 9 14 Between 231 and 240 8 16 Between 241 and 250 4 6 Between 251 and 260 3 3 >260 2 9 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 168 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart Number of Research Projects ORS-5 Orthopaedic Surgery U.S. Seniors 200 Matched 150 160 120 Not Matched 137 112 105 87 80 40 51 37 30 37 29 17 15 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Independent Applicants 200 Matched Not Matched 160 120 80 40 0 17 1 None 32 27 10 9 1 17 9 2 3 13 6 4 12 14 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 169 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications ORS-6 Orthopaedic Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched 250 Not Matched 205 200 150 113 96 100 96 55 50 57 54 28 24 45 17 17 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Publications 250 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 200 150 100 49 50 29 16 10 8 0 None 1 11 3 11 2 2 3 4 4 4 20 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 170 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart Number of Work Experiences ORS-7 Orthopaedic Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched 150 Not Matched 130 90 113 112 120 101 89 76 60 34 30 40 33 26 35 18 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences 150 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 120 90 60 30 6 29 25 18 12 4 16 6 13 9 10 19 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 171 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart Number of Volunteer Experiences ORS-8 Orthopaedic Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched 120 Not Matched 107 100 89 80 71 68 67 60 52 20 40 35 40 21 20 27 21 15 14 9 51 19 24 19 18 12 8 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Independent Applicants Matched 120 Not Matched 100 80 60 40 20 20 3 7 3 14 4 18 14 5 10 7 4 8 7 10 6 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4 2 8 2 2 9 4 13 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 172 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors ORS-9 Orthopaedic Surgery Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 700 Matched 600 700 Not Matched 600 500 453 500 400 400 300 389 300 175 200 168 100 No 138 100 11 0 232 200 0 Yes 48 No Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree 700 700 600 606 600 500 500 400 400 300 300 183 200 557 200 152 100 100 0 Yes 15 No 3 0 Yes 64 No 34 Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 173 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 OTO Otolaryngology Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 174 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table Summary Statistics OTO-1 Otolaryngology U.S. Seniors Matched (n=267) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=45) Matched (n=11) Unmatched (n=41) 11.7 6.1 6.5 3.2 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.1 1.4 1.2 1.6 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 243 232 231 220 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 250 235 240 225 5. Mean number of research experiences 3.5 3.3 3.7 2.6 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 5.1 3.0 4.9 6.6 2.7 2.5 2.5 3.7 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 7.0 6.3 5.5 4.1 9. Percentage who are AOA members 41.6 11.1 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 38.6 31.1 n/a n/a 3.7 2.2 n/a n/a 9.7 11.1 n/a n/a 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 175 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty OTO-1 Otolaryngology U.S. Seniors Matched 60 Not Matched 49 50 40 30 24 22 18 20 10 0 34 32 5 1 6 1 2 7 1 2 11 5 5 3 5 4 5 5 11 10 3 1 7 16 10 2 6 17 8 3 9 2 10 1 11 2 0 12 13 2 14 15 0 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Independent Applicants Matched 60 Not Matched 50 40 30 20 20 10 7 2 1 0 1 3 0 2 3 3 1 4 1 0 5 4 2 6 1 0 7 0 0 8 2 0 9 1 0 10 2 0 11 0 0 12 0 0 13 0 0 14 0 0 15 1 1 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 176 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks OTO-1 Otolaryngology 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 177 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked OTO-2 Otolaryngology U.S. Seniors 250 Matched 241 Not Matched 200 150 100 50 29 25 15 1 0 1 2 1 0 3 0 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 250 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 200 150 100 50 21 9 15 2 0 1 5 0 2 3 0 0 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 178 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart USMLE Step 1 Scores OTO-3 Otolaryngology U.S. Seniors Matched 80 Not Matched 72 67 70 60 54 50 40 32 31 30 17 20 10 0 0 0 <= 180 0 0 Between 181 and 190 1 5 Between 191 and 200 3 3 Between 201 and 210 6 10 4 2 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 3 1 Between 231 and 240 Between 241 and 250 Between 251 and 260 >260 1 0 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores 80 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 0 <= 180 0 6 Between 181 and 190 2 5 Between 191 and 200 1 4 Between 201 and 210 1 3 1 Between 211 and 220 6 Between 221 and 230 1 7 Between 231 and 240 3 6 Between 241 and 250 0 3 Between 251 and 260 2 0 >260 0 1 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 179 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score OTO-2 Otolaryngology 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 180 200 220 240 Independent Applicants 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 180 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart USMLE Step 2 Scores OTO-4 Otolaryngology 80 U.S. Seniors Matched 78 Not Matched 70 60 55 51 50 41 40 30 23 20 10 0 11 0 0 <= 180 0 0 Between 181 and 190 0 2 Between 191 and 200 0 2 Between 201 and 210 8 8 7 1 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 4 Between 241 and 250 13 7 Between 251 and 260 1 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 80 Independent Applicants Matched 70 Not Matched 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 0 <= 180 0 2 Between 181 and 190 1 3 Between 191 and 200 8 1 Between 201 and 210 0 9 3 1 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Step 2 Scores 0 6 Between 231 and 240 5 4 Between 241 and 250 0 2 Between 251 and 260 2 3 >260 1 1 Score Unknown Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 181 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart Number of Research Projects OTO-5 Otolaryngology U.S. Seniors 80 Matched Not Matched 70 71 63 60 55 49 50 40 26 30 20 10 3 7 2 16 10 7 3 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Independent Applicants 80 Matched Not Matched 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 4 1 None 10 10 2 1 1 6 1 2 3 4 2 4 4 7 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 182 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications OTO-6 Otolaryngology U.S. Seniors Matched 120 Not Matched 119 100 80 60 40 20 40 31 19 34 24 12 6 7 6 9 5 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Publications 120 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 100 80 60 40 19 20 0 6 1 None 8 4 1 2 2 3 1 2 3 3 1 4 2 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 183 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart Number of Work Experiences OTO-7 Otolaryngology U.S. Seniors Matched 80 70 Not Matched 64 60 47 50 40 44 43 38 31 30 20 11 10 9 10 8 4 3 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences 80 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 5 1 None 5 2 1 6 3 3 2 11 6 0 3 8 2 4 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 184 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart Number of Volunteer Experiences OTO-8 Otolaryngology U.S. Seniors Matched 70 Not Matched 62 60 50 40 31 27 30 10 19 3 2 1 0 None 1 18 13 10 5 26 21 18 20 30 4 2 2 3 4 4 5 8 4 6 2 7 2 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences 70 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 60 50 40 30 20 10 10 0 0 None 4 1 1 3 3 2 2 1 3 5 2 4 1 4 3 0 5 6 3 0 7 2 0 8 1 0 9 3 4 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 185 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors OTO-9 Otolaryngology Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 280 Matched 240 280 Not Matched 240 200 200 156 160 160 111 120 120 80 No 31 40 5 0 103 80 40 40 164 0 Yes No Ph.D. Degree 280 Yes Other Graduate Degree 280 257 240 240 200 200 160 160 120 120 241 80 80 44 40 0 14 10 No 40 40 1 0 Yes No 26 5 Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 186 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 PTH Pathology Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 187 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table Summary Statistics PTH-1 Pathology U.S. Seniors Matched (n=267) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=10) Matched (n=192) Unmatched (n=189) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks 8.9 4.5 5.7 3.0 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.4 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 226 195 224 212 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 233 203 225 210 5. Mean number of research experiences 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.7 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 4.6 2.3 6.9 7.0 3.0 2.4 2.9 2.9 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 4.6 3.3 3.0 2.0 9. Percentage who are AOA members 10.9 0.0 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 40.4 30.0 n/a n/a 17.2 10.0 n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree 10.5 0.0 n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 188 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Chart PTH-1 Pathology U.S. Seniors Matched 100 Not Matched 80 60 40 20 33 6 4 8 3 13 9 0 0 1 2 18 18 0 3 0 4 1 0 5 6 30 24 20 1 7 0 8 25 0 9 19 0 10 12 12 0 11 0 12 0 13 14 6 14 1 0 15 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Independent Applicants Matched 98 100 Not Matched 80 60 40 38 33 23 24 23 20 21 12 17 4 4 8 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 2 7 2 8 9 2 9 9 0 10 5 3 11 6 0 12 4 0 13 7 0 14 3 1 15 4 10 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 189 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph PTH-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Pathology 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 190 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PTH-2 300 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Pathology U.S. Seniors Matched 257 Not Matched 250 200 150 100 50 9 9 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 3 0 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 300 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 250 200 159 144 150 100 50 26 21 10 9 0 1 2 3 8 2 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 191 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PTH-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Pathology U.S. Seniors Matched 60 Not Matched 54 48 50 39 40 30 30 28 26 22 20 7 10 0 1 2 <= 180 11 4 Between 181 and 190 1 Between 191 and 200 2 0 Between 201 and 210 1 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 0 Between 231 and 240 0 Between 241 and 250 0 0 Between 251 and 260 >260 1 0 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores 60 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 50 40 36 34 31 30 23 25 24 23 23 18 20 16 13 8 10 0 38 36 0 7 2 <= 180 10 7 2 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 Between 241 and 250 Between 251 and 260 4 1 >260 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 192 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph PTH-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Pathology 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 160 180 200 220 Independent Applicants 240 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 193 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PTH-4 50 USMLE Step 2 Scores Pathology U.S. Seniors Matched 40 35 Not Matched 38 37 34 39 38 30 21 20 13 10 10 2 0 1 <= 180 0 2 Between 181 and 190 3 1 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 1 0 Between 211 and 220 1 0 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 Between 241 and 250 0 1 0 Between 251 and 260 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 50 Independent Applicants Matched 40 35 34 30 29 30 25 24 22 18 20 25 25 20 18 14 10 0 Not Matched 7 9 16 12 2 0 <= 180 10 6 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 Between 241 and 250 Between 251 and 260 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 194 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PTH-5 Number of Research Projects Pathology U.S. Seniors 60 Matched 54 Not Matched 54 52 50 40 40 36 31 30 20 10 5 1 0 None 2 0 1 2 1 3 4 1 5 or More Research Projects Independent Applicants 50 Matched 59 60 49 44 40 40 37 Not Matched 35 34 27 30 21 20 14 12 10 9 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 195 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PTH-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Pathology U.S. Seniors Matched 100 80 Not Matched 87 73 60 43 40 29 21 20 4 2 0 None 14 2 1 1 2 1 0 3 4 5 or More Publications 100 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 88 87 80 60 53 52 40 19 15 20 17 11 9 9 11 10 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 196 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PTH-7 Number of Work Experiences Pathology U.S. Seniors 60 Matched 56 47 50 Not Matched 59 44 40 30 31 30 20 10 4 1 0 None 2 1 1 2 1 3 4 1 5 or More Work Experiences 60 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 50 40 39 37 36 43 41 34 30 30 31 29 22 22 17 20 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 197 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PTH-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Pathology U.S. Seniors Matched 70 Not Matched 60 50 40 39 36 27 30 29 27 26 20 20 10 3 0 1 3 2 1 0 None 19 18 2 3 0 4 15 0 5 11 0 6 0 7 1 0 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Independent Applicants 70 Not Matched 61 60 50 Matched 48 42 40 31 30 25 24 24 24 17 20 14 14 10 4 9 6 8 5 6 2 9 5 1 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 198 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PTH-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Pathology Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 240 238 Matched 200 240 Not Matched 200 160 160 120 120 80 108 80 40 29 40 10 0 159 0 No 0 Yes 7 No Ph.D. Degree 240 240 200 200 160 160 120 120 80 80 46 No 239 40 9 0 Yes Other Graduate Degree 221 40 3 10 1 0 Yes No 28 0 Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 199 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 PD Pediatrics Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 200 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table PD-1 Summary Statistics Pediatrics U.S. Seniors Matched (n=1,734) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=78) Matched (n=595) Unmatched (n=581) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks 9.6 6.8 6.7 2.5 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.5 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 221 206 217 204 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 234 215 221 209 5. Mean number of research experiences 2.0 1.6 1.3 1.2 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 2.4 2.1 2.0 2.7 2.7 2.8 3.2 3.9 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 7.4 6.7 5.0 3.3 9. Percentage who are AOA members 11.6 1.3 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 33.6 24.4 n/a n/a 4.2 1.3 n/a n/a 8.9 17.9 n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 201 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PD-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Pediatrics U.S. Seniors Matched 350 Not Matched 300 250 200 150 159 145 118 105 100 50 173 149 226 199 48 8 0 23 1 50 39 9 8 2 66 9 4 3 106 70 4 5 5 3 6 3 7 8 3 8 9 10 6 11 5 12 2 0 13 58 3 2 14 15 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Independent Applicants Matched 330 350 Not Matched 300 250 200 150 100 107 83 50 40 42 50 48 29 35 21 48 46 45 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 7 2 0 1 43 40 13 9 10 35 0 11 25 12 3 15 1 13 15 14 2 8 1 15 17 8 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 202 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph PD-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Pediatrics 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 203 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PD-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Pediatrics U.S. Seniors 1,800 Matched 1,688 Not Matched 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 70 43 7 0 1 3 2 1 0 3 0 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 1,800 Independent Applicants Matched 1,600 Not Matched 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 504 377 400 200 138 71 0 1 48 18 2 3 13 1 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 204 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PD-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Pediatrics U.S. Seniors 350 Matched 300 Not Matched 316 302 285 264 250 204 200 160 150 87 100 50 17 0 20 5 <= 180 77 Between 181 and 190 11 Between 191 and 200 10 Between 201 and 210 10 12 8 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 2 Between 241 and 250 0 20 Between 251 and 260 0 >260 2 0 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Independent Applicants 350 Matched 300 Not Matched 250 222 200 140 150 105 100 50 0 1 4 <= 180 24 Between 181 and 190 116 80 49 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 74 72 57 Between 211 and 220 46 Between 221 and 230 42 59 27 Between 231 and 240 28 9 Between 241 and 250 18 3 Between 251 and 260 0 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 205 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph PD-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Pediatrics 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 160 180 200 220 Independent Applicants 240 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 206 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PD-4 300 USMLE Step 2 Scores Pediatrics U.S. Seniors Matched 235 250 212 194 200 150 195 122 100 50 294 285 Not Matched 112 59 9 0 4 <= 180 17 8 Between 181 and 190 10 7 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 11 10 7 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 5 Between 241 and 250 Between 251 and 260 13 2 1 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 300 Independent Applicants Matched 250 Not Matched 225 200 150 115 100 53 50 0 1 2 <= 180 102 99 79 48 66 56 61 35 19 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 60 59 Between 231 and 240 35 19 Between 241 and 250 27 7 Between 251 and 260 6 2 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 207 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PD-5 Number of Research Projects Pediatrics U.S. Seniors 500 Matched 457 400 400 300 Not Matched 310 291 200 160 116 100 23 17 16 13 6 0 None 1 2 3 4 3 5 or More Research Projects Independent Applicants 500 Matched Not Matched 400 300 236 222 200 167 166 116 96 100 47 39 25 24 19 19 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 208 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PD-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Pediatrics U.S. Seniors 700 Matched 649 Not Matched 600 500 400 304 300 284 229 200 157 100 34 16 7 0 None 111 1 6 2 11 4 3 4 5 or More Publications 700 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 600 500 400 300 311 295 200 92 82 100 55 54 79 42 26 27 98 15 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 209 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PD-7 Number of Work Experiences Pediatrics U.S. Seniors Matched 381 400 327 350 301 288 300 250 Not Matched 229 208 200 150 100 50 15 14 11 11 0 None 1 2 20 7 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 400 350 300 250 183 200 150 100 107 65 144 119 90 86 92 84 54 50 None 1 2 3 84 68 4 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 210 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PD-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Pediatrics U.S. Seniors Matched 450 Not Matched 440 400 350 300 250 209 200 139 150 100 50 173 18 0 124 74 46 9 3 2 None 179 178 154 1 9 7 2 3 8 4 7 6 5 6 6 7 18 3 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Independent Applicants Matched 450 Not Matched 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 107 66 96 61 103 70 77 64 63 51 50 50 49 85 51 28 28 16 27 12 29 11 32 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 211 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PD-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Pediatrics Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 1,800 1,600 1,533 Matched 1,800 Not Matched 1,600 1,400 1,400 1,200 1,200 1,000 1,000 800 800 600 200 400 201 77 200 1 No 0 Yes Ph.D. Degree 1,800 1,600 19 No Yes 1,800 1,662 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,200 1,000 1,000 800 800 600 600 400 400 200 59 Other Graduate Degree 1,400 0 582 600 400 0 1,152 77 No 72 200 1 0 Yes 1,580 64 No 154 14 Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 212 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 PM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 213 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table PM-1 Summary Statistics Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation U.S. Seniors Matched (n=178) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=19) Matched (n=174) Unmatched (n=113) 10.9 4.0 7.4 3.1 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.4 1.9 1.3 1.6 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 214 195 212 203 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 224 200 213 205 5. Mean number of research experiences 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.2 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 2.1 1.5 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.8 3.1 3.8 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 6.2 5.2 5.5 3.5 9. Percentage who are AOA members 3.9 0.0 n/a n/a 22.5 5.3 n/a n/a 1.1 0.0 n/a n/a 7.3 26.3 n/a n/a 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 214 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Chart PM-1 60 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 40 35 21 19 20 9 6 6 1 0 1 2 4 1 9 5 3 2 1 4 12 11 7 0 5 3 0 6 16 7 7 0 8 9 0 10 1 0 11 8 4 12 8 1 0 13 0 14 15 0 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Independent Applicants Matched 60 Not Matched 48 40 20 20 19 17 17 11 16 10 8 8 10 8 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 11 10 1 0 17 16 0 7 8 3 2 9 10 11 1 0 11 12 1 1 13 4 0 14 9 5 0 15 1 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 215 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph PM-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 216 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PM-2 150 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation U.S. Seniors Matched 129 Not Matched 120 90 60 29 30 19 8 6 5 0 1 2 1 3 0 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 150 Independent Applicants 138 Matched Not Matched 120 90 68 60 29 23 30 11 11 0 1 2 3 2 2 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 217 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PM-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation U.S. Seniors Matched 120 Not Matched 100 80 60 40 30 20 0 2 4 <= 180 11 5 Between 181 and 190 41 35 23 3 2 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 19 3 2 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 13 0 Between 231 and 240 0 Between 241 and 250 2 0 1 Between 251 and 260 0 >260 1 0 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Independent Applicants Matched 120 Not Matched 104 100 80 60 40 32 15 20 0 0 5 <= 180 19 18 4 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 12 17 Between 201 and 210 16 12 10 Between 211 and 220 9 Between 221 and 230 4 2 Between 231 and 240 4 2 Between 241 and 250 1 1 Between 251 and 260 0 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 218 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph PM-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 160 180 200 220 Independent Applicants 240 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 219 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PM-4 120 USMLE Step 2 Scores Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 100 80 60 40 21 20 0 34 33 0 3 <= 180 9 1 Between 181 and 190 10 3 Between 191 and 200 21 3 Between 201 and 210 22 19 3 1 0 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 1 Between 241 and 250 8 0 Between 251 and 260 1 4 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 120 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 104 100 80 60 40 33 20 0 0 0 <= 180 8 13 Between 181 and 190 22 11 Between 191 and 200 17 18 Between 201 and 210 12 17 10 Between 211 and 220 6 Between 221 and 230 8 1 Between 231 and 240 4 3 Between 241 and 250 0 0 Between 251 and 260 0 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 220 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PM-5 Number of Research Projects Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation U.S. Seniors 70 Matched 60 Not Matched 56 50 40 30 35 35 26 19 20 10 7 3 5 7 2 1 0 None 1 2 3 4 1 5 or More Research Projects Independent Applicants 70 Matched 64 Not Matched 60 50 45 47 40 30 26 27 24 20 20 7 10 11 5 8 3 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 221 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PM-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation U.S. Seniors Matched 100 80 Not Matched 67 60 41 40 28 16 20 8 15 11 5 3 2 0 None 1 2 1 0 3 4 5 or More Publications Independent Applicants 100 Matched Not Matched 87 80 60 51 40 28 22 20 25 17 10 10 6 7 2 0 None 1 2 3 22 4 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 222 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PM-7 50 Number of Work Experiences Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation U.S. Seniors Matched 40 32 37 35 33 Not Matched 30 27 20 14 10 4 4 2 5 4 0 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Independent Applicants Matched 50 44 40 30 Not Matched 38 35 28 24 19 18 20 22 21 14 12 12 10 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 223 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PM-8 30 Number of Volunteer Experiences Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation U.S. Seniors Matched 25 Not Matched 24 22 20 22 19 17 16 27 15 15 10 7 6 5 2 3 3 2 0 0 None 1 2 2 3 3 2 4 5 2 6 7 2 1 0 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Independent Applicants 30 Matched 28 Not Matched 29 25 21 20 20 16 15 15 21 19 13 11 13 9 10 12 11 10 8 4 5 8 6 6 4 3 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 224 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PM-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 180 171 160 Matched 180 Not Matched 160 140 140 120 120 100 100 80 80 60 60 40 40 40 19 20 0 138 7 No 18 20 0 0 Yes 1 No Ph.D. Degree 180 Other Graduate Degree 176 180 160 160 140 140 120 120 100 100 80 80 60 60 165 40 40 19 20 0 Yes 2 No 14 20 0 0 Yes No 13 5 Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 225 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 PS Plastic Surgery Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 226 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table PS-1 Summary Statistics Plastic Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched (n=74) 10.7 r Measure 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=94) r 6.5 Matched (n=7) r 3.3 Unmatched (n=22) r 4.3 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 2.3 2.6 2.3 2.3 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 249 238 221 226 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 249 242 223 225 5. Mean number of research experiences 3.8 3.7 3.9 2.6 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 8.1 6.1 12.7 10.6 2.3 2.8 1.7 3.9 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 7.1 6.3 4.1 4.1 9. Percentage who are AOA members 45.9 27.7 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 52.7 35.1 n/a n/a 6.8 3.2 n/a n/a 5.4 7.4 n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. r: Revised Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 227 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Chart PS-1 Plastic Surgery r U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 20 18 16 14 15 12 12 12 10 8 9 8 6 5 6 4 2 0 10 2 6 7 6 5 3 2 5 3 6 2 2 4 3 4 6 5 7 5 3 2 3 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Independent Applicants Matched 20 Not Matched 18 16 14 12 10 10 8 6 4 3 3 2 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or More Contiguous Ranks r: Revised Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 228 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph PS-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Plastic Surgery r 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks r: Revised Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 229 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PS-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Plastic Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched 50 46 Not Matched 47 43 40 30 26 20 10 2 1 0 3 0 1 2 3 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 50 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 40 30 20 11 10 0 3 1 1 3 6 3 2 2 0 3 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 230 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PS-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Plastic Surgery U.S. Seniors 25 Matched Not Matched 22 20 23 18 17 15 15 5 0 1 <= 180 3 0 0 Between 181 and 190 0 Between 191 and 200 1 2 Between 201 and 210 14 10 9 10 0 22 7 2 2 Between 211 and 220 0 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 Between 241 and 250 Between 251 and 260 >260 0 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Independent Applicants 25 Matched Not Matched 20 15 10 6 5 0 0 0 <= 180 1 2 Between 181 and 190 0 1 Between 191 and 200 2 2 Between 201 and 210 0 3 1 0 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 2 Between 231 and 240 0 2 Between 241 and 250 1 2 Between 251 and 260 0 0 >260 1 3 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 231 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph PS-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Plastic Surgery 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 160 180 200 220 Independent Applicants 240 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 232 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PS-4 40 USMLE Step 2 Scores Plastic Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 33 30 20 14 11 16 10 10 0 0 0 <= 180 0 Between 181 and 190 3 1 0 Between 191 and 200 0 2 1 Between 201 and 210 22 19 12 10 8 4 2 0 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 Between 241 and 250 Between 251 and 260 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 40 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 30 20 10 0 0 0 <= 180 0 1 Between 181 and 190 1 1 Between 191 and 200 1 4 Between 201 and 210 1 2 1 Between 211 and 220 3 Between 221 and 230 1 3 Between 231 and 240 0 2 Between 241 and 250 0 2 Between 251 and 260 1 1 >260 1 3 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 233 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PS-5 Number of Research Projects Plastic Surgery U.S. Seniors 30 Matched 25 Not Matched 21 21 20 15 22 19 17 13 10 5 26 10 8 5 4 2 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Independent Applicants 30 Matched Not Matched 25 20 15 10 5 4 3 1 0 0 None 4 5 3 2 0 1 2 3 2 4 4 1 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 234 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PS-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Plastic Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched 50 Not Matched 47 43 40 30 20 11 10 8 6 4 12 11 10 9 6 1 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Publications 50 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 40 30 20 13 10 0 6 5 1 1 0 None 1 1 0 1 0 2 3 1 0 4 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 235 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PS-7 Number of Work Experiences Plastic Surgery U.S. Seniors 20 Matched 18 16 15 15 16 12 20 Not Matched 17 16 12 11 10 10 5 5 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Independent Applicants Matched 20 Not Matched 15 10 7 5 5 2 3 2 3 1 2 1 0 None 1 2 2 0 3 4 1 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 236 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PS-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Plastic Surgery U.S. Seniors Matched 20 20 Not Matched 16 15 13 13 10 10 5 5 1 2 7 6 9 8 7 7 5 4 3 9 6 6 5 6 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences 20 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 15 10 5 5 3 1 1 1 0 None 1 2 0 3 3 0 2 1 0 3 4 1 0 5 6 2 2 2 0 1 0 7 8 9 0 1 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 237 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart PS-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Plastic Surgery Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 100 90 Matched 80 100 Not Matched 90 80 68 70 70 60 61 60 50 40 40 50 34 40 26 30 39 35 33 30 20 20 10 10 0 No 0 Yes No Ph.D. Degree 100 80 70 Other Graduate Degree 100 91 90 80 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 0 5 No 87 90 69 10 Yes 70 10 3 0 Yes 7 4 No Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 238 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 P Psychiatry Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 239 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table P-1 Summary Statistics Psychiatry U.S. Seniors Matched (n=630) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=28) Matched (n=402) Unmatched (n=537) 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks 8.5 4.1 5.9 2.7 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.1 1.4 1.3 1.3 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 214 198 209 200 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 225 200 211 203 5. Mean number of research experiences 2.1 1.6 1.5 1.4 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 3.0 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.3 3.6 4.3 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 5.9 4.5 3.8 2.6 9. Percentage who are AOA members 4.6 0.0 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 35.1 25.0 n/a n/a 5.1 0.0 n/a n/a 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree 13.2 10.7 n/a n/a n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 240 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart P-1 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Psychiatry U.S. Seniors Matched 300 Not Matched 250 200 150 92 100 50 22 7 22 5 0 1 2 27 23 4 2 3 61 55 39 2 4 59 2 5 2 6 51 1 7 2 0 8 9 49 10 37 1 11 26 26 0 0 12 0 13 13 14 28 0 15 0 16 or More Contiguous Ranks 300 Independent Applicants Matched 275 Not Matched 250 200 150 100 108 69 47 49 43 50 29 28 29 16 29 14 26 7 29 7 19 9 22 8 16 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 3 14 12 2 5 0 13 9 0 14 3 0 15 13 11 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 241 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph P-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Psychiatry 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 242 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart P-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Psychiatry U.S. Seniors 600 Matched 591 Not Matched 500 400 300 200 100 21 35 5 0 1 4 2 1 1 0 3 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 600 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 500 415 400 300 310 200 93 73 100 22 15 0 1 2 3 5 4 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 243 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart P-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Psychiatry U.S. Seniors 160 Matched 124 111 120 Not Matched 106 92 80 40 69 45 42 20 7 2 0 <= 180 Between 181 and 190 7 Between 191 and 200 7 Between 201 and 210 3 1 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 14 1 Between 231 and 240 0 Between 241 and 250 0 5 Between 251 and 260 0 >260 2 0 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Independent Applicants 160 Matched 159 Not Matched 130 120 71 80 55 44 40 0 109 103 3 51 42 31 14 8 <= 180 41 28 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 15 Between 231 and 240 14 8 Between 241 and 250 9 2 Between 251 and 260 1 1 >260 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 244 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph P-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Psychiatry 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 160 180 200 220 Independent Applicants 240 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 245 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart P-4 150 USMLE Step 2 Scores Psychiatry U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 120 97 101 97 98 90 65 60 52 45 30 5 0 13 1 <= 180 6 2 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 3 Between 201 and 210 2 1 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 12 1 Between 231 and 240 45 0 Between 241 and 250 0 Between 251 and 260 12 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 150 Independent Applicants Matched 129 115 120 90 113 110 78 69 60 39 35 51 42 30 0 1 Not Matched 43 30 18 18 5 <= 180 Between 181 and 190 Between 191 and 200 Between 201 and 210 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 16 12 Between 241 and 250 10 1 Between 251 and 260 2 2 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 246 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart P-5 Number of Research Projects Psychiatry U.S. Seniors Matched 200 148 160 Not Matched 141 126 120 105 80 64 46 40 9 6 6 5 None 1 2 2 0 0 3 4 5 or More Research Projects Independent Applicants 199 200 Matched 154 160 120 Not Matched 121 117 83 77 80 46 42 40 31 21 20 28 0 None 1 2 Research Projects 3 4 5 or More Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 247 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart P-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Psychiatry U.S. Seniors Matched 300 250 Not Matched 223 200 150 132 112 100 73 50 61 29 18 3 0 None 0 1 0 2 7 0 3 4 5 or More Publications Independent Applicants 300 Matched 276 Not Matched 250 200 201 150 98 100 71 68 60 45 36 34 50 21 18 11 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 248 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart P-7 Number of Work Experiences Psychiatry U.S. Seniors Matched 200 150 100 127 115 Not Matched 114 108 98 68 50 8 6 5 4 0 None 1 2 3 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Independent Applicants Matched 200 Not Matched 199 150 126 100 50 68 53 62 89 80 65 68 47 43 39 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 249 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart P-8 Number of Volunteer Experiences Psychiatry U.S. Seniors Matched 150 Not Matched 108 100 75 74 73 68 53 47 50 27 28 3 0 42 35 4 2 None 1 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 5 6 3 7 1 2 1 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences 150 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 128 100 88 86 67 70 66 59 45 50 59 37 47 37 36 24 18 13 12 15 8 10 4 10 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 250 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart P-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Psychiatry Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 700 600 601 Matched 700 Not Matched 600 500 500 400 400 300 300 200 221 200 100 0 409 100 29 28 No 0 0 Yes 21 No Ph.D. Degree 700 598 600 500 500 400 400 300 300 200 200 100 0 Yes Other Graduate Degree 700 600 7 28 No 547 83 100 32 0 0 Yes 25 No 3 Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 251 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 RO Radiation Oncology Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 252 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Table RO-1 Summary Statistics Radiation Oncology U.S. Seniors Matched (n=154) Measure Independent Applicants Unmatched (n=27) Matched (n=10) Unmatched (n=20) 10.8 4.3 7.0 3.5 2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.8 2.1 1.7 1.7 3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 240 217 241 214 4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 244 222 246 216 5. Mean number of research experiences 4.2 3.9 4.5 2.9 6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 7. Mean number of work experiences 8.3 6.6 9.6 7.3 2.2 2.8 2.5 3.9 8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 5.9 5.2 7.9 3.0 9. Percentage who are AOA members 31.2 7.4 n/a n/a 10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding 11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 45.5 33.3 n/a n/a 22.1 14.8 n/a n/a 7.8 22.2 n/a n/a 1. Mean number of contiguous ranks 12. Percentage who have another graduate degree n/a: The measure either does not apply to, applies to only a small percentage of, or no reliable data were available for independent applicants. Sources: Measures 1, 2, and match outcome are from the NRMP Data Warehouse; measures 3 and 4 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse and from the ECFMG, both by permission of the NBME and ECFMG; measures 5-9 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse; measure 10 is from the NIH website (http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateDate.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls); and measures 11 and 12 are from the AAMC Data Warehouse. Note: USMLE Step 1 scores are not available for most osteopathic medical school graduates included in the independent applicant group. Approximately 20 percent of U.S. allopathic medical school seniors do not take the USMLE Step 2 prior to the Match. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 253 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Number of Contiguous Ranks Within Preferred Specialty Chart RO-1 Radiation Oncology U.S. Seniors Matched 25 Not Matched 21 20 20 15 15 9 10 4 5 5 4 1 5 3 11 9 5 2 5 1 1 3 4 5 11 11 8 3 3 2 6 7 1 0 0 1 12 11 8 9 0 10 0 11 0 12 0 13 0 14 15 0 16 or More Contiguous Ranks 25 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 20 15 10 5 8 4 2 0 1 2 1 0 2 3 2 0 4 1 0 5 2 1 6 1 0 7 0 0 8 1 0 9 1 0 10 1 0 11 1 0 12 0 0 13 0 0 14 1 0 15 1 0 16 or More Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 254 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph RO-1 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of Contiguous Ranks Radiation Oncology 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 U.S. Seniors Independent Applicants 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of Contiguous Ranks Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 255 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart RO-2 Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked Radiation Oncology U.S. Seniors Matched 80 70 Not Matched 68 60 49 50 40 33 30 20 12 6 10 8 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked 80 Independent Applicants Matched 70 Not Matched 60 50 40 30 20 10 11 5 5 4 0 1 4 0 2 3 1 0 4 or More Distinct Specialties Ranked Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 256 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart RO-3 USMLE Step 1 Scores Radiation Oncology U.S. Seniors Matched 50 Not Matched 41 40 30 21 20 16 10 0 30 26 0 1 <= 180 1 2 Between 181 and 190 3 5 Between 191 and 200 9 2 Between 201 and 210 6 4 7 4 Between 211 and 220 Between 221 and 230 1 Between 231 and 240 Between 241 and 250 1 0 Between 251 and 260 >260 1 0 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Independent Applicants 50 Matched Not Matched 40 30 20 10 0 0 1 <= 180 0 2 Between 181 and 190 0 0 Between 191 and 200 1 4 Between 201 and 210 0 4 2 Between 211 and 220 4 Between 221 and 230 1 3 Between 231 and 240 2 1 Between 241 and 250 2 0 Between 251 and 260 1 0 >260 1 1 Score Unknown Step 1 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 257 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Graph RO-2 Probability of Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score Radiation Oncology 1.00 Probability of Matching 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 U.S. Seniors 0.00 160 180 200 220 Independent Applicants 240 260 280 Step 1 Score Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2009-2011 applicants. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 258 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart RO-4 60 USMLE Step 2 Scores Radiation Oncology U.S. Seniors 59 Matched Not Matched 50 40 30 25 20 10 0 0 2 <= 180 1 1 Between 181 and 190 1 1 Between 191 and 200 4 0 Between 201 and 210 1 2 5 2 Between 211 and 220 18 16 14 Between 221 and 230 Between 231 and 240 15 3 Between 241 and 250 10 1 Between 251 and 260 0 >260 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores 60 Independent Applicants Matched 50 Not Matched 40 30 20 10 0 0 1 <= 180 0 2 Between 181 and 190 1 1 Between 191 and 200 0 2 Between 201 and 210 5 1 0 Between 211 and 220 3 Between 221 and 230 1 3 Between 231 and 240 2 1 Between 241 and 250 2 1 Between 251 and 260 2 0 >260 1 1 Score Unknown Step 2 Scores Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse. USMLE scores by permission of the NBME and ECFMG. Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 259 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart RO-5 Number of Research Projects Radiation Oncology U.S. Seniors 80 Matched Not Matched 61 60 42 40 21 20 18 11 1 0 2 1 None 1 10 7 4 2 3 3 4 5 or More Research Projects 80 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 60 40 20 0 3 1 None 6 0 1 2 1 3 1 2 3 3 0 4 6 4 5 or More Research Projects Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 260 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart RO-6 Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications Radiation Oncology U.S. Seniors Matched 120 Not Matched 101 100 80 60 40 20 7 2 0 11 None 2 1 17 14 12 9 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 or More Publications 120 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 100 80 60 40 20 0 2 0 None 3 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 4 7 11 5 or More Publications Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 261 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart RO-7 Number of Work Experiences Radiation Oncology U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 50 40 40 30 34 30 19 20 10 6 3 17 14 7 6 3 2 0 None 1 2 3 4 5 or More Work Experiences 50 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 40 30 20 10 0 1 1 None 5 2 1 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 4 5 1 5 or More Work Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 262 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Number of Volunteer Experiences Chart RO-8 Radiation Oncology U.S. Seniors Matched Not Matched 30 25 23 21 20 20 14 10 7 9 8 7 2 0 0 None 1 8 6 5 2 12 2 3 3 2 4 5 2 6 3 2 7 0 8 9 10 or More Volunteer Experiences 30 Independent Applicants Matched Not Matched 20 10 4 0 0 None 2 0 1 3 1 3 0 2 3 5 2 4 2 4 1 1 5 0 6 0 0 7 1 0 8 0 0 9 1 10 or More Volunteer Experiences Source: NRMP Data Warehouse and AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 263 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011 Chart RO-9 Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors Radiation Oncology Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding AOA Membership 150 Matched 150 Not Matched 106 100 100 84 70 48 50 50 25 18 2 0 No 0 Yes 9 No Ph.D. Degree Yes Other Graduate Degree 150 150 142 120 100 100 50 23 0 50 34 21 4 No 0 Yes No 12 6 Yes Source: AOA membership from the AAMC Data Warehouse, NIH awards from http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/AggregateData.cfm Medical Schools Only.xls, Ph.D. and other graduate degrees from the AAMC Data Warehouse Copyright ©2011 NRMP and AAMC. Copies may be made for educational or noncommercial uses only. 264 Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011