ACTIVE MUSIC THERAPY, ACQUIRED BRAIN INJURY, AND INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION COMPETENCES Randomized cross-over study on active music therapy and neurological rehabilitation Purpose Participant Flow chart It is widely acknowledged that ABI to a large extend affects psychosocial functioning (Morton and Wehman, 1995). Research indicate that active music therapy can have an positive effect on interaction competences (Barker and Brunk, 1991, Nayak et al., 2000, Purdie, 1997) Musical interaction relies on many different networks of the brain working together(Peretz and Zatorre, 2005). When persons with ABI actively do music, they are offered an opportunity for simultaneous activation of the emotional-, motoric-, cognitive- and communicative structures of the brain. Søren Hald – Denmark hald@hum.aau.dk When client and music therapist play music together, their musical interaction behavior is continually adjusted. When interacting musically they use interpersonal communication competences such as empathy, self-disclosure, social relaxation, expressiveness, empathy, etc. It is the studies general hypothesis that an overall gain in doing music therapy in neurological rehabilitation is improved interpersonal communication competences. Rating musical exercises Two music therapy students were trained in using Brusia’s (1987) Improvisation Assessment Profile (Autonomy), and assigned ICCS-music rater questions. The four musical exercises (dialog, follow, hold on, and free impro.) done pre and post 20 sessions were analyzed by the two raters. The raters fist evaluated the four exercises with the ICCS – music rater tool, followed by IAP autonomy rating. The raters were blinded in regards to pre/post order of video clip. Music therapy method The client’s rehabilitation needs are clarified using a proxy Rehabilitation Needs Questionnaire(RNQ) addressing; physical, cognitive, psychological, and social rehabilitation needs. The therapists adapts and develop music therapy methods to address rehabilitation needs. Verbal dialog in music therapy addresses issues from; everyday life, rehabilitation needs, musical performance and interaction. The client's preferences of music and instruments is an important guideline in choosing intervention. In this study group therapy ended with a concert. Research question •What effect does music therapy have on interpersonal communication competences in people with acquired brain injury? •What is the effect of 20 music therapy sessions on interpersonal communication competences in musical improvisations? •What is the effect of 20 music therapy sessions on interpersonal communication competences in daily life? •Is there a correlation between interpersonal competences in music and daily life? Design The correlation hypothesis was tested on 18 participants having suffered from ‘medium’ to ‘servere acquired brain injury (ABI). To test the interpersonal effect of music therapy a randomized cross-over design (AB-BA) was assigned on 11 participants who have lived with their injury for more than five years. ‘A’ was twenty group music therapy sessions and ‘B’ was 4-5 months of standard rehabilitation. 3 participants got very ill and left the study. The 7 participants who had acute ABI were allocated to music therapy condition or standard rehabilitation, based on treatment considerations. Communication competences in daily life was measured with an altered version of Rubin and Martin (1994) Interpersonal Communication Competence Scale (ICCS) deployed on relatives, staff and participants. Interpersonal communication competences in music were measured by blinded raters using an adapted version of Bruscia’s (1987) Improvisation Assessment Profile -autonomy profile (IAP-Aut.) and an alteration of the ICCS questionnaire into musical means. Measurements Questionnaires •ICCS_Proxy - Staff and relative evaluation of ICC in daily life •ICCS_ABI - Self evaluation of ICC in daily life •ICCS_MU - Music therapist evaluation of client after MT assessment •ICCS_MU_OWN - Self evaluation after MT assessment •RNQ – Relatives, Staff and self evaluation of rehabilitation needs Musical exercises •Dialog (self chosen instrument) •Follow the therapist (on piano) •Hold on to a phrase while the therapist challenge •Free improvisation Blinded rating •ICCS_RAT - Blinded rater evaluation of ICC based on the four musical exercises. IAP_AUT - Blinded rater evaluation of autonomy in improvisation Development of ICCS questions ICCS – ABI. version (adapted from Rubin and Martin (1994)) Self-disclosure How often do you show friends who you really are? How often do you feel that you are understood by others? Etc. ICCS - Proxy (¤=he/she, #=client name) How often does # show friends who ¤ really is? How often does # experience being understood? Etc. Self disclosure in music Did the clients music express who he/she really is? Did you ‘understand’ the client’s music? Etc. ICCS - Client after assessment ICCS- Music rater (improvisation) Did your music express how you felt? Was the client’s music congruent with body language? (free) Did you experience clarity/focus in the clients’ music? (dialog) Etc. Did you experience, that your music was understood? Etc. Improvisation Assessment Profile - Autonomy Time point in free improvisation .10 .20 .30 .40 .50 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 Dependant -2 Follower -1 Partner 0 Leader 1 Resister 2 Score Score/min Volume Rhythmic ground Tonal and melodic Phrasing Total % Leader Leader Partner Partner Partner Partner Partner Partner Partner Partner Partner 0 0 9 2 0 2 1,1 Leader Leader Partner Partner Partner Leader Leader Leader Leader Leader Follower 0 1 3 7 0 6 3,3 Leader Leader Leader Partner Leader Leader Leader Partner Partner Leader Follower 0 1 3 7 0 6 3,3 Leader Leader Partner Partner Leader Leader Leader Leader Leader Leader Follower 0 1 2 8 0 7 3,8 0 3 17 24 0 21 11,45 0,0 6,8 38,6 54,5 0,0 Preliminary results from cross over study IAP - Autonomy subgroups pre/post Autonomy in free improvisation IAP pre/post 100 3.5 90 Volume 3 80 Interpersonal Communication Competence Scale (ICCS) 2.5 70 (Rubin and Martin, 1994) The communication experts Rubin and Martin (1994) made a search for common understanding of interpersonal communication competences and ended up with ten subgroups regarding interpersonal interaction. Their work resulted in a 30 items questionnaire with a five point Likert type scale (Almost always (5), often (4), sometimes(3), seldom (2), and almost never (1)). The ICCS subgroups are: 60 resister 50 leader 40 partner follower 30 20 Self-disclosure Being open and personal Empathy Feeling as, and with others Social relaxation Feeling relaxed with others and the ability to deal with their oddity without stress Assertiveness Express yourself and your point of view in an appropriate manner – plus the ability to stand on ones rights 10 ICCS in daily life Client 90 ICCS in MT Client 85 Flexibility and attention to the others thoughts and nonverbal signals 75 Expressiveness Verbal (finding the right words), nonverbal (facial expressions, prosody, gesture, etc.) 65 Non judging, open, spontaneous and problem solving 55 ICCS in daily life Staff and relatives ICCS in MT Therapist 70 ICCS in music Blinded Raters 60 Pre MT & Post MT & Std. Rehab. Std.Rehab. Immediacy Eye contact, open body language, obligingness Environmental control Ability to solve problems together with others and make others go for ones ideas Phrasing 1 Post 20 MT sessions 12 95 Interaction management 1.5 ICCS - Self disclosure results 100 80 Melodic ground Pre 20 MT sessions Post 20 MT sessions ICCS - Total score results Negotiating subjects, taking turns, starting and ending 2 0 0 Alter centrism Rhythmic ground 0.5 Pre 20 MT sessions Supportiveness ICCS - Music therapist proxy after assessment Pre Post Std.Rehab. Std.Rehab. Self disclosure in daily life - client 11 10 Self disclosure in MT - client 9 Self disclosure in daily life - Staff and relatives Self dislclosure in MT - Therapist 8 7 6 Self disclosure in music - Blinded raters 5 4 Pre MT & Post MT & Std. Rehab. Std.Rehab. Pre Post Std.Rehab. Std.Rehab. References: Høskoven Trænings-, Bo-, og Aktivitetshus BAKER, F. & TAMPLIN, J. (2006) Music therapy methods in neurorehabilitation, London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers. BARKER, V. L. & BRUNK, B. (1991) The Role of Creative Arts Group in the Treatment of Clients with Traumatic Brain Injury. Music therapy perspectives, 9, 26-31. BRUSCIA, K. E. (1987) Improvisational models of music therapy, Springfield, Ill., Charles C. Thomas. MORTON, M. V. & WEHMAN, P. (1995) Psychosocial and emotional sequelae of individuals with traumatic brain injury: a literature review and recommendations. Brain Injury, 9, 81-92. NAYAK, S., WHEELER, B. L., SHIFLETT, S. C. & AGOSTINELLI, S. (2000) Effect of music therapy on mood and social interaction among individuals with acute traumatic brain injury and stroke. Rehabilitation Psycholog PERETZ, I. & ZATORRE, R. J. (2005) Brain organization for music processing. Annu.Rev.Psychol, 56, 89-114. PURDIE, H. (1997) Music Therapy with Adults who have Traumatic Brain Injury and Stroke. British Journal of music Therapy, 11, 45-50. RUBIN, R. B. & MARTIN, M. M. (1994) Development of a Measure of Interpersonal Communication Competence. Communication Research Reports, 11, 33-44. WIGRAM, T. (2004) Improvisation : methods and techniques for music therapy clinicians, educators, and students, London ; Philadelphia, J. Kingsley Publishers. Søren Hald - Aalborg University - 2011 Interpersonal Communication Competences (ICC) Self-disclosure (Rubin and Martin, 1994) Being open and personal Empathy Feeling as, and with others Social relaxation Feeling relaxed with others and the ability to deal with their oddity without stress Assertiveness Express yourself and your point of view in an appropriate manner – plus the ability to stand on ones rights Alter centrism Negotiating subjects, taking turns, starting and ending Interaction management Flexibility and attention to the others thoughts and nonverbal signals Expressiveness Verbal (finding the right words), nonverbal (facial expressions, prosody, gesture, etc.) Supportiveness Non judging, open, spontaneous and problem solving Immediacy Eye contact, open body language, obligingness Environmental control Ability to solve problems together with others and make others go for ones ideas Interpersonal communication competence questions ICCS – ABI. version (adapted from ICCS - Proxy Rubin and Martin (1994)) (¤=he/she, #=client name) ICCS - Music therapist proxy after ICCS - Client after assessment assessment 5 ALMOST ALWAYS, 4 OFTEN, 3 SOMETIMES, 2 SELDOM, and 1 ALMOST NEVER 5 HIGEST, 4 GREATER, 3 MEDIUM, 2 LESS, and 1 MINIMUM grade 5 ALMOST ALWAYS, 4 OFTEN, 3 SOMETIMES, 2 SELDOM, and 1 ALMOST NEVER Self-disclosure ICCS- Music rater (improvisation) 5 HIGEST, 4 GREATER, 3 MEDIUM, 2 LESS, 5 ALMOST ALL, 4 A LOT, 3 SOME, 2 LITTLE, and 1 MINIMUM grade and 1 ALMOST NONE of the time. Self disclosure in music 1 How often do you show friends who you really are? How often does # show friends who ¤ really is? Did the clients music express who ¤ really Did your music express how you felt? is? Was the client’s music congruent with body language? (free) 2 How often do you feel that you are understood by others? How often does # experience being understood? Did you ‘understand’ the client’s music? Did you experience, that your music was understood? Did you experience clarity/focus in the clients’ music? (dialog) 3 How often do you reveal to others how you feel? How often does # reveal to others how ¤ feels? Did the client put emotions into the music? Did you put emotions into your music? Did the client seem to reveal emotions in the music? (free) Empathy Empathy in music 4 How often are you able to put yourself in others’ shoes? How often is # able to take the stance of others? Did the client understand the emotion the Did you understand the conditions the therapist played? therapist expressed in music? 5 How often do you have troubles understanding others feelings? (R) How often does # have troubles understanding others feelings?(R) Did the client have troubles understanding Did you have difficulties understanding the Did the client have difficulty matching the the feelings the therapist played? feelings that the therapist played? (R) musical style of the therapist? (follow) 6 How often do others feel that you understand them? How often does # understand how you feel? Did the client make an effort to be compassionate in the music? Social relaxation Did you make an effort to be compassionate in the music? Did the client match the rhythm of the therapist? (follow) Did the client give musical signals of understanding (copy, mirror, develop)? (dialog) Social relaxation in music 7 How often is it comfortable for you, to be together with others? How often is it comfortable for #, to be together with others? Did the client seem comfortable playing music together with you? Were you comfortable playing music with Did the client seem comfortable?(free) the therapist? 8 How often do you feel relaxed in small groups? How often does # seem relaxed in small groups? Did the client seem relaxed when you played music together? Did you feel relaxed playing music? 9 How often do you feel insecure when you How often does # feel insecure when in are in groups of strangers? (R) groups of strangers?(R) Did the client seem insecure playing music Do you feel insecure when you play music Did the client seem insecure playing music with a unfamiliar person? with people you don’t know? (R) with the therapist?(dialog) Assertiveness Assertiveness in music Did the client seem relaxed in the shared music making? (hold on) 10 When someone has wronged you, how often would you confront the person? When someone has wronged #, how often Did the client react musically on things would ¤ confront the person? that seemed to annoy in the music? Did you react musically on things that annoyed you in the music? When the therapist was challenging in the shared music, did the client maintain playing phrase? (hold on) 11 How often do you have trouble standing up for your rights? (R) How often does # have trouble standing up for own rights?((R) Did you have difficulty in achieving independence in the music? (R) Did the client get affected musically by challenging playing of the therapist?(R) (hold on) 12 How often do you stand up for your rights? How often does # stand up for own rights? Did clients create own musical space? Were you able to establish your own musical space? Did the client establish musical independence? (hold on) Altercentrism Did the client have trouble being independent in the music? Altercentrism in music 13 How often are conversations about your own topics? (R) How often are conversations about #’s topics? (R) Did the client play more than listen?(R) Did you play more than listen? (R) Was the client primarily into own music? (R)(diaog) 14 How often do you let others know that you understand what they are saying? How often does # let others know that ¤ understand what they say? Did you and the client’s music complement each other? Did yours and the therapist music complement each other? Did the client’s music accompaniment/ relate to the therapist’s?(dialog) Did you experience the client being present when you played? Did you have a sense of being present while playing? Did the client seem concentrated and focused? (hold on) 15 How often does your mind wander during How often dos # mind wander during conversations? conversations? Interaction Management Interaction management in music 16 How do you shift from one topic to the next without problems? How often is shift of topic in #’s conversations without problems? 17 In conversations, how often do you take charge by negotiating talk topics? How often is # involved in negotiating talk Did the client both give space and take topics? charge in the music? 18 How often would you estimate that you How often does # perceive both what is perceive both what is said and what is not said and what is not said? said in conversations with friends? Expressiveness Was the client’s music flexible and varied? Was your music flexible and varied? Did you notice something that were not expressed in the music? Did the client play in a flexible and varied way?(dialog) Did you both give space and take charge, playing music? Did the client develop ideas in the music?(dialog) Did you notice something that was not expressed in the music? Did the client respond to changes in the music?(free) Expressiveness in music 19 How often do your friends notice if you are happy or sad? How often is it apparent if # is happy or sad? Was it in the client’s music noticeable how Was it noticeable in your music how you he/she feels? feel? Did the client’s musical expression seem clear?(free) 20 How often is it hard for you to find the right words to express yourself? (R) How often is finding the right words hard for #?(R) Was it difficult for the client to musically communicate and express how he/she feels?(R) Was it difficult to communicate and express what you feel in the music? (R) Did the client seem “stiff” in matching the therapist’s music? (R)(follow) 21 How often do you experience being good at expressing you self verbally? How often do you experience # being good verbally ? Did you experience the client as being good at musical expression? Did you experience being good at expressing yourself through music? Did the client seem to be good at expressing him/her self musically?(follow) Supportiveness Supportiveness in music 22 How often is your communication kindhearted – not evaluative? How often does # respond kindhearted (supportive) – not evaluative? Did the client support the musical ideas of Did you follow the musical ideas of the the therapist? therapist? Did the client’s music relate to the musical output of therapist?(free) 23 How often do you make an effort to be equal with others? How often does # make an effort to be equal with others? Did you and the client maintain an equal relationship? Did you and the therapist maintain an equal relationship? Did the client intend to keep an equal supporting relationship in their music making?(free) 24 How often would others describe you as warm and loving? How often would you describe # as warm and loving person? Did you sense compassion and warmth in the clients music? Do you think that the therapist sensed compassion and warmth in your music? Did you experience a feeling of interpersonal warmth coming from the client?(free) Do you think the therapist felt your care? Did the client seem willing to participate in the improvisation?(follow) Immediacy Immediacy in music 25 How often do your friends feel that you care about them? How often do you experience that # care about you? Did you feel the clients care? 26 How often do you try to look others in their eyes when you talk to them? How often does # try to look into your eyes when you talk? Did the client adapt his/her music to music Did you adapt your music to the music of of the therapist? the therapist? Did the client look at the therapist? (follow) Did you experience immediacy from the client? Did you experience immediacy towards the therapist? Did the client seem attentive to the music of the therapist?(free) Did you express what you wanted in the music? Did the client seem satisfied with own musical output?(Dialog) Did the therapist pick up and use the client’s musical ideas?(dialog) 27 How often do you tell others that you feel How often does # tell other that he feel close to them? close to them? Environmental control Environmental control in music 28 How often do you feel that you accomplish How often do you experience that # what you want to in your conversations? communicate what ¤ wants? Did the client express what he wanted in the music? 29 How often can you persuade others to your position? How often can # persuade other to his/her Did the client influence the therapist to position? follow musical ideas? Were you able to draw the therapist into your musical ideas? 30 How often do you have difficulties convincing others to do what you want them to do? (R) How often does # have problems convincing others to do what # them to do? (R) Was it difficulty to draw the therapist into Did the client have difficulties signaling your musical space?(R) his/hers intentions? (R)(dialog) Did the client have problems drawing the therapist into own musical space Søren Hald - Aalborg University - 2011 Søren Hald - Aalborg University - 2011