Nonlocal Cosmology arXiv:0705.0153 S. Deser & R. P. Woodard & soon

advertisement
Nonlocal Cosmology
arXiv:0705.0153 & soon
S. Deser & R. P. Woodard
Modifications of Gravity
Only local, stable, metric-based is f(R)
Nonlocal modifications proposed for
Summing quantum IR effects from inflation
Explaining late time acceleration w/o DE
Explaining galaxies & clusters w/o DM
Isaac Newton in 1692/3
“that one body may act upon another at a
distance thro' a Vacuum, without the
Mediation of any thing else, by and
through which their Action and Force
may be conveyed from one to another,
is to me so great an Absurdity that I
believe no Man who has in philosophical
Matters a competent Faculty of thinking
can ever fall into it.”
Was Newton wrong about
action-at-a-distance?
We don’t think so
Primordial inflation IR gravitons
Fundamental theory is local
But quantum effective field eqns are not
M=0 loops could give big IR corrections
N(t,k) ~ [Ha(t)/2kc]2 for every k
Perhaps their attraction stops inflation
Late modifications from vacuum polarization
Would affect large scales most
But for now, just model-building
Late-Time Acceleration
(arXiv:0705.0153 with Deser)
Nonlocality via
-½
for □ = (-g) ∂µ(√-g gµν∂ν)
Retarded BC {□-1 & ∂t□-1} = 0 at t=0
Act it on R □-1R dimensionless
L = √-g R[1 + f(□-1R)]/16πG
□-1
f(X) the “Nonlocal distortion function”
Gµν + ∆Gµν = 8πGTµν
∆Gµν = [Gµν + gµν□ - DµDν] (f + □-1[Rf’])
(ρ
σ)
ρσ
+ (δµ δν - ½gµνg ) ∂ρ(□-1R) ∂σ(□-1[R f’])
Specialization to FRW
ds2 = -dt2 + a2(t) dx.dx
R = 6Ḣ + 12 H2
t
t’
-1
3
□ = -∫0 dt’/a ∫0 dt’’a3
Two Built-In Delays
R=0 during Radiation Dom. (H = 1/2t)
5
No modification until t ~ 10 years
□-1R ~ -4/3 ln(t/teq) during Matter Dom.
10
□-1R ~ -15 at t = 10
years
Reconstructing f(X) for ΛCDM
(arXiv:0904.0961 with Deffayet)
Screening
f(R) models have a problem
R > 0 for cosmology AND solar system
Need “screening mechanism” to suppress
response inside solar system
f(□-1R) models avoid this problem
2
□ ~ -∂t + ∂x
2
□-1R < 0 for cosmology
□-1R > 0 for gravitationally bound systems
f(X) = 0 for X > 0 means NO solar system change
How It Works
for slowly varying a(t)
Gµν + ∆Gµν = 8πGTµν ,∆Gµν ~ Gµν(f + □-1[Rf’])
Just rescale G! Geff = G/(1 + f + □-1[Rf’])
Friedman Eqn: 3H2 ~ 8πGeff ρ0/a3(t)
But Geff strengthens gravity!
Growth of Geff balances 1/a3(t)
Not relevant for solar system
But should increase structure formation
Dodelson & Park (arXiv:1209.0836)
Not purely Geff(t) when space dependent
Delayed so late that only ~10-30% effect
Local Version Is Haunted
(Nojiri & Odintsov, arXiv:0708.0924)
R[1+f(□-1R)] R[1+f(Φ)] + Ψ[□Φ–R]
Varying wrt Ψ enforces □Φ = R
NB both scalars have 2 pieces of IVD
Ψ□Φ -∂µΨ∂νΦgµν
-½∂µ(Ψ+Φ)∂ν(Ψ+Φ)gµν
+ ½∂µ(Ψ-Φ)∂ν(Ψ-Φ)gµν
Ψ-Φ has negative KE
No new initial value data for
the original nonlocal version
Synch. gauge: ds2 = -dt2 + hij(t,x) dxidxj
IVD for GR: hij(0,x) & ḣij(0,x) = 6 + 6
4+4 for constrained fields
2+2 for dynamical gravitons
IVD in nonlocal cosmo count the ∂t‘s
2
-2
0
R ~ ∂t & □-1 ~ ∂t □-1R ~ ∂t
2
∆Gµν has up to ∂t □-1
Hence hij(0,x) & ḣij(0,x), but what are they?
t=0 Constraints same as GR
Recall Gµν + ∆Gµν = 8πGTµν
∆Gµν = [Gµν + gµν□ - DµDν] (f + □-1[Rf’])
(ρ
σ)
ρσ
+ (δµ δν - ½gµνg ) ∂ρ(□-1R) ∂σ(□-1[Rf’])
Retarded BC [□-1 & ∂t□-1] = 0 at t=0
f(X) also vanishes at X=0
Only [gµν□ - DµDν] {f(□-1R) + □-1[Rf’(□-1R)]} ≠ 0
Synchronous constraints ∆G00 & ∆G0i
g00□ - D0D0 = ½hijḣij∂t - ∆ 0 at t=0
g0i□ - D0Di = -∂0∂i + ½hjkḣki∂j 0 at t=0
No Ghosts check ∂t2 terms
Recall Gµν + ∆Gµν = 8πGTµν
∆Gµν = [Gµν + gµν□ - DµDν] (f + □-1[Rf’])
ρσ
(ρ
σ)
+ (δµ δν - ½gµνg ) ∂ρ(□-1R) ∂σ(□-1[Rf’])
Dynamical eqns Gij + ∆Gij = 8πGTij
2
gij□ - DiDj -hij∂t + O(∂t) -1
∆Gij = 2 hij R f’(□ R) + O(∂t)
kl
Rij = ½ḧij + O(∂t) & R = h ḧkl
+hij□ + O(∂t)
+ O(∂t)
kl
Gij + ∆Gij ½ḧij – [½-2f’(X)]hijh ḧkl + O(∂t)
No graviton becomes a ghost!
Still might have a potential energy instability
Download