WELCOME KPTA Town Meeting

advertisement

WELCOME!

2012

KPTA Town Meeting

Kansas Physical Therapy Association

Topeka, Kansas 66603

785-233-5400 Fax: 785-290-0476

Email: kpta@kpta.com

www.kpta.com

1

2012 TOWN MEETING

SCHEDULE

K.C. at Shawnee Mission Medical Center – 11/6

Topeka at Rebound Physical Therapy – 11/6

K.C. at Olathe Medical Center – 11/8

Colby at Colby Community College – 11/15 (7-9pm)

Great Bend at Advance Therapy & Sports Med. – 11/8

(6:15-8:15 pm)

Manhattan at Mercy Regional Health Center – 11/13

(6:30-8:30 pm)

Salina at Southwind PT – 11/14 (6:30-8:30 pm)

Wichita at Via Christi - St. Francis Campus – 11/8

Pittsburg at Via Christi Hospital – 11/5

AGENDA

Welcome/Introduction

Payment/Reimbursement Issues

Update

2012 KPTA Legislative Plan

Update

House of Delegates Update

KPTA Strategic Plan 2011-2013

AGENDA

(aka) WHAT KPTA/APTA HAS

DONE FOR YOU (as a member)…

4

INITIATIVES

UPDATE FROM

APTA

PURPOSE

Define the current status of developing and implementing regulatory and payer policies.

Identify barriers and opportunities.

Increase your involvement in and knowledge of issues that have an impact on the practice of physical therapy.

Improve your advocacy efforts.

LEARNER OBJECTIVES

The audience members will identify and discuss the varied regulatory and payment policies related to physical therapy services.

The audience members will outline strategies for barriers and opportunities.

The audience will discuss and develop strategies for advocacy efforts.

PRACTICE

Challenges

AMA Challenges

 The Scope of Practice Partnership (SOPP) formed and officially rolled out in January, 2006.

 Comprised of various physician organizations that engage in tracking scope of practice legislative and regulatory efforts.

 Targeted professions: Nurses, Psychologists, Podiatrists,

Naturopaths, Optometrists, Pharmacists, Audiologists, Oral

Surgeons, and Physical Therapists.

 In 2006 the Coalition for Patients Rights (CPR) was formed to counteract the SOPP and consists of more than 35 organizations representing a variety of licensed healthcare professionals. APTA is a member.

AMA Challenges

 AMA published a white paper entitled “AMA

Scope of Practice Data Series

.

 APTA responds http://www.apta.org/uploadedFiles/APTAorg/

Advocacy/State/News/CPR/Statement_12220

9.pdf

 January, 2011, the APTA publishes “ Today

s

Physical Therapist: A Comprehensive

Review of a 21 st Century Health Care

Profession

.

AMA Challenges

 2011 AMA House of Delegates publishes a statement:

“ Physical therapists who are doctors of physical therapy, recognized by consumers and other health care professionals as the practitioners of choice to whom consumers have direct access for the diagnosis of, interventions for, and prevention of impairments, functional limitations, and disabilities related to movement, function, and health.

 “Whereas, Based on education and training, this is beyond the appropriate scope of practice of physical therapy; and

 “Whereas, Instead, this would constitute the practice of medicine .”

AMA Challenges

 AMA Document, “ Creation of State-based

Scope-of-Practice Review Committees

Legislative Template ” .

 Idea is to review scope practice changes before they are allowed to be brought to legislation.

 Many physician practice acts are broad and would probably preclude physicians from this type of process.

AMA Challenges

 Dry needling is also referred to as Intramuscular needling (IMS) and/or trigger point dry needling.

 APTA does not currently have any HOD or BOD policies or positions on this technique.

 AMA fights this based on “ invasive ” = practice medicine.

Infringement issues

 Athletic trainers’ legislative agenda has shifted from securing professional regulation to:

 Expanding scope of practice beyond treatment of athletic injuries in athletes.

Changing language on population from “ athlete ” to

“ individual,” “ person,” or “ patient.”

 Mandating payment for services provided by athletic trainers.

 Others looking at expanding scope: massage therapists, exercise physiologists, and personal trainers.

Term Protection

 Language included in the FSBPT Model Practice Act.

 18 states have explicit language protecting “ physical therapy.

 14 states have explicit language protecting

“ physiotherapy.

 A number of state PT Acts contain vague language.

 Key to enforcement is strength of term protection language + exemption language found in PT Act.

Term Protection

 Chiropractic Practice Acts

 17 states + DC use the term

“ physiotherapy ”

 2 states contain the term “ physical therapy ”

 2 states explicitly restrict use of term

“ physical therapy ” (AR + OH)

Practice Act Revisions

 State practice acts should reflect current state of the profession, including scope of practice and education requirements.

 May need to be updated to include emerging areas of PT practice.

 Fifth Edition of the FSBPT Model

Practice Act: Released in August, 2011.

MEDICARE

 Physical Therapists in Private Practice

(PTPPs) placed in moderate risk category.

 PTPPs must have a site visit prior to enrollment as of March 25, 2011.

“ HOW CAN I HELP?

DES MOINES UNIVERSITY

“ A Comparison of Health Care Use for Physician-Referred and Self-

Referred Episodes of Outpatient ”

Jane Pendergast,

Stephanie A. Kliethermes,

Janet K. Freburger,

Pamela A. Duffy

© Health Research and Education Trust

DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01324.x

Health Services Research

DES MOINES UNIVERSITY

Collaboration: Agreement between

University of Iowa and Wellmark, Inc.

 Compare patient profiles and health care use for physician-referred and self-referred episodes of PT on large, non-Medicare population.

DES MOINES UNIVERSITY

Results: Comparison

Average Age

Average visits / episode

Allowable amount / episode

Physician Referred

45.9

7.0

$420

Self-Referred

43.5

5.9

$347

DES MOINES UNIVERSITY

Results similar to previous studies, and differences may be due to controlling for case-mix.

 Role of physician as gatekeeper may be overstated.

 Health care use in self-referred groups 86% of physician-referred groups.

DES MOINES UNIVERSITY

 Allowable amount for self-referred PT episode 87% of physician-referred episode of care

 Health care use before and after PT episode similar in both groups.

 Both PT and related non-PT claims/episode were less in self-referred vs. physician-referred group.

PAYMENT

ISSUES

State Regulation of

Premium Hikes

 Beginning to see states develop more regulations related to premium hikes.

 U.S. Department of Health and Human

Services awarded 45 states and DC $1M each to help them improve their oversight of health insurance premium increases.

Prompt Payment Laws

 Prompt payment laws have been enacted in

50 states and the District of Columbia.

 Prompt payment laws require “ clean claims ” to be submitted.

 Payers may still delay and/or deny claims as a result of what the payer considers to be an improper, incomplete, or inaccurate. claim.

Payment Recovery

 Retrospective recovery of previously paid claims.

 Review state law regarding prompt payment and payment recovery.

 Review individual payer contracts.

 Inform patients of collections policy and financial responsibility.

Private Insurers Audit Activity

 Estimates by government and law enforcement agencies place the loss due to health care fraud as high as 10% of U.S. annual health care expenditure —or $226 billion / year.

 Blue Cross And Blue Shield Companies'

Anti-Fraud Efforts Collect More Than Half A

Billion Dollars In 2009

 Physical therapist assistants may provide services under the direction and supervision of a physical therapist.

GET INVOLVED!

MEDICARE

 For fiscal year 2010, HHS reported almost $48 billion in Medicare improper payments, (38 percent of the total $125.4 billion estimate for the federal government).

 Medicare Fee for Service error rate in 2010 was around 10.5% ($34.3 billion).

 Government’s goal is to reduce the Medicare

FFS improper payment rate to: 8.5% by Nov.,

2011, and 6.2% by Nov., 2012.

MEDICARE

 Post Payment Review

 Reviews are being conducted by Office of

Inspector General, ZPICs, MACs, Recovery

Audit Contractors

 RACs identify Medicare underpayments & overpayments & recover overpayments.

(Part A & B-so any provider can be subject to RAC review)

 KANSAS = Region D –HealthDataInsights, Inc. of

Las Vegas, NV

MEDICARE

 RACs

 Can reopen claims up to three years from the date the claim was paid.

 RACs cannot review claims prior to October 1, 2007.

 The RAC Program is required to follow all applicable Medicare regulations such as payment policies, reopening timeframes, and appeal rights for providers.

 RACs required to have a medical director on staff, and to use nurses, therapists, and certified coders.

 Cannot collect contingency fee if claim is being appealed at any level of appeal.

MEDICARE

 RACs

 RACs choose issues to review based on data mining techniques, OIG and GAO reports and experience of staff.

 Two types of review

Automated (no medical record)

Complex (medical records)

 New issues for review will be posted on

RAC’s website.

MEDICARE

 RACs

 RACs will send request for medical records.

 If provider does not submit requested record in 45 days, the service will be denied.

 Records may be submitted via mailed paper copy, fax, or mailed CD/DVD

 CMS has established medical record limits.

MEDICARE

 RACs

 Medical Record Request Limits

 inpatient hospital, IRF, SNF, hospice =10% of avg monthly Medicare claims (max of

45 days) per NPI

Other Part A Billers (outpatient hospital, home health)=1% of avg monthly Medicare services (max of 200) per 45 days per NPI

Physicians, Physical therapists in private practice

 Solo practitioner = 10 medical records per 45 days per NPI

 Partnership of 2-5 individuals: 20 medical records per 45 days per

NPI

 Group of 6-15 individuals=30 medical records per 45 days per NPI

 Large Group (16+ individuals)=50 medical records per 45 days per

NPI.

STAY UP TO DATE !

MULTIPLE PROCEDURE

PAYMENT “ CASCADING ”

 BCBS of KC: eff. 3/15/11, reimburse at 100% of the first unit of each service and 20% reduction to the PE.

 Wellmark: eff. 7/1/11, the highest priced procedure (PE) will be paid at 100% and subsequent procedures are subject to

20% reduction of PE.

 Aetna: eff. 11/14/11, the procedure with the highest practice expense RVU will be allowed at 100%. Each additional therapy service performed by the same provider group on the same date of service will be allowed at 80%.

 More to come???

Growth of Co-pays

Cost Sharing

 Costs for deductibles, copayments, and other cost sharing rise significantly.

 Employers are shifting more responsibility for health-care decisions to employees.

 The Kentucky Law went into effect on June 8, 2011.

This means that a patient that renews his or her plan or gets a new plan on or after June 8th will have the benefit of these reduced co-pays.

PTA Payment Issues & Differentials:

Know & Understand Policies & Contracts

 United Health Care / Optum Health

 UHC certificates of coverage all read that PM&R services must be performed by a physician, licensed therapy provider, or provider duly licensed to provide said services.

 Anthem BCBS – Indiana

 Providers of PT Services …”Physical therapy assistants may provide services under the direction and supervision of a physical therapist. Benefits for services provided by these practitioners are dependent upon the member's contract language .”

 http://www.anthem.com/medicalpolicies/guidelines/gl_pw_a051172.htm

PTA PAYMENT ISSUES &

DIFFERENTIALS:

 TRICARE

 Does not cover services provided by PTAs goes back to the regulations (32 CFR

199.6).

 Missouri HealthNet

 Therapy treatment services that may be billed to MO HealthNet are treatment services provided directly to the patient by the therapist.

SUPER COMMITTEE

 Joint Congressional Committee Created to Identify

$1.2-$1.5 trillion in spending cuts

 12 Members of Congress

– 3 Republicans & 3 Democrats from each chamber.

 Must produce savings package by November 23 rd.

 House and Senate must approve package by December 23 rd

 Without action, process known as sequestration goes into effect.

 January 15th with impact on 2013 budget.

SUPER COMMITTEE

 Scenario #1

 Super Committee and Congress approve debt reduction package

 Cuts could affect Medicare, Medicaid and provider specific accounts

 Cuts could be greater than $1.5 trillion

SUPER COMMITTEE

 Scenario #2

 Super Committee and Congress fail to produce a package

 Sequestration goes into affect

 Medicaid is sheltered from cuts

 Medicare receives 2% across the board cut which cannot not touch benefits

SUPER COMMITTEE

 Scenario #3

 Super Committee produces partial package.

 Cuts could affect Medicare, Medicaid and provider specific accounts.

 Sequestration still goes into affect- across the board cuts occur.

SUPER COMMITTEE

 Opportunities

 May be the only vehicle for SGR / Therapy

Cap exceptions extension before end of year deadline.

 APTA will propose long-term fix for Therapy

Cap.

CALL YOUR

SENATOR

OR CONGRESSPERSON!

SNF PPS FY 2012 Final Rule

See APTA website: http://www.apta.org/Payment/Medicar e/CodingBilling/SNF/

DIAGNOSIS CODING:

TRANSITION TO

ICD

10 (OCTOBER 2013)

 Identify all facility / practice stakeholders and provide education materials and develop training plans for all levels of staff (admin. and clinical).

 Develop plan for discussing with information technology vendors and billing clearinghouses to determine their readiness and plans for updating systems.

 Access private sector/or professional resources to provide for smooth and informed transitions.

 CPT will continue to be used on claims when ICD-10 is implemented.

 When appropriate; test, re-test and test some more!

REFORMING PAYMENT FOR

OUTPATIENT PHYSICAL THERAPY

 Alternative to the Therapy Cap

 Regulatory Activism

 MPPR

 Shrinking of “ Skilled ” Therapy

 Trends in Payment

 Increasing Consumer Responsibility

 Consistent with Policy Changes

REFORMING PAYMENT FOR

OUTPATIENT PHYSICAL THERAPY

 Based on Clinical Judgment of the PT rather than selection of intervention and time

 Clinical Reasoning Value over sole selection of procedures

 Consolidation of the Code Set

 Re-valuing services at a visit level vs. procedural level

 More Consistent with Future Models

(Bundling/Integrated Models)

REFORMING PAYMENT FOR

OUTPATIENT PHYSICAL THERAPY

 2-level “ Severity and Intensity ” system

 Evaluation

 Severity: Patient Need Over Episode of Care

 Intensity: Tiered Evaluation

 Examination and Intervention System: Visit

Base

 Severity: Patient Presentation at Visit

 Intensity: Intervention Needed to Address

Visit ’ s Contribution to Treatment Plan

REFORMING PAYMENT FOR

OUTPATIENT PHYSICAL THERAPY

 Potential Coding System – 18 new codes?

 Time Line

Stage Timeline

Concept

Comment /

Support

Refinement

Refinement

Member Action

March ’ 11 Board Appointed

Experts to CPT/RUC

June ’ 11

Member Survey

Member Comments on Concept Paper

Education / Information

Education July ’ 11

October

‘ 11

Fall ’ 11 Education

Proposal /

Implementation

2012 Education

Board Action

Presentation

Recommendation

Education / Information

Endorsement /

Recommendation

Potential Budget

Implications

Education /

Information

Stakeholders

AMA Meeting

CPT / RUC Meetings

AMA Meeting

CPT / RUC Meetings

AMA Workgroup

Consultant

AMA

CMS

Congress

Private Payers

Workers Comp

Speaking of Reimbursement…

 Presentation on Reimbursement news

 Summary:

 $3700 counts for outpatient part B services

(not inpatient/not swing bed) 1850 for SLP+PT and 1850 for OT

 $3700 is for the reimbursed total

 The cap is per calendar year based on start of

Medicare (usually around the birthdate)

 Need a physician signature or NPP on all

Plans of Care (90 days) per Medicare and by law/practice act every 30 days

54

CHALLENGE:

Join a KPTA committee today

&

Recruit at least 1 member!

2012 KPTA

LEGISLATIVE PLAN

MOVE FORWARD!

56

KPTA LEGISLATIVE DAY

In Topeka on JANUARY 30,

2013

57

HB 2159

Direct Patient Access to PT Services

KPTA will ask that HB 2159 be worked this legislative session

UPDATE

On Sept. 27, 2011, representatives from the KPTA met with groups opposing our efforts to gain direct patient access to PT services.

OPPOSITION TALKING POINTS

 PTs do not have enough education to practice without doctor referral

 There are significant differences between physician and PT education

 Without physician evaluation, underlying medical diagnoses will missed (i.e. PTs will miss cancer diagnoses)

KPTA RESPONSE

“ ONE VOICE”

Nebraska has had unrestricted DA since 1957, Arizona since 1983, and Colorado since 1988

 If PTs are not educated well enough, if PTs are missing cancer diagnoses because we are not trained well enough, if the public was indeed being harmed…..

THEN THE LAWS IN THE ABOVE NOTED STATES

WOULD HAVE BEEN REVOKED BY NOW

KPTA RESPONSE

“ ONE VOICE”

 In addition, if the public was being harmed because of direct patient access to PT services, then PTs would have higher malpractice rates in states with DA

BUT VERIFICATION FROM HPSO (leading carrier of malpractice insurance for PTs) SHOWS THIS NOT

TO BE TRUE

WHAT YOU CAN DO!

PLEASE CONTACT THE KPTA IF YOU

WOULD LIKE TO BE A LEGISLATOR P0INT

OF CONTACT

WE ARE LOOKING FOR PEOPLE TO SHARE

OUR

“ONE VOICE”

MESSAGE TO LEGISLATORS

KPTA House of Delegates Report

APTA House of Delegates

 June 2012

64

RC 2-12 PHYSICAL THERAPIST RESPONSIBILITY AND

ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THE DELIVERY OF CARE

Position statement that physical therapy is provided by or under the direction of the physical therapist. Evaluation remains the complete responsibility of the physical therapist.

Proviso that the position becomes effective when all necessary changes are in place, including approval of new policies by the

House.

Annual reports beginning in 2013

PASSED as Amended

65

RC 2-12 PHYSICAL THERAPIST RESPONSIBILITY AND

ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THE DELIVERY OF CARE (Continued)

Charge to explore practice models responsive to society’s needs by

Identifying changes needed

Amending any APTA documents as necessary

Approval of the model by the House

 Interim report in 2013, final report in 2014

PASSED as Amended

66

RC 13-12

AMEND DIAGNOSIS BY PHYSICAL THERAPISTS

 Physical therapists may order imaging and other studies

 Physical therapists may perform or interpret selected imaging and other studies

PASSED as Amended

67

RC 1412 PHYSICAL THERAPIST’S ROLE IN MANAGEMENT OF

THE PERSON WITH CONCUSSION

Physical therapists participate with a multidisciplinary team in education, prevention and management of concussion

Individuals with concussion should not return to organized activity without written clearance of a health care professional trained in concussion management

 should not return to selected activities until a health care professional trained in concussion management has determined they should return to the activity

PASSED as Amended

68

RC 18-12 AMEND: EDUCATIONAL DEGREE QUALIFICATION

FOR PHYSICAL THERAPISTS

 Amend policy to show that, effective 2018, the Doctor of Physical Therapy Degree is the minimal educational qualification for graduation

 PASSED (Consent)

69

RC 20-12 EXPLORE FEASIBILITY OF TRANSITIONING TO AN

ENTRY-LEVEL BACCALAUREATE PTA DEGREE

Conduct a feasibility study including

Content of a potential 4 yr. curriculum

Models for baccalaureate education

Mechanisms for 2 yr institutions to grant baccalaureate degree

Models for PTAs with AA degrees to earn the baccalaureate degree

Any necessary practice act changes

Interim report in 2013, final report in 2014

 PASSED as Amended

70

RC 22-12 RESOURCE MATERIALS FOR PHYSICAL THERAPISTS

AS EXPERT OR FACTUAL WITNESSES

 Make available resources for use by physical therapists (PT), physical therapist assistants

(PTA), and PT and PTA students to serve as expert or factual witnesses.

 PASSED as Amended

71

RC 23-12 STANDARDS OF CONDUCT IN THE USE OF SOCIAL

MEDIA

Adoption of a position that, in using social media, PTs and PTAs should

Consider whether and how to interact with patients through social media

Be clear when speaking as an individual as opposed to a representative of an organization

Identify and correct mistakes

Apply the Code of Ethics for PTs and

Standards of Ethical Conduct for PTAs to their engagement in social media

PASSED as Amended

72

RC 26-12 RESOURCE MATERIALS FOR PHYSICAL THERAPISTS

PRACTICING IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

 That APTA develop additional resources supporting the role of the physical therapist in the Emergency Department

 PASSED

73

RC 27-12 PHYSICAL THERAPISTS AS EXPERT PROVIDERS OF

EXERCISE AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY PRESCRIPTION

 Position that

APTA promotes as providers of choice for exercise and physical activity prescription for persons with noncommunicable diseases

(NCD) (eg, heart disease, stroke, chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes, certain cancers)

APTA seeks participation in development of exercise and activity guidelines for these

NCDs

 PASSED (Content)

74

KPTA

STRATEGIC PLAN 2011-2013

KPTA STRATEGIC PLANNING

Held in Topeka on July 23, 2011

Facilitated by Rich Drinon

Updated/revised via webinar on

September 12, 2011

Approved by BOD on Sept. 22, 2011

Approved by membership on Sept.

24, 2011

KPTA MISSION

The Kansas Physical Therapy Association is the member organization of physical therapists and physical therapist assistants that represents, promotes, and advocates for the profession of physical therapy, promotes evidence-based practice, and assists members in addressing the health and wellness needs of individuals in Kansas.

KPTA VISION

Consumers have unrestricted access to physical therapists as the practitioner of choice for diagnosis, evidence-based interventions, prevention of functional limitations and disabilities related to body function and structure, and promotion of physical activity and life participation. Physical therapists and physical therapist assistants, under the direction of physical therapists, are recognized and valued as the only providers of physical therapy.

KPTA STRATEGIC GOALS

1. Statutory, regulatory, and policy barriers to patient/client access to physical therapy services provided by the PT and PTA, under the direction and supervision of the PT, are reduced and, where possible,

 Objective #1: eliminated.

and Senate PHW Committees and 50% of all other legislative districts.

 Objective #2: Conduct one (1) KPTA Legislative Day prior to February 28, 2012, with a minimum of 125 participants.

 Objective #3: Collect PAC funds to $30,000 by May 31, 2012, and $35,000 by

May 31, 2014.

 Objective #4 : Conduct five (5) activities every year to promote policymaker awareness of barriers to patient/client access to physical therapy services.

KPTA STRATEGIC GOALS

2. Physical therapists are recognized as the practitioners of choice in maximizing movement and function.

 Objective #1: Educate members on how to brand themselves and their work settings with follow-up surveys to track implementation over two years.

Objective #2: Utilize the KPTA website more effectively by adding a consumer component and track user hits to the website quarterly for two years.

Objective #3: Facilitate 2 interdisciplinary speaking opportunities to other professional organizations or referral sources in two years.

KPTA STRATEGIC GOALS

3. Payment accurately reflects the resources and professional competency of PTs and PTAs required for achieving efficient and effective patient/client outcomes.

Objective #1: Educate PTs and PTAs about the APTA elements of defensible documentation through educational sessions at all KPTA conferences for the year 2011-2012.

Objective #2: Develop and disseminate virtual and real time educational programming tools reflecting the physical therapy brand to educate stakeholders (members, consumers, payers, legislators, regulators, employers) about the scope of physical therapy practice and clinical outcomes with the goal of utilization by 5% of the membership by July 2013 measured through electronic tracking and /or submission of brief reports.

KPTA STRATEGIC GOALS

3. Payment accurately reflects the resources and professional competency of PTs and PTAs required for achieving efficient and effective patient/client outcomes.

Objective #3: Develop collaborative relationships with referral and payment sources through proactive involvement of designated KPTA representatives as liaisons to identified payers through quarterly contact with payers and annual reports to the reimbursement committee.

Objective #4: Establish a KPTA survey tool to gather data related to outcomes for dissemination to our stakeholders(members, consumers, payers, legislators, regulators, employers).

KPTA STRATEGIC GOALS

4. Best practice principles of physical therapy are identified, applied, and integrated by PTs and PTAs.

 Objective # 1:

Create a user-friendly, technology-savvy website that allows for easy navigation, access to resources, and ecommerce as needed to promote best practice by June 2012.

 Objective # 2:

Programming committee will make online resources

(including webinars) accessible as part of the updated website to KPTA members by 2012.

KPTA STRATEGIC GOALS

5. Current and future members embrace membership and active participation in the organization.

 Objective # 1:

Coordinate Regional Membership Representatives to present to clinics by April, 2012.

 Objective # 2:

Incentivize membership to increase overall membership to 40% of total PT/PTA representation in Kansas within two

(2) years.

Speaking of Membership!

 PTs - 613

 PTAs - 119

 Students - 353

 Overall 1085

 Never cracked 1000 until this year!

85

Thank you

for attending the KPTA Town Meeting.

If you have any questions regarding membership or any of the issues discussed tonight please contact the KPTA office at

785.233.5400 or kpta@kpta.com

.

86

Download