Muon Track-Finder Trigger Darin Acosta University of Florida June, 2002

advertisement
Muon Track-Finder Trigger
Darin Acosta
University of Florida
June, 2002
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
1
Muon Track-Finding
• Link trigger primitives into 3D tracks
• Measure pT, , and  in non-uniform fringe field
• Send highest quality candidates to Global L1
• Partitioned into 60° sectors
that align with DT chambers


US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
2
CSC Muon Trigger Scheme
EMU
Trigger
On-Chamber
Trigger Primitives
Trigger
Motherboard
(UCLA)
Strip FE cards
Muon
Port
Card
(Rice)
LCT
3-D Track-Finding
and Measurement
Sector Receiver/ Processor
(U. Florida)
OPTICAL
FE
SR/SP
MPC
SP
LCT
3 / port card
TMB
FE
2 / chamber
Wire LCT card
Wire FE cards
RIM
RPC Interface
Module
3 / sector
In
counting
house
RPC
Combination of all
3 Muon Systems
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
4
CSC Muon Sorter
(Rice)
DT
4
4
Global  Trigger
Global L1
4
3
Scope of CSC Track-Finder
Baselined with 24 crates, reduced to 6 in 1998, now 1:
Prototype version tested Fall 2000:
Board
# units
Responsibility
New version (SR/SP combined)
MPC
48
Rice
Sector
Receiver
24
UCLA
Board
Sector
Processor
12
Florida
MPC
48
Rice
SR/SP
12
Florida
Clock and
Control
Board
6
Rice
Clock and
Control
Board
1
Rice
CSC Muon
Sorter
1
Rice
CSC Muon
Sorter
1
Rice
Crates,
Backplanes
6
Florida
Crates,
Backplanes
1
Florida
DDU
readout
1
Florida/Ohio
State
DDU
readout
1
Florida/Ohio
State
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
# units
Responsibility
4
Prototype Track Finder Tests
Focus during FY 2000 was on producing and
testing prototypes of all Track-Finder
components (except the CSC Muon Sorter)
•
•
•
•
•
Sector Processor:
UFlorida
Sector Receiver:
UCLA
Muon Port Card:
Rice
Clock and Control Board: Rice
Channel-Link backplane: UFlorida
Integration tests of the complete system yielded
100% agreement between hardware and software
for random and simulated physics events
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
Sector
Processor
FIFO
Custom
Back
plane
FIFO
Sector
Receiver
FIFO
100m
Optical
Links
FIFO
Port
Card
FIFO
FIFO
DAQ System (VME, Bit3 Controller, PC running Windows NT)
Results
included in
Trigger TDR
5
Sector Receiver Prototype
UCLA
Optical
Receivers and
HP Glinks
SRAM LUTs
Receives and
formats track
segment data
Front FPGAs
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
Back FPGAs
6
Sector Processor Prototype
Final Selection Unit
Extrapolation Units
XCV150BG352
XCV400BG560
Florida
Links track
segments into
3D tracks,
selects best
three tracks,
measures
momentum
12 layers
10K vias
17 FPGAs
12 SRAMs
25 buffers
Assignment Units Track Assemblers Bunch Crossing
256k x 16 SRAM
XCV50BG256 &
Analyzer
2M x 8 SRAM
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
XCV50BG256
7
1st Track-Finder Crate Tests
Sector Processor
(Florida)
Sector Receiver Clock Control
(UCLA)
Board (Rice)
Bit3
VME
Interface
Custom
ChannelLink
Backplane
(Florida)
Prototype
crate for
original six
crate design
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
Muon Port Card
(Rice)
Very
successful,
but overall
CSC latency
was too high -New design in
2001 improves
latency
100m optical
fibers
8
New Track-Finder Crate Design
Muon Sorter
SR SR SR SR SR SR
/ / / / / /
SP SP SP SP SP SP
MS
CCB
Clock and Control
Board
BIT3 Controller
Single Track-Finder Crate Design with 1.6 Gbit/s optical links
SR SR SR SR SR SR
/ / / / / /
SP SP SP SP SP SP
SR/SP Card
(3 Sector Receivers +
Sector Processor)
(60 sector)
From MPC
(chamber 4)
From MPC
(chamber 3)
From MPC
(chamber 2)
From Trigger
Timing &
Control
From MPC
(chamber 1B)
From MPC
(chamber 1A)
To
Global Trigger
To DAQ
• Reduces processing time from 525 ns (old design) to 175 ns
• Total Latency ~ 15 Bx (from input of SR/SP card to output of MS card)
• Crate Power Consumption ~ 1000 W • 16 Optical connections per SR/SP card
• Custom Backplane for SR/SP  CCB and MS connection
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
9
CSC Track Finder Backplane
Florida
Standard VME 64x J1/P1 backplane
SRSP 12
SRSP 11
SRSP 10
SRSP 9
SRSP 8
SRSP 7
Muon sorter
Clock and control
SRSP 6
SRSP 5
SRSP 4
SRSP 3
SRSP 2
SRSP 1
Standard VME
J2/P2 backplane
GTLP backplane
avoids latency
penalty of previous
Channel-Link
backplane (~3BX)
Rice
Custom GTLP 6U backplane
Design Approved
–
Technology same
as EMU
peripheral crates
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
These SRSP
feedthru connectors
are for DT
information
exchange via
transition board
10
SR/SP 2002 Board Layout
DC-DC Converter
Phi Global LUT
Eta Global LUT
Phi Local LUT
EEPROM
EEPROM
EEPROM
Indicators
VME/CCB
FPGA
TLK2501
Transceiver
Front FPGA
From CCB
PT LUT
DDU FPGA
Optical
Transceiver
To MS
Main
FPGA
Mezzanine
Card
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
TRANSITION
BOARD WITH
LVDS
TRANSCEIVERS
TO/ FROM
BARREL
11
SR/SP 2002 Design Status
Schematics nearly complete:
• Sector Receiver Front FPGAs (5 total)
• Choice: XC2V1000-FF896C with 432 user I/Os
• Sector Processor Main FPGA
• Choice: XC2V4000-FF1152C with 824 user I/Os
• Placed on mezzanine card (design started)
• Firmware written in “Verilog++”, validated by simulation
• VME & control interface FPGA
• Choice: XC2V250-FG456C with 200 user I/Os
• DAQ Interface FPGA
• Choice: XC2V250-FG256C with 172 user I/Os
• SRAM:
• 51 SRAM chips (>64MB) for Look-up functionality
Layout to commence soon
• Board will be dense! (Merger of 4 boards, but I/O ~same)
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
12
New Design Reduces Latency
First prototype dataflow
Pre-production prototype data flow
Front FPGAs
1
Lookup tables
Channel link
transmitters
4
From Muon Port Cards
Sector Receiver st.4
1
Sector Receiver st.2,3
Optical receivers
Sector Receiver st.1
From Muon Port Cards
3
Extrapolation units
2
9 Track Assembler units (memory)
3
Final selection unit 3 best out of 9
Front FPGAs
1
Lookup tables
0
Latency
Latency
Bunch crossing analyzer (not implemented)
1
2
Pt assignment (memory)
Total: 21 BX
To Muon Sorter
Sector Processor
Pt precalculation for best 3 muons
SR/SP board
1
Extrapolation units
1
9 Track Assembler units
Sector Processor
FPGA
1
3
To DT
Bunch crossing analyzer (not implemented)
Channel link receivers
2
Optical receivers
Pt precalculation for
9 muons
1
1
Total: 7 BX
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
Final selection
unit 3 best out
of 9
Output multiplexor
Pt assignment (memory)
To Muon Sorter
13
New Muon Sorter Design (Rice)
Reduced to single board -- reduces latency, cost
VME J1
CONNECTOR
9U * 400 MM BOARD
VME
INTERFACE
LVDS DRIVERS
CONNECTORS TO GMT
CCB
INTERFACE
SP1
SP2
SP3
CABLES TO
GLOBAL MUON
TRIGGER CRATE
New:
Will use common
Xilinx mezzanine card
SORTER
LOGIC
SP4
INPUT
AND
OUTPUT
FIFO
SP6
with Sector Processor
SP5
CUSTOM
BACKPLANE
SP7
SP8
SP9
SP10
SP11
SP12
GTLP TRANSCEIVERS
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
14
Sorter FPGA
SP 1
DFF
DFF
MUX
VME
FIFO
DFF
PIPELINE
MUON 1
MUON 1
MUX
LUTs
FIFO
MUX
VME
PIPELINE
MUON 2
VME
VME
DFF
MUON 2
FIFO
LUTs
DFF
FIFO
MUX
VME
PIPELINE
MUON 3
VME
FIFO
VME
DFF
LUTs
SP 2
..
.
FIFO
VME
VME
DFF
SP 12
...
VME
SORTER “4 OUT OF 36”
CCB
MUON 3
MUON 4
LUTs
FIFO
144
CCB
INTERFACE
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
VME
VME
15
CCB for Track Finder Crate
• Same CCB for peripheral (EMU) and Track Finder crates
• 20 sets (main 9U board + Altera-based mezzanine card)
have been fabricated so far
• 15 boards are assembled and tested
• 2 boards will be used for Track Finder tests (UF&Rice)
TTCrx
mezzanine board
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
16
Personnel
• Professors
• Darin Acosta (Florida), Robert Cousins (UCLA), Paul Padley (Rice)
• Postdocs
• Song Ming Wang (Florida), Slava Valouev (UCLA)
• Students
• Bobby Scurlock (Florida), Jason Mumford (UCLA)
• Engineers
• Alex Madorsky (Florida), Mike Matveev (Rice), Ted Nussbaum (Rice)
• Collaborating engineers (all PNPI)
• Victor Golovtsov, Lev Uvarov
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
17
Conclusions
• First Track Finder system prototyped successfully in Fall
2000
• Exact match to CMS OO simulation package
• Second generation pre-production prototype is well
underway with significant improvements
• Present and future activities
• 2001: R&D on optical links, FPGA logic, memory look-ups, backplane
technology, and DAQ readout
• 2002: build the 2nd generation prototype
• 2003: test with multiple CSC chambers, cosmic rays and/or structured
beam, tweaks for final design (if necessary)
• 2004: full production
• 2005: installation
• No trouble expected: all-digital system with off-the-shelf
components, well-defined internal and external interfaces,
and a stable and capable engineering team
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, Darin Acosta, University of Florida
18
Download