A Tool with an Attitude: The philosophy of stewardship end-result contracting February 11, 2009 1 In the mid-1990’s… The Forest Service was in “process gridlock” Budgets were shrinking Forest Communities were suffering under economic/social conditions Needed resource management wasn’t getting done Photos courtesy of the US Forest Service 2 Everybody was frustrated… Photo courtesy of Dave Wilson, National Wild Turkey Federation Around the country, diverse interests started seeking solutions 3 A new approach was needed… We needed to break the mold we were in – getting projects appealed and ending up in court…” *All quotes, unless otherwise noted, are from Forest Service personnel interviewed during the annual multiparty monitoring of the role of communities in stewardship contracting. Photos courtesy of Microsoft 4 Stewardship end-result contracting…..a new option… Clearwater Stewardship Project, Lolo NF, Photo courtesy of Tom Toman, Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation Colville NF, Bangs Biomass Utilization Photo courtesy of Ed Maffei Clearwater Stewardship Project, Lolo NF Photo courtesy of Carol Daly, Flathead Economic Policy Center 5 Collaboration is essential… “ Everybody has got something at stake…If you’re an advocate for fisheries but against timber [harvest], you have to realize those interests are not mutually exclusive; they’re entwined. It gets people who might be adversarial looking at other people’s needs.” 6 The focus is changed… Photo courtesy of John Lampereur Photo courtesy of the Ottawa National Forest 7 To what’s left…. the desired end-result on the ground. Photo courtesy of D. Rambo, Ozark NF Raspberry Stewardship Project 8 The benefits… “It…takes a lot of work, but when you don’t get litigated at the end, it speaks volumes.” Paint Emery Stewardship Project Flathead National Forest Photo courtesy of Carol Daly, Flathead Economic Policy Center 9 Getting needed work done… “It allows us to do the right thing on the land….We have the ability to produce the treatments we want the way we want them, and get the folks out there to do the right things right.” Forest Service, Idaho Before trail rehabilitation for fisheries Forest Service, Idaho Four years after trail rehabilitation 10 Working closely with partners… “We did this project through an assistance agreement with [a national wildlife group], and that worked better…. It created a little more trust with the local people than if it was just the local feds doing the project.” Photo courtesy of the National Wild Turkey Federation * From an interview of a BLM field staff person conducted during the annual multiparty monitoring. 11 …and contractors… Photos courtesy of Ed Maffei, Colville NF, Quartzite Fish Passage [Getting involved] is not an option. If you have an opportunity to make your social, cultural, and economic environment better, you have to. It’s a tremendous tool that Congress has afforded the local communities, and we want to avail ourselves of that opportunity.”* 12 Bundling projects to address multiple resources… “…Not just timber harvest but the whole range of habitat and fuel reduction projects…. [Being] able to accomplish [those] in one package with work done by folks suited to do that work ends up with the best for us with a good, reasonable price.” Photos courtesy of the US Forest Service 13 Reconnecting with communities… Clearwater Stewardship Project, Lolo National Forest Photo courtesy of Carol Daly, Flathead Economic Policy Center Before: “We were mending the agency’s relationships with the community – or not even having a relationship to repair.” 14 Working with communities… Now: “We’re working through conflicts or opportunities from a different standpoint – being more open to considering other things. We’ve developed some good, new relationships and new appreciation from the community of what we do.” 15 Meeting community needs… “ Citizens like the concept of stewardship contracting. They think it makes sense. …. There’s hope that we can put people back to work in the community. They can share in the economic as well as the ecological benefits.” Photo courtesy of the Croatan National Forest, North Carolina (FS-799) 16 Making scarce dollars go farther… Photo courtesy of Dave Wilson, National Wild Turkey Federation “Stewardship contracting gives us the opportunities to do so many things that we’ll never get funding for otherwise. We get to do good on-theground work and also build relationships, partnerships, and trust levels.” 17 …and sharing the responsibility… “There’s a sense of ownership that’s new and different. It gives people a chance to have some pride and some hands-on involvement… This stewardship thing. It makes us all stewards. It makes us all have some responsibility toward the land. I like that.” 18 Success in our area…* The Chickasawhay Ranger District on the De Soto NF has realized multiple benefits from collaboration that was started in 2004 to improve conditions for a threatened tortoise. Photo courtesy of the De Soto National Forest 19 Change isn’t easy… “I’m somewhat resistant to change – especially being really busy, shortstaffed, and having to perform multiple jobs due to staff cuts. When we started [this project], it wasn’t something I looked forward to. We were told to do one…and I wasn’t excited about being a guinea pig….” 20 But the results are worth it! “After working through the process, however, I have a much more positive impression of stewardship contracting. I think it’s got a place. It can be handy tool.” Photo courtesy of the White Mountain NF, Forest Discovery Trail Stewardship Project 21 Stewardship Contracting/Agreements Not our ONLY toolbut a very GOOD one! Photos courtesy of the Ottawa NF, Cisco Camp-Redlight Creek Stewardship Project 22 Advice and Technical Assistance… Presenters of this program National Stewardship Coordinator Regional Stewardship Coordinators In-house peers/mentors Partners Websites 23 Support from the Chief… “Let me assure you that the Forest Service is committed to continuing and expanding use of the stewardship contracting tool, including the use of agreements.” Letter from the Chief to the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; February 2008 24