By Prof. C. Radhakrishna 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 1 MODELING OF TRANSMISSION LINES Electrical Characteristics Natural or Surge Impedance Loading Classification of line length Performance Requirements of Power Transmission Lines Terminal V, I Relations Transmission Matrix Lumped‐Circuit Equivalent Simplified Models MODELING OF TRANSFORMERS Representation of Two‐Winding Transformers Standard equivalent circuit Equivalent π circuit representation Consideration of three‐phase transformer connections Representation of Three‐Winding Transformers Phase‐Shifting Transformers 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 2 Modeling of Transmission Lines For the same rating, cables are 10 to 15 times more expensive than overhead lines Electrical Characteristics Overhead lines characterized by four parameters: series resistance R due to the conductor resistivity, shunt conductance G due to leakage currents between the phases and ground, series inductance L due to magnetic field surrounding the conductors, and shunt capacitance C due to the electric field between conductors. Underground cables have the same basic parameters as overhead lines values of the parameters and hence the characteristic of cables differ significantly from those of overhead lines 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 3 Natural or Surge Impedance Loading • Characteristic impedance Zc with losses neglected is commonly referred to as the surge impedance. It is equal to √(L/C) and has the dimension of a pure resistance. • The propagation constant, γ, is defined as, γ = √(yz) = α + jβ The power delivered by a transmission line when it is terminated by its surge impedance is known as the natural load or surge impedance load (SIL): V 02 SIL ZC W where V0 is the rated voltage of the line. If V0 is the line‐ to‐neutral voltage, SIL given by the above equation is the per‐phase value; if V0 is the line‐to‐line value, then SIL is the three‐phase value. 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 4 Natural or Surge Impedance Loading contd….. At SIL, transmission lines (lossless) exhibit the following special characteristics: • V and have constant amplitude along the line. I • V and are in phase throughout the length of the I line. • The phase angle between the sending end and receiving end voltages (currents) is equal to βl. At the natural load, the reactive power generated by C is equal to the reactive power absorbed by L, for each incremental length of the line. No reactive power is absorbed or generated at either end of the line, and the voltage and current profiles are flat. This is an optimum condition with respect to control 10/17/2010 12:03 AM of voltage and reactive power. 5 Classification of line length a) Short lines: lines shorter than about 80 km (50 mi). They have negligible shunt capacitance, and may be represented by their series impedance. b) Medium‐length lines: lines with lengths in the range of 80 km to about 200 km (125 mi). They may be represented by the nominal π equivalent circuit. c) Long lines: lines longer than about 200 km. For such lines the distributed effects of the parameters are significant. They need to be represented by the equivalent π circuit. Alternatively, they may be represented by cascaded sections of shorter lengths, with each section represented by a nominal π equivalent. 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 6 Performance Requirements of Power Transmission Lines Voltage regulation, thermal limits, and system stability are the factors that determine the power transmission capability of power lines. Terminal V, I Relations z = r + jωι = series impedance per meter y = g + jωc = shunt admittance per meter to neutral 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 7 V1 = V2 cosh γl + Zc I2 sinh γl I1 = I2 cosh γl + (V2 / Zc) sinh γl where γ √ (yz) is called the propagation constant. and Z z / y is called the characteristic impedance of the line. 10/17/2010 12:03 AM c 8 Transmission Matrix V1 = AV2 + BI2 I2 = CV2 + DI2 where A = cosh γl C = (l / Zc) sinh γl B = Zc sinh γl D = cosh γl Lumped‐Circuit Equivalent The A, B, C and D parameters for the circuit are A 1 Z Y 2 Z Y C Y 1 4 B Z D 1 Z Y 2 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 9 Simplified Models Experience indicates the following classification of lines to be reasonable. Long line ( l > 150 mi, approximately): Use the π‐equivalent circuit model with Z and ( / 2 ) ; Y Medium‐length line (50 < l < 150 mi, approximately): Use the circuit model with Z and (Y/2) instead of Z and ( Y / 2), where Z = zl and Y = yl. This is called the nominal π‐ equivalent circuit. Short line (l < 50 mi, approximately): same as the medium‐ length line except that we neglect Y/2. 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 10 Modeling of Transformers In addition to voltage transformation, transformers are often used for control of voltage and reactive power flow. Practically all transformers used for bulk power transmission and many distribution transformers have taps in one or more windings for changing the turns ratio. Changing the ratio of transformation is required to compensate for variations in system voltages. Two types of tap‐changing facilities are provided: off‐load tap changing and under load tap changing (ULTC). The ULTC is used when the changes in ratio need to be frequent. The taps normally allow the ratio to vary in the range of ±10% to ±15%. When the voltage transformation ratio is small, autotransformers are normally used. 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 11 Representation of Two‐Winding Transformers Zp = Rp + jXp ; Zs = Rs + jXs Rp, Rs = primary and secondary winding resistances Xp, Xs = primary and secondary winding leakage reactances np, ns = number of turns of primary and secondry winding Xmp = magnetizing reactance referred to the primary side Fig. 3 Basic equivalent circuit of a two‐winding transformer 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 12 Standard equivalent circuit: Figure 4 Standard equivalent circuit for a transformer If the actual turns ratio is equal to np0 / ns0, then =1.0, and the ideal transformer vanishes. When the actual turns ratio is not equal to the nominal turns ratio, represents the off‐nominal ratio (ONR). The equivalent circuit of Figure 4 can be used to represent a transformer with a fixed (or off‐load) tap on one side and an under‐load tap changer (ULTC) on the other side. The off‐nominal turns ratio is assigned to the side with ULTC and has a value corresponding to the fixed‐tap position of the other side. 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 13 Equivalent π circuit representation (a) General π network (b) Equivalent π circuit 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 14 Consideration of three‐phase transformer connections In establishing the ONR, the nominal turns ratio (np0/ns0) is taken to be equal to the ratio of line‐to‐line base voltages on both sides of the transformer irrespective of the winding connections (Y‐Y, ∆‐∆, or Y‐∆). For a Y‐∆ connected transformer, this in addition accounts for the factor √3 due to the winding connection. In the case of a Y‐∆ connected transformer, a 30o phase shift is introduced between line‐to‐line voltages on the two sides of the transformer. It is usually not necessary to take this phase shift into consideration in system studies. The single‐phase equivalent circuit of a Y‐∆ transformer does not account for the phase shift. 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 15 Representation of Three‐Winding Transformers Figure 6 Equivalent circuit of a three‐winding transformer The three windings of the transformer may have different MVA ratings. Zps = leakage impedance measured in primary with secondary shorted and tertiary open Zpt = leakage impedance measured in primary with tertiary shorted and secondary open Zst = leakage impedance measured in secondary with tertiary shorted and primary open Zp = ½ (Zps + Zpt – Zst) Zs = ½ (Zps + Zst ‐ Zpt) 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 16 Zt = ½ (Zpt + Zst – Zps) Phase‐Shifting Transformers It consists of an admittance in series with an ideal transformer having a complex turns ratio, n n Figure 7 Phase‐shifting transformer representation Ye ip a s2 b s2 is Ye a jb s s Ye a s jb s v p v Ye s The admittance matrix in the above equation is not symmetrical. Therefore, a π equivalent circuit is not possible. If the turns ratio is real (i.e., and bs = 0), the model reduces to the equivalent π circuit shown in Figure 5. 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 17 CONCLUSION 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 18 REFERENCES [ 1 ] Arthur R. Bergen & Vijay Vittal : “Power System Analysis” , 2nd edition, Prentice Hall, Inc., 2000. [ 2 ] Prabha Kundur : “Power System Stability and control” , The EPRI Power System Engineering Series, McGraw‐Hill, Inc., 1994. 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 19 THANK YOU 10/17/2010 12:03 AM 20