PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLN: 13‐31 November 12, 2013 File Code #: R02 MEMO TO: Martha Rogers, Director of Education FROM: Heather Imm, Senior Planner Jennifer Passy, Manager of Planning Janice Wright, Superintendent of Finance RE: New Rockwood Elementary School Boundary Review – Report #2 Report Classification: INFORMATION BACKGROUND On September 24, 2013 the Board approved PLN: 13‐22 “New Rockwood Elementary School Boundary Review ‐ Report #2” which initiated the boundary review process for establishing the attendance area for the new Rockwood elementary school. ISSUE In accordance with the School Boundary Review Procedures Manual (320‐A), Report #2 is to provide: a) Alternative scenarios to address the accommodation issues; b) Staff analysis of the alternative scenarios developed; c) A list of recommended options including justification for the recommendations; d) The proposed timeline for implementation of the Boundary changes; and e) A communication plan. RECOMMENDATION 1. THAT memo PLN: 13‐31 entitled “New Rockwood Elementary School Boundary Review – Report #2” be received. RATIONALE See the attached report “New Rockwood Elementary School Boundary Review – Report #2”. NEW ROCKWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARY REVIEW REPORT #2 Presented to the Business Operations Committee Upper Grand District School Board November 12, 2013 New Rockwood School Boundary Review – Report #2 INTRODUCTION 1.0
The Board approved the initiation of the New Rockwood Elementary School Boundary Review on September 24, 2013. The Staff Committee has considered the goals, objectives and constraints of the review which were contained in Report #1 and discussed possible school boundary scenarios. The Staff Committee has also made a link available on the Board’s website to receive correspondence from the public. The Goals, Objectives and Constraints for this review are: Goals 1. Create a viable JK‐6 or JK‐8 boundary for the new Rockwood elementary school. 2. Assuming confirmation of a viable French Immersion (FI) start‐up program in Rockwood, establish the school location and FI boundary. Objectives 1. Develop an attendance area for the new Rockwood elementary school that establishes a viable and sustainable JK‐6 or JK‐8 program. 2. Alleviate the overcapacity pressure at Rockwood Centennial PS and develop viable and sustainable attendance areas for Rockwood Centennial PS and Eramosa PS. 3. Should early registration support establishing an FI program, identify a school(s) to accommodate the program and develop a viable and sustainable attendance area(s). 4. Should registration support establishing an FI program in Rockwood, establish a new FI attendance area for Brisbane PS, Erin PS and Erin DHS. 5. Maximize the number of students within walking distance to school. 6. Minimize the impact on students where transitions are proposed. Constraints 1. Confirmation of a viable start‐up FI program in Rockwood is necessary. FI registration will take place in early October. Registration levels will determine whether the enrolment will support an FI program and if so, whether it will start as JK/SK program or JK/SK/Gr 1 program. 2. The attendance areas needs to be established in time to allow communication of the boundary changes to families prior to Regular Track (RT) Kindergarten registration in February 2014 and to allow for the staffing process to incorporate these changes beginning in February 2014. 1
New Rockw
wood School B
Boundary Revie
ew – Report #2
2 2.0 EN
NROLMENT B
BACKGROUND ntennial PS Rockwood Cen
The current On the Gro
ound (OTG) ccapacity of Ro
ockwood Centtennial PS (RC
CPS) is 446 pu
upil places. The Full D
Day Kindergarrten (FDK) ren
novation plan
nned at RCPS will convert ttwo existing cclassrooms into a purpose b
built Kindergaarten room an
nd a seminar room. A furtther two classsrooms are to
o be expandeed to become K
Kindergarten rooms. The sschool will offfer FDK in Sepptember 20144 and at that time will havve an OTG capacity of 432 pu
upil places. Due to en
nrolment presssure currently experience
ed at RCPS, thhe school has 7 portables ((including thee eco‐
portable) in use on the
e site. There is also 1 portaable on site t hat is decommissioned. The enrolment at RCPSS at the begin
nning of Septe
ember was 5669 FTE studen
nts (Kindergarten studentss still counted aas half time). Chart 1 indicaates both the
e historical annd projected SStatus Quo en
nrolment gro
owth at RCPS. The
e chart also reflects the ch
hange in the sschool’s capa city as a result of the prop
posed renovations to accommo
odate FDK. Te
emporary acccommodation
n (ie. portablees) is shown aas a separate line from thee OTG capacity o
on the chart. The addition
nal portable caapacity show
wn reflects thee 7 portables currently in u
use on the site. 2.1 Chart 1 ‐ Ro
ockwood Centen
nnial PS Historical and Projected
d Status Quo Ennrolment nt at RCPS is p
projected to in
ncrease with FDK in Septe mber 2014. Beyond 2014
4 the enrolmeent is Enrolmen
projected to remain re
elatively stable with some moderate inccreases due to new residential construcction in Rockwood
d. Beyond 20
018, enrolmen
nt is projected to decline sslightly but reemain well ab
bove the OTG capacity. This decline can mainly be
e attributed tto larger num
mbers of studeents graduating Grade 8 th
han entering sschool at Kind
dergarten . 2.2 Erramosa PS The current OTG capaccity of Eramosa PS is 161 p
pupil places. TThe FDK reno
ovation appro
oved for Eram
mosa PS will replacce one existin
ng classroom and part of th
he staff room
m to create a p
purpose builtt Kindergarten
n room. 2
New Rockw
wood School B
Boundary Revie
ew – Report #2
2 Eramosa P
PS will have FFDK in Septem
mber 2014 and at that timee will have an
n OTG capacitty of 164 pup
pil places. Th
here are no po
ortables on siite at Eramossa PS. ment at Eramo
osa PS at the beginning of September w
was 126 FTE sstudents . Chart 2 The 2013//2014 enrolm
indicates both the historical and pro
ojected Statu
us Quo enrolm
ment at Eramosa PS. The cchart also sho
ows the change in the school’s capacity as aa result of the
e proposed reenovations to accommodate FDK. Chart 2 – Erramosa PS Histo
orical and Projeccted Status Quo Enrolment Enrolmen
nt projections for Eramosa PS indicate that the enrollment has beeen gradually declining. With the exception
n of an increase due to FDK
K, the decline
e is projected to continue. This decline is mainly attrributed to larger n
numbers of sttudents gradu
uating Grade 6 than enterring school at Kindergarten
n. Further, th
here is little resid
dential constrruction occurrring within th
he attendancee area. 2.3 Brisbane PS Brisbane PS received FFDK in the 201
12/13 school year. The schhool’s previous OTG capaccity before internal renovatio
ons were completed for FD
DK was 429 pu
upil places. Thhe current OTTG capacity o
of Brisbane PSS is 446 pupil placces. Brisbane PS offers a JK
K‐6 Dual Trackk program (bo
oth RT and FI)). The Dual Trrack (DT) natu
ure of the sch
hool often resu
ults in inefficient loading o
of classroom sspace. Basedd on past work by Planningg Departmentt staff, a DT school typically re
esults in the b
building’s cap
pacity being reeduced by three pupils per classroom. Therefore
e, the currentt Effective Cap
pacity of Brisb
bane PS is 38 9 pupil places. The school currently haas 1 decommisssioned portaable on site. The 2013//14 enrolmen
nt at Brisbane
e PS at the be
eginning of Seeptember wass 409 studentts. Chart 1 ind
dicates both the h
historical and
d projected Sttatus Quo enrrolment foreccast at Brisbane PS. The chart also shows the change in the school’s OTG capacityy as a result o
of the compleeted facility ch
hanges to acccommodate FFDK. d on the chartt. The effecttive capacity of the schooll is also noted
3
New Rockw
wood School B
Boundary Revie
ew – Report #2
2 Chart 3 ‐ Brrisbane PS Histoorical and Projeccted Status Quoo Enrolment Enrolmen
nt projections for Brisbane PS indicate that the schoool’s enrolmen
nt is relativelyy stable with some moderate
e growth. The
e growth in enrolment is in
n the FI progrram while thee RT program remains stab
ble. uted in part tto the decision resulting frrom the Edwaard The growtth projected in the FI proggram is attribu
Johnson P
PS Boundary R
Review, which reassigned East Wellingtton FI studen
nts from Guelp
ph to Brisban
ne PS starting in
n September 2012. The Status Quo enrrolment projeection assumees the repatriiation of Eastt Wellingto
on FI studentss to Brisbane PS who are currently attennding King Geeorge PS until 2014. The projection
n also include
es JK, SK and G
Grade 1 FI stu
udents from tthe Rockwood
d area who are currently attendingg Brisbane PS.. 3.0 FR
RENCH IMMEERSION PROG
GRAM IN ROC
CKWOOD Recomme
endations from the Edward
d Johnson PS FI Boundary Review (Janu
uary 24, 2012
2) included a cchange to the desstination scho
ool for JK‐8 FI students ressiding east of Jones Baselin
ne (referred tto as East Wellingto
on). FI studen
nts residing in
n East Wellinggton who werre formerly acccommodated in Guelph w
were assigned tto the attendance areas off Brisbane PS (JK‐6), Erin PPS (Gr 7/8) an
nd Erin DHS (9
9‐12). A furth
her motion diirected staff tto conduct an
n FI feasibility study to deteermine the potential for aa start‐up FI p
program in Rockwo
ood. n June 2012. Based on this study, Trusttees approved that The FI feaasibility study was completted by Staff in
an early FFI registration would take p
place in Rockw
wood in Octoober 2013. FI registraation occurred
d at RCPS on October 1st and 2nd. As off October 7th, FI registratio
on yielded thee following new FI stude
ent enrolmentts: JK
K= 17 SK
K = 7 Grade 1 = 15 4
New Rockwood School Boundary Review – Report #2 In addition to the new FI registrants for September 2014, there are FI students from East Wellington in JK or SK attending either King George PS or Brisbane PS. Added to the new registrants, the total enrolment of potential Rockwood FI students for 2014/15 are: JK= 17 SK = 12 Grade 1 = 27 Using these FI enrolments, projections indicate that by 2022 there is the potential for 225‐275 JK‐8 FI students in the Rockwood area. The FI enrolment is dependent upon several factors such as where the FI program is accommodated in Rockwood, FI participation in the future and the pace of future residential construction. 4.0 BOUNDARY SCENARIOS 4.1 Scenario 1 Since the presentation of Report #1 (PLN: 13‐24) on September 10, 2013, the Boundary Review Committee has met on four occasions and has been engaged in scenario development. The committee discussions have considered 6 different scenarios. Initially, the Committee considered a scenario that would accommodate the entire JK‐8 FI program at RCPS and the new school would accommodate JK‐6 RT only. As the larger of the two schools in Rockwood, RCPS was considered as the location for FI program given its projected size (200+ students). FI programs tend to rely more heavily on busing as students are typically drawn from much larger catchment areas which is similar to the current RCPS boundary. The RCPS site currently manages a number of school buses. It is evident in the enrolment projections for Scenario 1 that accommodating the entire JK‐8 FI program at one school is not a viable option. At the new school, despite having selected a sizeable RT boundary, the enrolment is not sustained in the long term which causes the new school to be underutilized by 2018. Further, the enrolment projections for RCPS indicate that the enrolments will increase well beyond the Effective Capacity of the school by 2018. It was not possible to create a balance in the DT program at RCPS. Coupled with a significant portion of the RCPS RT boundary being reassigned to the new school, an increase in FI participation from within the remaining RCPS boundary is projected. An increase in FI participation has been experienced in other school boundaries within the jurisdiction where FI programs have been introduced. The enrolment projections for Brisbane PS indicate that although the enrolment is projected to remain higher than the Effective Capacity, the school will have less pressure than Status Quo due to the assignment of the Rockwood area FI students to a Rockwood school. The enrolment at Eramosa PS has been gradually declining since 2008, which is a trend that is expected to continue. As a result of introducing FI, there is a slightly more noticeable decline projected than in the Status Quo. All scenarios reflect the same projections for Brisbane PS and Eramosa PS. 5
New Rockwood School Boundary Review – Report #2 It is Staff’s opinion that Scenario 1 is not viable for the following reasons:  it creates an imbalance between the RT and FI program sizes at RCPS,  overcapacity concerns at RCPS schools by 2018 and  underutilization at the new school by 2018. For these reasons, this scenario was discarded. The remainder of the scenarios considered by the Committee split the FI program between the two Rockwood schools. The highlighted enrolments in Table 1 identify the areas of concern that result from this scenario. Table 1 ‐ Enrolment Projections: Scenario 1 OTG Capacity
Effective Capacity
2014
JK/SK 1‐6
2018
7/8 Total JK/SK 1‐6
2022
7/8 Total JK/SK 1‐6
7/8 Total
Brisbane PS JK‐6 RT
20
95
115
20
95
115
20
90
110
Brisbane PS JK‐6 FI
80
215
295
85
220
305
90
240
330
420 110 330
440
Brisbane PS Total
446
Eramosa PS
New Rockwood JK‐6 RT
389
100 310
410 105 315
164
30
110
140
25
80
0
105
25
70
95
308
50
265
315
50
190
0
240
55
160
215
15
140
310
10
85
205
300
15
60
100
175
40
255
Rockwood Centennial PS JK‐8 RT
35
Rockwood Centennial PS JK‐8 FI
Rockwood Centennial PS Total
432
378
50
25
155
60
165 155 370
55
120
175
60
155
65
205 205 475
75
215 140 430
Note: Effective Capacities for the new Rockwood school and Brisbane PS are based on a JK‐6 DT or JK‐8 DT program. Enrolment projections have been rounded to the nearest 5. 4.2 Shortlisted Scenarios The Committee concluded that there were two viable scenarios to be included in Report #2 and presented to the public. Scenario 2 ‐ Staff’s Preferred Scenario proposes that the new school would be JK‐5 DT (both RT and FI), and RCPS would accommodate JK‐8 RT and Grades 6‐8 FI. Students from the new school would graduate to RCPS for Grades 6‐8 in both the RT and FI programs. Scenario 3 proposes that the new school would accommodate JK‐6 RT and JK‐3 FI. RCPS would accommodate JK‐8 RT and Grades 4‐8 FI. Students from the new school would graduate to RCPS for Grades 7/8 in RT and Grades 4‐8 in FI. The shortlisted scenarios have the same impact on Eramosa PS and Brisbane PS as in Scenario 1 and therefore the enrolment projections are consistent. A goal identified at the onset of this review was to create a JK‐6 or JK‐8 boundary for the new school. Enrolment projections for the RT 7/8 program in the future indicate that the enrolment will not be large enough to support two separate 7/8 programs. Therefore, both shortlisted scenarios have the 7/8 program at RCPS. 6
New Rockwood School Boundary Review – Report #2 4.3 Scenario 2 ‐ Staff’s Preferred Scenario In Scenario 2, the new school would offer JK‐5 DT. The boundary for the RT program generally includes an area south of Harris Street on either side of Highway 7 (Main Street) at the south end of the Village of Rockwood. The boundary for the FI program includes the Village of Rockwood as well as a larger rural area in the Township of Guelph Eramosa. Scenario 2 enrolment projections are shown in Table 2. The maps for Scenario 2 are located in Appendix A, Maps 1‐6. Table 2‐ Enrolment Projections: Scenario 2 OTG Capacity
Effective Capacity
2014
JK/SK 1‐6
Brisbane PS JK‐6 RT
20
95
80
215
2018
7/8 Total JK/SK 1‐6
115
20
95
295
85
220
2022
7/8 Total JK/SK 1‐6
115
20
90
305
90
7/8 Total
110
240
330
100 310
410 105 315
420 110 330
440
30
110
140
25
80
105
25
70
95
New Rockwood JK‐5 RT
40
180
220
40
110
150
40
100
140
New Rockwood JK‐5 FI
35
25
60
50
110
160
55
120
175
75
205
280
90
220
310
95
220
315
30
220
405
30
170
405
35
135
105
275
20
35
55
Brisbane PS JK‐6 FI
Brisbane PS Total
446
Eramosa PS
164
New Rockwood Total
308
389
269
Rockwood Centennial PS JK‐8 RT
155
205
Rockwood Centennial PS Gr 6‐8 FI
Rockwood Centennial PS Total
432
405
30
220 155 405
30
170 205 405
35
155 140 330 Note: Effective Capacities for New Rockwood school and Brisbane PS are based on a JK‐5 DT or JK‐6 DT program. The Effective Capacity for Rockwood Centennial PS is based on a Gr 6‐8 DT program only. Enrolment projections have been rounded to the nearest 5. A comparison between the enrolment projections and Effective Capacity of the new Rockwood school suggests that temporary accommodation may be necessary. Scenario 2 was selected as Staff’s preferred scenario given that RCPS is projected to be utilized efficiently to 2018. There is also a balance achieved between the size of the RT and FI programs at the new school. Further, the establishment of a JK‐5 DT at the new school increases opportunities for cohesion between the two programs, given that the Grade 5 students graduate to RCPS together. 4.4 Scenario 3 In Scenario 3, the new Rockwood school would offer JK‐6 RT and JK‐3 FI. The boundaries for both the RT and FI program are the same as Scenario 2. The difference between Scenario 3 and Scenario 2 is the grades that are offered in the RT and FI programs at the new school and RCPS. The Scenario 3 enrolment projection is shown in Table 3. The maps for Scenario 2 are located in Appendix A, Maps 7‐11. 7
New Rockwood School Boundary Review – Report #2 The move of Grade 3 FI students for Grades 4‐8 is consistent with recent decisions by Trustees in other areas of the jurisdiction. Table 3 ‐ Enrolment Projections: Scenario 3 OTG Capacity
Effective Capacity
2014
JK/SK 1‐6
Brisbane PS JK‐6 RT
Brisbane PS JK‐6 FI
20
95
80
215
2018
7/8 Total JK/SK 1‐6
115
20
95
295
85
220
2022
7/8 Total JK/SK 1‐6
115
20
90
305
90
7/8 Total
110
240
330
100 310
410 105 315
420 110 330
440
30
110
140
25
80
105
25
70
95
New Rockwood JK‐6 RT
40
230
270
40
150
190
40
120
160
New Rockwood JK‐3 FI
35
25
60
50
70
120
55
75
130
75
255
330
90
220
310
95
195
290
30
175
360
30
125
360
35
115
105
255
60
35
95
Brisbane PS Total
446
Eramosa PS
164
New Rockwood Total
308
389
275
Rockwood Centennial PS JK‐8 RT
Rockwood Centennial PS Gr 4‐8 FI
Rockwood Centennial PS Total
155
0
432
396
30
175 155 360
40
30
205
40
165 205 400
35
175 140 350 Note: Effective Capacity for Brisbane PS is based on a JK‐6 DT program. The Effective Capacity for the new Rockwood school is based on JK‐3 DT and at Rockwood Centennial PS on Gr 4‐8 DT program. Enrolment projections have been rounded to the nearest 5. In comparison to Scenario 2, the utilization of RCPS is not as efficient out to 2018. Relative balance in the projected size of the RT and FI programs is achieved at the new school, keeping in mind the difference in grades offered in each program. A comparison between the enrolment projections and the Effective Capacity of the new school indicates that it will experience more enrolment pressure than in Scenario 2, requiring the use of temporary accommodation. 5.0 Transportation Considerations The transportation implications for the RT are the same between the two scenarios. There may be less busing required for RT students in the younger grades who reside in the south end of Rockwood as the new school is located closer to those neighbourhoods. In FI, despite the difference in grades offered at the new school between Scenarios 2 and 3, there may be little difference in the amount of busing required. Generally, as the FI program expands to include more grades, there will also be a corresponding reduction in transportation for the students who reside in Rockwood who would have been transported to Brisbane and Erin PS for FI. Once a scenario is confirmed by the Board, Service de transport de Wellington‐Dufferin Student Transportation Services (STWDSTS) will determine transportation eligibility. The www.findmyschool.ca website will be updated in April 2014 to include transportation eligibility information for the new boundaries and recommended walking routes. 8
New Rockwood School Boundary Review – Report #2 6.0 Implementation Timelines To avoid RT students being moved to the new school and returning to RCPS a year later, it is proposed that the following phase in of grades occur: Scenario 2 (students entering Grade 5 in 2014 would be grandparented at RCPS): 2014/15 – New School opens JK‐4 RT 2015/16 – New School has JK‐5 RT Scenario 3 (students entering Grade 6 in 2014 would be grandparented at RCPS): 2014/15 – New School opens JK‐5 RT 2015/16 – New School has JK‐6 RT Based on the enrolment projections for both Scenarios, it is anticipated that RCPS could accommodate grandparented students for one year through the use of existing portables on site, if necessary. For the FI program, it is proposed that in both shortlisted scenarios the first grade of FI students graduating to RCPS remain at the new school for an additional year. The following year this cohort of FI students would graduate to RCPS with the students in the grade below. This would occur only once to avoid the move of a small cohort of FI students into RCPS. It may be necessary to utilize temporary accommodation at the new school to hold an additional grade of FI students for one year. 7.0 Communication Plan This Communication Plan focuses on giving the public an opportunity to be fully informed of the scenarios, and to continue to provide input to the Staff Committee.  Report #2 was posted on the Board’s website on November 8, 2013  Report #2 will be presented to the Business Operations Committee on November 12, 2013.  A Public Information Session will be held in the gymnasium at RCPS on November 21, 2013 from 7:00‐9:00pm.  A letter will be sent home to parents and guardians of RCPS, Eramosa PS and Brisbane PS students, informing them of the release of Report #2 and to solicit attendance at the Public Information Session.  Newspaper ads for the Public Information Session scheduled for November 21, 2013 will be developed and booked.  A media release will be sent to local newspapers, radio and TV stations. 
Web pages in the Planning Department section of the Board website will be updated and will include links to the report, letters and other documents as required. 
Information on delegation opportunities will be included with a link to the web page containing delegation requirements. 9
New Rockwood School Boundary Review – Report #2 
The Boundary Review web page is promoted on the home page of the Board’s website, and the home pages of RCPS, Eramosa PS and Brisbane PS with links to the Planning Department web pages. 
The Planning Department web page includes a form that gives community members the opportunity to sign up and receive email alerts when significant new content is added to the site. 
The submission form for receiving community input is included on the website with the response deadline (December 18, 2013). o

This feedback will be shared on the website without attribution. Due to time constraints and staff resources, individual responses cannot be provided. This information will be posted with the form. A PDF version of the comment form, which can be printed and dropped off at RCPS, Eramosa PS, Brisbane PS or the Board office will be available. The Public Information Session will provide another vehicle for communication to the community, and an opportunity for the public to provide comments (comment sheets), and discuss the scenarios with staff and the local trustee. A final Communication Plan will be included in the Final Boundary Review Report. 8.0 Next Steps  Public Information Session November 21, 2013 Rockwood Centennial PS, Gymnasium 7:00pm‐9:00pm  Public Input Deadline December 18, 2013  Final Boundary Review Report Distribution January 10, 2014  Business Operations Committee January 14, 2014 Staff presentation of Final Boundary Review Report Opportunity for delegations  Board Meeting January 28, 2014 Board Decision related to Final Boundary Review Report Opportunity for delegations Additional opportunities for delegating at Standing Committee and Board meetings include:  November 26, 2013 Board Meeting  December 17, 2013 Board Meeting 10
11
APPENDIX A MAPS 12
Scenario 2 - New Rockwood PS JK-5 RT Attendance Area
GZOWSKI ST
School Locations
STA
T
RICHA
R DS ON ST
CHURCH ST
T
ALMA S
T
LAVA S
BALAC
CLARA
BRADY ST
JACKSON ST
DE
NN
ST
IS
ST
LEY ST
ST SHAN
DIVISION
S
ST
ST
MARY
ION
ST
GOWAN ST
BR
GE
ID
ST
BL
IV
PR ATE
C
MILLVIEW
T
WE
C RES
WINSTON ST
HENRY ST
RIDGE TO P
ELL
YS
L
E MY P
AC
AD
SC O
T S LN
HIGHWAY 7
PA
MIL N E
PL
ST
NBAR S
T
DU
OLD MAPLE BLVD
KVIEW LN
PAR
JOHN ST
HA
YW
CRES
LN
ST
RKINSON D
ISAAC
PARKEDGE
IN
MAC LENNAN
TERSL
AR
VD
BL
LN
ON
GT
50
SAMMON DR
WETHERALD ST
S
FREDERICK ST
C
U
LO
A
FOUN T
ARD CT
N
N
LLI
RD
ST
IS
COKER
ST
R
H AR
JOLLIFFE AVE
ST
MAY
ST
R
ST
CARROLL ST
BERNARDI CRES
WHEELER CT
PL
NE
GABRIEL LN
TE R
WA
P I NE
GAMBLE LN
TO
ES
ROCKWOOD
RD
New Rockwood
School
CHRISTIE ST
COB
ER
CRE
MAN
INKER
FALL ST S FALL ST N
THATCH
MAIN ST N
New Rockwood School Boundary
MACKENZIE ST
New Rockwood PS
PRINCESS ST
Other Schools
NAME
LANDREX BLVD
Legend
Map1
UGDSB Planning Dept. October 2013
S:\Planning\Boundary reviews\New Rockwood PS\Maps\New Rockwood JK-5 Dual v2.mxd
0
0.125
0.25
0.5 km
6
MAIN ST N
Rockwood Cent. PS
Rockwood Cent. PS Boundary
WELL INGTON RD 50
T
ALMA S
5
TOWN
OF ERIN
MAIN ST S
4
ROCKWOOD
ST
RIS
HAR
0.5
1
2 km
LANDREX
BLVD
ALMA ST
GUELPH
ST
ST
VA IDGE
BALACLA
BR
ST CLARA
COBBLESTONE
ST PL
T
EW
D
RG E V I
E R GEO MILL
T
A
P RIV
ST E E CT
G
OR
E
G W
T
S
FE
L
CARROLL
B
LIF
L
ST
JO E
AV
RR
HA
T
S
IS
SAMMON
DR
LP
HS
ST
JACKSON
ST
DE
N
ST NIS
JOLLIFFE AVE
Map 2
UGDSB Planning Dept., October 2013
0
DIVISION ST
S
OU D
LV
Note: The map is for reference purposes only.
It is subject to change.
LOUS
BLVD
T
ALMA S
GU
E
ION
DOWLER ST
FALL
ST N
FALL ST S
STA
T
MACKENZIE
ST
CHRISTIE
ST
QUEEN ST
1
HIGHWAY 7
ALICIA LN
2
WELLINGTON RD 29
3
EDEN
MILLS
Rockwood
Cent. PS
WELLINGTON RD 44
GUELPH-ERAMOSA
Scenario 2 - Rockwood Centennial PS JK-5 RT Attendance Area
7
Legend
1
10
WELLINGTON RD 27
FOURTH LINE
THIRD LINE
8
T
IAN
TR
HIGHWAY 7
AS
H
AD
HIGHWAY 7
1
ERAMOSA-MILTON
TL
MILTON
SECOND LINE
PUSLINCH
WILSON ST
ESTE
M
HO LN
ST
2
WELLINGTON RD 44
3
L
EDEN
MILLS
ERAMOSA-ERIN TL
IS S
MAIN ST S
4
R
HA R
SEVENTH LINE
ROCKWOOD
SIXTH LINE
5
MAIN ST S
AL
IND
WELLINGTON RD 29
SIXTH LINE
MAIN ST N
6
JONES BASELINE
7
INDIAN TRL
GUELPH-ERAMOSA
TOWN
OF ERIN
T
MA S
Scenario 2 - Rockwood Centennial PS Gr 6 RT Attendance Area
9
AY 7
HIGHW
50
WELLINGTON RD
Legend
Rockwood Cent. PS
UGDSB Planning Dept., October 2013
0
0.5
1
2 km
Map 3
Rockwood Cent. PS Boundary
Note: The map is for reference purposes only.
It is subject to change.
4
II
Scenario 2 and 3 - Rockwood Centennial PS 7/8 RT Attendance Area
1
2
1
New school
8
10 11 12 13
VRockwood
Cent. PS
14
Eramosa Option Area
VI
Rockwood Cent. PS
ENNOTVILLE
9
29
HIGH
WAY
6
27
OUSTIC
26
VIII
1. J.D. Hogarth PS & Centre Wellington DHS
OR
2. Rockwood Centennial PS & J.F. Ross C.V.I.
28
VII
Students in this area (which include both
side of Well. Rd 22 and 26) choose 1 of 2 options
before entry into Grade 7. Attend Either:
30
25
WELLINGTON RD 2
2
N
WEL LINGTO
24
22
X
4
5
6
7
I
16
15
IX
13
TO N
WELLING
11
10
V
9
8
7
IV
6
3
II
2
EDEN MILLS
HA R
S
RIS
RD 50
T
HIGHWAY 7
1
1
2
N PKY S
I
LINGTON RD 44
WEL
4
T SO
WA
WATSON RD S
5
III
YORK RD
N
WELLINGTO
MAIN ST N
EASTVIEW RD
VI
EVERTON
WELLINGTON RD 27
12
SPEEDVALE AVE E
RD 124
WELLINGTON RD 125
14
VIII
VICTORIA RD S
III
II
VII
VI
V
IV
III
II
X
9 10
18
XI
I
WELLINGTON RD 38
3
19
2
20
1
WELLINGTON RD 29
21
XII
I
RD 22
23
IX
WELLINGTON RD 26
6
31
5
32
School
IV Locations
4
2
3
I II
Legend
3
Map 4
3
4
UGDSB Planning Dept. October 2013 5
6
S:\Planning\Boundary reviews\New Rockwood PS\Maps\Rockwood Centennial PS 7-8.mxd
0
1
2
4 km
28
Scenario 2 - New Rockwood School JK-5 FI Attendance Area
27
Map 5
OUSTIC
26
HI G
HW
AY 6
Legend
25
School Locations
N RD 22
WEL LINGTO
24
New Rockwood school
Rockwood Cent. PS
23
New Rockwood School Boundary
21
WELLINGTON RD 26
22
5
6
7
9 10
II
VII
VI
V
I
IV
III
II
I
X
18
XI
19
16
WELLINGTON RD 29
14
13
11
10
V
9
EVERTON
7
IV
5
4
I
2
EDEN MILLS
HIGHWAY 7
1
1
ROCKWOOD
2
TSON PKY S
WA
3
II
50
WEL LINGTON RD
MAIN ST S
6
III
ST
ALMA
MAIN ST N
8
WATSON PKY N
RD 124
12
VI
YORK RD
TO N
WELLING
WELLINGTON RD 27
VIII
15
IX
WATSON RD S
4
20
XII
3
4
5
UGDSB Planning 6
Dept. October 2013
S:\Planning\Boundary reviews\New Rockwood PS\Maps\Rockwood Centennial PS FI map.mxd
0
1
2
4 km
28
Scenario 2 - Rockwood Centennial Gr 6-8 FI Attendance Area
27
Map 6
OUSTIC
26
HI G
HW
AY 6
Legend
25
School Locations
N RD 22
WEL LINGTO
24
New school
Rockwood Cent. PS
23
Rockwood Cent. PS Boundary
21
WELLINGTON RD 26
22
5
6
7
9 10
II
VII
VI
V
I
IV
III
II
I
X
18
XI
19
16
WELLINGTON RD 29
14
13
11
10
V
9
EVERTON
6
5
III
4
I
2
EDEN MILLS
HIGHWAY 7
1
1
ROCKWOOD
2
TSON PKY S
WA
3
II
50
WEL LINGTON RD
MAIN ST S
7
IV
MAIN ST N
8
WATSON PKY N
RD 124
12
VI
YORK RD
TO N
WELLING
WELLINGTON RD 27
VIII
15
IX
WATSON RD S
4
20
XII
3
4
5
UGDSB Planning 6
Dept. October 2013
S:\Planning\Boundary reviews\New Rockwood PS\Maps\Rockwood Centennial PS FI map.mxd
0
1
2
4 km
Scenario 7 - New Rockwood PS JK-6 RT Attendance Area
GZOWSKI ST
School Locations
STA
T
RICHA
R DS ON ST
CHURCH ST
T
ALMA S
T
LAVA S
BALAC
CLARA
BRADY ST
JACKSON ST
DE
NN
ST
IS
ST
LEY ST
ST SHAN
DIVISION
S
ST
ST
MARY
ION
ST
GOWAN ST
BR
GE
ID
ST
BL
IV
PR ATE
C
MILLVIEW
T
WE
C RES
WINSTON ST
HENRY ST
RIDGE TO P
ELL
YS
L
E MY P
AC
AD
SC O
T S LN
HIGHWAY 7
PA
MIL N E
PL
ST
NBAR S
T
DU
OLD MAPLE BLVD
KVIEW LN
PAR
JOHN ST
HA
YW
CRES
LN
ST
RKINSON D
ISAAC
PARKEDGE
IN
MAC LENNAN
TERSL
AR
VD
BL
LN
ON
GT
50
SAMMON DR
WETHERALD ST
S
FREDERICK ST
C
U
LO
A
FOUN T
ARD CT
N
N
LLI
RD
ST
IS
COKER
ST
R
H AR
JOLLIFFE AVE
ST
MAY
ST
R
ST
CARROLL ST
BERNARDI CRES
WHEELER CT
PL
NE
GABRIEL LN
TE R
WA
P I NE
GAMBLE LN
TO
ES
ROCKWOOD
RD
New Rockwood
School
CHRISTIE ST
COB
ER
CRE
MAN
INKER
FALL ST S FALL ST N
THATCH
MAIN ST N
New Rockwood School Boundary
MACKENZIE ST
New Rockwood PS
PRINCESS ST
Other Schools
NAME
LANDREX BLVD
Legend
Map 7
UGDSB Planning Dept. October 2013
S:\Planning\Boundary reviews\New Rockwood PS\Maps\New Rockwood JK-5 Dual v2.mxd
0
0.125
0.25
0.5 km
6
MAIN ST N
Rockwood Cent. PS
Rockwood Cent. PS Boundary
WELL INGTON RD 50
T
ALMA S
5
TOWN
OF ERIN
MAIN ST S
4
ROCKWOOD
ST
RIS
HAR
0.5
1
2 km
LANDREX
BLVD
ALMA ST
GUELPH
ST
ST
VA IDGE
BALACLA
BR
ST CLARA
COBBLESTONE
ST PL
T
EW
D
RG E V I
E R GEO MILL
T
A
P RIV
ST E E CT
G
OR
E
G W
T
S
FE
L
CARROLL
B
LIF
L
ST
JO E
AV
RR
HA
T
S
IS
SAMMON
DR
LP
HS
ST
JACKSON
ST
DE
N
ST NIS
JOLLIFFE AVE
Map 8
UGDSB Planning Dept., October 2013
0
DIVISION ST
S
OU D
LV
Note: The map is for reference purposes only.
It is subject to change.
LOUS
BLVD
T
ALMA S
GU
E
ION
DOWLER ST
FALL
ST N
FALL ST S
STA
T
MACKENZIE
ST
CHRISTIE
ST
QUEEN ST
1
HIGHWAY 7
ALICIA LN
2
WELLINGTON RD 29
3
EDEN
MILLS
Rockwood
Cent. PS
WELLINGTON RD 44
GUELPH-ERAMOSA
Scenario 3 - Rockwood Centennial PS JK-6 RT Attendance Area
7
Legend
4
II
Scenario 2 and 3 - Rockwood Centennial PS 7/8 RT Attendance Area
1
2
1
New school
8
10 11 12 13
VRockwood
Cent. PS
14
Eramosa Option Area
VI
Rockwood Cent. PS
ENNOTVILLE
9
29
HIGH
WAY
6
27
OUSTIC
26
VIII
1. J.D. Hogarth PS & Centre Wellington DHS
OR
2. Rockwood Centennial PS & J.F. Ross C.V.I.
28
VII
Students in this area (which include both
side of Well. Rd 22 and 26) choose 1 of 2 options
before entry into Grade 7. Attend Either:
30
25
WELLINGTON RD 2
2
N
WEL LINGTO
24
22
X
4
5
6
7
I
16
15
IX
13
TO N
WELLING
11
10
V
9
8
7
IV
6
3
II
2
EDEN MILLS
HA R
S
RIS
RD 50
T
HIGHWAY 7
1
1
2
N PKY S
I
LINGTON RD 44
WEL
4
T SO
WA
WATSON RD S
5
III
YORK RD
N
WELLINGTO
MAIN ST N
EASTVIEW RD
VI
EVERTON
WELLINGTON RD 27
12
SPEEDVALE AVE E
RD 124
WELLINGTON RD 125
14
VIII
VICTORIA RD S
III
II
VII
VI
V
IV
III
II
X
9 10
18
XI
I
WELLINGTON RD 38
3
19
2
20
1
WELLINGTON RD 29
21
XII
I
RD 22
23
IX
WELLINGTON RD 26
6
31
5
32
School
IV Locations
4
2
3
I II
Legend
3
Map 9
3
4
UGDSB Planning Dept. October 2013 5
6
S:\Planning\Boundary reviews\New Rockwood PS\Maps\Rockwood Centennial PS 7-8.mxd
0
1
2
4 km
28
Scenario 3 - New Rockwood School JK-3 FI Attendance Area
27
Map 10
OUSTIC
26
HI G
HW
AY 6
Legend
25
School Locations
N RD 22
WEL LINGTO
24
New Rockwood school
Rockwood Cent. PS
23
New Rockwood School Boundary
21
WELLINGTON RD 26
22
5
6
7
9 10
II
VII
VI
V
I
IV
III
II
I
X
18
XI
19
16
WELLINGTON RD 29
14
13
11
10
V
9
EVERTON
7
IV
5
4
I
2
EDEN MILLS
HIGHWAY 7
1
1
ROCKWOOD
2
TSON PKY S
WA
3
II
50
WEL LINGTON RD
MAIN ST S
6
III
ST
ALMA
MAIN ST N
8
WATSON PKY N
RD 124
12
VI
YORK RD
TO N
WELLING
WELLINGTON RD 27
VIII
15
IX
WATSON RD S
4
20
XII
3
4
5
UGDSB Planning 6
Dept. October 2013
S:\Planning\Boundary reviews\New Rockwood PS\Maps\Rockwood Centennial PS FI map.mxd
0
1
2
4 km
28
Scenario 3 - Rockwood Centennial Gr 4-8 FI Attendance Area
27
Map 11
OUSTIC
26
HI G
HW
AY 6
Legend
25
School Locations
N RD 22
WEL LINGTO
24
New school
Rockwood Cent. PS
23
Rockwood Cent. PS Boundary
21
WELLINGTON RD 26
22
5
6
7
9 10
II
VII
VI
V
I
IV
III
II
I
X
18
XI
19
16
WELLINGTON RD 29
14
13
11
10
V
9
EVERTON
6
5
III
4
I
2
EDEN MILLS
HIGHWAY 7
1
1
ROCKWOOD
2
TSON PKY S
WA
3
II
50
WEL LINGTON RD
MAIN ST S
7
IV
MAIN ST N
8
WATSON PKY N
RD 124
12
VI
YORK RD
TO N
WELLING
WELLINGTON RD 27
VIII
15
IX
WATSON RD S
4
20
XII
3
4
5
UGDSB Planning 6
Dept. October 2013
S:\Planning\Boundary reviews\New Rockwood PS\Maps\Rockwood Centennial PS FI map.mxd
0
1
2
4 km