Three Extremal Problems for Hyperbolically Convex Functions Roger W. Barnard, Kent Pearce, G. Brock Williams Texas Tech University [Computational Methods and Function Theory 4 (2004) pp 97-109] Notation & Definitions D {z :| z | 1} Notation & Definitions D {z :| z | 1} hyperbolic metric 2 | dz | ( z ) | dz | 2 1 | z | Notation & Definitions D {z :| z | 1} Hyberbolic Geodesics Notation & Definitions D {z :| z | 1} Hyberbolic Geodesics Hyberbolically Convex Set Notation & Definitions D {z :| z | 1} Hyberbolic Geodesics Hyberbolically Convex Set Hyberbolically Convex Function Notation & Definitions D {z :| z | 1} Hyberbolic Geodesics Hyberbolically Convex Set Hyberbolically Convex Function Hyberbolic Polygon o Proper Sides Classes H { f A ( D ) : f ( D) is hyp. convex, f (0) 0, f (0) 0} Classes H { f A ( D ) : f ( D) is hyp. convex, f (0) 0, f (0) 0} H poly { f H : f ( D) is hyp. polygon} Classes H { f A ( D ) : f ( D) is hyp. convex, f (0) 0, f (0) 0} H poly { f H : f ( D) is hyp. polygon} H n { f H poly : f ( D) has at most n proper sides} Classes H { f A ( D ) : f ( D) is hyp. convex, f (0) 0, f (0) 0} H poly { f H : f ( D) is hyp. polygon} H n { f H poly : f ( D) has at most n proper sides} H { f H : f ( z ) z a2 z 2 a3 z 3 } Examples k ( z ) 2 z (1 z ) (1 z ) 4 z 2 k 2 Problems 1. Fix 0 1 and let f H . For z D \{0}, find min Re f H f ( z) z Problems 1. Fix 0 1 and let f H . For z D \{0}, find min Re f H f ( z) z 2. Fix 0 1 and let f H with f ( z ) z a2 z 2 a3 z 3 Find max Re a3 f H . Problems 1. Fix 0 1 and let f H . For z D \{0}, find min Re f H f ( z) z 2. Fix 0 1 and let f H with f ( z ) z a2 z 2 a3 z 3 Find max Re a3 f H 2 3 3. Let f H with f ( z ) z a2 z a3 z max Re a3 f H . Find . Theorem 1 Let 0 1 and let z D \{0}. Let L( f ) f ( z) / z. Then, the extremal value (maximum or minimum) for L over H is obtained from a hyperbolically convex function f which maps D onto a hyperbolic polygon with exactly one proper side. Specifically, max Re f ( z ) k (r ) , z r min Re f ( z ) k (r ) , z r f H r | z | and f H r | z | Theorem 2 Let 0 1. Then, the maximal value for L( f ) Re a3 over H is obtained by a hyperbolically convex function f ( z ) z a2 z 2 a3 z 3 which maps D onto a hyperbolic polygon with at most two proper sides. Remark Minda & Ma observed that k cannot be extremal for 1 2 Theorem 3 The maximal value for L( f ) Re a3 over H is obtained by a hyperbolically convex function f ( z ) z a2 z 2 a3 z 3 which maps D onto a hyperbolic polygon with at most two proper sides. Julia Variation Let be a region bounded by piece-wise analytic curve . Let be non-negative piece-wise continuous function on . For w let n(w) denote the outward normal to at w. For small let {w ( w) n( w) : w } and let be the region bounded by . Julia Variation (cont.) Let f be a 1 1 conformal map, f : D , with f (0) 0. onto Suppose f has a continuous extension to D. Let f be a 1 1 conformal map, f : D , with f (0) 0. Then, onto zf ( z ) 1 z f ( z ) f ( z ) d o( ) 2 D 1 z where for ei ( f ( )) d d | f ( ) | Julia Variation (cont.) Furthermore, the change in the mapping radius between f and f is given by f (0) mr ( f , f ) d o( ) 2 D Variations for H poly (Var. #1) Suppose f H n , f not constant. If f ( ) is a proper side of f ( D), then for small there exists a variation f H n which "pushes" either in or out to a nearby geodesic . Furthermore, f agrees with the Julia variational formula up to o( ) terms. Variations for H poly (Var. #2) Suppose f H n , f not constant. If f ( ) is a proper side of f ( D) which meets a side *. Then, for small , there exists a variation f H n1 which adds a side to f ( D) by pushing one end of in to a nearby side . Furthermore, f agrees with the Julia variational formula up to o( ) terms. Proof (Theorem 1) Step 1. Reduction to at most two sides. Step 2. Reduction to one side. Proof (Theorem 1) Step 1. Reduction to at most two sides. Let Hn H H n . Suppose f is extremal in Hn for some n 3 and f ( D) has (at least) 3 proper sides, say j f ( j ), j 1, 2, 3. For each side j apply the variation #1 with control j j . Let f be the varied function. Then, 3 f ( z ) f ( z ) 1 z j f ( z ) d o( ) z z 1 z j 1 2 j Proof (Theorem 1) Hence, 3 j 1 z L( f ) L( f ) Re f ( z ) d o( ) j 1 2 1 z j and j mr ( f , f ) d o( ) j 1 2 3 j Proof (Theorem 1) From the Calculus of Variations: mr ( f , f ) If 0, then f Hn for small. 0 L( f ) If 0, then the value of L( f ) can be 0 made smaller than the value of L( f ). Proof (Theorem 1) We have 3 j L( f ) 1 z Re f ( z ) d j 1 2 0 1 z j and 3 mr ( f , f ) j d j 1 2 j 0 Let Q( ) f ( z ) 1 z . Then, using the Mean Value Theorem 1 z 3 j L( f ) Re Q( j ) d 0 j 1 2 j Proof (Theorem 1) Since Q is bilinear in , not all three of the points Q( j ) can have the same real part. Wolog, Re Q( 1 ) Re Q( 2 ). Then, we will push 1 in and 2 out (not vary 3 ) so that L( f ) is smaller than L( f ). Specifically, choose 1 0 2 (3 =0) so that mr ( f , f ) 1 d 2 d 0. 2 1 2 2 0 Proof (Theorem 1) Then, L( f ) 1 2 Re Q( 1 ) d Re Q( 2 ) d 0 2 1 2 2 2 1 Re Q( 1 ) d d 0 2 2 2 1 Consequently, if f is extremal in Hn , n 3, then f ( D) can have at most two proper sides. Proof (Theorem 1) Step 2. Reduction to one side. Suppose f is extremal in Hn for some n 3. By the above argument f ( D) can have at most 2 proper sides. Suppose f ( D) has exactly 2 proper sides, say j f ( j ), j 1, 2. As above apply variation #1 to each side j with control j j and let f be the varied function. If in the formulation for L( f ) we were to have 0 Re Q( 1 ) Re Q( 2 ), then f would not be extremal. Proof (Theorem 1) Thus, we must have Re Q( 1 ) Re Q( 2 ) x0 . Further, we must have that Q maps the pre-image arcs j to arcs which overlap the line l {z : Re z x0 }. Proof (Theorem 1) We consider the vertex z* 1 whose image under Q f 1 lies to the right of l. Apply variation #2 to 1 near z* to add another side to f ( D) - making sure the side is short enough so that its image under Q f 1 lies to the right of l. Q f 1 Proof (Theorem 1) We consider the vertex z* 1 whose image under Q f 1 lies to the right of l. Apply variation #2 to 1 near z* to add another side to f ( D) - making sure the side is short enough so that its image under Q f 1 lies to the right of l. Q f 1 Proof (Theorem 1) We consider the vertex z* 1 whose image under Q f 1 lies to the right of l. Apply variation #2 to 1 near z* to add another side to f ( D) - making sure the side is short enough so that its image under Q f 1 lies to the right of l. Q f 1 At the same time push 2 out to preserve the mapping radius. Proof (Theorem 1) We consider the vertex z* 1 whose image under Q f 1 lies to the right of l. Apply variation #2 to 1 near z* to add another side to f ( D) - making sure the side is short enough so that its image under Q f 1 lies to the right of l. Q f 1 At the same time push 2 out to preserve the mapping radius. Proof (Theorem 1) The varied function f Hn and by the above variational argument has a smaller value for L than f . Hence, if f is extremal for L in Hn , n 3, then f ( D) cannot have two proper sides, i.e., f ( D) must have exactly one proper side. Since H2 Hn for all n 3, if f is extremal for L in Hn (and since by the above f H2 ), then f must be extremal for L in H2 as well. Proof (Theorem 1) Finally, since H n Hn , the extremal value for L over H is achieved by a function f for which f (D) has exactly one proper side. We note the range of k ( z ) / z is symmetric about the real axis. Also, for fixed r , 0 r 1, Re (k (rei ) / rei ) is a monotonically decreasing function of , 0 . Proofs (Theorem 2 & 3) Step 1. Reduction to at most four sides. 5 j L( f ) 2 Re (3a3 4a2 2 ) d j 1 2 0 j Step 2. Reduction to at most two sides.