PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLN: 12‐23 October 16, 2012 File Code #: R02 MEMO TO: Martha Rogers, Director of Education FROM: Heather Imm, Senior Planner Jennifer Passy, Manager of Planning
Janice Wright, Superintendent of Finance
RE: King George PS JK‐8 FI Boundary Review – Report #2 Report Classification: INFORMATION BACKGROUND On June 26, 2012, Trustees approved the King George PS JK‐8 FI Boundary Review Report #1 which initiated the boundary review process for establishing the JK‐8 FI program at King George PS, effective September 2014. ISSUE In accordance with the School Boundary Review Procedures Manual (320‐A), Report #2 is to provide: a) Alternative scenarios to address the accommodation issues; b) Staff analysis of the alternative scenarios developed; c) A list of recommended options including justification for the recommendations; d) The proposed timeline for implementation of the boundary changes; and e) A communication plan. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. THAT memo PLN:12‐23 entitled “King George PS JK‐8 FI Boundary Review ‐ Report #2” be received. RATIONALE See the attached report “King George PS JK‐8 FI Boundary Review – Report #2”. King George PS JK‐8 FI Boundary Review – Report #2 2
King George PS JK‐8 FI Boundary Review – Report #2 KING GEORGE PS JK‐8 FI BOUNDARY REVIEW REPORT #2 Presented to the Business Operations Committee Upper Grand District School Board October 16, 2012 3
King George PS JK‐8 FI Boundary Review – Report #2 1.0
INTRODUCTION Background 1.1
The Staff Committee has followed the goals, objectives and constraints of the review (Appendix A) which were contained in Report #1 and discussed possible school boundary scenarios. The Staff Committee has made a link available on the Boards’ website to receive correspondence from the public. The goals of this review are to establish a JK‐8 French Immersion (FI) boundary for King George PS, relieve FI enrolment pressure at Victory PS and accommodate 7/8 FI students feeding from Edward Johnson PS, King George PS and Victory PS. As such, this review does not consider changes to the Regular Track (RT) program at Victory PS. 1.2
Purpose of this Report In accordance with the School Boundary Review Procedures Manual (320‐A), Report #2 is to provide: a) Alternative scenarios to address the accommodation issues; b) Staff analysis of the alternative scenarios developed; c) A list of recommended options including justification for the recommendations; d) The proposed timeline for implementation of the boundary changes; and e) A communication plan. 2.0 ENROLMENT BACKGROUND 2.1 King George PS The current On the Ground Capacity (OTG) of King George PS is 504 pupil places. The school implemented Full Day Kindergarten (FDK) in September 2012 and has an enrolment of 428 students. King George PS is currently accommodating JK‐5 FI students as a result of the Edward Johnson Boundary Review (150 students) and temporarily holding JK‐5 FI students from East Wellington who formerly attended Edward Johnson PS (30 students). King George PS is also holding JK‐8 Regular Track (RT) students from Laurine Ave. PS in 2012/13 while that school is under construction (248 students). In 2013/14, King George PS will no longer hold the Laurine Ave PS students but will hold JK‐6 RT students destined for the new Lee St. PS (approx. 300 students), along with the JK‐6 FI program. 4
King Georgge PS JK‐8 FI Bo
oundary Review
w – Report #2
Chart 1‐‐King George PSS Enrolment Projection (reflectss current JK‐6 FI boundary) mplemented at Kinng George in 2012 Notes: Full Day Kindergarten was im
Hiistorical enrolmen
nt for King George
e is not relevant giiven it was previo
ously a 7/8 Dual trrack school Ea
ast Wellington FI sstudents included in 2012 & 2013 eenrolment projecttions only. King George P
PS is to becom
me a JK‐8 FI centre. The eestablishmentt of the JK‐8 FFI boundary iss By 2014, K
consistent with previous decisions ffrom the Central Guelph FFI Accommodation Review
w which contemplated the need for a JK‐8 FI program in North Guelphh. An interim
m holding bou
undary was establishe
ed for North G
Guelph 7/8 FII students (inccludes studennts feeding frrom Edward Johnson PS, V
Victory PS and Paaisley Rd PS) w
who were asssigned to John
n McCrae PS. As outline
ed in the Kingg George Boun
ndary Review
w Report #1, tthere is also JK‐6 FI enrolm
ment pressuree in West Gue
elph at Victoryy PS and Paisley Rd PS. Staaff determineed that projeccted FI growtth in East Gueelph will mean that the remaining King Georrge PS capacitty will only bee able to reso
olve the overccrowding at V
Victory PS. e PS (Chart 1)) indicate theere will be cap
pacity in 2014
4 in The JK‐6 FFI enrolment projections at King George
excess of approximately 150‐200 pu
upil places to relieve FI en rolment presssure at Victory PS and exp
pand the FI pro
ogram to inclu
ude Grades 7 & 8. Victory PS V
2.2 Victory PSS is a JK‐6 school offering b
both RT and FFI programmi ng. The curreent enrolmen
nt at Victory P
PS is 284 stude
ents (84RT, 20
00 FI). Chart 2 indicates th
hat Victory PSS is projected to experiencce enrolment pressure iin 2014 once it receives FD
DK and beyon
nd. In 2014, itt is projected
d to be approxximately 100 students o
over its 294 O
OTG Capacity. The enrolm
ment pressure is attributed to both the iintroduction of FDK and continued growth in the FI proggram. Accom
mmodating booth RT and FI programmingg reduces thee efficiencyy in the use off the school and the Victorry PS site is noot suitable fo
or accommodaating portables. used to right ssize Victory PPS either through a grade level shift or Capacity aat King Georgge PS will be u
boundaryy reassignmen
nt. 5
King Georgge PS JK‐8 FI Bo
oundary Review
w – Report #2
Since the goals of this review are to
o establish a JK‐8 French Im
mmersion (FI)) boundary fo
or King George PS, relieve FI enrolment prressure at Vicctory PS and aaccommodatee 7/8 FI studeents feeding ffrom Edward Johnson P
PS, King Georgge PS and Vicctory PS, chan
nges to the Reegular Track ((RT) program at Victory PSS are not consid
dered. Ch
hart 2 – Victory PS Enrolment P
Projection (both RT & FI) Notes: B
Boundary changes occurred in 2011 as a result of the Centre Guelph FI Review. 2.3 Jo
ohn McCrae P
PS John McCrae PS will h
have FDK in 20
014 at which time it is proojected to be approximately 150‐200 sttudents mentation, the enrolment pressure is projected to continue increeasing over capacity. Beyond FDK implem
McCrae PS. at John M
King Geo
orge PS will prrovide a JK‐8 FI program in
n North Guelpph by 2014. D
Decisions from
m the King Geeorge PS Bound
dary Review w
will impact on
n future 7/8 FFI students grraduating from
m Edward Joh
hnson PS, Vicctory PS and Kingg George PS but will not im
mpact on any ccurrent or 20013/14 John M
McCrae PS Grade 7 or 8 stu
udents. Additional enrolmentt pressure will be resolved at John McC rae PS througgh the openin
ng of a new JK
K‐8 FI centre in
n South Guelp
ph. 2.4 Pa
aisley Rd PS Paisley R
Rd PS will have FDK by 2014 at which tim
me its enrolm
ment is projeccted to be app
proximately 1
120 studentss over the school’s capacityy. Beyond the implement ation of FDK,, the enrolmeent of the school is projected to remain aat approximattely 600 stude
ents. Althouggh the school has 3 portab
bles on site currentlyy, the site is n
not ideal for aaccommodating additionall portables. SSince the scho
ool accommo
odates both RT and FI prograams, this redu
uces the efficiiency in the uuse of the school. As indicaated in Section 2.1, the spaace constraints at Paisley R
Rd PS will nott be resolved through the King George P
PS Boundary R
Review. 6
King George PS JK‐8 FI Boundary Review – Report #2 3.0 SHORTLISTED SCENARIOS Since the presentation of Report #1 in June 2012 (PLN: 12‐17), the Boundary Review Staff Committee has met on three occasions and has been engaged in scenario development. The committee discussions considered relevant factors and concluded that there were two (2) viable King George JK‐8 FI school boundary scenarios to be included in Report #2 and presented to the public. In both Scenarios 1 and 2 there is a consistent element. The 7/8 FI students from Edward Johnson, King George and Victory PS would attend the King George PS JK‐8 FI centre. This assignment of some of the North Guelph 7/8 FI students holding at John McCrae PS to a JK‐8 FI program in North Guelph is consistent with decisions from the Centre Guelph FI Accommodation Review. The difference between Scenarios 1 and 2 is how the FI enrolment pressure at Victory PS is resolved. Scenario 1 contemplates grade level shifts from Victory PS to King George PS and Scenario 2 contemplates an adjustment to the Victory PS JK‐6 FI boundary. 3.1 Staff’s Preferred Scenario Scenario 1 – Grades 4‐6 FI Reassignment Scenario 1 involves the move of entire grades of FI students from Victory PS to King George PS as a way to reduce the enrolment pressure at Victory PS. The Staff Committee considered this approach given the already limited area of the Victory JK‐6 FI boundary. The maps for Scenario 1 are located in Appendix B, Maps 1‐3. Scenario 1 reflects the following: Grade 4‐6 FI students to attend King George PS  Victory PS‐ Grade 7&8 FI students to attend King George PS Grade JK‐3 FI students remain at Victory PS Grade JK‐6 RT students remain at Victory PS  Edward Johnson PS‐ Grade 7&8 FI to attend King George PS  King George PS ‐ Grade 7&8 FI remain at King George PS The enrolment impact of this scenario is as follows: Table 1: Scenario 1 Enrolment Projection 2014
School
King George PS
2017
2021
Capacity
JK/SK
1‐6
7/8
Total JK/SK
1‐6
7/8
Total JK/SK
1‐6
7/8
Total
504
90
255
55
400
325
140
565
345
220
670
100
105
Victory PS RT (JK‐6)
15
70
0
85
15
65
0
80
15
65
0
80
Victory PS FI (Gr1‐3)
85
120
0
205
85
115
0
200
85
115
0
200
100
190
0
290
100
180
0
280
100
180
0
280 Victory Total
294
Notes: Enrolment projections have been rounded to the nearest 5 7
King George PS JK‐8 FI Boundary Review – Report #2 Scenario 1 achieves all of goals established for this review for Victory PS. The enrolment pressure at Victory PS is relieved through the reassignment of Grades 4‐6 FI to King George PS. A viable JK‐8 FI program is created at King George PS during the period 2014‐2017. Beyond 2017, Staff acknowledges that future enrolment pressure projected at King George PS will have to be addressed. Although the King George PS site was designed to accommodate 6 portables, projections indicate that future enrolment could surpass the maximum site capacity as 2021 approaches. Staff will need to continue to monitor the enrolment at King George PS. According to the King George PS walking distances outlined in Map 5, Appendix C, approximately half of the Victory PS FI geographic boundary falls within the Grade 2‐6 walking distance boundary of 2.4 km. A more complete analysis of the walking route by Staff at Wellington Dufferin Student Transportation Services will be necessary prior to January 2014 to determine how many students will be eligible for bussing to King George PS. 3.2 Scenario 2 – Victory JK‐6 FI Boundary Change Scenario 2 reflects a boundary adjustment which reassigns a portion of the current Victory JK‐6 FI attendance area to King George PS as a way to relieve FI enrolment pressure. After considering several boundary adjustment options, the area identified to be reassigned to King George PS was the area on the north side of Division St and Clarence St. The maps for Scenario 2 are located in Appendix B, Maps 3 & 4. Scenario 2 reflects the following:  Victory PS‐ Grade JK‐6 FI students in the reassigned area to attend King George PS Grade 7&8 FI students attend King George PS Grade JK‐6 RT students remain at Victory PS  Edward Johnson PS‐ Grade 7&8 FI to attend King George PS  King George PS ‐ Grade 7&8 FI remain at King George PS The reassignment of the specified area of the Victory JK‐6 FI boundary to King George PS would result in the following enrolment projection: Table 2: Scenario 2 Enrolment Projection 2014
School
King George PS
2021
Capacity
JK/SK
1‐6
7/8
Total JK/SK
1‐6
7/8
Total JK/SK
1‐6
7/8
Total
504
120
260
55
435
135
310
150
595
140
335
235
710
15
70
125
195
0
0
0
85
15
65
0
80
15
65
0
80
180
55
135
0
190
55
130
0
185
265
70
200
0
270
70
195
0
265 Victory PS RT
Victory PS FI
Victory Total
2017
55
294
70
Notes: 2014 enrolment projections assume that FI students entering their final year at Victory PS are grandparented (ie. Gr6 FI) Enrolment projections have been rounded to the nearest 5. 8
King George PS JK‐8 FI Boundary Review – Report #2 JK‐5 FI students within the area to be reassigned from Victory PS would attend King George PS effective September 2014. Grade 6 FI students would be grandparented at Victory PS for 2014/15. Scenario 2 achieves the goals established for this review for Victory PS. The enrolment pressure at Victory PS is relieved through the reassignment of JK‐6 FI students from its current boundary to King George PS. A viable JK‐8 FI program is created at King George PS during the period 2014‐2017. As with Scenario 1, future enrolment pressure at King George PS beyond 2017 will need to be monitored by Staff. According to the walking distances from King George PS as shown on Map 5 in Appendix C, the majority of the students within the area to be reassigned to King George PS from the Victory FI boundary would be eligible for transportation. As with Scenario 1, the final determination of which students receive bussing will be made by Wellington Dufferin Student Transportation Services prior to January 2014. 3.3 Comparison of Shortlisted Scenarios The Staff Committee discussed at length the benefits and drawbacks of the two shortlisted scenarios and determined that either scenario will create a viable JK‐8 FI program at King George PS. Both scenarios help to relieve enrolment pressure at Victory PS in order that FDK can be accommodated at this school. The accommodation of some 7/8 FI students from John McCrae PS to King George PS is only the first part of the solution for John McCrae PS as a new JK‐8 FI school in South Guelph is also necessary. A comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of each scenario has been summarized in the Table 3 below: Table 3: Comparison of Scenario Advantages and Disadvantages Scenario 1
Grades 4‐6 FI Reassignment
Advantages
Scenario 2
FI Boundary Change
Keeps youngest students in a local school
Siblings directed to King George PS would remain together
Maintain friendships in grade
Traditional split of FI program at Grade 7
Increased familiarity in new school
Walking to school = healthy option
Ability to respond to future FI trends without Boundary Review process
Potential difficulties with after school minding by older siblings
Potential splitting of friendships Splitting of older siblings from younger siblings in Grade 4
Very limited Victory FI boundary
Loss of connection between Primary and Junior in FI program (ie. Disadvantages reading buddies)
Possible impact on school councils, fundraising, etc. due to smaller student population
Some students will require bussing to school
Possible impact on school councils, fundraising, etc. due to smaller student population
Most students would require bussing to King George PS
9
King George PS JK‐8 FI Boundary Review – Report #2 A comparison of the approximate enrolment by grade of the FI program remaining at Victory PS in Scenario 1 and 2 is outlined below in Table 4: Table 4: Scenario Comparison of FI Grade Breakdown at Victory PS JK
SK
GR01
GR02
GR03
GR04
GR05
GR06
Total
40
45
40
45
35
0
0
0
205
40
45
40
40
35
0
0
0
200
40
45
40
40
35
0
0
0
200
25
30
25
25
20
15
10
20
170
25
30
25
25
25
20
20
20
190
25
30
25
25
20
20
20
20
SCENARIO 1
2014
2017
2021
SCENARIO 2
2014
2017
2021
185
Notes: Enrolments by grade are approximate and have been rounded to the nearest 5. Taking into consideration the various points outlined in Table 3, the enrolment forecasts and class size/structure the Staff Committee has determined that Scenario 1 is preferred. Accommodating younger students at their local school was an important factor in the Committee’s preference. Also, maintaining the current size of the Victory PS FI boundary ensures a more stable population making the school less susceptible to future fluctuations in student enrolment. 5.0 IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINES In September 2014, King George PS will no longer be holding RT students from the Lee St. PS. King George PS is anticipated to operate as a JK‐7 FI school in 2014/15. By 2015/16, the school will have a full JK‐8 FI program. The Staff Committee discussed the boundary change implementation timelines and proposes the following: Scenario 1 – Staff’s Preferred Scenario  In September 2014, all Victory PS Grade 4‐6 FI students will attend King George PS.  Grade 7 FI students feeding from Edward Johnson PS, Victory PS and King George PS will attend King George PS in 2014/15.  Grade 8 FI students feeding from Edward Johnson PS and Victory PS be grandparented at John McCrae PS in 2014/15. 10
King George PS JK‐8 FI Boundary Review – Report #2 Scenario 2  JK‐5 FI students within the Victory FI boundary to be reassigned to King George PS will attend King George PS in 2014/15.  Grade 6 FI students within the Victory FI boundary to be reassigned to King George PS be grandparented at Victory PS in 2014/15.  Grade 7 FI students feeding from Edward Johnson PS, Victory PS and King George PS will attend King George PS in 2014/15.  Grade 8 FI students feeding from Edward Johnson PS and Victory PS be grandparented at John McCrae PS in 2014/15. 6.0 COMMUNICATION PLAN This Communications Plan focuses on giving the public an opportunity to be fully informed of the scenarios, and to continue to provide input to the Staff Committee.  Report #2 will be presented to the Business Operations Committee on October 16, 2012. 
A Public Information Session will be held for the community on October 23, 2012 (NEW DATE) 
A letter will be sent home to parents and guardians, informing them of the report and to solicit attendance at the Public Information Session. 
Newspaper ads for the Public Information Session will be developed and booked. 
A media release will be sent to local newspapers, radio and TV stations. 
A news brief will be sent targeted towards newspapers that serve the Guelph area. 
Report #2 will be posted on the Board’s website on October 12, 2012. 
Web pages in the Planning Department section of the Board website will be updated to include the contents of the report, links to Report 1&2, memos and other documents as required. 
Information on delegation opportunities will be included with a link to the web page containing delegation requirements. 
The Boundary Review pages will be promoted on the home page of the Board’s website, the Victory PS, King George PS, Edward Johnson PS and John McCrae PS web pages and other school web pages as appropriate, with links to the Planning Department web pages. 
The Planning Department web page will include a form that gives community members the opportunity to sign up and receive email alerts when significant new content is added to the site. 
The submission form for receiving community input will be included on the website with the response deadline. o This feedback will be shared on the website without attribution. Due to time constraints and staff resources, individual responses cannot be provided. This information will be posted with the form. A PDF version of the comment form which can be printed and dropped off at John McCrae PS, Victory PS, King George PS, Edward Johnson PS or the Board office will be available. 
The Public Information Session will provide another vehicle for communication to the community, and an opportunity for the public to provide comments (comment sheets), discuss the scenarios 11
King George PS JK‐8 FI Boundary Review – Report #2 with staff and meet the trustees in attendance. A new or revised communications Plan will be developed for inclusion in the Final Boundary Review Report. 7.0 NEXT STEPS  Public Information Session (NOTE DATE CHANGE) 
Public input deadline October 23, 2012 King George PS 7:00pm‐9:00pm November 30, 2012 December 7, 2012 (For consideration in Final Boundary Review Report) 

Final Boundary Review Report Distribution Business Operations Committee December 11, 2012 Staff presentation of Final Boundary Review Report Opportunity for delegations  Board Meeting December 18, 2012 Board Decision related to Final Boundary Review Report Opportunity for delegations Additional opportunities for delegating at Standing Committee and Board meetings include:  October 30, 2012 –Board Meeting  November 6, 2012 – Program Committee Meeting  November 13, 2012 – Business Operations Committee Meeting  November 27, 2012 – Board Meeting 12
APPENDIX A GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND CONSTRAINTS King George JK‐8 FI Boundary Review – Goals, Objectives & Constraints CONSTRAINTS: 2. The attendance area boundary needs to be established and communicated to affected families in time for staffing for the 2014/15 school year. 3. The King George JK‐8 FI boundary decision will impact South Guelph boundary review considerations.
3. Establish a new 7/8 FI boundary for students graduating from Edward Johnson PS, King George PS and Victory PS. 4. Maximize the number of students within a safe walking distance to school. 5. Minimize the impact on students where transitions are proposed.
1. King George PS site is designed to accommodate a maximum of 6 portables. 1. Develop an attendance area for King George PS that establishes a viable and sustainable JK‐8 FI program. 2. Alter JK‐6 FI boundary or program at Victory PS to ensure enrolment balanced to school capacity.
1. Create a viable and sustainable JK‐8 FI program at King George PS. 2. Accommodate north Guelph 7/8 FI students feeding from Edward Johnson PS, King George PS and Victory PS. 3. Relieve French Immersion enrolment pressure at Victory PS. OBJECTIVES: GOALS: APPENDIX B BOUNDARY MAPS Scenario 1 - JK-3 French Immersion
Map 1
WOOLWICH ST
WOODLAWN RD E
DIVISION ST
Victory PS
A
ER
LONDON RD W
Paisley Rd PS
Y ST
M AC D
ON E L
L ST
ELIZABETH ST
King George PS
Victory PS
Paisley Rd PS
UGDSB Planning Dept. October 2012
YORK RD
John McCrae PS
GORDON ST
EDINBURGH RD S
WELLINGTON ST W
Legend
RD
King George PS
K ST
PAISLE
O
M
SA
NORFO
L
PAISLEY RD
Ed Johnson PS
VICTORIA RD S
EDINBURGH RD N
SILVERCREEK PKY N
WILLOW RD
SILVERCREEK PKY S
HANLON EXWY
SPEEDVALE AVE E
Scenario 1 - Grade 4-6 French Immersion
Map 2
Area reassigned
from Victory PS to
King George PS
(FI Grades 4-6)
SPEEDVALE AVE E
DIVISION ST
A
ER
LONDON RD W
Paisley Rd PS
Y ST
M AC D
ON E L
L ST
ELIZABETH ST
Paisley Rd PS
Ed Johnson PS
Reassigned Area
UGDSB Planning Dept. October 2012
YORK RD
John McCrae PS
GORDON ST
King George PS
EDINBURGH RD S
WELLINGTON ST W
Legend
RD
King George PS
K ST
PAISLE
O
M
SA
NORFO
L
PAISLEY RD
Ed Johnson PS
VICTORIA RD S
EDINBURGH RD N
SILVERCREEK PKY N
WILLOW RD
SILVERCREEK PKY S
HANLON EXWY
WOOLWICH ST
WOODLAWN RD E
Scenario 1 & 2 - Grade 7/8 French Immersion
Map 3
Legend
Area reassigned from
Interim Holding Area
to King George PS
(FI Grades 7/8)
HIGHWAY 7
WELLINGTON RD 29
INGTO
WELL
WELLINGTON RD 32
SPEEDVALE RD
WELLINGTON RD 31
Remaining Interim Holding Area to be
considered during the New South Guelph
JK-8 FI Centre Boundary Review.
12
WELLINGTON RD
4
HANLON EXWY
WOODLAWN
EASTVIEW RD
LONDON RD
John
McCrae PS
King
George PS
YORK RD
STONE RD
UGDSB Planning Dept. October 2012
24
N RD 1
HIGHWAY 7
WELLINGTON RD 29
WELLINGTON RD 30
6
WELLINGTON RD 38
WELLINGTON RD 39
Reassigned Area
AY
W
H
G
D7
WELLINGTON RD 86
John McCrae PS
W ELLINGT ON R
WELLINGTON RD 51
Interim Holding Area
H
I
King George PS
Scenario 2 - JK-6 French Immersion
Map 4
EDINBURGH RD N
SILVERCREEK PKY N
WILLOW RD
Victory PS
Paisley Rd PS
Y ST
M A CD
ONE L
L ST
ELIZABETH ST
Victory PS
Paisley Rd PS
Reassigned Area
UGDS B Planning Dept. October 2012
YORK RD
John McCrae PS
GORDON ST
King George PS
EDINBURGH RD S
WELLINGTON ST W
Legend
O
RD
King George PS
K ST
PAISLE
AM
ER
SA
NORFO
L
PAISLEY RD
Ed Johnson PS
DIVISION ST
LONDON RD W
SILVERCREEK PKY S
HANLON EXWY
SPEEDVALE AVE E
VICTORIA RD S
Area reassigned
from Victory PS to
King George PS
(FI Grades JK-6)
WOOLWICH ST
WOODLAWN RD E
APPENDIX C WALKING DISTANCES FROM KING GEORGE PS Map 5
ES
R
ATTO DR
MUSKOKA DR
M A DR
BALMORAL DR
MOHAWK DR
O D PL
UPLANDS PL
DAKOTA D R
O
CARMINE PL
CHELTONWOOD AVE
GLENBURNIE DR
ELGINFIELD DR
H ASTINGS BLVD
CALLANDER DR
CALGARY AVE
CT
L EE
LI
ND
SA
Y CT
0
KEMP CRES
TRAILBROOK LN
S CHRO
DE R
0.25
0.5
HAGAN AVE
BRADSON DR
GRANGE RD
ERIE ST
EMPIRE ST
ST
CR ES
HARDY ST
ST
FERGUSON ST
GARIBALDI ST
TE
YS
RE
WILLIAM ST
LOUISA DR
JANE ST
GROVE
STEVENSON ST S
R
SU
AV
E
DOMO DR
WHEELER AVE
NT
E
AUDEN RD
ST
WALNUT DR
SHIRLEY AVE
LANE ST
DUNKIRK ST
LAURINE AVE
FRANKLIN AVE
CRES
JACKSON ST
GRANGE ST
MORRIS ST
U
FO
ST
AIN
AC
OC
K
UPTON CRES
FRANCHETTO BLVD
CLARA ST
PROSPECT AVE
HILL C
HURON ST
ST
DUKE ST
AR
NEWSTEAD ST
KNIGHTSWOOD BLVD
R
L
DP
OO
NW
DA
I LL PL
H
GLE
CRESTWOOD PL
STUART ST
QUEEN ST
REGENT ST
REGENT ST
ST
P
HEPBURN AVE
ELIZABETH ST
UH
RQ
FA
KAR A
NORMANDY DR
PARKHOLM AVE
ST
SHERIDAN ST
WAVERLEY DR
BRIGHTON
PINE DR
BLVD
KIRSTEN DR
DELHI ST
HAVELOCK ST
ST N
PARK
LN
MA C D
ONELL
CARDE
N ST
VICTORIA RD N
DUMBARTON ST
COLLINGWOOD ST
METCALFE ST
S UNNYLEA CRE S
PRINCESS ST
ST N
T
X S
SE
ES
KING ST
KIRKLA
ND ST
GLASGO
W ST
N
PARK
AVE
DUBLIN
YA
RM
OU
BA
TH
KE
ST
R
ST
LD ST
ARNO
ST
AVE
CLINTO
N
ST N
N ST
GREY ST
YORK
SHIR E
O AVE
W ILSO
ST ARNAUD ST
EDINBURGH RD S
ALMA ST S
ALMA ST S
HEARN AVE
HA RRISON
SOUTHAMPTON
ST
ALMA ST N
G OLDIE AVE
BEECHWOOD AVE
WATERLO
OR
TH
LE
M O CRES
PALMER ST
R EST DR
LYON AVE
BARBER AVE
NORT
H ST
ARTHUR
CAMPION AVE
HAMEL AVE
JULIA DR
GUELPH ST
ROSEWOOD AVE
BAGOT ST
WESTERN AVE
RIDGEWOOD AVE
SLEEMAN AVE
KENWOOD CRES
MERRITT BLVD
CRES
H EATH RD
GLENGARY ST
SILVERCREEK PKY S
DR
ATH
KENT
ST
TON
ST
AS
MONTREAL RD
THORN TON ST
ES
DE
ER
P
ST
L
UG
DO
ST
ST E
RD
CASSINO AVE
CT
LAND
C
ST
WINSTON
WATT ST
Y
LL
HO
MBER
CHURCH
LN
CORK
NEW ST
RYAN AVE
RES
H C
GALT ST
NORT
HU
BE
LN
Laurine Ave PS
JOS E PH
ALLAN AVE
PRES
Central PS
AM ST
AP
EL
N
N ST
ER AV
E
DURH
QU
E
ST
ERM
A
AVE
CH
CORK
ST W
E
UR
INK
FOST
CAMB
RIDGE
ST
ELORA
ST
ROBINSON
RD ST
TH
AR
CRIM
EA
ST
OXFO
SCOTT CT
TROY CRES
YEATS CT
TI
DA
HA
ST
L EY S
T
EDMONTON
EASTVIEW RD
R AIT
ILW
MC
ST
PA IS
King George PS
L
TP
AR
OM
ST
SUFF
OLK ST
OL ST
EL IO
IA L
RAGLAN
LIVER
PO
LEMON ST
CT
FL E
CARTER DR
PAL E R
Paisley Rd PS
ABER
DEEN
ST
NNETT AVE
BE
ROSEDALE AVE
CT
TOBEY AVE
R
D
ST E
CADILLAC DR
R
GREENVIEW ST
VANCOUVER DR
NORW
ICH
MEYER
ST W
ST
ERIN AVE
RD
NO
EA
EL
OTTAWA CRES
DR
N
GREEN
N
ST
NORW
ICH
PEARL ST
N
LES ST
A
Ottawa Cres PS
SO
EN
LK S T
W
ST
DERRY ST
OS
HYLAND RD
ES
CR
ES
N
OL
DR
EV
ST
GARTH
ST
CO T E
AM
ER
MOUNTFORD DR
SKOV CRE S
LONDON RD E
EDWIN
DUBLIN ST S
ST
T DR
EN
ED
UGDSB Planning Dept. October 2012
MCTAGUE ST
MERION ST
PETROLIA ST
CR
O DY
WO
PL
MARCON ST
KERR ST
MONT ST
CHAR
CR
NC
LI
KW
MONTGOMERY ST
DR
D
AR
CH
OR
NE AVE
VER
LA
T
QUEEN S
S U FFO
PL
PIPE ST
SPRING ST
HOME
ST
TERRY
TIFFANY ST E
MITCHELL ST
BRONWYN PL
POWELL ST E
ST
OR
JOHN ST
POWELL ST W
LONDON RD W
SUFFOLK ST W
PLEASANT RD
EXHIBITION ST
KATHLEEN ST
ES
CR
CENTRAL ST
E
TIPPERARY PL
LONDON RD W
MERCER ST
CHASE AVE
ME
M
CLARKE ST E
Victory PS
EXTRA ST
DREW ST
GOWDY AVE
GEORGE ST
CLARKE ST W
CAVELL AVE
AN
LT
SU
CASTLEB
URY DR
S
CRE
DIVISION ST
CLAREN CE ST
CARDIGAN
WESTWOOD RD
LN
IT
M
NC
RA
AC
K
LINDEN PL
MOUTH CT
AJAX ST
LO
IS
ROBERTS
EDGEHILL DR
TOR
PLY
MELROS
E
UM
ST ANDREW ST
WILLOW RD
D A RD
GLENWOOD AVE
DR
S
MICHAEL PL
WOOLWICH ST
DAWSON RD
WESTMOUNT RD
DO
W
ME
A
EDINBURGH RD N
PAULINE PL
SILVERCREEK PKY N
SUNSET R D
EMMA ST
EARL ST
R
INSTER AVE
TM
ES
DR
A CT
VR
RD
TLE
RD
T HIS
M
SA
RK
HANLON EXWY
Willow Rd PS
STULL AVE
VERNEY ST
CHESTNUT PL
W
V A LL EYVIEW
GLEN
SHELLDALE CRES
PAUL AVE
PETER AVE
PL
D
EL
CT
GREENGATE RD
SPRUCE PL
MAC AVE
ON DR
BALSAM DR
FI
D
T C
R ES
ANN ST
EN
OO
SHERW
R
N D
ELMHU
RS
RSO
HIGHVIEW PL
Ed Johnson PS
P HI L IP AVE
TE A
IC
ER
BARTON ST
GLADSTONE AVE
SPEEDVALE AVE E
N
APPLEWOOD CRES
CATHCART ST
SUMAC PL
AC O R
STANLEY ST
N
AVE
RD
DELTA ST
ST
T CHER
ETON PL
PL
IE
W
RIV
ER
V
DR
IE
W
RI
VE
RV
BEATTIE ST
N
KITCHEN
ER
N
SO
EL
NT
O
Brant Ave PS
CONRAD CT
NICKLIN RD
C RES
STRATHMERE PL
WESTGATE DR
LONSDALE DR
LEWIS RD
BRENTWOOD DR
FREEMAN AVE
CARERE C
BRANT AVE
June Ave PS
ST
RM
VE
TA M A
DE
SAN
Note: The walking limits shown are
approximate. Safety/hazard issues
may be identified when the
Transportation Consortium completes
a detailed walking route investigation.
ON
Waverley Dr PS
LILAC PL
SHAFTESBURY AVE
PRICE ST
AL G O
RD
NICK LI
CHESTER ST
K IMBERLEY
RH
WAVERLEY DR
CLIVE AVE
3.2 km (Gr 7 to 8)
A
CT
DELAWARE AVE
BAILEY AVE
JUNE AVE
MA
EY
KENSINGTON ST
2.4 km (Gr 2 to 6)
DA CT
WINDSOR ST
L
MARILYN DR
N G PL
WOLSELEY RD
1.6 km (JK to Gr 1)
S
CRE
ONSHIRE
DEV
P
D
MONTANA R
LI
BURNS D R
Walking Distance
CHAD P
L
LN
UIN
NQ
AL G O
CAMPBELL RD
MATTHEW DR
AY
AVE
ALE
WOODLAWN RD E
SL
IR
ST
MASSEY RD
W
IR
FER N D
NG
KI
Scenario 2
Reassignment Area
FA
LINGTON
INVERNESS DR
WOODLAWN RD W
Existing Victory PS
FI Boundary
GLENBROOK DR
IS
DR
COUNTRY CLUB
ARROW RD
REGAL RD
Legend
GOLFVIEW RD
DALEBROOK PL
AVE
INVERNESS DR
King George PS - Walking Limits
1 km