Nonlocal Cosmology S. Deser (arXiv:0705.0153) N. C. Tsamis (arXiv:0904.1151) C. Deffayet and G. Esposito-Farese (arXiv:1106.4989) Modifications of Gravity Only local, stable, metric-based is f(R) Nonlocal modifications proposed for Summing quantum IR effects from inflation Explaining late time acceleration w/o DE Explaining galaxies & clusters w/o DM Isaac Newton in 1692/3 “that one body may act upon another at a distance thro' a Vacuum, without the Mediation of any thing else, by and through which their Action and Force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an Absurdity that I believe no Man who has in philosophical Matters a competent Faculty of thinking can ever fall into it.” Was Newton wrong about action-at-a-distance? We don’t think so Primordial inflation IR gravitons Fundamental theory is local But quantum effective field eqns are not M=0 loops could give big IR corrections N(t,k) ~ [Ha(t)/2kc]2 for every k Perhaps their attraction stops inflation Late modifications from vacuum polarization Would affect large scales most But for now, just model-building Late-Time Acceleration (arXiv:0705.0153 with Deser) Nonlocality via -½ for □ = (-g) ∂µ(√-g gµν∂ν) Retarded BC {□-1 & ∂t□-1} = 0 at t=0 Act it on R □-1R dimensionless L = √-g R[1 + f(□-1R)]/16πG □-1 f(X) the “Nonlocal distortion function” Gµν + ∆Gµν = 8πGTµν ∆Gµν = [Gµν + gµν□ - DµDν] (f + □-1[Rf’]) (ρ σ) ρσ + (δµ δν - ½gµνg ) ∂ρ(□-1R) ∂σ(□-1[R f’]) Specialization to FRW ds2 = -dt2 + a2(t) dx.dx R = 6Ḣ + 12 H2 t t’ -1 3 □ = -∫0 dt’/a ∫0 dt’’a3 Two Built-In Delays R=0 during Radiation Dom. (H = 1/2t) 5 No modification until t ~ 10 years □-1R ~ -4/3 ln(t/teq) during Matter Dom. 10 □-1R ~ -15 at t = 10 years Reconstructing f(X) for ΛCDM (arXiv:0904.0961 with Deffayet) How It Works for slowly varying a(t) Gµν + ∆Gµν = 8πGTµν ,∆Gµν ~ Gµν(f + □-1[Rf’]) Just rescale G! Geff = G/(1 + f + □-1[Rf’]) Friedman Eqn: 3H2 ~ 8πGeff ρ0/a3(t) But Geff strengthens gravity! Growth of Geff balances 1/a3(t) Not relevant for solar system But should increase structure formation Dodelson & Park (arXiv:1209.0836) Not purely Geff(t) when space dependent Delayed so late that only ~10-30% effect Local Version Is Haunted (Nojiri & Odintsov, arXiv:0708.0924) R[1+f(□-1R)] R[1+f(Φ)] + Ψ[□Φ–R] Varying wrt Ψ enforces □Φ = R NB both scalars have 2 pieces of IVD Ψ□Φ -∂µΨ∂νΦgµν -½∂µ(Ψ+Φ)∂ν(Ψ+Φ)gµν + ½∂µ(Ψ-Φ)∂ν(Ψ-Φ)gµν Ψ-Φ has negative KE No new initial value data for the original nonlocal version Synch. gauge: ds2 = -dt2 + hij(t,x) dxidxj IVD for GR: hij(0,x) & ḣij(0,x) = 6 + 6 4+4 for constrained fields 2+2 for dynamical gravitons IVD in nonlocal cosmo count the ∂t‘s 2 -2 0 R ~ ∂t & □-1 ~ ∂t □-1R ~ ∂t 2 ∆Gµν has up to ∂t □-1 Hence hij(0,x) & ḣij(0,x), but what are they? t=0 Constraints same as GR Recall Gµν + ∆Gµν = 8πGTµν ∆Gµν = [Gµν + gµν□ - DµDν] (f + □-1[Rf’]) (ρ σ) ρσ + (δµ δν - ½gµνg ) ∂ρ(□-1R) ∂σ(□-1[Rf’]) Retarded BC [□-1 & ∂t□-1] = 0 at t=0 f(X) also vanishes at X=0 Only [gµν□ - DµDν] {f(□-1R) + □-1[Rf’(□-1R)]} ≠ 0 Synchronous constraints ∆G00 & ∆G0i g00□ - D0D0 = ½hijḣij∂t - ∆ 0 at t=0 g0i□ - D0Di = -∂0∂i + ½hjkḣki∂j 0 at t=0 No Ghosts at t = 0 Recall Gµν + ∆Gµν = 8πGTµν ∆Gµν = [Gµν + gµν□ - DµDν] (f + □-1[Rf’]) ρσ (ρ σ) + (δµ δν - ½gµνg ) ∂ρ(□-1R) ∂σ(□-1[Rf’]) Dynamical eqns Gij + ∆Gij = 8πGTij 2 gij□ - DiDj -hij∂t + O(∂t) At t = 0 ∆Gij = 2f’(0) hijR kl Rij = ½ḧij + O(∂t) & R = h ḧkl + O(∂t) kl Gij + ∆Gij ½ḧij – [½-f’(0)]hijh ḧkl + O(∂t) 0 < f’(0) « 1 No graviton becomes a ghost! Avoid Geff with Tµν[g] =p[g] gµν + (ρ+p) uµuν (arXiv:0904.1151 with Tsamis) DµTµν = 0 4 eqns p, ρ uµ (gµν uµuν = -1) 5 variables Pick p[g] ρ[g] & uµ[g] for DµTµν=0 Enforcing conservation about FRW + ∆gµν 0th order uµ = δµ Get ∆u0 from gµν uµuν = -1 Dµ[(ρ+p)uµ] = u.∂p ∂t [a3(ρ+p)] = Known (ρ+p) u.D uν = -(∂ν+uν u.∂) p ∂t(ui/a) = Known Λ-Driven Inflation with QG backreaction from p = Λ2 f(-GΛ□-1R) Gµν = (p-Λ)gµν + (ρ+p) uµuν = -∫tdt’ a-3∫t’dt’’ a3 [12H2+6Ḣ] µ µ -3 t 3 ρ+p = a ∫ dt’ a ṗ and u = δ Two Equations -1R 3H2 = Λ + 8πG ρ -2Ḣ–3H2 = -Λ + 8πG p (easier) One Number: GΛ (nominally ∼ 10-6) One Function: f(x) (grows w/o bound) Numerical Results for GΛ=1/300 and f(x) = ex-1 X= -∫tdt’ a-3∫t’dt’’ a3R Criticality p = Λ2f(-GΛX) = Λ/8πG Evolution of X(t) Falls steadily to Xcr Then oscillates with constant period and decreasing amplitude Generic for any f(x) growing w/o bound Inflation Ends, H(t) goes < 0, R(t) oscillates about 0 Dark Matter vs Mod. Gravity Gµν = 8πGTµν works for solar system But not for galaxies Theory: v² = GM⁄r Obser: v2 ~ (a0GM)1/2 Maybe missing Mass Or modified gravity MOND (Milgrom 1983) ρ(x,y,z) ≡ mass in stars and gas gNi ≡ Newtonian acceleration gi ≡ actual acceleration gi µ(|g|/a0) = gNi a0 ∼ 10-10 m/s2 GR regime: µ(x) = 1 for x >> 1 MOND regime: µ(x) = x for x << 1 Eg. µ(x) = x/(1+x), or tanh(x), . . . Good agreement with galaxies but need relativistic model for Gravitational Lensing Recently disturbed systems The Bullet Cluster! Cosmology Previous models have new fields TeVeS (Bekenstein 2004) Another form of dark matter? Our Goal: A purely metric version Metric potentials for static, spherically symmetric ds2 = -B(r)c2dt2 + A(r)dr2 + r2dΩ2 b(r) = B(r) - 1 Rotation curves rb’(r) = 2v2/c2 [4GMa0/c4]½ a(r) = A(r) – 1 Lensing Data a(r) ~ + rb’(r) GR vs MOND for a MONDian ρ(r) M(r) = 4π/c2 ∫r dr’ r’2ρ(r’) GR a(r) = rb’(r) = 2GM(r)/c2r MONDian GM(r)/r2 « a0 δSGR/δb = (c4/16πG)[(ra)’ + O(h2)] - ½r2ρ 4 2 δSGR/δa = (c /16πG)[-rb’ + a + O(h )] MOND a(r) = rb’(r) = [4GM(r)a0/c4]½ ∂r(a2) = ∂r(rb’)2 = (16πGa0/c4) r2ρ 2 h LMOND to cancel from GR & add h3 for MOND LGR= -½r2ρb + (c4/16πG)[-rab’ + ½a2] LMOND= r2(c4/16πG)[ab’/r - ½(a/r)2 + c2/a0 [-1/6 (b’)3 + k(b’ – a/r)3 + . . . ] h3/r2 of GR « c2/a0 (h/r)3 of MOND for r « rH S = ∫dr [LGR + LMOND] ∂r(rb’)2 – 6k∂r(rb’-a)2 = (16πGa0/c4) r2ρ -6k/r (rb’-a)2 = 0 Conclusions Last chance for modified gravity based on gµν Not fundamental (we think) Models devised for From QG corrections during inflation Purely phenomenological for now Summing QG corrections from inflation Producing late acceleration w/o Dark Energy Describing galaxies & clusters w/o Dark Matter Tools for nonlocal model building Inverse covariant d’Alembertian Invariant volume of past light-cone