CITATIONS TO THE WORK OF
William J. Rapaport
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Department of Philosophy, Department of Linguistics,
and Center for Cognitive Science
State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260-2500
rapaport@buffalo.edu
http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/˜rapaport/
April 22, 2016
Summary:
Listed below are 616 non-self-referential citations (plus 9 “miscellaneous” references),
distributed as follows
(with 5 publications of unknown date):
Year
1978
1979
1980
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
# citations:
1
3
3
7
7
2
4
25
8
15
31
35
34
27
31
19
22
22
27
Year
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
# citations
20
22
20
9
18
20
19
11
21
9
23
18
18
13
12
13
12
6
2
Note: Works cited are listed in chronological order.
1
1. Rapaport, William J. (1976), “On Cogito Propositions”, Philosophical Studies 29: 63–68.
1. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
2. Rapaport, William J. (1976), Intentionality and the Structure of Existence, Ph.D. dissertation, Department
of Philosophy, Indiana University.
1. Zalta, Edward N. (1983), Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics (Dordrecht, The
Netherlands: D. Reidel).
2. Orayen, Raûl (1984), “On the Inconsistency of Meinong’s Ontology”, in Jorge J. E. Gracia (ed.), Philosophical Analysis in Latin America (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 115–139.
3. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1986), “Replies”, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 333–391
4. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
5. Orilia, Francesco (1987), “Definite Descriptions and Existence Attribution”, Topoi 6: 133–138.
6. Zalta, Edward N. (1987), “Erzählung als Taufe des Helden: Wie man auf fiktionale Objeckte Bezug
nimmt” (German translation, by Arnold Günther, of “Referring to Fictional Characters”, paper (in English)
presented at the American Philosophical Association Pacific Division meeting (March 1985)), Zeitschrift
für Semiotik 9(1–2): 85–95.
7. Orilia, Francesco (1991), “Type-Free Property Theory, Bradley’s Regress and Meinong and Russell Reconciled”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 39: 103–125.
8. Orilia, Francesco (1994), “Belief Representation in a Deductivist Type-Free Doxastic Logic”, Minds and
Machines 4(2) (May): 163–203.
9. Orilia, Francesco (2002), Ulisse, il quadrato rotondo e l’attuale re di Francia (Pisa, Italy: Edizioni ETS).
10. Nelson, Michael (2012), “Existence”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/existence/
11. Sendłak, Maciej (2012), “Wyglady, Identycznosc i Przedmioty Nieistniejace” (“Guises, Identity and Nonexistent Objects”), Diametros 31 (March): 56–87.
12. Mari, Laura; & Paoletti, Michele Paolini (2013), “Foreword” to special issue on “Meinong Strikes Again:
Return to Impossible Objects 100 Years Later”, guest edited by Laura Mari & Michele Paolini Paoletti,
Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (December): III–XVI.
13. Orilia, Francesco (2013), “Guise Theory Revisited”, in special issue on “Meinong Strikes Again: Return to Impossible Objects 100 Years Later”, guest edited by Laura Mari & Michele Paolini Paoletti,
Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (December): 53–76.
14. Landini, Gregory (2014), “Clark’s Paradox of Castañeda’s Guises: A Brief Memoir”, in Adriano Palma
(ed.), Castañeda and His Guises: Essays on the Work of Hector-Neri Castañeda (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter):
67–82.
2
3. Rapaport, William J. (1978), “Meinongian Theories and a Russellian Paradox,” Noûs 12: 153–180;
errata, Noûs 13 (1979) 125.
1. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1978), “Philosophical Method and the Theory of Predication and Identity”, Noûs
12: 189–210.
2. Parsons, Terence (1979), “The Methodology of Nonexistence”, Journal of Philosophy 76(11) (November):
649–662.
3. Routley, Richard (1979), Exploring Meinong’s Jungle and Beyond (Canberra: Australian National University, Research School of Social Sciences, Department of Philosophy).
4. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1980), On Philosophical Method (Bloomington, IN: Noûs Publications).
5. Kalsi, Marie-Luise Schubert (1980), “On Meinong’s Pseudo-Objects”, Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 11: 115–123.
• “The following paper is a consequence of my reading [Rapaport 1978].” (p. 122, n. 1.)
6. McMichael, Alan; & Zalta, Ed (1980), “An Alternative Theory of Nonexistent Objects”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 9(3) (August): 297–313.
7. Fine, Kit (1982), “The Problem of Non-Existents”, Topoi 1: 97–140.
8. Jacquette, Dale (1982), “Meinong’s Theory of Defective Objects”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 15:
1–19.
9. Fine, Kit (1982), “The Problem of Non-Existents: I. Internalism”, Topoi 1 (1&2) (December): 97–140.
10. Lambert, Karel (1982), “A Logical Interpretation of Meinong’s Principle of Independence”, Topoi 1 (1&2)
(December): 87–96.
11. Clark, Romane L. (1983), “Predication Theory: Guised and Disguised”, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.),
Agent, Language, and the Structure of the World: Essays Presented to Hector-Neri Castañeda, with His
Replies (Indianapolis: Hackett): 111–129.
12. Lambert, Karel (1983), Meinong and the Principle of Independence: Its Place in Meinong’s Theory of Objects and Its Significance in Contemporary Philosophical Logic (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University
Press).
13. Paśniczek, Jacek (1983), “Meinongian Semantics: Some Perspectives”, Studies in Logic, Grammar, and
Rhetoric (Warsaw: Warsaw University, Białystok Branch), Vol. 3, pp. 39–84.
14. Zalta, Edward N. (1983), Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics (Dordrecht, The
Netherlands: D. Reidel).
15. Fine, Kit (1984), “Critical Review of Parsons’ Non-Existent Objects”, Philosophical Studies 45: 95–142.
16. Landini, Gregory (1985), “Salvaging ‘The F-er Is F’: The Lesson of Clark’s Paradox”, Philosophical
Studies 48: 129–136.
17. Yourgrau, Palle (1985), “Sets, Aggregates, and Numbers”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15(4) (December): 581–592.
18. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
19. Simons, Peter (1986), “Alexius Meinong: Gegenstände, die es nicht gibt”, in Josef Speck (ed.), Grundprobleme der großen Philosophen, Philosophie der Neuzeit IV (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht):
91–127.
20. Orilia, Francesco (1987), Review of Edward N. Zalta’s Abstract Objects, in Noûs 21: 270–276.
21. Zalta, Edward N. (1987), “On the Structural Similarities between Worlds and Times”, Philosophical Studies 51(2) (March): 213–239.
22. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1988), “Persons, Egos, and I’s: Their Sameness Relations”, in M. Spitzer, F. A. Uehlin,
& G. Oepen (eds.), Psychopathology and Philosophy (Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 210–234.
3
23. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1988), “The Semantics of Thinking, Dia-Philosophical Pluralism, and Guise Theory”, Metaphilosophy 19(2) (April): 79–104.
24. Grim, Patrick (1988), “Logic and Limits of Knowledge and Truth”, Noûs 22: 341–367.
25. Simons, Peter M. (1988), “Über das, was es nicht gibt: Die Meinong-Russell-Kontroverse” (“On What
There Isn’t: The Meinong-Russell Controversy”), Zeitschrift für Semiotik 10(4): 399–426.
26. Zalta, Edward N. (1988), Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality (Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press).
27. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1989), “Semantic Holism without Semantic Socialism: Twin Earths, Thinking,
Language, Bodies, and the World”, in Peter A. French; Theodore E. Uehling, Jr.; & Howard K. Wettstein
(eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language II, Midwest Studies in Philosophy (Notre
Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press) 14: 101–126.
28. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1989), Thinking, Language, and Experience (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
29. Jacquette, Dale (1989), “Mally’s Heresy and the Logic of Meinong’s Object Theory”, History and Philosophy of Logic 10: 1–14.
30. Maloney, J. Christopher (1989), The Mundane Matter of the Mental Language (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press).
31. Orilia, Francesco (1989), “Identity across Frames”, in Ermanno Bencivenga et al. (eds.), Topoi, Supp. Vol.
4: 84–96.
32. Hirst, Graeme (1991), “Existence Assumptions in Knowledge Representation”, Artificial Intelligence 49:
199–242.
33. Linsky, Bernard; & Zalta, Edward N. (1991), “Is Lewis a Meinongian?”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69(4) (December): 438–453.
34. Orilia, Francesco (1991), “Type-Free Property Theory, Bradley’s Regress and Meinong and Russell Reconciled”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 39: 103–125.
35. Kroon, Frederick W. (1992), “Was Meinong Only Pretending?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 499–527.
36. Simons, Peter (1992), Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski: Selected Essays
(Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
37. Zalta, Edward N. (1992), “On Mally’s Alleged Heresy: A Reply”, History and Philosophy of Logic 13:
59–68.
38. Paśniczek, Jacek (1993), “The Simplest Meinongian Logic”, Logique et Analyse 143/144: 329–342.
39. Perszyk, Kenneth J. (1993), Nonexistent Objects: Meinong and Contemporary Philosophy (Dordrecht,
The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
40. Zalta, Edward N. (1993), “Twenty-Five Basic Theorems in Situation and World Theory”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 22: 385–428.
41. Paśniczek, Jacek (1994), “Ways of Reference to Meinongian Objects: Ontological Commitments of Meinongian Theories”, Logic and Logical Philosophy 2: 69–86.
42. Haller, Rudolf, & Fabian, Reinhard (1995), “Alexius Meinong und die Schule der Gegenstandstheorie”, in
Thomas Binder, Ulf Höfer, & Jutta Valent (eds.), Alexius Meinong: Die Grazer Schule der Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie (Graz: Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz): 7–28.
• Reprinted in Kurt Freisitzer, Walter Höflechner, Hans-Ludwig Holzer, & Wolfgang Mantl (eds.), Tradition und Herausforderung: 400 Jahre Universität Graz (Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck- u.
Verlagsanstalt): 277–291.
43. Paśniczek, Jacek (1995), “Are Contradictions Still Lurking in Meinongian Theories of Objects?”, in Rudolf
Haller (ed.), Meinong and the Theory of Objects, Grazer Philosophische Studien 50: 293–303.
4
44. Parsons, Terence (1995), “Meinongian Semantics Generalized”, in Rudolf Haller (ed.), Meinong and the
Theory of Objects, Grazer Philosophische Studien 50: 145–161.
45. Jacquette, Dale (1996), Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence (Berlin: Walter
de Gruyter).
46. Tomberlin, James E. (1996), “Actualism or Possibilism”, Philosophical Studies 84: 263–281.
47. Landini, Gregory (1998), “Russell’s Intensional Logic of Propositions: A Resurrection of Logicism?”,
in Franceso Orilia & William J. Rapaport (eds.) (1998), Thought, Language, and Ontology: Essays in
Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers): 61–93
48. Paśniczek, Jacek (1998), The Logic of Intentional Objects: A Meinongian Version of Classical Logic
(Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
49. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1999), The Phenomeno-Logic of the I: Essays on Self-Consciousness, ed. by
James G. Hart & Tomis Kapitan (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
50. Zalta, Edward N. (1999), “Natural Numbers and Natural Cardinals as Abstract Objects: A Partial Reconstruction of Frege’s Grundgesetze in Object Theory”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 28: 619–660.
51. Pelletier, Francis Jeffry; & Zalta, Edward N. (2000), “How to Say Goodbye to the Third Man”, Noûs 34(2):
165–202.
52. Orilia, Francesco (2002), Ulisse, il quadrato rotondo e l’attuale re di Francia (Pisa, Italy: Edizioni ETS).
53. Bělohrad, Radim (2003), “Novomeinongovské pojetı́ existence” (The Neo-Meinongian Conception of Existence), Filosofický Časopis 51(1): 57–69.
54. Millican, Peter (2004), “The One Fatal Flaw in Anselm’s Argument”, Mind 113(451) (July): 437–476.
55. Barbero, Carola (2005), Madame Bovary: Something like a Melody (Milan: Edizioni AlboVersorio).
56. Reicher, Maria E. (2005), “Russell, Meinong, and the Problem of Existent Nonexistents”, in Bernard
Linsky & Guido Imaguire (eds.), On Denoting: 1905–2005 (München: Philosophia Verlag): 167–193.
57. Barbero, Carola (2006), “Madame Bovary as a Higher-Order Object”, in Andrea Bottani & Richard Davies
(eds.), Modes of Existence: Papers in Ontology and Philosophical Logic (Heusenstamm, Germany: Ontos
Verlag): 173–190.
58. Barbero, Carola (2006), “Cry for a Shadow: Emotions and Object Theory”, in Venanzio Raspa (ed.),
Meinongian Issues in Contemporary Italian Philosophy (Heusenstamm, Germany: Ontos Verlag): 181–
211.
59. Zalta, Edward N. (2006), “Deriving and Validating Kripkean Claims Using the Theory of Abstract Objects”, Noûs 40(4): 591–622.
60. Zalta, Edward N. (2006), “Essence and Modality”, Mind 115(459) (July): 659–693.
61. Woods, John (2007), “Fictions and Their Logic”, in Dale Jacquette (ed.), Philosophy of Logic (Amsterdam:
Elsevier): 1061–1126.
62. Barz, Wolfgang (2008), “Aussersein des reinen Gegenstandes—ein Berührungspunkt zwischen Meinong
und Quine” (“Aussersein of Pure Objects—A Point of Contact between Meinong and Quine”), Zeitschrift
für philosophische Forschung 62(3): 358–384.1
63. Hieke, Alexander, & Zecha, Gerhard (2008), “Ernst Mally”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition) [http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/mally].
64. Reicher, Maria (2008), “Nonexistent Objects”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition) [http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/nonexistent-objects/].
65. Yagisawa, Takashi (2008), “Possible Objects”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition) [http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/possible-objects/].
1 Library research sources unintentionally humorously mistranslate this as “Beside Itself of a True Item—Point of Contact between Opinion and
Quine”! The German for ‘opinion’ is ‘Meinung’.
5
66. Feit, Neil (2009), “Naming and Nonexistence”, Southern Journal of Philosophy 47: 239–262.
67. Marek, Johann (2009), “Alexius Meinong”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 Edition) [http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/meinong/].
68. Voltolini, Alberto (2009), “Consequences of Schematism”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8:
135–150.
69. Mousavian, Seyed N. (2010), “Neo-Meinongian Neo-Russellians”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91:
229–259.
70. Berto, Francesco (2012), Existence as a Real Property: The Ontology of Meinongianism (Springer).
71. Sendłak, Maciej (2012), “Wyglady, Identycznosc i Przedmioty Nieistniejace” (“Guises, Identity and Nonexistent Objects”), Diametros 31 (March): 56–87.
72. Mari, Laura; & Paoletti, Michele Paolini (2013), “Foreword” to special issue on “Meinong Strikes Again:
Return to Impossible Objects 100 Years Later”, guest edited by Laura Mari & Michele Paolini Paoletti,
Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (December): III–XVI.
73. Orilia, Francesco (2013), “Guise Theory Revisited”, in special issue on “Meinong Strikes Again: Return to Impossible Objects 100 Years Later”, guest edited by Laura Mari & Michele Paolini Paoletti,
Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (December): 53–76.
74. Salis, Fiora (2013), “Fictional Entities”, Online Companion to Problems in Analytic Philosophy 2012–
2015 FCT Project PTDC/FIL-FIL/121209/2010;
http://philpapers.org/archive/SALFE
75. Bueno, Otávio; Menzel, Christopher; & Zalta, Edward N. (2014), “Worlds and Propositions Set Free”,
Erkenntnis 79(4): 797–820.
76. Voltolini, Alberto (2013), “There Are Intentionalia of Which It Is True that Such Objects Do Not Exist”,
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21(3): 394–414.
77. See also Miscellaneous items 3, 7, below.
4. Rapaport, William J. (1979), “An Adverbial Meinongian Theory”, Analysis 39: 75–81.
1. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1979), “Philosophical Method and Direct Awareness of the Self”, in Grazer
Philosophische Studien 7/8: 1-58.
2. Fine, Kit (1982), “The Problem of Non-Existents”, Topoi 1: 97–140.
3. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
4. Jacquette, Dale (1996), Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence (Berlin: Walter
de Gruyter).
5. Paśniczek, Jacek (1996), “The Relational vs. Directional Conception of Intentionality”, in Anna ZeidlerJaniszewska (ed.), Epistemology and History, Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the
Humanities, 47: 373–380.
6. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1999), The Phenomeno-Logic of the I: Essays on Self-Consciousness, ed. by
James G. Hart & Tomis Kapitan (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
7. Mousavian, Seyed N. (2010), “Neo-Meinongian Neo-Russellians”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91:
229–259.
8. See also Miscellaneous item 3, below.
6
5. Rapaport, William J. (1981), “How to Make the World Fit Our Language: An Essay in Meinongian
Semantics”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 14: 1–21.
1. Fine, Kit (1982), “The Problem of Non-Existents”, Topoi 1: 97–140.
2. Paśniczek, Jacek (1983), “Meinongian Semantics: Some Perspectives”, Studies in Logic, Grammar, and
Rhetoric (Warsaw: Warsaw University, Białystok Branch), Vol. 3, pp. 39–84.
3. Yourgrau, Palle (1985), “Sets, Aggregates, and Numbers”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15(4) (December): 581–592.
4. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
5. Grim, Patrick (1988), “Logic and Limits of Knowledge and Truth”, Noûs 22: 341–367.
6. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1989), Thinking, Language, and Experience (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
7. Jacquette, Dale (1989), “Mally’s Heresy and the Logic of Meinong’s Object Theory”, History and Philosophy of Logic 10: 1–14.
8. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
9. Hirst, Graeme (1991), “Existence Assumptions in Knowledge Representation”, Artificial Intelligence 49:
199–242.
10. Miller, Michael J.; & Perlis, Donald (1991), “Typicality Constraints and Range Defaults: Some Pros and
Cons of a Cognitive Model of Default Reasoning”, in Z.W. Ras & M. Zemankova (eds.), Methodologies
for Intelligent Systems: 6th International Symposium, ISMIS ’91, Charlotte, NC, USA, October 16–19,
1991, Proceedings (Berlin: Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 542): 560–569.
11. Kroon, Frederick W. (1992), “Was Meinong Only Pretending?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 499–527.
12. Perszyk, Kenneth J. (1993), Nonexistent Objects: Meinong and Contemporary Philosophy (Dordrecht,
The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
13. Jacquette, Dale (1996), Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence (Berlin: Walter
de Gruyter).
14. Tomberlin, James E. (1996), “Actualism or Possibilism”, Philosophical Studies 84: 263–281.
15. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1999), The Phenomeno-Logic of the I: Essays on Self-Consciousness, ed. by
James G. Hart & Tomis Kapitan (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
16. Barbero, Carola (2005), Madame Bovary: Something like a Melody (Milan: Edizioni AlboVersorio).
17. Reicher, Maria (2008), “Nonexistent Objects”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition) [http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/nonexistent-objects/].
18. See also Miscellaneous item 3, below.
7
6. Rapaport, William J. (1982), “Unsolvable Problems and Philosophical Progress”, 1982 Prize Essay,
American Philosophical Quarterly 19: 289–298.
1. Anonymous (1983), “Comparative Bibliography”, History in Africa 10: 415–443.
2. Rescher, Nicholas (1985), The Strife of Systems: An Essay on the Grounds and Implications of Philosophical Diversity (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).
3. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
4. Hite, Molly (2010), “Tonal Cues and Uncertain Values: Affect and Ethics in Mrs. Dalloway”, Narrative
18(3) (October): 249–275.
7. Rapaport, William J. (1983), “Meinong, Defective Objects, and (Psycho-)Logical Paradox”, Grazer
Philosophische Studien 18: 17–39.
1. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
2. Simons, Peter (1986), “Alexius Meinong: Gegenstände, die es nicht gibt”, in Josef Speck (ed.), Grundprobleme der großen Philosophen, Philosophie der Neuzeit IV (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht):
91–127.
3. Jacquette, Dale (1989), “Mally’s Heresy and the Logic of Meinong’s Object Theory”, History and Philosophy of Logic 10: 1–14.
4. Simons, Peter (1992), “On What There Isn’t: The Meinong-Russell Dispute”, in Peter Simons (ed.), Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski: Selected Essays (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers): 159–191.
5. Kroon, Frederick W. (1992), “Was Meinong Only Pretending?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 499–527.
6. Perszyk, Kenneth J. (1993), Nonexistent Objects: Meinong and Contemporary Philosophy (Dordrecht,
The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
7. Haller, Rudolf, & Fabian, Reinhard (1995), “Alexius Meinong und die Schule der Gegenstandstheorie”, in
Thomas Binder, Ulf Höfer, & Jutta Valent (eds.), Alexius Meinong: Die Grazer Schule der Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie (Graz: Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz): 7–28.
• Reprinted in Kurt Freisitzer, Walter Höflechner, Hans-Ludwig Holzer, & Wolfgang Mantl (eds.), Tradition und Herausforderung: 400 Jahre Universität Graz (Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck- u.
Verlagsanstalt): 277–291.
8. Paśniczek, Jacek (1995), “Are Contradictions Still Lurking in Meinongian Theories of Objects?”, in Rudolf
Haller (ed.), Meinong and the Theory of Objects, Grazer Philosophische Studien 50: 293–303.
9. Jacquette, Dale (1996), Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence (Berlin: Walter
de Gruyter).
10. Paśniczek, Jacek (1998), The Logic of Intentional Objects: A Meinongian Version of Classical Logic
(Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
11. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1999), The Phenomeno-Logic of the I: Essays on Self-Consciousness, ed. by
James G. Hart & Tomis Kapitan (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
12. Orilia, Francesco (2002), Ulisse, il quadrato rotondo e l’attuale re di Francia (Pisa, Italy: Edizioni ETS).
13. Mousavian, Seyed N. (2010), “Neo-Meinongian Neo-Russellians”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91:
229–259.
14. See also Miscellaneous item 3, below.
8
8. Rapaport, William J. (1984), “Can Philosophy Solve Its Own Problems?” The [SUNY] News 13 (May/June
1984): F2–F3.
• Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
9. Rapaport, William J. (1984), “Critical Thinking and Cognitive Development”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association 57(5) (May): 610–615.
• Benjamin, Martin (1989), “A Seminar on Teaching Philosophy”, American Philosophical Association
Newsletter on Teaching Philosophy 89(1) (Fall): 9–13.
10. Rapaport, William J. (1984), Critical study of Richard Routley’s Exploring Meinong’s Jungle and Beyond,
in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44(4): 539–552.
1. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
2. Hirst, Graeme (1991), “Existence Assumptions in Knowledge Representation”, Artificial Intelligence 49:
199–242.
3. Jacquette, Dale (1996), Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence (Berlin: Walter
de Gruyter).
4. Orilia, Francesco (2002), Ulisse, il quadrato rotondo e l’attuale re di Francia (Pisa, Italy: Edizioni ETS).
5. Mousavian, Seyed N. (2010), “Neo-Meinongian Neo-Russellians”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91:
229–259.
6. Paoletti, Michele Paolini (2013), “Commentary [on] Exploring Meinong’s Jungle and Beyond: An Investigation of Noneism and the Theory of Items, in special issue on “Meinong Strikes Again: Return to Impossible Objects 100 Years Later”, guest edited by Laura Mari & Michele Paolini Paoletti, Humana.Mente:
Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (December): 275–292.
7. See also Miscellaneous item 3, below.
11. Rapaport, William J. (1984), “Belief Representation and Quasi-Indicators”, M.S. Thesis Technical Report
215 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science).
1. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
2. Pollock, John L. (1986), Contemporary Theories of Knowledge (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield).
3. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1989), Thinking, Language, and Experience (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
4. Pollock, John L., and Cruz, Joseph (1999), Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, Second Edition (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).
9
12. Rapaport, William J., & Shapiro, Stuart C. (1984), “Quasi-Indexical Reference in Propositional Semantic
Networks”, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-84,
Stanford University) (Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics): 65–70.
1. Brachman, Ronald J., & Levesque, Hector J. (1985), “A Knowledge Representation Bibliography”, in
Brachman, Ronald J., & Levesque, Hector J. (eds.) Readings in Knowledge Representation (San Mateo,
CA: Morgan Kaufmann): 537–563, citation on p. 556.
2. Barnden, John A. (1986), “A Viewpoint Distinction in the Representation of Propositional Attitudes”,
Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-86, Philadelphia) (Los Altos,
CA: Morgan Kaufmann): 411–415.
3. Barnden, John A. (1986), “Imputations and Explications: Representational Problems in Treatments of
Propositional Attitudes”, Cognitive Science 10: 319–364.
4. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
5. Pollock, John L. (1986), Contemporary Theories of Knowledge (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield).
6. Maida, Anthony S. (1989), “The Propositional Version of the Knowledge Representation Hypothesis”,
Technical Report CS-89-16 (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Department of Computer
Science).
7. Maida, Anthony S. (1990), “The Society of Cognitive Scientists: A Metaphor for Belief Reasoning”,
Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Pennsylvania State University.
8. Maida, Anthony S. (1991), “Maintaining Mental Models of Agents Who Have Existential Misconceptions”, Artificial Intelligence 50: 331–383.
9. Pollock, John L., and Cruz, Joseph (1999), Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, Second Edition (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).
13. Rapaport, William J. (1984), “Comments on Dibrell’s ‘Persons and the Intentional Stance’,” oral comments delivered at the Creighton Club/New York State Philosophical Association (April 1984; Cazenovia,
NY).
• Dibrell, William (1988), “Persons and the Intentional Stance”, Journal of Critical Analysis 9(1): 13–25.
10
14. Schagrin, Morton L.; Rapaport, William J.; & Dipert, Randall R. (1985), Logic: A Computer Approach
(New York: McGraw-Hill).
• Japanese translation, Logic and Algorithms, by Takemasa Ooya (Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Japan, 1986).
• Italian translation, Logica e Computer, by Gianfranco Forni, revised by Marco Colombetti (Milan: McGrawHill Libri Italia, 1986).
• Italian student edition, Logica e Computer, by Gianfranco Forni, adapted by Maria Cristina Valenti (Milan:
McGraw-Hill Libri Italia, Divisione scuola, 1986).
1. Tymoczko, Thomas (1986), Review of Schagrin, Rapaport, & Dipert 1985, Teaching Philosophy 9(1):
78–80.
2. Jason, Gary (1987), Review of Schagrin, Rapaport, & Dipert 1985, Philosophia 17(4) (December): 557–
558.
3. Keyworth, Donald (1987), Review of Schagrin, Rapaport, & Dipert 1985, Computers & Philosophy 2(3).
4. Ketner, Kenneth Laine (1988), “Peirce and Turing: Comparisons and Conjectures”, Semiotica 68(1/2):
33–61.
5. Alchourròn, Carlos E., & Martino, Antonio A. (1989), “A Sketch of Logic without Truth”, in Proceedings
of the 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (Vancouver) (New York: ACM
Press): 165–179.
6. Godlovitch, Stan (1990), “SANDY v 3.06—A Critical Review”, Computers & Philosophy 5(1): 24–60.
7. Evans, Fred (1993), Psychology and Nihilism: A Genealogical Critique of the Computational Philosophy
of Mind (Albany: SUNY Press).
8. Floridi, Luciano (1999), Philosophy and Computing (London: Routledge).
9. Gabbay, Dov M.; & Woods, John (2003), Agenda Relevance: A Study in Formal Pragmatics, Vol. 1 of A
Practical Logic of Cognitive Systems (Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland).
10. Morineau, Thierry (2011), “Turing Machine Task Analysis: A Method for Modeling Affordnces in the
Design Process”, International Journal of Design Engineering 4(1): 58–70.
11
15. Rapaport, William J. (1985), “Meinongian Semantics for Propositional Semantic Networks”, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (University of Chicago)
(Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics): 43–48.
1. Habel, Christopher U. (1986), “Plurals, Cardinalities, and Structures of Determination”, Proceedings of
the 11th International Conference On Computational Linguistics (COLING-86, Bonn) (Morristown, NJ:
Association for Computational Linguistics): 62–64.
2. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1989), Thinking, Language, and Experience (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
3. Israel, David (1989), Review of Rapaport 1986 [Item 21, above], Journal of Symbolic Logic 54(2): 617618.
4. Maida, Anthony S. (1989), “The Propositional Version of the Knowledge Representation Hypothesis”,
Technical Report CS-89-16 (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Department of Computer
Science).
5. Maida, Anthony S. (1990), “The Society of Cognitive Scientists: A Metaphor for Belief Reasoning”,
Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Pennsylvania State University.
6. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
7. Hirst, Graeme (1991), “Existence Assumptions in Knowledge Representation”, Artificial Intelligence 49:
199–242.
8. Maida, Anthony S. (1991), “Maintaining Mental Models of Agents Who Have Existential Misconceptions”, Artificial Intelligence 50: 331–383.
9. Marcu, Daniel (1995), “A Formalism and an Algorithm for Computing Pragmatic Inferences and Detecting Infelicities”, M.Sc thesis (University of Toronto);
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
35014755 A formalism and an algorithm for computing pragmatic inferences and detecting infelicities microform
10. Marcu, Daniel; & Hirst, Graeme (1995), “An Implemented Formalism for Computing Linguistic Presuppositions and Existential Commitments”, International Workshop on Computational Sematnics;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
2610314 An Implemented Formalism for Computing Linguistic Presuppositions and Existential Commitments/
file/79e4150a44174c6701.pdf?ev=pub int doc dl&origin=publication detail&inViewer=true
11. Yagisawa, Takashi (2008), “Possible Objects”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition)
[http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/possible-objects/].
12. See also Miscellaneous item 3, below.
16. Rapaport, William J. (1985), “Machine Understanding and Data Abstraction in Searle’s Chinese Room”,
Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (University of California at
Irvine) (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates): 341–345.
1. Cole, David; Fetzer, James H.; & Rankin, Terry L. (1990), Philosophy, Mind, and Cognitive Inquiry: Resources for Understanding Mental Processes (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
2. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
12
17. Rapaport, William J. (1985, unpublished version), “Meinongian Semantics and Artificial Intelligence”;
originally scheduled to appear in Peter Simons (ed.), Essays on Meinong (Amsterdam: Rodopi Editions).
• Published version appears as:
Rapaport, William J. (2013), “Meinongian Semantics and Artificial Intelligence”, special issue on “Meinong
Strikes Again: Return to Impossible Objects 100 Years Later”, guest edited by Laura Mari & Michele
Paolini Paoletti, Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (December): 25–52.
1. Barnden, John A. (1986), “Imputations and Explications: Representational Problems in Treatments of
Propositional Attitudes”, Cognitive Science 10: 319–364.
2. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
3. Simons, Peter (1986), “Alexius Meinong: Gegenstände, die es nicht gibt”, in Josef Speck (ed.), Grundprobleme der großen Philosophen, Philosophie der Neuzeit IV (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht):
91–127.
18. Rapaport, William J. (1985), “To Be and Not To Be”, Noûs 19: 255–271.
1. Landini, Gregory (compiler) (1986), “Philosophical Bibliography of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in James E.
Tomberlin (ed.), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel): 395–434.
2. Hirst, Graeme (1991), “Existence Assumptions in Knowledge Representation”, Artificial Intelligence 49:
199–242.
3. Orilia, Francesco (2002), Ulisse, il quadrato rotondo e l’attuale re di Francia (Pisa, Italy: Edizioni ETS).
4. Barbero, Carola (2005), Madame Bovary: Something like a Melody (Milan: Edizioni AlboVersorio).
5. See also Miscellaneous item 3, below.
13
19.
Rapaport, William J. (1985/1986), “Non-Existent Objects and Epistemological Ontology,” Grazer
Philosophische Studien 25/26: 61–95.
• Reprinted in Rudolf Haller (ed.), Non-Existence and Predication (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1986).
1. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1988), “Persons, Egos, and I’s: Their Sameness Relations”, in M. Spitzer,
F.A. Uehlin, & G. Oepen (eds.), Psychopathology and Philosophy (Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 210–234.
2. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1988), “The Semantics of Thinking, Dia-Philosophical Pluralism, and Guise Theory”, Metaphilosophy 19(2) (April): 79–104.
3. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1989), “Semantic Holism without Semantic Socialism: Twin Earths, Thinking,
Language, Bodies, and the World”, in Peter A. French; Theodore E. Uehling, Jr.; & Howard K. Wettstein
(eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language II, Midwest Studies in Philosophy (Notre
Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press) 14: 101–126.
4. Hirst, Graeme (1991), “Existence Assumptions in Knowledge Representation”, Artificial Intelligence 49:
199–242.
5. Kroon, Frederick W. (1992), “Was Meinong Only Pretending?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 499–527.
6. Perszyk, Kenneth J. (1993), Nonexistent Objects: Meinong and Contemporary Philosophy (Dordrecht,
The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
7. Paśniczek, Jacek (1994), “Ways of Reference to Meinongian Objects: Ontological Commitments of Meinongian Theories”, Logic and Logical Philosophy 2: 69–86.
8. Paśniczek, Jacek (1995), “Are Contradictions Still Lurking in Meinongian Theories of Objects?”, in Rudolf
Haller (ed.), Meinong and the Theory of Objects, Grazer Philosophische Studien 50: 293–303.
9. Jacquette, Dale (1996), Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence (Berlin: Walter
de Gruyter).
10. Paśniczek, Jacek (1998), The Logic of Intentional Objects: A Meinongian Version of Classical Logic
(Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
11. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1999), The Phenomeno-Logic of the I: Essays on Self-Consciousness, ed. by
James G. Hart & Tomis Kapitan (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
12. Barbero, Carola (2005), Madame Bovary: Something like a Melody (Milan: Edizioni AlboVersorio).
13. Barbero, Carola (2006), “Cry for a Shadow: Emotions and Object Theory”, in Venanzio Raspa (ed.),
Meinongian Issues in Contemporary Italian Philosophy (Heusenstamm, Germany: Ontos Verlag): 181–
211.
14. Marek, Johann (2009), “Alexius Meinong”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 Edition)
[http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/meinong/].
15. See also Miscellaneous item 3, below.
14
20. Rapaport, William J. (1986), “Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, and the Chinese-Room Argument”,
Abacus 3 (Summer 1986) 6–17; correspondence, Abacus 4 (Winter 1987) 6–7, Abacus 4 (Spring 1987) 5–7.
1. Cole, David; Fetzer, James H.; & Rankin, Terry L. (1990), Philosophy, Mind, and Cognitive Inquiry: Resources for Understanding Mental Processes (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
2. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
3. Edgar, Stacey L. (1997), Morality and Machines: Perspectives on Computer Ethics (Sudbury, MA: Jones
and Bartlett), Ch. 12.
4. Mooney, Vincent John, III (1997), “Searle’s Chinese Room and Its Aftermath”, Report No. CSLI-97-202
(Stanford: Stanford University Center for the Study of Language and Information).
15
21. Rapaport, William J. (1986), “Logical Foundations for Belief Representation”, Cognitive Science 10:
371–422.
1. Nakhimovsky, Alexander (1988), “Aspect, Aspectual Class, and the Temporal Structure of Narrative”,
Computational Linguistics 14(2): 29–43.
2. Asher, Nicholas (1989), “Belief, Acceptance and Belief Reports”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19(3)
(September): 327–362.
3. Barnden, John A. (1989), “Towards a Paradigm Shift in Belief Representation Methodology”, Journal of
Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 1: 133–161.
4. Cohen, L. Jonathan (1989), “Belief and Acceptance”, Mind 98(391) (July): 367–389.
5. Israel, David (1989), Review of Rapaport 1986, Journal of Symbolic Logic 54(2): 617-618.
6. Lindemann, Bernhard (1989), “What Knowledge Does It Take to Read a Newspaper?”, Journal of Literary
Semantics 18(1) (April): 50–65.
7. Maida, Anthony S. (1989), “The Propositional Version of the Knowledge Representation Hypothesis”,
Technical Report CS-89-16 (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Department of Computer
Science).
8. Wilks, Yorick; Ballim, Afzal; & Dietrich, Eric (1989), “Pronouns in Mind: Quasi-Indexicals and the
‘Language of Thought’,” Computers and Artificial Intelligence 8: 493–503.
9. Dipert, Randall R. (1990), “The Structure of Agency: Issues in the Representation of Agency and Action”,
in Deepak Kumar (ed.), Current Trends in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes
in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 68–84.
10. Haas, Andrew R. (1990), “Sentential Semantics for Propositional Attitudes”, Computational Linguistics
16(4): 213–233.
11. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
12. Maida, Anthony S. (1990), “The Society of Cognitive Scientists: A Metaphor for Belief Reasoning”,
Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Pennsylvania State University.
13. Wyatt, Richard W. (1990), “Kinds of Opacity and Their Representations”, in Deepak Kumar (ed.), Current
Trends in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437
(Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 124–144.
14. Ballim, Afzal; Wilks, Yorick; & Barnden, John (1991), “Belief Ascription, Metaphor, and Intensional
Identification”, Cognitive Science 15: 133–171.
15. Ballim, Afzal; & Wilks, Yorick (1991), “Beliefs, Stereotypes and Dynamic Agent Modeling”, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 1: 33–65.
16. Ballim, Afzal; & Wilks, Yorick (1991), Artificial Believers: The Ascription of Belief (Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
17. Bourne, John R.; Liu, Hsi-Ho; Orogo, Constantine D.; Collins, Glen C.; Uckun, N. Serdar; & Brodersen,
Arthur J. (1991), “Organizing and Understanding Beliefs in Advice-Giving Diagnostic Systems”, IEEE
Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 3(3) (September): 269–280.
18. Hadley, Robert F. (1991), “The Many Uses of ‘Belief’ in AI”, Minds and Machines 1(1): 55–73.
19. Bingi, R.; Khazanchi, Deepak; & Yadav, Surya B. (1995), “A Framework for the Comparative Analysis
and Evaluation of Knowledge Representation Schemes”, Information Processing and Management 31(2):
233–247.
20. Maida, Anthony S. (1991), “Maintaining Mental Models of Agents Who Have Existential Misconceptions”, Artificial Intelligence 50: 331–383.
16
21. Miller, Michael J.; & Perlis, Donald (1991), “Typicality Constraints and Range Defaults: Some Pros and
Cons of a Cognitive Model of Default Reasoning”, in Z.W. Ras & M. Zemankova (eds.), Methodologies
for Intelligent Systems: 6th International Symposium, ISMIS ’91, Charlotte, NC, USA, October 16–19,
1991, Proceedings (Berlin: Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 542): 560–569.
22. Reichgelt, Han (1991), Knowledge Representation: An AI Perspective (Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing
Corp.)
23. Montgomery, Christine A.; Stalls, Bonnie Glover; Stumberger, Robert E.; Li, Naicong; Belvin, Robert S.;
Arnaiz, Alfredo; & Hirsh, Susan B. (1992), “Language Systems, Inc.: Description of the DBG System as
Used for MUC-4”, Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Message Understanding (McLean, VA) (Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics): 197–206.
24. Ballim, Afzal (1993), “Propositional Attitude Framework Requirements”, Journal of Experimental and
Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 89–100.
25. Chalupsky, Hans (1993), “Using Hypothetical Reasoning as a Method for Belief Ascription”, Journal of
Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 119–133.
26. Dipert, Randall R. (1993), Artifacts, Art Works, and Agency (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
27. Livergood, Norman D. (1993), “Design Issues in the Simulation of Beliefs in Corporate Intelligence Systems: REALPOLITIK II”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 39: 99–112.
28. Von Eckardt, Barbara (1993), What Is Cognitive Science? (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
29. Garfield, David A.S.; & Rapp, Charles (1994), “Application of Artificial Intelligence Principles to the
Analysis of ‘Crazy Speech’,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 182(4): 205–211.
30. Orilia, Francesco (1994), “Belief Representation in a Deductivist Type-Free Doxastic Logic”, Minds and
Machines 4(2) (May): 163–203.
31. Wiebe, Janyce M. (1994), “Tracking Point of View in Narrative”, Computational Linguistics 20(2) (June):
233–287
32. Bingi, R.; Khazanchi, Deepak; & Yadav, Surya B. (1995), “A Framework for the Comparative Analysis
and Evaluation of Knowledge Representation Schemes”, Information Processing and Management 31:
233–247.
33. Orilia, Francesco (1995), “Knowledge Representation, Exemplification, and the Gupta-Belnap Theory of
Circular Definitions”, in Marco Gori & Giovanni Soda (eds.), Topics in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the 4th Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA ’95; Florence, Italy),
Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 992: 187–198.
34. Dipert, Randall R. (1996), “Reflections on Iconicity, Representation, and Resemblance: Peirce’s Theory
of Signs, Goodman on Resemblance, and Modern Philosophies of Language and Mind”, Synthese 106:
373–397.
35. Dipert, Randall R. (1997), “The Mathematical Structure of the World: The World as Graph”, Journal of
Philosophy 94: 329–358.
36. Kapitan, Tomis (1998), “On Depicting Indexical Reference”, in Franceso Orilia & William J. Rapaport
(eds.) (1998), Thought, Language, and Ontology: Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers): 183–215.
37. Wilson, Theresa; & Wiebe, Janyce (2003), “Annotating Opinions in the World Press”, 4th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGdial-03), Association for Computational Linguistics, http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/
38. Wiebe, Janyce; Wilson, Theresa; & Cardie, Claire (2005), “Annotating Expressions of Opinions and Emotions in Language”, Language Resources and Evaluation/ 39: 165–210.
39. Elson, David K.; & McKeown, Kathleen (2010), “Building a Bank of Semantically Encoded Narratives”,
Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010; Valletta, Malta; http://www.cs.columbia.edu/∼delson/pubs/LREC2010-ElsonMcKeown.pdf
40. See also Miscellaneous item 3, below.
17
22. Rapaport, William J. (1986), Review of Karel Lambert’s Meinong and the Principle of Independence, in
Journal of Symbolic Logic 51: 248–252.
• Orilia, Francesco (2002), Ulisse, il quadrato rotondo e l’attuale re di Francia (Pisa, Italy: Edizioni ETS).
23. Shapiro, Stuart C., & Rapaport, William J. (1986), “SNePS Considered as a Fully Intensional Propositional Semantic Network”, Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-86,
Philadelphia) (Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann), Vol. 1, pp. 278–283.
1. Wilks, Yorick; & Ballim, Afzal (1986), “Multiple Agents and the Heuristic Ascription of Belief”, Memoranda in Computer and Cognitive Science MCCS-86-75 (Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico State University
Computing Research Laboratory).
2. Fox, Edward A.; Nutter, J. Terry; Ahlswede, Thomas; Evens, Martha; & Markowitz, Judith (1988), “Building a Large Thesaurus for Information Retrieval”, Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Applied Natural
Language Processing (Austin, TX) (Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics): 101–
108.
3. Hausser, Roland (1988), “Left-Associative Grammar: An Informal Outline”, Computers and Translation
3(1) (March): 23–67.
4. Ballim, Afzal, & Wilks, Yorick (1991), Artificial Believers: The Ascription of Belief (Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
5. Xu, Jun (2003), “Implement an Intelligent ArcView User Interface using SNePS”;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2936046 Implement an Intelligent ArcView User Interface Using SNePS
6. Xu, Jun (2003), “An Intelligent Natural-Language Interface for ArcView”;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228818435 An intelligent natural-language interface for arcview
24. Wiebe, Janyce M., & Rapaport, William J. (1986), “Representing De Re and De Dicto Belief Reports
in Discourse and Narrative”, Special Issue on Knowledge Representation, Proceedings of the IEEE 74:
1405–1413.
1. Ballim, Afzal; Wilks, Yorick; & Barnden, John (1991), “Belief Ascription, Metaphor, and Intensional
Identification”, Cognitive Science 15: 133–171.
2. Nissan, Ephraim, & Shimony, Solomon Eyal (1996), “TAMBALACOQUE: For a Formal Account of the
Gist of a Scholarly Argument”, Knowledge Organization 23: 135–146.
3. Nissan, Ephraim (2001), “An AI Formalism for Competing Claims of Identification: Capturing the ‘Smemorato di Collegno’ Amnesia Case”, Computing and Informatics 20: 625–656.
4. Sonnenhauser, Barbara (2011), “ ‘Renarrative’ und Indirekte Rede im Bulgarischen”, Die Welt der Slaven:
Halbjahresschrift fur Slavistik 56 (1) (January): 131–154.
18
25. Rapaport, William J. (1986), “Searle’s Experiments with Thought”, Philosophy of Science 53: 271–279.
1. Jacquette, Dale (1989), “Adventures in the Chinese Room”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
49(4) (June): 605–623.
2. Cole, David; Fetzer, James H.; & Rankin, Terry L. (1990), Philosophy, Mind, and Cognitive Inquiry: Resources for Understanding Mental Processes (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
3. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
4. Jacquette, Dale (1990), “Fear and Loathing (and Other Intentional States) in Searle’s Chinese Room”,
Philosophical Psychology 3(2): 287–304.
5. Cole, David (1991), “Artificial Intelligence and Personal Identity”, Synthese 88: 399–417.
6. Bombardi, Ron (1993), “The Education of Searle’s Demon”, Idealistic Studies 23: 5–18.
7. Lee, Cho-Sik (1993), Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence (in Korean) (Seoul: Korea University Press),
§7-2.
8. Melnyk, Andrew (1996), “Searle’s Abstract Argument against Strong AI”, Synthese 108: 391–419.
9. Maloney, J. Christopher (1998), “A Role for Conceptual Role Semantics”, in Franceso Orilia & William J.
Rapaport (eds.) (1998), Thought, Language, and Ontology: Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda
(Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers): 169–180.
10. Reingold, Eyal, & Nightingale, Johnathan (1999), “John R. Searle’s Chinese Room”,
[http://www.psych.utoronto.ca/˜reingold/courses/ai/cache/searle.html].
11. Preston, John, & Bishop, Mark (eds.) (2002), Views into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and
Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
12. Moural, Josef (2003), “The Chinese Room Argument”, in Barry Smith (ed.), John Searle (Cambridge,
UK: Cambridge University Press): 214–260.
13. Cole, David (2004), “The Chinese Room Argument”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia
of Philosophy (Fall 2004 Edition), [http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2004/entries/chinese-room/].
14. Damper, Robert I. (2006), “The Logic of Searle’s Chinese Room Argument”, Minds and Machines 16(2):
163–183.
15. Buzzoni, Marco (2013), “Is Frankenstein’s Creature a Machine or Artificially Created Human Life? Intentionality between Searle and Turing”, Epistemologia 36: 37–53.
26. Bruder, Gail A.; Duchan, Judith F.; Rapaport, William J.; Segal, Erwin M.; Shapiro, Stuart C.; &
Zubin, David A. (1986), “Deictic Centers in Narrative: An Interdisciplinary Cognitive-Science Project”,
Technical Report 86-20 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science, September 1986).
1. Nakhimovsky, Alexander (1988), “Aspect, Aspectual Class, and the Temporal Structure of Narrative”,
Computational Linguistics 14(2): 29–43.
2. Wiebe, Janyce M. (1994), “Tracking Point of View in Narrative”, Computational Linguistics 20(2) (June):
233–287
3. Millis, Keith K. (1995), “Encoding Discourse Perspective during the Reading of a Literary Text”, Poetics
23: 235–253.
4. Zwaan, Rolf A.; Magliano, Joseph P.; & Graesser, Arthur C. (1995), “Dimensions of Situation Model
Construction in Narrative Comprehension”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition 21: 386–397.
19
27. Rapaport, William J.; Shapiro, Stuart C.; & Wiebe, Janyce M. (1986), “Quasi-Indicators, Knowledge
Reports, and Discourse”, Technical Report 86-15 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science); revised version published as Rapaport, Shapiro, & Wiebe 1997 (see item 47 below).
1. Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1989), Thinking, Language, and Experience (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
2. Maida, Anthony S. (1990), “The Society of Cognitive Scientists: A Metaphor for Belief Reasoning”,
Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Pennsylvania State University.
3. Wyatt, Richard W. (1990), “Kinds of Opacity and Their Representations”, in Deepak Kumar (ed.), Current
Trends in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437
(Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 124–144.
4. Chalupsky, Hans (1993), “Using Hypothetical Reasoning as a Method for Belief Ascription”, Journal of
Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 119–133.
28. Rapaport, William J. (1987), “Belief Systems”, in Stuart C. Shapiro (ed.), Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence (New York: John Wiley): 63–73.
• Lindemann, Bernhard (1989), “What Knowledge Does It Take to Read a Newspaper?”, Journal of Literary
Semantics 18(1) (April): 50–65.
• Maida, Anthony S. (1990), “The Society of Cognitive Scientists: A Metaphor for Belief Reasoning”,
Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Pennsylvania State University.
20
29. Shapiro, Stuart C., & Rapaport, William J. (1987), “SNePS Considered as a Fully Intensional Propositional Semantic Network,” in Nick Cercone & Gordon McCalla (eds.), The Knowledge Frontier: Essays in
the Representation of Knowledge (New York: Springer-Verlag): 262–315.
1. Barnden, John A. (1989), “Towards a Paradigm Shift in Belief Representation Methodology”, Journal of
Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 1: 133–161.
2. Cravo, Maria R.; & Martins, João P. (1989), “Path-Based Inference in SNeBR”, Proceedings, 4th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence (EPIA 89, Lisbon) (Springer Lecture Notes in Computer
Science 390): 97–106; DOI:10.1007/3-540-51665-4 77
3. Maida, Anthony S. (1989), “The Propositional Version of the Knowledge Representation Hypothesis”,
Technical Report CS-89-16 (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Department of Computer
Science).
4. Neal, J.G.; Thielman, C.Y.; Funke, D.J.; & Byoun, J.S. (1989), “Multi-Modal Output Composition for
Human-Computer Dialogues”, Proceedings of the Annual AI Systems in Government Conference: 250–
257; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/AISIG.1989.47332
5. Cravo, Maria R., & Martins, João P. (1990), “Path-Based Inference Revisited”, in Deepak Kumar (ed.),
Current Trends in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence,
No. 437 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 15–26.
6. Dipert, Randall R. (1990), “The Structure of Agency: Issues in the Representation of Agency and Action”,
in Deepak Kumar (ed.), Current Trends in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes
in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 68–84.
7. Geller, James (1990), “Order Dependence of Declarative Knowledge Representation”, in Deepak Kumar
(ed.), Current Trends in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 41–54.
8. Govindaraju, Venu; Lam, Stephen W.; Niyogi, Debashish; Sher, David B.; Srihari, Rohini; Srihari, Sargur N.; & Wang, Dacheng (1990), “Newspaper Image Understanding”, in S. Ramani, R. Chandrasekar,
& K.S.R. Anjaneyulu (eds.), Knowledge Based Computer Systems; International Conference KBCS’89
(Bombay, 1989) (Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 444): 375–384.
9. Haller, S.M.; & Ali, S.S. (1990), “Using Focus for Generating Felicitous Locative Expressions”, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial
Intelligence and Expert Systems (IEA/AIE’90) 1: 472–477; http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=98866
10. Kumar, Deepak (1990), “An Integrated Model of Acting and Inference”, in Deepak Kumar (ed.), Current
Trends in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437
(Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 55–65.
11. Maida, Anthony S. (1990), “The Society of Cognitive Scientists: A Metaphor for Belief Reasoning”,
Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Pennsylvania State University.
12. Nakhimovsky, Alexander (1990), “Topological and Metrical Invariants of Grammatical Meanings”, Proceedings of the European AI Conference (Stockholm): 1-3.
13. Ballim, Afzal; Wilks, Yorick; & Barnden, John (1991), “Belief Ascription, Metaphor, and Intensional
Identification”, Cognitive Science 15: 133–171.
14. Maida, Anthony S. (1991), “Maintaining Mental Models of Agents Who Have Existential Misconceptions”, Artificial Intelligence 50: 331–383.
15. Wiebe, Janyce M. (1991), “References in Narrative Text”, Noûs 25: 457–486.
• Reprinted in Judith Felson Duchan, Gail A. Bruder, & Lynne E. Hewitt (eds.), Deixis in Narrative: A
Cognitive Science Perspective (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates): 263–286.
16. Woods, William A. (1991), “Understanding Subsumption and Taxonomy: A Framework for Progress”, in
John F. Sowa (ed.), Principles of Semantic Networks: Explorations in the Representation of Knowledge
(San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann): 45–94.
21
17. Cercone, Nick; Goebel, Randy; de Haan, John; & Schaeffer, Stephanie (1992), “The ECO Family”, Computers and Mathematics with Applications 23(2–5): 95–131.
• Reprinted in Lehmann, Fritz (ed.) (1992), Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Pergamon Press): 95–131.
18. KQML Advisory Group; with Finin, Tim; McKay, Don; & Fritzson, Rich (1992), “An Overview of
KQML: A Knowledge Query and Manipulation Language” (unpublished ms.)]
[http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/94713.html]
19. Markowitz, Judith A.; Nutter, J. Terry; & Evens, Martha W. (1992), “Beyond Is-A and Part-Whole: More
Semantic Network Links”, Computers and Mathematics with Applications 23(6–9): 377–390.
• Reprinted in Lehmann, Fritz (ed.) (1992), Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Pergamon Press): 377–390.
20. Woods, William A., & Schmolze, James G. (1992), “The KL-ONE Family”, Computers and Mathematics
with Applications 23(2–5): 133–177.
• Reprinted in Lehmann, Fritz (ed.) (1992), Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Pergamon Press): 133–177.
21. Ali, Syed S. (1993), “Node Subsumption in a Propositional Semantic Network with Structured Variables”,
Proceedings of the 6th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
22. Ali, Syed S. (1993), “A Structured Representation for Noun Phrases and Anaphora”, Proceedings of the
15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates):
197–202.
23. Chalupsky, Hans (1993), “Using Hypothetical Reasoning as a Method for Belief Ascription”, Journal of
Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 119–133.
24. D’Aloisi, Daniela, & Castelfranchi, Cristiano (1993), “Propositional and Terminological Knowledge Representations”, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 149–166.
25. Dipert, Randall R. (1993), Artifacts, Art Works, and Agency (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
26. Funke, Douglas J.; Neal, Jeannette G.; & Paul, Rajendra D. (1993), “An Approach to Intelligent Automated
Window Management”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38: 949-983.
27. Mamede, Nuno J. (1993), “SNePSR —A SNePS with Resources”, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical
Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 199–213.
28. Roberts, Lawrence D. (1993), How Reference Works: Explanatory Models for Indexicals, Descriptions,
and Opacity (Albany: SUNY Press).
29. Von Eckardt, Barbara (1993), What Is Cognitive Science? (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
30. Wyatt, Richard (1993), “Reference and Intensions”, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial
Intelligence 5(2&3): 263–271.
31. Ali, Syed S. (1994), ”A Logical Language for Natural Language Processing”, Proceedings of the 10th
Biennial Canadian Artificial Intelligence Conference (Banff);
http://tigger.cs.uwm.edu/ syali/Publications/cscsi94.ps
32. Ali, Syed S. (1994), ”ANALOG: A Logical Language for Natural Language Processing”, American Association for Artificial Intelligence Fall 1994 Symposium Working Notes, Knowledge Representation for
Natural Language Processing (November 4–6, 1994; New Orleans: 1–11;
http://tigger.cs.uwm.edu/ syali/Publications/aaai-fall94-symp.pdf
33. Giraud-Carrier, Christophe G. (1994), “On Integrating Inductive Learning with Prior Knowledge and Reasoning”, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation (Brigham Young University Department of Computer Science)
[http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/giraud-carrier94integrating.html].
22
34. Haller, Susan M. (1994), “A Model for Cooperative Interactive Plan Explanation”, Proceedings of the the
10th [IEEE] Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications (Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer
Society Press): 254–260.
35. Haller, Susan M. (1994), “Recognizing Digressive Questions Using a Model for Interactive Generation for
Interactive Generation”, Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation
(Association for Computational Linguistics): 181–188.
36. Welty, Christopher A., & Ferrucci, David A. (1994), “What’s in an Instance?”, Technical Report 94-18
(Troy, NY: Renssselaer Polytechnic Institute Department of Computer Science).
37. Wiebe, Janyce M. (1994), “Tracking Point of View in Narrative”, Computational Linguistics 20(2) (June):
233–287
38. Haller, Susan M.; & Ali, Syed S. (1995), “Recognizing Text Plans”, Proceedings of the 4th Golden West
International Conference on Intelligent Systems (Raleigh, NC: ISCA): 76–80.
39. Mathur, M.C. (1992), “Graph Theoretic Knowledge Representation and Knowledge Organization”, IEEE
International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 2: 1712–1717;
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.1992.271549
40. Orilia, Francesco (1995), “Knowledge Representation, Exemplification, and the Gupta-Belnap Theory of
Circular Definitions”, in Marco Gori & Giovanni Soda (eds.), Topics in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the 4th Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA ’95; Florence, Italy),
Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 992: 187–198.
41. Campbell, Alistair; & Burhans, Debra (1996), “Interpretation: The Relationship between Language and
Ontology”, Proceedings of the 1996 AAAI Symposium on Knowledge Representation Systems Based on
Natural Language: 6–10.
42. Dipert, Randall R. (1996), “Reflections on Iconicity, Representation, and Resemblance: Peirce’s Theory
of Signs, Goodman on Resemblance, and Modern Philosophies of Language and Mind”, Synthese 106:
373–397.
43. Haller, Susan (1996), “Planning Text about Plans Interactively”, International Journal of Expert Systems
9: 85–112.
44. Matos, Pedro A., & Martins, João P. (1996), “Planning in a Commonsense Framework”, paper presented
in abstract form at AAAI 96 Workshop on Theories of Action and Planning;
http://www.cs.utep.edu/actions/aaai96/proceedings.html
45. Dipert, Randall R. (1997), “The Mathematical Structure of the World: The World as Graph”, Journal of
Philosophy 94: 329–358.
46. Goetz, Philip (1997), “Attractors in Recurrent Behavior Networks”, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation (SUNY
Buffalo Department of Computer Science).
47. Hartley, Roger T., & Barnden, John A. (1997), “Semantic Networks: Visualizations of Knowledge”, Trends
in Cognitive Sciences 1: 169–175.
48. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; & Haller, Susan M. (1997), “Uniform Knowledge Representation for
Language Processing in the B2 System”, Natural Language Engineering 3: 123–145.
49. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; & Haller, Susan M. (1997), “Mixed Depth Representations for Dialog Processing”, in Morton Ann Gernsbacher & Sharon J. Derry (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual
Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (University of Wisconsin–Madison) (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates): 687–692.
50. Bringsjord, Selmer, & Ferrucci, David A. (1998), ”Logic and Artificial Intelligence: Divorced, Still Married, Separated . . . ?”, Minds and Machines 8(2): 273–308.
51. Kumar, Deepak, & Meeden, Lisa (1998), “A Hybrid Connectionist and BDI Architecture for Modeling
Embedded Rational Agents”, Proceedings, AAAI Fall Symposium on Cognitive Robotics;
http://mainline.brynmawr.edu/ dkumar/Papers/cogrob98.ps
23
52. McRoy, Susan W. (1998), “Achieving Robust Human-Computer Communication”, International Journal
of Human-Computer Studies 48: 681-704.
53. Gu, H.; Halper, M.; Geller, J.; & Perl, Y. (1999), “Benefits of an OODB Representation for Controlled
Medical Terminologies”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 6(4): 283–303.
54. Lee, Chain-Wu (1999), “TERRESA: A Task-Based Message-Driven Parallel Semantic Network System”,
PhD dissertation (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science & Engineering).
55. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; Restifficar, Angelo; & Channarukul, Songsak (1999), “Building Intelligent
Dialog Systems”, intelligence 10(1): 14-23.
56. Restificar, Angelo C.; Ali, Syed S.; & McRoy, Susan W. (1999), “ARGUER: Using Argument Schemas
for Argument Detection and Rebuttal in Dialogs”; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
2362033 ARGUER Using Argument Schemas for Argument Detection and Rebuttal in Dialogs
57. Indurkhya, Bipin (2000), Review of Andy Clark, Jesús Ezquerro, & Jesús M. Larrazabal (eds.), Philosophy
and Cognitive Science, in Minds and Machines 10(3): 430-435.
58. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; & Haller, Susan M. (2000), “Mixed Depth Representations for Dialog Processing”, in Łucja M. Iwańska & Stuart C. Shapiro (eds.), Natural Language Processing and Knowledge
Representation: Language for Knowledge and Knowledge for Language (Menlo Park, CA/Cambridge,
MA: AAAI Press/MIT Press): 283–299.
59. Geller, James; Gu, Huanying; Perl, Yehoshua; & Halper, Michael (2003), “Semantic Refinement and Error
Correction in Large Terminological Knowledge Bases”, Data & Knowledge Engineering 45: 1–32.
60. Ismail, Haythem O. (2006), “Simultaneous Events and the ‘Once-Only’ Effect”, in Brandon Bennett &
Christiane Fellbaum (eds.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the 4th International
Conference (FOIS 2006) (Amsterdam: IOS Press);
http://met.guc.edu.eg/Repository/Faculty/Publications/107/OnceOnly.pdf
61. Lopes das Neves, Pedro Miguel (2007), “Development of Techniques to Control Reasoning using SNePS”,
unpublished master’s thesis, Engenharia Informática e Computadores, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.
62. Chun, Soon Ae; & Geller, James (2008), “Evaluating Ontologies Based on the Naturalness of Their Preferred Terms”, Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008;
Waikoloa, Big Island, Hawaii); http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.151
63. Rus, Vasile; McCarthy, Philip M.; McNamara, Danielle S.; & Graesser, Arthur C. (2008), “A Study of
Textual Entailment”, International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 17(4): 659–685.
64. Ismail, Haythem O. (2010), “A Reason Maintenance Perpective on Relevant Ramsey Conditionals”, Logic
Journal of the IGPL 18: 508–529; DOI:10.1093/jigpal/jzp036;
http://met.guc.edu.eg/Repository/Faculty/Publications/163/Ismail.pdf
65. Scally, Jonathan R.; Cassimatis, Nicholas L.; & Uchida, Hiroyuki (2012), “Worlds as a Unifying Element
of Knowledge Representation”, Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 1: 14–22;
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bica.2012.03.004
66. Guns, Raf (2013), “Tracing the Origins of the Semantic Web”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(10): 2173–2181.
24
30. Srihari, Sargur N.; Rapaport, William J.; & Kumar, Deepak (1987), “On Knowledge Representation
Using Semantic Networks and Sanskrit”, Technical Report 87-03 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of
Computer Science).
• Briggs, Rick (1987), “Knowledge Representation and Inference in Sanskrit”, AI Magazine 8(2) (Summer):
99.
31. Nakhimovsky, Alexander, & Rapaport, William J. (1988), “Discontinuities in Narratives”, Proceedings
of the 12th International Conference of Computational Linguistics (COLING-88, Budapest): 465–470.
1. Wiebe, Janyce M. (1990), “Identifying Subjective Characters in Narrative”, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference On Computational Linguistics (COLING-90, Helsinki) (Morristown, NJ: Association
for Computational Linguistics): 401–406.
2. Weber, Heinz J.; & Thiopoulus, Constantin (1991), “Ein Topikbasiertes Retrievalsystem in Hypertext”,
LDV Forum 8:21–26.
3. Wiebe, Janyce M. (1994), “Tracking Point of View in Narrative”, Computational Linguistics 20(2) (June):
233–287.
4. Emmott, Catherine (1997), Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
32. Peters, Sandra M.; Shapiro, Stuart C.; & Rapaport, William J. (1988), “Flexible Natural Language
Processing and Roschian Category Theory”, Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Cognitive
Science Society (Montreal) (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates): 125–131.
1. Cline, Ben E., & Nutter, J. Terry (1990), “Implications of Natural Categories for Natural Language Generation”, in Deepak Kumar (ed.), Current Trends in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture
Notes in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag): 153–162.
2. Wiebe, Janyce M. (1994), “Tracking Point of View in Narrative”, Computational Linguistics 20(2) (June):
233–287
25
33. Rapaport, William J. (1988), “Syntactic Semantics: Foundations of Computational Natural-Language
Understanding”, in James H. Fetzer (ed.), Aspects of Artificial Intelligence (Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
Kluwer Academic Publishers): 81–13.
• Preprinted as Technical Report 86-24 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science, December 1986).
• Reprinted in Eric Dietrich (ed.) (1994), Thinking Computers and Virtual Persons: Essays on the Intentionality of Machines (San Diego: Academic Press): 225–273.
1. Laymon, Ronald (1988), “Some Computers Can Add (Even If the IBM 1620 Couldn’t): Defending
ENIAC’s Accumulators against Dretske”, Behaviorism 16(1): 1–16; citation is to preprint version.
2. Cole, David; Fetzer, James H.; & Rankin, Terry L. (1990), Philosophy, Mind, and Cognitive Inquiry: Resources for Understanding Mental Processes (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
3. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
4. Cole, David (1991), “Artificial Intelligence and Personal Identity”, Synthese 88: 399–417.
5. Jackendoff, Ray (1991), “The Problem of Reality”, Noûs 25: 411–433.
• Reprinted as Ch. 8 of Ray Jackendoff, Languages of the Mind: Essays on Mental Representation
(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992): 157–183.
6. Korb, Kevin B. (1991), “Searle’s AI Program”, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 3(4): 283-296.
7. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), What Robots Can and Can’t Be (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
8. Lee, Cho-Sik (1993), Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence (in Korean) (Seoul: Korea University Press),
§7-2.
9. Fetzer, James H. (1994), “Mental Algorithms: Are Minds Computational Systems?”, Pragmatics and
Cognition 2: 1–29.
10. Shapiro, Stuart C. (1995), “Computationalism”, Minds and Machines 5: 517–524.
11. Fetzer, James H. (1996), Philosophy and Cognitive Science (New York: Paragon House), Ch. 3, pp. 45–47.
12. Melnyk, Andrew (1996), “Searle’s Abstract Argument against Strong AI”, Synthese 108: 391–419.
13. Narayanan, Ajit (1997), “Biomolecular Cognitive Science”, in Seán Ó Nualláin, Paul Mc Kevitt, & Eoghan
Mac Aogáin (eds.), Two Sciences of Mind: Readings in Cognitive Science and Consciousness (Amsterdam:
John Benjamins): 21–36.
14. Fetzer, James H. (1997), “Thinking and Computing: Computers as Special Kinds of Signs”, Minds and
Machines 7: 345–364.
15. Hauser, Larry (1997), “Searle’s Chinese Box: Debunking the Chinese Room Argument”, Minds and Machines 7(2): 199-226.
16. Mooney, Vincent John, III (1997), “Searle’s Chinese Room and Its Aftermath”, Report No. CSLI-97-202
(Stanford: Stanford University Center for the Study of Language and Information).
17. Horn, Robert E. (1998), “Can Computers Think? The History and Status of the Debate, Map 1 of 7”, in
Mapping Great Debates: Can Computers Think? (Bainbridge Island, WA: MacroVU).
18. Horn, Robert E. (1998), “Can Chinese Rooms Think? The History and Status of the Debate, Map 4 of 7”,
in Mapping Great Debates: Can Computers Think? (Bainbridge Island, WA: MacroVU).
19. Jørgensen, Stig W. (1999), “Is MT Translation? Reflections on a Recent Assault”, Journal of Experimental
and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 11: 531–541.
26
20. Reingold, Eyal, & Nightingale, Johnathan (1999), “John R. Searle’s Chinese Room”,
[http://www.psych.utoronto.ca/˜reingold/courses/ai/cache/searle.html].
21. Fetzer, James H. (2001), Computers and Cognition: Why Minds Are Not Machines (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
22. Zlatev, Jordan (2001), “The Epigenesis of Meaning in Human Beings, and Possibly in Robots”, Minds and
Machines 11(2): 155–195.
23. Kary, Michael, & Mahner, Martin (2002), “How Would You Know if You Synthesized a Thinking Thing?”,
Minds and Machines 12(1): 61–86.
24. Preston, John, & Bishop, Mark (eds.) (2002), Views into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and
Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
25. Dascal, Marcelo (2003), Interpretation and Understanding (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).
26. Moural, Josef (2003), “The Chinese Room Argument”, in Barry Smith (ed.), John Searle (Cambridge,
UK: Cambridge University Press): 214–260.
27. Wakefield, Jerome C. (2003), “The Chinese Room Argument Reconsidered: Essentialism, Indeterminacy,
and Strong AI”, Minds and Machines 13(2): 285–319.
28. Bringsjord, Selmer, & Arkoudas, Konstantine (2004), “The Modal Argument for Hypercomputing Minds”,
Theoretical Computer Science 317: 167–190.
29. Zambak, Aziz; & Vergauwen, Roger (2009), “Artificial Intelligence and Agentive Cognition: A LogicoLinguistic Approach”, Logique et Analyse, nouvelle série 52(205) (March): 57–96.
30. Dietrich, Eric (2010), “Analogical Insight: Toward Unifying Categorization and Analogy”, Cognitive Processing 11: 331–345.
31. Cudré-Mauroux, Philippe (2011), “Loose Ontological Coupling and the Social Semantic Web”, Proceedings of Advances in Intelligent Web Mastering 3; Proceedings of the 7th Atlantic Web Intelligence Conference, AWIC 2011 (Fribourg, Switzerland; January); DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-18029-3 2
https://diuf.unifr.ch/main/xi/sites/diuf.unifr.ch.main.xi/files/AWIC.pdf
27
34. Rapaport, William J. (1988), “To Think or Not To Think”, Noûs 22: 585–609.
1. Jahren, Neal (1990), “Can Semantics Be Syntactic?”, Synthese 82(3) (March): 309–328.
• Reprinted in James H. Fetzer, Epistemology and Cognition (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 1991).
2. Cole, David (1991), “Artificial Intelligence and Personal Identity”, Synthese 88: 399–417.
3. Rheinwald, Rosemarie (1992), “Das ‘Chinesische Zimmer’ als Test des Turing-Tests? Zur Frage, ob
Maschinen denken können” (“The ‘Chinese Room’ as Test of the Turing Test? On the Question whether
Machines Can Think”), Philosophische Rundschau 39(1-2): 133–156.
4. Melnyk, Andrew (1996), “Searle’s Abstract Argument against Strong AI”, Synthese 108: 391–419.
5. Mooney, Vincent John, III (1997), “Searle’s Chinese Room and Its Aftermath”, Report No. CSLI-97-202
(Stanford: Stanford University Center for the Study of Language and Information).
6. Preston, John, & Bishop, Mark (eds.) (2002), Views into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and
Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
35. Wiebe, Janyce M., & Rapaport, William J. (1988), “A Computational Theory of Perspective and Reference in Narrative”, Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (SUNY Buffalo) (Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics): 131–138.
1. Galbraith, Mary (1989), “What Everybody Knew versus What Maisie Knew: The Change in Epistemological Perspective from the Prologue to the Opening of Chapter 1 in What Maisie Knew”, in Style 23(2,
Summer): 197–212.
2. Mayer, Rolf (1990), “The Release of Information in Discourse: Compactness, Compression, and Relevance”, Journal of Semantics 7: 175–219.
3. Segal, Erwin M.; Duchan, Judith F.; & Scott, Paula J. (1991), “The Role of Interclausal Connectives in
Narrative Structuring: Evidence from Adults’ Interpretations of Simple Stories”, Discourse Processes 14:
27–54.
4. Montgomery, Christine A.; Stalls, Bonnie Glover; Stumberger, Robert E.; Li, Naicong; Belvin, Robert S.;
Arnaiz, Alfredo; & Hirsh, Susan B. (1992), “Language Systems, Inc.: Description of the DBG System as
Used for MUC-4”, Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Message Understanding (McLean, VA) (Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics): 197–206.
5. Emmott, Catherine (1997), Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
6. Francisco, Virginia; & Gervás, Pablo (2013), “EMOTAG: An Approach to Automated Markup of Emotions in Texts”, Computational Intelligence 29(4).
36. Rapaport, William J.; Segal, Erwin M.; Shapiro, Stuart C.; Zubin, David A.; Bruder, Gail A.; Duchan,
Judith F.; Almeida, Michael J.; Daniels, Joyce H.; Galbraith, Mary M.; Wiebe, Janyce M.; & Yuhan, Albert Hanyong (1989), “Deictic Centers and the Cognitive Structure of Narrative Comprehension”, Technical Report 89-01 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science, March 1989).
• Millis, Keith K. (1995), “Encoding Discourse Perspective during the Reading of a Literary Text”, Poetics
23: 235–253.
• Puschmann, Cornelius (2010), The Corporate Blog As an Emerging Genre of Computer-Mediated Communication: Features, Constraints, Discourse Situation (Göttingen, Germany: Universitätsverlag Göttingen).
• Contini-Morava, Ellen (2012), “The Message in the Navel: (Ir)realis and Negation in Swahili”, Language
Sciences 34: 200–215.
28
37. Rapaport, William J.; Segal, Erwin M.; Shapiro, Stuart C.; Zubin, David A.; Bruder, Gail A.; Duchan,
Judith F.; & Mark, David M. (1989), “Cognitive and Computer Systems for Understanding Narrative
Text”, Technical Report 89-07 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science, August 1989).
1. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), “Cinewrite: An Algorithm-Sketch for Writing Novels Cinematically, and Two
Mysteries Therein”, Instructional Science 21: 155–168
• Reprinted in Mike Sharples (ed.), Computers and Writing: Issues and Implementations (Dordrecht,
The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992): 155–168.
2. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), What Robots Can and Can’t Be (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
3. Montgomery, Christine A.; Stalls, Bonnie Glover; Stumberger, Robert E.; Li, Naicong; Belvin, Robert S.;
Arnaiz, Alfredo; & Hirsh, Susan B. (1992), “Language Systems, Inc.: Description of the DBG System as
Used for MUC-4”, Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Message Understanding (McLean, VA) (Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics): 197–206.
4. Wiebe, Janyce M. (1994), “Tracking Point of View in Narrative”, Computational Linguistics 20(2) (June):
233–287
5. Millis, Keith K. (1995), “Encoding Discourse Perspective during the Reading of a Literary Text”, Poetics
23: 235–253.
38. Rapaport, William J. (1990), “Representing Fiction in SNePS”, in Deepak Kumar (ed.), Current Trends
in SNePS—Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437 (Berlin:
Springer-Verlag): 107–121; pre-printed in Deepak Kumar (ed.), “Proceedings of the First Annual SNePS
Workshop”, Technical Report 89-14 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science, December
1989): 89–98.
1. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), “Cinewrite: An Algorithm-Sketch for Writing Novels Cinematically, and Two
Mysteries Therein”, Instructional Science 21: 155–168
• Reprinted in Mike Sharples (ed.), Computers and Writing: Issues and Implementations (Dordrecht,
The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992): 155–168. [Citation is to TR 89-14.]
2. Young, John W., Jr. (1992), Review of Kumar (ed.), Current Trends in SNePS, in SIGART Bulletin 3(3)
(August): 11–12.
39. Rapaport, William J. (1990), “Computer Processes and Virtual Persons: Comments on Cole’s ‘Artificial
Intelligence and Personal Identity’ ”, Technical Report 90-13 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of
Computer Science, May 1990).
1. Cole, David (1991), “Artificial Intelligence and Personal Identity”, Synthese 88: 399–417.
2. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), What Robots Can and Can’t Be (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
3. Hauser, Larry (1997), Review of Selmer Bringsjord’s What Robots Can and Can’t Be, in Minds and
Machines 7: 433–438.
29
40. Srihari, Rohini K., & Rapaport, William J. (1990), “Combining Linguistic and Pictorial Information: Using Captions to Interpret Newspaper Photographs”, in Deepak Kumar (ed.), Current Trends in SNePS—
Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437 (Berlin:
Springer-Verlag): 85–96.
• Preprinted in Deepak Kumar (ed.), “Proceedings of the First Annual SNePS Workshop”, Technical Report
89-14 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science, December 1989): 67–77.
1. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), “Cinewrite: An Algorithm-Sketch for Writing Novels Cinematically, and Two
Mysteries Therein”, Instructional Science 21: 155–168.
• Reprinted in Mike Sharples (ed.), Computers and Writing: Issues and Implementations (Dordrecht,
The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992): 155–168. [Citation is to TR 89-14.]
2. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), What Robots Can and Can’t Be (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers) [citation is to TR 89-14]
3. Guglielmo, Eugene J., & Rowe, Neil C. (1996), “Natural-Language Retrieval of Images Based on Descriptive Captions”, ACM Transactions on Information Systems 14(3; July): 237–267.
41. Peters, Sandra L., & Rapaport, William J. (1990), “Superordinate and Basic Level Categories in Discourse: Memory and Context”, Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
(Cambridge, MA) (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates): 157–165.
• Shapiro, Stuart C. (2000), “SNePS: A Logic for Natural Language Understanding and Commonsense Reasoning”, in Łucja M. Iwańska & Stuart C. Shapiro (eds.), Natural Language Processing and Knowledge
Representation: Language for Knowledge and Knowledge for Language (Menlo Park, CA/Cambridge,
MA: AAAI Press/MIT Press): 175–195.
42. Shapiro, Stuart C., & Rapaport, William J. (1991), “Models and Minds: Knowledge Representation for
Natural-Language Competence”, in Robert Cummins & John Pollock (eds.), Philosophy and AI: Essays
at the Interface (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 215–259.
1. Mamede, Nuno J. (1993), “SNePSR —A SNePS with Resources”, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical
Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 199–213.
2. Tambe, Milind; & Rosenbloom, Paul S. (1996), “Event Tracking in a Dynamic Multiagent Environment”,
Computational Intelligence 12(3): 499–521.
3. Steinhart, Eric (1997), Review of Robert Cummins & John Pollock (eds.), Philosophy and AI: Essays at
the Interface, in Minds and Machines 7: 464–468.
4. Orilia, Francesco (1998), “Guise Theory, Property Theory, and Castañeda’s Philosophical
Methodology”, in Franceso Orilia & William J. Rapaport (eds.) (1998), Thought, Language, and Ontology: Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic
Publishers): 39–59.
5. Indurkhya, Bipin (2000), Review of Andy Clark, Jesús Ezquerro, & Jesús M. Larrazabal (eds.), Philosophy
and Cognitive Science, in Minds and Machines 10(3): 430-435.
6. Ismail, Haythem O. (2006), “Simultaneous Events and the ‘Once-Only’ Effect”, in Brandon Bennett &
Christiane Fellbaum (eds.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the 4th International
Conference (FOIS 2006) (Amsterdam: IOS Press);
http://met.guc.edu.eg/Repository/Faculty/Publications/107/OnceOnly.pdf
30
43. Rapaport, William J. (1991), “Predication, Fiction, and Artificial Intelligence”, Topoi 10: 79–111.
• Preprinted as Technical Report 90-11 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science, May
1990).
1. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), “Cinewrite: An Algorithm-Sketch for Writing Novels Cinematically, and Two
Mysteries Therein”, Instructional Science 21: 155–168.
• Reprinted in Mike Sharples (ed.), Computers and Writing: Issues and Implementations (Dordrecht,
The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992): 155–168. [Citation is to TR 90-11.]
2. Bringsjord, Selmer (1992), What Robots Can and Can’t Be (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
3. Bringsjord, Selmer, & Ferrucci, David A. (2000), Artificial Intelligence and Literary Creativity: Inside the
Mind of BRUTUS, a Storytelling Machine (Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
4. Proudfoot, Diane (2006), “Possible Worlds Semantics and Fiction”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 35:
9–40.
44. Rapaport, William J. (1991), “Meinong, Alexius; I: Meinongian Semantics”, in Hans Burkhardt & Barry
Smith (eds.), Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology (Munich: Philosophia Verlag): 516–519.
• Marek, Johann (2009), “Alexius Meinong”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 Edition) [http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/meinong/].
45. Rapaport, William J. (1992), “Logic”, in Stuart C. Shapiro (ed.), Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence,
2nd edition (New York: John Wiley): 851–853.
• Shapiro, Stuart C. (2000), ”Propositional, First-Order, and Higher-Order Logics: Basic Definitions, Rules
of Inference, and Examples”, in Łucja M. Iwańska & Stuart C. Shapiro (eds.), Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Representation: Language for Knowledge and Knowledge for Language (Menlo Park,
CA/Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press/MIT Press): 379–395.
31
46. Shapiro, Stuart C., & Rapaport, William J. (1992), “The SNePS Family,” Computers and Mathematics
with Applications 23: 243–275.
• Reprinted in Fritz Lehmann (ed.), Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Pergamon Press,
1992): 243–275.
1. Young, John W., Jr. (1992), Review of Kumar (ed.), Current Trends in SNePS, in SIGART Bulletin 3(3)
(August): 11–12.
2. Chalupsky, Hans (1993), “Using Hypothetical Reasoning as a Method for Belief Ascription”, Journal of
Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 119–133.
3. Cravo, Maria R., & Martins, João P. (1993), “SNePSwD: A Newcomer to the SNePS Family”, Journal of
Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5(2&3): 135–148.
4. Franconi, Enrico (1993), “A Treatment of Plurals and Plural Quantifications Based on a Theory of Collections”, Minds and Machines 3(4): 453–474.
5. Kawaguchi, E.; Lee, M.; & Nozaki, K. (1993), “Meaning Description by SD-Forms and a Prototype of a
Conversational-Text Retrieval System”, Proceedings, 5th International Conference on Tools with Artificial
Intelligence in IEEE Transactions on Applications and Industry;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
3721983 Meaning description by SD-Forms and a prototype of aconversational-text retrieval system
6. Halper, Michael; Geller, James; Perl, Yehoshua; & Klas, Wolfgang (1994), “Integrating a Part Relationship
into an Open OODB System using Metaclasses”, in N. Adam, B. Bhargava, & Y. Yesha (eds.), CIKM-94,
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (Gaithersburg, MD): 10–17;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication
/2497452 Integrating a Part Relationship into an Open OODB System using Metaclasses
7. Kawaguchi, E.; Lee, M.; & Nozaki, K. (1994), “A Speech-Text Retrieval System Using Semantic Data
of the English/Japanese Conversational Texts”, Proceedings, 1994 International Symposium on Speech,
Image Processing and Neural Networks;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication
/3574401 A speech-text retrieval system using semantic data of theEnglishJapanese conversational texts
8. Haller, Susan M.; & Ali, Syed S. (1995), “Planning Responses in Reaction to User Feedback”, Proceedings, 7th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence in IEEE Transactions on Applications and Industry;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3619853 Planning responses in reaction to user feedback
9. Srihari, Rohini K. (1995), “Computational Models for Integrating Linguistic and Visual Information: A
Survey”, Artificial Intelligence Review (special issue on Integrating Language and Vision) 8: 349–369
• Reprinted as book chapter in Paul Mckevitt (ed.), Kluwer, 1995.
10. Haller, Susan (1996), “Planning Text about Plans Interactively”, International Journal of Expert Systems
9: 85–112.
11. Burhans, Debra T. (1997), “Pragmatic Question Answering: Generic versus Specific Responses”, Proceedings, AAAI-97: 807; http://www.aaai.org/Papers/AAAI/1997/AAAI97-138.pdf
12. de Matos, Pedro A.; & Martins, João P. (1997), “Contextual Logic of Change and Contextual Proofs”,
Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME’97);
https://www.researchgate.net/publication
/220810619 Contextual Logic of Change and Contextual Proofs
13. de Matos, Pedro A.; & Martins, João P. (1997), “Contextual Logic of Change and the Ramification Problem”, Proceedings of Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 8th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence, EPIA’97 (Coimbra, Portugal);
https://www.researchgate.net/publication
/220773658 Contextual Logic of Change and the Ramification Problem
32
14. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; & Haller, Susan M. (1997), “Uniform Knowledge Representation for
Language Processing in the B2 System”, Natural Language Engineering 3: 123–145.
15. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; & Haller, Susan M. (1997), “Mixed Depth Representations for Dialog Processing”, in Morton Ann Gernsbacher & Sharon J. Derry (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual
Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (University of Wisconsin–Madison) (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates): 687–692.
16. Mori, Angelo Rossi; Gangemi, Aldo; Steve, Geri; Consorti, Fabrizio; & Galeazzi, E. (1997), “An Ontological Analysis of Surgical Deeds”, Proceedings, 6th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine in
Europe (AIME’97; Grenoble, France;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221450310 An Ontological Analysis of Surgical Deeds
17. Zarri, Gian Piero (1997), “NKRL, a Knowledge Representation Tool for Encoding the ‘Meaning’ of Complex Narrative Texts”, Natural Language Engineering 3(2): 231–253;
DOI:10.1017/S1351324997001794
18. McRoy, Susan W. (1998), “Achieving Robust Human-Computer Communication”, International Journal
of Human-Computer Studies 48: 681-704.
19. Hendler, James; & Stoffel, Kilian (1999), “Back-End Technology for High-Performance KnowledgeRepresentation Systems”, IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(3): 63–69.
20. Liu, Li-min; Halper, Michael; Geller, James; & Perl, Yehoshua (1999), “Controlled Vocabularies in
OODBs: Modeling Issues and Implementation”, Distributed and Parallel Databases 7(1): 37–65.
21. McRoy, Susan W.; & Ali, Syed S. (1999), “A Practical, Declarative Theory of Dialog”, Electronic Transactions Artificial Intelligence 3: 153–176;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220465352 A Practical Declarative Theory of Dialog
22. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; Restificar, Angelo; & Channarukul, Songsak (1999), “Building Intelligent
Dialog Systems”, intelligence 10(1): 14-23.
23. Restificar, Angelo C.; Ali, Syed S.; & McRoy, Susan W. (1999), “Detecting Arguments and Generating
Rebuttals in Human-Computer Dialog”, Working Notes of the AAAI Workshop on Mixed-Initiative Intelligence (AAAI-99; Orlando, FL);
http://www.cs.wright.edu/people/faculty/mcox/mii/papers/restificar.pdf
24. Gangemi, Aldo; Steve, Geri; & Giacomelli, Fabrizio (2000), “ONIONS: An Ontological Methodology for
Taxonomic Knowledge Integration”;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication
/2386179 ONIONS An Ontological Methodology for Taxonomic Knowledge Integration
25. Ismail, Haythem O. (2000), “Reasoning and Acting in Time”, Proceedings of the 17th National Conference
on Artificial Intelligence and 12th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (Austin,
TX).
26. McRoy, Susan W.; & Ali, Syed S. (2000), “A Declarative Model of Dialog”, in Carolyn Penstein Ros
& Reva Freedman (eds.), Building Dialog Systems for Tutorial Applications: Papers from the 2000 Fall
Symposium (Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press Technical Report FS-00-01): 28–36;
https://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Fall/2000/FS-00-01/FS00-01-005.pdf
27. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; & Haller, Susan M. (2000), “Mixed Depth Representations for Dialog Processing”, in Łucja M. Iwańska & Stuart C. Shapiro (eds.), Natural Language Processing and Knowledge
Representation: Language for Knowledge and Knowledge for Language (Menlo Park, CA/Cambridge,
MA: AAAI Press/MIT Press): 283–299.
28. Sowa, John F. (2000), Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations (Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole).
29. Stoffel, Kilian; Taylor, Merwyn; & Hendler, Jim (1997), “Efficient Management of Very Large Ontologies”, Proceedings of the 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-97, Providence, RI)
33
(Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, and Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 442-447;
http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/plus/Parka/aaai97.ps
30. Chalupsky, Hans (2000), “OntoMorph: A Translation System for Symbolic Knowledge”, in A.G. Cohn,
F. Giunchiglia, & B. Selman (eds.), Knowledge Representation 2000: Proceedings of the 7th International
Conference (KR-2000; Breckenridge, CO) (San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann).
31. Gomez, Fernando (2000), “Why Base the Knowledge Representation Language on Natural Language?”,
Journal of Intelligent Systems 10(2): 161–181.
32. McRoy, Susan W.; Channarukul, Songsak; & Ali, Syed S. (2000), “Text Realization for Dialog”, in Carolyn Penstein Ros & Reva Freedman (eds.), Building Dialog Systems for Tutorial Applications: Papers
from the 2000 Fall Symposium (Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press Technical Report FS-00-01): 105–112;
http://aaaipress.org/Papers/Symposia/Fall/2000/FS-00-01/FS00-01-015.pdf
33. Channarukul, Songsak; McRoy, Susan W.; & Ali, Syed S. (2001), “YAG: A Template-Based Text Realization System for Dialog”, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems
9(6): 649–659.
34. Di Eugenio, Barbara; Glass, Michael; & Trolio, Michael J. (2002), “The DIAG Experiments: Natural
Language Generation for Intelligent Tutoring Systems”,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication
/2538206 The DIAG experiments Natural Language Generation for Intelligent Tutoring Systems
35. Leitão, António Menezes (2002), “A Formal Pattern Language for Refactoring of Lisp Programs”, Proceedings, 6th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering;
DOI:10.1109/CSMR.2002.995803;
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/st/lehre/Arte-fakt/Seminar/papers/06/Formal/
pattern-language-for-refactoring.pdf
36. McRoy, Susan W.; Channarukul, Songsak; & Ali, Syed S. (2002), “YAG: A Template-Based Generator
for Real-Time Systems”, NAACL-ANLP 2000 Workshop: Syntactic and Semantic Complexity in Natural
Language Processing Systems; http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/W/W00/W00-1437.pdf
37. McRoy, Susan W.; Ali, Syed S.; & Nalamlieng, Nipat (2003), “Equuleus: Presentation from Legacy Documents”, in Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence
(ICTAI’03) (Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society): 589–596.
38. McRoy, Susan W.; Channarukul, Songsak; & Ali, Syed S. (2003), “An Augmented Template-Based Approach to Text Realization”, Natural Language Engineering 9(4): 381–420.
39. Sowa, John F. (2003), “Laws, Facts, and Contexts: Foundations for Multimodal Reasoning”, in Vincent F.
Hendricks, Klaus Frovin Jørgensen, & Stig Andur Pedersen (eds.), Knowledge Contributors (Springer
Synthese Library 322): 145–184.
40. Xu, Jun (2003), “Implement an Intelligent ArcView User Interface using SNePS”;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication
/2936046 Implement an Intelligent ArcView User Interface Using SNePS
41. Xu, Jun (2003), “An Intelligent Natural-Language Interface for ArcView”;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228818435 An intelligent natural-language interface for arcview
42. Brown, Eric W.; Hersh, William; & Valencia, Alfonso (2004), “SIGIR 2003 Workshop on Text Analysis
and Search for Bioinformatics” [http://www.sigir.org/forum/2004D/brown sigirforum 2004d.pdf]
43. De Boni, Marco (2004), “Relevance in Open Domain Question Answering: Theoretical Framework and
Application”, PhD dissertation (Heslington, York, UK: University of York Department of Computer Science); http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/ftpdir/reports/2004/YCST/06/YCST-2004-06.pdf
44. Campbell, Alistair E.R.; & Burhans, Debra T. (2006), “A Layered Heterogeneous Cognitive Robotics
Architecture”, in Michael Beetz, Kanna Rajan, Michael Thielscher, & Radu Bogdan Rusu (eds.), Cognitive
Robotics: Papers from the AAAI Workshop (Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press Technical Report WS-06-03):
40–46.
34
45. Helbig, Hermann (2006), Knowledge Representation and the Semantics of Natural Language (Berlin:
Springer-Verlag).
46. Hsing, Michael; & Cherkasov, Artem (2006), “Integration of Biological Data with Semantic Networks”,
Current Bioinformatics 1: 273–290.
47. Nagi, Rakesh; Sudit, Moises; & Llinas, James (2006), “An Approach for Level 2/3 Fusion Technology Development in Urban/Asymmetric Senarios”, Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Information
Fusion, DOI:10.1109/ICIF.2006.301662
48. Rödder, Wilhelm; & Kulmann, Friedhelm (2006), “Recall and Reasoning—An Information Theoretical
Model of Cognitive Processes”, Information Sciences 176: 2439–2466.
49. Lopes das Neves, Pedro Miguel (2007), “Development of Techniques to Control Reasoning using SNePS”,
unpublished master’s thesis, Engenharia Informática e Computadores, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.
50. Mazuel, Laurent; & Sabouret, Nicolas (2008), “Generic Command Interpretation Algorithms for Conversational Agents”, Web Intelligence and Agent Systems 6: 43–57.
51. Ismail, Haythem; & Kasrin, Nasr (2010), “Focused Belief Revision as a Model of Fallible RelevanceSensitive Perception”, in R. Dillmann et al. (eds.), 33rd Annual German Conference on Artificial Intelligence, KI 2010 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 6359): 126–134.
52. Fossati, Davide (????), “DIAG-NLP: Improving Intelligent Tutoring Systems with Natural Language Generation Technology”;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication
/255624276 DIAG-NLP IMPROVING INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS WITH NATURAL
LANGUAGE GENERATION TECHNOLOGY
53. Helbig, Hermann; & Glöckner, Ingo (????), “Towards a Logical Foundation of Semantic Networks—A
Typology of Descriptive Means for Semantic Inference”;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication
/250766532 Towards a Logical Foundation of Semantic Networks - A Typology of Descriptive Means
for Semantic Inference
54. Manuel, Helder; Coelho, Ferreira; dos Remédios, Maria; Pereira, Vaz; & Cravo, Lopes (????), “Revisão
Adaptativa de Cren cas”;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242429961 Reviso adaptativa de crenas
55. McRoy, Susan W. (????), “Efficient Representations for Multi-Modal Interaction”;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254817902 Efficient Representations for Multi-Modal Interaction
56. Stoffel, Kilian; & Hendler, James (????), “PARKA-DB: Back-End Technology for High Performance
Knowledge Representation Systems”;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication
/253729990 PARKA-DB Back-End Technology for High Performance Knowledge Representation Systems
35
47. Shapiro, Stuart C., & Rapaport, William J. (1992), “A Fully Intensional Propositional Semantic Network”, in Leslie Burkholder (ed.), Philosophy and the Computer (Boulder, CO: Westview Press): 75–91.
• Kumar, Deepak, & Meeden, Lisa (1998), “A Hybrid Connectionist and BDI Architecture for Modeling
Embedded Rational Agents”, Proceedings, AAAI Fall Symposium on Cognitive Robotics;
http://mainline.brynmawr.edu/ dkumar/Papers/cogrob98.ps
48. Rapaport, William J. (1993), “Because Mere Calculating Isn’t Thinking: Comments on Hauser’s ‘Why
Isn’t My Pocket Calculator a Thinking Thing?”’, Minds and Machines 3: 11–20.
1. Hauser, Larry (1997), “Searle’s Chinese Box: Debunking the Chinese Room Argument”, Minds and Machines 7(2): 199-226.
2. Preston, John, & Bishop, Mark (eds.) (2002), Views into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and
Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
49. Rapaport, William J. (1993), “Cognitive Science”, in Anthony Ralston & Edwin D. Reilly (eds.), Encyclopedia of Computer Science, 3rd edition (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold): 185–189.
• Aamodt, A., & Nygard, M. (1995), “Different Roles and Mutual Dependencies of Data, Information, and
Knowledge: An AI Perspective on Their Integration”, Data and Knowledge Engineering 16: 191–222.
36
50. Rapaport, William J. (1995), “Understanding Understanding: Syntactic Semantics and Computational
Cognition”, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), AI, Connectionism, and Philosophical Psychology, Philosophical
Perspectives, Vol. 9 (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview): 49–88
• Reprinted in Toribio, Josefa, & Clark, Andy (eds.) (1998), Language and Meaning in Cognitive Science:
Cognitive Issues and Semantic Theory, Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science: Conceptual Issues,
Vol. 4 (New York: Garland): 73–88.
1. Gonzalez, Ruben (1997), “Hypermedia Data Modeling, Coding, and Semiotics”, Proceedings of the IEEE
85: 1111–1140.
2. Toribio, Josefa, & Clark, Andy (1998), “Introduction: Where Minds Meet Words”, in Toribio, Josefa, &
Clark, Andy (eds.) (1998), Language and Meaning in Cognitive Science: Cognitive Issues and Semantic
Theory, Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science: Conceptual Issues, Vol. 4 (New York: Garland):
vii–xii.
3. Kay, Kendrick (2001), “Machines and the Mind: Do Artificial Intelligence Systems Incorporate Intrinsic
Meaning?”, The Harvard Brain 8 (Spring),
[http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/˜hsmbb/BRAIN/vol8-spring2001/ai.htm].
4. Preston, John, & Bishop, Mark (eds.) (2002), Views into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and
Artificial Intelligence (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
5. Sivashanmugam, Kaarthik; Sheth, Amit; Miller, John; Verma, Kunal; Aggarwal, Rohit; & Rajasekaran,
Preeda (2003), “Metadata and Semantics for Web Services and Processes”, in Datenbanken und Informationssysteme, Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Gunter Schlageter (Publication Hagen):
6. Cornejo, Carlos (2004), “Who Says What the Words Say? The Problem of Linguistic Meaning in Psychology”, Theory & Psychology 14(1): 5–28.
• Citation is to the Toribio & Clark reprint.
7. Ben Jacob, Eshel; & Shapira, Yoash (2005), “Meaning-Based Natural Intelligence vs. Information-Based
Artificial Intelligence”, in The Cradle of Creativity.
8. Ellis, Glenn W.; Ory, Eleanor C.; & Bhushan, Nalini (2005), “Organizing a K–12 AI Curriculum using
Philosophy of the Mind”, 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 12–15, Portland, OR: The
Changing Landscape of Engineering and Technology (Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering
Education) (13 pp.)
9. Zambak, Aziz; & Vergauwen, Roger (2009), “Artificial Intelligence and Agentive Cognition: A LogicoLinguistic Approach”, Logique et Analyse, nouvelle série 52(205) (March): 57–96.
10. Dietrich, Eric (2010), “Analogical Insight: Toward Unifying Categorization and Analogy”, Cognitive Processing 11: 331–345.
11. Arnellos, Argyris; Lekkas, Dimitrios; Zissis, Dimitrios; Spyrou, Thomas; & Darzentas, John (2011), “Fair
Digital Signing: The Structural Reliability of Signed Documents”, Computers & Security 30: 580–596.
12. Schubert, Lenhart (2014), “Computational Linguistics”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition),
http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/computational-linguistics/.
37
51. Ehrlich, Karen; & Rapaport, William J. (1995), “A Computational Theory of Vocabulary Expansion:
Project Proposal”, Technical Report 95-15 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science)
and Technical Report 95-08 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Center for Cognitive Science)
• Sinha, R.M.K. (2001), “Dealing with Unknowns in Machine Translation”, Proceedings of 2001 IEEE
International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 2: 940–944;
DOI:10.1109/ICSMC.2001.973038
52. Shapiro, Stuart C., & Rapaport, William J. (1995), “An Introduction to a Computational Reader of
Narratives”, in Judith Felson Duchan, Gail A. Bruder, & Lynne E. Hewitt (eds.), Deixis in Narrative: A
Cognitive Science Perspective (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates): 79–105.
• Mueller, Erik T. (2004), “Understanding Script-Based Stories Using Commonsense Reasoning”, Cognitive
Systems Research 5(4) (December): 307–340.
53. Rapaport, William J., & Shapiro, Stuart C. (1995), “Cognition and Fiction”, in Judith Felson Duchan,
Gail A. Bruder, & Lynne E. Hewitt (eds.), Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective (Hillsdale,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates): 107–128.
• Gander, Pierre (2005), Participating in a Story: Exploring Audience Cognition (Lund University Cognitive
Studies 119); http://www.pierregander.com/research/participating in a story.pdf
54. Ehrlich, Karen; & Rapaport, William J. (1997), “A Computational Theory of Vocabulary Expansion”,
Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Stanford University) (Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates): 205–210.
• Barg, Petra; & Kilbury, James (2000), “Incremental Identification of Inflectional Types”;
http://user.philosophy-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/∼kilbury/Publ/BargKilbury2000-IIIT.pdf
55. Rapaport, William J.; Shapiro, Stuart C.; & Wiebe, Janyce M. (1997), “Quasi-Indexicals and Knowledge
Reports”, Cognitive Science 21: 63–107.
• Reprinted in Francesco Orilia & William J. Rapaport (eds.), Thought, Language, and Ontology: Essays in
Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998): 235–294.
• Pre-printed as Rapaport, Shapiro, & Wiebe 1986; see item 25 above for further citations.
1. Gordon, Peter C.; & Hendrick, Randall (1998), “The Representation and Processing of Coreference in
Discourse”, Cognitive Science 22(4): 389–424.
2. Kaplan, Aaron N., & Schubert, Lenhart K. (2000), “A Computational Model of Belief”, Artificial Intelligence 120: 119–160.
3. Varnier, Giuseppe (2000), Review of Orilia, Francesco, & Rapaport, William J. (eds.) (1998), Thought,
Language, and Ontology: Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda, in Minds and Machines 10(3):
448–452.
4. Bergler, Sabine; Doandes, Monia; Gerard, Christine; & Witte, René (2004), “Attributions”, in Yan Qu,
James G. Shanahan, & Janyce Wiebe (eds.), Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text: Theories and Applications (AAAI-EAAT 2004), SS-04-07 (Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press): 16–19.
5. Corazza, Eros (2004), Reflecting the Mind: Indexicality and Quasi-Indexicality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
38
56. Rapaport, William J. (1998), “How Minds Can Be Computational Systems”, Journal of Experimental and
Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 10: 403–419.
1. Whobrey, Darren (2001), “Machine Mentality and the Nature of the Ground Relation”, Minds and Machines 11(3): 307-346.
2. Bringsjord, Selmer, & Zenzen, Michael (2003), Superminds: People Harness Hypercomputation, and
More (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
3. Bringsjord, Selmer, & Arkoudas, Konstantine (2004), “The Modal Argument for Hypercomputing Minds”,
Theoretical Computer Science 317: 167–190.
4. Floridi, Luciano (2004), “Open Problems in the Philosophy of Information”, Metaphilosophy 35(4): 554–
582.
5. Honingh, Aline (2004), “Coding Cultures” [http://staff.science.uva.nl/˜ahoningh/education].
6. Bringsjord, Selmer (2008), “The Logicist Manifesto: At Long Last Let Logic-Based Artificial Intelligence
Become a Field unto Itself”, Journal of Applied Logic 6(4) (December): 502–525.
7. Floridi, Luciano (2011), The Philosophy of Information (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
8. Piccinini, Gualtiero; & Bahar, Sonya (2013), “Neural Computation and the Computational Theory of
Cognition”, Cognitive Science 34(3) (April): 453–488.
9. Fresco, Nir; & Staines, Philip J. (2014), “A Revised Attack on Computational Ontology”, Minds and
Machines 24(1) (February): 101–122.
57. Orilia, Francesco, & Rapaport, William J. (eds.) (1998), Thought, Language, and Ontology: Essays in
Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda, Philosophical Studies Series (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
1. Varnier, Giuseppe (2000), Review of Orilia, Francesco, & Rapaport, William J. (eds.) (1998), Thought,
Language, and Ontology: Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda, in Minds and Machines 10(3):
448–452.
2. Corazza, Eros (2004), Reflecting the Mind: Indexicality and Quasi-Indexicality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
3. Varnier, Giuseppe (2014), “Quasi-Indexicals, Kaplanian Monsters, and Self-Consciousness”, in Adriano
Palma (ed.), Castañeda and His Guises: Essays on the Work of Hector-Neri Castañeda (Berlin: Walter
de Gruyter): 161–185.
58. Rapaport, William J. (1998), “Prolegomena to a Study of Hector-Neri Castañeda’s Influence on Artificial Intelligence: A Survey and Personal Reflections”, in Francesco Orilia & William J. Rapaport, (eds.),
Thought, Language, and Ontology: Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers): 345–367.
• Varnier, Giuseppe (2000), Review of Orilia, Francesco, & Rapaport, William J. (eds.) (1998), Thought,
Language, and Ontology: Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda, in Minds and Machines 10(3):
448–452.
59. Rapaport, William J. (1998), “Academic Family Tree of Hector-Neri Castañeda”, in Francesco Orilia
& William J. Rapaport, (eds.), Thought, Language, and Ontology: Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri
Castañeda (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers): 369–374.
• Dunn, J. Michael; & Eisenberg, Paul (2014), “Chorus: Hector-Neri Castañeda; A Conversation about
Hector by Two of His Colleagues”, in Adriano Palma (ed.), Castañeda and His Guises: Essays on the
Work of Hector-Neri Castañeda (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter): 15–18.
39
60. Rapaport, William J. (1999), “Implementation Is Semantic Interpretation”, The Monist 82: 109–130.
1. Arkoudas, Konstantine; & Bringsjord, Selmer (2007), “Computers, Justification, and Mathematical Knowledge”, Minds and Machines 17(2) (Summer): 185-202.
2. Turner, Raymond (2009), “The Meaning of Programming Languages”, APA Newsletter on Philosophy and
Computers 9(1) (Fall): 2–7.
3. Zambak, Aziz; & Vergauwen, Roger (2009), “Artificial Intelligence and Agentive Cognition: A LogicoLinguistic Approach”, Logique et Analyse, nouvelle série 52(205) (March): 57–96.
4. Dietrich, Eric (2010), “Analogical Insight: Toward Unifying Categorization and Analogy”, Cognitive Processing 11: 331–345.
5. Turner, Raymond (2010?), “Programming Languages as Mathematical Theories” (unpublished ms.?)
6. Scheutz, Matthias (2012), “What It Is Not to Implement a Computation: A Critical Analysis of Chalmers’
Notion of Implementation”, Cognitive Science 13: 75–106.
7. Endicott, Ronald (2016), “Developing the Explanatory Dimensions of Part-Whole Realization”, Philosophical Studies, online 30 March, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11098-016-0674-7
61. Rapaport, William J. (2000), “How to Pass a Turing Test: Syntactic Semantics, Natural-Language Understanding, and First-Person Cognition”, Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 9(4): 467-490.
• Reprinted in James H. Moor (ed.), The Turing Test: The Elusive Standard of Artificial Intelligence (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003): 161–184.
1. Ronald, Edmund M.A., & Sipper, Moshe (2001), “Intelligence is Not Enough: On the Socialization of
Talking Machines”, Minds and Machines 11(4): 567–576.
2. Araujo Filho, J.E.; & Kieitz, K.H. (2003), “Adaptive Reference-Driven Decision-Making Process”, in
O. Nasraoui; H. Frigui; & J.M. Keller (eds.), IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems 1: 452–
457.
3. Honingh, Aline (2004), “Coding Cultures” [http://staff.science.uva.nl/˜ahoningh/education].
4. Lenski, Wolfgang (2004), “Towards a Theory of Information”, in Wolfgang Lenski (ed.), Logic versus
Approximation (Berlin: Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3075): 77–105.
5. Ariza, Christopher (2009), “The Interrogator as Critic: The Turing Test and the Evaluation of Generative
Music Systems”, Computer Music Journal 33(2) (Summer): 48–70.
6. Zambak, Aziz; & Vergauwen, Roger (2009), “Artificial Intelligence and Agentive Cognition: A LogicoLinguistic Approach”, Logique et Analyse, nouvelle série 52(205) (March): 57–96.
7. Proudfoot, Diane (2013), “Rethinking Turing’s Test”, Journal of Philosophy 90(7) (July): 391–411.
62. Rapaport, William J. (2000), “Cognitive Science”, in Anthony Ralston, Edwin D. Reilly, & David Hemmendinger (eds.), Encyclopedia of Computer Science, 4th edition (New York: Grove’s Dictionaries): 227–
233.
• Glick, Jonathan (ed.) (2001), “Cognitive Science: Good Places to Start”, AI Topics
[http://www.aaai.org/AITopics/html/cogsci.html].
40
63. Rapaport, William J., & Ehrlich, Karen (2000), “A Computational Theory of Vocabulary Acquisition”,
in Łucja M. Iwańska & Stuart C. Shapiro (eds.), Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Representation: Language for Knowledge and Knowledge for Language (Menlo Park, CA/Cambridge, MA: AAAI
Press/MIT Press): 347–375.
1. Johnson, Frances L.; & Shapiro, Stuart C. (1999), “Says Who?—Incorporating Source Credibility Issues
into Belief Revision”, CSE Techinical Report 99-08 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer
Science & Engineering), [http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/˜shapiro/Papers/johsha99a.pdf].
2. Lemaire, Benoı̂t; & Dessus, Philippe (2003), “Modèles Cognitifs Issus de l’Analyse de la Sémantique
Latente”, Cahiers Romans de Sciences Cognitives 1(1): 55–74;
http://webcom.upmf-grenoble.fr/sciedu/pdessus/crsc03.PDF
3. Milewski, Robert Jay (2006), “Automatic Recognition of Handwritten Medical Forms for Search Engines”,
PhD dissertation (Buffalo, NY: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science & Engineering)
64. Rapaport, William J. (2001–2005), “Some Definitions of ‘Artificial Intelligence’ ”,
[http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/˜rapaport/definitions.of.ai.html].
• Friedenberg, Jay, & Silverman, Gordon (2006), Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Study of the
Mind (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).
65. Rapaport, William J. (2001–2009), “Intensionality vs. Intentionality”,
[http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/˜rapaport/intensional.html].
• Convertino, Gregorio; & Farooq, Umer (2004), “Interpreting Scenario-Based Design from an Information
Systems Perspective”, Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems (New York,
NY).
41
66. Rapaport, William J. (2002), “Holism, Conceptual-Role Semantics, and Syntactic Semantics”, Minds and
Machines 12(1): 3–59.
1. Goldstone, Robert L., & Rogosky, Brian J. (2002), “Using Relations within Conceptual Systems to Translate across Conceptual Systems”, Cognition 84: 295–320.
2. Dietrich, Eric (2003), “An ABSURDIST Model Vindicates a Venerable Theory”, TRENDS in Cognitive
Science 7(2, February): 57-59.
3. Goldstone, Robert L.; Feng, Ying; & Rogosky, Brian J. (2005), “Connecting to the World and Each Other”,
in D. Pecher & R. Zwaan (eds.), Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory,
Language, and Thinking (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 292–314.
4. Gozzano, Simone (2006), “Functional Role Semantics and Reflective Equilibrium”, Acta Analytica: Philosophy and Psychology 21(1): 62–76.
5. Lin, Shou-de (2006), “Modeling, Searching, and Explaining Abnormal Instances in Multi-Relational Networks”, PhD dissertation (University of Southern California Department of Computer Science);
http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/∼sdlin/publication/thesis Linsd.pdf
6. Lin, Shou-de; & Verspoor, Karin (2008), “A Semantics-Enhanced Language Model for Unsupervised Word
Sense Disambiguation”, in A. Gelbukh (ed.), 9th International Conference on Computational Linguistics
and Intelligent Text Processing, CICLing 2008 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4919): 287–298.
7. van Dantzig, Saskia; Pecher, Diane; Zeelenberg, René; & Barsalou, Lawrence W. (2008), “Perceptual
Processing Affects Conceptual Processing”, Cognitive Science 32: 579–590.
8. Zambak, Aziz; & Vergauwen, Roger (2009), “Artificial Intelligence and Agentive Cognition: A LogicoLinguistic Approach”, Logique et Analyse, nouvelle série 52(205) (March): 57–96.
9. Arnellos, Argyris; Lekkas, Dimitrios; Zissis, Dimitrios; Spyrou, Thomas; & Darzentas, John (2011), “Fair
Digital Signing: The Structural Reliability of Signed Documents”, Computers & Security 30: 580–596.
67. Rapaport, William J., & Kibby, Michael W. (2002), “Contextual Vocabulary Acquisition: A Computational Theory and Educational Curriculum”, in Nagib Callaos, Ana Breda, and Ma. Yolanda Fernandez J.
(eds.), Proceedings of the 6th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (SCI 2002;
Orlando, FL) (Orlando: International Institute of Informatics and Systemics), Vol. II: Concepts and
Applications of Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics I, pp. 261–266.
1. Iwańska, Łucja M. (2004), “Comparing, Integrating Lexical Definitional Knowledge from Multiple Sources”,
in Dan Moldovan & Roxana Girju (eds.), HLT-NAACL 2004: Workshop on Computational Lexical Semantics (Association for Computational Linguistics): 84–91.
2. Rusu, Amalia (2007), “Exploiting the Gap in Human and Machine Abilities in Handwriting Recognition
for Web Security Applications”, Ph.D. dissertation (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer
Science & Engineering).
42
68. Rapaport, William J. (2003), “What Is the ‘Context’ for Contextual Vocabulary Acquisition?”, in Peter P.
Slezak (ed.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Cognitive Science/7th Australasian Society
for Cognitive Science Conference (ICCS/ASCS-2003; Sydney, Australia) (Sydney: University of New South
Wales), Vol. 2, pp. 547–552.
1. Kecskes, Istvan (2006), “On My Mind: Thoughts about Salience, Context and Figurative Language from
a Second Language Perspective”, Second Language Research 222: 219–237;
DOI:10.1191/0267658306sr266ra;
http://peer.ccsd.cnrs.fr/docs/00/57/20/99/PDF/PEER stage2 10.1191%252F0267658306sr266ra.pdf
2. Frishkoff, Gwen A.; Collins-Thompson, Kevyn; Perfetti, Charles A.; & Callan, Jamie (2008), “Measuring
Incremental Changes in Word Knowledge: Experimental Validatio and Implications for Learning and
Assessment”, Behavior Research Methods 40(4): 907–925.
3. de Sousa, Lucilene Bender (2011), “Aquisição Lexical através da Leitura” (“Lexical Acquisition through
Reading”), master’s thesis in Reading and Cognition (Santa Cruz do Sul, Brazil: Universidade de Santa
Cruz do Sul).
4. Ali, Zuraina; & Ayub, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd (2012), “Obstacles and Successes in Learning Vocabulary
from Context”, paper presented at Graduate Research in Education Seminar (GREduc2012) (November),
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/5085/1/pbmsk-2012-zuraina-ObstaclesSuccessesLearning.pdf
5. Mozeti, Igor (????), “Reasoning with Temporal Context in News Analysis”;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237769671 Reasoning with temporal context in news analysis
43
69. Rapaport, William J. (2003), “What Did You Mean by That? Misunderstanding, Negotiation, and Syntactic Semantics”, Minds and Machines: Journal for Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science 13(3): 397–427.
1. Arrighi, Claudia, & Ferrario, Roberta (2004), “Abductive Reasoning, Interpretation and Collaborative
Processes”, paper presented at Model Based Reasoning 2004
[http://www-3.unipv.it/webphilos lab/courses/progra1.html].
2. Arrighi, Claudia, & Ferrario, Roberta (2005), “The Dynamic Nature of Meaning”, in Lorenzo Magnani &
Riccardo Dossena (eds.), Computing, Philosophy and Cognition: Proceedings of the European Computing
and Philosophy Conference (ECAP 2004) (London: [King’s] College [London] Publications): 295–312;
[http://www.loa-cnr.it/Files/extArrighiFerrario.pdf].
3. Arrighi, Claudia; & Ferrario, Roberta (2008), “Abductive Reasoning, Interpretation and Collaborative
Processes”, Foundations of Science 13: 75–87.
4. Georgescu, Alexandru V.; & Bărbat, Boldur E. (2008), “Modelling Time in Protensional Agents”,
8th WSEAS International Conference on Simulation, Modelling and Optimization (SMO ’08; Santander,
Cantabria, Spain, Sept. 23–25); http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2008/spain/smo/smo32.pdf
5. Kecskes, Istvan (2008), “Dueling Contexts: A Dynamic Model of Meaning”, Journal of Pragmatics 40:
385–406.
6. Zambak, Aziz; & Vergauwen, Roger (2009), “Artificial Intelligence and Agentive Cognition: A LogicoLinguistic Approach”, Logique et Analyse, nouvelle série 52(205) (March): 57–96.
7. Clouard, Régis; Renouf, Arnaud; & Revenu, Marinette (2010), “An Ontology-Based Model for Representing Image Processing Application Objectives”, International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial
Intelligence 24(8): 1181–1208.
8. Clouard, Régis; Renouf, Arnaud; & Revenu, Marinette (2011), “Human-Computer Interaction for the
Generation of Image Processing Applications”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69:
201–219.
9. Cudré-Mauroux, Philippe (2011), “Loose Ontological Coupling and the Social Semantic Web”, Proceedings of Advances in Intelligent Web Mastering 3; Proceedings of the 7th Atlantic Web Intelligence Conference, AWIC 2011 (Fribourg, Switzerland; January); DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-18029-3 2
https://diuf.unifr.ch/main/xi/sites/diuf.unifr.ch.main.xi/files/AWIC.pdf
10. Portmann, Edy; Kaufmann, Michael Alexander; & Graf, Cédric (2012), “A Distributed, Semiotic-Inductive,
and Human-Oriented Approach to Web-Scale Knowledge Retrieval”, in Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
235724398 A Distributed Semiotic-Inductive and Human-Oriented Approach to Web-Scale Knowledge Retrieval/
file/9fcfd512e4923a00a7.pdf?ev=pub int doc dl&origin=publication detail&inViewer=true
11. Kecskes, Istvan (2013), “Why Do We Say What We Say the Way We Say It?”, Journal of Pragmatics 48:
71–83.
12. Phan, Phuong Thao; Rabah, Mourad; & Estraillier, Pascal (2015), “A Situation-Based Multi-Agent Architecture for Handling Misunderstandings in Interactions”, International Journal of Applied Mathematics
and Computer Science 25(3): 439–454.
13. Pollock, Joey (2015), “Social Externalism and the Problem of Communication”, Philosophical Studies
172: 3229–3251.
44
70. Rapaport, William J. (2004), “Helping Students Apply Reasoning to Gaining Word Meanings from Context: Application of Artificial Intelligence and Verbal Protocol Data to Curriculum Design”, unpublished
presentation to the 49th Annual Convention of the International Reading Association (Reno, NV; 2004)
(with Michael W. Kibby).
• Gunning, Thomas G. (2006), Assessing and Correcting Reading and Writing Difficulties, 3rd Edition
(Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon).
71. Rapaport, William J. (2005), “In Defense of Contextual Vocabulary Acquisition: How to Do Things
with Words in Context”, in Anind Dey, Boicho Kokinov, David Leake, & Roy Turner (eds.), Modeling and
Using Context: 5th International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 05, Paris, France, July 2005,
Proceedings (Berlin: Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 3554): 396–409.
• Frishkoff, Gwen A.; Collins-Thompson, Kevyn; Perfetti, Charles A.; & Callan, Jamie (2008), “Measuring
Incremental Changes in Word Knowledge: Experimental Validatio and Implications for Learning and
Assessment”, Behavior Research Methods 40(4): 907–925.
72. Rapaport, William J. (2005), “Philosophy of Computer Science: An Introductory Course”, Teaching
Philosophy 28(4): 319–341.
1. Eden, Amnon H. (2007), “Three Paradigms of Computer Science”, Minds and Machines 17(2) (Summer):
135-167.
2. Tedre, Matti (2007), “Lecture Notes in the Philosophy of Computer Science”
[http://cs.joensuu.fi/˜mmeri/teaching/2007/philcs/].
3. Tedre, Matti (2007), “Know Your Discipline: Teaching the Philosophy of Computer Science”, Journal of
Information Technology Education 6: 105–122.
4. Dodig-Crnkovic, Gordana (2008), “Computing and Philosophy Global Course: What Can We Hope for
[from Computing]? What Should We Do [with Computing]? What Can We Know [about Computing and
by Computing]?”, APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers 8(2) (Fall): 38-41.
5. Müller, Vincent C. (2008), “What a Course on Philosophy of Computing Is Not”, APA Newsletter on
Philosophy and Computers 8(2) (Fall): 36–38.
6. Turner, Raymond, & Eden, Amnon (2008), Call for papers on the philosophy of computer science track
for the 7th European Conference on Computing and Philosophy and special issue of Minds and Machines,
[http://pcs.essex.ac.uk/ecap09/cfp.html].
7. Turner, Raymond, & Eden, Amnon (2009), “The Philosophy of Computer Science”, in Edward N. Zalta
(ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 Edition)
[http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/computer-science/].
8. Rocchi, Paolo (2010), Logic of Analog and Digital Machines (Nova Science Publishers).
9. Tedre, Matti (2011), “Computing as a Science: A Survey of Competing Viewpoints”, Minds and Machines
21(3) (Fall): 361–387.
10. Tedre, Matti; & Moisseinen, Nella (2014), “Experiments in Computing: A Survey”, The Scientific World
Journal, Vol. 2014, Article ID 549398, pp. 1–11.
11. Tedre, Matti (2015), The Science of Computing: Shaping a Discipline (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press).
45
73. Rapaport, William J. (2005), “Implementation Is Semantic Interpretation: Further Thoughts”, Special
Issue on Theoretical Cognitive Science, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence
17(4; December): 385–417.
1. Bringsjord, Selmer (2007), “Offer: One Billion Dollars for a Conscious Robot; If You’re Honest, You
Must Decline”, Journal of Consciousness Studies 14(7): 28–43.
2. Turner, Raymond, & Eden, Amnon (2008), Call for papers on the philosophy of computer science track
for the 7th European Conference on Computing and Philosophy and special issue of Minds and Machines,
[http://pcs.essex.ac.uk/ecap09/cfp.html].
3. Turner, Raymond, & Eden, Amnon (2009), “The Philosophy of Computer Science”, in Edward N. Zalta
(ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 Edition)
[http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/computer-science/].
4. Turner, Raymond (2009), “The Meaning of Programming Languages”, APA Newsletter on Philosophy and
Computers 9(1) (Fall): 2–7.
5. Turner, Raymond (2009), “Specification and Theory Construction in Computer Science”,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242323995 SPECIFICATION and THEORY CONSTRUCTION
in COMPUTER SCIENCE/file/60b7d5298c5cb9c00a.pdf?ev=pub int doc dl&origin=publication detail&
inViewer=true
74. Rapaport, William J. (2006), Review of John Preston & Mark Bishop (eds.), Views into the Chinese Room:
New Essays on Searlle and Artificial Intelligence, in Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84(1) (March):
129–133.
• Nasuto, Slawomir J.; Bishop, John Mark; Roesch, Etienne B.; & Spencer, Matthew C. (2015), “Zombie
Mouse in a Chinese Room”, Philosophy & Technology 28(2) (June): 209–223.
75. Rapaport, William J. (2006), “How Helen Keller Used Syntactic Semantics to Escape from a Chinese
Room”, Minds and Machines: Journal for Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science: 16(4):
381–436.
1. Wolfram Research Inc. (2008), “The Math behind Numb3rs”, Episode 410: Chinese Box,
[http://http://numb3rs.wolfram.com/410/].
2. Ford, Jason (2011), “Helen Keller Was Never in a Chinese Room”, Minds and Machines 21(1): 57–72.
3. Schweizer, Paul (2012), “The Externalist Foundations of a Truly Total Turing Test”, Minds and Machines
22(3) (Fall): 191–212.
4. Cole, David (2014), “The Chinese Room Argument”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia
of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition),
http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/chinese-room/
5. Gasparyan, Diana (2016), “Artificial Intelligence and Semantics through the Prism of Structural, PostStructural and Transcendental Approaches”, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, online
15 March, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12124-016-9344-8
76. Rapaport, William J. (compiler) (2007; updated frequently), “Can Programs Be Verified?”
[http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/∼rapaport/584/canprogsbeverified.html].
• Pincas, Uri (2011), “Program Verification and Functioning of Operative Computing Revisited: How about
Mathematics Engineering?”, Minds and Machines 21(2) (Summer): 337–359.
46
77. Shapiro, Stuart C.; Rapaport, William J.; Kandefer, Michael; Johnson, Frances L.; & Goldfain, Albert
(2007) “Metacognition in SNePS”, AI Magazine 28(1) (Spring): 17–31.
• Campbell, Alistair E.R.; & Burhans, Debra T. (2006), “A Layered Heterogeneous Cognitive Robotics
Architecture”, in Michael Beetz, Kanna Rajan, Michael Thielscher, & Radu Bogdan Rusu (eds.), Cognitive
Robotics: Papers from the AAAI Workshop (Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press Technical Report WS-06-03):
40–46.
• Luger, George F. (2009), Artificial Intelligence: Structures and Strategies for Complex Problem Solving,
6th edition (Boston: Pearson/Addison-Wesley).
• Capraro, Gerard T.; & Wicks, Michael C. (2010), “Knowledge Based Systems and Metacognition in
Radar”, in Y. Bi & Mary-Ann Williams (eds.), KSEM 2010 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in
Artificial Intelligence 6291): 573–578.
• Capraro, Gerard T.; Wicks, Michael C.; & Schneible, Richard (2010), “Metacognition in Radar”,
Proceedings—2010 12th International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications,
ICEAA’10, ISBN 978-142447368-7, DOI: 10.1109/ICEAA.2010.5651574: 693–696.
• Goertzel, Ben; Lian, Ruiting; Arel, Itamar; de Garis, Hugo; & Chen, Shuo (2010), “A World Survey
of Artificial Brain Projects, Part II: Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures”, Neurocomputing 74:
30–49.
• Gadhiok, Manik; Amanna, Ashwin; Price, Matthew J.; & Reed, Jeffrey H. (2011), “Metacognition: Enhancing the Performance of a Cognitive Radio”, IEEE 1st International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on
Cogntiive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA): 198–203;
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/COGSIMA.2011.5753445
• Kontos, John; Armaos, Joseph; & Malagardi, Ioanna (2011), “Metagnostic Deductive Question Answering with Explanation from Texts”, in C. Stephanidis (ed.), Universal Access in HCI, Part IV, HCH 2011
(Berlin: Springer-VErlag LNCS 6768): 72–80.
• Velik, Rosemarie (2012), “AI Reloaded: Objectives, Potentials, and Challenges of the Novel Field of
Brain-Like Artificial Intelligence”, BRAIN: Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience
3(3) (October): 25–54.
• Caro, Manuel F.; Josyula, Darsana P.; Cox, Michael T.; & Jiménez, Jovani A. (2014), “Design and Validation of a Metamodel for Metacognition Support in Artificial Intelligent Systems”, Biologically Inspired
Cognitive Architectures 9: 82–104.
• Gürcan, Önder (2014), “Effective Connectivity at Synaptic Level in Humans: A Review and Future
Prospects”, Biological Cybernetics 108(6) (December): 713–733.
• Bytniewski, Andrzej; Chojnacka-Komorowska, Anna; Hernes, Marcin; & Matouk, Kamal (2015), “The
Implementation of the Perceptual Memory of Cognitive Agents in Integrated Management Information
System”, in Dariusz Barbucha, Ngoc Thanh Hguyen, & John Batubara (eds.), New Trends in Intelligent
Information and Database Systems (Springer): 281–290.
78. Rapaport, William J. (2012), “Semiotic Systems, Computers, and the Mind: How Cognition Could Be
Computing”, International Journal of Signs and Semiotic Systems 2(1) (January-June): 32–71.
• Mondal, Prakash (2014), “Does Computation Reveal Machine Cognition?”, Biosemiotics 7: 97–110.
79. Rapaport, William J. (1992–2013), “What Is Computation?”
[http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/∼rapaport/computation.html]
• Tedre, Matti (2015), The Science of Computing: Shaping a Discipline (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press).
47
80. Rapaport, William J. (1999–2013), “How to Study: A Brief Guide”
[http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/∼rapaport/HOWTOSTUDY/]
• Ticket to Write: English Skills for Success 1E (Pearson Education, 2012).
81. Rapaport, William J. (2003–2013), “William Perry’s Scheme of Intellectual and Ethical Development: A
journey along the 9 ‘Perry’ positions (as modified by Belenky et al. 1986)”
[http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/∼rapaport/perry-positions.html]
• Ingram, Ella L.; & Nelson, Craig E. (2008), “Applications of Intellectual Development Theory to Science
and Engineering Education”, in Gerald F. Ollington (ed.), Teachers and Teaching Strategies: Innovations
and Problem Solving (New York: Nova Science Publishers):1–30.
82. Rapaport, William J.; & Kibby, Michael W. (2014), “Contextual Vocabulary Acquisition: From Algorithm to Curriculum”, in Adriano Palma (ed.), Castañeda and His Guises: Essays on the Work of HectorNeri Castañeda (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter): 107–150.
• Palma, Adriano (2014), “H-NC and His Ambiguous Guises, or, by Way of Introduction”, in Adriano
Palma (ed.), Castañeda and His Guises: Essays on the Work of Hector-Neri Castañeda (Berlin: Walter
de Gruyter): 1–14.
48
Miscellaneous
1. There is a general reference to my work on Meinong in:
• Byrd, Michael (1986), Review of E. N. Zalta’s Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics, in Journal of Symbolic Logic 51: 246–248.
2. There are references to my work in:
1. Thimbleby, Harold (1991), Review of Fetzer, Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits, in SIGART
Bulletin 2(4) (August): 188–189.
2. Fetzer, James H. (1992), “What Reviewers Should and Should Not Do: On Harold Thimbleby on AI: Its
Scope and Limits”, SIGART Bulletin 3(1) (January): 6–7.
3. There is a reference to “Rapaport’s studies” on Meinong in:
• Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1987), “Self-Consciousness, Demonstrative Reference, and the Self-Ascription
View of Believing”, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 1: Metaphysics (Atascadero,
CA: Ridgeview Publishing Co.): 405–454.
4. There is a discussion of Cassie and the CVA project in:
• Gross, Neil (ed.) (1994), “ ‘Cassie’ Has Her Thinking Cap On”, Business Week (29 August): 82.
5. There is a discussion of Cassie and of my master’s student Min-Hung Liao’s MS thesis, “A Chinese-English
Machine Translation System” (1998), in:
• Port, Otis (ed.) (1995), “Computer Translators Better Getting” [sic], Business Week (11 December): 115.
6. There is an oblique citation to my teaching (actually more of an acknowledgment), in:
• Baiocco, Sharon A., & DeWaters, Jamie N. (1998), Successful College Teaching: Problem-Solving Strategies of Distinguished Professors (Boston: Allyn and Bacon): 285.
7. There is a reference to “the Clark-Rapaport paradox” (see Rapaport 1978 [item 3, above]) in:
• Poli, Roberto (1998), Review of D. Jacquette’s Meinongian Logic, in History and Philosophy of Logic 19:
117-119.
8. There is a reference to a webpage for one of my courses:
[http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/˜rapaport/572/S01/checkers.html]
(which is merely a newspaper article on computer checkers) in:
• Williams, Sam (2002), Arguing A.I.: The Battle for Twenty-First Century Science (New York: Random
House): 91.
49