Coordinating Spanish and English Reading Instruction Doris Luft Baker Rachell Katz B-ELL Schools IBR August 24, 2006 © 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning Coordinating Spanish and English Reading Instruction Materials created/adapted by: • Rachell Katz • Doris Baker Additional Support • Katie Tate • Deni Basaraba • Anna Ingram 2 Copyright All materials are copy written and should not be reproduced or used without expressed permission of Dr. Scott Baker or Dr. Carrie Thomas-Beck. Selected slides were reproduced from other sources and original references cited. 3 Overview 1. Roles of BELL team members 2. Forming Instructional Groups: Using Spanish and English Data 3. Progress Monitoring 4. Planning for the 45 minute English reading instruction and the 90 minute Spanish instruction. 4 Roles of B-ELL team Roles of each member • Doris - Regional Coordinator focusing on ELL reading instruction in B-ELL schools • Rachell - Regional Coordinator focusing on reading instruction for non-ELL students in B-ELL schools • Jorge- Support teachers and instructional assistants with the delivery of instruction. • Fátima - Assist with IDEL training, refresher, and template development. Creating Interaction tables. 5 Forming Instructional Groups Using Spanish and English Data Small group instruction Allows for differentiated instruction Informal assessments (i.e. individual turns) to check on mastery Differentiated pacing between groups to keep engagement high 7 Step 1. Forming Instructional Groups First Grade Spring Table Spanish Student FPS #of words FPS Status recoded FLO Total words score read % FLO Status Accuracy Group Brandon Emmanuel Karina Kimberly Ruby Yoslin Angeles Brayan Andres Antony Ivan English Student Brandon Emmanuel Karina Kimberly Ruby Yoslin Angeles Brayan Andres Ant ony Ivan NWF # of words recoded NWF Status ORF Score Total words read % Accuracy ORF Status Group 8 Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills/ Indicadores Dinámicos del Éxito en la Lectura Summary of Effectiveness by Grade Date: Step: Interaction Table District: Washington School: Sunnyside DIBELS Beginning Middle PSF PSF Name Miguel Maria Giovanni Estefania Michelle Alexis Carlos Miguel Rosa Lillyana Ivan, Ricardo Vanessa Jovanny Omar Alexis Brenda Melisa Armando Sonia Veronica Jocelyn Marco Bianney Miguel Yajaira IDEL Check if Beginning Middle Low Risk FSF FSF at least 35 14 23 21 31 33 15 0 3 9 11 3 8 10 11 37 0 22 51 34 15 8 29 20 3 9 12 43 38 36 45 45 5 12 5 23 19 17 31 36 20 52 55 52 43 42 21 44 29 41 30 49 27 v v v v v v v v v v v v v v DIBELS Check if Beginning Middle Low Risk NWF NWF at least 35 18 33 10 4 48 14 8 3 23 15 0 25 29 11 44 . 24 29 31 5 22 52 37 13 44 24 56 46 34 55 75 40 23 6 38 31 36 43 47 23 59 44 58 48 71 15 44 46 31 49 67 68 v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v IDEL Check if Beginning Middle Low Risk FPS FPS at least 50 36 6 8 13 6 9 0 5 2 37 1 0 14 18 12 0 5 28 3 0 4 3 3 29 4 0 81 30 22 34 19 8 28 13 46 60 7 7 20 41 36 22 32 55 41 60 37 40 21 61 97 24 v v v v v v January, 2006 Beginning-Middle of First Grade DIBELS Check if Middle Low Risk ORF at least 70 55 1 2 13 7 8 0 7 0 124 0 7 8 16 31 . 11 18 4 0 18 1 1 48 17 0 79 46 20 50 45 49 52 12 56 90 40 36 28 46 68 v v 27 7 9 6 1 0 1 1 6 43 1 0 0 6 14 1 14 48 64 56 50 75 25 94 83 41 31 6 7 0 9 1 39 9 5 v v Middle Low Risk FLO at least 20 21 60 v IDEL Check if v v v v Check if Low Risk at least 20 21 16 20 13 8 25 5 0 16 46 5 14 4 12 29 4 25 15 15 7 9 21 1 33 27 6 v v v v v v v v 9 Step 2. Use Interaction Tables to Insert Information Spanish End of First Grade Student FPS Brandon Emmanuel Karina Kimberly Ruby Yoslin Angeles Brayan Andres Antony Ivan 100 75 43 43 17 30 35 27 18 37 1 #of words FPS Status recoded Established Emerging Deficit Deficit Deficit Deficit Deficit Deficit Deficit Deficit Deficit FLO Total words score read 23 45 5 48 11 0 22 11 10 8 0 % FLO Status Accuracy At risk Low risk At risk Low risk At risk At risk At risk At risk At risk At risk At risk Group English End of First Grade Student NWF Brandon Emmanuel Karina Kimberly Ruby Yoslin Angeles Brayan Andres Ant ony Ivan 72 52 83 75 33 50 52 39 34 39 0 # of words recoded NWF Status Established Established Established Established Emerging Established Established Emerging Emerging Emerging Deficit ORF Score 34 45 49 50 10 8 22 11 10 8 0 Total words read % Accuracy ORF Status Some risk Low risk Low risk Low risk At risk At risk Some risk At risk At risk At risk At risk Group 10 Step 3. Analyzing Students’ Understanding of the Alphabetic Principle (FPS/NWF) Spanish End of First Grade Student FPS Brandon Emmanuel Karina Kimberly Ruby Yoslin Angeles Brayan Andres Antony Ivan 100 75 43 43 17 30 35 27 18 37 1 # of words recoded 20 15 10 4 0 5 10 2 0 2 0 FPS Status FLO Total words score read Established 23 Emerging 45 Deficit 5 Deficit 48 Deficit 11 Deficit 0 Deficit 22 Deficit 11 Deficit 10 Deficit 8 Deficit 0 % FLO Status Accuracy At risk Low risk At risk Low risk At risk At risk At risk At risk At risk At risk At risk Group NWF Status Established Established Established Established Emerging Established Established Emerging Emerging Emerging Deficit % Accuracy Group English End of First Grade Student NWF Brandon Emmanuel Karina Kimberly Ruby Yoslin Angeles Brayan Andres Antony Ivan 72 52 83 75 33 50 52 39 34 39 0 # of words recoded 16 16 20 22 8 14 12 15 4 6 0 ORF Score 34 45 49 50 10 8 22 11 10 8 0 Total words read ORF Status Some risk Low risk Low risk Low risk At risk At risk Some risk At risk At risk At risk At risk 11 Number of Words Recoded in FPS Indicador 3 Prim er grado Fluidez en las Palabras sin Sentido IDELTM zu f or u ga gu po ta m a __/16 16 li j u pidi da nu so l eba 17 __/18 ji zo d i sa doro 16 __/16 l od u r ivi sumi ac de – o supu jo –i 20 __/20 rate zep u t u se fa co 14 __/16 Total: _____ 83 Nmero de Palabras Completas le’das (NPC): _____ 22 12 Step 4. Fluency and Accuracy Reading Connected Text Spanish End of First Grade Student FPS Brandon Emmanuel Karina Kimberly Ruby Yoslin Angeles Brayan Andres Antony Ivan 100 75 43 43 17 30 35 27 18 37 1 # of words recoded 20 15 10 4 0 5 10 2 0 2 0 FPS Status FLO score Established 23 Emerging 45 Deficit 5 Deficit 48 Deficit 11 Deficit 0 Deficit 22 Deficit 11 Deficit 10 Deficit 8 Deficit 0 Total words read 25 50 10 50 16 0 36 15 11 14 0 % Accuracy 92% 90% 50% 96% 69% 0% 62% 74% 91% 58% 0% Total words read 37 49 54 54 11 12 24 12 13 11 0 % Accuracy 92% 92% 91% 93% 91% 67% 92% 92% 77% 73% - FLO Status Group At risk Low risk At risk Low risk At risk At risk At risk At risk At risk At risk At risk English End of First Grade Student NWF Brandon Emmanuel Karina Kimberly Ruby Yoslin Angeles Brayan Andres Antony Ivan 72 52 83 75 33 50 52 39 34 39 0 # of words recoded 16 16 20 22 8 14 12 15 4 6 0 NWF Status ORF Score Established 34 Established 45 Established 49 Established 50 Emerging 10 Established 8 Established 22 Emerging 11 Emerging 10 Emerging 8 Deficit 0 ORF Status Group Some risk Low risk Low risk Low risk At risk At risk Some risk At risk At risk At risk At risk 13 Performance on 3rd-Grade DORF passage Our Sick Kitty Our kitten was sick. She would not eat and she stopped drinking. She did not purr anymore. She wanted to sleep all the time. She cried if I touched her. Dad said, “We need to take her to the vet.” The vet is an animal doctor. I held her in the cat carrier. I kept her wrapped in a fuzzy blanket. I talked to her because she does not like to ride in the car. But this time she was so sick she was quiet the whole ride. 10 18 29 30 41 46 59 69 82 88 Total Words (TW)= 51 Words Read Correct (wrc)= 44 14 Calculating % accuracy • Accuracy: Determine the number of words read correctly and the total words read. Divide the number of words read correctly (wrc) by the number of Total Words (TW) read. • Example: 44(wrc) /51(TW) = 86% accuracy 15 Step 5. Grouping Students Spanish Student FPS Brandon Emmanuel Karina Kimberly Ruby Yoslin Angeles Brayan Andres Antony Ivan 100 75 43 43 17 30 35 27 18 37 1 # of words recoded 20 15 10 4 0 5 10 2 0 2 0 FPS Status FLO score Established 23 Emerging 45 Deficit 5 Deficit 48 Deficit 11 Deficit 0 Deficit 22 Deficit 11 Deficit 10 Deficit 8 Deficit 0 Total words read 25 50 10 50 16 0 36 15 11 14 0 % Accuracy 92% 90% 50% 96% 69% 0% 62% 74% 91% 58% 0% Total words read 37 49 54 54 11 12 24 12 13 11 0 % Accuracy 92% 92% 91% 93% 91% 67% 92% 92% 77% 73% - FLO Status Group At risk Low risk At risk Low risk At risk At risk At risk At risk At risk At risk At risk 3 3 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 English Student NWF Brandon Emmanuel Karina Kimberly Ruby Yoslin Angeles Brayan Andres Antony Ivan 72 52 83 75 33 50 52 39 34 39 0 # of words recoded 16 16 20 22 8 14 12 15 4 6 0 NWF Status ORF Score Established 34 Established 45 Established 49 Established 50 Emerging 10 Established 8 Established 22 Emerging 11 Emerging 10 Emerging 8 Deficit 0 ORF Status Group Some risk Low risk Low risk Low risk At risk At risk Some risk At risk At risk At risk At risk 3 3 3 3 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 16 Description of Groups in First Grade Group 1 - The lowest performing students on understanding the alphabetic principle. Group 2 - Students recognize some letter sounds but need more instructional support on blending and reading connected text. Group 3 - Students demonstrate an understanding of the alphabetic principle, and are reading grade level material with 90% accuracy or above. 17 Fluency and Decoding If students are reading grade level material with 90% accuracy or above, then consider using grade level passages for fluency building. If students are reading grade level material with less than 90% accuracy, then assess them to identify gaps in decoding skills. Also, ensure students are practicing fluency in below grade level material or supplemental program with at least 90% accuracy. 18 Breakout Activity In groups of three, use the Kindergarten Spring data provided to form instructional groups. • Provide a description of instructional focus for each group • Use benchmark tables to determine the instructional focus. 19 Forming Instructional Groups - Kindergarten Spring Table Spanish Student FSF FSF Status FPS # of words recoded FPS status Malintzi Julissa Luis Brenda Brandon Diego Ruby Jose Alehandra Elian 39 38 59 63 33 52 37 42 54 52 Emerging Emerging Established Established Deficit Established Emerging Emerging Established Established 16 22 18 24 11 11 2 18 47 38 4 6 5 5 0 0 0 5 10 11 At risk At risk At risk At risk At risk At risk At risk At risk Low risk Low risk Student PSF PSF Status Malintzi Julissa Luis Brenda Brandon Diego Ruby Jose Alehandra Elian 52 52 53 62 42 46 44 50 53 40 Established Established Established Established Established Established Established Established Established Established Group English NWF # of words recoded 25 3 16 2 32 9 29 4 20 3 41 10 0 35 9 54 14 23 4 NWF Status Low risk Some risk Low risk Low risk Some risk Low risk At risk Low risk Low risk Some risk Gr oup 20 Description of Groups in Kindergarten Group 1 This group needs heavy focus on understanding the alphabetic principle. Continue practice on phonemic awareness. Group 2 Stude nts are established or nearly established in phonemic awareness, but need continuous practice on understanding the alphabetic principle and blending. Group 3 Stude nts have established phonemic awareness, and understanding of the alphabetic principle. Stude nts are ready to read grade level decodable text. 21 Your Turn Use your first and second grade DIBELS/IDEL booklets to fill out the table to form instructional groups. For this activity, use the scores in the booklets and the benchmark tables to determine skill status. 22 Instructional Status Terminology Progressive or Midpoint Benchmark Goals: Developing Skills Final Benchmark Goals and Later: Goal Skills Low Risk Some Risk At Risk Established Emerging Deficit Used for all measures except ORF and LNF 23 Large group share out What were the strengths of forming instructional groups using this step by step process? What were the challenges of forming instructional groups? 24 Steps for grouping Prioritize instructional target based on DIBELS/ IDEL goals and timelines. Examine multiple scores Evaluate errors patterns in booklets Create instructionally appropriate small groups Plan intervention Monitor Progress Regroup based on student progress 25 Progress Monitoring Spanish Progress Monitoring IDEL Progress monitoring materials that are currently posted on the web are: IDEL Fluidez en la Lectura Oral for first, second, and third grade IDEL FPS is almost completed IDEL FSF is coming soon!! 27 Guidelines on Progress Monitoring ELLs For Phonemic Segmentation Fluency • Progress monitor in English until probes are available in Spanish. Choose one language to progress monitor students on phonemic segmentation fluency. For Nonsense Word Fluency • If the alphabetic principle is an instructional focus for that language, then progress monitor students in that language. For Oral Reading Fluency • Progress monitor students in both languages. Consider their nonsense word fluency scores. 28 Identify Goal and Timeline What is the outcome goal? • What is the next DIBELS/IDEL benchmark for the student’s grade level? What is the present level of performance? • What is the student’s current DIBELS/IDEL benchmark scores? How much growth is needed? How much growth does this require per week? 29 Spanish Goal Setting Example: Malintzi •Malintzi 1st grade (Fall) •What is the outcome goal? –The winter benchmark FPS for 1st grade FPS is a minimum of 70 letter-sounds per minute •What is the present level of performance? –16 letter-sounds, 1st Grade IDEL FPS •How much growth is needed? –54 letter-sounds by the Winter Benchmark! •How much growth does this require per week? –54 divided by 14 weeks = 4 letter-sounds per week 30 Aimline: Ensure Malintzi is on Track to Reach the Goal! 31 Example #2: Ruby Ruby: Second Grade (Fall) • What is the winter outcome goal? The winter benchmark for 2nd grade FLO is a minimum of 50 correct words per minute What is the present level of performance? 11 wpm, 2nd Grade IDEL FLO • How much growth is needed? 39 wpm by the Winter Benchmark! How much growth does this require per week? 39 divided by 14 weeks = 2.8 words per week 32 Aimline: Ensure Ruby is on Track to Reach the Goal! 33 Data Decision Rules 1. If three (3) consecutive data points are above the aimline, student is making adequate progress towards the benchmark goal. 34 Stay the Course! Data Decision Rules 2. If the date points align with the aimline, student is making adequate progress towards the benchmark goal. 35 Decisions Rules- Basics “Don’t Wait!” Data Decision Rules 3. If three (3) consecutive data points are below the aimline, change the intervention. 36 Breakout Activity In groups of three identify a first or second grade student from your building that you want to progress monitor in Spanish. Use the IDEL benchmark goal chart to determine the weekly growth needed to achieve the winter goal. 37 Alterable Variables Chart Alterable Components Opportunities to Learn (Time / Concentration of Instruction) Program Efficacy Program Implemen tation Grouping for Instruction Coordination of Instruction Specific Adjustments Increase attendan ce Provide instruction daily Increase opportunities to respond Preteach componen ts of core program Use Supp lement extensions of core wi th the core appropriate program materials Vary schedule of easy/hard tasks/skills Add anothe r instructional period (double dose) Replace current core program Implement specially designed program Model lesson Monitor delivery implemen tation frequently Provide coaching and ongoing support Provide additional staff developmen t Vary program/ lesson schedule Check group placemen t Reduce group size Increase teacher-led instruction Provide individual instruction Change instructor Clarify instructional priorities Establish concurrent reading periods Provide comp lementary reading instruction across periods Establish comm unication across instructors Meet frequently to examine progress 38 Planning for the 45 minute English reading instruction, and 90 minute Spanish instruction. Kinder and First Grade Scenario: Fall scores on DIBELS/IDEL DIBE LS Performance on ISF, LNF, PSF, and NWF IDEL Per formance on FSF, FNL, and FPS Engli sh Reading Instruction Intensive on DIBELS Low Risk on IDEL -Use Core Program Intensive on DIBELS Some Risk on IDEL - Use Core Program - Use of ELL Handbook and Extra-Support Handbook.** Intensive on DIBELS At Risk on IDEL - Increase instructional tim e and intensity. - Use of Core Program - Use of ELL Handbook and Extra-Support Handbook. - Possible use of a strong intervention program focusing on phonemi c awareness and phonics. ** **Focus heavily on phonemi c awareness and phonics activities in Lectura. 40 Second and Third Grade Scenario: Fall scores on DIBELS/IDEL DIBE LS Performance on NWF and ORF IDEL Per formance on FPS and FLO English Reading Instruction Intensive on DIBELS Low Risk on IDEL - Use Core Program with ELL Handbook and Extra Support Handbook (Strong phonics instruction is critical) Intensive on DIBELS Some Risk on IDEL - Use Core Program with ELL Handbook and Extra Support Handbook (Strong phonics instruction is critical) Intensive on DIBELS At Risk on IDEL - Increase instructional time and intensity. - Use Extra Support Handbook - Consider a strong intervention program that emphasizes phonics 41 Whole Group Instruction: (Classroom Teacher, 15 minutes, entire class participates) •Core Program Literature (Teacher Read Alouds and Anthology Selections) Instructional Small Groups (Classroom Teacher, 30 mins. homogenous groups) •Core or Intervention on Phonics •Vocabulary practice from anthology/high frequency words. •Provide plenty of opportunities for students to practice using vocabulary in context 42 English: Effectiveness of core program. Additional supplemental/ intervention programs used. In your building teams discuss what activities were included in whole group and small group English instruction for ELLs. • How did you prioritize whole group English instruction last year? • How did you differentiate small group English instruction last? Summarize instructional plan on chart paper to share out with the group. • Were large group activities accessible to the range of learners in the group? What were some ways that the lesson was made more accessible to the students with lower reading skills in English? 43 Spanish: Prioritizing activities in Lectura during whole group instruction. Selecting activities for small group instruction. Activity In your building teams discuss what activities were included in whole group and small group Spanish instruction. How did you prioritize for whole group Spanish instruction last year? How did you differentiate for small group Spanish instruction last year? Summarize on chart paper to share out with the group. 44 Big Ideas for Kindergarten Students will recognize the high-frequency words taught in HMR kindergarten by sight by the end of the year. Students will recognize and produce the most common sounds associated with the 26 letters of the alphabet by the end of the year. Students will blend Letter sounds in one syllable words at the rate of 25 sounds per minute by the end of the year. Copyright @ 2006 Ashlock Consulting Inc. 45 Big Ideas for First Grade Students will recognize and produce letter/sound correspondences at the rate of one per second. Students will read regular one-syllable words fluently by the end of grade 1. Students will read all high-frequency words taught in grades K-1 fluently by the end of grade 1. Students will read fluently one word per 2-3 seconds midyear and one word per second by the end of grade 1. Students will read 40-60 wcpm by the end of grade 1. Copyright @ 2006 Ashlock Consulting Inc. 46 Big Ideas for Grade 2 Students will demonstrate sound/ spelling knowledge of diphthongs and digraphs by the second month of grade 2. Students will use advanced phonic elements to recognize words by the middle of grade 2. Students will begin to read multisyllabic words by the middle of grade 2. Students will read all high-frequency words taught in grade K-2 fluently by the end of grade 2. Students will read fluently 90-100 wcpm in connected text by the end of grade 2. Copyright @ 2006 Ashlock Consulting Inc. 47 Big Ideas for Grade 3 Students will recognize and produce common word parts by the second month of grade 3. Students will read regular multisyllabic words by the middle of grade 3. Students will read 120 wcpm in connected text by the end of grade 3. Copyright @ 2006 Ashlock Consulting Inc. 48 Conclusion 49