UNIT REVIEW FOR 2012 Unit Name: Entomology
advertisement
UNIT
REVIEW
FOR
2012
Unit
Name:
Entomology
Unit
Head:
Bruce
Tabashnik
Date
of
review:
March
25,
2013
Important
issues,
concerns,
and
trends
for
the
next
5
years
Most
recent
budget
cut:
20%
of
staff/operaQons
(Total
$
–
faculty
salary
$)
Past
16
years:
90%
of
staff/operaQons
budget
cut
Our
major
challenge
is
to
sustain
excellence
in
the
face
of
perennial
budget
cuts.
We
have
a
world‐renowned
Department
of
Entomology.
To
maintain
this
excellence,
resources
are
required
to
recruit
and
retain
faculty
and
to
sustain
the
Department’s
infrastructure.
The
hiring
of
three
outstanding,
energeQc
new
faculty
(Davidowitz
2009,
Moore
2010,
and
Walker
2011)
has
substanQally
bolstered
the
Department,
improved
morale,
and
posiQoned
us
to
sustain
excellence
well
into
the
future.
!
!
!"#$%&'(#)*'!+$,-$.)'/,&.0!
Important
issues,
concerns,
and
trends
for
the
next
5
years
1#2.)!3#&!$,-$#&!,3,4,5+!
6,)#$-.6%4!+!
Major
resource:
faculty
are
harmonious,
collaboraQve,
extremely
producQve
Faculty
&
other
dept.
members
idenQfy
strongly
with
Entomology
Be`er
support
needed
for
faculty:
space,
tech
support,
infrastructure
for
grants,
merit
raises
!"#$%&"'()!
5/(6%7"))0()(!
*+,,-%."/01+2034!
!(3()%8$$62+)39!
."2<%*+#,(!
:")39"%;#<3()!
=0"<>9#<%?0!
@(<1-%:++)(!
A+9<%!"$#BC+!
:0>9"($%D0(9$(!
&+C%EB039!
!"3)0>0"%E3+>'!
&)#>(%F"C"69<0'%
G"39$((<%@"$'()!
.0"<"%@9(($()!
$8.5
million
in
new
extramural
funding
2011‐2012
CooperaQve
Extension
Total
Extension
FTE:
3.3
(23%
of
total
faculty
FTE)
Millions
of
stakeholders
benefit
from
our
Extension
programs
every
year:
Urban
IPM:
Reduced
pes<cide
use
in
schools
71
to
93%,
saving
an
average
of
$10,500
per
school
per
year,
and
improving
the
health
of
school
children
in
55%
of
school
districts
in
Arizona
and
a
total
of
>2.7
million
school
children
in
23
partner
states.
Co`on
IPM:
Reduced
insec<cide
use
by
90%
rela<ve
to
1995;
this
has
reduced
risks
to
human
health
and
the
environment,
saved
AZ
coPon
growers
$388
million
since
1996
and
preserved
9000
jobs
and
$700
million
in
annual
contribu<on
to
the
AZ
economy.
Vegetable
IPM:
Reduced
use
of
broadly
toxic
pes<cides,
improving
health
of
millions
of
consumers
na<onwide.
Improved
pest
control
boosted
profits
of
ca.
700
growers
in
Arizona
by
>$1000
per
grower
per
year.
Insect
Discovery
and
Insect
FesQval:
In
2012,
Insect
Discovery
sparked
interest
in
science
in
3400
K‐12
students
in
Tucson,
mostly
from
low
income
areas.
The
2012
Insect
Fes<val
aPracted
thousands
of
families
to
the
UA
campus
to
marvel
and
learn
about
insects.
The Chronicle: Faculty Scholarly Productivity Index
3/25/13 7:48 AM
Faculty Scholarly Productivity Index
Home
Facts & Figures
Faculty Scholarly Productivity Index
Top Research Universities Faculty Scholarly Productivity Index
The 2007 index compiles overall institutional rankings on 375 universities that offer the Ph.D. degree.
The Chronicle: Faculty Scholarly Productivity Index
2007
Or
3/25/13 7:48 Entomology
AM
Biological and Biomedical Sciences
2007
Go
Choose an institution
Go
Entomology - 2007
Next Page >>
<< Prev Page
Next Page >>
<< Prev Page
Faculty Scholarly Productivity Index
Home
Facts & Figures
Faculty Scholarly Productivity Index
Faculty Scholarly
Productivity Index
Institution *
Top Research Universities Faculty Scholarly Productivity Index
The 2007 index compiles overall institutional rankings on 375 universities that offer the Ph.D. degree.
2007
Or
Biological and Biomedical Sciences
2007
Entomology
Go
Entomology - 2007
Next Page >>
<< Prev Page
Next Page >>
<< Prev Page
Institution *
Faculty Scholarly
Productivity Index
Number of
faculty
Percentage of
faculty with
journal publication Citations
per
cited by another
faculty
work
U. of California at Davis
1.87
18
-
-
100%
12.39
94%
70.28
U. of Wisconsin at Madison
1.44
14
-
-
86%
7.57
79%
42.43
3
U. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1.36
22
-
-
77%
5.86
77%
57.5
1.27
34
-
-
91%
6.76
85%
32.09
47.52
5
U. of Arizona
1.23
27
-
-
74%
4.22
67%
6
U. of Maryland at College Park
1.14
20
-
-
85%
3.8
90%
30.8
7
Cornell U.
1.08
32
-
-
69%
4.91
72%
30.88
8
North Carolina State U.
1.02
28
-
-
79%
4.39
79%
25.71
9
U. of Kentucky
1
16
-
-
81%
5.69
69%
26.25
23
-
-
87%
4.61
74%
New grants
per faculty
Total value of
new grants per
faculty
Percentage of
faculty with a
journal
publication
Books per
faculty
Books per
faculty
Journal
publications per
faculty
2
of
10 U. of Minnesota-Twin CitiesPercentage .9
Percentage of
faculty with a
book publication
Percentage of
faculty with a
journal
publication
1
4Go U. of California at Riverside
Choose an institution
Number of
faculty
Percentage of
faculty with a
book publication
Journal
publications per
faculty *
Institution
faculty with
journal publication Citations
per
cited by another
Citations
per
faculty
work
faculty
Citations per
paper
Percentage of
faculty getting a
new grant
Average amount
of grant
Percentage of
faculty with an
award
18.67
Awards
per
faculty
1
U. of California at Davis
1.87
18
-
-
1
100%
U.
of California at 12.39
Davis
94%
70.28
70.28
4.76
33%
.61
$251931
$412251
11%
.17
2
U. of Wisconsin at Madison
1.44
14
-
-
2
U.86%
of Wisconsin at 7.57
Madison
79%
42.43
42.43
4.6
36%
.5
$84327
$168654
7%
.07
3
U. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1.36
22
-
-
3
5.86
77%
U.77%
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
57.5
57.5
7.57
41%
.73
$50472
$69399
14%
.41
4
U. of California at Riverside
1.27
34
-
-
4
6.76
U.91%
of California at Riverside
85%
32.09
32.09
3.74
21%
.21
$27587
$133992
29%
.35
5
U. of Arizona
1.23
27
-
-
5
U.74%
of Arizona
67%
47.52
47.52
8.67
37%
.67
$139446
$209169
11%
.19
6
U. of Maryland at College Park
1.14
20
-
-
6
U.85%
of Maryland at College
Park
3.8
90%
30.8
30.8
6.29
40%
.45
$44037
$97861
10%
.1
7
Cornell U.
1.08
32
-
-
7
Cornell
69% U.
4.91
72%
30.88
30.88
5.12
38%
.63
$64851
$103761
19%
.28
8
North Carolina State U.
1.02
28
-
-
8
North
U.
79% Carolina State
4.39
79%
25.71
25.71
4.53
21%
.29
$55692
$194921
25%
.39
9
U. of Kentucky
1
16
-
-
9
U.81%
of Kentucky
69%
26.25
26.25
3.96
25%
.38
$66601
$177602
13%
.19
.9
23
-
-
10 U.87%
of Minnesota-Twin
4.61Cities
74%
18.67
18.67
3.52
35%
.52
$83278
$159615
4%
.09
10 U. of Minnesota-Twin Cities
Institution *
Citations per
faculty
Citations per
paper
Percentage of
faculty getting a
new grant
New grants
per faculty
1
U. of California at Davis
70.28
4.76
33%
.61
2
U. of Wisconsin at Madison
42.43
4.6
36%
.5
3
U. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
57.5
7.57
41%
.73
4.22
5.69
* Anvalue
institution
if the discipline
related to more than one department.
Total
of may appear more than once
Percentage
of is Awards
per
new grants per
Average amount
faculty with an
RELATED
STORY:
Faculty-Productivity
Offers Surprises (November 16, 2007)
faculty
of grant
award Index faculty
$251931
$412251
How
The Index Works
11%
.17
The index
examines faculty
on a Ph.D. program's Web sites, and includes a total of 217,254 names. A professor listed in both history and
$84327
$168654members who are
7%listed .07
American studies would be counted twice. But at the next level of aggregation (the humanities in this case), the professor would be counted only once. The index
$50472
$69399
14%
.41
Research
Total
Research
FTE:
8.75
(58%
of
total
faculty
FTE)
PublicaQons
2010‐2012
131
peer‐reviewed
pubs
indexed
in
Web
of
Science
5
peer‐reviewed
pubs
indexed
in
Web
of
Science
per
faculty
research
FTE
per
year
Median
impact
for
86
Entomology
journals:
0.9
Median
impact
factor
for
Ento
faculty
pubs:
4.7
(higher
than
85
of
86
Ento
journals)
15
high‐profile
Entomology
faculty
publica<ons
(Impact
>9,
PNAS
=
9.7):
Science
3,
Nature
Biotechnology
2,
PNAS
3,
Ecology
Le6ers,
PLoS
Medicine,
PLoS
Pathogens
3,
Annual
Rev
Entomol,
Current
Biology
CitaQons
(Web
of
Science)
2063
cita<ons
in
2012
of
all
pubs
produced
by
15
current
Entomology
faculty
Mean
cita<ons
in
2012
=
236
per
Research
FTE
(2063
total/8.75
Research
FTE)
Mean
cita<ons
in
2012
=
138
per
faculty
member
(48
in
2007,
#2
na<onally*)
Mean
cita<ons
per
paper
(all
years):
17
now
(8.7
in
2007,
#1
na<onally*)
*2007
na<onal
rankings
of
Faculty
Scholarly
Produc<vity
for
Entomology
(see
previous
slide)
hPp://chronicle.com/stats/produc<vity/
Research
Total
Research
FTE:
8.75
(58%)
Funding
Grant
proposals
US
federal
agencies
FY2012
NIH,
NSF,
USDA
&
EPA:
14
submiPed,
7
funded
All
FY2011‐FY2012
(UA
Analy<cs):
68
submiPed,
50
funded,
6
pending
Contracts
&
gihs
2012:
Arizona
CoPon
Growers
Associa<on,
BASF,
Bayer,
CoPon
Inc.,
Crop
Protec<on
Services
(Yuma),
D’Arrigo
Bros.
of
California,
Dow,
DuPont,
FMC,
Gowan,
JV
Farms/SkyView
Cooling,
Marrone
BioSciences,
Monsanto,
Lure
Labs,
Nichino
Americas,
Syngenta,
Valent
Total
research
expenditures
for
FY12:
$3.8
million
Federal:
$1.8
million,
State:
$1.3
million,
Gios/Local/Other:
$0.6
million
Non‐state
spending
=
$0.24
million
per
Research
FTE
Total
new
extramural
funding
2011‐2012:
$8.5
million
=
$4.3
million
per
year
Academic
Programs
Total
Teaching
FTE:
2.45
(17%
of
total
faculty
FTE)
A.
InstrucQon
Total
student
credit
hours
taught
by
department:
1555
=
635
SCH
per
Teaching
FTE
B.
Graduate
Interdisciplinary
Program
in
Entomology
&
Insect
Science
(EIS)
6
MS
and
24
PhD
students
Graduate
Chair:
Hunter
(Entomology
Professor)
26
EIS
graduate
students
mentored
by
core
Entomology
faculty
11
grad
students
mentored
per
Teaching
FTE
Doctoral
Degrees
Conferred
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Masters
Degrees
Conferred
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
!
!"#$%&%'()*('+,--'.&'(*#/)('01$,2/'3456701$,2/'34589'!"##!$%&!'$(&!)*!'$(&!+,!-.%+,/!*%!0$##1!!
01$,2/'3456'
!"#$%&'
2345!678!
2345!@A7B29-!CA7!
2345!@CHB!29-!CCH!
29-!CN7"!
29-!CNH<!
2<5S!6TUM!
2<5S!@NH"BV!
!
:,(-&''
9,:&():!$,;!<=#)=%&!!
"/%*&(*#*/D!!
I&;+($#!J!K&)&%+,$%D!2,)*L*#*/D!!
29-!-&L+,$%!!
P%&&,?*=:&!Q&:)!I$,$/&L&,)!
9,)%*;=()*%D!V+*#*/D!
9,:&()!W+:(*X&%D!Q%&(&.)*%:?+.!
;2%($#<("$=%>'
>?&&#&%!
>$#E&%!F!<$%%+G%&!
M+&?#&!
O=,)&%!
O=R&%!
O=,)&%!
>$#E&%!
-&(%&):!*'!-=((&::Y!"%)?%*.*;:!
S+X+,/!+,!-DLR+*:+:!
9,:&()!V+*#*/D!S$R!!
9,:&()!V+*#*/D!!
9,:&()!-D:)&L:!V+*#*/D!
9,:&()!2(*#*/D!
I**%&!F!-L+)?!
!-)*(E!
Z!
W$X+;*[+)\]!S+!F!>$#E&%!
S+]!M+&?#&]!P%*,&,R&%/!
<$%%+G%&!
9,:&():!$,;!<=#)=%&!!
2(*#*/+($#!Q?D:+*#*/D!!
"/%*&(*#*/D!!
9,:&()!Q$)?*/&,:!
I&;+($#!J!K&)&%+,$%D!2,)*L*#*/D!!
9,:&()!Q&:)!I$,$/&L&,)!
29-!-&L+,$%!!
P%&&,?*=:&!Q&:)!I$,$/&L&,)!
9,)%*;=()*%D!V+*#*/D!
9,:&()!W+:(*X&%D!Q%&(&.)*%:?+.!
>?&&#&%!
W$X+;*[+)\!
<$%%+G%&!F!>$#E&%!
-)*(E!
M+&?#&!
V$E&%!
O=,)&%!
Z!
O=,)&%!
>$#E&%!
?*--'3456''
2345!6H8<!
2345!A68!
2345!@6CSB29-!C6CS!
2345!@6CMB29-!C6CM!
29-!CU8!
29-!C@@!
!
01$,2/'3458'
2345!678!
2345!@86B29-!C86!
2345!@A7B29-!CA7!
2345!@C7B29-!CC7!
2345!@CHB29-!CCH!
2345!@7TB29-!C7T!
29-!CN7"!
29-!CNH<!
2<5S!6TUM!
2<5S!@NH"BV!
!
<*=%:&:!()*('+,--'2"('.&'(*#/)(!*%
