�
,
':/
';:.�:i �" '.
.'
�i;" '(�_: -?
I'
.-
-:
;
j
'
,
,
,
',;
"Camera
.
",
,
.
.?
.
. .
'
.
..
.'
'
..
.:
'1 'I .
'.
.
,
.
.,
'
". '
, ,': '
:,
-I.,
,
'. .
."
'
1
,. ,
"
,'1"-': ;'
"
:;.;
� ,:
:'
.-.
.'I '
,
.'
'.
i
"
�'�;\J�j;jj:,w,X:;�>;'::,'J!·.'
.
,
'>
}\
�: ,
'"
�} ;
. ,�.
.. '
'.:
; .t.
.
�
';
'
'
1,'
,' ,
, .\;
:�
'
.. "
. '�
"
,I
•
.
;�
'-: .
t,
,
.;
.
.
.,
..
..' , .
"
.�
,
r."
,, :
.
.
"
r
•
;
.
-
.
...
.
.
"
. . ;" ;1'
.
. :'
.
)
"
';"
{:
;
'
,
"
'
.�.
:
. -",
( :.
.. '
.
"
.
. ' . ;.�
.
.
·r'·
.
/.
:
',' ; :
"
,. '
'
'
::
.
.')\" ",
"i
I. ,
'''
.
..
.
:;;
'.
j
. Jet Propulsion Laboratory . , ,;" .
Calilornia Inst�ute ofTechnoiogy.
-,'
:
.
);- .
,
'
.
..
:,.
'
"
.
, ,:
:·JPL
";
,.
.'
"
";\
�}
!'
,
"
' ,
.
, 'I,
,
� ; ;; .
.
"
.
.
"
(, .
, ,'
"i
,1
.,
" '\ :
",. ,
.
.
.: �
'. :
TJl
'.
.:. .:
,
,
:�
,.
':<: '
, "
10
Iii
=J
J>
5/ 21/9 3
AGENDA
WFPC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
27-28 May 1993
JPL 180-101
presenter
8:30AM
Welcome & Introduction
Simmons
8:40AM
Review Purpose and Structure
Devirian
8:50AM
Review Board Chairmen Comments
JPUGSFC
9:00AM
Science Objectives
Trauger
9:15AM
Instrument Description & Status Overview
Beckert
9:30AM
System Design Change Summary
Rockey
9:45AM
EMI/EMC Test Resutts
Whittlesey
10:05AM
Dynamics Test Resutts, Weight and C.G.
BrenV O'Connell
10:35AM
Thermal Vac Test Summary and Resutts
Gallagher/Garcia
11 :35AM
Lunch
12:25PM
Optical Alignment Results
Macenka
12:55PM
Science Calibration and Characterization
Trauger
1:40PM
Contamination Control Status
Scon-MonckITaylor
2:10PM
Open Items/Plans for future work/test
Gallagher
2:20PM
Performance Verification Status Overview (CM-02)
Rockey
2:55PM
Compliance wijh Environmental Test Requirements
Gibbel
3:10PM
ECR, Waiver, DAR and Limited Life Items
Thomas
3:25PM
Mechanical Envelope Verification Measurements
Herrell
3:40PM
Acceptance Data Package Description & Status
Martin
3:55PM
Safety Data Package and Compliance Verification
Ross
4:15PM
Reliabilijy and QA Summary/PFR History & Status/Risk Assessment
Schneider
5:00PM
Adjourn
28-May
8:30AM
Post-Shipment Preparations Overview
Collins
8:45AM
Transportation & Handling Plans
Argoud
9:05AM
GSFC I&T Plan
Collins
9:20AM
KSC Launch Processing Flow
Collins
9:35AM
GSFC/KSC Facility Evaluation
•
Schneider
9:45AM
Summary
Devirian
9:55AM
Review Board Meeting/Consent to Ship
JPUGSFC
I
�
w
:E
«
0
�
�
W
Z
«
...I
Q.
C
...I
W
LL
W
C
-
-
�
.J
Il.
.,
�
w
-
>
W
0::
Q.
J:
en
W
0::
Q.
-
I
(II)
en
en
..
�
co
N
I
......
N
�:E
Q)
•
:l
...
as.
..CD
•
==
E
(I)
.>
(I) .
as
0
..
as
CD
>-
a:
c:
as
Ii:
C.
.-
CD
'C
(I)
J:
'C
.u..
en
3:
0..
Gi
•
.-
�
(.)
:l
•
...
en
-C
C
as
Q)
en
0
C.
•
:l
a..
.J
D.
.,
Wide Field Planetary Camera
JPL
Pre-Ship Review Purpose & Structure
Purpose
•
Verify that testing has been completed with no unacceptable problems or
anomalies
•
Assess the extent to which flight qualification criteria were attained
•
Evaluate readiness of hardware and software for delivery
5120193
MO-2
Wide Field Planetary Camera
.JPL CRITERIA FOR INSTRUMENT SHI PMENT
•
WFPC must have completed all planned testing and verifications, as
documented in the Performance Verification Plan, except for:
a. those compatibility items which can only be verified at GSFC; or
b. those requirements for which waivers have been approved.
•
•
•
Transportation vehicles and equipment must have been successfully tested,
using approved procedures, and ready for shipment.
Facilities at GSFC (Bldg. 29 cleanroom) must be confirmed to be ready to
receive WFPC-II and associated GSE.
WFPC ground operations team, along with all required GSE, must be ready
to deploy to support GSFC and KSC pre-launch operations.
5/20/93
MO-3
Wide Field Planetary Camera
AGENDA
.JPL
27-28 May 1993
180-101
Ti m e
Topic
Presenter
8:30 AM
Welcome & Introduction
Simmons
8:40 AM
Review Purpose and Structure
Devirian
8:50 AM
Review Board Chairmen Comments
JPUGSFC
9:00 AM
Science Objectives
Trauger
9:15 AM
Instrument Description & Status Overview
Beckert
9:30 AM
System Design Change Summary
Rockey
9:45 AM
EMIIEMC Test Results
Whittlesey
10:05 AM
Dynamics Test Results, Weight and C.G.
BrenV O'Connell
10:35 AM
Thermal Vac Test Summary and Results
Gallagher/Garcia
11:35 AM
5121/93
JPL
Lunch
12:25 PM
Optical Alignment Results
Macenka
12:55 PM
Science Calibration and Characterization
Trauger
1:40 PM
Contamination Control Status
Scott-MoncklTaylor
2:10 PM
Open Items/Plans for future work/test
Gallagher
2:20 PM
Performance Verification Status Overview (CM-02)
Rockey
2:55 PM
Compliance with Environmental Test Requirements
Gibbel
3:10 PM
ECR, Waiver, DAR and Limited Life Items
Thomas
3:25 PM
Mechanical Envelope Verification Measurements
Herrell
3:40 PM
Acceptance Data Package Description & Status
Martin
3:55 PM
Safety Data Package and Compliance Verification
Ross
4:15 PM
Reliability and QA Summary/PFR H istory & Status/Risk Assessment
Schneider
5:00 PM
Adjourn
MD·4
Wide Field Planetary Camera
AGENDA, continued
JPL
Time
Topic
P resente r
28-May
8:30 AM·
Post-Shipment Preparations Overview
Collins
Transportation & Handling Plans
Argoud
9:05 AM
GSFC 1&T Plan
9:20 AM
KSC Launch Processing Flow
Collins
8:45 AM
9:35 AM
GSFC/KSC Facility Evaluation
Collins
Schneider
9:45 AM
Summary
Devirian
9:55 AM
Review Board Meeting/Consent to Ship
JPUGSFC
5/20/93
MO-5
"'i'
<[
a:
w
:E
<[
(,)
>
a:
<[
Iw
2
<[
...I
a.
-
C
...I
W
u:::
w
c
i
en
w
>
-
I0
W
�
0
W
0
2
w
-
0
en
�
CD
(W)
en
en
....
.c
N
-
CD
>
a:
Q.
-
-
en
I
CD
...
a.
..
....
>
m
==
...
CD
0)
::::J
m
...
I-
..,
JPL
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
INSTRUMENT DESCRIPTION &
STATUS OVERVIEW
MAY 27-28,1993
JEWEL BECKERT
,
HST:, WFPC-2
,
,
arA IrnAgd:
- ,,
,
,
I
,
,
5DFeu.,,:
,--I-
�
,
5
F124
Pickoff
Mlm>r
Mech.lln16m
,
Ooclo"
;
(6.y3)
SOF
5o,",ct.
1
r-
s;t:t
RJUe �
�
RJU6
I-
�,uo .....
�UA� I-t
,
,
,
,
,
...... !)USA:
...... �USOI
,
I
RfU
A
I-
DI".".
TlI.I
S....I
I
r-
CH Elee.
(CH I)
CH Elee.
(CH 2·4)
I
r
CMD& �
TlI.I
5�
r ���
M
I
Engr.
Oat.o
Meeh.
Driver"
CCD.
TEC
1--4)
(eH
TEeps
I+-
.y
M.scJunlsms
&umpt
EMf
Fltte.6o>c
Select
_
h
Pow..ON/OFF
B@,
SOFA
CCD
I'.1ndowo
(CH 2-4)
1-
1-
�
0
ElcctrI",,1
UlrTOr
t.i:
PC Relay
0 '"
( 130)
Optlc.
(FI12.9)
LVPS
•
0.,1-5
&o-U .....
OfF
WFPC-II Functional Block Diagram
..
PC fold
MlrrO(
(FI3O )
11 AFJ..f
WFCReloy
l+�
----+
Pyramid
H..t
. 1.Iochr;�;j
_
I
PATHS
- --"--
1 1 f'YR ump. 1
� ,[.r;:"4) �I
Mcch.PS
Hoa...-.
CAL L.mpo
CCO
I'.IM<Iow
(CH I)
�-
ON/OFF
5..!...
f'ower
1
f+-
(CH 2-4)
romp.
Co_oI
1
.�
�
Logic
1
�
CCO
(CH I)
�
I.
I
AFM
E1ect.ron1c.
"'"""'"
"-
(6oy 4)
Clode IIF
CI�1t
WCALLsmp
_____
�
OSP/ADC
-I
.... - VIS CAL ump.
OSP/ADC
Clade I/F
S.1ect
Ooclo 0
;"p';t
ou.
I
5DF 6
,
....
�-
SOF A
,
,
,
-0
C.IFUp
MlrTOr"
MW1..nr�
�
Y.JFC Fold
MlrTonlo
(FI12.9)
__
,
n Fbc6<l
�
1:3,+. "h"'�
Radiator
r1RcPf.
Her•.
ON/OFF
f-.
L
HP Her..
ON/OFF
Ho.ot
0.,
0.,.
&Oi
Hoat
f-- .HrI
Hut
R.a.::!l.ItMh4..t
to -V'GO
J
Wide-Field!._ �letary Camera
Cutaway View
Showing Interior
RADIATORIBAY 5
SUPPORT STRUTS
. MULTILAYER
INSULATION
RADIATOR
LIGHT SEAL
RADIATOR
SUPPORT STRUTS
-V
3
�
MULTILAYER
INSULATION
'-.
LIGHT BAFFLE
HEAT
PIPES
PVRAMln (FIXED)
OPTICAL BENCH
(GRAPHITE EPOXY)
FILTER SELECTOR
(48 FILTERS)
UV FOLD MIRROR
1124 PICK-OFF
MIRROR
-V2
ELECTRONICS
COMPARTMENT
�I
REGISTRATION
FiniNG· POINT B
OPTICAL BENCH
SUPPORT STRUTS
......�+
V3
-v
,
REGISTRATION
FiniNG
POINT A
PICK·OFF MIRROR
MECHANISM
ENTRANCE
APERTURE
PURG,,-... AS LINE
HEAT PIPES
CONNECTOR
RADIATOR/BAY 5
SUPPORT STRUTS
3-V
MULTILAYER INSULATION
RELAY OPTICS ASSEMBLY
-
111II1�32§'&"'Jf\J@:���
LIGHT BAFFLE
MULTILAYER INSULATION
OPTICAL BENCH (GRAPHITE EPOXY)
ENTRANCE APERTURE
1/24 PICK-OFF
MIRROR
JACKING ROD AND
CONNECTOR LOCK,CONNECTOR
BRACKET
+V3
PICK-OFF MIRROR
MECHANISM
I
�
-v,
REGISTRATION
FiniNG
POINT A
�+V
REGISTRATION FiniNG
OPTICAL
POINT C
BENCH
SUPPORT STRUTS
INVAR BULKHEAD
2
OPTICAL BENCH
SUPPORT STRUTS
PYRAMID (FIXED)
FOLD MIRRORS (3 ARTICULATING,
FILTER SELECTOR (48 FILTERS)
1
FIXED)
MULTILAYER
INSULATION
EVA HANDRAIL
TRIPOD
ASSEMBLY
I���
WIDE FIELD/PLANETARY CAMERA - II
JET PROPULSION LABORATORY
PROJECT SCHEDULE
APPROVAL:
1991
ACTIVITY
I
�
STATUS AS OF:
May 27, 1993
REV G, DATE:
Dec 14, 1992
CREATION DATE:
Oct 31, 1991
FY91
J
1993
1992
FY92
FY93
1994
FY94
REVIEWS
2
3
4
REL OPT PNULSFLe,'Y STIM
"
5
6
7
m�
II
"
16
e"'�-:'S/GFE/IVT ABA
[9) [SAF)
'LATING FOLD MIRRORS
[IIIJ [SAF)
, HEADS
(I-5J
_._
-
__
_______ 0 . 0
OPTICAL BENCH
HOUSING
[29) [SAFJ
[27) [SAF)
19
MECHANISM COVER
20
RADIATOR & TRUSS
CABLING
(FLT,
[4BJ [SAF)
[110) [SAF)
GSE & Ttvl [34J [SAFJ
22
THRML SYS-HEAT PIPES. MLI [21} (SAF)
23
FLIP MIRROR MECHANISM
24
PICKOFF MECH,
25
FIXED PYRAMID ASSEMBLY
[99] [SAF]
ARM & COVER [I] [SAF)
[I] [SAF)
26 BAKEOUTS & ADSORBER DEVICE [lOJ [SAF)
27 INTEGRATION AND TEST
2B
OPT BENCH INTEG & ALIGN
[0)
H
30
EMI/EMC & DYNAMICS TESTS
[0)
WT.
H
H
[0] (9)
31
32
33
..................
.........r-"".... ............
SYST VERIF,
� _GSFC
CG,
T/V & SCI CAL
FNL CLOSEOUT,
SERVICING
& KSC OPERATIONS
SHIP
r....' ,-_,
[0)
-'--'--'
I
i
i
i
"
i
t-++-t....t-t--l
.J
,It-t-+-t-lt-t-+-+-II-t--t
."IIUVC.
4 ,,0:;. '.
·_-._=
FAB CERT DELIVER
CERT T
lolL!
_De lolL
�
i;����S
__
;�
�
/
�
F
L
V
.CCVER
e'M
S
����::�ii����!:���������� �' f'� :t"";;Mt:L' :J::J::J::t::J::t::J::t::J::t::J::l
PVRAMIO -FOLOS
SM REV SIPE CO� CMO/TLM :"OV:R"': SM PLAN OPS PLAN P FLT READINESS REV
u � [OSFC IST"':SlP' INHl\7"UNCH&FLT SUP;>
"if......
••
HSG
_•
1
11
.1 .1 .1 .1
.1 .1
I I
1
SVS
1
1
...
NOTES:
4-CAMERA BASELINE WITH AFMs
FOR [XX) [YYJ: XX DENOTES' OF WORKING DAYS FLOAT ON 31 OCTOBER 1991
YY DENOTES. OF WORKING DAYS FLOAT AS OF STATUS OATE
Rev. A:
Rev. B:
..
•
0_._0
STRUCTURES AND MECHANISMS
.. I<IO O"S .EW SUI MONITOR CAM
_
[5) [SAF)
LUHAL l,;l,;US. t A�. t"KI.i. !)I,;Ht.t.N l4J I::iAt J
fER, SOFA & FILTERS [69J [SAFf
18
RI�.BAFiT. EVA
NULL.
[l2J [SAF)
IONIC BAYS
17
21
[20J [SAF)
_
IONICS
_CAl,IBRATION SUBSYSTEM
12
�
•
.1
1
_
J
I
1
1
.1.1
...
AODED MILESTONES, SCIENCE DELIVERABLES, CRITICAL PATH INFO 11/30/91
FACILITY IMPACT,OPTICS RELOCATIONS FOR AFMs,PC CAMERA RELOCATION 1/20/92
1_'"
_
...
I I I I I I I I
1
�
�::,
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
'I;iI
1
,
Rev, C:
Rev, 0:
MID-FY92 REPLAN (4/20/921
RETROFIT FIXED PYR ASSEMBLY,
Rev, E:
Rev. F:
Rev. G:
FY93 REPLAN, DELIVER 5-31-93 (9-21-921
EXTEND T/V TEST, DELIVER 6-7-93 (11-30-921
INCLUDE CCD TILT PC CAM, DELIVER 6-11-92 (12-14-921
DELIVER 5-31-93
(6-1-921
, .PL3/May 25. 199�
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
SUMMARY OF
SYSTEM DESIGN CHANGES
MAY 27-28,
1992
DON ROCKEY
WFPC-II SYSTEM ENGINEER
HEAT PIPES
CAMERA HEAD
RADIATOR/BAY 5
SUPPORT STRUTS
MULTILAYER INSULATION
-
/'
�IIIW� W-&4\�
EVA HANDRAIL
TRIPOD
ASSEMBLY
LIGHT BAFFLE
MULTILAYER INSULATION
OPTICAL BENCH (GRAPHITE EPOXY)
ENTRANCE APERTURE
1124
PICK-OFF
MIRROR
-V2
PICK-OFF MIRROR
MECHANISM
CONNECTOR
BRACKET
-v
,
'JACKING ROD AND
LOCK,CONNECTOR
REGISTRATION FITTING
OPTICAL
POINT C
BENCH
SUPPORT STRUTS
I
�
REGISTRATION
FITTING
POINT A
MULTILAYER
INSULATION
..
RELAY OPTICS ASSEMBLY
/
+V3 £1'
V
t!73-
+V2
OPTICAL BENCH
SUPPORT STRUTS
INVAR BULKHEAD
PYRAMID (FIXED)
.
FOLD MIRRORS (3 ARTICULATING,
FILTER SELECTOR (48 FILTERS)
1
FIXED)
TEST
CONNECTOR
RADIATORIBAY 5
SUPPORT STRUTS
MULTILAYER
RADIATOR
INS!)LATION
LIGHT SEAL
PURGE
GAS LINE
RADIATOR
SUPPORT STRUTS
-V
3
�
MULTILAYER
INSULATION
LIGHT BAFFLE
HEAT
PIPES
PYRAMID IFIXED)
F1L TER SELECTOR
(48 Fil TEAS)
CAl FLIP
MIRnOR
f/24 PICK-OFF
MIRADA
.v
ELECTRONICS
COMPARTMENT
CAMERA
HEAD
ARTICULATING
FOLD MIRRORS
CALIBRATION
MODULE
REGISTRATION
FITTING - POINT B
OPTICAL BENCH
SUPPORT STRUTS
+V
,
...0
d'.
PICK-OFF MIRROR
COVER
HINGE LUG
�I -v,
,
' � +V
REGISTRAnON
FITTING
POINT A
PICK-OFF MIRROR
MECHANISM
ENTRANCE
APERTURE
3
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
MAJOR WF/PC-II CONFIGURATION CHANGES
WF/PC-I
WF/PC-II
CONFIGURATION
8 CAMERAS (4 WFs, 4 PCs)
4 CAMERAS (3 WFs, PC)
PYRAMID MIRROR
ROTATE/FOCUS
FIXED
PICK-OFF MIRROR
FIXED
ARTICULATING (pupil alignment)
FOLD MIRRORS
FIXED
AFMs IN PC, WF-3, WF-4
12 C +2 C FOR AFMs
THERMAL CONTROL
APERTURE
,
MgF WINDOW
OPEN
CORRECTIVE SECONDARIES
RELAY OPTICS
CCDs (15 micron pixels)
TI (800 X 800 pixels)
CORONENE COATING
-90 C OPERATION
LORAL (800X800 pixels)
LUMOGEN COATING
-78 C OPERATION
ELECTRONICS·
NON-REDUNDANT
REDUNDANT (7.5 & 15 e/DN)
STRUCTURAL DELTAS
PICK-OFF MIRROR COVER,
EVA HAND RAILS, PC HEAT PIPE,
SIPE I/F, T-O PURGE
CONTAMINATION CONTROL
BAKEOUTS, ADSORBER,
CCD DECONTAMINATE SEQ.
LIGHT PIPE
CCD UV FLOOD
CAL SIS (UV + INCANDESCENT)
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
SUMMARY OF SYSTEM CONFIGURATION CHANGES
ECR#
TITLE
19215
RAM PATCH INCREASED WAIT TIME: SOFA PHOTODIODE TURN-ON TO POSITION SAMPLE
19214
SHORTENED POMC RELEASE BAR V3 DIMENSION TO AVOID POSSIBLE SIPE INTERFERENCE
19213
TILTED PC TO AVOID GHOST IMAGES OFF SOFA
19212
MODIFIED CAL SIS WINDOWS TO OBTAIN MORE UNIFORM RADIOMETRIC OUTPUT
19211
REMOVED PYRAMID ROTATION FIRMWARE PATH FROM RAM LOAD
19210
REVISED THERMAL ANALYSIS TO REFLECT FEWER CAMERA HEADS, INCREASED ALLOWED
HEAT PIPE NON-CONDENSIBLE SLUG GROWTH
19209
REVISED AFM POWER BUS FUSING TO AVOID INADVERTENT TRIPS
19208
CHANGED GAIN OF REDUNDANT ADCs FROM 7.5 TO 15 ELECTRONS/DN
19207
DELETED ECR 19204 TO PAINT EDGE OF PICK-OFF MIRROR
19206
MODIFIED BAYS 1-4 HEATERS TO MAINTAIN OPTICAL BENCH WITHIN 10 C TO 14 C RANGE
19205
REPLACED MOVEABLE PYRAMID WITH FIXED MOUNT PYRAMID,
REVISED SPECIFIED OTA CONIC CONSTANT TO REFLECT CORRECT FOCUS
I JANUARY 1993 PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL TEST REVIEW I
MAY 1992 DELTA CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
SUMMARY OF SYSTEM CONFIGURATION CHANGES
ECR#
TITLE
19199
ADDED EVA HANDRAILS
19198
MODIFIED HST APPLICATION PROCESSOR PROGRAM TO MAINTAIN TEMPERATURE OF
AFMs WITHIN OPERATIONAL LIMITS
19197
ADDED ZEOLITE MOLECULAR ADSORBER
19196
ADDED AFMs (TO MAINTAIN PUPIL SHEAR CORRECTION)
ROUTE CABLE THROUGH PC FOLD MIRROR BULKHEAD OPENINGS
POWER & TELEMETRY INTERFACES THROUGH RIU-C
19195
CONFIGURATION CHANGE TO THREE WFCs + ONE PC
REBEND PC HEAT PIPE
ELIMINATED SCABBED WFC TEC POWER SUPPLY
TERMINATED UNUSED TEMPERATURE CHANNELS
ADDED SOFA PARTIAL STEPPING CAPABILITY
MODIFIED MEGA-BRACKET, DELETED/TERMINATED CABLING
19194
ADDED BAY 3/4 ELECTRONICS "CROSS-STRAPPING"
19193
ADDED TEMPERATURE SENSOR TO THE PICK-OFF MIRROR
19192
INCREASED BOLT HOLE SIZE OF RELAY OPTICS FLEXURE TO ALLOW PUPIL& BORESIGHT
ALIGNMENTS (EXTRA DEGREES OF FREEDOM)
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
SUMMARY OF SYSTEM CONFIGURATION CHANGES
ECR#
TITLE
19191
CANCELED ECRs 19126 & 19138-A, MAINTAINED WFPC-I RAM LOAD & PROM
19190
SHIMMED WF/PC FOLD MIRRORS & PYRAMID TO PRESERVE OPTICAL PATH LENGTH &
PROVIDE AFM CLEARANCE
19189
MODIFIED TEC COLD JUNCTION SET POINTS FOR LORAL CCDs
19188
MODIFIED CCD FRAME OVERLAP REQUIREMENT (FROM 50 TO 40 PIXELS)
19187
INCORPORATED LORAL CCDs
19186
UPDATED ASSEMBLY DRAWING TO SHOW EXTENDED GUIDERAIL
19185
PROVIDED FLIGHT COVER FOR PICK-OFF MIRROR
19184
ADDED CONTAMINATION CONTROL BAFFLES NEAR CCDs
19183
IMPROVED TELEMETRY RESOLUTION ay ADDING FOUR TEMPERATURE TRANSDUCERS
TO THE RADIATOR
19182
MODIFIED PICK-OFF MIRROR MOUNT (FROM 4 TO 3 POINT MOUNT)
19180
MODIFIED BAY 5 REPLACEMNT HEATER TO MAINTAIN A TEMPERATURE >-20C (REVERT
TO WFPC-I CONFIGURATION & CONFORMAL COATING)
Wide. Field/Planetary Camera II
ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY AND
MAGNETICS TEST REQUIREMENTS
COMPLIANCE
MAY 27,1993
A. WHITTLESEY
Wide Field/Planetary Camera II
EMC/MAG TEST OBJECTIVES
TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE TO EMC/MAG REQUIREMENTS OF
ST-ICD-03F AND JPL TS512406.
Wide FieldlPla•. �tary Camera II
EMC & MAGNETIC TEST RESULTS
TEST
RADIATED EMISSIONS
14 KHz TO 18 GHz
PASS/FAIL
COMMENTS
FAIL
EVALUATION
HIGH AMBIENT. BUT WITH
USE AS IS DAR
#20 SUBMmED
NARROWBANWBROADBAND
RADIATED SUSCEPTIBILITY
14 KHz TO 3 GHz
14.8 TO 15.3 GHz
CONDUCTED EMISSIONS RIPPLE
AND NOISE
30 Hz TO 50 MHz
PASS
PASS
USE AS IS DAR #18 SUBMmED
SIMILAR TO WFJPC I
FAIL
NARROWBAND/BROADBAND
IN-RUSH CURRENTS
PASS
CONDUCTED SUSCEPTIBILITY
RIPPLE AND NOISE
30Hz TO 50 MHz
PASS
TRANSIENTS
PASS
MAGNETICS, DC
FAIL
MAGNETICS, AC
PASS
I
I
I
TRANSIENT AMPLITUDE LIMITED
BY 2A SPEC LIMIT; NOT VOLTAGE
LIMIT
AT A,B,C, LATCHES (GFE'D BY
GODDARD) OK AT 3 CM.
I
USE AS IS DAR
#19 SUBMITTED
WIDE FIELD/PLANETARY CAMERA II
DYNAMIC TEST RESULTS
David Brent/Mike O'Connell
Sections 354/521
May 28, 1993
AGENDA
Test Objectives
David Brent
Test Appproach
Mike 0' Connell
Test Results:
Mike O'Connell
Sine Vibration Test
Random Vibration Test
Acoustic Test
Verification of Test Objectives
David Brent
Structural Integrity
Optical Alignment
Contamination
Development of FEM
David Brent
Conclusion
David Brent
TEST OBJECTIVES
1) Verify system structural integrity.
2) Verify optical alignment stability.
3) Verify contamination requirements met.
4) Enable development of a test verified finite element
model.
5) Verify adequacy of subassembly vibration tests.
..JPL
WIDE FIELD/PLANETARY CAMERA
VIB RATION TEST A PPROACH
o
V1 AXI S WF/PC II SI NE SURVEY, NO FORCE LIMITING
-
.1 gpk, 5-2000 Hz, 2 OCTAVES
I
MINUTE
- EXTREMAL CONTROL OF 3 ACCELE ROM ETERS, ONE AT EACH LATCH
- PERFORM BE FORE AND AFTER RANDOM VIB RATION
o
WF/PC II TENTED WITH FLIGHT LIKE PURGE FOR ALL DYNAM IC TESTS
o
FUNCTIONAL TESTS PERFORMED B E FORE AND AFTER EACH VIBRATION TEST R UN
.lPL
WIDE FIELD/PLANETARY CAMERA
( VIB RATION TEST APPROACH CONT'D )
o
SINGLE AXIS TEST APPROACH, V1 AXIS
o
WFIPC II FO RCE LIMITE D PROTOFLIGHT ( PF ) RANDOM VIB RATION TEST, .02 g2/Hz,
2.9 grms
- FORCE LIMITS FINALIZED FROM SINE SU RVEY DATA
&
PF-1 2 d B RANDOM
o
EXTREMAL CONTROL OF 3 ACCELEROMETERS, ONE AT EACH LATCH IN V1 AXIS,
AND FORCE TRANSDUCER AT LATCH A, V1 AXIS
o
R ESPONSE PEAK LIMITED AT 1 0 CHANN ELS ( OPTICAL BENCH, POM M ECH.,
RADIATOR)
o
STEP THROUGH LOW LEVEL RUNS TO PF LEVEL; P F-1 2dB, PF-4dB, PF
o
FUNCTIONAL TESTS PERFORMED B EFORE AND AFTER EACH VIB RATION TEST RUN
..IPL
WIDE FIELD/PLANETARY CAMERA
ACO USTIC TEST APPROACH
o
WF/PC II ACOUSTIC TEST TO WF/PC I RADIATOR PF LEVELS, 1 47.0 dB OVERALL
- AVERAGE CONTROL OF 4 MICROPHONES
o
STEP THROUGH LOW LEVEL RUNS TO PF, PF-1 2, P F-4, PF
- MOLECULAR ABSOR B E R V1 AXIS TEST PERFORMED PRIOR TO PF LEVEL RUN
o
WF/PC II TENTED WITH FLIGHT LIKE PURGE FOR ALL DYNAMIC TESTS
o
FUNCTIONAL TESTS PERFORMED BEFORE AND AFTER EACH VI BRATION TEST
RUN
.JPL
WIDE FIELD/PLANETARY CAMERA
TEST RESULTS SUM MARY
ALL
o
WF/PC II RANDOM VIB RATION RESPONSE GENERALLY LESS THAN WF/PC I
•
•
•
•
WF/PC II VIB RATION
&
o
ACOUSTIC INPUTS WERE WITHIN SPECIFICATIONS
D U E TO FORCE LIMITING WITH EXTREMAL CONTROL, USE OF FLIGHT LATCHES,
AND USE OF SMALLER MORE RIGID VIBRATION FIXTU R E
1 .8 Qrms vs. 2.6 Qrms O N PYRAMID BULKH EAD/OPTICAL B ENCH
ASSEM B LY/SUBSYSTEM VIB RATI ON SPECI FICATIONS BOUNDED SYSTEM
VIB RATION TEST RESPONSES EXCEPT SLIGHT EXCEEDENCE, 3dB AT 55 Hz
H z, OF AFM SPECI FICATION
&
ACCELE RATION SPECTRUM NOTCHING DUE TO FORCE LIMITING WAS 4·8 dB,
WITHI N RECOMM ENDED RANGE
85
..IPL
WIDE FIELD/PLANETARY CAMERA
( TEST R ESU LTS SUMMARY CONT'D )
o
WF/PC II ACOUSTIC TEST R ESPONSES G EN E RALLY EXCEEDED VIBRATION TEST
RESPONSES (EXCEPT AT 32 Hz) & WF/PC I ACOUSTIC TEST R ESPONSES
(ESPECIALL Y 40-200 Hz)
o
ASSEMB LY/SU BSYSTEM VIB RATION SPECI FICATIONS BOUNDED SYSTEM
ACOUSTIC TEST R ES PONSES EXCE PT:
- AFM SPECI FICATION EXCEEDED BY 4 d B @ 85 Hz
- MOLECULAR ABSORBER V1 SPECI FICATION EXCEEDED BY 2X IN TERMS OF grms
o
AFM EXCEEDENCES NOT A CONCERN; Fn » 80 Hz, AFM SPEC. WAS 5.0 grms VS. 2.1
grms WF/PC II SYSTEM R ESPONSE AND SYSTEM ALIGNM ENT NOT EFFECTED BY
DYNAMIC TESTS
o
2 MOLECULAR ABSOR BERS WERE SUCCESSFU L LY PF VIBRATION TESTED IN TH E
V1 AXIS TO 30.4 Qrms PRIOR TO PF LEVEL ACOUSTICS RUN
..IPL
WIDE FIELD/PLANETARY CAMERA
TEST RESULT CONCLUSIONS
o
WF/PC II DYNAMICS TESTS VERIFIED COMPLIANCE WITH PF TEST
ENVIRONM ENTS DEFINED BY GSFC
- ASSUMES VIB RATION SPECIFI CATION PROVI DED BY GSFC HAS MARGIN OV ER
FLIGHT (NOT VERIFI E D)
o
SOM E RISK ACCEPTED BY PERFORMING 1 AXIS VIBRATION TEST
- RISK M ITIGATED BY CONSERVATIVE ACOUSTIC TEST
FIGURE 11. WFPC PF VIBRATION TEST, CONTROL ACCEL SUMMARY
. .
,
iii .[
..
ii
•
0.1
_.i: 1,.
,
"
.
! 1 1�!
.'
ii
�" "
."I""
Ii,
i i.l.
2
g 1Hz
0.001
1 i III1 1
+ ++
·
·· ··· ·············
,
+..,..
•
,
11
IIII!
10
•
•
•
.
. ... ......
_
.. . .. ... .. _._. .
,
-
.S!«,2]gnns
- Control Aceell, 2.2 grrns
·
··········
Control Aceel 2, 2.3 grrns
Control Aceel 3,2.3 grrns
III
r r
············
······
···
,
.
. . .-.. .;. .--..L
�
.....-.
'Iit t111t
T T
···
···
'
· ··
1 1 1 1 i
. . L!. L,
j
.t................
1\11 '1111
100
Frequency, Hz
... ..
..
�...!
·····.........
1000
.
FIGURE 12. WFPC PF VIBRATION TEST, FORCE V1 SUMMARY
!
1000
,
i
!'
I
,l
,
'J
,
,
,
,
I
.... .
10
"
:r
I,
,
!
t
I
,
I,
;.
,
•
, , _\
,
'
•
/
,
,
�!
"
,,
,
,
.,
'
,
• �...
,', :
i
,'J I,
•
i
'
,
i
�I� I
1
", \ ,,\
'\'
,
•
,
"
"'
l
i
.,
. .
, ,� "
", "I
l
i"
r:\.; ! �,
1\:' :/r
I
,I',, '
•
I
0.1
- - Force A Vl, 219.8 lbs rms
. . .
•
Force B Vl, 187.8 Lbs rms
....... Force C Vl, 98.1 lbs rms
,
,
I
•
-
'-" ,
!
,
,
,
•
Force Specification, A Vl
,
�
!
.,
'
,
:
,
!-
-.�--
I
'
:
,I
I,
'
'.
"
,
.'
f,
7 !��f
l
��
�,
ll:
, I.
,�
,
�
,
!
0.001
10
100
Frequency, Hz
f
I� 13�
),
,
1000
FIGURE 13. WFPC PF VIBRATION TEST, FORCE V2 &V3 SUMMARY
1000
j. 4 i i i
: 1 j j j
l il l
·· ···· ···· ··· ··· ·········.........•....
�.............
.
. .
:
:
.l .... l . L
j j r f �1:
�....
...•.......
.
...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. l.
.. .....l..... .. ..
.... ..... .
..
.
,r",! !'! ! iii!
,
.
..
i.
.
.. ...
j. .
.
l
.
. .. . .. ..
�
i ...i..••�•..i.••••• •••••.•.••.••••
.... .
. l . j j �
1'1
,I
!
10
0.1
IIII Iii! ! 1,1 II
j .t .
Force Spec., A V3
. .
i
,
•
,
•
•
•
i,
:
, .
Force A V3 1917 Lbsrms
ir t
Force C V2, 99.2 Lbsrms
I: ::--111111!111 ........
·· ··..
0.001
·
·······
II
,
10
. . . .... ..+ ...
. .... .. .. .
-Force A V2, n.2 Lbsrms
:
�/JJ.l.I"'LrJt\�IIll�l .jJIII l :
!.
,i
..
i
:
"
!"
i
, .
100
Frequency, Hz
.,fi
' i '" i :
I
"
. ..
. .
J
1"
1\',1;' "" """ 1\
'
I.:
.
!\\'� ,! ." " "! l'l 1, � !'1\, I�'
i i . ! i\.
'I'�I
..
'
..
1
..
"
t"�
' lII\ ' i, i \, ,.
�"l
.
. ..
q:
�
,"
..
C i'
" ,
.............
,
.
1000
I
FIGURE 25. WFPC 2 AVERAGE PF ACOUSTIC INPUT, 4 MICROPHONES
STOP BND
43 BAND
B:STORED
._--
_••
d
���� [I
.
---
_
120
10
dB
100
90
P2470 26 Mar
_--_.
_.__
.-._--
_•.__
._-_
--�.
r--t
•
•
•
•
•
•
" rJ'
I
1"
"
.
•
"
.
•
"
.
"
.
.
"
"
.
.
.
"
•
"
�.
•
•
'I
•
t
- - -
'
•
I
.
lorv
_._.
10
1993
.
dBV
STATUS:
��....... .
.
.
.
---
-
_-,-_.•__
.
-:- -
-.
"'-".�.
... . . . .
.
.............................
•
.
.
"
.
.
.
"
.
.
.
"
•
.
.
"
"
.. .
.
"
.
"
"
"
"
.
.
"
.
.
"
.
.
"
.
.
.
"
.
"
.
.
.
"
"
.
"
"
.
"
"
.
"
"
.
"
"
.
"
"
.
.
"
.
"
"
.
"
"
.
•
"
. .
.
•
"
"
•
"
"
.
.
.
"
"
•
.
"
•
.
.
•
.
"
•
.
"
•
.
"
•
.
.
•
.
"
.
.
"
.
.
"
"
.
"
•
.
.
.
"
.
.
"
•
.
.
"
•
.
.
·
•
.
.
. ..
,,
.
.
•
.
.
.
.
.
•
.
•
.
.
.
,,
.
.
"
•
"
"
"
"
"
.
"
"
•
"
"
"
"
"
"
••_._
....
.
_.>' . •.
�.
.
•
•
.
•
-
'
'
--­
�
"
•
"
,,
.
"
·
•
"
,,
.
"
.
"
"
,,
"
"
"
"
•
,,
"
-
..
_
n
.
,.--..•
-,,-
"
.
.
.
.
.
-- �
. /__�
"
, .••.
.......
Sp8C1flcafIon
•
.
.-- .. -
___
.
--..
Lower Tolerance
.
.
____
\::._t:,
_
__
-
PAUSED
RMS: 12
.•-_
.••
.•.•. _•.
4 Mic Average...
130
RANGE:
"
·
•
..
,,
.
"
·
"
"
·
10
"
·
.
"
·
.
"
,,
.
"
·
.
.
,,
.
-,
.:..:...:.
"
.
.
"
,,
.
·
.
"
·
.
.
..
.
"
•
..
•
.
..
,
I
I
I
" .. \
I
"
I
•
.
,,
"
·
•
,,
•
,,
•
·
•
,,
•
•
•
•
"
•
•
!
... i
I
i
I
!
I
80
70
ST ART:
x:
i
. .. I
II
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
12-:5Hz ---- ,.-.--
RMS LEVEL
.
Y:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
ANDS
B
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
."£ 1-43°··--------.. ·-·--'----·S"TOP: ····20-
147.73 dBSPL
.
.
.
600'
!,
Hz
i
WFPC 2 VS. WFPC 1 AVERAGE ACOUSTIC INPUT
150
I.I
.
140
m
'0
J
w
�.J
.
W
a:
�
Ul
Ul
w
a:
a.
o
z
�
�
130
120
--
110
WFPC 1 AVERAGE, 145.0 dB
- - WFPC 2 Average, 147.9 dB
100
90
1000
100
Freq, Hz
.
.
FIGURE 14. WFPC PF VIBRATION TEST, OPTICAL BENCH SUMMARY
,
i
,
/
I
�/!
.
l�
VI �;I
,
,
!
i
'\
i\
i,
�
,1.\'
I
_
.
!
!
\
,
I ..
,',�I
1
'�
"
1
�/'
n";
, �.
, [I
\' !
- -_
_
i
�:�i��":46:��S
1
i
I:
,
.�':
'
•
257V2, 1.0 grms
.•,
�: �
257V3, 1.5 grms
;' "
- - 258Vl, 1.8 grms
.'
!
� - 258V2, 1.0 grms
�+··r·+++-······-·---·+-······-+--·····'····�
t1:5 gnTIS ,.J
.r.'· "�,·+·····;-···+····!····f"-H··"'···············-:l
258V:t;
.
I�
•
•
•
•
•••• • • •
_
10
100
Frequency, Hz
1000
FIGURE 26. WFPC PF ACOUSTIC TEST, OPTICAL BENCH SUMMARY
f
,
0.1
,
. �:
1,'
i
)1,� �
�V
V
\.I
�
0.001
'-'-
F:i.
�
�
..... -
�'�f'J
.
. .
.
p.
i
�
:
" ' Y " \L .
'
!
i
,
'/, , "-
,
. !
i\
•
•
•
•
•••••••
1
.. � i \
i .'
·rI
257V2, 1.4 grms
,
,;
\.!
, ,
!
\
- -: 257Vl, 2.1 grms
Ii
i
:
,
M
:H
(
!
��
I
.
!
257V3, 1.5 grms
- - 258Vl, 1.8 grms
;
-6 - 258V2, 1.9 grms
-I- 258V3, 1.3 grms
, iii '1
10
�
,,'
/,
\
08 Spec., 6.3 grms
,
,
f
i;\
,
Nh
�", ��. "
V
2
g 1Hz
'\
II
i
100
Frequency, Hz
l,
,
,
1
1000
•
�
�
WFPC PF VIBRATION TEST, PYRAMID BULKHEAD & AFM SUMMARY
:
.
:
.
.
.
.
1
2
g 1Hz
0,01
0,0001
10
100
Frequency, Hz
1000
WFPC PF ACOUSTIC TEST, PYRAMID BULKHEAD AFM SUMMARY
0.1
V
2
'/
g 1Hz
i
i
,
,
�l';'
�
r'
,
•
.
1
·· ·
·····
" ""',,f'
,
;,
,
"
' '' ,
i
it".
" ,
'
,. "
" "
, ,
'}I
.
, �'
i'.
it"
+i. . .':... ... . . . +i.. .. . .. ii ... . . .. .
I
:
I:-+.++..!.
'
..
'\,
" 'l"• 'i
' '
',
'"
. . . ..
+.
. +...
H
,
"
, -
1,.
!i
--
"
,
•
•
.
"
. ': , .'
I'
.. 1
.
AFM, 5.0 gnns
- - 258Vl, 1.8 gnns
•
•
•
•
• • •• •
••
10
'
iIi' : : �/,��, :,,' :::
i
i �,I
:.
0.001
.
"i
258V2, 1.9 gnns
258V3, 1.3 gnns
100
Frequency, Hz
1000
I
1-:
FIGURE 32. WFPC PF ACOUSTIC TEST, MOLECULAR AD SORBER SUMMARY
10
IIII i
.
I ' II I
! .i ,
:
.
:
:
:
:
2
g 1Hz
0.1
,
0.001
'
j
i
�
'
i
!
II
i
iiii
i i
·.;·-·i-.··I·-l·-I·--_·.__·_.___;._··_··.··�··_·_..;···_·1-
11II1
10
I
-- Molecular Adsorber, 30.4 grms
- - 311Vl, 27.0 grms
\
.....
.
�.7 �s
ami,
100
Frequency, Hz
ii
...j...;
I!
....•..•..•.........
1000
VERIFICATION OF INSTRUMENT STRUCTURAL
INTEGRITY
1)
Visual inspection showed no failures.
2)
Pre and post low level sine vibration tests showed no change in the
3)
"frequency signature" of the instrument.
Short and long form functional tests indicate no problems with the
electronics or mechanisms.
>
I-
..J
-
m
<C
IC/)
Iz
w
�
z
(!)
-
..J
<C
..J
<C
0
I-
a..
0
LL
0
z
0
I<C
0
-
-
LL
-
a:
w
>
"t)
Q)
�
Q
..r::: .
(I) .....
�
� E:
� s:::
E:�
e (\l
:::Scs
�.�
Q) .....
E:§c:: Q)
.�
..... �
e.SE
:9(1)
:s
Q)
I t))
....
(I). c::
(\l
�-5
�cs
(\l. §
�.SE
ctE:
•
TEST VERIFIED FINITE ELEMENT MODEL
•
Sine vibration tests provided required data to produce a test verified
FEM.
I
First two modes of FEM must be within 10% of test results. (REF ICD-03F).
Mode
I
Frequency (Hz)
Description of Vibration Mode
Test
FEM
32.5
31.8
Instrument Yaw (V2)
2
33.0
35.3
Radiator/Housing Bounce (V1)
3
47.1
46.8
POM Arm Yaw
4
55.3
51.4
Optical Bench Bounce
5
64 0
63.0
Optical Bench Yaw
1
.
CONTAMINATION REQUIREMENTS
No Shedding of Radiator Zot Paint:
•
Witness plates were located both facing and beneath
the radiator during both the random vibration and
acoustic tests.
•
Inspection of the witness plates following the
vibration tests showed a negligible amount of
particles.
Housing Interior:
•
Inspection of the interior of the housing following all
dynamic testing showed an acceptable amount of
particulates.
CONCLUSIONS
All test objectives met.
1)
System structural integrity verified.
2)
Optical alignment stability verified.
3)
Test verified finite element model supplied to GSFC.
4)
Following revision of the molecular adsorber assembly test specification,
5)
all subassembly vibration tests envelope the system response.
Verified instrument meets contamination requirements.
WF/PC II Weight' And Center Of Gravity
Measurement Results
HST Coordinates
Center of Gravity
Weight (lbs)
V1 (in)
V2 (in)
V3 (in)
626.2.± 2.0
218.46.± 0.50
O.OO.± 0.02
-51 .06.± 0.04
WF/PC-2
Predicted
12/22/92
619.6.± 10.0
218.59.± 1.00
-0.92 .± 1 .00
-49.52.± 1 .00
WF/PC-2
Measured
5/13/93
6 18.4.± 0.8
Not Measured
- 1.21 .± 0.03
-49.48.± 0.04
WF/PC-I
•
•
•
•
--,
WF/PC II weight measured per JPl Procedure WF/PC II 140.
The following flight hardware items were missing and were weighed separately:
1) pickoff mirror cover, 2) light shield, 3) non-flight top cover Mli.
The following non-flight hardware items were included in the measurements and were .
weighed at a later date:
1) optical bench TVT instrumentation, 2) lifting hardware, 3) flight top cover Mli.
Weight and C.G. calculations to be documented in an interoffice memorandum.
Wide Field Planetary Camera - 2 .
Pre-Ship Review
Thermal Vacuum Test
Summary and
Results
David Gallagher
JPL
May 27,1993
JPL
[ AGENDA]
•
TV TEST SUMMARY
•
AS-RU N TEST TIMELIN E
•
CONCLUSION
•
•
•
•
•
POWER PROFILE - D. ROCKEY
THERMAL PERFORMANCE - R. GARCIA
OPTICAL ALIGNMENT - S. MACENKA
SCIENCE CALIBRATION/CHARACTERIZATION - J.TRAUGER
CONTAMINATION - J. SCOTT-MONCK/D. TAYLOR
Dave Gallagher May 27, 1993 Pre-Ship Review
JPL
•
[-- SUMMARY ]
TEST COMPLETED IN 31 DAYS
- 5 DAYS HOT SOAK
- 6 DAYS HOT ORBIT
- 9 DAYS NOMINAL ORBIT
- 5 DAYS COLD ORBIT
•
12,800 FRAMES OF SCIENCE DATA
•
275,000 GALLONS OF LN2
•
CHAMBER/FACILITY SUPPORTED TEST
WITH NO SIG N I FICANT PROBLEMS
Dave Gallagher May 27. 1993 Pre-Ship Review
JPL
•
•
[
SU
IV!��RY
]
COMPLETED ALL PLANNED TESTS PLUS
SEVERAL ADDITIONAL TESTS DEFINED
DURI NG TV
1770 ANTICIPATED EXPOSU RES VS. 3200
EXPOSU RES RECORDED
Dave Gallagher May 27, 1993 Pre-Ship Review
JPL
•
•
•
[ . SU IV!��RY .)
DEMONSTRATED INSTRUMENT
PERFORMANCE AT 24,28, 32V I N
HOT,NOMINAL AND COLD ORBIT
CON DITIONS
VERIFIED ALL MECHANISMS INCLUDING
FAILSAFES
PERFORMED CCD DECONTAMINATION
Dave Gallagher
May 27, 1993 Pre-Ship Review
JPL
•
•
•
•
[
SU
���RY
]
PERFORMED POWER PROFILE TEST AT
EACH ORBITAL CONDITION
VERIFIED I NSTRUM ENT PERFORMANCE
FOLLOWING FA COLD EXPOSU RE
DEMONSTRATED I NSTRUMENT THERMAL
BALANCE
DEMONSTRATED INSTRUMENT M ET
OPTICAL BENCH STABILITY
REQU I REMENT
Dave Gallagher May 27, 1993 Pre-5hip Review
I
.J
11
I
-
I
-
w
z
..J
W
:!1
-
I-I-­
CIJ
W
I-Z
�
a:::I
CIJ
<C
,
TEMP
•
•
�
�
...
o
(J)
o
_I
.
Close Door
I
i
co
0>
'<
'"
en
:T
a
f
;u
0>
0en
:T
a
t
"
0>
<0
co
�
Jg
en
:T
a
I·
t
C'l
C'l
0
-i
POM Slep ,
lence
Power Profi
fortoqe Margin
fA Hoi
fun
3
t
I
Jg
�'"
" '"
""
,
CO
o
o
o
I\J
o
ification
In-Boy fun
,01
a
1
•
I\J
o
;*
Z
I
•
J.
Cl
<'l
Turn On T[,
Oecomlominotion 61
Heoler Mo
loltoge Uorqin
�
�
�2!
::!
0
z
Heater 1.40
Decontamination
?(
12
�
0
-
i3:
�
r
Imoge 510
Healer Mor
Power Pro:
I
:
""
•
•
•
•
n
lability
Shroud
C'l
0
(if "Qd)
i
g
�
----
�
-u-
I
I\J
'"
PI-
CCO 51, Iflity
I
Q'"
Z
<'l
'"
n
�
� :E
�::! ��
"
-n
o
Z
-i
�I
Linearity
O[H
>
r-
Reciprocily
AlIGNM[NT
Stim Slob
iii
s:
Col Repeal
f�ls
O[
i
c:
0
•
Sel
Shoding
Romp
Decontamination 63
Image
All
J
*
J.
J.
fAColdfu
Mol
CCO Sel PIceo
ifcl
I�
•
•
ep
Stim (xp
.",
0>
r:
Crude Aligr
0
..
�
Slimulus Te� s
•
•
I
•
I
•
I
J
3
L5:
:l
1
*
Z
I
SOfA Pori
I
+
t
J
�
Image 510
�wer Pro
11
•
I '
'"
•
I
'"
'"
Z
'"
'"
-.l
Vi
•
z
Cl
...
o
'"
a
o
.
,
"
Power Pro
;,.
•
(J)
o
I
-L
-',
(C)
.ns SOfA)
Aft Shroud
Break Vow
��
�
Desorb COC
co
"C
•
�
•
j-
iii
s:
"
m
;U
>
-i'
C
;U
m
;U
0
-n
r=
m
"
Woocs
NB fillers
Pholomeh)
�
�
a
W
'"
WING
�
��
c
c
�
K-Spols
Buyaff Images
-i
I
m
(J
CD
X
.C'l
40
20
0
-20
�
-
-40
11.
-60
w
�
-80
:;
WF/PC-II
HOT SOAK
� � ��v.
/,--,
,\
f-
�"\
AS RUN THERMAL-VAC TEST
�.�
�
,
j� . ..
HOT R IT
l• ••
25
�"". '1.
r if
..-
NOMINAL ORBIT
COL PRBIT
-----
-100
-120
�
-
;;;;.
z
z
i
�
lj;
,.
�
Q
-140
§
§
-160
3
35
I'
�
z
i
,.
8
DAY
•
Bay 5 Shrd
---0-- Rad Shrd
•
Hsg Shrd
--<>-- CCO Temp
•
Hgs
5121193
TVA::',-. .JNXLS
Test
No. Test Phase
1 Start
WF/PC-II As Run Test Sequence (5/21/93)
Test
Engineering Test Description
Bay Rad
Hrs
Hsg
CCD
Hrs Cum Day Shrd Shrd Shrd Temp
6.8
Start pump-down/back fill sequences
0
0
0
20
Hgs
20
20
20
20
Note and/or Science Test Description
20
2 Transition
Change Shroud Temperatures
9
0
0
25
25
3 Transition
Change Shroud Temperatures
11
0
0
30
30
30
25
4 Hot Soak
Start of Hot Soak +35 C (htrs, electronics on)
27
1
10
35
35
35
28 SOFA Open, Shutter Opened at 16:45, Bay 5 to +40
5 Hot Soak
POMM step sequencing (full range)
3.8
50
2
5
28
28
28
34 SOFA remaining below +35 C
6 Hot Soak
Long Func. both bays no SOFN AFMslTECs
3.1
58
2
2
28
28
28
35
V)
1 .2
72
3
2
30
30
30
35 Mod Funct. Test: No SOFA, AFM 0 V, Bay 5 at +44
0.4
106
4
2
28
28
33
35
28
28
33
35 AFM Electronics On, Stim Radiometry Various Filter.;
-30
-30
20
30
End Hot Soak - Start Transition to Hot Orbit
Aft Shroud Certification Complete
7 Hot Soak
Power ProfileNoltage margin (+32, 28, 24
8 Hot Soak
Verify RAM
9 Hot Soak
CaCM Data Verifies Ready to End Hot Soak
121
5
2
1 0 Transition
Lowered Housing Shrd Temps, End Hot Soak
151
6
-15
1 1 Transition
Aft Shrd (htrslelectrslAFM
1 2 Transition
1 3 Transition
1 4 Transition
(OV) On, TECs Off)
.
In-Bay Functional Test (SOFNAFMITEC Off)
End Transition from Hot Soak - Start Hot Orbit
1 5 Hot Orbit
7.0
151
6
-30
-30
-30
20
28
155
6
-50
-30
-30
20
23 Cal SIS On (Incandescents lamps only), HJ-2 failure
1 .7
159
7
-65
-30
-30
-20
20 Emulates On-orbit In-Bay Conditions
5.8
161
7
-65
-30
-30
-20
20
5.2
167
7
-65
-55
-5
-20
1 5 Stimulus Focus!Aberration Verification
End Transition from Hot Soak - Start Hot Orbit
1 6 Hot Orbit
3.6
1 72
7
-65
-55
-5
-20
20 Image Stability/Icing -32 C
1 7 Hot Orbit
3.1
1 79
7
-65
-55
-5
-20
1 4 Stimulus Characterization Test
1 8 Hot Orbit
1 9 Hot Orbit
20 Hot Orbit
CCD set point control (TECs off)
21 Hot Orbit
1.1
183
8
-65
-55
-5
-20
1 4 Crude Alignment (Test Abort: Stim Focus Problem)
7.5
184
8
-65
-55
-5
-20
14 Resume Stimulus Characterization Test
2.0
194
8
-65
-55
-5
-20
14 CCD Perf 1 st four set pts (-22 C, -32 C Obtained)
3.4
196
8
-65
-55
-5
-20
1 4 Vibration Environment Test
22 Hot Orbit
1.0 200
8
-65
-55
-5
-20
1 4 UV Calibration Channel Retest
23 Hot Orbit
1 .4 201
8
-65
-55
-5
-20
1 4 CCD Perf 1 st four set pts
24 Hot Orbit
0.5 202
8
-65
-55
-5
-20
1 4 Crude Alignment (Fine Focus)
25 Hot Orbit
1 .9 206
9
-65
-55
-5
-20
1 4 Image Stabilityllcing -32 C
26 Hot Orbit
27 Hot Orbit
CCD set point control (TECs on)
28 Hot Orbit
CCD Decontamination #1 (CCDs at 22 C)
16.4 208
9
-65
-55
-5
-20
1 4 Reverify CCD Perf set pts (-43 C , -52 C Not Obtaine
1 0.6 225
9
-65
-55
-5
-78
1 4 CCD Perf 2nd four set pts (-72 C, -78 C, -84 C , -90
14 CCD Calib Thermal Stability (includes 7 hr decontam
9.5 239
10
-65
-55
-5
22
3.1
248
10
-65
-55
-5
-78
1 4 Reverify CCD Perf set pts (-72 C , -78 C)
12.6 252
11
-65
-55
-5
-78
1 4 Short Term Monitor
1 .3 265
11
-65
-55
-5
-78
1 4 Shutter Shading Test
32 Hot Orbit
1 .9 266
11
-65
-55
-5
-78
1 4 Basic Function o f Both Bays
33 Hot Orbit
13.6 268
11
-65
-55
-5
-78
1 4 Light Transfer Test
34 Hot Orbit
3.8 282
12
-65
-55
-5
-78
1 4 Linearity Test
35 Hot Orbit
4.6
12
-65
-55
-5
-78
29 Hot Orbit
30 Hot Orbit
31 Hot Orbit
Heater duty cycle 25% (32
V)
285
Page 1
1 4 Short Term Monitor caE & contamination)
TVA� IN.xLS
.
.
Page 2
TVAb, .IN.xLS
•
WF/PC·" As Run Test Sequence (5/21/93)
Test
No. Test Phase
71 Nominal
Engineering Test Description
Problem with TQCM #2
Test
Hrs
Bay Rad
Hsg
CCD
Hrs Cum Day Shrd Shrd Shrd Temp Hgs
5.8 445
19
·95
·70
·17
·78
Note and/or Science Test Description
1 2 Long Term Monitor
72 Nominal
0.8 451
19
·95
·70
·17
·78
1 2 Crossed Ramp + Narrow Band Fitter
73 Nominal
0.7 452
19
·95
·70
·17
·78
1 2 Photometric Stability over FOV
74 Nominal
1 .1
453
19
·95
·70
·17
·78
1 2 Crossed Ramp + Narrow Band Filter
75 Nominal
7.2 454
19
·95
·70
·17
·78
12 Mission Simulation Photometry
9.0 462
19
·95
·70
·17
22
77 Nominal
2.0 471
20
·95
·70
·17
·78
78 Nominal
6.0 473
20
·95
·70
·17
·78
1 2 Far U V Diversity Test
79 Nominal
3.9 479
20
·95
·70
·17
·78
1 2 Verify CCD Perf set pts (-43 C , ·52 C Obtained)
80 Nominal
3.2 483
20
·95
·70
·17
·78
·78
76 Nominal
CCD Decontamination #2 (CCDs at 22 C)
81 Nominal
4.2 486
20
·95
·70
·17
82 Nominal
6.0 490
20
·95
·70
·17
·78
12
CCD Decontamination #2 (CCDs at 22 C)
1 2 Icing/Contamination Test
1 2 UV & Woods Filter Verification
12 Mission Simulation Photometry
1 2 U V Flat & Cal Channel Consistency
83 Nominal
4.4 496
21
·95
·70
·17
·78
1 2 Filter VerificationTest
84 Nominal
0.2 501
21
·95
·70
·17
·78
1 2 UV Flats/Cal ConSistency .
85 Nominal
3.4
501
21
·95
·70
·17
·78
12 2x2 Verification
86 Nominal
4.3 505
21
·95
·70
·17
·78
1 2 Filter Ghost Test
87 Nominal
2.2 509
21
·95
·70
·17
·78
1 2 Ramp Filter Calibration Test
·78
1 2 SOFA Clear Sensors Anomaly Test
88 Nominal
0.6
512
21
·95
·70
·17
89 Nominal
10.3
51 3
21
·95
·70
·17
·78
1 2 Ramp Filter Calibration Test
90 Nominal
0.4
523
22
·95
·70
·17
·78
1 2 Polarization Quad Flats
91 Nominal
6.2 524
22
·95
·70
·17
·78
12 NB Filter Thruput (subset of filters)
92 Nominal
1 .5 530
22
·95
·70
·17
·78
12 SOFA Clear Sensors Anomaly Test
532
22
·95
·70
·17
·78
12
Power Profile
532
22 ·150
·85
·22
·78
10
End Nominal Orbit - Start Cold Orbit
93 Nominal
94 Transition
Power Profile
1 .2
Shrouds for Cold Orbit (Switch to Primary Elect)
95 Cold Orbit
0.1
533
22 ·150
·85
·22
·78
1 0 Icing/Contamination Test
1 0 Short Term Monitor (contamination)
96 Cold Orbit
4.3
534
22 ·150
·85
·22
·78
97 Cold Orbit
7.6
538
22 ·150
·85
·22
·78
1 0 Cal Channel High Priority Flats
98 Cold Orbit
0.3 546
23 ·150
·85
·22
·78
1 0 Icing/Contamination Test
99 Cold Orbit
9.3 546
23 ·150
·85
·22
·78
1 0 Far UV Diversity Test
100 Cold Orbit
5.2 556
23 ·150
·85
·22
·78
1 0 Long Term Monitor
101 Cold Orbit
2.9 561
23 ·150
·85
·22
·78
1 0 AFM Grid Test/Alignment Test
·85
·22
·78
10 Photometric Stability over FOV
1 02 Cold Orbit
2.0
564
24 ·150
1 03 Cold Orbit
3.0 567
24 ·150
·85
·22
·78
1 0 Cal Channel High Priority Flats
1 04 Cold Orbit
2.9 570
24 ·150
·85
·22
·78
1 0 Quad Flats
105
3.5
573
24 ·150
·85
·22
·78
1 0 Peak TransmiSSion of Wide Band Flats
&old Orbit
Page 3
TVA::.. ,.JN.xlS
Page 4
TVAb"....N.xLS
WF/PC-II As Run Test Sequence (5/21/93)
Test
No. Test Phase
Engineering Test Description
Test
Bay Rad Hsg CCD
Hrs
Hrs Cum Day Shrd Shrd Shrd Temp Hgs
Note and/or Science Test Description
141 Warm-up
0.6 685
29 -100
-85
-35
2 SOFA Wheel 7 Homing Phase Characterization Test
142 Warm-up
685
29 -100
-56
-85
-35
-56
2
Set Voltage to +32 V
145 Warm-up
1 .4 690
29 -100
-85
-35
-56
-56
-56
146 Warm-up
9.0 692
29
-30 -100
-10
-56
147 Warm-up
704
29
-20 -100
-56
16
148 Warm-up
713
30
0
-56
22
149 Warm-up
2.2 713
30
o -105
o -105
-1 0
0
-56
20 Basic Functionality
1 50 Warm-up
715
30
0
-85
0
-56
19
Set Voltage to +28 V
151 Warm-up
71 5
30
0
-85
0
-56
19
Resume Warm-Up Sequence
143 Warm-up
1 .5 686
29 -100
-85
-35
144 Warm-up
2.1
688
29 -100
-85
-35
2 Schedule Test
2 SOFA Spin Wheel 6 Test
4 SOFA Ten Filter Shuffle Test
8 SOFA Homing Phase Characterization Test
1 52 Warm-up
716
30
0
-80
0
-70
21
1 53 Warm-up
716
30
0
-75
0
-65
21
1 54 Warm-up
716
30
0
-70
0
-60
155 Warm-up
717
30
0
-65
0
-55
1 56 Warm-up
717
30
0
-60
0
-50
1 57 Warm-up
717
30
0
-55
0
-45
158 Warm-up
718
30
0
-50
0
-40
23
22
22
22
22
718
30
0
-45
0
-35
23
160 Warm-up
719
30
0
-40
0
-30
24
161 Warm-up
720
30
0
-35
0
-25
24
162 Warm-up
721
30
0
-30
0
-20
25
163 Warm-up
723
30
0
-25
0
-15
26
164 Warm-up
724
30
0
-20
5
-10
28
165 Warm-up
726
30
0
-15
5
-5
29
166 Warm-up
727
30
0
-10
5
0
30
167 Warm-up
728
30
0
-5
5
5
31
168 Warm-up
728
30
0
0
5
10
31
169 Warm-up
729
30
0
5
5
15
27
10
26
20
159 Warm-up
.
170 Warm-up
730
30
0
5
26
171 Warm-up
730
30
20
20
26
26
172
732
30 OFF OFF OFF
26
26
End
Prepared 5118/1993
Page 5
Set Voltage to +24 V
End
JPL
•
•
•
[ CONCLUSION )
HOT JUNCTION 2 THERMISTOR PROVI DED
ANOMOlOUS DATA ( POSS.
DELAMI NATED)
U NABLE TO MAINTAIN BENCH > 10 deg C
@ COLD ORBIT/24V CONDITION
PASSED AFT SHROUD CONTAMI NATION
CERTIFICATION
Dave Gallagher May 27. 1993 Pre-Ship Review
JPL
[ CONCLUSION]
CONT.
•
SOFA· POSITION ANOMALY DIAGNOSED
AND RESOLVED VIA RAM PATCH
- RAM PATCH INCREASED
PHOTODIODE SAMPLE DELAY TIME
- TESTED AT BOTH COLD ORBIT,
NOM. ORBIT AND AM BIENT
•
WF/PC-2 QUALIFIED THERMALLY,
ELECTRICALLY, AND OPTICALLY
Dave Gallagher
May 27. 1993 Pre-Ship Review
JPL Integration and Test
WFPC-2 Test & Burn-in Hours
1 08.4 % . . . .
-
100%
-
. .
.
.
.
. - .-.,.-. - .-. - .- . . - . -. - .- . -.-- . -_ . . .
----
75%
----
50%
----
25% ---0%
----
Updated 5/21193
1 626 Hours
as of May 1 9 1 993
------l1 1500
hours
1125
---- 750
(GOAL)
I
Hours
Hours
375
Hours
306 Hours Bay 1 Rework
o Hours
WF/PC-2 PRE-S H I P REVIEW
WF/PC TEM P E RATUR E CONTROL
R. D. GARCIA
MAY 27, 1 993
WF/PC-2 PRE-SHIP REVIEW
A NALYTICAL APPROAC H
o
C O R R E LATE TH E R MAL A NALYTICAL MODEL WITH THERMAL BALA N C E T E S T R E S U LTS
A DJUST F O R TEST S ET U P
NOT P E R FECTLY BLACK S H ROU DS
CQ CM H EAT EX CH AN G ER ON S LANT PLATE
ISOTH ERMAL S H ROUDS COMPARED TO ICD D ISTRIBUTION
ADJUST FOR ADDITIONAL HEAT LEAKS
H O U S I N G BLANKET 1 5 LAYERS EMBOS S E D KAPTON
CAL SS S U P PORT BRACKET A N D CABLES EXPOS E D
BLiN DMATE C O N N ECTOR a n d CABLES N O T COVE R E D A S O N WFPC-1
o
U S E CORRE LATED MODEL TO MAKE FLIGHT P R E D ICTS
WFPC-2 P R E -S H I P REVIEW
"'OMPARISON OF S H RO U D TEMPERATU R E S WITH ICD S I N K TEMPERATURES
aST CCR 3364
PIRN 3 "195
P.age 6 ,,! 6
/
-Y2
-Y1
WF/PC
Shroud & Fixture
Thermocouples
1
l. 27
:/i········:··_-\
0:
33
.
.
o
<8> /
o ...-
.
32 ....
31
..:
:0
30
\"ig,:;\ .
\ <5> ;
\ 10'9:""
-:
••.•....
'\ '\o�
.
29
.
\\;/. ....
26
\'�P17 \'''25
.
• TC in View
r) TC out of View
.')
'
ContrOl Circuit
Designation
D.PERRY MAY29.1992
•• "
'-'
'''
'
' \_
WFPC -1 OBSER'
29
�
061 1
....,
.
.. _
_
. _
•
•
, VOLTAGE PROFILE
Month and Day,
0 61 1
061 1
30
_ 1 . 11
1 990
061 1
06 1 2
\.
-
1\
06 1 2
V
'\
I/)
:::J
'iii
�
,
06 1 2
\
28
f
.2
�
8.
E
�
27
26
•
�.-
25
1 62.0
MSID
M021
1 62.2
1 62.3
1 62 �5
Day of Year,
Name
VOLTSA
Subtract 1 .2 valls for losses to instrument.
1 62.7
1 99 0
j
1 62 .8
1 63 .0
WFPC-2 P R E S H I P REVIEW
T E MPE RATU R E CONTROL S U MMARY OF TEST R E S U LTS
o
O PTICAL B E N C H TE M P E RATU R E CONTROL
STABIL ITY ACCE PTABLE
H EATER D UTY CYCLE H I G H
27% I N H O T O R B I T 3 2 VOLTS
80% IN NOMINAL O RB IT 28 VOLTS
1 00% IN COLD O RBIT 28 VOLTS
, , , f!� ,
I :" @o�
041 2
40.0
041 4
041 6
, J:,:!�
35.0
,
041 8
"-
'
0420
"
,
0422
0424
,U
m- rurt .. !'
�
MONTH AND DAY
0426
0428
0430
32\1
NOM/N. L
I
OR
,
0502
I,
, ,
0504
0506
I
eo
0508
D oet, 1
r --j �
..
:i..
€.
�..
051 4
un Lll
TD II�&IE"r
-
I 2 11 �
z sv
I}
20.0
d
1 5.0
�
D-
E
�
0512
f-
t)
::J
�.
�
30.0
25.0
051 0
1 0.0
"
-......
I-
A
""
5.0
-
0.0
-
V
-5.0
-1 0.0
1 02
1 04
106
1 08
1 10
112
114
,
116
1 20
118
DAY Of YEAR
o BCH PYR
[] BCH CH
.Il.
BCH fM
1 22
1 24
1 26
1 28
-'-
1 30
-'--'-
1 32
1 34
93102 1 65400
0412
1 .00
0.90
0414
041 6
041 B
0420
, , ,
0422
, , ,
0424
, , ,
, ,
MONTH AND DAY
0426
042B
0430
,
0502
0504
0508
0506
051 0
"
0.60
V
0.50
.......
u
'"
.,
c
t
'"
f
.;:!
�
.,
Q.
E
.,
....
051 4
::
:
�
0.70
0
I
,
E
O.BO
..
:::J
051 2
E
0.40
�
I::
0.30
�
F
0.20
I::
0. 1 0
0.00
-0. 1 0
-0.20
-0.30
-0.40
-0.50
-0.60
-0.70
-O.BO
-0.90
I'
�
I::
-
"
r
r
-�
V
M.....
A. A
r- yv
nIlv vf> ..."
A
.-....
..
vv
.A
\."
'.
A
ftv V' �
_w
W1
:
/\
'"
�
�
�
:
I::
:
E
�
f
E
-1 .00
1 02
II
,
1 04
1 06
1 08
-
, ,
1 10
112
114
116
118
DAY OF YEAR
o DB FM
1 20
1 22
1 24
1 26
1 2B
1 30
1 32
1 34
93102 1 65.400
WF/PC-2 P R E-S H IP REVIEW
T E M P E RATU R E CONTROL S U MMARY OF TEST R E S U LTS
o
E LECTRONICS
INTERNAL (BAYS 1 -4)
C O NTROLLED BY H EATERS CYCLING
BA Y 3&4 LOCALIZED H EATING
BAY 5
TEST I N C L U D E D H A N D HOLD STUDS
SA F I N G TRAN S I E N T S IM ILAR TO WF/PC-1
D U R I N G HOLD MODE MARGINAL AS EXPECTED A N D S IMILAR TO WF/PC-1
o
CALIBRATION SYSTEM
A F F ECTS TEMPERATU R E OF OPTICAL BEN CH DURING LONG E R EXPOS U R E S . R EQ U IRES 24
H O U R O F F TIME TO F U LLY R ECOVER
041 2
40.0
0414
" '
35.0
fj
30.0
041 6
j�
041 8
..!seAl!..
'
0420
'L '
I
�
0422
t.40NTH AND DAY
0426
0428
0430
0424
.
uin-' t �/7: '
�,
,
.
.lz. V
0502
0504
�, "I. /SIT ·
NOH
0508
0506
OLD ('.
I
051 0
051 2
051 4
W 7f>
£&/7'+! I UTi
�H lENT"
I 2 !lV
•
-
:
I Z<,I
-
25.0
�
20.0
1 5.0
f
.2
I!
1 0.0
E
�
5.0
..
e
t>
�
..
D-
0.0
�l-
-5.0
e
:
.. �
..
.2
:
:
tr......
l
I ...
I
.
1
:
- 1 0.0
-1 5.0
/
:
:
�I-
-20.0 ,
1 02
:
-
,
,
,
1 04
,
,
,
1 06
,
,
,
1 08
,
,
,
1 10
,
.
,
1 12
,
,
,
1 14
,
,
,
1 16
,
,
,
118
,
,
,
1 20
DAY OF YEAR
o BAY 1
,
,
,
1 22
.
,
,
1 24
,
,
,
1 26
.
.
.
1 28
.
.
.
1 30
.
.
.
1 32
.
.
1 34
93102 1 65400
MONTH AND DAY
041 2
50.0
45.0
041 4
�r
40.0
35.0
30.0
co
.�
�
t
25.0
.i!
�
20.0
E
�
1 5.0
..
a.
041 6
1
0418
,
,
�
0420
0422
0424
0426
,
,
,
0428
,
,
,
0430
,
,
,
0502
,
,
,
0504
,
0506
,
,
0508
,
,
,
0510
,
,
,
051 2
,
,
,
051 4
,
'
\In
.
·
·
·
·
·
·
�r
·
·
·
·
·
r
-
�
-,-
I-
-
1
-
1-II
�
-
-
-
-
1 0.0
-
-
5.0
-
0.0
-
�
-5.0
- 1 0.0 ,
1 02
,
,
,
1 04
,
,
106
,
1 08
,
,
,
,
,
,
1 10
1 12
,
,
114
_1
"
1 16
,
,
1 18
,
,
,
1 20
DAY Of YEAR
o BAY 3
o BAY
4
,
,
1 22
,
1 24
,
1 26
-
,
1 28
1 30
1 32
1 34
93102 1 65040D
WF/PC-2 P R E -S H I P REVIEW
LOCATION OF BAY 3 A N D 4 TH E R M ISTOR A N D HEATER
THIER. M I 5 il'R
HEATER.
'9&
-. .
� ' ''.oo::.�
.......
� ,.t!�_&
til}
+
-.
•
- ..
•
'}
I • .-00£
� ..::\..... ...
.. &
� &.�t
...-
�.
!!:
r.:
•
'
�}
MI....
�.
,,)}.�
;7)
-
;
0
��
•
••
e
�&
0
--
s=
.. ' '-T-'
r ��
��1�-
i'....--..---j�
�
•• ::t 'w. �
I
�.-�M.,.
-
:::
.
'
· ·--· ·
--
�
!
I
t
��;;.�I.M
� CD#_
.�
" ("
_m
"
'oo�,n��1
+
041 2
50.0
f-ffffff-
45.0
40.0
35.0
..
..
t)
f
..
-2
e
a.
E
�
I\.
041 6
/·Uli
��, I
041 8
,
150.41(
0420
I
25.0
Ff-
- 1 0.0
0428
0430
/'IDI4/'"
"-
I
.J
r�
0504
.
0506
I
'
r
--TEes
Il
\�(V
r-
';tXJ) ()f!1 I T
1\
ILAor
1 08
1 10
�.
\J\
DErDA) 'ittJl1IJ/,,-n� -
112
114
1 16
118
DAY OF YEAR
o BAY 5
�I urtJ '-!;jl�",r
---J �
7D�
:
W
1 20
1 22
1 24
1 26
.
--=
:
:
:
,rr-
r
j-oI
-25.0 f-
1 06
051 4
,..
llECDNTA> MtTIIlN
1 04
051 2
"ffC
� - -f ,... " ..j
�
�
�
051 0
:
CAl- U� �
I!�t"£..
�
-30.0 f1 02
0508
:
f-1 5.0
f-20.0
0502
l. OIaS
.,,� "...
�
lJ
f-
-5.0
'
I
6fT
t
�
�
�f-
0.0
,,,
0426
I];� I.
1 5.0 f-
5.0
0424
!!'"
20.0
1 0.0
, ,.
MONTH AND DAY
0422
SJoT ()
ff-
30.0
.2
.!!
' ,
0414
I
I
I�
-'--'--'- -'--'--'- -'--'--'-
1 28
1 30
1 32
1 34
93102 1 65.400
t.40NTH AND DAY
041 2
40.0
0414
041 6
.� .. .
35.0
30.0
041 8
.......,
0420
0422
0424
0426
0428
0430
0502
. . .
•
0504
. .
0506
0508
•
051 0
051 2
f-'t-
:
-
:
:
20.0
..
�
1 0.0
E!
a.
E
:
I
1 5.0
u
:::J
-
I
J
co
t.
-
.
,..
25.0
�.,
051 4
\
5.0
�
/
"'--,
. �
V"t!
...
"-
\
-
0.0
I
(
I'
-5.0
- 1 0.0
.
- 1 5.0
-20.0
1 02
,
1 04
1 06
1 08
1 10
112
,
,
114
116
118
DAY OF YEAR
o CAL 55
1 20
1 22
1 24
1 26
,
1 28
,
1 30
,
-
,
,
1 32
,
,
1 34
93102 1 65400
WF/PC-2 P RE -S H IP REVIEW
T E M PE RAT U RE CONTROL S U M MARY OF TEST RESU LTS
o
S E N SOR COOLING SYSTEM
MAINTA IN E D TEC O P ERATING SET P OINTS U N D E R ALL CON DITIO N S
COULD N OT M A I N TAIN T EC OFF LOWER S ET POINTS IN H O T ORBIT
HOT J U N CTION #2 TRA N S DU C E R APPARE NTLY DEBON D ED . TEMP ERATU RE WARM E R THAN
HJS 1 ,3 & 4. TEC CJ C O L D E R W H E N TEC O F F . RES P O N D ED TO H EATERS CYCLING
I N DCATE D LOWER R E S ISTANCE TO H OU S IN G TEMPERATU R E
DECONTA MI NATION REQUIRES THAW H EATERS
HEAT PIPES
TEMP ERATU R E D I F F E R E NTIAL ACROSS H EAT PIPE < 1 .5°C
D I F F E R E NCE D I D NOT G ROW S U B STANTIAL Y DU RIN G COLD ORBIT I N DICATING ONLY
SMALL N O N C O N D E N S I B L E GAS SLUG S IZE.
MONTH AND DAY
041 2
40.0
041 4
C-
-
30.0
20.0
,..b:.
�
r
041 6
041 8
,
T
-,
Cc-
1 0.0
li
..
u
f
�..
CC- 1 0.0
CC-
-20.0
:J
a.
E
,!!
-30.0
,
-
.
0.0
..
:J
0420
,
,
,
0424
,
0426
,
0428
,
,
0430
0502
,
,
,
,
0504
,
0506
0508
,
,
,
,
051 0
,
,
-70.0
051 2
,
,
,
,
051 4
,
,
0
0
o
:
0
o
o
o
o
,I
�r
�r
III
c
-60.0
,
.......
r
r
-40.0
-50.0
0422
a
0
c-
o
Cc-
o
r
r
-80.0
.,
�
.
c
c
-90.0 ,
1 02
,
,
,
1 04
,
,
1 06
.
,
,
l oa
1 10
112
114
,
,
1 16
1 18
1 20
,
,
1 22
,
1 24
1 26
1 28
o
CJ 2
6 CJ 3
1 32
1 34
93102 1 65400
DAY Of YEAR
o CJ 1
1 30
o CJ
4
t.40NTH AND DAY
041 2
40.0
,
"
30.0
20.0
��� . "�
041 4
041 6
041 8
0420
0422
0424
•
•
0426
•
0428
•
0430
0502
0504
0506
•
•
0508
051 0
•
051 2
051 4
•
•
·
·
:
·
•
1 0.0
0.0
..
�
-1 0.0
t
..
u
€.
:::J
-
-20.0
.r--
..
a.
E
,!
-30.0
-40.0
-50.0
-60.0
-70.0
r
If
e
•
Il-
�
..
r
I
I
I'
I,
'"
....
..
\
-,""V"
'"
�1
.\
'Y
'I.
�I-
�
..
1 04
1 06
1 08
1 10
1 12
114
JIll'
n
'""'r.;
I-
-80.0
1 02
1
p-I
o HJ2
+ RAD +V2
\[
f.!f
116
118
1 20
1 22
1 24
1 26
� HJ3
)
:
·
·
,
:
r��
:
·
---
,
·
·
•
1 28
1 30
1 32
1 34
93102 1 65-400
DAY OF YEAR
o HJl
* RAD -V2
I
o
HJ4
MONTH AND DAY
041 2
40.0
041 4
0418
0420
0422
0424
0426
.
c
/' h.
30.0
20.0
041 6
�
.
0428
.
0430
0502
. . .
. . .
0504
•
•
0506
•
•
•
0510
0508
•
•
•
•
•
•
051 2
•
•
051 4
. . .
u
'"
L'Y
lI'
1 0.0
:
·
0.0
..
.:!
Je
.,
- 1 0.0
:
t.>
f
1?
..
::J
·
-20 .0
a.
E
�
-30.0
r
-40.0
r
r
V
-50.0
·
,
-. ,
·
-60.0
.� :=\
-70.0
-80 .0 •
1 02
•
•
1 04
•
1 06
1 08
•
1 10
•
112
114
•
116
•
•
1 18
DAY OF YEAR
o HEAT PIPE 1
o HP SADDLE 1
•
1 20
:
�
\F' W
\.
:
·
•
1 22
1 24
126
1 28
1 30
1 32
1 34
93102 090500
MONTH AND DAY
041 2
40.0
,
0414
,
,
,
,
F�.
30.0
20.0
.
041 6
041 8
0420
0422
0424
0426
0428
•
0430
,
,
•
0502
•
0504
•
,
.
0506
,
,
.
0508
051 0
051 2
•
•
•
051 4
•
•
y
,
=""
I/'
·
1 0.0
r
0.0
..
.:1
J!
t;
f
�..
"
�
�
- 1 0.0
-20.0
a.
E
·
-30.0
:
·
.
r
�
r
�
-40.0
V
�
-50.0
-60.0
-70.0
:
·
I
{
�
�
�
-80.0
1 02
1
1 04
1 06
\. -
1
1
1 08
1 10
1 12
114
116
118
1 20
DAY OF YEAR
o HEAT PIPE 2
:
,-\
,
1
[J HP SADDLE 2
1 22
1
1
1 24
�
.1
1 26
vi!
, , ,
1 28
, .
1 30
1 32
:
·
:
:
1 34
93102 090500
t.40NTH AND DAY
041 2
.w.0 r '
r
30.0
..
- 1 0.0
(j
�
.2
�
..
-20.0
a.
E
041 6
041 8
I'ieI._
0420
0422
, , ,
, ,
0424
, , ,
, ,
0426
0428
0430
, , ,
0502
0504
0506
0508
051 0
,
051 2
, ,
051 4
-
-,
I
�
�
0.0
2
.!!
,
elY
1 0.0
•
041 4
�r
20.0
..
,
-30.0
,!!
-.w.0
-50.0
-60.0
-70.0
r
�
�
�
-r
r r
r
-
V
�
�
�
�-,..-,
-"'"
:
-
"I
,
A I,.};.�
�.
.
,
�r
r
�
-80.0
1 02
1 04
1 06
, ,
, , ,
1 08
"
1 10
1 12
114
,
, , ,
116
, ,
118
DAY OF YEAR
o HEAT PIPE 3
[J HP SADDLE 3
1 20
1 22
1 24
1 26
r �
"'"
\r
1 28
�
:
W
1 30
,
1 32
-
:
:
1 34
93102 090500
MONTH AND DAY
041 2
40.0
f-
30.0
0414
041 6
0420
041 8
0422
0424
0426
•
•
I'r..-v-,,"
.
0428
.
0430
, , ,
,
0502
0504
, , ,
, , ,
,
0506
0508
051 0
, ,
,
051 2
....
-0/
20.0
051 4
, , '-
I
f-
1 0.0
-
0.0
..
.�
"'i
u
t
::J
-
-
1
00
.
-20.0
�
..
:
r
-
f-
-
:
a.
E
,!
r r
-30.0
-40.0
-50.0
-60.0
-70.0
r
-
V
�
,
�
,
,
Jt
or .,
�
-I
-
�
"- .J
-'"I
r
f-
�
�
-BO.O
1 02
,
1 04
1 06
1 08
,
L
"
1 10
,
,
112
11"
1 16
,
,
, _ L.L
118
DAY or YEAR
o HEAT PIPE 4
o HP SADDLE 4
, , ,
1 20
,
1 22
,
,
1 24
,
1 26
..A -A
,.
'r
1 28
�
W
1 30
1 32
-
1 34
93102 090500
WFIPC-2 THERMAL RESULTS
Thermal Analytical Model Correlation and Flight Predicts
Temperature, °C
Component
Hot Orbit
Cold Orbit
Flight Predict
Reqt
Test Result
Predict
Test Result
Predict
MinIMax
MinIMax
Bay I
1 2- 1 6
1 2- 1 6
13
13
10114
- 1 0/20
Bay 2
1 4- 1 6
IS
12
15
1 31 1 6
- 1 0/20
Bay 3
14-22
13-19
17
14
I I IIS
- 1 0/20
BAY 4
1 4-22
13-19
IS
14
I IIIS
- 1 0/20
BAY 5
23
I7
3
0
SI 1 7
-20/40
RIU A
IS
IS
16
15
1 31 1 6
- 1 0/20
RIU B
IS
IS
15
15
1 31 1 6
- 1 0/20
RIU C
IS
IS
14
15
1 31 1 6
- 1 0120
AFM EL
16
IS
10
15
1 31 1 6
1 0/20
CAMERA HEAD 1
1 6- 1 9
12-20
13
13
3116
- 1 0/20
_.lliRA HEAD 2
1 6- 1 9
1 2-20
15
13
SI16
- 1 0120
CAMERA HEAD 3
1 6- 1 9
12-20
15
13
SI16
- 1 0/20
I S-2 1
1 2-20
I7
13
8116
- 1 0120
CAL MODULE
9-23
1 1 -23
12-23
7-19
9/24
- 1 0/30
P I C K
O F F
15
15
13
15
1 01 1 9
5125
C H
13
13
II
10
1 01 1 2
10114
PYRM
13
13
10
10
10112
10114
AFM
13
13
10
10
10112
10114
MECH/SOFA
12
12
8
9
10115
- 1 0120
ATTACH PT A
12
13
9
10
1 1115
- 1 0/20
""TACH PT B
11
13
8
10
10/14
- 1 0/20
lACH PT C
14
13
II
10
1 01 1 3
- 1 0/20
'"
EL
EL
CAMERA HEAD 4
EL
MIRROR
B E N C H ,
BLKHD
BENCH,
BLKHD
BENCH,
BLKHD
•
_
WFIPC-2 THERMAL RESULTS
Thermal Analytical Model Correlation and Flight Predicts
.
Temperature . ....e
TEC CJ I
-20/-32/-70
--
-42/-501-76
--
-20/-90 '
-201-90
--
-42/-50/-76
--
-20/-90 '
-201-90
--
-42/-50/-76
--
-20/-90
'
-20/-90
--
-42/-50/-76
--
-201-90 '
-20/-90
-76/-84/-88
TEC CJ 2
-20/-321-70
-76/-84/-88
TEC CJ 3
-20/-321-70
-76/-84/-88
TEC CJ 4
-20/-32/-70
-76/-84/-88
TEC HJ I
-34/- 1 8
-20
-53
-56
-551-20
-701 1 5
TEC HJ 2
-251- 1 3
-20
-40
-56
-551-20
-701 1 5
TEC HJ 3
-37/-20
-20
-53
-56
-551-20
-701 1 5
-37-19
-20
-54
-56
-551-20
-701 1 5
KAD +VI
-43/-34
-40
-66
-67
-67/-40
-70/0
RAD -VI
-431-34
-40
-66
-67
-67/-40
-70/0
�
l.
HJ 4
AVAILABLE SET POINTS DEPEND ON ORBIT.
WF/PC·2 PRE·S H IP REVIEW
C O N C L U S ION
o
OPTICAL B E N C H
T E M P E RATU RE CAN BE MAINTA I N E D AS S U MIN G WF/PC·1 VOLTAG E PROFILE
BA Y 1 SET POINTS
°
H EATER O N : 1 2 C
°
H EATER O F F : 1 4 C
SE T POINTS CAN B E C H A N G E D IN FLIGHT
o
E L E CTRONICS
LOCALIZED H EATING IN BAYS 3/4 S H O U L D NOT AFFECT TH E RMAL PERFORMANCE
o
o
CAL IBRATION SYSTEM WILL AFFECT TEM PERATU RE OF OPTICAL B E N C H PARTIC U LARLY
D U RING LONG E X POSURES
S E N SOR COOLING SYSTEM
COLDER SET POI NTS WITH TECS OFF MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE IN HOT OR BIT
(RARELY U S E D IN TEST)
TEC/HJ TEM P E RATU R E FOR D IAG NOSTIC P U RPOSES
3:
w
-
>
w
a:
fl.
-
J:
(J)
W
•
a:
fl.
N
•
(.)
fl.
'""'-
u.
3:
..J
a.
..,
(J)
(.)
-
t-
fl.
0
<C
�
Z
W
(.)
<C
:E
•
<C
•
(J)
('I)
en
en
,....
..
......
N
�
as
:E
.JPL
WF/PC-2 O PTICS TOP- L EV E L R EQ U I R E M E NTS
•
WAVEFRONT (rms waves at 633 nm)
WF 0.079 (A.l 1 2 . 6 )
PC
•
0.081 (A./ 1 2 . 3 )
FRAME OVERLAP (pixels)
W F 40 ± 3 0
P C 40 ± 7 0
•
C O M PONENTS A N D SU BASSE M B L I ES
See
•
f:J. W
chart
I MA G E SMEAR
0.1 pixel during 3000 second exposure
•
FLOW DOWN REQUIREMENTS FOR FA BRICATION, ALIG N M E NT, AND STA BILITY
G IVEN IN E R ROR BUDGET CHARTS
2
WF II
.rror
••
budg
D.slgn
0.007
RSS 0.080
O••lgn & RSS
Pimicrkroroft Filter "mltror� Fold mirror fligRelht aybarrel
in
surface -(ot.t10� polish
in test barrel
polish
mount strain {Wedge) -( tilt ) mount strain mount strain
< till
l( tilt) ( till
0.081
rpyram;
0.019
0.022
0.008
.
OJ 1 2 • • )
0.020
0.046
dual �umUIU)
alResiignment
Foc:ua
spheriandcal
0.025
-
0.030
-
0.010
0.011
0.010
0.021
0.010
0.01'
0.020
0.008
Figure 3:
WF II static wavefront budget at the center of the CCD. Tolerances
which effect pupil alignment have been added in ovals to the tolerances in
Figure 2.
These are the wedge of the filters and the tilts of the pick off mirror.
pyramid. the fold mirror. and the relay.
The pick off mirror tilt. ±6 arc sec. is
half the proposed adjustment increment in the pick off mirror mechanism.
±12 arc sec. Wedge of the filter is 0.0006 in over a 2.256 inch aperture. The
pyramid rotation repeatability specification is ±:30 arc sec.
The pyramid tilt
tolerances. ±JO arc sec. is for errors which will not be routinely corrected by
the pick off mirror mechanism. such as wobble about the pyramid rotation
axis or differential tilts between the WF and PC induced by gravity release.
Tilt
tolerances for the fold mirrors and relay are ±10 arc sec and :tzo arc sec.
respectively.
The bold lines bound all tolerances which cannot be
compensated with a one time pick off mirror adjustment.
3
PC II e"Dr
bUdget
D••lgn 0.03B
ASS
0.082
Design & RSS
0.090
Pick off
mirror
Filter
(lI 1 1 . 1 )
Fold mirror
. Relay
polish 0.020
test barrel
0.046
mount strain
mount strain
mount strain
0.010
0.010
0.014
polish 0.019
surface
0.022
Residual
alignment
Focus and
spherical
0.030
Figure 4:
PC II static wavefront budget at tbe center of tbe CCD.
Tolerances
which effect pupil alignment have been added in ovals to tbe tolerances in
Figure 2.
Pupil alignment tolerances are tbe same as in WF II (see Figure 3)
but their effect on the RMS wavefront is slightly different.
4
PU P I L SHEAR ERROR BUDGET FOR F I X ED P Y R AM I D M I R R O R
Total wavefront error
WF 1J12.8
PC 1J12.4
Pupil shear
errors Al26.1
Non-pupil shear
errors Al14.7
Uncorrectable pupil shear
0.44% (A/26.1)
I
AFMs
I
I
Filler wedge
0.11
knowledge 0.30
- fharrn!!S1 n IJA
Correctable pupil shear
WF 0.35%
I
Pick off
mirror
I-
I
Design
WF Al1 43
PC Al50
thermal
L.. rana�f!!S"
Structure
0.01
I
Pyramid
f- ground vlb. 0.25
ha .. n,.. h ulh n 1 1)
resolution 0.02
5
Relays
I
Pick off mirror
1/2 step 0.13
- launch vlb. 0.01
L..
".",. .n.rI
ulh n n1
J
Folds
f- Iaunch vlb. 0.08
L.. ........
nd vlb. 0.15
WF/PC-2 OPTICS
Wavefront RMS
Item
7
8
9
10
11
12
P r imary M i r r o r
S /N - 2 0 3 , WF-2
S /N� 2 0 4 , WF - 4
S /N - 2 0 5 , WF- 3
S /N-2 0 6 , WF-Spare
S /N - 2 0 1 , P C - Spare
S / N-2 0 2 , P C - 1
Secondary M i r r o r
S /N- 4 1 2 , WF-2
S /N- 4 0 9 , WF- 4
S /N - 4 1 4 , WF- 3
S /N- 4 1 9 , WF-Spare
S /N- 3 0 8 , PC- Spare
S /N- 3 2 0 , P C - 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
I
Spec i f i c a t i on
(@
6328 A)
Actual
••
Aw
0 5 November 1 9 9 2
Reflectance
(% @
Spec i fi c a t i on
I
1 2 0 0 A)
Act u a l
78
78
78
78
78
78
76
76
74
77
77
68
.
.
.
.
.
.
02 6
02 6
026
026
026
02 6
0
0
0
0
0
0
.
.
.
.
.
.
014
01 6
014
01 0
02 0
010
68
68
68
68
68
68
74
77
76
79
72
76
13
14
15
16
17
18
Re l a y Assembly
WF-2
WF- 3
WF- 4
WF-Spare
P C - Spare
PC-1
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
04 8
048
048
048
04 8
04 8
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
032
033
02 2
02 9
03 0
030
53
53
53,
53
53
53
56
59
56
61
55
52
19
20
21
22
Fold Mirror
·S / N- 0 0 6 , P C - 1
S /N - 2 0 3 , WF-2
S /N- 0 0 4 , WF-3
S /N- 0 0 1 , WF - 4
0 . 0 25
0 . 025
0 . 025
0 . 0 25
0
0
0
0
007
015
005
005
78
78
78
78
77
78
79
80
23
24
p i ckoff Mirror
S / N- 0 0 1 , F l i ght
S /N- 0 0 4 , Spare
0
0
0
0
0
0
.
.
.
.
I
I
Notes
per witness
per witness
0 . 015
0 . 023
68
68
75
65
computed from
lines
I
1 - 6 and 7 - 1 2
fixed
spec per-
tains to 1 . Sx1 . 0-in
elliptical area at
4 7 deg angle o f
incidence
6
sample
measurements
wavefront
0 . 031
0 . 031
sample
measurements
WAVEF RONT S U M MARY
(All table e ntries a re rms waves at 633 nm)
Buy-off wave
with post-dyn
Interferometry
(SAF)
focus
w/o focus focus
Phase Retrieval
(TV-warm orbit)
w/o focus
(a,b)
Channel
Phase Retrieval
(SAF)
w/o focus focus
PC1
0.031
0.032
0.034
0.035
0.053
0.025
0.01 4
WF2
0.027
0.027
0.028
0.034
0.034
0.032
0.021
WF3
0.037
0.045
0.042
0.043
0.048
0.041
0.026
WF4
0.033
0.037
0.029
0.040
0.030
0.021
0.01 6
Phase Retrieval
(TV-cold orbit)
w/o focus
(a,b)
(a)
Preliminary numbers from analysis by C . B urrows
(b)
Wavefront error budget without focus i s 0.075 and 0.073 waves rms a t 633 n m for the PC and WFC
respectively
7
.IPL
M U LT I P L E I N D E P E NDENT V E R I FICATION METHODS
Compo nent/S u bassem bly
Verification Methods
Relay secondary mirrors
Interferometry with null lens
Interferometry without null lens
Assembled relay
Image Inspection with OCA null lens
I nterferometry with Tinsley and OCA null lenses
Interferometry without null lens
Image inspection with GSFC null lens
GSFC measurement of caustic
Image Inspection with mini-stimulus
Interferometry with mini-stimulus
M i n i-st i m u l u s
Interferometry without null lens
Hartmann focus measurement
Image Invers i o n
Pupil position (parallax) a n d size (angular subtense)
Stimulus primary, secondary
I nterferometry with null lens
Sti m u l u s
I nterferometry with OCA null lens and GSFC null lens
Focus set by knife edge, Hartmann with and without null lens,
image I nspection.
Pupil centering, axial position and size measured
Spherical aberration measured by IVT
Spherical aberration by phase retrieval
8
..JPL
FRAME OVE R LAP AND I MAG E SMEAR
•
•
PYRAM I D A P E X COORDINATES I N EACH CHANN E L
PC1 :
(40, 49)
WF2:
(47, 28)
WF3:
(34, 49)
WF4:
(46 , 43)
K-SPOTS SHOW N E G LIGIBLE DRIFT OVE R 1 0 M I NUTES BASED ON TV EXPOSU RES
9
..JPL
A B SO L UTE CAM E RA FOCUS
•
•
TV FOCUS DATA NOT YET AVAILA B LE FROM PHASE R ETRIEVAL ANALYSIS
CAMERA FOCUS UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATED TO BE ± 0.01 0 INCHES BY OPTICS
ALIGN MENT TEAM
1 0
SUMMARY OF WF/PC-2 CONFOCALITY MEASUREMENTS
Defocus in f/24 space (in)
Mini-stimulus·
Channel
Visual
Interfer.
Stimulus (TV chamber)
Stimulus (SAF)
Visual
Interfer.
Pre-dyn.
Pre-dyn.
Post-dyn.
Max t'1
phase ret.
sharpness
sharpness
(d)
0.0175 (b)
0.0285
0.0167
PCl
0.0004
-0.0110
-0.0011
0.0081
0.0 (a)
0.0 (a)
WF2
-0.0026
-0.0057
-0.0054
0.0110
0.030 (c)
-0.025 (c)
0.0085
WF3
0.0008
-0.0122
0.0016
-0.0002
0.041
(c)
-0.035 (c)
-0.0100
WF4
-0.0014
-0.0116
-0.0010
0.0202
0.035 (c)
-0.035 (c)
-0.0035 (b)
(b)
(b)
-
Note a. PCI defocus arbitrarily set to zero.
Note b. Based on measurements made at the center of each CCD.
Note c. Sign to be detennined.
Note d. Excludes pre-dynamics measurements.
1 1
0.0138
0.0318
----
M E C H AN I S M
•
MARG I N
PICK-OFF MIRROR
- Range of ± 75 steps per axis
- Optimum alignment during TV testing without pre-test mirror measurement
10 steps in axis 1
28 steps in axis 2
- Predicted range required for flight mirror ± 21 steps per axis
- Predicted on-orbit POMM margin of 54 steps
•
AFMs
- Maximum voltage 90V
- Voltages required for minimum
coma during TV testing
- Wavefront specification satisfied with AFMs off in PCI and WF4
Ch.annel
Segments 1 & 2
Segments 3 & 4
Segments 5 & 6
% Pupil Shear Corrected
PC1
23.25
0.0
0.0
0.68
WF3
7 .4
0.0
29.2
1.03
WF4
8.3
0.0
7.4
0.08
12
STI MULUS
•
WA VEFRONT
-
•
C H ARA CTERIZAT I O N
Interferometric measurement in building 248 (no vibration isolation)
RMS wavefront error ').../ 37 with null lens (')...
=
633 nm)
RMS wavefront error agrees with measurements in SAF and at OCA
FO CUS
Estimated focus error ± 0.010 inches
Focus position includes offsets for A-latch error, change in OTA primary mirror conic
constant, and null lens power (see next chart)
•
PUPIL
Centration error
<
0.2% per axis
- Centration stability
- Size accu racy
::..
<
0.25% per axis between measurements
1%
- Axial distance accuracy
::..
0.5%
13
TOP SURFACE OF LOWER RIAF RETICLE
}
0.0114
.
_c�----L---_·---Knife·Edge Focus
0.0274
Conic Canst
yith Null Lens
Offset
DFM
0.0455
111928
TOTAL
0.0132
0.0341+/- 0.006
A-Latch Offset
(1 sigma)
Focus shift caused by
("Old Value")
Null Lens
---Neutral Zone
Focus Offset
yithout Null Lens
DERIVATION OF PROPER
MEASUREMENT OF STIMULUS
STIMULUS FOCUS OFFSET
FOCUS OFFSET
ALL DIMENSION INCHES
14
AHV
12/17/92
.I
•
,
PERFORM A N C E
SUM M ARY A N D
•
WF/PC-2 meets all optical requirements with margin
•
Stimulus meets all optical requirements with margin
•
No concerns
15
C O N CERN S
WIDE FIELD I PLANETARY CAMERA -II
SCIENCE CALIBRATION AND CHARACTERIZATION
Pre-Ship Review
May 27, 1993
J. Trauger
JPL
WIDE FIELD PLANETARY CAMERA
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
CONTAMINATION CONTROL STATUS
Presented by
John Scott-Monck I Dan Taylor
May 27, 1 993
.JPL
•
REQUIREMENTS AND GOALS
WF/PC-II PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION REQUIREMENTS AT
LAUNCH:
•
INTERNAL SURFACES
- LEVEL 300
(150)
OTHER SURFACES
- LEVEL 400
(300)
HST AFT SHROUD REQUIREMENT
·
SAMPLE AT 28°C (10·C ABOVE MAX. OPERATING
TEMPERATURE)
·
·
•
(15MHz) TQCM at -20·C
<1Hz/Hr. AVERAGE COLLECTED OVER 8 Hr. PERIOD
WF/PC-II MOLECULAR CONTAMINATION GOAL
"ONE PERCENT DEGRADATION IN UV THROUGHPUT AS
MEASURED AT 147 nm OVER A THIRTY DAY PERIOD IN
ORBIT".
JS-M/1
5/27/93
.JPL
STRATEGY TO CONTROL MOLECULAR CONTAMINATION
•
CCD WITH HIGHER OPERATING TEMPERATURE (-70·C VS. -100·C)
•
VENTING OF THE ELECTRONICS BAYS TO AFT SHROUD
•
INCORPORATION OF A MOLECULAR CONTAMINATION "TRAP"
•
SUBSYSTEM AND COMPONENT IN-PROCESS BAKEOUTS
•
ELIMINATE THE APERTURE WINDOW
•
MAINTAIN THE INSTRUMENT UNDER NEARLY CONTINUOUS PURGE
•
EMPLOY CAP MODELING
JS-M/2
5127/93
CONTAMINATION ANALYSIS PROGRAM
•
ASSESSED DESIGN TRADE-OFFS
NEW CCD
. MOLECULAR "TRAP"
•
PREDICTED WF/PC-II RELATIVE UV PERFORMANCE
•
ESTABLISHED SUBSYSTEM BAKEOUT ALLOCATIONS
JS-M/3
5127/93
JPL
WIDE FIELD PLANETARY CAMERA
MOLECULAR CONTAMINATION BUDGET AS OF 05/27/93
FOR CRITICAL WFIPC II SUBSYSTEMS
Suballocation
Level Achieved
(ng/cm2)
(ng/cm2)
WF/PC-2 Subsystem
Fold Mirror & (3) AFM
1.3
0.4
Relay Optics (4)
3.2
Camera Head Assembly (4)
5.2
10.0
3.8
Shutter Mechanism and Plate
SOFA Mechanism
6.8
Internal Cabling
4.2
1.8
24.5
9.9
Internal Housing
1.6
1.4
0
0
1.9
2.7
0.3
2.8
Vent Tube
Optical Bench
Heat Pipes (4)
2.6
1.9
2.0
Calibration Mirror and Mechanism
0.3
1.9
0
0.7
Pick-Off Mirror and Mechanism
0.1
<0.1
....J!.
J
Pyramid Mechanism
Internal Thermal Blankets
Molecular Adsorber Mounting
Subtotal
33.8
57.5
5.0
RESERVE
HST HUB Sources
TOTAL
Jl..2
47.0
J.S-M/4
5127/93
JPL
APPROACH
•
TRACK CCD TEMPERATURES WITH caCM's
ONE ON SLANT PLATE
ONE IN STIMULUS AT PICKOFF MIRROR LOCATION
VERIFY NO RESIDUAL CONTAMINATION AT END OF TEST
•
TaCM ON SLANT PLATE
. MONITOR INTERIOR OF CAMERA AT -SO'C
•
TaCM's FOR AFT SHROUD CERTIFICATION
OTl1
5/27/93
TQCM/CQCM CONFIGURATION
D. Pear feb. IS, I",
"
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
.
•
,
f··�·-····-------
.1QcM12
:/
•
A
'V
,
.
.
.
.:'
!
'
'
,
..
\ �.:'"�•12
.
' "
tf
,
. --- ..
.
.
.
·
•
·
·
·
,'
...
A
W(top)
\
\. .
•
...
•
n
a.
•
\, \.
�
A
'V(boCtam) \ .�
,0'o • , 000
\'o�
:-�
'
F.
o� 0
to
..
N
11'
\
.
,
.
.
,
..
.- _ ..
,
. .
. .
.
0
t,
Cable ,
TQCM '., Bay.
TQCM #2, Bay 2
7
3
TQCM '3, Bay '/RId.
6
CQCM '., RIAF - POM
2
TQCM 14, Slant Pit Inside'
<9>
TQCM/CQCM
E+W
s
TQCMI4
"\,.';f
...
'
.
•
+V1
+V3" t
� +V2
• CQCMffl
+ CIRCUIT
CQCM #2, Slant Pit Inside
4
DT/2
5127/93
RESULTS OF TV TEST
•
UV PERFORMANCE GOAL
SCIENCE TEAM MEASURED NO LOSS IN UV THROUGHPUT DUE
TO CONTAMINATION
SENSITIVITY
-
___
DATA FROM CQCM's AND CAP MODEL PREDICTS
_
__
LOSS IN 30 DAYS (from camera source only)
•
CCD DECONTAMINATION REQUIRES +20·C
•
NO RESIDUAL CONTAMINATION ON CQCM AT END OF TEST
•
AFT SHROUD CERTIFICATION
PASSED - BASED ON OUTGASSING ON BAY 1 AND 5 AREAS
WITNESS MIRROR - NO LOSS OF REFLECTANCE
OT/3
5127/93
..JPL
EXTERNAL SURFACE CLEANLINESS
•
PARTICULATE - LEVEL 400 PER MIL. STA.1246 B
RESULTS
•
__
NVR - LEVEL B PER MIL. STA. 1246 B
RESULTS
__
DT/4
5127/93
z
0
0
w
en
«
m
w
m
tJ)
::)
�
<t
�
tJ)
Z
..J
..J
-
==
w
..J
0
>
0
0
�
<t
z
-
z
0
-
-
:E
�
Z
0
0
..I
a.
.,
Q.
-
l:
en
0
t-
>
0
«
w
a:
.«
a:
w
:E
«
0
•
�
z
-
:E
«
t-
Z
0
o�
w
0«
0
0
t-
0
m
oa:
..J
«0
·
z
_z
LLO
•
C')
1I)s:!!
j::r--
o�
N
•
ca
....
CI)
E
ca �
CI)
0 -
�>
w
0::
�
(I)
:E.::) ·
. wu. �
ca0::
CI)
0::
0::
!::
..,
.
CI) C. ZOO
s:::::: -ca� Wu..�
D..(I)
(I)
D.. . OZ
CI)
-C ....
«
...I
D..
Gi
D..
U.
-
CI)
-C
--
�
'-
CI)
.
.
..c
C)
CG
CG
(!)
-
.>
't:S
-
CG
c
.J
a.
-,
.
C'?
en
en
-
.....
ft
N
>-
CG
:E
JPL
[-O
PEN ITEMS
1
The following is a list of Instrument work to
be completed at GSFC and KSC:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FORWARD CLOCK PLUG INSTALLATION
FLIGHT POM COVER INSTALLATION
MINOR MLI CLOSEOUT (LIFTING LUGS)
FLIGHT HANDHOLD STUDS INSTALLATION
FLIGHT POM INSTALLATION AND ALIGNMENT
VERFICATION
APERTURE PLUG REMOVAL/LIGHT BAFFLE
INSTALLATION
FLIGHT POM COVER BAKEOUT (GSFC task)
Dave Gallagher May 27, 1993 Pre-Ship Review
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
PERFORMANCE VERIFICATION
STATUS OVERVIEW
MAY 27-28,
1992
DON ROCKEY
WFPC-II SYSTEM ENGINEER
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
AGENDA
WF/PC-II SYSTEM TEST SEQUENCE
SUBSYSTEM VERIFICATION SUMMARY
KEY SYSTEM PARAMETER VERIFICATION OVERVIEW
WF/PC-II SYSTEM TEST OVERVIEW
EMI/EMC TEST RESULTS
DYNAMIC TEST RESULTS
LIGHT LEAK TEST RESULTS
ACOUSTIC TEST RESULTS
THERMAL-VAC TEST RESULTS
POST THERMAL-VAC ACTIVITIES
POWER PROFILE SUMMARIES
SUMMARY & SUBMITTED OARs
WF/PC·II PRE·SHIP REVIEW
WF/PC-II SYSTEM TEST SEQUENCE
COMPLETED BASELINE VERIFICATIONS(POM THEODOLITE SURVEY, ETC. )
COMPLETED SUBSYSTEM VERIFICATIONS
MARCH 1-5, 1993
EMI/EMC TESTING(BLDG 179)
STIMULUS THERMAL-VAC CHECK-OUT TEST (SANS WF/PC)
PRE-DYNAMIC TEST IMAGING(BLDG 248 CHAMBER AT AMBIENT)·
MARCH 19-26, 1993
LOW LEVEL SINE SWEEPS/RANDOM VIB/ACOUSTIC WITH POMC (BLDG 144)
LIGHT LEAK TESTING(BLDG 144)
POST-DYNAMIC TEST IMAGING(BLDG 248 CHAMBER AT AMBIENT)
APRIL 12, 1993
START OF SYSTEM THERMAL-VAC TEST
MAY 13, 1993
COMPLETION OF SYSTEM THERMAL-VAC TEST
BASELINE VERIFICATION (POM /ENVELOPE THEODOLITE SURVEY)
SUBSYSn;M
Fliallt Hardware
Pick-off Mirror
Assembly (S/N-l)
Shutter
(in a
'Ibe1:mal Vac
-55'C,
+50'C
ere)
SOFA
I,..
AFMs
'Ibe1:mal Vac
-35'C, +50'C
AFM Electronics
+40'C
-25'C,
+55'C
RarDan Vib
PF level
2
+lO'C,
a 1••ISlts
134 hrs at 6s'C
Delivered,
4333 Life CVcles on EM
-35'C, +35'C
27 cycles
FA level
16.2 Hz/hr 12'C CQCM-70'C
Delivered, WF/PC Design
PF level
<1 Hz/hr 20'C, CQCM -70'C
Delivered
FA
<1 Hz/hr 20'C, CQCM -70'C
-lO'C,
level
72 hrs at 6S'C
6 Hz/hr 20'C,
CQCM - 70'C
>50 Hz/hr, CQCM -70'C
+35'C
TES
50'C unpowered
4 hr soak
+45'C
-GO'C,
7.7 Hz/hr 20'C, CQCM-70'C
FA level
3.3 Hz/hr 20'C, CQCM-70'C
TES
-40'C, +40'C
Bay 5 +55'C
lan'r:l -25 +S5'C
-55'C,
level
FA
-35'C
+45'C
Msorber
IaoI Cover
cert Bakerut
FA level
+20'C
calibration SIS
cal Flip Mirror
May 21, 1993
1.3 Hz/hr 20'C, CQCM-70'C
camera Heacls
Electronics
ere)
(in a
1
0.85 Hz/hr 20'C TQCM-20'C
Fix Fold Mirror
Relay Optics
SlHfARY
-35'C, +45'C
50 cycles
'd (fixed)
-15'C,
VERh ....:ATIaf
lan'r:l PF level
PF
PF Retest
Sys level
Test
CQCM -70'C
1.7 Hz/hr 22'C, CQCM-70'C
To Be Ccl!QJleted at GSFC
0.7 Hz/hr 20'C, TQCM-20'C
Heat pipes
0.5 Hz/hr 20'C,
Sys level
CQCM-70'C
Test
1
Data captured at time of Hardware Review/Certification Requirement
2
Protoflight random vibration: 1 min/axis, 3 axes
Delivered
Delivered (FIt +
Delivered (4 +
,\
Delivered (4 + spare)
WFfPC Desiqn
Delivered
WF/PC Design
Radiator
MLI}3lanketing
Delivered (3 + spares)
1000 Cycles + 10'C
Delivered
TES
level
(>30 gntS)
+90'C
<1 Hz/hr 20'C,
Delivered, 100 cycles
WF/PC Design
Delivered (S + spares)
FA
Test
Delivered
WF/PC
Delivered (4 +
Delivered -- -----
(HRCR)
!
i
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
KEY SYSTEM PARAMETER VERIFICATION OVERVIEW
PRE SYSTEM TEST
SUBSYSTEM
REQUIREMENT
OPTICAL
END-TO-END THROUGHPUT
PRE-TN WITNESS PLATE DATA,
TN SHORT/LONG TERM MONITORS
TN SHORT/LONG TERM MONITORS
POST SAFING TN IMAGES
(MACENKA)
TOTAL WAVEFRONT ERROR
(ALIGNMENT)
PRE-TN AUTOREFLECTOR DATA
PRE-TN RIAF/STIMULUS TESTS
POST DYNAMIC IMAGES
POST SAFING TN IMAGES
(MACENKA)
GEOMETRIC STABILITY
(IMAGE STABILITY)
PRE-TN ANALYSIS
K-SPOT DATA + FLASH LAMPS +
POM SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
GEOMETRIC DISTORTION
RAY TRACE PREDICTS
ON-ORBIT STAR FIELDS
(MACENKA)
CCD FRAME OVERLAP
SAF ALIGNMENT WITHOUT CAMERAS
POST SAFING TN K-SPOTS
(MACENKA)
FOCUS
SAF ALIGNMENT WITHOUT CAMERAS
STIMULUS, MINI-STIMULUS, VISUAL,
HARTMANN, INTERFEROMETRIC
POST DYNAMIC IMAGES
POST SAFING TN IMAGES
{COSTAR CONFOCAL TESTS}
(TRAUGER)
SYSTEM TEST
MECHANISMS (GALLAGHER)
AFMs (new)
FUNCTION WITHIN SPEC
LIFE TESTING ON SPARE
TN FUNCTIONAL TESTING *
POMM (new)
FUNCTION WITHIN SPEC
LIFE TEST ON ENGINEERING MODEL
TN FUNCTIONAL TESTING
CAL FLIP (FS) FUNCTION WITHIN SPEC
WF/PC-I DESIGN
TN FUNCTIONAL TESTING
*
SHUTTER (FS) FUNCTION WITHIN SPEC
WF/PC-I DESIGN
TN FUNCTIONAL TESTING
*
FUNCTION WITHIN SPEC
WF/PC-I DESIGN
TN FUNCTIONAL TESTING
*
SOFA (FS)
TN= THERMAL VACUUM TEST
*
TESTING OVER FULL RANGE OF ANTICIPATED ON-ORBIT OPERATING TEMP
FS = FAIL SAFE
SAF= SIC ASSEMBLY FACILITY
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
KEY SYSTEM PARAMETER VERIFICATION OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
SUBSYSTEM
REQUIREMENT
SIGNAL CHAIN
SAF REVERSE CLOC K TESTING
DYNAMIC RANGE/NOISE
LINEARITY
RECIPROCITY
PHOTOMETRIC STABILITY/ACCURACY STIMULUS CHECKOUT
RESIDUAL IMAGE
PRE-TN LIGHT LEAK CHECKS
LIGHT LEAKS
(TRAUGER)
SI C&DH
FUNCTION WITHIN SPEC
INTERFACE TESTING
THERMAL
FUNCTION WITHIN SPEC
THERMAL CONTROL ANALYSIS
VERIFICATION OF THERMAL MODEL
ELECTRONICS
FUNCTION WITHIN SPEC
EMI/EMC TESTING
ACOUSTIC TESTING
(GALLAGHER)
(GARCIA)
(WHITTLESEy)
. FUNCTION WITHIN SPEC
(BRENT, O'CONNELL) ENVELOPE (HERRELL)
STRUCTURAL
SYSTEM TEST
PRE SYSTEM TEST
TN SCIENCE IMAGERY
TN SCIENCE IMAGERY
TN SCIENCE IMAGERY
TN SHORT/LONG MONITORS
TN SCIENCE IMAGERY
TN SCIENCE IMAGERY
TN FUNCTIONAL TESTING
{VEST TESTING}
TN FUNCTIONAL TESTING *
TN FUNCTIONAL TESTING
FUNCTION WITHIN SPEC
ASSEMBLY LEVEL TESTING
TN FUNCTIONAL TESTING
ADSORBERS
FUNCTION WITHIN SPEC
ASSEMBLY LEVEL TESTING
TN FUNCTIONAL TESTING
INSTRUMENT
INSTRUMENT LIFE
SINGLE POINT FAILURES
WF/PC-I EXPERIENCE BASE
WF/PC-I EXPERIENCE BASE
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
(BRENT)
MASS/Cg & POWER (ROCKEy) ASSEMBLY/SUBSYSTEM DATA
(SCOTT-MONCK, TAYLOR)
TN
*
=
THERMAL VACUUM TEST
*
ASSEMBLY & SIS VIBRATION TESTING DYNAMIC TESTING
INSPECTION {HFMS}
CAL SIS
(TRAUGER)
*
SAF
=
*
SAF & TN MEASUREMENTS
JPL SPACECRAFT ASSEMBLY FACILITY
REPEATED TESTING OVER FULL RANGE OF ANTICIPATED ON-ORBIT OPERATING TEMPS (HOT, NOMINAL, COLD)
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
WF/PC-II SYSTEM TEST OVERVIEW
EMI/EMC
(WHITTLESEy)
TEST CONDUCTED 3/1-5/93
SUCCESSFULLY PASSED 5 OF 8 TEST PARTS
POWER CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
RIPPLE CURRENT
IN-RUSH CURRENT
POWER CONDUCTED SUSCEPTIBILITY
RIPPLE VOLTAGE
PASSED
TRANSIENT VOLTAGE PASSED
MAGNETIC FIELD EMISSIONS
DC
LOW FREQ AC
FAILED «WF/PC-I)
PASSED
DAR-018
FAILED (GFE LATCH) DAR-019
PASSED
E-FIELD RADIATED EMISSIONS
FAILED «WF/PC-I)
E-FIELD RADIATED SUSCEPTIBILITY
PASSED
TEST REPORT ISSUED 3/26/93, REPORT & THREE DARs SUBMITTED TO GSFC 4/1/93
DAR-020
NOTE: WF/PC-II FAILED EMISSION LEVELS WERE BELOW THE COMPARABLE WF/PC-I LEVELS
THE MAGNETIC FIELD TEST FAILURE WAS A RESULT OF A GFE LATCH
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
WF/PC-II SYSTEM TEST OVERVIEW
DYNAMIC TESTING NIBRATION/ACOUSTIC)
(BRENT/O'CONNELL)
TEST CONDUCTED 3/19-26/93
VALIDATED WF/PC-II FINITE ELEMENT MODEL
FIRST MODE AT 32 Hz (PREDICTED -25 Hz BASED UPON HDOS LATCH STIFFNESS ESTIMATES)
PRE-TO-POST DYNAMIC OPTICAL CHANGES OBSERVED (TRAUGER)
TWO MOLECULAR ADSORBERS RE-QUALIFIED IN V1 PRIOR TO FULL PF ACOUSTIC TEST(> 30 grms)
TEST REPORT ISSUED 5/4/93
LIGHT LEAK TEST 0NF/PC INTO HUB) (AS REPORTED AT APRIL MONTHLY MANAGEMENT MEETING)
VISUAL TEST PERFORMED BY J. TRAUGER, J. McGUIRE, A. VAUGHAN
OBSERVED 3 LIGHT LEAKS
BRIGHTEST LEAKS FROM "OLD" WF/PC-I CAL LAMPS IN BACK OF SHUTTER (SHUTTER CLOSED)
MAGNITUDE -1 CAL LAMP LEAK FROM EDGE OF DEPLOYED FLIP MIRROR
NOTE: NO LEAK SEEN WITH FLIP MIRROR STOWED
TWO SEPARATE MAGNITUDE +5 LEAKS FROM AFT PART OF CAL SIS
PROJECT HAS COORDINATED WITH STScl, UNDERSTAND NO SIGNIFICANT OPERATIONAL IMPACT
USED DURING EARTH OCCULTATIONS, SMOV TEST PLANNED
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
WF/PC-II SYSTEM TEST OVERVIEW
THERMAL-VAC
TEST DURATION: 31 DAYS, STARTED APRIL 12 COMPLETED MAY 13
5 DAY HOT SOAK, 6 DAYS HOT ORBIT, 9 DAYS NOMINAL, 5 DAYS COLD ORBIT, 3 DAYS WARM-UP
SUCCESSFULLY DEMONSTRATED: .
SHUTTER/POM FUNCTIONALITY IN FA HOT SOAK (+35 C)
INSTRUMENT FUNCTIONALITY IN HOT/NOMINALICOLD ORBIT CONDITIONS AT 24, 28 & 32 V
ALL MECHANISMS FUNCTIONED PROPERLY INCLUDING FAIL SAFES (SEE SOFA CAVEAT)
BASIC FUNCTIONALITY AFTER EXPOSURE TO FA COLD CONDITIONS
CCD DECONTAMINATION SEQUENCE (WITH & WITHOUT HEAT PIPE HEATERS)
OBTAINED POWER PROFILES UNDER HOT/NOMINALICOLD ORBIT & VARYING VOLTAGE CONDITIONS
OPERATED ON PRIMARY & REDUNDANT ELECTRONICS, PRIMARY & REDUNDANT POWER BUSSES
OBTAINED EXTENSIVE SCIENCE DATA(168 TAPES) CHARACTERIZING CCDs/OPTICS/FILTERS
OBTAINED 6 TAPES OF ENGINEERING DATA
PERFORMED BLIND ALIGNMENT TEST
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
WF/PC-II SYSTEM TEST OVERVIEW
THERMAL-VAC (OPTICS) (TRAUGER/MACENKA)
OBTAINED:
ALiGNMENT/WAVEFRONT ERROR/PUPIL SHEAR DATA
OPTICAL THROUGPUT DATA(QE)
BORESIGHT DATA (CCD FRAME OVERLAP)
IMAGE STABILITY DATA
THERMAL-VAC (CONTAMINATION) (SCOTT-MONCK/TAYLOR)
5 DAY HOT SOAK AT +35 C (+40 C ON BAY 5 ELECTRONICS)
PASSED AFT SHROUD CERTIFICATION (ANOMALOUS DATA FROM TQCM WITH VIEW OF BAY 2)
INFER EXTREMELY LOW CONTAMINATION LEVELS ATIRIBUTABLE TO INSTRUMENT
DESPITE CCD SET POINT OF -78 C (ANTICIPATED -72 C) FOR DARK CURRENT PERFORMANCE
THERMAL-VAC (MECHANISMS) (GALLAGHER)
SOFA POSITION ANOMALIES (MOST OCCURANCES UNDER COLD ORBIT CONDITIONS)
DIAGNOSED AS INSUFFICIENT WAIT TIME: PHOTODIODE TURN-ON TO POSITION SAMPLE
INSTITUTED RAM PATCH TO INCREASE WAIT TIME
EXTENSIVELY TESTED SOFA RAM PATCH AT -10 C
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
WF/PC-II SYSTEM TEST OVERVIEW
THERMAL-VAC (THERMAL) (GARCIA)
TESTED INSTRUMENT OVER SPEC RANGE +35 C TO -15 C
BAY 5 ELECTRONICS TEMPERATURE IN HOT SOAK: +40 C
MAINTAINED OPTICAL BENCH WITHIN +12 C +2 C UNDER HOT, NOMIINAL & COLD ORBITS
27% REPLACEMENT HEATER DUTY CYCLE IN HOT ORBIT(32 V)
80% DUTY CYCLE IN NOMINAL ORBIT (28 V)
100% DUTY CYCLE IN COLD ORBIT (28 V)
DURING PROLONGED TN COLD ORBIT/24 V TEST OPTICAL BENCH NOT MAINTAINED ABOVE +10 C
PREDICT WILL MAINTAIN BENCH ABOVE +10 C ON-ORBIT BASED ON WF/PC-I VOLTAGE PROFILE
KEPT OPTICAL BENCH TEMPERATURE WITHIN TEMP STABILITY LIMITS OF AFMs (0.07 C/3000 SEC)
DEMONSTRATED CCD SET POINTS, THERMAL BALANCE OF INSTRUMENT/BAY 5
HOT JUNCTION #2 ANOMALOUS READINGS (SENSOR DEBONDED, NO IMPACT ON TEMP CONTROL)
POST THERMAL-VAC
MASS/Cg MEASURED (BRENT))
POST TN POM POSTION & ICD ENVELOPE DOCUMENTED VIA THEODOLITE SURVEY (HERRELL)
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
POWER PROFILE SUMMARY
WF/PC-II Orbital
.
Hot (+14 C)
Hot (+14 C)
Hot (+14 C)
/
79.
75.51
Nominal (+12 C)
Nominal (+12 C)
Nominal (+12 C)
71,\
87.4
Cold (+10 C)
Cold (+10 C)
Cold (+10 C)
Normal
Operate"
+AFMs
NO ReplHtrs
(W)
Orbital
Average·
Hold Mode +
RepHtrs
(W)
[Limit 93 WI
67.4
61.4
55.9
84.9
77.4
118.3
116.1
103.5
1
Volts Repl Duty Heat Orbital Average:
(V) Htr Cycle (W) Normal Operate"
+AFMs + Repl Htrs
(W) (%)
(W)
[Limit 189 WI
'
95.1·· ·····. ·
95,11
95.1.
100.5
92.1
85.3
32.0 48.1 0.25 12.0
28.0 36.8 O.3�/12.0
i.
24.0. 27.1.0.44 12.0 .
..
... ,I . .· ..
. .
..
48.3/( 0.61 29.6.>
28.0 37.01 0.80 29.6 .
.
24.0 21.2 ,1.00 27.2 >. .
. . . , . . .. 1 .... . J
1 1
1 J
,
... 1 .· . . 1 ... ··
37.2· ······· ··
32.0 48.3. 0.77
1.00 37.0
1.00 27.2
28.0 37.0
24.0 27.2
CAL SIS Orbital Average:
(W) Nor Oper+AFMs +
RepHtrs + CAL
(W)
[Limit 189 WI
130.3
··
. .
.
. ......... ... J 1
124.7/ 1
..122.3
1
131.7
129.1
112.5
1
>
30.4
. 30.4
30.4
,
29.1.
29.11
29.1
30.8
28.8
31.6
1
160.7
158.5
145.9
_
n
153.8
153.8/ 1
151.4 1
,
168.5 -.J
157.9
144.1
Peak'"
Peak PowerMechanism Normal
Oper +
Condition
Actuation
AFMs +
RepHtrs (100%) +
(W)
Actuations (W)
[Limit 262 WI
96.7
263.1
96.7
249.6
1
227.3
96.7
,
96.7
95.01
96.7
,
94.51
96.7
96.7
1
240.1
227.1'
219.0
243.3
225.8
209.2
Shading Indicates Predicted Values
•
Hold Mode includes RIU, LVPS, MECH Rep/acement Heaters
1
Normal Operate includes LVPS, MECH, TEC
I
... CAL Flip Mirror Power Draw Drops to -84 W within several seconds
..
1 1
1
1
1
.... Peak Power of 262 W for 2 minutes is permitted as long as thermal constraints not exceeded, Power Constraints Reference ICD-03, CCR 3510
I
I
I
I
I
I
5/19/93
I
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
SUMMARY OF SUBMITTED OARs
SUBJECT DESCRIPTION
DAR #
DATE
DAR-18
3/31/93
EMI/EMC
NARROW BAND CONDUCTED EMISSIONS
DAR-19
3/31/93
EMI/EMC
MAGNETIC FIELD INTENSITY AT LATCHES
DAR-20
3/31/93
EMI/EMC
DAR-21
4/20/93
STATIC ENVELOPE
NARROW & BROAD BAND RADIATED EMISSIONS
TYPE
AFM CABLING EXCEEDS ICD-03 STATIC ENVELOPE
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
ENGINEERING LIENS SUMMARY
DURING TN TEST HEATERS/BLANKETS DID NOT MAINTAIN OPTICAL BENCH ABOVE +10 C IN COLD
ORBIT/24 V CONDITIONS (REQUIRED FOR OPERATION OF AFMs) (WAIVER BEING PROCESSED)
PREDICT WILL MAINTAIN BENCH ABOVE +10 C ON-ORBIT BASED ON WF/PC-I VOLTAGE PROFILE
NEW TOP THERMAL BLANKET (SANS LOGO) IS UNTESTED
VIBRATION FROM FACILITY/STIMULUS PRECLUDED VERIFYING IMAGE MOTION STABILITY
CAL SIS LIGHT LEAKS
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
SUMMARY
OBJECTIVES OF THE SYSTEM LEVEL TEST HAVE BEEN MET:
CONDUCTED A COMPREHENSIVE END-TO-END SCIENCE/ENGINEERING TEST
VERIFIED KEY FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITIES
VERIFIED STRUCTURAL & THERMAL MODELS/MARGINS
CALIBRATED & CHARACTERIZED INSTRUMENT/CCDs/ELECTRONICS/FILTERS
IDENTIFIED/DOCUMENTED INSTRUMENT IDIOSYNCRASIES
WITH THE EXCEPTIONS NOTED IN THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED DARs (018, 019, 020, 021) &
WITH THE CAVEATS PRESENTED DURING THIS REVIEW, WF/PC-II HAS VERIFIED ALL OF
ITS FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS & ENVIRONMENTAL TEST REQUIREMENTS
ALL OUTSTANDING ACTION ITEMS HAVE BEEN CLOSED
THERE ARE NO ADDITIONAL OUTSTANDING LIENS AGAINST THE FLIGHT HARDWARE,
ALL ECRs INCORPORATED INTO HARDWARE, ALL WAIVERS CLOSED, DARs SUBMITTED
BASED ON THE TOTALITY OF SUBSYSTEM & SYSTEM LEVEL TEST RESULTS,
WF/PC-II IS READYTO SHIP FROM AN ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE
.r/PC-XX PRB-8BXP RBVXBW
TBBRIIAL
Document
CEIS-II
(PD751-60)
Paragraph
4.3.4.1
VActnJIl TH8T VBlUPXCATX01l8
Performance/Design Requirements
Temperature Range :
- The WF/PC-II electronics
shall be compatible with
the following temperature
criteria :
Bay 1 - 4 (Housing Mounted):
-15 to +25·C
FIt Accpt
T/V test temp:
-15 to +35·C
AFM Electronics
(w/o Actuators):
+5 to +20·C
FIt Accpt
T/V test temp:
-15 to +35·C
Bay 5 (Ext Rad Mounted):
-20 to +40·C·
FIt Accpt
Document
CEIS-II
(PD751-60)
Paragraph
4.3.5.1
Buyoff/Comments
performance/Design Requirements
Temperature Control and
Regulation :
- The WF/PC-II thermal design
shall include provisions to
thaw frozen heat pipes.
- The WF/PC-II thermal
control system shall
maintain the following
thermal conditions during
orbital operations :
1
T/V test Bay 5 temp:
-20 to +40·C·
• Waiver
21091
Buyoff/Comments
Heat pipe thaw demonstration not
performed during T/V test based
on Pre-Environment Test Review
recommendation (see RFA #18 and
DFM #2058 used to close AI).
WF/PC- II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
THERMAL VACUUK
Document
Paragraph
TBST VERIFICATIONS
performance/Design Requirements
Buyoff/Comments
Passed.
verified by Pre and Post
Dynamics images in comparison
with T/V images obtained during
Hot/Nominal/Cold orbit
conditions (1 pixel=15 microns).
Max V2 shift -1 pixel (Prel Data)
Max v, shift -1 pixel (Prel Data)
CEIS-II
(PD751-60)
4.4.1.1
optical Stability :
- Exposure of the WF/PC-II to
the launch and on-orbit
thermal, static, and dynamic
environments shall not result
in a displacement of the normal
image plane, as measured at the
CCDs, in any axis; V"V2' or
V" of more than ±20 /-1m.
CEIS-II
(PD751-60)
4.4.1.2
Image Jitter :
- Image jitter, induced by
any WF/PC-II source, over a
3000 sec exposure
integration time shall be
less than ±1.5 /-1m in the V,
and V2 axes at the normal
image plane of the CCDs.
CEIS-II
(PD751-60)
4.4.2.2
optical Bench Temperature :
- The optical bench shall be
maintained at +12 ±2'C for
the AFMs to operate within
specifications.
K-Spot data indicates: Pyrmaid,
Fold Mirrors and Relays Passed.
As anticipated RIAF & Stimulus
effects so dominated image
motion stability as to mask
POM/POMM contributions
Passed with Qualification.
Maintained Optical Bench above
+10'C under cold orbit/28 V
conditions but not at 24 V.
CARD turns off AFMs below +10·C.
I
!
,
-
2
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
THERMAL VACUUK
Paragraph
Document
4.4.2.2.2
CElS-II
(PD751-60)
Paragraph
Document
4.7.2.1
CElS-II
(PD751-60)
Paragraph
Document
4.8.7.1
CElS-II
(PD751-60)
/
TBST VBRIFI�TIO.S
-
(Cont'4)
Duyoff/Comments
Performance/Design Requirements
Short Term Optical Bench
Stability :
- The optical bench shall be
stable to within ±0.07·C over
any 3000 sec exposure and
+1.0·C over one week period.
Passed.
Fold mirror bulkhead temperature
met stability requirement
(±0.084·C/hr). Stability also
inferred from unchanging
wavefront error.
Duyoff/comments
performance/Design Requirements
Thermoelectric Coolers :
- The TECs shall provide the
thermal control necessary
to maintain the CCDs at a
controlled set point with a
long term stability of ±5·C
and a short term (� 4 hours)
stability of less than
O.OI·CrC.
Passed.
Verified in T/V at 2·C nominalto-cold orbit temp. swing.
Objective: cold junction temp.
setpoint stability of O.I·C
under 10·C electronic temp.
change (DFM 555).
performance/Design Requirements
TEC Temperature Controller :
- The TEC temperature
controller shall provide a
long term (14 hours)
stability of ±5·C.
- The TEC short term
stability shall be
O.OI·CrC.
3
Duyo ff/comments
Passed.
Passed.
.
0424
14:0
0424
12:0
0.10
,
0424
16:0
0424
18:0
0424
20:0
0424
22:0
,
0425
2:0
0425
0:0
0425
6:0
0425
4:0
O.OB
-
r
0.06
..
::l
0
:J:
0.04
'ti-
'"
..
0
0.02
�
0
0.00
It:
f
.2
e
..
a.
E
-
I,
r
I
II
I
r
-0.02
�
I�
..
....
-0.04
Ilnln nn
IlL
V�
�
-0.06
-0.08
-0.10
114.50
,
,
114.58
,
114.67
o OPTICAL BENCH FOLD MIRROR
,
114.75
,
114.83
,
114.92
DAY OF YEAR
,
115.00
,1
II 11
WLJ
,
115.08
�.-'
ILl
-
,
115.17
115.25
93102 165<100
0504
12:0
0.10
0504
13:0
0504
14:0
0504
lS:0
0504
15:0
0504
17:0
0504
18:0
.
0504
19:0
0504
20:0
0504
22:0
0504
21:0
0504
23:0
•
•
0505
0:0
•
0.08
0.06
:::I
0
0.04
-
..
�
tJ
to
0.02
c
r
..
£
0
""
r!
.O!
E
E
..
D-
0.00
�
-0.02
11\,1
lu1
..
...
-0.04
-O.OS
I
r
�
f-J'
U
II'
�
MI
n..JIlI
J.l
-
r
-0.08
r
-0.10
124.50
..L
0
124.54
1 24.58
124.S3
o OPTICAL BENCH FOLD MIRROR
124.67
124.71
124.75
DAY OF YEAR
124.79
124.83
124.88
124.92
124.96
125.00
93102 1 &SolOO
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
THBRDL
Document
CElS-II
(PD751-60)
Document
CElS-II
(PD751-60)
Paragraph
4.11.1.1
paragraph
5.9.1. (1). (c)
VActJ1JIl
'fEST VERII'ICATIOBS
-
Per formance/Design Requirements
Thermal Gradients :
- Thermal gradients
the optical bench
no greater than:
6"C along the V3
I"C along the V,
axes.
across
shall be
with TECs ON
-
22"C
32"C
43" C
52"C
72"C
7S"C
S4"C
90"C
4
Buyoff/Comments
Passed.
(Caveat: no V2 data)
axis and
and V2
Performance/Design Requirements
set Points :
with TECs OFF
(Cont'a)
Buyoff/comments
Passed.
Verified control at all CCD set
points.
WF/PC·II PRE·SHIP REVIEW
REQUIREMENTS VERIFIED BY ANALYSIS ALONE
REQUIREMENT/PARAMETER
ANALYSIS TITLE & DESIGN FILE #
ADSORBER LIFE, CEIS-II, 5.2.1.5
J. BARENGOLTZ, 10M 355-1-93-086
INSTRUMENT LIFE, CEIS-II, 4.1.8, 4.3.10.1
SIMILARITY TO WF/PC-I + NEW SIS LIFE TESTS
GEOMETRIC STABILITY, CEIS-1I 3.3.7
ROCKEY/RODGERS, DFM 2038
LOADS, CEIS-II 4.10. 2, ICD-03, 3.5.1.1
D. BRENT, STRESS REPORT, 4/7/93
OPTICAL BENCH TEMP STABILITY, CEIS-II, 4.4.2.2.1
R. GARCIA, DFM 1931
PARTICULATE RADIATION
SIMILARITY TO WF/PC-I
PICK-OFF MIRROR MECH STABILITY, CEIS-1I 4.4.3.2.3
D. ROCKEY/D. RODGERS, DFM 2038
PICK-OFF MIRROR IMAGE STABILITY, CEIS-II 5.2.2.1.(5)
D. ROCKEY/D. RODGERS, DFM 2038
SINGLE POINT FAILURE, CEIS-II, 4.3.10. 2 & ICD-03 3.7.5
SWENSON, DFM 1616
VENTING (LAUNCH ASCENT), CEIS-II, 4.3.11.2
ELLIOT, DFM 961
UV LAMP LIFE, CEIS-II, 4.14.3.2.4 & 5.8.2.(2)
L. MAJORANA, 3/19/92 BRIEFING
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
REQUIREMENTS VERIFIED BY DESIGN
CEIS-II REQUIREMENTS/PARAMETERS
BAY 5 RADIATOR (RADIATED POWER: > 58 W), CEIS-1I 5.7. 2.(1)
BAY 5 RADIATOR(EMISSIVITY: > 0. 85), CEIS-1I 5.7.2.(3)
CAL LAMP (FREQUENCY OF ACTUATION: ONCE/HR THROUGHOUT INSTRUMENT LIFE)
LIGHT LEAKS, CEIS-II 4.1.7 (EXT. RAD TO ST BAFFLE)
LOADS: RADIATOR STRUCTURAL COUPLlNG, CEIS-1I 4.10. 2
LOADS: LIGHT BAFFLE ASCENT/DESCENT LOADS, ICD-03 3. 5 . 1. 4.1
OPTICAL BENCH(LIMIT ON SIDE PANEL DIFFERENTIAL THERMAL COEF. OF EXPANSION), CEIS-II 4. 4. 2.1
PICK-OFF MIRROR ARM DIMENSIONAL STABILITY OVER TEMP, CEIS-II 4.4.2.3
PICK-OFF MIRROR MECHANISM ACTUATION DUTY CYCLE, CEIS-II 5. 2. 2. 1.(6) (ONCE/DAy)
REDUNDANCY, CEIS-1I 4.3.10.3(SPF ISOLATION)
REPAIRABILITY, CEIS-II 4. 1. 9
SOFA (FREQUENCY OF FILTER CHANGES: TWICE/HR), CEIS-II 5.3.1.(4)
TEC RADIATOR(RADIATED POWER: > 36 W), CEIS-1I 5.7.1.(1)
TEC RADIATOR(EMISSIVITY: > 0. 85), CEIS-1I 5.7.1.(3)
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
REQUIREMENTS VERIFIED BY DESIGN
ICD-03 REQUIREMENTS/PARAMETERS
GROUNDING: SI TO ST REMOVABLE GROUNDING STRAP, ICD-03 3. 7 . 7
LOADS: LIGHT BAFFLE ASCENT/DESCENT LOADS, ICD-03 3.5.1. 4. 1
LOADS: EMERGENCY & LANDING LOAD FACTORS, ICD-03 3.5.1.5
LOADS: MAXIMUM EVA CREW LOADS ON HANDHOLDS/ EQUIPMENT TETHERS, ICO-03 3. 5 . 1.8. 1
LOADS: GUIDERAIL, ICD-03 3.5.1. 8. 2
LOADS: SSE EQUIPMENT TETHER ATTACHMENT LOADS, ICD-03 3. 5.1.8.3
LOADS: FLIGHT PICK-OFF MIRROR COVER & HANDRAIL LOADS, ICD-03 3.5.1.8. 4
THERMAL LOAD: SSM TO SI THERMAL LOAD, ICD-03 3. 6. 1 . 1. 6
VENTING DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE (ASCENT/DESCENT) ICD-03 3. 6. 6
WF/PC-II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
REQUIREMENTS VERIFIED BY DESIGN
lCD-OS REQUIREMENTS/PARAMETERS
LOADS: NO UTILIZATION OF RIU AS STRUCTURAL MEMBERS, lCD-OS 3. 5. 1
VENTING: CONSIDER ADDED VOLUME OF RIUs, lCD-OS 3. 3. 8
ICD-83 REQUIREMENTS/PARAMETERS
SI ACCESSIBILITY LIMITED TO RADIATOR ONCE INSTALLED INTO SIPE, 3.3. 7
SI INSTALLATION INTO SIPE WITHOUT DAMAGE TO SI OR CREATION OF PERSONNEL HAZARD, 3.1. 1
SI STATIC/DYNAMIC ENVELOPE (NO CONTACT SIPE GUIDERAIL CONTACT WITH SI), 3. 3. 3
SI PURGE COMPOSITION & FLOW RATE TO BE DEFINE BY WF/PC-II DESIGN TEAM, 3. 3. 9
SI NON-OPERATIONAL TEMPERATURE LIMITS, 3. 5 . 1
REQUIREMENTS VERIFIED BY ON-ORBIT CHARACTERIZATION
GEOMETRIC DISTORTION, CEIS-II 4. 3 .2.3
NO GROUND TEST PLANNED,
CHARACTERIZE USING ON-ORBIT
STAR FIELD IMAGES
-
e
CD
E
ca
0
ca
CD
c
ca
-
-
D-
:c
-
CD
.II.
.
CD
"
.-
;:
W
0
�z
enc(
w::J
�a.
..J::E
�O
O
z
Wen
�
::E z
zW
::E
a:
_w
>a:
zw:l
a
w
a:
O
C")
0)
0)
..-
�
�
>
c:(
:e
....I
W
m
m
"
:e
•
Wide Field/Planetary Camera II
AGENDA
•
•
•
OBJECTIVE
COMPLIANCE WITH SUBSYSTEM (COMPONENT/ASSEMBLY)
LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL TEST REQUIREMENTS
COMPLIANCE WITH SYSTEM (INSTRUMENT) LEVEL
ENVIRONMENTAL TEST REQUIREMENTS
Wide Field/Planetary Camera II
OBJECTIVE
TO SUPPORT THE EVALUATION OF FLIGHT READINESS AND TO
ASSESS THE EXTENT TO WHICH ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
AND ACCEPTANCE REQUIREMENTS WERE MET.
WFPC - I I TEST MATRI X
EQUIPMENT AND
TEST TYPE
FLIGHT UNIT
"" :z:
0
TEST
,.
SYSTEII
2.
HClJSING
3.
4.
��
��
5.
A
•
PICK·OFF
PICK·OFF MIRROR COVER
7.
SHUTTER MECHAMISM
e.
FILTER SELECTOR SYSTEM
=
IV'>
=>
0
U
<
SpF
co
0>
I.LJ
""
0::
...;
-
co
>-
:E
0
Q
:z:
V'>
�
SLL
SFA
w
0::
IV'>
---'
tIi
<
:>:
=>
=>
'-'
<
>-
...J
......
i
I.LJ
:I:
>-
UJ
:I:
>-
A
SFA
>>01>UJ_ oI- ...J UJ --'
'-' - 1-=> co < co
0- - :z: I- 0100. <0.
u I.LJ exUJ
U
U
U V'> U V'>
:E=> :E=>
UJ V'> UJ V'>
S
S
0
w
>-
z
0
0
0::
I:z:
0
0
0
I.LJ
I-
<
-
�
0
W
:E:
..
..
A
A
=
SSp F
SSpF SSpF
SSpF SSp F
•
--'
u
=> :z: «:z:
00 <..> 0
- :z: � �>- o V'> 0:: >u
UJ
:z:
�
'"
S
'-' V'> >-<
- u --'
U:E wo
:E:>: --' V'>
wUJ w_
S
><
�
U
>-
-
=>
V'>
e<:
0
<..>
><
0::
�
>-
V)
V)
UJ
0::
>V)
a)
a)
w
""
:E
0
«
:E
0::
>-
0::
0>
-
V)
-
�
:z:
0
«
---'
0::
w
:r:
:>:
=>
U
=>
>-
«
---'
0::
UJ
:r:
f-
«
:>:
�
:>:
�
UJ
U
0::
oz
LL 0
UJ
>< 0::
UJ
--'
V) >-
-
�«
N>
«a)
�
<..>
---'
U
>-
LL
�
---'
Z
w
u
Iu
w
«: i
LL
---'
0::
w
>
::>
S
SS
•
ANALYSIS
FLIGHT ACCEPTANCE
SSFA
�
be
valid for "FPC-II..
S
=
�A
SYSTEM lEVEL TESTS
II = low lEVEL
I
I
SSFA
Qual Test imerited frail "Fpc·l..
Analysis was done for "FPC-I. and should
FA
u
MECHAMISM
6.
A
-
0::
<
>-
V'>
V'>
Cl
w
>-
MIRROR
PICK·oFF MIRROR
•
**
""
0
0
z
""
QUAL UNIT
•
(PYICAL BENCH
1/24
��
��
�::>
ASSEMBLY
I-
<0
0
-
FLIGHT SPARES
PF
=
5S = SUBSYSTEM LEVEL TESTS
PROTOFLIGHT
TA = (PF + At)
EOUIPMENT AND
TEST TYPE
FLIGHT UNIT
0
:�
��
TEST
""!:;
<!)
��
��
ASSEMBLY
9.
MIRROR
PYRAMID
(ACTUATOR MECHANISM)
10.
FOlD MIRRORS (F IXED)
II.
AFM MECHANISMS
12.
•
:z:
0
-
U
IV)
::>
0
U
'"'"
I
I<
a:
co
•
>-
>
14.
cros
2
•
••
�
..,
'"
w
Z
:r:
�
:z:
-
VI
w
I-
SSF
A
SS
::E
::>
::>
u
<
>-
......
�
i=
w
>>OIlw_ o I- -' UJ -'
u_ 1-Z
::> co <co
C>
0_ - ZI- 0100..
Iuw
<
u u
0
UVI UVl
�f:;
::E ::> ::E::>
W V) W Vl
l-
•
0
0
0::
C>
w
Iw
::E
�
..... 1 Yest repeated on IIFPC-II
on Qual
following
ems •
Test
UFPC-I.
Analysis was done for UFPC-I. and
inherited from
A
=
�
��
u
-
IVI
::>
0
U
'"'"
a:
en
-
>
z
w
-
V>
a:
V>
UJ
en
-
I-
>
L
0
z
CI
""
'"'"
V>
---'
"'"
w
::c
::E
""
l-
L
u
=:>
=:>
"'"
>
-----'
"'"
0::
w
::c
::E
::;:
---'
'"
u
a:
02:
LL. 0
V> I-
-
X ""
- «
'"'" en
-
N>
SSp
F
SSf
A
SS F
A
SSF
SSF
be
valid
S
=
(I_e_
A
A
SSF
A
Vespel gear).
for UFPC-II.
SYSTEM LEVEL TESTS
LL = Low LEVEL
PF
=
w
---'
U
>-
u
UJ
LL.
---'
SS
FA
SSF
A
«
u
:z:
UJ
I-
SSF
A
design changes
should
ANALYSIS
FLIGHT ACCEPTANCE
=
U
IW
Z
(!)
-'
'"'" Z
uo
:z: - - 0V) 0:: lUVI I- '"'"
- U ---'
U::E wO
::E::E -' VI
w w w-
V>
l-
SSF
A
SyA
Qual
U
"'"
a:
-
SS
SSF
A
testing
I"'"
-
0
UJ
I-
SS
S
Radiation
2:
0
0
w
0
QUAL UNIT
SSrA
2
FA
-'
::E
(including
RELAY OPTICS
V)
V)
w
a:
IV)
-
-
SS
2:
C>
l<
a:
co
.:z:
AFM elECTRO... CS
RIU·C)
11.
FLIGHT SPARES
SS = SUBSYSTEM LEVEL TESTS
TA = (PF + �t)
PROTOFLIGHT
SS
>- .
U
w
,�
---'
UJ
CY
>=>
EQUIPMENT AND
TEST TYPE
FLIGHT UNIT
FLIGHT SPARES
QUAL UNIT
0
w
��
g,�
g�
TEST
"'l'"
g�
ASSEMBLY
IS.
16.
17.
18.
19.
zo.
21.
CAMERA HEAD ASSEMBLY
wI TEC
HEAT PIPES
RADIATORS
•
:Z:
0
0
-
Ie(
l<
0:
<XI
<..>
<0
>
IVJ
:::>
0
<..>
e(
>
-
-
o:
-
w
z:
-
V)
-
::E
0
Cll
:z
�
ELECTRONICS (BAY
5)
3
V)
V)
w
0:
lV>
-'
<
�
w
:c
l-
::E
:::>
:::>
<..>
e(
>
......
-'
�
0:
:c
w
I-
>>OIlw_ oI- -' w-'
<..> - 1- :::> <XI <<0
0_ - Zl- 0100..
<..> w
<..>
<..>
<..> VJ <..> VJ
�fu
lu
z:
0
0
w
:z
0
0
-
I-
0
0::
<
0
w
lw
::E
-
ffi� ffi� �
0
<..>
-
:::> :z <:z
00 uo
--'
ov> 0:: l-
z_ --
w <..> V> 1-<
- u-'
Z
t!> <..> ::E wo
-' V)
w_
I-
� ffi�
I<
0:
<0
�
<..>
I-
-
:::>
V>
u
0
<
>-
-
w
Vl
:z
-
t<
0::
CXl
�
>-
�
0
::;:
0
<
IX
z
3
I-
V>
V>
0::
tV>
w
<
--'
IX
::E
:c
l-
w
�
:::>
::;:
U
<
>-
::;:
�
U
0::
oz
w
---'
"- 0
�
0:
:c
I-
w
- <
>< IX
<co
�
V> t-
N>
-
SSpF
"r A
SSr A
A
A
UV LMP
A
A
A
A
SSF
A
S5FA SSr A SSr A
-------
S5f
A
S5F
A
- '--
stnuctural Qualification inherited fra. UFPC-I.
.
.. Qual Test fnherlted
fran "'FPC-I.
Analysis was done for "'FPC-I. end should
.
A
FA
=
A N ALYSIS
FLIGHT ACCEPTANCE
=
be
valid for "FPC-II.
S
=
SYSTEM LEVEL TESTS
LL = Low LEVEL
PF
=
w
--'
:::>
SSFA
SSp F
CALIBRATION SUBSYSTEM
-------
0
z
SSFA SSrA
•
CENTRAL
ELECTRONICS
iSAYS 1·4;- (Including RIUs AlB)
l
:z
SS = SUBSYSTEM LEVEL TESTS
PROTOFLIGHT
TA = (PF + htl
W
--'
u
>U
W
"-
--'
<
t-
u
:z:
u
w
--'
0::
"-
w
>:::>
,.
'"
EQUIPMENT AND
TEST TYPE
FLIGHT UNIT
FLIGHT SPARES
QUAL UNIT
0
w
f-
:�
0
TEST
��
S�
��
<.!)
ASSEMBLY
22.
FLIP MIRROR MECHANISM
Zl.
GFE HARDIIARE
24.
ADSORBER
25.
CABLING/CONNECTORS
26.
•
4
-
z
0
I-
«
U
IVl
::>
0
U
«
5
MLI/THERMAL BLANKETS
•
0::
<0
.....
>
:z
w
.....
Vl
Z
0
!;(
0::
-
CD
.....
>
::e;
Q
01
z
�
f-
VJ
VJ
00
f-
z
Vl
Vl
w
0::
I-
Vl
-'
�
w
:r
l-
::e;
::>
::>
U
�
......
-'
�
0::
w
:r
I-
SSpF
S5.rA
$SFA
A
>>OIlw_ o1--' w -'
u- 1-::> 00 «00
0_ ..........
:z I- 01-
00..
c;!f!:;
Uw
U
U
UVl UVl
::e; ::>
w Vl
ffiB:
z
0
0
I-
0::
-
.....
0
w
«
0
0
«
Iw
::e;
.....
0::
u
0
w
l-
U
z
0
--'
::> z «; :z
00 uo
z- - a: ll1-«
UJ
- u -'
:z
U::E wo
.....
�
S:?
f-
::e; ::E -' Vl
ww L.LJ .....
«
u
-
IVI
::>
0
U
«
a:
00
;>
0
-
«
0::
;>
L.LJ
a:
VJ
--'
::E
::>
::::>
u
«
;>
-...
--'
UJ
:z
::E
0
0
z
«
::E
0::
UJ
w
Vl
a:
f-
f-
.....
«
SS FA
I
«
::E
0::
I
::E
--'
u
UJ
L.LJ
u
a:
Lo.. 0
U
VI f-
OJ
>< a:
L.LJ
oz
-
..... «
«00
.....
N>
•
6
•
27.
SHIPPING CONTAINER
, Quol Test repeated on UFPC·II 101l... lng design changes (I.e. Yespel gear
5
6
Design Qualification based
l..IpM
the original
Qual Test inherited fro. "FPC-I.
Analysis was done lor UFPC·I. and should
A
FA
=
ANALYSIS
FLIGHT ACCEPTANCE
=
be
S
position switches).
"FPC-. design.
Structural design 01 the MLl/Thennol Blankets inherited Iroo UFpc·l
•
••
-lnSCabbed"
end
•
valid lor UFpc·ll.
=
SYSTEM LEVEL TESTS
LL = Low LEVEL
PF
=
SS = SUBSYSTEM LEVEL TESTS
PROTOFLIGHT
TA = (PF + �t)
L.LJ
--'
>-
Lo..
.....
---'
z
«
I-
u
UJ
---'
a:
Lo..
w
>
=>
Wide FieldlF- . .Aetary Camera II
SUBSYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL TEST MATRIX
Eligbl l:lllBiY:llI:I
Pick-off Mirror Assembly
(SIN-1)
TherlTlal Vae
Non-Operate
-SS'C, +50'C
Thermal Vac
Operate
-3S'C, +50'C
-3S'C, +4S'C
50 cycles
-3S'C, +3S'C
27 cycles
Shutler (in atmosphere)
SOFA
Pyramid (fixed)
Random Vib
Comments
PF Level
4333 Life Cycles on EM
FA Level
100 cycles WF/PC Design
FA Level
PF Level
AFMs
-1 S'C, +40'C
AFM Electronics
-2S'C, +SS'C
FA Level
1000 Cycles + 10'C Spares
-10'C, +3S'C
Fix Fold Mirror
Relay Optics
Camera Heads
Electronics (in atmosphere)
TBS
5O'C unpowered
4 hr soak
Calibration SIS
Cal Flip Mirror
FA Level
-10'C, +20'C
-SS'C, +4S'C
-40'C, +40'C
Bay S ±SS'C
Lamp -25 +8S'C
Lamp PF Level
-3S'C, +4S'C
PF Level
PF Level
Adsorber
POM Cover
FA Shedding Test
-&D'C, +90'C
WF/PC Spare
Radiator
Heat Pipes
MLI Blanketing
FA Level
4 + spares
System TN
System TN
Failed to keep optical bench
above +10·C when bus @ 24v.
I
,
Wide FieldlPlar�""" ary Camera I I
EMC
&
MAGNETIC TEST RESULTS
Wide FieldlPlah�tary Camera II
SYSTEM LEVEL DYNAMIC TEST R ESULTS SUMMARY
•
•
•
WF/PC II DYNAMICS TESTS VERIFIED COMPLIANCE WITH PF
TEST ENVIRONMENTS DEFINED BY GSFC
ACCELERATION SPECTRUM NOTCHING DUE TO FORCE
LIMITING WAS WITHIN RECOMMENDED RANGE OF 4-8 dB
ASSEMBLY/SUBSYSTEM VIBRATION SPECIFICATIONS
BOUNDED SYSTEM TEST RESPONSES EXCEPT:
-
-
AFM'S EXPERIENCED SMALL NARROWBAND EXCEDANCE
BELOW RESONANT FREQUENCY - ACCEPTABLE
MOLECULAR ABSORBER V1 SPECIFICATION EXCEEDED BY
2X IN TERMS OF G RMS OPEN PFR (5641 8)
2 SPARES SUCCESSFULLY RE-PF TESTED
Wide Field/Planetary Camera II
SYSTEM LEVEL TN TEST SUMMARY
•
•
HOT AND
COLD MARGIN
HOT ORBIT
COLD ORBIT
TEST
}
MET 1DOC MARGIN REQUIREMENT ON ELECTRONIC
BAYS.
- HOT ORBIT OPTICAL BENCH REQUIREMENTS MET
- UNDER COLD ORBIT & 24 V BUS CONDITIONS,
OPTICAL BENCH NOT MAINTAINED ABOVE 1 DoC
- HOT JUNCTION NO. 2 ANOMALOUS BEHAVIOR P/FR
NO. 56419 WRITTEN (NO NEGATIVE IMPACT)
.....
.....
,
<
�
La.I
�
<3
u La.I
>
.....
>
� La.I
<�
ILa.l
o.
Z .....
< :c
...J (I)
0. ,
....... �
o.
c
...J
La.I
.....
L&,.
La.I
C
.....
3
e (l)
z=
cC�
I-
"'(1)
(I)
� (I)
<�
c La.l
l-
........
(I)
�
La.l La.I
L&,.
> .....
..... ...J
:l c
La.I
"'1(I) .....
��
u .....
La.I ...J
V)
.�
e
:z:
�
•
::z::
M
C7\
C7\
....
.....
N
•
�
::z::
WF/ P C - I I PRE - SH I P REV I EW
AGENDA
•
ENGINEERING CHANGE REQUEST (ECR) STATUS
•
WAIVER STATUS
•
DEVIATION ApPROVAL REQUEST (DAR) STATUS
•
LIMITED LI FE ITEM STATUS
•
SUMMARY
MT
-
2
WF/ PC - I I PRE-SH I P R EV I EW
ENG I N E E R I NG CHANG E REQUEST ( ECR) STATUS
BCR I
summary/Description
status
Closure
Date
19214
Shorten the WF/PC-II Pick-Off Mirror Cover
( POMC ) Release Bar ( in -V3 dimension) to
avoid possible Radial SIPE interference .
Approved
5/3/93
19215
Add a software delay, i n the form o f a
" RAM PATCH" to the WF/PC-II RAM LOAD to
al low more time for the SOFA home position
sensors to respond when activated by the
microprocessor .
Approved
5/19/93
i
MT
-
3
WF/ P C - I I P R E - SH I P REV I EW
WAI V E R STATUS
-
-----
waiver
I
t
--------
summary/Description
status
Closure
Date
Approved
2/4/93
2 10 9 0
Delay recertification o f the Bldg.
Clean Room crane.
( due May 1 9 9 3 )
2 10 9 1
change WF/PC-II Bay S Electronics ( fl i ght
acceptance) upper limit from +4S ' C to
+40 · C .
Approved
3/2 2/93
2 10 9 2
Change AFM electronics ( flight acceptance)
lower limit from - 3 S ' C to -2 S · C .
Approved
3/19/9 3
2 10 9 3
Change the POMC operational ( fl i ght
to
acceptance ) lower limit from - 6 0 C
-2SC.
Approved
S/ 12/93
2 10 9 4
waive the requirement to maintain the
i f in cold orbit
optical bench above +10C
conditions , the voltage falls below +2 8 . 0
volts .
In sign-off
TBD
248
I
--- -
MT
-
4
WF/ PC - I I PRE - S H I P REV I EW
D EV IATION A PPROVAL REQUEST ( DAR) STATUS
DAR
•
Summary/Description
Status
Closure
Date
0 18
Request a waiver of the ST-ICD- 0 3 F
requirements for S I Narrow Band Conducted
Emissions.
( Para. 3 . 7 . 8 . 3 )
Submitted to
GSFC on
4/1/93
Pending GSFC
Approval
0 19
Request a waiver of the ST-ICD-0 3 F
requirements for SI Magnetic Field
( Para. 3 . 6 . 2 . 2 )
Intensity.
Submitted to
GSFC on
4/1/ 9 3
pending GSFC
Approval
020
Request a waiver o f the ST-ICD-03F
requirements for Radiated Electric Field
( Para. 3 . 7 . 8 . 8 )
Emissions.
Submitted to
GSFC on
4/1/93
pending GSFC
Approval
021
Request modification o f the Radial ORI
static Envelope r ST-ICD- 0 3 F , Figure
3 . 3 - 1A , Sheet 1 , to accommodate the AFM
cable/connector near the guiderail .
Submitted to
GSFC on
4/2 9/93
Pending GSFC
Approval
-_
.
.
_
------
MT
-
5
WF/ PC - I I P R E - S�I P REV I EW
LIMITED L I FE I TEM STATUS
I
subsystem
,
pick-Off Mirror Mech .
Shutter :
Blade A
Blade B
Shutter
I
Life eye1.
Requirement
(cycles)
�2 , 5 0 0
�150 , 0 00
�150 , 00 0
---
(Fail Safe)
SOFA
�100 , 0 00
rotations
�1,000
�1,000
�1 , 000
CAL Flip Mirror
�3, 650
CAL Flip Mirror
(Fail Safe)
---
UV Lamp
-
-
-
Test cycles
Prior to
SAP'
Delivery
31
---
100
100
-
20
---
100
-
-
--
Test cycles
During
system
:rr.T
8
Total
CYcles
39
3283
3 2 14
3383
. 3314
2
22
1518
1618
I
AFMs :
pc
WF-3
WF-4
rncandescent Lamps
Welch Allyn 1
Welch Allyn 2
Carlis
System
Test
constraint
(cycles)
-----
--
-
:!:2·00
--
-
15
15
15
454
542
542
469
557
557
114
47
161
3
2
5
12 4
117
139
:
�3 , 6 5 0
� 3 , 650
�3 , 6 5 0
:!:2 0 0
:!:2 0 0
:!: 2 0 0
40
33
55
84
84
84
�3 , 6 5 0
:!: 2 0 0
232
38
-----
270
MT
I
-
6
WF/ PC- I I PRE-SH I P R EV I EW
SUMMARY
•
•
•
•
ALL WF/PC- I I ECRs AND WAIVERS HAVE BEEN CLOSED .
WAIVER #21094 IS IN "SIGN-OFF" AND SHOULD BE C LOSED BY THE
END OF THIS WEEK, MAY 28 , 1993 .
FOUR WF/PC- I I OARs HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO GSFC .
(DAR #018 , 019 , 020 , AND 021)
ALL CHANGE CONTROL DOCUMENTATION ( I . E . ECRs , WAIVERS ,
AND OARs) IS CURRENT AND REFLECTS THE WF/PC - I I FLIGHT
CONFIGURATION .
MT
-
7
-
s::
0
.-
ctS
Co)
.• •
==
(1)
.-
>
(1)
a:
c.
..c
en
I
f
C.
I
0
c.
u:
3:
....
(1)
>
(1)
c.
0
(1)
>
s::
W
-
ctS
Co)
.s::
ctS
.c
Co)
(1)
:E
I
0
C.
u:
3:
f
ai M
l: �
,....
:E �
..J LI')
WFIPC-" Pre-ahlp Revlew
This brief d iscussion wi l l :
•
Outl i ne steps which verify the
•
I dentify the
•
•
WF/PC-II
WF/PC-II
e nvelope
m echanical envelope
Describe tight clearances with respect to the
on-orbit i nstal lation, and the COSTAR
SIPE, the
Summarize resu lts
LM Herrell
5127/93
WFIPC-IJ t're-shlp Review
Steps taken to verify WF/PC-II mechanical envelope:
1 . By i nference, simi larity of hardware between W F/PC-I and
WF/PC-II provides a high degree of confidence
2. I nspection reports verify that all hardware was
built wit h i n tolerances to specifications as tight as
.002 "
3. WF/PC-I tooling was used for WF/PC-I I (matchmate &
RIAF), providing a verification of latch and radi ator
locations and di mensions
4. As-bu i lt measurements were made of basic length,
width and height di mensions.
' . D i mensions were wit h i n the envelope with one
exception, documented in DAR 21
5. Metrology taken of d i mensions requ i ring g reater
accu racy than the basic m easurements made i n
eg; m ec h plate attach poi nts, POMM
6.
(4) above,
Radiator metrology, combined with worst case analysis,
verifies radiator envelope and radiator fit to SSM
.
7. Metrology taken of tight OTA & SIPE cleara nces identified by GSFC
LM Herrell
5/27/93
WFIPC-II .-re-shlp Review
Steps yet to be taken to verify the mechanica l envel ope:
1 . WF/PC-II wi l l be instal led i n the GSFC H ST High-Fidel ity
Mechanical S i m ulator (H FMS)
2. There wi l l be a fit-check of WF/PC-II and the POMC
i n the SIPE at GSFC
LM Herrell
5127/93
WFIPC-..
. e-ship Review
.------::;;;;;:::- 7I.JI0
-VI
-I I I,
e ll'
+VI
//
-V2
"T
iii
II
(O"I-I(C1011
IIKI. I/r
'.415
I
II .
HI
"I
!ll
i Lt,t.t
j2.l�.
l--H.(:.,·
".20
i
i
5
,.3 -1
20.IOO---f
.cr
+
",,/:-.-.-::
HANDHOLD
(NveLOpe
I
21.150 RU--1
'L
<h
I
"... .�' � �-
�
I
A
I
I
"t
- +v2
�'HOU
I
H.H.
[L.�l$tDE
01 HANDHOlD
25.7"
i· �,1:-I· ·�7.21"'"'1
· · · ··1--··--·
5.16
I
II
i,!
I
�
:'. 0
5
11.00 I
A
... J
j-
,
(1)
I . I � RH
POlN1
R('
5," ---_-'
2
�. '."'''.
t:;SJJ;:"
S[CTION 4-A
I :II I
HAC:�(HVCLOP£
i
L....
r
1
i
i
....- ( lUND IIAI[
CONNeCTOR
Jo\CKINC 1100
!
RADIAL ORI STATIC ENVELOPE fiG.
II Acr
i
i
i
i
�
31.160 _1
O-----U.71
'------
8'.110
i
'611�,'HI(
31 160
.J
3 . 3 - 1 A SHT.
WF/PC-II ICD Envelope
LM Herrell
5/27/93
WFIPC-II Pre-ship Review
�
+VI -�r-�-r-Cr--r-1-1P'��=1+-�--)
I I L
uoo
n
,
-VI
+V2
yOUNT POlloi'
- - V2
A
LA
:O'i �
'.n
•.25 11[1
I
.....-J
PI
• ",
".000
m
1---+---- �����oO:f
{:: I: : : : : : : : I::::I "
...
RADIAL
.:::: .::�
a:
1 . 1 4 11['
�:;
20.800 IIU
'j'"
�:J�--r '·l1S
�
n
F
, 00
I
r ,,··,, ----1!
h- I
�
+V3
�)<....
An �HAOUO
ORI
STATIC
•
20.800 R(I __
!:t-- , .....
H-""'"'"
1,!
f:;�����
--i;..d �
;';
L
��!
�
FIG.
)1.260 11(( __
3.3- 1 A
___
SHT.
_
CO..,,[(IOII
8KI
",
( ..,
,
(
[l(CIIIOHICS
'"
��!�
ENVELOPE
WF/PC-I I ICD
i!1
•
[HVClOP[
0#
.J
2
Envelope
LM Herrell
5/27/93
WFIPC-II Pre-ship Review
I
CAMERA HEAD
p ,-V
/'
MUllilAYER INSULATION
MULTILAYER
INSULATION
_
_
_
_
EVA HANDRAIL
RELAY OPTlCS ASSEMBLY �_r.
TRIPOD
ASSEMBLY
LIGHT BAFFLE
MULTILAYER INSULAT�N
OPTICAL BENCH (GRAPHITE
4
ENTRANCE APERTURE '-
fJ24 PICK·OFF
MIRROR
.V,
�l
PICK·OFF MIRRO
MECHANISM
' -
I , l, �
'V
.VI
FmlNO
POINT A
.V,
OPTICAL BENCH
SUPPORT STRUTS
INVAR BULKHEAD
FOLD MIRRORS (3 ARTICULATING, 1 FIXED)
•
'\ PYRAMID (FlXED)
fiLTER SELECTOR (48 FILTERS)
5".(,.'
Envelope tight clearances identified by GSFC
LM Herrell
5/27/93
WFIPC-" t're-shlp Review
WF/PC-II tight clearances as a function of the mission phase
EVA changeout
In 51PE
COSTAR
deployment
and
H5T Insertion
WF/PC-II
hardware extremities
1 POMC "
2 pick-off mirror
SIPE heater
" I
clearance
NA
NA
COSTAR deploy of
M 1 m irrors
pick-off mirror mechanism"
3 mech covert
NA
gloved hand
NA
OTA hub
NA
NA
OTA hub
NA
housing
4 calibration system
5 guiderails (GFE)
SIPE guiderails
OTA guiderails
NA
6 latches (GFE)
SIPE latches
OTA latches
NA
7 BMC (GFE)
BMC Interface
BMC interface
NA
OTA bipodl
NA
8 EVA handrails "
NA
9 AFM electronics "
NA
1 0 radiator
astronaut glove
OTA bipod!
NA
astronaut glove
SIPE guiderail
fit to SSM
NA
" Subassemblies marked with (") are new to WF/PC.
All other subassemblies are built to same external dimensions as WF/PC-1.
LM Herrell
5127/93
WFIPC-II Pre-ship Review
New WF/PC-I I subsassemblies are shown to meet envelope
subassemblv
method of verification
POMC
dimensional check;
fit check on W F/PC-II and in S I P E
POM/POMM
metrology
EVA
AFM
handrails &
electronics
dimensional check
LM Herrell
5/27/93
Metrology shows the POM/POM M fit within ICD envelope
r
+V3
I
i
••
4.030± .01
.,
I
' OB
L
0.78
PICK-orr �IRROR../ I
5.65
13 .00
,
�'A. A\;i!
+ V l -'-!-'-/-'-'
R£r
4' RU
�
>
':ii
_h_J3' Rer
-
!STA210:Joiil
1
I �-j
I
I
- - - - - -----
I
i.
5.0
\2)
I
. _ ._._._.-
.....,..
- - - - -- - - - -
UPPORT ARM
-
I
i
\IGtIT
PATH
or
FIG.
3 . 3 - 2 0 WFPC - I I PICI<OFF M I RROR AND S U P PORT A R M
POMIPOMM fit
POM envelope
within envelope
location
by:
1
+V3 corner
(Inches)
measurement
accuracy
0 _ 03
0.001
2
-V3 corner
0.40 '
0.001
3
+V2 corner
0_36
0.001
4
-V2 corner
0 . 35
0.001
5
- V 1 surface
0. 1 0
0.001
•
Estimate. Measurement not taken.
WFIPC-h
.
.
d-ship Review
Summary
•
•
•
•
Dimensi onal c hecks of WF/PC-I J hardware are complete
A com bi nation of simi larity to WF/PC-I, tool i ng, ana lysis,
metrology, and d i mensional checks verify the fit of W F/PC-II
i nto both the S I P E and the H ST
The one exception has been shown to be acceptable
and i s documented i n DAR 21
Tight clearances have been identified and d imensions
docum ented by GSFC
Conclusion:
•
•
WF/PC-I I d i mensions meet the req u i red ICD
mecha nical envelope
WF/PC-II is ready for final fitchecks i n the S I P E and H FMS
LM Herrell
5/27/93
..JPL
WF/PC·II PRE·S H I P REVIEW
ACC E PTANC E DATA PAC KAG E
DESCRI PTION and STATUS
MAY 27-28, 1 993
BREDT MARTIN
..JPL
ACCEPTAN C E DATA PACKAGE DESCRI PTION and STATUS
ITEM
D ESCRI PTION
1
As built log for fl ight hardware
2
Instrument Log book
3
S ubsystem log books for the POMC,
% COMPLETE
COMME NTS
1 00
0
66
Original exists
Data exists
POM, radiator studs and any other
items which may be removed and
re-installed during I&T
4
Documentation (S pecs)/Drawing Tree
5
Mass properties weight and balance
1 00
0
Report i n progress
report
6
Sh ipping documentation
1 00
7
Discussion of work planned but not
1 00
completed
BDM-1
..JPL
ACC E PTANCE DATA PAC KAG E DESC RI PTION and STATUS
ITEM
DESC RIPTION
8
Work planned to be completed
% COM PLETE
COMM ENTS
1 00
at GSFC and KSC
9
Copies of open/closed and Red
90
cycle
Flag P/FRs
10
Listing and discussion of hard-
Others in closure
1 00
None
ware shortages
11
Test Matrix updated for final sub-
0
Data exists
system and system tests
12
Waivers and Deviations for
99
contractual and I C D requirements
13
List of lim ited l ife items showing the
1 waiver stil l i n
progress
0
Data exists
cycles expended through del ivery,
cycles remaining for each item
and appropriate log book{s) for
tracking additional cycles
BDM-2
..JPL
ACC E PTAN C E DATA PAC KAG E DESCRI PTION and STATUS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
14
Packagi ng, Handling and Trans-
% COMPLETE
COMM ENTS
1 00
portation Constraints
15
List of i nstalled non-flight hard-
1 00
ware
16
As-run test procedures for system
TN procedure by
7/93
50
level environmental and functional
tests
17
Cali bration Data
18
Safety Compliance Data Package
19
Com plete drawing package for
Report to be
published 7/93
0
1 00
99
as-bui lt configuration, specifications
I n HST 440 Library
at GSFC
MLI drawings i n
progress
and procedures
20
Power Consumption report for all
operating modes
0
Data exists
BDM-3
.JPL
ACC EPTANC E DATA PAC KAG E DESCRI PTION and STATUS
ITEM
DESCRI PTION
21
H RCRs - a ll pages
0
Data exists
22
Residual parts l ist
0
Data exists
23
Trending Data
1 00
24
EEE Parts List
1 00
% COM PLETE
COMMENTS
Contained i n
as-built l ist
25
Contami nation Certification
specifyi ng cleanli ness of
0
Data exists
0
Data exists
exterior surfaces
26
Evidence of closure of all action
items from PDRs, CDRs, PERs
and other formal reviews
BDM-4
WF/PC II PRE-SHIP REVIEW
MAY 27/28
1 993
SAFETY
Dennis Ross
WF/PC
II SAFETY
•
Safety history
•
General items
•
Environmental testing
•
NASA Safety Review Process
•
Transportation
•
Testing/Integration
•
Open items/Concerns
DSR
-
2
WF/PC
II SAFETY
SAFETY HISTORY
86 )
•
WP/PC I (Pre-ship Jan.
•
WF/PC II �CDR May
•
S afety Steering Committee Meetings
•
Phased Safety Reviews
'
'92
-
MSFC/GSFC, JSC, KSC
-
Phase II Level
DS R
-
3
WF/PC
II SAFETY
SAFETY HAZARDS
•
No RF
•
Ionizing radiation from UV lamp
•
No propellants or pyros
•
No high voltages
•
Heat pipes contain ammonia
•
No significant energy sources
- Unpowered during launch
- Minimal flammables
•
Purge systems
•
MLI venting, attachment, grounding
•
MGSEIEGSE
DSR
-
4
WF/PC
II SAFETY
GENERAL ITEMS
•
Heat pipes 4 instead of 8
•
Burst test to over 5500 PSI
•
Proof tested to 3000 PSI
•
One heat pipe modified
•
Fracture Control Analysis
(Material and Pressure capability)
- Maximum worst-case working
pressure 820 PSI at 95°C
•
Sharp edges
- Astronauts conducted preliminary
sharp edge inspection 3/03/93
DSR
-
5
WF/PC
II SAFETY
GENERAL ITEMS (Cont'd)
•
Materials list by code
- MUAs From WF/PC I and updates
- Flammability assessment
•
Extensive Fracture Control Summary
Report and Stress Analysis Report
DSR
-
6
WF/PC
II SAFETY
ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
•
Facility safety reviews
•
Operational safety reviews
•
ESD reviews
•
Vibration test
•
EMIIEMC test
•
Acoustic test
•
Thermal Vac test
•
GSFC (Bldg. 29 SSDIF) 2/93, 5/93
•
KSC
(AE, PHSF)
DSR
-
7
WF/PC
II SAFETY
NASA SAFETY REVIEW PROCESS
•
NASA documents
- NSTS 1700.7B
- KHB 1700.7B
•
Phase II Flight Safety Review 6/92
( 1 0/92)
•
Phase II Ground Safety Review 12/92
•
Phase III Flight Safety Review (6/93)
•
Phase III Ground Safety Review (6/93)
DSR
-
8
WF/PC
II SAFETY
NASA SAFETY REVIEW PROCES S
(Cont'd)
•
Safety verification tracking logs
- Some items to be finalized with GSFC
(JSCIKSC)
•
Certificates of Safety compliance
•
Flight readiness review
•
Inputs to GSFC for launch site safety
plan
•
Action items from reviews
DSR
-
9
WF/PC
II SAFETY
TRANSPORTATION
•
To GSFC from JPL
•
To KSC from GSFC
•
Transportation safety surveys
•
To PHSF (KSC) from AE (CCAFS)
•
Transportation requirements per JPL ES
501492D and DOT
DSR
-
10
WF/PC
II SAFETY
TESTING/INTEGRATION
•
GSFC (SSDIF)
•
CCAFS (Hangar AE)
•
KSC (PHSF)
•
Safety coverage hazardous ops
•
All hazardous procedures approved by
JPL Safety
•
Certified and trained personnel
DSR
-
11
WF/PC
II SAFETY
OPEN ITEMS/CONCERNS
•
Flight and Ground Safety Reviews to be
completed
•
Tracking logs will be updated monthly and
reported to JSCIKSC through GSFC
•
NCR for SEECO 707 material
•
MSDS for heat pipe ammonia
•
Radiation source approval from White
House
•
Cleaning materials
•
Procedures
•
No safety show-stoppers
DSR
-
12
�PL
PRE-SHIP REVIEW
WIDEFIELD PLANETARY CAMERA
PROGRAM ASSURANCE .
PRESENTATION DATE:
MAY 27-28, 1 993
WFPC II
PROGRAM ASSURANCE
E. B. SCHNEIDER
EBS-l, 5127-28193
�PL
PRE-SHIP REVIEW
WIDEFIELD PLANETARY CAMERA
PROGRAM ASSURANCE
PRESENTATION DATE:
MAY 27-28, 1 993
AG ENDA
0
WFPC II PFR STATUS
0
WFPC II PFR RISK RATING SUMMARY
0
RISK ASSESSMENT BASED ON PFR RATINGS
0
WFPC II OPEN PFRs
0
WFPC II RED FLAG PFRs
0
QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY
0
WFPC II RISK ASSESSMENT
0
GSFC CLEANROOM FACILITY
0
CONCERNS
EBS-2, 5/27-28193
�PL
PRE-SHIP REVIEW
WIDEFIELD PLANETARY CAMERA
PROGRAM ASSURANCE
PRESENTATION DATE:
MAY 27-28, 1 993
WFPC II PFR STATUS*
OPEN
CLOSED
8
76
HOLD
1
TOTAL
84
*AS OF 5/1 8/93
EBS-3, 5/27-28/93
..IPL
PRE-SHIP REVIEW
WIDEFIELD PLANETARY CAMERA
PROGRAM ASSURANCE
PRESENTATION DATE:
MAY 27-28, 1 993
WFPC II PFR RISK RATING SUMMARY
PFRs
53
3
4
1
8
6
1
4
2
1
RISK RATING
1 /1
1 /2
1 /3
1 /4
2/1
2/2
2/4
3/1
3/3
3/4
EBS-4. 5/27-28/93
...IPL
WIDEFIELD PLANETARY CAMERA
PROGRAM ASSURANCE
PRE-SHIP REVIEW
PRESENTATION DATE:
MAY 27-28, 1993
RISK ASSESSMENT BASE D ON PFR RATINGS
FaUure Cause/Corrective Action Ratlng
FAILURE EFFECT
RATING
Certain Corrective Action
Known Cause
(1)
NEGLIGIBLE
(1)
SIGNIFICANT
(2)
or
CATASTROPHIC (3)
Unlmown Cause
No
Additional
Risk
(2)
Uncertain Corrective Action
Known Cause Unlmown Cause
(3)
(4)
NeglJglble
Additional
Risk
..
Known or Potential
Additional Risk
(Red Flag)
NOTE: This qualitative risk assessment does not take Into consideration the
possible effects of redundancy, alternate operating modes, fault protection
routines or workaround operations which were Intentionally excluded
from consideration when the PFR ratings were appUed. Additionally,
numerous other factors would need to be conSidered for an overall
assessment of risk, such as the calculated probabtllty of recurrence of a
given failure and the possible effect of other PFR Incidents.
EBS-5, 5127-28/93
..JPL
PRE-SHIP REVIEW
PRESENTATION DATE:
MAY 27-28, 1 993
WIDEFIELD PLANETARY CAMERA
PROGRAM ASSURANCE
WFPC II OPEN PFRs*
PFR NUMBER
PFR DATE
PRELIMINARY
RISK RATING
42908
56407
5641 8
5641 9
56420
56421
56423
58208
1 0-1 -92
1 0-1 4-92
03-26-93
04-21 -93
04-21 -93
05-03-93
05-1 0-93
01 -22-93
3/4
1 /1
1 /4
----._.
._.-
-1 /1
-
-
*AS OF 5-1 8-93
EBS-6, 5127-28193
,
..IPL
WIDEFIELD PLANETARY CAMERA
PROGRAM ASSURANCE
PRE-SHIP REVIEW
PRESENTATION DATE:
MAY 27-28, 1 993
WFPC II RED FLAG PFRs
539B2
05/11/92
CAMERA· HEAD #205 YAS I NSTALLED IN THE PIGS 1 VACUUM CHAMBER FOR BRASS BOARD INTEGRATION
TESTING. BARS AND STRIPES YERE OBSERVED IN SEVERAL SUCCESSIVE DARK FRAMES AFTER THE ceo YAS
CooLEO TO -70 C. THE IMAGE YAS PROCESSEO THROUGH CHANNELS 3 AND 7 YHICH YERE SUCCESSFULLY
SET UP YITH CAMERA HEAD #203 AND #204 PREVIOUSLY. ATTEMPTS YERE HADE TO D I SCOVER POSSIBLE
SOURCES FOR THE "IMAGE NOISE" YI THOUT SUCCESS. THE CCD YAS COOLED TO -B9 C AND THE NOISE IN
THE IMAGE FADED AYAY . THE NOISE DID NO� RETURN YHEN THE CCD YAS YARMED THREE HOURS LATER.
THE TEST YAS REPEATED TYICE ON 5/12/ & 5/13. THE "NOISE" DID NOT RETURN. TESTS YERE
CONDUCTED YHICH VER IFIED A CAMERA HEAD PROBLEM. CAMERA HEAD #205 YAS THEN REMOVED FROM THE
TEST CHAMBER AND INSPECTED. NO PROBLEMS YERE FOUND . NEXT, ALL · SIGNALS ASSOCIATED YITH
ON-CHIP CCD VIOEO AMPL I F IER YERE PROBED AND COMPARED TO THE YFPC I I EM CAMERA HEAD. ONLY A
M I NOR ANOMALY IN THE VIDEO S I GNAL YAS FOUND. (SEE ATTACHEMENT). A NUMBER OF ATTEMPTS TO
LOCATE AND CORRECT THE "NOISE" OBSERVED IN THE IMAGES FROM CAMERA HEAD #205/206 RESULTED I N
FAILURE. ALTHOUGH MANY REMEDIES YERE TRIED AND THE CONFIGURATION O F THE CAMERA HEAD CHANGED
SIGNIFICANTLY IN THE POROCESS, THE PROBLEM REMAINED ELUSIVE.
1 1 /16/92
24
53984
03/25/91
AS A PART OF THE YF/PC- I I DESIGN REVIEY PROCESS, A PART PEDIGREE STUDY YAS CONDUCTED FOR
ALL PARTS I NSTALLED I N THE FLIGHT HARDYARE. THE SEARCH REVEALEO THAT PART TEST HISTORIES
COULD NOT BE LOCATEO FOR 51 TRACE NUMBERS. PERSONNEL FROM PARTS RELIABILITY ENGINEERING
AND QUALITY ASSURANCE YERE INTERVIEYED AND CONCURRED THAT THEY HAD MADE AN EXHAUST IVE
SEARCH FOR THE PART HISTORIES AND KNEY OF NO OTHER POSSIBLE LOCATIONS. THE DATA I S
CONS IDERED LOST B Y ALL PARTIES INVOLVED . THE PART TYPES AND TRACE NUMBERS ARE GIVEN I N THE
ATTACHED L I S T . SOME OF THE PARTS ARE SAME LOT & DATE CODES AS USED ON YF/PC- l - DATA NOT
AVA I LABLE. PARTS WI THOUT ESTABLISHED PEDIGREE · HAVE NOT BEEN REPLACED OR RESCREENED_ THERE
IS HIGH CON F I DENCE THAT SYSTEM USED TO DETERMINE FLIGHT ACCEPTAB ILITY OF THESE PARTS
WORKED. SYSTEM USED TO STORE AND RETRI EVE FLI GHT PARTS PEDIGREE HAS BEEN OVERHAULED AND I S
NOW FELT TO BE UNDER CONTROL. R I SK O F T H I S "USE -AS-IS" D I SPOSITION I S CONSIDERED MEDIUM.
THE RECOMMENDAT ION IN 10M 5211-91 -004 REV A WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED BY PROJECT DUE
. TO LACK OF
FUNDS FOR RESCREENING OR CONTI NUED EVALUATION.
04/21/92
33
56409
10/30/92
WFIPC I I EXECUTED ERRONEAOUS GATE 0 SERIAL MAGNITUDE COMMANDS YHILE LOAD ING THE RAM LOAD
05/04/93
34
OPEN CIRCUIT ON R7 (BETYEEN PINS 7 & B ) OF THE RESISTER NETWORK, OR OPEN CIRCUIT ON PIN 1
OF THE CD4D93BR.
PARTS WERE SUBJECTED TO THE FOLLOWING EXAM INATION TESTS.
1 . EXTERNAL VI SUAL EXAM I NA T I ON
2. HERE T I C I TY TEST
(SEE ATTACHMENT ) .
3.
4.
5.
6.
THE PARTS WERE SUBMITTED TO THE FAI LURE ANALYSIS GROUP FOR A POSSIBLE
X'RAY
ELECTR I CAL
TEMPERATURE CYCLE
WIRE BOND PULL TEST
THE REPORTED FAI LURE COULD NOT BE VAR I F I ED .
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
REVIEW TESTING COND I T I ONS AND PROCEDURES, OR INSPECT THE HARDYARE
WHERE THE PARTS WERE INSTALLED FOR POSSIBLE CAUSE THAT MAY RESULT IN AN OPEN .C I RCUIT AS
REPORTED.
EBS-7, 5/27-28/93
�PL
WIDEFIELD PLANETARY CAMERA
PROGRAM ASSURANCE
PRE-SHIP REVIEW
PRESENTATION DATE:
MAY 27-28, 1 993
QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY
o
5 OPEN INSPECTION REPORTS
032440 - PICK-OFF MIRROR
032546 - f/1 2.9 RELAY
032441 CH F/30
0291 1 8 WFPC ASSEMBLY PROCEDURES
034531 - RADIAL SI ASSEMBLY
-
-
o
OPEN IRs DO NOT AFFECT SHIPPING INSTRUMENT
o
1 MRB (00033) CAMERA H EAD SADDLE CLOSED 5-6-93
EBS-8, 5/27-28193
.-IPL
PRE-SHIP REVIEW
WIDEFIELD PLANETARY CAMERA
PROGRAM ASSURANCE
PRESENTATION DATE:
MAY 27-28, 1 993
WFPC II RISK ASSESSMENT
QUALITY ASSURANCE
NO LIENS
RELIABILITY ASSURANCE
10M 521 1 -91 -21 3
SOFA-OPTICAL ENCODER­
UNKNOWN RISK AID CONVERTER
TIMING MARGINS-LOW RISK
DYNAMICSITHERMAUEMC
NO LIENS
SAFETY
NO LIENS
ELECTRONIC PARTS
NO LIENS - LOW RISK PARTS PEDIGREE
OPTICS RELIABILITY
NO LIENS
WAIVERS
2 WAIVERS WITH SIGNIFICANT
RISK
EBS-9, 5/27-28193
�PL
PRE-SHIP REVIEW
WIDEFIELD PLANETARY CAMERA
PROGRAM ASSURANCE
PRESENTATION DATE:
MAY 27-28, 1 993
CONCERNS
o
RELIABILITY ANALYSIS
NO INDEPENDENT/CONCURRENT REVIEW OF A NEW
DESIGNS FOR WFPC II
o
GSFC DYNAMICS SPECIFICATION
THERE IS AN UNDEFINED RISK THAT WFPC II WILL BE
EXPOSED TO LAUNCH VIBRATION ENVIRONMENTS THAT
SIGNIFICANTLY EXCEED THE SYSTEM VIBRATION TEST
SPECIFICATION PROVIDED BY GSFC, WITH THE RESULTING
RISK OF LAUNCH VIBRATION FAILURES
o
POST-SHIPMENT ALIGNMENT VERIFICATION
NO POST SHIPMENT OPTICAL ALIGNMENT VERIFICATION
WILL BE CONDUCTED PRIOR TO LAUNCH
EBS- 1 1 , 5127-28/93
WF/PC- I I
P R E-S H I P · R EVI EW ·
'MAY 27 , AN D 28, 1 993
POST S H I P M E NT P R E PARATI O NS
,
OV E RVI EW
"
A. Col l i ns
,......
. ......=
.
...;=.............;;;;;;;"........,..... "..''''';0.;..''...'''......;;;;;;;;;;;;;,,,.....,;,,............;.......,,.;;;;;;;;;;m......
. ...."'.....,,.,,..........;.;;;.."
"""••"......;;;;;..;;;;;;;;;;;;.......:..;:;=;.;w
.;......-.__••_...
•
............._..-'
WF/PC- I I
POST-S H I P M E NT P R E PARATI O N S
..
•
TRANSPO RTATION AN D HAN D LI N G P LANS.
M. Argoud
•
G SFC I NT EG RATION A N D TEST P LANS.
A. C o l l i ns
•
KSC LAU NC H P ROCESS I N G FLOW.
A. Co l l i ns
�'
::=
L&.I
.....
>
L&.I
0:::
.J
D.
,
Q..
.....
=
V)
I
L&.I
0:::
Q..
.....
.....
I
U
Q..
L&..
::=
V)
z
«
...J
Q..
�
Z
.....
...J
Cl
Z
«
=
Cl
Z
«
Cl
=
0
�
0:::
«
Z
0
:E:
.....
l«
I0:::
0
Q..
V)
z
«
0:::
I-
•
M
0'\
0'\
..
.....
CO
N
. >«
:E:
WFPC - I I PRE -SH I P REV I EW
0
CONT ENTS :
-
O V ERALL SUMMARY
-
V EH I C LE S C H EDU L E
HAND L I NG P LAN
ESCORT P LAN
ENV I RONMENTA L MON I TOR P LAN
-
CONC LUS I ON
MA - 1
MAY - ' 93
WFPC - I I P RE-SH I P REV I EW
OV E RA L L SUMMARY
o
S C I ENCE I NSTRUMENT AND GROUND SU PPORT EOU I PMENT
o
FROM J P L ( PASAD ENA , CAl TO GS FC (GREENB E LT , MD)
o
START J UN E 1 ,
o
P LANNED 2 7 5 0 M I LE NON- STOP TRI P
o
REOU I RES AP P ROXIMATE LY 72 HOU RS
o
STOPS FOR FUEL , MEALS AND NEC ESSARY CONVEN I ENCES
1993 ,
NO LATE R THAN 1 PM
MA - 2
MAY - ' 93
WFPC - I I PRE-SH I P REV I EW
O V E RA L L SUMMARY ( CONT . )
o
THREE V EH I C L E CONVOY
MOTORHOME
V EH I C L E )
-
( CONVOY
COMMAND
CENTER
AND
ESCORT
SC I EN C E
I NSTRUMENT
(AIR- RI D E ,
C L I MATE
CONTRO L L E D ,
I NSTRUMENTED
AND
C E RT I F I E D ,
TRACTOR/TRAI LER)
-
o
GROUND S U P PORT EQU I PMENT CONTRO L L E D TRACTORlTRA I LER)
(AIR- R I D E ,
C L I MATE
H I GHWAY ROUTES
-
ROUTE 15 FROM Los ANGE LES TO BARSTOW , CA
-
ROUTE 40 T H ROUGH F LAGSTAFF , AZ . , ALBUQU ERQU E , NM . ,
AMAR I L LO , TX . , OKLAHOMA C I TY , OK . , L I TTLEROCK AR . ,
KNOXV I LL E , TN .
ROUTE 81 NORTH TO TH E WASH I NGTON , D . C . AREA
-
B E LTWAY ( 4 9 5 ) TO GSFC I N GREEN B E LT , MD
MA - 3
MAY - ' 93
WFPC - I I PRE-SH I P REV I EW
O V E RA L L SUMMARY ( CONT . )
o
CONVOY O RGAN I ZATI ON
CONVOY D I RECTOR
QUAL I TY ASS U RANCE ENG I N EER
-
I N STRUMENTAT I ON ENG I NEER
I NSTRUMENT MECHAN I CA L ENG I NE ER/TECHN I C I AN
o
-
VENDOR LEAD DRIVER
-
3 AUTHORI Z ED DRI VERS
T RI P P ROGRESS REPORT I NG
V I A T E LEPHONE ( DA I LY BAS I S )
TIME
( B ETWEEN 3 : 3 0 AND 4 : 3 0 PM , J P L TIME)
MA - 4
MAY - ' 93
WFPC - I I PRE-SH I P REV I EW
HANDLING P LANS
o
VEH I C LE SCHED U L E
V EH I C LE
JPL
C E RT I /
CHKOUT
OUTFIT
LOAD
RO L L OUT
MOTORHOME
5-25
--------
5 - 2 6 / 27
5 - 27 / 28
6 - 1 - 93
TRACTOR/VAN 1
LOAD ING RAMPS
5-26
5 - 2 6 /27
5 - 27
5 - 2 7 / 28
& 6-1
6- 1
TRACTOR/VAN 2
5 - 27
5 - 27
5 - 27
5 - 2 7 / 28
6-1
MA - 5
MAY - ' 93
WFPC - I I PRE-SH I P REV I EW
HAN D L I NG P LAN ( CONT . )
o
A L L ACTIV I T I ES CONTRO L LED BY J P L DOCUMENT WFPC - I I 400
" CONTAM I NATI ON CONTRO L P LAN"
o
T RANSPORT CON F I G U RATION
WFPC - I I HARD MOUNTED TO TRANS PORTER ON ADAPTER
PLATE WITH F L I G HT LATCH ES
o
S EALED BAG (GN 2 P U RGED 3 P LACES)
RAD IATOR 1 0 c u .
o
FT . / HOUR
-
P I C K - O F F M I RROR 1 cu .
-
CA L I BRATI ON LAMP . 1 CU . FT . /HOUR
FT . /HOUR
HARD COV ER ON T RANS PORTER
MA - 6
MAY - ' 93
WFPC - I I P R E - SH I P REV I EW
HAND L I NG P LAN ( CONT . )
o
TRAI L E R VAN
. F U L LY ENC LOSED
-
A I R R I D E SUSPEN S I ON
C L I MAT I C CONTRO L
TEMP ERATURE 6 5 TO 7 5 ° FAH RENH E I T
-
H UM I D I TY CONTRO LLED :
NOT TO EXC EED 5 0 % RH
V AN D E L I V ERED TO J P L 2 DAYS PRIOR TO TRI P ,
I N STRUMENTED , AND RUN T H ROUGH TRIAL COURS E FOR
C E RT I F I CATI ON
PRO C EDURE WFPC - I I 1 5 0
PROC EDURE WFPC - I I 1 5 1
-
PROC EDURE WFPC - I I 160
MA - 7
MAY - ' 93
WFPC - I I PRE-SH I P REV I EW
HAN D L I NG P LAN ( CONT . )
o
C E RT I F I ED VAN . DO ES NOT LEAVE LAB UNT I L LOADED
o
TRACTOR
-
CHECKED FOR VAL I D
STATES ALONG ROUTE
L I C ENSE
AND
P ERMITS
FOR
ALL
LEAD
V E H I C LE
VIA
THE
H P GREATER THAN 2 5 0
DUAL WH E E LS , TAND EM AXLES
A I R R I D E REAR SUS P ENSION
RAD I O COMMU N I CAT ION
ALARM RAD I O
WITH
C B ( BACKU P )
C E L LU LAR PHONE
2 DR! V ERS FOR 24- HOUR SERV I C E
MA
8
MAY - ' 93
-
WFPC - I I PRE-SH I P REV I EW
HAND L I NG PLAN ( CONT . )
o
LOAD ING AT J P L (TRACTOR/VAN 1 )
VAN O N L EV E L GROUND
TRANS PORTER PULLED Up RAMPS WITH COME -ALONG
TRANS PORTER MOUNTED ON WOOD EN B LOCKS
TRANS PORTER STRAPPED TO VAN BED
PORTA B L E PURGE Box
S PARE PURGE Box
-
+
+
6 PACK GN 2
6 PACK GN
2
F L I G HT TOOL Box
PURG E S U P P LY CART
MA - 9
' 93
MAY
-
WFPC- I I PRE-SH I P REV I EW
HAND L ING P LAN (CONT . )
o
LOAD ING AT J P L (TRACTO R/VAN 2 )
-
I NSTRUMENT S PREADER BARS AND L I FT FIXTURES
EXTRA S I X - PACK OF CERT I F I E D PURGE GAS
F L I GHT I NSTRUMENT GROUND SU PPORT EQU I PMENT
TEC H N I CA L DOCUMENTAT I ON
O F F I C E MATERIALS AND S U P P L I ES
o
ALL EOU I PMENT INS PECTED BY J P L - OA
o
ALL EOU I PMENT L I STED ON S H I P P I NG MAN I FEST
MA - 10
MAY - ' 93
WFPC - I I P R E -SH I P REV I EW
ESCORT P LAN
o
MOTO R HOME LEAD VEH I C L E
RAD I O COMMUN I CATION WITH TRACTOR
-
-
MOTORO LA FM NASA ( FREO) RAD IOS
[TWO-WAY B ETWEEN CONVOY V EH I C LES]
STANDARD C B - FREOU ENCY RAD I OS
VHF RAD I O PHONES OR C E L L U LAR PHONE
[ FO R LOCAL AND/OR I NTERSTATE CAL LS]
P E RSONN E L
-
CARAVAN LEADER
-
F L I GHT MECHAN I CA L TECHN I C I AN
I NSTRUMENTAT I ON ENG I N E E R
QUA L I TY ASSURANCE REPRES ENTAT I V E
MA - 1 1
MAY - ' 93
WFPC - I I P R E - SH I P REV I EW
ENVI RONMENTAL MON ITORING PLAN
o
I NSTRUMENTATION
3 -Ax I S ACCELEROMETER NEAR WFPC - I I "A" LATCH
-
3 -AxI S ACC E LEROMETER ON THE FLOOR O F TRA I LER VAN
Z -AXI S TRANS PORTER ACC E L EROMETER ALARMED AT + / - 1 G
T O KEY TONE ON RAD I OS I N TRACTOR AND L EAD VEH I C L E
ACC E LEROMETER OUTPUTS RECORDED O N D I G ITA L
(SHOCK - ORDER FROM DAL LAS I NSTRUMENT)
SR-4
TRA I LER VAN T EMPERATURE AND HUMI D I TY RECORDED ON
GRAPH
MA - 12
MAY - ' 93
<C
:::: >­
<C
::::
3
L&J
1-1
>
L&J
c:::
Q.
1-1
::c
en
I
L&J
c:::
Q.
1-1
1-1
I ..
U
Q.
u..
3
en
LIJ
::::
I-f
.....
:z:
0
1-1
en
=
-I
u
:z:
0
u
.....
:z:
L&J
::::
Q.
1-1
::c
V)
0
LIJ
::::
I-f
.....
LIJ
::::
I-f
.....
M
-
......
-
U
en
::::
-I
U
u..
V)
t!'
0
....
0
....
0
....
-I
Q.
'J
..J
Q.
'J
..J
Q.
'J
en
«
en
«
en
«
LIJ
::::
«
V)
LIJ
::::
«
V)
LIJ
::::
«
V)
I
......
u
V)
:::.:::
• •
•
•
• •
• •
'4 .
{i
1 :
� '"
.
"0 .....
-:.,� .
.
�
.\
.
.',
;
i
\
i
I
I
I
�
�.
I NTEG RATI ON AN D TEST
[V E R I FI CATI O N AN D FIT-CH ECK]
,
"
P LANS
WF/PC- I I I GS'FC
A. Col l i n s
�
�
,..":m;..
. .'.....,..;;;;;;;;;..;
,.................
...
..
.. ........;..;;..;;;;...;;..".............i..";;;"......,;;;;;;;;;;:..;;;;;;i;;;.i;'..'''........m.......'','
,'''''.;;i';i
..:;;;;;;;;;;;..""",;."..."";;mm;
;
;
..
;;;;;;;;;;i;;............�_••••_••_••••••_•••_••••_m
..�
WF/PC-II I NTEG RATION AN D TEST P LANS AT GSFC.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
"
WF/PC-II OPERATIONS DOCUMENTATION STATUS.
'
JPL G E NERATED WF/PC-II TEST PROCEDURE STATUS.
GSFC GENERATED WF/PC-II TEST PROCEDURE STATUS.
GSFC WF/PC-II ACTIVITY FLOW.
GSFC COMPATIBILITY AND FIT-CHECK TEST SCHEDULE.
JPL TEST PERSONNEL AT GSFC.
GSFC BUILDING 29 LAYOUT.
JPL TEST TEAM ACTIVITIES.
,
.
,n=�,
DOCUMENT
10 NUMBER
TITLE/SUBJECT
D 751-53
ICD-OB, APPENDIX VI
D 751-61
Servicing Mission Plan
D 751-62
Operations Support Plan -Vol. 1 ,Gnd Ops. March, 1 993
JUNE, 1 992 ,
Updates Cu rrently Under Review
Released (Part 1 )
I n Review (Part 2)'
Released
April, 1 993
D 751-64
COMMAND HANDBOOK Vers.- 2.0
Sept,.1 992
D 751 -65 ·
TELEMETRY HANDBOOK Vers-.1 .1
Oct.. 1 992
DM-05
[D-1 722, Part B)
FLIGHT S/W REQUIR EMENTS, Rev.C
April 1 993;
Constraints and Restrictions Document [CARD]
Operations Limitations Document [OLD]
•
•
DCN-4 Currently Under Review.
·
Post-Thermal Vacuum Updates
in Preparation.
OPERATIONS PROCEDURES
ALIVEN ESS TESTS
[Based on AD-B10,820]
IN-BAY FUNCTIONAL [Based on the AD-840]
•
Old procedures were checked operationally in March, 1 993
New Additions will be checked as VEST Procedures.
Old procedures were checked operationally in March, 1 993
New Additions will be checked as VEST Procedures
Targeted for Completion prior to Hardware Shipment.
WF/PC-II Operations Documentation Status
,__••____._�;;;_
;;;;... ••••••___.........__
*
Released
Nov. 1 992
Vol. 2,Flt Ops.
SMO-1020
STPG-G-Ops-0001
STATUS
CURRENT
VERSION
••:::;:l;�........_ .......m......................�:::;;;::;;::;;: ....:..:;;:;;",...;;;."......"';;:....:;;............:,,''''''';:..,,;;" "'''",0;,;;;;;;;,,,,;0 ,,,,,,.;;,..:;;,;;;;,,,,,;,•. ;;;:;;,;;,,:;;,,,,,,;;,
, ..0........;;.
!
iI!
I
I
I
I·
�
WF/PC-I\ Test Procedures.
Status
Document Title/Subject
WF/PC-1I 1 1 1 '
[P 442-0 1 6 1 ]
WF/PC-II, Pick-off Mirror Installation/Removal/Alignment
Verification.
Released
WF/PC-II 1 1 2
[P 442-0 1 6 3]
WF/PC-II, Assembly Tasks To Be Performed At GSFC/KSC.
Released
WF/PC-II 1 50
[P 442-01 64]
WF/PC-II, Procedure for Installation/Removal .of the
Transporter From Cross-Country Transport Vehicles.
Released
WF/PC-1I 1 51
[P 442-01 65]
WF/PC-II, Transport Vehicle Selection.
Released
WF/PC-II 21 0
[P 442-01 68]
WF/PC-II, System Test Procedure.
Released
WF/PC-II 402
[P 442-01 69]
WF/PC-II, System Test Complex Set-Up and EGSE Checkout.
Released
�
JPL G ENERATED WF/PC-II TEST PROCEDU RE STATUS
:=
:�
WF/PC-IJ Test Procedures
Status
Document Title/Subject
P 442-0065
P 442-01 41
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
442-01 42
442-031 2
442-031 3
442-031 4
442-031 5
442-03 1 6
442-0328
442-0329
442-0337
442-0338
442-0342
442-0345
442-0480
442-0481
442-0482
VEST ( WF/PC-II) EICIT Procedure.
WF/PC-II Vertical Insertion/Removal from Low Level
Positioner.
RSIPE Dust Cover Integration.
VEST (WF/PC-II) IVT Procedure . .
VEST (WF/PC-II) Aliveness Test.
VEST (WF/PC-II) Fu nctional Test.
VEST Safing and Recovery Procedure.
VEST System Functional Test Procedure.
H FMS WF/PC-lI lnsertion/Removal Procedure.
HFMS WF/PC-II Fit-Check/Interface Check.
VEST Confocal Test Procedure.
S MGT-4
H FMS WF/PC-II Optical/Mechanical Test Procedure.
RSIPE WF/PC-II Astronaut Familiarizatio n .
WF/PC-II Crew Verification Procedure.
HFMS EICIT/lVT Procedure.
RSIPEIWF/PC-lI l nterface Checkout.
� n��=�u���
� ����
GSFC G ENERATED WF/PC ll
.
Released
Released
Released
Released
Released
Released
Released
In GSFC Review
Released
In GSFC Review
In GSFC Review
Released
In GSFC Review
Released
In GSFC Review
In GSFC Review
In GSFC Review
E STATUS
.
.�
,............ _�
_.......................... ...............�.�.................m..•·..........�.............·..······m............................................................................................................................................_.........._.. ....
=
TOOUCREW
RECEIVEI
o
Transfer 10 cloan room
.'
o Alivonoss IJPL GSE)
o
0
o
AID CHECK
POST·SHIP
INSPECT
HANDLING
o Functional (JPL GSE)
Visual Extornal Inspection
o Tool box tools
o
Crew aids
Contamination chockfcloaning
CHECK
SIPEISSE
I-
o Mechanical IF
o
Electrical IF
o
Purge flow
o Alivoness (JPL GSE)
Procodure roviow
o
Oelnlogr310 (with cover In
place)
EVA
CREW
o EVA
o Sharp odges
o Familiarization
o Inspection
o Tool aIds chock
VESTISTOCC
o SMGT 4
FIT CHECK
FUNCTIONAL
----
o
o
o
o
o
Eloc. lnlor. continuity Isolation losl
Inlerface vorif. 'Iost/alivonoss los 1
Saflng/recovory losl
o Glinl
as necoss3rv
o
o
Veril. tost/alivoness losl
Systom functional losl
•
socond run
o EVA'
Syslom functional lost
o
Alivenoss (JPl aSE)
SHIP TO
KSC
TEST
-
o
o Mochanlcal IF
o COSTAR arm doploy
FUNCTIONAL
o Confocal
Functional lost
PRE·SHIP
I--
VEST
HFMS "
VEST
�
Inspoclion
o Air RIDE van
o Proload check
o Alivenoss IJPL GSE)
o
.�
Functional losls (JPL GSE)
GSFC WF/PC-II ACTIVITY FLOW .
�.
!..............................................................................................................................................................................................
.....m ..m••mm........................................................................
�
r
asrc WM< FlO«OeIaol-PSI1
WFII'c.n Suppol1 h.� Til 8,
ACTlYlTtnAA!
P.rlON��___�''''U
--_I.,
H
JUNE
, Iw 1
U,SED ONA NOYUIBI!II 15,1003
.
I.A� AUDIIIESS ST"'TUS .
.
2
F
�?!:!V' oy .DeP_3!l,. �PL In pasade�:J, �. A IN.Tran,slt (@!2hrs,) - x II x x
Arrival,
UnpaCking and Cleaning
. Handling,
. .
.
.
Mci;e WF/PC-1I EaSE io il.137. Sel.Up:nun EaSE runciionalTesl:
MOVE WFjpC-li into The HST Ctc3n�oom. Perlo�m Receiving tnsp.·
I
•
._
•.
.
Pe�jo;m Post.Shlpment WF/PC:II Ailveness/FunclloMl Test
W���.C:II v.�J ��unctlo.n.' T's,ilngJ�_��· 11· E'
C'iilVT·.- ----_
.
. Trainlng
EVA Crew
.
..
.
.
.
.
wFiPc:il VEST Tesiing . Contlnued. . .
.
W!.'PC:'I �e.s.:r FU"'iion8I T""ngj'-';i 2)
Wf'IPC-1I RSIPE FIT-CHECK
WF/PC·II HFMS FIt-Check
. .
'E�c�uie ��/PC-lfGUNT/CONi=OCAL Test
SMGT · l 1
,
,
.
- -
I
-
.
___________ . _____
. ,E,,;�cut.�.����:"_�,C:�hip ,A.liv��?SSIF.uncHon:l1 Test
WFIPC·�re·Shlp T!!!�
: portDlIon PreparDtlon
Convoy
WF/PC·IIIGSE To KSC
.
-:iPt:_ij��t!.I!�CliIT�hnl�i��Trni�i·nglFamit1��i·l�i·ion
"'-
1
�. .: �
.. -"- -'
.
•
,
___� ._ _.__
ra
I
I !
1 __;_1- I
S 5 � !;-;1M
$
�
_
1
1 1 1 1,' ' 1 I 2 f
.
,
5 I 7 • , 0 , 2 3 • 5 II! 1 S O , I
.
.
,
T Wi "" '
"
S
l
I !.
1
, , 2. 2 2 2 2 ' , 2 . 3 1
.
2 ' 3 " S II ;. 8 9 .!l.! , 2 3 •
T W ' F S
I
..
.\
__
_. _ _
.
I
I
I
I
.
_.
,I ."
-- ---
-
-
_
F.:.... :J!
.
.
I
0
11
i ,
I!-i
.
I
t.li'
,I, 0 I 2
t
I
.
\ 1lI I·�l'
5 8 7
r----:7
-
!J
!.i��e!5=
_lxlxJxJ�
I
5 III T '!I T ! ' 5 S M ' W rtF 5 S '" T�W T . '
JULY
. . --I
.
'�
�
. I- r-�
i
I
c
i
1 .
0t "
A
·
'
-----
'
I
_
' ''
.
S
,
3 \. S II ,_ . 9 0
..
.
I
y
;
x' x x p c c "
!l!Eixlx c�clc
1
I
1 _
x x x x c c x x . x x �l,��
. .. L[
J ___
.
;
J
J
I
._.
_ ___... .
_
.___
!
!
.__ _
)
.L
'
T il
.
I
- --n r:T�-
I I I L.
AUGUST
5 S "' T WIT 1'1515110111 "
1
'
1
2.'.2 2 2 2 . 2 2 12, 3 1 31 1
. . . .. .
1 2._3 • 5 I r '\' .!b.l..!J! , 2 • 5 II
M TW' F
1 I I I
I
,
,
F
·· · 1
5 5 III ' W T F
l
1 --
,Iw T
1
, I , I t ' I 1 1 . ' '_ ' 2
,.
.
7 • , II ' t ' I ' • 5 I 7 • , 0
S S M
,
1
_
__
hblTjrh
1�#;6:t
IX x -.
Il!l�� � I
1:loIolilil.( .
-j---�T-
I
GSFC CO_M ��IL�� F��-���� ��S:r SCHEDULE
_
. _ I I I c l l1
- .¢p
FROM JUNE 3 , 1 993 TO AUGUST 1 9 , 1 993
D.: Gallagher
A. Collins
ELECTRICAL/SOFTWARE TEST SUPPORT
K.Stowers
A. Sen
J. Schoeni
H. Conley
S. Pick
MECHANICAL TEST SUPPORT
M. Argoud
L. Broms
B. DeBusk
P. Vosse
QUALITY ASSURANCE
P. Sorci
[Mechanical Tech nicians will be
Rotated to Maintain a n average of TWo]
JPL TEST PERSONNEL AT GSFC
III
234'
OFFICES
AUTOMATED DATA
P R OCESSING
'"
(!l
0
�
OFFI CES
x
0
Ol
:.;
A
3-t
,
T-29 TRAILER
COMPLEX
:.;
0
o
'"
D
CLEAN ROOM
0 :';
RM 130
Ol g
�Q
-'
m
= E
,3 0:
... 0
u 0
�
c
Equip "5
Ch.nlng�
Room !
I ,
, ..
'j
FLIGHT
HARDWARE
R M 134
STAGING
RM 137
'---
JPL
JPL
FLIGHT-HARDWARE
!
-1
�
a:
0
A
j
I�
0
(!l
c
-'
m
(!l
c
....
SHIPPING &
RECEIVING
-'
m
RM 1 3 5
STO R A G E
RM 136
. LARGE
DELIV E R I ES
JPL
NORTH
DOCK F O R SMALL
DELIVERY
�
�
41:1
TRUCKS
BUILDING 29 LAYOUT at GSFC
•
,�__
___
N
,d!Y
�
J PL TEST TEAM ACTIVITI ES
TEST TEAM ACTIVITIES ON ARRIVAL:
•
Personnel Badging arid Security.
•
Office and Work Space Assignments.
•
Clean Room Familiarization and Certificatio n .
INSTRUMENT ACTIVITIES:
'
Instru ment and Su pport Equipm ent U nloadi ng.
•
•
Receiving Inspection of Transporter
and Support Equipment.
•
Preparation for Cleanroom Entry.
•
I nstrument Receiving I n spection
•
Instru ment Post-Shipment Functional Test.
•
EGSE Set-up, and Checkout.
�
�
���2525252525SE�SESESESESE��SE�25��'�
',�SE��
G
Z
CJ)
en
w
-
u
=0
u ·rI: $
� c.. o
....I
u. J: u.
$u
z
.
I
....
:::J
«
....I
u.
CJ)
�
-
en
t:
--
-
0
U
•
«
..�........"."."..........""...."".".""..".""."...""".....,,...........".""..."."..........""""""""""".."""""."."....."".".,,,,................""".."...•"".".""".".".."."..".";"""....,,",,.....,,..,,•...................
�
�
,
WF/PC-II I NTI;G RATI ON A N D TEST PLANS AT KSC
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
'�
HST SM I&T FLOW AT KSC
KSC WF/PC-II SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
JPL TEST PERSONNEL AT KSC.
JPL TEST TEAM ACTIVITIES ON ARRIVAL.
KSC BUILDING AE FLOOR PLAN.
AE CLEAN ROOM LAYOUT.
BUILDING AE ACTIVITIES.
PHSF BUILDING LAYOUT.
PHSF CLEAN ROOM LAYOUT.
PHSF 1&T ACTIVITIES
...emb�,
d\fIdout, l
VlF,llP,lA9
""""*"',
d.."",,,
$$££IlS£ l .
''''''
""p,I"Up"
......
. ..
.
.
.
(OWl/lend I
..,SS,
loKSC
(BelOII
ORU
shlpml"I,
" RIl l'
MISF
51
.. e05E
t\<H
l1l>I1"_'"
,.
a/
,
,
,
-.1
OROCCl",.h,.
1-1-1--
,
l T""d,, lo VpF
P,ylo,d C,"Is,.,
,,,11,"11011/ Rol.
,
P.ybed
,,,"'dod
MO,bh.
1--�
wr r
SSE I"NII,
e lo
tlunlllO
..
bdlly
ORU
'"" 1I11011on
�
n�
ope,.no",' SAC
mocll'"''''''
"pe"'''''''
to!!F tonl�In••
Opel,U"",,
f-
SSIO
FlIJlo;llonol
Test'nll
t-�
F55 .. ORve
I
....c
. lI.""'.'
Opel.,O",
Ad....,,,
"
'"
Act....I..
..""
\/PF T."
In"''',''''"
P,ylold
P..�
""'d
ClledI,
I--
I-�
--
---
COSTAR" ."d.,
loPIISF
lnt'''!J
C'I!��
1"IeOl.led
I>-
COSTARI ASIPE
'"'0910110"
..
+
,.
I---
vIFPCl!/nS1PE
I"f·o..
nol\
1--
SSE lWFPCl!
1110111_
1'1,1"0;110"01 T",
�
Payb,d ros.ovr
.. C....""
Pllps
c .
,
WFPCl! Ilinttil
I"pItSF
P,yt).d
p'OOO""od
Cllech
O,hh,
E!,d'�ftl
Conneclt
--
-10>-
CITE
EI.d,lc31
COtlI'leC"
O,bh.,
'VI
lJ
I-�
I-c-
CITE
'V,
OrbIt••
!!"d I" "nd
1-11>-L... ''''' ,.
CITE
''''
�
�
-�
P�y"'nd
CIo.e"'"
I--�
O....'.g'�l1011
CITE
(by 000,
P�yloAd
Cb,ule
-�
-�
Payload
,.,
C.nlsle< ',,:st.I.
.. T",,".' l0
..
l tll,ll'let>
P,.p,,c
,.I"'n,
��
HST SM 1 &T FLOW AT KSC
._
I-�
P'ybld
�
rGlIM
F
1---1
tll,lnch
n.)M/n.... 2J!.'93
.t.dJP:
�p� . -:::;:::
: �;:::
::
::::;
: ��;:-;;;;;:;;Io;;;;; d'A"
..i"Ki�=
ACTIVITIES
_
_
-
..... ,-- . .
..
--
.
...
..
... _
..
...
-
.....
--
ARE BASED ON A DECEMBER
_ ...
2.1993
tiC'....
·-
---'
-I
LAUNCH
_�,lJ19,J�.�.�g,�� �.�t,:
C�;;�Y'A·;�i�;��atKs2��;!i�;�:·:���:;�
_
. . .. .-. , :. . .�.
..
Conyoy 10 AE Building Shipping & Receiylng Dock
Unload InslrumentITranspor1er and Move II Into the airlock (R133)
- - - I-·----�
AUGUST)
., �
, -, -sEPTEMBER '
,, �
_
_
DAlE 9 i o 1 - 2 :' 3 14 [51617 · 8 : 9 O l 1 1 i 2
.:..
tffi$
A
JP
E
.��= ��
.
.
. .
I
_
,
,,
:
.
.
_.
!
I
1
2 3 14 :St6t7 8 9 O I 1 ! 2 !3T4 Si
__
_
_ __ _
I
i
I
I
'
::
.
:: •
::'- :
"" .
.'
:
I
_
_
.,..
"
.
. ...
I I I
I
""
-
....
• .
_
' �
f ±tt
,+ .LlmII
-E-:>:::
.- fr
o
_
_
.
1,. ,.:: ,1.,
I
.
, _1_
_
::
•
_: ! _ I - - _
:
'
I
I
.
I I
I j I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I I
i I
I I
"
.J
: \
I
[ 1-[' i
I I
I ) I
III
' W-I I
[
'
I '
'
=+#t
:
'
1
I
I
III
-1.4
I : I [
�
i _1_
I!I ...LL
X
:
I
i W
;,:-[I1"
"-
i
:
- �
"TI _: :_ :'- I I :
xllxlI
I rT!I
W
':'=OTI
�
I
..
.
\ !
,
--, i I!
:" "0.. I
I
I
II
I .
+ ,-,I +
--!--,
!
II i
W W"
W
-f-4
_
JPL PHSF ACTlvlTIESJI
<';��" . r.· �.. . ,.--,. '- _:.
.
i
'
I
Tl fT- .
_
. Xx ..L
1)
::3l·!!�Jl<>rt�VI£IP..c: 11 !!(L ,TO p' � ' ., . ,
. . jJ _
-".:"-" ��,
I_
'
. .:J _ __. ··
. . ... ·
Unload InslrumenVTransporter and Move Inlo The AirlC?ck (Rl17)
1
e-s eP:93 _O-Sep-93
.
·
.
- :• .. "•. .•:.·--LLU- . " ,.
j :�: , ' .
'
6-S�p-93 ...!�
!: �P-93 _ .. .·t'
Unload EGSE an��ve it inlo Trailer T-4
X
I
.
.
6-S!p-93
.:. . :,:,=rj J._IL ,; ..,•.,,'-... _ j :. _ 00 � I !
Perform JPL ReceiVing Inspection
on all WF/PC-II Ilems.
�Sep-93.
I
6-Sep-93 O-Sep-93 _ ;'�-: . .. . I
Move InSlrumenVT;ansporter To Roll-up Access Door To R 1 1 6
. :,' .•..._•: .:'-_ .iL'... - X T:
1 O-Sep-93 O-Sep-9 ?
Prepare Transporter for CleanRoom Entry
X T<·:
:<._1_
�.',:..:.;;'): L
. ..
! I I I
. ' " '_::,:'"
6-Sep-93 e -Sep-93 _I_ it ,,:;'
Move TransporterlWF/PC-1t Inlo R 1 1 6
X _1_
,
.
. ::
>
. -I--!---lSel opEGSE and run EGSE Funclional Tesl
I
_ ��p-93. e-Sep-93
� I
I 1
i.�,:�<,':
41 !:Sep-93 -!:.Sep-93
Connect EGSE 10 WFJPC-II
X_
j
...
.
' I
Perform Post·Shipmenl lnslrument Aliveness/Functional Tesl
� I X
: :: :'•.:• • ::)'
\ I
I 1
�P�- ��
.
.
,:/,)
=.:
1 1 0-Sep-93 1 0-Sep-93
Transfer WF/PC-1I from Transporter 10 LLP
X
.
. . .' . .
.
-' ,
10- seP-93 1 0-SepRe position WF/PC-II from Horizonlal 10 VeJ1ical
X
,
!!.
�
-:
-'--,:::,
- I
.· ,.·,·• j
Separale WF/pC-n from LLP using VIF
_
X
_____. __ �� -Se.p.:�� ��ep-9�.
.
: =r -'I
.;..:,.:1. :'.
___ � �!:"P-93 10-Sep-93
-r I
Remove llP Irom Under(inside) VIF
...
.
Moye CRVC Inlo VIF
I
_ -,-"=-�p-9� lo-�ep-9 ' ._ '"....
X
.··· .'---L T!
. ,
II
.. ,
.
·
p-93
-Sep-93
Ins�!:, WF/PC-lI lnlo RSIPE
�
l·
�
>
'
'
'
\
!
1
JJ_:'
.__ __ _ "!'9.:�e
I
�
I
.
..
.
_
.
,I
. . 1 1_: Sep-9,3 1. .1":��P:.9? T,
1_ '
.LJ " j L,
.__��1��.�"t!�!.Eld!I01.ovd.S.IU::!.� ':In WF/�C::.:".
1- _L_L
LLL I!I _ _1_1 I 1 _
1
1
-Sefl
I
os
- !l3 1 1 :SOIl·!l3 !
C er:. .___ ..
I
_.�l c.����
:
l
�_
.
l
\
i
L
!
:
I!l
JJJ__
_.
_
!..
�
;
.
.
.
.
� '3·Se.e.:.93 13-S0£:..93 I
! i.
PertormWF/PC-lI ln-RSIPE Funclional Tesl
i
:
'
_
[Xll i..\'..\.'�""'..:...:..;"".....;
: : i
lot,
JPL INTEGRATION AND TEST TEAM SHIFTS TO A MONITOR/SUPPORT MODE OF OPER
i
.
.•
:
•.•
.
_
_ _
.
+;,:
,
.
,
$::i<:"/,:'
t;
:
'.
_
'
:
,
,
:.'"
,
,
. ·' ·
.
.
IIl
.
_
--
,
__
_
" . . .
_ _
'
' ." :
",
.
....•
_
:
*'"
,
'
:...
+
_
"
<"
•• '
.
.
.
:
-
:::
_ _� ' '
.
_
IT,:" ,:.:,. .l.iL-: . "
"
_
I _1_1_""
I
.l.iL"
1 1 _..
_I __
!
_I_I__
._ " ' _._ _ ___ _____. .. _._ __ __
_)__:- ,_ _-_ , t -_L,_ 1
lllY (�.pi=r,pro�::�,SI"�,: in 1�e PHSF
_
,
-:. ;'::'.�::",:,:,,,-,'.,:'.'' 1':,:,
·
,
:
.
3
J
.
��g.
�
.
'
s.
,
�,
!
93
�
:�
.
�
�.
J
,
:
:
'
,
:
:
1
i
.
�
�
_
�
,
���ng
e
_ '_ _ ,
:
\ay,��-a,�-: �t��
,
:
p
HS
. .
A GSE
'
-".:�P-,",
._.
!
I
.
•
_�rform 1��L!���ncli��_'..!�_'_��
. I
-�
I
T
' I
.•.•.'' '••. I •-.'. .) :::..� _ .I ' ' ' :: J-i-L_ . '·':_TTT
- ' : LLLL
:'
j TT
l Ir ,.
I .:' :: .'. I "'T""i - ' ,
'
.
i
I '
I
=
00 ---+--t--t-+--I
I .
'-._' . -ttl
'
= !L
r-t+ -_.";· '. :'.:u- i
I
\
,i!:--+
l-- ' --;--L :" .' :....L ) I " "
I "
I
_ X ·» .
......
_ X : " .•. '.•..
..
:
.. .:
.
.
__
Ti I
i i
-���:�.:;.:; �;�,!:,:�:� � .f'�:'�; �� � �Et';_:�:i.�t;TI H! ; . . 1 JJi TT "'.
. I I I ". "i,_.I _,__! .,...•... I I I '
2O-A�g,",� 20-Aug-" _
..
_ .20 0AU�.93 �O-Aug·93
"'
1
,' :
20-Aug-93 24-Aug-93 X :: .". .•"
.
...
.
= �-Au_�7.93 24-=A�:g:i X <':>
:,-'
i
.
Move personnal elleclS 1 0 JPL Ollices i n Room 135
" '___
.. •
. 24-Aug-93
. . -:T
' :?
20-Aug-93
'-('.:::
Perform JPL Receiving Inspeclion on an WF/PC-lI l1ems.
:
.
Move Inslrumenlffransporter To Roll-up -Access Door To Room_��___ ___
.2_���g:.9.3 �-AUQ�93 X :/:-·:.
Perlorm CleanroomPrep.rasks
....!. -'-"-:A�•.:� 24 .Au . - ', , X
E.,O-A U 9-= 9� 24-AU9:93
Move Transporter, MGSe and Purge Unils Inlo R-132
X .'{;�
1 I .'.: �: .r:_
1
.
�O -A1l 9�..? �:Aug-93
Move Purge syslem Inlo R 124 and install.
X '
I
.
.
.
20-A�9-93 24-Aug-93. -1-\ �::::.lrx
Sel-up EGSE and run Funclional l'est
I I
1 24·Aug-93 24-Aug-93
\
) ;�\'� X I �
Remove Transporter Cover and Perform Receiving Ins�eclion On Insl.
�
2 25-Au9 -93 E.,6-Aug-93 1
Perform Posi-Shipmenl lnslrumenl Aliveness/Functional Tesl
i1�
--IIXII
Inslall Flighl Pick-oil Mirror on WF/PC-Il
[
I
>
� 27-A U9:'�� �- AU9-93
'
Ix
I _LL
� 3.!:�u_9-93 __2.:.�ep..:9..?
����9���!.�� 9?!��.��g�.�'=n!..��ri!�colio�_�...
__
-.?-§eP:J_3 ��'p:.9_3
..lJ-Ll._
2
'
Prep� re , r'FJP� � ll a�,� �� E for lr,ansport loPH � F
ep 93 -���p,�,93
,
:'.:,:
" 1, ,
7:� :,
, !-
Unload EGSE and move il inlo Room 131
_
I
�
TASK T i F SSMiT WlT i F S S M1TWi T i F S S�T WI T ! F S S M I T W I T I F S S M I T W I T i F S
TASK
A�:r __ �� !.l2_2 2 _�.l2J�1�
_
'_!_ .
-Ll lL 1 1 .!..ill1 11 1 � 1 1 .�2-l�-+� ;�2
L__��
. DATE
. !,2. 2 � .11�. _
..
i3 4 5 7 !8 19 10 1
---
41=
!
+ If. #�1-::
�
'
__
�
.
__
__
_
!lT
__
__
_
.•
'· !i
:I
.m
i
_
._
____. . . . . _.__n. .__n._ . ._�=_�_ _���_�_��.I.'._ _=.�.�.=.�_.�.=_=n_�_�_._=�.=.�.�_� . . n_ _. .n_. ._._n. ._:_. ._ _ . ./
. .
__
__ n
. __
,
.
n___
TEAM MEMBER ,Aug. 1 9, / Sept.20, Sept.20, / Jan.1 , 1994
D. Gallagher
A. Collins
A. Collins
ELECTRICAL/SOFTWARE
TEST SUPPORT
,
' K.Slowers
, A. Sen
J. Schoeni
H. Conley
S. Pick
MECHANICAL TEST SUPPORT
M. Argoud
M. Argoud
L. Broms
,L. Broms
P. Vosse
P. Vosse
B. DeBusk
QUALITY ASSURANCE
P. Sorci
P. Sorci
�
JPL TEST PERSONNEL AT KSC
WF/PC- I I I KSC-A E
T EST T EAM ACTIVITI ES O N
A R R IVA L : .
•
I nstru ment and S u p p o rt Eq u i pment U n load i n g .
•
Personnel 8ad g i ng a n d Secu rity.
•
Office a n d Work Space Ass i g n m ents.
•
Clean Room Fam i l iarization and Certificati on.
;, 1 !:!0
133
� r---,
"
131
12B
132
/ �
I
129
"
I
I
29A
135C
�4
116
1 25
SOUTH
ANTENNA TOwen
'
.
2
r
lOB
I
1 10
1 2 J tl
135
1 19
r
1
J7 1 1J 1i l J
I
-
1 3 70
7
L
I
109A
1018
lOlA
101
�
J
c:- J
C
1 3 5A
�
COOUNG
r-r---"
109
A
NORTH
ANTENNA TOWER
1
100
8
02
1 '
-+
�
100B
M
136
D
1
1 34
1 00A
BU ILDING AE
FLOOR PLAN
RM 128
RM 126A
,
o
? _r- r g
-=- '-
'"
l- S!
::;;
130
Height
RM 124
R1! 133
�eiling Heigh
40' 0"
-
b
M
,
---
.,.
:
AIRLOCK
�
@
0:
�
.
LID
r-- 2
I' 4"
tr
·
·
\��C
LID
..
•
•
� !::�"-:
.. .
==-
J
'"
'"
'"
-
j
,
8' 1 "
..
.,.,
;,
'"
f
I
V
RM 132
3';' 0"
Ceiling Height
I
I
"�
5 1' 6"
RM 102C
R1f' 1 18B
-
-
R1! 120A
'"
I8l
51
d
::;;
::;
'"
BI ;::
COSTAR
0
�
WF�C
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
30'
..
•
•
1OjD"
RM
EGSE
Ceiling Height 10' 0"
3�' 5"
f
1 1 8A
-
o.
WF�C
RM 131
R1i 1 1 8
RM
0:
High Bay Test Area
I� I
I
�
'"
10' 0"
�
- ------- --
.s
Ceiling
RM 126C
RM
o
129A
•
RM 129
-
COSTAR
EGSE
��
�':•••_.__:'__
&
...=.
;.;:_::
:::.:.::::.::::..
o
m
_
..
�
.!,,:.;;;;,;;;;===;,;;:==>-==_________.'->..,.
....�.
_
_
WF/PC- I I I KSC
B U I L D I N G A E ACTIVITI ES
•
Pre-Arrival Activities At AE.
•
•
Arriva l At AE and U n packing .
Post-Transportation Functional Test.
F l i g ht Pick-Off M i rror I n stal l ati o n .
Optical A l i g n ment Verification.
•
Transportation to The PHSF.
•
•
�
-"
-..,.�
'"--::"&.-=---
-. .
-;;;:;;?9
•
•
PHSF Test
Equipment
Trailer ("4)
Cable Tray
•
Air Conditioning ( 70F)
DIS - 2 boxes, 4 headsels each
t
I
2 Phones
� I
Video monilor of PHSF highbay
Existing cable tray 10 highbay
I
4 1 1 5VAC duplex receplacles
I
, ' 1 2 ea. L5-30R recpl. / 4 ea. L21-30R recpl.
2 ea. 20B VAC 1 3 phase 50 amp wilh mating conneclor,,!
•
•
N
•
Controf
Room 2
•
C>
PHSF Highbay Cleanroom
Room 1 1 6
B xmil l B rcv RS-422 dala lines
I
- - - .
•
'
PHSF Airlock
Room 1 1 7
•
2 ea. 1 20 1 20B VAC 1 3 phase 50 amp Crouse Hinds male
connectors to be wired to GSE for use with existing female
receptacles
' 2 ea.l l 0 VAC / 20 amp ( VIF and PC )
1 20 VAC 1 1 phase I 30 amp Crouse Hinds male connectors
to be wired to GSE for use wilh existing female receplacles
( SA-2 dark currenl test )
2 ea. l l 0 VAC 1 20 amp
•
•
PHSF Control
Building
Covered
Storage
Area
PHSF LAYOUT
'
.
•
•
Conlrol
Room 1
Exisling 5-15 dUf ex 1 2 0 VAC 1 1 phase 30 amp
wilh mating conr ectors
Conlrol of CCTV amera from CR2
Existing DIS
PURGE CART
FSS SCAFFOLD
I
-
FSS IN CSS
0
I
M
SAC ON
SAC DOLLY
VIF
;.,
"
<;
z
W
Do
II:
0
0
0
M
I.
g
WFPC
ORUC IN
PSSIT
r
ORUC TN
FIXTURE
..
"
PURGE CART
107 '
PHSF HIGHBAY CLEAN ROOM LAYOUT
0
-
;.,
..
--/
WF/PC- I I I KSC
_
P HS F ACTIVITI ES
."
•
•
•
•
Post-Transportati o n Funct i o n a l .
Pre paration fo � RSI P E I � teg rat io � .
.
RSI P E I nteg rat i o n and Fi nal Conf i g u ration Check.
I n- RSI P E Fu n cti onal Check.
---
---
---
J P L Ops. Team Transitions To a
GSFC S u p port M ode of Operati o n .
.�
-
---
-
�
II!
1,11
.-.PL
PRE-SHIP REVIEW
WIDEFIELD PLANETARY CAMERA
PROGRAM ASSURANCE
PRESENTATION DATE:
MAY 27-28, 1 993
G S FC CLEAN ROOM FAC I LITY
RES U LTS OF F I NAL REVI EW
TBD
EBS
5127-28193
Wide Field Planetary Camera
JPL
Criterion
•
Completed planned testi ng
Summary
Status
•
•
•
•
•
Vehicles and equ i pment ready
Facilities at GSFC ready
Operations team, GSE ready
All testing accompl ished
Resu lts as reported
Tested, proofed, loaded
. and ready to rol l
•
•
•
Ready to receive WFPC- I I
Team ready, travel
arrangements mad e ;
GSE loaded and ready
Conclusion
WFPC is ready to ship.
5/20/93
MO- 1