Toward an Understanding of
Hadron-Hadron Collisions
From Feynman-Field to the LHC
Rick Field
University of Florida
Outline of Talk
 Ricky & Sally.
Outgoing Parton
 The Berkeley Years – Rick & Jimmie.
PT(hard)
Initial-State Radiation
Proton
 The early days of Feynman-Field
AntiProton
Underlying Event
Phenomenology.
Outgoing Parton
Underlying Event
Final-State
Radiation
 Mapping out the energy dependence of the UE:
Tevatron to the LHC.
 Early LHC UE predictions.
 From 7 GeV/c pions to 1 TeV jets!
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
CDF Run 2
CMS at the LHC
Page 1
Margaret Morlan
Margaret Field in “The Man From Planet X” (1951)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=896jnOb1fcI
Ricky Field - Scientist
Sally Field - Actress
 My mother was born on May 10, 1922, in
Houston Texas. She died on Sunday
November 6, 2011 in Malibu, California at
age 89.
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 2
The Berkeley Years
Rick Field 1964
me
R. D. Field
University of California, Berkeley, 1962-66 (undergraduate)
University of California, Berkeley, 1966-71 (graduate student)
My sister Sally!
Rick & Jimmie
1968
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 3
My Ph.D. advisor!
The Berkeley Years
R. D. Field
University of California, Berkeley, 1962-66 (undergraduate)
University of California, Berkeley, 1966-71 (graduate student)
me
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Bob
Cahn
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Chris
Quigg
J.D.J
Page 4
Before Feynman-Field
Rick & Jimmie
1968
Rick & Jimmie
1970
Rick & Jimmie
1972 (pregnant!)
Rick & Jimmie at CALTECH 1973
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 5
Toward and Understanding of
Hadron-Hadron Collisions
Feynman-Field Phenomenology1
Feynman
 From 7 GeV/c
and
hat!
Field
Outgoing Parton
p0’s
to 1 TeV Jets.
The early days of trying to
understand and simulate
hadron-hadron collisions.
PT(hard)
Initial-State Radiation
Proton
AntiProton
Underlying Event
Outgoing Parton
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
st
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Underlying Event
Final-State
Radiation
Page 6
The Feynman-Field Days
1973-1983
“Feynman-Field
Jet Model”
 FF1: “Quark Elastic Scattering as a Source of High Transverse Momentum
Mesons”, R. D. Field and R. P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. D15, 2590-2616 (1977).
 FFF1: “Correlations Among Particles and Jets Produced with Large Transverse
Momenta”, R. P. Feynman, R. D. Field and G. C. Fox, Nucl. Phys. B128, 1-65
(1977).
 FF2: “A Parameterization of the properties of Quark Jets”, R. D. Field and R. P.
Feynman, Nucl. Phys. B136, 1-76 (1978).
 F1: “Can Existing High Transverse Momentum Hadron Experiments be
Interpreted by Contemporary Quantum Chromodynamics Ideas?”, R. D. Field,
Phys. Rev. Letters 40, 997-1000 (1978).
 FFF2: “A Quantum Chromodynamic Approach for the Large Transverse
Momentum Production of Particles and Jets”, R. P. Feynman, R. D. Field and G.
C. Fox, Phys. Rev. D18, 3320-3343 (1978).
 FW1: “A QCD Model for e+e- Annihilation”, R. D. Field and S. Wolfram, Nucl.
Phys. B213, 65-84 (1983).
My 1st graduate
student!
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 7
Hadron-Hadron Collisions
FF1 1977
 What happens when two hadrons
collide at high energy?
Hadron
Hadron
Feynman quote from FF1
???
“The model we shall choose is not a popular one,
 Most of the time the hadrons
ooze
so that we will not duplicate too much of the
through each other andwork
fall apart
(i.e.who are similarly analyzing
of others
no hard scattering). The
outgoing
various
models (e.g. constituent interchange
particles continue in roughly
the same
model, multiperipheral
models, etc.). We shall
Parton-Parton Scattering Outgoing Parton
assume
direction as initial proton
andthat the high PT particles arise from
“Soft” constituent
Collision (no large transverse momentum)
direct hard collisions between
antiproton.
quarks in the incoming particles, which
Hadron
Hadron
 Occasionally there will
be a large
fragment
or cascade down
into several hadrons.”
transverse momentum meson.
Question: Where did it come from?
 We assumed it came from quark-quark
elastic scattering, but we did not know
how to calculate it!
Outgoing Parton
high PT meson
“Black-Box Model”
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 8
Quark-Quark Black-Box Model
No gluons!
Quark Distribution Functions
determined from deep-inelastic
lepton-hadron collisions
FF1 1977
Feynman quote from FF1
“Because of the incomplete knowledge of
our functions some things can be predicted
with more certainty than others. Those
experimental results that are not well
predicted can be “used up” to determine
these functions in greater detail to permit
better predictions of further experiments.
Our papers will be a bit long because we
wish to discuss this interplay in detail.”
Quark-Quark Cross-Section
Unknown! Deteremined from
hadron-hadron collisions.
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Quark Fragmentation Functions
determined from e+e- annihilations
Page 9
Quark-Quark Black-Box Model
Predict
particle ratios
FF1 1977
Predict
increase with increasing
CM energy W
“Beam-Beam
Remnants”
Predict
overall event topology
(FFF1 paper 1977)
7 GeV/c p0’s!
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 10
Telagram from Feynman
July 1976
SAW CRONIN AM NOW CONVINCED WERE RIGHT TRACK QUICK WRITE
FEYNMAN
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 11
Letter from Feynman
July 1976
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 12
Letter from Feynman Page 1
Spelling?
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 13
Letter from Feynman Page 3
It is fun!
Onward!
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 14
QCD Approach: Quarks & Gluons
Quark & Gluon Fragmentation
Functions
Q2 dependence predicted from QCD
Parton Distribution Functions
Q2 dependence predicted from
QCD
FFF2 1978
Feynman quote from FFF2
“We investigate whether the present
experimental behavior of mesons with
large transverse momentum in hadron-hadron
collisions is consistent with the theory of
quantum-chromodynamics (QCD) with
asymptotic freedom, at least as the theory
is now partially understood.”
Quark & Gluon Cross-Sections
Calculated from QCD
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 15
Hadron-Hadron Collisions
 Proton-Proton or Proton-Antiproton Colliders:
Hadron
Hadron
???
u
u
u
d
d
Ebeam
½Ebeam
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
1/6E
beam
½Ebeam
u
u
ECM ~ ¹/3 Ebeam
u
+
1/6E
beam
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 16
Monte-Carlo Simulation
of Hadron-Hadron Collisions
 Color singlet proton collides
with a color singlet antiproton.
 A red quark gets knocked out of
the proton and a blue antiquark
gets knocked out of the
antiproton.
 At short times (small distances) the color forces
are weak and the outgoing partons move away
from the beam-beam remnants.
Jet
quark-antiquark
pairs
color string
Proton
Beam
Beam Beam
Remnants
Remnants
Remnants
AntiProton
Beam
Beam
Beam
Remnants
Remnants
Remnants
color string
quark-antiquark
pairs
Jet
 At long times (large distances) the color
forces become strong and quarkantiquark pairs are pulled out of the
vacuum and hadrons are formed.
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
 The resulting event consists of
hadrons and leptons in the form
of two large transverse
momentum outgoing jets plus
the beam-beam remnants.
Page 17
Feynman Talk at Coral Gables
(December 1976)
1st transparency
Last transparency
“Feynman-Field
Jet Model”
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 18
A Parameterization of
the Properties of Jets
Field-Feynman 1978
Secondary Mesons
(after decay)
continue
 Assumed that jets could be analyzed on a “recursive”
principle.
(bk) (ka)
 Let f(h)dh be the probability that the rank 1 meson leaves
fractional momentum h to the remaining cascade, leaving
Rank 2
Rank 1
quark “b” with momentum P1 = h1P0.
 Assume that the mesons originating from quark “b” are
distributed in presisely the same way as the mesons which
(cb)
(ba)
Primary Mesons
came from quark a (i.e. same function f(h)), leaving
quark “c” with momentum P2 = h2P1 = h2h1P0.
cc pair bb pair
Calculate F(z)
from f(h) and b i!
Original quark with
flavor “a” and
momentum P0
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
 Add in flavor dependence by letting bu = probabliity of
producing u-ubar pair, bd = probability of producing ddbar pair, etc.
 Let F(z)dz be the probability of finding a meson
(independent of rank) with fractional mementum z of the
original quark “a” within the jet.
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 19
Feynman-Field Jet Model
R. P. Feynman
ISMD, Kaysersberg,
France, June 12, 1977
Feynman quote from FF2
“The predictions of the model are reasonable
enough physically that we expect it may
be close enough to reality to be useful in
designing future experiments and to serve
as a reasonable approximation to compare
to data. We do not think of the model
as a sound physical theory, ....”
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 20
Monte-Carlo Simulation
of Hadron-Hadron Collisions
FF1-FFF1 (1977)
“Black-Box” Model
F1-FFF2 (1978)
QCD Approach
FFFW “FieldJet” (1980)
QCD “leading-log order” simulation
of hadron-hadron collisions
the past
yesterday
today
FF2 (1978)
Monte-Carlo
simulation of “jets”
ISAJET
HERWIG
(“FF” Fragmentation)
(“FW” Fragmentation)
SHERPA
PYTHIA 8
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
“FF” or “FW”
Fragmentation
PYTHIA 6.4
HERWIG++
Page 21
The Fermilab Tevatron
CDF “SciCo” Shift December 12-19, 2008
My wife Jimmie on shift with me!
Proton
CDF
1 mile
AntiProton
Proton
2 TeV
 I joined CDF in January
1998.
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
AntiProton
Acquired 4728 nb-1 during
8 hour “owl” shift!
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 22
High PT Jets
CDF (2006)
Feynman, Field, & Fox (1978)
Predict
large “jet”
cross-section
30 GeV/c!
Feynman quote from FFF
600writing,
GeV/c Jets!
“At the time of this
there is
still no sharp quantitative test of QCD.
An important test will come in connection
with the phenomena of high PT discussed here.”
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 23
High Energy Physics
 Proton-antiproton collisions at 2 TeV.
 Define EH to be the amount of energy
required to light a 60 Watt light bulb for
1 second (EH = 60 Joules). 1 TeV = 1012
ev = 1.6×10-7 Joules and hence EH =
3.75×108 TeV.
Proton
 A proton-antiproton collisions at 2 TeV is
equal to about 3.2×10-7 Joules which
corresponds to about 1/200,000,000 EH!
The energy is not high in every day
standards but it is concentrated at a
small point (i.e. large energy density).
 The mass energy of a proton is about 1 GeV and the
mass energy of a pion is about 140 MeV. Hence 2
TeV is equavelent to about 2,000 proton masses or
about 14,000 pion masses and lots of hadrons are
produced in a typical collision.
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
-7
3.2x10
2 TeV J
AntiProton
Lots of outgoing hadrons
Display of charged
particles in the CDF
central tracker
Page 24
Collider Coordinates
xz-plane
x-axis
x-axis
Beam Axis
Proton
P
cm
AntiProton
z-axis
Proton
“Transverse”
xy-plane
y-axis
AntiProton z-axis
 cm is the center-of-mass scattering angle and  is the
azimuthal angle. The “transverse” momentum of a
particle is given by PT = P cos(cm).
 Use h and  to determine the direction of an
outgoing particle, where h is the “pseudo-rapidity”
defined by h = -log(tan(cm/2)).
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Azimuthal
Scattering Angle
y-axis
 The z-axis is defined to be the beam axis with
the xy-plane being the “transverse” plane.
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Center-of-Mass
Scattering Angle
PT

x-axis
h
cm
0
90o
1
40o
2
15o
3
6o
4
2o
Page 25
CDF DiJet Event: M(jj) ≈ 1.4 TeV
ETjet1 = 666 GeV ETjet2 = 633 GeV
Esum = 1,299 GeV M(jj) = 1,364 GeV
Proton-Antiproton Collisions at 1.96 TeV
M(jj)/Ecm ≈ 70%!!
CDF
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 26
QCD Monte-Carlo Models:
High Transverse Momentum Jets
Hard Scattering
Initial-State Radiation
Hard Scattering “Jet”
Initial-State Radiation
“Jet”
Outgoing Parton
PT(hard)
Outgoing Parton
PT(hard)
Proton
“Hard Scattering” Component
AntiProton
Final-State Radiation
Outgoing Parton
Underlying Event
Underlying Event
Proton
“Jet”
Final-State Radiation
AntiProton
Underlying Event
Outgoing Parton
Underlying Event
“Underlying Event”
 Start with the perturbative 2-to-2 (or sometimes 2-to-3) parton-parton scattering and add initial and finalstate gluon radiation (in the leading log approximation or modified leading log approximation).
 The “underlying event” consists of the “beam-beam remnants” and from particles arising from soft or
semi-soft multiple parton interactions (MPI).
The “underlying
event” is“jet”
an unavoidable
 Of course the outgoing colored partons fragment
into hadron
and inevitably “underlying event”
background to most collider observables
observables receive contributions from initial
and final-state radiation.
and having good understand of it leads to
more precise collider measurements!
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 27
Traditional Approach
CDF Run 1 Analysis Charged Particle D Correlations
Leading Calorimeter Jet or
Charged Jet #1
Leading Charged Particle Jet or
PT > PTmin |h| < hcut
Direction
Leading Charged Particle or
2p
“Transverse” region
very sensitive to the
“underlying event”!
Away RegionZ-Boson
“Toward-Side” Jet
D
“Toward”
“Transverse”
“Transverse”
“Away”
Leading Object
Direction
D
“Toward”
“Transverse”
“Transverse”
Transverse
Region

Leading
Object
Toward Region
Transverse
Region
“Away”
Away Region
0
-hcut
“Away-Side” Jet
h
+hcut
 Look at charged particle correlations in the azimuthal angle D relative to a leading object (i.e.
CaloJet#1, ChgJet#1, PTmax, Z-boson). For CDF PTmin = 0.5 GeV/c hcut = 1.
 Define |D| < 60o as “Toward”, 60o < |D| < 120o as “Transverse”, and |D| > 120o as

“Away”.
o
All three regions have the same area in h- space, Dh×D = 2hcut×120 = 2hcut×2p/3. Construct
densities by dividing by the area in h- space.
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 28
Run 1 PYTHIA Tune A
PYTHIA 6.206 CTEQ5L
CDF Default Feburary 25, 2000!
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
Parameter
Tune B
Tune A
MSTP(81)
1
1
MSTP(82)
4
4
PARP(82)
1.9 GeV
2.0 GeV
PARP(83)
0.5
0.5
PARP(84)
0.4
0.4
PARP(85)
1.0
0.9
"Transverse" Charged Density
1.00
CDF Preliminary
0.75
1.0
0.95
PARP(89)
1.8 TeV
1.8 TeV
PARP(90)
0.25
0.25
PARP(67)
1.0
4.0
New PYTHIA default
(less initial-state radiation)
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Run 1 Analysis
0.50
0.25
CTEQ5L
PYTHIA 6.206 (Set B)
PARP(67)=1
1.8 TeV |h|<1.0 PT>0.5 GeV
0.00
0
PARP(86)
PYTHIA 6.206 (Set A)
PARP(67)=4
data uncorrected
theory corrected
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
PT(charged jet#1) (GeV/c)
 Plot shows the “transverse” charged particle density
versus PT(chgjet#1) compared to the QCD hard
scattering predictions of two tuned versions of
PYTHIA 6.206 (CTEQ5L, Set B (PARP(67)=1) and
Set A (PARP(67)=4)).
Old PYTHIA default
(more initial-state radiation)
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 29
The New Forefront
 The forefront of science is moving
from the US to CERN (Geneva,
Switzerland).
Proton
14 TeV
Proton
 The LHC is designed to collide protons with protons at
a center-of-mass energy of 14 TeV (seven times greater
energy than Fermilab)!
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 30
The LHC at CERN
Me at CMS!
6 miles
CMS at the LHC
Darin
Proton
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
14 TeV
Proton
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 31
The LHC
 7 TeV on 7 TeV proton-proton collider, 27km ring
• 7 times higher energy than the Tevatron at Fermilab
• Aim for 5 TeV for 2008
• 100 times higher design luminosity than Tevatron (L=1034cm-2s-1)
 1232 superconducting 8.4T dipole magnets @ T=1.9ºK
• Largest cryogenic structure, 40 ktons of mass to cool
 4 experiments
 Start Date:
September 10, 2008
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 32
Incident of September 19th 2008
 Very impressive start-up with beam on September 10, 2008!
 While making the last step of the dipole circuit in sector 34, to 9.3kA. At 8.7kA,
development of resistive zone in the dipole bus bar splice between Q24 R3 and the
neighboring dipole. Electrical arc developed which punctured the helium
enclosure.
14 months of repair!
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 33
Min-Bias “Associated”
Charged Particle Density
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
1.2
RDF Preliminary
14 TeV
Min-Bias
"Transverse" Charged Density
"Transverse" Charged Density
1.2
py Tune DW generator level
10 TeV
7 TeV
0.8
1.96 TeV
0.9 TeV
0.4
0.2 TeV
Charged Particles (|h|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
RDF Preliminary
LHC14
py Tune DW generator level
0.8
LHC10
LHC7
Tevatron
900 GeV
0.4
PTmax = 5.25 GeV/c
RHIC
Charged Particles (|h|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
0.0
0.0
0
5
10
15
20
0
25
2
D
“Toward”
RHIC
“Transverse”
“Transverse”
0.2 TeV → 1.96 TeV
(UE increase ~2.7 times)
Tevatron
“Away”
6
8
10
12
14
Center-of-Mass Energy (TeV)
PTmax (GeV/c)
PTmax Direction
4
PTmax Direction
D
“Toward”
“Transverse”
PTmax Direction
1.96 TeV → 14 TeV
(UE increase ~1.9 times)
LHC
“Transverse”
“Away”
D
“Toward”
“Transverse”
“Transverse”
“Away”
 Shows the “associated” charged particle density in the “transverse” region as a function of
PTmax for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |h| < 1, not including PTmax) for “min-bias” events
at 0.2 TeV, 0.9 TeV, 1.96 TeV, 7 TeV, 10 TeV, 14 TeV predicted by PYTHIA Tune DW at the particle
Linear scale!
level (i.e. generator level).
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 34
Min-Bias “Associated”
Charged Particle Density
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
1.2
RDF Preliminary
14 TeV
Min-Bias
"Transverse" Charged Density
"Transverse" Charged Density
1.2
py Tune DW generator level
10 TeV
7 TeV
0.8
1.96 TeV
0.9 TeV
0.4
0.2 TeV
Charged Particles (|h|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
RDF Preliminary
py Tune DW generator level
LHC14
LHC10
LHC7
0.8
Tevatron
0.4
900 GeV
RHIC
PTmax = 5.25 GeV/c
Charged Particles (|h|<1.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
0.0
0.0
0
5
10
15
20
25
0.1
D
“Toward”
LHC7
“Transverse”
100.0
PTmax Direction
7 TeV → 14 TeV
(UE increase ~20%)
D
“Toward”
LHC14
“Transverse”
“Away”
10.0
Center-of-Mass Energy (TeV)
PTmax (GeV/c)
PTmax Direction
1.0
Linear on a log plot!
“Transverse”
“Transverse”
“Away”
 Shows the “associated” charged particle density in the “transverse” region as a function of
PTmax for charged particles (pT > 0.5 GeV/c, |h| < 1, not including PTmax) for “min-bias” events
at 0.2 TeV, 0.9 TeV, 1.96 TeV, 7 TeV, 10 TeV, 14 TeV predicted by PYTHIA Tune DW at the particle
Log scale!
level (i.e. generator level).
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 35
Conclusions November 2009
 We are making good progress in understanding and modeling the
“underlying event”. RHIC data at 200 GeV are very important!
Outgoing Parton
PT(hard)
Initial-State Radiation
Proton
 The new Pythia pT ordered tunes (py64 S320 and py64 P329)
are very similar to Tune A, Tune AW, and Tune DW. At present
the new tunes do not fit the data better than Tune AW and Tune
DW. However, the new tune are theoretically preferred!
AntiProton
Underlying Event
Underlying Event
Outgoing Parton
Final-State
Radiation
Hard-Scattering Cut-Off PT0
PYTHIA 6.206
 = 0.25 (Set A))
4
PT0 (GeV/c)
 It is clear now that the default value PARP(90) = 0.16 is
not correct and the value should be closer to the Tune A
value of 0.25.
 The new and old PYTHIA tunes are beginning to
converge and I believe we are finally in a position to make
some legitimate predictions at the LHC!
5
3
2
 = 0.16 (default)
1
 All tunes with the default value PARP(90) = 0.16 are
wrong and are overestimating the activity of min-bias and
the underlying event at the LHC! This includes all my
“T” tunes and the (old) ATLAS tunes!
 Need to measure “Min-Bias” and the “underlying
event” at the LHC as soon as possible to see if there is
new QCD physics to be learned!
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
CM Energy W (GeV)
UE&MB@CMS
Page 36
LHC 2009 Summary
 November 20th 2009
•
First beams around again
 November 29th 2009
•
Both beams accelerated to 1.18 TeV simultaneously
 December 8th 2009
•
•
LHC - highest energy collider
2x2 accelerated to 1.18 TeV
First collisions at Ecm = 2.36 TeV!
Proton
 December 14th 2009
•
•
2.36
900 GeV
TeV
Proton
Stable 2x2 at 1.18 TeV
Collisions in all four experiments
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 37
“Transverse” Charged Particle Density
PT(chgjet#1) Direction
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
"Transverse" Charged Density
0.8
D
RDF Preliminary
Fake Data
pyDW generator level
ChgJet#1
“Toward”
0.6
PTmax
“Transverse”
“Transverse”
0.4
Leading Charged
Particle Jet, chgjet#1.
“Away”
0.2
900 GeV
Prediction!
Charged Particles (|h|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
PTmax Direction
0.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
PTmax or PT(chgjet#1) (GeV/c)
“Toward”
 Fake data (from MC) at 900 GeV on the
“transverse” charged particle density,
dN/dhd, as defined by the leading
charged particle (PTmax) and the leading
charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged
particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 2.
The fake data (from PYTHIA Tune DW)
are generated at the particle level (i.e.
generator level) assuming 0.5 M min-bias
events at 900 GeV (361,595 events in the
plot).
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
D
18
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
“Transverse”
“Transverse”
Leading Charged
Particle, PTmax.
“Away”
Rick Field
MB&UE@CMS Workshop
CERN, November 6, 2009
Page 38
“Transverse” Charge Density
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
Rick Field
MB&UE@CMS Workshop
CERN, November 6, 2009
"Transverse" Charged Density
1.2
RDF Preliminary
py Tune DW generator level
7 TeV
0.8
factor of 2!
900 GeV
0.4
Prediction!
Charged Particles (|h|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
4
10
0.0
0
2
6
8
12
14
16
18
20
PTmax (GeV/c)
PTmax Direction
D
LHC
900 GeV
“Toward”
“Transverse”
PTmax Direction
900 GeV → 7 TeV
(UE increase ~ factor of 2)
“Transverse”
“Away”
~0.4 → ~0.8
D
“Toward”
LHC
7 TeV
“Transverse”
“Transverse”
“Away”
 Shows the charged particle density in the “transverse” region for charged particles (pT > 0.5
GeV/c, |h| < 2) at 900 GeV and 7 TeV as defined by PTmax from PYTHIA Tune DW and at the
particle level (i.e. generator level).
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 39
“Transverse” Charged Particle Density
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
RDF Preliminary
Fake Data
pyDW generator level
"Transverse" Charged Density
"Transverse" Charged Density
0.8
ChgJet#1
0.6
PTmax
0.4
0.2
900 GeV
Monte-Carlo!
Charged Particles (|h|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
0.8
CMS Preliminary
ChgJet#1
data uncorrected
pyDW + SIM
0.6
PTmax
0.4
0.2
900 GeV
Real Data!
Charged Particles (|h|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
0.0
0.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0
2
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
PTmax or PT(chgjet#1) (GeV/c)
PTmax or PT(chgjet#1) (GeV/c)
 Fake data (from MC) at 900 GeV on the
“transverse” charged particle density,
dN/dhd, as defined by the leading
charged particle (PTmax) and the leading
charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged
particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 2.
The fake data (from PYTHIA Tune DW)
are generated at the particle level (i.e.
generator level) assuming 0.5 M min-bias
events at 900 GeV (361,595 events in the
plot).
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
4
 CMS preliminary data at 900 GeV on the
“transverse” charged particle density,
dN/dhd, as defined by the leading charged
particle (PTmax) and the leading charged
particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles
with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 2. The data
are uncorrected and compared with
PYTHIA Tune DW after detector simulation
(216,215 events in the plot).
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 40
LHC: March 30, 2010
 First collisions with beam energies
of 3.5 TeV (Ecm = 7 TeV)! Factor of
4.5 higher energy than the
Tevatron.
Stable Beams at Ecm = 7 TeV!
UF Group at CERN Bld 40
Proton
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
7 TeV
Proton
Page 41
CMS: March 30, 2010
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 42
PYTHIA Tune DW
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
Charged Particle Density
CMS Preliminary
"Transverse" Charged Density
1.2
7 TeV
data uncorrected
pyDW + SIM
0.8
CMS
900 GeV
0.4
Charged Particles (|h|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
1.2
RDF Preliminary
7 TeV
ATLAS corrected data
Tune DW generator level
0.8
ATLAS
900 GeV
0.4
Charged Particles (|h|<2.5, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
0.0
0.0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0
2
4
6
8
10
 CMS preliminary data at 900 GeV and 7 TeV 
on the “transverse” charged particle density,
dN/dhd, as defined by the leading charged
particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles
with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 2. The data are
uncorrected and compared with PYTHIA
Tune DW after detector simulation.
16
18
20
ATLAS preliminary data at 900 GeV and 7
TeV on the “transverse” charged particle
density, dN/dhd, as defined by the leading
charged particle (PTmax) for charged particles
with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 2.5. The data are
corrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune
DW at the generator level.
PT(chgjet#1) Direction
PTmax Direction
D
D
“Toward”
“Toward”
“Transverse”
“Transverse”
“Away”
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
14
PTmax (GeV/c)
PT(chgjet#1) GeV/c
“Transverse”
12
“Transverse”
“Away”
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 43
PYTHIA Tune DW
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
3.0
1.2
CMS Preliminary
7 TeV
data uncorrected
pyDW + SIM
Ratio: 7 TeV/900 GeV
Charged Particle Density
CMS Preliminary
0.8
Ratio
CMS
900 GeV
0.4
data uncorrected
pyDW + SIM
2.0
CMS
1.0
7 TeV / 900 GeV
Charged Particles (|h|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
Charged Particles (|h|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
0.0
0.0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
PT(chgjet#1) (GeV/c)
PT(chgjet#1) GeV/c
 CMS preliminary data at 900 GeV and 7 TeV  Ratio of CMS preliminary data at 900 GeV
and 7 TeV on the “transverse” charged
on the “transverse” charged particle density,
particle density, dN/dhd, as defined by the
dN/dhd, as defined by the leading charged
leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for
particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles
charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and
with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 2. The data are
|h| < 2. The data are uncorrected and
uncorrected and compared with PYTHIA
compared with PYTHIA Tune DW after
Tune DW after detector simulation.
PT(chgjet#1) Direction
detector simulation.
D
“Toward”
“Transverse”
“Transverse”
“Away”
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 44
PYTHIA Tune DW
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
3.0
3.0
RDF Preliminary
data uncorrected
pyDW + SIM
Ratio: 7 TeV/900 GeV
Ratio: 7 TeV/900 GeV
CMS Preliminary
2.0
CMS
1.0
7 TeV / 900 GeV
ATLAS corrected data
pyDW generator level
2.0
ATLAS
1.0
7 TeV / 900 GeV
Charged Particles (|h|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
Charged Particles (|h|<2.5, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
0.0
0.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
PTmax (GeV/c)
PT(chgjet#1) (GeV/c)
 Ratio of CMS preliminary data at 900 GeV  Ratio of the ATLAS preliminary data at 900
and 7 TeV on the “transverse” charged
GeV and 7 TeV on the “transverse” charged
particle density, dN/dhd, as defined by the
particle density, dN/dhd, as defined by the
leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for
leading charged particle (PTmax) for charged
charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h|
particles with pT > 0.5 GeV/c and |h| < 2.5.
< 2. The data are uncorrected and compared
The data are corrected and compared with
with PYTHIA Tune DW after detector
PYTHIA Tune DW at the generator level.
PTmax Direction
simulation. PT(chgjet#1) Direction
D
D
“Toward”
“Transverse”
“Toward”
“Transverse”
“Transverse”
“Away”
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
“Transverse”
“Away”
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 45
PYTHIA Tune DW
How well did we do at predicting the “underlying event” at 900 GeV and 7 TeV?
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
1.2
CMS Preliminary
CMS Preliminary
ChgJet#1
data uncorrected
pyDW + SIM
0.6
Charged Particle Density
"Transverse" Charged Density
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
0.8
PTmax
0.4
0.2
900 GeV
Tune DW
Charged Particles (|h|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
0.0
7 TeV
data uncorrected
pyDW + SIM
0.8
900 GeV
0.4
Tune DW
Charged Particles (|h|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
0.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0
5
10
15
20
PTmax or PT(chgjet#1) (GeV/c)
30
35
40
45
50
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
3.0
CMS Preliminary
Ratio: 7 TeV/900 GeV
 I am surprised that the
Tunes did not do a better
job of predicting the
behavior of the “underlying
event” at 900 GeV and 7
TeV!
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
25
PT(chgjet#1) GeV/c
Tune DW
data uncorrected
pyDW + SIM
2.0
1.0
7 TeV / 900 GeV
Charged Particles (|h|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
0.0
0
2
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
PT(chgjet#1) (GeV/c)
Page 46
PYTHIA Tune DW
How well did we do at predicting the “underlying event” at 900 GeV and 7 TeV?
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
1.2
CMS Preliminary
CMS Preliminary
ChgJet#1
data uncorrected
pyDW + SIM
0.6
Charged Particle Density
"Transverse" Charged Density
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
0.8
PTmax
0.4
0.2
900 GeV
Tune DW
Charged Particles (|h|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
0.0
7 TeV
data uncorrected
pyDW + SIM
0.8
900 GeV
0.4
Tune DW
Charged Particles (|h|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
0.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0
5
10
15
20
PTmax or PT(chgjet#1) (GeV/c)
25
30
35
40
45
50
PT(chgjet#1) GeV/c
"Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dN/dhd
3.0
CMS Preliminary
Ratio: 7 TeV/900 GeV
 I am surprised that the
Tunes did as well as they did
at predicting the behavior of
the “underlying event” at
900 GeV and 7 TeV!
Tune DW
data uncorrected
pyDW + SIM
2.0
1.0
7 TeV / 900 GeV
Charged Particles (|h|<2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c)
0.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
PT(chgjet#1) (GeV/c)
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 47
CMS DiJet Event: M(jj) ≈ 2 TeV
ETjet1 = 1.099 TeV ETjet2 = 935 GeV
M(jj) = 2.05 TeV
M(jj)/Ecm ≈ 29%
But M(jj) > 2 TeV!
CMS
Proton-Proton Collisions at 7 TeV
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 48
0
p ’s
7 GeV
→ 1 TeV Jets
CMS
FF1
Rick & Jimmie ISMD - Chicago 2013
Rick & Jimmie CALTECH 1973
7 GeV/c p0’s!
Physics Colloquium - Baylor
Waco, January 22, 2014
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Page 49