Lattice QCD and String Theory Lattice 2005 Julius Kuti Confining Force

advertisement

Lattice QCD and String Theory

Julius Kuti

University of California, San Diego

Lattice 2005

July 25, 2005

Trinity College, Dublin

Confining Force What is this confining fuzz?

AntiQuark

Quark

String in QCD ?

String theorists interested in QCD string problem

Quenched, but relevant in confinement/string connection large N ADS/CFT

On-lattice QCD string excitation spectrum

Casimir energy of ground state

Goldstone modes

Æ collective string variables

Effective string theory?

Some early developments:

Polyakov

..

1977 strings from field theory

Luscher,Symanzik,Weisz 1980 Wilson loops and QCD string

Luscher

1980 QCD picture of gluon excitation on all scales

1981 universal Casimir energy

Michael et al., Ford 1990 first on-lattice string excitations

Polchinski and Strominger 1991 effective non-critical string (fixes Nambu-Goto)

Gliozzi et al.

Munster et al.

1996 high precision Z(2) free energy

1997 two-loop Z(2) interface

Juge, JK, Morningstar 1997 first comprehensive QCD string spectrum

Teper 1998 large N

This talk: review of recent work on Casimir energy, the excitation spectrum of the Dirichlet string, and the closed string with unit winding (string-soliton)

Will not discuss: large N and AdS/CFT connection Neuberger, Teper , Brower string breaking

Hagedorn temperature

Bali

K-strings

`t Hooft flux quantization

OUTLINE

1. String formation in field theory real time string formation from simulations

Z(2) gauge field theory and LW effective string action benchmark checklist

2. Poincare and conformal effective string theory

Nambu-Goto string and its problems unless D = 26

Polyakov string and its problems unless D = 26

Poincare invariant and conformal effective string theory any D

3. Ground state Casimir energy

D=3 SU(3), SU(2), Z(2), Z(3)

D=4 SU(3)

4. Dirichlet string spectrum

D=3 Z(2), SU(2)

D=4 SU(3)

5. Closed string spectrum (torelon with unit winding)

D=4 SU(3) and D=3 Z(2)

6. Conclusions

R = 0.675 fm

D=3 Z(2) lattice gauge theory

R=6.75 fm

R=0.675 fm R=6.75 fm

Y quantum string simulation in real time

Z(2) lattice gauge theory D=3

φ

(x, y, t) is plotted

X

Wilson Surface of 3d Z(2) Gauge Model

Similar picture expected in QCD

β = −

1

2

Z(2) gauge Ising duality confining phase mass gap gapless surface

0 smooth

β

R roughening transition

Kosterlitz-Thouless role of skrew dislocations in Wilson surface universality class

β deconfined critical region continuum limit (QCD)

φ

Loop Expansion

Soliton Quantization (string)

Effective Schrodinger equation based on fluctuation matrix of string soliton M

= −∇ + "

U (

φ soliton

) effective potential x y long flux limit: spectrum expected to factorize translational zero mode Æ Goldstone spectrum zero energy bound state

φ

(y) exp(iqx) q

=

π

L n, n

= approximate here, but exact for torelon

1, 2,3...

P x

= +-1 and P z

= +-1 two symmetry quantum numbers mean field energy eigenvalues and wave functions are determined numerically exact ones from simulations shape and end effects distort the transfer to collective geometric variables

‘classical’ torelon ground state classical solutions suggest to introduce collective coordinates x( x,t) which describe the undulating motion in y-direction:

φ

(x, y, t) classical soliton

= φ s

(y

− ξ

(x, t))

+ η

(x, y

− ξ

(x, t), t) quantum field collective variables

(quantized) fluctuation field x y

Path integral can be written in terms of massless x field and massive h field interaction Lagrangian, FP determinants worked out

‘classical’ ground state, fixed end sources flipped at symmetry axis x y typical derivative interaction term a labels

( x,t) world sheet coordinate indices

To get effective string theory, we have to integrate out the massive field h

Most important step in deriving correction terms in effective action of Goldstone modes in Z(2) D=3 gauge model:

Goldstone

ξ massive scalar

η

Goldstone

ξ

~

µ

1 q 2 + M 2 µ when q =

π

R n << M n << ⋅ π

ξ is the D-2 dimensional displacement vector (collective string variables)

Boundary operators set to zero in open-closed string duality

S

LW

S

0

=

= σ

RT T S

0

+

S

1

+

S

2

+

S

3

+ …

1

2 πα '

T

∫ ∫

0

R d τ d σ

0

1

2

S

1

=

1

4

T

0

τ { ( ∂ ∂

1

= σ R + µ −

)

σ = 0

π

24 R

+ ( ∂ ∂ )

σ = R

}

( D − 2)(1 + b

R

)

∆ E =

π

(1 + b

R R

)

S

2

=

1

4 c

2

T

∫ ∫

0

R

0 d σ ⎨

1

2

( ∂ ∂ )( ∂ ∂ ) S

3

=

1

4 c

3

T

∫ ∫

0

R

0 d σ ⎨

1

2

( ∂ ∂ )( ∂ ∂ )

⎭ higher dimensional ops O(1/R 3 ) c

3

term is not independent in D=3

Benchmark checklist:

- Massless Goldstone modes?

- Local derivative expansion for their interactions?

from fine structure in the spectrum

- Massive excitations?

- Breathing modes in effective Lagrangian?

- String properties ? Bosonic, NG, rigid, …?

OUTLINE

1. String formation in field theory real time string formation from simulations

Z(2) gauge field theory and LW effective string action benchmark checklist

2. Poincare and conformal effective string theory

Nambu-Goto string and its problems unless D = 26

Polyakov string and its problems unless D = 26

Poincare invariant and conformal effective string theory any D

3. Ground state Casimir energy

D=3 SU(3), SU(2), Z(2), Z(3)

D=4 SU(3)

4. Dirichlet string spectrum

D=3 Z(2), SU(2)

D=4 SU(3)

5. Closed string spectrum (torelon with unit winding)

D=4 SU(3) and D=3 Z(2)

6. Conclusions

Poincare and conformal effective string action

One-dimensional string sweeps out two-dimensional world-sheet described by

µ τ σ

( t,s) parameters mapped into the string coordinates: 0 τ σ 1 τ σ … d τ σ = +

1.

Consistent relativistic quantum theory requires parametrization invariance: action should only depend on embedding in spacetime characterized by the induced metric h ab

= ∂ a

X

µ ∂ b

X

µ a,b run over ( t,s) simplest choice: Nambu-Goto string action S

NG

= d d

M

L

NG

, L

NG

= −

1

2

πα

'

M designates world-sheet symmetries: D-dimensional Poincare group

Two-dimensional coordinate (Diff) invariance

− ab

1/ 2 string tension problems: Light cone quantization which has the correct D-2 oscillators spoils

Lorentz invariance outside the critical dimension D=26

Covariant (Virasoro) quantization leads to D-1 oscillators unless D=26

Z(2) vortex, Nielsen-Olesen vortex, and QCD string require Poincare invariance and D-2 oscillators (longitudinal oscillator is not protected as a Goldstone mode of symmetry breaking)

2.

S [X, ]

P

γ = −

1

4

πα

'

M d d ( )

1/ 2 γ ∂ a

X

µ ∂ b

X

µ

γ = det

γ ab classically S

NG and S

P are equivalent

S

P has three symmetries: D-dimensional Poincare invariance two-dimensional coordinate (Diff) invariance two-dimensional Weyl invariance new

Weyl equivalent metrics correspond to the same embedding in space-time

µ

X ' ( , )

µ

X ( , )

γ ab

τ σ = ω τ σ ⋅ γ τ σ ab

ω ar problem : Polyakov quantization contains additional Liouville mode (scalar field) and leads again to D-1 oscillators

3.

Polchinski and Strominger: we need a new effective string description

For strings emerging from field theory we would like to require D-2 oscillators, Poincare invariance, and dim invariance

Goldstone theorem does not protect longitudinal mode from acquiring a mass (breathing mode of Z(2) vortex is an example)

PS: to resolve the paradox we could start from path integral of field theory with collective coordinate quantization including measure terms

Convert path integral to covarian form with D unconstrained X m fields

S

0

=

1

2

πα

'

∫ τ τ ∂

+

X

µ ∂

X

µ

+ determinants

The measure derives from the physical motion of the underlying gauge fields and therefore should be built from physical objects, like the induced metric h ab

= ∂ a

X

µ ∂ b

X

µ same determinant as Polyakov, but built from induced metric:

S

L

=

26 D

48

π

∫ + d d

+ − e iS

L

Polyakov determinant in conformal gauge

S

'

L

=

48

π

∫ + d d

∂ 2

+

X

(

⋅∂ ∂

+

X

⋅∂

+

X

X)

⋅∂

2

2

X h e

φ substituting induced conformal gauge metric for

S

PS

=

1

4

π

will fix b=0, c2, and c3 in Luscher-Weisz effective action, there will be higher order corrections with new unknown parameters

1

α

'/ 2

+

X

µ ∂

X

µ

+ β

∂ 2

+

X

X

+

X

⋅ ∂ 2

X

(

+

X

⋅ ∂

X)

2

+ −

3

O(R )

D

26

12 conform invariant

Poincare invariant

D-2 oscillators anomaly free

PS String-soliton with winding number w along the compact dimension

R is the length of the compact direction

E

N

2 = σ 2 2

R

⋅ w

2

π

3

(D 2) 4 (N

+

N )

+

4

N

− = ⋅ =

1 f or torelon

π

R

2 2

2 n p=

2

π ⋅ n

R n=0,1,2,…

+ 2 +

R

1 p O( )

T 3

Energy spectrum

J. Drummond

F. Maresca

JK p is the momentum along compact dimension by left and right movers

N

+

N sum of right and left movers

Poincare invariant conformal field theory

D-2 oscillator states and anomaly free

Dirichlet string open string attached to D

0 branes in modern language Caselle

E

N

R 1

π

2

(D 2)

σ

R

2 same as fixed end NG energy spectrum

N=0 ground state (Casimir energy)

Arvis highly degenerate

OUTLINE

1. String formation in field theory real time string formation from simulations

Z(2) gauge field theory and LW effective string action benchmark checklist

2. Poincare and conformal effective string theory

Nambu-Goto string and its problems unless D = 26

Polyakov string and its problems unless D = 26

Poincare invariant and conformal effective string theory any D

3. Ground state Casimir energy

D=3 SU(3), SU(2), Z(2), Z(3)

D=4 SU(3)

4. Dirichlet string spectrum

D=3 Z(2), SU(2)

D=4 SU(3)

5. Closed string spectrum (torelon with unit winding)

D=4 SU(3) and D=3 Z(2)

6. Conclusions

..

Luscher-Weisz Casimir Energy

C eff

(r)

..

SU(3)

V(r) = σ r + const

π (D-2)/24r

F(r) = V’(r) b=0

D

Short distance

QCD running

C ( )

LW

=

1

2

3

'( ) asymptotic Casimir energy

-> string formation

D b=0.08 fm

−π (D-2)/24 asymptotic r

Æ infinity

Evidence for string formation in QCD?

Quark loops ?

Changing dimension D shows significant difference

It is D = 2+1 which is more tantalizing

NG universal subleading full PS should not need b

NG

?

LW invoked a boundary operator for D = 3+1

Later LW showed that b=0 is set from matching te

Polyakov loop correlator spectrum to open-closed string duality full PS universal subleading

SU(3)

Luscher

Weisz

SU(2)

Caselle also Majumdar

Pepe

Rago universal subleading full PS

Z(2) D=3 classical + quantum

Juge et al.

Caselle et al. global fit zero-point oscillators only

Conclusions: 1. Casimir energy does not fully match expected universal behavior

2. End distortions matter, sensitive to D, boundary operators?

3. limited global fit to torelon Casimir energy by Meyer and Teper consistency with universal subleading correction is reported

4. It is difficult to discover the string from Casimir energy

Casimir energy of baryon string

Takahashi, Suganuma

D=4 SU(3)

Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 074506

Y shape is favored, first excitation is reported

β = de Forcrand and Jahn

Nuclear Physics A 755 (2005) 475

D=3 Z(3) gauge model in dual potts spin representation analytic Casimir term by de Forcrand et al.

β =

Y shape configuration is favored by Casimir energy

Holland, JK

β = 3

0.59 100 lattice

β = 3

0.56 100 lattice

D=3 Z(3) gauge model in dual potts spin representation work in progress: space-time picture, baryon string excitations

β = wetting at transition point

β = 3

0.5512 100 lattice

OUTLINE

1. String formation in field theory real time string formation from simulations

Z(2) gauge field theory and LW effective string action benchmark checklist

2. Poincare and conformal effective string theory

Nambu-Goto string and its problems unless D = 26

Polyakov string and its problems unless D = 26

Poincare invariant and conformal effective string theory any D

3. Ground state Casimir energy

D=3 SU(3), SU(2), Z(2), Z(3)

D=4 SU(3)

4. Dirichlet string spectrum

D=3 Z(2), SU(2)

D=4 SU(3)

5. Closed string spectrum (torelon with unit winding)

D=4 SU(3) and D=3 Z(2)

6. Conclusions

PS string

PS string

D=3 SU(2) and Z(2) exhibit similar behavior symbol:circles end distortion

PS universal subleading

PS

end distortions in field theory first NG term first subleading

Summary of main results on the spectrum of the fixed end Z(2) string full PS x

= σ

R dimensionless scale variable

E

N

/

σ = x 1

− D

12

− x 2

2 π + 2

π x 2

N NG

Expand energy gaps for large x

(

N

π

E

0

) ( ) x 2

+ ( ) x 4

+ …

First correction to asymptotic spectrum appears to be universal

Higher corrections code new physics like string rigidity, etc.

Similar expansion for string-soliton with unit winding

Data for R < 4 fermi prefers field theory description which incorporates end effects naturally full PS

Juge et al.

universal subleading

Majumdar

?

Juge et al.

Juge et al.

Juge et al.

Surprise: data point approach the PS prediction from above universal subleading term suggested the approach from below data follows the full PS curve more closely than expected

Juge et al.

Juge et al.

SU(3) D=4

Opposite fixed color source (antiquark)

R

Fixed color source

(quark)

Λ

Æ angular momentum projected along quark-antiquark axis

S states (

Λ

=0)

P states (

Λ

=1)

D states (

Λ

=2)

..

.

Σ

g

+ −

Π

+ −

+ −

Three exact quantum numbers characterize gluon excitations:

Λ

+ −

Angular momentum with chirality

+−

CP

Chirality, or reflection symmetry for

Λ

= 0 g (gerade) CP even u (ungerade) CP odd

Juge, JK, Morningstar SU(3) Dirichlet spectrum with fine structure

PRL 90 (2003) 161601

Gluon excitations are projected out with generalized Wilson loop operators on time sclices the spatial straight line is replaced by linear combinations of twisted paths effective mass plot analysis from large correlation matrix

+

,

, u

Σ − u

LW

C~1 string?

Π

U

Multipole states adiabatically evolve into string states with expected level ordering in large R limit

Short distance multipole expansion:

H

Cb

=

H gauge

+

π

1

− r |

{ −

+

6

4

singlet

3

1

octet

× a

∫ d rA (r,t)J(r,t)

Bali an Pineda

OUTLINE

1. String formation in field theory real time string formation from simulations

Z(2) gauge field theory and LW effective string action benchmark checklist

2. Poincare and conformal effective string theory

Nambu-Goto string and its problems unless D = 26

Polyakov string and its problems unless D = 26

Poincare invariant and conformal effective string theory any D

3. Ground state Casimir energy

D=3 SU(3), SU(2), Z(2), Z(3)

D=4 SU(3)

4. Dirichlet string spectrum

D=3 Z(2), SU(2)

D=4 SU(3)

5. Closed string spectrum (torelon with unit winding)

D=4 SU(3) and D=3 Z(2)

6. Conclusions full PS universal subleading

Juge et al.

no end effects

full PS universal subleading full PS universal subleading

Juge et al.

no end effects

F. Maresca and M. Peardon

Trinity, 2004

15 basic torelon operators translated and fuzzed in large correlation matrices

Typical effective mass plots show good plateaus

Perfect string degeneracies

E

1

2 =

E

2

0

+ p

3

=

2

π

L

4

πσ + p

3

2

Expected string behavior

E

1

2

=

E 2

0

+

8

πσ

E

1

2

=

E 2

0

+ p

3

=

4

π

L

8

πσ + p

3

2 more lattice systematics is needed required technology is in place

E

2

1

=

E

2

0

+

12

πσ p

3

=

2

π

L

+ p

3

2

Conclusions

1. Poincare invariant conformal effective string provides the right framework to analyze the lattice QCD simulations

2. Fine structure in spectrum tests the string properties

3. End effects in Casimir energy and Dirichlet spectrum remain problematic for string theory interpretation

4.

Precocious approach to Poincare string spectrum more accurate data is needed to test higher terms

5. It remains a challenge for String Theory to explain the

Poincare invariant and conformal effective QCD string

Download