The Current State of the Property F Conjecture Eric Rowell April 2016 AMS Western Sectional (2 + 1)Topological Quantum Field Theory Surfaces with marked points: (2 + 1)Topological Quantum Field Theory Surfaces with marked points: → H Reshetikhin-Turaev TQFTs Modular Category C → TQFT. Roughly: Reshetikhin-Turaev TQFTs Modular Category C → TQFT. Roughly: I Marked points labelled by objects X ∈ C Reshetikhin-Turaev TQFTs Modular Category C → TQFT. Roughly: I Marked points labelled by objects X ∈ C I Gluing+Disjoint union axioms reduce to labelled disks, annuli and trinions Z X Y Reshetikhin-Turaev TQFTs Modular Category C → TQFT. Roughly: I Marked points labelled by objects X ∈ C I Gluing+Disjoint union axioms reduce to labelled disks, annuli and trinions Z → X Y H = Hom(X ⊗ Y , Z ) Mapping Class group Definition Let Σ be an oriented surface, with boundary ∂Σ, and n marked points. The mapping class group MCG (Σ) is the group of isotopy classes of orientation-preserving self-homeomorphisms of Σ. Mapping Class group Definition Let Σ be an oriented surface, with boundary ∂Σ, and n marked points. The mapping class group MCG (Σ) is the group of isotopy classes of orientation-preserving self-homeomorphisms of Σ. Remark I ∂Σ is fixed pointwise Mapping Class group Definition Let Σ be an oriented surface, with boundary ∂Σ, and n marked points. The mapping class group MCG (Σ) is the group of isotopy classes of orientation-preserving self-homeomorphisms of Σ. Remark I ∂Σ is fixed pointwise I the n points are fixed set-wise Mapping Class group Definition Let Σ be an oriented surface, with boundary ∂Σ, and n marked points. The mapping class group MCG (Σ) is the group of isotopy classes of orientation-preserving self-homeomorphisms of Σ. Remark I ∂Σ is fixed pointwise I the n points are fixed set-wise I generated by Dehn twists and braid moves The Braid Group The Braid Group A key example is the braid group Bn generated by σi : The Braid Group A key example is the braid group Bn generated by σi : 1 i ... i+1 n ... The Braid Group A key example is the braid group Bn generated by σi : 1 i ... i+1 n ... Definition (Artin) Bn is generated by σi , i = 1, . . . , n − 1 satisfying: The Braid Group A key example is the braid group Bn generated by σi : 1 i ... i+1 n ... Definition (Artin) Bn is generated by σi , i = 1, . . . , n − 1 satisfying: (R1) σi σi+1 σi = σi+1 σi σi+1 The Braid Group A key example is the braid group Bn generated by σi : 1 i ... i+1 n ... Definition (Artin) Bn is generated by σi , i = 1, . . . , n − 1 satisfying: (R1) σi σi+1 σi = σi+1 σi σi+1 (R2) σi σj = σj σi if |i − j| > 1 Example (punctured Disk D 2 ) MCG Example (punctured Disk D 2 ) MCG = B6 Example (punctured Disk D 2 ) MCG = B6 note: ∂D 2 = S 1 Example (punctured Disk D 2 ) MCG Example (Torus T 2 ) MCG = B6 note: ∂D 2 = S 1 Example (punctured Disk D 2 ) MCG = B6 note: ∂D 2 = S 1 Example (Torus T 2 ) MCG = SL(2, Z) Mapping Class Group Action Mapping Class Group Action MCG (Σ) acts on H(Σ) (projectively ). Mapping Class Group Action MCG (Σ) acts on H(Σ) (projectively ). Examples H(T 2 ) ∼ = Crank(C) , MCG (T 2 ) = SL(2, Z) action is by 0 −1 1 1 → S, →T 1 0 0 1 Mapping Class Group Action MCG (Σ) acts on H(Σ) (projectively ). Examples H(T 2 ) ∼ = Crank(C) , MCG (T 2 ) = SL(2, Z) action is by 0 −1 1 1 → S, →T 1 0 0 1 H([D 2 , X , . . . , X ; Y ]) ∼ = Hom(Y , X ⊗n ), Bn action via σi → IX⊗i−1 ⊗ cX ,X ⊗ IXn−i−1 ∈ End(X ⊗n ). Mapping Class Group Action MCG (Σ) acts on H(Σ) (projectively ). Examples H(T 2 ) ∼ = Crank(C) , MCG (T 2 ) = SL(2, Z) action is by 0 −1 1 1 → S, →T 1 0 0 1 H([D 2 , X , . . . , X ; Y ]) ∼ = Hom(Y , X ⊗n ), Bn action via σi → IX⊗i−1 ⊗ cX ,X ⊗ IXn−i−1 ∈ End(X ⊗n ). Note: For genus 0, modular not needed, braided is sufficient. Common Constructions Example G a finite group, ω a 3-cocycle on G : the Drinfeld double D ω G has Rep(D ω G ) modular. Common Constructions Example G a finite group, ω a 3-cocycle on G : the Drinfeld double D ω G has Rep(D ω G ) modular. Example g semisimple Lie algebra, q = e πi/` Common Constructions Example G a finite group, ω a 3-cocycle on G : the Drinfeld double D ω G has Rep(D ω G ) modular. Example g semisimple Lie algebra, q = e πi/` g Common Constructions Example G a finite group, ω a 3-cocycle on G : the Drinfeld double D ω G has Rep(D ω G ) modular. Example g semisimple Lie algebra, q = e πi/` g Uq g Common Constructions Example G a finite group, ω a 3-cocycle on G : the Drinfeld double D ω G has Rep(D ω G ) modular. Example g semisimple Lie algebra, q = e πi/` g Uq g Rep(Uq g) Common Constructions Example G a finite group, ω a 3-cocycle on G : the Drinfeld double D ω G has Rep(D ω G ) modular. Example g semisimple Lie algebra, q = e πi/` g usually modular. Uq g Rep(Uq g) C(g, `) Common Constructions Example G a finite group, ω a 3-cocycle on G : the Drinfeld double D ω G has Rep(D ω G ) modular. Example g semisimple Lie algebra, q = e πi/` g Uq g Rep(Uq g) C(g, `) usually modular. Remark C(g, `) are often denoted SU(N)k , SO(N)k , Sp(N)k etc. Motivating Question Question When is the image of MCG (Σ) on H(Σ) a finite group? Motivating Question Question When is the image of MCG (Σ) on H(Σ) a finite group? Theorem (Ng-Schauenburg) For Σ = T 2 Motivating Question Question When is the image of MCG (Σ) on H(Σ) a finite group? Theorem (Ng-Schauenburg) For Σ = T 2 always finite. Motivating Question Question When is the image of MCG (Σ) on H(Σ) a finite group? Theorem (Ng-Schauenburg) For Σ = T 2 always finite. Remark For certain C, known before e.g. Rep(D ω G ), Coste-Gannon-Ruelle. Quantum Dimensions Let X ∈ C be simple. Quantum Dimensions Let X ∈ C be simple. NXZ ,Y := dim Hom(X ⊗ Y , Z ) defines a fusion matrix [NX ]Z ,Y = NXZ ,Y Quantum Dimensions Let X ∈ C be simple. NXZ ,Y := dim Hom(X ⊗ Y , Z ) defines a fusion matrix [NX ]Z ,Y = NXZ ,Y Definition Define dim(X ) to be the maximal eigenvalue of NX . Quantum Dimensions Let X ∈ C be simple. NXZ ,Y := dim Hom(X ⊗ Y , Z ) defines a fusion matrix [NX ]Z ,Y = NXZ ,Y Definition Define dim(X ) to be the maximal eigenvalue of NX . I X is a pointed object if dim(X ) = 1 Quantum Dimensions Let X ∈ C be simple. NXZ ,Y := dim Hom(X ⊗ Y , Z ) defines a fusion matrix [NX ]Z ,Y = NXZ ,Y Definition Define dim(X ) to be the maximal eigenvalue of NX . I X is a pointed object if dim(X ) = 1 I X is an integral object if dim(X ) ∈ Z Quantum Dimensions Let X ∈ C be simple. NXZ ,Y := dim Hom(X ⊗ Y , Z ) defines a fusion matrix [NX ]Z ,Y = NXZ ,Y Definition Define dim(X ) to be the maximal eigenvalue of NX . I X is a pointed object if dim(X ) = 1 I X is an integral object if dim(X ) ∈ Z I X is a weakly integral object if dim(X )2 ∈ Z. Quantum Dimensions Let X ∈ C be simple. NXZ ,Y := dim Hom(X ⊗ Y , Z ) defines a fusion matrix [NX ]Z ,Y = NXZ ,Y Definition Define dim(X ) to be the maximal eigenvalue of NX . I X is a pointed object if dim(X ) = 1 I X is an integral object if dim(X ) ∈ Z I X is a weakly integral object if dim(X )2 ∈ Z. I C is pointed, integral or weakly integral if all simple X ∈ C are. Examples Example Fibonacci: C(g2 , 15) Examples Example Fibonacci: C(g2 , 15) f × f = 1 + f . dim(f ) = √ 1+ 5 2 Examples Example Fibonacci: C(g2 , 15) √ f × f = 1 + f . dim(f ) = 1+2 5 " −4iπ/5 # e e −4iπ/5 σ1 7→ , 0 e 3iπ/5 # " 3iπ/5 e 0 σ2 7→ −e 3iπ/5 e −4iπ/5 Examples Example Fibonacci: C(g2 , 15) √ f × f = 1 + f . dim(f ) = 1+2 5 " −4iπ/5 # e e −4iπ/5 σ1 7→ , 0 e 3iπ/5 # " 3iπ/5 e 0 σ2 7→ −e 3iπ/5 e −4iπ/5 |ρ(Bn )| = ∞ Examples Example Fibonacci: C(g2 , 15) √ f × f = 1 + f . dim(f ) = 1+2 5 " −4iπ/5 # e e −4iπ/5 σ1 7→ , 0 e 3iπ/5 # " 3iπ/5 e 0 σ2 7→ −e 3iπ/5 e −4iπ/5 |ρ(Bn )| = ∞ Example Ising: SO(8)1 Examples Example Fibonacci: C(g2 , 15) √ f × f = 1 + f . dim(f ) = 1+2 5 " −4iπ/5 # e e −4iπ/5 σ1 7→ , 0 e 3iπ/5 # " 3iπ/5 e 0 σ2 7→ −e 3iπ/5 e −4iπ/5 |ρ(Bn )| = ∞ Example Ising: SO(8)1 σ × σ = 1 + ψ, σ × ψ √ = σ, ψ × ψ = 1. dim(σ) = 2 Examples Example Fibonacci: C(g2 , 15) √ f × f = 1 + f . dim(f ) = 1+2 5 " −4iπ/5 # e e −4iπ/5 σ1 7→ , 0 e 3iπ/5 # " 3iπ/5 e 0 σ2 7→ −e 3iπ/5 e −4iπ/5 |ρ(Bn )| = ∞ Example Ising: SO(8)1 σ × σ = 1 + ψ, σ × ψ √ = σ, ψ × ψ = 1. dim(σ) = 2 Braiding via: 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 R = √12 0 −1 1 0 −1 0 0 1 Examples Example Fibonacci: C(g2 , 15) √ f × f = 1 + f . dim(f ) = 1+2 5 " −4iπ/5 # e e −4iπ/5 σ1 7→ , 0 e 3iπ/5 # " 3iπ/5 e 0 σ2 7→ −e 3iπ/5 e −4iπ/5 Example Ising: SO(8)1 σ × σ = 1 + ψ, σ × ψ √ = σ, ψ × ψ = 1. dim(σ) = 2 Braiding via: 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 R = √12 0 −1 1 0 −1 0 0 1 |ρ(Bn )| = ∞ |ρσ (Bn )| < ∞ Property F Conjectures Conjecture (Naidu-R, Etingof-R-Witherspoon, R-Stong-Wang) I Classic: Let C be a braided fusion category. Then |ρX (Bn )| < ∞ for all X , n ⇔ C is weakly integral. Property F Conjectures Conjecture (Naidu-R, Etingof-R-Witherspoon, R-Stong-Wang) I Classic: Let C be a braided fusion category. Then |ρX (Bn )| < ∞ for all X , n ⇔ C is weakly integral. I Genus g : Let C be a modular category. Then |ρ(MCG (Σ))| < ∞ for all Σ with any labels X ∈ C ⇔ C weakly integral. Property F Conjectures Conjecture (Naidu-R, Etingof-R-Witherspoon, R-Stong-Wang) I Classic: Let C be a braided fusion category. Then |ρX (Bn )| < ∞ for all X , n ⇔ C is weakly integral. I Genus g : Let C be a modular category. Then |ρ(MCG (Σ))| < ∞ for all Σ with any labels X ∈ C ⇔ C weakly integral. I Object-wise: Let C be a braided fusion category, and X ∈ C simple. Then |ρX (Bn )| < ∞ for all n ⇔ dim(X )2 ∈ Z. Property F Conjectures Conjecture (Naidu-R, Etingof-R-Witherspoon, R-Stong-Wang) I Classic: Let C be a braided fusion category. Then |ρX (Bn )| < ∞ for all X , n ⇔ C is weakly integral. I Genus g : Let C be a modular category. Then |ρ(MCG (Σ))| < ∞ for all Σ with any labels X ∈ C ⇔ C weakly integral. I Object-wise: Let C be a braided fusion category, and X ∈ C simple. Then |ρX (Bn )| < ∞ for all n ⇔ dim(X )2 ∈ Z. We will say X has property F if |ρX (Bn )| < ∞ for all n. Theorem (Etingof,R,Witherspoon) Let G be a finite group, ω any 3-cocycle. Theorem (Etingof,R,Witherspoon) Let G be a finite group, ω any 3-cocycle. For all X ∈ Rep(D ω G ), ρX : Bn → End(X ⊗n ) has |ρX (Bn )| < ∞. Theorem (Etingof,R,Witherspoon) Let G be a finite group, ω any 3-cocycle. For all X ∈ Rep(D ω G ), ρX : Bn → End(X ⊗n ) has |ρX (Bn )| < ∞. Proof. 1. Enough to consider Bn acting on End((D ω G )⊗n ) Theorem (Etingof,R,Witherspoon) Let G be a finite group, ω any 3-cocycle. For all X ∈ Rep(D ω G ), ρX : Bn → End(X ⊗n ) has |ρX (Bn )| < ∞. Proof. 1. Enough to consider Bn acting on End((D ω G )⊗n ) 2. σi acts monomially on the basis of tensor products of δg h ∈ D ω G . Theorem I Object-wise Property F true for pointed categories. Theorem I Object-wise Property F true for pointed categories. I Genus g Property F conj. true for Rep(DG ) for Σ with ∂Σ ∈ {∅, S 1 }. (Fjelstad-Fuchs) Theorem I Object-wise Property F true for pointed categories. I Genus g Property F conj. true for Rep(DG ) for Σ with ∂Σ ∈ {∅, S 1 }. (Fjelstad-Fuchs) I Genus g Property F conj. true for SU(2)2 and SU(2)4 for Σ with ∂Σ = ∅. (G. Wright) Theorem I Object-wise Property F true for pointed categories. I Genus g Property F conj. true for Rep(DG ) for Σ with ∂Σ ∈ {∅, S 1 }. (Fjelstad-Fuchs) I Genus g Property F conj. true for SU(2)2 and SU(2)4 for Σ with ∂Σ = ∅. (G. Wright) I Object-wise Property F true for braided group-theoretical categories C ⊂ Rep(D ω G ). Quantum Groups A complete list of weakly integral categories from (simple) quantum groups: I SU(2)2 , SU(2)4 , SU(N)1 , SU(4)2 , SU(3)3 , Sp(4)2 = SO(5)2 Quantum Groups A complete list of weakly integral categories from (simple) quantum groups: I SU(2)2 , SU(2)4 , SU(N)1 , SU(4)2 , SU(3)3 , Sp(4)2 = SO(5)2 Property F: various authors (see Freedman-Larsen-Wang, CMP 228) Quantum Groups A complete list of weakly integral categories from (simple) quantum groups: I SU(2)2 , SU(2)4 , SU(N)1 , SU(4)2 , SU(3)3 , Sp(4)2 = SO(5)2 Property F: various authors (see Freedman-Larsen-Wang, CMP 228) I SO(N)1 , SO(N)2 Quantum Groups A complete list of weakly integral categories from (simple) quantum groups: I SU(2)2 , SU(2)4 , SU(N)1 , SU(4)2 , SU(3)3 , Sp(4)2 = SO(5)2 Property F: various authors (see Freedman-Larsen-Wang, CMP 228) I SO(N)1 , SO(N)2 Property F: R-Wenzl Quantum Groups A complete list of weakly integral categories from (simple) quantum groups: I SU(2)2 , SU(2)4 , SU(N)1 , SU(4)2 , SU(3)3 , Sp(4)2 = SO(5)2 Property F: various authors (see Freedman-Larsen-Wang, CMP 228) I SO(N)1 , SO(N)2 Property F: R-Wenzl I C(g, `) for some small ` for eN , g2 (mostly pointed). Quantum Groups A complete list of weakly integral categories from (simple) quantum groups: I SU(2)2 , SU(2)4 , SU(N)1 , SU(4)2 , SU(3)3 , Sp(4)2 = SO(5)2 Property F: various authors (see Freedman-Larsen-Wang, CMP 228) I SO(N)1 , SO(N)2 Property F: R-Wenzl I C(g, `) for some small ` for eN , g2 (mostly pointed). Property F: trivial. Quantum Groups A complete list of weakly integral categories from (simple) quantum groups: I SU(2)2 , SU(2)4 , SU(N)1 , SU(4)2 , SU(3)3 , Sp(4)2 = SO(5)2 Property F: various authors (see Freedman-Larsen-Wang, CMP 228) I SO(N)1 , SO(N)2 Property F: R-Wenzl I C(g, `) for some small ` for eN , g2 (mostly pointed). Property F: trivial. Theorem (Jones,Larsen-R-Wang,R) Every C = C(g, `) not listed above has some X ∈ C with |ρX (Bn )| = ∞ for n 0. Quantum Groups A complete list of weakly integral categories from (simple) quantum groups: I SU(2)2 , SU(2)4 , SU(N)1 , SU(4)2 , SU(3)3 , Sp(4)2 = SO(5)2 Property F: various authors (see Freedman-Larsen-Wang, CMP 228) I SO(N)1 , SO(N)2 Property F: R-Wenzl I C(g, `) for some small ` for eN , g2 (mostly pointed). Property F: trivial. Theorem (Jones,Larsen-R-Wang,R) Every C = C(g, `) not listed above has some X ∈ C with |ρX (Bn )| = ∞ for n 0. So the Classic Property F conj. true for quantum groups. Yang-Baxter eqn. Definition (R, V ) is a braided vector space if R ∈ Aut(V ⊗ V ) satisfies (R ⊗ IV )(IV ⊗ R)(R ⊗ IV ) = (IV ⊗ R)(R ⊗ IV )(IV ⊗ R) Yang-Baxter eqn. Definition (R, V ) is a braided vector space if R ∈ Aut(V ⊗ V ) satisfies (R ⊗ IV )(IV ⊗ R)(R ⊗ IV ) = (IV ⊗ R)(R ⊗ IV )(IV ⊗ R) Get local Bn -reps (ρR , V ⊗n ) by Yang-Baxter eqn. Definition (R, V ) is a braided vector space if R ∈ Aut(V ⊗ V ) satisfies (R ⊗ IV )(IV ⊗ R)(R ⊗ IV ) = (IV ⊗ R)(R ⊗ IV )(IV ⊗ R) Get local Bn -reps (ρR , V ⊗n ) by ρR (σi ) = IV⊗i−1 ⊗ R ⊗ IV⊗n−i−1 Yang-Baxter eqn. Definition (R, V ) is a braided vector space if R ∈ Aut(V ⊗ V ) satisfies (R ⊗ IV )(IV ⊗ R)(R ⊗ IV ) = (IV ⊗ R)(R ⊗ IV )(IV ⊗ R) Get local Bn -reps (ρR , V ⊗n ) by ρR (σi ) = IV⊗i−1 ⊗ R ⊗ IV⊗n−i−1 ρR (σi ) v1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ vi ⊗ vi+1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ vn −→ v1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ R(vi ⊗ vi+1 ) ⊗ · · · ⊗ vn Square Peg, Round Hole? Definition (R,Wang) Anyon X is localizable if there is a braided vector space (R, W ) and Square Peg, Round Hole? Definition (R,Wang) Anyon X is localizable if there is a braided vector space (R, W ) and injective algebra maps τn : CρX (Bn ) → End(W ⊗n ) Square Peg, Round Hole? Definition (R,Wang) Anyon X is localizable if there is a braided vector space (R, W ) and injective algebra maps τn : CρX (Bn ) → End(W ⊗n ) such that the following diagram commutes: CBn ρn CρX (Bn ) ρR τn & / End(W ⊗n ) Conjecture (R-Wang,Galindo-Hong-R) Let X ∈ C, C a braided fusion category. Conjecture (R-Wang,Galindo-Hong-R) Let X ∈ C, C a braided fusion category. The following are equivalent: Conjecture (R-Wang,Galindo-Hong-R) Let X ∈ C, C a braided fusion category. The following are equivalent: I X has property F , Conjecture (R-Wang,Galindo-Hong-R) Let X ∈ C, C a braided fusion category. The following are equivalent: I X has property F , I X is (quasi-)localizable, Conjecture (R-Wang,Galindo-Hong-R) Let X ∈ C, C a braided fusion category. The following are equivalent: I X has property F , I X is (quasi-)localizable, I X is weakly-integral Theorem (R-Wenzl) A fundamental spin object X ∈ SO(N)2 has property F . Theorem (R-Wenzl) A fundamental spin object X ∈ SO(N)2 has property F . Proof (for N odd, q = e πi/(2N) ) Theorem (R-Wenzl) A fundamental spin object X ∈ SO(N)2 has property F . Proof (for N odd, q = e πi/(2N) ) 1. We need a non-standard deformation: Uq0 soN gen’d by Bi with I [Bi , Bj ] = 0 for |i − j| > 1 Theorem (R-Wenzl) A fundamental spin object X ∈ SO(N)2 has property F . Proof (for N odd, q = e πi/(2N) ) 1. We need a non-standard deformation: Uq0 soN gen’d by Bi with I I [Bi , Bj ] = 0 for |i − j| > 1 Bi2 Bi±1 − (q + q −1 )Bi Bi±1 Bi + Bi±1 Bi2 = Bi±1 . Theorem (R-Wenzl) A fundamental spin object X ∈ SO(N)2 has property F . Proof (for N odd, q = e πi/(2N) ) 1. We need a non-standard deformation: Uq0 soN gen’d by Bi with I I [Bi , Bj ] = 0 for |i − j| > 1 Bi2 Bi±1 − (q + q −1 )Bi Bi±1 Bi + Bi±1 Bi2 = Bi±1 . 2. Uq0 soN End(X ⊗n ). Theorem (R-Wenzl) A fundamental spin object X ∈ SO(N)2 has property F . Proof (for N odd, q = e πi/(2N) ) 1. We need a non-standard deformation: Uq0 soN gen’d by Bi with I I [Bi , Bj ] = 0 for |i − j| > 1 Bi2 Bi±1 − (q + q −1 )Bi Bi±1 Bi + Bi±1 Bi2 = Bi±1 . 2. Uq0 soN End(X ⊗n ). 3. The quantum torus: Tq2N (n) gen’d by ui : I [ui , uj ] = 0 |i − j| > 1, Theorem (R-Wenzl) A fundamental spin object X ∈ SO(N)2 has property F . Proof (for N odd, q = e πi/(2N) ) 1. We need a non-standard deformation: Uq0 soN gen’d by Bi with I I [Bi , Bj ] = 0 for |i − j| > 1 Bi2 Bi±1 − (q + q −1 )Bi Bi±1 Bi + Bi±1 Bi2 = Bi±1 . 2. Uq0 soN End(X ⊗n ). 3. The quantum torus: Tq2N (n) gen’d by ui : I I [ui , uj ] = 0 |i − j| > 1, ui ui+1 = qui+1 ui , Theorem (R-Wenzl) A fundamental spin object X ∈ SO(N)2 has property F . Proof (for N odd, q = e πi/(2N) ) 1. We need a non-standard deformation: Uq0 soN gen’d by Bi with I I [Bi , Bj ] = 0 for |i − j| > 1 Bi2 Bi±1 − (q + q −1 )Bi Bi±1 Bi + Bi±1 Bi2 = Bi±1 . 2. Uq0 soN End(X ⊗n ). 3. The quantum torus: Tq2N (n) gen’d by ui : I I I [ui , uj ] = 0 |i − j| > 1, ui ui+1 = qui+1 ui , ui2N = 1. Theorem (R-Wenzl) A fundamental spin object X ∈ SO(N)2 has property F . Proof (for N odd, q = e πi/(2N) ) 1. We need a non-standard deformation: Uq0 soN gen’d by Bi with I I [Bi , Bj ] = 0 for |i − j| > 1 Bi2 Bi±1 − (q + q −1 )Bi Bi±1 Bi + Bi±1 Bi2 = Bi±1 . 2. Uq0 soN End(X ⊗n ). 3. The quantum torus: Tq2N (n) gen’d by ui : I I I [ui , uj ] = 0 |i − j| > 1, ui ui+1 = qui+1 ui , ui2N = 1. 4. Uq0 soN → Tq2N (n) via Bj → i uj +uj−1 . q−q −1 Theorem (R-Wenzl) A fundamental spin object X ∈ SO(N)2 has property F . Proof (for N odd, q = e πi/(2N) ) 1. We need a non-standard deformation: Uq0 soN gen’d by Bi with I I [Bi , Bj ] = 0 for |i − j| > 1 Bi2 Bi±1 − (q + q −1 )Bi Bi±1 Bi + Bi±1 Bi2 = Bi±1 . 2. Uq0 soN End(X ⊗n ). 3. The quantum torus: Tq2N (n) gen’d by ui : I I I [ui , uj ] = 0 |i − j| > 1, ui ui+1 = qui+1 ui , ui2N = 1. 4. Uq0 soN → Tq2N (n) via Bj → i uj +uj−1 . q−q −1 Factors over End(X ⊗n ). Proof (cont.) Proof (cont.) −2 2 5. From all this: End(S ⊗n ) ∼ + un−1 i = h1, u12 + u1−2 , . . . , un−1 Proof (cont.) −2 2 5. From all this: End(S ⊗n ) ∼ + un−1 i = h1, u12 + u1−2 , . . . , un−1 PN−1 4j 2 2j γ 6. ρX (σi ) → √N j=0 q ui where |γ| = 1. Proof (cont.) −2 2 5. From all this: End(S ⊗n ) ∼ + un−1 i = h1, u12 + u1−2 , . . . , un−1 PN−1 4j 2 2j γ 6. ρX (σi ) → √N j=0 q ui where |γ| = 1. A Gaussian representation. Proof (cont.) −2 2 5. From all this: End(S ⊗n ) ∼ + un−1 i = h1, u12 + u1−2 , . . . , un−1 PN−1 4j 2 2j γ 6. ρX (σi ) → √N j=0 q ui where |γ| = 1. A Gaussian representation. 7. ρR (σi ) generate a finite group (Jones,Galindo-R). I Drinfeld: does weakly integral imply weakly group-theoretical? I Drinfeld: does weakly integral imply weakly group-theoretical? I R-Wang: If (R, V ) is a braided vector space with R unitary and finite order then |ρR (Bn )| < ∞ I Drinfeld: does weakly integral imply weakly group-theoretical? I R-Wang: If (R, V ) is a braided vector space with R unitary and finite order then |ρR (Bn )| < ∞ I Cui, Galindo, Plavnik, Wang: Every weakly integral modular C is obtained by gauging a pointed modular category. I Drinfeld: does weakly integral imply weakly group-theoretical? I R-Wang: If (R, V ) is a braided vector space with R unitary and finite order then |ρR (Bn )| < ∞ Cui, Galindo, Plavnik, Wang: Every weakly integral modular C is obtained by gauging a pointed modular category. L Gauging: (C, G ) → D = g ∈G Dg , C = D0 . I I Drinfeld: does weakly integral imply weakly group-theoretical? I R-Wang: If (R, V ) is a braided vector space with R unitary and finite order then |ρR (Bn )| < ∞ Cui, Galindo, Plavnik, Wang: Every weakly integral modular C is obtained by gauging a pointed modular category. L Gauging: (C, G ) → D = g ∈G Dg , C = D0 . now equivariantize: B = DG . dim(B) = |G |2 dim(C). I Current Efforts/Open Problems I Next talk: P. Gustafson considering Rep(D ω G ) for Σ with ∂Σ = ∅ and ω 6= 1. Current Efforts/Open Problems I Next talk: P. Gustafson considering Rep(D ω G ) for Σ with ∂Σ = ∅ and ω 6= 1. I Show that property F is invariant under gauging. Current Efforts/Open Problems I Next talk: P. Gustafson considering Rep(D ω G ) for Σ with ∂Σ = ∅ and ω 6= 1. I Show that property F is invariant under gauging. I Verify property F for TY (A, χ, τ )Z2 . Current Efforts/Open Problems I Next talk: P. Gustafson considering Rep(D ω G ) for Σ with ∂Σ = ∅ and ω 6= 1. I Show that property F is invariant under gauging. I Verify property F for TY (A, χ, τ )Z2 . I Verify property F for weakly group-theoretical braided fusion categories. Thank you!